User talk:Atlantic306/Archive15 (counter)d

Discussion you previously took part in

A discussion you previously took part in, at Ron Stallworth, has spawned another attempt by an editor to force his scan of a yearbook picture onto the page, at this new discussion. As your previous response was well-thought-out and cogent, I thought you might want to weigh in on this one as well. Thanks. Amsgearing (talk) 15:52, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:David M. Cote

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:David M. Cote. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Doria Ragland

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Doria Ragland. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

Claims of significance

You removed a proposal for deletion template with the reason stated in your edit summary "has claims of significance". Would you be more specific about that? I'm not being sarcastic. I would like to hear more about your criteria for keeping an article. Thanks.
Vmavanti (talk) 19:03, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

• • hi, will reply tomorrow as offline, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 20:17, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
  • responded on your talkpage Atlantic306 (talk) 01:07, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Stanley Kubrick

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Stanley Kubrick. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

Curious

I wonder what makes you think this is vandalism? Harsh Rathod Poke me! 16:39, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

Apologies, have self-reverted mistake, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 16:42, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

Enjoy! Harsh Rathod Poke me! 16:47, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

your vague arguments at AfD

Hi. This is more of a followup to the post above this one. I have seen your participation in a few AfDs. I also recently pinged you at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sorry (2017 film) (2nd nomination), and around two weeks ago at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Main Maike Chali Jaungi Tum Dekhte Rahiyo. Both of these discussions are still ongoing, and you have been asked for your input, due to your previous vague arguments to "keep" the article. Kindly read WP:Clearly notable, and WP:JUSTA. Although not binding, I suggest you to provide sources for your arguments or to retract them. Again, it is just a suggestion; please feel free to ignore it if you'd like. Regards, —usernamekiran(talk) 23:34, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

• • Hi, am disappointed with your attitude which borders harrassment - just because you ping someone does not mean they must respond, and the provision of sources is as much for the nominator as for the keep voter and votes are not retracted on the urging of the nominator. Regarding my arguments being vague, if your arguments were so strong the articles would have been deleted regardless of my input. As you are probably aware in Europe with the copyright restrictions and so forth not all Indian websites are available due to early measures by those websites so searching is more difficult. Regarding Main Maike Chali Jaungi Tum Dekhte Rahiyo sources were provided by another editor and although you tried to discredit them your argument has not been supported so I waited to see other editor's opinion of the sources. Regarding the Sorry article the question is most importantly whether the article has been faked rather than sources because if it is a fake it can be deleted as a speedy deletion G3. I hope we can return to more cordial relations, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 00:24, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
    • Also, the links you gave are to an essay that is considered biased by a number of editors which is why it was not included in the new AFD explanatory template. It is neither a policy or even a guideline, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 00:29, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
      • I apologise for my comment looking as harassment, it was definitely not my intention. In short, what I am trying to say here is, it is a good practice to provide sources when the argument says nothing else than "Keep as there are enough sources for WP:GNG to be passed" special:diff/864964257; especially if it is the first vote. That was my point. Nothing more. And regarding the pings, if an editor states "it passes GNG", "has reliable sources", and no sources have been provided in the discussion by anybody; the sources should be provided while making the comments like them. If sources are not provided originally, and someone else asks that editor particularly for the sources, and even then if the sources are not provided; then how is the community supposed to know if the editor really even performed the search, or simply commented "has sources"?
      • But all of these are opinions, they are logical summary/result of other policies, and guidelines. And they are not binding, as I politely said in my first comment. I just wanted to let you know, and I have delivered my message. Regards, —usernamekiran(talk) 17:52, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 October 2018

• From the editors: The Signpost is still afloat, just barely

• Op-ed: Wikipedia's Strickland affair

• News and notes: WMF gets a million bucks

• In the media: Bans, celebs, and bias

• Discussion report: Mediation Committee and proposed deletion reform

• Traffic report: Unsurprisingly, sport leads the field – or the ring

• Technology report: Bots galore!

• Special report: NPP needs you

• Special report 2: Now Wikidata is six

• In focus: Alexa

• Gallery: Out of this world!

• Recent research: Wikimedia Commons worth $28.9 billion

• Humour: Talk page humour

• Opinion: Strickland incident

• From the archives: The Gardner Interview

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:11, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Notability (people)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Notability (people). Legobot (talk) 04:23, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ron Stallworth

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ron Stallworth. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Brett Kavanaugh

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Brett Kavanaugh. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Green Gully season 2010

Hello Atlantic306. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Green Gully season 2010, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The reason given is not a valid speedy deletion criterion. Thank you. SoWhy 08:09, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Proud Boys

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Proud Boys. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Equality Trust edits

Hi,

We have been trying to edit/correct the entry for our charity for a while.

We asked https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Lyiriyah to do this for us, but this has been reversed. The information currently there is not accurate.

Please can you revert back to the edits Lyiriyah made.

thanks,

The Equality Trust team — Preceding unsigned comment added by Equalitytrust (talk • contribs) 14:11, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Hello, I saw you did some editing on the last article Deadly Gamble which was directed by same person I just created article for that is currently in draft status. The article is The Listing (film) but is in draft. Are you able to review and publish? I'm not sure how to publish as a article.

Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BaldinoJoey (talk • contribs) 17:34, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

November 2018

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Paul Jessup (artist). This edit lacks secondary sourcing. That is not acceptable. Drmies (talk) 01:07, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Doug Wardlow

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Doug Wardlow. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

Discussion at Talk:Virtual Riot#Merge proposal

 You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Virtual Riot#Merge proposal. As a participant of this page's AfD, you are encouraged to comment on the proposal. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 02:31, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Biography/Politics and government

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Biography/Politics and government. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:BTS (band)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:BTS (band). Legobot (talk) 04:23, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

Melanie Liburd

It puzzles me how lack of significant coverage, recreation of a deleted page without draft, lack of verifiability of any biographical statement in this article, and relying on one Deadline article is outdone by a couple of episodes on a tv show, when all articles are about fictional character not the actress and none of those sources are even given. I mean, PopSugar? Really? Trillfendi (talk) 18:19, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

• • In the main cast of two national TV series as verified so passes criteria 1 WP:NACTOR. Why don't you improve it instead of deleting ? The G4 nomination was completely wrong, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 18:23, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Antisemitism in the UK Labour Party

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Antisemitism in the UK Labour Party. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Draft talk:Joan Kelley Walker

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Draft talk:Joan Kelley Walker. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.15 16 November 2018

Chart of the New Pages Patrol backlog for the past 6 months.

Hello Atlantic306,

Community Wishlist Survey – NPP needs you – Vote NOW

• Community Wishlist Voting takes place 16 to 30 November for the Page Curation and New Pages Feed improvements, and other software requests. The NPP community is hoping for a good turnout in support of the requests to Santa for the tools we need. This is very important as we have been asking the Foundation for these upgrades for 4 years.

If this proposal does not make it into the top ten, it is likely that the tools will be given no support at all for the foreseeable future. So please put in a vote today.

We are counting on significant support not only from our own ranks, but from everyone who is concerned with maintaining a Wikipedia that is free of vandalism, promotion, flagrant financial exploitation and other pollution.

With all 650 reviewers voting for these urgently needed improvements, our requests would be unlikely to fail. See also The Signpost Special report: 'NPP: This could be heaven or this could be hell for new users – and for the reviewers', and if you are not sure what the wish list is all about, take a sneak peek at an article in this month's upcoming issue of The Signpost which unfortunately due to staff holidays and an impending US holiday will probably not be published until after voting has closed.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)}18:37, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Mohammad bin Salman

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Mohammad bin Salman. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Atlantic306. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Atlantic306. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonestown: The Women Behind the Massacre

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonestown: The Women Behind the Massacre. Levivich (talk) 02:13, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Jennifer Aniston

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jennifer Aniston. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Jackie Walker (activist)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jackie Walker (activist). Legobot (talk) 04:23, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

Nuages Jazz

Are you done working on Nuages Jazz?
Vmavanti (talk) 23:24, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

• • No, need at least a month, there are no timelimits Atlantic306 (talk) 17:14, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

True. On the other hand, on October 28 you wrote "will source search tomorrow" in your edit summary. How did that go? Please let me know. The article was created eleven years ago and has barely been touched.
Vmavanti (talk) 19:23, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

Curfew

You removed the proposed deletion template and gave as your reason in your edit summary "has reliable sources coverage such as the Evening Standard". Would you enter sourced material into those articles so that the maintenance templates can be removed? Would you provide the list of sources you found? Thanks for your help. I'm sure many readers will appreciate it.
Vmavanti (talk) 19:20, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

• • When I have the time, its as much your responsibility as mine and Im not listing anything except when I add references to the article. See WP:PROD where it states that a prod can be removed for any reason and if you disagree to take it to AFD not bother the deprodder and tell him to rewrite the article. The Evening Standard review is quoted on their website and they do at least have an entry on allmusic but no bio. If it had not been for the Evening Standard I would not have deprodded it. The readers do not appreciate articles suddenly disappearing when there is the possibility that they can be improved. My outlook is trying to prevent reasonable articles from being deleted and if I spent all my time on one article another ten might be deleted in the meantime, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 19:35, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

What's wrong with deleting articles? By the way, you can use a colon rather than an asterisk to indent text on this page. Thank your for the quick reply.
Vmavanti (talk) 20:42, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Jair Bolsonaro

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jair Bolsonaro. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:David Wolfe (entrepreneur)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:David Wolfe (entrepreneur). Legobot (talk) 04:24, 23 November 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Biography

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Biography. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Stéphane Grappelli

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Stéphane Grappelli. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Infobox family

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Infobox family. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Carrie Rentschler

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Carrie Rentschler. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Biography

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Biography. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 December 2018

• From the editor: Time for a truce

• Op-ed: Looking back, looking forward: A beginner's experience on Wikipedia

• Special report: The Christmas wishlist

• Opinion: The blogosphere migrates to Galaxy WMF

• News and notes: Reviewer of the year, WikiCup winner, and the 2019 Wikimedia Summit

• Reflections: Wikipedia, history, and the 100th anniversary of Armistice Day

• In the media: Court-ordered article redaction, paid editing, and rock stars

• Discussion report: Farewell, Mediation Committee

• Arbitration report: A long break ends

• Traffic report: Queen reigns for four weeks straight

• Gallery: Intersections

• Recent research: Why do the most active Wikipedians burn out?; only 4% of students vandalize

• Essay: No one cares about your garage band

• Humour: The dark side of our favorite root vegetable

• From the archives: Ars longa, vita brevis

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:46, 1 December 2018 (UTC)

Cite AV media help

An editor who is also a programmer told me he could use help writing instructions on how to use templates, specifically Cite AV media. Do you know enough about this template to explain to readers how to use it? If so, take a look. By the way, you said on your User page you are in the Scottish highlands. I own a West Highland terrier, my second. I love that little guy.
Vmavanti (talk) 19:39, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

• Hi, sorry I've never used that template, Sam Sailor (talk · contribs) may be able to help. There are lots of highland terriors up here and they are used to the very cold weather that some other breeds don't like, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 20:10, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

Yes, I know that well. I live in a cold climate that my dog loves. The double coat protects him. He hates the summer, won't walk in it. But I can walk him in 10 degree (F) weather in the winter when the other dogs (and owners) won't go outside. He was diagnosed last Christmas with diabetes, but he's getting along OK with daily shots and prescription canned food. Stubborn guy, stubborn but lovable.
Vmavanti (talk) 22:00, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

Have had diabetes in my family and it is manageable. I'm not permitted to keep pets by the rental agreement on the cottage but I do feed a stray cat and there are cows at the back of the garden, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 13:31, 1 December 2018 (UTC)

Jayasri (Band)

You moved Draft:Jayasri (Band) on the basis, in part, of "notable label Sony". I think you're reading more into the mentions of Sony than they merit. Picking one item from the list, "Rootsie Boopsie", Discogs shows it's a Papa Winnie record, nothing to do with Jayasri. Those albums in the table which clearly claim to be Jayasri's all lack a major label - Planet Entertainment Europe, Ransilu Asia, Saranga Asia, M Entertainment Asia, Lotus Records Austria EU, Jayasri music. All of them redlinks - and I've tried stripping words from the end of the names and still found nothing. So I ask, what credible claim of significance is there? Cabayi (talk) 14:36, 1 December 2018 (UTC)

• • Having their music featured in notable films and performing the anthem for a world cricket tournament, also some of the references are reliable so it is definitely not an A7 Atlantic306 (talk)

Please comment on Talk:Bekir Fikri

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bekir Fikri. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 2 December 2018 (UTC)

You've got mail

Hello, Atlantic306. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.Peacock11 (talk) 11:09, 2 December 2018 (UTC)

Milan Raspopović

Thank you for your overall efforts to improve tis biography. Still the biography is far from encyclopaedic. There is a long list of deficiencies listed here not addressed at all. Please, take a look at these deficiencies. My personal opinion is this biography is a strong candidate for speedy deletion for its promotional nature, false claims and lack of reliable references.--109.93.102.172 (talk) 18:17, 2 December 2018 (UTC)

• • Replied on article talkpage Atlantic306 (talk) 18:32, 2 December 2018 (UTC)

Minal Khan (actress)

Hi you edited page Parchayee which is the series of Minal Khan (actress). I mean she is the leading actress of that series and other multiple projects, but her page is redirected by user:Saqib by saying she is not notable. will you please see the article and this https://www.google.com.pk/search?q=minal+khan&client=ms-android-oppo&prmd=ibnv&source=lnms&tbm=nws&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwin75jzsP_eAhVbSxUIHVI7AYkQ_AUoA3oECA4QAw also her article is well sources. Thank You 119.160.117.56 (talk) 19:52, 1 December 2018 (UTC)

• • Hi, will look into it tomorrow. Advise you to leave it for the time being, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 21:25, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
    • Hi, you have been reported as a suspected sockpuppet so if you are not one I recommend creating the article fresh through the WP:AFC process where it will get consideration instead of redirecting, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 19:07, 2 December 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Sammi Giancola

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Sammi Giancola. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

Kira Buckland

Wikipedia is not IMDB; if a credit does not have its own article, it does not warrant inclusion in a filmography. We are never required to document every single credit from an actor. Please stop reverting and study up notability guidelines first. Sk8erPrince (talk) 15:55, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

• • Notability does not include lists of works, there are thousands of bios on actors, authors, academics that have lists of their works with no articles. Take academics where there is a list of their papers, none of them will have articles. Atlantic306 (talk) 16:02, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

Filmographies =/= academics
I'm afraid your analogy is not applicable. But you know, it's fine. It's just one credit; I'm not gonna lose sleep over this. Sk8erPrince (talk) 17:26, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Road Warrior Hawk

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Road Warrior Hawk. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Michael Fassbender

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Michael Fassbender. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

Sir George Duff-Sutherland-Dunbar, 6th Baronet

I've made Sir George Duff-Sutherland-Dunbar, 6th Baronet into a stub. He did publish a huge work on India, so probably notable although I have found few good sources yet. --Tagishsimon (talk) 14:04, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

• • Thanks that's a big improvement Atlantic306 (talk) 14:57, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

Reverts on those libraries

Hey! Not saying you are wrong, just want to clear this up: Revert 1 and Revert 2. I did not see anything on either page that sufficiently establishes notability. For the record, libraries are usually not notable. As much as I hate to say it (take a look at my userpage, I care a lot about making library pages) they are almost always shut down. Library systems, on the other hand, are indeed notable. It's just the standalone library that is not. There is extensive coverage linking systems with notability on the WP:LIBRARIES project, but time and time again individual libraries fail. (If something has changed in the past few months where the general consensus says individual libraries are notable, please link, because I would love for it to be true, I've just never seen it). The two pages I moved would easily result in "merge" at AfD due to poor references. However, AfD isn't a tool to decide to merge articles which is why I took it upon myself to move them as I did. I'll create a RfC if need be, but they are very weak pages covered more than enough in the main library system page. SEMMENDINGER (talk) 20:08, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

• • Hi, sorry for the delay, will reply in full tomorrow. Just to say I've got about 3 or 5 library articles on my watchlist which havent been redirected, also AFD is not always representative of a consensus for example these two articles have been edited by a number of experienced editors who didn't see that they should be redirected, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 21:48, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

No worries, take your time. I don't think seniority of editors has any bearings on notability however. Simply put, the articles do not pass GNG. Frances T. Bourne Jacaranda Public Library has all primary sources from the friends of the library. That's not notable. Gulf Gate Public Library has two references, one is the local newspaper which isn't the best for establishing notability, and while the other is good, it's not in-depth coverage of the topic. The library is one out of 50 on a list.. that's not notability. So honestly, they would fail AfD, regardless of who is editing them. I'll bring them to RfM if I must, but I figured I'd talk with you first and see if those redirects make sense instead. Let me know. SEMMENDINGER (talk) 00:34, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

• • • Hi, personally I'd like to see all librarys included as they have similar notability to high schools in local coverage which is acceptable for most topics except companies and brands. However, the tide is probably against this so go ahead with the merge and redirect if you wish but please include the part about the nature area, and the Readers Digest in the other if possible Atlantic306 (talk) 15:07, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

I love the thought, but they are more akin to elementary/middle schools which are better covered at the district level. I'll go ahead with moving the appropriate information. SEMMENDINGER (talk) 18:12, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Antisemitism in the UK Labour Party

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Antisemitism in the UK Labour Party. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Tucker Carlson

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Tucker Carlson. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Elizabeth Warren

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Elizabeth Warren. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 8 December 2018 (UTC)

Your removal of CSD-tag on Mister Supranational

Hello. I noticed that you removed the CSD-tag with the edit summary "has extra content and references since the Jan 2017 AFD", but how do you know that they're "substantially different" (which is what is needed to decline a CSD G4), considering that you're not an admin, and did not take part in the AfD-discussion a year ago? That there would be some differences is obvious, since the 2018 pageant, which is mentioned in the article, hadn't taken place when the article was deleted at AfD, but that does not make them substantially different. - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 18:45, 9 December 2018 (UTC)

• The criteria is not having to be substantially different but having to be substantially identical which is a higher bar. Atlantic306 (talk) 11:45, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

• There's no practical difference between "substantially identical" and being "substantially different", so it isn't a higher bar, and if we're going to nitpick the first sentence in the section about criteria for CSD G4 actually says "This applies to sufficiently identical copies, having any title, of a page deleted via its most recent deletion discussion", leaving a lot of room for interpretation. But regardless of that your post above doesn't answer my question: what I would like to know is how you could possibly know whether they were sufficiently/substantially identical alike or not, considering that you're not an admin and didn't take part in the AfD-discussion. Because if you don't know for sure whether they're sufficiently/substantially alike or not you can't decline CSD G4-nominations. The recreated article has been deleted, BTW, for being the creation of a sock of an indefinitely blocked user, just as I suspected it was. - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 12:29, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

• • If you cannot see the difference between significantly different and significantly identical I am very surprised. It was blatantly obvious that the article was not identical and any admin would have refused it. I see you pride yourself on having a grumpy attitude, well that is not suited to Wikipedia Atlantic306 (talk) 12:51, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
    • You're still doing your best to avoid answering the simple question I asked, which makes this whole thing look even more suspicious. I reverted the changes you made to my previous post, BTW... - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 13:14, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Apologies for changing your post that was a typo, the answer is that the AFD said that were no references at that time and the new article had 2018 content and 4 references which means it was not substantially identical. If you are suspiscious that I am connected to the blocked user that is not the case as yesterday before he was blocked I nominated 2 of his articles for Prod deletion Atlantic306 (talk) 13:30, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

Re: Suresh Lama

Were you going to notify the article's creator that you moved it to draft space? Because it seems like that might be a helpful step in the process if you want people to ever work on these kinds of articles, instead of just shoving them down the memory hole. -208.81.148.195 (talk) 16:49, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

• • Hi, the article creator was informed within a minute of the article being moved Atlantic306 (talk) 18:20, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Neil deGrasse Tyson

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Neil deGrasse Tyson. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

Red (John Stevens album)

I see that you've reverted my edit on Red (John Stevens album) and its talk page. That's fine... if you can provide a source for the info that's been tagged as cn for 2.5 years. I'm working on a huge backlog of articles on the jazz project's cleanup page. 2 years of being tagged as needing a source counts as a challenge to the accuracy of the info (biography or not), so cutting the info is fine. The only source for the article doesn't mention "jazz" either, hence my removal of the genre and talk page link to the jazz project. Do you have a source for the challenged info and the "jazz" label? EddieHugh (talk) 21:13, 12 December 2018 (UTC)

• • Hi, sorry for the delay. Earlier tonight I did a search of Billboard without success and tomorrow will have a longer look, if I can't source it then will revert my edits. Regarding jazz genre if it was on the Billboard jazz chart that should be enough, Allmusic review describes one of the songs as "swinging" but they dont give the genre as jazz but their genre specifications are not acceptable apparently.As said will look into it more tomorrow, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 22:49, 12 December 2018 (UTC)

Ok, thanks. Billboard jazz charts contain a lot that isn't jazz (unfortunately). Almost anything containing one or more tracks that Sinatra once sang, or with a band member known for jazz, or with a tinkly trumpet, gets on there. Willie Nelson (Sinatra songs) and Paul Simon (Wynton Marsalis etc) are on there at the moment. And you're right: AllMusic can't be relied on for much (unfortunately, again). EddieHugh (talk) 00:37, 13 December 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 13 December 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Paul Ryan

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Paul Ryan. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.16 15 December 2018

Hello Atlantic306,

Reviewer of the Year

This year's award for the Reviewer of the Year goes to Onel5969. Around on Wikipedia since 2011, their staggering number of 26,554 reviews over the past twelve months makes them, together with an additional total of 275,285 edits, one of Wikipedia's most prolific users.

Thanks are also extended for their work to JTtheOG (15,059 reviews), Boleyn (12,760 reviews), Cwmhiraeth (9,001 reviews), Semmendinger (8,440 reviews), PRehse (8,092 reviews), Arthistorian1977 (5,306 reviews), Abishe (4,153 reviews), Barkeep49 (4,016 reviews), and Elmidae (3,615 reviews).
Cwmhiraeth, Semmendinger, Barkeep49, and Elmidae have been New Page Reviewers for less than a year — Barkeep49 for only seven months, while Boleyn, with an edit count of 250,000 since she joined Wikipedia in 2008, has been a bastion of New Page Patrol for many years.

See also the list of top 100 reviewers.

Less good news, and an appeal for some help

The backlog is now approaching 5,000, and still rising. There are around 640 holders of the NPR flag, most of whom appear to be inactive. The 10% of the reviewers who do 90% of the work could do with some support especially as some of them are now taking a well deserved break.

Really good news - NPR wins the Community Wishlist Survey 2019

At #1 position, the Community Wishlist poll closed on 3 December with a resounding success for NPP, reminding the WMF and the volunteer communities just how critical NPP is to maintaining a clean encyclopedia and the need for improved tools to do it. A big 'thank you' to everyone who supported the NPP proposals. See the results.

Training video

Due to a number of changes having been made to the feed since this three-minute video was created, we have been asked by the WMF for feedback on the video with a view to getting it brought up to date to reflect the new features of the system. Please leave your comments here, particularly mentioning how helpful you find it for new reviewers.

---

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:14, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Linda Sarsour

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Linda Sarsour. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

Re: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OS 0.1

I left a reply to your comment. It'd be appreciated if you addressed the concerns of myself and Richard3120. Hiàn (talk) 03:26, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of longest-reigning monarchs

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of longest-reigning monarchs. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Linda Sarsour

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Linda Sarsour. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Paul Ryan

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Paul Ryan. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Love Faces 2016 film poster.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Love Faces 2016 film poster.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:42, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Donald Trump

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Donald Trump. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

hey

stop undoing the revertaions on Vita please. Her background is shown here if you don't believe me. https://www.mylife.com/lavita-raynor/e700272216318

• replied on your talkpage Atlantic306 (talk) 16:57, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

Reason

What is the reason for this revert

• • Hi, not a reliable source, and minor charity while laudable is not encyclopedic, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 17:01, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 22 December 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Rivers

Just FYI I was not attempting to vote twice... My vote got moved from the new section... --Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:25, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

• sorry if I inferred that, my comment got moved too, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 19:41, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
  • All good. Just didn't want you thinking I was trying to game the system and vote twice. --Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:00, 22 December 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Jack Evans (D.C. politician)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jack Evans (D.C. politician). Legobot (talk) 04:23, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

Cross-wiki CSD requests

Hi, you recently removed a tag that on Fatema Ismaeil إسلام placed on an article using a custom reason that amounted to “This is not notable and I’m a sysop on a project where people can actually read the sourcing and tell if this person meets anything close to your inclusion criteria.” as not being a valid reason for CSD. When admins and editors from other projects place CSD tags, they are likely not going to know our bureaucracy so they almost always use custom reasons. I do this whenever I need to request a deletion on another project as I only speak English and cannot decipher their deletion pages. Admins are not robots and are capable of reading the reason and matching it with policy.

In this case, I’ve deleted the article as a clear A7. If you run into further issues with ar.wiki editors and things like this, please consider reaching out to Alaa or another ar.wiki sysop who is active on en. ar.wiki is one of the projects that does the most to collaborate with en.wiki on addressing cross-wiki spam, and having their users not help us anymore because our users can’t think to read the article in question is less than ideal. TonyBallioni (talk) 04:19, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

I also deleted several others that you removed as A7. Two probably should be dealt with via PROD or AfD and not A7, so I’ll let the ar.wiki sysop who came here to help our project out know about those processes. TonyBallioni (talk) 04:29, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

• • Thanks, I somehow missed them being a sysop, will be more careful Atlantic306 (talk) 14:49, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 December 2018

• From the editors: Where to draw the line in reporting?

• Op-ed: Wikipedia not trumped by Trump appointee

• Special report: The Signpost got 380,000+ views in 2018, sounds reasonable enough, right?

• News and notes: Some wishes do come true

• In the media: Political hijinks

• Discussion report: A new record low for RfA

• WikiProject report: Articlegenesis

• Arbitration report: Year ends with one active case

• Traffic report: Queen dethroned by U.S. presidents

• Gallery: Sun and Moon, water and stone

• Blog: News from the WMF

• Humour: I believe in Bigfoot

• Essay: Requests for medication

• From the archives: Compromised admin accounts – again

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:35, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019!

Hello Atlantic306, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019. Happy editing, Meatsgains(talk) 16:06, 24 December 2018 (UTC) Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Thanks, keep up the great work you are doing at New Page Patrol Atlantic306 (talk) 20:18, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Royalty and Nobility

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Royalty and Nobility. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Matthias Corvinus

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Matthias Corvinus. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 26 December 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Death of Elaine Herzberg

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Death of Elaine Herzberg. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

AmeriDarts

Could do with some of those RS reviews. Care to post them all or at least tell me where I can find them? --The1337gamer (talk) 12:44, 26 December 2018 (UTC)

• Hi, sorry for the delay, will respond in full tomorrow Atlantic306 (talk) 18:29, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Could only find one rs review so have replaced prod, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 19:26, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

Hello

I saw you just deprodded And-Kensaku. The IGN link that was dead is this https://web.archive.org/web/20090213002427/http://wii.ign.com:80/objects/142/14286567.html which is for another, unreleased game Kensax (and even if by some chance it was the same, it is not a coverage of the game either). Ugh, guess I will have to take this to AfD for absolutely no reason. Please check the sources in detail before deproding in rush. Regards, Jovanmilic97 (talk) 23:17, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

• • This is the IGN link here, it has a slightly different name but it's not a review Atlantic306 (talk) 00:06, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Not seeing much else (nothing at Metacritic ) so will revert my deprod Atlantic306 (talk) 00:12, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ersan ?lyasova

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ersan ?lyasova. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

Article Review

Hello Atlantic306. Thank you so much for the review of the articles I wrote. These are my first efforts, so this is somewhat exciting for me to see these posted. I appreciate your efforts very much.Hu Nhu (talk) 19:08, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

• • Thanks for writing very good articles, please keep it up, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 00:01, 29 December 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Eva Bartlett

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Eva Bartlett. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 29 December 2018 (UTC)

Pastoral Narrative Disclosure

Please reinstate the 'Pastoral Narrative Disclosure' entry. The material provided in the webapage I created is not in breach of copyright as it is a unique overview of the topic, but further to this, the material provided is explicitly and verifiably released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license for free public domain access approved between Frontiers in Psychaitry and myself as lead author of the article. I am more than happy to create our own webpage to promote the PND model, however we decided to go with Wikipedia; neverthless if Wikipedia is not willing to permit public access/knowledge about this new model we will develop our own webpage. Please advise asap. - Dr. Lindsay Carey — Preceding unsigned comment added by LinzCarey (talk • contribs) 13:11, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

• • There is no article with that title, please let me know the correct title, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 14:16, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
    • Found the title and replied on your userpage Atlantic306 (talk) 21:46, 29 December 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Tamika Mallory

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Tamika Mallory. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

Article in danger

The article about famous German musician is in great danger of being deleted. The deletion claim says that he is not notable. That not true because he's has 3 million+ subscribers on YouTube and a verified twitter account. His songs have reached #1 in many charts. I won't say that the article is good but it obviously shouldn't be deleted. You are the best Wikipedian I know for biography. So can you please help improve the article and remove the deletion claim?

Article: TheFatRat Hermit Curator 14:05, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

Thanks a lot for discussing it in the nomination page. Hermit Curator 10:43, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Michel Temer

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Michel Temer. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Carl Benjamin

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Carl Benjamin. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

Maymay's Endorsements

Hi Jimmy! I noticed you reverted a part I removed in Maymay's article. Just wanna ask if it does not look promotional as long as there's a reference linked? Cause I personally think product endorsements have nothing to do with a biography of a celebrity but please let me know otherwise. Thanks for all your efforts! :)   Sub |_HMU  03:53, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

• • Hi, I dont think it is too promo, is there a guideline on endorsements? thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 14:42, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Oswald Boelcke/GA1

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Oswald Boelcke/GA1. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Oswald Boelcke

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Oswald Boelcke. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Great to see you in wikpedia.Thanks for showing appreciation IshwarTalkY 15:22, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

• Thanks and happy new year Atlantic306 (talk) 16:06, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
• Welcome and Happy new Year Ishwar^TalkY 06:12, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Donald Trump

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Donald Trump. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Article titles

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Article titles. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

MayMay’s Bio

Hi Atlantic306!

I can’t find any articles regarding the part you reverted since it is said in a video. Can I use a video as citation?

Thank you!

Maywardjedi (talk) 02:00, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

• • Hi it depends if the video is a reliable source such as an official not copyvio video posted by a national broadcaster or newspaper, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 13:42, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

Kent Ingle

Hi, I noticed you nominated Kent J. Ingle for speedy. I don't disagree, am not contesting the speedy, but believe that the subject of the article is notable and ultimately can and should be recreated as non-promotional, so I userfied it to a subpage of mine with plans to use some of the sources to recreate it from scratch and republish it within a month or so. Please let me know if this is in any way inappropriate. Thanks! Jacona (talk)

• • No problem, as it is best recreated by an unconnected editor to overcome promotional issues caused by undeclared paid editing, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 18:54, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

Preeti Suman

I was considering nominating Preeti Suman for deletion and saw your comment in an edit summary "has some prominemt roles". So far as I see she's only been an extra or an assistant director, neither of which amount to an assertion of notability. Help me - what am I missing? thanks, Cabayi (talk) 14:27, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

• • Assistant director is rarely notable. On the acting I was WP:AGF on the claim in the table that she had two leading roles but have just checked and neither of the series has an article so the notability is unproven so I won't oppose at AFD, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 17:26, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Suki Waterhouse

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Suki Waterhouse. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Kätlin Aas

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Kätlin Aas. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

article for review

Please review this article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ketaki_Narayan Juwais (talk) 06:49, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Pamela Geller

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Pamela Geller. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

James Altucher

I have seen that you have undid the changes that I have made for James Altucher's page. How is what I put too promotional? I wanted to high-light part of his career of a podcast host and the people that he had on there. If I am not able to do that, fine, but what would be a good example of a way to high-light his podcasts? — Preceding unsigned comment added by JohnPark112234 (talk • contribs) 13:54, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

• Hi, you can still add info about his podcasts provided it is well referenced and in a neutral tone. I removed your edit because it read like an advert for the podcast, if it just states what the podcast is about in a concise and simple description it should be ok, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 14:02, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ricardo Vélez Rodríguez

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ricardo Vélez Rodríguez. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Rihanna

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Rihanna. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Sofia Carson

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Sofia Carson. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
  

~ Amory (u • t • c) 17:51, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

• Thanks, i'll be careful with it Atlantic306 (talk) 21:06, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Biography

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Biography. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

Reena aggarwal

Hi this is on behalf of Reena Aggarwal...this page was created for Reena aggarwal who did Balika vadhu and Kya haal Mr. Paanchal'...but slowly and gradually u deleted all the information and credits about her and u made this page of the other reena Aggarwal who is a marathi actress... please fix this... Homecalling (talk) 15:06, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

• No, you are wrong - the article was formerly about the other Reena Aggarwal and was hijacked so I reverted it back to the original subject in one edit not slowly and gradually. Wikipedia is not for promotion, see WP:COI, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 15:33, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

Please check all the information carefully...some of the project u have mentioned are done by other Reena aggarwal and even she is a well known actress in television industry..m trying to create her Wikipedia page but I am facing problem due to a mix of profiles. Credit should be given to the write person for their jobs. Both the actresses are working hard but everything is being put on this Reena's profile which is creating confusion for all the followers. Homecalling (talk) 19:20, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Michel Temer

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Michel Temer. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Nobuhiro Watsuki

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Nobuhiro Watsuki. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Killing of Aya Maasarwe

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Killing of Aya Maasarwe. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

Sorry about that!

Sorry about my erroneous PROD; it's been a long time since I've done one of those. Strange that Twinkle will advise that there's a prior AfD but not actually do anything to prevent the PROD from going forward. Anyhow, thanks for catching that! DonIago (talk) 21:52, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

• • No problem, AFD is an option if you like, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 22:09, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 January 2019

• Op-Ed: Random Rewards Rejected

• In focus: The Collective Consciousness of Admin Userpages

• News and notes: WMF staff turntable continues to spin; Endowment gets more cash; RfA continues to be a pit of steely knives

• In the media: The Signpost's investigative story recognized, Wikipedia turns 18 and gets a birthday gift from Google, and more editors are recognized

• Discussion report: The future of the reference desk

• Featured content: Don't miss your great opportunity

• Arbitration report: An admin under the microscope

• Traffic report: Death, royals and superheroes: Avengers, Black Panther

• Technology report: When broken is easily fixed

• Gallery: Let us build a memorial fit for such pain and suffering

• News from the WMF: News from WMF

• Recent research: Ad revenue from reused Wikipedia articles; are Wikipedia researchers asking the right questions?

• Essay: How

• Humour: Village pump

• From the archives: An editorial board that includes you

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:49, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Avraham Steinberg

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Avraham Steinberg. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Cate Blanchett

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Cate Blanchett. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Justin Fairfax

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Justin Fairfax. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion contested: Bukhara State University

Hello Atlantic306, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Bukhara State University, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional. Nonprofit universities are generally notable. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 20:13, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of 2019 Australian Open – Men's singles final for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2019 Australian Open – Men's singles final is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2019 Australian Open – Men's singles final until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Iffy★Chat -- 13:14, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

Edit on Chen Hanwei

Hi, I notice the edit on Chen Hanwei but the evidence is confirmed on Chen Hanwei that he is nominated in this year Star Awards so you may check out The Celebrity Agency Instagram or go to Toggle website to check out the nominees for this year star awards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 42.60.158.79 (talk) 01:55, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Christopher Nolan

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Christopher Nolan. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Dinesh D'Souza

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Dinesh D'Souza. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Triangle 54

Can you please explain how this is incorrect? I get that the LIE doesn't directly border Triangle 54, but it's directly north of 54th Avenue. And the easternmost street is indeed a slip road. epicgenius (talk) 22:48, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

• • Hi, yes I misinterpreted your figures as acres rather than feet. Isn't it better to use acres rather than square feet? regards Atlantic306 (talk) 23:17, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
    • No worries, and it's all good since I misunderstood your edit as well . Anyway, the triangle is only about a fifth of an acre, so it's very small. I find that for areas less than 10,000 square feet, the square-foot measurement is easier to visualize since it's such a small number. I'd be fine with acreage as well, though. epicgenius (talk) 01:14, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

Why

Pls stop reverting sensible true edits. Adding true facts with valid source material is not promo.

• • Sockpuppets are not allowed to edit Atlantic306 (talk) 15:08, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

What is a sock puppet? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:205:4389:9EE1:0:0:239E:90AC (talk) 15:12, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Moran Mor Athanasius Yohan Metropolitan

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Moran Mor Athanasius Yohan Metropolitan. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ricardo Vélez Rodríguez

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ricardo Vélez Rodríguez. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Cathy McMorris Rodgers

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Cathy McMorris Rodgers. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Aurora, Illinois shooting

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Aurora, Illinois shooting. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

Young Peculiar

Hi, you deprodded the above article with the reasoning "having a set on a C4 channel is a claim to pass WP:NMUSIC as well as being the best in their genre within their regional locality". I'm going to take it to AfD, but I just wanted to check that you were talking about the live set on Project4.tv, and their EP being number one in the Yorkshire newspaper list. I don't agree with either of those reasons, but I'll explain everything in the AfD - I just wanted to make sure I had understood your two points correctly. Richard3120 (talk) 03:24, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

• • Hi, am not sure it is notable as I don't recognise the sources except the Yorkshire Times which is a regional reliable source. Otherwise I deprodded because it had claims of passing WP:NMUSIC criteria 7 and 12, as you describe for featuring on a national tv programme and less certainly winning an award that could indicate prominance in their locality, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 15:07, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

Thanks – I don't think they are notable, and I've explained why at AfD, feel free to comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Young Peculiar. Richard3120 (talk) 17:56, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Keith Urban

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Keith Urban. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Article titles

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Article titles. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ben Shapiro

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ben Shapiro. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Shabir Ally

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Shabir Ally. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Jussie Smollett

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jussie Smollett. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:2010–2017 Toronto serial homicides

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2010–2017 Toronto serial homicides. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 February 2019

• From the editors: Help wanted (still)

• News and notes: Front-page issues for the community

• In focus: Wikimedia affiliate organizations seek community participation in 2019 board election

• Discussion report: Talking about talk pages

• Featured content: Conquest, War, Famine, Death, and more!

• Arbitration report: A quiet month for Arbitration Committee

• Traffic report: Binge-watching

• Technology report: Tool labs casters-up

• Gallery: Signed with pride

• Recent research: Research finds signs of cultural diversity and recreational habits of readers

• Essay: Optimist's guide to Wikipedia

• From the archives: New group aims to promote Wiki-Love

• Humour: Pesky Pronouns

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:15, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ralph Northam

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ralph Northam. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Seyed hasan aghamiri

Sir...why want to heart me...why...whay want to delete article hasan aghamiri..dont do it...please😭😭 Arman Aryamehr (talk) 11:54, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

• Hi, unfortunately the articles do not meet the WP:GNG requirements and the English is confused, for example calling someone a stalker is implying they are a criminal, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 11:59, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for removing the advert tag from the article 'Sarawat Yai'

Thank you very much for removing the advert tag. May I ask you for your help please? I want Wikipedia no matter in what language to be the ultimate source for information and the most trusted online encyclopedia.

'Sarawat Yai' is a famous Thai crime Novel. It's been made into a miniseries once in 1989, and already have an article for it in Thai Wikipedia. So when the remake came out this year, I did some research and wrote an article 'Sarawat Yai (2019 TV Series)' with ample references, but the admin deleted it. I also created the disambiguation page because 'Sarawat Yai' also refer to a rank of ROyal Thai Police, the admin deleted that too. He wanted the novel, original miniseries and subsequent remakes to be in one article. I tried to tell him that this is not Wikipedia way of doing it, cited 'Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Television'. When you search for the terms 'Sarawat Yai' in Thai google now the knowledge graph give a confusing set of information. I told the admin it's important that we must separate the each remakes and give it an aritcle because no remakes are ever the same, he refused to listen and totally disregarded 'Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Television'. The knowledge graph for Sarawat Yai is like.....The title is of the remake , but the cast and production info are all mixed up. You dont know whos in which version and what. It's a ridiculous looking knowledge graph. Can you please help make this right, he treat to block me if I have any more attempt of creating same article. He's very prejudice and unfair, what can I do? Please help.พระยาไทยบันเทิง (talk) 22:47, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

• • Hi, unfortunately I don't speak Thai but I would suggest that you raise your concerns with a Thai Wiki admin that you are on good terms with or you believe to be a fair person, if you don't wish to use their talk page you could email them, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 12:19, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
    • Thank you for our advice. But before I do that, may I ask, am I on the right track? I mean, my understanding is correct about how to write a wikipedia article, right? and that I should have a separate article for the a novel, an original TVSeries and a TVSeries remake? Thank you again.พระยาไทยบันเทิง (talk) 00:11, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
  • In the English wikipedia you are correct as the tv series has coverage in reliable sources that are significantly about the tv series rather than the book so it qualifies for its own article, I don't know the rules of the Thai wiki, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 15:48, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:The Red Tent (film)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:The Red Tent (film). Legobot (talk) 04:23, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

Your edit to Joseph

Hi. Have you got the wrong initialiation for Joseph? the JSPH links to Abby Howard cheers IdreamofJeanie (talk) 18:21, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

• • thanks, have corrected it Atlantic306 (talk) 18:23, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

Adam Garcia

Hi, I saw you removed some of my added info on Adam Garcia by saying primary source is not sufficient? What do you mean by primary source? Records are from the official newspaper and Supreme court case. It clearly meets reliable sources as per WP:GNG and reliable source factors. Laura GoldS (talk) 20:00, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

• • The sources are not good enough, see WP:BIO. For inclusion in blps information must be sourced from reliable secondary sources, the supreme court is a primary source as is flickr and marriage records, the newspaper counts but it can't be checked without subscribing so is not enough, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 20:05, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

Supreme Court is a primary source of what? Primary source means associated with the subject or published by the subject. WP:BASIC on WP:BIO says it should be secondary and all these are secondary. I uploaded the version of that subscription to flicker for people to look at and I can upload the readable version of the newspaper also. His father is a Drug Lord and money launderer and everything is on record. What else do you suggest we need? Laura GoldS (talk) 20:11, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

• See WP:Primary sources, a picture of a birth certificate is a primary source and unacceptable as are the other sources, as the newspaper is unreadable. If you continue like this you will have to be blocked from Wikipedia. What you are engaged in is investigative journalism which is not permitted here, Atlantic306 (talk) 20:21, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

I am not into investigative journalism. I am just asking that what I added is verifiable and true. That's what I know about Wikipedia that how it should be. There are multiple cited sources here that require free subscriptions, even on Financial Times and NYT as well after reading a few articles. I am just trying to understand. Laura GoldS (talk) 20:27, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

This is what reliable source says

In general, the most reliable sources are:

Peer-reviewed journals Books published by university presses University-level textbooks Magazines, journals, and books published by respected publishing houses Mainstream newspapers As a rule of thumb, the more people engaged in checking facts, analyzing legal issues, and scrutinizing the writing, the more reliable the publication. Self-published material, whether on paper or online, is generally not regarded as reliable, but see self-published sources for exceptions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Laura GoldS (talk • contribs) 20:35, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

• Hi,the problem is the information is not verified enough in reliable sources otherwise it would have been included long ago. For example, the SMH piece if it is the same as a previous version earlier removed is based on an aside from a quote from a felon, so it is not reliable, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 22:32, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Michael Jackson

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Michael Jackson. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Donald Trump

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Donald Trump. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Suki Waterhouse

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Suki Waterhouse. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Michael Jackson

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Michael Jackson. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Antisemitism in the UK Labour Party

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Antisemitism in the UK Labour Party. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

Bikash khawash

Bikash khawash is a Nepai nation football player. He playing Nepali A division club Nepal army football club.

In this way not deletion this page.

Thank's!

श्रेष्ठ भूपेन्द्र (talk) 13:04, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Rebecca Maria Abate

Hello Atlantic306. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Rebecca Maria Abate, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: it:Alfiere della Repubblica might well be a notable award, seeing as it is the highest. Plus, she got coverage in reliable sources for it. Needs more discussion. Thank you. SoWhy 14:25, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Otto Warmbier

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Otto Warmbier. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

Draft: Nicky Larson et le Parfum de Cupidon

Hie, I added the section you asked for the draft for Draft: Nicky Larson et le Parfum de Cupidon. I hope it is okay. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zeynel (talk • contribs) 03:33, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Mary Kay Letourneau

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Mary Kay Letourneau. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.17

Hello Atlantic306,

News

• The WMF has announced that Google Translate is now available for translating articles through the content translation tool. This may result in an increase in machine translated articles in the New Pages Feed. Feel free to use the {{rough translation}} tag and gently remind (or inform) editors that translations from other language Wikipedia pages still require attribution per WP:TFOLWP.

Discussions of interest

• Two elements of CSD G6 have been split into their own criteria: R4 for redirects in the "File:" namespace with the same name as a file or redirect at Wikimedia Commons (Discussion), and G14 for disambiguation pages which disambiguate zero pages, or have "(disambiguation)" in the title but disambiguate a single page (Discussion).
• {{db-blankdraft}} was merged into G13 (Discussion)
• A discussion recently closed with no consensus on whether to create a subject-specific notability guideline for theatrical plays.
• There is an ongoing discussion on a proposal to create subject-specific notability guidelines for chemicals and organism taxa.

Reminders

• NPR is not a binary keep / delete process. In many cases a redirect may be appropriate. The deletion policy and its associated guideline clearly emphasise that not all unsuitable articles must be deleted. Redirects are not contentious. See a classic example of the templates to use. More templates are listed at the R template index. Reviewers who are not aware, do please take this into consideration before PROD, CSD, and especially AfD because not even all admins are aware of such policies, and many NAC do not have a full knowledge of them.

NPP Tools Report

• Superlinks – allows you to check an article's history, logs, talk page, NPP flowchart (on unpatrolled pages) and more without navigating away from the article itself.
• copyvio-check – automatically checks the copyvio percentage of new pages in the background and displays this info with a link to the report in the 'info' panel of the Page curation toolbar.
• The NPP flowchart now has clickable hyperlinks.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – Low – 2393 High – 4828
Looking for inspiration? There are approximately 1000 female biographies to review.
Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost.

---

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:18, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Companion (Doctor Who)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Companion (Doctor Who). Legobot (talk) 04:25, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Modern Talking

Kamala! King Kong Bundy!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CB57CuT4smM 113.210.65.249 (talk) 10:59, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Nicky Larson et le Parfum de Cupidon film poster.jpeg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:05, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Bohemian Rhapsody (film)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bohemian Rhapsody (film). Legobot (talk) 04:25, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Muse (disambiguation)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Muse (disambiguation). Legobot (talk) 04:27, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Paul Atherton

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Paul Atherton. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Harbhajan Singh Khalsa

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Harbhajan Singh Khalsa. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of Electronic Arts games

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of Electronic Arts games. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Thank U, Next

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Thank U, Next. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

Infobox cricketer

Hi. When you edited Tarun Kumar (cricketer) you re-introduced a number of infobox errors into the article. These should have shown up when you previewed the article. Specifically the innings and not out parameters do not exist. A bunch of us are currently trying to clear up as many of the errors in the template as possible - we've gotten it down from over 8,000 to less than 150 - which is why I spotted your edit. In addition,, per WP:OLINK we don't link major geographical entities such as major countries. India certainly constitutes a major country. Stylistically Right-handed is better - and is one of the two options specified in the template documentation - and we almost always use long dashes rather than short ones to show "blank" stats: at least, that's the general style used by WikiProject Cricket I think. I just wanted to explain my revert to you. If you're going to reply here a ping would be handy. Blue Square Thing (talk) 04:03, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

• • Blue Square Thing (talk · contribs) Hi, apologies, the changes to the infobox were accidental as I mistakenly edited an older version of the page, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 13:46, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

• Thanks for explaining - I didn't want you to get the impression I was jumping on you and my edit summary was a little snarky. Blue Square Thing (talk) 14:00, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:George Pell

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:George Pell. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 23 March 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Marc-André ter Stegen

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Marc-André ter Stegen. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of photographers

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of photographers. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Television

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Television. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Kirarin Revolution

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Kirarin Revolution. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Michael Jackson

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Michael Jackson. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Olivia Jade

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Olivia Jade. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Eaton Township Weis Markets shooting

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Eaton Township Weis Markets shooting. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Black and white

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Black and white. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 March 2019

• From the editors: Getting serious about humor

• News and notes: Blackouts fail to stop EU Copyright Directive

• In the media: Women's history month

• Discussion report: Portal debates continue, Prespa agreement aftermath, WMF seeks a rebranding

• Featured content: Out of this world

• Arbitration report: The Tides of March at ARBCOM

• Traffic report: Exultations and tribulations

• Technology report: New section suggestions and sitewide styles

• News from the WMF: The WMF's take on the new EU Copyright Directive

• Recent research: Barnstar-like awards increase new editor retention

• From the archives: Esperanza organization disbanded after deletion discussion

• Humour: The Epistolary of Arthur 37

• Op-Ed: Pro and Con: Has gun violence been improperly excluded from gun articles?

• In focus: The Wikipedia SourceWatch

• Special report: Wiki Loves (50 Years of) Pride

• Community view: Wikipedia's response to the New Zealand mosque shootings

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:02, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of most-subscribed YouTube channels

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of most-subscribed YouTube channels. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of works by Leonardo da Vinci

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of works by Leonardo da Vinci. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (television)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (television). Legobot (talk) 04:26, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Twist of Fate 2016 Indian TV Series.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Twist of Fate 2016 Indian TV Series.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:43, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Jussie Smollett

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jussie Smollett. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

Please give your advice for improving the article

Jimmi, hi. I decided to contact you because you recently reviewed Storror article that I recovered within WP:ABANDON and also because you seem to know what is going on in Great Britain. Can you please take a look at Draft:Tide (banking)? It is (a properly stated) COI contribution. Since it is my first article about a British company and a finance company, I’d really appreciate any advice that you can give for improving it. Thank you. -- Bbarmadillo (talk) 19:39, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

• • Very interesting, plenty of good refs so published, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 15:46, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for reviewing this. -- Bbarmadillo (talk) 18:33, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Gavin McInnes

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Gavin McInnes. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:And Then There Were None

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:And Then There Were None. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:35 mm film

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:35 mm film. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

April 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Muhammad (Karakunnu), you may be blocked from editing. MalayaliWoman (talk) 16:35, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

• • Removing invalid tags and restoring references is not vandalism Atlantic306 (talk) 18:52, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for your help

Thank you for helping me improve my article! Vepelza24 (talk) 11:08, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Martin Luther King Jr.

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Martin Luther King Jr.. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

You are most welcome.

Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:30, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Adam Leitman Bailey

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Adam Leitman Bailey. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of Monty Python's Flying Circus episodes

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of Monty Python's Flying Circus episodes. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 12 April 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Catherine Parr

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Catherine Parr. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

Assistant needed

Hello,Jimmy sir @Atlantic306: I created 2 article which I think would be WP:N. But due to film title which is relevant. I couldn't create the article. So if you could assist me with the article changing the title by moving the page. It's would be very helpful. The 2 article are Bhoot Police (film) change it to Bhoot Police, the other one is Rooh Afza (2020 film) change it to Rooh Afza (film). Sir is it not possible to change the article name which is relevant towards the film title which "Bhoot Police" and "Rooh Afza" respectively. Sir, 1 last request please Akhil (singer), Flint J could you also review this article too. AR.Dmg (talk) 17:34, 12 April 2019 (UTC). Sir @Atlantic306: could you help me by article [[Dabangg 3 (film) to Dabangg 3. I couldn't create the article relevant to the film because of the redirect. AR.Dmg (talk) 02:14, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Motion picture content rating system

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Motion picture content rating system. Legobot (talk) 04:33, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Monopoly (song)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Monopoly (song). Legobot (talk) 04:26, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

Help

Hello sir, @Atlantic306:

Sir I would like to raise a friendly request to you to do the assessment about this articles which I recently created ABCD – American Born Confused Desi,Boss – Baap of Special Services,Firrkie,I M 24,Sab Kushal Mangal,Section 375,Sridevi Bungalow. I can assure that they fulfill the policy and WP:N. But then also whether this article comply with WP:N, if they do not fulfill the criteria then please move this articles to draft space so that I work on it otherwise they would be deleted by any Wikipedia administrator. It would be a great help sir if you accept my request and kindly do the assessment of the articles. It would build the confidence booster for new editor. AR.Dmg (talk) 01:16, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Martin Luther King Jr.

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Martin Luther King Jr.. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Johannes Gutenberg

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Johannes Gutenberg. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:WikiLeaks

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:WikiLeaks. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Avengers: Infinity War

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Avengers: Infinity War. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of box office records set by It

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of box office records set by It. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Graham Linehan

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Graham Linehan. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Bobby soxer (music)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bobby soxer (music). Legobot (talk) 04:26, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Athens News

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Athens News. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Neil Sabatino and Draft:Mint 400 Records

Hello,

On April 23 you moved Draft:Neil Sabatino and Draft:Mint 400 Records to draftspace, along with Draft:List of Mint 400 Records artists. I've been trying to help Pacific305, who doesn't seem to understand what happened to those pages and why. I'm also a little confused as to why 5 year old articles were moved to draft, rather than being edited in place to resolve any UPE or COI concerns. Pacific305 admits to being Neil Sabatino, and to having edited those articles although he has not done so using that account. Assuming what he says is true, that would represent improper COI editing although it would not constitute UPE.  Would you please visit his talk page and discuss your concerns about those articles with him? Thank you. ~ ONUnicorn^{(Talk|Contribs)}problem solving 15:01, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

why is draft template on a draft page not appropriate?

You removed it three times, on three different articles: [1][2][3]; however, it's not clear to me why {{draft}} placed on an article in draft space is not appropriate. Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:09, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

• • I removed it once on each of the articles because it is encouraging the articles to be submitted for review before the UPE and sockpuppet investigations are over, is that what you want ? Atlantic306 (talk) 01:07, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Donald Trump

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Donald Trump. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Radoslav Rochallyi

Draft:Radoslav Rochallyi - rationale was given after restoration, is there something I'm missing? SITH (talk) 21:12, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

There is no rush to delete it, it was probably a period of frustration and from a brief look it seems to have reliable sources so it is in doubt whether it should have been declined in the first place which led to the frustration, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 21:26, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

Sorry it was copyvio reason so in that case i will restore the G7

Atlantic306 (talk) 21:28, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Richard B. Spencer

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Richard B. Spencer. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

==

Please comment on Talk:Jimi Hendrix posthumous discography

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jimi Hendrix posthumous discography. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Anthony Bliss for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anthony Bliss is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthony Bliss (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TSventon (talk) 16:57, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Zack Hample

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Zack Hample. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 April 2019

• News and notes: An Action Packed April

• In the media: Is Wikipedia just another social media site?

• Discussion report: English Wikipedia community's conclusions on talk pages

• Featured content: Anguish, accolades, animals, and art

• Arbitration report: An Active Arbitration Committee

• Traffic report: Mötley Crüe, Notre-Dame, a black hole, and Bonnie and Clyde

• Technology report: A new special page, and other news

• Gallery: Notre-Dame de Paris burns

• News from the WMF: Can machine learning uncover Wikipedia’s missing “citation needed” tags?

• Recent research: Female scholars underrepresented; whitepaper on Wikidata and libraries; undo patterns reveal editor hierarchy

• From the archives: Portals revisited

• Humour: Jimbo and Larry walk into a bar ...

• Opinion: The gaps in our knowledge of our gaps

• Interview: Katherine Maher marks 3 years as executive director

• Community view: 2019 Wikimedia Summit gathers movement affiliate representatives to discuss movement strategy

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:36, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Scarlett Johansson

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Scarlett Johansson. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of Italian supercentenarians

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of Italian supercentenarians. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 2 May 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Bruno Bettelheim

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bruno Bettelheim. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 3 May 2019 (UTC)

Drafitying articles albums

Hi Atlantic306. You been recent WP:DRAFTIFYING lots of article about albums created by NorthPark1417. For future reference, non-free albums cover art cannot be used in drafts per WP:NFCC#9 (see also WP:DRAFTS#Preparing drafts); so, please remove or hide the album covers or any other non-free files used in the articles. This will save a file reviewer from having to do so later on. Thanks in advance. -- Marchjuly (talk) 03:59, 3 May 2019 (UTC)

• • Will do, thanks for the link, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 12:21, 3 May 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Postmodern art

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Postmodern art. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

RadhaKrishn (TV series)

While I get your reasoning for removing the speedy tag, it's worth noting that the entire AfD ran after the series supposedly premiered so the series had already premiered, yet the article was still deleted. --AussieLegend (✉) 14:47, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

• • You're right but two of the keep votes thought it was upcoming such as FitIndia said it could be recreated when it aired, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 15:34, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Jiho Lee for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jiho Lee is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jiho Lee until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 01:51, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Jeremy Corbyn

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jeremy Corbyn. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

Ced

Should I ced the List of programs broadcast by CTV and CTV Two pages! --2600:1:C43A:3826:CC8E:F4F9:EC0C:DB60 (talk) 13:46, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

• If you like, as long as it is correct, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 13:53, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Jeremy Corbyn

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jeremy Corbyn. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

Underlined Passages

Hello, I noticed that you placed a mark on the Underlined Passages page saying that it was created for payments. I think I may have been the original creator of that page, and I did not get any payments or am part of anything like that. I think that the placard may have been placed in error? Can you help clarify? Ricksanchez (talk) 17:11, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

• Comment: Can I remove the tag, it looks like you removed most of the information. The only things I would change to add to your edits is to remove the 2nd image (not necessary) and to edit the album pages and then re link them. Would you agree to that? I also think that a Speedy Deletion Tag should be added to the "Michael Nestor" page, as I don't think that it is a necessary or encyclopedic page. Please let me know your thoughts so I can clean this up. I read the drama surrounding the blocked user so I understand the context now. Thank you! Ricksanchez (talk) 17:34, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

• Hello again, I removed most everything from this page that was not neutral. It should be relatively encyclopedic now, just stating basic facts. With your permission I would like to remove the tag. Thanks! I dont think there is any need to for the individual album pages, I would like to merge them with the main page if possible. Ricksanchez (talk) 03:10, 3 May 2019 (UTC)

• Thanks for cleaning up the article, I've removed the tag. I don't have a view about the album pages, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 12:20, 3 May 2019 (UTC)

• Thank you for your help on this. I made edits to the album pages, but I am not sure how to remove them from draft status, can you help? I have never worked in draft status, so this would be a good learning experience for me. Thank you! Ricksanchez (talk) 14:30, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

• Hi, the album pages are not ready yet as to prevent deletion they do need reviews and summaries but they need to be balanced with a mix of good and bad reviews if possible and quotes need to include both positive and negative elements, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 14:40, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:British Royal Family

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:British Royal Family. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

Removed Information

Hello Atlantic306, I noticed that you removed some of my information on the Russ Vitale Wikipedia page. I was wondering if there was anything I could do to change that or fix any mistakes that I may have made. Thanks, Stranger062

• Hi, I removed it because it was too promotional and caused another editor to add an advertising tag. Please only add factual information such as he released the album Zoo on such a date and it charted at... and went platinum, he toured where and where etc, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 16:58, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Notability (academics)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Notability (academics). Legobot (talk) 04:23, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

NorthPark1417

Hi. In following up on the message you left on my talk page last month, I went through and looked at the still unreviewed articles by this editor. Any without significant edits by others I moved to draftspace, following your example. Is there anything which should be done to the numerous other articles created by this editor? Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:57, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Assassination of Jamal Khashoggi

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Assassination of Jamal Khashoggi. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 9 May 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Lady Louise Windsor

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Lady Louise Windsor. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 10 May 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Juan Guaidó

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Juan Guaidó. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 11 May 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Anti-German sentiment

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Anti-German sentiment. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

Ced

Should I ced the List of programmes broadcast by RTÉ 2#Historic pages! --2600:1:D406:F698:BD77:450F:8510:C826 (talk) 15:25, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

"Malcolm in the Middle" is the show to ced. --2600:1:D406:F698:BD77:450F:8510:C826 (talk) 15:28, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

I just told you Serols removed becAuse of huggle. --2600:1:D406:F698:BD77:450F:8510:C826 (talk) 15:40, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

Ced is short for copyedit or copyediting; simply meaning to edit the page and make necessary corrections and improvements, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 16:05, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

Trent Garrett ‎

You've been around long enough that you should know that the WP:BURDEN to provide sources is on the editor who adds or restores the material. Mind your WP:BLP issue. Toddst1 (talk) 23:51, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

• • Well its not as easy as all that as the refs can't be accessed in Europe due to copyright laws Atlantic306 (talk) 00:45, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Bond 25

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bond 25. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

In regards to your edits on Maharajapuram

Are you sure that A7 doesn't apply? You said that A7 applies for spam and copyvio. But I reviewed the criterias written here say different things. Sincerely, Masum Reza^☎ 12:57, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

• Hi, no its definitely not for places, films, books, schools, products. I meant G11 for spam and G12 for copyvio related to places but that does not seem to apply here, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 13:00, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:The New York Times

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:The New York Times. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Lavender Hill Mob (gay activist group)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Lavender Hill Mob (gay activist group). Legobot (talk) 04:23, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you Atlantic306, for clearing article:Shruti Naidu from AfD. --Gpkp (u • t • c) 17:13, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Danny Baker

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Danny Baker. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

9 to 5

Will do thanks for spotting that!

Juanpumpchump (talk) 12:42, 16 May 2019 (UTC) No problem, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 20:43, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Calvin Cheng

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Calvin Cheng. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

Your recent removals..

You've removed several articles by User:Bijnorlion. This user has 53 notices in May of this year regarding draft space and just in general their articles being non-notable. I've issued them a warning on their talk page, they thanked me and made another article. Some of the articles are notable, some are not.. But they show no sign of stopping despite warnings. What would be the appropriate course of action in this scenario? Alex.osheter (talk) 17:00, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

Hi, one was deleted A7, two of the others he moved straight back to mainspace where I prodded them. Then after some improvement to the article he deprodded one of them. Some of the articles such as MPs are obviously notable so for the time being I think its best to treat each article on its own merits but if problems still persist after a couple of weeks perhaps a report at WP:ANI will be needed. In the meantime I'll advise him on some issues, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 19:02, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.18

Hello Atlantic306,

WMF at work on NPP Improvements

Niharika Kohli, a product manager for the growth team, announced that work is underway in implementing improvements to New Page Patrol as part of the 2019 Community Wishlist and suggests all who are interested watch the project page on meta. Two requested improvements have already been completed. These are:

• Allow filtering by no citations in page curation
• Not having CSD and PRODs automatically marked as reviewed, reflecting current consensus among reviewers and current Twinkle functionality.

Reliable Sources for NPP

Rosguill has been compiling a list of reliable sources across countries and industries that can be used by new page patrollers to help judge whether an article topic is notable or not. At this point further discussion is needed about if and how this list should be used. Please consider joining the discussion about how this potentially valuable resource should be developed and used.

Backlog drive coming soon

Look for information on the an upcoming backlog drive in our next newsletter. If you'd like to help plan this drive, join in the discussion on the New Page Patrol talk page.

News

• Following a request for comment, the subject-specific notability guideline for pornographic actors and models (WP:PORNBIO) was removed; in its place, editors should consult WP:ENT and WP:GNG.

Discussions of interest

• A request for bot approval for a bot to patrol two kinds of redirects
• There has been a lot discussion about Notability of Academics
• What, if anything, would a SNG for Softball look like

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7242 Low – 2393 High – 7250

---

Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of DannyS712 (talk) at 19:17, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Drake (musician)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Drake (musician). Legobot (talk) 04:24, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

Regarding CSD tag removal

@Atlantic306:You removed CSD tag from Dhvani Bhanushali discography(https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/897644796) which completely meets A1 criteria for deletion.Even reknown singers have separate page if there is a big number of songs which makes it this and this.Lemme know your suggestions.IRIEN✓ (aka MAh'ia)🙏 13:25, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

Original Creator did removed tag himself.(https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/897647976).More information see on talk page before removing.IRIEN✓ (aka MAh'ia)🙏 13:41, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

• A1 means no context, it does not qualify for s speedy deletion Atlantic306 (talk) 15:26, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Game of Thrones title sequence

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Game of Thrones title sequence. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Princess Michael of Kent

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Princess Michael of Kent. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Domenico Losurdo

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Domenico Losurdo. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Santa Claus

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Santa Claus. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Chuck Tingle

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Chuck Tingle. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Deploying Legobot?

Hi, Atlantic306! How does one deploy the Legobot or otherwise add:

• The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Chuck Tingle. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

to my Talk page like it is on yours? Other than copy/paste? Thanks. Gerntrash (talk) 21:02, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Thank you! Gerntrash (talk) 22:34, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Shakespeare on the Saskatchewan

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Shakespeare on the Saskatchewan. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Axios (website)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Axios (website). Legobot (talk) 04:27, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

Reviewing Stowaways on the Ark

Can you please rate it again? I've made some improvements, and I would like to know what I can also improve some more! :) NickBlamp (talk) 18:52, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

• • Hi, it looks good and I'll review it tomorrow but there is one problem and that is the length of the plot. The maximum is 700 words but it is presently 1360 so can you please reduce that to within 700, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 19:01, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
    • OK! The plot is now written in 701 words. NickBlamp (talk) 11:30, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Donald Trump

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Donald Trump. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Biographies of living persons

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Biographies of living persons. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Donald Trump

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Donald Trump. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Julian Assange

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Julian Assange. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Fabiana Rosales

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Fabiana Rosales. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 May 2019

• From the editors: Picture that

• News and notes: Wikimania and trustee elections

• In the media: Politics, lawsuits and baseball

• Discussion report: Admin abuse leads to mass-desysop proposal on Azerbaijani Wikipedia

• Arbitration report: ArbCom forges ahead

• Traffic report: Dark marvels, thrones, a vile serial killer biopic, that's entertainment!

• Technology report: Lots of Bots

• News from the WMF: Wikimedia Foundation petitions the European Court of Human Rights to lift the block of Wikipedia in Turkey

• Recent research: Wikipedia more useful than academic journals, but is it stealing the news?

• Essay: Paid editing

• From the archives: FORUM:Should Wikimedia modify its terms of use to require disclosure?

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:10, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Theodore Edgar McCarrick

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Theodore Edgar McCarrick. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Air Force Amy

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Air Force Amy. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Thomas Rosica

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Thomas Rosica. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Murder of Hae Min Lee

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Murder of Hae Min Lee. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of French supercentenarians

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of French supercentenarians. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Concerning the Labia Theatre and its nomination for deletion

I hope I didn't come across as unreasonable or callous in my nomination for deletion of the Labia Theatre article. Ultimately, I simply want the article to abide by Wikipedia's guidelines. This is why I hope to improve the article over the coming week and get it to such a point. That means I want to ensure that:

1) The article uses multiple credible, third-party sources to demonstrate the subject's notability. I've been searching for these, and although this opinion is tentative, I believe this can be done. I won't grasp at straws for sources, but I don't want the article removed if it can be established as notable – I'm effectively going for a weak keep. Because I'm still uncertain of this, however, I am not electing to withdraw the nomination at this time (see: WP:SOURCESMAYEXIST). I'm tackling this issue first since time is of concern. Basically, it's a save the rec center plot where the stakes are minimal, the pacing is garbage, and the protagonist and the antagonist are the same person.

2) The plagiarism is completely gone. Since the edit history of the article is rather short, it shouldn't be difficult to find and remove the offending lines (I already know of two).

3) All claims be properly sourced per WP:CHALLENGE.

4) The article is neutral, especially insofar as promoting the subject.

I should note that one of my biggest concerns with smaller, less active articles like this is that they're often ripe for abuse, as shown by the article's state a few years ago. It's evident you've been exceptionally vigilant in monitoring the article in recent years, and I plan to add it to my Watchlist as well for extra coverage if the article is kept.

All the best. TheTechnician27 (talk) 07:30, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

• Hi, no problem I'll help look for sources and protection orders tomorrow, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 15:23, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
  • I legitimately don't think there are any protections for historical importance placed on the theatre. I can't stop you if you want to take a look, but it would seem bizarre that the theatre isn't even mentioned by e.g. the South African Historical Society, that the achievement isn't documented on their website, and that I can't find anything about such a protection elsewhere. TheTechnician27 (talk) 19:05, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
  • Update: I can't find anything that pushes it over that threshold of "significant coverage by reliable, third-party sources". It would work best as a section, perhaps, in another article, but I simply can't find justification to give it its own separate article. TheTechnician27 (talk) 19:55, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

• • Update 2: The IOL source about controversy pushed me from Delete to Weak keep, and I've retracted my nomination accordingly. I've added a construction tag to Labia Theatre while work is ongoing. I'll be keeping my word about improving the article – it goes without saying that your help is welcome and appreciated – and hopefully making it the best it can be with the sources we have to work with. TheTechnician27 (talk) 06:00, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar

Hey, you deserve this for going out of your way to dig up those articles – specifically that last one from IOL – and for so quickly catching and reverting the COI editing on the Labia Theatre article last week. It's a shame that the article is in such disrepair, but that's about to change. I hope this Barnstar finds you in good spirits. Best regards. TheTechnician27 (talk) 06:16, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

• Thanks, glad to help. I've closed the AFD as you've withdrawn the nomination. I'll try to help from tomorrow, there are quite a few book sources shown on google books but I can't access them on my ipad, some of the book sources seem to be connected to apartheid. Thanks again, Atlantic306 (talk) 11:27, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of Canadian supercentenarians

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of Canadian supercentenarians. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of Spanish supercentenarians

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of Spanish supercentenarians. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of German supercentenarians

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of German supercentenarians. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anime and manga

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anime and manga. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

You are welcome.

Fylindfotberserk (talk) 08:46, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Sabine Weyand

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Sabine Weyand. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Marriage

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Marriage. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Kodomo no Jikan

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Kodomo no Jikan. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

Uptowncharlybrown

Hi - it appears you removed the notability template from Uptowncharlybrown. I've reviewed the criteria at Wikipedia:Notability (sports)#Horse racing before adding it, and again now. I'm not seeing notability per that guidance (e.g. Pasco Stakes is not a Grade I race). Can you clarify notability for this horse per the listed criteria? Thanks. Dmoore5556 (talk) 08:18, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

• It can pass WP:GNG independently of the horse racing criteria due to the newspaper coverage, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 13:15, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
  • hmm... there are very limited references on the page, nothing substantial outside of usual coverage for the field in the Belmont. I'll look around a bit more; may raise at WP:AFD. Thanks. Dmoore5556 (talk) 15:20, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Warwick Castle

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Warwick Castle. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Call You Mine

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Call You Mine. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of most visited museums

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of most visited museums. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:RT (TV network)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:RT (TV network). Legobot (talk) 04:29, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:The Singing Nun

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:The Singing Nun. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:William Happer

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:William Happer. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:5G

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:5G. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ronald Reagan

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ronald Reagan. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Brora, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clyne (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:26, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Bill Shorten

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bill Shorten. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Sukavich Rangsitpol

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Sukavich Rangsitpol. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

Lowercases?

Should I ced all the lower case TV titles in the List of programs broadcast by Global page? For example, "2 guys and a girl" would be "Two Guys and a Girl". --2600:1005:B013:AA92:55AC:4F96:503F:259F (talk) 23:12, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

The series should be listed as their official name, so if the official name is lower case that would be fine, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 23:17, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Charles Desmarais

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Charles Desmarais. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

Sagar S

Just wondering about your recent revert of my clean-up of the Sagar S article? Please see my edit-summary and note on the article talkpage for an explanation of my edit, and let me know (at the article talkpage) if you believe any particular content I removed needs to be retained. Abecedare (talk) 20:31, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

Naval Space Command

Just want to give you a head up that I intend to clean up Naval Space Command. My intent is to clean up the readability and remove most of the buzz words. It reads like a military fact sheet right now, and I think it can be much better. Since you’ve taken an interest in the article, I’d appreciate whatever help you can give. Garuda28 (talk) 20:48, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

• • Hi, I would like to see the details of its former role and functions retained as it was a major command and is therefore of historic interest but if it can be simplified that would be great, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 21:09, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

I tried to consolidate it into the history section, but I think I was able to do an effective job at keeping the content of the mission while removing some of the more military specific (while incredibly ambiguous) lingo. Plus, the information is finally sourced through inline text citations. What do you think? Any particular things from before that we need to still add?Garuda28 (talk) 21:30, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

That's easier to understand and well referenced, but could we include where the bases were perhaps ? thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 23:09, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

The remote sensing stations? That should be an easy add. Garuda28 (talk) 23:43, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Recusancy

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Recusancy. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of people with non-binary gender identities

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of people with non-binary gender identities. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Sharyl Attkisson

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Sharyl Attkisson. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Theodore Edgar McCarrick

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Theodore Edgar McCarrick. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of the verified oldest people

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of the verified oldest people. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Television licensing in the United Kingdom

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Television licensing in the United Kingdom. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

New Page Review newsletter July-August 2019

Hello Atlantic306,

WMF at work on NPP Improvements

More new features are being added to the feed, including the important red alert for previously deleted pages. This will only work if it is selected in your filters. Best is to 'select all'. Do take a moment to check out all the new features if you have not already done so. If anything is not working as it should, please let us know at NPR. There is now also a live queue of AfC submissions in the New Pages Feed. Feel free to review AfCs, but bear in mind that NPP is an official process and policy and is more important.

QUALITY of REVIEWING

Articles are still not always being checked thoroughly enough. If you are not sure what to do, leave the article for a more experienced reviewer. Please be on the alert for any incongruities in patrolling and help your colleagues where possible; report patrollers and autopatrolled article creators who are ostensibly undeclared paid editors. The displayed ORES alerts offer a greater 'at-a-glance' overview, but the new challenges in detecting unwanted new content and sub-standard reviewing do not necessarily make patrolling any easier, nevertheless the work may have a renewed interest factor of a different kind. A vibrant community of reviewers is always ready to help at NPR.

Backlog

The backlog is still far too high at between 7,000 and 8,000. Of around 700 user rights holders, 80% of the reviewing is being done by just TWO users. In the light of more and more subtle advertising and undeclared paid editing, New Page Reviewing is becoming more critical than ever.

Move to draft

NPR is triage, it is not a clean up clinic. This move feature is not limited to bios so you may have to slightly re-edit the text in the template before you save the move. Anything that is not fit for mainspace but which might have some promise can be draftified - particularly very poor English and machine and other low quality translations.

Notifying users

Remember to use the message feature if you are just tagging an article for maintenance rather than deletion. Otherwise articles are likely to remain perma-tagged. Many creators are SPA and have no intention of returning to Wikipedia. Use the feature too for leaving a friendly note note for the author of a first article you found well made or interesting. Many have told us they find such comments particularly welcoming and encouraging.

PERM

Admins are now taking advantage of the new time-limited user rights feature. If you have recently been accorded NPR, do check your user rights to see if this affects you. Depending on your user account preferences, you may receive automated notifications of your rights changes. Requests for permissions are not mini-RfAs. Helpful comments are welcome if absolutely necessary, but the bot does a lot of the work and the final decision is reserved for admins who do thorough research anyway.

Other news

School and academic holidays will begin soon in various places around the Western world. Be on the lookout for the usual increase in hoax, attack, and other junk pages.

Our next newsletter might be announcing details of a possible election for co-ordinators of NPR. If you think you have what it takes to micro manage NPR, take a look at New Page Review Coordinators - it's a job that requires a lot of time and dedication.

---

Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:38, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

The June 2019 Signpost is out!

• Discussion report: A constitutional crisis hits English Wikipedia

• News and notes: Mysterious ban, admin resignations, Wikimedia Thailand rising

• In the media: The disinformation age

• On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?

• Traffic report: Juneteenth, Beauty Revealed, and more nuclear disasters

• Technology report: Actors and Bots

• Gallery: Unlike the North Face, Wiki Loves Earth

• Special report: Did Fram harass other editors?

• Recent research: What do editors do after being blocked?; the top mathematicians, universities and cancers according to Wikipedia

• From the archives: Women and Wikipedia: the world is watching

• Opinion: Why the Terms of Use change didn't curtail undisclosed paid editing—and what might

• In focus: WikiJournals: A sister project proposal

• Community view: A CEO biography, paid for with taxes

• Op-Ed: 2019 Wikimedia Affiliate Selected Board Seats Election Results

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:52, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:The Guardian

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:The Guardian. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:African Americans

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:African Americans. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Jimmy Dore

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jimmy Dore. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:T. Rex (band)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:T. Rex (band). Legobot (talk) 04:25, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ivanka Trump

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ivanka Trump. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Antisemitism in the UK Labour Party

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Antisemitism in the UK Labour Party. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Please revise

Is Margaret Borland still incomplete? Thank you. Tobias Epos (talk) 16:38, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ben Shapiro

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ben Shapiro. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Adam Brooks (wrestler)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Adam Brooks (wrestler). Legobot (talk) 04:23, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Hessy Levinsons Taft

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Hessy Levinsons Taft. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Christchurch mosque shootings

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Christchurch mosque shootings. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Christchurch mosque shootings

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Christchurch mosque shootings. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Christchurch mosque shootings

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Christchurch mosque shootings. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of Italian supercentenarians

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of Italian supercentenarians. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 14 July 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Once Upon a Time in Hollywood

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Once Upon a Time in Hollywood. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Raul Calvoz

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Raul Calvoz. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Theodore Edgar McCarrick

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Theodore Edgar McCarrick. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Elon Musk

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Elon Musk. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Donald Trump

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Donald Trump. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Michael Jackson

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Michael Jackson. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:George Grant (author)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:George Grant (author). Legobot (talk) 04:24, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of last words

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of last words. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

Negging

Maybe you missed that there were two edits?

There's a broad consensus that negging is a coercive and manipulative behaviour (obviously, that's the intent) so I added a couple of sources making that point. I also removed some text that was sourced to "Negging Women - 10 Awesome Negs That Work", for reasons that are, I think, obvious, and I changed [[Seduction community|pickup artist community]] to [[pickup artist]]s because seduction community is a redirect to pickup artist.

I explained this on talk now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.1.159.160 (talk) 07:39, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

• The edit summary where you said you had added 23 references was the one I meant was false Atlantic306 (talk) 13:09, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Mariah Carey

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Mariah Carey. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Wikipedia

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Wikipedia. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Visual arts

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Visual arts. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

H. G. Wells' The War of the Worlds (Pendragon Pictures film)

Not sure if you noticed but there was an ongoing move discussion on the talk page. Were you planning on closing that discussion per WP:SNOW? PC78 (talk) 15:49, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

Page move

Please revert your page move of the article, H. G. Wells' The War of the Worlds (Pendragon Pictures film). There is an ongoing requested move discussion on its talk page, and at this present moment, consensus is for a different title. Thank you for helping with this! Paine Ellsworth, ed. ^put'r there  15:51, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

I've gone ahead and made the page move to allow discussion to continue at Talk:H. G. Wells' The War of the Worlds (Hines film)#Requested move 24 July 2019. You are welcome to participate and give your opinion! Paine Ellsworth, ed. ^put'r there  16:52, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

• Sorry about that, there was a csd nomination of the redirect that said the title had been resolved in the discussion of the Asylum version and linked to that so I missed the talk page discussion linked here, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 18:40, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

• No problemo. I saw in the page history that the earlier PROD had been changed to a CSD, so it was definitely an honest mistake. We've all made them, and I've even made a few stupid mistakes along the way, believe it or not. Best to you! Paine Ellsworth, ed. ^put'r there  02:20, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Greta Thunberg

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Greta Thunberg. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Robert Christgau

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Robert Christgau. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Israel Shamir

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Israel Shamir. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Andy Ngo

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Andy Ngo. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Music

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Music. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:One Piece

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:One Piece. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 July 2019

• News and notes: Wikimedia grants less accessible for travel, equipment, meetups, and India

• In the media: Politics starts getting rough

• Discussion report: New proposals in aftermath of Fram ban

• Arbitration report: A month of reintegration

• Gallery: Classic panoramas from Heinrich Berann

• On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?

• Community view: Video based summaries of Wikipedia articles. How and why?

• News from the WMF: Designing ethically with AI: How Wikimedia can harness machine learning in a responsible and human-centered way

• Recent research: Most influential medical journals; detecting pages to protect

• Special report: Administrator cadre continues to contract

• Traffic report: World cups, presidential candidates, and stranger things

• In focus: The French Wikipedia is overtaking the German

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:17, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

Anilcsrao1 (talk) 22:38, 31 July 2019 (UTC)== Wikipedia: Anil CS Rao ==

Hello

All I did was to add minor changes on my Living Bio Wiki - if you wish I can find a 3rd Party (neutral) person to do the changes for me. BTW - the changes I made have not been reverted:

My mother and late father are Board Certified Medical Doctors (MDs). If my knowledge and the fact these are my parents is not sufficient proof - let me know how to verify this fact.

Here is an article about my late father which also mentions my mother and late younger brother: http://www.ajnr.org/content/ajnr/25/8/1451.full.pdf

I removed/updated my titles to reflect those I removed from my prior publisher Cyberwit.Net (I no longer have any relationship with ANY publisher - every one of my titles is 'self-published' and listed on Amazon & Flipkart through pothi.com )

You can verify on Amazon the list that remains and those titles that were removed by me.Anilcsrao1 (talk) 22:34, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

• Hi, the changes you made are fine, the template was just a caution issued to all editors connected to the subject of an article in case they rewrite the whole article and don't give references. As per WP:COI it's best practice for connected editors to make suggestions for edits to the article on the article talk page and if they are accepted by a neutral editor they will be added to the article for you, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 22:43, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:MLA film poster 2018.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MLA film poster 2018.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:34, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Serge F. Kovaleski

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Serge F. Kovaleski. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Satoshi Nakamoto

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Satoshi Nakamoto. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Scott Storch

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Scott Storch. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Lil Nas X

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Lil Nas X. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Donald Trump

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Donald Trump. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

Help request

How should I exit an article that the citation link is dead? Benjamin.blouin (talk) 10:20, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

You can add the {{dead link}} template to indicate that the link is dead, and better yet, you can try to recover the link through a web archive such as the Wayback Machine (see Help:Using the Wayback Machine) - citation templates such as {{cite web}} come with archiveurl= and archivedate= parameters that can be used to point to the archived copy of a website that's no longer live. Huon (talk) 12:10, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Penny Rowson

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Penny Rowson. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Rachel Campos-Duffy

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Rachel Campos-Duffy. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Donald Wuerl

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Donald Wuerl. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Meghan Murphy

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Meghan Murphy. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

Blpprod

Hey I removed the PROD here because he's apparently dead. It definitely needs sources and I'd be surprised if it wasn't a copyvio but I can't find it right now. Took me a second to see that he was dead also, so just wanted to let you know. Praxidicae (talk) 14:56, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

• • Thanks, I agree with the redirect Atlantic306 (talk) 15:21, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Greta Thunberg

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Greta Thunberg. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

We should never delete an article no matter what

Let me ask you a serious question. Have you ever voted to delete an article? If so, why? If not, why not? Do you believe you are defending a moral or religious principle by trying to prevent articles (any article) from being deleted? Do you believe that desire is consistent with the rules of Wikipedia? Do you believe it is consistent with what writers and editors (among others) do in the real world? Give it some thought. Thanks.
Vmavanti (talk) 06:14, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

• • I've actually nominated 20 AFDs myself,, and of my last 500 AFD votes here 124 have been for delete, 250 keep,18 redirect,merge 25. Also see my speedy deletion log here.Atlantic306 (talk) 16:20, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Categorization

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Categorization. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Panic! at the Disco

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Panic! at the Disco. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Dominique Sandy prod

Hi there, I understand you delisted Dominique Sandy for proposed deletion. That's fine. Just wanted you to know that there is no special notability guideline for lacrosse and even players at the top level need to meet the GNG. I didn't find any significant coverage of Sandy in reliable sources, so I proded. I'll be listing at AfD soon. Thanks. - Mnnlaxer | talk | stalk 00:35, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

AfD: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dominique Sandy - Mnnlaxer | talk | stalk 17:35, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

• Thanks for letting me know, I don't know much about lacrosse except for its Native American origins, so I'll leave it to others to comment at the AFD, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 18:12, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Tennis

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Tennis. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:2019 Hong Kong anti-extradition bill protests

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2019 Hong Kong anti-extradition bill protests. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Mike Cernovich

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Mike Cernovich. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Donald Wuerl

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Donald Wuerl. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

Help please

What does "inform author" mean?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Jefferrson_Rodrigues Wassis82 (talk) 04:49, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Emerson, Lake & Palmer

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Emerson, Lake & Palmer. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Stanley Kubrick

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Stanley Kubrick. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:James Martin (priest, born 1960)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:James Martin (priest, born 1960). Legobot (talk) 04:24, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Talk:Suicide methods

In response to this, I just wanted to remind you Wikipedia is not censored. Your concern, while likely justifiable, probably hurt the arguement for the hatnote more than helps. Idk, that's just my 2 cents. (If you respond, please ping me). –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 21:11, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

• Hopefully not, was considering AFD but it's been there 18 times, a policy reason would be WP:NOTHOWTO, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 22:52, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Year of the Villain

Hello. I need help with this article. I need people who know more about DC than me. I hope you have luck. F. E. Puricelli (talk) 21:28, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

• • Hi, the talk page of WP:WikiProject Comics is probably the best place for help, I only know a small amount, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 22:55, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Kevin Feige

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Kevin Feige. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Request for your assistance in keeping an important article alive

Greetings,

I noticed that you voted "KEEP" on a recent music-related deletion dispute. I would greatly appreciate it if you could consider voting KEEP in the following case: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/ADSR_Online_Midi_Editor_and_Player

After several people voted "DELETE", I discovered that Classical_Archives (the largest classical music site in the world), has endorsed the product that this article describes, for the past two years. The following website contains the statement "MidiPro.org is the ONLY Online Midi Editor": https://www.classicalarchives.com/midi.html

It would be a huge loss to the music community if this article was deleted, since it describes the only Online Midi Editor and Player in existence.

Thank you very much for your consideration. MySonLikesTrump (talk) 00:53, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

• Unfortunately WP:Canvassing applies here, you could ask for input at the talk page of WP:WikiProject Albums but don't suggest which way they should vote, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 13:20, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Jennell Jaquays

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jennell Jaquays. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Diane Therrien

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Diane Therrien. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Be Natural, The Untold Story of Alice Guy-Blaché poster.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Be Natural, The Untold Story of Alice Guy-Blaché poster.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:25, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

Core-and-pod deletion

Hi Jimmy, I had marked the page core-and-pod for deletion, and when you deprodded it, you mentioned that AFD is available. I'm not very familiar with this process, would you mind telling me how it works, or what my options are for getting the page deleted? Thanks! werewolf (talk) 03:01, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Normani

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Normani. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

Elliot James

Hi, I don't agree with James' notability... the Alternative Press source is literally one quote, a primary source, taken from an interview given to a blog, and the Billboard source is again one promotional quote for a single and an album... none of these records have charted anywhere. I think I'm going to take this to AfD because I still can't see any real evidence of individual notability during the last decade. Richard3120 (talk) 16:40, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

• • have just searched for reviews of his solo album Always Lately and couldn't find any rs coverage. Perhaps a selective merge to the band page? regards Atlantic306 (talk) 20:11, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

Yes, I've had that album on my watchlist for some time... I was waiting to see if it received any more coverage after its release, but there's been nothing, and it hasn't charted anywhere. There seems to be a single-purpose account trying to promote James and all his releases, but I can't find anything that makes him notable outside the band. I agree with you, the two sources you mention are brief enough to merge with a couple of references to Hey Monday... I'll try and do that next week. Richard3120 (talk) 21:40, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Boris Johnson

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Boris Johnson. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:2019 in film

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2019 in film. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 25 August 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Zendaya

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Zendaya. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

Elyna Rafan and iflix spam

I'm sorry I think I ingested too much vandalism tonight, got dysspamia, need to run for the room of porcelain, and can't deal with a repeater - Elyna Rafan (talk · contribs). You dinged them on spam links and that's what it looks like to me (all of them today that is). Sorry (urp) Shenme (talk) 03:47, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Korn

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Korn. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of Marvel Cinematic Universe films

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of Marvel Cinematic Universe films. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Desmond Napoles

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Desmond Napoles. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:The Real Housewives of New York City

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:The Real Housewives of New York City. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 August 2019

• News and notes: Documenting Wikimania and our beginnings

• In focus: Ryan Merkley joins WMF as Chief of Staff

• In the media: Many layers of fake news: Fake fiction and fake news vandalism

• Discussion report: Meta proposals on partial bans and IP users

• Traffic report: Once upon a time in Greenland with Boris and cornflakes

• Op-Ed: We couldn't have told you this, but Wikipedia was censored

• Opinion: The Curious Case of Croatian Wikipedia

• Community view: Chinese Wikipedia and the battle against extradition from Hong Kong

• News from the WMF: Meet Emna Mizouni, the newly minted 2019 Wikimedian of the Year

• Recent research: Special issue on gender gap and gender bias research

• On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:41, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of music considered the worst

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of music considered the worst. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Kennedy Stewart (Canadian politician)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Kennedy Stewart (Canadian politician). Legobot (talk) 04:24, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Stoya

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Stoya. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Milo Yiannopoulos

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Milo Yiannopoulos. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Paul Stamets

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Paul Stamets. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Red (Taylor Swift album)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Red (Taylor Swift album). Legobot (talk) 04:25, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Noah Kraft

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Noah Kraft. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Donald Trump

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Donald Trump. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Noah Kraft

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Noah Kraft. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:IHeartRadio Canada

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:IHeartRadio Canada. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!

Thanks for performing administrative functions on Wikipedia. I had a new article which needed placement into a location with multiple edits for redirects. It takes an administrator to execute these kinds of moves, and you did it for me in this case. Thanks for being an admin, and doing this admin task in the queue, and for doing it so soon after I requested it. Blue Rasberry (talk) 16:39, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

Glad to help but I'm not an admin, the WP:Page mover right is available to non-admins, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 13:37, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Marvin Minsky

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Marvin Minsky. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Milo Yiannopoulos

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Milo Yiannopoulos. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

New Page Review newsletter September-October 2019

Hello Atlantic306,

Backlog

Instead of reaching a magic 300 as it once did last year, the backlog approaching 6,000 is still far too high. An effort is also needed to ensure that older unsuitable older pages at the back of the queue do not get automatically indexed for Google.

Coordinator

A proposal is taking place here to confirm a nominated user as Coordinator of NPR.

This month's refresher course

Why I Hate Speedy Deleters, a 2008 essay by long since retired Ballonman, is still as valid today. Those of us who patrol large numbers of new pages can be forgiven for making the occasional mistake while others can learn from their 'beginner' errors. Worth reading.

Deletion tags

Do bear in mind that articles in the feed showing the trash can icon (you will need to have 'Nominated for deletion' enabled for this in your filters) may have been tagged by inexperienced or non NPR rights holders using Twinkle. They require your further verification.

Paid editing

Please be sure to look for the tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary. WMF policy requires paid editors to connect to their adverts.

Subject-specific notability guidelines' (SNG). Alternatives to deletion

• Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves once more with notability guidelines for organisations and companies.
• Blank-and-Redirect is a solution anchored in policy. Please consider this alternative before PRODing or CSD. Note however, that users will often revert or usurp redirects to re-create deleted articles. Do regularly patrol the redirects in the feed.

Not English

• A common issue: Pages not in English or poor, unattributed machine translations should not reside in main space even if they are stubs. Please ensure you are familiar with WP:NPPNE. Check in Google for the language and content, and if they do have potential, tag as required, then move to draft. Modify the text of the template as appropriate before sending it.

Tools

Regular reviewers will appreciate the most recent enhancements to the New Pages Feed and features in the Curation tool, and there are still more to come. Due to the wealth of information now displayed by ORES, reviewers are strongly encouraged to use the system now rather than Twinkle; it will also correctly populate the logs.

Stub sorting, by SD0001: A new script is available for adding/removing stub tags. See User:SD0001/StubSorter.js, It features a simple HotCat-style dynamic search field. Many of the reviewers who are using it are finding it an improvement upon other available tools.

Assessment: The script at User:Evad37/rater makes the addition of Wikiproject templates extremely easy. New page creators rarely do this. Reviewers are not obliged to make these edits but they only take a few seconds. They can use the Curation message system to let the creator know what they have done.

DannyS712 bot III is now patrolling certain categories of uncontroversial redirects. Curious? Check out its patrol log.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Andy Ngo

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Andy Ngo. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Kate Dover

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Kate Dover. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Conspiracy theories about Adolf Hitler's death

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Conspiracy theories about Adolf Hitler's death. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Biography/Core biographies

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Biography/Core biographies. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

Andra and the Backbone

Hello, Atlantic306,

I think you should rethink moving articles in the mainspace into Draft space after they have been in the main space for 12 years. "Draftifying" is usually done for new articles, not for articles that have been around for more than a decade. The article creator has long left Wikipedia and the chance that any random editor will work on this draft are highly unlikely. I can almost state with 100% certainty that unless YOU choose to improve this article, no one else will be touching it and it will be deleted in 6 months as a stale draft.

Please do not move articles that have existed for years into draft space unless you know the article creator will be available to improve on them. Otherwise propose them for deletion through AFD or Proposed Deletion. Moving old article to draft space is not saving them, it is just a slightly slower road to deletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:48, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

100,000th edit!

	100,000th edit award
	Hello Atlantic306 let me be the first to congratulate you on your 100,000th edit! You are now entitled to place the 100,000 Edit Star on your bling page! or you could choose to display the {{User 100,000 edits}} user box. Or both! Thanks for all your work at the 'pedia! Cheers, — MarnetteD|Talk 04:22, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

• Thanks its nice to reach the milestone even if most of my edits are very boring minor ones, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 18:42, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
  • You are welcome. No matter how boring or minor they are still of value to the 'pedia. Thanks again for your edits and here is to the next 100K! MarnetteD|Talk 04:13, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Tasha Scott for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tasha Scott is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tasha Scott until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Erpert ^{blah, blah, blah...} 04:19, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Sameh Sami

Thank you for not deletion this page Sameh Sami. I will try to improve it. I will put extra references directly about him, regards Ahmed aldola (talk) 22:06, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Film

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Film. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Propaganda

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Propaganda. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of most-liked YouTube videos

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of most-liked YouTube videos. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Super Audio CD

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Super Audio CD. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Idles (band)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Idles (band). Legobot (talk) 04:26, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Midland–Odessa shooting

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Midland–Odessa shooting. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Veridia

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Veridia. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Sturmabteilung

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Sturmabteilung. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Adam Leitman Bailey

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Adam Leitman Bailey. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Siouxsie Sioux

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Siouxsie Sioux. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:African Americans

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:African Americans. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of largest hospitals

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of largest hospitals. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Fitindia. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, S5-class submarine, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

FitIndia ^{Talk Mail} 15:26, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

AfroCine: Join the Months of African Cinema this October!

Greetings!

After a successful first iteration of the “Months of African Cinema” last year, we are happy to announce that it will be happening again this year, starting from October 1! In the 2018 edition of the contest, about 600 Wikipedia articles were created in at least 8 languages. There were also contributions to Wikidata and Wikimedia commons, which brought the total number of wikimedia pages created during the contest to over 1,000.

The AfroCine Project welcomes you to October, the first out of the two months which have been dedicated to creating and improving content that centre around the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora. Join us in this global edit-a-thon, by helping to create or expand articles which are connected to this scope. Also remember to list your name under the participants section.

On English Wikipedia, we would be recognizing participants in the following manner:

• Overall winner (1st, 2nd, 3rd places)
• Diversity winner
• Gender-gap fillers

For further information about the contest, the recognition categories and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. See you around :).--Jamie Tubers (talk) 00:50, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Cultural impact of the Beatles

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Cultural impact of the Beatles. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 September 2019

• From the editors: Where do we go from here?

• Special report: Post-Framgate wrapup

• In the media: A net loss: Wikipedia attacked, closing off Russia? welcoming back Turkey?

• Traffic report: Varied and intriguing entries, less Luck, and some retreads

• News from the WMF: How the Wikimedia Foundation is making efforts to go green

• Recent research: Wikipedia's role in assessing credibility of news sources; using wikis against procrastination; OpenSym 2019 report

• Gallery: Finding freely licensed photo collections

• On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?

• In focus: Wikidata & Wikibase for national libraries: the inaugural meeting

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:06, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Robert Walker (actor, born 1918)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Robert Walker (actor, born 1918). Legobot (talk) 04:23, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Infobox film

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Infobox film. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

Ajuda

Boa tarde, como faço para concluir a mesma ? me ajude. Por favor

https://pt.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:JEFFERSON_RODRIGUES Wassis82 (talk) 23:13, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Red (Taylor Swift album)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Red (Taylor Swift album). Legobot (talk) 04:25, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of largest hospitals

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of largest hospitals. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

Invite Only Cabo

For the notice, the article is now deleted by an admin. You can report me for edit-warring, but we haven't crossed the WP:3RR line. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 19:32, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Transgender

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Transgender. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

Tagging of Draft:Chle Sihle

I recently removed a speedy delete tag that you had placed on Draft:Chle Sihle. I do not think that Draft:Chle Sihle fits any of the speedy deletion criteria  because This is simply not Patent Nonsense. I request that you consider not re-tagging Draft:Chle Sihle for speedy deletion without discussing the matter on the appropriate talk page. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 20:55, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

A request

Can you review this article?— Vaibhavafro ^💬 05:35, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

• • Hi, it's been reviewed and passed by another reviewer, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 18:43, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

Lina Condes

Please except our Editing. The artist going through paper work in USA. We need to remove USA from bio. She has Ukrainian passport. Can cause a problem in immigration. Stingerman91 (talk) 21:30, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

• ok ill leave it but please see WP:COI, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 21:45, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Adam Leitman Bailey

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Adam Leitman Bailey. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Bell Media Radio

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bell Media Radio. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Catholic Church and homosexuality

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Catholic Church and homosexuality. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Gold digger

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Gold digger. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

Tagging of Draft:Birdnest

I recently removed a speedy delete tag that you had placed on Draft:Birdnest. I do not think that Draft:Birdnest fits any of the speedy deletion criteria  because "BLP of a privatre person" is not a valid deletion reason, and this is not unsourced.. I request that you consider not re-tagging Draft:Birdnest for speedy deletion without discussing the matter on the appropriate talk page. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 01:57, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

• The sources are youtube and a forum, at MFD Atlantic306 (talk) 15:54, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

Live and Let Die (film) and Diamonds Are Forever (film) alterations

After viewing documentary and other televised programs about these films, These documentaries clearly state that the films Diamonds Are Forever released in 1971 and Live and Let Die released in 1973 are co-productions between the United Kingdom and the United States. In the opening credits of Live and Let Die, the U.S.A crew is credited, if the film was not a co-production, it would not have used a U.S crew. Live and Let Die titles: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sn8alMYSu44

In Diamonds Are Forever, scenes were shot at Universal Studios which is based in the United States, which also means that Diamonds Are Forever is also a co production. This can be found on IMDB: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0066995/locations?ref_=tt_dt_dt

• You need a better source, it's not listed at the American Film Institute which lists all US films, and just because it uses a foreign crew doesn't make it a co-production as it's where its registered for tax purposes that determines it and IMDb is an unreliable source. Also note that similar edits have been reverted in the past so you will end up getting a block for edit warring Atlantic306 (talk) 22:34, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
  • For example Star Wars is an American film but it had 14 weeks of shooting in England at Elstree Studios with a British crew bit it is not termed a co-production, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 22:38, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Seth Rollins

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Seth Rollins. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Lana Del Rey

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Lana Del Rey. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Emilia Clarke

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Emilia Clarke. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of LGBT YouTubers

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of LGBT YouTubers. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Irvin Rockman

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Irvin Rockman. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Jeffrey Epstein

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jeffrey Epstein. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:21 Savage

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:21 Savage. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Tulsi Gabbard

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Tulsi Gabbard. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

New Page Review request

Please review this article created by me. (I am asking since I am in a bit hurry about a wikibreak; I wouldn’t have asked normally). Regards, — Vaibhavafro ^💬 10:00, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:How It's Done

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:How It's Done. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

Please send me deleted article

Hello hope you are doing well. RE: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:MBisanz#John_Mark_Dougan the deleting admin has not been on wikipedia since september. 11 days later and he has not responded. Moscowdreams (talk) 21:54, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

thank you very much !!!! Moscowdreams (talk) 22:21, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

• It seems to me that Moscowdreams already has a copy of the deleted article on his user page. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 23:02, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

oh thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 23:12, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Tim Pool

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Tim Pool. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

Starling City (Arrow episode)

Is the round-robin move done? Can I move Draft:Starling City to this now vacant title? --Kailash29792 (talk) 03:21, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of nicknames of presidents of the United States

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of nicknames of presidents of the United States. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Tim Pool

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Tim Pool. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 25 October 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ariana Grande discography

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ariana Grande discography. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Aaron Hernandez

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Aaron Hernandez. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Erica C. Barnett

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Erica C. Barnett. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Welcome To Hong Kong

Is the proper move from draftspace to mainspace done? Can I move the title back to "Welcome to Hong Kong" which is the correct capitalisation as per this? I'd also like the history of the redirect merged; it is currently at Draft:Move Welcome to Hong Kong. --Kailash29792 (talk) 03:28, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Erica C. Barnett

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Erica C. Barnett. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 October 2019

• In the media: How to use or abuse Wikipedia for fun or profit

• Special report: “Catch and Kill” on Wikipedia: Paid editing and the suppression of material on alleged sexual abuse

• In focus: The BBC looks at Chinese government editing

• Interview: Carl Miller on Wikipedia Wars

• Community view: Observations from the mainland

• Arbitration report: October actions

• Traffic report: Wrestling with a couple of teenagers, a Nobelist, and a lot of jokers

• Gallery: Wiki Loves Broadcast

• Recent research: Research at Wikimania 2019: More communication doesn't make editors more productive; Tor users doing good work; harmful content rare on English Wikipedia

• Essay: Wikipedia is in the real world

• News from the WMF: Welcome to Wikipedia! Here's what we're doing to help you stick around

• On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:11, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Russia national football team

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Russia national football team. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (miscellaneous)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (miscellaneous). Legobot (talk) 04:26, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thom Bresh

Saw your vote here. I added multiple reliable sources to the article to make it quite clear that he handily passes WP:NMUSIC. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:41, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Deadpool 2

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Deadpool 2. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

New Page Review newsletter November 2019

Hello Atlantic306,

This newsletter comes a little earlier than usual because the backlog is rising again and the holidays are coming very soon.

Getting the queue to 0

There are now 804 holders of the New Page Reviewer flag! Most of you requested the user right to be able to do something about the huge backlog but it's still roughly less than 10% doing 90% of the work. Now it's time for action.
Exactly one year ago there were 'only' 3,650 unreviewed articles, now we will soon be approaching 7,000 despite the growing number of requests for the NPR user right. If each reviewer soon does only 2 reviews a day over five days, the backlog will be down to zero and the daily input can then be processed by every reviewer doing only 1 review every 2 days - that's only a few minutes work on the bus on the way to the office or to class! Let's get this over and done with in time to relax for the holidays.
Want to join? Consider adding the NPP Pledge userbox.
Our next newsletter will announce the winners of some really cool awards.

Coordinator

Admin Barkeep49 has been officially invested as NPP/NPR coordinator by a unanimous consensus of the community. This is a complex role and he will need all the help he can get from other experienced reviewers.

This month's refresher course

Paid editing is still causing headaches for even our most experienced reviewers: This official Wikipedia article will be an eye-opener to anyone who joined Wikipedia or obtained the NPR right since 2015. See The Hallmarks to know exactly what to look for and take time to examine all the sources.

Tools

• It is now possible to select new pages by date range. This was requested by reviewers who want to patrol from the middle of the list.
• It is now also possible for accredited reviewers to put any article back into the New Pages Feed for re-review. The link is under 'Tools' in the side bar.

Reviewer Feedback

Would you like feedback on your reviews? Are you an experienced reviewer who can give feedback to other reviewers? If so there are two new feedback pilot programs. New Reviewer mentorship will match newer reviewers with an experienced reviewer with a new reviewer. The other program will be an occasional peer review cohort for moderate or experienced reviewers to give feedback to each other. The first cohort will launch November 13.

Second set of eyes

• Not only are New Page Reviewers the guardians of quality of new articles, they are also in a position to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged for deletion and maintenance and that new authors are not being bitten. This is an important feature of your work, especially while some routine tagging for deletion can still be carried out by non NPR holders and inexperienced users. Read about it at the Monitoring the system section in the tutorial. If you come across such editors doing good work, don't hesitate to encourage them to apply for NPR.
• Do be sure to have our talk page on your watchlist. There are often items that require reviewers' special attention, such as to watch out for pages by known socks or disruptive editors, technical issues and new developments, and of course to provide advice for other reviewers.

Arbitration Committee

The annual ArbCom election will be coming up soon. All eligible users will be invited to vote. While not directly concerned with NPR, Arbcom cases often lead back to notability and deletion issues and/or actions by holders of advanced user rights.

Community Wish list

There is to be no wish list for WMF encyclopedias this year. We thank Community Tech for their hard work addressing our long list of requirements which somewhat overwhelmed them last year, and we look forward to a successful completion.

---

To opt-out of future mailings, you can remove yourself here

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:33, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Sierra McCormick

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Sierra McCormick. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Mohan Bhagwat

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Mohan Bhagwat. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm GeoffreyT2000. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Drishyam/GA1, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 18:57, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Zoo (Russ album)

I've made some edits to the Zoo draft page. Do you think it's good to go? Aitch & Aitch Aitch (talk) 19:40, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

• Hi, it needs a reception section with details of reviews in reliable sources, each review referenced, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 19:42, 5 November 2019 (UTC) Also, it needs a chart positions table, that can be copied over from the main Russ article Atlantic306 (talk) 19:43, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Tucker Carlson Tonight

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Tucker Carlson Tonight. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for your comments on my Rise of the Synths article. A question please.

Thanks for your comment. Much appreciated. I wasn't sure if/how to respond so apologies if posting this in the wrong place. You suggested the article required a reception section with more sources. The film has yet been released so there are not any reviews available. The soundtrack was released and is mentioned on numerous other wikipedia pages of artists who appeared - but I can't link them to this article until it gets approved. I would anticipate adding a reception section once the film is released following International Premiere next week. Appreciate your guidance. Many thanks

//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:The_Rise_of_the_Synths

DAPJ (talk) 19:49, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

• • Unless you can find some more reliable sources coverage of the film's production, it may have to wait for the reviews. However, another AFC reviewer may have a different view, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 20:07, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Biography

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Biography. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

Non-Notability of Vikas_Shrivastav

You have reverted a recent edit of a page where I marked as non-notable. Kindly cross check the sources provided. The sources describes a theft incident that happened and the person whom the article is about is mentioned as a suspect. The notability source should verify that the person is notable and a dedicated Wiki article is worth having whereas the sources clearly doesn't verify the subject's authenticity or notability.

Rohithvsn (talk) 20:04, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

I joined Wikipedia long back, initially the markup, the policies everything was greek to me. A couple of months back I wanted to start contributing like every other Wikipedians so started reading the policies, learned the markups ( still learning), templates and proudly started to contribute since yesterday.

Rohithvsn (talk) 20:32, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

Sure, thanks for that info. I will be careful.

Rohithvsn (talk) 20:37, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Tom Hiddleston

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Tom Hiddleston. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Julian Assange

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Julian Assange. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Strictly Come Dancing (series 17)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Strictly Come Dancing (series 17). Legobot (talk) 04:26, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

A survey to improve the community consultation outreach process

Hello!

The Wikimedia Foundation is seeking to improve the community consultation outreach process for Foundation policies, and we are interested in why you didn't participate in a recent consultation that followed a community discussion you’ve been part of.

Please fill out this short survey to help us improve our community consultation process for the future. It should only take about three minutes.

The privacy policy for this survey is here. This survey is a one-off request from us related to this unique topic.

Thank you for your participation, Kbrown (WMF) 10:44, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:The Coddling of the American Mind

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:The Coddling of the American Mind. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Jo-Ann Roberts

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jo-Ann Roberts. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Sharyl Attkisson

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Sharyl Attkisson. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Football prods

Hi there,

Sorry, will reduce the number going forward, thanks.

There is not that much left to clean up anyway.

Geregen2 (talk) 00:29, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Stephen Miller (political advisor)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Stephen Miller (political advisor). Legobot (talk) 04:23, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Infobox person

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Infobox person. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Atlantic306! You created a thread called Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Akram Habib at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of Jennifer Aniston performances

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of Jennifer Aniston performances. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Infobox officeholder

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Infobox officeholder. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Beyoncé discography

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Beyoncé discography. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Peter Arnett

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Peter Arnett. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (television)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (television). Legobot (talk) 04:27, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Sarah Palin

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Sarah Palin. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Max Blumenthal

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Max Blumenthal. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Joan Crawford

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Joan Crawford. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 November 2019

• From the editor: Put on your birthday best

• News and notes: How soon for the next million articles?

• In the media: You say you want a revolution

• On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?

• Arbitration report: Two requests for arbitration cases

• Traffic report: The queen and the princess meet the king and the joker

• Technology report: Reference things, sister things, stranger things

• Gallery: Winter and holidays

• Recent research: Bot census; discussions differ on Spanish and English Wikipedia; how nature's seasons affect pageviews

• Essay: Adminitis

• From the archives: WikiProject Spam, revisited

• In focus: An update on the Wikimedia Movement 2030 Strategy

• Special report: How many people edit in your favorite language? Where are they from?

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:23, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Dwight D. Eisenhower

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Dwight D. Eisenhower. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 30 November 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Greta Thunberg

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Greta Thunberg. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Billy Dee Williams

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Billy Dee Williams. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

Uthamaputhiran (2010 film) / Perazhagan

Can you kindly add notable citations to these pages? Thank you! --DragoMynaa

• Will look for some tomorrow, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 20:35, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	I appreciate you keeping Chris Stuckmann's page free from vandalism. I only ask that you do not delete an entire paragraph of my edits simply because you didn't like the source I provided for one sentence. Forbesave (talk) 02:48, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Mark Dixon (businessman)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Mark Dixon (businessman). Legobot (talk) 04:23, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Draft talk:Erica C. Barnett

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Draft talk:Erica C. Barnett. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Tristan Pollock

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Tristan Pollock. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Bruce Pascoe

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bruce Pascoe. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

Aspies for Freedom

The forum is gone. You are mixing it up with Autism Friends, which is a breakaway group and not part of Aspies for Freedom. There has been no sign of any AFF event for several years. It's up to you to prove it's active now, not me to prove it's gone. 2001:8003:58A3:6C01:B899:8B96:409F:8499 (talk) 23:04, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

• The refs are for it existing so its up to you to supply refs that it's defunct as per WP:BURDEN Atlantic306 (talk) 23:58, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

The refs are out of date as indicated by the tag at the top. Provide updated information about it's present status - otherwise the argument that it is defunct is valid. 2001:8003:58A3:6C01:C0FC:52E3:1CB1:292D (talk) 03:44, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Writers Guild of America Awards

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Writers Guild of America Awards. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Korea

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Korea. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Aphex Twin

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Aphex Twin. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

Captain Rex Homepage

Hi Atlantic306,

You are continuously taking down my comments on the Captain Rex wiki page. I am doing a class project and have to add so many words to a certain Wikipedia page. I am not trying to be disrespectful to the original source material, so I am wondering what I can do to this page (specifically in the character's history)that won't get my material removed.

Thanks for your time,

                  AgentKid 35  — Preceding unsigned comment added by AgentKid35 (talk • contribs) 00:19, 11 December 2019 (UTC) 

• • That's a terrible school project, content should not be added willy-nilly. Where is this content coming from, did you write it yourself? Atlantic306 (talk) 00:23, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

No this content is coming from the episodes of Star Wars the Clone Wars as well as the Clone Wars film. Would this be better if I added a whole new section to this page? AgentKid35 (talk) 00:40, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

• No, it's all got to go. Where exactly is the content coming from, is it directly copied from imdb, rotten tomatoes or fandom etc ? because direct copying is not allowed Atlantic306 (talk) 00:45, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

No, they are my personal summaries on the movies and the tv episodes. I am citing both the movie and the show as sources for my content so I do not see how I am violating copyright. A little more insight would be nice. Again thank you for your time and patience. AgentKid35 (talk) 01:01, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

• • Well, that's good that they are your own words. Regarding insight, there is currently an effort by a number of editors to completely delete articles about fictional characters that are just plot summaries without real world context - hundreds of them are being deleted which I don't always agree with. So adding more plot is harming the Captain Rex article because it is swamping the real world context. If you want to improve the article please add real world context to it such as information on the creators, the cartoonists and how they developed the character and how the character has been commented on by real media in reviews and articles, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 01:10, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

Ok. Thank you very much. I will take your advice. Thank you for the help. AgentKid35 (talk) 01:17, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Timothée Chalamet

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Timothée Chalamet. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:James Martin (priest, born 1960)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:James Martin (priest, born 1960). Legobot (talk) 04:24, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Everett Stern

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Everett Stern. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Led Zeppelin

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Led Zeppelin. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

If you have an opinion

Regarding the AfD discussion, of this article that you've edited. plese feel free and stop in and express it. Cheers. 67.167.8.141 (talk) 05:18, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

Inappropriate

@Atlantic306: Why was that inappropriate? Their identities are not supposed to be known do to Canadian law I read. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:569:7469:A600:A9A0:1D91:2567:DF62 (talk) 21:38, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

Really

So, you are one of THOSE editors. They are not notable - what with them being an unsigned band no has ever heard of, and there are no relevant references possible. But carry on with your nonsense. A typical editor who doesn't contribute anything, but reverts lots of edits for no reason. Yawn.

2A02:C7F:BAC5:7800:FD70:5E33:E154:91C9 (talk) 22:17, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

• • At least I don't falsify timestamps on proposed deletions Atlantic306 (talk) 23:18, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

New Page Review newsletter December 2019

Reviewer of the Year

This year's Reviewer of the Year is Rosguill. Having gotten the reviewer PERM in August 2018, they have been a regular reviewer of articles and redirects, been an active participant in the NPP community, and has been the driving force for the emerging NPP Source Guide that will help reviewers better evaluate sourcing and notability in many countries for which it has historically been difficult.

Special commendation again goes to Onel5969 who ends the year as one of our most prolific reviewers for the second consecutive year. Thanks also to Boleyn and JTtheOG who have been in the top 5 for the last two years as well.

Several newer editors have done a lot of work with CAPTAIN MEDUSA and DannyS712 (who has also written bots which have patrolled thousands of redirects) being new reviewers since this time last year.

Thanks to them and to everyone reading this who has participated in New Page Patrol this year.

Top 10 Reviewers over the last 365 days

Rank	Username	Num reviews	Log
1	Rosguill (talk)	47,395	Patrol Page Curation
2	Onel5969 (talk)	41,883	Patrol Page Curation
3	JTtheOG (talk)	11,493	Patrol Page Curation
4	Arthistorian1977 (talk)	5,562	Patrol Page Curation
5	DannyS712 (talk)	4,866	Patrol Page Curation
6	CAPTAIN MEDUSA (talk)	3,995	Patrol Page Curation
7	DragonflySixtyseven (talk)	3,812	Patrol Page Curation
8	Boleyn (talk)	3,655	Patrol Page Curation
9	Ymblanter (talk)	3,553	Patrol Page Curation
10	Cwmhiraeth (talk)	3,522	Patrol Page Curation

(The top 100 reviewers of the year can be found here)

Redirect autopatrol

A recent Request for Comment on creating a new redirect autopatrol pseduo-permission was closed early. New Page Reviewers are now able to nominate editors who have an established track record creating uncontroversial redirects. At the individual discretion of any administrator or after 24 hours and a consensus of at least 3 New Page Reviewers an editor may be added to a list of users whose redirects will be patrolled automatically by DannyS712 bot III.

Source Guide Discussion

Set to launch early in the new year is our first New Page Patrol Source Guide discussion. These discussions are designed to solicit input on sources in places and topic areas that might otherwise be harder for reviewers to evaluate. The hope is that this will allow us to improve the accuracy of our patrols for articles using these sources (and/or give us places to perform a WP:BEFORE prior to nominating for deletion). Please watch the New Page Patrol talk page for more information.

This month's refresher course

While New Page Reviewers are an experienced set of editors, we all benefit from an occasional review. This month consider refreshing yourself on Wikipedia:Notability (geographic features). Also consider how we can take the time for quality in this area. For instance, sources to verify human settlements, which are presumed notable, can often be found in seconds. This lets us avoid the (ugly) 'Needs more refs' tag.

16:10, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

Happy Holidays

Sweet Brown Snail by Jason Rhoades and Paul McCarthy

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Thank you for all your edits and contributions this year. Wishing you a happy holiday! ThatMontrealIP (talk) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

• Thanks for the card and for your great work on the arts Atlantic306 (talk) 20:38, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

Cheers

Merry Christmas, Atlantic306! Or Season's Greetings or Happy Winter Solstice! As the year winds to a close, I would like to take a moment to recognize your hard work and offer heartfelt gratitude for all you do for Wikipedia. May this Holiday Season bring you nothing but joy, health and prosperity. Onel5969 TT me 11:12, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

• Thanks for the card and for your great NPP patrolling, goodness knows what the backlog would be without you and Rosgill, Atlantic306 (talk) 20:40, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

Good luck

豊かな十年へようこそ/WELCOME TO THE D20s

Miraclepine wishes you a Merry Christmas, a Happy New Year, and a prosperous decade of change and fortune.
このミラPはAtlantic306たちのメリークリスマスも新年も変革と幸運の豊かな十年をおめでとうございます！
フレフレ、みんなの未来！/GOOD LUCK WITH YOUR FUTURE!
ミラP 03:02, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

• Thanks for the card and for your valuable contributions to Wikipedia, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 03:38, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 December 2019

• From the editors: Caught with their hands in the cookie jar, again

• News and notes: What's up (and down) with administrators, articles and languages

• Special report: Are reputation management operatives scrubbing Wikipedia articles?

• In the media: "The fulfillment of the dream of humanity" or a nightmare of PR whitewashing on behalf of one-percenters?

• Discussion report: December discussions around the wiki

• Arbitration report: Announcement of 2020 Arbitration Committee

• Traffic report: Queens and aliens, exactly alike, once upon a December

• Technology report: User scripts and more

• Gallery: Holiday wishes

• Recent research: Acoustics and Wikipedia; Wiki Workshop 2019 summary

• From the archives: The 2002 Spanish fork and ads revisited (re-revisited?)

• On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?

• Op-Ed: Why we need to keep talking about Wikipedia's gender gap

• WikiProject report: Wikiproject Tree of Life: A Wikiproject report

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:37, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

Request for help

Thank you for taking the time to visit Alida Anderson. I need some further guidance as to what to do next... I followed your link to Page Curation, but I do not understand how I can use that tool (or even if I'm authorized to use it).

As I understand it, your tag indicates three things: "promotional content", "inappropriate external links", and content "written from a neutral point of view."

I need help in removing the "promotional content" and "inappropriate external links" - would it be possible for you to point those out? I've reviewed all the links and clearly I'm missing something.

I'm also a little confused by the "neutral point of view" issue, but that I can review and tackle.

Gracias, --Untipoflaco (talk) 19:14, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for the quick feedback! I have fixed the page as you recommended... I had used "seminal" because the reviewers had called the book "the first book to..." but I deleted that adjective as recommended. I also deleted the self quote -- I used that because I've seen this technique used regularly in many articles about academia - but I took it out as advised.

Thanks again the quick response and let me know if/when the tag can be removed.

Muchas Gracias,

--Untipoflaco (talk) 19:43, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

Happy New Year Atlantic306!

Happy New Year!

Hello Atlantic306:
Thanks for all of your contributions to improve the encyclopedia for Wikipedia's readers, and have a happy and enjoyable New Year! Cheers, Donner60 (talk) 04:31, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks (static)}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.

• Thanks for the card and for improving Wikipedia, refards Atlantic306 (talk) 11:21, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

Help with editing

Hi, I could use some help adding upgrading articles and adding entries to the List of fugitives from justice who disappeared. I been working very hard as of late on editing and it is too much to do all by myself and I could really use some help. Do you think you could help me with this? I would be very thankful for some help. Davidgoodheart (talk) 22:18, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

Struck Sockpuppet in Articles for Deletion

Hi there, I saw you struck a comment from someone on an articles for deletion page I created earlier today, saying they were a confirmed sockpuppet. Can I just confirm - you do not think that they are a sock of me, do you? If so that was an error. Would it be possible to make it clear on the page that they were not a sock of me? As it stands, it reads like I have made a sock (now blocked) to support my own deletion proposal. Thanks. -- Sirfurboy (talk) 22:30, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

• Hi, don't consider thats necessary because if you were involved your nomination would be struck out as well, but you could add a line saying you have no involvement if you like, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 22:36, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

                                                 

• 
• 
• 

Happy New Year!

• 
  MMXX Lunar Calendar

Atlantic306,
Have a great 2020 and thanks for your continued contributions to Wikipedia.

---

   – 2020 is a leap year – news article.
   – Background color is Classic Blue (#0F4C81), Pantone's 2020 Color of the year

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year 2020}} to user talk pages.

– North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:36, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

• Thanks for the card and for improving wikipedia in all spaces Atlantic306 (talk) 00:48, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Atlantic306!

Happy New Year!

Atlantic306,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
-Nahal^(T) 23:10, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

• Thanks for the card and for your work improving Wikipedia, Atlantic306 (talk) 08:58, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Pizzarias article

Thanks for your edit to Draft:Pizzarias. Could you help improve this article further so it will qualify for publication? I have included several references to third party sources but apparently it's still not enough to satisfy the editors.Sedimentary (talk) 17:06, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

• Hi, will look at it tomorrow, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 17:05, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
• Thanks for all your help, you're awesome! Sedimentary (talk) 16:31, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

JRD Tata Jubilee Park

Hi, @Atlantic306:, i think this a local park and also very few sources talk about it, questioning about its notability, it  should be deleted. Rocky 734 (talk) 01:38, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

• Disagree, Wikipedia has a role as a gazetteer and as such a lower level of notability is used for geographic features and places such as these, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 15:18, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

Maria Jose Sevilla ¨s article Hello again. I improved the article one more time, after it was corrected by a native english person, specialist in the subject, but you reverted it. I don't understand why since it was much better. I worked on it many many ours, but for nothing!!!. It is very disappointing. Marisa Glez Glez Glez — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marisa Glez Glez Glez (talk • contribs) 21:54, 5 January 2020 (UTC)

• • Unfortunately the person's use of English was not suitable with informal phrases such as " back in the 80s", the replacement of prose with lists, removing the lede which all articles more than a few sentences should have and the use of promotional wording. Please believe me the current version is much better and the revised version would not have been approved out of draftspace, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 22:31, 5 January 2020 (UTC)

Rise of the Synths page - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:The_Rise_of_the_Synths

Thanks again for feedback on this draft page. I've amended to include updates and additional references and a reception section following the film's premieres in November 2019. Will continue to add references as additional reviews are published. Also added links to page from existing sites (e.g. John Carpenter, Gunship (band), Robert Parker (music producer), Carpenter Brut) whose pages already referenced the film/its soundtrack). Grateful for any additional feedback or help getting this page published. Many thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DAPJ (talk • contribs) 12:41, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

Why Deletion of Shreyans Bokadiya

Kindly explain me or help me to improve the article of indian film maker shreyans bokadiya. I don't wish it to get deleted. HimanshiBokadiya (talk) 03:13, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

Vandalizing the page of Preda Mihailescu in English

Mr. Atlantic, my page is vandalized since a while and you folks sleep and take no action. The minimal search in the books in the bibliography will show you that the questions are raised by a troll, and the page was 100% ok. If you had not reacted to my changes, I would suppose that everyone sleeps. But your interference proves you are either not entitled to the responsibilty you carry, or irresponsible. Please take an action, verify what you claim to miss, and remove this vandalism. I also reported to the Bibliography pages, nobody answers. I am autraged and demand action and appologies! — Preceding unsigned comment added by PredaMi (talk • contribs) 15:49, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

Bhanwar Singh Bhati Article

Bhanwar Singh Bhati (politician) (talk) 08:24, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

Hello, @Atlantic306; received your message regarding the page of Bhanwar Singh Bhati. We are thankful that you permit us to show the authenticity of the page.

It seems that the Wikipedia team believes this page is for promotional purposes rather than for username.

This page deserves to be there as it does not violate any of the norms of your policy. All the information on this page is authentic, reliable, and genuine to everyone's knowledge. The references data we have used is valid and trustworthy, that is clearly showing the authenticity of the page.

We would also like to grab your attention towards the Govind Singh Dotasra page that is updated on WikiPage, which is almost identical to Bhanwar Singh Bhati Page. We assure you that Bhanwar Singh Bhati's page is not promotional and does not violate any of your policies.

Details of Bhanwar Singh Bhati are accurate that can help people to know more about Bhanwar Singh Bhati Biography. We would be extremely privileged if a team of yours updated this page on Wikipedia.

We would be grateful if you put it back in the draft space, so we'll be able to add more references to enhance the reliability of the page.

The Signpost: 27 January 2020

• From the editor: Reaching six million articles is great, but we need a moratorium

• News and notes: Six million articles on the English language Wikipedia

• Special report: The limits of volunteerism and the gatekeepers of Team Encarta

• In the media: Turkey's back up, but what's happening with Dot-org and a new visual identity?

• Arbitration report: Three cases at ArbCom

• Traffic report: The most viewed articles of 2019

• Gallery: Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, we're all winners

• News from the WMF: Capacity Building: Top 5 Themes from Community Conversations

• Community view: Our most important new article since November 1, 2015

• In focus: Cryptos and bitcoins and blockchains, oh no!

• Recent research: How useful is Wikipedia for novice programmers trying to learn computing concepts?

• From the archives: A decade of The Signpost, 2005-2015

• On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?

• WikiProject report: WikiProject Japan: a wikiProject Report

• Humour: Predicting the 6,000,000th article

• Obituary: Remembering Wikipedia contributor Brian Boulton

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:08, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Confused about "Astley and Bedford Colleries"

Hello Atlantic306, I am confused about a page you were involved with, and I wondered if you could explain to me about how things work. I was poking around pages related to speedy deletion, looking to see how I could be helpful in that area. I found a list of the pages currently tagged for speedy deletion, and checked out Astley and Bedford Colleries, which redirected to Astley and Tyldesley Collieries#History but had been tagged for deletion on the grounds of "implausible typos or misnomers." I thought that maybe a bot had considered the names too dissimilar, but I was curious so I went to the article page for Astley and Tyldesley Collieries and found a statement, citing a reliable source, that it used to be called Astley and Bedford Colleries. I clicked "contest this deletion" but that just added to the article's talk page. Reading the speedy delete tag more closely, I decided it would be OK for me to delete the tag, since I was sure it didn't apply, so I did so. Then I looked at the history of the page, and saw that the redirect had been created and then flagged for deletion by the same person!!! So I think I have two questions: 1, a practical question: how can a person be helpful with speedy deletes? (Sub-question: Did I do anything wrong when I was poking around?) 2, out of sheer curiosity: why did you tag your own redirect for a speedy delete?? Many thanks! ~ oulfis 🌸(talk) 05:45, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you reviewed

Hello, Atlantic306

Thank you for creating Nomad (NZ band).

User:Atlantic306, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hi, can you please fix the reference for their charting single

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Atlantic306}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Atlantic306 (talk) 16:31, 2 February 2020 (UTC)

Hello Atlantic306,

I saw you just reviewed and declined my article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Sylvermay because of not enough reference. Regarding Ref.15 I have a photo from the magazine showing the page were the artist is named and has his article with photo. Can I post this or show you? Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by JMBARRY87 (talk • contribs) 23:47, 2 February 2020 (UTC)

Uproxx again

Thanks for the response here. I wonder if Bearcat has seen it and changed his mind afterwards? ミラP 15:40, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

One person opining that a source is reliable is not in and of itself proof that I was wrong — especially not when we're talking about a topic that's overall so little-covered that Uproxx is among the most substantial sources that can be found at all. If a person had dozens of strong, notability-supporting sources evincing a very clear pass of WP:GNG (which is not just "number of footnotes >= 2", bu takes into account additional factors like depth and range and context), then I wouldn't really care if their article was using a bit of Uproxx for supplementary sourcing of stray facts — but if a person has so little coverage that you need to make Uproxx a load-bearing pillar of whether she even gets over GNG in the first place or not, then it's no magic bullet by itself if it's the best you can do. Bearcat (talk) 16:00, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

Opinion about artist's page deletion

Hey Atlantic, I see you are pretty active in the music related page deletion discussions. Can I ask you for your honest opinion about the current situation happening on this page nominated for deletion? I would just like to know how you feel about it. To me personally, it seems like the nominator is just trying to attack the article, trashing all the sources. Is that even allowed? Thank you for your time! MusicHyper (talk) 21:46, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

• Hi, WP:Canvassing applies. I look through all band and musician articles on Fridays. The nominator is allowed to examine the sources individually but you are allowed to rebuff with your own view which you have, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 21:57, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

Apologies. I had no idea about WP:Canvassing. Please ignore my previous message. MusicHyper (talk) 22:04, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

Bindu (Sri Lankan film)

Hi Atlantic306! You removed the PROD notice on Bindu (2009 film) saying "has reliable sources coverage such as Sri Lankan Sunday Times". The issue is not verifiability (there is a Sri Lankan site that lists all released Sri Lankan films), but notability from independent sources. "Articles on such a film should assert that the film in question was notable for something more than merely having been produced, and if any document can be found to support this, in any language, it should be cited." Newspapers list almost all films that are about to be released or are currently being shown, so that alone is not enough to establish notability. See Talk:Bindu (2009 film) for a breakdown of the references provided. --Danielklein (talk) 11:03, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

• • National newspaper coverage reviews fulfills criteria 1 of WP:NFILM by itself and news coverage in reliable sources also counts substantially to WP:GNG, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 17:19, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

WP:NFILM says (note the word insufficient):

To presume notability, reliable sources should have significant coverage. Examples of coverage insufficient to fully establish notability include newspaper listings of screening times and venues, "capsule reviews", plot summaries without critical commentary, or listings in comprehensive film guides such as Leonard Maltin's Movie Guide, Time Out Film Guide, or the Internet Movie Database.

Text of the reference: Many of these sources can provide valuable information, and point to other sources, but in themselves do not indicate a notable subject. Similar cases of publications where a mention does not establish notability may include: reviews that are part of a comprehensive review of ALL films in a particular festival, that don't assert anything regarding the notability of individual entries; other forms of comprehensive, non-selective coverage; and some web based reviews by amateur critics who have not established their own notability as critics.

A "review" that was published to promote the film doesn't count as notability. It's the same as current news events. Not all news events are notable just because they're current and verifiable. --Danielklein (talk) 22:37, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

Answered in the AfD, these two refs I mentioned aren't actual reviews so two rs reviews are still needed to pass criteria 1 of WP:NFILM, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 00:51, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

Draft: Nanette Carter

Thanks for the feedback! I made the necessary edits including additional citations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leahfreemanhaskin (talk • contribs) 18:50, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Draft:Ian Parker (singer-songwriter)

Draft:Ian Parker (singer-songwriter), a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Ian Parker (singer-songwriter) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Ian Parker (singer-songwriter) during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Chess (talk) Ping when replying 09:57, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

Help

Hello, I was looking over artist bio and saw that you edit a page for an artist. I was wondering if you can give me tips on editing biographies. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cre8tiveIQ (talk • contribs) 23:12, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

• Hi, useful information is at WP:BLP. Basically all information about a person needs to be referenced to WP:Reliable sources so that the reader can check that the article is correct and to stop vandals adding fake information. Unreferenced information is vulnerable to being removed sooner or later, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 23:20, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

Thank you, in an article, I edited I used a source from a news article multiple times. I see others use A,B,C instead of referencing that exact source is there a link to an article where I can learn how to do that? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cre8tiveIQ (talk • contribs) 23:48, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

• WP:REFB but it's a bit complicated, basically if you give the reference a name such as ref name=Newspaper within the ref template then give the full reference, you can then just put ref name=Newspaper/ within the ref template when you use it again without repeating the full reference it will then be rendered as a b c in the references section, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 23:56, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for taking the time to reply, does seem complicated but I'll read over that article and see if I can figure it out. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cre8tiveIQ (talk • contribs) 01:02, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

I could not figure it out, wikipedia seems like writing code. Are we able to ask others to take a look at the article I'm working on? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cre8tiveIQ (talk • contribs) 02:50, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

Your snitch-tagging of my Razzie edits

Any idea why you couldn't have just stated your concerns on my talk page instead of dragging my name through the mud on these two film talk pages? Tom Danson (talk) 04:45, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

• Because I needed other peoples opinions about it, Atlantic306 (talk) 15:27, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Even so, that's just plain disrespectful to tag another user/bring up complaints about them without talking to them directly first. If you have an issue with my edits, bring it up to me on my Talk page. If we reach an agreement, then consider it over...if we're still at an impasse, THEN bring it up on the talk pages and noticeboards. Tom Danson (talk) 21:24, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Champian Fulton

Jimmy:

My mistake for not noticing that Ms. Fulton's Wiki page already mentions Sarah Vaughan, Red Garland, Wynton Kelly and other famous artists, as influences. I saw that this morning, when I read through her article. Quoting from The New York City Jazz Record review (page 25) would have been redundant (especially for the important opening paragraph). However; it is a nice piece; very informative (by Mr. Henderson) and should go somewhere as a verifiable third-party source.

Tim Gemmill tim@cozgem.com TenorT (talk) 19:46, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

• Hi, yes it could be used as a source for any extra content in the main text but we have to be careful to avoid anything that looks promotional, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 20:53, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

I don't know Ms. Fulton (never met her), but she is obviously very talented or Alex Henderson would not be so complimentary of her musical abilities. I enjoy reading The New York City Jazz Record, as we spent a lot of time in New York City in the 1970s. And, if I can help a struggling artist with their Wikipedia page, that's something I like to do. I added the NYCJR CD review as a third-party source, after the review by Jazz Times (Reference #18). Another editor (more knowledgeable of her career), can now quote from it in the body of the article, if they so desire. Take care.

TenorT (talk) 21:09, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer newsletter February 2020

Hello Atlantic306,

Source Guide Discussion

The first NPP source guide discussion is now underway. It covers a wide range of sources in Ghana with the goal of providing more guidance to reviewers about sources they might see when reviewing pages. Hopefully, new page reviewers will join others interested in reliable sources and those with expertise in these sources to make the discussion a success.

Redirects

New to NPP? Looking to try something a little different? Consider patrolling some redirects. Redirects are relatively easy to review, can be found easily through the New Pages Feed. You can find more information about how to patrol redirects at WP:RPATROL.

Discussions and Resources

• There is an ongoing discussion around changing notifications for new editors who attempt to write articles.
• A recent discussion of whether Michelin starred restraunts are notable was archived without closure.
• A resource page with links pertinent for reviewers was created this month.
• A proposal to increase the scope of G5 was withdrawn.

Refresher

Geographic regions, areas and places generally do not need general notability guideline type sourcing. When evaluating whether an article meets this notability guideline please also consider whether it might actually be a form of WP:SPAM for a development project (e.g. PR for a large luxury residential development) and not actually covered by the guideline.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7095 Low – 4991 High – 7095

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

16:08, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

fix unclear citation style warning

Hi @Atlantic306 thankyou for your citation tips regarding the page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_J._Black

I have looked through the page, and all citations are the same (format) all using "...{{Cite web|..." ... I'm not sure what I'm missing :) Any help/advice would be greatly appreciated. IntoTheFuture1402 (talk) 12:50, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

Deletion review for Southeast Team Handball Conference

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Southeast Team Handball Conference. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Malo95 (talk) 10:40, 23 February 2020 (UTC)

My submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Madhu_Guruswamy (February 24)

Can you please help me to complete this article Thank you. --Playlikeastar (talk) 10:47, 24 February 2020

• Hi, am a bit busy at present but what is needed is extra references in newspapers or other reliable sources that are directly about him. Filmibeat is not a reliable source, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 21:32, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

Thank you, sir, I have added around 17 references like Indian Express/Times of India/thenewsminute/Deccan Chronicle and meany. sir whenever you find the time please help me it's almost a year I am working on this page Thank you. --Playlikeastar (talk) 11:47, 25 February 2020

About page of Neonfly band

Thanks for your help and support. I hope my article won't be deleted.

This link was removed from me (https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/reviews/article-2158013/REVIEW-Monsters-rock-emerge-mud-Download-2012.html) and replaced with another one, but this newspaper more famous. Could you restore this? There is a paragraph about Neonfly written under the second photo.

--Yulia Markhutova (talk) 21:00, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

• Hi, glad to help but the Daily Mail is not allowed as a reference on Wikipedia because they've been found to print fake stories now and again, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 21:30, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

Oh!!!! Thanks a lot! --Yulia Markhutova (talk) 21:40, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

Can I radio rock interviews insert into the article?

• Metal Gods Meltdown Rock Show
• NeonFly interview for Classic Rock FM radio at Galapagai/Roko naktys 2012
• EurometalExpressShow
• The Michael Spiggos Melodic Rock Show featuring Frederick Thunder (NeonFly) 07.07.2019

--Yulia Markhutova (talk) 21:49, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

• Suggest you just add the ClassicRock one as that is the better known one, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 22:03, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

• Thanks a lot! --Yulia Markhutova (talk) 22:12, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

• Hi Atlantic306!

Thank you for review my Neonfly page I hope that the page will be published soon "thanks to your good hand"! I'll continue in the same vein because I want to write about all their albums, biographies. I understood what I need to do it. Also I'll be modify this page for the better.

It's strange, but I found this page Forever Storm yesterday and I was surprised how did they publish this page and why did my page teste so meticulously?

Thanks again for support! I hope we will met soon! --Yulia Markhutova (talk) 20:16, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

• It would be best to wait for the AfD to end first, also it might be too soon to do album pages and bios until they get more coverage which would happen if they had a big hit. Regarding page reviews it sometimes depends on which editor reviews the article, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 20:22, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

• Sorry, but I've got one more question: Can I do links to foreign sources (not English) and do I need to do it now? Thanks! --Yulia Markhutova (talk) 21:19, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
• As long as they are in references, non-English reliable sources are fine, you can do it now if you like as it may help with the AfD, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 21:46, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
• This is a list of the English reliable sources and unreliable sources Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums/Sources regards 21:48, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

Patience?

Sigh, I hate these tags, did you know? Could you kindly give us ten minutes to find the second ref, instead of applying the silliest tag I know, because I believe most of readers can count to one without being told. Sorry for a little rant. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:31, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

Do you have access to JSTOR? Then you might add this. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:06, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

• hi, yes I'll look into it tomorrow, thanks for adding the refs Atlantic306 (talk) 23:09, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 March 2020

• From the editor: The ball is in your court

• News and notes: Alexa ranking down to 13th worldwide

• Special report: More participation, more conversation, more pageviews

• In the media: Mapping IP editors, Smithsonian open-access, and coronavirus disinformation

• Discussion report: Do you prefer M or P?

• Arbitration report: Two prominent administrators removed

• By the numbers: How many actions by administrators does it take to clean up spam?

• Community view: The Incredible Invisible Woman

• In focus: History of The Signpost, 2015–2019

• Recent research: Wikipedia generates $50 billion/year consumer surplus in the US alone

• From the archives: Is Wikipedia for sale?

• Traffic report: February articles, floating in the dark

• Gallery: Feel the love

• On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?

• Op-Ed: What I learned as Wikimedia UK Communications Coordinator

• Opinion: Wikipedia is another country

• Humour: The Wilhelm scream

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:22, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Naagini titlecard.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Naagini titlecard.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:35, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

Removed updates from wikipedia

You have again removed an update on pratibhashali. Please check the source website and then take an action. The given facts are not true on page that is why this should be updated. It's a humble request don't remove the updates by me. Prashu Damoh (talk) 05:14, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Citation - Michael J Black

Hi @Atlantic306, we have since modified the citations on the Michael J Black page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_J._Black. changing the reference type for most and adding more attributes relevant to each. Do you think its now good enough to remove the citation warning? thanks in advance IntoTheFuture1402 (talk) 15:59, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Doxa Kato Kamila F.C.

Hi, I don't think that playing in a notable league makes the club notable. Otherwise, we would have thousands of clubs from the English 20th tier (such as from Bristol and Avon Association Football League), or even from the Italian 9th tier (Terza Categoria). There is not clear guideline for clubs as there is for players, so we need to check WP:GNG (which, in my opinion, the Greek club doesn't pass). Nehme₁₄₉₉ (talk) 20:50, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

• A fourth level league is reasonably high in a footballing nation and there are articles for a number of the other clubs in the league, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 20:55, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
  • I'm not disputing the notability of the league, rather that of an amateur club which just gained promotion to the fourth tier of Greek football, an amateur competition. The article just says that the club is "a Greek football club based in Kato Kamila, Central Macedonia, Greece." Usually the club should have at least played in the domestic cup competition (Greek Football Cup), which only clubs from tiers 1-3 can qualify to. Also, the other clubs might have played in higher tiers in the past. Not all of them have the 4th tier of Greek football as their highest point in their history. Nehme₁₄₉₉ (talk) 21:00, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

I need your help. ASAP.

I have created a page called Perumaan. The film stars Arjun Das. User:Brutalgraph] keeps undoing my edits on both the Arjun Das and the Perumaan page. Can you kindly help me? --DragoMynaa

CAN SOMEONE PLEASE HELP ME . MY EMAIL ADDRESS IS MAYA82STER@GMAIL.COM . IM CRAZY FAN OF THIS HEROINE . I WANT SOMEONE TO WRITE HER WIKIPEDIA . SHE HAS SO MANY NEWSPAPER INTERVIEW . ANYONE READS THIS PLEASE EMAIL ME — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maya82ster (talk • contribs) 11:29, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

Neonfly music band

I congratulate all of us on the victory! Thanks for your help and support!--Yulia Markhutova (talk) 23:27, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

Thank you!

Thank you for taking care of my mess at Leigh Gill. I don't know if it's the recent desysopping or something else but it seems there's admin backlog everywhere. You were able to fix that because you are a page mover? There's no way that I could have done it myself, right? Sometimes, I can move over a redirect and sometimes I can't. I don't really know exactly where the line is. Thanks again! Usedtobecool ☎️ 16:16, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

• No problem, the details of difficult page moving are explained at WP:Pagemover and there is a link there where you can apply for the page mover right if you like, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 16:26, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

  Atlantic306, looking at the information, it occurred to me that, most likely, I can move over a redirect only when the history of the redirect has only one log- creation of it. I'll test that hypothesis when next I do moves. It's only the third/fourth time that I have absolutely needed to do a move that I couldn't, so I think I'll stick to what I can already do, for now. Best, Usedtobecool ☎️ 16:51, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Manchester United Treble Reunion for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Manchester United Treble Reunion is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manchester United Treble Reunion until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – PeeJay 21:23, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Teamwork Barnstar
	Thank you so much for cooperation & Best wishes Arenasky (talk) 18:42, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

Regarding JioCinema Article Help

Hi Atlantic306, Thank you for reviewing the JioCinema article and I need your help to improve the article. Could you please highlight the content which you feel is promotional. This article had information about our history, products and services supported by reference links. Also, this article was reviewed by Fylindfotberserk and it was good to go. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Fylindfotberserk#Live_Article_Went_to_Draft%21 I would really appreciate your help to improve this article and moving this into the main space. --Reenajha07 (talk) 06:06, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

• Replied on your talkpage Atlantic306 (talk) 18:40, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

Derogatory

I'm sure you didn't mean to be derogatory. But I'm not an IP hopper. My carrier changes my IP on its own - I did not ask for that. And it sort of sounds derogatory, though I'm sure not intentionally. Stay safe. --2604:2000:E010:1100:EDB7:BE53:2AC8:FEF3 (talk) 02:18, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

• Its not derogatory, the point I was making is that you are the same person who asked for the AFD as the person who commented, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 02:21, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
• I've changed my comment to be cleaer, Atlantic306 (talk) 02:24, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

• I appreciate it. Some people seem to not treat IPs with respect reserved for editors, so maybe I was sensitive. And the hopping I can't control. Thanks. 2604:2000:E010:1100:EDB7:BE53:2AC8:FEF3 (talk) 02:42, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

Heer (Geo TV serial)

Hello Atlantic306, I see that you dePRODed Heer (Geo TV serial). I personally searched quite extensively and couldn't find any independent RS with SIGCOV. Did you find any? If not, I'm considering taking the article to AfD. Best, MrClog (talk) 00:30, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

• Unfortunately there is very little online content related to Pakistani tv series that are not currently airing so offline sources are needed and to avoid institutional bias there is often a presumption made as per WP:TVSERIES that those offline sources do exist, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 00:36, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

  A serial like Romeo weds Heer, which airs on Geo TV too, has numerous online sources. Specifically when it comes to "modern" drama like Heer, a presumption of offline sources is not particularly strong, because the type of media that report on such programming tends to at least have an online branch or be completely online. --MrClog (talk) 00:49, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

• The difference is that series was broadcast in 2018 and the references were gathered at that time according to the access dates whereas this one was broadcast in 2016 and the article created years later. The type of sources would be newspaper and magazine reviews and features but the Pakistan media don't seem to keep old entertainment sources online unless they are behind a paywall, regards Atlantic306 (talk)

National Council on Severe Autism

Could you please revert Ylevental's removal of the notability tag? Notability has still not been established and I can't revert it as it has been protected from IP edits. 1.152.107.36 (talk) 08:01, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

• No, I don't think it would be appropriate as the ban was over this issue, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 20:29, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

Jake Goldberg Page

So, the thing is that HE DID a Q/A Via instagram saying those things about his personal live. He said a lot of things. Just because it doesnt have an article from a important web saying those thing doenst mean he didnt say those thing. You can verify that on his instagram if you like. Those are facts about him. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 123thejoker1234 (talk • contribs) 22:38, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

Its PERSONAL LIFE. It doenst meen has to be enciclopedic that area. If you want to rewrite that in other way, be my guest. and if you find that information somwhere else, be my guest too. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 123thejoker1234 (talk • contribs) 22:44, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

"Dreams of King Sejong: Yeo Min Lak (2CD), TeRra Han's Allbum" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Dreams of King Sejong: Yeo Min Lak (2CD), TeRra Han's Allbum. Since you had some involvement with the Dreams of King Sejong: Yeo Min Lak (2CD), TeRra Han's Allbum redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Regards, SONIC678 04:35, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 March 2020

• From the editors: The bad and the good

• News and notes: 2018 Wikipedian of the year blocked

• WikiProject report: WikiProject COVID-19: A WikiProject Report

• Special report: Wikipedia on COVID-19: what we publish and why it matters

• In the media: Blocked in Iran but still covering the big story

• Discussion report: Rethinking draft space

• Arbitration report: Unfinished business

• In focus: "I have been asked by Jeffrey Epstein …"

• Community view: Wikimedia community responds to COVID-19

• Recent research: Disease outbreak uncertainties, AfD forecasting, auto-updating Wikipedia

• From the archives: Text from Wikipedia good enough for Oxford University Press to claim as own

• Traffic report: The only thing that matters in the world

• Gallery: Visible Women on Wikipedia

• News from the WMF: Amid COVID-19, Wikimedia Foundation offers full pay for reduced hours, mobilizes all staff to work remote, and waives sick time

• On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:41, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

Maria José Sevilla article

Hello, @Atlantic306: many thanks for not deleting Maria Jose Sevilla article. It was a great idea to put it back in the draftspace, so I was able to improve it and add more references. I think she deserves the article. I published it in spanish first, but the wikipedia translation program, is not working from spanish into english, this is why I started a new one in english. Many thanks again for your help. I have improved it and it is ready to publish. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marisa Glez Glez Glez (talk • contribs) 18:40, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

Gérard Mussies‎

I can understand why you undid my revision to this page as problematic. I made it because the content that was there also seemed problematic. (It seems to me to at least partially constitute original research, and I'm seeing some POV pushing, partly after looking at other work of the editor in question.) What do you suggest for this page? Russ Woodroofe (talk) 21:53, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

• Hi, the reason I made the edit was because there are some editors who vote delete based on the state of the article being a couple of sentences rather than the notability. After the AFD would be better for pruning/improving the article in my view, regards Atlantic306 (talk)
  • Ok, will leave it be until the AfD is over. (May ping you at that point.) Do you have any opinion on the merit of the prune, or of a better approach? As you can see, I'm !voting for keep, and pruned because I think it made the article stronger. It did drop it below 3 references, which I hear some editors use as a benchmark. I looked for more, but did not find usable sources. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 23:14, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Hi, i'd have to read all the references first, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 23:52, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Just a quick inquiry

Hi Atlantic306
Do you consider yourself an inclusionist? I noticed you #vote keep in most AFDs you participate in. It's almost as if you don't want any article getting deleted. It would be nice if Wikipedia was a platform where everyone can have an article, but this isn't the case. I personally do a thorough search on Google before nominating an article for deletion or participating in an AFD discussion. I personally feel like you are very sympathetic in AFD discussions. This is just my opinion.  Versace1608  ^{Wanna Talk?} 00:38, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

@Versace1608: don't really appreciate being cross-examined as if voting keep was a crime. The facts are that I've actually voted delete at least 300 times at AFD, probably 400 - I've participated in 1000s of AFDs, and have started about 21 AFDs myself including one that finished this week in a merge result. Also see my User:Atlantic306/CSD log where there are a lot of G11s apart from the G13s. I've noticed that you have become a lot more deletionist lately particularly in the Superthriller AFD where your comments were very unfair in my view. To start with you didn't find any extra sources yourself and then when I found a full Times articles and reviews in The Guardian and NME you still weren't satisfied when there is more than enough for GNG with the AllMusic bio as well. Regarding AFDs one of the reasons I dont vote delete so often is when I do a full search it often takes over an hour so I tend to concentrate on articles that are likely to be notable rather than the poorer ones which get deleted anyway, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 02:14, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

• Just got the AFD stats working and from the last 500 AFDs participated in if you leave out the no-consensus results then ive got an 88% match for votes compared to results which isn't too bad as shown here Atlantic306 (talk) 02:38, 5 April 2020 (UTC) From your results without no consensus you have a match of 95% so you win by 7% but it isn't a lot of difference is it ? regards Atlantic306 (talk) 02:46, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

I apologized if you get the feeling that I was cross-examining you. That was not my intention. I was simply asking you a simple question. I don't really care about stats man. We are both here to contribute to this encyclopedia the best way we can. Thanks for the response and thank for debunking some of the opinions I had about you. I did not know you've voted delete in over 300 and 400 AFD discussions.  Versace1608  ^{Wanna Talk?} 13:58, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

Rob Cesternino article

Hi, I have no conflicts of interest to declare and removing unreferenced content is not a form of editorial bias. Kindly stop reverting my edits. --Instantwatym — Preceding unsigned comment added by Instantwatym (talk • contribs) 20:16, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Response to paid editing

Hi Atlantic306
No, I am not a paid editor, I am just an avid contributor to the Wikipedia editing. Its just my hobby and passion. Kindly allow me to edit Ushna Shah's article as per my wishes, according to the Wikipedia's editing policy. my version looks more good. Will be very kindful to you. Thanks. :)

 Pyar Ke Sadqay1608  ^{Wanna Talk?} 12:53, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

• Its better as it is as some of your references are unreliable and it reads too promotional, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 19:58, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
• @Pyar Ke Sadqay: How can it be your hobby and "passion" when you've been doing it for 4 days and you have fewer than 100 edits? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:20, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Okay, bro!!  Pyar Ke Sadqay1608  ^{Wanna Talk?} 12:53, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

Airlinesmap

Dear Atlantic306, I have created a page for airlinesmap by mistake encyclopedia name is used lets edit that. The airlinesmap is a new product and new features. Its complete revolution in travel metasearch. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ashokbhamla (talk • contribs) 18:31, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Bambi

Please undo your edit to mine on the Bambi article. Bambi was shot, and this plays out in the very next scene of the movie. Forklift17 (talk) 22:00, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

• Bambi was not shot in the original film Atlantic306 (talk) 22:01, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
  • False. Here is a copy of the script--it's crude, and there's a critical typo here, but it's the best I could find. Anyway, the important part starts with "Faline does it and runs away. When Bambi is jumping a crag a gunshot is heard. Bambi falls down [w]ounded." In the very next scene, his father commands him to wake up, but Bambi struggles to get up. Why? Because he was recovering from a gunshot wound! Forklift17 (talk) 22:03, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
• Hi, according to this here Bambi being shot did not make it to the film. I've seen the film and that scene was not in the version I saw (VHS), regards Atlantic306 (talk) 22:14, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

  (talk page watcher) I don't recall it from the movie myself, but this Guardian article, written by the actor who voiced Bambi, says There’s a scene in the movie where Bambi is shot and you see his father appear. He says, “Bambi, get up, get up, you have to get up.”. Schazjmd (talk) 22:44, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

I believe that scene must have been deleted before release. Searching on YouTube for Bambi gets shot turned up zero coverage of that scene, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 22:57, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

From that Guardian article: "A lot of people don’t know it was shot on reel-to-reel film and almost 6,000ft long. By late 1941, Disney was in enormous debt and America was entering the war. He needed to get Bambi out, so he cut it by over 2,000ft. It’s a shame, because the film should be 38 minutes longer, and some beautiful scenes are missing. But I hear they recently unearthed that footage and are restoring it. That’s something I would love to see." So it was heavily cut before release, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 23:01, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

I can't link because I used my library proxy, but a 1942 article on the movie (captioning images from the film) has "IN MAN'S WORST INVASION OF THE FOREST, Bambi is shot while defending Faline from the dogs. As flames from the campfire sweep over the woods, Bambi's father prods him on to escape in a climactic leap over the waterfall." BAMBI, New York Times, 12 July 1942:SM16

So it sounds as if it were in the original release but may have been cut before VHS/DVD releases? Schazjmd (talk) 23:10, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

• I still don't believe it was in the original release, the NYT piece could have been based on pre-release publicity stills, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 23:31, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

  Well, the Saturday Evening Post article is talking about the changes made between the Bambi novel (in which Bambi's cousin is shot and killed, and in which Bambi isn't shot) and the Disney film. It doesn't say that Bambi getting shot isn't in the movie. " The NYT and Guardian articles say it happened, and the Guardian article doesn't say that scene was cut in those 2000 ft. I think 3 reliable sources support that Bambi was shot. Schazjmd (talk) 23:40, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

  Anyway, I was just intrigued by the research challenge; it's up to you all what you do with it. Sorry for butting in on the conversation. Schazjmd (talk) 23:44, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

• The Saturday Evening Post headlines Bambi being shot as a difference between the book and the film, the Guardian quotes an old actor who worked on the film before 38 minutes were cut and the NYT is using publicity stills. There is no sign of any footage, and the Bambi article has been up for more than a decade and since ive been watching it for the last 4 and a half years no-one until now has added Bambi being shot, in my view. I don't mind being proved wrong but there is a lack of evidence so far, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 23:53, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
  • I just rewatched it the other night. It is unmistakable that Bambi was shot. As he leaps across a gorge, a shot rings out, Bambi immediately flinches, and when he lands he tries to stand up but cannot. Forklift17 (talk) 01:08, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
  • What format did you watch it on? Atlantic306 (talk) 01:34, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Uploading pictures/

Hi!

I am having a tonne of trouble uploading pictures to a page I am writing.

I have full permission to use the pictures.

Am I doing something wrong?

Thanks! :D

Witrin (talk) 00:12, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm DarkGlow. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Bessie Carter, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

DarkGlow (talk) 00:18, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EnergyTeachers.org

Could you please reopen this DR? Regardless of the IP's intentions, the DR was created by RoySmith (a respected user) and should be allowed to run the normal course of discussion. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:55, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

• It was not a deletion review it was an AFD, do you have any connection to the ip who requested the AFD? I've asked Roy Smith for his view, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 20:06, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
• Its been renominated here Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EnergyTeachers.org (2nd nomination), Atlantic306 (talk) 20:12, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

Question

What exactly are you referring to as promotional on the Angel X draft? Iamangelx (talk) 21:33, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

• Hi, the tone is too promotional with the use of peacock terms such as legendary and he has done much much more!. Also autobiographies are discouraged as per WP:AUTOBIO, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 21:37, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Sargun Kaur Luthra

Hi [4] We don't use labels like Parallel Lead. You can check this essay User:Cyphoidbomb/Campaign of Ignorance to know the long going assertion of this labels plus Tellychakkar is not considered reliable source as per WP:ICTFSOURCES. Sid95Q (talk) 05:02, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Digital companion draft page

Hello, Why did you flag my page for speedy deletion? It is not an ad or promotion in any way. No one is profiting off of this page in any way, I am merely trying to inform and educate the public on an established industry term that does not currently have a Wikipedia page. I have included many references, a lot of research and effort into creating this page, and it is in no way "unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view" - there is no intention of promoting one particular company/group/etc. whatsoever. It is strictly informational. Why did you do this? Digital companion (talk) 19:03, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

• Because the article was written in a way that promoted the products mentioned in the article and was not written in the neutral tone that is required on Wikipedia. Also there was no mention of the criticism and controversies surrounding these products such as personal data collection and analysis for commercial purposes, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 20:05, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

The Magic Roundabout

Hi! Why did you remove all those reviews and accolades from the page The Magic Roundabout? LucaGaletti95 (talk) 10:12, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

• Because they were undue weight as there were already plenty of bad reviews analysed in the article to make a representative sample. Not every review should be included and adding so many bad reviews made the page non neutral and somewhat of a hatchet job, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 16:34, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

Ok, thanks for the reply. However, in the Reception section referring to the film The Magic Roundabout there is only Rotten Tomatoes. I think the review that I inserted can be restored, as there are no reviews on the film, and those in that article are all directed towards Doogal. Furthermore, I think some reviews should also be removed from the page Titanic: The Legend Goes On for the same reasons LucaGaletti95 (talk) 18:41, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

• • As there are three positive and two negative reviews on rotten tomatoes there should be at least one positive review highlighted as well as the negative one, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 19:12, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

What about Titanic: The Legend Goes on? LucaGaletti95 (talk) 21:11, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

• Will look at it tomorrow, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 21:45, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 April 2020

• News and notes: Unbiased information from Ukraine's government?

• In the media: Coronavirus, again and again

• Discussion report: Redesigning Wikipedia, bit by bit

• Featured content: Featured content returns

• Arbitration report: Two difficult cases

• Traffic report: Disease the Rhythm of the Night

• Gallery: Roy is doing fine and sending more photos

• Recent research: Trending topics across languages; auto-detecting bias

• Essay: Wikipedia:An article about yourself isn't necessarily a good thing

• By the numbers: Open data and COVID-19: Wikipedia as an informational resource during the pandemic

• Opinion: Trusting Everybody to Work Together

• On the bright side: What's making you happy this month?

• Interview: Health and RfA's: An interview with Guy Macon

• In focus: Multilingual Wikipedia

• WikiProject report: The Guild of Copy Editors

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:17, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

Help With Underlined Passages

Hi there, I am always trying to improve my editing skills, I added back some of the old edits to make the page flow better, but it looks like you made a comment about "independent?" is that because I don't have any other independent sources? I know we talked before about this page with lack of negative or other viewpoints, and I tried to find some but I could not. In that case would it be better to just not put any quotes in there? It is hard to edit some of the music pages because there are just not a lot of counter viewpoints out there. Thanks for your advice in advance Ricksanchez (talk) 07:14, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

• The material you re-added came from a suspected undeclared paid editor and is therefore not considered neutral or independent especially as the two sources have links to the record label, regards Atlantic306 (talk)
  • Thanks, I was referring more generally. I like your approach of trying to keep articles very tone neutral. If I am working on an article where the only references say "thing X is the bees knees" but I find no balancing counter that says, "yes X is the bees but not quite the knees" how should I handle that? Although the first reference is not necessarily promoting X there is no counterbalance. Hopefully that makes sense. I would like to hear your perspective on how you handle that. Thanks again Ricksanchez (talk) 20:27, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
• Hi, the source of the review is important; for example if it is in a publication which is a reliable source, preferably a national one, then it would be ok to quote it but it should not be claimed that an album or band was met with acclaim etc when there are only a couple of reviews. The reviews used in Underlinked Passages were from local sources that are close to the record label so have issues in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 22:05, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Imran Rahman

I removed the G11 tag, which I understand can be removed by any other editor except the author. I don't think that the stub is promotional with so little content. It needed rejecting rather than deleting. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:12, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

• Ok, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 18:24, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

Vambu Sandai - Discussion

Please take part in the merger discussion for Vambu Sandai. Lakshmi Putrudu, the dubbed version of this film, should not have a wiki page. The discussion is located on the page titled Vambu Sandai. Thank you. --DragoMynaa archived Atlantic306 (talk) 21:22, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Request to express your thoughts at Nomination of Sadat Hossain for deletion

A seond time discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sadat Hossain is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

If you are able to express your thoughts and regards again Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sadat Hossain (2nd nomination) it will be helpful for me. He is now IMDB listed Director and Famous Bangladesh Award winner. Jubair Sayeed Linas (talk) 12:09, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Help creating Article

Hello,

I want your help in creating an article of Indian YouTuber. Because i don't know much english and reffrences. I need your help. I want you to contribute to that article.

I request you.

I hope for you.

Don't disappoint me by saying no.

I am waiting for your reply. Mr. Bikaneri (talk) 09:46, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

• Hi, as I don't know much about Youtubers and am a bit busy you would be better making an entry at WP:Requested articles, regards Atlantic306 (talk)

Re create

Please make Bhamatsar article available on Wikipedia. But the article was correct but the article was removed due to the creation of ban user. Just as you created Dulchasar, make a Bhamatsar article as well. 223.188.133.81 (talk) 08:44, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

• Hi, am a bit busy at the moment, but will look into it in about a week, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 18:05, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

Review question

What is the problem related to accepting the page Aman shrivas nandvanshi (talk) 00:19, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

(by talk reader) @Aman shrivas nandvanshi: Unlike Twitter or Facebook, Wikipedia is not a social network where everyone creates their own profile. We are an encyclopedia like Britannica. Although, we host a lot of biographic articles, we don't allow autobiographies, like what you wrote at Draft:Aman shrivas, much of which isn't even in English. You should instead try Wikipedia in Hindi. Chris Troutman (talk) 01:04, 8 May 2020 (UTC)