Jump to content

User talk:Edward Waverley

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Edward Waverley has forgotten his password. He now goes by the name of Jonathan Oldenbuck. Please click here to leave him a message.


On today's DYK

[edit]
Updated DYK query On 21 January, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Craignethan Castle , which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

(The article was recently expanded). — ERcheck (talk) 15:34, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Scottishborderslogo.png)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Scottishborderslogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 10:40, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Renfrewshirelogo.png)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Renfrewshirelogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 10:40, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox

[edit]

Hadn't realised what was going on. I will have a look and make comments if necessary. Thanks for letting me know. Regards, --Bill Reid | Talk 17:39, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to the wikiproject -nice work on the Maggie's centres its now ripe for expansion - here's the bulletin - if you don't like it just delete it from your talk page, otherwise, it automatically updates. Please give me or one of the other project members a shout if you need any help. Kind regards --Mcginnly | Natter 19:00, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Architecture Bulletin  

A new Historic houses task force has been created.

Please join if you are interested!

Announcements - please add your Project announcements  


Articles at Peer Review - edit list
Machu Picchu
Manor House, Sleaford
Endeavour House
Taliesin (studio)
New article announcements - add new architecture article to list
Articles related to architecture over the past two weeks are listed automatically by AlexNewArtBot.

This list was generated from these rules. Questions and feedback are always welcome! The search is being run daily with the most recent ~14 days of results. Note: Some articles may not be relevant to this project.

Rules | Match log | Results page (for watching) | Last updated: 2024-11-18 19:10 (UTC)

Note: The list display can now be customized by each user. See List display personalization for details.
















DYK announcements - add new architecture article to list
New participants (add me)
Jpboudin, Mayarrow, Nwhysel, Cassianto, Jtmorgan
This template will be updated regularly. If you would rather not receive this bulletin, just delete it from your talk page.

List of castles in Gibraltar

[edit]

Hello, I've nominated the blanked page List of castles in Gibraltar for speedy deletion. I hope this is fine with you. Otherwise let me know. --Tikiwont 10:51, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Castle Kennedy

[edit]

My apologys, I was aware of Castle Kennedy Gardens, and Lochinch Castle. What I was unaware off was previous to Lochinch Castle there stood on the same site "Castle Kennedy". (I feel a right wally on this one, my Grandad used to live in Castle Kennedy village, ahh well) *mental note to self :- must take more effort with research! Gfours 14:06, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Craigend Castle

[edit]

I added your pic's to Craigend Castle, and again thanks for the advice. Gfours 14:50, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:BellwayHomesLogo.jpg)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:BellwayHomesLogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 20:39, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Edward Waverley, as a WikiProject Scotland participant, please check out this this thread and consider adding the bot results page to your watchlist so we can manually update the New Articles page. There are some false results for the first batch, but I'm sure we can collectively tune the rules to improve the output.

If we get enough people watching the results page, we'll be cooking with gas as they say :)   This looks like a great helper in finding new Scotland related material. Cheers. --Cactus.man 22:38, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

tTis article is in need of information, so that it has enough content to support a huge "infobox". Please add to the article everything you have read about James Gibbs ...or perhaps you already have. --Wetman 07:58, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Newbigging, South Lanarkshire, by 68.33.126.220, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Newbigging, South Lanarkshire fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

importance debated


To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Newbigging, South Lanarkshire, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Newbigging, South Lanarkshire itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 21:02, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

[edit]
Updated DYK query On 11 June, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Alexander Edward, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Carabinieri 12:13, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

William Schaw

[edit]

I've tidied up the William Schaw article a bit more. As for Schaw's appointment being that of a catholic in response to the Ruthven raid, that comes from the same page as the subsequent comments, including him being a jesuit, which appear in Stevenson's book. For stylistic reasons I did not include the same reference twice, but I've put it in now. Good to see the work you've been doing on castles and architects.Harrypotter 17:07, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Historic Houses in Scotland

[edit]

I wondered if you and any of the 'Scottish team' were aware that a "discussion" had taken place regarding this title and the decision taken to rename it "Houses in Scotland". Personally I find such a decision beyond comprehension. Is there some way this can be appealed? David Lauder 21:11, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

fixed

[edit]

I fixed it. there was an extra set of brackets around the !. Easiest way to fix it would be just to go there, and examine the script, it can be edited like any other wikipedia page. ThuranX 15:05, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

[edit]
The Original Barnstar
For your excellent, if a bit overly modest work on William Bruce (architect), which I peer-reviewed. Asking what needs to be done on such an excellent article like that to reach GA is somewhat overly-modest, methinks. Have a barnstar, and I hope you can get it to FA! Adam Cuerden talk 21:54, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. I went ahead and put it on the GA candidacy page, with a note that I was just responding to a peer-review request that seemed to already be at the needed level. Looks like others agreed with my assessment, and you have a GA! Adam Cuerden talk 21:54, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

July 4th, 2007 DYK

[edit]
Updated DYK query Did you know? was updated. On 4 July, 2007, a fact from the article Dumfries House, which you recently nominated, was featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Andrew c [talk] 00:13, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Storeys

[edit]

Hi CmdrObot, please can you stop automatically changing storeys to stories. Storey, and its plural storeys, are standard British English spellings for the floors of a building, and so according to WP:ENGVAR there is no need to change to US English story and stories on UK topics. Thanks, Edward Waverley 12:57, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Edward. I've checked it in the dictionary, and you're quite correct, it's a perfectly acceptable spelling. I've removed that rule from my bot (and added a test so I won't forget and add the rule again at some future date). Cheers, CmdrObot 17:55, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mr Bruce

[edit]

Looking at the second ref I'm left guessing, the mark-up is <ref name="ARxv"/> so I presume it's from Architect Royal, page xv - if so, please say and I'll make it clearer there. Thanks.--Alf melmac 14:41, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, you fixed it yourself, no worries, looking good :) --Alf melmac 14:09, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

William Bruce (architect)

[edit]

Congratulations. Giano 06:16, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats from me too. Excellent article. --Bill Reid | Talk 08:04, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. Good work sir. Ben MacDui (Talk) 18:23, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you all! Edward Waverley 10:08, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Edward, do you know what happened to the above user? He co-founded the castle project with you and then disappeared. Ta --Bill Reid | Talk 15:40, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Aberdeenshirelogo.png

[edit]
Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Aberdeenshirelogo.png. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:35, 6 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 19:35, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Anguslogo.png

[edit]
Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Anguslogo.png. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:17, 7 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 19:17, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Highlandlogo.png

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Highlandlogo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:42, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Edinburghlogo.png

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Edinburghlogo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:45, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:HS-icon.png

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:HS-icon.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:29, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Braal (band)

[edit]

An editor has nominated Braal (band), an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Braal (band) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 17:00, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:NTS-icon.png

[edit]

Thank you for uploading Image:NTS-icon.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 16:35, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:HS-icon.png)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:HS-icon.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:05, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:NTS-icon.png)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:NTS-icon.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:07, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Landscapeinstituteoldlogo.jpg)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Landscapeinstituteoldlogo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:08, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Castle open icon.png listed for deletion

[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Castle open icon.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 07:08, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ruin icon.png listed for deletion

[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ruin icon.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:04, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Yamamoto Fumaru (1918-2001), by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Yamamoto Fumaru (1918-2001) is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Yamamoto Fumaru (1918-2001), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 04:21, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sllogo3.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sllogo3.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:21, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedian in Residence at the National Library of Scotland

[edit]

I'm just dropping you a quick note about a new Wikipedian in Residence job that's opened up at the National Library of Scotland. There're more details at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Scotland#Wikimedian in Residence at the National Library of Scotland. Richard Symonds (WMUK) (talk) 15:39, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:EildonScottsView.JPG listed for discussion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:EildonScottsView.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly hi! 08:00, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Financial company logos has been nominated for discussion

[edit]

Category:Financial company logos, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:29, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Eastayrshirelogo.png

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Eastayrshirelogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:13, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Eastrenfrewshirelogo.png

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Eastrenfrewshirelogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Braal (DC Comics) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 17:51, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"F. W. Benson" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect F. W. Benson. Since you had some involvement with the F. W. Benson redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 21:47, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Landscape gardens has been nominated for renaming

[edit]

Category:Landscape gardens has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:10, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The file File:Mormaerv2.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused. Superseded by File:Mormaerv2.png.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 10:41, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Breu, Jörg, father and son" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Breu, Jörg, father and son and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 15#Breu, Jörg, father and son until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. CycloneYoris talk! 03:16, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]