User talk:ErASethi

March 2016

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Gyanmati Mataji, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 11:38, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Statue of Ahimsa, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 11:40, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@ErASethi Please read WP:REF before continuing with any further edits on Gyanmati Mataji or Statue of Ahimsa -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 17:06, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As per your query on my talk page, the reply is add reference against the content using <ref></ref> tags. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 17:10, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the latest edit adding the reference seems appropriate. Just an advice, continue the discussion where its initiated. You can use {{u|username}} to notify the user. For example ErASethi -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 17:29, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot once again. One more thing, is it fine if the reference is in Hindi. Capankajsmilyo

I don't think, hindi references would be a problem as long as they are reliable. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 17:50, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Don Bosco Higher Secondary School, Dimapur

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Don Bosco Higher Secondary School, Dimapur, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.dbhssdimapur.org/history/.

It is possible that the bot was mistaken and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 08:36, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Bhagalpur into Champapuri. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 03:17, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, ErASethi. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the article Binod Sethi, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 06:02, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kohima Jain Temple for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kohima Jain Temple is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kohima Jain Temple until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Metropolitan90 (talk) 15:39, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]