User talk:Aleuuhhmsc

Welcome!

Hello, Aleuuhhmsc, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! 99.53.112.186 (talk) 21:51, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

US title

"WWE recognizes Flair's fourth and fifth reigns as being uninterrupted, and considers this a continuation of the fourth." They do? So why do they state it ended on July 26? http://www.wwe.com/classics/titlehistory/unitedstates/3044541222 They just forgot to add the two reigns that happened between July 26 and the January 27 title win by Roddy Piper (same goes for the Blackjack / Jones stuff: http://www.wwe.com/classics/titlehistory/unitedstates/304454113) And we should not put these reigns in grey even if WWE decided to see the reign as a continuation, because the title changes happened in NWA and were recognized at that time.WrestlingLegendAS (talk) 16:43, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

               @WrestlingLegendAS: Maybe after Flair's reign ended on July 26, they considered the title "vacated" or something like that. The problem is this is the WWE United States Championship. It doesn't matter if the NWA recognizes recognizes reigns or not. It is the WWE United States Championship and it only matters if WWE recognizes reigns or not.

hi. Wwe includes contradictory information. In their article about titles won by fathers and sons, WWE describes Flair as six time champion. Legendas is wright, they have black holes in their title history, which are filled with other sources. However, WWE regcognized Flair as six times champion. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 21:35, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Combined reigns

Hi. To include the section "combined reigns", the title must have at least, a wrestler with two reigns. You know, reignS to combine. NXT and NXT Womens titles only have one reign champions. So, the section is unnecessary. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 22:23, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I get that, but people still like to see it. Aleuuhhmsc (talk) 22:55, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Plus, I highly doubt anyone is going to win the NXT or NXT Women's Championships more than once; former champions will keep passing the baton to newer, up-and-coming wrestlers. So, people would want to see the rankings. --Aleuuhhmsc (talk) 22:59, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The ranking is in the champions list. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 10:52, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

People like me like to see champions climb the ladder on the leaderboard.--Aleuuhhmsc (talk) 01:57, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright

Please, stop using copyrighted photos in the articles. You can't take a picture from WWE or Twitter and put it into an article. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 19:27, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You took it from WWE.com. All photos by WWE are copyrighted. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 19:54, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The photo is a screen capture from a WWE copyrighted video. Seriously, read some pages about copyright before upload an image. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 10:27, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

So what makes Seth Rollins' and John Cena's pics not copyright? I would like the picture of Kevin Owens to be in WWE holding the IC title

Cena and Rollins photos were taken by fans. Also, the fans gave their permission to use them in wikipedia. As you can see, Cena photo has proper license. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 13:54, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kevin Owens as Intercontinental Champion.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kevin Owens as Intercontinental Champion.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:32, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:KevinOwensPic.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:KevinOwensPic.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Tabercil (talk) 23:21, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Aleuuhhmsc. You have new messages at Whpq's talk page.
Message added 20:19, 19 December 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Whpq (talk) 20:19, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ringnames

Please, take a look on FL section All of them include all the names. However, I started a discussion in the talk page. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 02:15, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Which one? Aleuuhhmsc (talk) 02:19, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

.The project. Usually, people discuss in the project talk page. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 02:22, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

RE

I've been 8 years. It just takes time to get used to everyone and how to go about the process.--WillC 04:14, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Because you started with the wrong format. You followed the WWE lists. The WWE lists are wrong. I have considered taking them to FL demotion several times because they are horrid.--WillC 19:26, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Wrestlinglover: How are the WWE lists wrong or horrid? Who says that they are wrong? Is there a consensus? Plus, what's the big deal? Aleuuhhmsc (talk) 21:38, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The big deal is these lists have been peer reviewed and are a specific status. They are FLs. The WWE lists currently fail the FL criteria and the MoS. I could take them to FL and get them demoted from their FL status to prove this.--WillC 21:48, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Wrestlinglover: Then why don't you get your other "experienced" editors and fix it yourselves. If I could spend as much time as I did trying to fix all the tables, then you sure as hell can, too. One of this project's goals is to establish uniform style as best as possible and that was what I attempted to do. But if my edits are being reverted after I tried to HELP, then FUCKIN FIX IT FOR ME so I don't have to keep bitching at all of you and annoying the hell out of everyone here. Aleuuhhmsc (talk) 21:57, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well 1) Calm down. 2) You took the time to convert stuff, that is your fault not mine. 3) You could have inquired as to why the lists were different in the first place. 4) I have taken the time to update lists, you can see the stars for every single one of them that I did on my user page. 5) IPs and new users have no idea what they are even doing half the time and I have better things to do than worry about all of their edits. 6) Lets actually have a discussion on a format than just make everything the same without any reason as to why they have some features.--WillC 06:25, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Wrestlinglover: Sorry, I just hate being treated like crap cuz I'm a new guy when I'm only trying to help. Aleuuhhmsc (talk) 13:08, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just stop making edits to lists and come to the project page and actually learn something about the format. I had to revert your edits on the style guide cause they were wrong. Rowspan does not allow a table to sort correctly. Also, there has yet to be an agreed upon format so you can't update lists with something that isn't even official, let allow the style guide.--WillC 06:18, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Wrestlinglover: What does rowspan do differently then? Aleuuhhmsc (talk) 14:22, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It won't allow the columns to sort properly in order. They screw up the whole table. That is why they aren't in the articles anymore.--WillC 16:17, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Wrestlinglover: Like how? Can you explain a little more? Like does it not sort in alphabetical order? Aleuuhhmsc (talk) 17:58, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Each column has a sort function at the top. Whatever you place in a row it will sort the column by the alphabet or numerically. Once you rowspan a column over two rows, it screws that all up. Because now it can't sort as 1, 2, 3, or 6, 5, 4. When it tries to sort a rowspan column it returns all messed up and inaccurate. There is a discussion going on at the project page where we are going to create a new format and update the style guide. Maybe you can educate yourself to some of the functions of the articles that way.--WillC 20:00, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Read and understand Wikipedia:Consensus. This is not about anyone wanting their way. You can't change an article's format because you feel like it unless there is a consensus on that format change. There was never an agreement on this format until the specifics are finalized and the style guide is OFFICIALLY changed. Read the policy. Learn before you act.--WillC 06:08, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want a uniform style then involve yourself in the discussion. Otherwise just because you changed a bunch of articles to fit what you desired without a consensus does not make it a uniformed style. If you want to improve wikipedia then play by the rules of wikipedia. That involves getting a consensus and learning the editing process.--WillC 14:17, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Aleuuhhmsc. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thanks for fixing the reigns page. I did have a template set but it was somewhat broken. Thanks for the fix! TheGRVOfLightning(talk) 01:25, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WWE Raw Women's Championship

Can you please not do a blind revert with no explanation as you did here? It was one thing that you corrected a couple of things, but you removed and changed other things with no explanation. --JDC808 ♫ 07:41, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

      I apologize for that. Aleuuhhmsc (talk) 19:22, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.^{[survey 1]} The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.^{[survey 2]} The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 19:25, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

^ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
^ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 08:25, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Aleuuhhmsc. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Aleuuhhmsc. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Aleuuhhmsc. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Oct 26 Raw Bracket.png

The file File:Oct 26 Raw Bracket.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned image, no context to determine possible future encyclopedic use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --TheImaCow (talk) 19:39, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[1] This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.

[2] Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

[survey 1]

[survey 2]