User talk:Nrt0011

Welcome!

Hello, Nrt0011, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Janine DiVita did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Introduction tutorial
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Introduction to referencing
Help pages
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. Tacyarg (talk) 07:36, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for welcoming. This in my dreaming platform and I hope will do all my best to stay here forever. Nrt0011 (talk) 22:51, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

Hello, I'm JalenFolf. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Burnt Hair have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Jalen Folf (talk) 18:49, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jalen,hope you are great.

Please take a look on this article because this is a product of Elon Musk and there is not anything promotional I believe:-)

It is just describing the item. Nrt0011 (talk) 18:53, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:ORDO Store has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:ORDO Store. Thanks! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 21:59, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

fixed the problem, the sources removed or changed with correct ones. Nrt0011 (talk) 22:50, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: ORDO Store (October 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Timtrent were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

References must be as stated. This is full of store locations, PR pieces, items like Quora(!), none of which are useful. Your job is to prove that it passes WP:NCORP

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:ORDO Store and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 22:51, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Everything is very accurate and very understandable from your side. I know I thank you very much for the reasons you gave and I will once again try to be more in-depth and accurate by completing all the tasks properly and not breaking any rules from the Wiki. Nrt0011 (talk) 23:01, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The criteria are tough. Start by reducing your references to only those that meet the criteria. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 23:03, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you again. I'm doing all my best by reducing some of references. Nrt0011 (talk) 23:05, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nrt0011! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 22:51, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In our country in Albania, it is not that people or news channels are very focused on businesses and they are hardly talked about at all. Here, all the media are 100% focused on such policies and developments, that's why I encountered some difficulty in gathering information when creating this company. I have also published a television station which was not on Wikipedia, but I also had very few sources from different directions. Nrt0011 (talk) 12:54, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: ORDO Store (October 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:ORDO Store and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 08:09, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Greenman,

I am still working on this page for finding and adding all information correctly. Nrt0011 (talk) 22:22, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there,

In our country in Albania, it is not that people or news channels are very focused on businesses and they are hardly talked about at all. Here, all the media are 100% focused on such policies and developments, that's why I encountered some difficulty in gathering information when creating this company. I have also published a television station which was not on Wikipedia, but I also had very few sources from different directions. Nrt0011 (talk) 12:54, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: ORDO (October 25)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was:

Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. This is sometimes done in order to bypass Articles for Creation review. However, if a submitter is ready to have the article in article space, it can be moved into article space, rather than creating a copy. It is common for a page that has been duplicated in draft space and in article space to be nominated for deletion or proposed for deletion.

If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement.

Please do not submit multiple copies of drafts. It does not increase the likelihood that one of them will be accepted into article space, and annoys the reviewers. It is likely to be seen as an effort to game the system, and may result in the drafts being nominated for deletion.

This draft is written from the viewpoint of the company, focusing on what the company says about itself. Corporate notability is based on what independent reliable sources have written about the subject.

Not every business corporation is notable, and this draft does not establish corporate notability. You may ask for advice about corporate notability at the Teahouse.

Does the author of this draft have any sort of financial or other connection with the subject of this draft? Please read the conflict of interest policy and the paid editing policy and make any required disclosures.

You may ask for advice about conflict of interest at the Teahouse.

If this draft is resubmitted without addressing the question about conflict of interest, it may be Rejected or nominated for deletion.

Robert McClenon (talk) 12:01, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

{{subst:Uw-c&pmove|Draft:ORDO Store|to=ORDO Store}} ~~~~ Nrt0011 (talk) 22:45, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Draft:ORDO Store a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into ORDO Store. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Nrt0011 (talk) 22:46, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Nrt0011. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:57, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Nrt0011, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:58, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]