User talk:Arenasky

The Vampire's Trail moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, The Vampire's Trail, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. You need more than just IMdB. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 08:46, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @DGG:, i realized and Thank you so much for information. Arenasky (talk) 09:26, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Vampire's Trail (February 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Vampire's Trail and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Vampire's Trail, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 04:25, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Arenasky! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 04:25, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of I Don't Speak English

Hello, Arenasky,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Crystallizedcarbon and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged I Don't Speak English for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. You may find our guide for writing quality articles to be extremely informative.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Crystallizedcarbon}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 13:04, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Banzai (1997 film)

Hello, Arenasky,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Crystallizedcarbon and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged Banzai (1997 film) for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. You may find our guide for writing quality articles to be extremely informative.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Crystallizedcarbon}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 13:08, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Eat It (film)

Hello, Arenasky,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Crystallizedcarbon and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged Eat It (film) for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. You may find our guide for writing quality articles to be extremely informative.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Crystallizedcarbon}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 13:10, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Season of the Senses

Hello, Arenasky,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Crystallizedcarbon and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged Season of the Senses for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. You may find our guide for writing quality articles to be extremely informative.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Crystallizedcarbon}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 13:11, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sandro Merli

Hello, Arenasky,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Crystallizedcarbon and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged Sandro Merli for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. You may find our guide for writing quality articles to be extremely informative.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Crystallizedcarbon}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 13:12, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sandro Dori

Hello, Arenasky,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Crystallizedcarbon and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged Sandro Dori for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. You may find our guide for writing quality articles to be extremely informative.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Crystallizedcarbon}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 13:12, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @Crystallizedcarbon:, I need time to complete my articles Arenasky (talk) 13:31, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I moved one to your user space and the rest have been moved to draft space for you to improve. Regards. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 16:56, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Savages (1995 film) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Savages (1995 film), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Sanyam.wikime (talk) 14:08, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kiss Me a Lot (film) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Kiss Me a Lot (film), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 14:59, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Antonella Della Porta moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Antonella Della Porta, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 14:59, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sergio Montanari moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Sergio Montanari, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. b uidhe 16:08, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Dear @Buidhe:, Please review this article Draft:Sergio_Montanari, I added all the sources and searched for over an hour on google. Thank you so much & Best wishes

Empty articles

Please do not create empty articles. If you want to work on an article without disruption, use the draft space. Otherwise you could be blocked from editing. ... discospinster _talk 17:55, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @Discospinster:, I'm so sorry and please forgive me, i'm new user, Thank you for your guidance and have a good time Arenasky (talk) 18:26, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Malizia 2000 moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Malizia 2000, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 19:11, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

some furrher advice

Perhaps I can offer you some general advice, based upon many years experience here:

The first step in creating an article is to have references at hand--references providing substantial coverage from third-party independent reliable sources, not press releases or mere announcements . Such sources are major newspapers and magazines, or reliable books or specialized encyclopedias. If this is all you have at first, put in draft space, not article space, until you find more. There is no point even starting without at least one reference--and you will surely have one, for you are gettin the information from somewhere. Add the reference at the very first edit. The best way is to use the "cite" templates", as described at WP:REFBEGIN.

If you have several good references you can write in article space, but I would advise not doing it until you have some experience.

Once you have a start in draft space, add other references/. For a bio article, there should be a source for the persons birth & education and steps in their career, and one at least for the importance of the work they did. For a film, you need more than just than IMdB. We do not consider IMdB reliable, for they do not necessarily check their entries. There are published guides to early films ,and performers in them, giving reliable details. DGG ( talk ) 19:11, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Dear @DGG:, Thank you so much for your guidance, I will try harder, Have a good time and Best wishes 🍀 Arenasky (talk) 19:22, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please review my articles

Draft:Antonella_Della_Porta
&
Draft:Malizia_2000
Thank you so much, i added 8 new references and Unfortunately i couldn't find any more references.
My Dear Friends @Buidhe: @Crystallizedcarbon: @DGG: & @Discospinster: Arenasky (talk) 22:26, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Malizia 2000 (February 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Malizia 2000 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Malizia 2000, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 22:54, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Antonella Della Porta has been accepted

Antonella Della Porta, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 01:35, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sergio Montanari (February 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sergio Montanari and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sergio Montanari, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 10:34, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sergio Montanari (February 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Requires significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources to show notability - not just refs that show they worked on films

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sergio Montanari and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sergio Montanari, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 11:09, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Jay Wade Edwards (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Lakeland

Robert Estrin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Lakewood

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done, The problem was solved Arenasky (talk) 10:05, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:The Vampire's Trail has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:The Vampire's Trail. Thanks! Atlantic306 (talk) 00:50, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello My Dear Friends @Atlantic306:, @Sulfurboy:, @Buidhe:, @DGG: Unfortunately I couldn't find any more references: Draft:The Vampire's Trail, please help me about this problem, Thank you so much, Arenasky (talk) 01:36, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Vampire's Trail has been accepted

The Vampire's Trail, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Atlantic306 (talk) 16:46, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sergio Montanari has been accepted

Sergio Montanari, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 19:01, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:03, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mohammad Mohammadian

As of now, it appears as if you are deleting interwiki-links in the Wikidata entry about Mohammad Mohammadian, without doing anything to have the articles deleted. Would you mind explaining why you are doing this? Bw --Orland (talk) 16:50, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Dear @Orland:, I realized and thank you for notice, Best regardsArenasky (talk) 18:21, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And still you are doing nothing to sort this out? --Orland (talk) 20:43, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Arenasky: saying "thank you" to Orland is not an explanation. Deleting interwiki links on wikidata in what appears to be a destructive act is something difficult to explain: I'm puzzled too. Boud (talk) 19:20, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Dear @Boud:, I apologize from the bottom of my heart, Unfortunately I didn't know creating an article in different languages is spam, I will never spam again, Best wishes Arenasky (talk) 19:43, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but I still don't understand. There is absolutely no problem with creating an article in several different languages, especially if you are fluent in those languages, as long as those articles follow generic Wikipedia policy and language-Wikipedia-specific policies and guidelines. Instead of apologising, it might be better to explain. Why did you delete the wikidata links to the equivalent articles in the other languages?

I'm also wondering why you removed a COI warning from a biographical article of which 99% of the text is currently yours. You should probably address this question at Talk:Mohammad Mohammadian. See WP:COI to understand the issue. Boud (talk) 20:23, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @Boud:, Thanks a lot for your information about WP:COI and ... I thought it's ok if I deleted, but unfortunately I was wrong and I deleted it only once, He told me to delete these articles and for some languages I found and did a quick delete template but I could not find it for some languages and I thought it was right, I was just thinking about spam and I was very confused about spam problem. now I know the rules better with the help of you and other friends. Best wishes Arenasky (talk) 21:04, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dawn Kasper, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fairfax.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]