Jump to content

User talk:Capankajsmilyo/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3

Nehru's Blunders

Hello, Capankajsmilyo. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Teahouse Question

Hi there - just a heads up that I have moved your recent question at the Teahouse from the bottom of the page to the top. Most talk pages require that new discussions be placed at the bottom of the page. At the Teahouse, however, new questions are placed at the top to maximize visibility. Thanks! ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 17:10, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

'Jain Agamas' and 'Jain literature' shouldn't be merged. As per my understanding,

  • Jain literature = Jain Agamas + Commentaries + Books written on Jainism
  • Jain Agamas = Sacred texts of the Jains Nimit 23:27, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
It would be good to create these three sections in jain literature itself. I got confused because it wasnt mentioned in the article. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo 23:30, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Jain monarchs and such

Hi, you appear to have been overzealous in your recent categorisations of monarchs and dynasties as being Jain. Please ensure that their articles actually state that they are Jain by religion (and also not simply patrons of Jainism as well as other religions). If they do state that they are Jain, please ensure that such claims are referenced before tagging them and their entire dynasties as being Jain. I have reversed a number of your recent edits as a result. Please look through your other edits as well.--Cpt.a.haddock (talk) 20:35, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Jain dating

Listen, according to genetic and fossil evidence, archaic Homo sapiens evolved to anatomically modern humans solely in Africa between 200,000 and 100,000 years ago, with members of one branch leaving Africa by 60,000 years ago. You can't write dates for the jinas as if they are factually accurate statements, it's nuts to write Naminatha lived from 584,979-574,979 BCE. We can't even securely date Mahavira or Gautama Buddha, nevermind someone half a million years ago. Ogress smash! 08:16, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

September 2015

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nanda Empire. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

  • If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
  • If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. As with many of your other recent edits, the article does not support anything about the Nandas being Jains. If you believe this to be true, then please add supporting sources and then classify them as being a Jain Dynasty. Cpt.a.haddock (talk) 12:25, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Cpt.a.haddock Nandas were Jains - https://books.google.co.in/books?id=8UhvGRoyAqMC - page 113 -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo 12:32, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
I'm rather sceptical of this source. However, please incorporate Sangave's contentions into the body of the article along with the reference as it directly contradicts the usual tale of the Nandas being of shudra heritage (which, incidentally, is also recounted by later Jain sources where Chanakya is the one who is a Jain). The religions section of the infobox technically only lists the major religions of the empire, not necessarily of its rulers. Thanks.--Cpt.a.haddock (talk) 16:45, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Dear both, please note that the sources must be WP:HISTRS for this subject. This source doesn't appear to be. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 17:38, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Can you please go slow?

It appears that you are very eager to contribute, but then you are using sources that definitely don't qualify per our standards and are therefore introducing errors or complexities that should be avoided. e.g. Categories such as Category:Chakravartin Jain etc don't belong as these are not how historians classify things. Please have a read through of our reliable sources guideline and in particular WP:HISTRS. If you can, please tag Category:Chakravartin Jain with {{db-g7}} and remove any articles categorized in it as this would avoid spending time on a CfD.—SpacemanSpiff 18:35, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

SpacemanSpiff Cat chakravartin included many rulers who as per Jain texts are not chakravartis. As described in Salakapurusa there are only 12 Jain Chakravartin. So I created this category. Can you please elaborate on unreliable source thing? Recently someone said on bot request page that even some blogs are reliable. At least WP admins should not make conflicting remarks. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 18:41, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Context matters, not all blogs are reliable, not all blogs are unreliable. This is not conflicting information. This is the English language Wikipedia and there's already an emperor category, there's no reason to create categories for traditional names; traditional names should be used when they are used regularly, as such in scholarly literature and an equivalent English term isn't common, e.g. Tirthankaras or Nayanmars etc. Finally, the term "Chakravartin Jain" itself is ambiguous as it doesn't mean anything without the necessary context and as such shouldn't be a category. Kautilya3 has already evaluated one source above, and these are things you shouldn't be using in history articles here and I'm sure he'll be able to evaluate other sources too. —SpacemanSpiff 18:51, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

OK if you think so chakravartin and chakravartin jain can be done away with. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 18:55, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

  • Chakravartin is an old category, so it can not be deleted by me just like that and I had already nominated it for deletion a few days back. It is only because of that I saw the new one. —SpacemanSpiff 18:57, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
You are adding so many unreliable sources and claiming everyone who ever lived in India was a Jain. Please, check WP:RS. Today I have seen you use a source that was Wikipedia pages printed into a book, a self-pub paper by a man in South Florida who writes about aliens and claims Semiramis invaded the Indus Valley, and blogs. Please. I severely dislike reverting your edits and I dislike even more when you return with the same claim by an equally dubious source. Ogress smash! 19:30, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

SpacemanSpiff Ogress Kautilya3 please comment on this source https://books.google.co.in/books?id=ZgNHE-48jNcC&pg=PA168&lpg=PA168&dq=jainism+nanda+dynasty&source=bl&ots=xR-f3Kpf39&sig=1pFIm-qBdJUQE90MCs94WXSXZOc&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CEUQ6AEwB2oVChMIoPGQlMrWxwIVVwaOCh1hOwBH#v=onepage&q=jainism%20nanda%20dynasty&f=false -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 19:39, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

I cannot access it. Ogress smash! 19:44, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Gimme your mail address, I will send you a screenshot. Its a google book, for god's sake :P -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 19:46, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
A HISTRS source (please see the guidelines) must be written by scholars trained in historical scholarship. If they are academics of history employed at reputable Universities, they would qualify. If not, you would need scholarly reviews published in journals that certify their scholarship in history. This book is at best good for writing about general facts about Jain religion. It is not reliable for historical information. Cheers, Kautilya3 (talk) 19:47, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
It also says if available, can you please refer me to a scholarly source describing the religion of Nanda Empire clearly. If there's no such source, the link you referred also states that other sources can be considered. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 19:52, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
I used google books, including .com and trying my own search: it's not available to me. I'm not an idiot. My Wikipedia email is enabled. Ogress smash! 19:49, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Please try https://books.google.co.in/books?id=ZgNHE-48jNcC and let me know. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 19:52, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Global Vision Publishing House does not seem to have a reputation for fact checking etc. Please see Wikipedia:Mirrors and forks and [1]. JimRenge (talk) 20:06, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

(edit conflict) Encyclopaedia of Oriental Philosophy and Religion is not a reliable source, let alone a WP:HISTRS source. It is essentially self-published (N.K Singh, the editor, founded the publishing company) by an author/publisher on no scholarly repute; held by a miniscule number of libraries; and I haven't seen any scholarly reviews. Also the word "oriental" in the title for a work published so recently is not a promising sign. As a general rule: such multi-volume reference works produced by no-name publishers (and often purportedly written by 1-2 persons) are almost always plagiarized from wikipedia, century old public-domain works, primary sources etc; Gyan publishers is notorious for churning out such volumes, and Global Vision Pub House seems to be of its ilk. In future, if you have questions about a particular source just ask here or at WP:RSN and over time you'll develop a better idea of what type of sources are acceptable.
Another unrelated issue: Articles such as Pleistocene, Upper Paleolithic, 23rd century BC should not be tagged with {{WP Jainism}} template. Only pages significantly and directly linked with a topic, where project members can help with overall article content, formatting and sourcing, should be classed as under the project's purview. Just being able to imagine a link is not sufficient. :)
Btw, I second the recommendation above to slow down a bit. Your enthusiasm, good-will, and willingness to listen is indeed appreciated. But you are making some (understandable) newbie errors, and because of your high editing volume, it is making editors cleaning up after them more grumpy than we would like to be. Abecedare (talk) 20:09, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Here are some authentic sources that talk about Jainism-Nandas connection, found by googling "Nandas Jain": [2], [3], [4]. - Kautilya3 (talk) 20:17, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for clarifying the picture Abecedare. The link you gave would be helpful (hopefully) for knowing the reliability (Wikipedia criteria) of sources. Talk pages thing noted. I would also like to know that if there's a vacuum as in this case (Nanda Empire article doesn't mention a word about religion), would filling that gap be a mistake? Those who revert changes (in this case ogress), shouldn't they cite sources (scholarly) denying the fact or at least claiming otherwise (in this case other religion) -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 20:26, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

You are suggesting I need to cite that we can't see they had a specific religion? Also, I too appreciate you are willing to listen and I like that you are working so hard on Jain issues, it's just a few snags we need to sort out. I also double-down on the tagging ancient centuries: AFAIK there is suggestion Parshvanatha could have been a real person but no evidence and certainly no specific dating. We can't even firmly date Mahavira and Buddha. Ogress smash! 20:28, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Capankajsmilyo, please see WP:BURDEN. JimRenge (talk) 20:34, 1 September 2015 (UTC)


Ogress first of all, you should not revert any changes because of your POV without talking about it. Secondly, yes I am saying that you should tell the sources from where you have decided that Nandas were of no religion or of some other religion. I have seen on your talk page, that you love engaging in edit wars. Further, also please refer me to the sources, which prove to you that Tirthankara were not rulers. Rishabha was the founder of biggest and most ancient ruling dynasty (Ikshvaku) of India. He was the one, who taught how to rule and his son was the first chakravartin ruler. All those who followed ruled for a pretty long period and were all Kshatriyas except from Mahavira, who took diksha at the age of 30. You just keep reverting the tag jain monarchs on tirthankara without even talking about it. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 20:46, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the sources Kautilya3. You are great! Please go through these sources now, Ogress and add them and Jainism on Nanda Empire, if you are not on Wikipedia just for reverting contributions of others.

"I have seen on your talk page, that you love engaging in edit wars." Where on Earth did you see that? "Secondly, yes I am saying that you should tell the sources from where you have decided that Nandas were of no religion or of some other religion." I'm not claiming anything of the sort, what POV? Risabha is a mythological figure. You keep claiming these figures lived at specific times and were regents when they are not accepted by scholars. This isn't Jainopedia, we don't accept scripture at face value. Ogress smash! 21:30, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Canpankajsmilyo, please calm down. Many of us have a number of pages on our watch lists, which we try to protect from vandalism or corruption by unsourced edits etc. We might not have any interest in editing those articles ourselves. So, you shouldn't go around demanding that other people should edit articles. (They might, but it is their wish and interest.) When you add content, you have to provide reliable sources as per WP:RS policy. If you don't give sources or if your sources are no good, we would revert those edits. Please don't be offended by it. You can fix whatever problems we point out when we revert the edits, and reinstate the edits (assuming that they are valid edits). If we don't point out particular problems (some of us are lazy), then please feel free to ask why a revert was made. That is how it works. Cheers, Kautilya3 (talk) 21:59, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
I would echo what Abecedare says above, the publication is clearly problematic, the author doesn't have any known credentials, the publishing house is unknown in the scholarly publications area, the author has published such encylopaedias on topics ranging from death to sin and Qur'an to Jainism, which is unimaginable by any standards. Such references should never be used. And then there's another problem here, you shouldn't be conflating mythology with history.—SpacemanSpiff 04:04, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Kalpavtiksha

See the tslk page of this article. All the opinion is for not merging. Pl remove the merger tag so that article can be posted for DYK before due date.--Nvvchar. 11:29, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Please stop

This is again a poor quality source. You really should not be using devotional books as sources. You've been alerted to this before in the above thread when I asked you to go slow, but you're not listening, and you're making way too many edits for other editors to fix. —SpacemanSpiff 19:14, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

This is also not reliable? I'll find another and get it confirmed from you first now. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 19:16, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
You really have to go slow, you're creating a lot of work for other editors now. First you went ahead and created a content fork in the form of Bharata Chakravartin, then you added similar content to Bharata (emperor) and Jadabharata. Please stop treating these articles as sandboxes. With this, you're causing a lot of other editors to scratch their head and figure out what needs to be done. I know you're operating out of good faith, but I suggest you focus on an area that is more related to your expertise, and get an understanding of Wikipedia policies before delving into these spaces. —SpacemanSpiff 19:19, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
Ohk -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 19:22, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
But please give me bharata chakravarti in my special page. I have spent hours developing that page. Few other editors have also made significant contribution to that article. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 19:24, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
I'd like to add that your insistence on adding religious material as fact is highly problematic, such as insisting that the Indian epics are all verifiable historical fact and adding "Ikshvaku dynasty" as a cat for like every Indian historical figure you can find, adding specific dates for the jinas half a million years ago and putting them on those wiki date range pages, and other problematic issues such as adding cite after cite after cite for the Nanda dynasty being Jain and each and every one not reliable, or, in the most recent case, doesn't claim they were Jain despite your apparent good citing. You've added epic tons of material and now it's evident it all needs to be evaluated for verity, reliability, factualness, and truth. Ogress smash! 19:25, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
I did not added anything to jadabharata. Also not any new content to bharata (emperor) except infobox sons. I did most of my editing in Bharata Chakravarti as earlier, I was not aware that both personalities were some. When through talks, discussions and research it seemed they both are same I added merge tags. I will slow down now but please restore bharata chakravarti. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 19:30, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
I now understand what you mean Ogress. History and mythology are separate on Wikipedia. I did not add Ikshvaku to any new article. I just shifted the content of a sub cat (Ikshvaku clan ramayana) to its main cat. The Parshva thing you are talking about regarding historical dates, I have not reverted your revert. You can check on 870s BC page. Nanda refs were also given by Kautilya3. I am not able to get this reliable concept due it being highly subjective in nature and trying my best to find WP level sources. I have done 80-90% edits on Jainism related pages only, that to mostly stubs. I won't do any substantial edit without discussing it on talk page, but please give Bharata Chakravarti page back. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 19:38, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
(edit conflict)::::I don't know what you want me to restore, but I have not deleted any article related to your editing. I'm not involved in the specific content either and I have no opinion on that, but I'm focusing more on your editing behavior which is to randomly add these poor quality sources and a word or two here and there. As I said before, I understand that you're operating out of good faith and have an interest in these topics, but you'll need to follow policies and these edits are definitely problematic. e.g. This edit is problematic for a variety of reasons: you're conflating history and mythology, you've copied over from another article without attributing, you haven't even checked if the content your adding is verifiable material etc. And this is just one example, and it is a drain on the time of other editors. I strongly suggest that you stop editing in this area for a while, focus on editing in some areas where you have expertise, learn our policies, find out about encyclopaedia writing and then handle these sort of subjects. —SpacemanSpiff 19:40, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
Sure -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 19:43, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Again, please slow down

Pankaj, as you ere advised above, can you please slow down, because your activities are getting disruptive. Exampl of some issues:

  1. This is not a reliable source.
  2. This is at best a borderline source, and should not be cited widely, and replaced with more scholarly works instead
  3. Surya should not have a filmography (we can talk about depiction of Surya in literature, film, thaeter, but that should be based on scholarly secondary soources and not as a list of trivia)
  4. Surya may be the son of Bharata in some legends, but afaik that is not the common mythology, and should not be presented w/o context
  5. Ditto for Chandra and Bahubali
  6. You shouldn't be mixing up mythology and history as you did here (I am assuming for the moment that Andhra Ikshvaku are historically attested)

I would have explained the above points and other issues with your editing in greater detail, except that your fast pace editing doesn't allow others to respond adequately. Please read up on WP:RS, WP:NPOV (and especially WP:RPOV) before continuing at a much slower and deliberate pace. Abecedare (talk) 19:34, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

PS: Just saw Spaceman and Ogress' message in the section above. I second what they said. Abecedare (talk) 19:36, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
Sure -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 19:39, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
Can you please elaborate on filmography thing? -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 19:47, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
Firstly filmography is not the correct word for referring to films and television programs in which Surya has been depicted. But more importantly, as I said in the parenthetical note, wikipedia articles can talk about how Surya has been portrayed in literature, film, theater, art, dance etc but that should be based on scholarly secondary sources. So find some sources that discuss such depictions and analyze, say, the iconography, artistic intent, reception etc. That is encyclopedic. Just a list of modern TV series in which a single actor played Surya in a relatively minor role, is mere trivia, bordering on promotionalism (even though that may not be your intent). Abecedare (talk) 20:03, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

September 2015

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding , a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Over the past few days many editors have tried to reason with you and I have also asked you as one not involved in the specific content issues. You said you'll stop this, but you don't seem to show any intent to listen to feedback. This behavior is now crossing into the realm of being disruptive. SpacemanSpiff 07:09, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Which page did I edit now? I was just doing talk pages. Can I not even talk on wikipedia -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 07:13, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
This is one example. Just a few hours ago Ogress brought this specific example to your talk page, and you respond with another merger proposal.—SpacemanSpiff 07:15, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
I checked on my, Rishabha as well as Rishabha (Hinuism) talk page for any previous oppose. Unable to find, I added it. I havent added any new source, and only commented sources on talk pages since our lat discussion. Will not to that as well now. Ogress have u opposed that merger? -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 07:23, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
It wasn't me, no. Must have been someone else. Ogress smash! 07:25, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
SpacemanSpiff Ogress did not, please see his reply -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 07:33, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
See this note specifically asking you to stop categorizing everything under the dynasty. And then you go on to tag more articles for merging into that page. All this without giving any proper explanation as to why these pages should be merged. You can not expect other editors to do your work for you, or to refute this every time you catch a fancy to something. —SpacemanSpiff 07:36, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
I gave an explaination, see Talk:Ikshvaku dynasty#Merger and Talk:Ikshvaku, and also I did not do any more categorization. Not asking anyone to do any work. I was previously stopped from doing edits, so not doing anything myself and asking for discussions in talk pages. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 07:43, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Template:Authority control

Why are you removing those templates? Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 07:08, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Weird: apparently you didn't, but it's look like in the "Difference between revisions", for example here. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 07:12, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
Because it was appearing twice on page frontend -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 07:12, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
Ah, I see. The "Difference between revisions" was misleading in this respect. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 10:01, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

September 2015

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Gautama Buddha are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. JimRenge (talk) 12:54, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

JimRenge Discussing the Jainism and Buddhism in reference to Gautama Buddha only. Because the article doesn't talk about that aspect -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 13:04, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Sleep

Do you ever sleep? Best regards (or sleep tight ;), Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 20:33, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Lol, thanks for the concern -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 20:35, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Kalpavriksha has been nominated for Did You Know

Hello, Capankajsmilyo/Archive 1. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).


Please sign your talk page posts

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at User talk:Yobot, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. GoingBatty (talk) 14:13, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Notes

Instead of simply adding a naked url as "Suggested sources" as you did here, here, here etc, please spell out what the source is (title, author, publisher etc) and what exactly you want to cite it for. As you have been told before, fewer considered edits are more valuable than dozens of edits that need to be reverted/cleaned-up or (as in this case) are simply cryptic.

Also, I am not clear why you are tagging some pages with {{WP Jainism}} (for example Rohtak, which does not currently even mention Jain/Jainism)? Abecedare (talk) 16:50, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Sure. I tagged rohtak based on a source I found which talks about Jainism in Haryana (rohtak in specific). I will soon start my work on such an article. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 18:17, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Please see my earlier note to you, about when wikiproject tags are appropriate. Abecedare (talk) 19:54, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
This time it wasn't imagination but source. Are you saying that info must first be added before WP tag? -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 20:20, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Here is the source Udayana] by Abhay Kumar Singh, Udai Prakash Arora (Anamika Pub & Distributors, 01-Jan-2007) -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 20:25, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Pankaj, I am surprised you are reading, "Only pages significantly and directly linked with a topic, where project members can help with overall article content, formatting and sourcing, should be classed as under the project's purview. Just being able to imagine a link is not sufficient." so literally by focusing on "imagined".
To spell it out: even a real sourced link, does not mean that an article falls under the purview of the project. For example, scores of countries have embassies in New Delhi. That does not mean the article should be tagged with all those wikiproject templates. The question to ask is which wikiprojects an editor looking for help with the overall article (ie,not just a detail in the article), should be guided towards. And conversely,if the article subject would be a separate entry if one were writing an encyclopedia about the wikiproject's domain. There is no firm rule, but unless the domain is mentioned in the lede sentence(s) of the article, the wikiproject is unlikely to be worth including. This certainly requires some editorial judgment and wiki-experience, and perhaps you should just hold off on tagging pages with wikiproject tags for now. Abecedare (talk) 20:45, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Context matters

Hi Pankaj, Regarding this comment [5], please note that we have told you to follow WP:HISTRS for historical information. A reliable source for religious matters may not be reliable for historical information. WP:CONTEXTMATTERS. - Kautilya3 (talk) 21:10, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 8 September

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Sanghiji, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.ourjaipur.com/2013/01/jain-temple-sanganer.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 09:57, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Category:Harivamsa, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kautilya3 (talk) 10:11, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Category:Harivamsa

Category:Harivamsa, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 00:03, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Your Teahouse question

Your question was archived without an answer. I would suggest asking at WP:VPR. I was gone last week or would have posted that on The Teahouse.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 21:47, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Kalpavriksha

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:21, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

September 2015

Information icon Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Sagara (Vedic king) a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge.

In this case you should start a move discussion so that consensus can be reached as to whether the article should be renamed, and if so, what the alternate title should be. Abecedare (talk) 22:28, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for informing. The move tab was hidden in more, so couldn't find it. I have used the tab now. I will keep this in mind in future. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 05:32, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Panjak, you seem to have missed the last paragraph of my note above. Please discuss the propose move, since "King Sagara" is unlikely to be the best title for the article, even if the move is itself thought to be desirable. Also note that the Arun Kumar Jain book is very poorly written and by an author/publisher of no known academic repute. Also the content you added does not seem to be supported by even that book; where did you get it from? Please update the reference and content to comply with WP:V and WP:RS. Abecedare (talk) 17:29, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Bot requests

Information icon Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Your recent talk page comments on Wikipedia:Bot requests were not added to the bottom of the page. New discussion page messages and topics should always be added to the bottom. Your message may have been moved by another user. In the future you can use the "New section" link in the top right. For more details see the talk page guidelines. Thank you. GoingBatty (talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by GoingBatty (talkcontribs) 22:20, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Royal Jains

Template:Royal Jains has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Abecedare (talk) 17:59, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Dear Pankaj, Are you sure that you have HISTRS sources for all the entries in this new template? - Kautilya3 (talk) 09:50, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

This template might require some cleanup. Most of the links are certain. Few links dont cite religion on their pages. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 09:53, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
Sorry, you haven't answered my question. HISTRS sources? Whenever you add a "religion" entry in the infobox, you should provide a reliable source with page number. - Kautilya3 (talk) 09:58, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
Sorry, I am not able to understand your question. I haven't added religion in infobox, instead added links to pages stating Jainism (already) to this template. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 10:00, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
If the information is already there in the pages, then we depend on you to check its sourcing before you add the pages to the template. This is a highly visible template! You can't add pages willy nilly. - Kautilya3 (talk) 10:07, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
Please elaborate what you mean by highly visible as this template has just been created and added to 10-12 pages only. Can you please cite a few examples to clarify on willy nilly links. Also if there are some issues in this template, please help me improve it. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 10:11, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
"Highly visible" because people can scan it at one go and find all the people that Wikipedia is claiming to be royal Jains. You shouldn't add pages to it unless it is authentic information. Frankly you are playing with fire here. Please tread cautiously. - Kautilya3 (talk) 10:15, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
If you can cite atleast one example, that would be helpful in understanding what you mean. Are you talking about Royal or Jains? By HISTRS, you mean historical/traditional or something else? I have created the template sensing the need for such as it was very difficult to trace royal jains through any existing list or category. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 10:22, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
Several of us have explained the idea of WP:HISTRS on your archived talk page. If you still don't know what it means, it is a serious problem. I am pinging Abecedare and SpacemanSpiff to advise you. - Kautilya3 (talk) 10:32, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
I know HISTRS, I am getting confused about what you mean by your statement. Let me try to put my doubt this way. All the links I listed are royal figures (undoubtedly). Some of them are tradition while most are historical (I hope you are not talking about it). Their respective pages state them to be Jains or there is no reference on the page regarding religion at all. I have removed those which had a conflict regarding religion (If you are talking about this). Please help me restructure the template to improve its authenticity. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 10:41, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

To make it authentic, you need to go to each page listed there, check if the page mentions that the king was a Jain, and check if the information is supported by a HISTRS. You need to remove any page that doesn't satisfy these criteria. I have randomly checked a few pages, and here is what I found:

  • Pushyamitra: The page doesn't say he was a Jain.
  • Pulakeshin I: The word "Jain" doesn't occur anywhere on the page.
  • Kirtivarman I: The word "Jain" doesn't occur anywhere on the page.
  • Dantidurga: The word "Jain" doesn't occur anywhere on the page.
  • Bhimdev I: The word "Jain" doesn't occur anywhere on the page.
  • Samprati: The page says Religion is "Jainism", but it is marked as "citation needed."

So, pretty much nothing is checking out. I have no idea how you listed these people as Royal Jains. - Kautilya3 (talk) 11:12, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Removed Links -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 12:50, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
There are so many problems with the template!
  • Includes historical figures, without justification. As was discussed at Talk:Ashoka/Archive1#Religion, we should not be assigning religion to historical figures w/o proper context. For example, Jain sources claim Chandragupta to be a Jain, which is not the same as his being one (the page itself needs clean up). This is in addition to the WP:HISTRS issue.
  • Similar issue with some of the mythological figures (why are they labelled "traditional" in any case?); how is Hanuman a royal?
  • More basically: the template introduces a new classification scheme for this collection of historical and mythological figures. Is there a single reliable source that discusses all these figures collectively as royals?
Pinging User:SpacemanSpiff, who is more familiar with the TfD process, to see if the template should be simply removed from the pages or deleted.
And @Capankajsmilyo: your sub-par and POV editing in the area is really getting disruptive. For example, despite my advice earlier about moving pages, you moved Rama in Jainism tp Jain Ramayana without any discussion. And you have still not removed the non-RS book by Arun Kumar Jain from Sagara (Vedic king), or corrected the content to match what the sources actually say! If you continue in this vein, I think you are likely to be topic banned from Indian religion and history based articles. Abecedare (talk) 14:32, 23 September 2015 (UTC) fixed some grammatical and punctuation error. Abecedare (talk) 18:11, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
Ashoka was deleted hours ago. I know there is difference between historical and traditional. What is the difference between traditional and mythical? Moved Rama in Jainism giving a reason as per the bold move given in Wikipedia instructions. Removed Sagara book and added reliable sources. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 14:44, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
Pankaj, I can make a suggestion that will keep you out of trouble. Create a list article with a title like "List of kings that sponsored Jainism". You can include there all the kings that your sources say supported Jainism, and include citations. Once the information is settled and verified, we can think about other formats. List articles are safe things to make. They can be edited by anybody or challenged by anybody. Categories and templates are only meant for impeccable information. - Kautilya3 (talk) 15:32, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
That's a good suggestion but only if some WP:HISTRS sources can be found discussing the topic of royal patronage of Jainism (I would expcet such sources to exist). Else it would be a recipe for on-wiki synthesis and reification. Abecedare (talk) 17:41, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
(edit conflict)The same logic at CfD or AfD would be applicable here -- conflating history and mythology. Pankaj, you have to stop this crusade or it's not going to work out well for you. Please listen to what everyone is saying.—SpacemanSpiff 17:43, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

aviod

Please avoid this web page (www.fas.harvard.edu/~pluralsm/affiliates/jainism/article/south.htm) which appears to have numerous inaccuracies. Tukol claims the Kadambas and Chalukyas were Jains and that the Gangas conquered Nepal. There may be many more of such absurd claims. Please try to use real book sources written by reputed historians.Holenarasipura (talk) 20:25, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Further, the web page calls all Hoysala kings as Jains though the dynasty of kings took to Hinduism from the time of Vishnuvardhana, and all the Rashtrakutas as Jains just because Amoghavarsha came under the influence of Jain Acharyas. Clearly, this article is not of high quality.Holenarasipura (talk) 20:47, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction

The following sanction now applies to you:

You have been topic banned for three months from now from editing all pages about Indian religions, broadly construed, including edits about Indian religions and about people belonging to any of those religions. Also from talking about those religions in any discussions. This ban applies to all kinds of pages (articles, talkpages, noticeboards, templates, etc) and to all types of editing, such as article edits, page moves, page creations, etc.

You have been sanctioned for persistent disruptive editing on subjects related to Indian religions. When I look at your talkpage and its archive, I see a lot of good advice and many warnings from quite a few editors, especially to do with using reliable historical sources. Experienced editors seem to have explained the sourcing problems patiently, and really tried to help you edit better. This is probably because they like your enthusiasm and good faith; I do, too. But it has come to a point where other editors seem to be describing the problems with your sources over and over, to no avail. What struck me especially was that you were asked three weeks ago repeatedly, and with much explanation, to "please go slow"[6][7] and to make yourself master of HISTRS before adding so much material, and creating and moving pages, etc, at such speed. And yet, after a day of slowing down slightly, asking a question at the Teahouse, etc, you accelerated again, and have been editing at breakneck speed ever since. Yesterday (23 September per UTC) you made 340 edits! Sometimes there were three edits to three different pages in the same minute. How could you possibly make considered, thoughtful edits at such a rate? You'd have to be a well-programmed robot — a human can't do it. And considering your rate of editing, I'm not sure when you would find the time to study HISTRS as it deserves to be studied, either, or to mull over what people tell you. And this means that other people have to use a lot of time to clean up after you and explain to you. That's unacceptable. When I first looked at your contributions, I considered giving you a strong warning to slow down, but after noticing other editors doing just that, without effect, I see no other recourse than to topic ban you. Three months is a rather short topic ban, and the reason I've kept it short is because you're still rather new. If you were a more experienced editor I'd have banned you for six months or a year. Please make sure you understand what a topic ban is: read WP:TBAN. That is a policy you can't afford to speedread, because if you violate this topic ban, it will be enforced with blocks.

This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/India-Pakistan#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. Bishonen | talk 15:44, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Warning

Edits like this and that and the other 30 odd edits you've done since Bishonen's sanction above are a violation of your topic ban. Any further edits and you will be blocked for violating the topic ban. It is especially important that you adhere to the ban as it's now presenting more evidence that you are either not willing to work in a collaborative project or you are not able to comprehend what's expected, both of which are highly disruptive and will likely result in being indefinitely blocked, not just the minor sanction imposed above. —SpacemanSpiff 07:10, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

This is in reponse to your message on my talk page as I don't want to fragment the discussion. The problems have been with respect to your edits on religion, they were most visible on the pages of historical figures, but as Talk:Ikshvaku dynasty shows, it was not the only case. Given that the problems were so wide in reach covering the gamut of Indian religions I don't see how anything else would be sufficient. That a few edits may not in and of themselves be problematic isn't the question here, the point of the topic ban is to avoid others having to sift through edits to figure out which ones are good. As I had suggested to you over a month ago, it is perhaps best for you to edit areas where you have some expertise in and understand Wikipedia policies including WP:RS, WP:POV, WP:OR and others before you contribute to these areas where you have a hobbyist interest in. Sadly, you did not listen to that and it has now come to this point. This is still a very limited topic ban, both in scope and duration and I will encourage you to get a better grasp of encyclopaedic writing while this is in force and contribute effectively after that. —SpacemanSpiff 08:19, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
I too will reply here to your message on my talk page; let's keep it all on your page for convenience. I don't understand how you can think your ban was "regarding HISTRS", if you read what I said in my ban notice above: "You have been topic banned from editing all pages about Indian religions, broadly construed, including edits about Indian religions and about people belonging to any of those religions. Also from talking about those religions in any discussions." That's what it said, and that's what it meant: you can't edit any page that has to do with Indian religions. Can't edit it at all. Obviously Jainism, for example, is an Indian religion. I'm afraid it's not for you to decide to respect some parts of the ban and not others. If you edit those articles or their talkpages again, you will be blocked. Please re-read my ban notice. Carefully. In that notice, I also urged you to read the policy WP:TBAN, to get a grasp of what a topic ban is. It frankly doesn't look like you did. Bishonen | talk 08:56, 26 September 2015 (UTC).
But none of my previous edits related to Indian Religions was opposed. The edits opposed were Indian kings and royal people, you can check my talk pages. My contributions related to religion (I only edit Jainism pages) was sometimes even thanked and I received a barnstar as well. And why talk pages? Why are they included in ban? Please reconsider my ban. I have never done anything conflicting on religion pages. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 09:16, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
The thing which I am not getting is RS related to history, it being highly subjective in nature. The religion pages iv recently edited are not related to history. I won't edit any of the history pages, but please reconsider my religion ban, only Jainism. I have no issues being banned on all other religions be it Sikh Hindu or Christianity. You can check my past contributions in Jainism pages. I have helped expanding the stubs. And even nominated article Mahavira for Peer Review to raise it to GA level. I have added many pics via Wikipedia commons and have been engaged in positive debates (not conflicting) regarding Jainism. The only conflict was with the Kings and historical dynasties and empires. Ban me for lifetime on that. But please reconsider my ban on just Jainism pages. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 09:22, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
Here are the last few edits that have been considered as wrong. Please check if anything was wrong in the last edits after ban.
  1. Digambara - Added the actual words
  2. Digambara - Links were wrong, is it good to let wrong links stay on wikipedia?
  3. Manatunga - Again wrong links (disambig)
  4. Jainism - Rephrased to make better presentation. The content which could be assimilated in a single line was spread over three lines. Consolidated that.
  5. [8] - Spell and links. You can verify that I did nothing wrong here as well.
I even got Sallekhana protected by an administrator due to constant vandalism. I am just trying to help here. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 09:49, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
Nobody doubts you're trying to help, but I'm afraid I won't reconsider. As SpacemanSpiff says above, a) it's a pretty limited ban, both in scope and length, and b) the big point of the ban is to rescue other people from ongoingly having to sift through your (very numerous and fast) edits to figure out which ones are good. Please see here how you can now appeal the ban. You have already tried appealing to the enforcing administrator (=me) to reconsider, and I have declined, so you are left with alternatives 2 (appealing at WP:AE or WP:AN) and 3 (appealing at WP:ARCA, which means you'd appeal to the Arbitration committee). Think about it, check out those noticeboards, and pick one. I remind you that even if you appeal the ban, you remain bound by it until you are notified that your appeal has been successful. Bishonen | talk 10:12, 26 September 2015 (UTC).

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vishuddhasagar (October 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Onel5969 TT me 14:04, 2 October 2015 (UTC)


Teahouse logo
Hello! Capankajsmilyo, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 TT me 14:04, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Ramdev

You made some highly inappropriate edits at Ramdev, which I was going to leave a warning about, but then I noticed that you are under a topic ban that applies to the article. I've left a message with Bishonen (talk · contribs), who had discussed the topic ban with you previously. --Ronz (talk) 23:40, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

You were topic banned "from editing all pages about Indian religions, broadly construed, including edits about Indian religions and about people belonging to any of those religions", and yet you have made a series of edits to Ramdev, an article about an Indian spritual leader. I don't see how you could have thought that page wasn't connected with an Indian religion. You have been blocked for 24 hours, see below. Please stay away from these topics; the next block will be longer. Bishonen | talk 01:35, 4 October 2015 (UTC).

October 2015

To enforce an arbitration decision you have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block or other sanctions.

If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. Bishonen | talk 01:34, 4 October 2015 (UTC)


Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted a procedure instructing administrators as follows: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."

Ramdev too Bishonen? There's no mention of religion on his page except infobox. He is a yoga guru and political activist. How could one possibly know that he is covered in ban? I wouldn't have edited the page if it was of religious guru. Does this mean that I can't edit pages for even Narendra Modi or Ravi Shankar Prasad, them being of Indian religion? In fact more than 99% of Indians will be of a Indian religion be it Hindu, Sikh or Muslim. Does this mean I can't edit any Indian? Not even Mahatma Gandhi or Subhas Chandra Bose. I thought the ban was related to Indian religions. Please clarify what all is banned or is it a blanket ban? I am a simple and local resident of India, so its obv. that I can't make edits to US people :p -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 04:12, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
Ronz you even reinstated some of my edits. I removed the content following the deadlinks tag which were dated more than a year ago. What is it I did wrong? -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 04:24, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
(talk page stalker) Hi, Yoga is one of 6 schools of Orthodox Vedic religion. Anyway, it is matter of just 24 hours, it will not make much difference. And I think that Narendra Modi is not covered by your topic ban. I think you can edit articles of politicians of all religions. You can edit Ravi Shankar Prasad but not Sri Sri Sri Sri Sri Ravi Shankar. Regards. --Human3015TALK  04:29, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
Human3015 thanks for clarification, I hope I won't be banned from editing some xyz Indian again saying that he is of Indian religion. Although I am still confused after your comments about International Yoga Day. Is it related to religion? Yoga is related to fitness as far as I know, this is the first time I am hearing about it being associated with religion. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 04:46, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
Pankaj, Ramdev is classified under "Hindu religious leaders", that's as close to the topic of Indian religions as you are going to get. On others like Narendra Modi, Human3015 is only partly correct. In such pages, context also matters. If you edit about his actions against corruption as Prime Minister it is ok, but if you write about his diet during the Navratri visit to the US and the dinner with Barack Obama, that is a violation of your topic ban. In effect, pages that are directly linked to Indian religions are covered under the ban, but in addition edits that are linked to Indian religions but on pages that aren't directly linked are also covered under the ban. Also, this is not just on article space but all name spaces, your edits to Draft:Vishuddhasagar are also a violation of the topic ban. I think you said that you are a Chartered Accountant, but I could be mistaken. But if that's the case why don't you focus your efforts on cleaning up something like Taxation in India and related topics? Those are obviously topics that could use an expert who knows the literature in that area. Try cleaning up that article for a start, add good quality sources, remove all the directly listings and make it readable for someone who is trying to get an understanding of the subject. —SpacemanSpiff 04:59, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
SpacemanSpiff I am not a Chartered Accountant but a student of CA course. Ramdev is not a religious leader at all, let alone Hindu leader. If anyone has classified him such, it is wrong. You can check his page if it mentions anything about any of his religious leader activity. He talks about yoga, fitness, nationalism, economy, corruption and has started interest in politics recently. I doubt even the word religious is mentioned on his page, let alone religious leader. As Regards Modi, as you said that I can't edit his religious activity, is the same principle not applicable for Ramdev? I edited the political and corruption text. It was in no way related to religion, still I am blocked. It's getting oppressive and harrasing now. If you think, I am a vandalised and edit war person say so. Most of the pages I edited were in very bad conditions. They were unsourced, uncited (by this I mean without a single source or citation) and contained template tags since 2007-08. I think now I understand, why Wikipedia is in such a bad condition. I guess, I should leave Wikipedia editing altogether. Do what you want and demolish this beautiful creation of some genius. I don't care, I have 5 of my own websites, and leaving Wikipedia will give me more time for my own websites. Have fun, demolishing interest of editors who want to help. Thanks -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 05:46, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
Well, I tried helping you out, but it seems that the effort was unwarranted. If you do decide to continue editing here, the conditions of the topic ban are what they are and will be enforced. —SpacemanSpiff 05:59, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
  • Capankajsmilyo, SpacemanSpiff and Human3015 have answered your questions clearly in my opinion, so I won't repeat what they said. Also do please read WP:TBAN, as you have been asked to. Your question "Does this mean I can't edit any Indian? Not even Mahatma Gandhi or Subhas Chandra Bose?" is answered there. If you remain in any doubt whether your topic ban covers some particular edit or article, feel free to ask me before making them. Bishonen | talk 10:17, 4 October 2015 (UTC).

Proposed deletion of List of slogans by Narendra Modi

The article List of slogans by Narendra Modi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable slogans by Narendra Modi.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. reddogsix (talk) 09:35, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Teahouse reply

Hello, Capankajsmilyo/Archive 1. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Cordless Larry (talk) 14:14, 7 October 2015 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

Nomination of List of slogans by Narendra Modi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of slogans by Narendra Modi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of slogans by Narendra Modi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sitush (talk) 18:19, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on John F. Kennedy Public School requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. KDS4444Talk 15:20, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of John F. Kennedy Public School for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John F. Kennedy Public School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John F. Kennedy Public School until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. KDS4444Talk 15:24, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 15 October

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that National Herald Case, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. RichardOSmith (talk) 20:00, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Religion edits

Hi Pankaj, please note that your topic ban prohibits you from editing or participating on all Indian religion topics. So, please refrain from making edits however small. You might ask an admin for permission to put in edit requests. But, without permission, you shouldn't do it. - Kautilya3 (talk) 12:14, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

I'm really surprised you seem incapable of abiding by your topic ban, Capankajsmilyo, so many times as it has been explained to you, such as here, here, and here, that you're not allowed to edit articles about Indian religion or religious figures at all. Not minor edits, not uncontroversial edits: no edits. Nevertheless you made 21 edits about Jain religious figures today in the space of 10 minutes. (Your typical speed, which you have also been warned about). You also edited Template:Infobox Jain temple a few hours earlier, and Ahinsa Sthal. My personal theory is that you simply don't read the explanations of what the ban means, but I suppose you could also be testing its (already well-explained) limits. People shouldn't have to keep checking your speed-editing, and that's the reason you were topic banned: to stop the wear and tear on other users. This is a positively last warning: one more edit, however small, in violation of your topic ban, and you will get a lengthy block. Bishonen | talk 14:07, 25 October 2015 (UTC).

October 2015

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Narendra Modi are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Please note that Talk:Narendra Modi is meant for discussing the Narendra Modi article. Please discuss other subjects (such as Arvind Kejriwal and Sonia Gandhi) on their respective talk pages. Drawing parallels between different articles is also frowned upon, as per WP:OSE. Kautilya3 (talk) 12:33, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Why do you finish comment with Pankaj Jain when you can put it as signature itself -- curious.

Good day! --AmritasyaPutraT 18:38, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

I don't, Its in signature ;) -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 18:40, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
Ah 8-) --AmritasyaPutraT 18:45, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for showing concern :) -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 18:47, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Warning

It appears that you are continuing your POV editing elsewhere now as is shown by this set of edits where you added cn tags when cites are clearly provided and removal of sourced contextual content. If you continue this behavior, your topic ban is likely to be expanded or your editing privileges completely revoked. —SpacemanSpiff 16:42, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Capankajsmilyo, you complained of this warning on my page, but I agree completely with it and have explained why here. You're very close to being either blocked or topic banned from Indian articles altogether. Most probably blocked, since the experience of your current topic ban from religious articles has been that you keep testing its boundaries, and now have also simply moved your tendentious editing to another field. Bishonen | talk 21:01, 31 October 2015 (UTC).

November 2015

Information icon Hello, I'm Shrikanthv. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Robert Vadra, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Shrikanthv (talk) 12:47, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

@Shrikanthv: Can you provide a link to the problem edit? - Kautilya3 (talk) 20:42, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
Kautilya3 I guess he is referring to some edit on Robert Vadra. However I just used a tool checklinks and made some improvements in infobox. I did not made any addition or deletion. Do let me know about the conflict edit if any. Thanks!
I also could not see any such edit there; just tagging of dead links and filling up of reference and mentioning Priyanka's name in infobox as spouse. Whats wrong here @Shrikanthv:? You are placing template notices on experienced editors and also "possibly" accusing them of COI over here. (Note: "Possibly" because your that statement is making no sense to me.) §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:13, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Your edits to Gangadhar Nehru

Capankajsmilyo, that's not asking "beforehand", I don't know why you call it that. It's asking afterwards. I do have a good mind to topic ban you from Indian subjects, both because the edits show incompetence with regard to reliable sources, and because you went ahead and made them, then asked. But the one saving grace is that you did ask, so I (for my part) won't ban you at this time. Next time, ask first, and please take on board what SpacemanSpiff tells you about what's wrong with your source, and try to follow WP:HISTRS going forward. Please revert your edits to Gangadhar Nehru right away next time you're online. Bishonen | talk 10:13, 7 November 2015 (UTC).

Sure, thanks. It has already been reverted by Kautilya3. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 12:12, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
That is the easy way out, Pankaj. I am not convinced that you understand what was wrong with the edit. If you do, please state it.
This edit [9] to Kalinga (India) is again problematic. You don't state the source for the rulers you added. On the surface, this just appears to be a random collection of names of rulers over a period of 700 years! I think it is best to leave this out. What you get to see on Google Books is a badly truncated version of the book, and what you are presenting is a distorted picture as a result. - Kautilya3 (talk) 09:14, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello Kautilya3, I added the book along with rulers. Truncated version? -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 09:32, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
You might have. But how will anybody know that this where the material comes from? It is truncated because only 6 pages appear on Google Books. You have no idea what is in the rest of the book. - Kautilya3 (talk) 09:39, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
So should I revert it? They were kings of Kalinga, book states. But they were not the only ones. Book doesn't talk about others in the pages available. What to do in such a case? -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 09:47, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
Indeed, this list is no good. For a country that existed for about a 1000 years, we need highlights, not a list of rulers. - Kautilya3 (talk) 14:35, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Diwali Greeting

Happy Diwali!!!

Sky full of fireworks,
Mouth full of sweets,
Home full of lamps,
And festival full of sweet memories...

Wishing You a Very Happy and Prosperous Diwali.
§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:13, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Send Diwali wishings by adding {{subst:Happy Diwali}} to people's talk pages with a friendly message.
Happy Diwali!!!

Sky full of fireworks,
Mouth full of sweets,
Home full of lamps,
And festival full of sweet memories...

Wishing You a Very Happy and Prosperous Diwali.
Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 12:16, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Send Diwali wishings by adding {{subst:Happy Diwali}} to people's talk pages with a friendly message.

Thanks for the diwali greetings. A very happy diwali to you too! --regentspark (comment) 13:33, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Category:Attendant gods

Category:Attendant gods, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Redtigerxyz Talk 11:24, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Capankajsmilyo/Archive 1. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by LukeSurl t c 12:22, 12 November 2015 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

Your GA nomination of Mahavira

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mahavira you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Royroydeb -- Royroydeb (talk) 11:40, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

WP India Newsletter

{{subst:Wikipedia:WikiProject India/Outreach/November 2015 Newsletter}} -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 10:40, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Capankajsmilyo/Archive 1. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by DES (talk) 12:33, 18 November 2015 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Modi

Template:Modi has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:42, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

OK

OK Pankaj, I'm lifting your topic ban on condition that you edit much less fast than you did before the ban. If I deem it necessary, I'll come back and limit you to a maximum number of edits per day, but that's a pretty blunt instrument which I'd rather not use. Please listen to what experienced and knowledgeable editors tell you. I also strongly advise you to abide by WP:BRD and use WP:RSN and WP:DRN etc rather than repetitive arguing on talk pages. To speak more personally, I think you know that I topic banned you because you exhausted other volunteers. Please try to be aware of the need to avoid that. As soon as you have responded positively here, you can regard yourself as unbanned. Happy editing. Bishonen | talk 20:08, 10 December 2015 (UTC).

Thanks a lot! I'll try my best to abide by all the guidelines. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 04:30, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
That's good. I've logged the lifting of the ban here, so you can refer to that link if somebody should complain between now and Christmas. Enjoy. Bishonen | talk 11:30, 11 December 2015 (UTC).
Hi Pankaj, Welcome back to the full-fledged Wikipedia. I would suggest you be cautious in your edits, especially when concerning religions, and make sure you clearly distinguish religions and history. Only the material sourced to WP:HISTRS sources should be called history. Cheers, Kautilya3 (talk) 13:35, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
Sure, will keep it in mind. Thanks a lot -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 18:44, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Prevent disruption of content in the article

Hi Capankajsmilyo,

This is regarding the article National Herald Case, here the duplicate content has been added , old content deleted without any proper reason, and adding words which are taking the article to the biased way(like using 'fraud' and 'criminal' for the article subjects), thus destroying the neutrality of the article. It seems that the media highlight of the case makes it bit sensitive. I have been able to restore the content as much as possible. My request is that please look into the edits ASAP and if possible add to it "semi-protected" sort of mode for a particular time to prevent it from vandalism.

Work2win (talk) 21:10, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

Appropriate level of detail

Hi, thank you for adding info to Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. IMHO, some of it was too detailed, and I have removed the full list of Presidents. Please have a look at WP:What Wikipedia is not for some guidance as to what is/isn't good content for the encyclopedia.

I hope this does not discourage you from continuing to contribute here. Beyond question, many pages on Indian topics still need improvement! – Fayenatic London 22:08, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Haryana

Don't think I can follow up right now, but take a look at MrsJespersen's edits. Doug Weller talk 19:15, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

December 2015

Information icon Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Ahimsa (disambiguation) does not have an edit summary. I see that you sometimes use Edit Summaries, but please could you try harder to always use them - thanks.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Trafford09 (talk) 00:35, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Jainism

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Jainism you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Yash! -- Yash! (talk) 10:40, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Images

Hi Pankaj, I am not sure why you are removing the size parameters from images. - Kautilya3 (talk) 15:19, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

It has been used even where its not required. Image has a default size parameter so why define it again? -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 15:23, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
I don't know about the default size parameter, but your removal of the size on Nehru-Gandhi family was a disaster. On other images, a preferred size might have been indicated for readability or for formatting purposes. Please don't fix if it isn't broken, and make sure you don't break it anew. - Kautilya3 (talk) 16:29, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for pointing out. Will keep it in mind. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 16:33, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Mail

Hello, Capankajsmilyo. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

--Human3015TALK  20:09, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Jainism

The article Jainism you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Jainism for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Yash! -- Yash! (talk) 22:43, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Redirect of Jyotigram Yojana

I see in this edit you redirected Jyotigram Yojana to Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Gram Jyoti Yojana. I want to clear you few things. If two schemes are related to same thing then it doesn't mean that we should merge it. Specially these 2 schemes are not of "same" government. Jyotigram Yojana is of Government of Gujarat and Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Gram Jyoti Yojana is of Government of India. At most we can merge various schemes initiated by same government related to same thing, but here governments are different. Also read federalism or federalism in India. India is a federal country. India is Union of States. Each state has its own government and own initiatives. --Human3015TALK  09:11, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

There's not enough content on either of the articles and both are stubs. That is why attempted a merge. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 05:21, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Indian English

I noticed you have been adding [Use Indian English] to certain articles. So what exactly are the differences between British English and Indian English? --Kansas Bear (talk) 19:29, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

There isn't much major differences between the two that I know of, hence adding such a tag. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 05:20, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
However, I added such tag only to the articles related to India. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 05:23, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
(talk page stalker) @Kansas Bear: There are some minor differences. For example, 100,000 is known as Hundred thousands in British English but knwon as 1 Lakh in Indian English. Same way 1,00,00,000 is known as 1 crore instead of 10 million.--Human3015TALK  06:12, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Capankajsmilyo!

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Happy New Year 2016}} to send this message

Wikiproject assessment

Hi Pankaj, I notice you giving article assessment ratings. Please note that, in order to assess for a project, you need to be a member of the project and, possibly, its assessment team. You also need to closely know the guidelines for assessing for that project. Some of the assessment edits you have done lead me to believe that you don't know this. So, until you become a full-fledged assessor, please don't do any assessments. Cheers, Kautilya3 (talk) 01:23, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Category:Jainism of the Middle Ages has been nominated for discussion

Category:Jainism of the Middle Ages, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 09:16, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Category:Jains of the Middle Ages has been nominated for discussion

Category:Jains of the Middle Ages, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 09:17, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:List of Delhi NGOs, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:35, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

February 2016

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Minister of Tourism (India) into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.
* Arbitrarily redirecting pages, like Minister of Tourism (India) that have existed for years, may not be a great idea if done without any discussion.
220 of Borg 09:40, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Information icon Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Thanks! - 220 of Borg 09:41, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Ok, will keep it in mind for future. Thanks! -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 10:22, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Your Teahouse question

I'm sorry to see no one answered your Teahouse question before it was archived. I don't know how to answer the question but they might know at WP:VPT.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 21:24, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for the information Vchimpanzee -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 10:24, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Jainism

Heyo Capankajsmilyo. Great work on the article. Sorry, I don't have enough time on my hands to do a full review but a quick look tells me that the lead is too short and doesn't cover all the topics in the article yet. There are still a few unreferenced facts there. Other than that, the article is in need of some copy-edits and might need a bit of neutralization. Overall, in a much better state and close to getting to the GA status. I suggest you make a request at GOCE, expand the lead and make sure that every fact has a citation, and it is good to be nominated. Best, Yash! 17:00, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Smart cities

Template:Smart cities has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. DexDor (talk) 07:34, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Jainism II

Hello, Capankajsmilyo -- I'm almost finished copy-editing Jainism. I'll read it through again tomorrow and I may have a few questions or comments for you. I'm tired now and will take a break until tomorrow. Corinne (talk) 02:21, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Thankyou! I see that you have added a few clarify tags. Will try and resolve them. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 02:22, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
I've noticed that, generally, discussions are kept off the actual Requests page. There is always the Requests talk page, but it would be best to conduct discussions on the article's talk page, the requester's talk page, or the copy-editor's talk page.
I think the article is almost ready for a GA review, but let's take care of a few things first. I think the appearance of two of the tables could be improved. See the details of my suggestions at User talk:Corinne#Jainism. I'm not very good at tables and right now don't have the patience to read up on how to change the width of columns or the color of header rows. It looks like you know more than I do. If you could read my suggestions and make any changes that you agree with, I think that would be something that could improve the article.
The other thing is that, in the section Jainism#Statues and sculptures, that looks like a gallery, and usually sections do not start with a gallery. I'm wondering if Checkingfax has any suggestions regarding the placement of those three images. I also think they could be slightly larger than they are. Also, I think the dimensions of each sculpture or statue should be left out of the caption (I believe the dimensions are in the text of the article, aren't they?). In the middle image, what does "initiative of" mean? I mean, I know what "built upon the initiative of" kind of means, but could you be more specific and tell me what it really means? Corinne (talk) 15:59, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Hi Corinne. If you go to edit-source while wikEd is toggled on, wikEd will show you the heading color. Right now the heading is background=#9c0 which is that deep puce green.
That is a 3-place hexadecimal number for that particular shade of green. You can replace it with a different hex number or you can use a named color from the named web color list. You can then clone that line of wikicode to the other tables (including the background= part). You can also use 6-place hex numbers if you wish. You just put a pound sign in front of the hex number, be it 3 or 6 places long.
What size is your computer screen? What magnification do you run it at? On my screen at 100% the table lines of text are on one line per cell with no wrapping. In fact there is whitespace between the right margin of the table and the right margin of my screen. Wikitables automatically adjust to their contents and to your screen unless they are hardsized in some fashion (by pixels or by screen width percentage). So there are no hanging indents to create. And if they were created they would not be universal to all screen sizes and screen magnifications.
Forcing image sizes can become a MOS:ACCESSIBILITY issue. I will have a look at the gallery and the image sizing. I already converted an infobox that just contained two images into two separate images because the infobox was too unwieldy by comparison to other images in the article, and it had a heading about God, when God is already the section title so it was redundant. Cheers! {{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk} 16:37, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Category:Chartered Accountants has been nominated for discussion

Category:Chartered Accountants, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shyamsunder (talk) 10:05, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Category:Indian Chartered Accountants has been nominated for discussion

Category:Indian Chartered Accountants, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shyamsunder (talk) 10:06, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Girish Ahuja requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Prof TPMS (talk) 11:17, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Notification about disabling the Wikipedia collections tool

Thank you for using the collections feature in Wikipedia beta! Due to technical and moderation issues, we will be turning off this experimental feature. Your collections will be available for viewing and export until March 1st. If you would like to save your collection as links on a special Wikipedia page, please fill out the following [http://goo.gl/forms/ZyYQm6uu7e form]. If you are interested in giving your feedback about Wikipedia Collections please do so here.

Thanks,

Jon Katz
Product manager, Wikimedia Foundation
Jkatz (WMF) (talk) 23:57, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Infobox Jain deity

Template:Infobox Jain deity has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox deity. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Redtigerxyz Talk 11:16, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Jain monasticism

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Jain monasticism you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sainsf -- Sainsf (talk) 02:21, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Digambara

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Digambara you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sainsf -- Sainsf (talk) 02:21, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mahavira

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mahavira you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sainsf -- Sainsf (talk) 04:20, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Reply :)

Hello, could you reply here that you have started the page? --Tito Dutta (talk) 07:04, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Statue of Ahimsa

Thank you for ur suggestions. I just wanted to add the references for the Guinness World Record Certificate. Should I add it under notes or references? Thanks once again. ErASethi (talk) 17:07, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Please continue further on your talk page where I posted comment. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 17:09, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Thanks a lot. I have added the reference. Can you please see whether it is fine? Thanks once again ErASethi (talk) 17:25, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 10 March

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:26, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

"In Use" tag

I noticed that you edited the page Clinical Establishments (Registration and Regulation) Act, 2010, while it had a {{in use}} tag. Please wait for the other editor to finish his edits and remove the tag. If the tag has not been removed after 30 minutes, you can carry out your edits then. Please do not remove the tag on your own until then. -Kenfyre (talk) 08:12, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 11 March

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:27, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

In case you wish to nominate the article, please do so. However there is one refrence tag for which I could not locate an alternate reference.--Nvvchar. 07:43, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

@Nvvchar Nominate for? -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 12:52, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
For DYK.--Nvvchar. 12:53, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
@Nvvchar done. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 14:52, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Thhere could be a problem with your name as author as your edit, before I started on 24 February, was on 5th February and the article has be posted ob DYK as per rules within 7 days of starting of the expansion. Pl see if you can rectify it. Otherwise it will not go through.Nvvchar. 02:05, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

This was my first DYK. I don't know much. Can you please guide me on what to do. I read the policies and instructions before nominating, though I found it quite confusing. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 03:02, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
Please change the sequence of names, putting my name first, in the posting and also in credits below that. QPQ is essential as all other contributing to the articles have more than 5 DKYs to their credit. Nvvchar. 09:33, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
@Nvvchar done. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 07:21, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Isn't it already resolved? Ms Sarah Welch wrote "per consensus" on nomination page in last comment. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 07:59, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

INCOTM March article

Hello, most probably you have noticed that Environment of India has been selected as the article of the month. In March we'll collaboratively attempt to improve article. Please spend some time and help to improve this article. Regards. --Tito Dutta (talk) 18:03, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Umaswati

Hello! Your submission of Umaswati at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 00:49, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Smilyo concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Smilyo, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Environmental issues in India into Environment of India. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 00:51, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Umaswati

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Namaskar Pankaj Ji!

I am sorry to crowd your talk space, but I would like to join the Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Narendra Modi as I now feel more confident in my ability to properly vet sources as well as ensure the provision, for those readers so interested, in a neutral and objective source of information of Pradhan Mantri Narendro Modi Ji's administration.

I am particularly interested in establishing a "uniformity of standards for information" to accompany our contributions; I hope to see the day when the quality and standards of Wikipedia Hindi and Wikipedia Telugu (as well as all other Indian-language Wikpedias) that exist to educate and motivate our people) are able to convey the complexity of this world we share with the same standards of ethics, neutrality, presentation and fidelity as Wikipedia English (we have our work cut out for us).

I am currently able, though only under the supervision of a sincere Wikipedia contributor such as yourself, of rendering well-researched and neutral articles authored and edited in English into both Telugu as well as Hindi.

I am committed to the democratization of knowledge that Wikipedia represents; and no one is in more desperate a need for a seat at the table of those who govern and regulate our marketplace of ideas than our sisters and brothers in India.

Thank you for reaching out to me! I hope to hear from you. Svabhiman (talk) 10:05, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Mahavira


Thanks a lot @Baffle gab1978 -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 05:33, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mahavira

The article Mahavira you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Mahavira for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sainsf -- Sainsf (talk) 09:01, 5 April 2016 (UTC)


Thanks a lot @Miniapolis -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 19:14, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

April 2016

Information icon Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Template talk:Infobox character. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. AussieLegend () 10:39, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Digambara

The article Digambara you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Digambara for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sainsf -- Sainsf (talk) 08:41, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Information icon This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 18:24, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Jain monasticism

The article Jain monasticism you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Jain monasticism for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sainsf -- Sainsf (talk) 13:21, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

To sum up, all content you add to this wiki (other than brief quotations, where absolutely necessary) should be written in your own words. Capankajsmilyo, please read WP:copyrights and WP:plagiarism and let us know when you have done so. Please don't edit any more until you do this. Any further copyright violations will result in you being blocked from editing. — Diannaa (talk) 15:42, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for the links. They were really helpful. The plagiarism one was nice and elaborate with illustration. However, I could not understand the relevance of WP:copyrights in relation to my edits. How to proceed further? -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 16:07, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
@Capankajsmilyo: You can begin by self-reverting, or rewriting, any and all instances you remember of copy-pasting in recent months, including those links identified in ANI complaint against you. Look at your entire edit history, check what you added (in green), and begin the clean up. @Diannaa may have more suggestions. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 16:47, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

The main thing you need to do is stop adding copyright violations. All prose you add to this wiki has to be written in your own words. As far as helping with clean-up, I've prepared a contribution survey and put it in User:Diannaa/sandbox. Please copy this into your own sandbox. This is the same report we use at WP:CCI. The diffs in bold are the ones most likely to have copyright violations. The articles are sorted with big edits at the top and small edits at the bottom. The ones at the top are the articles most likely to contain copyright violations. There's a hundred articles on the list altogether. Please go through all these diffs in bold and look for and remove copyright violations wherever you find them. I know this task is very time consuming and difficult, because I do it all the time when trying to clear cases at WP:CCI, so that is why it is vitally important that you do this task yourself and not burden the community with the clean-up. Please make this a priority over creating new content. The clean-up may take you several weeks. — Diannaa (talk) 11:38, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for the report. However, if there is a better one, can you please refer me that. I copied this report to my sandbox and checked more than 20 articles. It has taken into consideration, template additions, infobox additions and even books added as reference. Few edits were in which only a book was added in reference column. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 12:33, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
The list also contains some intra-wiki copies. What can I do for them? In the new intra-wiki copies I mention that the content is copied from another article in comments. But the ones I did earlier, I did not do that. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 12:36, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
@Capankajsmilyo: Frankly, @Diannaa list is already a lot of help and you shouldn't be asking for "better one" already. Just look at the bolded numbers, where you added a lot of content. Go through line by line, source by source, and start deleting or 'rewriting in your own words' any and all copyvio you discover. To show progress, you can use <s></s>, like this:
Chakravartin Ashoka Samrat: (15 edits, 1 major, +10081) (+8)(+70)(+135)(+18)(-66)(+7)(-3)(-175)(-74)(-25)(+35)(+10081)(-3)(-32)(-49), once you have throughly checked and updated the edit related to 10081 link, in your sandbox.
Addressing Copyvio charges against you should be your only priority right now in wikipedia. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 13:05, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Capankajsmilyo, just go through all the diffs in bold. There is no easy way to do this; there's no shortcuts. You can use the tool https://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios/ to compare wiki pages with web pages to help you find copyright violations. For intra-wiki copies, go back and make a tiny edit to add the attribution. Here is an example of how to do it.Diannaa (talk) 13:53, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

GA nomination for Jain monasticism removed

@Capankajsmilyo: I have removed your GA nomination for Jain monasticism article, till the above copyvio case is duly addressed and cleared. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 13:12, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

Ms Sarah Welch, GA nominations may not be removed once the review is actually is under way. The only options are to pass or to fail said nomination. Under the circumstances, and especially as the article has had persistent copyvio issues, it would almost certainly have to be failed, and I will be doing so after I post this. However, the reviewer of this nomination has the final say, so I am pinging Sainsf, who may decide to restore and resume the nomination after reviewing the material above. (The copyvios issue came up at WP:AN#Repeated Copyright Violations that spans 100s of pages, and has continued above.)
Capankajsmilyo, the article can be nominated again once all of the copyvio issues have been cleared and the other issues raised in the GA review have been addressed. I suggest you get a peer review before then, to get independent eyes on it who can tell you whether it is ready for nomination. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:40, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
@BlueMoonset: Understood. For some reason, I missed that the review was already in progress. After your note, I see it is. I just wanted a reviewer to avoid starting the GA review process, since every review is so much work, and @Capankajsmilyo needs to help address this issue. FWIW, the wiki article Mahavira, which recently got GA and is now a DYK nomination seems to have the same issue. Thanks for the note and taking care of this. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 16:01, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
@BlueMoonset and Ms Sarah Welch: Posting my view on this issue here as well. I have no objection to the failing of this nomination, in fact it appears the best solution at the moment given the issues we have yet to fix and the long time the review has already had to wait. Please note that this editor has two nominations in the queue even now, we might need to check them. Sainsf <^>Feel at home 16:21, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
@Sainsf: Thanks for the alert. Indeed, the two articles are Rishabhanatha and Bahubali. I will let BlueMoonset check and if appropriate, do the honors. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 16:31, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
@Ms Sarah Welch @BlueMoonset Kindly correct me if I am wrong, but Rishabhanatha and Bahubali doesn't appear on User:Capankajsmilyo/sandbox. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 17:33, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Capankajsmilyo, you are the one who nominated these two articles for GA, which is what counts: we need to be sure that the articles do not have copyvio and other issues. I have checked the nominations for both Rishabhanatha and Bahubali, and had to remove them both. For Rishabhanatha, I did so after finding a clear example of the sort of copyvio that has been described above, and for Bahubali, the entire Statues section of the article is completely unreferenced except for one paragraph, rendering the article completely ineligible for GA, and also making it impossible to check for copying in the bulk of that Section. Note that the various copyvio tools do not work when the copied texts are only available via Google books, since the tools cannot check the actual contents of those books; this is the sort of check that has to be done manually. Courtesy pinging Sainsf and Ms Sarah Welch to inform them of the results. BlueMoonset (talk) 17:43, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
Capankajsmilyo, I believe you should take a break from beginning work on articles for at least a week and try to repair the damages. This will help you learn new things and write better articles on the future. Sainsf <^>Feel at home 17:49, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
(edit conflict) *@Capankajsmilyo: I concur with @BlueMoonset. @Dianna's list in your sandbox is your top 100 list to work on. You have over 150 edits in Rishabhanatha, and over 50 in Bahubali. It would be better if you relooked at these articles, line by line, reference and reference, clean it up or assure that there is no copyvio no matter who did it, and check everything is supported. Once you are at that stage, nominate it. You must do so because reviewing is a lot of work, and not a cat and mouse game. GA review is not about fixing major problems such as copyvio or unsourced sections as @BlueMoonset notes, but should be about fine tuning a "close to good article". You also need time to clean up the articles with copyvio problems, which ought to be your highest priority in wikipedia till @Dianna is satisfied with your efforts. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 17:53, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
These two articles do not appear on the script-generated report I provided. I'm not sure why. — Diannaa (talk)
@Capankajsmilyo: For every Jainism/Indic/etc article where you have substantial edits, please use this copyvio check tool that @Diannaa mentioned above. The bolded numbers are only starting point, and do not mean they completely identify that there may be a copyvio issue. For example, the bolded 10081 of Chakravartin Ashoka Samrat you struck off here, is flagged with copyvio problems if you run copyvio check tool on the article. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 21:01, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:List of Delhi NGOs

Hello, Capankajsmilyo. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "List of Delhi NGOs".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Lakun.patra (talk) 13:09, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Status

I see that Diannaa has asked you to clean up the copyvios from your contributions but I'm unable to see any work on that while you are still going on with new content additions and nominations for GA/Peer review etc. Can you please let us know what efforts you have taken towards cleaning up past copyvio? —SpacemanSpiff 04:25, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

I am trying to clean the articles. I have struck User:Capankajsmilyo/sandbox as told by Ms Sarah Welch. I have also tried and cleaned Digambara, Jain literature, Bahubali, Bharata Chakravartin, Tarunsagar and few other pages besides those whom I've struck in sandbox. Will try to clean more. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 04:38, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
Ok, that's good then. But on Bharata Chakravartin, that was a problem from the start as it was a duplicate article. I brought it up when you created it but then it seems to have slipped my mind, I'm going to ask Diannaa (gratuitous ping) to see what should be done there with that article along with Bharata (emperor) and Jadabharata. I remember there being a detailed discussion among some editors regarding this but can't find that discussion now. The Bharata Chakravartin article is problematic as it started out as some form of copy paste. —SpacemanSpiff 04:47, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
I was new then and din know much of Wikipedia policies. But now, it doesn't seem to be a copy at all. You can verify. Besides that, from what I could find out, both the characters seem to be different having a common name. Just like Bharata (Ramayana). -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 04:54, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
There is only one common thing between the three Bharatas that India got its name Bharata from them. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 04:56, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
You were new then, agreed, and I'm not holding this against you now but the mess still needs to be fixed. What's the difference between Jadabharata and Bharata Chakravartin? You have essentially used content from the others to start this one when it is just the same. I'm not here to argue about the different streams of thought, I'm only looking at the Wikipedia process. —SpacemanSpiff 05:13, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
Jadabharata is a Hindu scripture that talks about Bharata (emperor), a Hindu character. The Wikipedia page is entirely unreferenced having information about Bharata Chakravartin (Jainism) which is not there in Jadabharata scripture at all. That is why it's confusing. I would like to recommend merging Jadabharata into Bharata (emperor) (hinduism) and Bharata Chakravartin (Jainism). -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 07:51, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

@Capankajsmilyo: what you call "cleaned" so far is predominantly cosmetic changes, such as adding PD-notice templates, such as here and here. What we really need is edits of the type @जैन has recently made in terms of WP:Copyvio and WP:Plag compliance, such as this and this. The Copyvio 1-100 check list, created by @Diannaa, and in your sandbox, is largely unaddressed. @SpacemanSpiff: I suggest we request @Capankajsmilyo to not worry about merging articles, fixing new articles, adding or deleting large scale templates such as "Authority control" from articles, nominating new peer review, or for GA, or for DYK or adding any new content; rather, he should focus his time, checking line by line, ref by ref, anything he added, so as to clean out that 1-100 list first, because there are substantial allegations, as well as evidence, of Copyvio problems created by him. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 12:12, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

I am trying to do both PD and edits of kind you mentioned. Few examples are [10], [11], [12]. I have done line by line edits only, you can check by edit pattern or you can verify the article and sources. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 12:33, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
I have not seen much happening so far in the way of copyright clean-up but at least you have stopped adding more copyright violations. I am checking your contribs daily. I agree that copyright clean-up should be your priority right now. Sorry but I don't have time to help; I am very busy checking the bot reports at User:EranBot/Copyright/rc and have time for little else. — Diannaa (talk) 13:00, 25 April 2016 (UTC)


I'd suggest cutting the guy a little slack. Editing wikipedia isn't a paid job, and no one is obliged to spend hours checking articles line by line, even if they were responsible for copyvio issues. If he is willing to spend some time addressing the issues, then great, if he would rather be adding content to wikipedia then that is something he is entitled to do. Spacecowboy420 (talk) 07:38, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 10 May

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Girnar Jain temples

An IP added large amounts of text without refs. Then after repeated warnings to add refs, removed a large amount of text from Girnar Jain temples here with dubious ES. Then, the IP was blocked, and started socking on another IP. I restored the content to Girnar Jain temples having to manually replace your changes. The citation you removed was referenced by this content and replacement of your edits 'broke' the ref. I replaced these with CN. As I am unfamiliar with the topic, would you please see what needs fixing? Or, if you feel that text should not be there, please, by all means, remove it! Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 18:06, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

I've tried to cleanup with what was available on article. Thanks for informing. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 19:32, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

IVC

Any chance of you actually trying to source any of your about 15 cn tags? I removed the article tag you shouldn't do both. Doug Weller talk 05:26, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community Survey

The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:49, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

I understand that you reverted the likely-vandal user. But your revert was not to the best possible version. You removed sourced sentences in your revert. Please be careful next time. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:15, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for pointing out -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 13:56, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Sangha

There is a move request at Talk:Sangha (Buddhism)#Requested move 4 June 2016 that suggests to reverse the page moves recently suggested in the discussion above it. Your involvement with the previous page moves suggests that you might be interested.  OUR Wikipedia (not "mine")! Paine  22:03, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

June 2016

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Narendra Modi may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • In 2016, he announced his target to double the farmers income by 2022.<ref>{{citation |title=PM targets to double farmers'' income by 2022 |url=http://www.thestatesman.com/
  • pm-targets-to-double-farmers-income-by-2022/146344.html |work=[[The Statesman]] |date=4 June 2016 })</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:56, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Tag bombing

Hi Pankaj, this constitutes WP:Tag bombing. Please don't do it. It looks like you need to take a few days off and cool down. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 10:22, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

You need to genuinely make an effort to verify the content before you decide that a citation is needed. Since the material has links to full articles, you need to check them first. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 10:24, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
That was not cited, nor did the article contain any source which listed all (or any) of the points I added [citation needed] tags to. But if you say so, I won't add cn tags to it. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 10:27, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Removal of large sections in numerous articles

Wikipedia:Verifiability requires only "any material challenged or likely to be challenged (NOT all material) must be attributed to a reliable, published source using an inline citation." Please adhere to "When tagging or removing material for lacking an inline citation, please state your concern that it may not be possible to find a published reliable source for the content, and therefore it may not be verifiable." References for the deleted part of Sita can be easily found and tagging would have been better option. --Redtigerxyz Talk 16:14, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

This is the second comment iv got on Verification thing. Please note that I deleted as a part of WP:UNSOURCED not on verifiability accounts. Please guide me to the Wikipedia policy which allows us to add content without source (whether verifiable or not). If you are talking about Sita particularly, I won't remove the content again if you want. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 16:24, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
(edit conflict) Mandodari: WP:V also suggests one to "check to see whether the material is sourced to a citation elsewhere on the page." The opening statement of "Mother of Sita?" is a summary of the section ahead and backed by the completely referenced section ahead. --Redtigerxyz Talk 16:28, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for pointing out on Mandodari. That was helpful. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 16:38, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Capankajsmilyo, WP:UNSOURCED doesn't say that unsourced material must be removed. In fact, what it says is "When tagging or removing material for lacking an inline citation, please state your concern that it may not be possible to find a published reliable source for the content, and therefore it may not be verifiable" and then goes on to say, in a note, that "it is advisable to communicate clearly that you have a considered reason to believe that the material in question cannot be verified". None of this, of course, prevents you from going around deleting stuff but removing material that is generally uncontested (like the stuff you removed from Laksmana and earlier from Indian rebellion of 1857) without first trying to find a source, and doing so on a large scale, gives the impression that you're on some sort of mission. Especially when it is clear that you've made no attempt to try to find a source. That's never desirable on Wikipedia.--regentspark (comment) 16:36, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Just to clarify, I'm not on any mission. Further, I read "The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material" and "Any material lacking a reliable source directly supporting it may be removed and should not be restored without an inline citation to a reliable source." If it suits you to, I would not delete any unsourced info, although I would encourage you to check among hundreds of unsourced articles and scrutinise them as per "your opinion" which you consider as verifiable or sourced. At last I also read "Do not leave unsourced or poorly sourced material in an article if it might damage the reputation of living people[5] or existing groups, and do not move it to the talk page. You should also be aware of how the BLP policy applies to groups." Please consider WP:BURDEN before accusing me of anything. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 16:45, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Also please provide cites for Lakshmana and Rebellion page. I won't remove anything of them. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 16:53, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Modi

Capankajsmilyo, you're misunderstanding what I'm saying. It's not a question of praising or criticizing Modi but rather one of presenting substantive content on his tenure as prime minister. If you read the section as it is now, it consists almost entirely of one line sentences, sort of bullet points, on his initiatives and plans. That's not enough. The section should contain fewer specific initiatives and focus only on those ones whose outcomes have been analyzed in academic sources (unlikely because of the short time) or in the media (more likely). The way it is written now, it looks like fancruft and won't be taken seriously by the reader. Our article is actually doing a disservice to Modi because of the shallowness of the content. --regentspark (comment) 17:21, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Mahavira

Hello! Your submission of Mahavira at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Intelligentsium 22:57, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Mahavira

On 15 June 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mahavira, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Mahavira (pictured) was the 24th and last tirthankara (teaching god) in Jainism? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mahavira. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Mahavira), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:01, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Edits to Kannada poets

I noticed you have been adding templates to various Kannada poet articles. While often templates help bring value to an article, just throwing info that makes no sense into it only spoils the effort. For instance, can you prove that Raghavanka was not born in the 12th century? You claim Naraharitirtha was from the 13th century, but his compositions are from the 14th century. Practically every article you have touched has such mistakes. I suggest you make changes from "born" and "died" to "lived" and just put in the century when he wrote the classic/poems. This way there is no guess work. Often there can be disagreement among historians whether a classic was written in a century or the previous or the next. Just indicate that with "12th or 13th century". Also you are throwing in multile templates into each article throwing off the alignment. This is an eye sore. Please rectify your mistakes.Pied Hornbill (talk) 15:03, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

Done -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 16:12, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
Hi. As far as possible, use earliest year of publication when providing citations from ref books. Please don't create hanging uncited sentences when you create a "biography" section, which appears to be a repeat sentence from the lead. The hanging sentences tempts other users to drop "citation needed" tags that spoils the article.Pied Hornbill (talk) 01:45, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
Seems like you are not aware of WP:Lede. Please have a look. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 02:31, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
I am aware of it. Just that your section on "biography" was redundant and also repetitive word to word. If you have new info about the poets biography, it makes sense to add a new section with fresh content. All you did was copy the same sentence with the original citation. Also, going from standard citation format to Stanford format did not improve the article. You are just creating edits with real no progress and opening up the article for tag from hasty users who don't know about WP:Lede. In wiki, it helps to take precautions.Pied Hornbill (talk) 03:03, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
WP:Lede: As a general rule of thumb, a lead section should contain no more than four well-composed paragraphs and be carefully sourced as appropriate.Pied Hornbill (talk) 03:10, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
WP:Lede: Because the lead will usually repeat information that is in the body, editors should balance the desire to avoid redundant citations in the lead with the desire to aid readers in locating sources for challengeable material. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 07:28, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Bahubali


July 2016

Information icon Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Mularaja does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Trafford09 (talk) 12:54, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Rishabhanatha

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Rishabhanatha has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 20:24, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Pulaksagar

Hello Capankajsmilyo,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Pulaksagar for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. ubiquity (talk) 05:09, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

August 2016

Information icon Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to National Pension Scheme does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. If you cannot manage an Edit summary, please mark such edits as wp:minor. Thanks. Trafford09 (talk) 22:02, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Ways to improve Shrutakevalin

Hi, I'm Savonneux. Capankajsmilyo, thanks for creating Shrutakevalin!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Still contains a lot of foreign language content

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Savonneux (talk) 04:50, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Jainism

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Jainism you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Nrityam -- Nrityam (talk) 09:40, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Please use the most specific categories applicable

Greetings, I applaud your enthusiasm in creating articles on Indian legislation, but please be aware that Wikipedia articles should have the most specific categories applicable. As an example, Microsoft is not filed under "Business", "Computers", etc (these are not YouTube tags), but rather:

And so forth.

So please do not use "Category:India" as that is for only the most general articles dealing with that nation. At the absolute least use "Category:Indian legislation", but your best bet is to look at long-standing well-developed articles on famous Indian legislation, and mimic the fine and detailed categories that such articles use, which should include categories for the date of the legislation, its topic, etc.

Again, kudos for your work, do not be discouraged, please just familiarized yourself with how having very precise categories makes your articles even easier to find and more useful, and avoids cluttering the very general categories. With just a little study, this will become very second nature to you and make each new article you create stronger and more integrated into the system. Again kudos for your enthusiasm! MatthewVanitas (talk) 06:15, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for informing MatthewVanitas, will keep it in mind. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 07:48, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Edit Warring

Stop icon

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.192.111.202 (talk) 11:37, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

2016 Uri Attack

Stop icon

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.255.44.53 (talk) 19:51, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 6 October

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

Template talk:Infobox person

Everyone that commented at "Template talk:Infobox person" concerning whether to change the wording about including the name of parents also !voted in the section below, except you. Can you return and vote? "Proposal: Remove the requirement that parents be "independently notable" ". Thanks. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 02:55, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

Asian 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 01:26, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox religious biography/color

Template:Infobox religious biography/color has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 13:18, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Template:Current MPs of India

Pankaj, I noticed that you recently created this template. While the enthusiasm is appreciated, there are some issues here. According to WP:NPOL, every one of the 750+ Indian MPs are notable. A large number, if not all, have articles. Given that, the template you created is totally impractical. The topic is much better served by a category, or at most by a list. Vanamonde (talk) 04:12, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Why is it impractical? -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 04:16, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
Because, as I just said, it would need to have 788 entries, which is far too many to be useful. Vanamonde (talk) 04:57, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
Converted (y) -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 06:52, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
Thank you, but I don't understand your fascination with navboxes. Please, explain to me why this is not better handled as a sortable list, which can contain a lot more information: party, state, constituency, tenure, etc, etc. Vanamonde (talk) 08:05, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Non-free image use

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload new images. However, it appears that one or more of the images you have recently uploaded or added to a page, specifically Template:Current MPs of India, may fail our non-free image policy. Most often, this involves editors uploading or using a copyrighted image of a living person. For other possible reasons, please read up on our Non-free image criteria. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 08:12, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Current MPs of India

Template:Current MPs of India has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. —SpacemanSpiff 08:20, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Could you please help me with Draft:Nageshwar Parshwanath Tirth

Hello Pankaj Jain, Firstly, thank you for inviting me for WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge. I would like to ask you if you could help me with Draft:Nageshwar Parshwanath Tirth article that I am trying to start. That would be quite helpful.

Thank You

Regards

Pratyk Jain

I have seen the article. You haven't added any WP:RS. Do you have any news report link or any book mentioning about the temple? -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 14:52, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
I couldn't find many reliable sources for this article. There are some sites that suggest this temple for tourism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pratyk321 (talkcontribs) 15:14, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
Moderation is quite strict here. I'm afraid without RS, you won't be able to get your article published. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 15:24, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

PageViews template

Hi Pankaj, I am not sure why you are putting the PageViews templates on the talk pages. It will only end up inciting all the POV pushers. Has this been discussed anywhere? -- Kautilya3 (talk) 18:55, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Should I not do it? Is this against some WP:POLICY? -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count)
Not everything is against policy, some things are against common sense. You have, of your own volition, decided without any community input or attempt to discuss, that scores of talk pages require pageview graphs, when millions of talk pages don't have them. Why? You should revert these and seek consensus at each page you wish to modify, or in some central location, although where that might be, I'm not quite certain. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:19, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
I will be happy to initiate a discussion, any idea where to do it? -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 19:20, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
Since you are mostly addressing India pages, WikiProject India noticeboard would be the best place to discuss. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 20:01, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Edit summaries

I have noticed that you often edit without an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. An edit summary is even more important if you delete any text; otherwise, people may think you're being sneaky. Also, mentioning one change but not another one can be misleading to someone who finds the other one more important; add "and misc." to cover the other change(s). Thanks! --220 of Borg 17:18, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Pankaj, you were just asked to use edit-summaries, and here I find you editing on Template:Narendra Modi, again without using them. So let me ask you again. Please use an edit summary for each and every edit. The only obvious exceptions I can think of are when you use rollback, and when you are in your own userspace. Anywhere else, best practice is to use an edit-summary every time. This is especially true when making changes that could be disputed, because not leaving an explanation is a recipe for your intentions being misunderstood. Vanamonde (talk) 14:39, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Indeed Vanamonde93 it surprises me, after 7 years editing WP, that some editors blithely refuse to even acknowledge such simple requests. 220 of Borg 10:07, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
Edit summaries that are misleading are possibly worse than none at all. I AGF, but could you please explain why your edit summary here, reads "Cleanup", possibly unnecessary, but fails to mention the addition of the {{Narendra Modi}} template? 220 of Borg 12:09, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions alert

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. ----regentspark (comment) 14:13, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

Capankajsmilyo, I'm reminding you of the arbcom authorized discretionary sanctions on India articles. Please note that if you keep adding Narendra Modi templates, or if your obsession with Modi continues, you're going to end up with a Modi related topic ban. --regentspark (comment) 14:14, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

What is this message about? Am I banned? -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 15:21, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
No. Just a warning that you may end up topic banned. Now that I think about it, you do have an obsession with Modi and with templating in general. If you continue adding templates willy nilly, you will end up with some sort of ban - either a Modi specific one, or a template addition one, or both. Just be careful. --regentspark (comment) 15:59, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
I see I am not the only one who has noticed this. I mentioned the 'Modi templating' too, above, regarding failure to mention it in edit summaries. 220 of Borg 03:39, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Pankaj, I think I have said this before, but I will say it again. Even setting aside any obsession with Modi, you have a tendency to make vast numbers of gnomish edits, often without obvious purpose. These include creating impractical templates, and adding graphs to talk pages (both of which are issues that have been brought up above). Now they may not indvidually be against policy, but you need to remember that we are here to build an encyclopedia, and fundamentally that means writing content. There is, of course, a place for edits that organize and maintain that content, but frequently your efforts in this direction are misguided. You have the ability to write content; why not get back to that? Vanamonde (talk) 16:28, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Capankajsmilyo. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Foreign policy of the Narendra Modi government

Hello again, Pankaj. I noticed that you've nominated Foreign policy of the Narendra Modi government for GA status. No I'm glad you're interested in improving that article, because it's an important topic. As of now, though, the article is liable to be quick-failed as soon as somebody opens the review. It is very far from meeting GA criteria 2 & 4, and the prose has issues, too. It has a notice about a lack of sources and that notice is unquestionably still valid. I would strongly suggest that you withdraw the nomination, and do the grunt work of preparing the article. It cannot have unsourced paragraphs, and it needs to be based on sources analyzing the substance of the policies. If you are interested, there are some sources in my sandbox. Vanamonde (talk) 04:15, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

Vallabhbhai Patel

Thanks a lot Corinne -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 01:08, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

This cite does not exist. 200,000 is never mentioned in article

Failed link at Burhan wani page[1]. The orginal article does not mention any number except tens of thousands. That cannot translate into two lakhs. Please file WP:ANI against @Kautilya3 who has been persistently trying to whitewash information on this page. Other include at @Mar4d. Military titles not allowed for militants and insurgents.Thank you.2602:30A:C7D7:E590:A4A2:9805:63B8:6794 (talk) 14:37, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Modi and sources

Pankaj, you need to carefully read WP:DUE before adding more content to the Modi page. It is not enough for a particular fact to be mentioned by a newspaper: if we added every such, the article would be enormous. The content currently in the article is not perfect. If you look at it carefully, though, you will notice that most things are cited to scholarly sources, which are of higher quality than the news media, and to international sources, which will (naturally) be better at judging the big picture because they are further removed. Indian media sources are generally used as supporting sources, or for details that incontrovertibly belong in the article, such as details of his early life or dates of specific events (like his inauguration). And I hope I don't need to remind you about BRD. Vanamonde (talk) 07:13, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Stop unhelpful edits, Wikipedia is not a crystal ball

Stop you edits, of redirects of and consider reading the issues, Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, Wikipedia:CRYSTALBALL Junosoon (talk) 03:24, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Bahubali

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Bahubali you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 20:01, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

I hope you don't mind me grabbing Bahubali as well. It's very close to GA-status. Adam Cuerden (talk) 20:04, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Bahubali

The article Bahubali you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Bahubali for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 20:21, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Jainism

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Jainism you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 14:00, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Good work so far! Just let me know when the tags are dealt with, and I'll give it another go-over. As I said, we should probably accept this'll take a bit; it's a big, detailed article - but I'm here for as long as it takes to get it to GA, and a decent ways towards FA. =) Adam Cuerden (talk) 19:22, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for the support n help Adam Cuerden -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 03:27, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
Let me know when you're ready forr the next part of the review. Adam Cuerden (talk) 02:35, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
Just 2-3 cn tags left. Will try n resolve asap. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 02:38, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Rishabhanatha

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Rishabhanatha you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 09:01, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Part two of the review is up. Adam Cuerden (talk) 21:26, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Jainism

The article Jainism you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Jainism for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 11:20, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

I suspect we'll go way over 7 days; honestly, so long as you're willing to put the work in, I'm happy to shepherd this through. I've done a few featured articles, so I think I can push this to the point where it can get to that state; it doesn't seem that far off, but, as tends to happen in long articles, the last few sections get neglected. I can probably help with this, if you want me to? I can summarise, but you'll need to provide citations and correct any mistakes by me or the articles I'm summarising. Adam Cuerden (talk) 11:43, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
That would be great. Will provide citations for sure. Please go ahead. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 02:40, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Roshen Dalal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. PamD 08:25, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

hi

Hi, I saw you are in the wikiprojects indian television and was wondering what you could do with this hot mess of an article: Hare Kkaanch Ki Choodiyaan - thanks. EDIT: Somebody has already gotten to it. Sorry! --Jennica / talk 23:56, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 10:28, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Shiva GAR

G'day, if you get a free moment, would you mind returning to the Good Article Re-assessment for the Shiva article, and stating whether you are happy for the review to be closed? Thank you for your time. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 08:23, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Vishuddhasagar

Hello, Capankajsmilyo. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Vishuddhasagar".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 02:31, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sallekhana

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sallekhana you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dharmadhyaksha -- Dharmadhyaksha (talk) 04:20, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Happy New Year Capankajsmilyo!

--Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 12:37, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Hi! Am not sure if you have notice it or not, but the annual editing competition Wikipedia:WikiCup has started and the signup is open till 5 February 2017. The cup encourages content improvement and tries to make editing on Wikipedia more fun; and it did that for me last year. I have hence decided to drop this friendly note hoping that you would take part. Although the signup ends on 5th Feb, the earlier you sign in the earlier you start scoring. Happy New Year and Happy Editing! §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:30, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Train-the-Trainer 2017: Invitation to participate

Hello Capankajsmilyo,
It gives us great pleasure to inform that the Train-the-Trainer (TTT) 2017 programme organised by CIS-A2K is going to be held from 20-22 February 2017.

What is TTT?
Train the Trainer or TTT is a residential training program. The program attempts to groom leadership skills among the Indian Wikimedia community members. Earlier TTT have been conducted in 2013, 2015 and 2016.

Who should join?

  • Any active Wikimedian contributing to any Indic language Wikimedia project is eligible to apply.
  • An editor must have 500+ edits.
  • Anyone who have already participated in an earlier iteration of TTT, can not apply.

Please see more about this program and apply to participate or encourage the deserving candidates from your community to do so: CIS-A2K/Events/Train the Trainer Program/2017

The last date of filling the form is 26 January. If you have any question, please leave your message here.
Regards. GSS (talk|c|em) 08:48, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sallekhana

The article Sallekhana you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Sallekhana for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dharmadhyaksha -- Dharmadhyaksha (talk) 10:40, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Reminder. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:46, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Preceding name before signature

Hi,I have noticed that you are preceding a text -- Pankaj Jain, before your signature, during talk pages. Kindly refrain from adding text on wikipedia, which cannot be verified or are ambiguous, in nature, !. I donot know what, -- Pankaj Jain means?, because that is not your user name , if it something related to you, then please donot write any promotional content about your self on talk pages, thanks?Junosoon (talk) 05:55, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

It is not promotional to add your real name in front of your signature: a large number of people do so, or have done so, including several administrators. If Capankajsmilyo used this real life identity to claim any expertise on Wikipedia, it may become an issue: but I see no evidence that they have done that. Vanamonde (talk) 06:53, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
@Vanamonde93:, @Capankajsmilyo:, I did not say, that text content -- Pankaj Jain, was real name, but ambiguous text, used, which cannot be verified?, and why is it being used?, if the text is used as something promotional, is still a question?. I think the User:Capankajsmilyo will clarify better. Thanks.Junosoon (talk) 07:33, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
It is my real name. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 08:02, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
@Capankajsmilyo: If that is your real name, I will advice you to use, it only on your user page, not not in related articles which you have created [13],[14], also it is giving impression of two signatures, which is confusing and not advisable.Thanks. Junosoon (talk) 09:50, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) As some part of your signature; whether it be your real name or my grandfather's name, is unlinked, it might be creating confusion to Junosoon and he might be getting impression that these are two signatures. But I do not see anywhere in WP:SIG that all parts of signature have to be wikilinked. Also, I do not see where Capankajsmilyo has used his signature on a non-talk page; whoever is the creator of that non-talk page is immaterial. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:55, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

  • Drive-by comment: I don't think there's anything wrong in adding your real name (or any pseudonym)to your signature but as DD says above the form of your signature, especially with the length is quite distracting as it occupies almost an entire line and the unlinked part splits off when there's insufficient space. I would suggest getting rid of the unnecceary contribs/count links and keep it simple like "Pankaj Jain (Capankajsmilyo) -- (talk)" or some such thing, linking Pankaj Jain to your user page so that it doesn't cause any confusion if the signature splits. The contribs and counts don't serve any purpose as anyone can find it out by just hovering over your signature. Shorter signatures make it easier for people to figure out who it is, especially on mobile screens where your current signature is more than one line! cheers. —SpacemanSpiff 14:02, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Additional customs duty listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Additional customs duty. Since you had some involvement with the Additional customs duty redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 08:40, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Bahubali

Hello! Your submission of Bahubali at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 13:29, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Bahubali

On 6 February 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Bahubali, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Jain figure Bahubali is said to have meditated motionless in a standing posture for a year, during which time climbing plants grew around his legs? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bahubali. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Bahubali), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:23, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Category:Indian monks by century has been nominated for discussion

Category:Indian monks by century, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ―Justin (koavf)TCM 02:48, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Category:Indian Jain monks by century has been nominated for discussion

Category:Indian Jain monks by century, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ―Justin (koavf)TCM 02:50, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Syed Aman Mian Shrma

I need an explanation as to why you created Syed Aman Mian Shrma. Nick (talk) 20:27, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Hello Nick, I just created the page because he is one of the actors of a TV series. Anything wrong? -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 23:57, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Yes, the sources are unacceptable, the page title was wrong (the correct page title was protected to prevent re-creation) and you ignored consensus of the AfD by creating the page. You should also be aware that every single iteration of the article has been created by someone who has been paid (using the same sources you used) and that vast numbers of paid editors have pushed this page at a variety of titles (including this title, as late as yesterday). So yes, there's lots that is wrong, and at present, the concern is that you're involved in the undisclosed paid editing which has tried to force this article on Wikipedia. If you have been paid, you need to declare it, if you've been asked by another editor to create the page on their behalf, you must tell us, otherwise you're in danger of being blocked for undisclosed paid editing, undisclosed conflicts of interest and possibly meat/sock puppetry. Nick (talk) 00:09, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
I haven't been paid by anybody. But, yes the person asked me once. I googled and found a few sources, so I initiated the page. I wasn't aware of all this, nor could I find any discussion about it. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 00:40, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
If you have a username of the person who contacted you, we will need to know it. The original article was at Syed Aman Mian Sharma and the deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Syed Aman Mian Sharma. The sockpuppetry pages (where you should divulge all that you know about this article) are at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Theactingeeker and Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Theactingeeker/Archive. Nick (talk) 00:53, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
I was not contacted on Wikipedia, so won't be able to help you with username. I'll go through all the discussions, thanks for sharing. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 00:55, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Categories

Please don't add non-existent categories as you did eg here. Categories are not like articles, they should not be created as red links, per WP:NOTRED. To see the result, why not try helping to reduce the backlog at Special:WantedCategories? You might want to have a read of WP:Overcategorization - in general we want categories of 30-50 articles rather than 3-5, so it is often better to have an article in separate, more general categories such as Category:Jain monks and Category:12th-century monks and then use a WP:Category intersection tool to find 12th-century Jain monks. Le Deluge (talk) 17:15, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

March 2017 WikiCup newsletter

And so ends the first round of the competition, with 4 points required to qualify for round 2. It would have been 5 points, but when a late entrant was permitted to join the contest in February, a promise was made that his inclusion would not result in the exclusion of any other competitor. To achieve this, the six entrants that had the lowest positive score of 4 points have been added to the 64 people who otherwise would have qualified. As a result, some of the groups have nine contestants rather than eight. Our top four scorers in round 1 were:

  • Scotland Cas Liber, last year's winner, led the field with two featured articles on birds and a total score of 674.
  • European Union Iry-Hor, a WikiCup newcomer, came next with a featured article, a good article and a tally of 282 bonus points for a score of 517. All these points came from the article Nyuserre Ini, an Ancient Egyptian pharaoh,
  • Japan 1989, another WikiCup newcomer, was in joint third place at 240. 1989 has claimed points for two featured lists and one good article relating to anime and comedy series, all of which were awarded bonus points.
  • South Australia Peacemaker67 shared third place with five good articles and thirteen good article reviews, mostly on naval vessels. He is also new to the competition.

The largest number of DYKs have been submitted by Vivvt and The C of E, who each claimed for seven, and MBlaze Lightning achieved eight articles at ITN. Carbrera and Peacemaker67 each claimed for five GAs and Krishna Chaitanya Velaga was well out in front for GARs, having reviewed 32. No featured pictures, featured topics or good topics yet, but we have achieved three featured articles and a splendid total of fifty good articles.

So, on to the second round. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 1 but before the start of round 2 can be claimed in round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points equally.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is a good article candidate, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth 13:52, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Deletion of tagged content

Hi Pankaj, I think we have been through this before, but you might have forgotten. Do not delete content tagged for citations unless you have good reason to believe that it is not verifiable. Have you spent any effort to find the citations for the content you deleted at Bharata (emperor)? -- Kautilya3 (talk) 00:46, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

WP:BURDEN? -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 00:52, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Capankajsmilyo, reviewer User:Adam Cuerden has not posted to this review since last year, and this is the second-oldest nomination out there. If you'd like, I can put the nomination back into the pool of nomination awaiting reviewers. Since this is such an old nomination, given that the GA Cup is in its final two weeks, it seems likely that a reviewer will pick this one because it comes with extra bonus points for being so old. I'm happy to do this if you'd like me to. Please let me know your preference. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:28, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Please add it to the pool, thanks -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 04:45, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Capankajsmilyo, normally I'd offer to do the same with this nomination, but you haven't indicated whether you've addressed the majority of the issues raised in Adam Cuerden's original review. If you still haven't, then probably the best thing to do is close it. If you have, we should probably put it back into the pool of nominations waiting for a reviewer. Please let me know how this one stands. Thank you. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:32, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Please it back to the pool, the last time I checked, issues were all addressed -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 04:46, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Indian Jain monks by century

Following the decision at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2017_February_24, please would you help to implement the decision? I have done some of the categories, and listed the remainder at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Working/Manual#Multiple_merge_targets. – Fayenatic London 22:47, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Never mind, I finished it. – Fayenatic London 22:16, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Symbols

Re: this and similar edits. The AAP "broom" symbol was deemed to be unacceptable per policy at various discussions a couple of years ago. I doubt that the BJP symbol is any different because it has the same ECI origin. You'd probably be best reverting. In fact, an awful lot of your recent edits to political articles are dubious per past consensus etc. - Sitush (talk) 01:13, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Would you please refer me to those consensus discussions? And BJP symbol is the one I have used as per commons and Election commission of India. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 01:49, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Re-initiating INCOTM

It's been almost an year since "Indian collaboration of the month" was active. Firstly we need to restart this as soon as possible for development of India-related articles to greater heights. The members page was blanked, where many of them are inactive. This mass message is to all the members of WikiProject India, about this and interested editors interested will sign up. After this message gets delivered, we'll wait for 7 days before we start a discussion under a thread on the collaboration's talk page, among the members. The discussion will include what to clean-up of sub-pages, a new set of guidelines for smooth and uninterrupted functioning of the collaboration etc. Please keep all the discussions under this thread only, so that it will easier for future reference. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Re-initiating INCOTM

It's been almost an year since "Indian collaboration of the month" was active. Firstly we need to restart this as soon as possible for development of India-related articles to greater heights. The members page was blanked, where many of them are inactive. This mass message is to all the members of WikiProject India, about this and interested editors interested will sign up. After this message gets delivered, we'll wait for 7 days before we start a discussion under a thread on the collaboration's talk page, among the members. The discussion will include what to clean-up of sub-pages, a new set of guidelines for smooth and uninterrupted functioning of the collaboration etc. Please keep all the discussions under this thread only, so that it will easier for future reference. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Invitation to join the Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Incubator/Indian military history

You are invited to join the Indian military history work-group, an initiative of the Military history WikiProject. This group is to exclusively deal with the topics related to Indian military. If you're interested, please add you name to the participants list. Ignore if you are already a member. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:06, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Indian defence services

You are requested to participate in the discussion of Wiki Loves Indian defence services on the talk page of WikiProject India. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:44, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

March 2017

Copyright problem icon Your addition to Faridabad has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:14, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Hi! I see that last year you were asked by Diannaa to clear up your copyright violations. What point is that at? Because whatever has been done, it's not yet enough, as is shown by the amount of copied text added by you to Faridabad and not until now removed. I see that you've had plenty of time for other edits. I think the copyright clean-up should take precedence over those. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:05, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
I had tried and cleaned it up. I don't know how this one was left. Is there a way to get a list of copyrighted items left? I am sure there won't be much. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 00:38, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

FYI

Hi there, re: this edit, Template:Infobox actor is an alias for Template:Infobox person. There's no actual benefit to making this change, since it requires the Wikipedia servers to redirect to Template:Infobox person anyway. This may even cause page rendering delays, if even for a fraction of a second. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:01, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Question

Eagle2468 (talk) 16:40, 29 March 2017 (UTC) Jai Matha Bhavani! wat do u think of wikipedia? pls let me know ASAP on my talk page! thank u.

Discussion to restart Indian collaborations of the month.

A discussion on INCOTM's talk page has been initiated. It includes various steps to be taken to keep the project alive and also regarding electing the coordinators. Please discuss. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Rishabhanatha

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Rishabhanatha you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ThatGirlTayler -- ThatGirlTayler (talk) 00:40, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination

@Capankajsmilyo: I have completed the first section of the checklist for the article Rishabhanatha please correct any errors that I listed, so we can move on to the next section and get through the process in a fast and timely manner. ThatGirlTayler (talk) 01:07, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Rishabhanatha

The article Rishabhanatha you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Rishabhanatha for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ThatGirlTayler -- ThatGirlTayler (talk) 00:20, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of World Sufi Forum for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article World Sufi Forum is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World Sufi Forum until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — kashmiri TALK 13:28, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Rishabhanatha

The article Rishabhanatha you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Rishabhanatha for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ThatGirlTayler -- ThatGirlTayler (talk) 22:22, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Chaulukya to Solanki

Respected sir

I want to you to change the article heading Chaulukya back to Solanki as very few people are familiar with the word Chaulukya and even Google results for Chaulukya describe 'did you mean Chalukya' it is an NRI who had edited the prestigious history of history converting Solanki to Chaulukya ; please read about this topic and see to new changes ; actually I'm a new user and I'm not familiar with wikipedia features but I know alot about history and I even find you also a knowledgeable person , please help.
Your thankful  Kunal Singh Solanki Nathawat (talk) 07:10, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Jainism

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Jainism you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Shaded0 -- Shaded0 (talk) 15:40, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Hi talk:Capankajsmilyo, please respond to my comments regarding unresolved cleanup and maintenance tags per Talk:Jainism/GA6 and let me know your availability to review this. Since there are previous reviews, I mainly wanted to discuss and see if issues on Talk:Jainism/GA5 have been resolved. Please let me know and I will continue on reviewing this article. Thanks. Shaded0 (talk) 17:46, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

18:35, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Jainism

Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Jainism has been completed.

I took the liberty of removing the update tags in several sections. It seems to me that they already include enough general information that is an appropriate for the article. Others may not agree,

In the "Community" section some interesting data is included from a 2001 Indian census. This should certainly be updated with the latest figures.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Good luck with the GA nomination.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 21:11, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Thanks a lot Twofingered Typist. I guess you are referring to literacy data in community section. Unfortunately GOI did not publish religious literacy data in 2011 census. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 02:36, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
Capankajsmilyo I was. I thought it was interesting, but I can see why any government today might decide that gathering this sort of information might potentially be more trouble than it's worth. I added a little clarification to explain the age of the data. Regards. Twofingered Typist (talk) 11:44, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Rishabhanatha

Hello! Your submission of Rishabhanatha at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 23:19, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sallekhana

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sallekhana you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Aircorn -- Aircorn (talk) 02:00, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

19:32, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Hi, I noticed you made some edits to the article after I did the review. Please feel free to nominate articles to Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Requests before placing them back on the GA nomination list. This will help improve the articles you nominate to GA tremendously, as they will conform with our Wikipedia:Manual of Style. The biggest issues I see are unsourced paragraphs/sections and very short paragraphs. Bullets in introductions aren't standard either. I usually try to use Featured Article styles as reference to how GA articles should "look". Let me know if you have any questions. ComputerJA () 02:10, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Revert vandalism first

Hi Pankaj, when you see an article having been vandalised, like Hizbul Mujahideen today, please revert it first before doing further edits. I have had do a big revert to an old version, because your edits interfered with a plain undo. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 16:41, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Will try and keep that in mind. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 16:52, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

16:40, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Rishabhanatha

On 25 April 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Rishabhanatha, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Rishabhanatha (statue pictured), the traditional founder of Jainism, was said to be born in the age when there was happiness all around with no work for men to do? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Rishabhanatha. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Rishabhanatha), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:04, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Please remove wikidata linking and addition of undiscussed fields in all templates

I strongly recommend that you self revert all your template changes that link wikidata or add new undiscussed fields into infoboxes. If you get community consensus, after due invitation, affected projects notifications and participation, then such changes to the infoboxes may be appropriate. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 13:16, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Gaurav Bhatia for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gaurav Bhatia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gaurav Bhatia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Uncletomwood (talk) 18:13, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Jainism GA Review

Hi, I have place the GA review on hold pending a few outstanding issue with prose and a few sections for expansion or other issues. If you have any comments please feel free to post any updates to the review page. Thanks again for taking the time on this, I believe it is pretty close and should be addressable. Let me know any clarifications if you need. Shaded0 (talk) 16:26, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Jainism

The article Jainism you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Jainism for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Shaded0 -- Shaded0 (talk) 16:40, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Jainism

The article Jainism you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Jainism for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Shaded0 -- Shaded0 (talk) 15:03, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

May 2017 WikiCup newsletter

The second round of the competition has now closed, with just under 100 points being required to qualify for round 3. YellowEvan just scraped into the next round with 98 points but we have to say goodbye to the thirty or so competitors who didn't achieve this threshold; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia. Our top scorers in round 2 were:

  • Scotland Cas Liber, led the field with five featured articles, four on birds and one on astronomy, and a total score of 2049, half of which came from bonus points.
  • Japan 1989 was in second place with 826 points, 466 of which were bonus points. 1989 has claimed points mostly relating to anime and Japanese-related articles.
  • South Australia Peacemaker67 took third place with two FAs, one GA and seven GARs, mostly on naval vessels or military personnel, scoring 543 points.
  • Other contestants who scored over 400 points were Freikorp, Carbrera, and Czar. Of course all these points are now wiped out and the 32 remaining contestants start again from zero in round 3.

Vivvt submitted the largest number of DYKs (30), and MBlaze Lightning achieved 13 articles at ITN. Carbrera claimed for 11 GAs and Argento Surfer performed the most GARs, having reviewed 11. So far we have achieved 38 featured articles and a splendid 132 good articles. Commendably, 279 GARs have been achieved so far, more than double the number of GAs.

So, on to the third round. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed in round 3. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points equally.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth 13:16, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

19:50, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sallekhana

The article Sallekhana you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Sallekhana for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Aircorn -- Aircorn (talk) 22:41, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Rollback granted

Hi Capankajsmilyo. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

  • Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
  • Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
  • Rollback should never be used to edit war.
  • If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
  • Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Beeblebrox (talk) 18:10, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

02:25, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Can you please explain why are you removing category Indian people from the article? Thanks. - Ind akash (talk) 10:26, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

No historic proof. She is a character in Ramayana. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 10:51, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Thanks very much for explanation. Can you please also explain why have you removed WikiProject Jainism from the article's talk page. Thanks - Ind akash (talk) 12:02, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Not a primary topic of Jainism. Plus, not much stated in article about Jainism. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 12:03, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Thanks very much. It was nice to talk to you. Ind akash (talk) 12:07, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

21:48, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Sallekhana

Hello! Your submission of Sallekhana at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 21:52, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Desingh

Thanks for editing this article. You added a link to Swarup Singh however that was a different king. I'll try and create a stub though there is not much info about Swarup Singh of GingeeSupcmd (talk) 00:47, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

I had earlier CSDed the article for A7, and it was deleted then. The user went back to create it at AfC where it was rejected again. She then bypassed AfC and had it created, with the same problems as before. I am no authority on Jain Mandirs, and I don't want to seem bitey on the newbie. You seem to be the person knowledgeable in this field. Please take a look at the article, and see if it can be salvaged. If not have it deleted, and reason it with her as I feel she desperately wants this article on Wikipedia. Jupitus Smart 03:48, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

So what do you suggest. Is the mandir notable enough to merit an article? Jupitus Smart 05:33, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
Can't justify the notability without reference. Ask her to add sources verifying notability, else go for deletion. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 06:03, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for the heads up. I'll ask her, and see what she has to say. Jupitus Smart 06:24, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
Happy to help. :D -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 06:25, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

22:18, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Sallekhana

On 27 May 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sallekhana, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Sallekhana is a religious practice of voluntarily fasting to death? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sallekhana. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Sallekhana), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Mifter (talk) 00:02, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

The article Leetul Gogoi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A case of WP:BLP1E

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gbawden (talk) 08:06, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

To be quite honest, this is probably better off as an article about the incident. The officer himself is not likely to be notable without it, and so this is a case of BLP1E. Vanamonde (talk) 08:01, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

12:18, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Template:Infobox person/Wikidata

With this series of edits, you changed the infobox from opt-in to opt-out. There is no consenus for that sort of dramatic change. The only way in which we are ever likely to gain consensus for infoboxes fetching Wikidata is if we can show that the infobox can be implemented on articles without changing anything in the article in the first instance. That is hugely important for infoboxes that could potentially be used in a large number of articles, but it does mean that an editor at each article has to take responsibility for activating the fetching of Wikidata by the positive action of supplying the |fetchwikidata= parameter and giving it a value. I hope you understand. --RexxS (talk) 15:09, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

AAP government advertisement controversy

Pankaj, an article of this sort is a very questionable standalone piece. What we really need is an article about the AAP government, of which this can be a part. Lacking that, this article just looks like muckraking. Vanamonde (talk) 11:01, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Leetul Gogoi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Leetul Gogoi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leetul Gogoi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Gbawden (talk) 09:32, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

19:05, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

15:30, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Your question about bots on the Teahouse

I am way behind on the archives, but you never got a response to your question over a month ago about bots. I think that type of question can be answered at WP:VPT.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 20:39, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Wikidata infobox makes article worse

Please don't replace standard infoboxes with Wikidata infoboxes if they are less complete or sourced than the original version, as you are thereby making the article actievly worse. You have been reverted twice at Prachi Desai, and you have done the same at e.g. Sidharth Malhotra or Evelyn Sharma. Using Wikidat to make enwiki better may be defensible (though never necessary), but using it to make enwiki worse is not really acceptable. Fram (talk) 06:45, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Mewar I

Template:Mewar I has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 06:14, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Wikidata infoboxes

Hi Capankajsmilyo. The WD infoboxes you've recently made are mostly wrappers for the standard template. The end goal is to have Wikidata in the main template, not as a side template. Just a heads up – it's easier to copy the template, change it, then move that code back to the main one, instead of making a wrapper. Thanks, Laurdecl talk 06:34, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

According to the discussions going on at present, it seems unlikely that the objective will be achieved anytime soon. Till that time it's better to have wrappers, since the changes in main template gets incorporated automatically. Thanks for informing though. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 08:44, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
What I mean is that we have Wikidata in the main infobox as opt-in, so articles won't be changed unless fetchwikidata=ALL is specified. The goal is to have all infoboxes with the ability to fetch from Wikidata and automatically, without the editor using a special template. Laurdecl talk 07:28, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
That's working in wrapper as well. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 14:03, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

15:44, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Wikidata infoboxes

Hi there, re: this edit, would you please be so kind as to edify me on where consensus was established to replace infoboxes with Wikidata infoboxes? I'd like to read up on the rationale, since I can imagine problems arising with referencing, since it's often useful to have references in infoboxes. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:23, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

@Cyphoidbomb: There isn't. There was an RfC that found consensus to modify infoboxes to use Wikidata (Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Wikidata Phase 2), but not to actually replace infoboxes in articles. We are working on importing references from Wikidata at Template:Infobox person/Wikidata. Eventually this template will be merged with Template:Infobox person (Wikidata usage will remain optional, of course). Thanks, Laurdecl talk 07:37, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
I asked Capankajsmilyo above already not to replace a standard infobox with a /Wikidata one unless it clearly made the article (well, the infobox) better, but they haven't responded. They are introducing the infobox on other articles for no good reason at all though (e.g. here and the similar edits they made around the same time. Capankajsmilyo, please stop making these replacements, there is no consensus for them and they don't improve the article one bit (while adding to the risk of undetected vandalism). Fram (talk) 09:38, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
Pankaj, you've been warned about being insufficiently communicative before. The chance that you have actually not seen these messages is nonexistent. Please make it a point to respond; it is common courtesy, if nothing else. Vanamonde (talk) 12:31, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
  • It slipped somehow from my list. It could be a good idea to start a discussion on replacing infoboxes in that case. First thing could be to replace image with Wikidata image, since Nikki is opposing on adding anything and everything on Wikidata template. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 14:07, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
    • And why would we replace an image decided locally with an image decided on another website, where it would supposedly apply to all wikilanguages? What's the actual benefit of doing this? If we already have an image in the infobox, there is no reason to replace it with whatever is the Wikidata image by default. Fram (talk) 14:21, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
  • It would be good to discuss this on {{Infobox person/Wikidata}}. You can raise your issues there, so that everyone can share theirs. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 14:26, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
    • No, this is not about whether that template should have the possibility to fetch the image from Wikidata, but whether you should be changing articles which already have an image in the local infobox, to the Wikidata infobox and to get the image from there (or the thing you are already doing, replacing the local title of the article in the infobox with the Wikidata label, prviding no benefit and added vandalism risk). It is not about what the template can do, but about how you apply it. Fram (talk) 14:30, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
That is why I said that it would be a good idea to start discussion on whether infoboxes should be replaced, if yes, how. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 15:04, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
Well, that's not really what you said, but anyway, that's not a discussion for the /Wikidata subpage, but for at least the main infobox person page, and preferably a page like WP:VPPR, to ensure general participation, not just the people most interested in Wikidata. Fram (talk) 15:11, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
  • Please stop. All you are doing is giving Fram more possible material for the next TfD; I can imagine it now – "This infobox is being added all over random articles, here are seven examples of minor typos that I've spent nine and a half hours looking for!" (with pictures). Once this template is merged with infobox person, the ability to fetch from Wikidata will be on millions of articles (opt-in, presumably). This is the point I'm making about wrappers: having a separate /Wikidata template is only intended for testing, the end goal is to incorporate it into the main infobox. You will end up being blocked, and making more people hostile to a reasonable inclusion of Wikidata in articles that can benefit from it. Help us improve the infobox to the point where it is production-quality. There is a lot of work to do. Laurdecl talk 06:46, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

15:38, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

The article Meat in India has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Reads like an essay. WP:NOTESSAY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gbawden (talk) 10:11, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

WikiCup 2017 July newsletter

The third round of the competition has finished in a flurry of last minute activity, with 288 points being required to qualify for round 4. It was a hotly competitive round with all but four of the contestants exceeding the 106 points that was necessary to proceed to round 4 last year. Coemgenus and Freikorp tied on 288, and both have been allowed to proceed, so round 4 now has one pool of eight competitors and one of nine.

Round 3 saw the achievement of a 26-topic Featured topic by MPJ-DK as well as 5 featured lists and 13 featured articles. PanagiotisZois and SounderBruce achieved their first ever featured articles. Carbrera led the GA score with 10, Tachs achieved 17 DYKs and MBlaze Lightning 10 In the news items. There were 167 DYKs, 93 GARs and 82 GAs overall, this last figure being higher than the number of GAs in round 2, when twice as many people were taking part. Even though contestants performed more GARs than they achieved GAs, there was still some frustration at the length of time taken to get articles reviewed.

As we start round 4, we say goodbye to the fifteen or so competitors who didn't quite make it; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them (some people have fallen foul of this rule and the points have been removed).

If you are concerned that your nomination, whether it be for a good article, a featured process, or anything else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth 05:37, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

15:32, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Request for openion

Article Legitimacy (criminal law) has been requested to be moved to Legitimacy (law) requesting your openion at Talk:Legitimacy_(criminal_law)

Thanks and regards

Mahitgar (talk) 05:43, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

15:07, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

DIPP

Pankaj, can you please explain why you created a redirect from Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion (India) to DIPP, a page about a Nigerian musician? Vanamonde (talk) 13:41, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

I was going to create DIPP (disambiguation) and the mentioned page. But got stuck in some work. Please delete that for now...will need some more time. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 03:34, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
Okay, I've deleted it. Vanamonde (talk) 05:31, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

23:00, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

15:58, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

21:45, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Syama Prasad Mukherjee

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Syama Prasad Mukherjee you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Haxwell -- Haxwell (talk) 20:40, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

21:45, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Chandragupta Maurya

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Chandragupta Maurya you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ssriram mt -- Ssriram mt (talk) 18:00, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

23:29, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Chandragupta Maurya

The article Chandragupta Maurya you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Chandragupta Maurya for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ssriram mt -- Ssriram mt (talk) 02:41, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

18:01, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

WikiProject Investment

Hey there! I just re-launched the WikiProject Investment.

The site has been fully revamped and updated and I would like to invite you the project.

Feel free to check out the project and ping me if you have any questions.


I'd like to invite you to join the Investment WikiProject. There are a lot of Investment related articles on Wikipedia that could use a little attention, and I hope this project can help organize an effort to improve them. So please, take a look and if you like what you see, help get this project off the ground and a few Investment pages into the front ranks of Wikipedia articles. Thanks!


Cheers! WikiEditCrunch (talk) 10:52, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

22:10, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

WikiCup 2017 September newsletter

Round 4 of the WikiCup has ended and we move forward into the final round. In round 4, a total of 12 FAs, 3 FLs, 44 GAs, 3 FLs, 79 DYKs, 1 ITN and 42 GARs was achieved, with no FPs or FTs this time. Congratulations to Peacemaker67 on the Royal Yugoslav Navy Good Topic of 36 items, and the 12 featured articles achieved by Cas Liber (5), Vanamonde93 (3), Peacemaker67 (2), Adityavagarwal (1) and 12george1 (1). With a FA scoring 200 points, and bonus points available on top of this, FAs are likely to feature heavily in the final round. Meanwhile Yellow Evan, a typhoon specialist, was contributing 12 DYKs and 10 GAs, while Adityavagarwal and Freikorp topped the GAR list with 8 reviews each. As we enter the final round, we are down to eight contestants, and we would like to thank those of you who have been eliminated for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia. The lowest score needed to reach round 5 was 305, and I think we can expect a highly competitive final round.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to reduce the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck, and let the best man (or woman) win! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth 06:25, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

You've got mail

Hello, Capankajsmilyo. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Ankitcreativelinks (talk) 16:18, 3 September 2017 (UTC) Please check my mail in Wikipedia mail box. Thanks and Regards, Ankit.

22:15, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Do not delete content and cite unsourced as the reason

There's a better way, Add a citation needed tag. ShotgunMavericks (talk) 10:03, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

19:16, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
30 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Stub Rural Landless Employment Guarantee Programme (talk) Add sources
1,624 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Beti Bachao, Beti Padhao Yojana (talk) Add sources
14 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Pooled Finance Development Fund Scheme (talk) Add sources
776 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Paryushana (talk) Add sources
1,031 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Pradhan Mantri Gramin Awaas Yojana (talk) Add sources
114 Quality: High, Assessed class: GA, Predicted class: B Ahimsa in Jainism (talk) Add sources
118 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Bharat Nirman (talk) Cleanup
261 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Revised National Tuberculosis Control Program (talk) Cleanup
182 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C National Informatics Centre (talk) Cleanup
574 Quality: High, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: FA Forgiveness (talk) Expand
3,100 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: C Jammu and Kashmir (talk) Expand
32 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Indian missions (talk) Expand
1,024 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: C Mahmud of Ghazni (talk) Unencyclopaedic
158 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Kaleshwaram (talk) Unencyclopaedic
1,202 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA Smart Cities Mission (talk) Unencyclopaedic
148 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Sampoorna Grameen Rozgar Yojana (talk) Merge
70 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Bhamashah Yojana (talk) Merge
244 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Direct Benefit Transfer (talk) Merge
28 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C E-participation (talk) Wikify
7 Quality: High, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: GA India–Tonga relations (talk) Wikify
218 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Ethics in religion (talk) Wikify
63 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start National Career Service (India) (talk) Orphan
20 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start E-Office Mission Mode Project (talk) Orphan
4 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start E-governance in Punjab (talk) Orphan
9 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Stub Siddha Siddhanta (talk) Stub
28 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Business identification number (talk) Stub
534 Quality: Low, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: Start Pradhan Mantri Jeevan Jyoti Bima Yojana (talk) Stub
16 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Stub Jyotigram Yojana (talk) Stub
214 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Antyodaya Anna Yojana (talk) Stub
8 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Unorganised Workers' Identification Number (talk) Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:14, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

15:32, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Infoboxes

You have been trying to change the basic parameters in an Infobox. This article may be of use to you: Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Infoboxes. Cheers. - Chandan Guha (talk) 14:50, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 September 2017

16:00, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

2017 Military history WikiProject Coordinator election

Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway. As a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 29 September. Thank you for your time. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:16, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Vyaghra

Hello Sir, Can you review my article Vyaghra Gotra. its pending for approval. please help me. Kshatriya1995 (talk) 11:16, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

23:25, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Mahavira


Hello, Capankajsmilyo. You'll have seen that I have completed the copy-edit you requested at Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Requests for Mahavira. I'm sorry it took me so long. The weather has been great, and I've been enjoying being outdoors and have been busy. I left a number of "clarification needed" tags with accompanying hidden notes to editors (i.e., you), which you can remove when you've resolved the issues. Let me know if you have any further questions or need help formulating a sentence. I just have one thing I want to mention: normally, in articles other than those on technical or mathematics topics, I write out numbers below a hundred in full ("twenty-four" instead of "24"), but since this article contains so many ordinal numbers ("22nd", "23rd", 24th"), I thought it would be more consistent if I used the number instead of the word for cardinal numbers also (22, 23, 24). Miniapolis, do you concur, or would you write out the words for the numbers in full – and, if so, cardinal only, or both cardinal and ordinal? I changed one short list to paragraph form; the MoS discourages lists unless absolutely necessary and appropriate.  – Corinne (talk) 17:33, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Hi, Corinne. Yes, I agree; according to MOS:NUMERAL they can be written either way, and consistency is best. Miniapolis 00:55, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Thanks a lot Corinne. The article is looking much better now. I'll try n resolve the tags asap and will try to renominate it when the cooling period ends. Thanks for such a great work once again. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 00:26, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
You are welcome. Glad to help.  – Corinne (talk) 16:08, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
I cannot stop you from nominating the article again. If you want it to pass, though, you should probably be addressing the major issues raised in previous FACs; depth of coverage, prose written from the perspective of a believer, and image licensing. Copy-editing is helpful but is not going to fix those things. Vanamonde (talk) 04:09, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Syama Prasad Mukherjee

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Syama Prasad Mukherjee you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Daniel Case -- Daniel Case (talk) 06:20, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

14:21, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Syama Prasad Mukherjee

The article Syama Prasad Mukherjee you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Syama Prasad Mukherjee for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Daniel Case -- Daniel Case (talk) 20:40, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

15:31, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

Books and Bytes - Issue 24

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 24, August-September 2017

  • User Group update
  • Global branches update
    • Star Coordinator Award - last quarter's star coordinator: User:Csisc
  • Wikimania Birds of a Feather session roundup
  • Spotlight: Wiki Loves Archives
  • Bytes in brief

Arabic, Kiswahili and Yoruba versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:53, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 October 2017

Your GA nomination of Syama Prasad Mukherjee

The article Syama Prasad Mukherjee you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Syama Prasad Mukherjee for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Daniel Case -- Daniel Case (talk) 04:02, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

18:18, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

00:20, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

List of Jains/wikidata

I have moved List of Jains/wikidata to User:Capankajsmilyo/List of Jains/wikidata for two reasons: subpages are not allowed in the mainspace, and literiabot pages are not allowed in the mainspace. Fram (talk) 09:41, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

WikiCup 2017 November newsletter: Final results

The final round of the 2017 WikiCup is over. Congratulations to the 2017 WikiCup top three finalists:

In addition to recognizing the achievements of the top finishers and everyone who worked hard to make it to the final round, we also want to recognize those participants who were most productive in each of the WikiCup scoring categories:

  • Featured Article – Cas Liber (actually a two-way tie with themselves for an astonishing five FAs in R2 and R4).
  • Good Article – Adityavagarwal had 14 GAs promoted in R5.
  • Featured List – Canada Bloom6132 (submissions) and Japan 1989 (submissions) both produced 2 FLs in R2
  • Featured Pictures – Cascadia SounderBruce (submissions) improved an image to FP status in R5, the only FP this year.
  • Featured Topic – Denmark MPJ-DK (submissions) has the only FT of the Cup in R3.
  • Good Topic – Four different editors created a GT in R2, R3 and R4.
  • Did You Know – Adityavagarwal had 22 DYKs on the main page in R5.
  • In The News – India MBlaze Lightning (submissions) had 14 ITN on the main page in R2.
  • Good Article Review – India Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (submissions) completed 31 GARs in R1.

Over the course of the 2017 WikiCup the following content was added or improved on Wikipedia: 51 Featured Articles, 292 Good Articles, 18 Featured Lists, 1 Featured Picture, 1 Featured Topics, 4 Good Topics, around 400 Did You Knows, 75 In The News, and 442 Good Article Reviews. Thank you to all the competitors for your hard work and what you have done to improve Wikipedia.

Regarding the prize vouchers - @Adityavagarwal, Vanamonde93, Casliber, Bloom6132, 1989, and SounderBruce: please send Godot13 (talk · contribs · email) an email from the email address to which you would like your Amazon voucher sent. Please include your preference of global Amazon marketplace as well. We hope to have the electronic gift cards processed and sent within a week.

We will open up a discussion for comments on process and scoring in a few days. The 2018 WikiCup is just around the corner! Many thanks from all the judges. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email), and Godot13 (talk · contribs · email) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:41, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

18:45, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

19:19, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Digambara

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Digambara you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Redtigerxyz -- Redtigerxyz (talk) 18:01, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Digambara

The article Digambara you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Digambara for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Redtigerxyz -- Redtigerxyz (talk) 18:41, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

WikiCup 2018

So the 2017 WikiCup has come to an end. Congratulations to the winner, to the other finalists and to all those who took part. 177 contestants signed up, more than usual, but not all of them submitted entries in the first round. Were editors attracted by the cash prizes offered for the first time this year, or were these irrelevant? Do the rules and scoring need changing for the 2018 WikiCup? If you have a view on these or other matters, why not join in the WikiCup discussion about next year's contest? Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Godot13 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

19:19, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 November 2017

20:30, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Train-the-Trainer 2018: Invitation to participate

Hello, it gives us great pleasure to inform that the Train-the-Trainer (TTT) 2018 programme organised by CIS-A2K is going to be held from 26–28 January 2018.

  • What is TTT?
Train the Trainer or TTT is a residential training program. The program attempts to groom leadership skills among the Indian Wikimedia community members. Earlier TTT have been conducted in 2013, 2015, 2016, and 2017.
  • Who should join?
An editor who is interested to conduct real-life and online Wiki-events such as outreach, workshop, GLAM, edit-a-thon, photowalk etc.
Any active Wikimedian contributing to any Indic language Wikimedia project is eligible to apply.
An editor must have 500+ edits.
Anyone who have already participated in an earlier iteration of TTT, can not apply.

Please see more about this program at: CIS-A2K/Events/Train the Trainer Program/2018. Please fill this form to show your interest to join. The last date of signing up is 7 December 2017. If you have any question, please let us know.

On behalf of Titodutta. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 11:25, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Capankajsmilyo. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

17:51, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Jainism

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Jainism you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Katolophyromai -- Katolophyromai (talk) 01:20, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

17:58, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Books and Bytes - Issue 25

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 25, October – November 2017

  • OAWiki & #1Lib1Ref
  • User Group update
  • Global branches update
  • Spotlight: Research libraries and Wikimedia
  • Bytes in brief

Arabic, Korean and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:57, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Jainism

The article Jainism you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Jainism for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Katolophyromai -- Katolophyromai (talk) 21:42, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (National Skill Development Corporation) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating National Skill Development Corporation, Capankajsmilyo!

Wikipedia editor Nick Moyes just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

More independant refrences are needed for this article to support the organisations notability.

To reply, leave a comment on Nick Moyes's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Nick Moyes (talk) 16:55, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 December 2017

15:27, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2018!

Hello Capankajsmilyo, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2018.
Happy editing,
MBL Talk 05:54, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

16:19, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Wikigraphists Bootcamp (2018 India)

Greetings,

It is being planned to organize Wikigraphists Bootcamp in India, please fill out the survey form to help the organizers. Your responses will help organizers understand what level of demand there is for the event (how many people in your community think it is important that the event happens). At the end of the day, the participants will turn out to have knowledge to create drawings, illustrations, diagrams, maps, graphs, bar charts etc. and get to know to how to tune the images to meet the QI and FP criteria. For more information and link to survey form, please visit Talk:Wikigraphists Bootcamp (2018 India). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:45, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

18:46, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 January 2018

23:56, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

17:07, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Books and Bytes - Issue 26

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 26, December – January 2018

  • #1Lib1Ref
  • User Group update
  • Global branches update
  • Spotlight: What can we glean from OCLC’s experience with library staff learning Wikipedia?
  • Bytes in brief

Arabic and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:36, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Chyavana (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

  • disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
  • disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. feminist (talk) 06:52, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
19 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Stub Unnat Jeevan by Affordable LEDs and Appliances for All (talk) Add sources
174 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Value-added taxation in India (talk) Add sources
1,354 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Arjuna (talk) Add sources
27 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Voluntary Disclosure of Income Scheme (talk) Add sources
12 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Pooled Finance Development Fund Scheme (talk) Add sources
3,189 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Rajya Sabha (talk) Add sources
353 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Ajatashatru (talk) Cleanup
14 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start World Music Festival (talk) Cleanup
205 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Bharat Nirman (talk) Cleanup
7,169 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Air pollution (talk) Expand
3,503 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Mahabharata (talk) Expand
30 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Indian missions (talk) Expand
2,251 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Smart Cities Mission (talk) Unencyclopaedic
159 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Desai (talk) Unencyclopaedic
999 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C National Pension System (talk) Unencyclopaedic
1,118 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Income tax in India (talk) Merge
262 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA Digambara (talk) Merge
86 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Swavalamban (talk) Merge
396 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C Service Tax (talk) Wikify
4,664 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA 2016 Indian banknote demonetisation (talk) Wikify
144 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C Providing Urban Amenities to Rural Areas (talk) Wikify
20 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: C Maldives Inland Revenue Authority (talk) Orphan
4 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Micro Tech Global Foundation (talk) Orphan
6 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Stub Bambang Sumitra (talk) Orphan
50 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Shishunaga (talk) Stub
10 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Stub Swasth Jeevan Sewa Guarantee Yojana (talk) Stub
64 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Stub Post Office Passport Seva Kendra (talk) Stub
18 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Mahapurana (Jainism) (talk) Stub
17 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C Kalameshwar (talk) Stub
8 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start Smart Party (talk) Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:49, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 5 February 2018

20:51, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Supporting Indian Wikipedia Program resource distribution

In 2017 - 2018, the Wikimedia Foundation and Google working in close coordination with the Centre for Internet and Society (CIS), Wikimedia India chapter (WMIN) and user groups will pilot a program encouraging Wikipedia communities to create locally relevant and high-quality content in Indian languages. This program (Code name: Project Tiger) will:

(a) Support active and experienced Wikipedia editors through the donation of laptops and stipends for internet access and
(b) Sponsor a language-based contest that aims to address existing Wikipedia content gaps.

The objective of the program is to provide laptops and internet stipends for existing editors who need support to contribute more actively. 50 basic model Acer Chromebooks and Internet stipends for 100 contributors are available for distribution. Provided resources are the sole property of the beneficiaries and should be used for the betterment of the movement.

If you're an active Wikimedian, and interested to receive support from this project, please apply. It will take around 10 minutes of your time, and will ask descriptive questions about your contribution to Indic Wikimedia projects.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:12, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

21:59, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Parshvanatha

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Parshvanatha you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Farang Rak Tham -- Farang Rak Tham (talk) 17:40, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

Please let me know as soon as you are ready for this, so I can start the detailed review.--Farang Rak Tham (talk) 13:08, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for starting the review Farang Rak Tham. I have started addressing the issues raised by you. Kindly start with the detailed review as soon as you like. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 18:55, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
Okay, perfect.--Farang Rak Tham (Talk) 19:25, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
The detailed review has started some days ago. Will you be available to respond?--Farang Rak Tham (Talk) 09:06, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Parshvanatha

The article Parshvanatha you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Parshvanatha for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Farang Rak Tham -- Farang Rak Tham (talk) 18:02, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

22:54, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

Action needed :)

Hello! I am writing to you because your name is on the Tech Ambassadors list.

Per my previous message on your talk page on Meta, we're making some progress over getting a Phabricator workboard through which we can coordinate communal work. Please confirm that https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/p/Capankajsmilyo is your account there, by adding it to the table on Meta. (Documentation is available if you want to create a new account.)

Finally, a friendly reminder to keep an eye on both your talk page on Meta and m:Talk:Tech/Ambassadors/List! Your voice matters and I want to make sure that we don't miss it. Thanks! Elitre (WMF) (talk) 13:20, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 February 2018

19:52, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Goods and Services Tax (India), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Business Today (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

WikiCup 2018 March newsletter

And so ends the first round of the competition, with 4 points required to qualify for round 2. With 53 contestants qualifying, the groups for round 2 are slightly smaller than usual, with the two leaders from each group due to qualify for round 3 as well as the top sixteen remaining users.

Our top scorers in round 1 were:

  • United States Aoba47 led the field with a featured article, 8 good articles and 42 GARs, giving a total of 666 points.
  • Germany FrB.TG , a WikiCup newcomer, came next with 600 points, gained from a featured article and masses of bonus points.
  • India Ssven2, another WikiCup newcomer, was in third place with 403 points, garnered from a featured article, a featured list, a good article and twelve GARs.
  • United States Ceranthor, India Numerounovedant, Minnesota Carbrera, Netherlands Farang Rak Tham and Romania Cartoon network freak all had over 200 points, but like all the other contestants, now have to start again from scratch. A good achievement was the 193 GARs performed by WikiCup contestants, comparing very favourably with the 54 GAs they achieved.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 1 but before the start of round 2 can be claimed in round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews.

If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Cwmhiraeth (talk) and Vanamonde (talk) 15:27, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

17:11, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

19:43, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

15:03, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Start-Up India

Hi Capankajsmilyo, Appreciate your recent edits, however I would ask that you work with the content that I have already added, rather than deleting and re-writing over the top. If there was anything in there that you disagree with, then lets discuss it first please? Trent Roller 20:57, 21 March 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trent Roller (talkcontribs)

Project Tiger Writing Contest

In 2017 – 2018, the Wikimedia Foundation and Google working in close coordination with the Centre for Internet and Society (CIS), Wikimedia India Chapter (WMIN) and user groups from India, are piloting a program encouraging Wikipedia communities to create locally relevant and high-quality content in Indian languages. This program will (a) support active and experienced Wikipedia editors through the donation of laptops and stipends for internet access and (b) sponsor a language-based contest that aims to address existing Wikipedia content gaps.

Phase (a) has been completed, during which active contributors were awarded laptops and internet stipends. Phase (b) will be a contest in which editors will come together and develop a writing contest focused on content gaps. Each month three individual prizes will be awarded to each community based on their contribution for the month. The prizes worth 3,000 INR, 2000 INR, and 1,000 INR, will be awarded to the top contributors for each month. The contest started at March 1, 2018, 0:00, and will end at May 31, 2018, 23:59 (IST). Useful links are as follows:

Looking forward your participation, all the best. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) at 22:21, 21 March 2018 (UTC).

20:03, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Signpost issue 4 – 29 March 2018

Removal of sourced information in Digambara Terapanth

Dear Pankaj Ji, I note that you has removed information based on the article by Prof. Cort

John E. Cort "A Tale of Two Cities: On the Origins of Digambara Sectarianism in North India." L. A. Babb, V. Joshi, and M. W. Meister (eds.), Multiple Histories: Culture and Society in the Study of Rajasthan, 39-83. Jaipur: Rawat, 2002

You claims that that the text is unsourced. I should mention that Prof. Cort is among the best known scholars of Jainism. One of his sources was Buddhivilas, a widely used source on the subject, which was also cited.

Bakhtram Sah Krit Buddhivilas, Rajsthan Oriental Research Institute, Ed. Padma Dhar Pathak, 1964

What he has written is also supported by what Dr. Kasturchand Kasliwal, a distinguished author, write in his

"Khandelvaal Jain Samaj Ka Brihad Itihas", 1989, Ch 9, Samajik Itihas.

I have seen all of these personally. I have all of them. Malaiya (talk) 23:05, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

Then you should add them as reference. Capankajsmilyo (talk) 02:28, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Pankaj ji: Why did you remove the text? It had cited the paper by Prof. Cort, and the Buddhivilas? Malaiya (talk) 02:32, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Restored, but try using better refs and writing style. Creating bullet points is not a good idea. Capankajsmilyo (talk) 02:43, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

19:28, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Jainsim

Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Jainism has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 12:52, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

Thanks a lot Twofingered Typist. Will propose for GA soon. Capankajsmilyo (talk) 12:42, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
Pankaj, the copy edit has addressed issues with grammar and spelling [284] but not the issues with clarity and neutrality that previous reviews have brought up. That is not what the GOCE works on; it is work the nominator is supposed to do. I am unable to understand why you cannot understand, after 3 (4?) failed reviews, that you need to fundamentally rewrite several pieces of the article, so that it is clear to a reader not well-versed in Jain philosophy, and is written from a point of view that is independent of Jain philosophy. What you really need to do is find a bunch of scholarly sources, read them, and rewrite the page based on what they say. I can't stop you from renominating the article; but if you do so without actually rewriting the problematic bits, the review will face the same issues as before. Vanamonde (talk) 12:47, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Vanamonde93 would you like to help in identifying such parts via tags? Capankajsmilyo (talk) 13:30, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
I haven't the time for a full review. Here's some examples: "connoting the path of victory in crossing over life's stream of rebirths through an ethical and spiritual life." This is in Wikipedia's voice, and it shouldn't be. "Rishabhanatha, who is believed to have lived millions of years ago" implies historians/scholars believe him to have lived that long ago; obviously untrue. That's a Jain belief. "The Jain Agamas suggest that Mahāvīra's approach to answering all metaphysical philosophical questions was a "qualified yes" (syāt)." This is incomprehensible to someone without a background knowledge of the subject. "Jainism also prescribes seven supplementary vows which include three guņa vratas ("merit vows") and four śikşā vratas." Again, very difficult to understand, and definitely needs further context.

After skimming the article again, I have to amend part of what I said earlier; there are enough good sources already in the article. They just need to be used, or others found, for sections such as the "reception" section (which is at this moment just a list of quotes) and the "Jains in the modern era" section, which is once again a collection of somewhat arbitrary facts, without secondary sources tying them together or attesting to their significance. Vanamonde (talk) 13:46, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

Thanks!

Hello, Thanks for adding the elevation info to the infobox in Template:Infobox Province of China (PRC). I added the highest elevation in Hubei, Henan, Fujian, Jiangxi, Anhui and Hunan provinces to the infobox on those pages. My only question is, is there a way to add the name of the highest point to the infobox? Thanks again for your time! No one else knew how to help me! Thanks!! Geographyinitiative (talk) 05:16, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

Everything can be done. But I won't recommend adding what's not in {{Infobox settlement}} Capankajsmilyo (talk) 05:59, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
I have now added the highest point in every province in China to the infobox of the page for each province. But now there's the question of adding the name of the highest point to the infobox. If I add this "| elevation_max_point =" will it add the name of the highest point? I have no clue. Furthermore, I just tried to edit Ningxia, but failed- Ningxia is not a province, it's an autonomous region. Not sure why it failed. Geographyinitiative (talk) 09:40, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
You have been adding code along with text, I would suggest to remove that. Just value like "3556" is sufficient. Regarding name, I doubt {{Infobox settlement}} supports it. You can post a query on its talk page. If enough people support adding such a parameter, I would be happy to help. Capankajsmilyo (talk) 10:05, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
@Geographyinitiative: Your edit at Ningxia failed because you accidentally inserted parameter "elevation_max_m" into the text of parameter "area_footnotes". It has been fixed. --Neo-Jay (talk) 10:13, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

18:08, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

給您的星章!

原星章
Thanks for adding max/min elevation parameters to the PRC Provinces Infobox template! Geographyinitiative (talk) 05:05, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
You're welcome Capankajsmilyo (talk) 05:09, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Capankajsmilyo/Archive 1. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Nick Moyes (talk) 12:16, 12 April 2018 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

15:20, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Module:DigitLocalizer

Module:DigitLocalizer has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the module's entry on the Templates for discussion page. {{3x|p}}ery (talk) 17:29, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Books & Bytes - Issue 27

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 27, February – March 2018

  • #1Lib1Ref
  • New collections
    • Alexander Street (expansion)
    • Cambridge University Press (expansion)
  • User Group
  • Global branches update
    • Wiki Indaba Wikipedia + Library Discussions
  • Spotlight: Using librarianship to create a more equitable internet: LGBTQ+ advocacy as a wiki-librarian
  • Bytes in brief

Arabic, Chinese and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:50, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

18:16, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

A cup of tea for you!

Merged and moved Khatushyam and the Khatushyam Temple Please take a look and feel free to update and improve. thanks. DBigXray 22:31, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 April 2018

Discretionary sanctions alert: discussions about the integration of Wikidata on the English Wikipedia

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding discussions about the integration of Wikidata on the English Wikipedia, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Alsee (talk) 01:32, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

Regardless of your intent, concerns have been raised that posting Wikidata RFC link to Wikidata:Project_chat[300] was a de facto off-wiki advertizement to an audience with predictable partisan position on the issue. Please review the Canvass guidelines, with special attention to the Votestacking section. Please use more care in the future to avoid advertizing an RFC or other consensus process in a way which may be interpreted as an attempt stack the !voting in your favor. Alsee (talk) 01:36, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

What is this? Am I being blocked? Capankajsmilyo(Talk | Infobox assistance) 01:38, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
No. A notice does not imply not imply misconduct. Any editor can inform any other editor that discretionary sanctions exist in relation to a topic, for any reason or for no reason at all. Once an editor has been notified that discretionary sanctions exist in relation to a topic, administrators may impose sanctions if they view any future behavior as disruptive
Below the notice I explained my concerns, however my concerns carry no more weight than any concerns raised by any random editor. Alsee (talk) 01:56, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
What is your concern regarding my edits? That I informed Wikidata people that you think that their policies have loopholes? Or that I compared the several hundreds of votes on Portal RFC with a little above 50 votes on Wikidata RFC? As far as I remember, I suggested to advertise on Infobox and signpost. Are you suggesting that they will invite Wikidata supporters and hence my action is inappropriate just because you want to decide the vote (which applies to whole of English Wikipedia) without even informing whole of English Wikipedia? Capankajsmilyo(Talk | Infobox assistance) 02:04, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
The concern is that advertizing the RFC at Wikidata project chat falls under the Votestacking section of the Canvassing guidelines. It has the obviously predicable effect of summoning allies to stack the !voting. The canvassing guidelines explain what is appropriate advertizement, and what is not. Alsee (talk) 02:18, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

16:18, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

WikiCup 2018 May newsletter

The second round of the 2018 WikiCup has now finished. Most contestants who advanced to the next round scored upwards of 100 points, but two with just 10 points managed to scrape through into round 3. Our top scorers in the last round were:

  • Scotland Cas Liber, our winner in 2016, with three featured articles
  • Republic of Texas Iazyges, with nine good articles and lots of bonus points
  • India Yashthepunisher, a first time contestant, with two featured lists
  • Cascadia (independence movement) SounderBruce, a finalist last year, with seventeen good topic articles
  • United States Usernameunique, a first time contestant, with fourteen DYKs
  • San Francisco Muboshgu, a seasoned competitor, with three ITNs and
  • South Carolina Courcelles, another first time contestant, with twenty-seven GARs

So far contestants have achieved twelve featured articles between them and a splendid 124 good articles. Commendably, 326 GARs have been completed during the course of the 2018 WikiCup, so the backlog of articles awaiting GA review has been reduced as a result of contestants' activities. As we enter the third round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed in round 3. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met; most of the GARs are fine, but a few have been a bit skimpy.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:10, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Goods and Services Tax (India), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Financial Express (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:06, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

16:27, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Acharya Vidyasagar

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Acharya Vidyasagar you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Barkeep49 -- Barkeep49 (talk) 16:20, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Acharya Vidyasagar

The article Acharya Vidyasagar you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Acharya Vidyasagar for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Barkeep49 -- Barkeep49 (talk) 17:01, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

22:22, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

17:34, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 May 2018

Delete

Could you nominate this page for deletion? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manoj_Kumar_Chauhan_(Indian_civil_servant)

Don't think this lower service officer makes the cut for WP:Bio (2402:3A80:823:7C38:FFC7:DCB0:7F60:7EF6 (talk) 13:27, 26 May 2018 (UTC))

12:40, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Wanderings of Acharya Shantisagar

His wanderings are very significant, and very well documented in detail in Diwakar's Charitra Chakravarti book. They had a significant impact on the practice of Jainism in the regions he visited. People remember his visit to their region. His arrival marked the return of the Digambar monks in the region after the gap of about 7-8 centuries. During this period, only the Bhattarakas headed the Jain institutions in much of India.

In Delhi's Sri Digambar Jain Lal Mandir, there exists a marble memorial commemorating his arrival in Delhi, the very first after a gap of several centuries. Please visit the memorial when you are in Delhi.Malaiya (talk) 00:18, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

21:54, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

21:55, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

21:47, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 28

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 28, April – May 2018

  • #1Bib1Ref
  • New partners
  • User Group update
  • Global branches update
    • Wikipedia Library global coordinators' meeting
  • Spotlight: What are the ten most cited sources on Wikipedia? Let's ask the data
  • Bytes in brief

Arabic, Chinese, Hindi, Italian and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:33, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Vallabhbhai Patel

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Vallabhbhai Patel you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carabinieri -- Carabinieri (talk) 17:40, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

23:10, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 June 2018

WikiCup 2018 July newsletter

The third round of the 2018 WikiCup has now come to an end. The 16 users who made it to the fourth round had at least 227 points. Our top scorers in round 3 were:

  • South Carolina Courcelles, a first time contestant, with 1756 points, a tally built largely on 27 GAs related to the Olympics
  • Scotland Cas Liber, our winner in 2016, with two featured articles and three GAs on natural history and astronomy topics
  • Cascadia (independence movement) SounderBruce, a finalist last year, with a variety of submissions related to transport in the state of Washington

Contestants managed 7 featured articles, 4 featured lists, 120 good articles, 1 good topic, 124 DYK entries, 15 ITN entries, and 132 good article reviews. Over the course of the competition, contestants have completed 458 GA reviews, in comparison to 244 good articles submitted for review and promoted. As we enter the fourth round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met. Please also remember that all submissions must meet core Wikipedia policies, regardless of the review process; several submissions, particularly in abstruse or technical areas, have needed additional work to make them completely verifiable.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Cwmhiraeth (talk), Vanamonde (talk) 04:55, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

00:46, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

23:09, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

16:00, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

Hi, You nominated the article Vallabhbhai Patel for Good Article status. I have the started the review and raised a few issues, you have not replied. Are you still interested in pursuing this?--Carabinieri (talk) 22:25, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

09:44, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Vallabhbhai Patel

The article Vallabhbhai Patel you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Vallabhbhai Patel for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carabinieri -- Carabinieri (talk) 16:21, 29 July 2018 (UTC)

14:05, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 July 2018

19:39, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

17:53, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

16:46, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 29

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 29, June – July 2018

Hindi, Italian and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:02, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

16:16, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 August 2018

WikiCup 2018 September newsletter

The fourth round of the 2018 WikiCup has now come to an end. The eight users who made it to the final round had to score a minimum of 422 points to qualify, with the top score in the round being 4869 points. The leaders in round 4 were:

  • South Carolina Courcelles scored a magnificent 4869 points, with 92 good articles on Olympics-related themes. Courcelles' bonus points alone exceeded the total score of any of the other contestants!
  • Hel, Poland Kees08 was second with 1155 points, including a high-scoring featured article for Neil Armstrong, two good topics and some Olympics-related good articles.
  • Scotland Cas Liber, with 1066 points, was in third place this round, with two featured articles and a good article, all on natural history topics.
  • Other contestants who qualified for the final round were Marshall Islands Nova Crystallis, Republic of Texas Iazyges, Cascadia (independence movement) SounderBruce, Wales Kosack and United States Ceranthor.

During round four, 6 featured articles and 164 good articles were promoted by WikiCup contestants, 13 articles were included in good topics and 143 good article reviews were performed. There were also 10 "in the news" contributions on the main page and 53 "did you knows". Congratulations to all who participated! It was a generally high-scoring and productive round and I think we can expect a highly competitive finish to the competition.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck, and let the best editor win! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66, Vanamonde and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:31, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

16:47, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

22:35, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

21:57, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

15:22, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox officeholder/party

Template:Infobox officeholder/party has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 11:55, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 October 2018

17:34, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

23:37, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

22:40, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

Hi, I invite you to join the Indian military history task force, an initiative of the Military history WikiProject. This task force is created to deal exclusively with the topics related to Indian military. If you are interested, please add you name in alphabetical order to the participants list. In addition, you can also indicate areas of special interest across your name. Please free to ping me if you have further questions. Thanks. Adamgerber80 (talk) 03:38, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Indian military history task force created

Dear all, I am happy to inform you that the Indian military history working group which was started in June 2016, as a part of the Military History WikiProject's incubator, now graduated into a full-fledged task force. You're receiving this message because you've shown you support previously to the working group, if you wish to be a part of present task force, kindly sign-up on the members page. Regards, KCVelaga (talk) 16:24, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Aiyaary (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Financial Express
National Financial Reporting Authority (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Financial Express

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

23:11, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Books & Bytes, Issue 30

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 30, August – Septmeber 2018

  • Library Card translation
  • Spotlight: 1Lib1Ref spreads to the Southern Hemisphere and beyond
  • Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
  • Global branches update
  • Bytes in brief

French version of Books & Bytes is now available in meta!
Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:43, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hi Capankajsmilyo! You created a thread called Which is the appropriate field? at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 27 October 2018 (UTC)


Notice

The article List of megaprojects in India has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not defined

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Shyamsunder (talk) 22:59, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 October 2018

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vinaya Pitaka, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pearson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

20:08, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
411 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Bimbisara (talk) Add sources
660 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Iron and steel industry in India (talk) Add sources
1,259 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Spirituality (talk) Add sources
1,101 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Magadha (talk) Add sources
2,151 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA Taarak Mehta Ka Ooltah Chashmah (talk) Add sources
1,018 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Balabhaskar (talk) Add sources
68 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Internet in Thailand (talk) Cleanup
157 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Shravasti (talk) Cleanup
24 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Deimachus (talk) Cleanup
4,267 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Mahabharata (talk) Expand
88 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Digital television in the Philippines (talk) Expand
3,664 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Dawood Ibrahim (talk) Expand
749 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Kalinga War (talk) Unencyclopaedic
358 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Bank rate (talk) Unencyclopaedic
10 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Curtius Rufus (talk) Unencyclopaedic
276 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Suryavansha (talk) Merge
719 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Rashtriya Ekta Diwas (talk) Merge
31 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Dahi chutney (talk) Merge
52 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Modasa (talk) Wikify
65 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Panchala Kingdom (Mahabharata) (talk) Wikify
88 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA Kosambi (talk) Wikify
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start References of Pragjyotisha in Mahabharata (talk) Orphan
27 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start Ancestors of Rama (talk) Orphan
6 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start Dhana Taprogge (talk) Orphan
46 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Aparna Vinod (talk) Stub
11 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Merutunga (talk) Stub
62 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Mahameghavahana dynasty (talk) Stub
11,153 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start The Villain (2018 film) (talk) Stub
14 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Radha Kumud Mukherjee (talk) Stub
10 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Dineshchandra Sircar (talk) Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:13, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

17:28, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

Mahavira

I see nobody replied to your request for a mentor. You might try looking through the list of mentors and finding someone on that list whose area of interest is not too far from your own, and asking on their talk page. Not everyone on that list necessarily watches the FAC talk page, so they may not have seen your post. Failing that, you can also look for people not on that list who have successfully taken similar articles through FAC, and see if they would be willing to advise you. Best of luck with the article. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 12:22, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

19:21, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Capankajsmilyo. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

23:28, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

22:22, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 December 2018

16:12, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Train 18

On 9 December 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Train 18, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that India's newest train has no engine? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Train 18. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Train 18), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex Shih (talk) 12:03, 9 December 2018 (UTC)

17:33, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

Mahavira copyedit

Thanks a lot, Miniapolis Capankajsmilyo(Talk | Infobox assistance) 11:25, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

Template:Wikidata Infobox

Please check the usage of Template:Wikidata Infobox in Helena Zeťová‎‎: I see some red ink (the word "Wikipedia" right under the photo, with text "⧼lang⧽:Helena Zeťová" in the hoverbox under the cursor pointing at this word), and even more when article is being edited. Staszek Lem (talk) 22:58, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

20:34, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Neminatha

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Neminatha you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Display name 99 -- Display name 99 (talk) 00:40, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

Books & Bytes, Issue 31

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 31, October – Novemeber 2018

  • OAWiki
  • Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
  • Global branches update
  • Bytes in brief

French version of Books & Bytes is now available on meta!
Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:34, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Neminatha

The article Neminatha you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Neminatha for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Display name 99 -- Display name 99 (talk) 15:02, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 December 2018

Welcome to the 2019 WikiCup!

Hello and Happy New Year!

Welcome to the 2019 WikiCup, the competition begins today. If you have already joined, your submission page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and we will set up your submissions page. One important rule to remember is that only content on which you have completed significant work during 2019, and which you have nominated this year, is eligible for points in the competition, the judges will be checking! Any questions should be directed to one of the judges, or left on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will make it to round 2. Good luck! The judges for the WikiCup are Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Godot13 (talk · contribs · email), Vanamonde93 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:14, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

FAC

Heartfelt apologies for taking so long to come back to you on the request you put on my talk page. I am finally free to follow it up, unless of course you have despaired of waiting and found another editor to discuss it with instead. Let me know here if you would still like my detailed comments and suggestions. Tim riley talk 19:10, 29 December 2018 (UTC)

I would definitely like that Tim riley Capankajsmilyo(Talk | Infobox assistance) 00:14, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
Comments

At last I have studied the text of the Mahavira article. The length, and the proportions of the article seem to me well judged. Indeed I wonder how much use I can be in suggesting how to improve the article, because it seems to me not far off FA quality.

One point is about the lead. It is a cardinal rule in Wikipedia that the lead should (i) summarise all important points in the main text and (ii) contain nothing that isn't in the main text. As far as I can see you have satisfied both of those requirements, and so the three citations you have in the present lead can be removed, as the main text expands on the two points with due citations.

A second point is that an article will not survive FAC if there are query tags left undealt with. I have no idea whether the "contradictory" tag in the Nirvana and moksha is justified, but you need to deal with it. Likewise the "clarification needed" tags in Texts and Teachings.

A minor point is the ordering of the citations in the text. It is generally, though not unanimously, held that multiple citations should appear in numerical order. See the second paragraph of Historical Mahavira, where you have [21][2] and the third para of Birth – [45][4].

And that really is all I can find to suggest. I think it is a fine article and I hope you can steer it through FAC at a second attempt. I see that it was peer reviewed in 2015, and as it has changed a good deal since then, I think if I were you I'd put it up for peer review again. If you do, I'll lean on a few of my regular WP collaborators to look in and give you their comments. Please keep me informed of developments. Tim riley talk 16:40, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

Thanks a lot Tim riley. I have resolved the issues highlighted by you and proposed the article for peer review. Capankajsmilyo(Talk | Infobox assistance) 00:32, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

18:29, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

17:54, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox character/Wikidata

Template:Infobox character/Wikidata has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 10:49, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Rajnath Singh

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Rajnath Singh you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Buidhe -- Buidhe (talk) 11:00, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Rajnath Singh

The article Rajnath Singh you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Rajnath Singh for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Buidhe -- Buidhe (talk) 11:22, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

20:33, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Prabalsagar, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jethwarp (talk) 13:14, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ahichchhatra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ramnagar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

18:15, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 January 2019

17:11, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

18:45, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Parshvanatha copyedit

Thanks a lot Miniapolis Capankajsmilyo(Talk | Infobox assistance) 01:12, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

23:13, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

Talk to us about talking

Trizek (WMF) 15:08, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

21:16, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

Books & Bytes, Issue 32

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 32, January – February 2019

  • #1Lib1Ref
  • New and expanded partners
  • Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
  • Global branches update
  • Bytes in brief

French version of Books & Bytes is now available on meta!

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:29, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 February 2019

16:38, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

19:29, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

19:43, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

18:04, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 March 2019

16:28, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

Chandragupta Maurya

Thanks a lot Baffle gab1978 Capankajsmilyo(Talk | Infobox assistance) 17:16, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

18:24, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

Mahavira

Did you still want to take this to FAC? I'm currently working on a few other article projects, but I have some time to help review if you were still looking to take it back to FAC soon. ceranthor 17:14, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

That would be great. Thanks a lot Ceranthor Capankajsmilyo(Talk | Infobox assistance) 17:16, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
No problem! Just a reminder - I can absolutely help with writing the content, but I know next to nothing about the topic material, and it looks like you've had some trouble at previous FACs with comprehensiveness concerns. Have you thought about ways to address that? ceranthor 15:53, 12 April 2019 (UTC)

23:00, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

19:07, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hi Capankajsmilyo! You created a thread called New multiwiki system at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 28 April 2019 (UTC)


22:27, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 April 2019

MfD nomination of Portal:Narendra Modi

Portal:Narendra Modi, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Narendra Modi and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Narendra Modi during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 12:00, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

WikiCup 2019 May newsletter

The second round of the 2019 WikiCup has now finished. Contestants needed to scored 32 points to advance into round 3. Our top four scorers in round 2 all scored over 400 points and were:

  • Scotland Cas Liber (1210), our winner in 2016, with two featured articles and three DYKs. He also made good use of the bonus points available, more than doubling his score by choosing appropriate articles to work on.
  • Wales Kosack (750), last year's runner up, with an FA, a GA, two FLs, and five DYKs.
  • Adam Cuerden (480), a WikiCup veteran, with 16 featured pictures, mostly restorations.
  • Kingdom of Prussia Zwerg Nase (461), a seasoned competitor, with a FA, a GA and an ITN item.

Other notable performances were put in by Chicago Barkeep49 with six GAs, United States Ceranthor, England Lee Vilenski, and Saskatchewan Canada Hky, each with seven GARs, and Denmark MPJ-DK with a seven item GT.

So far contestants have achieved nine featured articles between them and a splendid 80 good articles. Commendably, 227 GARs have been completed during the course of the 2019 WikiCup, so the backlog of articles awaiting GA review has been reduced as a result of contestants' activities. The judges are pleased with the thorough GARs that are being performed, and have hardly had to reject any. As we enter the third round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed in round 3. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:45, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

16:27, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

Notice

The article Ashwin Porwal has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article appears to be an attempted promotion created by an editor that has done the same for other individual doctors in India. See also WP:EXIST and WP:NOTDIRECTORY.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 17:40, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ashwin Porwal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 17:56, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

00:48, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

13:03, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

Books & Bytes, Issue 33

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 33, March – April 2019

  • #1Lib1Ref
  • Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
  • Global branches update
  • Bytes in brief

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:41, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Chandragupta Maurya

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Chandragupta Maurya you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Display name 99 -- Display name 99 (talk) 14:20, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Adi Shankara

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Adi Shankara you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Winged Blades of Godric -- Winged Blades of Godric (talk) 15:20, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Narendra Modi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Business Today
Premiership of Narendra Modi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Business Today

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Chandragupta Maurya

The article Chandragupta Maurya you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Chandragupta Maurya for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Display name 99 -- Display name 99 (talk) 20:21, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

15:33, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 May 2019

Ways to improve Ministry of Planning (India)

Hello, Capankajsmilyo,

Thanks for creating Ministry of Planning (India)! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please add your references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 19:56, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

Ways to improve Ministry of Animal Husbandry, Dairying and Fisheries

Hello, Capankajsmilyo,

Thanks for creating Ministry of Animal Husbandry, Dairying and Fisheries! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please add your references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 20:04, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Jitendra Singh (BJP politician) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Prime Minister's Office
Rajendra Agrawal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Mohammad Shahid

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 16:21, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

15:24, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of AirSwap for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article AirSwap is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AirSwap until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Blumpf (talk) 03:17, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Acharya Vidyasagar

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Acharya Vidyasagar has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

I do not know enough about the subject to understand why the GA reviewer feels there are POV issues.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 21:35, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

Thanks a lot Twofingered Typist Capankajsmilyo(Talk | Infobox assistance) 04:45, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Krishan Pal Gurjar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Business Today (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:27, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

17:06, 10 June 2019 (UTC)