Jump to content

User:Bellerophon/Dashboard

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


RfA candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report
RfB candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report

No RfXs since 08:57, 27 September 2024 (UTC).—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online

Immediate requests Entries
Wikipedians looking for help 0
...from administrators 1
Requests for unblock 130
Wikipedia fully protected edit requests 16
Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests 64

Possible vandalism

Enhanced editing toolbar: Bold text, Italic text, Example image, Heading text, Bulleted list item, Numbered list item, Indented line, Non-formatted text, Big text, Small text, Superscript text, Subscript text, Redirect, Table.

MediaWiki toolbar: Link title, External link, Example sound, Formula, Strike-through text, Table, Footnote.

Editing alerts:

Vandalism reports

Reports

Bot-reported

User-reported

Page deleted. & user warned. JBW (talk) 17:31, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

Usernames for administrator attention / Requests for page protection

Usernames for administrator attention


Bot-reported

User-reported

Requests for page protection


Current requests for increase in protection level

Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
Shortcuts

Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


Tim Membrey

Reason: Tim Membrey has been linked with a delisted free agency move to the Collingwood football club. However some not logged in users have fallen under the impression that he has officially been signed on with them and no longer plays for the Saints. If Collingwood do end up signing him the earliest he can do it is on November 1st 2024. Flipstatic Energy (talk) 09:51, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 18:47, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

Reason: Intermittent vandalism and aggressive participation (e.g. repeated personal attacks) by an non-EC user, who has refused to stop after being politely told several times that they were violating the WP:ARBECR by involving themselves in Israeli-Palestinian conflict-associated editing.

Examples of the said user’s ECR violations: I, II, III, IV, V, VI, VII and VIII.

Also this by another non-EC user.

P.S. In the content of the article, “Israel” is mentioned 48 times, “Palestine” 6 times while “Gaza” 3 times. It has basically intertwined with the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Steven1991 (talk) 12:41, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

To provide more context, within the past several days this user has made multiple attempts at trying to prevent other users from engaging with the page: 1, 2 , this just appears to be a latest attempt.
They were told by an admin, Those edits aren't vandalism; this is a routine content dispute over inclusion, where WP:ONUS applies, especially given that there are WP:BLP concerns. If anything, repeatedly re-adding contested material without consensus is the most problematic behavior here. Anyone reviewing this should also be aware of OP's recent history ... On consideration, I suggest that you find other, less controversial topocs to edit
They were also told, In looking at the article talkpage, there are numerous editors expressing concerns about content you are pushing to include. And you are repeatedly personalizing the dispute and casting plenty of aspersions of your own--to an unwise degree given your own recent block history (three in the past month), and made doubly so by your decision to call admin attention to this dispute. My best advice to you is to ... show more good faith at the talkpage, and make sure you understand WP:ONUS, WP:BLP, and WP:BLPCRIME; your hands are far from clean here
On the article's talk page they began spamming (1, 2, 3, 4) me with alerts regarding ECR, when no one else agrees with WP:ARBECR applying to the article, and were told (1, 2), You know they're already aware of ECR, they were aware before you started alerting them.They're allowed to edit this article, just not be involved in WP:PIA. Now stop harassing them by spamming alerts at them. You've been told before not to do this with other users ... I already pointed out that they are allowed to edit this page as antisemitism as a whole is unrelated to WP:PIA & just because some aspects under ECR are included in the article, does not mean the entire article is under ECR.     Now please, leave them alone, stop aggressively trying to kick them off the page, & focus on content Wikipedious1 (talk) 15:09, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
I.) Isolated instances of reversing edits that apparently violated the WP:VANDAL and WP:ARBECR are not considered edit warring, when some of your last week’s mass deletions of well-sourced content comprised a few to no reasons, as pointed out by one of the admins who intervened ( “Lol” is not a reason ), not mentioning those entries were directly associated with the A/I conflict in which you’re not supposed to have got involved in the first place.
III.) Last week, I made a significant compromise by removing the vast majority of the specific entries you didn’t want to be kept in the list so as to address your “concerns” so as to de-escalate for any disputes the sake of de-escalation.
IV.) I have never ceased to follow the demands from you/other users concerning any other disputed content, despite my personal disagreement – I removed those entries accordingly without much questioning when it’s supposed to take place prior to any mass deletion attempts.
V.) I have tried my best to be patient and keep all of my replies as polite, civil and humble as possible, none of which however seemed to have been reciprocated by you at any point of time. You do not appear to have shown any signs of improving your manner in your correspondence, which I find considerably intimidating.
IV.) It is not “spamming” when you appeared to have violated the rules of engagement repeatedly and got relevant reminders. They are reminders – gentle reminders. I advise you to follow the WP:AGF and avoid mischaracterising my actions as anything “malicious” unfriendly when what I desire is respect.
You were asked repeatedly, as per the WP:NPA and WP:HA, to stop referring me to as an “entity” (dehumanising code word) or persistently employing offensive language in your replies to my polite and humble messages. You don’t appear to have apologised to me either despite your claim of having “reformed”.
Rather than listen, you appeared to have continued the suspected WP:NPA, WP:HA and WP:ARBECR violations. Reminders were given repeatedly as I didn’t want to bring in the specialised admins when they’re already busy enough – I have exercised maximal restraint throughout the process. Steven1991 (talk) 15:36, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
I think your first point is the only one that seems reasonable to me, I did make edits and discussion regarding protests related to WP:PIA, which may be incorrect, however I have refrained from discussing the conflict, or taking a side, other than describing what I perceived to be Biden's side in the conflict (this was relevant to a disputed incident in the article). In other words I made edits and discussions about protests, and a public figure's opinions (Biden's), only when it was relevant to specific incidents on the list that were in contention. I do not believe the entire article is related to WP:PIA, however, and I would dispute that, and I would guess that that is not the consensus among the editors. I want to point out that I have refrained from editing the page until a consensus to the current impasse is reached. I also think it's strange that I was blocked for making improper edit summaries (including what you're referring to, I don't understand why you're still bringing that up or presenting it as an ongoing issue when it has been settled), which means an admin or admins saw my edits, and decided that I hadn't broken any rules other than making improper edit summaries and not properly discussing my edits. It just seems strange that only within the past <24 hours it appears to have become a problem, when I was blocked on the 12th of October. For any admins my question would be why no one seemed to have caught this additional, earlier breach.
You don’t appear to have apologised to me either. I referred to you as the "Steven Entity" several times in 2 separate occasions, once on your talk page and once on the article's talk page, separated by the IIRC 48 hours of my block period. I thought it was all in good humor especially as a newer Wikipedia user who has not really engaged in discussion on an article talk page before, but since engaging with other editors I've since realized that creating nicknames for others -- only meant in good humor and not to seriously hurt other's feelings -- is an impediment to civility and consensus, and I have shed the earlier immaturity. I also noticed that you did not tell me to not refer to you in this way, so I thought it was okay to do so. In day to day civil discussion, as an example, I would expect someone to correct me immediately if I were to misgender them or mispronounce their name - in this situation I was only told by other members not to refer to you in this way, and you did not remark on it until after I already agreed to stop referring to you in this way. While it seems that this has been a major slight to you -- which is fine, you are of course allowed to feel that way -- I do get the feeling that it is being weaponized as another "point" you have in your dispute against me, in the same way your request for page protection seems to be another weapon you've decided to fire as part of the dispute rather than something you believe at a genuine level would allow for more meaningful contribution to the article. Though these points do not take away from the fact that my nickname for you was wrong. I do want to apologize to you for referring to you in this way on 2 separate occasions, and I do want to point out that I did agree to not refer to you in this way, and I have not done so since, I also want to thank you for improving my netiquette and my ability to use Wikipedia through engaging in our dispute. I'll repost this to your talk page as well, though I do question why you're bringing it up on this page and what relevance it has here, as well as what relevance some of these matters that appear to be settled have to this request for protection. Wikipedious1 (talk) 16:25, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

I've since realized that creating nicknames for others -- only meant in good humor


It is not just a nickname. Calling a living person an “entity” is a form of dehumanisation. It’s not an isolated incident. It happened repeatedly. My perception of it being in violation of the WP:NPA is thus legitimate.

While it seems that this has been a major slight to you


Still, you do not appear to be acknowledging that it is inherently wrong. It is not my subjective perception but an objective fact that it is under no circumstances acceptable to be doing what you seem to have ultimately shown the slightest bit of willingness to somehow feel apologetic for.

I do get the feeling that it is being weaponized as another "point" you have in your dispute against me


Still, you are casting aspersions on me. I am sorry to say that you haven’t appeared to show the willingness to acknowledge that what has been done is inherently wrong under literally all circumstances in daily life.

in the same way your request for page protection seems to be another weapon you've decided to fire as part of the dispute


Because the issue has continued. I have been pretty patient, polite and humble throughout the process, but what did I get in return? It is hard to describe, isn’t it? Steven1991 (talk) 19:20, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
V.) Your quoted user has apparently NEVER never been involved in the editing of that article at any point of time, not least the period 1 September~19 October 2024. The user is a disinterested party who made a highly subjective judgment based on very limited information and he has no administrative powers on the site and who’s supposed not to get involved either.
VI.)

when no one else agrees with WP:ARBECR

It does not require any participant’s “agreement”. It is a site-wide rule applicable to every individual participating in Wikipedia’s editing activities. You were reminded by other users of such requirements in some of the entries pertaining to the discussion as well, which you don’t appear to have followed.Steven1991 (talk) 15:39, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

Checking to see if protection is necessary. I could see protecting at EC level as related content for a limited time, like a year or so. But there needs to be diffs showing that more than a couple non-WP:XC users are engaging the topic area on that page. Sorry, the above is just too lengthy and disorganized for me to easily parse, so I suggest compiling the evidence concisely, with diffs alongside names and dates. Thank you. El_C 18:36, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
Thank you very much. Regarding non-WP:XC user participation, this and this user were also participating substantially in the article concerned and had made been making a significant input touching the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. They are not supposed to have engaged in the first place until they have acquired an XR status, but such a site-wide rule has seemed to be ignored by them since they started their participation in the article concerned. The former non-XC user even posted about the matter associated with the article concerned on different Talk pages, which is not supposed to have been done, despite being reminded by an uninvolved admin to stay away from the topic area.Steven1991 (talk) 18:52, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
Sorry, if it's just a couple of users, then it's more of an WP:AE/WP:ANI matter, but otherwise falling short of applying ARBECR (it'd be different if it was a primary article, but not for related content). Anyway, if those two users repeat the violations, they should be dealt with by warnings/blocking rather than protecting the page for everyone else. I'll leave this open for a while more, in case you have more evidence to submit that shows there being more than two non-XC users violating the remedy. Also, no links to talk pages or contribs, WP:DIFFs only, please. El_C 19:14, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

ARM (film)

Reason: High IP vandalism for days changing boxoffice numbers. Please protect page for longer time. RangersRus (talk) 14:07, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:16, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 19:02, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

Iron Maiden (band)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Looks like Dylan Florida is testing on this one too. Jalen Barks (Woof) 14:35, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 180.150.38.85 (talk · contribs). Its predecessor, 1.152.106.165 (talk · contribs · WHOIS), as well. In view of their general editing pattern, successors should probably just be shipped off to SPI for processing. Favonian (talk) 16:25, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

List of aviation shootdowns and accidents during the Saudi Arabian–led intervention in Yemen

Reason: Anon IP edits, using WP:SPS like X, Ex-Twitter as source. Also unsourced material. Recomend to restore to mid protection. 30days accounts Mr.User200 (talk) 15:12, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

Extended protection due to Arab conflict 2600:100C:B0A1:195:54A8:F1E5:B5B6:EF15 (talk) 15:46, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last occurence of "X, Ex-Twitter" sourcing was on September 30, and "restore to mid protection" seems odd as the article has never been protected. Favonian (talk) 18:20, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

Lviv

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term IP disruption. May fall under WP:RUSUKR. Mellk (talk) 17:46, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 92.253.236.0/22 (talk · contribs). One-month partial block from the article in question. Favonian (talk) 18:05, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

Boys Town (organization)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP editwarring. - FlightTime (open channel) 18:20, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:25, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

Sinai rosefinch

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Continued changing of cited information. Onel5969 TT me 18:25, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: Ineam (talk · contribs). Favonian (talk) 18:34, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

Martin (2024 film)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Nearly 70 vandalism edits. No idea if I've reverted to the correct version but it seems OK now. Ip and new account vandalism. Knitsey (talk) 18:46, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:52, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

Thaheem (tribe)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive edits, requesting temp-semi. Sir Calculus (talk) 19:20, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

Current requests for reduction in protection level

Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
Shortcuts

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

  • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
  • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
  • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
  • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.

Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Shortcuts

Current requests for edits to a protected page

Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Shortcut

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

  • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
  • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
  • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
  • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
  • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Further information: Wikipedia:Edit requests


Gaza genocide

My suggestion is to leave out the following 2 sentences in the "German complicity" paragraph as they seem to be based on misunderstandings:

"She also highlighted police suppression of pro-Palestine protests throughout Germany[509] as evidence of state complicity.[508] Karen Wells et al. highlight how Germany has entrenched its complicity in Israel's actions by banning use of the word "genocide" in reference to Israel.[471][better source needed]"

1. In general violent protests are not allowed in Germany. As some of the first pro-Palestine protests were violent, they were sometimes forbidden by courts, if they were expected to turn violent. But that is common policy in Gemany with all subjects and not special for pro-Palestine protests.

Meanwhile, there even is a calendar concerning pro-Palestinian protests[8] with daily up to 20 protests all over Germany. Thus, there is no general police suppression of pro-Palestine protests as is suggested by the current wording.

2. The word “genocide” is not banned in reference to Israel in Germany - maybe that was a misunderstanding: What is not allowed in Germany is to call for genocide against Jews. The slogan “From the river to the sea” is seen as such call and banned. Gilbert04 (talk) 15:34, 11 October 2024 (UTC)

@FortunateSons: A quick browse shows at least for the first part support for removal, can you add any additional incite? -- Cdjp1 (talk) 12:38, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
I've removed #2. But there does seem to be evidence that pro-Palestine protests have been banned in parts of Germany at times.[9][10][11].VR (Please ping on reply) 14:55, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Thank you. Maybe the following article gives a bit more clarity.[[12]] Gilbert04 (talk) 18:10, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately that source seems incomplete. Germany has indeed suppressed peaceful criticism of Israel.[13] And Washington Post says "A planned photo exhibit in southwestern Germany was canceled as a result of social media posts by its curator, including one describing “genocide” in Gaza."[14] VR (Please ping on reply) 22:32, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Well, I do not think that any source will ever be complete. Let me add two more.[[15]][[16]] Gilbert04 (talk) 20:44, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

Gaza genocide 2

Consider changing "The Israeli government rejected South Africa's allegations, and accused the court of being antisemitic, which it often does when criticised" to "The Israeli government has been accused of consistently weaponizing antisemitism against it's critics, including in the ICJ ruling." Ecco2kstan (talk) 23:12, 13 October 2024 (UTC)

The Weaponization of antisemitism page hyperlinked over "often done" has many sources to draw from regarding the accusations' consistency and nature.
My main concern with the original text is that it's voiced as if it's an observation made by a Wikipedian. The benefit here is that the weaponization of antisemitism has a clearer consistency grounded outside of Wikipedia. Perhaps other ways to word this out include adding a time scale (increasingly accused since Oct. 7th) or specifying the critique (against critiques of their actions since Oct 7th).
If a lead paragraph change is necessary, there may be reason to outline Israeli motives and conditions for the genocide, including Zionism and anti-Arab racism. Ecco2kstan (talk) 23:25, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
@Ecco2kstan, how about: "The Israeli government rejected South Africa's allegations. Supporters of Israel say that accusing Israel of genocide is both antisemitic[17][18] and a form of Holocaust erasure[19], but others argue antisemitism shouldn't be exploited to shield Israel from such allegations.[20][21][22][23]".VR (Please ping on reply) 00:12, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
I'm not as familiar with the Holocaust erasure claims, but I'm happy with that reworking! If that weaponization of Holocaust denial detail isn't on the weaponization of antisemitism page already, it might be a worthwhile phenomenon incorporate if there's more citations you can find. I might look into it myself. Thanks! Ecco2kstan (talk) 03:10, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
That does sound quite balanced. +1 from me. Neutral Editor 645 (talk) 18:02, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

Template:Israel–Hamas war infobox

Inform readers of the distinction between the dagger symbol and the cross symbol in the infobox.

Under "Commanders and leaders" in the infobox Yahya Sinwar has a dagger next to his name, but others such as Marwan Issa have a cross next to their name. The distinction between these symbols is not immediately clear to someone reading the article, I feel that this should be explicitly noted on the page. The Elysian Vector Fields (talk) 20:27, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

@TheElysianVectorFields: That isn't the article page, that's the infobox template. I changed the target for you above. It seems the dagger means "killed in action" (KIA) and the cross means "assassinated". I honestly don't know how I'd add a note to that effect. Maybe someone smarter than me can figure it out. ~Anachronist (talk) 01:52, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

Gaza genocide

The last few sentences of the second lead paragraph regarding assassinated Hamas leaders are too detailed for the lead. I don't believe including all of their names without reason is appropriate when the Infobox can convey a simpler understanding of their demise and state. Instead, figures of utmost relevance should be accounted for with reasons outside of their killings.

My suggestion is to change this:

In January 2024, Saleh al-Arouri, the deputy political chief of Hamas, was assassinated in Beirut, Lebanon. In July, Israel claimed to have killed military leader Mohammed Deif in an airstrike in al-Mawasi. In August, Ismail Haniyeh, the political leader of Hamas was assassinated in Tehran, Iran. In October, Yahya Sinwar, the chief and preceding political leader of Hamas, was killed in a shootout in Rafah.

To this:

Throughout 2024, Israel has killed many of Hamas' political and military officials. Prominent figures killed by Israel include Ismail Haniyeh and Yahya Sinwar, who have collectively served as political leaders for Hamas since 2007, and supposedly[citation for clarity] Mohammed Deif, who led Hamas' military branch, the Ezzedeen al-Qassam Brigades, since 2002.

This connects to Israel's goals described prior to this section, while establishing the impact of those killings pertaining to Hamas and Palestine as a whole. The readability of this is a bit wonky though, so if you have any better ideas, please let me know! Ecco2kstan (talk) 04:08, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

OOPS! I made a mistake in the title. This DOES NOT pertain to the Gaza Genocide article! This is about the Israel-Hamas War. Ecco2kstan (talk) 04:13, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

Israel–Hamas war

Move Saleh al-Arouri from military to political due to him being the Deputy Chairman of the Hamas Political Bureau before his death ElementalKnight987654321 (talk) 06:19, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

Handled requests

A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.

WP:CSD / Proposed deletions

Candidates for speedy deletion Entries
All candidates 8
Attack pages 0
Copyright violations 0
Vandalism 0
Hoaxes 0
Spam/advertising/promotion 3
No significance or importance 2
Nonsense pages 0
No context 0
Duplicate articles 0
Previously deleted at XfD 0
Blocked or banned user creation 0
Test pages 0
Broken redirects 0
Empty articles 0
Dependent on non-existent page 0
Request from author 0
Technical speedy deletion 1
Unspecified reason 0
Files with unacceptable licenses 0
Redundant files 0
Orphaned non-free revisions 1
Expired PRODS

The following articles have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
( source / chronological order / expired )

This box:
Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently
Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 6 items

Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old needing human review – No backlog currently

Requested RD1 redactions – 5 items

Proposed deletion – No backlog currently

Old AFDs

Old discussions (open)


Backlogs

Administrative backlog

Wikipedia backlog

Administrative backlog
Wikipedia infobox backlog
Wikipedia stub sorting backlog
Wikipedia template parameter issues
Wikipedia assessment backlog
Film and television backlog
1911 Encyclopaedia Britannica articles with no significant updates
All articles lacking in-text citations
All articles needing coordinates
All articles to be split
All articles with bare URLs for citations
All articles with broken links to citations
All articles with dead external links
All articles with specifically marked weasel-worded phrases
All articles with too many examples
All articles with topics of unclear notability
All copied and pasted articles and sections
All media requiring a US status confirmation
All portals with untriaged subpages
All self-contradictory articles
All uncategorized pages
All unreferenced BLPs
Articles lacking ISBNs
Articles missing coordinates with coordinates on Wikidata
Articles missing payload orbit parameters
Articles needing cleanup
Articles needing expert attention
Articles needing footnote reformatting
Articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction
Articles to be expanded
Articles to be merged
Articles to be merged after an Articles for deletion discussion
Articles using infobox body of water without pushpin map
Articles which could have free content incorporated from elsewhere
Articles with bare URLs for citations from August 2022
Articles with bare URLs for citations from August 2024
Articles with bare URLs for citations from March 2022
Articles with empty sections
Articles with hatnote templates targeting a nonexistent page
Articles with music ratings that need to be turned into prose
Articles with obsolete information
Articles with permanently dead external links
Articles with sections that need to be turned into prose
Articles with unsourced quotes
Avoided double redirects to be updated
Biography articles without listas parameter
Biography articles without living parameter
Books with missing cover
Articles needing additional categories
Copy to Wikimedia Commons (bot-assessed)
CS1 errors: unrecognized parameter
CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown
Articles with links needing disambiguation
Files lacking an author
Files where a release under a free license has been assumed
Files with poor sources
Good articles in need of review
Harv and Sfn no-target errors
Articles needing additional images
Images of Currency with no circulation parameter
Images requiring maintenance
Images that should have transparent backgrounds
Images with an unknown US copyright status
Images with inappropriate compression
Images with watermarks
Interlanguage link template existing link
Manually maintained portals without listed maintainers
Mechanical reproductions of original works in need of additional detail
Microbiology articles needing images
No local image but image on Wikidata
Novel has infobox needing cover
Pages missing lead section
Pages using backwards copy with unknown parameters
Pages using duplicate arguments in template calls
Pages using infobox musical artist with associated acts
Pages using infobox settlement with unknown parameters
Pages with active help requests for the IABot Interface
Pages with backwards copy warnings
Pages with broken anchors
Pages with broken reference names
Pages with duplicate reference names
Pages with incorrect ref formatting
Pages with missing references list
Pages with reference errors
PD-AR-Photo images with URAA-restored copyright
PD-UK-unknown images with URAA-restored copyright
Polynesia articles missing geocoordinate data
Portals with minor issues in need of attention
Portals with undated maintenance templates
Portals without maintenance status
Possibly free images
Redirects from non-English-language terms
Redirects from undetermined-language terms
Redirects to undetermined-language terms
Wikipedia requests
Road backlog
Sidebars with styles needing conversion
Articles lacking sources
Stale userspace drafts
Stub message templates needing attention
Talk pages with comments before the first section
Templates using sidebar games events without correct name
Templates with missing or incorrect documentation
Wikipedia articles needing translation
Unassessed articles
Uncategorized country data templates
United States-centric
Unlinked Wikidata redirects
Userboxes
Userboxes with insufficient color contrast
Wikipedia articles in need of updating
Wikipedia articles needing context
Wikipedia articles that are too technical
Wikipedia articles with an infobox request
Wikipedia articles with plot summary needing attention
Wikipedia bots with unknown status
Wikipedia cleanup by subject
Wikipedia conflict of interest edit requests
Wikipedia extended-confirmed-protected edit requests
Wikipedia external links cleanup
Wikipedia featured article candidates
Wikipedia files lacking a description
Wikipedia files that transclude the Non-free use rationale template with no Purpose specified
Wikipedia files with disputed copyright information
Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing
Wikipedia non-free files for NFUR review
Wikipedia orphaned files
Wikipedia pages with contentious topic restrictions without a placed date
Wikipedia pages with incorrect protection templates
Wikipedia partial-block edit requests
Wikipedia requested audio of animals
Wikipedia requested audio of orchestras
Wikipedia requested images of algae
Wikipedia requested images of cities
Wikipedia requested images of COVID-19-related topics
Wikipedia requested images of dinosaurs
Wikipedia requested images of dipterans
Wikipedia requested images of extinct organisms
Wikipedia requested images of pterosaurs
Wikipedia requested maps
Wikipedia requested maps in Autonomous Region of Bougainville
Wikipedia requested maps in French Polynesia
Wikipedia requested maps in Illinois
Wikipedia requested maps in Melanesia
Wikipedia requested maps in Micronesia
Wikipedia requested maps in New Caledonia
Wikipedia requested maps in Papua New Guinea
Wikipedia requested maps in Polynesia
Wikipedia requested maps in Rhode Island
Wikipedia requested maps in the Cook Islands
Wikipedia requested maps in Vanuatu
Wikipedia requested maps in Wisconsin
Wikipedia requested maps of protected areas
Wikipedia requested photographs in Kentucky
Wikipedia requested photographs in Louisville, Kentucky
Wikipedia requested range maps for birds
Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests
Wikipedia-related user templates
WikiProject assessment categories needing attention
Backlog templates
Wikipedia:Backlog
Template:Backlog
Wikipedia:Categories for discussion
Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Speedy
Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Working/Manual
Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations
Wikipedia:Database reports/Interlanguage link templates need to fix
Template talk:Did you know
Wikipedia:Good article nominations
Wikipedia:Graphics Lab/Map workshop
Wikipedia:Pages needing translation into English
Wikipedia:Pages needing translation into English/Articles by user/PootisHeavy
Wikipedia:Peer review/List of active reviews
Wikipedia:Proposed article splits
Wikipedia:Requested articles
Wikipedia:Requested articles/Biography/By profession
Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Holding cell
Wikipedia:Templates with red links
Wikipedia:Typo Team/moss
Wikipedia:WikiProject Arab world/Requests for Arabic script
Wikipedia:WikiProject Economics
Wikipedia:WikiProject Hong Kong/Requests
Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Requests
Pages missing references list

Pages with an automatically generated reference list
2024 United States House of Representatives elections in Georgia
2024–25 Lee Man FC season
Chromakopia
January 28 incident
Jhariah
List of acts of the Parliament of England from 1485
List of DreamWorks Pictures films
List of South Park characters
List of the costliest tropical cyclones
List of WNBA career 3-point scoring leaders
Longest NCAA Division I football winning streaks
Miura Next
Mohun Bagan in international football
Mongol invasions of Korea
Mount Zion Baptist Church (Arlington, Virginia)
Muroran Station
Order of battle of the Israel–Hamas war
Politics of Lower Saxony
Sabrina Claudio
Samadhi
SCM U Craiova (basketball)
Senate of the Czech Republic
Shuhada al-Aqsa Hospital
Sid Meier's Railroads!
Sondhi Limthongkul
South Africa national rugby union team
Sudanese Armed Forces
Draft:2023–2024 Middle Eastern crisis
Draft:Bart's Birthday
Draft:Bosanska Artiljeria
Draft:Dessy klement
Draft:Fan-made Kendrick Lamar movie
Draft:Hagop Artist
Draft:Lily Pink
Draft:List of individuals nominated for the Nobel Chemistry Prize
Draft:List of Netherlands tornadoes
Draft:Naitik verma
Draft:Ramkripalyadvg
Draft:Richard Raymond (publisher)
Draft:SMG4
Draft:The Seacoast Repertory Theater
Draft:Yaelokre
Portal:Chile
Portal:Europe
Portal:Russia
Portal:Ukraine
Template:York Region weatherbox
Help:Cite errors/Cite error group refs without references

WP:RFPERM

Requests for rollback


Rollback

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Cooldudeseven7

Reason for requesting rollback rights: I have done TWO rollback rights request, and I am happy to say that I have surpassed 200 mainspace edits and have also surpassed 1 month of Recent Changes Patrolling.I love the ability to help, and I already love to prevent vandalism with the help of Ultraviolet and Twinkle. I am ready to join the rollbacker force to get access to more tools, like AntiVandal and Huggle for even faster response. Don't worry, I won't bite the newcomers unless necessary! Thanks, Cooldudeseven7 (Cheers! Let's Discuss over a cup of tea!) Celebrating 1000 Edits! 13:56, 11 October 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 2 requests for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([24][25]). — MusikBot talk 19:40, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
Could you please comment on this edit and subsequent warning from @Oblivy. Why did you make this edit and do you believe it was appropriate for Oblivy to warn you? -Fastily 05:26, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
I was a beginner at the time and I did not think that I would have to read the diffs for an edit that causes the word "its" to change to "it's." I really think that it was important for Oblivy to warn me, as it teaches me to never just blatantly use find and replace. Thanks, Cooldudeseven7 (Cheers! Let's Discuss over a cup of tea!) Celebrating 1000 Edits! 01:29, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
For what it’s worth the rapid fire use of find and replace gave me some concerns. I did look through their edits and this seemed to be a one-off, and the immediate acceptance of responsibility and efforts to resolve are praiseworthy. OTOH automated tools in the wrong hands can cause a lot of havoc in a hurry… Oblivy (talk) 09:12, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
I did not mean to cause any harm back then and I now decided that reading diffs is important and you cant just do a repetitive shortcut to find and replace on articles. Thanks, Cooldudeseven7 (Cheers! Let's Discuss over a cup of tea!) Celebrating 1000 Edits! 17:30, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
Hey! This is Cooldudeseven7 again, and i'm just asking if there is any progress on this Rollback case? Thanks, Cooldudeseven7 (Cheers! Let's Discuss over a cup of tea!) Celebrating 1000 Edits! 11:15, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
I've randomly sampled your recent edits and I'm seeing an unacceptably high number of serious mistakes. In addition to the error above, I found:
  1. Here, you offered poor advice and almost inappropriately moved the page to userspace. Pages like this are not acceptable on Wikipedia, even in the userspace.
  2. Editors may remove warnings from their talk pages at any time, meaning this revert followed by these warnings (1, 2) and subsequent AIV report are extremely inappropriate
  3. I'm not sure why you felt the need to insert a {{Static IP}} template here. Not a helpful edit. Also worth noting that this doesn't belong in a section header, which breaks the page formatting.
I think you need to spend a few months learning how Wikipedia works (i.e. quit RC Patrol for now and go make article contributions instead) before applying for advanced permissions. To be clear, RC patrol isn't a race to see who can revert the most edits, so please don't treat it as such. Closing as  Not done. -Fastily 23:08, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Thanks, but am I not allowed to ever submit again because of these or are you just saying wait a bit? Cooldudeseven7 tea talk 00:16, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
You can resubmit at a later time. I would recommend waiting a good amount of time, addressing comments left above, and making sure you are ready and qualified. You may also want to consider WP:CVSCHOOL, after addressing the feedback above. (Non-administrator comment) Sincerely, Guessitsavis (she/they) (Talk) 13:14, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Thank you. Cooldudeseven7 tea talk 11:23, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

User:TheWikiToby

(Trying this again because one of my scripts broke the template)

I have been reverting vandalism and patrolling recent changes for over a month now. The last time my request was declined, I simply hadn't been patrolling for a month at that point, and @Fastily had no other objections. I have consistently warned all vandals I reverted and reported many to AIV. I believe I'm ready to have rollback now. Also note that I am a pending changes reviewer. TheWikiToby (talk) 17:32, 14 October 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([26]). — MusikBot talk 17:40, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
I see that you are failing to consistently warn editors when you revert their edits (e.g. 1, 2, 3). Why? It's important to leave a notification for every revert you make (especially when reverting good faith edits). Are you aware of tools such as Twinkle or Ultraviolet which make this extremely easy? -Fastily 23:53, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
@Fastily Diff by diff:
1. Completely forgot that there is a warning template for NOTFORUM. The last time I used that warning was all the way on Sept 13 [27] which is more than a month ago. Completely skipped my mind.
2. I have no explanation on this one; I probably just forgot.
3. No explanation either.
The earlier failures seem to be one off mistakes I made that happen to be close together, but the revert that happened just today is definitely very unfortunate for me not to warn. The sea of reverts I've made mostly have warnings other than the above, so I don't exactly know how I managed to forget to warn at all. I'll make sure this doesn't happen again. TheWikiToby (talk) 01:10, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

User:Bigeditingideas

Reason for requesting rollback rights: I have experienced myself with editing on Wikipedia and undoing vandalism on Wikipedia, and I think I am ready to undo vandalism the easy way. If anyone could reach out to me so we can get this settled and I can have my rights, then that would be great. Thanks! - Bigeditingideas (talk) 23:18, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

 Not done I reviewed your contributions and found little to no recent anti-vandalism work. If you're still interested in this tool then please spend at least a month actively patrolling RecentChanges (Twinkle & Ultraviolet can help with that) before reapplying. Also, please ensure that you are consistently warning editors when you revert their edits. Thanks, Fastily 23:53, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

User:Jlwoodwa

I've been patrolling Special:RecentChanges for vandalism, and I sometimes encounter editors who rapidly vandalize many dozens of pages before being blocked. In these cases, I don't need to check each diff before reverting it, so I'm requesting rollback to more efficiently handle them. I am also interested in the tools that require rollback, such as Huggle. jlwoodwa (talk) 23:19, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

 Done -Fastily 23:53, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

There are no outstanding requests for reviewer rights.

Requests for file mover

File mover

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
Requests for autopatrolled

Autopatrolled

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Golan1911

Meets the minimum criteria, and a random sampling of their creations doesn't raise any red flags. My only concern is their liberal use of quotations in reception sections, but I don't consider it an overly serious issue for this permission as the copyright reports come away otherwise clean; I've also started a discussion on their talk page about it. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 18:54, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

 Done Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 23:27, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

User:Hounaam

Dear Wikipedia Admins, I am requesting the Autopatrolled right to further support my contributions to Wikipedia. While I may not have thousands of edits or article creations, my work is rooted in careful research and learning from experienced editors. My focus is on Iranian early modern, modern, and contemporary art and culture, especially highlighting the stories of Iranian women often overlooked in history. I ensure all my edits are supported by reliable, academic sources, and I have a track record of accurate contributions with very few reverts. I believe that having the Autopatrolled right would allow me to continue enhancing the articles related to Iran and Iranian art and culture. Thank you for your consideration. Warm regards, Hounaam (talk) 22:53, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

 Done Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 23:36, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
I greatly appreciate this opportunity, and I won’t disappoint! Hounaam (talk) 09:03, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

User:SafariScribe

I am requesting the Autopatrolled right, like any other editor, to help reduce the NPP work load. I have worked at AFC/NPP/AFD, and I've created good articles that would pass a deletion discussion if nominated. Cheers! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 11:47, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

 Comment: @SafariScribe: I'm a little puzzled here, I randomly picked like seven articles from your recent creations, and they were all dab pages, which generally aren't really considered when evaluating these requests. Could you maybe provide some examples of fairly recent content creations? Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 23:56, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
@Just Step Sideways, maybe you didn't see this ones: One Too Many (2022 film), A Requiem for Syrian Refugees, Lalita Tademy, Jabari Banks, and more to create at User:SafariScribe/Articles created. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 03:57, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
 Checking.... Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 18:28, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
 Not done I think you are generally doing a good job getting articles started, but in pretty much every one of the articles you linked, I also see others coming along and fixing them up, correcting language/grammar/etc, and in one case a copyvio that had to be revision deleted. So, while it is great that you are expanding the project with new content, I think your creations would continue to benefit from being reviewed by others. Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 18:40, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

User:Yut3117

They have created 60 Japanese-related articles, the majority of which are BLPs. None of them have been deleted, and no major issues were found upon my quick checks. Thank you. GrabUp - Talk 16:40, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

 Done Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 00:16, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

User:Ibjaja055

I have created 247 articles on English Wikipedia, covering a variety of subjects. I am currently a New Page Patroller and actively participate in Articles for Creation (AfC) and Articles for Deletion (AfD). I also enjoy turning the red links of notable recent deaths into blue, and I believe this right will help to reduce the workload at New Page Patrol (NPP). Thank you. Ibjaja055 (talk) 00:30, 14 October 2024 (UTC)

 Done Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 02:00, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

User:SCreditC

Hi, I have created 25 articles by 2021, none of which has been deleted. Recently, I created another 3 articles, and in total I have made 3200 edits (none of which has been deleted). These articles and edits are primarily about modern Chinese history, which I am familiar with. And I just realized I may have been qualified for the "auto-patrol" right for a long time, but never asked for it. Therefore, I'd like to ask to become an auto-patroller which hopefully will also save some work for the new page patrollers in the future. Thank you very much. SCreditC (talk) 03:36, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

 Done Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 02:13, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

User:Rubystaramaryllis

Meets minimum criteria, no articles deleted, no behavior issues Mach61 17:34, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

This is borderline... no deletions, but quite a high proportion of their articles have outstanding cleanup tags. I might have granted it if it was a self-request but as it is,  Not done. – Joe (talk) 13:05, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

User:Originalmess

Meets minimum criteria (by a hair), no articles deleted Mach61 17:38, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

Haha hi, thanks. I'm not very active anymore due to the need to continue getting my life together but will probably return to creating articles someday. I occasionally review pages and always check GNG, policies, etc before creating articles. I have no interest in wasting time or causing trouble! originalmesstalk 07:42, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
 Not done – user hasn't created an article in two years. – Joe (talk) 13:02, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

User:StuggerMax

Hello, I’m requesting Autopatrolled rights to help reduce the New Pages Patrol workload. I focus on classical Greek topics and have translated many pages from the Greek Wikipedia, having created over 50 pages so far. With these rights, I could streamline my contributions and make the review process easier. Thank you for considering my request. StuggerMax (talk) 17:51, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

 Done, I see there were some issues with copyright and sourcing when you started editing, but they haven't reoccurred recently. – Joe (talk) 13:01, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

User:Yummifruitbat

I have returned to editing after a looooong wikibreak (life happens). Before that I was a reasonably active user in good standing for a couple of years and created quite a few articles only one of which was deleted (while I was on wikibreak so not around to add the additional sourcing, from specialist publications, that it needed to confirm notability).

I'm in the process of updating many out-of-date articles about carnivorous plants, including filling in large gaps in the taxonomy, so I have well over 100 new pages on my to-do list. To reduce the burden on NPP, I'd like to request autopatrolled before I start churning through those please. YFB ¿ 16:14, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

 Request withdrawn On second thoughts, I have the sense I'm about to receive some patronising / demotivating comments, so I won't trouble you all further. YFB ¿ 20:48, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

(oh, edit conflict proved me correct)

Well, that's been a wikibreak of extraordinary length. Welcome back! As you will appreciate, Wikipedia has moved on in the 17 intervening years. I've had a look at the nine articles that you have produced since you've become active again. The expectation is that articles by autopatrolled editors are clean and don't need attention by others. However, that's not the case for the stubs that you produce, with recurrent issues being lack of categories, tagging for single source or orphan status, DEFAULTSORT missing for bios, and a variety of WP:MOS issues. I suggest that you keep a close eye on how other editors tweak your articles and if you take all those things on board, your articles will be clean enough for becoming autopatrolled in no time.  Not done for the bot. Keep up your good work! Schwede66 20:41, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
I hope that you don't perceive the words above as patronising, Yummifruitbat. Schwede66 21:03, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Respectfully, yes I do. The combination of the manner of your review of my contributions, the edit summaries you used, and the points you chose to pick up on (dashes and subtleties of date formatting; missing linebreak before stub tag; an incorrect accusation of including an unsourced DoB in a BLP where the date was actually ref'd but the ref wasn't repeated directly alongside the date; downgrading another reviewer's assessment from 'Start' to 'Stub') led me to decide to withdraw my nomination as I already felt patronised and demotivated. You replied to my query on your talk page (about the DoB comment) in a way that implied I might not be able to figure out why you, an Admin active on this backlog, were suddenly reviewing my recent contributions. Your comment here reads as though my additions have been borderline worthless. 'The stubs you create', 'recurrent issues', 'lack of categories', 'tagging for single source or orphan status' (the latter both transient one-offs). My understanding was that NPP was supposed to catch and address articles with major issues - BLP problems, serious POV/COI, GNG, WP:NOT, vandalism - not trivial issues of formatting? Perhaps I had the wrong end of the stick. Either way, the net effect is that I feel pretty bitten / tag-bombed and strongly regret placing a request here. YFB ¿ 22:16, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
I'm sorry to hear that you feel like this, Yummifruitbat. However, I have to respond to those accusations:
  • combination of the manner of your review of my contributions – I've reviewed all of your articles created since you became active again last year. What is wrong with that?
  • the edit summaries you used – when I review editor contributions for autopatrolled, I try to be clear and informative so that it's helpful to the editor going forward. Which edit summary or summaries did not sit right with you?
  • the points you chose to pick up on (dashes and subtleties of date formatting – whenever I review an article, I run a couple of scripts that fix dashes and date formats. You may notice that I have not commented on dashes or date formats above, and in fact, I don't think I ever have as part of a review. I do not consider that relevant to autopatrolled flags.
  • missing linebreak before stub tag – that's something that's useful to know; it wasn't like that 17 years ago. Are you suggesting that you don't want to know when you are editing outside of what MOS prescribes?
  • an incorrect accusation of including an unsourced DoB in a BLP where the date was actually ref'd but the ref wasn't repeated directly alongside the date – thank you for posting about that on my talk page. I acknowledged that I did misunderstand that and proposed a way to resolve this. Isn't that normal editor interaction?
  • downgrading another reviewer's assessment from 'Start' to 'Stub' – I downgraded the assessment because it was wrong; Andreas Fleischmann is a stub and very far from being start class.
  • tag-bombed – I didn't place a single tag, so how can you possibly feel "tag-bombed"?
As I said before, what we are looking for at autopatrolled is editors who can consistently produce clean articles that don't need attention by others. If you have further thoughts on my responses, please don't hesitate to bring them up. Schwede66 00:24, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
I won't leave a long reply here as it doesn't seem appropriate to clog up this page. I recognise and accept that you have not intentionally patronised me, and to be clear I'm not accusing you of anything (apart from the DoB thing which we have discussed and resolved). What I've intended to describe above is the impression that your approach to the review gave me as a returning editor - and it did give that impression, whether or not you intended it, otherwise I wouldn't have been in the middle of withdrawing my request when you posted your response. I will explain more fully on your talk page. YFB ¿ 01:29, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

User:MoviesandTelevisionFan

Has created over 2500 politician biographies under NPOL. Categories, stub templates, WikiProjects, infoboxes, formatting, etc. are always properly done. Never have to do anything except mark as reviewed. C F A 💬 16:59, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

This user has had autopatrolled before. It was removed as a result of an ANI discussion in 2022. That doesn't mean it can't be granted again – but if anyone is minded to do so they should be aware of the background. I'll sit this one out due to my involvement last time. – Joe (talk) 17:07, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving...  The nominated editor doesn't seem to be interested in the permission. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 17:22, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
Requests for confirmation


Confirmed

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Casa del Espiritu Santo

Reason for requesting confirmed rights Hello, I am unable to move article from sandbox to main page. I have had the account for more than 4 days and have made the 10 edits. Please advise thank you Casa del Espiritu Santo (talk) 19:13, 18 October 2024 (UTC)

 Not done You made exactly one edit before making this request, and you haven't created a sandbox pages on this Wikipedia, so I'mn not sure what you are even talking about. Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 19:17, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
Requests for accountcreator

Account creator

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Bellerophon/Dashboard&oldid=1204589355"