User talk:LinzCarey

This is LinzCarey's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Spiritual Care Intervention Codings (WHO-SPICs) (September 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

User:LinzCarey/sandbox/Spiritual Care Intervention Codings (WHO-SPICs) may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 06:12, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, LinzCarey! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 06:12, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pastoral Narrative Disclosure (December 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00619. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Pastoral Narrative Disclosure may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Atlantic306 (talk) 15:25, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Pastoral Narrative Disclosure

Hi, have looked into this and I agree the copyvio is not an issue but the fact that it is being used for promotion by the authors of the research paper is an issue as promotion is not permitted on Wikipedia, see WP:PROMO. It is also advised that articles are written in a neutral point of view by an independent editor unconnected with the subject as per WP:COI. Finally, the fact that the article is so much a copy of the research paper is an issue because Wikipedia requires articles to be based on what independent reliable sources have written about the subject so it seems that it is too soon and that the article would be better postponed until the research is more widely reported. In conclusion, the subject is unfortunately not suitable for Wikipedia at this time. If you wish to be sent a copy of the article you can follow the procedure at WP:REFUND where you will need to refute the copyvio claim, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 21:44, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Wikipedia - Your response is seriously disappointing and expemplifies why Wikipedia will always be regarded as out of date and failing to engage new developmental material - and hence one of the reasons why we as academics tell students not to utilise Wikipedia! Surely one of the values of Wikipedia is to permit community commentary and hence the very reason why we want PND to be on Wikipedia - to gain community feedback. We certainly do not need to promote PND, it's accelarated viewing via academic circles has been outstanding! You were wrong the first time, and now wrong again !! Such it seems, is Wikipedia. However, thank you for your feedback - although unfortunately it reinforces our initial hesitation of engaging our exploratory work with Wikipedia! Adios Wikipedia !

September 2019

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Health and Social Care Chaplaincy, from its old location at User:LinzCarey/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 15:35, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Health and Social Care Chaplaincy (September 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Liance were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Health and Social Care Chaplaincy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Health and Social Care Chaplaincy, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-Liance^{talk/contribs} 15:35, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously? Rejected by Wikipedia?? Health and Social Care Chaplaincy is no different from any other journal listing, such as the Journal of Religion and Health. Wikipedia is meant to be a community encyclopedia, not an Orwellian ministry!

Your submission at Articles for creation: Health and Social Care Chaplaincy (October 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Taewangkorea were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Health and Social Care Chaplaincy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Health and Social Care Chaplaincy, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Taewangkorea (talk) 23:06, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

Hello, LinzCarey. We welcome your contributions, but it appears as if your primary purpose on Wikipedia is to add citations to research published by a small group of researchers.

Scientific articles should mainly reference review articles to ensure that the information added is trusted by the scientific community.

Editing in this way is also a violation of the policy against using Wikipedia for promotion and is a form of conflict of interest in Wikipedia – please see WP:SELFCITE and WP:MEDCOI. The editing community considers excessive self-citing to be a form of spamming on Wikipedia (WP:REFSPAM) and the edits will be reviewed and the citations removed where it was not appropriate to add them.

Finally, please be aware that the editing community highly values expert contributors – please see WP:EXPERT. I do hope you will consider contributing more broadly. If you wish to contribute, please first consider citing review articles written by other researchers in your field and which are already highly cited in the literature. If you wish to cite your own research, please start a new thread on the article talk page and add {{requestedit}} to ask a volunteer to review whether or not the citation should be added.

MrOllie (talk) 12:33, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Health and Social Care Chaplaincy

Hello, LinzCarey. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Health and Social Care Chaplaincy".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:12, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]