User talk:Das osmnezz

Rim Soheng (រីម សុហេង)
Personal information
Full name	Rim Soheng
Date of birth	8 May 2004 (age 20)
Place of birth	Battambang, Cambodia
Height	1.86 m (6 ft 1 in)
Position(s)	Center back
Team information
Current team	Angkor tiger football club
Number	19
Youth career
2019-2021	National football academy
Senior career*
Years	Team
2021-	Angkor tiger football club
International career
2019–	Cambodia U-16
	*Club domestic league appearances and goals, correct as of 20:12, 10 February 2023

Hello Das osmnezz. Thank you for creating the wiki page for Stefan Bajčetić. I'm a little unsure how to proceed with updating his last name to the proper form from Bajcetic to Bajčetić. The correct form of Bajčetić is also used for his father's wiki page. Can you please help change his main profile title name? Thank you kindly. Spirit Fox99 (talk) 20:07, 26 December 2022 (UTC)Spirit_Fox99Spirit Fox99 (talk) 20:07, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mass deprodding

We literally just had a huge arbcom case about mass afding/and editors deprodding. Could you please at least slowdown? You've deprodded at least 50 articles in the last hour without even an edit summary and while I recognize it's not required, it's still a good thing to explain why you're doing it and maybe don't do it so quickly. PRAXIDICAE🌈 17:09, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Praxidicae:, Ok I shall stop deprodding for now and won't do it as quickly. Sorry for the inconvenience. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 17:10, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Das osmnezz you are still doing the same thing today. Why? PRAXIDICAE🌈 18:52, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Das osmnezz; what are you doing? Your behavior appears to be disruptive. Please explain. -Ad Orientem (talk) 19:05, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Praxidicae:, @Ad Orientem:, Sorry Im super dumb I literally thought waiting a day and then deprodding a lot of articles counted as "slowing down" and wasn't disruptive but that was a mistake and not logical. I should have done it even more gradually or not at all. Im very sorry for the inconvenience and if you want I could stop deprodding any articles altogether. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 19:21, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You missed where I also asked you to use edit summaries explaining why - it's a general courtesy even though it isn't required but it's still disruptive to mass deprod articles, which you were doing at a rapid pace. The fact that you think doing so a day apart from this discussion means it's ok is mind boggling. PRAXIDICAE🌈 19:23, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) Any deprodding should include an explanation. I am not opposed to deprodding on principle. But mass derodding, that doesn't offer any explanation and appears to be without a rational, is not constructive. -Ad Orientem (talk) 19:24, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Praxidicae:, @Ad Orientem:, Thanks for the clarification. Yes like I said it was not logical at all in my part to do it so quickly and only a day after we had this discussion. Once again, I'm sorry for the trouble I caused, that's on me. Also, I tried to find the "huge arbcom case about mass afding/and editors deprodding" that @Praxidicae: mentioned yesterday but was unable to, does any of you have the link to it? . Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 19:29, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Considering they were all lugnuts articles, and he is indefinitely blocked as a result of said case, I'm surprised you were unable to find it but here it is. PRAXIDICAE🌈 19:34, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Remember when we asked you to please provide edit summaries when you deprod articles? It wasn't that long ago, and yet you're STILL failing to do it. CC: @Ad Orientem. PICKLEDICAE🥒 22:53, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Praxidicae:, My bad, I have put my reasoning on the talkpage for the one where I just removed the PROD. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 22:55, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Goce Petrovski for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Goce Petrovski is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goce Petrovski until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

MarchOfTheGreyhounds (talk) 18:12, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of James Furlong

Hello Das osmnezz,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged James Furlong for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

0xDeadbeef 09:24, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Fully professional leagues

Hello Das Osmenezz, I have some quotions reltd with that page:

1Would you mind to remove from that template: { { historical } }

2This list is very helful in terms of regarding notblity at Afd. Would you mind to create wieder tble which would also include 'seprate column for sources', 'separate column for "best achivement at IFFHS ranking of the leagues"' and separate sections for: 1Proffesioonal leagues at national level 2Lower divisions which are considered as proffesional 3Leagues at national level not considered as proffesional (currently thre is 1st and 3rd option but no 2nd)

What do you think? I would also like to very slightly change/update guidelines for notablity of football players but firstly I would like to correct this xtremally long (453 references) page, would you able to help me? It is very big. Cheers Dawid2009 (talk) 14:39, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jim Ablancourt

The article Jim Ablancourt has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG. Database hits only.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BilletsMauves^€500 11:51, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jim Ablancourt for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jim Ablancourt, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Ablancourt until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Estíbaliz Montes de Oca

Hello, Das osmnezz,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Pythoncoder, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged Estíbaliz Montes de Oca for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. You may find our guide for writing quality articles to be extremely informative. Also, you may want to consider working on future articles in draft space first, where they cannot be deleted for lacking content.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Pythoncoder}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

—pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 05:26, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Estíbaliz Montes de Oca

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Estíbaliz Montes de Oca requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 05:39, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Using AfD as a Forum

Please stop posting your boilerplate text about the unfairness of the biographies of footballers getting deleted at every AfD. It does nothing to advance your argument and undermines everything else you say because it is off topic. Further, it is disruptive because you are continuing to argue about NFOOTY long after the community came to a consensus that caps do not confer notability. -- Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 13:17, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Guerillero:, Ok I wont talk about the unfairness of the biographies of footballers getting deleted at every AfD from now on. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 16:02, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Joel Fahie for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joel Fahie is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joel Fahie until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 15:44, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Denis Franchi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Denis Franchi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Denis Franchi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Paul Vaurie (talk) 23:34, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Checking drafts

Hi Das,

Could you please try to remember to check for drafts before creating new articles? For example, although your Denis Franchi article easily meets GNG, a far more detailed draft for the player already existed in draftspace that could have been moved to mainspace instead. By checking for drafts before creating new articles, you can avoid merge discussions etc.

I see that GiantSnowman asked you to check this a few months ago. Just something to keep in mind. Cheers! MarchOfTheGreyhounds (talk) 13:51, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

S.L. Benfica (women)

Hi, S.L. Benfica (women)#Former players needs a criteria for player inclusion, otherwise it's arbitrary. SLBedit (talk) 10:35, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Phakamani Mngadi (2nd nomination) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Phakamani Mngadi (2nd nomination) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phakamani Mngadi (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Jogurney (talk) 02:52, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Young stars fc.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Young stars fc.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:33, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Robert Heiße for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Robert Heiße is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Heiße until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Dr. Duh 🩺 (talk) 17:18, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Remi Dujardin for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Remi Dujardin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Remi Dujardin (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 19:49, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Athanasios Raptis for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Athanasios Raptis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Athanasios Raptis until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Dr. Duh 🩺 (talk) 06:58, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Hi Das Osmennezz,

I noted you uite often wite articls about footballers from lower leagues. Recently I found player which appeared at PAntheon.World despite fact he reached/stsarted proffesional career at 39. Would you mind to help me translate this biography into sandbox from Japanese Wikipedia? (He is 100-th the most important player from Japan according to HPI/historical popularity index and is well sourced at JAwiki). Cheers Dawid2009 (talk) 11:02, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Dawid2009:, Sorry for the late response. Here is his translate Japanese Wikipedia article: [1]. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 02:03, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Erica Oyama moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Erica Oyama, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ASUKITE 15:42, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bohan Phoenix moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Bohan Phoenix, is not suitable as written to remain published. The article consisting of two sentence which don't establish notability, stating that they're a rapper, and that they moved to the US at the age of 11, is not enough to establish notability. Please expand the article further prior to moving back to the mainspace. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:10, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AUGUST 08 moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, AUGUST 08, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 20:01, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bohan Phoenix for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bohan Phoenix is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bohan Phoenix until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Robert McClenon (talk) 00:09, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Liga MX Femenil articles

Hi Das osmnezz, thanks for your contributions. Now I bring to your attention a group of players from the Liga MX Femenil that need an article because they pass Wikipedia's notability rules at WP:FOOTY. Aylín Aviléz, Nicolette Hernández and Magalí Cuadrado already played in their national football team. Bea Parra and Brenda Woch have caps in the Primera División (women). Chandra Eigenberger played in the Chicago Red Stars. Stephanie Ribeiro played in the Danish Women's League. Angelina Hix and Adyson Willett played in the Serbian Women's Super League. And the coaches Ana Cristina González and Christopher Cuéllar also reserve their own article.

I would really appreciate your contribution to the women's soccer community.

Thanks in advance and my best regards! 2806:105E:C:5AEC:61E3:A2AD:DE8C:5B26 (talk) 01:26, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I will probably make Wikipedia pages of Angelina Hix and Stephanie Ribeiro and maybe Bea Parra and Magalí Cuadrado. thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 17:02, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Matthew Benham moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Matthew Benham, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. MaxnaCarta (talk) 01:22, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Fatih Şentürk

Hello, Das osmnezz,

Thank you for creating Fatih Şentürk.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

We don't use YouTube or social media such as Facebook as sources. Please only include reliable sources per WP:RS

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Netherzone}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Netherzone (talk) 14:59, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve August 08 (rapper)

Hello, Das osmnezz,

Thank you for creating August 08 (rapper).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Needs more detail on how this rapper is notable, singles and albums released and reviewed. Please use secondary sources from notable websites and that are not mostly Q&A interviews.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|AngusWOOF}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 18:15, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Matthew Benham for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Matthew Benham is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew Benham until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Alexandermcnabb (talk) 06:48, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Leo dos Reis

Hi, I see you have created the article for Leo dos Reis. Can I ask for a favour? I had already created his draft before. Is it ok if we did a WP:HISTMERGE? Thanks, Nehme₁₄₉₉ 08:48, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Nehme1499:, Sure, but make sure to add the sources/references I put to the new page as well as your sources/references. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 17:02, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Patrik Manzila

Hello, Das osmnezz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Patrik Manzila, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:12, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Chiu Chung Man

Hello, Das osmnezz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Chiu Chung Man, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:05, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Sergio Uyi

Hello, Das osmnezz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sergio Uyi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:03, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Gilles Bourges

Hello, Das osmnezz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gilles Bourges, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:02, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tom Cannon (footballer) moved to draftspace

Thanks for creating Tom Cannon (footballer). Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. - GA Melbourne (talk) 02:40, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Das osmnezz. Thank you for your work on Alessio Curci. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:29, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Matthew Benham

On 22 November 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Matthew Benham, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that owner Matthew Benham influenced both Brentford FC in the UK and FC Midtjylland in Denmark to use mathematical modelling to recruit undervalued football players? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Matthew Benham. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Matthew Benham), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:03, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Draft:Patrik Manzila

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Patrik Manzila, was deleted as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:24, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Draft:Gilles Bourges

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Gilles Bourges, was deleted as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:39, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Karl Shand Jr. for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Karl Shand Jr. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karl Shand Jr. until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 20:11, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Das osmnezz. Thank you for your work on Yam Karkai. User:Onel5969, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

It would help if you would define what a "Non-fungible token artist" is.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:32, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hungarian Golden Ball moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Hungarian Golden Ball, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:30, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Citation Barnstar
	For adding references to Didrik Fløtre and many other articles! Thank you for being an awesome Wikipedian!!! gidonb (talk) 17:19, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stefan Bajčetić

Hello Das osmnezz. Thank you for creating the wiki page for Stefan Bajčetić. I'm a little unsure how to proceed with updating his last name to the proper form from Bajcetic to Bajčetić. The correct form of Bajčetić is also used for his father's wiki page. Can you please help change his main profile title name? Thank you kindly. Spirit Fox99 (talk) 20:11, 26 December 2022 (UTC)Spirit_Fox99Spirit Fox99 (talk) 20:11, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Yam Karkai

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Yam Karkai has been deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. As the page met any of these strictly-defined criteria, it was deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been deleted are:

It seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appeared to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. David Gerard (talk) 11:21, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar

Your work is so nice , i would like to get the page restored namely Ishfaq Manzoor that was deleted so that further required info may be added , the page deleted has been adjudged unjustifiedly not properly enquired only misinformation provided by the deleting user , so I found you working so genuinely and i thought u may get it restored accordingly so that i am able to modify the page namely Ishfaq Manzoor Mananbhat (talk) 15:23, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of Palau international footballers moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, List of Palau international footballers, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:51, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

He Tongshuai moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, He Tongshuai, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) WP:NFOOTY is no longer a valid SNG, so GNG must be met. It needs several refs from independent, reliable, secondary sources to pass WP:GNG. It should have at least 3 of those. Please remember that routine sports coverage does not satisfy GNG, and that interviews, being primary sources, do not go to notability either. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:08, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Das osmnezz. Thank you for your work on Joshua Bradley-Hurst. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article! But please fix the orphan issue.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 11:49, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at He Tongshuai, you may be blocked from editing.

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at He Tongshuai, you may be blocked from editing. 61.224.46.127 (talk) 14:23, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Jonathan de Falco.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Jonathan de Falco.

09:27, 2 December 2022: Das osmnezz triggered filter 869, performing the action "edit" on Draft:Jonathan de Falco. Actions taken: Tag; Filter description: Adding deprecated source to articles

09:27, 2 December 2022‎ Das osmnezz talk contribs‎ 2,082 bytes +165‎ No edit summaryundo Tags: 2017 wikitext editor use of deprecated (unreliable) source 61.224.46.127 (talk) 14:25, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Martin Agnarsson moved to draftspace

An article you created, Martin Agnarsson, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~ Eejit43 (talk) 23:31, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Das osmnezz. Thank you for your work on Mohamed Adel (footballer). User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article! Hopefully you can write more. Good day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 10:28, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

Hello, I'm Aaryan33056. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Racing Rioja CF, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Aaryan ^{📬 • 🥰} 08:13, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bobby Duncan (English footballer)

Please do NOT create an article in mainspace when a draft already exists - the big warning that pops up is a bit of a clue. Giant Snowman 17:24, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is something you have been warned about (at least) twice before, I note, here (July 2022) and here (September 2022). Giant Snowman 17:42, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ramin Ott

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ramin Ott requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramin Ott. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 21:49, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Min Thiha for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Min Thiha is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Min Thiha until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 01:04, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Javier Ribalta

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Javier Ribalta, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. MathXplore (talk) 11:35, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Chiu Chung Man

The article Chiu Chung Man has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

NN sports person

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. UtherSRG (talk) 13:06, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Please stop. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. Don't add any content farm,like site:kknews.cc Rastinition (talk) 00:24, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copy some text from site:twreporter.org

Faced with the proliferation of content farms, Facebook has continuously reduced the ranking of these websites on its platform, citing “poor user experience” and reducing the possibility users will see them. In October 2019, the company banned a number of content farms, including Mission, kknews.cc, and Hssszn, all of which are no longer allowed to appear on a user’s timeline.

--Rastinition (talk) 00:37, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Rastinition:, Sorry I had no idea kknews.cc was an inappropriate site for Wikipedia and I will try my best not tp repeat this mistake in the future. If I do make this type of mistake again, please let me know and I will remove the links. THanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 01:38, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Paul Lapic

The article Paul Lapic has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New articles

Hello Das osmnez, I would like to ask your support again please in creating the articles of Karol Bernal and Miah Zuazua because they just got their first caps with their respective national football team, so they pass Wikipedia's notability rules at WP:FOOTY. I would really appreciate your help.

Thank you and my best regards! 2806:105E:C:3302:9543:9C34:782E:6C5A (talk) 05:11, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Charlie Morgan (entrepreneur)

Hello, Das osmnezz, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username TheLongTone, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Charlie Morgan (entrepreneur), should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charlie Morgan (entrepreneur).

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|TheLongTone}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

TheLongTone (talk) 14:28, 20 February 2023 (UTC) Clearly a nudnik.TheLongTone (talk) 14:32, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Das osmnezz. Thank you for your work on Hassan Al-Thawadi. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello! Hopefully you have a good day today. Thanks for creating this article. I encouraged you to make more! Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 07:09, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fritz Neumayr article set for deletion

The article Fritz Neumayr that you were involved in has been marked for deletion - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fritz Neumayr KatoKungLee (talk) 20:06, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Gerry Cranham is a very good page. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 09:03, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Lee Ji-Yong. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:48, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carlos Labrada

You overwrote my !vote; please be more careful. Giant Snowman 19:48, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@GiantSnowman:, Sorry about that Id dint realize since there was a webpage error. I found many sources though. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 21:37, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sports notability

Hi, I noticed that you've been de-PRODing sports figures such as Akpo Godwin and Celestine Onyeka Obi with rationale like "6+ sources on page", "played for fully pro Nigerian top flight team" and "Young player with ongoing career in fully pro Nigerian top flight". Please familiarize yourself with WP:NSPORTS and refrain from de-PRODing articles that do not meet GNG; playing at a certain level or having a certain number of sources (many of which are simply lists of statistics) are not notability criteria. –dlthewave ☎ 00:20, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Steven Juncaj for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Steven Juncaj is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steven Juncaj until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Alvaldi (talk) 20:34, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Malcolm Stewart (footballer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Malcolm Stewart (footballer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malcolm Stewart (footballer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:27, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jarvis Filimalae / Vaai

Hiya. You created a redirect from Jarvis Vaai to Jarvis Filimalae and I was wondering why as there is no apparent reason why Jarvis Filimalae's family name would change - it would appear from a cursory search that there are two Jarvises here, but I thought you might know better! Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 08:28, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Alexandermcnabb:, this source lists details "Jarvis Vaai" that are the same as that of Jarvis Filimalae, also this profile gives "Jarvis Vaai" birthdate as the same as that of Jarvis Filimalae, so they are the same person. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 11:10, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Boris Ovcin

The article Boris Ovcin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delano McCoy-Splatt moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Delano McCoy-Splatt, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) WP:NFOOTY is no longer a valid SNG, so GNG must be met. It needs several refs from independent, reliable, secondary sources to pass WP:GNG. It should have at least 3 of those. Other than the Jamaica Observer piece, the other sources are simple mentions, brief blurbs, or primary/unreliable sources. Please remember that routine sports coverage does not satisfy GNG, and that interviews, being primary sources, do not go to notability either. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:13, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ömer Aysan Barış, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kocaeli.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of SSSniperwolf

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on SSSniperwolf requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SSSniperwolf. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Mccapra (talk) 09:02, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nabela Noor

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nabela Noor, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 19:51, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of My Linh Tran

Hello Das osmnezz,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged My Linh Tran for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Bensci54 (talk) 16:45, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Patrick Schnetzer

Hello Das osmnezz,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Patrick Schnetzer for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Bensci54 (talk) 16:46, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Zebelyan

I'd recommend next time not editing/commenting on an AFD 81 times - this will be seen as bludgeoning and could lead to a block. BeanieFan11 (talk) 14:41, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Phaedra Al-Majid for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Phaedra Al-Majid is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phaedra Al-Majid until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

// Timothy :: talk 02:47, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop creating sub-stubs

Please stop creating one-sentence articles. They have very little value. Normal readers expect to get information from Wikipedia, not be WP:REFBOMBed by everything and nothing at once. For football club articles, you must at least provide information about the level the club is currently playing at - as well as the highest level the club has played at. 2A01:799:19A1:C100:8D84:E25F:A091:9EAF (talk) 04:21, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, I will try to do that and make larger articles with more info. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 04:51, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Grégoire Nitot moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Grégoire Nitot. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. – robertsky (talk) 19:30, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Do you think Darcy McFarlane is salvageable?

Do you think Draft:Darcy McFarlane is worth a wikipedia article? Dwanyewest (talk) 09:14, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Dwanyewest:, I defineoty, think she is worth an article, however if other agree is another matter and whether it is draftified or deleted as soon as it is created is another matter... I couldn't find any more sources not in the article that Onel draftified already so I did not move it back to mainspace. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 18:37, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ersid Pllumbaj

Hello, Das osmnezz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ersid Pllumbaj, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:32, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Carlos Fernández (footballer, born 1992)

The article Carlos Fernández (footballer, born 1992) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Dr vulpes ^{(💬 • 📝)} 20:29, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lukas Browning Lagerfeldt

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lukas Browning Lagerfeldt requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 747pilot (talk) 00:04, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sini Laaksonen

The article Sini Laaksonen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable. Usually youth players are not notable unless they make it big in the international playing field.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 747pilot (talk) 00:09, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@747pilot FYI I have removed the Prod notice as I believe there are enough cited sources to constitute at least the possibility of passing WP:BASIC. You are of course free to take the article to AfD if you still doubt that it passes our notability guidelines. Best regards... -Ad Orientem (talk) 02:09, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe state the clubs she played for

Andrea Norheim 89.11.168.122 (talk) 20:52, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Žan-Luk Leban

The article Žan-Luk Leban has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

doesn't meet football notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mba Vitus Onyekachi

The article Mba Vitus Onyekachi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lacks sufficient coverage to pass WP:GNG and WP:BIO.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tutwakhamoe (talk) 14:27, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Koegathe Rabithome PROD removal

Hello Das osmnezz. I hope you're doing well. I am leaving this note because I think your removal of the BLPPROD from this article without adding any reliable sources that plausibly contribute to meeting the GNG is disruptive. It's true that a BLPPROD can generally be removed whenever a reliable source is added (and some people believe NFT or 11v11 are reliable sources), but NSPORTS2022 and SPORTCRIT make it abundantly clear that a sports biography must include at least one reliable source that plausibly contributes towards SIGCOV in the article. This has been clear since April 2022, and you typically attempt to include such sources when you create sports biographies. Please be sure to do the same when you remove a BLPROD from a sports biography as actions like this are wasting editors' time. Jogurney (talk) 12:37, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mba Vitus Onyekachi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mba Vitus Onyekachi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mba Vitus Onyekachi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Tutwakhamoe (talk) 21:15, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Patricia Carballo

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Patricia Carballo, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:39, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Susan Whelan (executive)

The article Susan Whelan (executive) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article is extremely short (one sentence) and should be drafted until suitable for mainspace

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tirishan (talk) 18:05, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox

Hey mate, mind adding infoboxes to the pages of footballers you make? It makes it easier to see the career and statistics of the players, not sure why you stopped having them in. Good job otherwise, you're very prolific. Cheers!--Ortizesp (talk) 21:00, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Susan Whelan (executive) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Susan Whelan (executive). Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs to be extended and use the sources effectively; may be a work in progresss. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 05:23, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

who is last known to have played as a

Hello my friend, I hope you are fine. I am concerned by your use on all the pages you create of the phrase "who is last known to have played as". It adds the impression of uncertainty and mystery. It would be better just to say "who last played as". This is just advice, but I hope you will at least reflect upon it. Keep up the great work!!! Best wishes, BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 03:22, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Adding to the above: For retired players "last played as" is not a good choice. It unduly emphasises the player's last club; See WP:RECENTISM. I've been fixing this at a bunch of articles, most recently at Mariano Dalla Libera. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 09:45, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Jirijoonas Kanth

Hello, Das osmnezz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jirijoonas Kanth, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:01, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Inma Puig for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Inma Puig is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inma Puig until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Chiserc (talk) 09:51, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Trần Minh Toàn

Hello, Das osmnezz,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Illusion Flame and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, Trần Minh Toàn, for deletion, because [consensus decision] previously decided that it wasn't suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. If you wish to restore a page deleted via a deletion discussion, please use the deletion review process instead, rather than reposting the content of the page.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Illusion Flame}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

- 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 13:21, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Jean-Philippe Saïko

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Jean-Philippe Saïko, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:23, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stavros Papadopoulos moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Stavros Papadopoulos, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. EdmHopLover1995 (talk) 02:15, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alessandro Iannuzzi moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Alessandro Iannuzzi. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources and WP:BLP. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Pbritti (talk) 16:02, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Archi Fataki for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Archi Fataki is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Archi Fataki until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Jogurney (talk) 17:34, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dahlia Salah

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Dahlia Salah requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at [[2]]. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. JoelleJay (talk) 00:55, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear das omnezz

I Need your help to create my Wikipedia page. I will give you sample of my sandbox that I made. Im the person of the profile information everything is authentic.

thank you

rim soheng

Rim Soheng (born 8 May 2004), is a Cambodian football player currently playing as a centerback for Angkor tiger football club in the Cambodian League, and the Cambodia national team.<ref>{{cite web| url = https://www.gofootballtogo.com/team/cambodia-u16/24105/ https://globalsportsarchive.com/people/ Rim soheng (talk) 15:10, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of SSSniperwolf for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article SSSniperwolf is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SSSniperwolf (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Alexandermcnabb (talk) 04:27, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Draft:Jirijoonas Kanth

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Jirijoonas Kanth, was deleted as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:48, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Das osmnezz. Thank you for your work on Renson Haynes. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, I had the following comments:

Hello! Hopefully you have a nice day today. Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by creating an article. As your article have adhered to the policies of Wikipedia, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a good day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 08:58, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kitson Cécile for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kitson Cécile is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kitson Cécile until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk) 19:49, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation

Hello Das osmnezz!

The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 10:30, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Joey Ciochetto for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joey Ciochetto is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joey Ciochetto until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk) 19:42, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Raboama Koloti

Hi. You know better than to +1 invalid rationales as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raboama Koloti. Having played for a national team does not confer notability. Robby.is.on (talk) 23:40, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Giulia Dragoni

On 20 July 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Giulia Dragoni, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in July 2023, Giulia Dragoni became the youngest person to represent any Italian senior national football team – including both men and women – in the 21st century? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Giulia Dragoni. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Giulia Dragoni), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—Kusma (talk) 12:02, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Jacques Herzog

Hello, Das osmnezz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jacques Herzog, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:01, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New articles

Hey Das osmnezz,

Good job on all your articles on footballers from around the world. It's impressive how find all these random players from different decades. I'm curious how you look around for new players to create and how you make a decision? Cheers! JTtheOG (talk) 02:16, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@JTtheOG:, Thanks, it depends, two ways among other wats I find players are seeing players without Wikipedia pages on random list/season/club articles and also read news articles online and then search up if the player has a wiki page etc.

I also noticed you went to UCD on ur user profile... many of my friends are going to UCD, I got into UCD this year but chose UCSC instead, despite my friends begging me to go to UCD cuz its better academically and they were going there lmao. Das osmnezz (talk) 17:52, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting. It's definitely fun to just scroll through articles and see who has red links. It's amazing how many notable players there are out there waiting for an article to get created. Well, keep up the good work. I'm interested in seeing your progress, if in fact you continue using Wikipedia in the future.

And yeah, I just graduated last year. The campus and the town itself is so beautiful; it's actually what caught my attention in the first place. I'm not sure I've ever been to Santa Cruz, though I'm sure it's beautiful as well. It is California after all. JTtheOG (talk) 22:06, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@JTtheOG:, Thanks, also what did u major in Das osmnezz (talk) 22:30, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I studied international relations and minored in Spanish. How about you? JTtheOG (talk) 22:37, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@JTtheOG:, Nice, if I went to UCD I would've majored in international relations as well, one of my UCD friends is majoring in it. At UCSC im majoring in sociology for now but im prob gon switch to Econ later. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 22:45, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good luck, man! I encourage you to just have fun and meet lots of people. The college years really go by quickly. Grades are important (I guess), but you should really focus on learning and critically thinking about things that you find interesting, getting exposed to different kinds of cultures, and growing as a person overall. That's what I took away. JTtheOG (talk) 23:32, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Adrian Galliani for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adrian Galliani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adrian Galliani until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Angelo (talk) 14:55, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Ryan McLean

I have restored the draft - it is not ready. Giant Snowman 08:28, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New articles

Hello Das osmnezz, I would like to ask your support please in creating the articles of Karol Bernal, Jasmine Casarez, Daniela Monroy, Gabriela Valenzuela and Andrea Hernández because they got already many caps with their national football team, so they pass Wikipedia's notability rules at WP:FOOTY. I would really appreciate your help.

Thank you and my best regards! 2806:105E:C:36D5:317D:7CA1:5B09:C06 (talk) 14:51, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dennis Kutrieb

The article Dennis Kutrieb has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not managed in any professional league

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Telfordbuck (talk) 22:34, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Das osmnezz. Thank you for your work on Romane Munich. User:Tails Wx, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good work on the article

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Tails Wx}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Tails Wx (they/them) 11:57, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of C.W. Raines for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article C.W. Raines is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/C.W. Raines until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

IncompA 00:17, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Charlie Morgan (entrepreneur)

Hello, Das osmnezz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Charlie Morgan (entrepreneur), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:02, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Das osmnezz/Portland Red Star

User:Das osmnezz/Portland Red Star, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Das osmnezz/Portland Red Star and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Das osmnezz/Portland Red Star during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Unknown Temptation (talk) 10:55, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Short descriptions

Hi. You're a quite prolific article creator. Going forward, could you please include short descriptions when creating articles? They usually come in this format: {{Short description|English footballer (born 2004)}}, so nationality – if it's not ambiguous – and date of birth.

I've been going through hundreds of articles where short descriptions were missing and it would be nice if no new articles would crop up without short descriptions. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 09:24, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Arguments at AfD

Hi Das osmnezz. When you !vote to keep an article at AfD, could you please try to provide links to sources you think count toward GNG, or refer to the !vote of another editor who does so, or provide hard evidence of the subject meeting a different notability criterion? You clearly feel strongly about keeping a lot of football BLPs that other editors are less keen on; and that's perfectly okay. But I have seen you write "Keep: subject meets GNG" a dozen times, but when closing the discussion I can't give that sort of !vote any weight at all. If you want your opinion to carry weight, you need to make it actionable. I find it helpful to link the three best sources I have, when making a similar argument. Happy editing, Vanamonde (Talk) 20:54, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to second that motion. Writing "Keep per above" or "Keep per meeting GNG" is the same thing as saying "The Bible is the truth because it is". That doesn't prove anything, it just restates what is trying to be proved. You need to defend your arguments, not just put your opinion out there. Paul Vaurie (talk) 03:35, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Adifane Noussoura

Hello, Das osmnezz, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username North8000, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Adifane Noussoura, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adifane Noussoura.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 03:06, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ryu Nugraha

The article Ryu Nugraha has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non Notable footballer

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jehipuvu (talk) 10:46, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ryu Nugraha moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Ryu Nugraha. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because the subject currently does not meets the WP:GNG, and WP:NBLP criteria showing no significant coverage from secondary reliable sources that is independent of the subject.. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 13:39, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Das osmnezz. Thank you for your work on Guglielmo Arena. User:BeanieFan11, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Its not required, but it'd be nice to include more than just "he was appointed manager of [team] in [year]... he was then appointed manager of [team] in [year]..."

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|BeanieFan11}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

BeanieFan11 (talk) 22:39, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ryu Nugraha

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ryu Nugraha requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:31, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Das osmnezz. It would appear to me that the issue here summed up what you wrote on Talk:Ryu Nugraha: "This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because he is clearly prospect in Indonesian football". Essentially, what you have written is, "this page should not be deleted because, while he may not be be a notable player at present, he may be in some time in the future." For the article to be retained in the English language Wikipedia as of 9 Sep 2023, it needs to be demonstrated that it passes notability on 9 Sep 2023.--Shirt58 (talk) 🦘 09:02, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Shirt58:, He is clearly notable now, there are already many sources about him and he has an ongoing pro career. thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 16:14, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ryu Nugraha, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nagano.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of SSSniperWolf for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article SSSniperWolf is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SSSniperWolf (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

ltbdl (talk) 06:19, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ryu Nugraha for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ryu Nugraha is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryu Nugraha until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

ltbdl (talk) 06:25, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Das osmnezz. Thank you for your work on Władysław Dąbrowski. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hey there! Hope you're having a great day. Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia with your article. I'm happy to inform you that your article has adhered to Wikipedia's policies, so I've marked it as reviewed. Have a fantastic day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 11:30, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Charlie Morgan (entrepreneur)

Hello, Das osmnezz. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Charlie Morgan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:48, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mahmood Rasooli

Please comment on my article nomination.Mahmood Rasooli - Mahmood Rasooli (nomination)

I have used reliable sources in my article and reliable sources have been used in all my explanations. And someone gives unacceptable reasons and wants to delete my article.

I want you to tell me what you think about my article.

(This text was written with Google Translate.) AbolfazlEbrahimi14 (talk) 10:09, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Martin Agnarsson

Hello, Das osmnezz. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Martin Agnarsson".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 14:05, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Isaidnoway (talk) 09:57, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WP:REFBOMB

Hi. As I previously told you in January 2021 (link to discussion) you shouldn't dump references in article like you did here and here today. That is WP:REFBOMBing and not helpful.

Instead, as I told you in March 2021 (link to discussion) Template:Refideas could be a useful way of keeping references. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 10:45, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this continues ([3], [4]) I will ask administrators to intervene. Robby.is.on (talk) 09:29, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I will stop doing it from now on 100 percent I only did it cuz I only added like max 5 refs to those guys sorry Das osmnezz (talk) 09:38, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good. I appreciate how much work you put into searching for references; thanks for that. Happy editing, Robby.is.on (talk)

September 2023

Your Article "Aidana Otorbaeva" Has been Nominated for Deletion, Please See https://w.wi MercuryOxide (talk) 18:55, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kévin Bru

I see you have been spoken to earlier about WP:REFBOMBing. I have absolutely no idea why you bombed the Kévin Bru lead with 15 references, the lead was only two sentences on who he is and who he plays for. There was no chance of the page being deleted or tagged for notability, due to the 100+ references put in the article by the now banned User:Timmy96. Most of the lead sources you added were random news stories that are not related to the preceding text, apart from that they prove that he exists and is a footballer, something done by the rest of the bloated and overly long page. Unknown Temptation (talk) 22:56, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Aidana Otorbaeva for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aidana Otorbaeva is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aidana Otorbaeva until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 23:55, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Scott MacNicol

Hello, Das osmnezz. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Scott MacNicol".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 14:31, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Yam Karkai

Hello, Das osmnezz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Yam Karkai, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Das osmnezz. Thank you for your work on Trần Duy Long. User:BeanieFan11, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Remember to add navboxes when applicable as I did here.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|BeanieFan11}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

BeanieFan11 (talk) 13:26, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Das osmnezz. Thank you for your work on Trần Văn Khánh. User:BeanieFan11, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Anything about his apparent stint as manager of the national team?

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|BeanieFan11}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

BeanieFan11 (talk) 13:36, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Football in Tokelau" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Football in Tokelau has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Football in Tokelau until a consensus is reached. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 15:50, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Das osmnezz. Thank you for your work on Adama Congo. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating the article on Wikipedia and expanding the sum of human knowledge in Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 11:06, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of M. Basri

The article M. Basri has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 76.14.122.5 (talk) 22:43, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Norman Nuñez

I don't mean to be rude or anything, but you might want to correct your spelling on your post? Regards. Govvy (talk) 10:15, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is SSSniperwolf. Thank you. CityOfSilver 02:07, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dylan Scicluna for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dylan Scicluna is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dylan Scicluna until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Nath1991 (talk) 02:22, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Yam Karkai

Hello, Das osmnezz. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Yam Karkai".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:17, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Matt Dibley-Dias

The article Matt Dibley-Dias has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

List of facts, so indication of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JMHamo (talk) 17:32, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Marcel Mendes-Dudziński

The article Marcel Mendes-Dudziński has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

List of facts, so indication of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JMHamo (talk) 22:54, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Marcel Mendes-Dudziński for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marcel Mendes-Dudziński is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marcel Mendes-Dudziński until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JMHamo (talk) 11:19, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Matt Dibley-Dias for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Matt Dibley-Dias is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Dibley-Dias until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JMHamo (talk) 19:15, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Kadisha Martina" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Kadisha Martina has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 5 § Kadisha Martina until a consensus is reached. Jõsé^hola 06:33, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to referencing

See introduction to referencing for an easy way to cite references. Kiwiz1338 (talk) 08:46, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Playermaker for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Playermaker is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Playermaker until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bosecovey (talk) 19:49, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Fc fleury 91.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fc fleury 91.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 12:11, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kraków Dragoons FC

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kraków Dragoons FC requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. FromCzech (talk) 09:02, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Das osmnezz. Thank you for your work on Nuri Asan. User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:58, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Das osmnezz. Thank you for your work on Carlos Castro (footballer, born 1970). User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:59, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of FK Arkadag

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on FK Arkadag requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, society, or group that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ~ GB fan 13:30, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Das osmnezz. Thank you for your work on Alejandro Semenewicz. User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 02:03, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dav Nim

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Dav Nim requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dav Nim. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 16:29, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Das osmnezz. Thank you for your work on Vincenzo Gianneo. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for your work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 16:56, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Das osmnezz. Thank you for your work on Marcel Muller (footballer). North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 03:41, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Das osmnezz. Thank you for your work on Pavol Gostič. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 02:00, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Das osmnezz. Thank you for your work on Aleš Hellebrand. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 19:06, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ramadhan Singano

Hello Das osmnezz,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Ramadhan Singano for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

DrowssapSMM 12:38, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ramadhan Singano moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ramadhan Singano, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Bbb23 (talk) 16:43, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Das osmnezz. Thank you for your work on Elenildo de Jesus. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 22:40, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Das osmnezz. Thank you for your work on Nguyễn Văn Cường. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start. You need to put more material from your sources into the article. happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 01:44, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Slobodan Lučić for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Slobodan Lučić is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slobodan Lučić until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Vanjagenije (talk) 19:27, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Das osmnezz. Thank you for your work on Lucía Moral. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 14:35, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Cardo Siddik

Hello, Das osmnezz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cardo Siddik, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:06, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Noëlle Amouzoun moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Noëlle Amouzoun. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 23:05, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Das osmnezz. Thank you for your work on FK TransINVEST. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:22, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sabina Rgayeva for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sabina Rgayeva is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sabina Rgayeva until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk) 07:30, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bryan Joel Rodriguez for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bryan Joel Rodriguez is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bryan Joel Rodriguez until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Joeykai (talk) 04:03, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Das osmnezz. Thank you for your work on Tânia Morais. Bruxton, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Please format the reference using MOS:REF as a guide. the article also suffers from WP:OVERSECTION so I will fix that for you.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bruxton}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bruxton (talk) 16:13, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Das osmnezz. Thank you for your work on Issiaka Kamate. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:25, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Das osmnezz. Thank you for your work on Mathias Oyewusi. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 09:29, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Das osmnezz. Thank you for your work on Herzl Kabilio. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:45, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alexander Gurendal moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Alexander Gurendal. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JTtheOG (talk) 20:47, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Das osmnezz. Thank you for your work on Winston Chung Fah. BeanieFan11, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Consider expanding; right now you've only got mention that he was a manager, include two quotes and a nickname.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|BeanieFan11}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

BeanieFan11 (talk) 23:15, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Alex Arce

Hello, Das osmnezz,

Thank you for creating Alex Arce.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thanks for Creating this article but Please add more reliable source are needed to evulate the Subject's Notability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Aviram7}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 12:41, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Aksel Bellabbaci

Hello, Das osmnezz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Aksel Bellabbaci, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:06, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cardo Siddik for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cardo Siddik is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cardo Siddik until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spike 'em (talk) 12:44, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Amos Nondi (footballer) moved to draftspace

Hi, Das osmnezz. You recently created an article at Amos Nondi (footballer) that really belongs at Amos Nondi, a title that is WP:SALTed to prevent recreation. Instead of creating the article at a title with unnecessary disambiguation (circumventing the creation protection), you should request unprotection of the correct title (Amos Nondi) as explained at WP:SALT. You are an experienced editor, so I'd expect that you would have noticed the unnecessary disambiguation and creation protection. I have moved the article to draftspace at Draft:Amos Nondi (2), since there is an existing draft for the article at Draft:Amos Nondi. (You might also want to incorporate content from one draft into the other.) SilverLocust 💬 06:17, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of WAGMI United for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article WAGMI United is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WAGMI United until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

scope_creep^Talk 14:24, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gary Hogan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Gary Hogan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gary Hogan. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CycloneYoris ^talk! 00:31, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Imre Vankó for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Imre Vankó is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Imre Vankó until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

_signed,Rosguill ^talk 16:30, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Goyang Happiness FC

Hello Das osmnezz, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Goyang Happiness FC, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goyang Happiness FC.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 14:33, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Shu Shine F.C.

Hello Das osmnezz, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Shu Shine F.C., should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shu Shine F.C..

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 14:35, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jonas Rouhi

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jonas Rouhi, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Uncle Bash007 (talk) 10:40, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Julio Barrabes for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Julio Barrabes, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julio Barrabes until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Darren Middleton (footballer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Darren Middleton (footballer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darren Middleton (footballer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

S.A. Julio (talk) 06:25, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Footballer articles

Hello! Thank you for all of your contributions to articles about footballers. I've noticed that many of them are only a few sentences long. If I can make a suggestion, you might consider keeping these articles in WP:DRAFT space until they're properly written and ready for mainspace. This prevents New Page Patrol from getting clogged with stubs and allows us to prioritize quality over quantity. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 01:27, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will try to create longer articles from now on. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 05:31, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lazy quotations

Please don't use "he was described as..." to disguise chunks of text as quotations and avoid actually writing content. These are not warranted uses of quotations, and in several of the stubs you've created, make up such a majority of the text that they probably amount to copyright violations. The result was especially abominable in Sirimongkol Rattanapoom, where you did so with machine translated text that ended up making no sense. --Paul_012 (talk) 13:41, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bruno Davidson for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bruno Davidson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bruno Davidson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Htanaungg (talk) 07:14, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Das osmnezz. Thank you for your work on Biel Vicens. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 15:27, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Elvis Browne moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Elvis Browne. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JTtheOG (talk) 02:34, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Roberto Malotti

The article Roberto Malotti has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not managed in a professional football league

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Telfordbuck (talk) 15:18, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know/Hall of Fame/Themed sets

The Women's series was added to the Wikipedia:Did you know/Hall of Fame/Themed sets. You can add this to your list of accomplishments, {{User DYK HoF}}. Cheers! --evrik ^(talk) 02:44, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Scott MacNicol

Hello, Das osmnezz. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Scott MacNicol".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:05, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jacek Deniz Troshupa

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jacek Deniz Troshupa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. BlameRuiner (talk) 22:35, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Das osmnezz,

If you want to recreate an article that has been deleted through an AFD deletion discussion, you need to work on a draft in Draft space or User space and submit it to AFC for review or it is likely to be tagged for speedy deletion, CSD G4. I thought I'd let you know that another editor is working on a draft of this player and you can find it at User:BalkanianActuality/Jacek Deniz Troshupa. Perhaps you can work together and see if this draft meets AFC approval. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:03, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz:,

@Liz:, Can you drafifty my article Jacek Deniz Troshupa so I can work on it and/or use it ass metrial to add to BalkanianActuality's draft? Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 02:41, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Inaccurate article titles in citations

Hi Das osmnezz, please include accurate article titles in your citations. I might have an idea why you're doing it, but they can border on being misleading. You should not be adding or removing anything. JTtheOG (talk) 03:26, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Grayson Dettoni moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Grayson Dettoni. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JTtheOG (talk) 23:00, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mirosław Modzelewski for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mirosław Modzelewski is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mirosław Modzelewski until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 19:45, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Salted pages

As you have done with Noe Baba (footballer) and Samuel Somerville (footballer) (and possibly others), please do NOT create a new article with an unnecessary disambiguation when the base article has been repeatedly deleted and SALTed. Such conduct is disruptive. Instead, you need to approach the SALTing admin and seek for the article to be draftified/restored so you can improved. Giant Snowman 18:19, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Chance Cowell

Hello Das osmnezz, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Chance Cowell, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chance Cowell.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Anwegmann}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Anwegmann (talk) 22:03, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Das osmnezz. Thank you for your work on Farai Mbidzo. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 19:22, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jaami Qureshi

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jaami Qureshi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. BlameRuiner (talk) 09:59, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dino Mennillo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dino Mennillo, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dino Mennillo (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cristóbal Cubilla moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Cristóbal Cubilla. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ratnahastin (talk) 05:47, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sirimongkol Rattanapoom for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sirimongkol Rattanapoom, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sirimongkol Rattanapoom until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Silvio Trucco

Hello Das osmnezz, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Silvio Trucco, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Silvio Trucco.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|SafariScribe}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 04:19, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Christian Nanetti

Hello Das osmnezz, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Christian Nanetti, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christian Nanetti (2nd nomination).

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|ComplexRational}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

^Complex/_Rational 17:28, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Zander Murray for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zander Murray, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zander Murray until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jamath Shoffner for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jamath Shoffner is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamath Shoffner until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Joeykai (talk) 03:43, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dead or alive

When you created Talk:Roy Terschegget, you included |living=no, even though Roy Terschegget describes and categorizes him as living. Please make sure to set this accurately. jlwoodwa (talk) 03:46, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Das osmnezz. Thank you for your work on James Armson. Another editor, Bruxton, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for the article. Please see WP:OVERSECTION vecause there are five one sentence sections.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bruxton}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bruxton (talk) 03:52, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources

Hey Das osmnezz, I hope you are doing well. This is a friendly reminder to use reliable sources to cite your statements. I removed the "AustrianSoccerBoard.at" reference from your new article, Alexander Knezevic, seeing as it is a forum. Sources like these should not be used under any circumstances. Cheers, JTtheOG (talk) 17:28, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Alexander Frank

Hello Das osmnezz, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Alexander Frank, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexander Frank.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|ComplexRational}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

^Complex/_Rational 18:21, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of David Pérez (footballer)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on David Pérez (footballer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Pérez (footballer). When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 14:11, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Amin Chiakha moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Amin Chiakha. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Broc (talk) 08:48, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Job Bogmis moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Job Bogmis. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and None of the sources on the page contribute to notability. First two references are interviews (primary source), last article is from the newspaper linked to Universidad de Concepción where he played (not independent).. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Broc (talk) 13:06, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Das osmnezz. Thank you for your work on Tomer Haran. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 15:38, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Job Bogmis

Hello Das osmnezz, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Job Bogmis, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Job Bogmis.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Broc}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Broc (talk) 07:41, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about David Pérez (footballer)

Hello Das osmnezz, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, David Pérez (footballer), should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Pérez (footballer) (2nd nomination).

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|ComplexRational}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

^Complex/_Rational 20:06, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Das osmnezz. Thank you for your work on Colin Farnerud. Another editor, Anwegmann, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

The youth international stats for this player need to be expressed more clearly in the article and sourced.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Anwegmann}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Anwegmann (talk) 17:42, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Lorenzo D'Agostini

Hello Das osmnezz, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Lorenzo D'Agostini, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lorenzo D'Agostini.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Anwegmann}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Anwegmann (talk) 17:51, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

David Pérez (footballer) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to David Pérez (footballer). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because of consensus at [[5]]. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Let'srun (talk) 20:52, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Esperanto national football team for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Esperanto national football team is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Esperanto national football team until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Walsh90210 (talk) 18:48, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Craig Butler (football manager) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Craig Butler (football manager) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Craig Butler (football manager) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Renerpho (talk) 22:47, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Das osmnezz. Thank you for your work on James Egeta. Another editor, Anwegmann, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

This article needs an infobox.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Anwegmann}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Anwegmann (talk) 06:52, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Das osmnezz. Thank you for your work on Paula Partido. Another editor, Anwegmann, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

In the future, please use a comma before "on loan from [team]."

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Anwegmann}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Anwegmann (talk) 06:54, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Das osmnezz. Thank you for your work on Emeka Andersen. Another editor, Anwegmann, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

This article needs an infobox.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Anwegmann}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Anwegmann (talk) 06:56, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mariam Dao Gabala

Hello, Das osmnezz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mariam Dao Gabala, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:06, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mariam Dao Gabala for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mariam Dao Gabala is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mariam Dao Gabala until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

— DaxServer (t·m·e·c) 08:09, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Arjun Tudu for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Arjun Tudu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arjun Tudu (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Coderzombie (talk) 10:25, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Das osmnezz. Thank you for your work on Mariam Dao Gabala. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for your work. I checked, she is wp:notable. But there is nearly no content in the article. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 14:47, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Miroslav Kozák for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miroslav Kozák is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miroslav Kozák until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 10:10, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Das osmnezz. Thank you for your work on Nguyễn Thành Vinh. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good start. The article needs expansion. There is material in the sources to expand it from. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 18:34, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Guillaume Trani

Hello Das osmnezz,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Guillaume Trani for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Cossde (talk) 14:36, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rafael Zuviría

Hello Das osmnezz,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Rafael Zuviría for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Cossde (talk) 14:37, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Imre Katzenbach

Hello Das osmnezz,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Imre Katzenbach for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Cossde (talk) 14:39, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong categories

Hi Das osmnezz, just a heads up, when you created the article for Antoniu Manolache, you included the categories from Martin Vician's article. I fixed the defaultsort, and added a couple of basic categories, but it would probably be better if you take a look and see what other categories should be added. Thanks. Cmr08 (talk) 01:17, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FootballDatabase.eu

Hi Das osmnezz. Going forward, please do not use the website FootballDatabase.eu as a reference. In December it was categorised as unreliable. See WP:WPFLINKSNO for details. I have removed it at Julien Pontgerard. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 09:36, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Das osmnezz. Thank you for your work on Isaac Ngata. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 21:01, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Willem Ebbinge for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Willem Ebbinge, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Willem Ebbinge until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use machine translations for people's names

Hi. In the Chatchawan Rodthong article, you provided the subject's name in incorrect Thai script. I assume you got the spelling from a machine translation. PLEASE NEVER DO THIS. Machine translations are wholly unable to identify the correct terms and spellings for proper names. If you don't know the language, please leave the native name empty. If there are previous articles where you used machine translations this way, please go back to check them for accuracy. --Paul_012 (talk) 16:52, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Imre Vankó

Hello, Das osmnezz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Imre Vankó, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:06, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Aveka Singh

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Aveka Singh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aveka Singh. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Fram (talk) 06:28, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Das osmnezz. Thank you for your work on Roberto Cevoli. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:19, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jacob Carney

I have moved this to draft and merged with an older, more substantive draft. Please stop creating incomplete, shitty stubs, it's embarrassing for the Project and undermines efforts to improve footballer bios. Giant Snowman 09:30, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@GiantSnowman: I've come across several other pages of him like this (take a look at Quim Junyent for an example, he wrote the team as "Gimnàstic Manres" when a simple Google Search would show that no team under that name exists), I've been saying exactly the same thing as you did too.

Maybe should we start a topic ban request to prevent him from creating those poor drafts? This is the only way I think it would force him into improving, worked with other users... BRDude⁷⁰ (talk) 19:23, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Toni Fernández: another sub-standard article... Not even an infobox was added here, no effort at all. And please, Mr. @Das osmnezz, stop writing that all your Barcelona players are "regarded as one of the club's most important players", because it is really subjective and in fact, it means absolutely nothing. BRDude⁷⁰ (talk) 19:27, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@BrazilianDude70:, @GiantSnowman:, Im sorry for all the troiuble I have caused... all I am trying to do is create pages to expand Wikipedia's football library... I have been trying to improve ever since you guys complained and made my articles more substantive and have improved infobox format (e.g. see Andre Raymond)... also, for the Barcleona thing, I had the bad habit of wrting that they were the club's most important players based on what a source said but I shouild have clarified I was talking about the youth team. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 19:46, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Das osmnezz: One correct example does not exempt you from all the poor ones. @GiantSnowman: same pattern remains on the new articles, see Viggo Gebel and Menno van Dam, clear lack of effort in the latter when he actually was a player before becoming a youth coach and later becoming manager of AaB. I'd still recommend the topic ban, no improvement whatsoever. BRDude⁷⁰ (talk) 01:00, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You bring up good points that I will take on board... I will say my article formatting in terms of infobox and categories has improved nonetheless and I wil keep on trying to improve it... as for pages like Viggo Gebel I could add more as their career develops but you are definitely right about pages like Menno van Dam, I will be much more throiguh and extensive when it comes to writing about their life and career. As I stated above, my dream has always been to expand Wikipedias football but I must obtain the mindset of quality over quantity. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 02:27, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest - to avoid us seeking a topic ban - you create articles in draft only. Giant Snowman 10:44, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have been trying to improve, like my last three articles (Ognjen Zaric, Mateusz Stolarski, Edgar Cardoso). All articles created will be extensive and thorough and detailed with improved formatting. I have now been spending much more time and effort creating articles and nothing against you or your articles I'm not super clear how my recent articles after your valid criticism are somehow of signifcantly lower quality than Dennis Milne, Brendan Sullivan or Kamarl Grant, to name a few of your recent articles. Again, I apologize for my previous inconveniences and will continue and keep on focusing on improving myself and progress while expanding Wikipedias football. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 18:52, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Das osmnezz: I'm not in the business of praising poor articles, but to defend @GiantSnowman, at least two of those three articles you mentioned are way too difficult to find more information than the article already have... The two I've pointed out have plenty of information which can be gathered with the proper effort (effort I could notice in those three articles you've created and mentioned). Now, aside from GS' suggestion, I'd recommend you a mass revision of your previous creations to seek a way to improve all of them instead of creating more articles and letting old ones stay poor. I've done an improvement myself at Aarón Ochoa recently, I guess it's a half-decent standard for a start article. BRDude⁷⁰ (talk) 04:12, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GiantSnowman and BrazilianDude70, I just came here to leave the same warning only to realize that not only did you guys beat me to it, but that I had left a similar warning in March. I haven't refreshed myself on the older articles, but the more recent ones seem to be based on a lot of interview sources. There are still 75 of these articles needing review at NPP, which is probably a few hours-worth of reviewer time to scrutinize the sourcing. Is this something that still needs to be addressed? Also pinging Joe Roe, who granted autopatrolled in July. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 03:22, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As stated above, I have been and will go to my previous articles and improve and expand them. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 03:39, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Re. autopatrolled, please see my reasoning at User talk:Joe Roe/Archives/2024#User:Das osmnezz, AP. – Joe (talk) 06:49, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As stated above, I have been and will go to my previous articles and improve and expand them. Because of this and creating higher quality articles, my article output has decreased. Thanks,— Preceding unsigned comment added by Das osmnezz (talk • contribs) 08:54, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Are you willing to stop making new articles in mainspace? Giant Snowman 17:25, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am willing to go through my previous articles and improve/expand them and have been doing so. On top of that, since the past few weeks, I have made sure to create only better quality and better formatted articles, so I don't see how my creating articles is a problem, especially seeing that it probably will and probably has been lower my output while simultaneously adding to Wikipedias football project with decent articles. I have now been spending much more time and effort creating articles as well as editing and improving my past ones. Nothing against you or your articles but I'm not super clear why someone whose last few articles include Amani Richards and other stubs is asking me to stop creating articles, especially when I have shown improvement in my current articles and have been going back to improve my past ones. I will continue to improve my past pages while creating new, better pages. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 08:31, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Das osmnezz: looking back to your own contributions, I don't see you "going through your previous articles and improve/expand them". I only see some creations like Rick Wright (football manager), a Bermudan football manager whose entire career (according by your article) existed in the US... Seriously, that's a "high quality" article to you?

@GiantSnowman: I'd propose a topic ban for Das osmnezz to stop creating articles, I honestly dont' see Das osmnezz willingly stopping to create poor quality articles nor improving/expanding those who are already there.

I have to reassure that's nothing personal to you, Das osmnezz, just something to make you actually improve after several messages encouraging you to do so (which were apparently ignored). BRDude⁷⁰ (talk) 01:07, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No Bermudian clubs were mentioned in any source about Rick Wright so I did noy put any Bermudian club info in the article, but I will re-read the sources. I stand by the fact that I have improved, I am not super clear how my recent articles somehow warrant a ban, I shouldnt have to provide examples but for example my last 10 before Ricky Wright were Raul Paula, Mitchell de Nooijer, Oliver Braude, Daniele Quieto, Heine Gikling Bruseth, Omar Berrada, Kristian Lien (footballer), Daniel Skaarud, Jan Oliveras, and Alejandro Gomes, the list goes on, I am not super clear how my recent articles somehow warrant a ban and I stand by the fact that I have improved. Nothing against GiantSnowman or his articles but I'm not super clear why someone whose last few articles include Amani Richards and other stubs is asking me to stop creating articles, especially when I have shown improvement in my current articles and have been going back to improve my past ones, both of which I have done. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 06:53, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think Rick Wright is borderline tbf. Giant Snowman 20:09, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just came across another one: Toni Fernández. How would you argue that's not a shitty article? There was not even a small effort to create even an infobox. BRDude⁷⁰ (talk) 18:25, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You already mentioned that one above. Robby.is.on (talk) 20:23, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As someone who's come across this user's work multiple times, I share this concern about quantity over quality. The user obviously has the time to make all these articles, but not the time to make any well? Another thing I have noticed is MOS:OVERSECTION, using multiple one-line sections to pad a small article, often with "Style of play" being position and favoured foot, and personal life being place of birth. See Sirimongkol Rattanapoom for a page I nominated for deletion but was kept. That page shows another concern - this user's editing is all over the place, concerning hundreds of countries and competitions, and on that page, the user introduced machine-translated gobbledegook:

"Rattanapoom was described as "Chom Khiri Nakprot Temple Municipal School, in the era where there was a midfielder like "Tan", they were promoted to the Department of Physical Education football level. Age group under 14 years, from Cup C to Cup B since I was in Mathayom 1 and only in my second year. They won the Department of Physical Education under-14-year-old Cup B championship immediately when they were 14 years old, which was the school's first major national championship ever..."

"Player was described as "long copy and paste"" appeared in lots of this user's articles, which suggests copy and paste to pump up the creations as much as possible. Going back to the translation issue, it's hard enough to find sources in English for players outside the top 4 in major European leagues, so this user should pick an area of interest and produce a few better articles, instead of such a random selection of players with a handful of appearances each.

There is no award for creating a lot of articles, just having your name first in the history. Do you have a favourite team or league you know a lot about and can make better articles? Or improve the thousands of pages that already exist? I recently found lots of players with 100s of La Liga appearances, Spain caps and major honours, who I could write about because I can read the source. That's a better use of my time and ability than making pages for every new player in Moldova or Slovenia. Unknown Temptation (talk) 13:32, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As I have said above many times, I am addressing quality problems with my newer articles (for instance all of whcih do not have wp:oversection) and am going back and improving my past ones. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 19:19, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Again, @Das osmnezz, please point out where are you improving your past articles, and where the new ones are better? I just came across Jesús Rodríguez (footballer, born 2005), yet another article where your poor standards stand out, where you didn't even bother to follow WP:FOOTY/Players or even create something with more effort than simple irrelevant lines like "He mainly operates as a winger. He specifically operates as a left-winger. He is right-footed. He is known for his speed." What is the point of writing it like this when you could actually create a section named "Style of play" with a simple sentence like: "Despite being right-footed, Rodríguez plays mainly as a left winger, and is known for his speed."

Sometimes it seems like you are regressing rather than improving, honestly.

@GiantSnowman: yet another "advice", Das osmnezz's articles are not improving in the scale of quality, they actually seem like the contrary of it. Maybe it's finally the time for a topic ban through an ANI? BRDude⁷⁰ (talk) 18:30, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's really poorly written and sourced! Giant Snowman 18:34, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am very sorry for the trouble I have caused. I will take further more points on board, such as using Midfielder#Winger in infobox and having longer and better quality sentences. One part that is ironic and frustrating to me is when I wrote stuff like "Despite being right-footed, Rodríguez plays mainly as a left winger, and is known for his speed" in a style of play section previosuly, you would complain about how short the article was or too many sections, etc. Damned if I do and damned if I don't, I guess. Again, this doesnt apply to other points made but applys to this one (I have also had other editors tell me to do almost completely opposite things). But I will keep on improving, apologize and like I said in the beginning will take the above on board. I have now been spending much more time and effort creating articles as well as editing and improving my past ones. I have said this many times and provided more exmaples above, but nothing against you or your articles but I'm not super clear why someone whose last few articles include Hermann Rülander, Gustav Lindgren and other stubs is asking me to stop creating articles. I will continue to improve my past pages while creating new, better pages. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 21:42, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Das osmnezz. Thank you for your work on Werick Caetano. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

IMO an edge case regarding wp:notability but I'm marking it as reviewed. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 19:34, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Bruno Davidson

Hello, Das osmnezz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bruno Davidson, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:06, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mackenzie Heaney

The article Mackenzie Heaney has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication that the subject meets WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mattythewhite (talk) 15:21, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Das osmnezz. Thank you for your work on Zourdine Thior. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good start. Needs much more content. It's in the sources. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:19, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Das osmnezz. Thank you for your work on Lucas de Vega. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good start. Needs more content. It's in the sources. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:22, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Miguel Coley

Hello, Das osmnezz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Miguel Coley, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:07, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Yannick Dinane

The article Yannick Dinane has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I am unable to find anything approaching WP:SIGCOV for this footballer.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JTtheOG (talk) 18:59, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ahmet Schaefer for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ahmet Schaefer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahmet Schaefer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Broc (talk) 12:49, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Repeated nationality phrasing

Hi Das osmnezz. A little heads-up regarding phrasing: If a footballer was born in a country and has never played abroad, it's not necessary to repeatedly specify the nationality of their clubs. Noel Futkeu, for example, was born in Germany so we don't need to repeatedly refer to his clubs as "German": [6]. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 00:24, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kota ranger.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kota ranger.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:20, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Yannick Dinane for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yannick Dinane is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yannick Dinane until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Dougal18 (talk) 13:44, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rick Wright (football manager), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anderson University.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:52, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dav Nim

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Dav Nim requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dav Nim. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:20, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dav Nim for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dav Nim is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dav Nim (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Dclemens1971 (talk) 19:51, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

United States boys' national under-15 soccer team

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to United States boys' national under-15 soccer team, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Demt1298 (talk) 16:52, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Miguel Coley

Hello, Das osmnezz. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Miguel Coley".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:09, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Das osmnezz. Thank you for your work on Lê Quang Trãi. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good start. Needs expansion. The material for it is in the sources. Happy editing

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 17:52, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Chance Cowell

Hello, Das osmnezz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Chance Cowell, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:08, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Matija Miketić

The article Matija Miketić has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable. Played just nine games at top-tier level.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sahari Gultom

The article Sahari Gultom has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:David Pérez (footballer)

Hello, Das osmnezz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:David Pérez (footballer), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:08, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]