User talk:GAROSENTAIJINOHGERRV7

Is it true that these countries are gonna make an appearance in Miss universe 2021 in December? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.200.3.201 (talk) 11:13, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GAROSENTAIJINOHGERRV7, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi GAROSENTAIJINOHGERRV7! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

Miss Earth 2021

Hi! Please refrain from adding unsourced/false content on the Miss Earth 2021 page like your recent edits. Unless you can supply a supporting article to cite your claim, only then it can be added.

Milesq (talk) 16:30, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's been almost a week since this message and I didn't get any reply at all and you still kept on adding unsourced content. Keep doing this and I might consider reporting to WP:ANI on this incident. Milesq (talk) 05:50, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents (ANI)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Milesq (talk) 12:26, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Stifle (talk) 09:43, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(after block)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Miss Earth 2021 and Miss Supranational 2022.

Why are you still adding unsourced material after the block expired [1][2]? ☆ Bri (talk) 13:37, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Are you even visiting your talk page? We're telling you to stop adding unsourced content, but if you're gonna keep ignoring these messages and being stubborn, might as well report you once more for a final warning.

Milesq (talk) 02:40, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stop the vandalism

Why are you insisting on adding a Miss Earth South Korea when there is none? You even preemptively assumed the withdrawal of several countries again, WITH NO SOURCE TO BACK IT UP. You're quite stubborn. Milesq (talk) 14:13, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021 (II)

You are still making unsourced changes to the number of entrants to a pageant. Do you realize that's why you were blocked a few days ago? - Bri.public (talk) 15:05, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Here we go again....

What's with you and your persistence on adding South Korea on Miss Earth 2021? The delegate roster has no Korea, and don't change the number of delegates in the contestants section without adding/removing names. With that said, stop vandalizing. You've been talked about this many times. Milesq (talk) 13:59, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"BHMNL Pasay 2021" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect BHMNL Pasay 2021. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 October 30#BHMNL Pasay 2021 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 14:52, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Timeline of national flags

I've reverted your additions to Timeline of national flags. This is because you simply reverted the page to a version from a few months ago with out taking into account any of useful changes that have been made. Most of the flags have been removed because they were highly anachronistic flags for places that never had them (Mongol flags, Anglo-Saxon flags, etc.) or flags that were only ever proposals. More specific reasons for the removal of specific flags can be found in the edit-summaries of the edits that removed them. If you want to re-add a specific flag than please give a specific reason in the edit summary. Also feel free to discuss it on the talk page. Cakelot1 (talk) 09:53, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Do not continue re-adding these flags en mass. These are not historic or even correct national flags. Read Talk:Timeline of national flags#Flags of England 519 and 927 for an example of the sort of incorrect thing your adding. If you want to add flags do it one at a time and give specific reasons why you want to add them. Please discuss with others (either here or on the article talk page) if you think I am incorrect in this. (Also please stop tagging edits as "Disambiguation links" when they are not) Cakelot1 (talk) 15:45, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Once again you performed the exact same big rollback without explaining yourself. Once again I have reverted it. If you continue performing these unconstructive edits it may start to be regarded as Vandalism. Please discuss these massive rollbacks of others hard work, before you do them please. Cakelot1 (talk) 09:45, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eduardo Jose Jallorina (December 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please do not resubmit without addressing the concerns.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Eduardo Jose Jallorina and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Eduardo Jose Jallorina, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 19:00, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"EJ Jallorina" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect EJ Jallorina. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 18#EJ Jallorina until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 17:28, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Timeline of national flags, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Cakelot1 (talk) 14:23, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Atsuki Mashiko for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Atsuki Mashiko is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atsuki Mashiko until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

RegistryKey^(RegEdit) 00:55, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of EJ Jallorina

A tag has been placed on EJ Jallorina requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sdrqaz (talk) 09:38, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

note

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give draft:Avataro Sentai Donbrothers a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Avataro Sentai Donbrothers. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 13:56, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Avataro Sentai Donbrothers

The article Avataro Sentai Donbrothers has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This page was made to avoid the draft submission by the user themselves.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Nomination of Avataro Sentai Donbrothers for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Avataro Sentai Donbrothers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Avataro Sentai Donbrothers until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Robert McClenon (talk) 04:31, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Please do not create, maintain or restore hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at List of programs aired by Banahaw Broadcasting Corporation. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Continued disruption will be met with being blocked from editing, or other sanctions. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Thank you. Abrilando232 (talk) 12:04, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Stop blanking sockpuppets' pages and replacing them with "Retired" banners Meters (talk) 08:57, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:12, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mia Sabathy

Hello, GAROSENTAIJINOHGERRV7. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mia Sabathy, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:02, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"List of current Star Magic artists" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect List of current Star Magic artists and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 29#List of current Star Magic artists until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 00:31, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mia Sabathy

Hello, GAROSENTAIJINOHGERRV7. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Mia Sabathy".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 10:58, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"List of former GMA Artist Center artists" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect List of former GMA Artist Center artists and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 9#List of former GMA Artist Center artists until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 07:59, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rika Sato (actress)

The article Rika Sato (actress) has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Atsuki Mashiko

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Atsuki Mashiko requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atsuki Mashiko. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 17:14, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]