User talk:اَشکَش

Your edits

Stop revision of Bareja, use more citations, quotes and use English sources, as I didn't find any mention in your cited source. AngelicDevil29 (talk) 18:31, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have added an English source, along with the Persian one which on its page number 308 mentions Barija Baluch tribe. اَشکَش (talk) 19:51, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gyan publishing house are unreliable sources, so kindly remove, and also use the translated quote from the another article, as not very one can understand Persian, so to verify you should put translated quote, and also a single source can not be enough, you need more sources to rewrite. AngelicDevil29 (talk) 22:36, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stop using unreliable sources, plus the source claims samma and sumra to be baloch tribes, which makes it absolutely unreliable, kindly use reliable English sources, more than one. AngelicDevil29 (talk) 18:09, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

which source claims samma and sumra to be Balochs tribes? اَشکَش (talk) 18:20, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

check your cited source " the martial races of undivided india", also gyan publishing house is unreliable. AngelicDevil29 (talk) 19:00, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

do not revert until you have multiple reliable sources, otherwise I will have to take it to ANI. AngelicDevil29 (talk) 19:04, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i have removed the cited source "the martial races of undivided india" and cited 3 new English sources. Now you should stop citing unreliable news articles and bring reliable sources, otherwise i will have to take it to the ANI.

Thanks اَشکَش (talk) 21:36, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

_signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:04, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Sir Calculus (talk) 17:55, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How is my edit unconstructive? Its you whose edits are constituting vandalism and are in a dire need to be reverted, I have cited sources for what i edited. Sangurs are a Baluch tribe of Jadgal Origin, your own cited source "An Anthropological Reconnaissance in West Pakistan, 1955" mentions Sangur to be a Baloch tribe of jadgal origin like the other sources i cited. I think i would have to take this to ANI ? اَشکَش (talk) 18:13, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Sir Calculus (talk) 18:36, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]