User talk:Junosoon

Junosoon, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Junosoon! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Hello, Junosoon. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by — Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 21:44, 8 August 2016 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

Stop

Please stop your disruptive CSD tagging, what are you tryin' to do? — RainFall 08:04, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

August 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Please stop speedy deleting notable actor articles Atlantic306 (talk) 08:20, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

Referencing books

Please use a {{cite book}} and add necessary fields Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 07:16, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Talk pages

Please add new talk to the bottom of the talk page. I noticed that you added talk to the top of Atlantic306 See help:talk pages Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 07:19, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lois Rodden, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mensa. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of wikis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Notable. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

Welcome

Hello, Junosoon, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 04:45, 25 August 2016 (UTC) Getting started Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Help directory Editing articles How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Lois Rodden

I realize that you are new to Wikipedia and encourage you to look at some of the links I posted above. You should never nest an infobox inside of another infobox. Additionally, that page is about an individual, not a website. If you wish to create a page about the website you may do so, but do not place that infobox on a page about an individual. --Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 04:46, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

@Zackmann08: Hi,Zackmann08,thank you for your comments,I am a bit confused on Infobox person module, does it not state in module adaptation, that at times one infobox can be adapted in another infobox,kindly guide.thanks Junosoon (talk) 05:00, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Astrodatabank has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Astrodatabank. Thanks! Joseph2302 18:41, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Astrodatabank has been accepted

Astrodatabank, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Joseph2302 18:54, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bollywood and superstitions (September 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bollywood and superstitions and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 13:45, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Edwin Charles Steinbrecher, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spiritual. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Dick Cresswell

Junosoon, I'm glad to see you reviewing at DYK.

I wanted to let you know that only one review icon should be used per full review, not an icon for each category. (The person whose style you were emulating, Coin945, has also been informed that multiple icons is not appropriate.) We have a bot that checks all reviews and assumes that the most recent icon in any review is the one that reflects its current status, which would not have been accurate based on your original review.

I'd like to suggest that you consider a written-out format going forward, mentioning in a sentence what you've checked and any issues, and per the DYK reviewing guide, start your review with the icon that sums up the status of the nomination, whether a tick if it meets the DYK criteria or a different icon if there are issues that need to be addressed. Thanks! BlueMoonset (talk) 17:40, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Surendra Kumar Apharya (September 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiPancake was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Surendra Kumar Apharya and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiPancake ^{✉ 📖} 14:15, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Edit reverted to redirect Narendra Modi’s demonetisation policy to Indian 500 and 1000 rupee currency demonetisation

Hi, could you please provide the reason? ==AdityaChanana (talk) 06:16, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

Hi, yes the two articles differ slightly as the one focusses only on Narendra Modi demonetisation policy, other article focusses on results of demonetisation.Thanks Junosoon (talk) 06:19, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

@Junosoon, Indian 500 and 1000 rupee note demonetisation is an article about the demonetization process, and reactions all together. The article created by you "Narendra Modi’s demonetisation policy" has no relevant reason to exist as the demonetization process is not a policy at the first point, the demonetization process is a decision by the Government of India and Reserve Bank of India all together (not Narendra Modi's personal policy or decision), to eliminate unaccounted cash (the reason understood), it was just announced by Narendra Modi as the Prime minister of India over the unscheduled TV broadcast. So the article "Narendra Modi’s demonetisation policy" must be deleted.

@AdityaChanana, your participation will be great. Regards. Hydloc009 (talk) 05:11, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

Thanks @Hydloc009. I would prefer to continue the discussion on the talk page. --AdityaChanana (talk) 05:39, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Narendra Modi’s demonetisation policy

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Narendra Modi’s demonetisation policy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from {{{value1}}}. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. The Masked Man of Mega Might (talk) 09:26, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Junosoon, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Narendra Modi’s demonetisation policy has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. The Masked Man of Mega Might (talk) 09:27, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

November 2016

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Narendra Modi’s demonetisation policy.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Please stop reverting the merge decision decided on the talk page. AdityaChanana (talk) 10:06, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

Merged page to Indian 500 and 1000 rupee note demonetisation

Talk:Narendra Modi’s demonetisation policy is the source page where the merge proposal was discussed and closed .Please do not revert the merge revisions of the article,simply because it does not suit to your interests.See WP:CONSENSUS.Please restrain from these unhelpful edits.Aru@baska^{❯❯❯ Vanguard} 11:10, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Junosoon. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of National Milk Day (India) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article National Milk Day (India) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Milk Day (India) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mr. Vernon (talk) 17:28, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

November 2016

Your addition to 2016 winter session of Indian Parliament and debate on note ban has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. This is your final warning. Further copyright violations will result in you being blocked from editing. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:59, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

Snowfall in Saudi Arabia

I linked some more references on the Talk page of Snowfall in Saudi Arabia, feel free to use them to flesh the piece out. I also suggested a re-title that fits Wiki conventions better, I'd love to hear your feedback there. JamesG5 (talk) 08:12, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Looks like an admin didn't see what you were doing with the move & broke the redirects, I messaged them to fix it. JamesG5 (talk) 08:37, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Fixed, and I repaired the references section. Might want to flesh it out with the info from the other sources I put on the talk page. JamesG5 (talk) 08:53, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Thank you, good wishes.Junosoon (talk) 08:55, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of 2016 Indian Chief Ministers Committee for Digital Payment Systems for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2016 Indian Chief Ministers Committee for Digital Payment Systems is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2016 Indian Chief Ministers Committee for Digital Payment Systems until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Vanamonde (talk) 04:31, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

ARBIPA sanctions alert

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Kautilya3 (talk) 15:03, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Hi Junosoon, this comment indicates that you did not understand what the alert was about. All editors are expected to have a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and apply them in their editing. This is especially important in contentious areas. The area you are currently disputing is contentious, and so far I don't see any evidence that you are making an effort to follow policies. You can change that by reading the policies. Please start with the "Five pillars" article in your welcome message. If you continue arguing without any attention to those policies, it will be considered disruptive. Cheers, Kautilya3 (talk) 12:12, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template talk:Did you know nominations/Astrodatabank

A tag has been placed on Template talk:Did you know nominations/Astrodatabank requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Unnecessarily created talk page on 15 Sept and not used yet!

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:51, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

Merged page to Indian 500 and 1000 rupee note demonetisation

It is for your kind information that the page Aakrosh Diwas which you created and heavily edited has been merged to Indian 500 and 1000 rupee note demonetisation per a merge discussion.Aru@baska^{❯❯❯ Vanguard} 15:44, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 2016 Cash Crunch India

The article 2016 Cash Crunch India has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Already covered at Indian 500 and 1000 rupee note demonetisation.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 18:27, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Please stop

Junosoon, I'm not sure exactly what you are doing on Indian 500 and 1000 rupee note demonetisation, but please stop, at once, and discuss the changes on the talk page first. You are deleting massive amounts of sourced content, creating decidedly unnecessary spinoff pages, and then tagging them for deletion: regardless of your intent, it is getting highly disruptive. You have already been warned about WP:ARBIPA: if you persist in your removals, or if you start edit-warring, you are facing a lengthy block. Vanamonde (talk) 14:24, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 21 December

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that some edits performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. They are as follows:

• On the Corruption in India page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
• On the Reserve Bank of India: Working and Functions page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check these pages and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:25, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

You need to stop editing articles related to Indian currency

I hope you don't take this the wrong way, but ... do you have any other hobbies? Movies? Music? The rest of the community clearly isn't loving your contributions to the one area you are currently editing in, and opening multiple ANI threads (not to mention frivolous AFDs) is not making the situation better. Try editing constructively in another area that is perhaps less likely to cause controversy. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 00:35, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Income Tax Department (India) raids 2016-2017

The article Income Tax Department (India) raids 2016-2017 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Already covered at Indian 500 and 1000 rupee note demonetisation and The Taxation Laws (Second Amendment) Act, 2016.Wikipedia is not a chronological repository of all income tax raids performed in a particular time and the money thus recovered.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Light^{❯❯❯ Saber} 07:08, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Income Tax Department (India) raids 2016-2017 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Income Tax Department (India) raids 2016-2017 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Income Tax Department (India) raids 2016-2017 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Light^{❯❯❯ Saber} 08:26, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Final warning

This is your final warning to cease your disruptive editing, be it copyright violations or endless creations of content forks etc as you've been warned before. Now you've started moving articles during the AfD process. Any further disruption will either result in a block or a topic ban from the area. —SpacemanSpiff 04:04, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Closure of a RFC and a move....

Per a clear consensus at a RFC which you started, the article Indian 500 and 1000 rupee note demonetisation was moved to 2016 Indian banknote demonetisation.Do not attempt to revert the move or move the article to a new article.Light^{❯❯❯ Saber} 15:42, 25 December 2016 (UTC) Light^{❯❯❯ Saber} 15:42, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

Another RFC Closure....

A RFC you started at Template Talk:Narendra Modi had been closed by me as procedural due to the very inappropriateness of the question and a complete non-contentious-ness of the asked question.Light^{❯❯❯ Saber} 13:25, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Persons With Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Persons With Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ChunnuBhai (talk) 06:15, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Indian Coinage Act, 1906

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on The Indian Coinage Act, 1906 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ChunnuBhai (talk) 06:16, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ajmer–Sealdah Express 2016 accident

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Ajmer–Sealdah Express 2016 accident requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ChunnuBhai (talk) 09:09, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Saudi Arabian snowstorm 2016

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Saudi Arabian snowstorm 2016 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ChunnuBhai (talk) 09:19, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Specified Bank Notes

The article Specified Bank Notes has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Concern: No citations/unsourced.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zweeb101 (talk) 16:31, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction

The following sanction now applies to you:

topic banned (for six months) from content relating to the economy of India, including but not limited to taxation, currency and associated policy, process or practice

You have been sanctioned repeating the same behavior despite multiple warnings

This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/India-Pakistan#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. —SpacemanSpiff 23:58, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Junosoon, you appealed this ban at WP:AE but the appeal has been declined. Your ban will run for six monhs from when it was imposed, that is, until 30 June 2017. EdJohnston (talk) 19:40, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Your post to ANI was in violation of your topic ban

That's been pointed out at ANI, but I want to make sure you understand that you could be blocked for it. The fact that you are appealing your ban doesn't mean that you can ignore it. Doug Weller talk 12:25, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

@Doug Weller: Thank you for informing, I wasn't aware of it.Junosoon (talk) 12:29, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Specified Bank Notes (Cessation of Liabilities) Ordinance, 2016 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Specified Bank Notes (Cessation of Liabilities) Ordinance, 2016 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Specified Bank Notes (Cessation of Liabilities) Ordinance, 2016 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Light^{❯❯❯ Saber} 12:09, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Format needed at AE

Hello Junosoon. Recently you again added text to another editor's section. Please move these statements to your own section As it says in the WP:AE header, "Non-compliant contributions may be removed or shortened by administrators." Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 05:23, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

@EdJohnston:, Hello EdJohnston, made the necessary move of statement,Thanks.Junosoon (talk) 06:36, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

WP:Merge

FYI, you're more than welcome to help with the revamp effort on WP:NAC, which I've been trying to get underway at a snail's pace for about three months now. It would be great to finally get this to the point where we can put it forward as a candidate for a guideline. TimothyJosephWood 18:20, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

@Timothyjosephwood: Thank you for your response, to the concern, yes sure, we can put it forward for as a candidate for a guideline, which I am sure will be of great help to all of wikipedia community. Junosoon (talk) 03:51, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

I suppose more specifically, I don't really deal with mergers, and if you do, and have specific helpful guidance that could be proposed as an addition, that is very welcome. TimothyJosephWood 04:01, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

@Timothyjosephwood: In case of controversial mergers area [1], though the policy states, one can request at Wikipedia:Proposed mergers,for help . The concern is that merge discussions are done by involved editors. The guideline we can suggest is that, before the taking the closure step, who ever does, the user should, inform an uninvolved admin or an uninvolved admin should approve the closure, mostly if it is WP:NAC when the closure step is being taken. The step of informing to an admin about closure, would also help in maintaining the closure in light of WP:NPOV, along with, this would help, reducing the number of controversial mergers cases. Please share your thoughts.Junosoon (talk) 05:32, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

NPOV is a policy which deals with article content, not editor conduct. And the purpose of NACs is to reduce the burden on administrators in cases where a decision is uncontroversial, and can be done by an experienced editor, but not necessarily an experienced editor who needs to have passed a comprehensive community review. My instinct is that if a close is so controversial that a non involved admin needs to be notified, then it shouldn't probably be an NAC.

The purpose of the redux of the NAC essay, is not so much to make new requirements, but to document best practice that is already taking place in most discussions, and to codify that behavior in a standard that can be expected of future participants. After all, for the most part, most of these areas are chugging along just fine, but it may be helpful for future editors to document how you make things run finely. TimothyJosephWood 05:57, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

By NPOV, in closures, I was actually trying to point, neutrality in editor conduct, looking the fact when a discussion involves, lot of involved editors, to balance the closure of any discussion to neutral decision, a step for involvement of admin, can be beneficial, though I agree , it will increase burden on admins.Thanks.Junosoon (talk) 06:55, 8 January 2017 (UTC)Junosoon (talk) 07:47, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

@Timothyjosephwood:, Can you kindly provide me the links, of your WP:NAC, discussions, I would wish to have a reading of same, for my learning. Thanks.Junosoon (talk) 07:47, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

See the talk page for WP:NAC. TimothyJosephWood 13:13, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Saudi Arabian snowstorm 2016 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Saudi Arabian snowstorm 2016 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saudi Arabian snowstorm 2016 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ChunnuBhai (talk) 09:22, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Closure of an AFD...

An Afd which was recently started on an article(see the prev. post) has been closed by me as Keep.Light^{❯❯❯ Saber} 10:33, 12 January 2017 (UTC) Light^{❯❯❯ Saber} 10:33, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

It's been reopened, since it had not run for the full week. Yngvadottir (talk) 21:24, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Gmail Phishing Scam

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Gmail Phishing Scam. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Phishing. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Phishing – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. DrStrauss talk 09:23, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

January 2017

Hello, I'm Zackmann08. Thank you for your recent contributions to 2017 North India cold wave. I noticed that when you added the image to the infobox, you added it as a thumbnail. In the future, please do not use thumbnails when adding images to an infobox (see WP:INFOBOXIMAGE). What does this mean? Well in the infobox, when you specify the image you wish to use, instead of doing it like this:

|image=[[File:SomeImage.jpg|thumb|Some image caption]]

Instead just supply the name of the image. So in this case you can simply do:

|image=SomeImage.jpg.

There will then be a separate parameter for the image caption such as |caption=Some image caption. Please note that this is a generic form message I am leaving on your page because you recently added a thumbnail to an infobox. The specific parameters for the image and caption may be different for the infobox you are using! Please consult the Template page for the infobox being used to see better documentation. Thanks! Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 18:04, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

@Zackmann08: Thanks, will follow the instructions in future.Junosoon (talk) 04:38, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Border Security and Immigration Enforcement Improvements

The article Border Security and Immigration Enforcement Improvements has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not contain enough information to be encyclopedic. No references, including no reference to text of executive order.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:18, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Plan to Defeat the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria

Hello, I am trying to fix your article so it will not be up for deletion. I think you have a solid start now with references. - Kiraroshi1976 (talk) 07:39, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

ITN recognition for 2017 North India cold wave

On 2 February 2017, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2017 North India cold wave, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 02:39, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

Source?

Hi, I was wondering if you could provide a source for the statements you added at Executive Order 13767?

(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Executive_Order_13767&type=revision&diff=763487075&oldid=763479730)

Thanks,

Gamebuster19901 (Talk║Contributions) 15:19, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

@Gamebuster19901:, Thanks, I have added the reference. Regards.Junosoon (talk) 15:27, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Notnews

Junosoon, you need to pause your editing for a moment and carefully read WP:NOTNEWS. Not every time in the news has enduring encyclopedic value; some some items passing mention in current articles, many deserve no mention at all, and only very few require standalone articles. Until you understand this, very many of your creations are going to end up at AfD (as many already have) and this is just creating trouble for everybody involved. Even if you are interested in current events, I would strongly suggest you confine your attentions to updating existing content. This is just friendly advice; I cannot sanction you in this respect; but if you keep creating things like Donald Trump promise of Making America Safe Again, odds are you will find yourself with a community ban from article creation. Vanamonde (talk) 06:34, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

@Vanamonde93:, If you have any problems with contents of article , use the talk page of article, to raise your concerns, it may be addressed there.ThanksJunosoon (talk) 07:28, 6 February 2017 (UTC), and if you feel the article is not suitable to be included in Wikipedia, you are welcomed, to raise Afd, before that try raising the issue at articles talk page, instead of going to end up at AfD.Junosoon (talk) 07:36, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Junosoon, I find your response to Vanamonde quite worrying. You wave away his concerns about your creation of inappropriate articles, which make so much work for other editors. At the same time, you have had many, many articles deleted or redirected, and you currently have at least two at AfD, and those two seem (IMO) highly likely to end up deleted too. Since you answered Vanamonde the way you did, I won't try to advise you. But I have a proposition for you. Unless you agree voluntarily to create articles only via Articles for creation from now on, I will propose a community ban from article creation for you at WP:ANI. I'm only giving you the opportunity to agree voluntarily because I think that may be more agreeable for you; I myself don't have any problem with taking it to ANI. BTW, I notice you have taken the trouble to rate the importance and quality of your new articles yourself, and rate them much too highly in my opinion. Is this something you always do — rate them yourself? That's not the intention of Wikiproject ratings. Anyway, please reply below, and let me know whether or not you agree to create articles only through AFC. Regards, Bishonen | talk 16:38, 6 February 2017 (UTC).

Nomination of Donald Trump promise of Making America Safe Again for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Donald Trump promise of Making America Safe Again is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donald Trump promise of Making America Safe Again until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Vanamonde (talk) 08:31, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.  Bishonen | talk 11:40, 6 February 2017 (UTC).

Nomination of Plan to Defeat the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Plan to Defeat the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plan to Defeat the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. regentspark (comment) 14:58, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Cashless Transaction (India) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cashless Transaction (India) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cashless Transaction (India) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Vanamonde (talk) 17:04, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Please respond to my proposal

Hi, Junosoon. I see you haven't replied to my proposal above, even though you are editing. Perhaps you missed it up there? Could you look now, please? There have been problems with your article creation, and I'd like to know if you agree to henceforth create articles only via Articles for creation. I'd appreciate it if you'll respond before you edit other pages again, so I'll know whether or not to raise the matter at WP:ANI. Bishonen | talk 09:18, 7 February 2017 (UTC).

@Bishonen:, Hi, thanks for your message, interests of wikipedia community is top priority for me. thanks.Junosoon (talk) 09:38, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Junosoon, you have not answered the question: are you willing to create articles only through the AFC process from now on, or not? Vanamonde (talk) 09:50, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Oh for god's sake. If you're not willing to answer yes or no, WP:ANI it is. Bishonen | talk 11:51, 7 February 2017 (UTC).

WP:ANI discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Bishonen | talk 11:58, 7 February 2017 (UTC).

Hi. A couple of things:

The formal part: Per consensus in the above ANI discussion, you are indefinitely banned from creating new articles on the English Wikipedia. The close message for the ANI thread is here. You may appeal this ban after six months, and every six months thereafter. Appeals should be lodged at WP:AN.

The less formal part: I appreciate this is not a welcome outcome. Hopefully it will be an opportunity to understand the community's longstanding concern with this aspect of your editing, without stopping you from making worthwhile contributions in other areas.

Happy to discuss if required, preferably on my talkpage. -- Euryalus (talk) 08:01, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

@Euryalus:, Thanks for informing, will discuss on talk page if any guidance is needed. Regards.Junosoon (talk) 08:04, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

• Hi, Junosoon, I'll just emphasise one thing: although I originally offered you the option of creating articles through Articles for creation, you didn't accept my offer, and it wasn't what the community decided at WP:ANI. You are indefinitely banned from creating new articles altogether, including AFC drafts, because many people thought it would be overwhelming for the volunteers at AFC to deal with them. It's suggested that you apply, for example on ANI, in six months' time, for permission to start creating articles via AFC. I hope that's clear. Bishonen | talk 16:40, 9 February 2017 (UTC).

@Bishonen:, Hi, Bishonen, thanks for clarification, regards.Junosoon (talk) 03:33, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

@Bishonen:, @Euryalus:, Hi, I just noticed Bishonen specified including AFC drafts, which is confusing me and looks an important point of concern, now, please clarify, the ban does not specicify the including AFC drafts, portion in statement of closure.! This would be assumption that including AFC drafts also applies.Junosoon (talk) 03:59, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

@Junosoon: Thanks for the question. Consensus was that the ban should include AFC drafts for the reason given by Bishonen. Have added this clarification to the log of the ban. -- Euryalus (talk) 04:19, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

@Euryalus: , Hi, sorry to say, but the closing statement reads, Per general consensus, Junosoon is indefinitely banned from creating new articles., I am still not sure, because debate was on two proposals during the WP:ANI, as Bishonen, changed the proposal during the discussion, and thereafter the there were debates on which proposal to accept.!!!I think we need to reopen the discussion for sure confirmation about closure statement.Junosoon (talk) 04:34, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Bluntly, no. There is a clear consensus in the thread that the ban applies to new articles including via AFC. Some editors proposed that the ban apply to articles except those created at AfC, but this was not sufficiently supported by the community. The close was made (by me) with due regard for Bishonen's change of proposal midstream, and with analysis of the intent of the other commenters in the thread in determining what, specifically, the community was uniting behind.

It is entirely reasonable that you have sought clarification on this point. But as that clarification has been provided, can I again suggest you turn your attention to other areas of editing besides creating new pages. -- Euryalus (talk) 04:59, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

@Euryalus:, Thank you for clarification, which you now have informed, thanks so much.Junosoon (talk) 05:45, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Np. And I genuinely mean it re contributing elsewhere. There's 5 million or so articles out there, so there's plenty of great work to do. Good luck with it, and hope you find some worthwhile things to work on. -- Euryalus (talk) 05:58, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Siti Aisyah, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indonesian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:39, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

March 2017

Hello, I'm BlackcurrantTea. I noticed that you made a change to an article, January 2017 Baghdad bombings, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. BlackcurrantTea (talk) 03:44, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

@BlackcurrantTea:, I guess you missed the reference, as the citation was not immediately after the end of statement!,No problems it has been fixed now. Thanks. Junosoon (talk) 11:29, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for fixing it! BlackcurrantTea (talk) 05:00, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Goshu Wolde, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Gore and Sword of honor. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of 2016 Winter Session of Indian Parliament for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2016 Winter Session of Indian Parliament is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2016 Winter Session of Indian Parliament until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ChunnuBhai (talk) 12:38, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Surendra Kumar Apharya

Hello, Junosoon. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Surendra Kumar Apharya".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Boomer Vial^{Holla! We gonna ball!} 08:06, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Frances Prince, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page San Pedro. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:26, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Persons With Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995

Hello, Junosoon. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Persons With Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Snickers2686 (talk) 23:32, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Bollywood and superstitions

Hello, Junosoon. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Bollywood and superstitions".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 04:47, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (The Indian Coinage Act, 1906) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating The Indian Coinage Act, 1906, Junosoon!

Wikipedia editor Winged Blades of Godric just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please add more relevant details and integrate it as an encycloepadic article.

To reply, leave a comment on Winged Blades of Godric's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Winged Blades ^Godric 09:01, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Junosoon. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Junosoon. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Category:Astrological databases has been nominated for discussion

Category:Astrological databases, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 22:00, 5 November 2019 (UTC)