User talk:Pranav Raj 1997

Welcome!

Hi Pranav Raj 1997! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! I dream of horses ^{(Contribs) (Talk)} 04:42, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sound Party (2023 film) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Sound Party (2023 film). Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it currently does not meet WP:NFILM, however may be suitable once the film releases and garners reviews from critics. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. — Karnataka ^talk 13:00, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sound Party (2023 film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sound Party (2023 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sound Party (2023 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Robert McClenon (talk) 05:47, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sound Party (2023 film) (August 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Sound Party (2023 film) instead.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft or article is about an unreleased film. The film notability guideline identifies three stages in the production cycle for films:

1. Planned films that have not begun production (principal photography or animation). These planned films do not satisfy film notability.
2. Films that are confirmed by reliable sources to have begun production, but have not been released. These films are only notable if production itself satisfies general notability in terms of significant coverage. Mere mention of the start of production does not satisfy notability.
3. Films that have been released, whose notability is determined by reception and reviews, or a major notable award for excellence in some aspect of filmmaking.

This film page must be evaluated based on general notability of production.

Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. This is sometimes done in order to bypass Articles for Creation review. However, if a submitter is ready to have the article in article space, it can be moved into article space, rather than creating a copy. It is common for a page that has been duplicated in draft space and in article space to be nominated for deletion or proposed for deletion.

If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sound Party (2023 film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 07:02, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pranav Raj 1997! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 07:02, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of K Muralikrishna

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on K Muralikrishna requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CrucialEditor (talk) 16:51, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@CrucialEditor The director is a well known personality in Odisha, a state in India Pranav Raj 1997 (talk) 16:57, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of K Muralikrishna

The article K Muralikrishna has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Movie director with no indication of notability. Of all sources cited, the subject received single passing mention in 3 of the sources, 2 passing mention in one while the others do not mention the at all

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CrucialEditor (talk) 06:42, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of K Muralikrishna for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article K Muralikrishna is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K Muralikrishna until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

CrucialEditor (talk) 06:43, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ravi Kumar Sagar moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Ravi Kumar Sagar. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ibjaja055 (talk) 05:46, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shine Screens for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shine Screens is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shine Screens until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Akshithmanya ^talk 15:58, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Pranav Raj 1997. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Sivam M, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Wikishovel (talk) 14:12, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Wikishovel I am not related to the person, created an article only because he is a known person. Pranav Raj 1997 (talk) 14:35, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

But you've uploaded File:Sivam M Director.jpg as your own work, a posed photo of him standing in front of the camera. The same is true of File:Ravi Kumar Sagar.jpg, File:Ravi Polishetty.jpg, and others. Wikishovel (talk) 14:37, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Wikishovel Captured that picture during launch of the film Pranav Raj 1997 (talk) 14:40, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You just walked into the launch, and took the picture? What about the other two photos? Wikishovel (talk) 14:41, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I actually had confusions regarding which license to select. That's it. I'm not connected to any content personally or I'm not being paid to edit. Let me know how I can prove my innocence. Pranav Raj 1997 (talk) 04:15, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Abhinav Sardhar moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Abhinav Sardhar. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability, it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and ANYBIO; NACTOR issues. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. BoraVoro (talk) 08:13, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Abhinav Sardhar (November 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Abhinav Sardhar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 12:49, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Timtrent He is a very popular celebrity of Andhra Pradesh, India. Please check the link : Abhinav Sardar https://www.google.com/search?kgmid=/g/11rh_8knmx&hl=en-IN&q=Abhinav+Sardar&kgs=5bdee92fb601674f&shndl=17&source=sh/x/kp/osrp/m5/2 Pranav Raj 1997 (talk) 13:03, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia has no interest in popularity, only in notability. You need to assert any WP:N and verify that he passes WP:NACTOR. I am not checking any links. It is your draft that I reviewed nd the manner of presentation 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 13:08, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sound Party (2023 film)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sound Party (2023 film) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sound Party (2023 film). When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Wikishovel (talk) 17:11, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

You may be blocked from editing without further warning if you make any further edits without responding to the inquiry you received regarding undisclosed paid editing. Star Mississippi 14:16, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not being paid to edit any content. I'm doing it out of passion Pranav Raj 1997 (talk) 04:10, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sivam M for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sivam M is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sivam M until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Wikishovel (talk) 11:14, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shine Screens for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shine Screens is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shine Screens (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

CNMall41 (talk) 17:16, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ravi Kumar Sagar

Hello, Pranav Raj 1997. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ravi Kumar Sagar".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 14:00, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Abhinav Sardhar

Hello, Pranav Raj 1997. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Abhinav Sardhar, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:05, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]