User:Robert McClenon/XfD log

This is a log of all deletion discussion nominations made by this user using Twinkle's XfD module.

If you no longer wish to keep this log, you can turn it off using the preferences panel, and nominate this page for speedy deletion under CSD U1.

April 2021

1. Anjum Sharma: nominated at AfD; notified Inda19712003 (talk · contribs) 14:50, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: Non-notable actor. The article should speak for itself, but does not provide evidence of acting notability or general notability. The listed roles are not listed as major roles. The article states that the subject is noted for Mirzapur, but the article on Mirzapur does not list Anjum Sharma. The references listed are interviews.
     {| class="wikitable"
     !  !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant
     |-
     | 1 || Hindustan Times interview || Independent source, not independent coverage ||
     |-
     | 2 || Indian Express interview || Independent source, not independent coverage ||
     |-
     | 3 || MissMalini.com, a gossip sheet || Interview || No
     |-
     |
     |}
2. Christopher Sembroski: nominated at AfD; notified Hektor (talk · contribs) 22:20, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
3. Pinkston Watersports: nominated at RfD; Target: Pinkston (notified); notified Alistair1978 (talk · contribs) 14:52, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: Little-used redirect, with 21 views in calendar 2020, that does nothing except link back to a disambiguation list.
4. Frederick Joseph: nominated at RfD; Target: Fred Flintstone (notified) 13:01, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: Redirect that is not explained in the target article, but was created twelve years ago by an account that has now been globally locked. In the absence of a better explanation, suggest that the redirect be viewed as vandalism.

May 2021

1. Denice Zamboanga: nominated at AfD; notified CommanderWaterford (talk · contribs) 06:37, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: Denice Zamboanga does not meet mixed martial arts notability guidelines, and this draft does not establish general notability. The statements that she competes in the ONE Championship are unverified, and the ONE Championship does not appear to satisfy mixed martial arts notability.
     This is one of three copies of the BLP, of which two are in draft space and this one in article space, probably in order to game the system. So this article cannot be moved to draft space when there already are two copies in draft space.
2. Valentin Primix: nominated at AfD; notified Creply (talk · contribs) 05:37, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: Valentin Primix does not, on the basis of this article, satisfy either musical notability or general notability. An article should speak for itself, but the article does not identify any criterion that satisfies musical notability, and does not describe significant coverage for general notability. The Career section reads like a social media profile.
3. Syed Iftquar Hussain: nominated at AfD; notified Syedbasharathmehdi (talk · contribs) 06:54, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: Syed Iftquar Hussain does not satisfy mixed martial arts notability, any other part of sports notability, or general notability. An article should speak for itself and should state how the subject is notable. Nothing in this article as written addresses any of the points of any section of sports notability, and there is no discussion of significant coverage such as would be necessary for general notability
4. The Lady of Heaven: nominated at AfD; notified 14saints (talk · contribs) 15:08, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: The Lady of Heaven does not satisfy film notability or general notability. This is an unreleased film. According to the guidelines on future films, unreleased films are only notable if production has itself been notable to satisfy general notability. Nothing in this article even starts to discuss significant coverage of production by reliable sources, likely because there has not been significant coverage of production by reliable sources. An article should speak for itself, and this draft does not.
     This article is promotional, and reads like an advertisement for the film, which is unreleased, and a release date is not given. This article is incomplete, in that portions of the article are empty sections.
     This article has already been moved to draft space once, and has been declined by Articles for Creation reviewers. Its principal author has been blocked for promotion. Another editor has moved the article back to article space without passing review.
5. Abdulmajeed Al Abbas: nominated at AfD; notified Lilianasri (talk · contribs) 04:31, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: Abdulmajeed Al Abbas does not satisfy association football notability guidelines. The subject has not played for a team at the highest level in Saudi Arabia. This draft also does not describe significant coverage that would satisfy general notability. This article was already move from article space to draft space once by User:Spiderone, and has been moved back to article space, so that any further draftification can only be done on the AFD close. Moving this article back to draft space a second time would be edit-warring.
6. Lydian Armenia: nominated at AfD; notified Margapro (talk · contribs) 19:44, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: Lydian Armenia: This appears to be undisclosed paid editing. A draft was created in March. This article was then created in article space, so that it cannot be moved into draft space. The originator also created Amulsar, which is about an affiliate of this company, which has been moved to Draft:Amulsar. The difference between the draft and the article is that the draft has 66 references, most of which are unreliable sources such as Youtube and Facebook, while the article has 22 references. An analysis of the references follows:
     {| class="wikitable"
     !  !!  !!  !! Reliable and independent? !! Significant
     |-
     | 1 || Banks.am || Press release || No ||
     |-
     | 2 || Banks.am || Press release || No ||
     |-
     | 3 || Lydian Armenia web site || Not independent || No ||
     |-
     | 4 || Aysor.am || Machine translation looks like press release || No ||
     |-
     | 5 || Youtube || || No ||
     |-
     | 6 || Yerevan Today || Machine translation looks like interview || No ||
     |-
     | 7 || Mediamax.am || Press release || No ||
     |-
     | 8 || || Interview || No ||
     |-
     | 9 || Lydian Armenia web site || Not independent || No ||
     |-
     | 10 || Lydian.International.co.uk - Web site of parent company || Not independent || No ||
     |-
     | 11 || Lydian.International.co.uk - Web site of parent company || Not independent || No ||
     |-
     | 12 || Lydian Armenia web site || Not independent || No ||
     |-
     | 13 || Lydian Armenia web site || Not independent || No ||
     |-
     | 14 || Mining Journal || Story about delisting of company || Probably || No
     |-
     | 15 || Lydian Armenia web site || || No ||
     |-
     | 16 || Banks.am || Couldn’t find mention of company || Probably || No
     |-
     | 17 || Minenergy.am || Armenian Energy Ministry Information Page || Yes || No
     |-
     | 18 || Lydian Armenia web site || || No || No
     |-
     | 19 || Armenpress.am || Press release || No || No
     |-
     | 20 || Youtube || || No || No
     |-
     | 21 || Youtube || || No || No
     |-
     | 22 || Youtube || || No || No
     |}
     None of the references prove anything. Other than the 22 references (at least not 66 in article space), nothing proves corporate notability.
7. Donkervoort D8: nominated at AfD; notified NSHPUZA (talk · contribs) 17:02, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: Donkervoort D8: Was created in draft space, and then in article space, which prevents a move back to draft space. Author also created Donkervoort D7. Does not satisfy product notability or general notability. Created by a blocked sockpuppet, but there have been good-faith edits since then, so not an open-and-shut G5. See analysis of sources below.
     {| class="wikitable"
     !  !!  !!  !!  !! Independent and reliable !! Significant
     |-
     | 1 || AutoExpress || Information Sheet || Probably not independent || No
     |-
     | 2 || BBC.com || Web page that cannot be loaded || Appears not || May be advertising
     |-
     | 3 || Car and Driver || Product Review || Yes || Yes
     |-
     | 4 || Fastestlaps || Product Information || Seems not independent || No
     |-
     | 5 || DesignBoom || Product Information || Seems not || No
     |-
     | 6 || Donkervoort.com || Own Web Site || No || Yes, but not independent
     |-
     | 7 || Donkervoort.com || Own Web Site || No || Yes, but not independent
     |}
     Only one independent significant source, does not satisfy notability, and the work of a sock.
8. Draft:Red Monkey Designs: nominated at MfD; notified Torrypendy (talk · contribs) 18:42, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: Red Monkey Designs
     This draft was submitted in January 2020 by Torrypendy, who is obviously Torry Pendergrass, founder of Red Monkey. I rejected it because it read like an advertisement. It also had too many non-permitted external links. It was deleted as G13 in July 2020, but was then undeleted. It was tweaked by gnomes in November 2020, which extended its shelf life. It was then deleted as G13 in May 2021, and has been undeleted again, and has been diddled with by Torrypendy and by a gnome. If a neutral editor had been planning to do real work on it, they would have done so within the past year. It isn't accomplishing anything, and should be gotten rid of.
9. Mint 400 Records discography: nominated at AfD; notified NorthPark1417 (talk · contribs) 21:12, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: Mint 400 Records discography: The problems with this article include notability, NPOV|neutraility, and verifiability. First, this is a discography for a record label. As such, it only passes notability if the record label passes musical notability or general notability. There is nothing in this article to that effect. The article does not speak for itself. The record label does not have a company article. Draft:Mint 400 Records has been submitted and declined and then rejected. Creation of this discography for a non-notable label is gaming the system.
     Second, the article has had a long history of paid editing, being created by NorthPark1417, who is blocked for conflict of interest. The article has not yet been cleaned of promotional material. It also contains language intended to praise the subject rather than describe them neutrally.
     Third, as to verifiability, the first seven references are unresolvable. References 8 through 10 are passing mentions, and reference 11 appears to be a passing mention, but is paywalled. However, the sources would only matter if they supported a claim of notability.
10. Jamie Jones (musician): nominated at RfD; Target: Jamie Jones (DJ) (notified); notified Tetraedycal (talk · contribs) 22:52, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: This is a questionable redirect. Jamie Jones (DJ) is not a musician. There is a Draft:Jamie Jones (musician), which is being reviewed. In my judgment as a reviewer, it has more than a 50% chance of surviving an AFD, and should be accepted, but this redirect needs to be replaced with hatnotes between the two Jamie Jones articles. Please delete this redirect.
11. Nabi Mammadov: nominated at AfD; notified Wikiazeus (talk · contribs) 15:24, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Nabi Mammadov has been created in both article space and draft space, which is typically done in order to game the system by preventing draftification. The images are the own work of the submitter, which is typically characteristic of a conflict of interest submission. The subject does not satisfy mixed martial arts notability or [[WP::GNG|general notability]].
12. Draft:Arvin Niknia: nominated at MfD; notified Mr.Univers99 (talk · contribs) 16:11, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Arvin Niknia: This article, which is now in draft space, appears to be entirely the work of a committee of sockpuppets who have been blocked as a result of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mr.Univers99. This isn't a G5 case because the sockpuppet investigation was started after the article was created, so that the master and the socks were not blocked at the time that the article was created. This has been declined four times, and also moved from article space to draft space once, so there is very little reason to think that this stub will become an article. If it isn't deleted now, it is likely to be resubmitted by more sockpuppets.
13. Kiefer (musician): nominated at AfD; notified Corylomberg (talk · contribs) 23:39, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Kiefer
      Musician who does not satisfy general notability and for whom the claim for musical notability is inadequate. Already draftified once, then moved back to article space by originator. The statement is made in the lede that the subject is a Grammy winner, but there is citation for that claim, and the statement at the end of the article about the Grammy is unreferenced, and has to do with a minor role. The article Ventura (Anderson .Paak album) about the Grammy-winning album does identify Kiefer as one of the producers of two tracks and one of the writers of one track. Musical notability criterion 8 refers to winning a major award such as a Grammy, and this is only a minor mention for an album, for a criterion that applies to performers.
      Only two references:
      {| class="wikitable"
      ! Reference !! Comments !! Independent and Reliable !! Significant
      |-
      | 1 || Allmusic || No ||
      |-
      | 2 || Pitchfork (online magazine) || Yes || No, one paragraph
      |}
14. Yam Haus: nominated at AfD; notified Mrpizzaman123456 (talk · contribs) 22:02, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Yam Haus - Run-of-the-mill touring band that does not satisfy notability. An article should speak for itself, and the article does not indicate any of the musical notability criteria or the significant coverage required for general notability.
      Originator submitted draft to AFC, and then created article while draft was in AFC review queue, so article cannot be moved to draft space. Naïve Google search shows not only that the band exists, and uses social media, which we knew, but that the band tours and sells tickets, but does not find significant independent secondary coverage.
      An article should speak for itself, and it should not be necessary to check the references, but two of the three are interviews:
      {| class="wikitable"
      !  !!  !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant
      |-
      | 1 || Explore Minnesota || Regional tourism newsletter, describes a previous gig. || Not exactly, because it is advertising || No. Two paragraphs.
      |-
      | 2 || Melodic Magazine, a web site || An interview || No, an interview || N/A
      |-
      | 3 || Minnesota Monthly || An interview || No, an interview || N/A
      |}
15. Ariana Nabaey: nominated at AfD; notified Khadempour322 (talk · contribs) 04:55, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Ariana Nabaey
      This martial artist does not satisfy martial arts notability or general notability. Originally created in draft space as autobiography by subject of draft, but declined by AFC reviewers. Then created in article space by a different self-promoting athlete, so that it cannot be moved back to draft space. Image of subject is own work of subject.
      An article should speak for itself without the need to check references, but the references are mostly almost the same, a record of his fights, rather than significant coverage, so that he does not satisfy general notability, and does not satisfy any of the mixed martial arts criteria.
      {| class="wikitable"
      ! Reference Number !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant
      |-
      | 1 || MMA Core. Info on fighters. || || No. || Not really
      |-
      | 2 || Fight Time. Info on fighters. || In Russian. Machine-translated. || No. || Not really
      |-
      | 3 || Zard News. Info on fighters. || In Persian. Machine-translated. Seems to be referring to a female martial artist with the same name. || No. || Not really.
      |-
      | 4 || Sherdog. A usually reliable source on martial arts. || || Yes. || No.
      |-
      | 5 || Tapology. Info on fighters. || || Probably. || No.
      |-
      | 6 || MMA Core. || Info on fighters. Similar to reference 1. || No. || Not really.
      |-
      | 7 || Mixedmartialarts.com || Info on fighters || No. || Not really
      |-
      | 8 || Superlutas.com.br || Info on fighters. In portuguese. Machine-translated. || No. || Not really
      |}
16. Ishq-e-Laa: nominated at AfD; notified Hum aur Tum (talk · contribs) 00:37, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Ishq-e-Laa
      This is an upcoming unreleased television series, and does not satisfy television notability or general notability. There is already a draft, so that this article cannot be moved into draft space. Naïve Google search shows that this is an upcoming television series; we knew that. The sources are puff pieces announcing the upcoming appearances of the male and female leads.
      {| class="wikitable"
      !  !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent  !! Significant
      |-
      | 1 || Somethinghaute.com. Pakistani web site. || Promo about male lead. || Probably not, appears to be from TV network. || No
      |-
      | 2 || Express Tribune. Pakistani web site. || Promo about male lead. || Probably not, appears to be from TV network. || No
      |-
      | 3 || Cutacut.com. || Promo about male lead. || No. From TV network. || No
      |-
      | 4 || DailyPakistan.pk || Promo about female lead. || Probably not, appears to be from TV network. || No
      |-
      |
      |}
17. Parviz Mahmudov: nominated at AfD; notified Rza835 (talk · contribs) 15:58, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Parviz Mahmudov
      Composer who does not meet general notability or any criterion of musical notability. Created first in draft space, and then in article space when autoconfirmed, thus making draftification impossible; this is sometimes done to game the system. See Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information; the discography is too long (and misspells Composer). Five references in Azerbaijani do not provide significant coverage.
      {| class="wikitable"
      !  !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant
      |-
      | 1 || milli.az || Wedding report, in Azerbaijani || || No
      |-
      | 2 || kaspi.az || Interview, in Azerbaijani || No || No, interview
      |-
      | 3 || azadinform.az || Interview, in Azerbaijani || No || No, interview
      |-
      | 4 || metbuat.az || Announcement in Azerbaijani || Maybe || No
      |-
      | 5 || metbuat.az || Announcement in Azerbaijani || Maybe || No
      |}
18. Draft:Zennic 2: nominated at MfD; notified LoudJarred (talk · contribs) 16:08, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Zennic
      Multiple copies of pages on this non-notable musician have been created in order to game the system. One copy is in article space and has been nominated for AFD for notability reasons and other reasons. These two copies are in draft space, and are being nominated for deletion because the creation of multiple copies is disruptive and tendentious. Prior creations in article space were speedily deleted as A7 and G11.

June 2021

1. Flight Reacts: nominated at AfD; notified Junefith (talk · contribs) 04:34, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: Flight Reacts
     YouTuber who does not satisfy general notability or biographical notability. Naïve Google search shows that he is a much-followed YouTuber; we knew that. Much of the article is non-encyclopedic and non-neutral and is written from a fan viewpoint. Trimming all of the fancruft out might not leave much.
     Submitted as a draft to AFC, then declined, then copied into article space (and so cannot be moved back into draft space).
     The references appear twice, in different orders. This analysis is of the second list. The references are either YouTube, or passing mentions by Steph Curry of the subject, or unresolvable.
     {| class="wikitable"
     !  !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant
     |-
     | 1 || Bleacher Reports || Passing mention of a comment by the subject || Yes || No. Passing mention.
     |-
     | 2 || Essentially Sports || Passing mention of a comment by the subject || Yes || No. Passing mention.
     |-
     | 3 || YouTube || || || No
     |-
     | 4 || YouTube || || || No
     |-
     | 5 || YouTube || || ||
     |-
     | 6 || YouTube || || ||
     |-
     | 7 || BiographyDaily || Reference is unresolvable || ||
     |-
     |
     |}
2. Abkhazia–United States relations: nominated at AfD; notified WikiCleanerMan (talk · contribs) 19:25, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: Abkhazia–United States relations
     See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abkhazia–United States relations. This is actually a second nomination, but the spelling and punctuation of the title is apparently different than in 2014.
     The United States has never recognized either Abhkazia or South Ossetia, and articles on relations between the United States and both Abkhazia and South Ossetia have been deleted as non-encyclopedic, and redirected to International recognition of Abkhazia and South Ossetia. This article was recently accepted from draft, apparently by good-faith mistake by a reviewer. Nothing has changed with regard to non-relations between the United States and Abkhazia since 2014. The United States still considers both Abkhazia and South Ossetia to be de jure parts of Georgia that were invaded by Russia in 2008, and that are essentially Russian puppet states.
3. Kristofer Kamiyasu: nominated at AfD; notified Sanna Bergman (talk · contribs) 04:00, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: Kristofer Kenichi Kamiyasu
     This actor does not appear to satisfy acting notability or general notability. An article should speak for itself so that a reader can determine what general or special notability criterion is satisfied, and this one does not. The lede identifies three roles:
     *1. Box 21, which does not have its own article.
     *2. M/S Romantika is a ship, not a performance.
     *3. The Hitman's Wife's Bodyguard is in post-production, and so not yet notable.
     Copies of this biography were created in both draft space and article space, possibly to game the system, so that the article cannot be moved to draft space to work on notability.
     The filmography consists mostly of red links, and does not appear to have any trapdoors to notability.
     An analysis of the references should only be necessary for GNG, but is "interesting", because some of them do not even mention the subject:
     {| class="wikitable"
     !  !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant
     |-
     | 1 || New York Times || Paywalled || Yes || Probably a passing mention.
     |-
     | 2 || Forbes || Mention of an unreleased movie, The Hitman's Wife's Bodyguard || Yes || No
     |-
     | 3 || Variety.com || Interview about the movie 'Knocking' || Yes || No. Subject not mentioned, only about movie.
     |-
     | 4 || Hollywood Reporter || Interview about the movie 'Knocking' || Yes || No. Subject not mentioned, only about movie.
     |-
     | 5 || Express.uk || About The Hitman's Wife's Bodyguard || Yes || No. Subject not mentioned, only about movie.
     |}
4. Scottish Universities Mission Institution: nominated at AfD; notified Satyamfxr (talk · contribs) 17:04, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: Scottish Universities Mission Institution
     This stub does not speak for itself and makes no claim of either general notability or organizational notability. Articles have been tendentiously created four times. The first two were deleted speedily. The third was moved to draft space. This is the fourth, and it makes no claim of notability. This does not mean that the school is notable, and it does not mean that the school is not notable. It does mean that the submitter is being disruptive by submitting articles that make no claim of notability.
     The only reference is a request for applications for employment for junior faculty members. This means that the school exists. We thought it existed.
     This article cannot be moved to draft space because there is already a draft, and so it needs to be deleted. The title should be ECP SALTed, so that a neutral experienced editor can either create a Start-Class article or accept a draft for a Start-Class article.
5. 2021 Ginetta Junior Championship: nominated at AfD; notified Samster80 (talk · contribs) 00:24, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: Non-notable motorsports competition. This article was already draftified once by User:Onel5969, but then created again in article space by the originator (rather than discussing with the reviewer). The article does not speak for itself in establishing notability, and the references do not speak for it either, because one is paywalled and the other is the subject's own web site:
     {| class="wikitable"
     !  !! Reference Number !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant
     |-
     | 1 || Forix.autosport.com || A login screen for a paywall || Don’t know || Probably not
     |-
     | 2 || Ginetta || Own web site || No || Not applicable
     |-
     |
     |}
     Does not satisfy general notability.

July 2021

1. Knives Out 2: nominated at AfD; notified Starzoner (talk · contribs) 04:47, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: Knives Out 2
     This film does not satisfy film notability guidelines, and in particular does not satisfy future film guidelines. The future film guidelines are poorly written and are often misunderstood. There is a myth that a film is considered notable if a reliable source states that production (principal photography or animation) has begun. A more careful reading of the guideline shows that films are divided into three groups based on stages of production:
     *1. Films for which production has not begun, which are not notable, and are usually redirected, to the director, the book, the franchise, or some related topic.
     *2. Films that have entered principal photography (or animation) but have not been released.
     *3. Films that have been released to theatres.
     Films that have been in production but not yet released are notable only if production itself has achieved general notability. Films that have been released to theatres are notable based on reviews or similar coverage. This film has been in principal photography but has not yet been released, and so is notable only if production itself satisfies general notability. An article should speak for itself as to why the subject is notable; but nothing in this article says that production has been notable.
     Because the notability criterion for the second group is poorly written, some film articles are written to provide a handwave that production is in progress or completed. The removal of the notability tag was a handwave, and did not make the article speak for itself
     A detailed analysis of the sources has not been provided at this time, but many of the sources simply identify cast members, and advance identification of cast members is not significant coverage.
     A film notability tag was removed from the article with the edit summary "Removed {{Notability}} tag: This film is in the news all the time. Def passes WP:GNG ". Nothing in the article refers to news about the film, which may or may not be significant. A statement in an edit summary does not establish notability. (If significant coverage of the film can be added to the article, that is what the Heymann rule is for.)
2. Draft:Regional at Best: nominated at MfD; notified K-popguardian (talk · contribs) 16:52, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: Regional at Best drafts
     These drafts are repeated resubmissions about an album that has repeatedly been determined not to satisfy musical notability, and has been more than once redirected to Twenty-One Pilots. There have been attempts to game the naming by alternate capitalization and by disambiguation. Three of the versions in article space have been locked as redirects (salted from being articles).
     See:
     *Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Regional at Best (album)
     *Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Regional at Best
     The targets of this deletion request are drafts of two spellings, and one submission from a sandbox.
     *Draft:Regional At Best (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
     *Draft:Regional at Best (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
     *User:Mattturner747/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
     None of these drafts will be accepted, because they cannot be accepted when the article title is locked. A Deletion Review recently affirmed the redirection, and so the uselessness of these drafts. See:
     https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2021_June_21
3. Road signs in Uganda: nominated at AfD; notified Kingwarnen (talk · contribs) 02:55, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: Road signs in Uganda
     This article has no sources. It is an image gallery rather than an encyclopedic article; see Wikipedia is not a gallery.
     A copy of this article was created in article space, and was moved to draft space by User:Asukite, but this copy has been created in article space again, so that a second draftification is not possible.
4. Restore The Broken: nominated at AfD; notified WVkiddo (talk · contribs) 15:58, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: Restore the Broken
     Non-notable band that does not satisfy any of the musical notability criteria. As a stub, it makes no claim of general notability. There is only one reference, which does not appear to be independent and is not significant coverage.
     This article was created in article space, and then (correctly) moved to draft space by User:GermanKity, and has now been moved back to article space by its originator. Moving it to draft space a second time would be move-warring. This might be a candidate for A7 as a band with no credible claim of significance, but that might be challenged, so a deletion discussion is in order,
5. Majid Norouzi: nominated at AfD; notified سماع (talk · contribs) 16:38, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: Majid Norouzi
     Actor of questionable notability. This article was moved from article space to draft space once by User:Onel5969 with the notation in the edit summary that possible undisclosed paid editing was being segregated. There has subsequently been no response to the concern about paid editing except to move the article back into article space. The main claim to fame is a television series, Gando (TV series), in a role that may or may not itself be a major role. The Gando article is being expanded by the author of this article in a way that appears to be the construction of a walled garden.
     The references are all IMDB, and so none of them are reliable.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Reference Number !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant
     |-
     | 1 || IMDB - Majid Norouzi || IMDB - Own entry || No || No
     |-
     | 2 || IMDB - Maslahat || IMDB || No || No
     |-
     | 3 || IMDB - Gando || IMDB || No || No
     |}
6. Devel Sixteen: nominated at AfD; notified ගොඩය (talk · contribs) 14:50, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: Devel Sixteen
     This stub does not contain enough information to establish product notability.
     There is also a draft, which is more detailed, and reads like an advertisement, so this article cannot be moved to draft space.
     Both of the references are advertisements.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Reference Number !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant
     |-
     | 1 || Driving.ca || In the nature of a press release || No || N/A
     |-
     | 2 || Throttlebias.com || Reads like an advertisement || No || N/A
     |-
     |
     |-
     |
     |}
7. Draft:Europe's last dictatorship: nominated at MfD; notified Jabbi (talk · contribs) 04:51, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: This draft was created in both article space and draft space. The article was then nominated for deletion, and has been deleted. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Europe's last dictatorship. The reasons for deletion, as noted by the closer, were varied, but none of the reasons implies that the title is likely to be notable in the future. The title in article space has since been redirected to Human rights in Belarus. There is no value in maintaining this draft.
8. Sri Hatakeswara Swamy Temple: nominated at AfD; notified Singupuramtown (talk · contribs) 19:57, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: Sri Hatakeswara Swamy Temple
     Religious building which does not satisfy building notability because no independent sources have been provided. Only source provided is the temple's own web site, which is obviously not independent. Already moved once to draft space by User:Discospinster, and moved back to article space with no real improvement. A second unilateral move to draft space would be move-warring. Either draftification or deletion would be valid AFD outcomes.

August 2021

1. Draft:Cowrywise: nominated at MfD; notified Theobasan (talk · contribs) 02:48, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: Cowrywise
     This draft was Rejected by User:Celestina007 on 17 February 2021. It would have become eligible for G13 in about two weeks, except that the originator removed the Reject notice:
     https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Cowrywise&type=revision&diff=1036611868&oldid=1036610597&diffmode=source
     and resubmitted it. This action is disruptive and is an effort to game the system to bypass a rejection and possibly to confuse the reviewers. Rather than restarting the G13 clock, please respect the intention of the Rejection by deleting the draft.
2. Enam Tugbefia: nominated at AfD; notified Bloomshouse (talk · contribs) 00:09, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: Enam Tugbefia
     Run-of-the-mill beauty contestant. This article was moved into draft space by User:Onel5969, and was then moved back into article space, so a second move to draft space would be move warring .
     This article does not speak for itself and does not explain why the subject satisfies either the general notability guideline or any other notability guideline. The only credible claims of significance are finishing second in a beauty contest, and a controversy over vote-rigging in the beauty contest. The latter seems to be a living person known for one event, which can be covered in an article on the beauty contest, if the beauty contest is itself notable.
     The article has been reference-bombed, and it should not be necessary to go through the sources to check on notability. However, reading the references shows that they are mostly about the 2019 beauty contest controversy.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Reference Number !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant
     |-
     | 1 || Modern Ghana || Reads like a press release || No ||
     |-
     | 2 || 3news || A photo gallery about the beauty contest controversy || No. ||
     |-
     | 3 || YEN.COM.GH || A photo gallery about the beauty contest itself || Maybe || No
     |-
     | 4 || 3news || Same photo gallery as 2 || No ||
     |-
     | 5 || Ghana Web || Same press release as 1 || No ||
     |-
     | 6 || Ghpage || Another press release || No ||
     |-
     | 7 || Voltaonlinegh || About the beauty contest controversy || || No
     |-
     | 8 || Ytainment || About the beauty contest controversy || || No
     |-
     | 9 || News AF Feed News || An interview || No ||
     |-
     | 10 || Pulse.com.gh || Same interview as 9 || No ||
     |-
     | 11 || Ghana News || A news story about the beauty contest || Yes || No. Two sentences.
     |-
     | 12 || Ghana Celebrities || A news story about the beauty contest || Maybe || No.
     |-
     | 13 || YEN.COM.GH || Another news story about the beauty contest || Maybe || No
     |-
     | 14 || Ghpage || Yet more coverage of the beauty contest || No ||
     |-
     |
     |-
     |
     |}
     This article is really about the beauty contest controversy. Either there should be an article about the beauty contest and the controversy, or there shouldn't; but the subject is clearly noted for one event. It appears that she or her flack are trying to use Wikipedia to advance her career by publicizing the controversy. The three conditions of BLP1E are all met. Either cover the controversy as a controversy, or don't cover it.
3. Draft:Continuous Innovation Framework: nominated at MfD; notified Arentvantspijker (talk · contribs) 02:27, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: Continuous Innovation Framework
     Draft that has been declined seven times by six reviewers. Reads like a blurb for a business methodology containing marketing buzzspeak, because it is a blurb for a business methodology. Submitter has failed to answer questions about conflict of interest, but see recent discussion at COIN: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#Draft:Continuous_Innovation_Framework
4. Bahujan Kranti Morcha: nominated at AfD; notified Mr.Rajvanshi (talk · contribs) 04:44, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: Bahujan Kranti Morcha
     Organization which has no references and does not establish organizational notability. Article was already moved to draft space once, and has been moved back to article space, so that another move to draft space would be move warring. This stub does not speak for itself, and neither do its references (because they aren't there).
5. 2021 Winston-Salem Open: nominated at AfD; notified MATTN101 (talk · contribs) 20:13, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: 2021 Winston-Salem Open
     Non-notable future tennis tournament. Already moved to draft space as not ready for article space once, but moved back to article space without improvement. Another unilateral move to draft space would be move-warring, but another move to draft space or to the bit bucket is needed, so using a consensus process. In its present state, does not satisfy event notability and in particular does not satisfy future event notability. No significant coverage because nothing to cover significantly yet. The references are two local online news web pages, and both appear to be in the nature of announcements (like press releases).
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Reference Number !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant
     |-
     | 1 || YesWeekly, local web news || Reads like a press release || ? || No
     |-
     | 2 || Winston-Salem Journal || Reads like a press release || ? || No
     |}
6. Knowledge in Islam: nominated at AfD; notified Wiki N Islam (talk · contribs) 00:08, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: Knowledge in Islam
     This article is essentially unchanged since 9 May 2021, when a deletion debate was closed with Draftify. It was then moved to draft space by closer User:Tone, and was moved back to article space on 11 May 2021, which was move warring against the consensus as found by the AFD. It was then moved back to draft space on 11 May 2021by User:Nearlyevil665. It was then moved back to article space on 19 August 2021 by User:Wiki N Islam. Rather than continuing the cycle of move-warring, I will let the community decide again.
7. Draft:Chondhi: nominated at MfD; notified Chondhi (talk · contribs) 23:48, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: Chondhi
     Something improper is going on here. There already is an article on Chondhi. This draft has a different latitude and longitude for the village than the article. The submitter of this draft, logged out, changed the latitude and longitude for the village and some other information, in a way that appears to be sneaky vandalism, but has been reverted. This draft may also be vandalism or a hoax, but is not so obvious that G3 would be appropriate. Should this draft be deleted, and should sources be found for the article, or should the article be corrected, or is this draft about a different village? Are there two villages with the same name in different districts in the same state, in which case disambiguation is in order?
8. Naraka: Bladepoint: nominated at AfD; notified Kou Dou (talk · contribs) 04:43, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: Naraka Bladepoint
     Game that does not satisfy game notability or software notability. Has one reference, which appears to be an independent review, but is in an audience-supported webmag. An article should speak for itself. This article has empty Development and Release sections and is not a useful stub.
     Moving this article to draft space would be in order, except that there is already a draft in draft space, which has been declined both as reading promotionally and as duplicating this article. Neither the draft nor the article is ready for article space. The draft has tone issues and does not establish notability. The article does not establish notability and does not have enough information for a stub.

September 2021

1. Diary of a Wimpy Kid (2021 film): nominated at AfD; notified Lorick2021 (talk · contribs) 22:20, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: Diary of a Wimpy Kid (2021 film)
     This is a film that is scheduled for release in December 2021, and is being submitted repeatedly, in advance of its release. The good-faith assumption is that it is being submitted by ultras, fanatical fans. Animated films usually have ultras. It was created in article space in December 2020, and was nominated for deletion, and was sent back to draft space; see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diary of a Wimpy Kid (2021 film). It was then submitted for review in June 2021 and declined, and then submitted for review twice in September 2021 and declined both times, and then copied into article space, and also submitted for review yet again. Creation in article space while there is already a draft games the system by making another move back to draft space impossible. So it looks as though we need another AFD. There is only one reference in the article, which is a long mention in collider.com of the film's teaser, which does not appear to be independent. A review of the references in the draft shows that they are mostly the same teaser for the film, or passing mentions, or interviews. There is nothing resembling significant coverage of the upcoming film. We know that it is an upcoming film. We knew that.
     Some random editor will probably state that the film has completed production, and that films that have completed production are considered notable. This is a common but silly misreading of a badly written portion of the film notability guidelines. It reasonably divides films into three classes:
     *1. Those that have not begun production, which are not notable.
     *2. Those that have begun or completed production, but have not been released (which are the subject of controversy).
     *3. Those that have been released.
     The guideline then goes on to say:
     *Additionally, films that have already begun shooting, but have not yet been publicly released (theatres or video), should generally not have their own articles unless the production itself is notable per the notability guidelines.
     This film has not been released. There is nothing in the advance coverage to the effect that the production is notable.
     The last time that an article on this film was taken to AFD, the conclusion was to send it to Draft. Since there already is a draft, which is better sourced than the article, the article should be deleted, and the draft may be submitted for review when the film is released.
2. Draft:Treymond Smith: nominated at MfD; notified Nihara.widefy (talk · contribs) 04:34, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: These three drafts were submitted to AFC by User:Nihara.widefy, and were declined for reasons of neutral point of view and of tone. The submitter was then blocked for UPE. (You don't expect neutral writing from an undisclosed paid editor, do you?) The three drafts were then all blanked as pending copyright violation review.
     *Draft:Treymond Smith (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
     *Draft:Deborah Mannas (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
     *Draft:Will Roberts (actor) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
     In nominating the drafts for deletion, I am not commenting on whether the subjects are biographically notable. They likely are notable, but the drafts were not assessed for notability because the tone and neutrality were unacceptable. If a neutral editor wants to compose drafts on these people, they will be better off to make a clean start without being burdened by the cruddy drafts, if any of the crud survives copyright review anyway. Just blow them up so that someone can start over if appropriate.
3. After We Fell: nominated at AfD; notified Lorick2021 (talk · contribs) 13:52, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: After We Fell
     This is either an unreleased film, or a film without Reception information. It does not satisfy film notability guidelines. A draft was submitted and declined three times in July. In September, a draft was submitted at about the same time as an article was created, so that the article cannot be moved back into draft space.
     There is a schedule of release information in various countries, some prior to 6 September. However, it also states that release will be on 30 September. There are no reviews and no reception information for the film's release in other countries.
     An analysis of the references shows nothing significant:
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Reference Number !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant
     |-
     | 1 || Soundtracklist.com || View blocked by anti-malware filter, but would not be significant coverage anyway || N || N
     |-
     | 2 || Deadline.com || States that film is being released directly to streaming. || N || N
     |-
     | 3 || Deadline.com || States that film went into production. We knew that. || N || N
     |-
     | 4 || IMDB || Release schedule || N || N
     |-
     | 5 || Netflixlife || Release schedule || N || N
     |-
     |
     |}
     There is nothing that constitutes independent significant coverage.
     Some random editor will probably state that the film has completed production, and that films that have completed production are considered notable. This is a common but silly misreading of a badly written portion of the film notability guidelines. It reasonably divides films into three classes:
     *1. Those that have not begun production, which are not notable.
     *2. Those that have begun or completed production, but have not been released.
     *3. Those that have been released.
     The guideline then goes on to say:
     *Additionally, films that have already begun shooting, but have not yet been publicly released (theatres or video), should generally not have their own articles unless the production itself is notable per the notability guidelines.
     This film has not been released. There is nothing in the advance coverage to the effect that the production is notable. The version that is in article space should be deleted, and the version that is in draft space can be left in draft space until it is ready for article space.
4. Draft:Garchomp: nominated at MfD; notified ShinyDialga777 (talk · contribs) 08:06, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: This Pokemon species is being resubmitted for review disruptively. It has been declined three times and then rejected twice, and has now been resubmitted again on 10 September 2021.
5. Draft:Lana Rhoades: nominated at MfD; notified Aitch & Aitch Aitch (talk · contribs) 04:40, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: Lana Rhoades
     This draft was submitted and rejected in February 2021, and has been resubmitted without explanation or discussion. (There have been changes, but the nature of rejection is and should be such that an editor should not simply modify and resubmit a draft after rejection.) The draft was rejected because articles about the subject have been created and deleted three times, most recently at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lana Rhoades (4th nomination). The title Lana Rhoades was cut down to a redirect, and was salted. It appears that the salting in article space has expired (possibly due to an error in entering the date by the salting admin).
     The subject is a pornographic actress who appears to have a cult following of ultras. Any effort to create an article (after three deletions and one Deletion Review) should be via another Deletion Review, not by disruptive resubmission.
     Recommend that this draft be deleted from draft space, and ECP create-protected in draft space, and that the redirect be ECP-protected in article space.
6. Water4: nominated at RfD; Target: Jerry Regier (notified); notified Back ache (talk · contribs) 17:58, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: There is no apparent relationship between the subject of this redirect and the target, and the redirect is to a non-existent section. The edit summary says that it is explained in the article, but it isn't. Request that redirect be deleted as useless.
7. Daniel Martyn: nominated at AfD; notified Philafrenzy (talk · contribs) 15:27, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: Daniel Martyn
     Non-notable military officer who does not satisfy general notability or military notability and is a low-profile individual. Nothing that is reported about the subject amounts to significant coverage. The references have been reviewed, and amount to passing mentions.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Reference Number !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable
     |-
     | 1 || Royal Navy || About the submarine, not its commander || Yes || No || Yes
     |-
     | 2 || Scotland Herald || An article about command of a submarine. Refers to the subject, but only in context of his role as commanding officer. || Yes || No || Yes
     |-
     | 3 || Royal Navy || Page does not exist || || No ||
     |}
8. Jay Bahd: nominated at AfD; notified Chinkudi (talk · contribs) 03:09, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: Jay Bahd
     Musician who does not satisfy musical notability guidelines or general notability guidelines. Created in both draft space and article space at the same time, so that this article cannot be moved into draft space.
     He has received two national industry awards that appear however to be vanity awards. A review of the references shows that none of them appear to be independent and reliable.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Number !! Reference !! Remarks !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || Instrumental || Artist info page || No || || No ||
     |-
     | 2 || CratesHub || Appears to be listing for pay site || No || || No ||
     |-
     | 3 || GHGossip || Artist info || No || || No ||
     |-
     | 4 || Ghana Music || Appears to be an industry rag || No || || No ||
     |-
     | 5 || 3Music || Report of vanity awards || No || || No ||
     |-
     | 6 || VGMA Awards || Report of vanity awards || No || || No ||
     |}
     Recommend that the article be deleted and the draft left standing for possible expansion.
9. Jake Ejercito: nominated at AfD; notified AnsrieJames9 (talk · contribs) 17:33, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: Jake Ejercito
     Actor who does not satisfy general notability or acting notability. Article was created as draft, then declined by AFC reviewer, then moved to article space by author.
     None of the three roles listed in the filmography are described as major roles in their own Wikipedia articles.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Role !! Major ? !! Comments
     |-
     | Sunday Noontime Live || No || Listed fifth as host
     |-
     | ASAP || No || Not found in list of performers
     |-
     | Marry Me, Marry You || No || Listed as a supporting role
     |-
     |
     |-
     |
     |}
     A check of the references shows that most of them are simply announcements that he has signed a contract with the largest agency in the Philippines. None of them come close to qualifying as significant coverage for general notability.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Reference Number !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || ABS-CBN.COM || Appears to be a photo gallery || No || || No || No
     |-
     | 2 || ABS-CBN.COM News || Announcement of contract with agency || No || No || || No
     |-
     | 3 || ABS-CBN.COM News || Another announcement of signing contract with agency || No || No || || No
     |-
     | 4 || PEP-PH.COM || Another story about signing contract with agency || No || No || || No
     |-
     | 5 || Yahoo || Yet another story about signing contract with Star Magic agency || No || No || || No
     |}
10. Cooper Hoffman: nominated at AfD; notified Wikidemon (talk · contribs) 22:41, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Cooper Hoffman
      Actor who does not satisfy acting notability or general notability. Article has been created both in draft space and in article space, which is commonly done to game the system by making it impossible to move the article into draft space. It does not prevent nominating the article for deletion.
      The subject only has one listed major role, and that is deficient with respect to acting notability in two respects. First, multiple major roles are required. Second, the film has not yet been released. A review of the references shows that they are puff pieces stating that the movie is being made and that the trailer has been released.
      {| class="wikitable"
      ! Reference Number !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
      |-
      | 1 || Newsweek || A puff piece about Hoffman || Yes || No || No. See WP:NEWSWEEK. ||
      |-
      | 2 || Hollywood Reporter || Announcement of casting || Yes || No || Yes || Yes
      |-
      | 3 || AV Club || Announcement of trailer || Not really || No || ||
      |-
      | 4 || People magazine || Announcement of trailer || Not really || No || Yes || No
      |-
      | 5 || CNN Entertainment || Announcement of trailer || Not really || No || || No
      |-
      | 6 || Yahoo || A promotional piece || Not really || No || || No
      |-
      |
      |-
      |
      |-
      |
      |}
      The draft can be left in draft space. He will probably be notable soon enough, but it is still too soon. The only problem with redirecting the article to the film is that the film shouldn't have an article yet either.

October 2021

1. Ritika Khatnani: nominated at AfD; notified Mims Mentor (talk · contribs) 03:56, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: Ritika Khatnani
     Indian beauty queen who does not satisfy general notability or entertainment notability as a model. This article has already been moved from article space to draft space once by User:Krishnavilasom Bhageerathan Pilla, and moved to article space by its author (who edits primarily Indian beauty contestants), so that moving it back again would be move warring.
     A review of the references shows that most of them are photo galleries of the beauty contest, and do not appear to be independent or significant coverage, and some of the references appear to be the same, probably due to syndication.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Number !! Reference !! Remarks !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || Rediff.com || A puff piece about Ritika || No || || || No
     |-
     | 2 || Latest.Ly || About winning Miss Diva International 2022 || No || || || No
     |-
     | 3 || India Times.com || Beauty Pageants section || Yes || No || Yes || No
     |-
     | 4 || Film I Beat || Article about beauty pageants || || No || || No
     |-
     | 5 || India Times.com || Beauty Pageants section - Appears to be syndicated || No || No || Yes || No
     |-
     | 6 || Daily Mail || Article on beauty pagents || No || No || No ||
     |-
     | 7 || India Times.com || Beauty Pageants section - Appears to be syndicated || No || No || Yes || No
     |-
     | 8 || India Times.com || Beauty Pageants section - Appears to be syndicated || No || No || Yes || No
     |-
     | 9 || India Times.com || Beauty Pageants section - Appears to be syndicated || No || No || Yes || No
     |-
     | 10 || India Times.com || Beauty Pageants section - Appears to be syndicated || No || No || Yes || No
     |-
     | 11 || India Times.com || Beauty Pageants section - Appears to be syndicated || No || No || Yes || No
     |-
     | 12 || India Times.com || Beauty Pageants section - Appears to be syndicated || No || No || Yes || No
     |}
2. Barbie Itungo Kyagulanyi: nominated at AfD; notified BalukuBrian (talk · contribs) 04:53, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: Barbie Itungo Kyagulanyi
     Ugandan author who does not satisfy general notability or author notability. This article was moved from article space to draft space once by User:MrsSnoozyTurtle, who cited BLP concerns and notability concerns, but was then moved back to article space by the author. Unilaterally draftifying it again would be move-warring.
     An article should speak for itself, and it should not be necessary to check the references to verify notability. However, a check of the references shows that none of them are independent or secondary. (The reference check also found copyvio, which was tagged for redaction.)
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Number !! Reference !! Remarks !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || Caring Hearts Uganda || Her organization || No || No || || No
     |-
     | 2 || Flash Uganda Media || A puff piece || No || No || ||
     |-
     | 3 || The Independent Uganda || An interview || No || || || No
     |-
     | 4 || Lifestyle Uganda || A Q&A piece about the subject || No || No || || No
     |}
     Naïve Google search shows the same information on social media as was found in the references, nothing we didn't know.
     Recommend moving back to draft again, with instructions to use AFC. (I am not moving it back to draft unilaterally to avoid move-warring.)
3. Surrogate (film): nominated at AfD; notified Dreamoutloud19 (talk · contribs) 05:08, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: Surrogate (film)
     This is an unreleased film, scheduled for release in November 2021. Nothing in this article indicates that the production of the film satisfies general notability. The three general references do not establish notability, because two are the director's own, and one is IMDB. This article was moved from article space to draft space by a reviewer, but the author then moved a copy into article space, so that it is in both draft space and article space, but does not satisfy film notability.
4. Vikram Vedha (2022 film): nominated at AfD; notified Hyderabadi (talk · contribs) 05:08, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: Vikram Vedha (2022 film)
     This film does not satisfy future film guidelines.

Documentation

Editors can experiment in this template's sandbox (create | mirror) and testcases (create) pages.
Subpages of this page.

This draft or article is about an unreleased film. The film notability guideline identifies three stages in the production cycle for films:

• 1. Planned films that have not begun production (principal photography or animation). These planned films do not satisfy film notability.
• 2. Films that are confirmed by reliable sources to have begun production, but have not been released. These films are only notable if production itself satisfies general notability in terms of significant coverage. Mere mention of the start of production does not satisfy notability.
• 3. Films that have been released, whose notability is determined primarily by reception and reviews.

This film page must be evaluated based on general notability of production.

Of the three references that are listed to state that principal photography has begun, two are press releases making a passing mention, and one does not appear to mention the film at all.

{| class="wikitable"

! Number !! Reference !! Remarks !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary

|-

| 1 || News18.com || Announcement of the film || No || No || Yes || No

|-

| 2 || New Indian Express || Announcement of stars || No || No || Yes || No

|-

| 3 || Firstpost.com || Announcement of stars || No || No || Yes || No

|-

| 4 || ANInews.in || Press release of start of principal photography || No || No. Passing mention. || Yes || No

|-

| 5 || Indiatoday.in || Press release of start of principal photography || No || No. Passing mention. || Yes || No

|-

| 6 || Indiaglitz.com || Announcement about a different show. If it mentioned this film, it was hard to see. || No. || No. || || No

|}

There is already a draft. This article can be merged into the draft or deleted.

1. Heropanti 2: nominated at AfD; notified Ajeet Param (talk · contribs) 06:52, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: Heropanti 2
     This is an unreleased film that does not satisfy film notability for films that have been produced and are awaiting release. Such movies are only notable if production itself satisfies general notability.

This draft or article is about an unreleased film. The film notability guideline identifies three stages in the production cycle for films:

• 1. Planned films that have not begun production (principal photography or animation). These planned films do not satisfy film notability.
• 2. Films that are confirmed by reliable sources to have begun production, but have not been released. These films are only notable if production itself satisfies general notability in terms of significant coverage. Mere mention of the start of production does not satisfy notability.
• 3. Films that have been released, whose notability is determined primarily by reception and reviews.

This film page must be evaluated based on general notability of production.

An article should speak for itself and explain why it is notable. This article only says that production took place. An analysis of the sources shows that most of them are press releases, mostly announcing people associated with the film.

{| class="wikitable"

! Number !! Reference !! Remarks !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary

|-

| 1 || Bollywood Hungama || Press release announcing selection of writer || No || || Yes || No

|-

| 2 || Bollywood Hungama || Press release announcing selection of director || No || || Yes || No

|-

| 3 || Bollywood Hungama || Press release announcing one of the stars || No || || Yes || No

|-

| 4 || Bollywood Hungama || Press release announcing the leading lady || No || || Yes || No

|-

| 5 || Bollywood Hungama || Press release announcing the release date || No || || Yes || No

|-

| 6 || Times of India || Photos of stars || Yes || No || No || Yes

|-

| 7 || Bollywood Hungama || Press release announcing completion of principal photography || No || No || Yes || No

|-

| 8 || Times of India || Report of stars returning to Mumbia after shoot. || No || No || Not usually || No

|-

| 9 || Bollywood Hungama || Press release announcing musical appointments || No || No || Yes || No

|-

| 10 || Bollywood Humana || Press release concerning various personnel. || No || No || Yes || No

|-

| 11 || FirstPost || Press release concerning music || No || No || Yes || No

|}

Two of them refer to the completion of production, but one of them is another press release, and the other says, in the Times of India, which is not a reliable sources, that the stars went home after the shoot. The fact that the film is in the can does not mean that putting it in the can was notable.

1. Bruce Whalen: nominated at RfD; Target: 2006 United States House of Representatives election in South Dakota (notified); notified Tdl1060 (talk · contribs) 17:20, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: The subject has declared his candidacy for the United States Senate from South Dakota in 2022. The subject should be redirected from the 2006 election to the 2022 election, which is much more likely to be what the reader is looking for.
2. InstaShop: nominated at AfD; notified Iabrawk (talk · contribs) 03:18, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: InstaShop
     Non-notable electronic commerce company. There have been two copies of this article, in article space and in draft space, and has been gaming of titles by changing the spelling. The draft has been declined twice. The article has been moved to draft space and moved back to article space. The article has been reference-bombed with non-independent sources, which on inspection all are press releases, interviews, or directory entries.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Number !! Reference !! Remarks !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || CNN.gr || Reads like a press release || No || || Yes || No
     |-
     | 2 || Bloomberg || Corporate directory information || No || No || || No
     |-
     | 3 || Relationship Science || Corporate directory information || No || No || || No
     |-
     | 4 || Khaleej Times || A press release || No || || || No
     |-
     | 5 || Insite OOH || Reads like a press release || No || || Yes || No
     |-
     | 6 || Wamda || Reads like a press release || No || || Yes || No
     |-
     | 7 || Khaleej Times || A press release, same as 4 || No || || || No
     |-
     | 8 || Bloomberg || A press release about acquisition || No || Yes || || No
     |-
     | 9 || Yahoo || A press release about acquisition || No || Yes || || No
     |-
     | 10 || SME10X || A press release about acquisition || No || Yes || || No
     |-
     | 11 || Irish Times || Interview with executive || No || No || || No
     |-
     | 12 || Bloomberg || Interview with executive about acquisition || No || || || No
     |-
     | 13 || Business Live.co.za || Press release about acquistion || No || || || No
     |-
     | 14 || Forex News || Press release about acquisition || No || || || No
     |-
     | 15 || Gulf News || Interview with executive || No || || || No
     |-
     | 16 || Petrol Plaza || Announcement by founder || No || || || No
     |-
     | 17 || Arabian Business || A press release about acquisition about charitable activity || No || || || No
     |-
     | 18 || Financial Times || A press release about acquisition || No || || || No
     |}
3. Lightyear (film): nominated at AfD; notified Starzoner (talk · contribs) 01:10, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: Lightyear (film)
     Unreleased film that does not satisfy film notability. The article and its references do not provide independent significant coverage of the film. The guideline on future films states that films do not satisfy notability if they have not completed production. Neither this article nor the references state that animation (which is the equivalent of principal photography) has been completed. Because the film has not been produced, this is too soon, even if films that are in or out of production are notable (which is a matter of contention). An analysis of the references is not necessary, but none of the references provide independent secondary coverage.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Number !! Reference !! Remarks !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || Deadline.com || A story about the teaser || No || Yes || Yes || No
     |-
     | 2 || Variety.com || Another story about the teaser || No || Yes || Yes || No
     |-
     | 3 || Variety.com || A pre-announcement || No || Yes || Yes || No
     |-
     | 4 || Fandango.com || An interview || No || || || No
     |-
     | 5 || YouTube || || No || || No || No
     |-
     | 6 || Comicbook.com || A 2019 article saying that there might be another film || Yes || No || Yes || No
     |-
     | 7 || Variety.com || Interview about an earlier film || Yes || No || Yes || No
     |-
     | 8 || Cinemablend.com || Article about the possibility of this film || Yes || No || || No
     |}
     This is a Pixar film, and Pixar has enthusiastic fans, but Wikipedia requires notability in addition to enthusiasm, and this article does not satisfy the notability guidelines.
     As an alternative to deletion, this article should be:
     *Moved back to draft space until the film is released.
     *Redirected to [[Toy Story (franchise}]].
4. Zenel Hajdini: nominated at AfD; notified ARBENTUZI (talk · contribs) 17:58, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: Zenel Hajdini
     The subject of this article does not appear to satisfy general notability because he does not have significant coverage by independent secondary sources. Review of sources shows that they do not appear to be independent and secondary. Review of sources also found at least one case where the text appears to be almost the same as the machine translation of the Albanian source.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Reference !! Remarks !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | Pirusti News || About the town in which he was born || Yes || No, could not find mention of subject || Yes || Yes
     |-
     | Rainca.com || Account of his life || No || Yes || Yes || No
     |-
     | Tupalla.com || Was not able to get machine translation from Albanian || No - This is the web site of the town of his birth. || Yes || ||
     |-
     | plus-televizion.tv/ || About his unit rather than about him || Yes || Not about the subject || Yes || No
     |-
     | www.botasot.info/ || Passing mention of subject || Yes || No || Probably || No
     |}
     Article was created in article space by originator, then moved back into draft space by User:GPL93, and declined by User:Eternal Shadow and User:Idoghor Melody. Originator then copy-pasted article from draft space to article space. History merge has been requested, but does not mean that it is ready for article space.
     The subject very likely is notable, but this draft does not demonstrate notability, as well as having tone problems. Draftification is probably in order, but unilateral draftification would be move-warring.

November 2021

1. Akasa Air: nominated at AfD; notified Yellow alligator (talk · contribs) 15:13, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: Akasa Air
     Start-up airline that does not meet corporate notability and has not begun operations. Naïve Google search shows that the airline is being started up. We knew that. This article does not speak for itself and does not say why the airline is notable, other than that it will exist. An analysis of the references shows that they are mostly press releases and interviews.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Number !! Reference !! Remarks !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || Forbes India || A review of Indian airlines. Passing mention of new airline || Yes || No || Yes ||
     |-
     | 2 || Moneycontrol || A press release, says that airline has received No Objection certificate || No || Yes || Yes || No
     |-
     | 3 || Moneycontrol || Another press release about registration of airline || No || Yes || Yes || No
     |-
     | 4 || CNBCTV 18 || Press release about No Objection certificate || No || Yes || Yes || No
     |-
     | 5 || Timesnownews || Another press release about No Objection certificate || No || Yes || Yes || No
     |-
     | 6 || Businessworld || An interview of CEO, mostly about plans to operate || No || Yes || Yes || No
     |-
     | 7 || Deccan Herald || Press release about NOC || No || Yes || Yes || No
     |-
     | 8 || Airways Mag || Article about four new Indian airlines || Yes || No || Yes ||
     |-
     | 9 || Livemint.com || Interview with lead investor about plans to operate || No || Yes || Yes || No
     |-
     | 10 || Sify.com || Press release about plans to operate in 2022 || No || Yes || Yes || No
     |-
     |
     |}
     This is one of two copies, in draft space and in article space. The draft was declined, so the originator also created it in article space. This may be done to prevent being moved to draft space.
     The airline will be notable when it begins operation. It may be notable if there has been in-depth coverage of its startup, but the references do not show that, and the Google search does not show that.
2. Nacsport: nominated at AfD; notified DuncRitchie (talk · contribs) 15:54, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: Sportsnac
     Sports analysis company that does not satisfy corporate notability. Naïve Google search shows that it advertises using social media. That isn't secondary coverage.
     A review of the sources shows that they are either press releases, or are about the video analysis of sport using their software.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Number !! Reference !! Remarks !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || El Pais || Promotional interview with founder || No || Yes || || No
     |-
     | 2 || La Provincia || Interview with founder || No || || || No
     |-
     | 3 || Marca.com || Article about the use of video analysis including by Nacsport || Yes || No, passing mention of Nacsport || Yes || No
     |-
     | 4 || Basketball.ca || 404-compliant || || || ||
     |-
     | 5 || RugbyLeague.com || Announcement that they are using Nacsport software || Yes || Yes || Yes || No
     |-
     | 6 || TelegraphandArgus.com || Story about using Nacsport software || Yes || No, passing mention of Nacsport || Yes || No
     |-
     | 7 || RFEH.es || Another story about video analysis of hockey || Yes || No, passing mention of Nacsport || Yes || No
     |-
     |
     |-
     |
     |}
     The conclusion is that the software probably passes software notability, but this isn't written as an article about the software. This is written as an article about a non-notable company that has developed a product that may be notable.
     This article was created in article space, and was moved to draft space by User:Celestina007. It was then moved back to article space by its originator within less than an hour, stating that the suggested edits were made (mostly removal of unverified material). The article is tagged as conflict of interest; the author has acknowledged a previous paid relationship, but denies being a paid editor at this time.
3. Diary of a Wimpy Kid (2021 film): nominated at AfD; notified Starzoner (talk · contribs) 23:09, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: Diary of a Wimpy Kid (2021 film) (3d nomination)
     This article is being move-warred into article space after Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diary of a Wimpy Kid (2021 film) (2nd nomination). Admins User:Vanamonde93 and User:Liz have both moved it back to draft space and said not to move it back into article space until it is released.
4. Dan Flanders: nominated at RfD; Target: Post-production (notified); notified Jedi Master Bra'tac (talk · contribs) 16:19, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: No idea why this redirect has been here for the last ten years.
     There is a draft in review at Draft:Dan Flanders, which is not ready for article space, but this redirect does not appear to have a use in article space either.
5. Ellam Sheriyakum: nominated at AfD; notified Rickyurs (talk · contribs) 20:35, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: Ellam Sheriyakum
     This film has not yet been released, and does not satisfy any current or proposed interpretation of film notability. The article says only that the film will be released, which can be mentioned under Jibu Jacob, the director. Nothing is said about production. A review of the sources shows that they all say that the film will be released. We knew that, and it does not yet make the film notable. It will probably be notable when released.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Number !! Reference !! Remarks !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || english.mathrubhumi.com || Announcement that teaser is out || No || No || || No
     |-
     | 2 || Asianetnews.com || Announcement in Mayalam that teaser is out || No || No || || No
     |-
     | 3 || Times of India || Announcement that teaser is out || No || No || No || No
     |-
     | 4 || Mayalayam News || Announcement that film will be released on 19 Nov || No || No || || No
     |-
     | 5 || Gaana.com || Brief article about soundtrack || No || Not about movie || || No
     |}
     This article exists in both article space and draft space, and so cannot be moved into draft space. The draft can be expanded with reviews when the film is released.
6. Jeff Carlisi: nominated at AfD; notified Loudshea (talk · contribs) 06:06, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: Jeff Carlisi
     Run-of-the-mill musician. An article should speak for itself, but this article does not establish either musical notability or general notability. The reference pages are not independent secondary coverage, because they are interviews, blog pages, and the subject's own pages.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Number !! Reference !! Remarks !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || YouTube || About the subject || No || Yes || No || No
     |-
     | 2 || Swampland.com || Interview || No || Yes || || No
     |-
     | 3 || Sweet Purple June: Wordpress || A blog page about a band || Probably || No, passing mention of subject || No || No
     |-
     | 4 || Velvet Thunder || Interview with subject || No || Yes || || No
     |-
     | 5 || Sweet Purple June: Wordpress || A blog page interview || No || Yes || No || No
     |-
     | 6 || Jeff Carlisi . Com || Subject's own web site || No || || No || No
     |-
     |
     |}
     This article has been created in both draft space and article space, and so cannot be moved to draft space.
7. Adlib: nominated at RfD; Target: Ad Lib, Inc. (notified); notified Rholton (talk · contribs) 23:29, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: This redirect should be retargeted to the disambiguation page, Ad lib (disambiguation). It is at least as likely that the reader is looking for the musical or theatrical phrase as for a company.
8. MultiVersus: nominated at AfD; notified WeldingF (talk · contribs) 00:27, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: MultiVersus
     Planned video game that does not satisfy game notability or general notability. There is only one reference listed, which is not independent, and therefore nothing that resembles significant coverage. This article is obviously incomplete because it lacks a Development section (and so doesn't say anything). There is also a draft, so that this article cannot be moved to draft space. The draft is a little better than this article, but its Development section relies on rumors, and some of its references are malformed, so that merging the draft into the article is not feasible. Speculation about upcoming video games is essentially crystal balling, and Wikipedia is not a crystal ball.
9. 1883 Magazine: nominated at RfD; Target: 1843 (magazine) (notified); notified Tajotep (talk · contribs) 07:17, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: There does not appear to be any connection between 1883 Magazine, as described in Draft:1883 Magazine, and 1843 (magazine). Not a useful redirect, and should be deleted.

December 2021

1. List of Hotels in Sudan by States: nominated at AfD; notified Ola.mahadi (talk · contribs) 02:42, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: List of Hotels in Sudan by State
     Incomplete list that does not satisfy the notability criteria for stand-alone lists or the criteria for stand-alone lists. Most of the items in the list are unreferenced and therefore unverifiable. This article was moved from article space to draft space once, and has been moved back to article space with no change except 'by state' added to the title without changing the content. Moving it back to draft space again would be move-warring, so letting the community decide.
2. Bisaat (TV series): nominated at AfD; notified Qwef1234 (talk · contribs) 17:22, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: Bisaat (TV series)
     This article as written does not satisfy television notability or general notability. The article says nothing about Reception of the show, and appears to be left over from before it first aired, so that it cannot be verified that the series has indeed started.
     The only references all predate the scheduled start date of the show and are announcements that it is planned, so that there is no significant coverage of an actual series.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Number !! Reference !! Remarks !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || Dailytimes.com.pk || Announcement that actress will perform as lead || No || No || Yes || No
     |-
     | 2 || Bolnews.com || Announcement that actress will perform as lead || No || No || Yes || No
     |-
     | 3 || Images.Dawn.com || Announcement that actress and actor will perform as leads in series || No || No || Yes || No
     |}
     It was already moved back to draft space once, and has then been moved back to article space, so that another draftification would be move-warring.
3. Lisa Couturier: nominated at AfD; notified Aguinthe22 (talk · contribs) 00:35, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: Lisa Couturier
     Inadequately sourced biography of a living person that does not satisfy author notability as written. An article should speak for itself, and this article does not explain why the subject is notable. One reference is a list of works, and the other source has been copied:
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! 1 !! Texas Tech University !! Description of subject's works, largely quoted in article !! No !! Yes !!  !! No
     |-
     | 2 || WordPress || Listing of works of subject || No || || No || No
     |-
     |
     |}
     Originator is a student who misunderstood the instructions of the instructor and both submitted the article to AFC for review and copied it into article space. Recommend deletion from article space, and leaving draft in draft space to be improved.
4. Elephant Robotics: nominated at AfD; notified RoadCrossing (talk · contribs) 18:38, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: Elephant Robotics
     Non-notable corporation that does not satisfy corporate notability or general notability. Naïve Google search shows that the company uses social media, and shows robotic elephants. Article was moved from article space to draft space by User:Joseywales1961 as not ready for article space, but has since been moved back to article space, and is still not ready for article space. With no independent coverage, it is not clear whether it will be ready for article space, but likely not. Neither of the editors who have worked on it have worked on anything else. There are no footnotes, only three external links, one of which is their own web site, and one of which does not mention the company.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Number !! Reference !! Remarks !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || Elephant Robotics || Corporate web site || No || No || || No
     |-
     | 2 || Forbes 30 Asians Under 30 || 30 Asians Under 30, does not mention Elephant Robotics and so completely useless || Yes || No || Yes || No
     |-
     | 3 || Forbes || Appears to be a press release || No || No || Yes || No
     |-
     |
     |-
     |
     |}
5. 2025 United States gubernatorial elections: nominated at AfD; notified Cookiemonstericecream (talk · contribs) 03:17, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: 2025 United States gubernatorial elections
     This article really does not contain enough information at this time about two elections in forty-seven months to warrant an article. It was rejected (not merely declined) on 29 November 2021 by User:Curbon7 with the notation: "Common practice stands that there is generally not enough sourcing for an article until usually a couple years before, unless it is a major (i.e. presidential) election." However, User:Thomascampbell123 then moved it to article space with the edit summary "Five sources seems sufficient", which reflects a common Wikipedia error in thinking that the number of sources is the key to notability of a topic, when sources are actually necessary but not sufficient. The move to article space after rejection (1) shows disregard for process, but (2) should indicate a willingness to accept the judgment of the community. So I am submitting this article to AFD rather than move-warring it back to draft space.
     We have only recently begun articles on the 2024 US presidential election. At this point the listing of candidates is largely crystal ball gazing and rumor.
6. Hossein Kamalabadi: nominated at AfD; notified Samansadeghy (talk · contribs) 06:06, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: Hossein Kamalabadi
     Run-of-the-mill animator. An article should speak for itself and should explain how the subject is notable, without the need for the reader to view the references. However, the references have been reviewed, except for those that contained malware. They include multiple profiles for the subject on social media, blurbs for the movies that he has animated, and a map of Tehran. None of the references provide significant coverage of the subject.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Number !! Reference !! Remarks !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || The Film Catalogue || About the company. Does not mention the subject || Yes || No || Yes || No
     |-
     | 2 || Virgool.io || A profile of the subject || No || No || || No
     |-
     | 3 || Manzoom.ir || Subpage not found || No || No || No || No
     |-
     | 4 || Iranads.club || A profile of the subject || No || No || || No
     |-
     | 5 || http://hosseinkamalabadi.r98.ir/post/3/kamala || Access to webpage blocked by antiviral software || || || ||
     |-
     | 6 || matalebha.ir || A profile of the subject || No || No || || No
     |-
     | 7 || Google Maps || A map of a section of Tehran || Yes || No || Yes || No
     |-
     | 8 || Virgool.io || Profile of Eshraghanimation - Lists that the subject works for them || No || No || Yes? || No
     |-
     | 9 || cinando || Profile of the company - Did not find mention of subject || No || No || Yes? || No
     |-
     | 10 || Instagram || Pictures - Relevance not certain || No || No || No || No
     |-
     | 11 || www.khabargozarisaba.com || Access to webpage blocked by antiphishing software || || || ||
     |-
     | 12 || Cinemapress.ir || A blurb for one of the subject's movies || No || Maybe || No || No
     |-
     | 13 || Aparat.com || A blurb for one of the subject's movies - Talks in Persian || No || Maybe || No || No
     |-
     | 14 || Virgool.io || Another blurb for the same movie || No || Maybe || No || No
     |-
     | 15 || ISEC Inc.com || Appears to be information about a client || No || No || || No
     |-
     | 16 || Aparat.com || A blurb for another movie - Also talks in Persian || No || Maybe || No || No
     |}
     The stub article does not explain how the subject satisfies general notability because the references do not establish it. This page was moved to article space by the originator once after being declined, and was then moved back to draft space by User:IVORK and rejected. The page was then moved to article space a second time by the originator without discussing the decline or the rejection. The originator is not required to use the Articles for Creation process, which is optional, but going through the motions of using AFC and then ignoring the reviews is not evidence of willingness to edit collaboratively. The originator is required to satisfy notability, and this article does not satisfy general notability or any other guideline.
7. Maktoob Media: nominated at AfD; notified Hishampgm (talk · contribs) 22:56, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: Maktoob Media
     News service that does not satisfy corporate notability or general notability as written, and has conflict of interest reporting. This page was created in article space, then moved to draft space by User:Celestina007, then moved back into article space without discussion by the sleeper account Aslah K, who is probably Aslah Kayyalakkath, a founder of Maktoob. The use of draft space is optional, but compliance with conflict of interest policy is not optional.
     The article has been reference-bombed, but an analysis of the sources shows that many of them are passing mentions, or are references to the re-reporting of their reporting (which means that they are a news service, but isn't independent secondary coverage), or otherwise not evidence of notability.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Reference Number !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || Economic Times of India || Not a valid link || No || No || No || No
     |-
     | 2 || Maktoob Media || Web page of one of founders of company || No || || || No
     |-
     | 3 || Caravanmagazine.in || Blog by one of founders of company || No || || || No
     |-
     | 4 || Maktoob Media || Corporate web page || No || || || No
     |-
     | 5 || Thewire.in || Re-reporting of news originally reported by Maktoob || No || Yes || Yes || No
     |-
     | 6 || Firstpost.com || Re-reporting of news originally reported by Maktoob, but does not mention Maktoob || No || No || Yes || No
     |-
     | 7 || Firstpost.com || Another re-report of news originally reported by Maktoob, but does not mention Maktoob || No || No || Yes || No
     |-
     | 8 || CNN.COM || A re-report of news originally reported by Maktoob that does not mention Maktoob || No || No || Yes || No
     |-
     | 9 || CPJ.ORG || Committee to Protect Journalists - Reports of attacks by Indian police on reporters including one from Maktoob Media || Yes || No || || No
     |-
     | 10 || The Hindu || Report of attack by Indian police on a Maktoob Media reporter || Yes || No || Yes || No
     |-
     | 11 || TheQuint.com || Report of arrest by Indian police on a Maktoob Media reporter || Yes || No || Maybe || No
     |-
     | 12 || TheQuint.com || Report of another arrest of a Maktoob Media reporter || Yes || No || Maybe || No
     |-
     | 13 || Vice.com || More discussion of abuse by Indian police - Did not find mention of Maktoob || Yes || No || || No
     |-
     | 14 || CPJ.ORG || Reports of judicial harassment of journalists including for Maktoob || Yes || No || || No
     |-
     | 15 || suprabhaatham.com || Report of an award to Maktoob for reporting || Yes || Yes || Probably || Yes
     |-
     | 16 || https://azhimukham.com/ || An editorial about Maktoob reporting on caste issues || Yes || No || || No
     |-
     | 17 || Twitter || Report of coverage of Christchurch (NJ) terrorist attack || Yes || No || No || Yes
     |-
     | 18 || Dailysabah.com || Re-reporting of Maktoob coverage of Christchurch (NJ) terrorist attack || Yes || No || || No
     |-
     | 19 || Twocircles.net || Report of an award to a Maktoob journalist for reporting || Yes || No || || No
     |}
     Reference 15, reporting an award to a Maktoob journalist for an article on caste issues in Kerala, is the only reference that may be evidence of notability. The subject, Maktoob Media, probably is a notable news service. The article was improperly moved into article space by a connected contributor, and should be moved back to draft space for review by neutral editors. Moving the article back to draft space a second time unilaterally would be move-warring, so requesting AFD either to delete, or to draftify and to protect with extended-confirmed protection so that a neutral editor can work on it.
8. Kabzaa (2022 film): nominated at AfD; notified OE1995 (talk · contribs) 01:35, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: Kabzaa
     This is an unreleased film that has no references and does not satisfy any version of film notability guidelines. A draft version, Draft:Kabzaa (2022 film), also exists. It appears that the originator is trying to game the system by making it impossible to move this stub into draft space. The draft has 13 references, and an assessment of those references will be provided later, but this should be deleted both as failing notability and as failing verifiability.
     There is also history at Draft:Kabzaa(2022film), showing that the draft was declined twice. The draft should be retained, because the film will probably be notable when it is released.
9. Terentyev Konstantin Victorovich: nominated at AfD; notified Терентьев Константин Викторович, "Шериф" (talk · contribs) 01:48, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
   • Reason: Terentyev Konstantin Victorovich
     Biography of a dead person that has no references and does not make an obvious claim of biographical notability that speaks for itself. This page has already been moved to draft space once and moved back to article space.
10. Draft:Starscixn: nominated at MfD; notified 118.100.60.210 (talk · contribs) 16:16, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Starscixn
      This draft has been declined twice and rejected once and resubmitted after rejection. This would be a marginal case as to deleting the draft, but an identical draft has also been submitted as Draft:Stars, which is an attempt to game the naming of drafts, and which has also been declined twice. All of the submissions have been from shifting IP addresses, so that discussion with the submitter is not possible. However, semi-protection of both spellings of the draft is possible and is requested.
11. Pankaj Kumar (director): nominated at AfD; notified Pankaj kumar (Director) (talk · contribs) 04:09, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Pankaj Kumar
      The article Pankaj Kumar (director), which appears to be an autobiography, represents its subject as the director of four films. In fact, the subject was the cinematographer, and not the director, and we already have an article on Pankaj Kumar (cinematographer). The four listed films have other directors. This article should be deleted as failing verifiability. The article identifying him as a cinematographer is verifiable, should be left alone, and is not involved in this AFD.
      Because the assertion that he is the director is demonstrably false, this is a borderline case for G3 hoax, but is a clearer case for AFD.
12. Karishma Sawant: nominated at AfD; notified 2409:4055:82:4245:0:0:CDE:E8A4 (talk · contribs) 07:43, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Karishma Sawant
      Actress who does not satisfy acting notability or general notability. Acting notability requires multiple major roles, but only one role is listed. Nothing in this article amounts to significant coverage by independent reliable sources. The one reference is an announcement of her role, which is not independent or secondary. Many of the statements are not substantiated by the footnotes that are required in a biography of a living person.
      This article was submitted to Articles for Creation, and was declined by User:Dan arndt as failing acting notability, and then pushed to article space anyway.
13. Vydubychi railway station: nominated at AfD; notified Doc Dimaus (talk · contribs) 02:49, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
    • Reason: Vydubychi railway station
      Railway station that does not satisfy general notability and so does not satisfy notability for geographic features, including artificial features that are infrastructure. The one reference states that the station exists, and that trains go through it. However, the guideline states that features related to infrastructure are notable based on general notability, and there is no independent significant coverage.
      This article has been pushed back into draft space twice, by User:John B123 and User:Onel5969, and moved back to article space twice. Rather than move-warring, a deletion discussion is in order. If sources can be found within seven days that establish notability, then the station is notable; and if not, not.

January 2022

1. I.S.S. (film): nominated at AfD; notified Bruno Rene Vargas (talk · contribs) 19:28, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: I.S.S. (film)
     Unreleased film that does not satisfy general notability and so does not satisfy any version of film notability. An article should speak for itself, and this article says nothing about what is notable about the film (because nothing is, because the film doesn't yet exist and its production has not been notable).
     There has been a myth for many years that the statement by a reliable source that a film is in production makes the film notable. That has been a myth at least since 2008. Nonetheless, editors often nominate older, little documented films for deletion. There is no real reason why little-documented unreleased films should be more notable than little-documented almost forgotten films. An effort to clarify the film notability guideline resulted in No Consensus, so nothing has changed. The mere fact that a film has been in production does not make it notable unless its production has been notable.
     Of the four references, one states that the film was produced, one states that an actress was signed to play in it, one states that it began production, and a paywalled source probably states that it began production.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Reference Number !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || fastlaneng.louisianaeconomicdevelopment.com || A database of films shot at least partly in Louisiana - lists the film || Yes || No || Probably || No
     |-
     | 2 || Deadline.com || Announcement of signing of actress || No || Not with respect to film || Yes || No
     |-
     | 3 || Starnewsonline.com (Wilmington, NC) || Paywalled, but apparently states that the film is being filmed || || No || || No
     |-
     | 4 || Varietyinsight || States that the film is being filmed in North Carolina || Yes || No || Probably || No
     |}
     Draftification is probably the best action, but after the article has been in article space for months, a unilateral draftification would be inappropriate. There is a content dispute about whether to mention a fact about the film, but the real content issue is whether to have an article.
2. Pathan (film): nominated at AfD; notified AK965 (talk · contribs) 17:37, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Pathan (film)
     This upcoming film has already been deleted once, but I haven't seen the deletion discussion, so am not sure that G4 is applicable. It does not satisfy any version of film notability guidelines (although an attempt to clarify the guideline resulted in No Consensus). The date for its release is based on rumors, which is crystal balling, and the references contain other release dates in the past that did not happen. This film may be in some sort of development limbo.
     The references do not provide anything that could be considered independent significant coverage to establish general notability. The references are a mixture of 404s, press releases, and blogs.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Number !! Reference !! Remarks !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || Filmfare.com || A fancy 404 || || No || No || No
     |-
     | 2 || Readersfusion.com || A press release about the film, says it is expected to be released in October 2021, which is past || No || No || No (at least as to release date) || No
     |-
     | 3 || Hindusstannewshub.com || Meant to be a release date, but another 404 || || No || No || No
     |-
     | 4 || latestnews.fresherslive.com || Advertising, that says that the movie will be released on 19 Nov 2021 || No || No || No (at least as to release date) || No
     |-
     | 5 || Dailymovieupdates.com || Announcement of cast || No || No || Maybe || No
     |-
     | 6 || Indiannewslive.com || Another 404 || || No || No || No
     |-
     | 7 || Mtwikiblog.com || Blog information about movie || Yes || No || No, a blog || No
     |-
     | 8 || Bollywood Product || States that release date is July 2022, which might actually be true || Yes || No || Maybe || No
     |-
     |
     |-
     |
     |-
     |
     |}
3. Corona Kumar: nominated at AfD; notified C.arunrathnakumar (talk · contribs) 03:45, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Corona Kumar
     This unreleased movie has no references, and so is not verifiable, and does not satisfy any version of film notability guidelines, or general notability. There is already a draft with more information than this article, which nonetheless also does not satisfy film notability at this time, so this stub should be deleted rather than draftified.
4. Ahmed Adel Alykob: nominated at AfD; notified Natasha m jad (talk · contribs) 16:15, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Ahmed Adel Alykob
     Non-notable association football player, does not meet general notability or football notability. Does not appear to have played at the fully professional level, but it does not appear that any teams or leagues in Iraq are considered to be at the fully professional level. The references have been checked, and are press releases and interviews, so that they do not establish general notability.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Number !! Reference !! Remarks !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || Newsanyway.com || Press release about transfer || No || No || Yes || No
     |-
     | 2 || Bignewsnetwork.com || Press release about return to play || No || No || Yes || No
     |-
     | 3 || Strongarticle.com || Same as 2, press release || No || No || Yes || No
     |-
     | 4 || Odysseyonline.com || Same as 2 and 3, press release || No || No || Yes || No'
     |-
     | 5 || Sunrisenews.co || Interview with subject || No || || Yes || No
     |-
     | 6 || Dailyscanner.com || Interview with subject || No || || Yes || No
     |}
     An article about the subject was created in article space in November 2021, and was then moved back to draft space by User:DMySon. This article was then created in article space, by the same editor as created the draft, which appears to be tendentious. This article should be deleted due to lack of notability, and the draft can be kept.
5. Memories (upcoming film): nominated at AfD; notified Josephjames.me (talk · contribs) 04:31, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Memories (upcoming film), also known as Theengirai
     This unreleased film seems to be in post-production limbo. There is nothing in this article that satisfies general notability or the current poorly written wording of future film guidelines. Review of the references shows that they are the sort of typical advance publicity for films, which are not considered either significant or secondary. One of the references refers to release of the film in April 2021 or May 2021.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Reference Number !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || CinemaExpress || Announcement of film || No || No || Yes || No
     |-
     | 2 || TimesofIndia || Advance mention of film || No || No || No consensus || No
     |-
     | 3 || CinemaExpress || Discussion of casting - Mentions release that is planned in April 2021 or May 2021 || No || No || Yes || No
     |-
     | 4 || ManoramaOnline || Glamour photos of leading lady || No || No || Yes || No
     |-
     | 5 || ETVBharat.com || Discussion of teaser in June 2021 || No || No || Yes || No
     |-
     | 6 || TimesofIndia || Another advance mention of film || No || No || No consensus || No
     |-
     | 7 || TimesofIndia || Yet another advance mention of film || No || No || No consensus || No
     |-
     | 8 || Cinema.Maalaimalar.com || Advance discussion of film || No || No || ? || No
     |-
     | 9 || Cinema.Vikatan.com || Interview with actor || No || No || ? || No
     |-
     | 10 || TimesofIndia || An interview with actor || No || No || No consensus || No
     |-
     | 11 || TimesofIndia || A story about a different film || No || No || No consensus || No
     |-
     |
     |}
     This article was proposed for deletion by User:Donaldd23 in July 2021, stating: "Non notable future film, fails WP:NFF as production wasn't notable. Should be deleted or moved to draftspace until release and then notability can be established." The PROD was removed and a small expansion was made, but it still does not establish notability prior to release. I concur with the recommendation of the PROD.
6. Heaven (Rolling Stones song): nominated at AfD; notified ErikFelik (talk · contribs) 01:09, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Heaven (Rolling Stones song)
     Song which does not satisfy any of the musical notability criteria for an individual listing of a song. The song has not charted, and there is no indication that it satisfies general notability. A review of the references shows that they appear to be listings of the works of the Rolling Stones; we knew that.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Number !! Reference !! Remarks !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || The Rolling Stones All the Songs: The Story Behind Every Track || Book || Yes || Not checked || Yes || Yes
     |-
     | 2 || Nzentgraf.de || Listing of all Stones works || Yes || No || Yes || Yes
     |-
     | 3 || Setlist.fm || User-generated content || Yes || No || No ||
     |-
     |
     |}
     This article was submitted as a draft, and was declined as not satisfying musical notability for songs. It has now also been submitted as an article, so that it cannot moved to draft space. I am recommending redirecting to the album, Tattoo You, and would prefer a community discussion rather than redirecting it unilaterally.
7. Payam Turk: nominated at AfD; notified Equaform (talk · contribs) 16:06, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Payam Turk
     Musical artist whose article makes no claim of satisfying general notability or musical notability. An article should speak for itself and should explain why the subject is notable without the need for the reader to review the references, and this article does not do that. A check of the references is useless anyway. They are all to music streaming services.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Number !! Reference !! Remarks !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || SoundCloud || User-generated content || No || || || No
     |-
     | 2 || YouTube || User-generated content || No || || || No
     |-
     | 3 || Deezer || Music streaming service: User-generated content || No || || || No
     |-
     | 4 || Spotify || Music streaming service: User-generated content || No || || || No
     |-
     | 5 || Nifrətim Artır Sənə || YouTube || No || || || No
     |-
     | 6 || Dostum || Deezer || No || || || No
     |-
     | 7 || Üzü qaralar || Deezer || No || || || No
     |-
     | 8 || Gəl - Üzü qaralar || Deezer || No || || || No
     |-
     | 9 || Mənən Türk || Deezer || No || || || No
     |-
     | 10 || Gecə yarı || Spotify || No || || || No
     |-
     | 11 || nifret || SoundCloud || No || || || No
     |-
     | 12 || Yaradan || SoundCloud || No || || || No
     |}
     There is no independent significant coverage. Naïve Google search is useless also. It shows that the subject uses social media, and shows the same musical works that are available on the music streaming services.
     This article was moved to draft space once by reviewer User:DMySon, and was immediately moved back to article space by the originator without change or improvement. Since the originator is not interested in developing the article, the community has no obligation to be interested in keeping in the article.
8. Fistful of Vengeance: nominated at AfD; notified Elainasla (talk · contribs) 06:05, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fistful of Vengeance
     Unreleased movie that does not satisfy any version of film notability guidelines and does not satisfy general notability guidelines.
     Created in article space in August 2021, then moved to draft space by User:Bovineboy2008 with the edit summary: 'film's production is not particularly notable, does not meet WP:NFF yet'. Submitted for AFC review on 20 January 2022, and declined with statement: 'Please expand after the film is released to include reception information, and resubmit.' Moved to article space immediately after decline, with edit summary: 'Deserves a page, and the official title doesn't include Wu Assassins in it (for some reason)'. The title is a secondary issue, but the film only deserves a page if it satisfies general notability or film notability. The article does not speak for itself and establish why the unreleased film is notable, and the references do not establish notability. The references say that the film started production and completed production, but there is nothing notable about the film or its production.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Number !! Reference !! Remarks !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || Collider.com || Description of teaser || No || Yes || || No
     |-
     | 2 || Deadline Hollywood || Announcement of plan to shoot film || No || No || Yes || No
     |-
     | 3 || Variety.com || Announcement of plan to shoot film || No || No || Yes || No
     |-
     | 4 || Maactioncinema.com || Announcement of film || No || No || || No
     |-
     | 5 || Twitter || Text saying that production is complete || No || No || No || No
     |}

February 2022

1. Avataro Sentai Donbrothers: nominated at AfD; notified GAROSENTAIJINOHGERRV7 (talk · contribs) 04:31, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Avataro Sentai Donbrothers
     This article fails both verifiability and notability. It has no references, and does not satisfy general notability or television notability.
     The statement that it is notable is both incorrect (misunderstanding Wikipedia's technical usage of Notable) and useless. Verifiability is a core content policy, and this article has no references.
     Moved to draft space once, but recreated in article space. Proposed for deletion once, but PROD was removed.
     It does not seem likely that the article will become notable and verifiable within seven days.
2. All Action Wrestling: nominated at AfD; notified Asstiddie (talk · contribs) 23:54, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: All Action Wrestling
     No references, and so does not satisfy the core content policy of verifiability. Does not explain how any of general notability, corporate notability, or sports notability are satisfied. This article was moved to draft space once by User:Discospinster as inadequately sourced, and moved back to article space with no improvement. A case could be made for A7, but a deletion discussion is a better idea.
3. Sunny Singh Ahluwalia: nominated at AfD; notified Hargun Singh Ahluwalia (talk · contribs) 00:16, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Sunny Singh Ahluwalia
     Non-notable person. Article does not satisfy the verifiability requirements for a biography of a living person. It reads like a directory entry, but Wikipedia is not a directory. There are only two references, only one of which is a footnote (but maybe you don't expect more in a two-sentence stub).
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Number !! Reference !! Remarks !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || www.5dariyanews.com || States that subject joined the party || Yes || No || Yes || No
     |-
     | 2 || Yugmarg.com || An interview || No || Maybe || || No
     |-
     |
     |}
     An article should speak for itself. Nothing in this article satisfies general notability or political notability.
4. Middle Georgia Knights: nominated at AfD; notified Georgiasbest (talk · contribs) 10:57, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
5. Laththi: nominated at AfD; notified OE1995 (talk · contribs) 05:39, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Laththi
     Unreleased movie that does not satisfy guidelines on notability for future films or general notability.
     An article should speak for itself and show why it satisfies general notability. This article does not. It should not be necessary to check the references to see if there is content. However, the references are predictably unhelpful, and include 404 errors, and publicity stuff.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Reference Number !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || Times of India || 404 error || || No || Not usually ||
     |-
     | 2 || Times of India || Another 404 error || || No || Not usually ||
     |-
     | 3 || Telegraphstar.com || Announcement about film || No || || Probably || No
     |-
     | 4 || Pinkvilla || Nothing that seems to be about film || No || No || || No
     |-
     | 5 || Pinkvilla || Story about production of film || No || Yes || || No
     |}
     There is a draft in draft space at Draft:Laththi which has been nominated for deletion. The draft should be kept because it is this article that is too soon and should be deleted.
6. It's Morris: nominated at AfD; notified Tbwqbc1 (talk · contribs) 22:56, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: It's Morris
     This article about a television show does not satisfy television notability or general notability. It has been moved from article space to draft space once, and copied back into article space without addressing the concern that it lacks Reception information, and that the sources are not reliable and secondary. Review of the sources shows that none of them are significant coverage.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Reference Number !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || Netondemand.mt || Short description of show || No || Yes || || No
     |-
     | 2 || Gwida.mt || Interview with actress || No || || || No
     |-
     | 3 || Ourwedding.mt || Interview with two actors || No || || || No
     |-
     | 4 || newsbook.com.mt || Article about actress || No || || || No
     |-
     | 5 || newsbook.com.mt || Information about actress's YouTube channel || No || || || No
     |-
     | 6 || lovinm.alta.com || Interview with actress || No || || || No
     |-
     | 7 || m3p.com.mt || Profile of another actress || No || Yes || No - Reader-generated content || No
     |-
     | 8 || bay.com.mt || Information about other shows || Yes || No || || No
     |-
     | 9 || m3p.com.mt || Profile of an actor || No || || No - Reader-generated content || No
     |}
     An article probably can be developed on the show that will pass notability, so the draft should be kept. This article does not pass notability.
7. Love Hostel: nominated at AfD; notified Sush150 (talk · contribs) 08:08, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Love Hostel
     Article about unreleased film that does not satisfy film notability guidelines or general notability guidelines. The article does not speak for itself (because there is no reception because the film isn't released). A review of the references reveals that they are simply advance publicity about the movie, not independent or secondary.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Reference Number !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || Bollywoodhungama.com || Announcement about film || No || Yes || Maybe || No
     |-
     | 2 || The Hindu || Page is blank || No || No || || No
     |-
     | 3 || Bollywoodhungama.com || Another announcement || No || Yes || Maybe || No
     |-
     | 4 || indiatvnews.com || Announcement of start of filming || No || No || || No
     |-
     | 5 || timesofindia.com || Announcement of start of filming. || No || No || || No
     |-
     | 6 || indianexpress.com || Interview with filmmakers || No || No || || No
     |-
     | 7 || news18.com || Interview with || No || No || || No
     |-
     | 8 || indiatoday.com || Interview with filmmakers. Same as 6 || No || No || || No
     |}
8. Bhala Thandanana: nominated at AfD; notified Khiladi King (talk · contribs) 05:02, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Bhala Thandanana
     Unreleased movie that does not satisfy any version of film notability, either past, present, or proposed, or general notability. The article says nothing about significant coverage of the film, or of its production. The article doesn't even say that production was finished, only that a ceremony was held of the start of production. It should not be necessary to look at the references to determine whether a film or any other subject satisfies general notability, because the article should speak for itself. A review of the references does not show general notability. A review of the references does at least show that production was completed, and that the producers are advertising the film, but there is nothing resembling independent secondary coverage in the references.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Reference Number !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || teleganatoday.com || A teaser about a publicity photo of the star || No || No || || No
     |-
     | 2 || thehansindia.com || A teaser about the stars and the film || No || No || || No
     |-
     | 3 || timesofindia.indiatimes.com || Another teaser about the film and the stars || No || No || ? || No
     |-
     | 4 || news18.com || Another teaser about the film || No || No || || No
     |-
     | 5 || sakshi.com || An interview says that filming was finished || No || Yes || || No
     |-
     | 6 || timesofindia.indiatimes.com || Interview with second leading man || No || No || || No
     |-
     | 7 || /timesofindia.indiatimes.com/ || Press release about a pooja for the start of filming. || No || Yes || || No
     |-
     |
     |-
     |
     |}
9. RJM (Artist): nominated at AfD; notified Mangolizer (talk · contribs) 19:58, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: RJM (artist)
     This musical artist does not satisfy any of the musical notability criteria or general notability. Naïve Google search shows that he exists, and that he uses electronic media to advertise. We knew that. The sources are only listing of his works on Apple Music. There are two copies of this article, in article space and draft space, so that the article cannot be sent back to draft space. The article should be deleted and the draft left alone.
10. RJ Rekha: nominated at AfD; notified Bhobiaram (talk · contribs) 14:34, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: RJ Rekha
      Non-notable radio disk jockey. Naïve Google search shows that she exists, and that she has this Wikipedia page. (It is not clear why the page is indexed.) This article was moved back from article space to draft space by User:Spiderone with the edit summary, "Not a single reliable source used". It was then moved back to article space. It still has two unreliable sources, YouTube and IMDB, and no reliable sources.
11. Pathan (film): nominated at AfD; notified OE1995 (talk · contribs) 17:39, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Pathan (film)
      The unreleased film, Pathan, which appears to be in post-production limbo, has been deleted:
      *Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pathan (film) (2nd nomination)
      *Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pathan (film)
      The film is now being subject to gaming of the system, apparently by editors who are trying to confuse the jury (we, the Wikipedia community, are the jury) and get an article into article space. There was a draft. The draft should have been kept, but was in good faith also deleted. The deletion of the draft resulted in a deletion review:
      *Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2022 February 3. Now editors who may be promoters of the film are relying on smoke and mirrors to keep an article. They have also tried to game the naming by introducing multiple versions that have been redirected:
      * Pathan (Film)
      * Pathan(film)
      * Draft:Pathan(2022)
      * Draft:Draft:Pathan(film)
      The current article has been reference-bombed, and the proponents should provide not less than three nor more than five references to make a case for general notability or film notability.
      This article should be deleted, and the title should be extended-confirmed protected. One draft should be kept, and can be reviewed when the film is released.
12. Ravanasura: nominated at AfD; notified OE1995 (talk · contribs) 01:54, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Ravanasura
      This is an unreleased film, and does not satisfy any past, present, or proposed version of film notability, or general notability. There is a myth that all unreleased films become notable when they have completed principal photography. That is a myth that has never been true of any past, present, or proposed guideline. Nothing in this article makes any claim of notability except for the start of production, which is not enough.
      A review of the references shows nothing that contributes to general notability, just advance publicity and announcements about casting and filming, nothing amounting to independent significant coverage.
      {| class="wikitable"
      ! Reference Number !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
      |-
      | 1 || Times of India || Advance publicity that doesn’t name the movie || No || No || No || No
      |-
      | 2 || Telugu apblive || Advance publicity for the movie || No || No || || No
      |-
      | 3 || Cinema Express || Advance publicity - Very much like 2 but in English || No || No || || No
      |-
      | 4 || Telugu apblive || More advance publicity for the movie || No || No || || No
      |-
      | 5 || Times of India || Announcement of launch of movie || No || || No || No
      |-
      | 6 || IndiaToday.in || Advance publicity || No || || || No
      |-
      | 7 || Cinema Express || Announcement of launch of movie || No || || No || No
      |-
      | 8 || Indian Express || Announcement of casting of star || No || No || || No
      |-
      | 9 || Outlook India || Interview with one of the actors || No || No || || No
      |-
      | 10 || Telanganatoday || Start of principal photography || Yes || Yes || || No
      |-
      | 11 || Times of India || Start of principal photography || Yes || Yes || No || No
      |-
      | 12 || Cinema Express || Start of principal photography || Yes || Yes || || No
      |-
      | 13 || Sakshi Post || Advance publicity and announcement of launch || No || No || || No
      |}
13. Nguyễn Văn Tùng: nominated at AfD; notified Cunlu12345 (talk · contribs) 00:12, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Nguyễn Văn Tùng
      Association football player who does not satisfy association football notability or general notability. This article consists only of a one-sentence lede, so that it cannot speak for itself and does not establish that there has been significant coverage. This is only a directory entry, but Wikipedia is not a directory. A reader should be able to look at an article and see why the subject is notable. This article was moved from article space to draft space once by User:Engr. Smitty, but was created again in article space, so that another draftification would be move-warring. Not enough information for an encyclopedia article even as a stub.
14. Yu-Gi-Oh! Go Rush!!: nominated at AfD; notified SpectresWrath (talk · contribs) 00:32, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Yu-Gi-Oh! Go Rush!!
      Upcoming television series that does not satisfy television notability or general notability because Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Moved back from article space to draft space once by User:Onel5969, and then redacted to remove copyvio, and then moved back to article space without improvement; but removing the copyvio did not add content. The only reference is a product announcement, which is neither independent nor secondary.
15. Draft:Kadda Sheekoff: nominated at MfD; notified 71.104.11.211 (talk · contribs) 19:43, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Kadda Sheekoff
      This draft has been in review repeatedly and has been rejected five times:
      https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Kadda_Sheekoff&oldid=1023272727
      https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Kadda_Sheekoff&oldid=1042496949
      https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Kadda_Sheekoff&oldid=1033299048
      https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Kadda_Sheekoff&oldid=1037989278
      https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Kadda_Sheekoff&oldid=1061051093
      The Reject messages were then stripped (although they say that they should not be removed):
      https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Kadda_Sheekoff&type=revision&diff=1074102465&oldid=1061098309&diffmode=source
      There may be paid editing or sockpuppetry, or the resubmission may simply be the work of ultras. It doesn't matter much.
      An article by this name, Kadda Sheekoff, was created twice, twelve years ago, and was deleted as A7, no credible claim of significance, and was indefinitely salted at the time. While a great deal can change in twelve years, there is no indication that this person is more notable than they were in 2010, and the tendentious resubmission has resumed. This draft cannot be accepted without unsalting, and there is no reason to unsalt. So the resubmissions of the draft are a waste of time, and the draft should go where the article is, into a bit bucket.

March 2022

1. Sunny Prajapati: nominated at AfD; notified Sunny25dec (talk · contribs) 17:19, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Sunny Prajapati
     This is an autobiography of a non-notable filmmaker. It has been reference-bombed with endnotes, but does not have any of the footnotes that are required for a biography of a living person. A previous version of this autobiography has been deleted as G11, spam. A draft version, Draft:Sunny Prajapati, has been submitted and declined four times, and this is essentially the same as the draft. An article should speak for itself, and this one does not establish a reason why the subject is biographically notable.
2. Super Daddy: nominated at AfD; notified RMonish (talk · contribs) 18:55, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Super Daddy
     Article about television show that does not satisfy television notability or general notability. The article says very little, and does not speak for itself. It appears, from the presence of a contestant table, to be a contest show, but the article doesn't even say that, let alone mentioning any third-party discussion. The references are also useless, and are mostly about the channel rather than the show.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Number !! Reference !! Remarks !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || tamil.news18.com || A puff piece about the TV channel || No || No || || No
     |-
     | 2 || tamil.indianexpress.com || Mostly about channel - Passing mention of show || Yes || No || || No
     |}
     The article is in both article space and draft space, and so cannot simply be moved to draft space. The show might be notable because there might really be independent significant coverage, so the draft should be kept, but left in draft space until improved.
3. Haroon Kadwani: nominated at AfD; notified Ak131001 (talk · contribs) 05:51, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Haroon Kadwani
     The article on this actor does not establish general notability, and is also the work of blocked sockpuppets. There is also a draft, so that the article can be deleted rather than draftified. Since the acting notability guideline states that persons meeting the guideline are likely to be notable, a biography that both fails to meet general notability and was the work of sockpuppets should not be kept in article space, but should be in draft space for improvement by neutral editors. A review of the references shows that none of them can be considered secondary coverage:
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Reference Number !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || thenews.com.pk || About Ruposh, passing mention of subject || Yes || No || Yes || No
     |-
     | 2 || dailytimes.com.pk || A puff piece for Ruposh that reads like an advertisement, passing mention of subject || No || No || Probably || No
     |-
     | 3 || imdb.com || Profile of subject || Yes || Yes || No || No
     |-
     | 4 || divaonline.com.pk || Another puff piece for Ruposh || No || No || N/A || No
     |-
     | 5 || dailypakistan.com.pk || About leading lady in Ruposh, passing mention of subject || Yes || No || Probably || No
     |-
     |
     |}
     Also, the subject only marginally satisfies acting notability, with two leading television film roles, and two previous secondary television roles that are not major. Both of the articles on leading television film roles were also written by now-blocked sockpuppets. (I have tagged them as needing review for COI.) The puppeteers may be trying to create a walled garden, but that is a concern beyond the scope of this AFD. This article does not establish general notability. This article and the film articles are tainted by sockpuppetry. This article should be deleted. In view of the history of prior creation and deletion of articles on the subject, the title should be given Extended-Confirmed Create protection.
4. Swaran Ghar: nominated at AfD; notified Beast012 (talk · contribs) 18:34, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Swaran Ghar
     Article about television series that has no Reception section and no independent significant coverage. An article should speak for itself and tell why the subject is notable. This article only says that the series exists. It was moved from article space to draft space as needing better sourcing, and was then promptly recreated in article space. The reviewer was correct in moving it to draft space, because the references are not independent and secondary, and because there is no Reception section.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Reference Number !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || filmibeat.com || Interview with actress || No || Not about series || || No
     |-
     | 2 || msn.com || Puff piece about two actors || No || Yes || Yes || No
     |-
     |
     |-
     |
     |}
     Maybe there is independent significant coverage. This article is not that coverage. This copy should be deleted from article space because there already is a draft.
5. My Dear Bhootham: nominated at AfD; notified TheRealAkash005 (talk · contribs) 08:21, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: My Dear Bhootam
     Non-notable web series. This article contains nothing that addresses general notability or web notability. The references do not provide significant coverage:
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Reference Number !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || cinema.vikatan.com || Description of characters || Yes || No || Yes || No
     |-
     | 2 || Timesofindia.com || Ad poster for a related movie || No || No || No || No
     |}
     Moved from article space to draft space once, then created in article space again. The page in article space should be deleted and the draft left alone.
6. Tristan Archer: nominated at AfD; notified Pinkd56 (talk · contribs) 07:25, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Tristan Archer
     Professional wrestler whose notability is marginal, and who was already the subject of one deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tristan Archer. Since there is no longer a special notability guideline for professional wrestling (which is not a sport in the usual sense), only general notability applies. An article should speak for itself, and this stub does not explain why the subject is notable. He holds the championship belt for a German wrestling promotion, which means that the promoters have decided that he can be the champion for now. An analysis of the references should not be necessary, but it shows that they are just trade rags, and none of them are secondary coverage, so that this stub does not satisfy general notability.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Reference Number !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || Cagematch.net || Information about wrestlers || No - Purpose is to promote wrestling || No || Yes || No
     |-
     | 2 || wxw-wrestling.com || About the wrestling promotion || No - In the nature of advertising || No - Passing mention || Yes? || No
     |-
     | 3 || wwe.com || Advertising by the promoters, but does contain information about subject. || No || Yes || Yes? || No
     |-
     | 4 || cagematch.net || States that subject is champion || No - Purpose is to promote wrestling || Yes || Yes || No
     |-
     |
     |-
     |
     |-
     |
     |}
7. On The Line (Michael Jackson Song): nominated at AfD; notified Vlogswithjj (talk · contribs) 15:46, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: On The Line (Michael Jackson Song)
     Song article that has no references, and so neither establishes musical notability nor is verifiable. Created twice in article space. Already moved to draft space once, and re-created in article space with no references, so that requesting deletion of the article is the only choice left.
8. Draft:Vivek Verma: nominated at MfD; notified Suryabeej (talk · contribs) 19:41, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Vivek Verma
     The reason why this draft should be deleted is not that so much that the subject is not notable, which is not in itself a reason to delete a draft, but that the title has not only been deleted from article space but salted. Because the title has been salted, and, in my opinion, the salting is correct, the resubmission of this draft is useless. The reviewers won't approve it, but they can't approve it even if they want to approve it. At least, they can't approve it without requesting unsalting, and there is no reason to request unsalting. See
     *Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vivek Verma
     *Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vivek Verma (2nd nomination)
     *Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2020 July 1
     *Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vivek Verma (musician)
     The gaming of titles is characteristic of attempts by paid editors and sockpuppets to sneak articles into article space, bypassing consensus. There has already been consensus that the subject is not notable, and that re-creation of articles is a waste of time and electrons. This draft is another effort to waste the time of the reviewers, and should go into a bit bucket.
9. User:Josh Gavin: nominated at MfD; notified Josh Gavin (talk · contribs) 02:21, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: This is a fake article in user space. The author also created a copy in article space, which I have moved into draft space at Draft:Josh Gavin because it has no references, another copy in draft space (which I have redirected to the other draft), and a copy in user talk space. The draft can be reviewed after it is resubmitted with references.
10. List of non-mouse controllers by Apple, Inc.: nominated at AfD; notified Thumperward (talk · contribs) 18:54, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: List of non-mouse controllers by Apple, Inc.
      There are at least two problems with this list article. First, and most basic, it has no references, and so is not verifiable. Second, it is list cruft. It consists of a list of things that have very little in common except that they are not computer mice. It was moved to draft space by User:Buidhe as not ready for article space, and it was not ready for article space because it had no references. It has then been moved back to article space with the edit summary: "this content has been live for over a decade and is not draft material. if it is deemed inappropriate, AfD it properly". It is inappropriate because it has no references, and because the originator apparently doesn't care about that, or would have added references before moving it back to article space.
      If references are provided, the next topic of discussion can be whether the list is useful or is list cruft.
11. Mahananda (2022 film): nominated at AfD; notified DaxServer (talk · contribs) 05:28, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Mahananda (2022 film)
      Article about an upcoming film that has two problems. First, it does not satisfy any version of film notability guidelines. Second, none of the references satisfy the English Wikipedia's guidelines on independent reliable sources. This film is scheduled for release on 8 April 2022. Neither the article nor the sources say anything significant about production, only who did it (and every film was produced by someone, unless it wasn't). None of the references show any independence; they are all from the filmmaker, composer, or other associates. Most of them are Times of India, which is not considered reliable, but reliability is not sufficient, because a reliably reported puff piece and an unreliably reported puff piece are both still puff pieces.
      {| class="wikitable"
      ! Reference Number !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
      |-
      | 1 || Timesofindia.indiatimes.com || Reads like a press release. States that filming had resumed. || No || Yes || No. See WP:TOI || No
      |-
      | 2 || Indianexpress.com || Interview with filmmaker || No || Yes || Probably || No
      |-
      | 3 || Timesofindia.indiatimes.com || Puff piece about music in film || No || No || No. || No
      |-
      | 4 || Timesofindia.indiatimes.com || Interview with filmmaker || No || Yes || No || No
      |-
      | 5 || Timesofindia.indiatimes.com || Same as 3, puff piece about music. || No || No || No || No
      |-
      | 6 || Timesofindia.indiatimes.com || Announcement of release on 8 April || No || No || No || No
      |-
      |
      |}
      As of about 0500 GMT, 20 March, there are both an article and a draft that have been tagged for history merge. The article was moved to draft space by User:DaxServer as not ready for article space, but was then copy-pasted back into article space, and the two pages have been tagged for history merge. The move to draft space has obviously been contested, so that AFD is the alternative to an alternative to deletion.
      The current article is not even worth keeping in anticipation of the release of the film, because none of the sources are independent, so that it is just a pre-release promotional item. A Soft Delete is in order. Blow this up so that another editor who isn't trying to rush stuff into article space can write a reasonable article when the film is released.
12. File:Mithya-web-series-poster.jpg: (log) nominated at FfD; notified VKG1985 (talk · contribs) 14:26, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: This film poster is being used solely for illustration purposes. The non-free content authorization has to do with educational articles about films.
13. Nguyễn Lam: nominated at AfD; notified Vhp.2411 (talk · contribs) 19:07, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Nguyễn Lam
      This association football player does not satisfy football notability because he has not played at the first tier of professional play, only the second tier (without regard to any downgrading of the notability criteria). This article also does not satisfy general notability.

April 2022

1. Draft:Masud rana: nominated at MfD; notified Asarani6886 (talk · contribs) 15:01, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Masud rana
     This is a variant capitalization of Draft:Masud Rana, which has been indefinitely create-protected (admin only) in draft space due to repeated recreation. The title exists in article space, but is a different fictional person. The person who is the subject of this draft has been the subject of a persistent effort of promotion and of sockpuppetry, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Masud rana505. This draft will never be accepted into article space, and will never even be correctly capitalized.
2. Virtual threads: nominated at RfD; Target: Green threads (notified); notified Entalpia2 (talk · contribs) 18:56, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Virtual threads are not synonymous with Green threads, because green threads were one implementation of virtual threads, which is a larger concept. Therefore this redirect prevents review of a draft of a separate article on Draft:Virtual threads. There should be two separate articles, each cross-referencing the other.
     It seems that the best way to resolve this issue is by discussing deleting the redirect (and then deleting the redirect, permitting two articles).
3. Mariela Anchipi: nominated at AfD; notified Augusto M Pilla (talk · contribs) 03:54, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Mariela Anchipi
     BLP that does not satisfy any notability guideline as written. An article should speak for itself, and this does not establish notability. In particular, the article does not establish general notability, entertainment notability, or musical notability. The article also has tone problems and content problems. It appears to have been written for fans of the subject, and contains too much trivia and gossip; if it established notability, it would need to be trimmed of non-encyclopedic material, but it doesn't establish notability. It also contains too much indiscriminate information.
     It should not be necessary to review 27 references, or 22 references, because 5 of the notes are annotations rather than references. However, the references have been checked, and none of them present significant secondary coverage:
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Number !! Reference !! Remarks !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || || An annotation, not a reference. || || || ||
     |-
     | 2 || || An annotation, not a reference. || || || ||
     |-
     | 3 || Infobae.com || A story about her wedding. || No || No || ? || No
     |-
     | 4 || Infobae.com || Appears to be a fan story || No || No || ? || ?
     |-
     | 5 || ciudad.com.ar || Celebrity gossip || Yes || Yes? || ? || No
     |-
     | 6 || ciudad.com.ar || Description of a show - Doesnt mention the subject || Yes || No || ? || No
     |-
     | 7 || lavoz.com.ar || Paywalled || ? || ? || ? || ?
     |-
     | 8 || elterritorio.com.ar || Celebrity gossip || Yes || No || ? || No
     |-
     | 9 || clarin.com || Coverage of a sexual harassment case in which she was one of multiple complainants || Yes || No || ? || No
     |-
     | 10 || miafm.cienradios.com || A celebrity profile || No || No || ? || No
     |-
     | 11 || ciudad.com.ar || Discussion of whether she has had cosmetic surgery || No || No || ? || No
     |-
     | 12 || radiomitre.cienradios.com || Interview with subject || No || No || ? || No
     |-
     | 13 || eltrecetv.com.ar || Another interview || No || No || ? || No
     |-
     | 14 || rionegro.com.ar || Account of a reality show that she was in || Yes || No || ? || No
     |-
     | 15 || infobae.com || Account of a reality show that she was in || Yes || No || ? || No
     |-
     | 16 || diarioshow.com || Another reality show account || Yes || No || ? || No
     |-
     | 17 || eltrecetv.com.ar || Another reality show account || Yes || No || ? || No
     |-
     | 18 || lanacion.com.ar || Interview with the subject || No || Yes || ? || No
     |-
     | 19 || || An annotation, not a reference. || || || ||
     |-
     | 20 || || An annotation, not a reference. || || || ||
     |-
     | 21 || || An annotation, not a reference. || || || ||
     |-
     | 22 || pizzabypizzaparty.com.ar || An ad for pizza and a passing mention || No || Yes || ? || No
     |-
     | 23 || lanacion.com.ar || An article about a show, passing mention || Yes || No || ? || No
     |-
     | 24 || YouTube || || No || No || No ||
     |-
     | 25 || espectaculosdeaca.com.ar || An article about a show, passing mention || Yes || No || ? || No
     |-
     | 26 || radiocut.fm || Quotes from the subject || No || No || ? || No
     |-
     | 27 || radiomitre.cienradios.com || Interview with subject || No || No || ? || No
     |-
     |
     |}
     The originator created this BLP in both draft space and article space, possibly in order to game the system by making it impossible to draftify the article. The originator then redirected the draft to article space. It is not impossible to delete the article.
4. Kevem Lopes Botelho: nominated at AfD; notified Rafaelzis (talk · contribs) 14:52, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Kevem Lopes Botelho
     This association football player does not satisfy either general notability or the now-deleted association football notability guideline. There is only one reference, which does not provide independent significant coverage. He has not played in the first tier of the Brazilian football system, although that no longer matters.
     Previously deleted on an expired PROD as not satisfying general notability or association football notability. Nothing seems to have changed.
5. Riju Jhunjhunwala: nominated at AfD; notified Thefinaldestiny (talk · contribs) 22:32, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Riju Jhunjhunwala
     Biography of living person who does not satisfy general notability or political notability. Both a draft and an article have been created, possibly to prevent moving the article into draft space. None of the references in the article are independent significant coverage. They include passing mentions, an interview, and profiles of his company and his foundation. It has not been necessary to check reliability of sources, but many of them are in the Times of India, which is not considered reliable, but it has not been necessary to check reliability of sources, because they do not pass the independent secondary significant coverage test.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Number !! Reference !! Remarks !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || Myneta.info || A profile of political candidate information || Yes || No || Probably || No
     |-
     | 2 || EconomicTimes of Times of India || Long story, but did not find mention of subject || Yes || No, might be a passing mention || Probably not || No
     |-
     | 3 || WSJ.com || Company profile listing subject as chairman || Yes || No || Yes || No
     |-
     | 4 || EconomicTimes of Times of India || Did not find mention of subject || Yes || No, might be a passing mention || Probably not || No
     |-
     | 5 || Indianexpress.com || Story about Panama Papers, passing mention of subject || Yes || No, passing mention || Yes || Yes
     |-
     | 6 || EconomicTimes of Times of India || Passing mention of subject in long story || Yes || No, passing mention || Probably not || No
     |-
     | 7 || EconomicTimes of Times of India || 404 error || || No || ||
     |-
     | 8 || Business Standard || Profile of subject's company || Yes || No || Yes || No
     |-
     | 9 || EconomicTimes of Times of India || Another corporate profile || Yes || No || Probably not || No
     |-
     | 10 || EconomicTimes of Times of India || An interview with the subject || No || Yes || Probably not || No
     |-
     | 11 || DaijiWorld || Profile of foundation established by subject || Yes || Not of subject || ? || No
     |-
     | 12 || Jawahar Foundation || Web site of subject's foundation || No || Not of subject || || No
     |-
     | 13 || The Times of India || News story about an election which the subject ran in and lost || Yes || No || Mostly not || Yes
     |-
     | 14 || The Times of India || Story about his wedding || Yes || Not with respect to GNG || Probably not || No
     |-
     | 15 || News.abplive.com || Story about his wedding || Yes || Not with respect to GNG || ? || No
     |-
     |
     |}
     The draft has 8 footnotes, which are mostly the same as in the article, and a URL dump, which has not been checked.
     Either the article can be simply deleted, or the draft can be deleted and the article moved into draft space.
6. Neeraj Agnihotri: nominated at AfD; notified Poojabrother (talk · contribs) 15:38, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Neeraj Agnihotri
     Non-notable photographer. One previous article was deleted. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neeraj Agnihotri. Analysis of the sources is probably not necessary, because this article is a stub that does not appear to be an improvement over the deleted article, but the sources have been checked, and are not independent:
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Number !! Reference !! Remarks !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || www.india.com || About a film - Mostly about the director - The cinematographer is the subject of the article || Yes || Not with respect to the subject || Probably || Yes
     |-
     | 2 || IMDB || Includes a blurb about a film || No || Not about the subject || No || No
     |-
     | 3 || IMDB, same as 2 || Includes a blurb about a film || No || Not about the subject || No || No
     |-
     | 4 || YouTube || About a documentary by the subject || No || Probably || No || No
     |-
     |
     |}
7. Archana Jois: nominated at AfD; notified Tanvirnahid565 (talk · contribs) 05:04, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Archana Jois
     This BLP still does not establish general notability for its subject. A previous article was deleted in 2019, saying that she had only appeared in one major film, and was too soon for acting notability. She has now appeared in another film which is a sequel to the first. Her appearance in this sequel saves this article from a G4 deletion.
     She has also appeared in Vijayaratha, which does not have an article and maybe should have an article. However, neither this article nor the sources support general notability. This article doesn't say anything except that she exists. The references don't say anything about her except that she exists. The references are almost all about the films, and are only passing mentions of her.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Number !! Reference !! Remarks !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || Times of India || Says that the subject is an actress || Yes || No. We knew that. || No? || No
     |-
     | 2 || The Hindu || Interview with subject || No || Yes || Yes || No
     |-
     | 3 || Bollywood Life || Advance description of KGF 2 || Yes || No || ? || No
     |-
     | 4 || zeenews.india.com || Review of KGF 2 || Yes || Not about the subject || Probably || Yes
     |-
     | 5 || Times of India || Review of Vijayaratha || Yes || Not about the subject || No? || Yes
     |-
     | 6 || NewIndianExpress.com || Review of KGF 1 || Yes || Not about the subject || Probably || Yes
     |-
     | 7 || pragativadi.com || News about revenue from KGF 2 || Yes || Not about the subject || ? || Yes
     |-
     | 8 || onmanorama.com || Hype about KGF 2 || Yes || Not about the subject || ? || No
     |-
     |
     |-
     |
     |}
     She may or may not be notable. This article does not speak for itself and does not establish her notability, and the sources do not establish her notability. Maybe the originator can find real sources about her within seven days and build an article. If not, the article should be either deleted or moved to draft space.
8. Dhone revenue division: nominated at AfD; notified Shashank1947 (talk · contribs) 15:25, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Dhone revenue division
     This article appears to be about a division of a state government in India, but has two problems. First, it has no references, and so fails verifiability. Second, it does not provide enough information to establish context, let along to determine organizational notability. This does not even provide enough information to locate reliable sources. An earlier version was already created in article space and moved to draft space, so that this version cannot be moved to draft space.
9. User:Ibrahim Coker/sandbox: nominated at MfD; notified Ibrahim Coker (talk · contribs) 02:22, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: This is fictional history set in the near future written in the past tense. I am not tagging it as a hoax for speedy deletion as G3 because it is in a sandbox, and a considerable amount of leeway is allowed with regard to the use of sandboxes. However, user page guidelines apply to sandboxes, and they include a rule against user pages that look like articles, and this looks like an article that contains untrue history.
10. 2022–23 Serie B: nominated at AfD; notified 11cookeaw1 (talk · contribs) 15:44, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: 2022–23 Serie B
      Article about the upcoming season of the second-tier Italian association football league. This article is too soon and does not contain enough information to satisfy general notability or any version of football notability. There are only two references, neither of which contains any information about secondary coverage of the league, and only one of which displays any information:
      {| class="wikitable"
      ! Number !! Reference !! Remarks !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
      |-
      | 1 || comofootball.com || The web site of Como, one of the teams || No || Yes || ? || No
      |-
      | 2 || figc.it || Appears to be the web site of the Italian football federation, but a 404 error || No || || ? ||
      |}
      This article was moved from article space to draft space by User:Eagleash with the edit summary: Not ready for mainspace WP:TOOSOON; insufficient information to remain as a published encyclopedia entry, which was correct at the time and is still correct. However, it was tweaked, and then moved back to article space by the originator with the edit summary "Ready", which was incorrect. It is not ready. It does not say anything encyclopedic except that the league exists, and there is already a parent article that says that.
      The proper place for this page is either draft space, user space, or a bit bucket until the season starts, but another unilateral move to draft space would be move-warring.
11. Homelessness in the MBTA Subway Station: nominated at AfD; notified CW1015 (talk · contribs) 22:47, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Homelessness in the MBTA Subway Station
      There are at least two problems with this article. First, it is an edge case as to whether it satisfies general notability. Second, more seriously, it is a statement of opinion by the author, and as such is a non-neutral point of view. Neutral point of view is the second pillar of Wikipedia. The opinion appears to be that housing the homeless will alleviate the problem of homelessness in the subway system, which is probably true but is an opinion. Rewriting this into a neutral discussion of what reliable sources say about homeless in the Boston subway system would not leave much, since the sources do not provide much.
      {| class="wikitable"
      ! Number !! Reference !! Remarks !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
      |-
      | 1 || mbta.com || A history of the Boston transit system || Yes || Not about the subject || Yes || No
      |-
      | 2 || Boston Globe || Editorial calling for end to homelessness || Yes || Yes || Yes, although a statement of opinion, and so a reliable report of the opinion of the newspaper || No, a primary statement of opinion
      |-
      | 3 || Boston Herald || About homelessness in the subway system || Yes || Yes || Yes || Yes
      |-
      | 4 || Boston Globe || About armrests in middle of subway benches || Yes || No || Yes || Yes
      |-
      |
      |-
      |
      |-
      |
      |}
      This article was moved to draft space by User:WhoAteMyButter once as not ready for article space (and it was not ready for article space), but was moved back to article space by the author.
12. PSIW Wonosobo: nominated at AfD; notified OrangTangerang53 (talk · contribs) 16:04, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: PSIW Wonosobo
      Non-notable association football team. The team plays at the third tier of Indonesian football. An article on the team was created, and was then draftified by User: Praxidicae as not ready for mainspace. The originator promptly both submitted the draft for AFC review and created a copy in article space, possible in order to game the system, making a second draftification impossible.
      There are three references, two of them being interviews; none of them are independent secondary significant coverage.
      {| class="wikitable"
      ! Number !! Reference !! Remarks !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
      |-
      | 1 || suarabaru.id || Interviews with players and others || No, interview || Yes || Probably || Yes
      |-
      | 2 || kuasakata.com || Interview with coach and players || No, interview || No || Probably || No
      |-
      | 3 || skor.id || Article about the upcoming tournament || Yes || Not about the team || Probably || No
      |-
      |
      |}
13. Ericdoa: nominated at AfD; notified Gameforall (talk · contribs) 20:59, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Ericdoa
      Musical artist and record producer who does not satisfy musical notability or general notability. This article has tone problems and appears to have been written to praise or promote its subject The sources have not yet been checked, but an article should speak for itself and explain what notability criterion is satisfied, and this article does not. The typo in the lede sentence as to the subject's date of birth (saying 2007, as opposed to the 2002 in the infobox) is evidence of sloppiness and haste. A previous article on the subject was deleted as G11, and the originator may have been in a hurry to get a new article listed. The good-faith explanation may be that the author is an ultra, an enthusiastic fan.
      The author has simultaneously created this page in article space and draft space, which may be intended to game the system by preventing draftifying the article. It doesn't prevent nominating the article for deletion as not meeting either musical notability guidelines or general notability guidelines.
14. Ander Puig: nominated at AfD; notified Kanskje ja (talk · contribs) 04:32, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Ander Puig
      Actor who is too soon to satisfy acting notability or general notability. This article was moved to draft space by User:Praxidicae as not ready for article space, to be incubated in draft space. It was then moved back to article space with the edit summary: "Each of the sentences is referenced. This is a totally arbitrary and unjustified measure." Referencing each of the statements is a necessary but not sufficient requirement for biographies of living persons. Notability is also required. The filmography lists one role that does not appear to be a major role and one future role. Multiple major roles are required for acting notability. The article also does not establish general notability. The first reference is not significant coverage, and the second reference (in Spanish) is an interview, and so not independent secondary coverage. The subject is a textbook case of too soon, and the article should be in draft space, but another unilateral move to draft space would be move-warring.
15. Sungai Klang Expressway: nominated at AfD; notified AnimationObjectShow (talk · contribs) 04:44, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Sungai Klang Expressway
      This is a planned, not completed, highway, and does not satisfy general notability or road notability. As a planned highway, it is too soon unless there is significant coverage of the planning process (e.g., controversy about whether to build the highway), and no such coverage is shown. There is only one reference (not properly formatted), which is the web site of the builder of the highway, and so is not independent. This article was moved to draft space by User:Imzadi1979, but moved back to article space. Because it is too soon, this article should be in draft space (but another unilateral move to draft space would be move-warring).
16. The Walt Disney Company EMEA: nominated at AfD; notified ClaveScottPH (talk · contribs) 05:07, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: The Walt Disney Company EMEA
      Unreferenced article. In its current condition, does not satisfy verifiability and is not ready for article space. It says nothing about the division of the company except that it exists. This page was created in article space and moved to draft space as not ready for article space, but was then recreated in article space with no improvement and no references. Since there already is a draft that the originator can work on, this unreferenced stub should go into the bit bucket.
17. Antakshri (film): nominated at AfD; notified GuardedEdits (talk · contribs) 05:42, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
18. Speed thinking: nominated at AfD; notified Sabrina Antoniou (talk · contribs) 19:45, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Speed Thinking
      There are at least two problems with this article, tone and notability. The tone is blatantly promotional, as it has been since the article was written in 2010, and has been tagged as {{peacock}} since 2011. It was written by two single-purpose accounts, neither of whom has edited since, one of whom is either the developer of the technique or a relative of the developer of the technique. Removing the puffery would reduce the article to a stub. So the question is whether the topic is notable. Does it pass general notability? Does the article speak for itself and explain how the technique is discussed by reliable sources? The article says that the technique is valuable, but it doesn't attribute that to reliable sources. A check of the references shows that their purpose has probably been to have references because Wikipedia requires them. Four of them are about three other books on similar techniques (and Wikipedia has articles about their authors and their works), which were written before Hudson's books. Two of the references are to the author's books. One of the references has nothing to do with the subject.
      {| class="wikitable"
      ! Reference Number !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
      |-
      | 1 || www.edwdebono.com || An Indonesian web site that has nothing to do with Edward DeBono. || Yes || No || No ||
      |-
      | 2 || gladwellbooks.com || Web site for an author who is cited in the article || No || No || || No
      |-
      | 3 || Blink, by Malcolm Gladwell || A book that is mentioned in the article as a predecessor to the technique || Yes || Not about this topic || Yes || No
      |-
      | 4 || Speed Thinking, by Ken Hudson || The book that describes the technique || No || Yes || || No
      |-
      | 5 || The Idea Accelerator, by Ken Hudson || Another book by the author of the technique || No || Yes || || No
      |-
      | 6 || The Inner Game, by Tim Gallwey || A web site about another author and their methodology || Yes || Not about this topic || || No
      |-
      | 7 || www.kenblanchard.com || A web site about another author and another methodology || Yes || Not about this topic || || No
      |-
      |
      |-
      |
      |}
      This article is about a technique. An article about either of the author's books might or might not pass book notability if it were neutral, which this article is not. This article does not establish that the technique passes general notability, and is promotion. Is there a bit bucket handy?

May 2022

1. Balen Shah: nominated at AfD; notified Krishnadahal12 (talk · contribs) 04:15, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Balen Shah
     Non-notable rapper, engineer, and would-be politician who does not satisfy general notability, political notability, or musical notability. A draft was submitted and declined twice, by different submitters and different reviewers, both of whom said it did not establish biographical notability. This article was then resubmitted by another editor and created in article space by another editor, and the subject still is not notable. Nothing in the article or the draft establishes general notability. As a candidate for Mayor of a large city, the subject does not satisfy political notability. The discography (which has been copied from the draft) does not establish musical notability. An article should speak for itself without the need to check the references, and this article does not, but the references have been checked. Seven of them are about his mayoral campaign, and are all primary coverage or passing mentions. None of them provide the coverage required for general notability.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Reference Number !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || Onlinekhabar || About Nepalese rap || Yes || No. Passing mention of subject. || Probably || No
     |-
     | 2 || Khabarhub.com || Story about filing as candidate for Mayor || Yes || Not really || Probably || No
     |-
     | 3 || https://myrepublica.nagariknetwork.com/ || A press release about filing for Mayor || No || Not really || || No
     |-
     | 4 || Nepalipatra.com || News about the election campaign for Mayor || Yes || Not really || Probably || No
     |-
     | 5 || Setopati.com || Mention of candidacy for Mayor || Yes || Not really || Probably || No
     |-
     | 6 || Makalukhabar.com || Release of full election manifesto (Did not translate, but not necessary to translate to determine independence) || No || Yes || Yes || No
     |-
     | 7 || https://myrepublica.nagariknetwork.com/ || About a new television show - Did not find mention of subject || Yes || No || Probably || No
     |-
     | 8 || https://myrepublica.nagariknetwork.com/ || Says he received a stick as his symbol for election campaign || Yes || No || Probably || No
     |-
     | 9 || theannapurnaexpress.com || Story about May 17 elections || Yes || No, passing mention of subject || Probably || Yes
     |-
     |
     |}
     There may be coordination between editors by his political campaign. This need not be addressed because he does not satisfy notability. Similarly, it is not necessary to inquire whether the editors have conflict of interest.
2. Mi Música: nominated at AfD; notified LaFuerzaReina (talk · contribs) 01:14, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Mi Música
     This song does not satisfy song notability, at least not at this time, because it neither satisfies any of the criteria that normally indicate that general notability is likely to be satisfied, nor does it directly satisfy general notability. Songs that do not satisfy song notability are usually redirected, to the album, or to the artist or the artist's discography. In this case, the album has not yet been released, and the single was released in advance. The article does not explain how the song is notable. It says that the song has been released; we knew that. None of the references are independent secondary coverage of the song. They are either about the (pending) album, or are associated with the artist.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Reference Number !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || Billboard || Announcement of plans for album || Yes || Not about the song || Yes || No
     |-
     | 2 || Youtube || Music video of the song, on the artist's Youtube channel || No || Yes || No || No
     |-
     | 3 || wearemitu.com || Interview with the artist || No || Not about the song || Probably || No
     |-
     | 4 || songdata.io || Information about the song || Yes || Not as to coverage of the song - Contains metadata about the song || Yes || No
     |-
     | 5 || Apple Music || States that the song is available on Apple Music || Yes || No || Yes || No
     |-
     |
     |-
     |
     |}
     This article was originally prepared in draft, and the title in article space was a redirect to the discography, but the submitter replaced the redirect with the draft, and then replaced the draft with a redirect to the article. These actions were permitted, but they don't establish notability.
3. Manyame Conservation Trust: nominated at AfD; notified Archie263 (talk · contribs) 20:47, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Manyame Conservation Trust
     Organization that does not show any evidence of satisfying organizational notability or general notability. Already moved from article space to draft space by User:Singularity42, then recreated by copy-paste by originator, and still does not make a credible claim of significance, let alone of notability.
4. White Men Can't Jump (upcoming film): nominated at AfD; notified ZX2006XZ (talk · contribs) 04:23, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: White Men Can't Jump (upcoming film)
     Unreleased, and unproduced, film that does not satisfy any version of film notability guidelines or general notability. An article should speak for itself, and this article says nothing about independent significant coverage by reliable sources, because such coverage is not possible, because production has not yet started. This is very much too soon and should be draftified (or deleted). I am not moving it unilaterally to draft space because it was already in draft space and then moved to article space, so the mover evidently wants it in article space (where it doesn't belong yet), so the community should decide.
5. Vietnam at the 2021 Southeast Asian Games: nominated at AfD; notified Phamgreenair (talk · contribs) 22:49, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Vietnam at the 2021 Southeast Asian Games
     Unreferenced, and so not verifiable. A copy of this article was already created in article space once, and moved to draft space by User:DarkGlow, who noted correctly that it was unsourced, and should be incubated in draft space. Instead, a copy has been created in article space, still without references, which was tendentious. This copy should be deleted and the draft left for addition of sources.
6. Fitness Blender: nominated at AfD; notified ButtercupBaleen (talk · contribs) 03:45, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fitness Blender
     Run-of-the-mill digital content publisher. There are two problems with this article. First, an article should speak for itself and explain why the subject is notable, but this article does not. There is nothing in it that identifies the significant coverage by third parties that would support corporate notability. It simply says that the company exists. What little content there is reads like a brochure. Second, the references do not provide multiple significant coverage by reliable sources. The Wall Street Journal article is independent reliable coverage. The other three references are interviews, essentially copies of each other. However, references are necessary but not sufficient, and the article is not sufficient.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Number !! Reference !! Remarks !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || Wall Street Journal || || Yes || Yes || Yes || Yes
     |-
     | 2 || Seattle Times || Interview (and puff piece) || No || Yes || Yes || No
     |-
     | 3 || King5.com (Seattle) || Interview || No || Yes || Yes || No
     |-
     | 4 || Business Insider || Interview || No || Yes || Yes || No
     |}
7. Giovanni Battista Meneghini: nominated at AfD; notified Nyaytyhyaynyiyeylyluytyeysy (talk · contribs) 04:04, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Giovanni Battista Meneghini
     Biography that does not establish notability. It says that he was the husband of Maria Callas, but notability is not inherited (or acquired by dower). It says nothing about his business career. He may or may not have been notable as a businessman, but the article only says, without citation, that he left a lasting impact on Venice, and on his wife's career. Three of the five references are to other Wikimedia projects, and as such as not reliable because they are circular references.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Number !! Reference !! Remarks !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || Ark of Grace || A biography of Maria Callas || Yes || Not of the subject || Yes || Yes
     |-
     | 2 || Wikimedia Commons || Pictures of subject and Callas || No || No || No - Circular || No
     |-
     | 3 || Google Arts and Culture || States that he was Callas's husband || Yes || No || Yes || No
     |-
     | 4 || Wikidata || || Yes || No || No - Circular || No
     |-
     | 5 || Wikimedia Commons || Pictures of subject and Callas || No || No || No - Circular || No
     |-
     |
     |}
8. M Hassan Mazandarani: nominated at AfD; notified Du 1966 (talk · contribs) 19:44, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
9. Zoe Abbott: nominated at AfD; notified MrWikkiTikkiTavi (talk · contribs) 03:40, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Zoe Abbott
     This article about this financial consultant appears to have been written to praise her rather than to describe her neutrally. The text of the article does not establish how she is notable; based on the article, she could be notable, but she could be a run-of-the-mill investment consultant. A check of the references answers any question about whether this article should be kept. All of the references are either interviews of varying degrees of promotion, or puff pieces. There is no secondary coverage.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Number !! Reference !! Remarks !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || Influencerhustle.com || An interview that appears to be promotional || No || Yes || || No
     |-
     | 2 || Voyagetampa.com || Another promotional interview || No || Yes || || No
     |-
     | 3 || Fox13news.com || A more neutral interview || Not really || Yes || || No
     |-
     | 4 || tricitydaily.com || An article that reads like an advertisement || No || Yes || || No
     |-
     | 5 || globalnewswire.com || Another interview || No || Yes || || No
     |-
     | 6 || Forbesindia.com || A story about the subject that reads like a puff piece || Yes || Yes || || No
     |-
     | 7 || Finance.yahoo.com || An interview that reads like an advertisement || No || Yes || || No
     |}
     If she is notable, then this article should go into a bit bucket before a neutral editor starts a biography of a living person.
10. Pavan Reddy Appakonda: nominated at AfD; notified Tiktokupdates (talk · contribs) 00:56, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Pavan Reddy Appakonda
      Article about a real estate investor that does not establish biographical notability. The article contains minimal information, and basically says that he is a real estate investor. Naïve Google search finds that he uses social media, and has publicized himself well. (If there were secondary coverage, it would be hard to weed out from his advertising.) A check of the references shows, again, that he generates publicity for himself. Five of the six references are interviews, and one is written by him. There is no independent coverage in the article. There is no secondary coverage in the article.
      {| class="wikitable"
      ! Number !! Reference !! Remarks !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
      |-
      | 1 || Businessworld.in || An interview || No || Yes || || No
      |-
      | 2 || Zeenews.india.com || Another interview, reads like a puff piece || No || Yes || || No
      |-
      | 3 || Financialexpress.com || An article by the subject || No || Yes || || No
      |-
      | 4 || Republicnewsindia.com || An interview that reads like a press release || No || Yes || || No
      |-
      | 5 || Rdtimes.in || Another interview that reads like a press release || No || Yes || || No
      |-
      | 6 || Theindianbulletin.com || A piece that uses the first person plural || No || Yes || || No
      |-
      |
      |}
      He may or may not be notable, but if he is notable, a neutral editor should start from the beginning, not from this article.
11. Draft:Mr. Gopal Chandra Budhathoki: nominated at MfD; notified Bimal Prasad Acharya (talk · contribs) 17:33, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Mr. Gopal Chandra Budhathoki
      I was in the process of writing an AFD for this page, and then it was moved to draft space. The author appears to be trying to spam with articles about a Nepalese politician who may be himself or his employer. A check of the references is normally not relevant to a nomination to delete a draft. But in this case the references are about someone else and a different office, so that this draft is a non-obvious hoax. It doesn't qualify as G3, but it needs deleting.
      {| class="wikitable"
      ! Number !! Reference !! Remarks !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
      |-
      | 1 || Kathmandupost.com || About the office of mayor rather than a person || Yes || Not about the subject || Yes || Yes
      |-
      | 2 || English.onlinekhabar.com || About the office of mayor of Kathmandu || Yes || No || Yes || Yes
      |-
      | 3 || Kathmandupost.com || About someone else in a different office || Yes || No || Yes || Yes
      |-
      | 4 || Wikipedia article || A circular reference || No || || || No
      |}
      The subject is supposedly the mayor of Mechinagar, which is being redirected to Kathmandu, but there is no indication that Mechinagar is an alternat name for Kathmandu. The mayor of Kathmandu appears to be Balendra Shah, and not the subject of this page. This is an non-obvious hoax, and should be deleted.
      There appears to be a conduct issue, but MFD is a content forum.
12. Liu Yu (singer, born 2000): nominated at AfD; notified TheAnnaBanana (talk · contribs) 19:09, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Liu Yu (singer, born 2000)
      Singer who does not individually satisfy any of the musical notability criteria. As a draft, it was declined twice, and then moved manually to article space. (There is no rule against manually moving a draft to article space, but basic policies such as notability and verifiability apply.) A review shows that the subject still does not satisfy any of the criteria individually, and this article should be redirected to Into1. (I am not unilaterally redirecting the article because I am requesting the community to decide, in order to avoid edit-warring.) The article has been reference-bombed, and the references are not being evaluated. The article should speak for itself, and does not establish individual notability.
13. Rikimaru Chikada: nominated at AfD; notified HakunaMatata Gravity (talk · contribs) 19:20, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Rikimaru Chikada
      Singer and dancer who does not individually satisfy musical notability. This page was declined twice as a draft, was manually moved to article space once, moved back to draft space, and manually moved to article space again. The article has been reference-bombed and the references are not being checked. The article should speak for itself, but only speaks for the subject as a member of two groups, Into1 and WARPs UP (which has also been manually moved into article space). Moving this back to draft space a second time would be move-warring. The community should delete or redirect.
14. WARPs UP: nominated at AfD; notified Lèo KVPS (talk · contribs) 00:16, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: WARPs UP
      Band that does not meet any of the musical notability criteria. Declined once in AFC, and then moved manually to article space anyway. The references do not provide general notability, because none of them are independent secondary coverage, but they include press releases and advertising.
      {| class="wikitable"
      ! Reference Number !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
      |-
      | 1 || Avex.jp || Official web site of band || No || Yes || || No
      |-
      | 2 || aramajapan.com || About formation of band Into1 || No || Not about this band || Yes || No
      |-
      | 3 || aramajapan.com || Reads like an ad for the band || No || Yes || || No
      |-
      | 4 || spice.eplus.jp || A press release about their video || No || Yes || Yes || No
      |-
      | 5 || jame-world.com || Announcement of album by band - Reads like press release || No || Yes || Yes || No
      |-
      | 6 || barks.jp || Announcement that reads like a press release || No || Yes || Yes || No
      |-
      | 7 || natalie.mu || Another press release || No || Yes || Yes || No
      |-
      | 8 || bandwagon.asia || Information on how to get tickets || No || Yes || Yes || No
      |-
      |
      |}
      Recommend that this article be draftified to allow neutral editors to find real sources.
15. Corfu Reading Society: nominated at AfD; notified Σωτήριος Μπουρδούκης (talk · contribs) 16:19, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Corfu Reading Society
      This article does not establish organizational notability and is non-neutrally written. There is only one source provided, a book. We can assume that the book is an independent reliable secondary source, but that it does not constitute significant coverage by multiple reliable sources. Promotional material extends from the first paragraph to the last section. In the first paragraph:

      It acquired a social, educational, political and patriotic character, occupying an important role in the intellectual and social life of the Ionian area, as it was born through the liberal Western European perceptions of early 19th century and the emerging common European concept.

      In the last section:

      The Corfu Reading Society, during the last fifty years, has developed a remarkable publishing activity that focuses on the study and promotion of Ionian culture.

      A Wikipedia article should describe what third-party [[WP:RS|reliable sources[[ say about an organization. This article is written from the perspective of the society and tells what the society says about itself. There is no discussion of third parties.
      This page was moved from article space to draft space by one reviewer with the notation that it was not ready for article space. However, it was then moved back to article space by its author. Moving it back to draft space unilaterally a second time would be move-warring, and the community can decide on the disposition of the article. The organization probably is notable, but the current article is not a suitable beginning, and should probably be reduced in draft space to a stub and then rewritten from independent sources.
16. Princess Christine of Ligne: nominated at AfD; notified KatiMedi (talk · contribs) 00:05, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Princess Christine of Ligne
      Biography of a living person with no valid references, and about whom a previous BLP has already been deleted. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Princess Christine of Orléans-Braganza. A redirect from Princess Christine of Ligne was deleted, because these are two forms of the name of the same person. I have not seen the deleted article and so am not tagging this article for G4. Sourcing is even more important for a biography of a living person than for other Wikipedia articles. However, this article has two references, neither of which can be checked. The first reference, https://www.monarquia.org/, results in warnings from both Firefox and Chrome. I did not attempt to view the rogue web site. The second reference, http://www.noblesseetroyautes.com/nr01/2012/10/remise-de-lordre-de-sainte-isabel-par-la-duchesse-de-bragance/#comment-325293 , returns the message "Page non trouvee", and the familiar code 404. Maybe the first reference can be viewed with a special browser, but one reference does not establish general notability, especially not when there has already been an AFD.
17. Vipin Das: nominated at AfD; notified 59.99.219.157 (talk · contribs) 03:56, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Vipin Das
      Film director who does not satisfy creative notability or general notability. There already was an AFD in March 2022. I have not seen the deleted article, so am not tagging this article for G4, but am noting that there does not appear to have been any substantial change. The authors attempted to game the title with an unnecessary disambiguation, which has been removed. The references are interviews, press releases, and a review of a movie (which is about the movie).
      {| class="wikitable"
      ! Number !! Reference !! Remarks !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
      |-
      | 1 || thenewsminute.com || An interview || No || Yes || || No
      |-
      | 2 || cinemaexpress.com || Another interview || No || Yes || || No
      |-
      | 3 || timesofindia.com || A review of a movie || Yes || Not about the subject || No || Yes
      |-
      | 4 || thehindu.com || An interview with the subject || No || Yes || Yes || No
      |-
      | 5 || thenewsminute.com || A press release about a movie || No || Yes || || No
      |-
      | 6 || timesofindia.com || Advertisement for a movie || No || No || No || No
      |-
      | 7 || indianexpress.com || An article about a movie || Yes || Not about the subject || || Yes
      |}
      The subject wasn’t notable two months ago, and not much has changed.

June 2022

1. Barof: nominated at AfD; notified Abbasulu (talk · contribs) 04:02, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Barof
     This film article does not have enough information to establish film notability. There has already been a previous AFD, so that the question should be whether this article contains any additional information. However, it has neither a plot summary nor reception information, so that the article does not provide any third-party information. (I have not read the deleted article and so am not tagging this article for G4.) A check of the references shows not only that there is no independent secondary coverage, but that there are only three references, each of which is repeated, and they basically say that the movie exists.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Number !! Reference !! Remarks !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || www.cinestaan.com || A web site providing movie information || Yes || No || Yes || No
     |-
     | 2 || timesofindia.com || Advance publicity about the movie || No || Yes || No || No
     |-
     | 3 || nowrunning.com || Cast listing about the movie || Yes || No || Yes || No
     |-
     | 4 || www.cinestaan.com || Same as reference 1 || Yes || No || Yes || No
     |-
     | 5 || timesofindia.com || Very little information except the name of the Same as reference 2 || No || Yes || No || No
     |-
     | 6 || nowrunning.com || Same as reference 3 || Yes || No || Yes || No
     |-
     |
     |}
     If a plot summary and reception information can be found within seven days, a Heymann close may be possible. Otherwise this article should be draftified or deleted. (Do not salt it, because someone might find reviews.)
2. Hamza Abo$$ (Artist): nominated at AfD; notified Drackosiru (talk · contribs) 07:43, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Hamza Abo$$ (Artist)
     This biography of a living person does not establish musical notability or general notability. Footnotes are required in a biography of a living person. This article has no footnotes, only 11 endnotes. After being Proposed for Deletion, the deletion proposal was removed by the author, which is permitted. The endnotes appear to be all press releases, many of them labeled as press releases, others recognizable by the exuberant tone that is not that of professional critics.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Reference Number !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || bignewsnetwork.com || A newswire press release || No || Yes || || No
     |-
     | 2 || benzinga.com/pressreleases || Reads like a paid puff piece || No || Yes || || No
     |-
     | 3 || usnewswire.org || A Press Release || No || Yes || || No
     |-
     | 4 || southeast.newschannelnebraska.com || Reads like another press release || No || Yes || || No
     |-
     | 5 || news.yahoo.com || Another gushing press release || No || Yes || || No
     |-
     | 6 || news.yahoo.com || Yet another gushing press release || No || Yes || || No
     |-
     | 7 || news.yahoo.com || Still another gushing press release || No || Yes || || No
     |-
     | 8 || apnews.com || A press release, labeled as such || No || Yes || || No
     |-
     | 9 || news.yahoo.com || Reads like a press release || No || Yes || || No
     |-
     | 10 || usnewswire.org || Another press release, labeled as such || No || Yes || || No
     |-
     | 11 || apnews.com || Another press release, labeled as such || No || Yes || || No
     |}
     There isn't any significant secondary coverage, either in-line, whether it is supposed to be, or at the bottom.
3. 2020–21 Albanian Basketball League: nominated at AfD; notified Shqiptar.06 (talk · contribs) 03:50, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: 2020–21 Albanian Basketball League
     No references and no explanation of why it is notable, but is not one of the subjects for which A7 is permitted. There is also a draft, so this unreferenced stub article should be deleted because it cannot be draftified.
4. Sumeet Patil: nominated at AfD; notified ShraddhaJagdale (talk · contribs) 18:00, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Sumeet Patil
     Indian art director who does not appear to satisfy creative notability or general notability. An article should speak for itself and explain why the subject is notable, and this does not. It says that he has developed a technique to allow the blind to paint, using fragrances. That is a credible claim of significance, but this is not an A7 nomination. The reference is 404-compliant, and so fails verifiability, which is a precondition to notability. It states that he received an award, but on verification, the award appears to be one that is given to children, and so is interesting, but does not establish notability. Other than that, the article consists of a filmography of films that are merely names. So there is nothing in the article itself to establish notability. A check of the references is not helpful. One is a promoted story. Another says that he received an award that appears to be given to children. Two of the references are 404-compliant, and four of them are IMDB. The IMDB references were not checked (because they were IMDB).
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Reference Number !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || indianexpress.com || Reads like a promoted story || No || Yes || Yes || No
     |-
     | 2 || nationalbalbhavan.nic.in || Says that he received an award in 2004. The award appears to be given to children. || Yes || No, not a significant award || Yes || Yes
     |-
     | 3 || timesofindia || 404 compliant || || No || ||
     |-
     | 4 || IMDB || || Yes || || No ||
     |-
     | 5 || IMDB || || Yes || || No ||
     |-
     | 6 || IMDB || || Yes || || No ||
     |-
     | 7 || timesofindia || 404 compliant || || No || ||
     |-
     | 8 || IMDB || || Yes || || No ||
     |}
5. In the Crease (studio show): nominated at AfD; notified Dhouston45 (talk · contribs) 20:19, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: In the Crease (studio show)
     Television show article with no references, which therefore does not satisfy television notability or verifiability. A copy was created in article space with no references, and moved to draft space by User:Mcampany. This copy was then created again in article space. At this point this article should simply be deleted, and any sources can be added to the draft.
6. Mekin Sezer: nominated at AfD; notified Cengizhekilo (talk · contribs) 04:00, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Mekin Sezer
     Non-notable actor. Nothing in this article says anything that would establish either general notability or acting notability. None of the films or plays listed in the filmography appear to be considered notable themselves. There is no mention in the text of this article about significant coverage.
7. Amir Mohammad Nekounam: nominated at AfD; notified A2004b (talk · contribs) 04:43, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Amir Mohammad Nekounam
     Non-notable sport shooter. There is no sport-specific guideline for shooting sports, so general notability is the only guideline. The text of the article reads like a resume, and says nothing about secondary coverage. An article should speak for itself without reference to the sources, because most readers will not be looking at the sources. However, the references have been checked, and are only routine mentions that he competed in the events.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Reference Number !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || issf-sports.org || Entry in a list of sport shooters || Yes || No || Yes || No
     |-
     | 2 || https://en.mehrnews.com/ || States that he won a gold medal || Yes || Not for GNG || Yes || Yes
     |-
     | 3 || https://en.mehrnews.com/ || States that he won a silver medal || Yes || Not for GNG || Yes || Yes
     |-
     | 4 || financialtribune.com || Coverage of a junior event || Yes || No || Yes || Yes
     |-
     | 5 || tasnimnews.com || Does not mention subject by name || Yes || No || Yes || No
     |}
     There is no significant coverage.
8. Zabihollah Kohkan: nominated at AfD; notified Zabikn7 (talk · contribs) 21:24, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Zabihollah Kohkan
     Association football player who neither satisfies general notability nor the former sport-specific special notability guideline. He was on the roster of a first-tier team, but did not make an appearance, and is now on the roster of a second-tier team. This article states only that he is a football player, and makes no mention of any third-party significant coverage. On the one hand, an article should speak for itself and should tell the reader, who may not want to read the references, why the subject is notable. This article does not do that. On the other hand, a check of the references is equally uninformative, although the article has been bombed with useless references, largely to his place on the youth team, and other routine coverage.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Reference Number !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || football-tehran.com || Listing in a listing of players || Yes || No || Yes || No
     |-
     | 2 || tasnimnews.com || Mention as member of youth team || Yes || No || Yes || No
     |-
     | 3 || the-afc.com || Routine coverage of youth team || Yes || No || Yes || No
     |-
     | 4 || teammelli.com || Another story about youth team || Yes || No || Yes || No
     |-
     | 5 || varzesh3.com || More routine coverage of youth team || Yes || No || Yes || No
     |-
     | 6 || jfa.jp || A youth team roster || Yes || No || Yes || No
     |-
     | 7 || persianfootball.com || A comment about his play on a youth team || Yes || No || Yes || No
     |-
     | 8 || farsnews.ir || Pictures of a youth team match || Yes || No || Yes || No
     |-
     | 9 || Google.com || Google search results - Indicate that he exists || Yes || No || Yes || No
     |-
     | 10 || sbfootball.blogfa.com || Blog says that he is on the team || Probably || No || No || No
     |-
     | 11 || rasanknews.com || Says that he is on the team || Yes || No || Yes || No
     |-
     | 12 || footba11.com || Roster of team || Yes || No || Yes || No
     |-
     | 13 || us.soccerway.com || Routine coverage of a game || Yes || No || Yes || No
     |}
     There is no significant coverage.
9. Mamla Hamla Jhamela: nominated at AfD; notified Abbasulu (talk · contribs) 03:35, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Mamla Hamla Jhamela
     Unreleased film that was already deleted once and still does not satisfy film notability or general notability. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mamla Hamla Jhamela. There is nothing in the article having to do with significant coverage of the film or its production, and not even a mention of when the film was produced or will be produced. The film appears to be in some sort of development limbo, and an article was deleted once, and should be deleted again.
10. Suzhal: The Vortex: nominated at AfD; notified Panda619 (talk · contribs) 05:14, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Suzhal: The Vortex
      Non-notable upcoming television series which is too soon. There is nothing in this article that indicates web notability, television notability, or general notability. There is not enough information to be encyclopedic, and no mention of what third parties have said.
11. Sincine Film Festival: nominated at AfD; notified Mahakal17 (talk · contribs) 20:57, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Sincine Film Festival
      Non-notable run-of-the-mill film festival that does not satisfy event notability. There are at least two problems with this article. First, there is nothing in the article that implies any sort of third-party coverage of the film festival. An article should speak for itself, and this article does not. Second, there is an obvious conflict of interest, because the second sentence in the article says:

      We are committed to bring the best of worldwide cinema

      . Wikipedia is written in the formal third person, not in the first person. This article has been moved out of process into article space without review by a neutral editor. It was moved to draft space by User:Praxidicae, and should have remained in quarantine, but was moved back into article space by Mahakal17, not by a reviewer.
12. Judson Clarke: nominated at AfD; notified Gussy226 (talk · contribs) 14:31, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Judson Clarke
      Australian rules footballer who does not satisfy general notability. There is no special notability guideline for Australian football, so that general notability is the only guideline. The lede sentence and the section on early life and junior football state only that he exists, but Wikipedia is not a directory. The paragraph on his 2022 career states that he played for Richmond, which is a database item of the sort that is no longer a basis for sports notability. Nothing is said about coverage by a reliable source.
      There is already a draft, Draft:Judson Clarke, which has somewhat more information, but is also not ready for acceptance. The draft contains a note that the subject does not satisfy WP:NAFL, but that guideline has itself now been deleted. A one-sentence stub was then inserted into article space, which was tagged for BLPPROD. The article was then expanded to the present three sentences with one (paywalled) reference, and the BLPPROD was properly removed, but the article does not make any claim of notability.
      The subject may have a fan club of ultras. Wikipedia does not need to accept inadequate stubs written by fan clubs.
13. Dylan Playfair: nominated at AfD; notified Oangie (talk · contribs) 03:36, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Dylan Playfair
      Actor whose articles have been deleted twice and still does not satisfy general notability. Only one of the references is significant coverage. One appears to be an interview, and two of them are database entries about his brothers, but notability is not inherited.
      {| class="wikitable"
      ! Number !! Reference !! Remarks !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
      |-
      | 1 || www.thestar.com || Toronto Star story about roles || Yes || Yes || Yes || Yes
      |-
      | 2 || theathletic.com || Paywalled, but appears to be an interview || No || Probably || Yes || No
      |-
      | 3 || eliteprospects.com || About one brother's hockey career || Yes || No || Yes || No
      |-
      | 4 || eliteprospects.com || About another brother's hockey career || Yes || No || Yes || No
      |-
      |
      |-
      |
      |}
      This article does not indicate any new achievements in the past two years since the last AFD, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dylan Playfair (2nd nomination).
14. Romanian Brazilians: nominated at AfD; notified Vladdy Daddy Silly (talk · contribs) 02:00, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Romanian Brazilians
      Articles on this subject have already been deleted, as per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Romanian Brazilians and a G4. I haven't seen the deleted article and so am not tagging this article for another G4. However, the same arguments apply as in the AFD, including not everything is encyclopedic and not enough information to be encyclopedic. The references verify that what is in the article is verifiable. The question is whether the subject is encyclopedic, and it has already been decided once that it is not.
      {| class="wikitable"
      ! Number !! Reference !! Remarks !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
      |-
      | 1 || brasilia.mae.ro || Says that Romania has an embassy in Brazil || Yes || Not about the subject || Yes || No
      |-
      | 2 || romanialibera.ro || Romanian newspaper - Says that there are 200,000 Romanian Brazilians || Yes || States that the subject group exists || Yes || Yes
      |-
      | 3 || romenos.com.br || An article about one group who emigrated from Romania to Brazil || Yes || Not really || Yes || Yes
      |-
      |
      |-
      |
      |-
      |
      |}
15. Marraban Bin yauri: nominated at AfD; notified Samum2 (talk · contribs) 14:41, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Marraban Bin yauri
      This article appears to be about a village, but is incomprehensible. It doesn't even say that the village is in Nigeria, which must be inferred. It does not establish geographic notability. It was moved to draft space once, and moved back to article space. If the village is a named inhabited place or otherwise notable, this article should be blown up and started over because the quality of the English is bad.
16. Miss Intercontinental 2018: nominated at AfD; notified MaximoredelValle (talk · contribs) 17:01, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Miss Intercontinental 2018
      Beauty pageant that has already been found non-notable once. Does not even have any references, and so fails verifiability as well as notability.
      Consider use of sodium chloride.
17. Celsius Network: nominated at AfD; notified Sbrk337 (talk · contribs) 19:27, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Celsius Network
      Cryptocurrency exchange that did not satisfy corporate notability in February 2022, and was deleted as per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Celsius Network, and is still not notable. An article on this business was restored on 13 June 2022, but what the reliable sources indicate is that the network ceased operation on 13 June 2022. If a company was not notable when it was in business, then it is not notable when it is out of business – unless its failure has itself satisfied general notability, which is not the case here.
      A draft, Draft:Celsius Network, was also submitted and declined on 13 June 2022, and has been resubmitted. The draft can be kept for possible expansion in case the failure of the network itself satisfies general notability
18. Warina Hussain: nominated at AfD; notified Moheen (talk · contribs) 20:59, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Warina Hussain
      Actress with one major role, who therefore does not meet acting notability guidelines. This title has been cut down to a redirect to Loveyatri, her major role, and expanded to an article several times, most recently by a sockpuppet. A review of the references shows that she also does not satisfy general notability, because they are mostly puff pieces promoting her.
      {| class="wikitable"
      ! Reference Number !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
      |-
      | 1 || news18.com || Wishing Happy Birthday to subject, but deleted as 404 || ? || No || No || No
      |-
      | 2 || anandabazar.com || A promotional interview || No || Yes || N/A || No
      |-
      | 3 || indianexpress.com || Announcement about the subject || No || Yes || Probably || No
      |-
      | 4 || TimesofIndia.com || A puff piece about a video, promoting her || No || Yes || No || No
      |-
      | 5 || siasat.com || Announcement that she will make a Tollywood debut || No || Yes || Probably || No
      |-
      | 6 || koimoi.com || A puff piece about an upcoming film || No || Yes || Probably || No
      |-
      | 7 || zeenews.india.com || Another puff piece about another upcoming film || No || Yes || Probably || No
      |-
      | 8 || ndtv.com || Pre-announcement of her major 2018 film || Yes || Yes || Yes || No
      |}
      As an Alternative to Deletion, the article should be cut down to a redirect to Loveyatri again, and the redirect should be given extended-confirmed protection so that a neutral editor can create an article when one of her films in progress is released. Until then, the title should be redirected. (Cutting the article down to a redirect by normal editing would only result in edit-warring.)
19. List of O Walzer Fuer Die Luftwaffe Characters: nominated at AfD; notified Krakennowak (talk · contribs) 03:20, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: List of O Walzer Fuer Die Luftwaffe Characters
      This list has neither any of references nor any blue links and so is completely unverifiable. There is no evidence of general notability or list notability. The originator has also created a draft that is the same as this article. Because there also is a draft, the article cannot be moved into draft space. So this article should go into a bit bucket while the draft is improved.
20. Rakhmatilla Akhmadjonov: nominated at AfD; notified Dilshod909 (talk · contribs) 05:54, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Rakhmatilla Akhmadjonov
      Non-notable blogger. A biography of a living person should speak for itself and explain why the subject is biographically notable, which this article does not do, probably because the subject is a run-of-the-mill student and blogger. This article was already moved to draft space once and back to article space, so not moving to draft space again (except by consensus). This article says nothing about significant coverage by reliable sources. It reads like a social media profile, but Wikipedia is not a social medium. This article was written to praise its subject, but Wikipedia is written from a neutral point of view.
21. Quahog, Rhode Island: nominated at RfD; Target: Family Guy (notified); notified Radiojon (talk · contribs) 00:10, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Quahog, Rhode Island
      I am requesting to delete this redirect in order to accept Draft:Quahog, Rhode Island as an article. After reviewing the draft, I tagged the redirect with {{db-afc-move}}, the variety of G6 used by AFC reviewers when there is a redirect that will be replaced by an article, typically, as in this case, where the draft will expand on a subtopic in the article. The G6 was declined by User:Jay with the comment "Removing G6 - this has been there from 2004, I would suggest a merge-and-redirect from the draft". I respectfully disagree, and am using RFD as the process to obtain consensus. I don't think that a subtopic or related topic redirect having existed for eighteen years is itself a reason to keep the redirect rather than to replace it with an article.
22. Reprise Digital: nominated at AfD; notified Raghavkvp (talk · contribs) 05:26, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Reprise Digital
      Non-notable marketing agency that does not satisfy general notability or corporate notability. The body of the article says nothing about significant coverage by third parties. The one reference is a press release about its management and so is not an independent source. The agency is a subsidiary of a subsidiary of The Interpublic Group of Companies, and a redirect to the parent company is a sufficient alternative to deletion.
23. Black Metaphor: nominated at AfD; notified Jimfrickebigred (talk · contribs) 05:42, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Black Metaphor
      Music producer who does not satisfy general notability or musical notability. Two previous articles have already been deleted; see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black Metaphor (2nd nomination). The edit summary states "Republishing formerly removed page", which is likely to qualify for G4. In any event, there is nothing in this article that is more recent than the date of the deletion discussion. Neither of the "most notable works" provide a basis for musical notability.
24. Dejavu (2022 film): nominated at AfD; notified Rvasarvindh (talk · contribs) 05:57, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Dejavu (2022 film)
      Unreleased film that does not satisfy any version of film notability guidelines. This article does not say anything about significant coverage of the film by independent sources, because there may not have been any. The two references are both only announcements of the film and the teaser, and so are not independent.
      {| class="wikitable"
      ! Reference Number !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
      |-
      | 1 || cinemaexpress.com || Announcement of film and its star and of the teaser || No || Yes || Yes || No
      |-
      | 2 || dtnext.in || Announcement of film and of teaser || No || Yes || Yes || No
      |}
      An article was created in article space, and was then moved correctly to draft space by User:Khgk. This copy was then created in article space, perhaps in order to game the system. Since there is already a draft, this version should be deleted as too soon.
25. 2022 FIBA Under-16 Women's Asian Championship: nominated at AfD; notified Alexander marshall 07 (talk · contribs) 16:36, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: 2022 FIBA Under 16 Women's Asian Championship
      Article about a youth sports championship that has not received significant coverage and so does not satisfy general notability or sports notability. This is a continental youth championship, and youth championships have never had a presumption of notability even before the revision of the notability guidelines, so that only general notability applies. Review of the sources shows that the first one is not about the youth tournament, and the other sources are by FIBA, the international basketball association, and so are not independent or secondary. Two of the sources are about other events and one is a database entry. One of them is significant coverage, but is not independent or secondary.
      {| class="wikitable"
      ! Reference Number !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
      |-
      | 1 || Jordantimes.com || The coverage is not about the youth team or youth tournament || Yes || No || Yes || Yes
      |-
      | 2 || fiba.basketball || By the sports association, about a senior competition || No || No || Yes || No
      |-
      | 3 || fiba.basketball || By the sports association, about the 2019 competition || No || No || Yes || No
      |-
      | 4 || fiba.basketball || By the sports association, ranking of U16 teams || No || Yes || Yes || No
      |-
      | 5 || fiba.basketball || By the sports association, about the subject competition || No || Yes || Yes || No
      |-
      |
      |}
      An article was created in article space, and was moved by reviewer User:UnitedStatesian to draft space. This copy of the article was then created in article space. There is already a draft, and this article does not satisfy general notability, so should be deleted.
26. Draft:David Greenbaum: nominated at MfD; notified 160.39.125.244 (talk · contribs) 16:12, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Unsourced stub biography of living person that does not make credible claim of significance.
27. Big Wheel (Mental As Anything song): nominated at AfD; notified TheMusicMaster001 (talk · contribs) 21:47, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Big Wheel
      Song that does not come anywhere close to general notability, and does not satisfy musical notability. Song notability requires independent coverage other than artist and label. A draft was declined twice, at which point this article was created and is essentially same as draft. Review of the references shows that they are catalog entries and show that the song charted 75 on the Australian national chart.
      {| class="wikitable"
      ! Reference Number !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
      |-
      | 1 || 45cat.com || A catalog entry || Yes || No || Yes || No
      |-
      | 2 || australian-charts.com || Another catalog entry - Shows that songs by the band have charted || Yes || No || Yes || No
      |-
      | 3 || charts.org.nz || Another catalog entry || Yes || No || Yes || No
      |-
      | 4 || australianmusicdatabase.com || Another catalog entry - Shows that the song was at 75 on the chart || Yes || No || Yes || No
      |-
      | 5 || germancharts.de || Shows that the song was 75 on Australian charts || Yes || No || Yes || No
      |-
      | 6 || Kent Music Report || Wikipedia, and so a circular reference || || No || No ||
      |-
      |
      |-
      |
      |}
      There is no coverage other than the mention of the chart position, and no coverage is not significant coverage. Recommend Redirection to Fundamental (Mental As Anything album) as alternative to deletion for both article and draft.

July 2022

1. Class Ache: nominated at AfD; notified Wowradio (talk · contribs) 03:38, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Class Ache
     This television show article has no references, and so fails both verifiability and notability. One copy of this article was already moved from article space to draft space by User:Mhawk10 as an alternative to deletion. That alternative is no longer available because the draft slot is now occupied. So this copy should be deleted, and the draft can be edited.
2. Indian Predator: The Butcher of Delhi: nominated at AfD; notified Neu84321 (talk · contribs) 03:30, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Indian Predator: The Butcher of Delhi
     This article about a television show is too soon and does not satisfy general notability or television notability. There is nothing in this article that refers to significant coverage or coverage by independent sources. It only states that the series will air in two weeks.
3. Lagging (TV series): nominated at AfD; notified Liam wigley (talk · contribs) 23:51, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Lagging (TV series)
     After research, it appears that this is not about Lagging (TV series) or Princess Mirror-Belle, but is a (messed-up) copy-paste of So Awkward. The title Princess Mirror-Belle has already been salted due to repeated recreation, and so this seems to have been renamed to game the name. This is probably a candidate for speedy deletion, maybe as A10, but is being nominated for deletion so as to write up the issue. I was originally planning to nominate it for deletion because it has no independent sources, but it has no independent sources because it is a copy-paste.
4. Craig Duffy: nominated at AfD; notified Craig F Duffy (talk · contribs) 18:53, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Craig Duffy
     autobiography of non-notable businessman and snooker and poker player who does not satisfy general notability. Nothing in the article refers to significant coverage by independent sources. An article on this person has already been discussed and deleted once at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Craig Duffy (entrepreneur), and nothing has changed except that the subject/author continues to be persistent.
     A review of the references shows that they are all database entries of the sort that have been deprecated even for major sports such as association football and baseball. Cue sports have never had a special notability guideline, although they have a lengthy notability essay which does not provide any specific basis for individual notability other than general notability. So neither the article nor the references provide significant coverage.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Reference Number !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || absc.com.au || A list of snooker champions || Yes || No - Database entries || Yes || No
     |-
     | 2 || cuesportsaustralia.com.au || Another list of snooker champions || Yes || No - Database entries || Yes || No
     |-
     | 3 || qldbilliardsandsnooker.asn.au || A long history of a state cue sports association, states that he was a champion || No || No - Essentially a database entry in prose || Yes || No
     |-
     | 4 || www.csns.ca || Did not find his name in this historical archive, but it is probably a database entry somewhere || Yes || No || Yes || No
     |-
     | 5 || pokerdb.thehendonmob.com || A page in a list of poker players in which each player has one page || No || No || Yes || No
     |-
     |
     |-
     |
     |-
     |
     |}
     Moved from draft space to article space at least twice and moved from article space to draft space at least once. Now that it is in article space again, AFD is in order.
5. Chandigarh women's football team: nominated at AfD; notified Lancepark (talk · contribs) 04:28, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Chandigarh women's football team
     Non-notable sports team that does not satisfy general notability. This was first created in article space but moved into draft space by User:Spiderone after being tagged as relying on primary sources. This copy was then created in article space, so that it cannot be moved into draft space, but still is not ready for article space. A check of the references shows that they are all primary sources, and mostly refer to the subjunior team winning its championship, and are not significant coverage. Junior and subjunior sports have very seldom been considered notable, even before the revision of the sports notability guidelines.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Reference Number !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || www.the-aiff.com || Page about the association in the web site for Indian football || No || Yes || Yes || No
     |-
     | 2 || www.rsssf.com || List of champions that doesn’t list them || No || No || Yes || No
     |-
     | 3 || www.the-aiff.com || Page about the Indian football association listing subjunior champions || No || No || Yes || No
     |-
     | 4 || www.the-aiff.com || Indian football association page that appears to be a directory to other pages || No || No || Yes || No
     |-
     | 5 || footballcounter.com || Article about subjunior championship || Yes || No || Yes || No
     |-
     | 6 || khelnow.com || A passing mention of subjunior championship || Yes || No || Yes || No
     |-
     |
     |-
     |
     |-
     |
     |-
     |
     |}
     Neither the article nor the references establish notability.
6. Macherla Niyojakavargam: nominated at AfD; notified Michaelhv88 (talk · contribs) 15:38, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Macherla Niyojakavargam
     Unreleased film that is too soon and does not satisfy film notability guidelines. This article has already been moved to draft space twice, once after a previous AFD found that it was not ready for article space and was closed as Draftify. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Macherla Niyojakavargam. However, the article has been moved back to article space, although it is still an unreleased film. There is nothing in this article that refers to significant coverage by independent sources. It should be either speedy-deleted as G4, or deleted. or draftified again, and the title should be Extended-Confirmed Protected in article space so that a neutral reviewer can move it into article space when the film is released and reviewed.
7. Governorpet: nominated at AfD; notified Yeeno (talk · contribs) 19:51, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Governorpet
     *Governorpet (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
     *Governorpet, Vijayawada (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
     Identical unsourced articles on the same place. Already twice moved to draft space, but moved back to article space by originator with and without disambiguation. One of these articles should be draftified again, but another unilateral move to draft space would be move-warring, and the other one (the one with the unnecessary disambiguation) should be deleted. The originator should be warned, but AFD is a content forum.
8. Galaxy Heroes (Cryptocurrency): nominated at AfD; notified Azovo (talk · contribs) 01:19, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Galaxy Heroes (cryptocurrency)
     Non-notable cryptocurrency and a series of non-fungible tokens. There is nothing either in the text of this article or in the references to establish general notability. Cryptocurrencies and NFTs are common areas for efforts to use Wikipedia for promotion, which is why community general sanctions have been authorized, and this is no exception. The references are all press releases and announcements, except possibly for one of the web sites that is flagged as containing a trojan, and so was not reviewed.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Number !! Reference !! Remarks !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || citinewsroom.com || Announcement of line of NFTs || No || Yes || No || No
     |-
     | 2 || www.newtelegraphng.com || Identified as dangerous web site due to trojan || || No || No ||
     |-
     | 3 || www.ippmedia.com || A press release of line of NFTs || No || Yes || No || No
     |-
     | 4 || venturesafrica.com || A press release about the sale of NFTs || No || Yes || No || No
     |-
     | 5 || nigerianinfo.fm || Another press release || No || Yes || No || No
     |-
     | 6 || citizen.digital || Another press release about reaching a sales target || No || Yes || No || No
     |-
     | 7 || nigerianinfo.fm || Another press release about reaching a sales target || No || Yes || No || No
     |-
     |
     |}
     The originator has made no other edits than creating this advertisement and becoming auto-confirmed and moving it to article space. It doesn’t belong in article space.
9. Miss Asia Quest 1969: nominated at AfD; notified Min Khant 234 (talk · contribs) 03:22, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Miss Asia Quest 1969
     Non-notable run-of-the-mill beauty contest. With no references, fails both verifiability and notability. Draft space would be an appropriate place for this article, but the author already has created a copy in article space. So the draft can be left alone, but this unsourced article can go into a bit bucket.
10. Draft:Pathaan (film): nominated at MfD; notified Orbit Wharf (talk · contribs) 06:32, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Draft:Pathaan (film)
      This draft is one of multiple reincarnations of articles on a planned big-budget film. This version was created in October 2021 by a sockpuppet, but has been subsequently edited by both good-faith and bad-faith editors, and has been in article space once before being draftified. Other versions have also been in article space. The promoters of the film appear to be trying to confuse the jury with multiple copies of articles. This version was rejected on 7 January 2022, and has since been nominated for deletion, which was No Consensus at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Pathan (film), and has been almost constantly edited by IP addresses, so that its history is confused.
      There is now another draft at Draft:Pathaan (2023 film). The (2023) version can be the version that is edited. We don't need two versions in draft space. (We don't need any versions in article space yet.)
11. Deepti Malik: nominated at AfD; notified MrJAT (talk · contribs) 03:56, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Deepti Malik
      This is one of three versions of an unreferenced biography of a living person that do not explain why the subject satisfies musical notability or general notability. They could be tagged for BLPPROD, or for A7, but a claim of significance seems to have been made, so we might as well go to AFD.
12. Draft:Amogh V P: nominated at MfD; notified Amogh Poonakar (talk · contribs) 15:49, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: :Draft:Amogh Vijayaraghavan Poonakar
      :Draft:Amogh V P
      Two copies of an unreferenced biography of a living person. The YouTube link is not really a reference but an external link.
      *Draft:Amogh Vijayaraghavan Poonakar (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
      *Draft:Amogh V P (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
      Autobiographical, but that is not, in itself, the reason to delete the drafts.
13. D-Kandjafa (musician): nominated at AfD; notified Suzeen Simon (talk · contribs) 17:03, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: D-Kandjafa (musician)
      Musician whose article does not present a case for musical notability or general notability. An article should speak for itself and explain what the significant coverage is, and this article does not, so it should not be necessary to check the references. However, they have been checked, and they do not provide significant coverage from independent sources. They include an interview, a blog, two short accounts of the theft of a record, a snippet about sales figures (of 500), and a list of the people at a party.
      {| class="wikitable"
      ! Reference Number !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
      |-
      | 1 || namibian.com.na || An interview || No || Yes || Yes || No
      |-
      | 2 || celebrity.land.en || Story about theft of recording || Yes || No || Probably || No
      |-
      | 3 || 99fm.com.na || A blog || Yes || No || No || No
      |-
      | 4 || neweralive.na || Snippet about sales figures || Yes || No || Yes || No
      |-
      | 5 || namibian.com.na || Announcement about theft of recording || Yes || No || Yes || No
      |-
      | 6 || namibian.com.na || A story including that the subject, and many other people, were at a party || Yes || No || Yes || No
      |-
      |
      |}
      Declined twice in draft space, then moved to article space by author. Draftification is an acceptable Alternative to Deletion. Not a good candidate for unilateral deletion because the issue is notability rather than verifiability. Reference check confirms that the subject does not pass musical notability or general notability
14. Hypnotic (upcoming film): nominated at AfD; notified $uperFan32 (talk · contribs) 01:03, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Hypnotic (upcoming film)
      Unreleased film that has been "upcoming" since this article was written in 2019 by a disruptive now-blocked user, and does not satisfy general notability or film notability. There is nothing in this article that either implies significant coverage or indicates a release date. The name-drops of a well-known director and a better-known star do not inherit notability. The mention of the start and end of principal photography is also a name-drop, because of the myth that films are notable after principal photography. What the guideline really says is that films are not notable before principal photography, and are only notable after principal photography and before release if production itself passes general notability. The article says nothing about production except that it happened, and the references do not provide independent or secondary coverage. The references are mostly announcements of signings and other advance publicity.
      {| class="wikitable"
      ! Reference Number !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
      |-
      | 1 || deadline.com || Advance publicity, announcing lead actor || No || Yes || Yes || No
      |-
      | 2 || collider.com || Advance publicity before start of filming || No || Yes || Yes || No
      |-
      | 3 || hollywoodreporter.com || Advance publicity, announcing a team addition || No || Yes || Yes || No
      |-
      | 4 || deadline.com || Announcement about producers of film || No || Yes || Yes || No
      |-
      | 5 || variety.com || Announcement of star as lead actor || No || Yes || Yes || No
      |-
      | 6 || deadline.com || Announcement of signing of female lead || No || Yes || Yes || No
      |-
      | 7 || deadline.com || Announcement of child star || No || Yes || Yes || No
      |-
      | 8 || deadline.com || Announcement of two supporting actors || No || Yes || Yes || No
      |-
      | 9 || deadline.com || Announcement of another supporting actor || No || Yes || Yes || No
      |-
      | 10 || deadline.com || About layoffs at production studio, passing mention that film is still in production || No || No || Yes || No
      |-
      |
      |}
      This article belongs in draft space, and can be reviewed for article space if and when the film is released. (At this point it may be in post-production limbo.) I am not unilaterally draftifying it because it has been in article space for three years (where it was put by a noiw-blocked disruptive editor), and because it is adequately sourced although the sources are crud.
15. Alessia Patregnani: nominated at AfD; notified Whountess378 (talk · contribs) 05:45, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Alessia Patregnani
      Actress who does not meet general notability or acting notability. Created in draft space by a single-purpose account, then moved to article space when autoconfirmed, then moved back to draft space by User:Praxidicae as not ready for article space. Then moved back to article space by originator. The article makes no mention of significant coverage. A check of the references shows that they are not significant coverage, but verify that she exists and is an actress.
      {| class="wikitable"
      ! Reference Number !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
      |-
      | 1 || cines.com || A movie database, lists Blood on Melies Moon || Yes || No || Yes || No
      |-
      | 2 || voice123.com || Lists her availability as a voice actress || No || No || Yes || No
      |-
      | 3 || tcm.com || States that she was music coordinator in Capturing the Friedmans || No || No || Yes || No
      |-
      | 4 || ilsussidiario.net || About her ex-husband, mentions their marriage and divorce || Yes || No, passing mention || Yes || No
      |-
      | No || No || Yes || No
      |-
      |
      |}
      Verifiability is an important policy, but so is notability, and she does not meet general notability. A review of the filmography includes only one work that is the subject of a Wikipedia article, in which she was the music director, and one in which a movie database verifies that she acted.
      {| class="wikitable"
      ! Work !! Comments !! Wikipedia Article !! Remarks !! Major Role
      |-
      | Petali di Rosa || || No || || No
      |-
      | Capturing the Friedmans || Music director || Yes || Not listed as actress || No
      |-
      | Blood on Méliès' Moon || || No || Role is verified || No
      |-
      | I piccoli maghi di Oz, || || No || || No
      |-
      | Brute || || No || || No
      |-
      | Fredericka || No short film by this title || No || || No
      |-
      | Danny & the Deep Blue Sea || || No || || No
      |-
      | Aurora: All is Well || || No || || No
      |-
      | Don Matteo || Television series || Yes || Not in list of recurring cast || No
      |-
      | Fratelli detective || || No || || No
      |-
      |
      |-
      |
      |}
      She does not have multiple major roles. The article and the references do not establish notability. She may be notable now or in the future, but this article should not be in article space. It should be in draft space, where it was. I am not moving it unilaterally back to draft space because that would be move-warring.
16. 2022 Tipperary Senior Football Championship: nominated at AfD; notified Fernandosmission (talk · contribs) 20:21, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: 2022 Tipperary Senior Football Championship
      Article about a future Gaelic football tournament that is too soon and does not satisfy event notability guidelines. The one reference is not about the upcoming competition but about the 2021 championship match. There is no significant coverage because there is no documented coverage, which is in turn because the event is in the future.
      An article was created in article space and moved to draft space. A stub was then created again in article space. An unregistered editor then copy-pasted the schedule from the draft to the article, which would cause attribution problems if the article were worth keeping, but it is not.
17. Kanyabugande Olivier: nominated at AfD; notified Camilopiz (talk · contribs) 16:01, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Kanyabugande Olivier
      Stub on actor that does not address either general notability or acting notability. There is already a draft so it cannot be moved to draft space. The references are both passing mentions of nominations for an award that is inaugural and so does not appear to be notable (but are only nominations):
      {| class="wikitable"
      ! Reference Number !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
      |-
      | 1 || newtimes.co.rw || List of nominees for first Rwanda International Movie Awards - Named as nominee || Yes || No, mention || Yes || No
      |-
      | 2 || inyarwanda.com || List of actors for a People's Choice Award || Yes || No, mention || Yes || No
      |-
      |
      |-
      |
      |}
      There is no mention of significant coverage and no mention of major roles.
18. Mugisha Emmanuel: nominated at AfD; notified Camilopiz (talk · contribs) 16:13, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Mugisha Emmanuel
      Stub article on actor that does not contain enough information to establish either general notability or acting notability. An article should speak for itself and this does not. It does not mention significant coverage or major roles.
19. Table tennis at the 2022 ASEAN Para Games: nominated at AfD; notified Muhammad fardhan rizqullah (talk · contribs) 05:48, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Table tennis at the 2022 ASEAN Para Games
      This article has no references. It also refers to a future event (as stated in the parent article) and does not give enough details to be encyclopedic, as well as being too soon for a future event. The lede sentence incorrectly uses the past tense. This article has no encyclopedic content. It was moved to draft space, and was moved back to article space by the author. It does not belong in article space.
20. Wheelchair tennis at the 2022 ASEAN Para Games: nominated at AfD; notified Muhammad fardhan rizqullah (talk · contribs) 05:51, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Wheelchair tennis at the 2022 ASEAN Para Games
      This article has no references. It also refers to a future event (as stated in the parent article) and does not give enough details to be encyclopedic, as well as being too soon for a future event. The lede sentence incorrectly uses the past tense. This article has no encyclopedic content. It does not belong in article space. Not moving to draft space because author moved another similar article back into article space from draft space, so might prefer an AFD.
21. Powerlifting at the 2022 ASEAN Para Games: nominated at AfD; notified Muhammad fardhan rizqullah (talk · contribs) 17:59, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Powerlifting at the 2022 ASEAN Para Games
      This article has no references. It also refers to a future event (as stated in the parent article) and does not give enough details to be encyclopedic, as well as being too soon for a future event. The lede sentence incorrectly uses the past tense. This article has no encyclopedic content. It does not belong in article space. Not moving to draft space because author moved another similar article back into article space from draft space, so AFD seems the necessary course.
22. Tri Ta: nominated at AfD; notified GrayEquinox951 (talk · contribs) 23:47, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Tri Ta
      Biography of a living person that does not satisfy general notability or political notability. The one reference states that he was elected mayor of the town. It is a reliable source, but is not an independent source, and does not provide significant coverage. Not much has changed since the previous article was deleted in 2007.
23. Rich Tran: nominated at AfD; notified GrayEquinox951 (talk · contribs) 23:52, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Rich Tran
      Biography of a living person that does not satisfy general notability or political notability. The one reference states that he was elected mayor of the town. It is a reliable source, but is not an independent source, and does not provide significant coverage.

August 2022

1. Henrybuilt: nominated at AfD; notified Synergistic2 (talk · contribs) 21:13, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Henrybuilt
     Article on design company that is written like an advertisement, but Wikipedia is not for advertisements. Naïve Google search shows that the company exists, and that the company advertises online, and finds plenty of non-independent coverage. However, the article does not provide evidence of independent secondary significant coverage. The article has been reference-bombed, so that a check of the references for whether they are independent, secondary, and significant is not feasible. The author, who has not responded to a request to declare any conflict of interest, seems to have dumped this into article space to ask Wikipedia to find the needle of independent significant coverage in the haystack of advertising. This article does not satisfy corporate notability, and it isn't our responsibility to rewrite it.
2. Gevherhan Sultan (daughter of Murad IV): nominated at AfD; notified Dt.022 (talk · contribs) 00:38, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Gevherhan Sultan
     Article with no references that are both verifiable and reliable. This article appears identical to a previous article on the same person that was created in article space and moved to draft space for better sources. So there is already a draft, and this article can be deleted to allow improvement of the existing draft. The first two appear to be books, but do not identify the title (which is why the previous article was draftified). The third is a web site that is probably user-generated content.
3. Kew OhSo (artist): nominated at AfD; notified Omni Maximum (talk · contribs) 03:51, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Kew OhSo (artist)
     Biography of a living person that was written to praise its subject rather than to describe him neutrally, but does not establish general notability. Nothing in this article describes the sort of significant coverage of the subject by reliable sources that would establish general notability. The title Kew OhSo has already been ECP-create-protected due to repeated recreation, so that creation with a disambiguation phrase is an attempt to game the naming of the article. The article has been reference-bombed, but does not speak for itself.
4. Intellecap: nominated at AfD; notified San1378 (talk · contribs) 05:46, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Intellecap
     Stub article about company that does not satisfy corporate notability. One copy of this article was already created, and moved into draft space as not ready for article space. This copy is the same, and is not ready for article space. It does not mention significant coverage by independent sources. Neither of the references is independent.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Reference Number !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || aavishkaargroup.com || Web site of parent company || No || Yes || Yes || No
     |-
     | 2 || forbesindia.com || Interview with CEO || No || Yes || Yes || No
     |-
     |
     |-
     |
     |-
     |
     |}
5. In Win Development: nominated at AfD; notified DigitalIceAge (talk · contribs) 18:55, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: In Win
     In Win Development, run-of-the-mill computer case and computer power supply company. This draft reads like an advertisement, and does not refer to any significant coverage by third parties. I put Notability and Tone tags on the article, which were reverted with the edit summary: "Where is the advertising? Point out the problems on the talk page instead of drive-by tagging". I haven't asked the author about COI. I haven't read the 2018 article, but this article doesn't appear to focus on anything since 2018, so that the 2018 AFD should be presumptive.
6. Allan Panaligan: nominated at AfD; notified JKLlamera (talk · contribs) 03:30, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Allan Panaligan
     Biography of person who does not satisfy political notability and does not appear to satisfy general notability. The subject was a council member and acting mayor of a city of 440,000, which is not presumed notable but sometimes is notable. This article does not establish notability. Two of the references are news stories about actions that he took as mayor that are passing mentions of him. One of them is an advertisement for tourism to his city.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Reference Number !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || Philstar.com || News story about garbage contract || Yes || Not about the subject || Yes || Yes
     |-
     | 2 || Philstar.com || News story about traffic enforcement || Yes || Not about the subject || Yes || Yes
     |-
     | 3 || Issuu.com || Advertisement for travel to the city || No || No || Yes || No
     |}
     This BLP was created in article space, moved to draft space, and created in article space again. The article should be deleted, and the draft can be expanded in draft space if there is [[WP:SIGC
7. General category (reservation): nominated at AfD; notified Thingofme (talk · contribs) 17:09, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: General category (reservation)
     Stub article that is essentially a dictionary definition of the term, and does not provide significant coverage except to state that persons outside the general category (that is, scheduled persons) are entitled to compete against persons in the general category. Both references are reliable sources that merely report a Supreme Court of India decision that is the basis of the second sentence. The descriptions of scheduled castes, scheduled tribes, other backward classes, and economically weaker section either are substantial articles or redirect to substantial articles. This should be merged into Reservation in India. It was originally created in article space, but was moved to draft space by User:Riteshmmec, who tagged the redirect in article space for R2. The author then converted the redirect back into an article, which now cannot be moved into draft space. A stub can be cut down to a redirect by normal editing, but the author has shown that they are being assertive, so AFD is in order.
8. Raj Sounds and Lights: nominated at AfD; notified Mitk1991 (talk · contribs) 12:11, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Raj Sounds and Lights
     This film stub does not satisfy film notability or general notability. The one reference is an announcement that the film will be released. The film has been released, but there is no subsequent release coverage.
     The usual action would be to move this article to draft space, but there is a long draft, Draft:Raj Sounds and Lights by a different author, but the draft has been declined, because it also lacks reception information, and so has no third-party coverage information, and it reads like a film poster.
     This stub does not have enough information to need to be merged into the draft and can be deleted. The draft can be improved in draft space and then accepted.
9. Maxwell Frost: nominated at AfD; notified DividedFrame (talk · contribs) 04:14, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Maxwell Frost
     Political candidate who does not meet political notability as a candidate, and does not meet general notability based on the text of this article. The references have not been checked in detail, but an article should speak for itself, and this article does not provide evidence of significant coverage of the subject. Subsequent coverage between now and November 2022 will probably be about the campaign, and so will not be considered to satisfy general notability. This article largely reads like a campaign brochure. If the campaign-related material were removed, not much would be left that is not already covered in 2022_United_States_House_of_Representatives_elections_in_Florida#District_10. There is also a draft which is almost identical to this article, so that draftification is not an alternative to deletion. Redirection is an alternative to deletion, and is recommended. I have not unilaterally redirected the article in order to avoid edit-warring, and because I am requesting a community decision.
10. 2022–23 in Indian football: nominated at AfD; notified DesiNerd27 (talk · contribs) 04:54, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: 2022–23 in Indian football
      This article has no references and so is not ready for article space. There is also a draft, which was declined once as too soon, but was then created in article space anyway. The article should be deleted, and the draft left alone for improvement to be moved into article space when it is ready.
11. File:Blackturnsred.png: (log) nominated at FfD; notified Dasiljac (talk · contribs) 13:42, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: See note by User:Minorax - No evidence of permission. The same rules apply to files in the English Wikipedia as in Commons.

September 2022

1. Korean Air Flight 2033: nominated at AfD; notified Javyriv (talk · contribs) 03:26, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Korean Air Flight 2033
     Unsourced article about a non-notable incident. An article on this topic was deleted eight years ago by Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Korean Air Flight 2033. The originator then created an article on 2 September 2022 with an edit summary including "I personally don’t know how to do the external links or references." It was then moved to draft space, and a note was left on the author's talk page, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Javyriv&type=revision&diff=1108014892&oldid=1108014130&diffmode=source, cautioning not to move the draft back to article space without references, and to use the AFC process. The originator then created this article in article space without references again. This is both a conduct issue and a content issue, but AFD is a content forum and should delete the unsourced article.
2. Seven Days (magazine): nominated at AfD; notified Congha2540 (talk · contribs) 04:00, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Seven Days (magazine)
     Article on magazine that does not satisfy magazine notability or general notability. Created in article space, then moved to draft space by User:Hey man im josh as not ready for article space. Then created again in article space by originator. The draft has now, reasonably, been cut down to a redirect to the article, but the article does not establish notability.
     A check of the references shows that none of them provide significant coverage of the magazine. One is a passing mention. One is an upload of a page from the magazine to Commons. One is a lengthy report that does not appear to be related.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Number !! Reference !! Remarks !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || againstthecurrent.org || Obituary-tribute to Dave Dellinger || Yes || No, passing mention of magazine || Yes || No
     |-
     | 2 || Wikimedia Commons || Photograph of masthead of magazine || No || No || No, circular reference || No
     |-
     | 3 || iranhrdc.org || A 2006 report, of no obvious connection to the subject || Yes || No, no obvious connection || Yes || No
     |-
     |
     |}
     Draftification, with instructions to use the AFC review process, is a reasonable alternative to deletion, but the originator has already disagreed with that option.
3. Delhi Premier League 2022: nominated at AfD; notified Ban kharkongor (talk · contribs) 03:29, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Delhi Premier League 2022'
     Unsourced article, so failing verifiability, about a football season that does not have enough information to be encyclopedic as of 4 September 2022. One copy of the article, with no references, was created by the originator, and was then properly moved to draft space by User:Spiderone. The originator then created another copy in article space, with no references. The originator then tagged the two copies for an unnecessary history merge. What is needed is to delete the copy in article space and leave the draft standing so that references can be added, as well as including the results of matches after the matches are played.
4. Kayadu Lohar: nominated at AfD; notified B.Raja1994 (talk · contribs) 21:57, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Kayadu Lohar
     Actress who does not satisfy either general notability or acting notability. The only reference is to IMDB, which is not a reliable source, and is a database entry. This page is a biography of a living person but has no footnotes. An earlier version of this article was created in article space, but was correctly moved to draft space by User:Spiderone, so that this cannot be moved to draft space. The version in draft space has more information, but also has more puffery. This page does not even have enough information to be a useful stub.
5. Mason Vale Cotton: nominated at AfD; notified Samuelloveslennonstella (talk · contribs) 07:56, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Mason Vale Cotton
     Actor who has already been found not to satisfy acting notability twice. The most recent deletion discussion was in August 2020 and was Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mason Vale Cotton (3rd nomination). No roles are described that are more recent than 2020. Neither the Desperate Housewives role or the Mad Men role are lead roles. Nothing has changed in the past two years.
6. Fatty Koo: nominated at AfD; notified Major Hitrite (talk · contribs) 03:59, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Fatty Koo
     Band that does not satisfy musical notability or general notability. A check of the references shows that they are mostly trade rags, except for reference 2 in the New York Times and references 3 and 10 in Billboard magazine, which should be reliable sources, but they are not verifiable because they are set up using Proquest, which is a paywalling service. So there is no verifiable significant coverage as of 10 September 2022.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Number !! Reference !! Remarks !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary !! Verifiable
     |-
     | 1 || muscianbio.org || A database entry || Yes || No || Yes || No || Yes
     |-
     | 2 || proquest.com || New York Times via proquest || Yes || || || || No
     |-
     | 3 || proquest.com || Billboard via Proquest || Yes || || || || No
     |-
     | 4 || allmusic.com || Listings on this site are not significant. || Yes || No || Yes || No || Yes
     |-
     | 5 || allhiphop.com || Listings on this site are not significant. || Yes || No || Yes || No || Yes
     |-
     | 6 || bmi.com || An informational article in an industry magazine, comparable to an interview. || No || Yes || Yes || No || Yes
     |-
     | 7 || stepbystep.com || This appears to be a web site building service. || No || Yes || No || No || Yes
     |-
     | 8 || tobygad.com || This is the personal web site of the producer. || No || Yes || || No || Yes
     |-
     | 9 || theboombox.com || A passing mention || Yes || No || Yes || Yes || Yes
     |-
     | 10 || proquest.com || Billboard via Proquest || Yes || || || || No
     |}
     If the Proquest references are replaced by regular links within seven days, they can be reassessed.
     There was a previous deletion discussion, which amounts to no quorum with 1 good-faith !vote and a banned user, so that this is a new deletion nomination of a new article.
7. Robert Holloway: nominated at AfD; notified 115.188.5.125 (talk · contribs) 20:42, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Robert Holloway
     This biography of a living person has verifiability problems as well as notability problems. As to verifiability, under the current cricket notability guideline, there is no statement that this individual played at the international level. There is also no mention of anything that resembles significant coverage to establish general notability. But the more basic problem is that this stub doesn't have any references. If references to reliable sources are added within seven days, they will still have to provide significant coverage.
     There probably should have been a proposed deletion, but we might as well publish this.
8. Zafar Mahmood: nominated at AfD; notified Lugnuts (talk · contribs) 23:47, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Zafar Mahmood
     Cricketer whose only reference is a database entry (no longer permitted as the only reference) and for whom no claim is made that would satisfy general notability because nothing is said about what third parties have written. Also does not satisfy the current version of cricket notability because there is no indication that he played test cricket or otherwise played internationally.
9. Tex Kelly: nominated at AfD; notified Vincelord (talk · contribs) 00:28, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Tex Kelly
     American football player who does not meet general notability or the current version of sports notability. The only references are database entries. There currently does not appear to be a gridiron football notability guideline, so the only guideline is general notability. This article makes no mention of independent significant coverage.
10. Aman Gupta: nominated at AfD; notified Ted071203 (talk · contribs) 19:41, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Aman Gupta
      This article about a non-notable businessman does not satisfy general notability or biographical notability. The article does not speak for itself and does not discuss independent significant coverage. The one reference is an interview, and is promotional. Appearance as a judge on a television show does not establish notability.
11. The Pope's Exorcist: nominated at AfD; notified Gondolabúrguer (talk · contribs) 19:58, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Pope's Exorcist
      Teaser stub about unreleased film that does not satisfy film notability or general notability. Unreleased films are only notable if production itself satisfies general notability. This stub does not say that production has happened, let alone that it was notable. The references are either teasers saying that there will be a film, or are about or by the late person that the movie is about.
      {| class="wikitable"
      ! Number !! Reference !! Remarks !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
      |-
      | 1 || imdb.com || IMDB summary of movie || Yes || No || No || No
      |-
      | 2 || msn.com || Announcement of planned film || Yes || No || Yes || No
      |-
      | 3 || abcnews.com || An interview with the real-life exorcist || Yes || Not about the film || Yes || Yes, but not about the film
      |-
      | 4 || worldcat.org || Listing of a book by the real-life exorcist || Yes || Not about the film || Yes || No
      |-
      | 5 || worldcat.org || Listing of another book by the real-life exorcist || Yes || Not about the film || Yes || No
      |}
      The notability of Gabriele Amorth is not in dispute; we already have an article about him. This stub says nothing about the film except that it doesn't yet exist.
12. Thunivu: nominated at AfD; notified Madhesh Elumalai (talk · contribs) 04:59, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Thunivu
      This article is very incomplete, without even a lede sentence, although the short description suffices for that purpose, and so is only a cast listing for a future film. It also has no references. As such, it fails verifiability, general notability, and film notability. There is also a draft, Draft:Thunivu, which has been correctly declined, and has been resubmitted. It appears that this is an attempt to sneak an entry into article space. Since there is already a draft, the article should simply be deleted, and the draft can be updated and resubmitted when the film is released. I recommend that the title be extended-confirmed protected in article space to prevent further efforts to game the system.
13. Violent Extremism in West Africa in the 21st Century: nominated at AfD; notified Tamedu quaternion (talk · contribs) 05:48, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Violent Extremism in West Africa in the 21st Century
      This article reads like an opinion piece in article space. It has twice been moved from article space to draft space, by User:Praxidicae and User:Bonadea. Both times the author has moved the article back to article space without attempting to discuss with the reviewers. There has not been any discussion on the article talk page (which was the draft talk page when the article was a draft). Maybe the author has a non-neutral point of view, since the topic is one in which a non-neutral point of view is at least as likely as a COI. The article consists in large part of excerpts from main articles, and that content will not be lost by deletion. Other than that, the introductory paragraphs are opinion.
14. Jean Dawson: nominated at AfD; notified Love Dont Cost A Dime (talk · contribs) 05:06, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Jean Dawson
      Singer who does not satisfy musical notability or general notability. The article does not speak for itself, and only says that he exists, so notability depends on the references. Two of them are interviews, and the other two are about albums rather than about him.
      {| class="wikitable"
      ! Number !! Reference !! Remarks !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
      |-
      | 1 || complex.com || An interview || No || Yes || Yes || No
      |-
      | 2 || essence.com || An interview || No || Yes || Yes || No
      |-
      | 3 || earmilk.com || Announcement of album || Yes || Not about the subject || Yes || No
      |-
      | 4 || nme.com || Review of an album || Yes || Not about the subject; yes about the album || Yes || Yes
      |-
      |
      |-
      |
      |}
      There is also a draft, Draft:Jean Dawson, which I have reviewed and declined. The draft contains more information than the article but does not establish notability. The subject likely is notable, but neither the article nor the draft establishes notability. There was a previous AFD that was closed on 27 August as Merge. The closer had a difficult task because the participants seemed to imply more coverage than is shown. The article now has a tag on it saying that it should be merged into the draft, but there is nothing to merge because the article has no information that is not in the draft, and neither the draft nor the article establishes notability. Either the article should be deleted and editors should be asked to improve and resubmit the draft, or the article can be expanded within seven days to be better than the current draft for a Heymann close.
15. Louth Intermediate Football Championship: nominated at AfD; notified Moresthepity (talk · contribs) 02:54, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Louth Intermediate Football Championship
      This stub has no references and no lede section, and does not make a credible claim of significance. A less incomplete article on this topic, which nonetheless was not ready for article space because it had no references, has already been moved to draft space. This stub should be deleted as failing both verifiability and notability.
16. Sweater Whether: nominated at AfD; notified WizardEditorCatBoy3126 (talk · contribs) 05:40, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Sweater Whether
      Non-notable unreleased film. The film's claim to fame is that it is India's first non-environmental film whose production was carbon-neutral. The only reference is in Digital Journal, which is a reliable source, and is an interview with the producer, and so is not independent or secondary. There is no mention of significant coverage of the green production of the film, or any aspect of the film. The article only says that the film will exist. We knew that. This article was created in article space, moved to draft space, and then moved back to article space with the edit summary

      The Film has it’s own google knowledge panel

      . Duh. That doesn't establish notability. Draftification is all right, but not moving unilaterally to draft space because that has already been done once.
17. Royal Humanitarian Order of the Kingdom of Gbi Traditional Area Hohoe: nominated at AfD; notified Leo0274 (talk · contribs) 05:52, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: :Royal and Dynastic Order of the Eagle of Hohoe
      :Royal Humanitarian Order of the Kingdom of Gbi Traditional Area Hohoe
      Non-notable chivalric orders under the patronage of a non-resident Ghanaian tribal king. Both created in article space and moved to draft space by User:DoubleGrazing saying "Mostly unreferenced, and no evidence of notability". They were both moved back to article space by the originator after adding what appear to be low-quality references, but the articles still do not speak for themselves. Nothing in the articles is about significant coverage by independent sources. No evidence of recognition by any nations.

October 2022

1. St Stephen's High School, Pathanapuram: nominated at AfD; notified Roberto529bl (talk · contribs) 20:24, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: St Stephen's High School, Pathanapuram
     St Stephen's Higher Secondary Pathanapuram
     Two sub-stubs for what appears to be one school that do not provide any indication of general notability.
2. Yasmín Ramírez: nominated at AfD; notified Narreola12 (talk · contribs) 02:07, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Yasmín Ramírez
     This biography of a living person fails verifiability because it has no independent references, and has no footnotes. The reference list is only a bibliography. There is also a draft that is almost identical to the article and has been declined as not satisfying author notability. If there were no draft, this article could be moved to draft space for the addition of proper references and for review as to notability. Since there already is a draft, this article should be deleted, and the draft can be left for improvement.
3. Copenhagen Cowboy: nominated at AfD; notified WikiNarco (talk · contribs) 07:01, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Copenhagen Cowboy
     Planned television series which does not pass television notability because it is too soon. Nothing in the text of the article describes significant coverage by independent sources, and so the article does not speak for itself and does not establish general notability.
     A detailed review of the references has not yet been done, but many of the references are not independent or reliable. They include 3 Netflix references, which is the producer and so not independent, 2 Twitter, and 2 Instagram.
     There is already a draft, and draft space is the right place for a page on a future television series, so that this article (which is the same as or almost the same as the draft) should be deleted and the draft left alone.
4. David Moreau: nominated at AfD; notified Delig (talk · contribs) 07:39, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: David Moreau
     Fictional character whose article does not have any properly formatted independent references. Naïve Google search on David Moreau and Genegineer finds that he has fandom, but does not find any reliable sources. If no independent references are found within seven days, this article should be moved to Draft:David Moreau (Marvel Comics) because there is already a draft for a living person in draft space, and a redirect may be made in article space to a list of characters.
5. Nightbitch (film): nominated at AfD; notified Dead-by-Dawn (talk · contribs) 01:18, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Nightbitch (film)
     Unreleased film that does not meet film notability or general notability. Originator moved it from draft space to article space with comment: "Filming has begun" and a source. There is a myth that a film becomes notable when principal photography begins. In fact, the film notability guideline is poorly written, and has been confusing for more than a decade, but it says that a film is not notable before filming has begun, and that an unreleased film in production is only notable if production itself satisfies general notability. There is nothing in this article that provides significant coverage of the production or release of the film. (It hasn't been released.) A review of the references shows that they are all the usual announcements made about an upcoming film, such as signing of the director and leading lady, and the distribution deal. All of the sources are primary. They are all reliable, but they are mostly reliably promotional.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Number !! Reference !! Remarks !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || deadline.com || Announcement of film and leading lady || No || Yes || Yes || No
     |-
     | 2 || hollywoodreporter.com || Announcement of auction to produce film and of leading lady || No || Yes || Yes || No
     |-
     | 3 || hollywoodreporter.com || Announcement of production of film and of leading lady || No || Yes || Yes || No
     |-
     | 4 || variety.com || Story about personnel change at production company, passing mention of film || Yes || No || Yes || No
     |-
     | 5 || deadline.com || Announcement of distribution deal for film || No || Yes || Yes || No
     |-
     | 6 || avclub.com || Announcement of distribution deal and puff piece for film || No || Yes || Yes || No
     |-
     | 7 || variety.com || Announcement of signing of leading man || No || Yes || Yes || No
     |-
     | 8 || bloody-disgusting.com || Another announcement of signing of leading man || No || Yes || Yes || No
     |-
     | 9 || variety.com || Another announcement of distribution, director, and actress || No || Yes || Yes || No
     |-
     | 10 || worldofreel.com || Announcement of start of filming, and teaser || No || Yes || Yes || No
     |-
     | 11 || indiewire.com || Announcement of plans to release film || No || Yes || Yes || No
     |-
     |
     |}
     The article should be moved back into draft space until the film is released, and a redirect should be made to Marielle Heller.
6. Draft:Quôc Anh Nguyên: nominated at MfD; notified QUOBSERVER (talk · contribs) 20:39, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Draft:Quôc Anh Nguyên
     Incomprehensible draft. Seems to be a rant against communism, but there the intelligibility ends. Declined once, then resubmitted and rejected. Expanded by author, but then abandoned. Would have been eligible for G13 except for a cosmetic edit. Originator has made no constructive edits.
7. LaQuan McGowan: nominated at AfD; notified TheEndZone (talk · contribs) 01:05, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: LaQuan McGowan
     American football player who does not satisfy general notability or sports notability. The subject did not satisfy the old version of gridiron football notability, which has been dropped, because it does not appear that he played professionally.
     There was a draft in draft space, which was then copy-pasted into article space, and the draft was blanked, but the draft has now been restored. A history merge has been requested for this version in article space.
     The text of this article says nothing about significant coverage by independent sources. A review of the references shows that the first two are a database entry and a YouTube page and so are not significant or secondary. The third is an article in an arena football e-magazine, which is not independent because it is promoting arena football (and there is no record that he played). The fourth reference is a 404 error.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Number !! Reference !! Remarks !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || espn.com || A database entry on college players || Yes || No || Yes || No
     |-
     | 2 || Youtube || Discussion on Youtube || Yes || No || No || No
     |-
     | 3 || arenafootballtalk.com || Story about signing || No, because electronic magazine is about arena football || Yes || Yes || No
     |-
     | 4 || carolinacobras.com || Has 404 error || No || No || No ||
     |}
     There is a draft. The draft can be left standing. He might play professionally and be covered by the hometown daily newspaper.
8. Bohan Phoenix: nominated at AfD; notified Das osmnezz (talk · contribs) 00:09, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Bohan Phoenix
     This article about a musician, known either as Bohan Phoenix or Leng Bohan, does not provide evidence of satisfying musical notability or general notability. Nothing in this article refers to significant coverage by independent sources. Nothing in this article indicates that any of the musical notability criteria have been met. This article was created in article space, then moved to draft space by User:Hey man im josh. Then a Career section was added, and the references, which are interviews, were moved around.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Number !! Reference !! Remarks !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || npr.org || A guide to performers on their radio shows || No || Yes || Yes || No
     |-
     | 2 || tonedeaf.thebrag.com || An interview || No || Yes || Yes || No
     |-
     | 3 || djbooth.net || An interview about his music || No || Yes || Yes || No
     |-
     | 4 || sinethetamag.medium.com || A combination interview and narrative || No || Yes || Yes || No
     |-
     | 5 || liftedasia.com || Another combination interview and narrative || No || Yes || Yes || No
     |-
     | 6 || breakingasia.com || Mostly interview and partly puff piece || No || Yes || Yes || No
     |-
     | 7 || mixmag.asia || Another interview || No || Yes || Yes || No
     |-
     |
     |}
     It wasn't ready for article space when it was draftified, and it still isn't ready for article space.
9. Pavel Baranov: nominated at AfD; notified Geregen2 (talk · contribs) 20:06, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Pavel Baranov
     Association football player about whom the only reference is a database entry. Was previously notable under the now-discontinued association football notability guideline. There is nothing in this stub that addresses general notability, which is the current governing notability guideline.
10. ORDO Store: nominated at AfD; notified Nrt0011 (talk · contribs) 12:20, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: ORDO Store
      This article was declined in Articles for Creation, and then moved into article space, and moved back into draft space as not ready for article space, but a copy has been created in article space anyway. This article does not satisfy WP:NCORP. It has been reference-bombed, and the references have not been analyzed in depth for significant coverage.
11. List of Bangladeshi Film Artists: nominated at AfD; notified Purnendu Bhowmik Shuvro (talk · contribs) 16:51, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: List of Bangladeshi Film Artists
      This page does not satisfy the notability guidelines for stand-alone lists. It was created in article space, then moved to draft space by User:Hey man im josh, then declined twice by User:S0091 and User:TheWikiholic. It was then moved back to article space. Moving it back to draft space again would be move-warring.
      Because of its length, it isn't likely to serve an encyclopedic purpose for the reader, and will be out of date unless it is constantly maintained by tweaking. Its purpose for other editors is better served by Categories, since these are maintained by the gnomes who categorize articles. Spot-checking of the entries shows that the persons in the list are all in one or more categories of Bangladeshi film artists, broken down by century, gender, and whether actor or director. So, as a stand-alone list article, it is useful neither to readers nor to editors.
12. Chris Gladwin (cricketer): nominated at AfD; notified Bobo192 (talk · contribs) 06:49, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
    • Reason: Chris Gladwin (cricketer)
      The only reference for this biography of a living person is a database entry, which is no longer considered sufficient to establish sports notability or general notability. This article does not mention significant coverage by independent sources.

November 2022

1. Megalopolis (film): nominated at AfD; notified Rusted AutoParts (talk · contribs) 04:49, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Megalopolis (film)
     Unreleased film that does not satisfy film notability or general notability. Unreleased films are only notable when production itself has been notable. There is a myth that films become notable when a reliable source states that principal photography has begun, but that is a myth, because principal photography is a necessary but not sufficient condition for notability of an upcoming film. Neither the article nor the sources say anything about principal photography except that it was planned to be in Georgia, and that it had begun, and the statements that it would be filmed in Georgia were made before the start of filming. None of the sources are independent secondary coverage. They are the usual pre-announcements that are always made about films that are in the works
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Reference Number !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || thefilmstage.com || Announcement of cast signings || No || Yes || Yes || No
     |-
     | 2 || www.gq.com || Long interview in Gentlemen's Quartery with Coppola || No || Yes || Yes || No
     |-
     | 3 || hollywoodreporter.com || Interview with Coppola || No || Yes || Yes || No
     |-
     | 4 || deadline.com || Another interview with Coppola || No || Yes || Yes || No
     |-
     | 5 || hollywoodreporter.com || Announcement that Coppola will make the film || No || No (too short) || Yes || No
     |-
     | 6 || deadline.com || Another interview with Coppola || No || Yes || Yes || No
     |-
     | 7 || showbiz411.com || Announcements about casting || No || Yes || Yes || No
     |-
     | 8 || deadline.com || Interview with Coppola || No || Yes || Yes || No
     |-
     | 9 || deadline.com || Another discussion of casting || No || Yes || Yes || No
     |-
     | 10 || hollywoodreporter.com || Another accouncement about casting || No || Yes || Yes || No
     |-
     | 11 || deadline.com || A story about casting || No || Yes || Yes || No
     |-
     | 12 || productionlist.com || A database about films || Yes || No || Yes || No
     |-
     | 13 || ajc.com || Atlanta Journal-Constitution: Article that filming will be in Georgia || Yes || No || Yes || No
     |-
     | 14 || collider.com || Article that filming is about to start || No || No || Yes || No
     |}
     This article was one of two drafts about the film, but has been moved into article space. There had been a redirect from the title to Francis Ford Coppola, which the author moved to limbo. The originator has a right to move the article into article space, but the article does not have a right to be in article space. The other draft can be left in draft space to be reviewed when the film is released and becomes notable.
2. Draft:Sukchain Singh: nominated at MfD; notified Isukchainsingh (talk · contribs) 05:42, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: #*{{pagelinks|Draft:Sukhchain Singh}
     *User:Isukchainsingh/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
     Two identical copies of an unsourced autobiography that is a biography of a living person. Biographies of living persons in article space, user space, and draft space must be sourced.
     If the originator can add sourcing within seven days, that will warrant a Heymann keep of the draft, and the redirection of the sandbox to the draft; but the autobiography will still be non-notable.
3. 2023 Memphis 901 FC season: nominated at AfD; notified Tivo15 (talk · contribs) 23:17, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: 2023 Memphis 901 FC season
     This stub has no details and no references, and so cannot satisfy general notability or sports notability. There is already a draft, which has information but no references, and is tagged as having no references, so this stub should not be moved into draft space, but should be deleted, while references are found for the draft.
4. Artur Nunes: nominated at AfD; notified Ana Ngola Forgotten Souls (talk · contribs) 01:14, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Artur Nunes
     This article is still not ready for article space. It is very incomplete, as evidenced by the multiple empty sections. It makes no mention of significant coverage that would support general notability or musical notability. This article should be in draft space until the sections are expanded to make it ready for article space, but it has already been in draft space once, and so cannot be unilaterally draftified again. I mistakenly tagged it for BLPPROD, but he is not a living person. Either expand the article within seven days for a Heymann close, or move it to draft space.
5. Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education, Shaheed Benazirabad: nominated at AfD; notified Vk8435820 (talk · contribs) 06:59, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education, Shaheed Benazirabad
     There is nothing in this article that attests to general notability. An article should speak for itself, and this article does not. There is already a draft, because the originator may be trying to overwhelm the system. This article can be deleted, and the draft can be kept.

December 2022

1. Paran Murmu: nominated at AfD; notified Murmupp (talk · contribs) 02:21, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Paran Murmu
     This article has no secondary sources and no mention of significant coverage. It also has no footnotes to support verifiability of a biography of a living person. It does not contain enough information to be encyclopedic.
2. 2023 USA Outdoor Track and Field Championships: nominated at AfD; notified TrackFieldFan2022 (talk · contribs) 20:07, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: 2023 USA Outdoor Track and Field Championships
     This article is written in the past tense about the future, which violates Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, and so violates verifiability. It has already been to draft space once and moved back to article space, so should not be unilaterally draftified again.
3. Postland: nominated at AfD; notified LuckySloops (talk · contribs) 05:12, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Postland
     This article has no references, and so cannot possibly meet film notability. This is also a conflict of interest edit, since the name of the originator of the article and the name of the director are the same.
4. Ridho Syuhada: nominated at AfD; notified Chrissteel34 (talk · contribs) 08:17, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Ridho Syuhada
     Association football player who does not satisfy sports notability or general notability. Article was created in article space, moved to draft space by User:Onel5969, but created again in article space by originator. Checking references shows that they are database entries or accounts of matches with passing mention that he played.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Reference Number !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || worldfootball.net || A database entry || Yes || No || Yes || No
     |-
     | 2 || suaramerdeka.com || Description of game || Yes || No, passing mention || Yes || No
     |-
     | 3 || soccerway.com || Match results || Yes || No || Yes || No
     |-
     | 4 || https://suarabaru.id/ || Description of game || Yes || No, passing mention || Yes || No
     |-
     | 5 || soccerway.com || Match results || Yes || No || Yes || No
     |-
     |
     |}
     The article should be deleted, and the draft allowed to stand.
5. Joginder Singh Vedanti: nominated at AfD; notified 1forever&ever (talk · contribs) 07:28, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
   • Reason: Joginder Singh Vedanti
     This article was created in article space by an editor who appears to have a conflict of interest. It was then moved to draft space by User:Onel5969 with instructions not to move it back to mainspace without review. The editor then created a copy of it in article space, thus ignoring the intent of the instruction. The article should be deleted so that the draft can be reviewed for neutrality.

January 2023

1. Brian Meshkin: nominated at AfD; notified T0mpr1c3 (talk · contribs) 22:17, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Procedural nomination. Talk:Brian Meshkin has been nominated for deletion with the following statement, which is clearly meant to request that the article be deleted:
     Mr. Meshkin’s page should be deleted because his page is inaccurate as all charges against him have been dismissed “in the interests of justice.” As such, the statement that Mr. Meshkin is “a federally indicted entrepreneur” is completely false. To leave Mr. Meshkin’s page up despite the court’s dismissal undermines the credibility of the important work contributors provide to Wikipedia by implicitly endorsing the publication of Mr. Meshkin’s page.
     Moreover, Mr. Meshkin’s page should be deleted because his page violates Wikipedia’s One Event and Neutrality Policies. See WP:BLP1E and WP:NPOV. For instance, rather than include categories of Mr. Meshkin typically found in other BLPs, such as “Early Life,” “Personal Life,” “Honors and Awards,” “Influences,” etc., his page almost entirely focuses on one event, namely, the indictment and lawsuit that has since been dismissed. This depiction of Mr. Meshkin is entirely lopsided and ignores the other work he’s done as an executive, elected official, non-profit leader, or father. Thus as it stands, this makes Mr. Meshkin’s Wikipedia page only focused on one event, making his page inherently non-neutral.
     Lastly, and for similar reasons as stated above, Mr. Meshkin’s page should be deleted because he does not meet the notability criteria. Wikipedia’s Notability Policy provides that a person is “presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject.” Further, if a person is notable for only one event, Wikipedia generally recommends that an article address the event--not the person. This is particularly true where, as here, the individual plays a major role in a minor event. In such cases, “it is not generally appropriate to have separate articles on the person and the event . . . the name of the person should redirect to the article on the incident, especially if the individual is only notable for that incident and it is all that the person is associated with in the source coverage.” (emphasis added). As mentioned, nearly half of the sources cited through Mr. Meshkin’s page relates to now-dismissed lawsuit. Therefore, his page should be deleted because the lawsuit was a minor event, negating a standalone Wikipedia page for Mr. Meshkin.
     Disclaimer: Mr. Meshkin, a non-notable, living, private citizen, has not been able to remove his page independently. As a result, K&L Gates represents Mr. Meshkin and receives compensation for representing him. KLG-DCPR (talk) 15:49, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
2. Japan at the 2009 Asian Youth Games: nominated at AfD; notified Akamaruhotohara (talk · contribs) 08:23, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Japan at the 2009 Asian Youth Games
     This article does not satisfy general notability. Neither of the references is a secondary source, or is significant coverage. A copy of this article was in article space, but was moved to draft space by User:Onel5969, at which point the originator created a new copy in article space.
3. Gennady Tkachenko-Papizh: nominated at AfD; notified Flibbertigibbets (talk · contribs) 04:35, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Gennady Tkachenko-Papizh
     Singer who does not appear to satisfy musical notability or general notability. There are two references. The first one is paywalled, but is assumed to be independent and secondary. The second one is a puff piece that cannot qualify as secondary coverage and probably is not independent. So there is only one valid reference, and none of the musical criteria are satisfied.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Reference Number !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     ! 1
     | https://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/03/arts/music/gennady-tkachenko-papizh-georgias-got-talent.html || Have not viewed, but assumed to be independent and significant || Yes? || Maybe || Yes || Yes?
     |-
     ! 2
     | https://www.amnestyindia.org/gennady-tkachenko-magic-miracle-ufo-marvell-music-space-age-music/ || A puff piece || No? || Yes || No || No
     |}
4. Duran Ferree: nominated at AfD; notified Philip.theiss (talk · contribs) 10:04, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Duran Ferree
     This one-sentence stub on an association football player has only one source, which is a database entry. As such, it does not even attempt to satisfy general notability, because it does not indicate what reliable sources have written, except that he exists.
     Also, this surviving sentence was copy-pasted from Draft: Duran Ferree; two other sentences may have also been copied from there before being redacted here. Is this double plagiarism? If this stub is kept, a history merge with the draft will be needed, but it will not be needed if this stub is deleted.
5. David McGrath: nominated at RfD; Target: The Adecco Group (notified); notified Tenjaye (talk · contribs) 10:17, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Target of redirect nowhere found in article. Not obvious what the purpose of the redirect is.
     There is a draft, Draft:David McGrath, which is in AFC. The draft has not been approved or declined at this time. If the unnecessary redirect is deleted, disambiguation will not be necessary.

February 2023

1. 2023 Prime Volleyball League: nominated at AfD; notified Hazedragon (talk · contribs) 02:07, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: 2023 Prime Volleyball League
     This article has no references, and makes no claims of the significant coverage that would satisfy general notability or sports notability. A version of this article was already in article space, but was moved to draft space by User:MPGuy2824. This version in article space should be deleted, unless it can be expanded to report significant coverage with references to reliable sources within seven days.

March 2023

1. Bageshwar Dham Sarkar: nominated at AfD; notified Homolego (talk · contribs) 17:13, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Bageshwar Dham Sarkar
     This stub article is about a Hindu temple. None of the references are about the temple, but they are all about its leader, a popular charismatic figure named Dhirendra Krishna Shastri, who is already the subject of an article. A previous editor nominated this stub for A7, which was declined, and then proposed its deletion, but the PROD was removed by an IP editor. There is no significant coverage of the temple.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Number !! Reference !! Remarks !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || NDTV.COM || Not about the temple but its leader || Y || Not about the temple || Yes? || Yes
     |-
     | 2 || hindustantimes.com || Not about the temple but its leader || Y || Not about the temple || Yes? || Yes
     |-
     | 3 || Theprint.in || Not about the temple but its leader || Y || Not about the temple || Yes? || Yes
     |-
     | 4 || hindi.thequint.com || Not about the temple but its leader || Y || Not about the temple || Yes? || Yes
     |-
     | 5 || timesnownews.com/india || Not about the temple but its leader || ? || Not about the temple || ? || Yes
     |-
     | 6 || indiatoday.in || Not about the temple but its leader || Y || Not about the temple || ? || Yes
     |-
     | 7 || theprint.in || Not about the temple but its leader || Y || Not about the temple || ? || Yes
     |}
     This stub can either be deleted, or redirected to Dhirendra Krishna Shastri.
2. Tuliram Ronghang: nominated at AfD; notified LordVoldemort728 (talk · contribs) 08:09, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Tuliram Ronghang
     Minor Indian politician, about whom article was deleted in 2020. Deletion of article is currently at Deletion Review, which is in the process of endorsing the 2020 deletion, while acknowledging that consensus can change. So this stub has been created, but it does not satisfy either political notability or general notability. It says nothing about third-party coverage of the subject. There are two references, but the second one is a puff piece which is probably not independent, and is not a secondary source. The first reference is on a web site that is blocked by anti-malware protection, so it should also be considered unreliable, even if it is significant coverage.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Number !! Reference !! Remarks !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || Eastern Mirror Nagaland.com || Web site blocked || ? || ? || No || ?
     |-
     | 2 || Hindustan Times || A puff piece || Probably not || Yes || Yes || No
     |}
     The originator states that consensus has changed, but has not shown that consensus has changed, and may be making a good-faith mistake.
3. Antonio Paone: nominated at AfD; notified ProfiExpert (talk · contribs) 17:35, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Antonio Paone
     There are at least two problems with this article.
     First, it is undisclosed paid editing, by a now-blocked undisclosed paid editor. An article almost identical to this one was created on 7 December 2022 in article space, and was then (correctly) moved to draft space by User:MarioGom. This article was then re-created on 26 February 2023 in article space, and the originator was blocked on 27 February 2023. Draft space is already occupied by a copy of this article, which is also undisclosed paid editing, so that this copy can be moved to a bit bucket.
     Second, this article, as written, does not establish general notability, because it does not speak for itself, and does not discuss what third parties have written about the subject. It only says what his flack says about him. It says that he exists; we knew that. He likely has been written about by independent secondary sources to a significant extent, but this piece does not summarize those writings. This article does not establish biographical notability. So this article can be deleted while a copy of it is already in draft space. There is no need to review the 17 references, at least at this time, because they should verify what is in the body of the article, which says that he exists. We don't need to do the flack's work for him.
     The photograph states that it is the submitter's own work, but it was taken in the subject's mansion, because the submitter is working for the subject. But the submitter has already been correctly blocked.
     If a neutral editor wants to develop an article about the subject, the copy of this article in draft space can be a start, but is not currently ready for article space.
4. Peter Kelly (footballer): nominated at AfD; notified EchetusXe (talk · contribs) 01:16, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Peter Kelly (footballer)
     This association football stub does not satisfy general notability because it says nothing about third-party coverage. It likewise does not satisfy sports notability because the association football guideline has been deleted. The only source appears to be a database entry in book form. The Heymann criterion should be finding another source and expanding the article within seven days.
5. Darling (2014 film): nominated at RfD; Target: Darling (2015 Indian film) (notified); notified Bovineboy2008 (talk · contribs) 06:07, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: This redirect was the result of a page move, but either redirection should have been suppressed, or the resulting redirect should have been tagged G6. This redirect is incorrect as a search term and has negative value.
6. Paul Buchanan: nominated at AfD; notified Lugnuts (talk · contribs) 17:41, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Paul Buchanan
     There are two related problems with this Lugnuts sports stub. First, its only source is a database entry, which does not provide secondary coverage. Second, because it only states that he exists (and we knew that from the database entry), it does not even attempt to satisfy general notability. It also does not satisfy the revised cricket notability guidelines. The Heymann criterion is to expand this article within seven days with a reliable source. If someone thinks that sources exist, draftification is a reasonable action.
7. List of international goals scored by Harry Kane: nominated at AfD; notified Joe Sins (talk · contribs) 06:09, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: List of international goals scored by Harry Kane
     There has already been a discussion of whether we need this article as a stand-alone article, and the consensus was that we do not. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of international goals scored by Harry Kane. The applicable policies include Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. There is slow-motion edit-warring to create a list article and to blank and redirect the list to Harry Kane.
8. Tropical Storm Bopha (2006): nominated at AfD; notified 122.52.66.207 (talk · contribs) 08:49, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Tropical Storm Bopha (2006)
     This storm is not sufficiently notable to justify a stand-alone article. It was submitted to Articles for Creation in November 2022, and the reviewer said to discuss at the parent article talk page, Talk:2006 Pacific typhoon season. It was then resubmitted by an unregistered editor (122.*) without discussion. It was then rejected due to the lack of discussion. The 122.* editor then copy-pasted the content of the draft to Tropical Storm Bopha (2006), which had previously been a redirect to the season article, and redirected the draft to the new storm article. The weather notability guide states:

     In order to be split off, the basic rule of thumb is that a system should have had a significant impact on land.

     . This article, to the extent that it is intelligible, does not describe a significant impact on land.
     Robert McClenon (talk) 08:49, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

April 2023

1. My Big Fat Greek Wedding 3: nominated at AfD; notified Alexisajet (talk · contribs) 13:26, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: My Big Fat Greek Wedding 3
     Unreleased film which does not satisfy the restrictive notability guidelines for future films as specified in the film notability guidelines.
     This article is about an unreleased film. The film notability guideline identifies three stages in the production cycle for films:
     *1. Planned films that have not begun production (principal photography or animation). These planned films do not satisfy film notability.
     *2. Films that are confirmed by reliable sources to have begun production, but have not been released. These films are only notable if production itself satisfies general notability in terms of significant coverage. Mere mention of the start of production does not satisfy notability.
     *3. Films that have been released, whose notability is determined by reception and reviews, or a major notable award for excellence in some aspect of filmmaking.
     This film is said to have completed production, but the statement that it has completed production is unsourced, so that the film cannot be confirmed to have started or completed production. There is nothing in the text of the article that reports that production or any other film activities received significant coverage by reliable sources. So the statement that it has completed production is unverified, but even if it were verified, general notability is not satisfied.
     This title was a redirect to the franchise, but the redirect was replaced by a copy-paste from draft space. So a history merge is required if the article is kept, but the article should be deleted.
2. R. L. V. Ramakrishnan: nominated at AfD; notified Wikki cinematic universe (talk · contribs) 14:11, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: R. L. V. Ramakrishnan
     Inadequately sourced stub biography of a living person of an Indian actor and dancer. The one reference is neither reliable, because it is Times of India or independent, because it is an interview. There is also a draft, which has slightly more information but is still insufficient, which was in article space before it was (correctly) moved to draft space by User:Onel5969. This article only states that he exists. The draft states that he is an actor, but does not prove acting notability. The draft should be left alone for improvement, and this stub should be deleted.
3. Noah Khyle: nominated at AfD; notified Rgold79709 (talk · contribs) 18:51, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Noah Khyle
     Actor who does not appear to satisfy general notability or acting notability. There are two copies of this BLP, one in article space and one in draft space. The BLPPROD can be removed from the article, because it now has a reliable source, but the reliable source is a passing mention. The other reference is IMDB.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Reference Number !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || Newsweek || Episode summary with a passing mention of Noah Khyle || Yes || No. Passing mention. || Yes. || Yes.
     |-
     | 2 || IMDB || A database entry || Yes || No. A database entry. || No. || Sort of.
     |}
     There is nothing in this stub that refers to significant coverage. The draft can be left in draft space, because the actor may satisfy acting notability in the future.
4. Nouns DAO: nominated at AfD; notified Maty.eth (talk · contribs) 20:43, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Nouns DAO
     The subject of this article is a Decentralized Autonomous Organization or DAO, a kind of business venture on a blockchain. The purpose of the venture is to sell non-fungible tokens or NFTS representing nouns (that is, words identifying things) as digital art. The business concept is described on this web site:
     https://www.noundation.wtf/intro/nouns-cc0#nouns-flywheel
     which can be seen to be a self-inflating financial bubble. Since this is a business venture, the applicable notability guideline is corporate notability, and this article does not satisfy it, because none of the coverage is independent and significant.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! 1 !! noundation.wtf !! An "interesting" description of this venture, which seems to be a self-inflating bubble !! No !! Yes !! N/A !! No
     |-
     | 2 || finance.yahoo.com || Appears to be a press release about a Super Bowl ad || No || Yes || N/A || No
     |-
     | 3 || voguebusiness.com || Appears to be an ad to sell members-only access to features of an NFT venture || No || No, not without buying in. || N/A || No
     |-
     | 4 || animationmagazine.net || Announcement of a planned film, appears to be a press release || No || Not about the organization || Yes || No
     |-
     | 5 || businesswire.com || A description of the planned venture || Yes || Yes || Yes || No
     |-
     | 6 || titan-comics.com || Announcement of the venture || No || Yes || Yes || No
     |-
     |
     |}
     An article was deleted after a deletion discussion on 3 April 2023: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Nouns_DAO. This article was then created, and deleted as previously deleted, but the G4 was overturned and this article was restored. So this is a different article about the same business venture that still does not satisfy corporate notability.
5. Britain's Got Talent (series 16): nominated at AfD; notified Maayyy1 (talk · contribs) 00:02, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Britain's Got Talent (series 16)
     This article, about a television series that may have started within the past 24 hours, has no references, and so should not have been created in article space. It may also be too soon with no results or very few results to report. There is also a draft, Draft: Britain's Got Talent (series 16), by a different editor, which was briefly in article space and was then (correctly) moved into draft space. Either references and substantive content should be added to this article within seven days for a Heymann result, or it should be merged with the existing draft and the merged draft left in draft space until there are substantive results with reliable sources.
6. User:Rgold79709: nominated at MfD; notified Rgold79709 (talk · contribs) 07:48, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: This user page is a fake article, and is an approximate copy of the article Noah Khyle, which has itself been nominated for deletion as a non-notable actor.
7. Nilan Fernando: nominated at AfD; notified Lugnuts (talk · contribs) 18:30, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Nilan Fernando
     Stub, by Lugnuts, on a cricketer who does not satisfy the current version of sports notability. This stub does not satisfy WP:NCRICKET as it currently is written, or general notability. The two references are both database entries.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Reference Number !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || espncricinfo.com || Career stats on player || Yes || No. Database entry || Yes || No
     |-
     | 2 || espncricinfo.com || Account of a match || Yes || No. Passing mention || Yes || No
     |-
     |
     |}
     *Draftify as proposer. Unilateral draftification would be inappropriate after three years in article space. If significant coverage is not found in six months, we know where the bit bucket is.
8. Pere Egbi: nominated at AfD; notified Wikipedien28 (talk · contribs) 05:44, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Pere Egbi
     Actor who does not satisfy general notability or acting notability. Acting notability requires two major roles. He has had one in The Perfect Arrangement. His other roles have not been major. One of the references is blocked by antimalware software, and so was not checked, but can be inferred to be unreliable. Two of the references are reviews of the movie in which he acted. They are significant as to the film, but not as to him. One of the references is a vanity site that displays celebrity biographies.
     There is also a draft that is the same as this article. The draft can be left alone and possibly improved. The article can be deleted.
9. Oleksandr Rudenko: nominated at AfD; notified Iliochori2 (talk · contribs) 20:32, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Oleksandr Rudenko
     Association football player who does not satisfy general notability. This article was draftified once, and has been moved back to article space with minimal improvement. An article should speak for itself, but this article says nothing about significant coverage of the subject. The references appear to be database entries, and a reader should not be expected to check the references to see whether third parties have written about the subject.
10. Yuriy Esaulov: nominated at AfD; notified Iliochori2 (talk · contribs) 20:41, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
    • Reason: Yuriy Esaulov
      Association football player who does not satisfy general notability. This article was draftified once by User:Onel5969, and has been moved back to article space with minimal improvement. This article has been tagged for notability three times by User: Anwegmann and Onel5969, and the tags have been removed twice. An article should speak for itself, but this article says nothing about significant coverage of the subject. The references appear to be database entries, and a reader should not be expected to check the references to see whether third parties have written about the subject.
11. Aaron Pollock: nominated at AfD; notified Lugnuts (talk · contribs) 06:18, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
    • Reason: Aaron Pollock
      This Lugnuts stub biography of a living person of a rower does not satisfy any current provision of sports notability or general notability. The one reference is a database entry, and so is not a secondary source. If a source that provides significant coverage can be found within seven days, that will be a Heymann result.

May 2023

1. Draft:Triangular number (v2): nominated at MfD; notified DDDAAANNNIIIEEELLLSSS (talk · contribs) 21:26, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Another troll mathematical draft, like Draft:Hyperoperation list, also being submitted to annoy the reviewers, with one of the same submitters. (A sockpuppet report has also been submitted.)
2. Chandan Madan: nominated at AfD; notified Mr. Smart LION (talk · contribs) 04:34, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Chandan Madan
     Stub biography of cricketer who does not satisfy cricket notability or general notability. There is nothing in this stub that describes significant coverage in a reliable source. The only reference is to a database source, and does not provide secondary coverage. The Heymann criterion is to find two reliable sources that provide secondary coverage within seven days.
3. Khawaja Habibullah Nowsheri Shrine: nominated at AfD; notified Wikipidiaedit1 (talk · contribs) 02:24, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Khawaja Habibullah Nowsheri Shrine
     It isn't entirely clear whether this article is about a Sufi poet, or about a shrine at his grave, but it doesn't satisfy general notability for either a person or a place. There is no explanation of what reliable sources have written about either the person or the place. None of the references are secondary. They include a map, which shows that the place exists.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Reference Number !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || google.com/maps || A map showing location of the shrine || Yes || No || Yes || No
     |-
     | 2 || thekashmirimages.com || An article about the Sufi poet, Khawaja HabibUlLah Nowsheri || Yes || About the poet, but not about the shrine || Yes || No
     |-
     | 3 || YouTube || Appears to be about Sufism in Kashmir || Yes || Not about the shrine || No || No
     |}
     If the article satisfied notability, it would need to be tagged for heavy copy-editing for grammar, usage, and style, but it doesn't pass notability.
4. Phalguna Chaitra: nominated at AfD; notified Ssgapu22 (talk · contribs) 04:54, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Phalguna Chaitra
     Unreleased movie that does not satisfy future film guidelines. This is a contested draftificiation; it was moved to draft space correctly by User:Onel5969. Unreleased movies that have completed production are only notable if production itself satisfies general notability. There is nothing in this article about significant coverage by independent reliable sources. A review of the references shows that they all say that the movie will be released on 12 May; we knew that.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Reference Number !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || simki.com || Movie announcement on a movie web site || Not really || No || Yes || No
     |-
     | 2 || thenewshashtag.com || Movie announcement || Not really || No || Yes || No
     |-
     | 3 || web.archive.com || Wayback machine - Machine translation fails || Yes || Probably not || ? || ?
     |-
     | 4 || odia.celebrity.com || Announcement that teaser was released || Yes || No || Yes || No
     |-
     | 5 || orissapost.com || Advertisement of movie || No || Not really || Yes || No
     |-
     | 6 || orissapost.com || Announcement that movie will premier in Australia || No || Not reall y || Yes || No
     |-
     | 7 || odishabytes.com || Advance publicity, and announcement of date || No || Not really || Yes || No
     |-
     | 8 || timesofindia.com || Advance publicity for movie || No || Not really || Not always || No
     |-
     |
     |}
     The references show that, like many articles on unreleased films, this is a good-faith but misguided attempt to use Wikipedia for movie advance publicity.
     The Heymann criterion will be if a Reception section is added between 12 May and 18 May referring to two reviews in reliable sources, which will be an entirely different article than this one.
5. List of cargo airlines: nominated at AfD; notified Kolyan.Mescher (talk · contribs) 21:06, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: List of cargo airlines
     This stand-alone list has no references, and so does not satisfy the verifiability policy. This article was moved to draft space in 2020, and was declined via AFC, and has been moved back into article space, so that this is a slow-motion contested draftification. See the guideline on list verification, which states that stand-alone lists should cite sources.
     *Draftify as nominator.
6. Draft:Separated By My Leader: nominated at MfD; notified Gabrielhussein503 (talk · contribs) 16:34, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: This is a walled garden of drafts, all with no references, about a television show that never happened, so that this is an elaborate hoax. Submitter has been blocked as not here to edit constructively.
     *Draft:Separated By My Leader (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
     *Draft:Vivian (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
     *Draft:Ben (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
     *Draft:Eddy (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
     *Draft:Matthew (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
     *Draft:Guled Mohamed (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
     *Draft:Jay Armstrong (Actor) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
     *Draft:Josephine (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
     *Draft:Myroslav Poltenko (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
     *Draft:James (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
     Recommend that all be Speedy Deleted as G3.
7. 2001 Santa Rosa Local Elections: nominated at AfD; notified Wowowin2015 (talk · contribs) 19:40, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: 2001 Santa Rosa Local Elections
     2004 Santa Rosa local elections
     Contested draftifications of two articles on local elections in the Philippines. Neither of these articles has any references, and so they fail verifiability, which is a core policy.
     *2001 Santa Rosa Local Elections (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
     *2004 Santa Rosa local elections (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
     The Heymann criterion will be the addition of two references to reliable sources, such as Philippine newspapers. (The references must be added to the article, not merely listed in this AFD as a [[WP:URLDUMP|URL Dump.) Not draftifying these articles again unilaterally, because that would be move-warring, so relying in AFD as the consensus process.
     *Draftify all as nominator.
8. Linlang (2023 TV series): nominated at AfD; notified Sammito (talk · contribs) 04:01, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Linlang (2023 TV series)
     This is an upcoming television series that has not aired yet, and is too soon to establish television notability. The article does not discuss significant coverage by reliable sources because the only coverage is advance publicity, which is not notable and may be promotional. There is also a draft; the draft was copied into article space by the draft originator to create the article. A draft is in order, because the show will be aired, and there will be reviews. This article should be deleted, and the draft left alone to wait for the show to air.
9. Anton Smit: nominated at AfD; notified Mill 1 (talk · contribs) 04:20, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Anton Smit
     This article about a screenwriter has only one reference, vprogids.nl. That web site is a cinema database, which lists all of the films he has written, but does not provide any independent significant coverage. This article reads like a resume or filmography, and says nothing else about the subject. Unilaterally sending this article to draft space after six years would be disruptive.
     *Draftify as nominator. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:20, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
10. Three Little Fish and the Big Bad Shark: nominated at AfD; notified Gugaantony (talk · contribs) 05:26, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
    • Reason: Three Little Fish and the Big Bad Shark
      This article has no references, and has been sent to draft space once, and moved back to article space. Without references, the article cannot satisfy book notability (or any other notability guideline).
      *Draftify as nominator. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:26, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
11. Grace Wong Kit-cheng: nominated at AfD; notified Cherish914 (talk · contribs) 21:06, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
    • Reason: Grace Wong Kit-cheng
      This biography of a living person of a politician is not verifiable. The article states that she is a member of the Legislative Assembly of Macau. If her status as a subnational legislator is verifiable, then she passes political notability. There is one reference, in Chinese, which is http://macaodaily.com/html/2017-05/07/content_1176995.htm . However, a machine translation shows that it makes no mention of the subject. It is a statement by someone else.
      There is also a draft, so that this article is not a candidate for draftification, but this article appears to have been copy-pasted from the draft, and a history merge will be needed if the article is kept. Both the article and the draft require heavy copy-editing for grammar and usage if they are kept. The draft should be kept for improvement.
12. The Bibites: nominated at AfD; notified Rtyjhnghfn (talk · contribs) 03:48, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
    • Reason: The Bibites
      This article is about a game that is a simulation of evolving life. There is nothing in the article that implies that the game satisfies game notability or software notability, because there is no mention of any significant coverage by third parties. An examination of the references shows that none of them are independent or secondary.
      {| class="wikitable"
      ! Reference Number !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
      |-
      | 1 || the-bibites.en.softonic.com || Appears to be the official web site for the game. || No || Yes || Yes || No
      |-
      | 2 || itch.io || Web page to download the game || No || Yes || Yes || No
      |-
      | 3 || youtube.com || A discussion of the game || No || Yes || Maybe || No
      |-
      | 4 || youtube.com || An experience playing the game || No || No || Maybe || No
      |-
      | 5 || google.com || Google search results || No || No || Maybe || No
      |}
      There is also a draft, which has been declined three times, after which the author copied the draft into article space. The article should be deleted. The draft can either be improved by adding evidence of significant coverage by reliable sources, or left alone in draft space.
13. List of 2023 MNL statistics: nominated at AfD; notified Zinnober9 (talk · contribs) 00:15, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
    • Reason: List of 2023 MNL statistics
      This list doesn't even explain what its title means, let alone whether it satisfies list notability. It doesn't even link to Myanmar National League or explain that it is about association football in Myanmar. It was draftified once, and so should not be draftified unilaterally a second time. The only reference is a sports database, which would not establish notability for a player, or for a team, or for a list.
14. Kathar Basha Endra Muthuramalingam: nominated at AfD; notified Yethin Nanba (talk · contribs) 19:18, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
    • Reason: Kathar Basha Endra Muthuramalingam
      Article about upcoming film that does not satisfy the notability guidelines for future films. Unreleased films are only notable if the article content establishes that production itself has been notable. Neither the text of this article nor the sources say anything about production except that it happened. The references are all typical advance publicity.
      {| class="wikitable"
      ! Reference Number !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
      |-
      | 1 || news18.com || Announcement of release date of film || Yes || No || Yes || No
      |-
      | 2 || ottplay.com || Announcement of release of film || Yes || No || Yes || No
      |-
      | 3 || timesofindia.indiatimes.com || Another announcement of film, and short interview with actor || No || No || Yes || No
      |-
      | 4 || cinemaexpress.com || Another announcement of release date || Yes || No || Yes || No
      |-
      | 5 || ottplay.com || More advance publicity || Yes || No || Yes || No
      |-
      |
      |}
      This article could be unilaterally draftified, except that there is already a draft, so that the proper disposition is either to delete the article or to merge the article into the draft in draft space. The Heymann criterion is if descriptions of two reviews in reliable sources can be added before the deletion discussion is completed.

June 2023

1. Raktabeej: nominated at AfD; notified Skarmory (talk · contribs) 06:08, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Raktabeej
     This article is about an unreleased film, and does not satisfy general notability or film notability. Unreleased films are only notable if production itself satisfies general notability. This article says nothing about production, and reads like advance publicity. This article has already been draftified twice and moved back to article space twice, by User:Skarmory and by User: Tanbiruzzaman.
2. International Conference on Clifford Algebras: nominated at AfD; notified Molitorppd22 (talk · contribs) 22:20, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: International Conference on Clifford Algebras
     This article is about a triennial academic conference, but the article provides no indication of general notability or event notability, because it says nothing about what third parties have written about the conference or why the conference is notable, such as what mathematical accomplishments have been announced at the conference, or what mathematical collaborations have resulted from the conference. The only reference appears to be a biography of William Kingdon Clifford, the developer of Clifford algebras. The book is probably evidence of the notability of its subject, William Kingdon Clifford, and of his main work, Clifford algebras, and the articles about them are not being questioned. This conference may be run-of-the-mill, in that there are many annual or triennial academic conferences, some of which are notable, and this article does not say why this one is.
     There is also a draft, which appears to be identical to this article. This article cannot be moved unilaterally to draft space because there is already a draft. So this article should be deleted while the draft is retained for possible expansion as to why this conference is notable.
3. Aurora Dream: nominated at AfD; notified Dunielm (talk · contribs) 23:13, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Aurora Dream
     This article is about a musical project that does not satisfy any of the musical notability criteria, and has been written by its principal musician, so that there is a conflict of interest. This article has been draftified once, by User:Exemplo347, and then declined by User:AngusWOOF, but was then also copied back into article space by the originator. The first paragraph of the History section would need to be deleted as peacockery if this article otherwise should be kept, but it doesn't address any of the musical notability criteria, and doesn't address general notability. The draft can be left in draft space to be worked on by any neutral editors.
4. Frank Boyd: nominated at AfD; notified Spanneraol (talk · contribs) 23:16, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Frank Boyd
     This stub is about a baseball player, but does not satisfy any version of general notability or biographical notability. The only references are databases. The special notability guideline for baseball has been removed, so that general notability is required but lacking.
5. Lalita Devi Temple,Naimisharanya: nominated at AfD; notified Opliappan (talk · contribs) 22:56, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Lalita Devi Temple,Naimisharanya
     This article is incomprehensible. It was moved to draft space once by User:Eejit43 who stated that it both needed better sources and had too many problems of language or grammar. Sources were then added, and the article was moved back to article space without addressing the grammatical issues, which render the article of very little encyclopedic value. The article has already been draftified once, and the originator has contested the draftification, so a second unilateral draftification would be move warring. The article should be either stubbed, or sent back to draft space for rework with instructions to use AFC for review so that it will be reviewed by an English-proficient editor prior to being returned to article space.
6. List of night vision devices: nominated at AfD; notified Wunghuang (talk · contribs) 05:08, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: List of night vision devices
     This list article has a few problems, the most serious of which is that it has no sources. It also does not indicate what the criterion is for inclusion, and so does not satisfy list notability. The criterion isn't having a Wikipedia article, since some of the entries are not linked to articles. This list was moved to draft space by User:BoyTheKingCanDance with the statement that it has no sources (because it has no sources). It was then moved back to article space by its creator without adding sources. This is a contested draftification and so is being sent to AFD.

July 2023

1. Maaveeran (2023 film): nominated at AfD; notified Yethin Nanba (talk · contribs) 01:14, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Maaveeran (2023 film)
     This is an unreleased film, and has already been draftified by AFD once, and is still an unreleased film. Unreleased films are only notable if production has been notable, and this article says nothing about production. Review of the references shows that none of them are secondary sources, and they are all advance publicity.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Reference Number !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || timesofindia.indiatimes.com || Says that the trailer has been viewed. || No || No || Sometimes || No
     |-
     | 2 || ottplay.com || Announcement of the trailer || No || No || ? || No
     |-
     | 3 || timesofindia.indiatimes.com || Discussion of change in date of release || No || Yes || Sometimes || No
     |-
     | 4 || ottplay.com || Interview about the dubbing || No || Yes || ? || No
     |-
     | 5 || timesofindia.indiatimes.com || Interview with the actor who plays the villain || No || Yes || Sometimes || No
     |-
     |
     |}
     There is already a draft, which has more sources than this article.
2. Black Table: nominated at RfD; Target: Table Mountain (notified); notified Dwergenpaartje (talk · contribs) 16:10, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Black Table
     There is no use of Black Table in Table Mountain, the target of this redirect, only of Back Table. This redirect has only been viewed 11 times in the first half of 2023. There is a draft, Draft:Black Table in review, concerning a novel, that is, an unrelated topic. The novel draft is not ready for article space, but might be ready for article space in the near future, and review has called attention to this useless redirect. The alternative to deleting this redirect when the novel is accepted would be including a hatnote in the article about the novel, but that would be a link to a misspelled version of the name of the geographic feature.
3. Dilwala(2023 film): nominated at AfD; notified Cinedigital9699 (talk · contribs) 16:14, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Dilwala(2023 film)
     A naïve Google search shows that this appears to be an unreleased film. IMDB, which is an unreliable source, says that it is upcoming. IMDB also has an incomprehensible summary, which was copied into this article, but which I have removed as copyvio. (The IMDB contributor apparently is not fluent with English.) This article was in mainspace, but was moved into draft space, citing paid editing and sockpuppetry. It was then declined, with the instruction to add reviews when the film was released. It has now been moved back into article space without the reviews (because it hasn't been released). Either the cast listing can be moved into draft space until the film is released and reviewed, or it can be blown up, and started over when the film is released and reviewed.
4. Atharva (2023 film): nominated at AfD; notified Porakuyya (talk · contribs) 20:15, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Atharva (2023 film)
     This seems to be an unreleased film. It seems to be an unreleased film because one of the sources announced that the film would be released in June (meaning 2023). However, a Google search does not find any reviews, and does find references to the film being upcoming and pending release. The references are the usual announcements naming the director and the cast.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Reference Number !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || timesofindia.indiatimes.com || Says that the trailer has been viewed. || No || No || Sometimes || No
     |-
     | 2 || ottplay.com || Announcement of the trailer || No || No || ? || No
     |-
     | 3 || timesofindia.indiatimes.com || Discussion of change in date of release || No || Yes || Sometimes || No
     |-
     | 4 || ottplay.com || Interview about the dubbing || No || Yes || ? || No
     |-
     | 5 || timesofindia.indiatimes.com || Interview with the actor who plays the villain || No || Yes || Sometimes || No
     |-
     |
     |}
     None of the references indicate that the film has been released. This article was moved to draft space once with the notation to wait for release, and has been moved back to article space, and does not seem to have been released. The plot is unreferenced and therefore unverified. (At least, the copyvio detector didn't find it.) Since the plot is unverified, there isn't enough to be worth draftifying. When it is released, a new article can be written.
5. 2023 World Junior Wrestling Championships: nominated at AfD; notified Pehlivanmeydani (talk · contribs) 17:38, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: 2023 World Junior Wrestling Championships
     This article about a future sports competition does not provide enough information to establish general notability or event notability. The history shows that an article was created in article space and draftified, and then another copy was created in article space again, so there is already a draft. The draft can be left alone for expansion, probably immediately after the competition occurs. A review of the references shows that none of them at this time are independent significant sources. They are either the sports federation's own or database pages or both.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Reference Number !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || uww.org || Article about rehosting || No || Yes || Yes || No
     |-
     | 2 || uww.org || Page that will show results but is now empty || No || Not at this time || Yes || No
     |-
     | 3 || allsportdb.com || Appears to be a future database page || Yes || Not at this time || Yes || No
     |-
     |
     |-
     |
     |-
     |
     |-
     |
     |}
6. Judeo-Kashani: nominated at RfD; Target: Soi language (notified); notified Kwamikagami (talk · contribs) 07:40, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Judeo-Kashani
     The only connection of the title of this redirect, Judeo-Kashani, and the target of this redirect, Soi language, is that the special-purpose infobox includes a link for Judeo-Kashani as one of six links to information about endangered languages. The redirect provides no useful information for a reader.
7. The Land Is Inhospitable and So Are We: nominated at AfD; notified Ss112 (talk · contribs) 08:25, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: The Land Is Inhospitable and So Are We
     Unreleased album that does not satisfy any of the musical notability criteria (because it has not been released yet). A check of the references shows that they are advance announcements, or interviews with the artist. None of them are independent secondary coverage.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Reference Number !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || variety.com || Advance announcement of album || No || Yes || Yes || No
     |-
     | 2 || vulture.com || Another advance announcement of album || No || Yes || Yes || No
     |-
     | 3 || rollingstone.comn || Interview with the artist || No || Yes || Yes || No
     |-
     | 4 || pitchfork.com || Another interview || No || Yes || Yes || No
     |}
     There was also a draft, so that draftification is not a valid option. The draft has been blanked. Moving the article into draft space until the album is released is the most reasonable option.
8. 2025 FIBA Under-19 Basketball World Cup: nominated at AfD; notified ShopperSignal78 (talk · contribs) 21:51, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: 2025 FIBA Under-19 Basketball World Cup
     This stub does not have enough information to be encyclopedic at this point, as is illustrated by the four red links to the qualifying tournaments. It does not satisfy event notability. A naïve Google search shows that the only coverage is routine coverage. The two references are not independent because they are both FIBA. There is also a draft, which is the same as this article. The draft should be kept, and can be expanded as the event is closer. For now, it is too soon for an article that only says that the tournament will happen.
9. 2023 Piala Belia: nominated at AfD; notified FM Malaysia (talk · contribs) 22:03, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: 2023 Piala Belia
     Youth football tournament with no current sources. The only reference is from February 2023 and states that the tournament is scheduled. That doesn't make it notable. Mostly this article reports unverified scores of games. Verifiability in Wikipedia is necessary; it is not a nice-to-have. This article has already been moved to draft space twice, and so should not be moved to draft space unilaterally a third time, and besides there are now two copies, one in draft space and one in article space. The article should be deleted from article space and left in draft space. The Heymann criterion is to provide real up-to-date sourcing rather than just move-warring.

August 2023

1. Vaazhai (2023 film): nominated at AfD; notified VendhanKovan (talk · contribs) 21:51, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Vaazhai (2023 film)
     Unreleased film that does not satisfy the notability guidelines for unreleased films, which are only notable is production itself has received significant coverage by independent sources. This article only says that the film is planned and that filming has started, so the article says nothing that implies film notability prior to release. The sources are largely in Tamil, but have been machine-translated, which is good enough to see that there isn't independent secondary coverage. None of the references are independent. They say that the film is upcoming. We knew that, but that doesn't make it notable. Maybe it will be when it is released.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Reference Number !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || tamil.behindwoods.com || Announcement of title of film || No || Yes || ? || No
     |-
     | 2 || kalakkalcinema.com || Announcement of title of film || No || Yes || ? || No
     |-
     | 3 || tamil.abplive.com || First phase of shooting has been completed || No || No || ? || No
     |-
     | 4 || newindianexpress.com || Interview with leading lady || No || Yes || Yes || No
     |-
     | 5 || zeenews.india.com || Advance publicity about the film and the directors || No || No || ? || no
     |-
     | 6 || indulgexpress.com || Says that shooting began || No || Yes || ? || No
     |-
     | 7 || cinemaexpress.com || A puff piece in which the composer praises the film || No || Yes || Yes || No
     |-
     | 8 || cinemaexpress.com || Same as 7 || No || Yes || Yes || No
     |-
     | 9 || dinamani.com || Release of the poster for the film || No || No || ? || No
     |-
     |
     |-
     |
     |}
     There is also a draft by the same editor, which is almost the same as this article, so that this article should be deleted, and the draft can be left to be expanded and resubmitted when the film is released.
2. Rudhraksh J: nominated at AfD; notified Wasabisushi2913 (talk · contribs) 23:13, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Rudhraksh J
     The actual subject of this article is an actor who has had one major role and so does not satisfy acting notability. There has already been a deletion discussion using his full name; see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rudhraksh Jaiswal, and Rudhraksh Jaiswal is a redirect. This article has an abbreviated form of his name as a novel method of gaming of article titles. The AFD was tainted by sockpuppetry by both the Keep and the Delete voters, but that does not warrant trying to evade the name. The redirect is not locked, so the originator could have expanded the redirect, or asked for Deletion Review. A review of the article shows that this article also does not establish acting notability or general notability. A review of the references shows that they are not about the actor, but about films about the Mahabharata, an interview with an actress, and an interview with the subject.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Reference Number !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || indiatoday.in || Not about the actor but about Indian mythological films || Yes || No || Yes || No
     |-
     | 2 || archive.org from Times of India || About the Mahabharata || Yes || No || Sometimes || No
     |-
     | 3 || Times of India || Another article about the Mahabharata || Yes || No || Sometimes || No
     |-
     | 4 || Times of India || Appears to be about someone else and other films || Yes || No || Sometimes || No
     |-
     | 5 || Times of India || An interview with the leading lady in a film in which he had a minor role || Yes || No || Sometimes || No
     |-
     | 6 || Indiatoday.in || An interview about why he isnt in a film due to covid || No || Yes || Yes || No
     |}
     There is also a draft, Draft:Rudhraksh Jaiswal. It should be left so that it can be expanded if he has another major role. This title should be deleted because it is not a plausible search term and is an article about a non-notable person.
3. Ramzi Toure Idrissou: nominated at AfD; notified DenisBoshnakovich (talk · contribs) 16:40, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Ramzi Toure Idrissou
     This stub article on an association football player does not satisfy general notability because it does not have any independent secondary sources. The references state that he exists and plays association football, but are a Wikipedia link and database entries.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Reference Number !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || Wikipedia || This is a link to the article about the team that the subject plays for || Yes || Not about the player || No || Yes
     |-
     | 2 || Tampa Spartans || Page listing him as a member of the college team || No || Yes || Yes || No
     |-
     | 3 || us.soccerway.com || A database entry || No || No || Yes || No
     |-
     | 4 || utrop.no || A database entry || No || No || Yes || No
     |-
     |
     |}
     The originator has also created a draft, so that this article cannot be draftified. This article can be deleted, and the draft can be expanded and resubmitted when there is adequate independent secondary coverage.
4. Draft:Zach Benson: nominated at MfD; notified Deepak52 (talk · contribs) 16:39, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Zach Benson
     Unreferenced promotional biography of a living person. Already speedily deleted once as G11. Apparent conflict of interest because picture is Own Work of submitter.
5. B'laster Holdings: nominated at AfD; notified BB38532 (talk · contribs) 22:07, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: B'laster Holdings
     This article, in article space, is one of three articles in three namespaces about this company that does not satisfy corporate notability because the coverage is not independent secondary coverage. The three articles are:
     *B'laster Holdings (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs), the subject of this AFD;
     *Draft:B'laster Holdings (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
     *User:BB38532/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
     The first and third are the work of User:BB38532, who is a single-purpose account, and the second is partly the work of BB38532, and also of another SPA who has declined to answer whether they have a conflict of interest. The existence of the two articles in draft and user space is only evidence of an apparent campaign to publish an article. The draft was declined five times and has been rejected twice.
     So does B'laster Holdings satisfy corporate notability? An article should speak for itself and explain why the company is notable, but the article consists of what the company says about itself, not what third parties have written. The references are not independent secondary coverage, but include press releases, an interview, and trade publications.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Reference Number !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || news5cleveland.com || One in a series boosting Ohio businesses || No - See organizational independence || Yes || Yes || Yes
     |-
     | 2 || prnewswire.com || A press release about an acquisition || No || Yes || Yes || No
     |-
     | 3 || counterman.com || Another press release about an acquisition || No || Yes || Yes || No
     |-
     | 4 || americanmotorcyclist.com || A story about being the official rust remover of motorcycle races || No - See organizational independence || Yes || Yes || Yes
     |-
     | 5 || aftermarketnews.com || An interview with the COO || No || Yes || Yes || No
     |}
     We can conclude that the AFC reviewers who declined and rejected the draft were right, and the article should be deleted, and the draft and the sandbox can be ignored (unless they are resubmitted).
6. Anthony Vaz: nominated at AfD; notified Lugnuts (talk · contribs) 05:17, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Anthony Vaz
     This stub biography of a sportsperson, by Lugnuts, has only one reference, which is a database entry. It therefore does not satisfy Olympic notability or sports notability as they are in 2023.
     *Draftify to Draft:Anthony Vaz (field hockey), as nominator.
7. Ethan Clark Marshall: nominated at AfD; notified Tiantark (talk · contribs) 06:19, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Ethan Clark Marshall
     Non-notable junior footballer. The article says nothing about significant coverage, and the references do not show significant coverage, because the first three of them do not appear to refer to the subject by name. The fourth and last reference could not be viewed because it was flagged as unsafe, which means that it is definitely a different type of unreliable source.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Reference Number !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || skysports.com || About the league competition - Did not find mention of subject || Yes || No || ? || No
     |-
     | 2 || swfc.co.uk || About the team - Did not find mention of subject || Yes || No || ? || No
     |-
     | 3 || gtfc.co.uk || Did not find mention of subject || Yes || No || ? || No
     |-
     | 4 || www.bostonunited.co.uk || Web site detected to be unsafe due to malware || ? || No || No || No
     |-
     |
     |}
     There is also a draft. The draft can be left alone when the article is deleted.
8. Draft:"MOONARK" James P.G. Wakefield: nominated at MfD; notified 208.30.123.13 (talk · contribs) 07:19, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: #*Draft:James PG Wakefield aka "MOONARK" (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
     *Draft:"MOONARK" James P.G. Wakefield (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
     These bombastic grandiose unreferenced biographies of a living person will never be encyclopedic articles, and may be subject to speedy deletion as G11 spam, but let's get a consensus to delete so that resubmissions can be tagged for G4.
9. Charlie Gray: nominated at AfD; notified Spanneraol (talk · contribs) 05:09, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Charlie Gray
     Baseball player for whom the only sources are database entries. The Heymann criterion is to provide two reliable sources. Since he is said to have died at the age of 36, there is likely to be an obituary, but it isn't one of the sources here.
     *Draftify as nominator. Provide six months to find sources.
10. Beond: nominated at AfD; notified Altoumulus (talk · contribs) 15:42, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
    • Reason: Beond
      Airline that is about to begin operations, and does not pass corporate notability, likely because it is too soon. The sources include interviews with corporate officers, and what appear to be reprints of corporate handouts.
      {| class="wikitable"
      ! Reference Number !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
      |-
      | 1 || Thetravel.com || Information page about new airline - Reads like corporate handout || No || Yes || Yes || No
      |-
      | 2 || Simpleflying.com || Information page about the airline - Reads like corporate handout || No || Yes || Yes || No
      |-
      | 3 || gulfnews.com || Interview with CEO || No || Yes || Yes || No
      |-
      | 4 || Flybeond.com || About Us page on web site || No || Yes || Not applicable || No
      |-
      | 5 || www.smh.com.au || Interview with commercial operations officer || No || Yes || Yes || No
      |-
      |
      |-
      |
      |}
      There is also a draft. This article can be deleted, and the draft can be improved when the airline begins operations and has independent significant coverage.
11. Clare Kenny: nominated at AfD; notified Patchen (talk · contribs) 00:38, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
    • Reason: Clare Kenny
      Musician who apparently does not meet general notability or musical notability. This article was created in 2009 with no references, and was tagged as having no references until 2011, when one reference was added, which is still the only reference, so now the article is tagged as needing additional references. The one reference is a book, and Google Books shows the applicable page, which is a passing mention. After fourteen years, only one reference has been found. As it is, she is a run-of-the-mill professional musician. The Heymann criterion will be to find at least two (preferably three) good-quality references in seven days.
      *Draftify as nominator to provide six months for good-quality references to be found.
12. Sound Party (2023 film): nominated at AfD; notified Pranav Raj 1997 (talk · contribs) 05:47, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
    • Reason: Sound Party (2023 film)
      This article about an unreleased film was created in article space and then correctly moved to draft space by User:Karnataka as too soon. The originator then contested the draftification by creating another copy of the article in article space.
      There are three stages of development for films:
      :1. Planned films which have not begun production. These should not have free-standing articles. Sometimes a redirect may be in order, such as to the producer, or the film series.
      :2. Films that have begun production, but have not been released. These films are only notable if production itself has been notable. A passing mention that production has started (or finished) does not establish notability.
      :3. Films that have been released, whether for theatrical viewing, for television, for film festivals, or otherwise. These films are notable based on reception and reviews, or for other reasons.
      :This film is in group 2, films that have begun production. The article makes no mention of anything notable about production.
      This film is too soon, and the article should be deleted from mainspace. When the film is released, the draft can be updated and resubmitted.
13. Michael Strickland (actor): nominated at AfD; notified Dmarex (talk · contribs) 19:20, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
    • Reason: Michael Strickland (actor)
      This stub biography of a living person has no reliable sources, only IMDB. The stub does not speak for itself because it neither identifies multiple major roles, as required for acting notability guidelines, nor refers to significant coverage in multiple sources, as required for general notability. There is one television role listed, about which List of Sunset Beach characters says: Brad Niklaus never had much of a story on this show.. This stub has existed since 2007, and has never had any reliable sources, and has been tagged since 2019 as needing reliable sources. The Heymann criterion is to add two reliable sources within seven days.

September 2023

1. Emilio Bonfigli: nominated at AfD; notified Doma-w (talk · contribs) 03:59, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Emilio Bonfigli
     Stub about boxer who does not satisfy the current versions of boxing notability or Olympic notability. The only reference is a database entry. The Heymann criterion is to find two or more sources to establish general notability.
     *Draftify as nominator, to allow six months to find significant coverage.
2. Tholvi F.C.: nominated at AfD; notified Rageshar07 (talk · contribs) 14:23, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Tholvi F.C.
     This is an unreleased film. Unreleased films are only notable if the production satisfies general notability, which is seldom the case, and this article says only that the film is in post-production. The references are mostly about the teaser, and so are promotional rather than encyclopedic, or are interviews. The article is a reasonable summary of what the sources say, because neither the article nor the sources say much.
     There was a draft, which has been blanked by its originator. The draft should be deleted as blanked by the originator, and this article should be draftified.
3. Mohammad Hossein Bagherifard: nominated at AfD; notified Mhbf (talk · contribs) 04:49, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Mohammad Hossein Bagherifard
     Probable autobiography of Iranian filmmaker. The subject made a film, Uncle Saeed, which may or may not be notable, but currently exists as Draft:Uncle Saeed. The subject also states that they have made two more films, without verification. The article has been reference-bombed with links to web pages that have passing mentions of the film, and sometimes the filmmaker.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Reference Number !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || http://www.entekhab.ir/ || Web site times out || ? || No || No || ?
     |-
     | 2 || cinemaorg.ir || A report by the Iranian film censorship agency,stating that Uncle Saeed was approved || Yes || No - Entries of the film and the filmmaker in a list || Yes || No
     |-
     | 3 || hashure.com || A blurb about the film || No. The blurb comes from the filmmaker. || No, passing mention || Probably || No
     |-
     | 4 || rottentomatoes.com || A short description of Uncle Saeed. Says that there are no reviews. || Yes || No || Yes || Yes
     |-
     | 5 || filmfreeway.com || A blurb about the film. The same blurb as is used in 3. || No || No, passing mention || Probably || No
     |-
     | 6 || fftgawards.com || A list of films including Uncle Saeed || Probably || No, passing mention of film, and not of filmmaker || Probably || No
     |-
     | 7 || edukino.pl || A list of films qualifying for a Polish festival including Uncle Saeed || Yes || No, passing mention || Probably || No
     |-
     | 8 || festival-meihodo.com || A list of films in another festival || Yes || No, passing mention || Probably || No
     |-
     | 9 || halamostanad.ir || A list of Iranian films entered in a Japanese film festival || Yes || No, passing mention of film, and of filmmaker || Probably || No
     |-
     | 10 || mehrnews.com || Mention of an award received by Uncle Saeed. No information as to prestigiousness of award || Yes || No, another passing mention || Probably || No
     |-
     | 11 || accoladecompetition.org || Mention of an award received by Uncle Saeed. No information as to prestigiousness of award || Yes || No, another passing mention || Probably || No
     |-
     | 12 || teater.ir || Another list of awards with no information as to prestigiousness of award. || Yes || No, another passing mention || Probably || No
     |-
     | 13 || njfilmawards.com || Mention of their award to Uncle Saeed in January 2023. No information as to prestige of award. || Yes || No, another passing mention || Probably || No
     |}
     None of the references are significant. Some of them refer to awards received by the film, which apparently is entered in festivals of unknown prestige and sometimes have received awards of unknown prestige, and we know that the film industry has many vanity awards. The film may be notable, but the drafts have been declined, and further work may be required to establish notability. Even if the film were notable, the references are all passing mentions, with no significant coverage. If the film draft is accepted, a redirect from the filmmaker to the film may be in order, but we don't make redirects from article space to draft space, and the BLP needs deleting.
4. Amin Ghafari: nominated at AfD; notified Khtibkiarash (talk · contribs) 22:15, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Amin Ghafari
     Contested AFC submission of biography of violinist who does not appear to satisfy musical notability. A draft was submitted twice and declined twice, so then this article, which appears to be identical to the declined drafts, was copied into article space. (This is not a copy-paste because there is only one author.) The article (like the draft) has been reference-bombed, so a source analysis has not been performed, at least not now. The peacock language is strongly suggestive of conflict of interest. If the originator wants to establish notability, they can specify which three sources should be evaluated. I have spot-checked the sourced, and they are largely primary, such as mentions of his performance in concerts (and playing in concerts is what violinists do). There is already a (declined) draft, so if the article does not establish musical notability or general notability, and it does not, it should be deleted.

October 2023

1. Priya Devi Elangbam: nominated at AfD; notified Praseodymium-141 (talk · contribs) 00:34, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Priya Devi Elangbam
     This Indian sepak takraw player does not satisfy sports notability or general notability. The article states that her team (the Indian national team) won a bronze medal at the 2022 Asian Games. There does not appear to be any special notability guideline for regional games such as the 2022 Asian games. A review of the references shows that they say that her team won the bronze medal, and that only one of them has a passing mention of the names of the players.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Reference Number !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || hangzhou2022.cn || Record of a match, states that the match took place. Does not name the subject. || Yes || No. Not even a passing mention by name. || Yes ? || No
     |-
     | 2 || timesofindia.indiatimes.com || States that the team won the bronze medal. Does name the subject in passing. || Yes || No, passing mention. || ? || Yes
     |-
     | 3 || olympics.com || States that the team won the bronze medal. Does not name the subject. || Yes || No, passing mention. || Yes || No
     |-
     |
     |}
     Neither the article nor the references provide significant coverage. This article was created in article space, and then moved to draft space; then this copy was created again in article space, so that this is a contested draftification. Since there already is a draft, this article can be deleted, and the draft should not be accepted, at least not without expansion to provide significant coverage.
2. Next Thai general election: nominated at AfD; notified Sbad61 (talk · contribs) 17:34, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Next Thai general election
     This article has no references, and verifiability in Wikipedia is not a nice-to-have because it is required. It was once moved to draft space, correctly, by User:DIVINE, but has been moved back to article space, and so is a contested draftification. Wikipedia should have either a draft or an article on the next general election in a country in which a general election is mandated by a given date, but the authors were already once told to find references. The Heywood criterion is to add two (preferably three) references to reliable sources, such as Thai newspapers, in any known language.
     *Draftify as nominator.
3. Bright Lights and Country Music (Rick Nelson album): nominated at AfD; notified Samchristie05 (talk · contribs) 07:13, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Bright Lights and Country Music (Rick Nelson album)
     This album article, in its current state, does not meet any of the musical notability criteria. This is a contested draftification, in that the history shows that it was created in article space, moved to draft space, and created again in article space. There is only one source, which is Allmusic, which should be used with caution, but which is not secondary coverage and so does not establish notability.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Reference Number !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || www.allmusic.com || || Yes || || Yes ? || No
     |-
     |
     |}
4. Othman Awad: nominated at AfD; notified Qasheesh (talk · contribs) 18:18, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Othman Awad
     Association football player who does not satisfy general notability or sports notability. Contested draftification. Created in article space. Moved to draft space (correctly) by User:Onel5969. Declined as 'athlete' (correctly) by User:KylieTastic. Moved back to article space. Review of the references shows that two of them are database entries, one is a press release (in Arabic), and one appears to be social media. None of the references are independent significant coverage.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Reference Number !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || us.soccerway.com || A database entry about the player || Yes || No || Yes || No
     |-
     | 2 || kooora.com || Appears to be social media or a database entry || Probably not || No || Maybe || No
     |-
     | 3 || sabq.org || On machine translation, reads like a press release about his contract || No || Yes || Maybe || No
     |-
     | 4 || int.soccerway.com || A database entry about a game || Yes || No || Yes || No
     |-
     |
     |-
     |
     |}
     *Draftify as nominator, to allow six months for author to find significant coverage.
5. Miomir Đuričković: nominated at AfD; notified Elektrotehnicar07 (talk · contribs) 17:07, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Footballer who does not satisfy general notability or sports notability. Contested draftification. This article was originally created in article space, but (correctly) draftified by User:Paul Vaurie for more sources. What was also needed was better sources. More sources were added, but none of them are significant coverage, and another copy was created in article space.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Reference Number !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || fksarajevo.ba || Pictures of players on the team || No || No, only a picture || Yes || No
     |-
     | 2 || www.sofascore.com || A database entry page || Yes || No || Yes || No
     |-
     | 3 || sportsport.ba || A page about his contract with the team || No || Yes || Yes || No
     |-
     | 4 || cg-fudbal.com || Mention that he played for the team || Yes || No || Yes || No
     |-
     | 5 || int.soccerway.com/ || A database entry page || Yes || No (although plenty of information) || Yes || No
     |-
     |
     |-
     |
     |-
     |
     |}
     Since there is also a draft, the article should be deleted, and the draft can be kept for improvement. The article was created by a copy-paste from draft space, so a history merge would be in order if the article were kept, but it does not need keeping.
6. Daria Lodikova: nominated at AfD; notified Vecihi91 (talk · contribs) 01:16, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Daria Lodikova
     Tennis player who does not satisfy general notability or tennis notability. This article is a contested draftification, which was moved from article space to draft space correctly by User:TheChunky the first time for better sources. The second draftification was technically incorrect, but was a response to the failure to provide the requested reliable sources. The one reference says that she played in the main draw of the Hong Kong Open, which is not one of the highest-level tournaments listed in the tennis notability guideline.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Reference Number !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || wtatennis.com || Bracket, showing that she played in the first round of doubles in the Hong Kong Open || Yes || No, a database entry || Yes || No
     |-
     |
     |-
     |
     |-
     |
     |-
     |
     |}
     *Draftify as nominator to allow time either to find coverage or for her to receive more coverage by playing in more tournaments.
7. Stefano Caselli: nominated at AfD; notified Skyrocket (talk · contribs) 05:52, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Stefano Caselli
     This biography of a living person of a cartoonist has no footnotes, and footnotes are required for biographies of living persons. It does not qualify for proposed deletion of BLPs because it has external links. They have been checked, and they do not contain significant coverage by independent sources. Two of them appear to be listings of his works, which do not verify basic information.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Reference Number !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || www.comics.org || A listing of all of his comic books || Yes || No || Yes || No
     |-
     | 2 || stekart.blogspot.com || Doesn't appear to mention him, but may be his blog || No || No || ? || No
     |-
     | 3 || comicbookdb.com || Aooears to be another listing of his comics || Yes || No || Yes || No
     |}
     This article has been tagged as needing better references since 2008. The Heymann criterion will be three independent reliable sources verifying basic biographical information and providing significant coverage.

November 2023

1. Muhammad Shahzad Mohmand: nominated at AfD; notified Politicianpakistan (talk · contribs) 10:35, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Politician who does not satisfy political notability or general notability. This article has been moved from draft space to article space after being declined in draft space, and has no properly formatted references.
2. I need more bullets: nominated at AfD; notified Catgull1 (talk · contribs) 11:03, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Internet meme that does not satisfy general notability or web notability. Created in draft space, then rejected in draft space by User:Maliner, then moved to article space by originator. Proposed for Deletion by User:OutsideNormality, but then deprodded by originator. The only source, Know your meme, has been noted to be an unreliable source.
3. Akasya Durağı: nominated at AfD; notified Hero: 108 (talk · contribs) 17:02, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: This article on a Turkish television series has no references and so does not satisfy either verifiability or notability. It consists of a one-paragraph overview, and a long cast list in an infobox, in which a majority of the entries are red links. There is nothing about what third parties have said about the show. (Maybe it has been reviewed, and maybe it hasn't.) It has been tagged as having no sources since 2015, and still has no sources eight years later.

December 2023

1. 1973 Lancashire County Council election: nominated at AfD; notified Djack1770 (talk · contribs) 04:47, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Contested draftification. This article was moved from article space to draft space by User: Significa liberdade saying that more sources were needed. It was moved back to article space without adding sources. There is only one source, The Elections Centre of Plymouth University, which is a reliable primary source.
2. Aspen Academy: nominated at RfD; Target: Savage, Minnesota (notified); notified Alex80454 (talk · contribs) 06:10, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: This redirect is useless because there is no reference to the school in the article. Often when an elementary school or middle school is redirected, there is a list of schools in the target article. In this case, there is no list in which the school appears. The Heywood criterion is to insert a mention of at least the school and possibly other schools.
3. Utamo: nominated at AfD; notified Cergun62 (talk · contribs) 21:42, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Contested draftification of an article about a grandiose planned Saudi resort development. Draftified by User:AntiDionysius as promotional and advertising. Moved back to article space by its originator. The text of the article is about what the Saudi government says about the planned resort, not about what third parties have said about it, so that it does not speak for itself. A check of the references shows that none of them are independent sources. They are all either publications by the Saudi government, or press releases by the Saudi government to news media, and so it does not satisfy general notability.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Reference Number !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || www.neom.com || Announcement of establishment of NEOM || No || Yes || Yes || No
     |-
     | 2 || www.neom.com || Announcement of plans for UTAMO in NEOM || No || Yes || Yes || No
     |-
     | 3 || www.arabnews.com || Reads like a press release from the Saudi office developing NEOM and UTAMO || No, a press release || Yes || Yes || Sort of
     |-
     | 4 || www.spa.gov.sa. Saudi Press Agency || States that it is a press release || No, a press release || Yes || Yes || No
     |}
     The project is probably too soon for independent secondary coverage.
4. Leyja: nominated at AfD; notified Cergun62 (talk · contribs) 07:32, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: This is the second of four articles about parts of NEOM, a grandiose Saudi commercial, industrial, and recreational development:
     *Utamo
     *Leyja
     *Trojena
     *Oxagon
     Leyja is an ecotourism destination. This article reads like an information brochure. It focuses on what the Saudi government says about Leyja and not what this parties say about it. The references read like press releases.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Reference Number !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || www.neom.com || Announcement of establishment of Leyja || No || Yes || Yes || No
     |-
     | 2 || www.spa.gov.sa, Saudi Press Agency || Press release that is same as reference a || No || Yes || Yes || No
     |-
     | 3 || www.designboom.com || Press release with promotional description || No || Yes || Yes || No
     |-
     |
     |}
5. Trojena: nominated at AfD; notified Cergun62 (talk · contribs) 07:57, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Trojena
     This is the third of four articles about parts of NEOM, a grandiose Saudi commercial, industrial, and recreational development:
     *Utamo
     *Leyja
     *Trojena
     *Oxagon
     This is a mountain tourism resort. It has been selected as the host location for the 2029 Asian Winter Games. The references are all press releases or marketing, except for one news report of the award of the games.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Reference Number !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || www.neom.com || Announcement of establishment || No || Yes || Yes || No
     |-
     | 2 || www.neom.com || Information-advertising brochure || No || Yes || Yes || No
     |-
     | 3 || english.alarabiya.net || Press release announcing establishment || No || Yes || Yes || No
     |-
     | 4 || saudigazette.com.sa/ || A press release about the announcement of the plans for the site || No || Yes || Yes || No
     |-
     | 5 || www.spa.gov.sa, Saudi Press Agency || Press release about bid to host 2029 Asian Winter Games || No || Yes || Yes || No
     |-
     | 6 || www.arabnews.com || News report that it will host 2029 Asian Winter Games || Yes || Yes || Yes || Yes
     |-
     |
     |-
     |
     |}
     That one news story is not enough to satisfy general notability.
6. Oxagon: nominated at AfD; notified Cergun62 (talk · contribs) 17:36, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Oxagon
     This is the fourth of four articles about parts of NEOM, a grandiose Saudi commercial, industrial, and recreational development:
     *Utamo
     *Leyja
     *Trojena
     *Oxagon
     This article is about a floating industrial complex on the Saudi shore of the Red Sea. However, the article does not speak for itself and does not provide any indication that the complex, which is still under construction is notable, because they do not describe what third parties have said. A review of the references was needed. None of the references are independent; they are in the nature of press releases:
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Reference Number !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || www.spa.gov.sa, Saudi Press Agency || Announcement of plans for Oxagon || No || Yes || Yes || No
     |-
     | 2 || www.neom.com || Information brochure about Oxagon || No || Yes || Yes || No
     |-
     | 3 || www.arabnews.com || Press release from prince about Oxagon || No || Yes || Yes || No
     |-
     | 4 || saudigazette.com.sa || Press release about a subsidiary company located at Oxagon || No || Not significantly about Oxagon because about Tonomus || Yes || No
     |-
     | 5 || www.gccbusinessnews.com || Access to web site blocked by malware protection || Probably not || Unknown || No || Probably not
     |-
     |
     |-
     |
     |-
     |
     |
7. Zheng Chongbin (Artist): nominated at AfD; notified Artbranch (talk · contribs) 18:54, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
   • Reason: Artist whose artistic notability has not been shown. This article was declined twice in AFC, and then moved to article space, and moved back to draft space by User:Naraht, and then moved to article space again, so that this is a contested draftification. The title of this article appears to be an unnecessary disambiguation, since there is no Zheng Chongbin, but further review shows that Zheng Chongbin is a protected title due to repeated recreation, so that the addition of the disambiguator is gaming of titles. The article has been reference-bombed, so an assessment of the sources has not been done. If the originator thinks that this is a better and more neutral biography than the deleted pages, the proper procedure should be to discuss with the protecting administrator, User:Jimfbleak, or request unprotection at RFPP, and if that is not successful, request Deletion Review, rather than adding a disambiguator to game the title.

January 2024

1. Miss Universe Myanmar 2017: nominated at AfD; notified Ko Ko431 (talk · contribs) 05:51, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: This article has no references, and so is inconsistent with the principle of verifiability. The national beauty pageant may have bee notable, if reliable sources covered it, but this article about it is not. Since this article contains the names of living persons, the policy on biographies of living persons applies, which says that they should be supported by footnotes. Draft was created by now-blocked sockpuppet, and was then rescued from G13 by being moved to article space, but fails verifiability.
2. Rakul Preet Singh’s Awards and Nominations: nominated at AfD; notified Kinadhaks (talk · contribs) 04:24, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: This article was created in draft space and declined in AFC as already contained in the parent article, and then moved to article space by the author. The issue in this case is not notability so much as balance and undue weight. This is a split of an article that does not need to be split because it is only Class C.
     There do not appear to be any additional awards listed in this article that are not in the parent article, so it is not necessary to merge.
3. Draft:Tim Hamons: nominated at MfD; notified ArtofAwakening (talk · contribs) 05:48, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: There are at least two problems with this draft. First, it is a biography of a living person with no references. Unreferenced BLPs may be deleted. Since this was a new submission to AFC, it would normally not be tagged for deletion initially, because the originator can add references and resubmit. Second, however, see the first line, which is the feedback from the bot that wrote the BLP. The verifiability problem of the combination of no references and apparent authorship by artificial intelligence should be enough reason to delete.
4. Nikolay Atanasov: nominated at AfD; notified Geschichte (talk · contribs) 03:04, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: Nikolay Atanasov
     This biography of an Olympic athlete was created under earlier sports notability guidelines, but no longer satisfies Olympic notability because the subject did not receive a medal. It does not satisfy general notability because it does not describe what third parties have written. The only reference is a database entry.
     *Draftify as nominator to allow six months to find significant coverage.
5. Nikolay Atanasov (gymnast): nominated at AfD; notified Lugnuts (talk · contribs) 03:09, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: This biography of an Olympic athlete was created by Lugnuts under earlier sports notability guidelines, but no longer satisfies Olympic notability because the subject did not receive a medal. It does not satisfy general notability because it does not describe what third parties have written. The only references are two database entries.
     *Draftify as nominator to allow six months to find significant coverage.
6. User:Z80Spectrum: nominated at MfD; notified Z80Spectrum (talk · contribs) 21:35, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: This user page is a diatribe against Wikipedia, and is not likely to be useful. The user page guideline states:

     In addition, there is broad agreement that you may not include in your user space material that is likely to bring the project into disrepute,

     This user page is a battleground statement, and Wikipedia is not a battleground.
     My involvement is that I tried to mediate a dispute about removal of talk page content at DRN, which is at Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Talk:ZX_Spectrum_graphic_modes#Summary_of_the_discussion_so_far. This diatribe was posted after the mediation began. A few hours ago, I failed the mediation after there were conduct allegations on the user talk page of admin User:Ritchie333.
7. Demon Slayer: Kimetsu no Yaiba – To the Hashira Training: nominated at AfD; notified ErnestoCabral2018 (talk · contribs) 18:33, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: Demon Slayer
     This article is about an unreleased movie. It exists in both draft space and article space. Maybe some editors think that creating both an article and a draft prevents moving the article into draft space. Articles on unreleased movies only satisfy film notability criteria if production itself has been notable. There is nothing in this article about production. The articles are mostly about the schedule for theatrical release of the film including a world tour of theatrical viewings. Do the sources refer to production or contribute to film notability? No. A check of the references shows that they are mostly just announcements of dates of release.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Reference Number !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || www.cbr.com/demon-slayer-hashira-training-arc-info/ || Appears tp be a fanzine || Sort of || Yes || Probably || No
     |-
     | 2 || deadline.com || Announcement of broadcast release date || No || No || Yes || No
     |-
     | 3 || Yahoo.com || Announcement of theatrical release date || No || No || Probably || No
     |-
     | 4 || www.crunchyroll.com || Another announcement of the date of release || No || No || Probably || No
     |-
     | 5 || kimetsu.com || Announcement in Japanese of world tour screening || No || No || Probably || No
     |}
     The draft is all right because it is a draft, and can be updated after the film is released and reviewed. The current article should be deleted.
8. Portal:European military history: nominated at MfD; notified Xanchester (talk · contribs) 07:17, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: Abandoned portal. This portal was created in October 2012 by an editor who last edited in June 2013. There was drive-by maintenance to the portal itself in September 2021, but no maintenance to the articles. The selected articles are partial copies of 195 articles (75 articles, 75 battles, 45 biographies), and the copies have not been edited since 2013. This portal has a better ratio of portal views to article views than others recently nominated for deletion, but that is because the viewing of the article Military history of Europe is poor
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Time !! Daily Portal Views !! Daily Article Views !! Percent !! Comments
     |-
     | Jan 23- Dec 23 || 9 || 18 || 50.0% ||
     |-
     | Jan 22 - Dec 22 || 21 || 23 || 91.3% || Peak views for both article and portal are 24 Feb 2022, date of Russian invasion of Ukraine
     |-
     | Jan 21 - Dec 21 || 31 || 23 || 134.8% ||
     |-
     | Jan 19 - Dec 19 || 21 || 49 || 42.9% ||
     |-
     |
     |}
     This portal is apparently being used by some viewers as an introduction to the topic, when they would do better to start with the lead article, which is updated from time to time and is linked to real articles.
9. Portal:American Revolutionary War: nominated at MfD; notified Kirill Lokshin (talk · contribs) 17:31, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: Abandoned portal. This portal was created March 2008 by an editor who now edits sporadically, most recently in October 2022. Most of the articles were partially copied in 2012. Some were added in 2016. No subsequent article maintenance. 16 biographies, 20 events, and 7 units are 43 articles. For several years, portal views have been less than 1% of views of the main article American Revolutionary War, and the portal is providing non-current versions of the articles.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Time !! Daily Portal Views !! Daily Article Views !! Percent !! Comments
     |-
     | Jan23-Dec23 || 14 || 6214 || 0.2% ||
     |-
     | Jan22-Dec22 || 21 || 5706 || 0.4% ||
     |-
     | Jan21-Dec21 || 31 || 6430 || 0.5% ||
     |-
     | Jan19-Dec19 || 24 || 5599 || 0.4% ||
     |-
     |
     |-
     |
     |}
     While the battles were fought 245 years ago, the historiography of this conflict is continuing to evolve, so a reader who is interested in an overview of the subject would do better to read the current articles rather than old snapshots. The current content can be viewed from the lead article by means of links and categories, so that a portal is not necessary.
10. Portal:German Empire: nominated at MfD; notified Niet-0-leuk (talk · contribs) 15:56, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
    • Reason: These are two abandoned portals on German history:
      *Portal:German Empire
      *Portal:Military history of Germany
      Portal:Military history of Germany was created in Oct 2011 by editor who last edited 2017. Recent maintenance has been drive-by only, by the usual drive-by tweakers. Partial copies of 15 biographies and 17 articles. Articles were snapshotted in 2011 and in 2016. Portal was renamed in 2019. No maintenance to articles since 2016.
      Portal:German Empirewas created 2016 by editor who last edited 2018. Has 11 articles and 7 biographies, which are partial copies of pages. No maintenance since 2017.
      Portal view data for these portals are listed below. So are data for Portal:Germany and Portal:East Germany for comparison, but the latter two are not being nominated for deletion at this time.
      {| class="wikitable"
      ! Portal !! Period !! Portal Daily Pageviews !! Article Daily Pageviews !! Percent !! Comments
      |-
      | Military history of Germany || Jan2023-Dec2023 || 16 || 73 || 21.9% || Portal created in Oct 2011 by editor who lasted edited 2017. Recent maintenance has been drive-by only, by the usual drive-by tweakers. Partial copies of 15 biographies and 17 articles. Articles were snapshotted in 2011 and in 2016. Portal was renamed in 2019. No maintenance to articles since 2016.
      |-
      | Military history of Germany || Jan2022-Dec2022 || 27 || 84 || 32.1% ||
      |-
      | Military history of Germany || Jan2021-Dec2021 || 40 || 92 || 43.5% ||
      |-
      | German Empire || Jan2023-Dec2023 || 14 || 4,897 || 0.3% || Portal created 2016 by editor who last edited 2018. Has 11 articles and 7 biographies, which are partial copies of pages. No maintenance since 2017.
      |-
      | German Empire || Jan2022-Dec2022 || 18 || 4,842 || 0.4% ||
      |-
      | German Empire || Jan2021-Dec2021 || 19 || 4,475 || 0.4% ||
      |-
      | East Germany || Jan2023-Dec2023 || 21 || 4,165 || 0.5% || Created Jan 2009 by editor who is still an active editor. Portal appears to have been rearchitected in 2020. Uses embedded article list with 51 articles.
      |-
      | East Germany || Jan2022-Dec2022 || 23 || 4,245 || 0.5% ||
      |-
      | East Germany || Jan2021-Dec2021 || 24 || 3,817 || 0.6% ||
      |-
      | Germany || Jan2023-Dec2023 || 120 || 16,246 || 0.7% ||
      |-
      | Germany || Jan2022-Dec2022 || 121 || 17,634 || 0.7% ||
      |-
      | Germany || Jan2021-Dec2021 || 106 || 15,677 || 0.7% ||
      |-
      |
      |-
      |
      |}
      Portal:East Germany was created in January 2009. Its originator is still an active editor (which is unusual for portals). There are 12 selected articles, one for each month.

February 2024

1. Shaun Prescott: nominated at AfD; notified Lugnuts (talk · contribs) 23:44, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: Shaun Prescott
     Stub article by User:Lugnuts that does not satisfy sports notability in general or cricket notability in particular. The only reference is a database entry. The cricket notability guideline states that significant coverage may exist for individuals who have played first-class cricket at the highest domestic levels, but should not be presumed (and is not present).
     *Redirect to List of Victoria first-class cricketers, as nominator.
2. Leonard Balsera: nominated at RfD; Target: The Dresden Files Roleplaying Game (notified); notified Newimpartial (talk · contribs) 08:33, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: The name Leonard Balsera is not found in the target article. Recommend deletion of redirect. A draft BLP is pending AFC review. The alternative is to include a description of the work by Balsera on the game in the History section.

March 2024

1. Paloma Aguirre: nominated at AfD; notified DianeCastaneda (talk · contribs) 03:58, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: Paloma Aguirre
     This article is a paid work by an editor who is being compensated by the subject. A draft has been created, Draft:Paloma Aguirre, which was declined twice, once for sourcing issues, once for tone issues. The author then created this article, which is the same as the draft, in article space. This bypassed AFC review, and bypassing AFC review is permitted except for paid editors. Review of the sources shows that this article does not establish biographical notability. Only the first reference is independent. The first reference, a newspaper account of her election, is a good source. The other four sources are associated with the subject or with organizations with which she is associated:
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Reference Number !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || sandiegotribune.com || Description of her election as Mayor || Yes || Yes || Yes || Yes
     |-
     | 2 || www.coastal.ca.gov || States that she is a member of this commission || No || No || Yes || No
     |-
     | 3 || www.paloma-aguirre.com/ || Her personal web site || No || Yes || No || No
     |-
     | 4 || www.imperialbeachca.gov || The city's web site || No || Yes || ? || No
     |-
     | 5 || caseagrant.ucsd.edu || A long account, that appears to have been written by her || No || Yes || Yes || No
     |}
     So this article can be deleted, at least for now, rather than being reviewed and sanitized due to the conflict of interest, and the draft can be left for improvement. This does not mean that she is not notable, or that she is notable, but that the article does not establish notability, and so the questions of tone and neutrality do not need to be addressed.

April 2024

1. User:Andrea Firmin: nominated at MfD; notified Andrea Firmin (talk · contribs) 00:44, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: This user page is an unreferenced biography of a living person.
2. User:ERIC SAMUEL KUHOGA: nominated at MfD; notified ERIC SAMUEL KUHOGA (talk · contribs) 00:50, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: This user page is a resume by a user who has made no other use of Wikipedia than to post this resume, and so can be deleted as U5. It is also an unreferenced biography of a living person.
3. User:LeniRico: nominated at MfD; notified LeniRico (talk · contribs) 01:56, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: On its face, this user page is an unreferenced autobiography of a living person. Because it is unreferenced, there is no way to be sure that it is or is not true, but on two readings, it seems to be the originator's fantasy. If it is not true, then it is a hoax. If it is true, it is still an unreferenced biography of a living person.
4. User:Edison Broce Urriola: nominated at MfD; notified Edison Broce Urriola (talk · contribs) 14:09, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: This user page is an unreferenced autobiography of a living person. The subject appears to be politically notable, but that notability is not verified, and verifiability is a non-negotiable policy. Creating this fake article in user space was the only activity by this editor.
5. User:Jamayare21: nominated at MfD; notified Jamayare21 (talk · contribs) 15:24, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: Machine translation shows that this is an unreferenced draft article about a village in Hiraan in Somalia. It is the only contribution of an editor who did nothing else. It does not qualify for U5 because it appears to be a poor-quality draft, but it is not about to be part of the English Wikipedia either in its current form or in a machine translation.
6. User:منجى محروس: nominated at MfD; notified منجى محروس (talk · contribs) 15:36, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: Machine translation from Arabic shows that this is a very long and very poorly organized discussion of Christian scriptures, by an editor who created it in their user page, and has not used Wikipedia otherwise. It is not clear whether this was meant to be a draft article or a school assignment or whatever, so it is not obviously a candidate for U5, but it can never be brought into any usable form.
7. User:Guillermo Morán Loyola: nominated at MfD; notified Guillermo Morán Loyola (talk · contribs) 15:43, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: A machine translation of this user page from the Spanish begins: "Architectural synthesis. Compendium of personal research." So this appears to be original research by an editor whose only contribution was this original research. It will never be a viable draft, both because it has no references, and because it is original research.
8. User:Aidil2018: nominated at MfD; notified Aidil2018 (talk · contribs) 17:08, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: This user page consists of predictions of political events, and outlines for predictions of sports events, that were in the future at the time that it was created, but are now in the past. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. These predictions were the primary editing of two user accounts, almost certainly one human, who made only a few other edits. They are marginal as to U5, and were crystal balling.
9. User:Plgu-lds: nominated at MfD; notified Plgu-lds (talk · contribs) 23:37, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: This user page and this sandbox appear to be almost identical, and are the only edits made by this editor. They are almost certainly copied from a copyrighted source (although I did not find it on a brief search). They are not in any form resembling drafts and so do not appear to be related to Wikipedia. They are probably U5 and probably G12.
10. User:Giomurtaz: nominated at MfD; notified Giomurtaz (talk · contribs) 23:54, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
    • Reason: Machine translation shows that this is a copy from Wikipedia of a large amount of information about Minecraft. This has been the only editing by this user, except that the user talk page is a copy of the Roblox page, probably by the same user but logged out, and in English. This is probably U5 and in any case is not related to the English Wikipedia.
11. User:DON RAJA: nominated at MfD; notified DON RAJA (talk · contribs) 02:20, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
    • Reason: This user page is an old copy of Portal:Geography, and is the only edit made by this one-edit wonder. As a copy of a portal, it is a redundant fork that has none of the navigational features of a portal.
12. User:Rayan al-ahmary: nominated at MfD; notified Rayan al-ahmary (talk · contribs) 02:40, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
    • Reason: This user page, which is the only edit by this editor, appears to be a translation of a copy of Samarium cobalt magnet from Arabic. It is a redundant fork, and so not a current copy of Wikipedia's information on the subject, and an attribution violation. The question that is known only to the editor, if even to them, is why an editor would do nothing but create a translation of a page into Arabic and save it as a user page. Regardless of why, it is not permitted.
13. User:Suraj Kr Sarkar: nominated at MfD; notified Suraj Kr Sarkar (talk · contribs) 04:53, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
    • Reason: This user page is a partial copy of Torsa River, and so is a redundant fork.
14. User:Ill Camille: nominated at MfD; notified Ill Camille (talk · contribs) 04:58, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
    • Reason: This user page appears to be an unreferenced autobiography of a living person, and is promotional. This has been the only editing by this editor. Either this is not intended as a Wikipedia draft, and is web hosting by an editor who is not otherwise using Wikipedia, or it is intended as a Wikipedia draft, in which case it is an unreferenced biography of a living person.
15. Artur Khachatryan: nominated at AfD; notified TheShadowCrow (talk · contribs) 22:16, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
    • Reason: Boxer whose only reference is a database entry. There is a draft for a diplomat, Draft: Artur Khachatryan, which will otherwise require disambiguation. The need for disambiguation is not a reason to delete, but the lack of sports notability is
16. User:YangZzz: nominated at MfD; notified YangZzz (talk · contribs) 06:18, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
    • Reason: This user page appears to be a translation or machine translation from Chinese of https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E4%BA%8C%E5%8D%81%E4%BA%8C_(2017%E5%B9%B4%E7%94%B5%E5%BD%B1) . As such, it is an attribution violation, and a redundant fork from the Chinese Wikipedia.
17. User:Kayode Ajulo: nominated at MfD; notified Kayode Ajulo (talk · contribs) 06:21, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
    • Reason: This user page is a fake article which is an unsourced biography of a living person.
18. Standard database management analysis: nominated at AfD; notified Biscuittin (talk · contribs) 18:32, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
    • Reason: No content and no sources. Created by now-blocked user. Tagged for eight years as having no sources, and for seven years as having no content. It is not clear to a database engineer what the topic or topics were supposed to be, but the titles of the empty sections seem to imply that was meant to promote a methodology. Heymann criterion is for someone to figure out what if anything this was supposed to be within 7 days.
19. Raja Mahendra: nominated at RfD; Target: Raja (notified); notified Arcarius (talk · contribs) 04:57, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
    • Reason: This redirect is to a section of the article that no longer exists. The section was added by a now-blocked sockpuppeteer, and the redirect was also provided by the sockpuppeteer. The section no longer exists, so the redirect is useless.
20. Draft:Sheep language: nominated at MfD; notified MON38 (talk · contribs) 17:02, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
    • Reason: This draft was declined as a copy of Yan yan tethera, but it is not an accurate copy of Yan yan tethera, because it has been tweaked and diddled with to introduce obscenities, and so probably qualifies for speedy deletion as G3, vandalism.
21. Robert Glen: nominated at AfD; notified Jmorrison230582 (talk · contribs) 01:09, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
    • Reason: The only reference for this stub biography of a footballer is a database entry, so this stub no longer satisfies sports notability and does not satisfy general notability. Draftification will provide six months to find significant coverage.
      *Draftify as nominator.
22. Draft:Hiiijeu373u3j3: nominated at MfD; notified Umarkhalid5000 (talk · contribs) 20:36, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
    • Reason: This is the same as Draft:Shaheedallll and is U5, Wikipedia is not for web hosting. No other contributions by author.
23. Draft:Ryan Daou (The Kingpin Of Addis Ababa): nominated at MfD; notified Khaled Tarabey (talk · contribs) 20:51, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
    • Reason: See also User:Khaled Tarabey/sandbox, which shows that this is the output from a large language model, and is web hosting by an editor who is not otherwise contributing to the encyclopedia.
24. User:SOKE*SHIHAN*CRUZ/sandbox: nominated at MfD; notified SOKE*SHIHAN*CRUZ (talk · contribs) 02:19, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
    • Reason: Another malformed copy of article pages, largely the same as what is in the user's user page at User:SOKE*SHIHAN*CRUZ. These are the only edits by the editor and have no encyclopedic value.

May 2024

1. 2024 World Aquatics Artistic Swimming World Cup: nominated at AfD; notified Hshezsvsbebe (talk · contribs) 22:20, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: This page has no references, and so fails both verifiability and general notability. It has been moved to draft space twice, by User:Hey man im josh and User:Wikishovel, and moved back to article space twice by the originator with no apparent improvement.
2. Oluwadunsin Oyekan: nominated at AfD; notified Victoryvicto (talk · contribs) 04:07, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: Non-notable clergy person and musician. There is nothing in this article that satisfies musical notability or general notability. The one reference says that he exists. Existence != Notability.
3. User:Tokyo5359/sandbox: nominated at MfD; notified Tokyo5359 (talk · contribs) 16:57, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: This is another stupid copy from some web page into a Wikipedia sandbox, again about artificial intelligence, and displaying human stupidity. This was submitted to AFC, but is clearly not a real draft. This may be G5, but we can let CheckUser determine that.

June 2024

1. Denice Zamboanga: nominated at AfD; notified JRM2018 (talk · contribs) 04:44, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: An article on this mixed martial artist was deleted three years ago after Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Denice Zamboanga as failing to meet either mixed martial arts notability or general notability. At the time, there were also multiple drafts, probably because someone was trying to game the system. The originators were then blocked for sockpuppetry. This article does not differ materially from the deleted article. The subject still is not top-ten-ranked, and so does not meet mixed martial arts notability. The article does not speak for itself and explain how the subject meets general notability. The subject's association with the ONE Championship is now verified, but "so what?", participation in the ONE Championship is not grounds for notability. The article has been reference-bombed, but nothing in the article refers to significant coverage in an article that does not speak for itself. This article differs enough from the deleted article so that speedy deletion is not in order; but it does not differ enough from the deleted article to avoid deletion.
2. Matias Fernandez-Pardo: nominated at AfD; notified EpicAdventurer (talk · contribs) 16:16, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: Association football player who does not satisfy general notability, and does not satisfy football notability criteria because those redirect to basic sports notability which redirects to general notability. This is a contested draftification. There are three references. The first of them is a database entry which shows that he plays association football. The second and third are articles in Dutch, which, on machine translation, are about the team, and not about him.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Reference Number !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || Soccerway || A database entry || Yes || No || Yes || No
     |-
     | 2 || https://www.nieuwsblad.be/sportwereld/live/voetbal/347570 || In Dutch. On machine translation, about the team. || Yes || No || Yes || Yes
     |-
     | 3 || onefootball.com/en/news/duitse-landskampioen-komt-speler-ophalen-bij-kaa-gent-39623474 || This article, on translation, is not about the player but about the team || Yes || No || Yes || Yes
     |}
     *Draftify as nominator. There may be significant coverage in the future.
3. User:Dull bull/sandbox: nominated at MfD; notified Dull bull (talk · contribs) 19:47, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: This is a non-obvious hoax. A naïve Google search finds no evidence that Gatorade was invented by Sean Simms. Our article shows that it was invented by Robert Cade and others. There is a Sean Simms who played American football and became an actor, and does not appear to have been associated with Gatorade. There is no evidence that any Sean Simms played for the New York Yankees. If this were not invented, it would be an unreferenced biography of a living person, which is not permitted but could be ignored in a sandbox. As it is, this is a non-obvious hoax.
4. Border 2 (film): nominated at AfD; notified TheSlumPanda (talk · contribs) 18:49, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: Planned film that does not satisfy film notability guidelines or general notability, and in particular does not satisfy future film notability guidelines. Unreleased films are only notable if production, that is, principal photography, has begun, and production itself is notable. This film has only been announced. The four references are all nearly the same, simply announcements that the director plans to make the film.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Reference Number !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || India Today || Announcement of plan of film || Yes || No. Future existence is not significant coverage. || Yes || No
     |-
     | 2 || NDTV.com || Announcement of plan for film || Yes || No. Future existence is not significant coverage. || Yes || No
     |-
     | 3 || Indian Express || Announcement of plan for film || Yes || No. Future existence is not significant coverage. || Yes || No
     |-
     | 4 || Times of India || Announcement of film, with discussion || Yes || No, even if somewhat more detailed. || No || No
     |-
     |
     |-
     |
     |}
     This stub does not speak for itself, and there is nothing here that approaches significant coverage of a film or its production.
     *Draftify as nominator.
5. Clayton Brown: nominated at AfD; notified Lugnuts (talk · contribs) 06:24, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: Olympic rower who did not receive a medal and does not meet either Olympic notability for athletes who received medals or general notability based on significant coverage. The only reference is a database entry. Heymann criterion is to find significant coverage within seven days and expand this stub.
     *Draftify as nominator to allow six months to find significant coverage.

July 2024

1. Luis Olaso: nominated at AfD; notified KSA13 (talk · contribs) 01:46, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: Footballer whose article has no footnotes, and whose only references are external links to database entries, and so does not meet general notability or sports notability in its current state. The article says that he played for the Spanish national team, which is probably true but unverified, and there isn't a football notability guideline that says that this is notability or presumed notability. The Heymann criterion is to find two reliable sources that provide significant coverage within seven days.
     *Draftify as nominator, to allow six months to find coverage.
2. Premium Guard Inc: nominated at AfD; notified Ambuj0070 (talk · contribs) 10:59, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: Premium Guard Inc.
     This article on an automotive filter company is written from the company's point of view, and says what the company says about itself, rather than what third parties say about the company. It does not satisfy general notability or corporate notability. The three references are all press releases.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Reference Number !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || www.counterman.com || A press release about the name change, in a trade publication || No || Yes || Yes || No
     |-
     | 2 || www.freightwaves.com || Transmission, a twice-weekly newsletter about auto supply networks. About moving facilities to Mexico. Reads like a press release. || No || Not really || Yes || No
     |-
     | 3 || www.aftermarketnews.com || A press release to a trade publication, about an acquisition. || No || Yes || Yes || No
     |}
     The first sentence after the lede is

     Established in New York City, Premium Guard Inc.’s focus from the start has been on providing a turnkey solution with wide application coverage and private label programs for all segments of the North American automotive aftermarket.

     That reads like marketing buzzspeak.
3. Tariq Chauhan: nominated at AfD; notified Infofox2656 (talk · contribs) 19:10, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: In its current form, this biography of a living person makes no reference to anything that is said by third parties about the subject, and so does not satisfy general notability. The one reference is a press release which makes a passing mention of the subject, which is not independent coverage or secondary coverage. It states that the subject is the co-founder of EFS Facilities Services Group, but an article on that group has been deleted for lack of corporate notability, so there is no good redirect target.
4. Crooked Boy: nominated at AfD; notified Flyless Kyle (talk · contribs) 06:21, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: This article does not satisfy musical notability because it has no charting information and does not otherwise satisfy any of the musical notability criteria, and does not satisfy general notability because it does not refer to significant coverage by third parties. It was unilaterally moved from draft space to article space by the page creator with the edit summary It's been too long, so draftification is not appropriate. The Heymann criterion is to add charting information within six days.
     *Draftify as nominator.
5. List of Playboy Interviews: nominated at AfD; notified GimmeChoco44 (talk · contribs) 06:38, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: This list is very incomplete, and only includes interview subjects for some years in the twentieth century, and none in the twenty-first century. The only sources are the Playboy magazine archives in which the interview appeared, so that there is no independent sourcing to establish list notability.
     *Draftify as nominator. This might be a useful list article when completed.
6. Peter Selvaratnam: nominated at RfD; Target: Mandibular notch (notified); notified Abishe (talk · contribs) 07:15, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: There doesn’t seem to be any mention of Peter Selvaratnam at Mandibular notch, and there doesn’t seem to be any mention of Mandibular notch in the article that previously existed at Peter Selvaratnam before it was cut down to a redirect.
7. Marek Małecki: nominated at AfD; notified Lugnuts (talk · contribs) 01:07, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: Equestrian who does not satisfy sports notability. There are two references. The first one is a database entry, and database entries do not establish sports notability. The second is an obituary, which may count toward general notability but is the only significant source. He competed in the Olympics, but does not have Olympic notability because he did not receive a medal.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Reference Number !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || https://www.sports-reference.com/olympics/athletes/ma/marek-malecki-1.html || A Wayback Machine copy of a database entry of sports statistics || Yes || No || Yes || No
     |-
     | 2 || hejnakon.pl || Obituary in Polish equestrian magazine. || Yes || Yes || Yes || Yes
     |}
     The Heymann criterion is to find additional sources within six days.
     *Draftify as nominator, to allow six months to find better coverage.
8. Draft:JackSucksAtLife: nominated at MfD; notified Strugglehouse (talk · contribs) 19:53, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: This draft is being tendentiously resubmitted in order to try to create an article on a YouTuber who has been found to be non-notable in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Massey Welsh in December 2018. That title has been salted.
     It was then recreated as JackSucksAtLife, an attempt to game the name, but was renominated for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JackSucksAtLife, and speedily deleted as G4 in October 2020. That title has also been salted.
     A draft was then created again in May 2023 and submitted, and declined twice. I then Rejected the draft in November 2023, because the subject had already been found to be non-notable in two AFDs, and no real effort was being made to address the issue of notability. It was then resubmitted later in November 2023, with no attempt to discuss the rejection. I had said, in my rejection, that the draft should not be resubmitted without discussing the rejection (but we don't expect ultras to follow the instructions). It has then been declined two more times, and then Rejected again by User:CFA (thank you). The reviewers couldn't accept this draft even if we wanted to accept it, so continuing to submit it is useless. If the proponents actually have new sources that they want considered, and so are requesting that one of the titles be desalted, they should ask for community discussion at Deletion Review rather than just pointlessly resubmitting, which is wasting their time and that of the reviewers, who can't accept the draft even if wanted to accept it. So I am asking for community discussion to delete this draft.
9. Edgardo Defortuna: nominated at AfD; notified Ashthetic (talk · contribs) 03:40, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: Edgardo Defortuna
     There are two problems with this biographical article about a Florida businessman. The first is that violates neutral point of view. The second is that it does not satisfy general notability.
     The article reads as if it was written by the subject's real estate company, because it may have been written by the subject's company. The last two paragraphs, Philanthropy and Civic Involvement, and Honors and Awards, have no references. They were written to describe the subject as favorably as possible. The section on Family Matters and the Next Generation is also a puff piece, and is mostly about his wife rather than about him.
     The references are not independent coverage, and mostly read like press releases. References 3 and 4 appear to be variations of the same press release.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Reference Number !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || www.islandernews.com || An interview in a Key Biscayne newspaper || No || Yes || Yes || No
     |-
     | 2 || www.forbes.com || An article by a Forbes 'contributor'. These are considered unreliable. || Maybe || Yes || No || ?
     |-
     | 3 || therealdeal.com || A profile that reads like a press release from the subject || No || Yes || Maybe || ?
     |-
     | 4 || commercialobserver.com || Another profile that reads like a variation of the same press release || No || Yes || Maybe || ?
     |-
     | 5 || www.bizjournals.com || An article for paid subscribers only. || Assumed to be No. || Yes || Probably not. || ?
     |-
     | 6 || mlmiamimag.com || Another interview that appears to have been provided by the subject. || No || Yes || Probably || ?
     |-
     | 7 || therealdeal.com || Another press release || No || Yes || Probably || ?
     |-
     | 8 || sfbwmag.com || Another press release || No || Yes || Probably || ?
     |-
     | 9 || www.bizjournals.com || A press release on acquisition by Christie's || No || Yes || Yes || ?
     |-
     | 10 || therealdeal.com || Another press release || No || Yes || Probably || ?
     |-
     | 11 || sfbwmag.com || An interview with the subject's wife || No || Not about the subject || Probably || ?
     |-
     | 12 || hauteliving.com || Another interview with the subject's wife || No || Not about the subject || Probably || ?
     |-
     | 13 || www.culturedmag.com || An interview by the subject's wife about a real estate project || No || Not about the subject || Yes || ?
     |}
     This is not the first article about this businessman. A prior article in 2017 was deleted as G5 and G11. An article on 6 June 2024 was deleted as G11. A draft was created on 19 June, and this article was created on 25 July, by the same editor, and they are similar. This article and the draft may be toned-down versions of the spam piece; I have not seen the spam piece and do not want to see it. The Heymann criterion is to find three independent reliable secondary sources within seven days. Otherwise, the originator will be able to find real sources for the draft and submit it for review.

August 2024

1. Tracel: nominated at RfD; Target: Parenteral nutrition (notified); notified Mikael Häggström (talk · contribs) 03:48, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: Useless redirect. The redirect points to a non-existent paragraph. That could be corrected. However, the target string 'tracel' is nowhere found on the page, and there is no obvious reference to a drug trade name. Recommend Deletion.

September 2024

1. Safavid Capture of Mesopotamia (1623-1624): nominated at AfD; notified Stickyrainbow (talk · contribs) 23:52, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: This article has no useful encyclopedic content about its subject, the Safavid capture of Mesopotamia. There is no lede section, and two of the three paragraphs are not about the campaign. The first paragraph is background, and the second paragraph is about the victorious commander. The infobox says nothing, because the strength and the losses are unknown. The third paragraph is partly about a military victory without describing the victory.
     The sentence

     This text aims to cover key aspects of his reign: his rise to power, consolidation, military successes, and the establishment of Isfahan

     is not only not encyclopedic, but reads as if it was copied from a book.
2. Aniruddhacharya: nominated at AfD; notified Dympies (talk · contribs) 05:24, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: Contested draftification. Article about self-publicizing Indian religious leader. The article is about what the subject and his followers say about him, not what third parties say. The sources include slideshows of information about the subject, which appear to be paid, and puff pieces and press releases. The article was draftified by User:Chaotic Enby with the statement: it needs better quality sources. They clarified that criticism with: Sources of the type "Know the net worth of X person!" are often celebrity gossip and not up to Wikipedia's reliability standards.. I concur with the criticism of the sources. The author added more sources that were no improvement and resubmitted.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Reference Number !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || www.tv9hindi.com || On machine translation, appears to be a promotional slideshow || No || No || No || No
     |-
     | 2 || www.outlookindia.com || A puff piece, a flattering press release || No || Yes || ? || No
     |-
     | 3 || english.newstrack.com || A discussion of his wealth || No || Yes || ? || No
     |-
     | 4 || newsable.asianetnews.com || A promotional slideshow || No || No || No || No
     |-
     | 5 || hindi.news18.com || Appears to be a placed story about a conflict with another swami || Probably not || Yes || No || No
     |-
     | 6 || www.indiatoday.in || A story about the subject's non-appearance on Big Boss || No || Yes || ? || No
     |-
     | 7 || timesofindia.indiatimes.com || Another story about non-appearance on Bigg Boss || No || Yes || No || No
     |}
     Neither the body of the article nor the sources demonstrate independent notability.

October 2024

1. Shyam Sunder Sharan: nominated at AfD; notified Rkrbhardwaj (talk · contribs) 19:12, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: Shyam Sunder Sharan
     Politician who acts as a spokesperson for a political party in the state of Bihar, and does not satisfy political notability or general notability. The subject is not a member of a national or state legislature and so does not satisfy political notability. Review of the references shows that only the first of them is possibly significant coverage in an independent source. The others are a press release, and two statements issued by the subject as spokesperson for the party, so that they are not independent.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Reference Number !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || news4nation.com || Report on meeting with national finance minister || Yes? || Yes || Yes? || Yes
     |-
     | 2 || www.insiderlive.in || Press release about his naming as spokesperson || No || Yes || Yes? || No
     |-
     | 3 || www.etvbharat.com || Appears to be a press release about upcoming election || No || Not about the subject, who is only acting as a spokesperson || Yes? || No
     |-
     | 4 || news4nation.com || An announcement by the subject about the election || No || Not about the subject, who is a spokesperson || Yes? || No
     |}
     The originator created both a draft and an article, which were identical. The draft has been redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, the redirection of the draft to the article should be reverted.

November 2024

1. Miss You (film): nominated at AfD; notified Meena1998 (talk · contribs) 21:53, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: This is about an unreleased film which does not satisfy film notability. Unreleased films are only notable if production itself has received significant coverage by reliable sources. A review of the sources shows that they are all announcements or press releases about the film or its songs. The first five references, in four different media, are essentially identical, which is best explained that they are the same press releases to different media.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Reference Number !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || The Hindu || States that movie will be filmed. || No. 1 through 5 are the same, and so are a press release. || Not for this purpose || Yes || Yes
     |-
     | 2 || cinemaexpress.com || States that movie will be filmed. || No. 1 through 5 are the same, and so are a press release. || Not for this purpose || Yes || Yes
     |-
     | 3 || thesouthfirst.com || States that movie will be filmed. || No. 1 through 5 are the same, and so are a press release. || Not for this purpose || Yes || Yes
     |-
     | 4 || www.business-standard.com || States that movie will be filmed. || No. 1 through 5 are the same, and so are a press release. || Not for this purpose || Yes || Yes
     |-
     | 5 || The Hindu || Same as 1 || No. 1 through 5 are the same, and so are a press release. || Not for this purpose || Yes || Yes
     |-
     | 6 || timesnownews.com || States that movie will be filmed. || Probably. || Not for this purpose || Yes || Yes
     |-
     | 7 || Times of India || Passing mention of a song. || Maybe || No. Passing mention. || No || Yes
     |-
     | 8 || cinemaexpress.com || Press release about a song. || No. || No || Yes || Yes
     |-
     | 9 || cinemaexpress.com || Another press release about a song. || No. || No || Yes || Yes
     |-
     | 10 || news18.com || An announcement about the film. || Probably. || Not for this purpose. || Yes || Yes
     |}
     There is also a draft; the draft and the article are by different authors. The information in this article and in the draft can be merged in the draft, and the draft can be submitted, with reviews and other quality sources, when the film has been released and reviewed.
2. Epack Prefab: nominated at AfD; notified Rosy431 (talk · contribs) 05:25, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
   • Reason: Epack Prefab
     Article about an Indian company which manufactures pre-engineered buildings (PEBs), also known as prefabricated buildings, but does not establish corporate notability. None of the references are significant coverage by independent sources. The references are mostly press releases or paid pieces by the company or interviews with the company, and some of them are about the technology rather than the company.
     {| class="wikitable"
     ! Reference Number !! Reference !! Comments !! Independent !! Significant !! Reliable !! Secondary
     |-
     | 1 || livemint.com || A corporate profile || No || Yes || ? || No
     |-
     | 2 || Times of India || An interview with an officer in the course of an article || Yes || No. Passing mention. || No || ?
     |-
     | 3 || news.abplive.com || An interview || No || Yes || ? || No
     |-
     | 4 || businesstoday.in || An interview about how prefab building reduces pollution || No || Not about the company, but about the technology || Yes || No
     |-
     | 5 || www.tv9hindi.com || An interview about prefab building || No || Not about the company, but about the technology || Yes? || No
     |-
     | 6 || www.zeebiz.com || An interview about the company || No || Yes || Yes? || No
     |-
     | 7 || www.etnownews.com || An interview with some promotional content || No || Yes || Yes? || No
     |-
     | 8 || auto.economictimes.indiatimes.com || A feature story, reads as if it was paid || No || Yes || No. Times of India. || No
     |-
     | 9 || infra.economictimes.indiatimes.com || Another feature story, may be paid || No || Yes || No. Times of India. || No
     |-
     | 10 || www.financialexpress.com || Reads like a corporate profile || No || Yes || Yes || No
     |-
     | 11 || www.adgully.com || An ad in an advertising web site, corporate information || No || Yes || ? || No
     |-
     | 12 || www.constructionworld.in || A press release || No || Yes || ? || No
     |-
     | 13 || www.outlookbusiness.com || An interview about prefab building || No || No. Not about the company, but about the technology || ? || No
     |-
     | 14 || The Hindu || A press release || No || Don't know. Only able to view lead of article due to paywall, but that was enough to see that it is a press release. || Yes || No
     |-
     | 15 || indianinfrastructure.com || Article about prefab building. Doesn't mention the company. || Yes || No. Not about the company, but about the technology || Yes || No?
     |-
     | 16 || www.zeebiz.com || An article about prefab building. No mention of company. || Yes || No. Not about the company, but about the technology || Yes? || No
     |-
     | 17 || www.business-standard.com || A press release about corporate plans. || No || Yes || Yes || No
     |}
     This article was originally created in article space by a now-blocked promotional editor, and moved back to draft space by the blocking administrator. This article appears to be identical to the draftified article by another editor. There are concerns about covert advertising, but it isn't necessary to know whether there is covert advertising, because there isn't coverage that satisfies corporate notability. The author of this version of the article has now been blocked as a sockpuppet.
     The draft can be left standing because drafts are not checked for notability. In view of the history of sockpuppetry and conflict of interest, salting is probably in order in article space.