User talk:Radiojon

Move along, nothing to see here... 👀

"Fishspinner" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Fishspinner. Since you had some involvement with the Fishspinner redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hog Farm (talk) 03:04, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:B22d bayonet base.jpg

The file File:B22d bayonet base.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Cox Television has been nominated for renaming

Category:Cox Television has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Raymie (t • c) 21:00, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Coby (Disambiguation)" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Coby (Disambiguation). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 6#Coby (Disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 13:05, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cobb Education Television

The article Cobb Education Television has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable cable access TV channel.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Raymie (t • c) 03:36, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cobb Education Television for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cobb Education Television is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cobb Education Television until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Raymie (t • c) 16:34, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 10

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

State park (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Cabin and Hike

Arthurs Seat, Victoria (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Doppelmayr

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited State park, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Cabin and Hike (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:23, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:T47-logo.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:T47-logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 19:55, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cobb Place

The article Cobb Place has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

It exists, but doesn't meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 15:22, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Peachtree 25th Building for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Peachtree 25th Building is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peachtree 25th Building until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Captain Galaxy 13:03, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:14, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Decorative vehicle lighting for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Decorative vehicle lighting, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Decorative vehicle lighting until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:ATSC-M/H stations has been nominated for deletion

Category:ATSC-M/H stations has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 22:20, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Ion DTV/text

Template:Ion DTV/text has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 03:17, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Articles to be expanded has been nominated for splitting

Category:Articles to be expanded has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. JsfasdF252 (talk) 15:59, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:WAD

Template:WAD has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – NJD-DE (talk) 20:48, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:F−

Template:F− has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Did Q28 make a mess today? 03:30, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:F+

Template:F+ has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Did Q28 make a mess today? 03:31, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:01, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

PI court case in limestone tn on d

ec 8 2021 2600:6C5D:6300:10BB:C885:9C1C:894F:378 (talk) 11:22, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:ViacomCBS Domestic Media Networks has been nominated for discussion

Category:ViacomCBS Domestic Media Networks has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. — Berrely • ^Talk∕_Contribs 16:33, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Inccat

Template:Inccat has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:13, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:TVQ

Template:TVQ has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:53, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Quahog, Rhode Island" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Quahog, Rhode Island and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 23#Quahog, Rhode Island until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:10, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of FM broadcast translators used as primary stations

The article List of FM broadcast translators used as primary stations has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

There's no real place for a page like this. A broadcast relay station by rule cannot originate programming on its own, even as it can function as a de facto station through a programming source. Moreover, the practice is so commonplace today and is solely confined to United States radio that the page might have made sense a decade ago... but not now.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nathan Obral • he/him • t • c • 20:54, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Compensation (engineering) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Compensation (engineering) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Compensation (engineering) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Dennis Brown - 2¢ 18:58, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Rootkit/archive" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Rootkit/archive and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 1#Rootkit/archive until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 05:20, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:GPB DTV

Template:GPB DTV has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 22:41, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Motorist (disambiguation)

The article Motorist (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Disambiguation page not required. The '?' Motorist is not known as "Motorist", and "motorist" is not ambiguous.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"OTAN" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect OTAN has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 7 § OTAN until a consensus is reached. TartarTorte 17:18, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Thoroughfare

The article Thoroughfare has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Dictionary definition like article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Destroyed towns has been nominated for merging

Category:Destroyed towns has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –DMartin 18:58, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Db

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Db, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 12:34, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of WAGC-LD

The article WAGC-LD has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable television station.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Let'srun (talk) 21:10, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of WXID-LP

The article WXID-LP has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject does not meet the WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Let'srun (talk) 22:23, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of W13DQ-D

The article W13DQ-D has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject does not meet the GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Let'srun (talk) 16:02, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of POTS codec

The article POTS codec has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I couldn't find sources to prove WP:N. No good WP:ATD. This has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve it.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 14:14, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of WTHC-LD

The article WTHC-LD has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject does not meet the WP:GNG; contains a lack of WP:SIGCOV.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Let'srun (talk) 23:49, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of WTHC-LD for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article WTHC-LD is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WTHC-LD until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Let'srun (talk) 16:09, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of National Narrowcasting Network

The article National Narrowcasting Network has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This company article has zero references to establish notability. After searching, found no comprehensive, in-depth coverage of this specific business. Article was created on 16 August 2004.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of WANN-CD

The article WANN-CD has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject does not meet the GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Let'srun (talk) 16:33, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of WUVM-LD for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article WUVM-LD is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WUVM-LD until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mvcg66b3r (talk) 09:37, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of WDWW-LD for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article WDWW-LD is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WDWW-LD until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mvcg66b3r (talk) 09:38, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of WIRE-CD

The article WIRE-CD has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject does not meet the GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 09:39, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of WSKC-CD for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article WSKC-CD is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WSKC-CD until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mvcg66b3r (talk) 09:46, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of WYGA-CD for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article WYGA-CD is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WYGA-CD until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mvcg66b3r (talk) 09:48, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:FMQ

Template:FMQ has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. House Blaster (talk · he/him) 00:46, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:AMQ

Template:AMQ has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. House Blaster (talk · he/him) 00:47, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Elvira Presents Haunted Hits

The article Elvira Presents Haunted Hits has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NALBUM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 14:24, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Elvira Presents Monster Hits

The article Elvira Presents Monster Hits has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NALBUM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 14:24, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Key Biscayne

Key Biscayne has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 14:42, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]