Jump to content

User talk:Projectmayhem666

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

References on Singularity Drive

[edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. I've cleaned up the wording, but the Singularity Drive article you just created is lacking sources. Please add them soon, or the article will be deleted. Thanks.--Theymos (talk) 17:52, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Singularity Drive

[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Singularity Drive, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Singularity Drive. Theymos (talk) 12:24, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:BLP

[edit]

Your recent addition to Talk:Big Bang has been reverted per WP:BLP. We don't refer to people with such negative labels here. If you wish to re-add your comment without the problematic language you are welcome to do so. Vsmith (talk) 16:33, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that, I just don't think any scientist can make a claim and it be treated as fact with absolutely no proof to back this up. Projectmayhem666 (talk) 15:09, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

mercury

[edit]

3kg is not lethal.--Stone (talk) 15:06, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know, absorbtion rate of 0.01% for Mercury means 30grammes of Mercury would be absorbed into the blood stream which is quite a fair bit, easily would result in respitory distress and acute renal failure, if it was untreated it could kill someone. Although if admitted to hospital kelation would definately get rid of it. So really although not guaranteed to kill, it still good at 3kg. Projectmayhem666 (talk) 11:07, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
3kg is not a problem, the 0.01% absorbtion rate is only for small quantities.Two journal articles deal with the ingestion of large amounts of mercury. [1] [2]. --Stone (talk) 12:12, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
In the first article the liver began to fail with liver funtion returning in 10 months, it doesn't prove that if left untreated his liver would have failed and the patient died, he was treated by kelation (took place in a hospital and it's the only real treatment for mercury poisoning).

White pixelization

[edit]

You're free to ask for a review of the deletion, or permission for recreation at Wikipedia:Deletion review. -- KTC (talk) 13:51, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]