Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Business/Archive 7
 | This is an archive of past discussions on Wikipedia:WikiProject Business. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | ← | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 |
Request for comment / Melaleuca / Hoover's
A discussion is going on at Frank L. VanderSloot regarding the use of Hoover's Company In-Depth Records as a way to describe the Melaleuca organization. GeorgeLouis (talk) 15:29, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
- That's a misleading and one-side presentation of the issue at hand. The question is not whether Hoover's is a reliable source on it surface. The underlying issue is that George has been trying (through numerous attempts at forum shopping)[1][2][3][4][5] unsuccessfully for quite some time to expunge the "multi-level marketing (MLM)" company designation from the Melaleuca article. However, the issue was settled long ago -- the company is an MLM, and there are ample (>20) sources to back it up. George is already aware of these sources from his previous unsuccessful attempts to whitewash the article of the term "MLM". It seems that they need to be presented once again. Here are a plethora of sources across the spectrum that all refer to Melaleuca as an MLM. It's staggering that the sham debate about this went on as long as it did.
Federal Trade Commission
- “Numerous letters came from individuals having negative experiences with various MLMs like Quixtar, 4Life, Mary Kay, Arbonne, Liberty League International, Financial Freedom Society, Herbalife, Xango, Melaleuca, EcoQuest, Pre-Paid Legal, PartyLite, Shaklee, Vartec/Excel, and Vemma. 73 Fed. Reg. at 16,113 n.37.”[6][7]
Journalists/News Articles
- DailyFinance (reporter Eamon Murphy): “For Melaleuca is essentially a pyramid scheme -- or, more politely, a "multilevel marketing firm," like Amway or Herbalife (HLF) -- in which so-called independent marketing executives make money by peddling the company's dietary supplements and cleaning products, as well as recruiting more salespeople (the newer recruits being on the lower levels of the pyramid).”[8]
- Harper’s Magazine (correspondent Jeff Ernsthausen): “This spring, Stephanie Mencimer of Mother Jones detailed Mitt Romney’s multilevel-marketing connections, which included more than $3 million in contributions to a Romney super PAC by executives at Nu Skin Enterprises and Melaleuca.”[9]
- Mother Jones (Washington Bureau correspondent Stephanie Mencimer): “And Romney's current finance chair, Frank VanderSloot, is the CEO of Idaho-based Melaleuca, a multilevel-marketing company that sells green cleaning products and nutritional supplements.”[10]
- “VanderSloot's company also has a controversial background. Like Amway, Herbalife, and other so-called multilevel marketing firms, its business model relies on recruiting distributors, who in turn must recruit more distributors, to sell its products.”[11]
- Rolling Stone (political reporter Tim Dickinson): “The Pyramid Schemer: Frank VanderSloot – Position: CEO of Melaleuca Inc., a "multilevel marketing" firm based in Idaho that sells off-brand cleaning products and nutritional supplements.”[12]
- Seattle Weekly (award winning journalist Laura Onstot): “Multilevel marketing—the pyramid-like (but only like!) business model made famous by Amway and Mary Kay—has, inevitably, gone green. Melaleuca, a household-products company based in Idaho (named for the plant from which tea tree oil is derived) is actively recruiting in the Puget Sound area. Brenda Malpedo of Tacoma, a Melaleuca ‘marketing executive,’ placed the Craigslist ad in order to recruit other salespeople to join.”[13]
- Forbe's Magazine: “Melaleuca is a pyramid selling organization, built along the lines of Herbalife and Amway. Vendors get commissions on the products they sell and also on products sold by vendors they recruit..” (NB: “pyramid selling” is a synonym for multi-level marketing)[14]
- Los Angeles Business Journal (staff reporter Alexa Hyland): “They decided to leave the company and join a competing multilevel marketing company, Melaleuca”[15]
- Susan Brown (Gainesville Sun correspondent): “Melaleuca Inc. sells vitamins, personal hygiene products, household cleaners and other consumables through multilevel marketing. President Frank VanderSloot said Melaleuca pays a 7 percent commission to seven levels of distributors.[16]
- Susan Brown (in Lakeland Ledger: via NYT Regional Newspapers wire)“…Frank Vandersloot, president of Idaho Falls, Idaho-based Melaleuca Inc, a multilevel distributor of vitamins, personal hygiene products, household cleaners, and other goods.”[17]
- Dean Miller (Nieman Reports): "...VanderSloot. He owns an international multilevel marketing/health products company, Melaleuca, Inc."[18]
MLM Experts
- Robert L. FitzPatrick: “Pyramid Scheme Alert compiled an analysis of the actual average incomes of a sample of 10,000 sales representatives for Nuskin, Nikken, Melaleuca, Reliv, Arbonne, Free Life International and Cyberwize.com. These seven multi-level marketing companies, six of which are large, well-known members of the Direct Selling Association (DSA) and the seventh a newer and fast-growing MLM, are regarded in the multi-level marketing business as representative examples of that industry. They are representative in product type, pay plan, business structure, and marketing claims of the majority of multi-level marketing companies. The companies were selected based on the data available but also on the representative nature of these companies.”[19] (see also [20]
- Jon M Taylor: Includes Melaleuca on list of MLM companies.[21][22]
- Stephen Barrett: Includes Melaleuca on list of MLM companies[23]
Organizations
- Human Rights Campaign: “Subsidiaries of VanderSloot's multi-level marketing company Melaleuca, of which he is CEO, have poured a combined $1 million into Restore Our Future, the main super PAC associated with Romney.”[24]
Consumer Organizations
- BBB: (lists Melaleuca as multilevel marketing company)[25]
Former Melaleuca Executives
- SEC Filing: “From 1991 to 1998, he [Timothy Transtrum] worked for Melaleuca Inc., a network marketing company, during which time he became Director of International Operations"(NB: "network marketing" is a synonym for MLM -- see multi-level marketing).[26]
- Spencer Reese (former in-house counsel for Melaleuca): “Spencer Reese is a partner in the law firm of Grimes & Reese. He is a graduate of the Washington University School of Law and is a member of the Idaho, Missouri and Colorado bars. He was formerly in-house counsel for Melaleuca, Inc., a multilevel marketing company with sales in excess of $260 million.”[27]
Melaleuca’s Statements in Court Affidavits
- “Melaleuca argues that OrGano seeks this information solely to support its unclean hands defense by attempting to establish that Melalueca engaged in the same “bad acts” against other competing multi-level marketing companies.”[28]
- “Accordingly, Melalueca’s response period shall be reduced, and its response must include those documents which describe Melaleuca’s recruiting of new marketing executives from competing multi-level marketing companies within the last six (6) years.”[29]
- “When Marketing Executives join Melaleuca, they sign what is called an Independent Marketing Executive Agreement with Melaleuca. The Bartholomews were Marketing Executives at Melaleuca until recently, when they left Melaleuca and joined another multi-level marketing company called Independent Energy Alliance (“IEA”).”[30]
Other Sources in Court Cases
- “Melaleuca is a consumer direct-marketing company, and commonly known and referred to as a multi-level marketing company. It manufactures skin care and other health products and markets these products through a complex network of independent contractors referred to as Independent Marketing Executives (“IME”). Each IME has the potential to create a multi-level customer base over which it has oversight. Each IME also receives a regular commission payment reflecting a certain percentage of the income derived from the sales made by other IME’s in his or her downline.”[31]
Rhode Island Red (talk) 17:00, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
- Congrats. Now to the real issue -- whether an NAICS code is "real" and usable in an article on a company where it is cited in undeniable reliable sources. Is the view Ah -- so the company itself determines what number to report? Fascinating proper to discredit mention of an NAICS code for a company as one editor insists? Or that Hoover's decision to label a company with particular codes is Hoover's own decision is correct? It would be unfair for me to point out that the lengthy post above is duplicative of many such, and that DRN did not concur with the poster therof. Cheers. Collect (talk) 21:47, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
- It would be better to centralize this discussion at Talk:Frank_L._VanderSloot#Later_discussion. GeorgeLouis (talk) 22:40, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Business template
The Business Template needs work. As you can see at http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Droga5&action=edit§ion=0, the raw template says "Locations," but the published template comes out as "Number of locations," which is not the same thing at all. Example at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Droga5. Can somebody fix it? GeorgeLouis (talk) 18:33, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
- {{Infobox company}} is protected, so only an admin can edit it (because the template is used in very many articles; a vandal could make one obscure change in template-space which damages very many articles).
- Simply changing the name of the parameter (from "locations" to something else) is not a solution; there are lots of other pages already using the template with the existing parameter name. Adding an extra parameter or an alias is doable, I suppose. The meaning of the "locations" field is explained way down in the template doc but it would be neater to explain this in a comment in the Usage section - which lots of editors copy & paste from, when adding the template to another article... bobrayner (talk) 22:18, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
- Have you found any other problems with the template? bobrayner (talk) 22:18, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
- I don't like infoboxes, so I don't use them much. But, no, I found only this one problem which jarred me. GeorgeLouis (talk) 22:34, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
- I've updated the template documentation. Does that help? bobrayner (talk) 11:00, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
- I don't like infoboxes, so I don't use them much. But, no, I found only this one problem which jarred me. GeorgeLouis (talk) 22:34, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
- Have you found any other problems with the template? bobrayner (talk) 22:18, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Request for comment – Gray's Pottery
I would appreciate additional editors joining the discussion at Talk:Gray's Pottery regarding how we should deal with the sourcing of this company, which was dissolved in 1961. Please comment there, not here. Thanks, C679 19:10, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
TAFI
 Hello, |
Planning to update The Boston Consulting Group page - looking for editors to partner with
Hello WikiProject Business community,
I noticed the Boston Consulting Group entry is rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
I would like to invest some time over the next few days to improve that entry, and the Bruce_Henderson and Growth-share_matrix which go with it naturally.
I'd appreciate the partnership of any willing editor to ensure that any updates conform to Wikipedia's high standards!
Filippo Scognamiglio (talk) 15:09, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
Updated Bruce_Henderson; Can anyone review and see if if can be classified as more than a stub now?
Filippo Scognamiglio (talk) 22:49, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
Request for article rating review
KMGi Group is currently rated as Stub class, the rating it has held since before I expanded the article. Request an independent assessment to see if it meets the criteria for Start or "C" class. Thank you. Cla68 (talk) 12:29, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
- Hi, I would say that looks like a C class article except that some of the refs don't link to full text or, in the case of the last ref, appear to be just plain wrong. So the refs need some work. --Pine✉ 20:54, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
Agile Business Intelligence
I just accepted Agile Business Intelligence from WP:Articles for Creation. The subject seems notable but the article is a mess. Help from a subject-matter expert would be appreciated. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 00:43, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
Change infoboxes to say "Majority owner(s)" instead of "Owner(s)"
Clarify cuz some people try to list over 100 minority owners on some articles. 71.255.86.27 (talk) 12:09, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
It seems strange that these are separate articles; there's certainly a lot of duplicate content. I was thinking about BOLDly redirecting the former to the latter. Thoughts? --BDD (talk) 00:51, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
New draft needing review
Hi, I've written a new draft for the Vocus article, which falls under this WikiProject and am looking for editors to review it. It would be great to have some impartial editors from this project check that the draft is non-promotional, neutral and otherwise meets Wikipedia's guidelines, as I wrote the draft on behalf of the company. I'd appreciate any help from editors here, both reviewing the draft and moving it live once it is ready. A note about my disclosure: since I have a COI, I will not move this draft live myself.
The article right now is not very well written and has a few specific issues:
- Two sections are timeline-like lists of events
- Most information in the article has no citation to support it
- Details throughout are out of date
- The Products and services section sounds very promotional and the only citation is a link directly to the Vocus website
With the draft I've prepared, I've aimed to address the above issues and generally provide a better overview of Vocus and its products and services. The draft is in my userspace here: User:16912_Rhiannon/Vocus
I welcome any feedback and ask that editors feel free to edit the draft, and / or to ask for changes or general questions here or on the draft's Talk page. Thanks, 16912 Rhiannon (Talk · COI) 23:36, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Question about Socially responsible outsourcing page
The page on socially responsible outsourcing has been flagged for revisions for awhile; I'm wondering if the term should be changed to "Impact Sourcing" given that most of the official studies on the practice use that term (see http://www.rockefellerfoundation.org/news/news/how-impact-sourcing-creating). Given the small size of that market I think it would be most appropriate to merge the article into the larger one about outsourcing as a sub-manifestation. Thoughts? Josephadeo (talk) 23:52, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Cooperative WikiProject
WikiProject Globalization, with assistance from Outlines WikiProject, has drafted an Outline of globalization. We welcome your input, additions, and comments. Meclee (talk) 16:44, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
One of your project's articles has been featured
Hello, |
One of your project's articles has been featured
Hello, |
Heritage Grill
Heritage Grill has been nominated for deletion. Any comments at the discussion would be greatly appreciated. Neelix (talk) 03:40, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
| Dear members of the WikiProjectBusiness WikiProject. This notification is sent from the Articles for Improvement team to let you know that the article Global financial system, which has been tagged as part of the project, has been selected to receive community improvement.
Users and members of the project that are willing to help, may do so in the article's entry on the Articles for Improvement page. |
|
| Regards. Meclee (talk) 16:55, 23 June 2013 (UTC) |
Proposed move of SMART criteria to SMART objectives
Members of this wikiproject may be interested in the discussion at Talk:SMART criteria#Requested move. We could definitely use some additional input. Yaris678 (talk) 21:47, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
- Update: Requesting a move was the wrong process. We are now discussing the title of the article at Talk:SMART criteria#Another discussion about the article title. The discussion is currently revolving around whether to go with SMART objectives, which is more formal and business oriented or SMART goals which is the more commonly used term, at least as far as Google Books is concerned. Yaris678 (talk) 18:19, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
One of your project's articles has been featured
Hello, |
A draft article at AFC needs help
Please take a look at W:Articles for creation/Kashiwagi Solution Model, the subject seems to be notable but it clearly needs help from someone who is familiar with the subject (or at least the type of subject). Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 08:59, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
Waukesha Bearings Corporation
I have recently joined Wikipedia and am looking at the bearing and engineering industry to further establish its presence on Wikipedia. I am looking for others to join me with any knowledge of the industry. I have made edits to a few articles thus far and have created an article: Waukesha Bearings Corporation. Thank you for your edits, suggestions and feedback.BearingTechnology (talk) 17:29, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
Help request for Accenture article
Hello, I've recently been working at the behest of Accenture, looking to improve their article by correcting some factual inaccuracies and outdated information currently present in it. Given my financial COI, I don't make edits myself; instead, I've posted a request at Talk:Accenture with some of the information I'd like to see corrected. If someone from this WikiProject has a chance to take a look, implementing the changes if they look appropriate, I'd sure appreciate it! Cheers, ChrisPond (Talk · COI) 14:59, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
c/c Ruthin n/wales
Hello mr director I have been following the progress of c/c soft drinks for many years. i dont know that you are aware that c/c had a depot in Ruthin North Wales in the late 1960s to the the late 1970s perhaps a little longer. BUT I KNOW THIS BECAUSE MYSELF MY FATHER AND BROTHER worked at c/c soft drinks for many years as a driver and drivers mate myself became a stacker driver and foreman for c/c by the way i loved every minute of it i can tell you so much about c/c that every day was a fantastic day i will finishh on that note for now and hope you will contact me for more info reg c/c uk as i have a photo to prove c/c did have a depot at Ruthin in north wales England thank you gloria.ernie@sky.comaʊ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.204.129.153 (talk) 19:11, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
Missing topics page
I have updated Missing topics about business and Economics - Skysmith (talk) 09:45, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Several business-oriented international organization templates are up for deletion
See Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2013_August_30 where these are mass-nominated -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 11:47, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
- also Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2013_August_31 -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 01:01, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
File:Long Branch Plantation horse sale 1883.jpg
File:Long Branch Plantation horse sale 1883.jpg has been nominated for deletion -- 70.24.249.39 (talk) 04:32, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
- This image appears to edify the subject matter and qualifies as public domain. What's the problem? Ray Wyman Jr (talk) 06:42, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
File:Handbill Long Branch Auction.jpg
File:Handbill Long Branch Auction.jpg has been nominated for deletion -- 70.24.249.39 (talk) 04:32, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
- Same issue here. The image enhances the subject matter and is clearly public domain. Why delete? Ray Wyman Jr (talk) 06:44, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
Here's an article at Afc which may be of interest. —Anne Delong (talk) 14:54, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
- hmmm... it is interesting. I was looking for a little challenge. I'll see what I can do. Ray Wyman Jr (talk) 07:00, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
Should Anthem Blue Cross and Anthem (insurance) be merged?
Just looking for some input on this.-- Brainy J ~✿~ (talk) 13:16, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
Edits to Good Technology
Hi, I work for Good Technology. The article has had flags indicating problems for a couple years. It also had some small inaccuracies, and presented a pretty incomplete overview of the company's history. While I understand that I have a conflict of interest, I want to help improve the article according to Wikipedia's standards. I have recently made some edits and additions, making every effort to express a neutral point of view; I also added about 20 independent citations. I hope a more experienced Wikipedian can take a look at my edits and provide any needed feedback. (previous version, prior to my edits)
Also, in the future I think it might make sense to merge the Visto article into this one, as the companies are now one and the same.-Karenarlenereynolds (talk) 00:18, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
Request for Comment regarding merger proposal
There is a request at the Proposed Merger Noticeboard requesting the merger of Entrepreneur (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) to Entrepreneurship (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (or vice versa); Comment: "There is no meaningful distinction between these topics and the current division is confusing to readers." Discussion >>>Here<<<. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 19:12, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
edit warring on Tribune Entertainment
There are no sources that say Tribune Entertainment was renamed as Tribune Studio. All sources say they are two separate divisions of the same parent company. One editor is determined to claim otherwise, despite arguments given on the talk page by two other editors trying to reason with him. More editors please look into this. Is there any business directory out there that would list this information? Dream Focus 20:11, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
Mannatech information - some facts
An article had been written on Wikipedia a while ago that was brought to my attention recently regarding my previous Facebook post about Mannatech and the Ambrotose product. When I first read this Wikepedia article two years ago I had just been introduced to this “Ambrotose” and I was a huge skeptic. My suspicions arose, and armed with this article I went to my first Mannatech presentation to take these people on.
However, it did not take long for me to notice that of the many people already using the product all had some amazing stories to share. Straight from the horses mouth as they say. And they all appeared healthy. Can they all be wrong? I don’t think so. So my family and I opted to try the product and I certainly would not be writing this if it did not work. Yes, added to this was a lifestyle change, exercise, healthy eating etc. Habits had to change, and with this I discovered that the definition of insanity is doing the same things day after day, but expecting to get a different result. Through this I also discovered that nature does things properly in its own time, so whether we like it or not, it cannot be rushed or fast forwarded. Fact. This therefore is like our bodies. So Ambrotose, which is a plant based food (nature), will not fix any disease that oneself or the doctor has named and/or labeled and put into a box. I believe from experience that it will however, supply your body with the communication it needs in its cells in order for your body to heal itself. Remember again your body is nature, not a man made machine that is synthetically made that requires synthetic things. By fueling your body with plant based foods like Ambrotose, you will be giving your body the tools it needs to communicate within itself to help repair problems, maintain the body’s functions and not just treat the symptom. The symptom is just the warning light that something is wrong. I believe that the advertising by drug companies will only aim at our fears by telling us what we want to hear and the result of this aimed at making our already fast complicated life’s faster for now and in the short term hassle free. Or is it?. Pop this synthetically made tablet and you can run faster, pop this tablet so you can feel better. If this is the case then why are there more and more sickly people around? Most importantly who do you think is benefitting from this. Read between the lines. Everyday I hear of someone with another disease of some sort. Are we getting brain washed or what? Don’t get me wrong, I do have the greatest respect for the medical profession and the technology surrounding it. One can have a heart transplant or knee replacement etc. From that aspect I believe drugs certainly do have a place and are most important in the correct situation. Imagine how much more effective medication would be in ones body if you were already taking Ambrotose. Modern medicine would I think be more effective when and if it becomes necessary. So less medication and more efficient results I would imagine. But in the long run prevention is better than cure. And yes I have been on both sides of the fence and armed now with more knowledge can decide for myself as I have more control over by body. In order for me to understand the truth and real facts in this scenario, I had to get out of my comfort zone and be teachable. A sharp business person will tell you to collect all the facts and information about something first with an open mind, then only can an informed decision can be made. This is what I chose to do as I believe there are certainly many fly by night companies out there which have unfortunately given the network industry a poor name.
The simple facts are that this company has successfully created many healthy and wealthy individuals based upon a winning business system. Part time. No one asking you for all your money with nothing in return. At your own leisure. Just do the business side or choose to just try the products. Choose. Anything wrong with that? Millions of orphaned children have been fed from this venture. Anything wrong with that? Google mannarelief and see for yourself in our own local areas. This means that for those of us that lie awake at night stressing about health issues or financial issues, we now have a solution for both problems. Or one can choose to put their heads back in the sand if one is above that.
As an individual I myself could also post information, good or bad on Wikipedia If I wanted to I could Google any large company or famous person and I’m sure dig up any degrading info if I so wish. But instead of pointing fingers I instead chose to find out the real facts for myself by getting on the Mannatech bus, take the journey and learn, after all I can get off any time I wish. It’s a no brainer for anyone really interested in a better life. So is your glass half full or half empty? Anyone willing to get out of their comfort zone and confident enough to have the long term vision to see an opportunity, please let me know as there are many people world wide who you could connect with in this regard. But be aware – you will meet many positive like minded people all working to the same common goal of empowering themselves and other people in turn. Please note that this is not intended to point fingers at anyone personally, but has given me the opportunity to hopefully shed some light about Mannatech to those who have taken the time to read this to the end.
Real Products. Real Passion. Real Possibilities.
Shaun Bonorchis Mannatech Associate — Preceding unsigned comment added by 105.226.208.104 (talk) 15:34, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
RIDC deletion nomination
Hi all, RIDC in the Pittsburgh metro area has been nominated for deletion, please leave any comments you may have at the talk page or if you have links any help on the article would also be appreciated. Market St.⧏ ⧐ Diamond Way 10:08, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
Template:Infobox_occupation and Wikidata
Hi, I'm a French contributor, and I'm working with a few others, both on frwiki and wikidata to mass-improve the articles for professions and occupations. We're adding standardized job codes (SOC codes for the US, but we're also adding international ones, and national ones for other countries), an image representing the job, and various other standardized info that can be imported into Wikidata, reused, and used to link Wikipedia to other canonical sources. Could a contributor with a bot try to do the same for English infoboxes, adding a SOC code parameter, a NOC code parameter (for Canada), and trying to fill them using the official nomenclatures ? --Teolemon Template_talk:Infobox_occupation Template:Infobox_occupation https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Occupations_and_professions_task_force — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:E35:2EA8:950:5BF:1AF3:3374:F3D0 (talk) 13:48, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
Dear businesspeople: This submission at Afc was declined quite a long time ago because it had no sources. I discovered that it had no reflist and that there were hidden references. Can someone check to see if this is a notable company before we let it go into the new G13 deletion black hole? Thanks. —Anne Delong (talk) 21:16, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
- I understand that this is a medium-sized brokerage in Mumbai, offering investment services. I checked HighBeam and could not find any current mentions of the company. The citation from Forbes is very old. I think it is safe to delete. Ray Wyman Jr (talk) 06:57, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks —Anne Delong (talk) 15:46, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
need of thrid party
Hello I would need someone to act as a third party and prove that the information we are uploading about egta are not wrong. It should not be a promotional article, but we wish simply to give information about who we are and what we do, because the current information is outdated. I have a "conflict of interest" as wikipedia calls it, and they therefore deleted my article. Any help is welcome
thank you
Anne-Laure — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.246.254.30 (talk) 15:49, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
Updated draft for Gary Loveman article
Hi, I'm looking for editors to help review a new draft I've prepared for the Gary Loveman article. Gary Loveman is the CEO of Caesars Entertainment Corporation and I'm hoping to find editors here who are knowledgeable about biographies of business people. I would like to disclose that I have written this draft on behalf of Gary Loveman and, because of my conflict of interest with this topic, do not intend to make any edits to the article myself.
Currently the article is in ok shape, however it is missing more recent information about Gary Loveman and could be expanded throughout based on information I've found in reliable sources. If you're able to help with this, my draft is linked from the request at Talk:Gary Loveman, which also explains the changes I'm hoping to make. Thanks, 16912 Rhiannon (Talk · COI) 21:08, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- This is
Done, but I'm also hoping to add a photo to the article soon. I might come back here to ask for help when I've completed the photo permissions process. Thanks, 16912 Rhiannon (Talk · COI) 19:01, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
Improving the Accountancy article
Hello, Businesspeople! I've been doing quite a bit of work on the Accountancy article, restructuring the lede and shifting the previously-massive History section to its own page with significant updates. I think the updated page is now ready for some significant improvements by the community, so I'd like to invite you guys to metaphorically stride over to the page boldly and improve the article.
I've listed some initial issues for discussion here at the article's talk page, so do head over there if you'd like to help.
- Well-restedTalk 10:53, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
- Heads up: there's an ongoing discussion over at the Accountancy talk page regarding the article title, and in particular regarding which term is more commonly used. We'd like to establish broad consensus before implementing any changes, so do head over if you'd like to contribute. -Well-restedTalk 05:10, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
Hello again businesspeople. This stale draft has an interesting topic, but needs someone with knowledge in this area to decide of it's a notable topic, or should be allowed to fade away. —Anne Delong (talk) 05:19, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
- ... and it's gone! —Anne Delong (talk) 04:04, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
Please contribute to the Redwood Software AfD discussion
Only three people have contributed to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Redwood Software (2nd nomination), and the discussion has been open for more than 2.5 weeks now. Dear all: Please contribute to the discussion. Thank you! —Unforgettableid (talk) 06:09, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
Help with an editor?
I declined a speedy on Chairman's Choice, but the article still needs some help finding sources and fleshing it out. The editor (User:Heyhoe30) is new, as this was their first article and first edits, so it would be incredibly nice if one of you could take them under their wing and help them out mentor-wise. The business section of Wikipedia isn't really my forte, so to speak, so any help any of you could give Heyhoe30 would be wonderful. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:04, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Need help from experienced business-article editors
A group of about 2 dozen editors is collaborating on business-related articles, but many of the articles are about companies that are not notable, and many of those that are have serious issues with referencing, promotional content, etc. Some have been deleted through A7 and a few others are at PROD or AFD.
My concern is that in an effort to clean these articles up, we may scare away editors who are truly interested in improving Wikipedia but just don't realize they are "doing it wrong."
I'm calling on editors, including I hope at least one or two former or current administrators, to join me and others at User:Davidwr/Tsinghua/(talk) in helping these editors improve their editing and not get scared off in frustration as their hard work on non-notable companies is deleted. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 02:49, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
- There may be some collaboration going on, but it seems clear to me that there are also users with multiple accounts in that group. I agree that their contributions appear to be good faith efforts that need guidance, although they also exhibit patterns consistent with paid editing.
- We should not discount the possibility that a PR company has set up the appearance of a collaborative group for the benefit of their clients. Especially telling is that none of these accounts are communicating on talk pages, which seems quite odd if this is a collaboration. I would be interested to know whether a checkuser can confirm that these accounts are actually editing from Tsinghua University. ~Amatulić (talk) 14:54, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
- If, hypothetically, I were in such a project, particularly if I knew the people off-Wiki already, I would probably communicate with them in person, by text, by email, or in some other off-wiki manner just as practical matter. Your points about a PR company either creating "fake students" or hiring real students to knowingly edit against Wikipedia's mission, or even duping real students into doing these edits naively are all very real possibilities. Hypothetically, a professor or supervising researcher may have received a "research grant" so he could get his innocent/naive students to do this type of editing. It's also plausible (but unlikely, given ethics rules) that a research supervisor may actually be studying how Wikipedia reacts to exactly this situation (if it turns out to be the case, then WMF's legal team may wish to send a cease-and-desist letter to the researcher's employer, but let's not get ahead of ourselves). davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 18:55, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
- Update: A parallel discussion is happening at Wikipedia:Education noticeboard/Incidents/Archive 2#Group of New/Newish Editors Creating/Editing pages about companies. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 20:13, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
- Update January 2014: These articles and editors are part of a university course. User:Uttsinghuajoint2014/Course Page was recently created. If you wish to offer assistance to these students, the best way to make "first contact" is probably through either the course instructors or, if you prefer, through the usual method of using the article's or user's talk page. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 03:21, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
Help needed with Dark store article
Hi, I wondered if anyone could help with the expansion of the above article. The subject basically concerns the concept of distribution centres which cater exclusively for online shoppers, currently an expanding sector in the UK. I started it a couple of days ago after watching a news item on the subject, but feel that to do it real justice, it needs someone with a good working knowledge of business and commerce who can flesh out the important details. If anyone can help it would be much appreciated. Thanks. Paul MacDermott (talk) 19:17, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
- Nice article!
- The sources seem to emphasise "dark stores" as fulfilling online orders for businesses which were traditionally bricks-and-mortar retailers. However, these dark stores are very similar to earlier stores built for online-only businesses such as Amazon. (And at least one of those supermarket chains has dabbled with having a model store which is similarly bereft of customers but it's used for testing rather than fulfilment). I think the topic might have grey areas round the edges rather than a neatly-defined scope. What's the best way to deal with that?
- Also: Does this happen in other countries - is it possible to internationalise a little? bobrayner (talk) 19:43, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks, I must confess I thought of the Amazon model while I was working on this, but had never heard the term applied to them. In fact, I first came across the phrase this last weekend when watching a BBC News item about the concept. I'm guessing the term came about as a way of differentiating from stores that are open to the public, but apparently the supermarkets prefer not to describe the operations as dark stores. In terms of other countries, the model is used in France according to the piece from the Today programme, but it's surely present in other countries like the US. Paul MacDermott (talk) 19:54, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
AfD needs expert/knowledgeable input. Mangoe (talk) 23:57, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
Created new article on Chicago Options Associates
I've gone ahead and created a new article on Chicago Options Associates.
Suggestions for additional secondary sources would be appreciated, at the article's talk page.
Cheers,
— Cirt (talk) 08:06, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
Why do we have two identical pages: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Customer_lifetime_value and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/lifetime_value?
you can see links to this different pages here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LTV
Regards, Yurij — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.44.250.216 (talk) 16:03, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
- They are not identical pages. One is a redirect to the other. bobrayner (talk) 17:22, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
- @194.44.250.216: I fixed the LTV disambiguation page. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 00:15, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
Dear business experts: This old abandoned page was never submitted at Afc and now it is about to be deleted as a stale draft. Is this a notable company, and should the article be kept? —Anne Delong (talk) 01:55, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
Merge RfC
Notice: Regarding merging and / or redirecting the articles: Administrative Assistant, Administrative assistant (redirect), and Secretary. Disscusion >>>HERE<<<. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 20:14, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
Propose merge from Meat market to Butcher
I have proposed that Meat market be merged to Butcher. Discussion is at Talk:Meat market#Merge discussion. Cnilep (talk) 08:30, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello again, Here's another business related Afc draft that may soon be deleted. Is this an important survey, and should the article be kept? —Anne Delong (talk) 22:17, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Dear business experts: This old abandoned page was never submitted at Afc. Now it's about to be deleted as a stale draft. Is this a notable company, and are the sources reliable? —Anne Delong (talk) 02:22, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks Anne Delong. I don't know where to post my comments unless the OP submits it and I review it. So I'll write here. I removed a word for word paste of a press release (but perhaps there are more). In my opinion, the article is almost impenetrable with jargon, and many of the sources are weak (at least one is a wiki) - but a Queen's Award in the London Gazette confers notability that is hard to argue with.
- So this is notable and has at least one good source, but has little content worth keeping.
- I edited it, which keeps it from the speedy list for six months, but the OP has not edited since they day the wrote the article, so no-one will ever submit it for review. Therefore, I don't see any loss if we tag it for deletion now.
- Just my opinion. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 15:41, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for your analysis. I have nominated it for deletion. Perhaps someone will write an acceptable article about this topic in the future. —Anne Delong (talk) 22:20, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Cleaning up numbers in the infobox
Would someone who is better at reading a corporate balance sheet than I am please read http://www.northerntrust.com/documents/earnings/2013/q4-2013-northern-trust-quarterly-earnings-release.pdf?bc=23216761 and correct the numbers in the infobox of the Northern Trust article? Thanks. BMK (talk) 01:41, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
Invitation to User Study
Would you be interested in participating in a user study? We are a team at University of Washington studying methods for finding collaborators within a Wikipedia community. We are looking for volunteers to evaluate a new visualization tool. All you need to do is to prepare for your laptop/desktop, web camera, and speaker for video communication with Google Hangout. We will provide you with a Amazon gift card in appreciation of your time and participation. For more information about this study, please visit our wiki page (http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Finding_a_Collaborator). If you would like to participate in our user study, please send me a message at Wkmaster (talk) 16:30, 3 March 2014 (UTC).
categories
can anyone tell me the difference between Category:Business_executives and Category:Corporate_executives? It seems these trees are fairly close and have a bit of duplication. Any reason to not merge them both to Business executives? --Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 22:06, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Dear business people: This old abandoned Afc submission appears to be about a notable person. I have fixed it up the best I can without having much knowledge of business. Is it ready for the encyclopedia? —Anne Delong (talk) 03:12, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
MARKETING STRATEGY
MARKETING STRATEGY IS NOTHING ITS A WAY TO FIND OUT BETTER WAY TO COVER THE MARKET IN DIFFERENT CIRCUMSTANCES AT MINIMUM TIME..
IN MY WORDS I DONT KNOW WHY PEPLE GIVING SO LONG AND BRIEF EXPLANATION ABOUT MARKETING STRATEGY BECAUSE MARKETING STRATEGY IS LOGICAL AND SIMPLE ...IF U THINK HOW MAKE SUCEESS OF ANY WORK THAT TIME ONLY U THOUGHT ABOUT STRATEGY AND THEN AFTER U WORK ON THAT" THIS IS CALLED STRATEGY — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.63.221.82 (talk) 17:53, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
Dear editors: This old Afc submission about a business-related journal will soon be deleted as a stale draft. Is this a notable publication, and should the article be kept and improved instead? —Anne Delong (talk) 03:51, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
Dear business experts: Here's another old Afc submission that appear to have references to reliable sources. Should this page be kept and improved instead of being deleted as a stale draft? —Anne Delong (talk) 14:57, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Subsidiaries
Should we, perhaps, have a category for lists of subsidiaries/associates?
We have such lists for RTZ, Total, News Corp, Gazprom, Tata, Pepsi, Capcom, HP, Sony, Time Warner, IBM ...
All the best, Rich Farmbrough, 21:11, 12 April 2014 (UTC).
- note, linking here from WP Lists. All the best, Rich Farmbrough, 21:31, 12 April 2014 (UTC).
- I completely support it. Rilech (talk) 00:52, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
More eyes requested please - Kane Is Able, Inc.
New article, sourcing and COI is a problem. The creator and the company's marketing intern is asking for advice. Andy Dingley (talk) 16:01, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Looking for community support on a new grant proposal
The Global Economic Map project (https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IEG/Global_Economic_Map) plans to build a bot that will upload economic/corporate/financial data into Wikidata and systematically display the data in articles such as this one: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mcnabber091/Economy_of_the_United_States. Our goal is to make an article for every country that looks like that one. The economic/corporate/financial data uploaded into Wikidata as part of this project will be usable for Wikipedia articles as well. We are looking for community support and people who want to get more involved with this Wikidata project. We would love to get more involved with WikiProject Business and hear your input. If you are interested to hear more please send me a message, write an endorsement on the grant page or ask questions below. Thank you Mcnabber091 (talk) 07:20, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
Help with updates to Harry & David
Hi, I am looking for editors to review a draft I have prepared to replace the existing Harry & David article. The current article is has been edited infrequently and is in need of general clean up and expansion. I believe my draft is an improvement over the existing company page, however as I've prepared this draft on behalf of Harry and David Holdings Inc. I'd prefer not make any changes to the article myself.
I have left a more detailed request on the Harry & David Talk page, which explains the changes I'm proposing and provides a link to the draft in my user space. If you have any questions or comments about my draft I hope that you will leave me a message on the article's Talk page so we can discuss and I can make any necessary changes. Thanks, 16912 Rhiannon (Talk · COI) 20:55, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
- I was able to find some editors through WikiProject Oregon who were able to help with this request. The article has now been updated. Thanks, 16912 Rhiannon (Talk · COI) 22:09, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
Dear businesspeople: Here's one more of those old Afc submissions soon to be deleted as a stale draft unless someone thinks it's a notable topic and decides to improve it. —Anne Delong (talk) 23:34, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
Leaflet For Wikiproject Business At Wikimania 2014
Are you looking to recruit more contributors to your project?
We are offering to design and print physical paper leaflets to be distributed at Wikimania 2014 for all projects that apply.
For more information, click the link below.
Project leaflets
Adikhajuria (talk) 15:18, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
Norris Production Solutions
See Talk:Dover Corporation#Merge discussion for a discussion that falls under the scope of this WikiProject.
As there are WP:COI concerns about many (perhaps all) of the major contributors to the article, input from uninvolved editors would be very helpful. Andrewa (talk) 01:12, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
Black billionaires (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) has been proposed to be renamed to African billionaires (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views), for the discussion, see talk:Black billionaires -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 06:13, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
2 articles that seem too narrowly focused
Key Performance Parameters and Analysis of Alternatives. I've taken the latter to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Analysis of Alternatives. Both state that the subject is US Department of Defense specific, which does not appear to be the case. Dougweller (talk) 12:46, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
I de-prodded this, but this stub needs some TLC. Bearian (talk) 23:01, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
Please evaluate a draft at AFC
Please evaluate the acceptability of Draft:The Social Contract with Business, I'm not sure it is an encyclopedic article. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 19:07, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
Is this topic notable? Asking here per implied recommendation at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics#Preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluation. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 22:29, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
A draft at AFC needs help
Please evaluate whether Draft:Data consolidation is a suitable topic for a separate article. The articles linked in the "See also" list seem to contain more detail and discussion of the topic than this draft. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 11:26, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
Notice of Peer Review Request
Peer review has been requested and reviews will be appreciated for the article Globalization.
The article Visteon is in need of reviews and contributions as well - it was cited for copyright a while back and reverted. Most efforts have been in verifying information and expanding. The article is not up to date. Kurjagger (talk) 02:56, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
The article AAMCO has a pending update on its talk page from a PR company (hi there). Would love to get feedback and hear about any more information that we can make available or how we can better write the article to be more wiki appropriate. Stefannagey (talk) 20:18, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
Template updates for new members of the Big Ten Conference
I am a bit confused by Rutgers' multiple campuses and need some advice at Talk:Big_Ten_Conference#Template_help regarding {{Big Ten Conference business school navbox}}.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 09:54, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Kleargear AFD deletion discussion notice
Discussion about whether or not to delete article for Kleargear, discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kleargear (2nd nomination). — Cirt (talk) 20:32, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
Occupation article structure
Template:Infobox occupation has a Business project template on its talk page making it appear to be within the scope of WikiProject Business. I have been unable to find a suggested outline for the article structure for business occupations like that for Rivers or Cities. The Lawyers article seems to have a reasonable outline but it isn't a guideline.
Thanks, SBaker43 (talk) 03:26, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Cold Calling
The term Cold Calling simply relates to contacting people usually via telephone that are basically strangers as it relates to an established existing personal relationship of any kind.
In Marketing and Network Marketing Cold Calling is a technique to reach out to people that are strangers however there is a common interest relating to what it is the Marketer may have to offer. In other words Cold Calling in Network Marketing refers to people with a product or a service that are reaching out to contact people that they would have not have known at all before that have indicated an interest in similar generally speaking products or services.
What the Cold Calling Marketer have in common is the fact that the Cold Call Contact or Genuine Prospect is looking for something related to a service or a product and the Marketer has a service or a product related to that interest.
173.51.120.205 (talk) 15:47, 9 July 2014 (UTC) Steve Sakal 07-09-2014
Intria Items article in wikipedia
Hi. I am very interested as to why none of the information in this article can be verified. Do you know why? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Raymonddd (talk • contribs) 09:30, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Entrepreneur article
03.09.14 The initial definition of the word at the front of this article, although not untrue does not i think give enough of a description. An entrepreneur is not just about business, but about innovation and the start of something new, and being able to get others involved in that. Often making money but also building something up from an initial idea, opportunity or gap in the market. The dictionary definition is below. Is it perhaps worth updating the page information to reflect this?
noun, plural entrepreneurs [ahn-truh-pruh-nurz, -noo rz; French ahn-truh-pruh-nœr] (Show IPA) 1. a person who organizes and manages any enterprise, especially a business, usually with considerable initiative and risk. 2. an employer of productive labor; contractor. verb (used with object) 3. to deal with or initiate as an entrepreneur. verb (used without object) 4. to act as an entrepreneur. — Preceding unsigned comment added by L Rackham (talk • contribs) 09:06, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
Dear business experts: This old AfC submission will soon be deleted as a stale draft. Is this a notable topic, and should the page be kept and improved instead? —Anne Delong (talk) 02:44, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks - it's in mainspace now. —Anne Delong (talk) 09:55, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
Servicing Stop nominated for deletion
There is an AfD for Servicing Stop, a seemingly non-notable company, which is in the scope of your project. The discussion can be found here. Primefac (talk) 13:04, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
One of your project's articles has been featured
Hello, |
TeleTech
Hi WikiProject, may I please ask that some of you add the article TeleTech to your watchlists? There is a COI at the article. A user named TTECHMKTG was editing a few weeks ago, and now IP 170.65.128.6 (which geolocates to TeleTech Teleservices in Englewood, Colorado) is restoring content previously deleted. The TTECHMKTG account was indeffed for username violation. I'm still concerned that TeleTech is attempting to market through Wikipedia. Most of the references used seem to be primary sources, like financial statements and press releases. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:43, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
Dear business experts: This old AfC submission appears to be about a successful businessman. I don't know anything about business, so I am posting this here. It would need editing for NPOV. Is this a notable topic, and should the article be kept instead of being deleted as a stale draft? —Anne Delong (talk) 22:53, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
Dear businesspeople: Here's another article about a company. Is this a notable topic? Are the sources appropriate? If so I am willing to edit for neutrality. —Anne Delong (talk) 00:05, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
Dear business experts: This old AfC draft will soon be deleted as stale. Is this a notable topic, and should the page be kept and improved? —Anne Delong (talk) 22:31, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
Comment on the WikiProject X proposal
Hello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on Wikipedia struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please review the proposal here and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for your time! (Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.) Harej (talk) 22:47, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
Affluence in the United States, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. GamerPro64 18:55, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
WP:VG comments subpages cleanup
Hi, there is currently a discussion taking place at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games#VG comments subpages regarding whether it would be acceptable to permanently shift all comments subpages associated with WP:VG articles into talk. This shift would follow the recommended approach given at WP:DCS. The WikiProject Business articles that would be affected by this action are these:
If you have objections related specifically to WikiProject Business' use of these subpages, please make this clear at the discussion so that other unrelated talk pages can be cleaned up where appropriate. Thank you. -Thibbs (talk) 15:53, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
Business cycle
2602:301:7780:B470:4D3C:F008:30A0:B358 (talk) 16:45, 20 November 2014 (UTC) from pete at katfsh4@aol.com2602:301:7780:B470:4D3C:F008:30A0:B358 (talk) 16:45, 20 November 2014 (UTC) The article on the subject of "Business Cycle" is very informative, but it equates the business cycle and the economic cycle. It has been awhile since I took Econ 101, but I remember the Samuelson text definitions to be a bit different. The definition of business cycle is as your article states. The ″economic cycle″, in my memory, is the flow of money from consumer to investor to producer, and back to consumer. Please respond.
Samsonite article
It seems that this article has been taken over by Samsonite Marketing: Samsonite 50.132.79.11 (talk) 23:53, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
List of circulating currencies
The list of circulating currencies now sorts properly when sorted by name of currency. Previously, e.g., "Thai baht" sorted under T; now it sorts under B. See the Talk page there under Sorting the table by "Currency".
If you would like to discuss this with me, please {{Ping}} me. Thnidu (talk) 07:19, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Email Marketing
Since the evolution of internet and email, there has be a lot happening in that world. The wikipedia article about [Marketing] seems to be in a need of a lot of updates. The flow of the article is random and does not lead to any informative conclusion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CostanzaK2 (talk • contribs) 11:52, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
There is an ongoing move discussion. --George Ho (talk) 00:33, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
WikiProject X is live!
Hello everyone!
You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that WikiProject X is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested, check us out! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!
Note: To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to Wikipedia:WikiProject X/Newsletter. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X.
Harej (talk) 16:56, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
template:Electronics industry in the United States has been nominated for deletion -- 65.94.40.137 (talk) 11:52, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi
Is anyone checking nominations for deletions?
Are any of the members of this wiki-project checking Wikipedia:WikiProject_Business#Article_alerts to see if any important pages are nominated for deletion? Ottawahitech (talk) 15:32, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
- Not me, until now. The alerts didn't show up on my watchlist until now, as I was only watching this main project page. To watch alerts, I have added the sub-page to my watchlist: Wikipedia:WikiProject Business/Article alerts Note: the slash (/) instead of the hash (#). --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 14:10, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
Ellen Pao discrimination lawsuit and business
Ellen Pao is currently rated as (Start-class, Low-importance) for this WikiProject. Just wondering if others also think that the importance of this article should be raised because of the ongoing high-visibility discrimination suit taking place? Ottawahitech (talk) 04:54, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
- Yes. I'll move it to Mid. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 14:21, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
Pi Sigma Epsilon
They do a Pro-Am Sell A Thon which rewards $50,000 to the winner. They are active in many major universities and should be classified as a co-ed, professional fraternity organization. http://www.pse.org/index.php/mainmenu-events/pro-am-sell-a-thon/pro-am-about
- Are you saying that we need a wikipedia page for Pi Sigma Epsilon? Ottawahitech (talk) 15:49, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
Anyone here assessing articles?
I see that this project has 1,563 un-assessed articles and was wondering if there is a need for help in this area? Ottawahitech (talk) 02:43, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
- Hmm..Looks like there are two locations in this project relating to article assessment:
DYK - history of Twitter on Wikipedia
The Twitter page was speedily deleted twice in early 2007. It finally managed to survive a proposed deletion in March of that year. Today the Twitter page brings close to a quarter million eyeballs a month to Wikipedia. Ottawahitech (talk) 05:20, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
- Just so happens that Ellen Pao, a venture capitalist, also failed to convince her employer to invest in Twitter in 2007 when her suggestion was shot down by management. (http://techcrunch.com/2015/03/09/ellen-pao-owns-the-room/) Ottawahitech (talk) 19:54, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
Dear business experts: Here's an old AfC submission that will soon be deleted as a stale draft. Perhaps someone here will be able to tell if this is a notable company, and if the page should be kept and improved.—Anne Delong (talk) 16:06, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bill Lupien - notable? appropriate content for a business article?
Dear business experts: This draft seems to me to be about a notable business person, and there are plenty of references (maybe too many). I have linked some of the references on line. I don't know anything about the business world, but I feel that the article needs editing for tone. I'd be grateful if someone could improve it before it goes into mainspace. —Anne Delong (talk) 23:57, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Economy of the Iroquois FAR
I have nominated Economy of the Iroquois for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 15:19, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
Advert banner on Assurant
Hello WikiProject Business! Would any of you kind editors mind reviewing/reassessing the advertisement banner currently on Assurant? It's been there for over 4 years now, and as far as I can tell, the page has been sufficiently cleaned up and improved. Thanks! --FacultiesIntact (talk) 07:55, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
Actuary FAR
I have nominated Actuary for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 02:08, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
European Company Regulation listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for European Company Regulation to be moved to Societas Europaea. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 22:30, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
Islamic economic jurisprudence listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Islamic economic jurisprudence to be moved to Islamic economics. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 22:30, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
Involuntary termination of employment listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Involuntary termination of employment to be moved to Termination of employment. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 22:32, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
Suggested retail price listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Suggested retail price to be moved to List price. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 22:33, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
James Shields listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for James Shields to be moved to James Shields (politician, born 1810). This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 22:44, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
AfC submission
Could anyone offer comments on Draft:Buyout (media industry)? Thanks, FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 14:05, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
S.p.A. listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect S.p.A.. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- 70.51.46.11 (talk) 07:22, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
S.A. (corporation) listed at Requested moves
An editor has requested for S.A. (corporation) to be moved to another page. Since you had some involvement with S.A. (corporation), you might want to participate in the move discussion (if you have not already done so). -- 70.51.46.11 (talk) 07:22, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
Article assessment backlog cleared
I am pleased to announce that as of 8:00 GMT, June 15, 2015, Category:Unassessed WikiProject Business articles stands empty. The project reached its high water mark of about 3700 unassessed articles around the end of November/beginning of December 2013. -- DanielPenfield (talk) 08:46, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
"S.A."
The usage and primary topic of S.A. is under discussion, see talk:S.A. (corporation) and talk:S.A. for multiple discussions. -- 70.51.203.69 (talk) 05:34, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi all. I am surprised that wikipedia has no article on this news source. This probably would make a good article. Best.4meter4 (talk) 12:44, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
- And your affiliate relationship with this website is? Also, looks like it's a personal finance/car insurance recommender/daily deals website rather than news. If it's actually notable (you've provided no proof of this), it belongs in WP:WikiProject Finance and/or WP:WikiProject Websites. Finally, why would anyone bother to write an article on a subject you can't even spell properly? -- DanielPenfield (talk) 13:24, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
- Ummm... You're attitude stinks. I simply saw this website used as a source in several wikipedia articles (not by me). Check my edit history. If this is the sort of response I can expect here, this is the last time I'm posting on this page. Read WP:CIVIL.4meter4 (talk) 03:26, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
Hey everyone - relatively new to editing wiki's. I made a few changes last week to Risk Register and I'm wondering if anyone is able to take a look at them and provide comments/feedback. I want to make sure I'm doing things right before continuing.
Also is there a policy/rule regarding linking to references that you are the author of? Ackis (talk) 14:54, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
- I think you mean Risk register. Someone who has access to ISO Guide 73:2009 would be the best person to review your edits.
- For links to your own pages, see WP:SELFCITE.
- --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 16:30, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
Corporare Headquarters listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Corporare Headquarters. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. 70.51.203.69 (talk) 08:55, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
Help with MetLife History section
Hello all. I'm working on behalf of MetLife to suggest improvements to their article, and I'm looking for interested editors who might join the discussion. Earlier this month, I proposed some changes to the article's History section, but thus far I haven't gotten any feedback. Since the article is of interest to this WikiProject, I'm hoping someone here might be curious enough to help. Because of my COI, I will not be making any edits myself, but I instead ask that other editors review my work and move it to the live article if they agree with the changes. I look forward to responding to any feedback on the article's talk page. Thanks, 16912 Rhiannon (Talk · COI) 19:27, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
Change the old logo of Dr. Reddy's Laboratories from wikipidea to new logo - Need help
Hi can some one please change the logo of Dr. Reddy's Laboratories to new logo. Dr. Reddy's on 1st July 2015 announced its new brand identity. the new website is www.drreddys.com few media coverage are : http://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/Hyderabad/new-logo-for-dr-reddys-labs/article7378349.ece — Preceding unsigned comment added by Himanshudigital (talk • contribs) 10:18, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
Pageview stats
After a recent request, I added WikiProject Business to the list of projects to compile monthly pageview stats for. The data is the same used by http://stats.grok.se/en/ but the program is different, and includes the aggregate views from all redirects to each page. The stats are at Wikipedia:WikiProject Business/Popular pages.
The page will be updated monthly with new data. The edits aren't marked as bot edits, so they will show up in watchlists. You can view more results, request a new project be added to the list, or request a configuration change for this project using the Tool Labs tool. If you have any comments or suggestions, please let me know. Thanks! Mr.Z-man 23:21, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
Subsidiaries and categoriɀation
At Deckers Outdoor Corporation a (now defunct) subsidiary has an infobox. Somewhat reasonably an IP has added an "established" category for the subsidiary. Also a "defunct" category, that I find a little... confusing. Comments? All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 02:15, 24 April 2014 (UTC).
Wikidata: Economics task force
Wikidata: Economics task force
Merger Discussion
key development indicator
This is a new Wikipedia entry. The term is used by multinational companies such as Danone, Siemens, Volkswagen, Accor. It is the subject of a new book.
List of CIGS Companies (Solar Panels)
I noticed the entry for list of CIGS Companies https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_CIGS_companies is missing some current companies, including First Solar and HULK Energy Technology. Others may be missing as well. Thanks in advance for looking into this and adding.
Relevant AfD
Hello there! Care to comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Netatmo? Best, FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 14:41, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
Inventory control problem and Inventory theory should be merged. Both articles deal with the same subject.Lbertolotti (talk) 18:27, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
Proposing deletion / redirection for Citrix Online
Hi there. I'm looking for editors interested in businesses, specifically software companies, to take a look at something I've proposed on the Citrix Online article. I'd like to discuss whether the article could be redirected to the Citrix Systems article, given that I don't believe Citrix Online meets WP:GNG and no longer exists as a division of Citrix. As a quick disclosure: I am working as a paid consultant to Citrix, so I won't be making any edits to the article myself. You can see my proposal for blanking and redirection over here on the article's talk page. Thanks! 16912 Rhiannon (Talk · COI) 20:15, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
Cleaning up new RW3 Technologies Page
Afternoon. I'm working on behalf of RW3 Technologies and am looking for help/some suggested improvements and validation of sources to their article. I'm fairly new to the Wikipedia world but have been learning and making some edits in areas I know a thing or two; however, because of my COI, I will not be making edits to this page. I look forward to comments and suggestions and am excited to be involved in the wiki community. Snagle77 (talk) 15:10, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
RISKY ENTREPRENEURIALISM
Can you please add: Ferdinand Lundberg said in "The Rich and The Super-Rich" (1968):
Pg. 300 - Entering into business for oneself in the United States has always been a highly risky affair. Most who remain in business do so on the thinnest of survival margins, constantly financed by short-term bank loans, the constant prey to recessions, regional strikes, or even vagaries of the weather. Many are hopelessly in debt. (Pg 94) Each year the failures exceed the new successes by a very, very, very wide margin. It is indeed a near-miracle, front page news, when anyone really makes it. Blame can be leveled for the misleading propaganda about the business system. Sound advice to 85 to 95 percent of Americans, contemplating opening new businesses would, in light of the facts, simply be "Don't." Salt98789 (talk) 00:54, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
The origin of Business Tranformation
Business Transformation originated at Gemini Consulting in the early 90s. This was enabled by what was then Gemini's fairly unique beginning which was the merger of a strategy firm, the MAC Group, and an operations firm URC, United Research. This Gemini could thus set the vision and deliver the transformation.
The methodology was detailed James Kelly and Francis Guillarts' book Transforming the Organisation. I believe Gemini even trademarked the term.
Unfortunately it has begun to be used widely across the consulting industry to mean "big delivery project"! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.84.229.7 (talk) 10:35, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
WP Business and/or WP Companies?
Hey! Are you interested in being joint owners of specific company pages or do you prefer not to get them? Or is there a case-by-case scenario? I've been working on adding the WP Companies tag to missing company articles. Sometimes WP Business is already there, sometimes not. I could be adding WP Business at the same time if it's something you want counted on your list. If it's clutter, however, that WP Companies is better suited to own, I'm happy to delete them when I see them. Preference? Alaynestone (talk) 02:45, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
Discussion of proposed merger of Cooperative Stock Market into Cooperative
The discussion for the proposed merger of the Cooperative Stock Market article into the Cooperative article is at Talk:Cooperative#Merge from Cooperative Stock Market. --Bejnar (talk) 21:46, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
Help with updates for BP
I am posting here for help to bring the BP article up-to-date with the most accurate information following the release of the company's annual report several months ago. I am BP's representative on Wikipedia and, as such, I do not edit the article myself. I have posted similar requests on related project pages, such as WikiProject Energy and WikiProject Companies and not yet found anyone to help. Would someone be willing to review my suggest edits at the very bottom of the BP Talk page and if the proposed updates seem OK, add the changes to the live article? I would be happy to answer any questions. Thanks. Arturo at BP (talk) 21:45, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
Complaint tablet to Ea-nasir
Could you please drop by here and think up a better name? Many thanks. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 12:14, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
Merger notice
In October 2011, it was suggested that "Strategic partnership" be merged into "Strategic alliance". Members of this group are requested to follow up the merger proposal and conclude. This is long-pending. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:47, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
"Caravan"
The usage and primary topic of Caravan is under discussion, see talk:travel trailer -- 70.51.44.60 (talk) 05:23, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
Help with BNY Mellon
Hello! Would anyone here be interested in reviewing three simple updates I am proposing on the The Bank of New York Mellon Talk page? Editors may remember from earlier messages here that I am working as a paid consultant to make suggestions to improve the BNY Mellon article. Because of this, I will not be making any changes myself. Instead, I'd like others help in making edits where they think it is appropriate. Thanks in advance for any assistance. Heatherer (talk) 15:43, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
Article request: Bernard Chaus Inc (now Chaus New York)
At one point this company recorded 290 million dollars in sales on the New York Stock Exchange (see here). Would be nice to have an article. Best.4meter4 (talk) 17:57, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
Notification of FLRC
I have nominated List of wealthiest charitable foundations for featured list removal here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured list criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Cowlibob (talk) 13:57, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
Expert attention required for Corporate Brain
I was wondering if your group could help with Corporate Brain and the discussion now underway at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Corporate Brain. --Salimfadhley (talk) 03:28, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
List of wealthiest families
I just started List of wealthiest families and could use a bit of help finding non-American families for the list. Many thanks for any help you can offer. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 14:18, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
Writing about Startup Companies
I'm working on writing about different startups and it's difficult to provide large quantities of unbiased information for companies that are so new. If anyone is willing to go in and look in my draft space, It'd be much appreciated. How can I make my work more information-based when a company that has very little corporate history? What are the standards for developing a good wikipage on a startup? I've looked at others on the site and it doesn't seem too far off.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Version_One_Ventures
Johnsonclaire770 (talk) 15:51, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
- Hi @Johnsonclaire770: - I doubt I can help you since many of the articles I start on Wikipedia end up being deleted. I did however add some wikiproject banners to the talkpage of your article to bring to the attention of a couple more, hopefully more active, wikiprojects. Be on the lookout, though, because some editors remove the tags from draft articles, not sure why. Good luck and keep us posted on your progress. Ottawahitech (talk) 23:41, 19 December 2015 (UTC)please ping me
Please check the neutrality of this page
Dear Moderators/Editors,
Please check into on this page & all the edits been done as per the advice/suggestions given by Wiki moderator Brianhe.
Can Any one remove the warning tag since all the issues been resolved - if its good to remove.
Page link Sobha Ltd
Regards, --Deepak HM 06:42, 20 November 2015 (UTC)Deepakhmwiki
- I had a look at it, the tag is down and the article looks fine, even the tagged diff looked pretty vanilla. -- Paid Editor -- User:009o9Talk 09:47, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
- @Deepakhmwiki and 009o9: The article is now at wp:AfD. Ottawahitech (talk) 23:57, 19 December 2015 (UTC)please ping me
@User:009o9 thank you for your suggestion & edits, will this article stands against AFD? interested moderators can give their opnion on the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sobha Ltd. is it based on total votes? still the articles adheres to wiki guidelines. usually takes 7 days for closing the AFD keeping this article live is a challenge --Deepak HM 07:08, 22 December 2015 (UTC)Deepakhmwiki
Merger RfC
Formal request received to merge: Stack Overflow into Stack Exchange. Input needed. >>>Join Discuss Here<<<. Thanks, GenQuest "Talk to Me" 00:14, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
- @GenQuest: Just curious why you posted this message on the talk-page for WikiProject Business. Isn't Stack Overflow a computing term? Ottawahitech (talk) 21:24, 31 December 2015 (UTC)please ping me
- I'll guess because Stack Overflow is a business? ‑ Iridescent 21:57, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
- @Iridescent: I stand corrected: Stack overflow is a computing term while Stack Overflow is a business. But then why is Talk:Stack Overflow tagged with the banner of wp:WikiProject Computing but not of the banner of this one (which would cause it to automatically show the RFC at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Business#Article_alerts with no need for someone to post it here)? Ottawahitech (talk) 16:52, 1 January 2016 (UTC)please ping me
- I'll guess because Stack Overflow is a business? ‑ Iridescent 21:57, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
AfC business article rejections v publications
I'm watching about 5 (decently written and sourced) business/organization articles in Articles for Creation. I thought it would be interesting to see the result here, there seems to be a re-occurring pattern developing. (None of these are my articles are mine, just frustrated with the AfD review process and moving target requirements.)
- Draft:123Greetings Declined for notability with 30 references. (18 November 2015) Diff
- Draft:Camden_Collective Declined for notability with 32 references (19 November 2015) Diff
- Article has been subsequently reviewed, polished and published by another editor Camden Collective
- Draft:Direct_Capital Declined for notability with 29 references (21 November 2015) [32]
- Chiropractic Biophysics (CBP) accepted via AfC, 25 references (21 November 2015)
End of list for now. -- Paid Editor -- User:009o9Talk 23:53, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
- Updated -- Paid Editor -- User:009o9Talk 09:32, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
- Comment The pattern here seems to be that a small group of editors will deny fairly reasonable business and organizational articles in WP:AfC routinely. The articles that do make it through, seem to have been where another editor has taken them straight from the Drafts section (I don't know if that was a result of this discussion or not). Resubmitting to AfC seems to just attract the same declining editors. Thoughts? -- Paid Editor -- User:009o9Talk 05:17, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
- @009o9: Just thought you may be interested to know that it is not only paid or business article editors who are experiencing frustration with the the so-called AfD culture. Ottawahitech (talk) 23:52, 19 December 2015 (UTC)please ping me
- There is no point in accepting an article from AfC unless it is likely to survive AfD. Promotional articles on minor companies usually don't. The clearest sign of such problems is a great many weak citations for an apparently insignificant company. With respect to notability, articles that include very minor awards give the impression that there are no major awards. Articles that emphasise the foundation and initial funding of a company give the impression that there is little in the way of actual accomplishments. Articles that use mainly press releases for references imply that they is nothing better. Articles that use local journals for references imply that there's nothing widely known. Articles that include trivial articles on trivial charities imply there is nothing major. As for promotionalism, articles that list every officer of a company imply that the intent is to promote the company; articles that emphasize the founder's motivations imply that also; articles that use buzzwords like "solution" imply that the editor doesn't know how to write anything other than a press release.Articles that include vague terms of praise or excellence imply that the editor does not understand the difference between that and an encyclopedia. If the company is notable, there will be better material than this. If it isn't present, it indicates either a promotional intent, or that it isn't there--or , sometimes, that it's an over-hasty job by a coi editor. DGG ( talk ) 01:10, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
- DGG's are pretty much spot on. Some of these issues are why there are now the guidelines of WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ROUTINE. Trivial mentions, promotional articles, and trivial awards actually point out the lack of notability. Some of the examples listed in the original post are perfect examples of how the AfC process works, as the editors received feedback and then improved the article, correcting the deficiencies, e.g. Camden Collective, which when it was declined initially, was nothing but a promo for the company, while the accepted article, while still promotional (imho), now serves an informational purpose. Onel5969 TT me 15:43, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Proposed deletion
I don't know how to get this listed on the project page. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kim White (2nd nomination). Thanks. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 17:28, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Help with Hansjörg Wyss?
Hi all. Back in October, I worked with another editor on changes to the Synthes USA section of the Hansjörg Wyss article based on a new draft I wrote. My draft reduced information about an indictment Wyss' company was involved in (here's what the article originally said). I detail my reasoning for removing that material here, but my main argument was that it didn't belong because Wyss was not named in the indictment and was never charged with wrongdoing. The editor who initially reviewed agreed.
Here's a quick summary of what followed:
- An editor who had not been involved in the Talk page discussion, reverted some of the changes and added in more information about the indictment
- I engaged the editor on the Talk page and we agreed to continue to work on the language, but the conversation stalled
- I then went through the Third Opinion process and an editor concluded that the text shouldn't be so detailed. However, they declined to make any edits
Since then, I have had difficulty finding anyone to help make the changes. I will not make them myself because I have a financial conflict of interest and I am working on the article on behalf of The Wyss Foundation. Would anyone here be interested in taking a look and making edits as they see fit? Thanks! Heatherer (talk) 17:12, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement!
Hello, |
Requesting review of Point72 changes
About a month ago, I requested some small changes to the article about my employer at Talk:Point72 Asset Management. So far I haven’t gotten a response. Could somebody take a look? These specific edits are very straightforward factual corrections and updates; however, there are more significant issues with the article I would like to address, and I don't want to do so without the input of independent Wikipedians. I would appreciate someone taking a look. Thank you. -AlexReads (talk) 17:17, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Cultural intelligence - please note that while Christopher Early and Soon Ang were the originators of CQ - THEY are the ones who DEVELOPED IT FULLY. David Livermore did NOT "develop it more fully" - rather, he simplified it. He is known for taking the scientific theory and putting it into simplified "airplane books" for the business person. He is not known for any research on the concept; rather only speaking and writing about it.129.74.119.7 (talk) 19:46, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
"The term is relatively recent: early definitions and studies of the concepts were given by P. Christopher Earley and Soon Ang in the book Cultural Intelligence: Individual Interactions Across Cultures (2003) and more fully developed later by David Livermore in the book, Leading with Cultural Intelligence.." This is the opening statement. Also, there is a typo with the 2 periods at end of sentence.
Cultural intelligence - please note that while Christopher Early and Soon Ang were the originators of CQ - THEY are the ones who DEVELOPED IT FULLY. David Livermore did NOT "develop it more fully" - rather, he simplified it. He is known for taking the scientific theory and putting it into simplified "airplane books" for the business person. He is not known for any research on the concept; rather only speaking and writing about it.129.74.119.7 (talk) 19:46, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
"The term is relatively recent: early definitions and studies of the concepts were given by P. Christopher Earley and Soon Ang in the book Cultural Intelligence: Individual Interactions Across Cultures (2003) and more fully developed later by David Livermore in the book, Leading with Cultural Intelligence.." This is the opening statement. Also, there is a typo with the 2 periods at end of sentence.129.74.119.7 (talk) 19:46, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
- I think the comment above may have been placed in the wrong section, but I can't be sure. Please let me know if this is relevant to the Point72 article in a way that I'm missing.
- onel5969, I appreciate your earlier feedback on my proposed changes. Please note, I have suggested a more substantial change to the article, and am still having difficulty soliciting other opinions. If you could take a look, I'd appreciate it. Thanks for any input! -AlexReads (talk) 21:13, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Category:Chartered Accountants
Category:Chartered Accountants has been nominated for deletion -- 70.51.46.39 (talk) 04:34, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
Just an FYI that this article was used for a school assignment last semester, needs cleanup. valereee (talk) 16:18, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Extreme wealth navbox
I've redesigned it and wish to see it in the mainspace. Please consider commenting at User talk:Robsinden#Navbox Extreme wealth with your views on how it may best be organized. Many thanks. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:54, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Trouble finding references? The Wikipedia Library is proud to announce ...
The Wikipedia Library
Alexander Street Press (ASP) is an electronic academic database publisher. Its "Academic Video Online" collection includes videos in a range of subject areas, including news programs (notably shows like 60 minutes), music and theatre, lectures and demonstrations, and documentaries. The Academic Video Online: Premium collection would be useful for researching topics related to science, history, music and dance, anthropology, business, counseling and therapy, news, nursing, drama, and more. For more details see their website.
There are up to 30 one-year ASP accounts available to Wikipedians through this partnership. To apply for free access, please go to WP:ASP. Cheers! {{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk} 06:46, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
RfC
Hello there! There's an ongoing RfC concerning Paul Singer and WP:NPOV in a broader sense, that you might care to comment on. Thank you, FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 01:44, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Doug McMillon article
Completed
Hello, WikiProject Business members! I recently posted a full draft in my user space to update the Wikipedia article on Walmart CEO Doug McMillon. You can see the edit request I posted here on the Talk page. My draft maintains most of what appears in the live article, but it adds more information, updates, fixes inaccuracies, better organizes and adds citations.
I am one of Walmart's representatives on Wikipedia, so I won't edit the article myself. Can any editors help? I am happy to answer any questions. Thanks, JLD at Walmart (talk) 14:13, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- This request has been completed. Thanks, JLD at Walmart (talk) 19:23, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement!
Hello, |
Invista page
The Invista page reads like it was created by the company PR team. It talks about awards and recognition, but skips over any mention of controversial issues, such as the political lobbying of its parent company and environmental issues. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Meiravl (talk • contribs) 21:58, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Salary detail in CEO bio
Can someone tell me whether this edit was proper.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:51, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Gildan Activewear Wikipedia Page (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gildan_Activewear)
Hi,
I am Lori Bogdanis from Gildan.
We have been trying to rectify false information on the Gildan Wikipedia page by creating entries on the Talk Pages, however we have had no success in having this data update to reflect current numbers. I am hoping you could help me rectify the following inaccurate information found on the Gildan Activewear page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gildan_Activewear. Please see below a detailed description of these issues:
The table on the right of the page cites old data from our 2012 financial results. Our 2015 financial results are as follows:
Revenue: $2.57 billion[5]
Operating income: $367.5 million[6]
Net income: $346.1 million[7]
Total assets: $2.83 billion [8]
Total equity: $2.19 billion [9]
Number of employees: 42,000 [10]
Subsidiaries: (Gildan does not have any subsidiaries, we have brands) These brands include Gildan®, GoldToe®, Anvil®, Comfort colors®, Secret®, Silks®, Powersox®, Kushyfoot® and Therapy Plus®, and our licensed brands are Mossy Oak® and Under Armour®. [11]
5.Gildan (PDF) http://www1.gildan.com/corporate/downloads/IR-Recast-CSECI-EN.pdf. Retrieved 25 April 2016. Missing or empty |title= (help) 6.Jump up ^ Gildan (PDF) http://www1.gildan.com/corporate/downloads/IR-Recast-CSECI-EN.pdf. Retrieved 25 April 2016. Missing or empty |title= (help) 7.Jump up ^ Gildan (PDF) http://www1.gildan.com/corporate/downloads/IR-Recast-CSECI-EN.pdf. Retrieved 25 April 2016. Missing or empty |title= (help) 8.Jump up ^ "Balance Sheet" (PDF). Gildan. Retrieved 25 April 2016. 9.Jump up ^ "Balance Sheet" (PDF). Gildan. Retrieved 25 April 2016. 10.Jump up ^ "Press release" (PDF). Gildan. Retrieved 25 April 2016. 11.Jump up ^ "Press release" (PDF). Gildan. Retrieved 25 April 2016.
Thank you again for your cooperation. Lori Bogdanis Lbogdanis (talk) 18:16, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Category:Ernst & Young Entrepreneur of the Year Award winners has been nominated for discussion
Category:Ernst & Young Entrepreneur of the Year Award winners, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 02:32, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
"Statutory holdback" vs "Retainage"
Two like articles. Possible merge? Care to make comments at WikiProject Law? Otr500 (talk) 01:11, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Category:Canadian Business Hall of Fame has been nominated for discussion
Category:Canadian Business Hall of Fame, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 02:33, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
- @RevelationDirect: Thanks for taking the time to post this. I tagged the category's talk page with this wikiproject, so now it should also be appear in the alerts section. Ottawahitech (talk) 00:58, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks! RevelationDirect (talk) 01:05, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Editing Assurant
First and foremost, I have a paid COI (noted here and here). I posted on the talk page about a month ago and haven't gotten any responses, so I was hoping that the members of WP Business might be able to help me out. The full question is posted there, but to summarize: I reviewed the actual South Carolina Supreme Court Ruling and have found nothing within it that suggests "that the company's policy was to target every policyholder recently diagnosed with HIV for an automatic fraud investigation." (reference here) I think the language describing the automatic fraud investigation should be removed. Can anyone weigh in on this? At the very least, I'm personally interested in how to go about weigh sources like this against each other in the future.--FacultiesIntact (talk) 17:51, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Merger proposal
It has been proposed that Japan foreign marriage be merged into Mail-order bride. Please comment at Talk:Japan foreign marriage#Merger proposal. ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 07:55, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
Looking for feedback on a tool on Visual Editor to add open license text from other sources
Hi all
I'm designing a tool for Visual Editor to make it easy for people to add open license text from other sources, there are a huge number of open license sources compatible with Wikipedia including around 9000 journals. I can see a very large opportunity to easily create a high volume of good quality articles quickly. I have done a small project with open license text from UNESCO as a proof of concept, any thoughts, feedback or endorsements (on the Meta page) would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
--John Cummings (talk) 14:44, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Writing essays/guidelines
Unfortunately it seems anybody who makes a bold attempt to significantly improve a company or CEO article gets some of anti paid editing warriors making wild accusations. It's a problem I think, especially given that so many business articles have been hijacked by PR operatives and the cruft added often goes undetected, so are often in a poor state and need a neutral editor to sort out. If you look to see what new pages or proposed drafts get deleted/rejected there is a major problem I see on here with people who declare a COI and get their work rejected or dismissed as an advert. I've seen a lot of quite notable firms and businesspeople rejected because people don't like the fact that it's a clear COI or is worded in a way which isn't quite neutral. Do you think perhaps a detailed essay on how to write business articles and what to avoid/include might be a good idea? We're missing out on a lot of genuinely notable business articles on here because of this issue I think, and the content should really be treated as fairly as any other subject.♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:17, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- @Dr. Blofeld: Having just rescued John D Wood & Co. from the wiki-bitbucket, I believe this is more than just a matter of COI editing. I believe it is a matter of a general anti-business sentiments. Ottawahitech (talk) 19:54, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
- Let's AGF here. There might be an anti-business attitude among some, especially after having been inundated with a lot of CoI stuff. As for the John D Wood & Co. article, it reads promotionally and it doesn't pass either NCORP or GNG. I agree with Dr. Blofeld that an essay of best practices is needed although I would assume such a thing already exists. With the number of crap articles on businesses we have here I have a hard time believing that
"We're missing out on a lot of genuinely notable business articles"
. Chris Troutman (talk) 20:20, 5 July 2016 (UTC)- @Chris troutman and Dr. Blofeld: I agree a detailed essay on how to write business articles and what to avoid/include would be a great asset. Anyone? Ottawahitech (talk) 15:20, 6 July 2016 (UTC)please ping me
- Let's AGF here. There might be an anti-business attitude among some, especially after having been inundated with a lot of CoI stuff. As for the John D Wood & Co. article, it reads promotionally and it doesn't pass either NCORP or GNG. I agree with Dr. Blofeld that an essay of best practices is needed although I would assume such a thing already exists. With the number of crap articles on businesses we have here I have a hard time believing that
Business Insurance
The article Business insurance has been a redirect to Insurance since 2007. Before that time there was an elaborate article on the topic. Just wondering if there is anyone here interested in reviving the old article. Ottawahitech (talk) 19:28, 10 June 2016 (UTC)please ping me
- Since no one has commented, I thought I would simply revert User:Kuru's redirection of Business insurance so that the original article is available and can be edited. Thoughts? Ottawahitech (talk) 14:55, 28 July 2016 (UTC)please ping me
- @Ottawahitech:, Kuru from 2007 seemed to feel that the elaborate, original article was a copyright violation. No objections to re-opening the stub obviously; there are millions of sources that can be used to develop an original commercial/business insurance article. Kuru (talk) 15:14, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
Looking for feedback on a Draft
Hi there, i would like to ask if some wants to help me with this article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Acrotec_Group (Swissfrance (talk) 07:19, 23 August 2016 (UTC)).
Notice to participants at this page about adminship
Many participants here create a lot of content, have to evaluate whether or not a subject is notable, decide if content complies with BLP policy, and much more. Well, these are just some of the skills considered at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship.
So, please consider taking a look at and watchlisting this page:
You could be very helpful in evaluating potential candidates, and even finding out if you would be a suitable RfA candidate.
Many thanks and best wishes,
Anna Frodesiak (talk) 03:40, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
AfD of Entrepreneurial feminism
An AfD discussion relevant to this project: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Entrepreneurial feminism. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:56, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Proposed split of State-owned enterprise to list article
I've proposed splitting State-owned enterprise out into List of state-owned enterprises, as a significant bulk of the article simply lists SOEs by country. I would suggest that it is better to have the separate list article for companies, and then maintain this article as a prose discussion of SOEs, mentioning companies when relevant to the prose.
Please see discussion at State-owned enterprise#Split into list article. — Sasuke Sarutobi (talk) 11:27, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
Request for Kelly Services article
On behalf of my employer, Kelly Services, I'm looking for help to make some simple updates to the Kelly Wikipedia article. As I've said on my profile page, I will not be editing the article because of my conflict of interest, and I hope to find a volunteer editor to review the proposed infobox and introduction provided here. Is a WikiProject Business participant able to help? Thanks in advance. Jane KS (talk) 17:35, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
NPOVN Discussion Notice
There is currently discussion at the NPOV Noticeboard concerning an article that may be of interest to members of this project. -Ad Orientem (talk) 17:41, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
What should we do with this? It looks like OR to me. I do think Chandler's book is noteworthy but perhaps it could simply be merged with Alfred D. Chandler Jr.?Zigzig20s (talk) 22:58, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
Request for Endurance International Group article
Hi, I'm Melanie, and on behalf of my employer, Endurance International Group, I am here to propose updates to the company's Wikipedia article. I am requesting assistance from volunteer editors to review a proposed draft and make sure that it complies with Wikipedia's guidelines. I've described my goals for the article in more detail here, and I won't be editing the article directly because of my conflict of interest. Is a WikiProject Business member willing to help implement changes appropriately? I am happy to answer any questions you may have. Thanks. Melanie from Endurance (talk) 21:43, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Old merge proposal
Hey folks! The proposal to merge Business marketing with Industrial marketing is over 3 years old. It appears to me that these cover the same topic. The discussion was never created but the tag has been there for 3 years, so I think it's safe to call the merge uncontroversial. Any chance someone here might be interested in completing that merge? Thanks a bunch! Happy editing! Ajpolino (talk) 04:08, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
2016 Community Wishlist Survey Proposal to Revive Popular Pages
Greetings WikiProject Business/Archive 7 Members!
This is a one-time-only message to inform you about a technical proposal to revive your Popular Pages list in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:
If the above proposal gets in the Top 10 based on the votes, there is a high likelihood of this bot being restored so your project will again see monthly updates of popular pages.
Further, there are over 260 proposals in all to review and vote for, across many aspects of wikis.
Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.
Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 17:56, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
A recent Forbes article
A recent Forbes article stated that the Indian economy surpassed that of the UK. However, Forbes used an unconventional method to arrive at this conclusion - they took the recent 20% slump in the value of the pound, and used that exchange rate for the entire 2016 GDP of the UK. Needless to say, this method of calculating GDP is completely wrong; the IMF and World Bank (etc.) take average monthly exchange rates. However, over at the Economy of the United Kingdom, Economy of France and Economy of India articles, many (uninformed) editors are taking the Forbes article as gospel. This is bad practice and I think it better we stick to official figures as provided by the IMF, where the methodology is proper. It would be nice if other editors here could help me keep an eye on those articles. Cheers. Antiochus the Great (talk) 12:25, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
Article assessments through the end of 2016
In 2016, articles within the scope of the WikiProject increased slightly from 25581 to 26097, importance unassessed articles dropped by approximately a quarter from 10224 to 7740, and completely unassessed articles dropped from 88 to 54. -- DanielPenfield (talk) 09:42, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Missing topics list
My list of missing topics about business (and some economics) is updated - Skysmith (talk) 13:13, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
Flora (Alexandra) Ogilvy
Is Flora Ogilvy, aka Flora Alexandra Ogilvy, a person of encyclopedia-worthy note in the business world? Please comment under "Encyclopedic?" within Talk:Flora Ogilvy. Thanks. -- Hoary (talk) 22:01, 8 January 2017 (UTC) ... typo fixed Hoary (talk) 10:07, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
- I've changed the articles to redirect them to that on her father. -- Hoary (talk) 00:56, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
Comments on RfC Donald Trump requested
There is currently an RfC about the outcome of the presidential election here. Participation would be appreciated. Thanks. SW3 5DL (talk) 16:57, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
List of highest-grossing films RFC
There is an RFC at Talk:List of highest-grossing films#RfC: How many entries should the main table have?. Your project is being notified because it has declared the article is under your scope. Betty Logan (talk) 16:27, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
Marketing article
The article on Marketing, which I assume is of considerable importance to this project, has been reverted to its 2009 version because of copyright violations. It probably needs to be completely rewritten. There's a detailed proposed outline on the talk-page in case that is of any use. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:31, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement!
Hello, |
Two articles on Agency law
We have two nearly identical articles:
I'm not sure exactly what the scope of the first article is supposed to be. The second I believe only applies to the U.K. (and I assume not Australia, New Zealand or Canada). However the first article has many of the same cases as the second, yet it also has citations to Restatement of Agency, which is American law.
I don't know enough about the difference of the various notion of agency internationally to know what needs to be done to the first article... --David Tornheim (talk) 10:04, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
RfC
There is an RfC on Napoleon Hill here. The article does not have a lot of traffic and would appreciate comments. Thanks. SW3 5DL (talk) 16:02, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
Cooperatives in the United States
Please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cooperatives#Cooperatives in the United States.
Thank you!
Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:47, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Mark Weinberger article
Hi, I'm Raffaella, media relations at EY. Last week, I suggested a handful of simple, non-controversial changes to improve the article on EY CEO Mark Weinberger: changing "Ernst & Young" to EY, job title from "chairman and CEO" to "global chairman and CEO", and section subheadings to main headings. The article is within the scope of WikiProject Business. Can editors here assist? Thanks, RS at EY (talk) 12:38, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
- This has been done. RS at EY (talk) 07:23, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement!
Hello, |
Upcoming "420 collaboration"
 You are invited to participate in the upcoming which is being held from Saturday, April 15 to Sunday, April 30, and especially on April 20, 2017!The purpose of the collaboration, which is being organized by WikiProject Cannabis, is to create and improve cannabis-related content at Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects in a variety of fields, including: culture, health, hemp, history, medicine, politics, and religion. WikiProject Business participants may be particularly interested in the following categories: Category:Cannabis companies and Category:Cannabis food companies. For more information about this campaign, and to learn how you can help improve Wikipedia, please visit the "420 collaboration" page. |
|---|
---Another Believer (Talk) 17:26, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
Please give your opinion about the viability/acceptability of this draft, it is awaiting a competent review at AFC. If you don't want to do a full review, simply post your comment on the Talk page. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 06:47, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
Relisted RfC discussion at Talk:International Justice Mission
I invite you to comment on the content at Talk:International Justice Mission#Request for comment on placement of criticism, which is recently relisted. --George Ho (talk) 18:26, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
Mark Weinberger: New draft request
I uploaded a full draft of an updated and expanded Mark Weinberger article in my user space. Perhaps members of WikiProject Business are interested in reviewing it. Disclosure: I have a WP:COI as I work in media relations at Mr. Weinberger's company EY, so I created an edit request on the article discussion page.
The article is currently marked {{third party}} because it relies too much on primary sources. I hope that my draft fixes that. It can be reviewed at once, or piece-by-piece. You can reach out to me here or on the Mark Weinberger Talk page if you have questions. FYI: I also posted a similar note on WikiProject Biography. Thanks, RS at EY (talk) 07:25, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- This has been done. RS at EY (talk) 17:16, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
Chief Data Officer
I'm about to start major updates to the Chief Data Officer article as described on Talk:Chief data officer#International Society of Chief Data Officers (isCDO). I've noticed that the page has been modified multiple times in the past for unencyclopedic content and I think it needs such a review again. I request that someone in this project with an independent perspective, outside the CDO community, take a look at it and remove unencyclopedic content. Afterward, I'll start my work to update and expand the article. Thanks in advance for any assistance.
Condorman (talk) 23:32, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
Popular pages report
We – Community Tech – are happy to announce that the Popular pages bot is back up-and-running (after a one year hiatus)! You're receiving this message because your WikiProject or task force is signed up to receive the popular pages report. Every month, Community Tech bot will post at Wikipedia:WikiProject Business/Archive 7/Popular pages with a list of the most-viewed pages over the previous month that are within the scope of WikiProject Business.
We've made some enhancements to the original report. Here's what's new:
- The pageview data includes both desktop and mobile data.
- The report will include a link to the pageviews tool for each article, to dig deeper into any surprises or anomalies.
- The report will include the total pageviews for the entire project (including redirects).
We're grateful to Mr.Z-man for his original Mr.Z-bot, and we wish his bot a happy robot retirement. Just as before, we hope the popular pages reports will aid you in understanding the reach of WikiProject Business, and what articles may be deserving of more attention. If you have any questions or concerns please contact us at m:User talk:Community Tech bot.
Warm regards, the Community Tech Team 17:16, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
I started a stub with the indicated title. Feel free to decap second word (hence "Sources sought", but some sources capitalize both words), remove from the procurement requests template, or otherwise edit or merge. It's a bit outside my interests, so any assistance will be welcome. Kablammo (talk) 20:46, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
Maintenance Request
Hi, my name is Dave and I work with Exelixis at a communications company based in Boston. I wanted to see if anyone from the community here would be able to make some basic, maintenance edits to the company's page - while all of these changes are super straightforward and based on public data about the company, we wanted to respect the integrity of the Wiki community. The most notable change is an update to key people in the info box, which hasn't been updated since August of 2010. The list of verified key people is available here if anyone is able to make this edit. http://www.exelixis.com/about/management Thank you for your time - and if there is a more appropriate place for this request, please let me know. Levydr (talk) 13:41, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
Help with article Stewart W. Bainum Jr.
Hi there, I'm reaching out here to see if anyone involved in this WikiProject would be interested to review a draft seeking to update and expand the article for Stewart W. Bainum Jr. Mr. Bainum is the current chairman of Choice Hotels and his existing article is quite short, likely due to more in-depth sources about him being older and not easily findable online. From news clippings provided by Mr. Bainum and research on Lexis Nexis and HighBeam, I've been able to find a lot of older sources that provide information about his political career and his development of the company that became Choice Hotels. If you're interested and have time to take a look, I have posted an edit request on the article's Talk page with more details. The new draft is saved in my user space here: User:16912_Rhiannon/Stewart_W._Bainum_Jr
Let me know if you have any feedback or questions about the new draft. Thanks in advance, 16912 Rhiannon (Talk · COI) 20:20, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
- Done This request has been reviewed. Thanks! 16912 Rhiannon (Talk · COI) 21:34, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
What are the vision and mission statements of a business
Are the vision statements considered as Motto of a particular business Abishe (talk) 13:17, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
Merger/Spin-off edit request
Hello -- I want to flag an updated page request for anyone who is available to help out, as I have a COI. Here is my comment on the talk page of the article in need of edits/updates: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:The_JBG_Companies#Merger.2FSpin-off_as_JBG_SMITH
Thanks in advance!
Jamarpr (talk) 15:13, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Women in Red's new initiative: #1day1woman
 A new initiative for worldwide online coverage: #1day1woman | ||
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Ipigott (talk) 11:15, 30 July 2017 (UTC) |
COI request
Hello, I was wondering if anyone was willing to take a look at my request over at Talk:Big Y? I have a COI as a former employee of one of their supermarkets, as explained in my request. I will also post this over at WP:COMPANIES to get feedback from both projects. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 23:46, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
Help with ICF International?
Hello! WikiProject Business members might be interested in this edit request at ICF International. The article on the Virginia-based consulting and technology services company is essentially a stub after an editor deleted much of the it due to potential copyright violations (which had apparently lasted for some years). About the same time that the potential copyvios were removed, I was working on a draft of the article to address other issues I saw: the entry relied heavily on primary sources, its content was choppy, fragmented and outdated. Now my draft is ready, and I'm here looking for another editor to review and consider implementing my proposed edits. I won't make the changes myself, as I am working on behalf of ICF, which I have also disclosed on the article's Talk page. Please let me know if you have any questions at all. Cheers, WWB Too (Talk · COI) 17:55, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
- No need to look, this has been done. WWB Too (Talk · COI) 21:19, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement!
Hello, |
Proposed merger notification
As the parent of the WikiProject Finance and also the WikiProject Investment I would like to let you know of the merger im proposing:
I have become aware, as a member, that this project is becoming increasingly more inactive. I recently revived the WikiProject Investment and it has been growing.
So I would like to propose a merger of these two projects.It would benefit the general coverage of finance and investment on Wikipeda ´, as both of these topics have much in common.
Please let me know if what your opinion on this is.
Thanks! WikiEditCrunch (talk) 10:24, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
I too noticed that issue after you had pointed out this here.Well the assessment page Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/WikiProject Business articles by quality statistics has not been updated by Wikipedia 1.0 bot since 2010,but when I looked at the Wikipedia:WikiProject Business page there were some differences that I compared with each other.Especially some files talk pages related to Business that I went onto create only in this month are recorded in this project page but not in assessment page.I was confused with this issue which is also similar to that of what happened to Wikipedia:WikiProject Carrom as well.Thank you Abishe (talk) 17:43, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
But take a look at this Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/WikiProject Business articles by quality log.This assessment has been working pity well by assessing each and every articles.Yes the interest shown on this project may have diminished(but I am not sure)I would like to improve articles related to Business Abishe (talk) 18:05, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
Lubrizol edit requests 2017
Editors, I posted a request for edits on the Lubrizol Talk page. With this request I ask editors to update the revenue and employee figures in the infobox and introduction. Here I ask editors to clean up the History section and add a paragraph that can replace potentially misleading material from Operations. Lastly, there is this request asking editors to include the number of Lubrizol facilities and offices to Operations. An editor had answered the last request, but it was reverted by another editor because I had used Lubrizol's website to verify the information. A third voice would be helpful in reviewing that piece of the edit request. I work for Lubrizol and I am aware of my conflict of interest; can an editor, or editors, review the draft and move the edits into the live article if they are neutral and appropriately cited? Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, Lz maor (Talk · COI--Lubrizol employee) 17:15, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Women in Red November contest open to all
  Contest details: create biographical articles for women of any country or occupation in the world:
| ||
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
--Ipigott (talk) 07:43, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
Help updating Sageworks
Hi! Are any WikiProject Business editors interested in some proposed updates for the article on Sageworks, a business that collects financial data on the private sector, and makes financial data and analysis software. In full disclosure, I'm here on behalf of Sageworks as part of my work with Beutler Ink. To start with, I've suggested a proposal for the History section, to provide some background on how the firm got started and a few major milestones. At Talk:Sageworks I've provided some background on the history of the page and why I'm offering new drafts. Let me know if you have any feedback or questions. Thanks in advance! 16912 Rhiannon (Talk · COI) 21:37, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
- Following up to say this request has been reviewed. Of course if anyone has an interest in taking a look and has any questions, I'm more than happy to discuss. Cheers, 16912 Rhiannon (Talk · COI) 21:08, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Help with New York Life request
Hi! I'm wondering if WikiProject Business editors might be interested in reviewing proposed updates at New York Life Insurance Company. The requests is to update article's infobox to: add products and assets under management; update income and employee figures. In full disclosure, I'm here on behalf of New York Life Insurance Company as part of my work with Beutler Ink. My hope is that an uninvolved editor (or editors) can review my proposed updates and make edits as appropriate. Thanks in advance! 16912 Rhiannon (Talk · COI) 20:20, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation links on pages tagged by this wikiproject
Wikipedia has many thousands of wikilinks which point to disambiguation pages. It would be useful to readers if these links directed them to the specific pages of interest, rather than making them search through a list. Members of WikiProject Disambiguation have been working on this and the total number is now below 20,000 for the first time. Some of these links require specialist knowledge of the topics concerned and therefore it would be great if you could help in your area of expertise.
A list of the relevant links on pages which fall within the remit of this wikiproject can be found at http://69.142.160.183/~dispenser/cgi-bin/topic_points.py?banner=WikiProject_Business
Please take a few minutes to help make these more useful to our readers.— Rod talk 13:56, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement!
Hello, |
Blake Ricciardi
Would someone from this WikiProject take a look at Blake Ricciardi? I am unable to find any sources which show that this person in Wikipedia notable enough for a stand-alone article per WP:GNG or WP:BIO. Googling gets a number of hits, but these seem to be mainly primary sources or trivia mentions and not the significant coverage in independent reliable sources needed for Wikipedia notability. It has been suggested that the article be taken to AfD, but I'm asking here to see if someone might be aware of better sources which can be used. The article was recently heaviy edited by an IP (most likely someone connected to the subject) who turned it into a mish-mash over promotional content. It was also most likely created by someone connected to subject. The article has been restored to the last table version before the IP editing, but even that doesn't seem good enough to avoid AfD. Thanks in advance. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:54, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
Book spam in Lean services
I have removed most of the spam for now, but it would be great if knowledgeable editors could keep an eye on this article. It has been the target of persistent book spam to promote the publications of "Lean Practitioner" Debashis Sarkar, as of 2006 a Deputy General Manager in an Indian bank. The author focusses on "XXX for dummies"-style guidebooks and "Quiz" books (book list on Amazon), I highly doubt he is a reliable expert on theoretical or academic aspects of this topic. GermanJoe (talk) 11:44, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Another interesting topic, that could use some love from interested editors. After a large expansion in 2014, the current version is too bloated, reads like a personal essay/guide and lacks uninvolved expert sources. Thanks in advance for any help in improving this article. GermanJoe (talk) 15:08, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
Input requested for New-collar worker
Hi all, I've been working in recent months to create a new Wikipedia article for New-collar worker and seeking editors' feedback on whether the term can be added to Designation of workers by collar color and I'd love to get more input at both pages. One editor has raised a discussion at Talk:New-collar worker as to whether the article is misleading about the origin of the term, on the basis of a title of an article discussing gold-collar workers. Since our readings of the piece seem quite different, it would be great to have some other editors take a look and see if we can clear this up! In full disclosure, I wrote and submitted the New-collar worker draft to AfC as part of my work at Beutler Ink, on behalf of IBM via Vianovo. Thanks in advance for any feedback, 16912 Rhiannon (Talk · COI) 16:56, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Manufacturing businesspeople and industrialists
Is there a difference in scope between Category:Manufacturing businesspeople and Category:Industrialists, or alternatively can they just as well be merged? Marcocapelle (talk) 21:04, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
Production and manufacturing
Is there a difference in scope between Category:Production and manufacturing and Category:Manufacturing, or alternatively can they just as well be merged? Marcocapelle (talk) 15:30, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
- Discussion continues at: Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2018_February_16#Category:Manufacturing. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:45, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement!
Hello, |
Category:Procurement practices has been nominated for discussion
Category:Procurement practices, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. -- Black Falcon (talk) 00:45, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement!
Hello, |
Paul Allen
Paul Allen, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. AIRcorn (talk) 04:14, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Additional review at Steuart Walton
Hi! Is anyone from this project able to give a second review to my edit request to update Steuart Walton? Because of my Wikipedia:Conflict of interest, I will not direct edit the page. Oshwah reviewed my draft last month. While Oshwah said they did not see anything concerning with my request, they were hoping another editor could also review. Since no one else has replied on the Steuart Walton Talk page, I bring it to your attention here. In a nutshell, the article is outdated and missing recent information about his work. Thanks, Kt2011 (Talk · COI:Walton family) 14:35, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
Nextdoor redraft
I've redrafted a problematic article, Nextdoor, the hyperlocal social network. Although I am an experienced editor, I am a paid consultant to Nextdoor. As such, it would be greatly appreciated if an independent editor could review my proposal at: User:BC1278/sandbox/Nextdoor I have also started a discussion at: Talk:Nextdoor#Request_for_Review Thanks BC1278 (talk) 21:51, 4 May 2018 (UTC)BC1278
Self-citing (self-promoting) articles
Lacking specific business-related background knowledge myself, it would be great if interested editors could have a critical look on these two articles. The first one has been clearly written by the source author, the second one by someone with a likely conflict of interest to promote a new publication. Questions to answer would be 1) Are these concepts "Wiki-notable"? 2) Are the used sources (a model based on a PhD survey and a self-published digital publication) sufficiently reliable?, and finally 3) Is it possible to reduce the excessive usage of buzzphrases and vague generalizations to condense the topics into something encyclopedic? Any help from uninvolved topic experts would be appreciated. GermanJoe (talk) 15:56, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
New member
Hi all,
I am a new member, and I am happy to join this great community. Please I need some orientation on how this community works.
Thank you in anticipation of your response.
Warm regards, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jerusalem666 (talk • contribs) 23:47, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
Employability: needs help
Employability is an important article that seems to have been declining in quality over the past few years, and it has some major problems now, starting with the lead. If you can, please help clean up the article and put it on your watchlist to help prevent further degeneration in the future. Although I'm not a member of this WikiProject, I've increased the importance of the article to "high", since employability would seem to be a topic of high importance indeed for WikiProject Business. Biogeographist (talk) 15:36, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
- I think I've corrected the very worst of the problems in Employability but it could still use review by other editors. Biogeographist (talk) 00:09, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
WikiProject collaboration notice from the Portals WikiProject
The reason I am contacting you is because there are one or more portals that fall under this subject, and the Portals WikiProject is currently undertaking a major drive to automate portals that may affect them.
Portals are being redesigned.
The new design features are being applied to existing portals.
At present, we are gearing up for a maintenance pass of portals in which the introduction section will be upgraded to no longer need a subpage. In place of static copied and pasted excerpts will be self-updating excerpts displayed through selective transclusion, using the template {{Transclude lead excerpt}}.
The discussion about this can be found here.
Maintainers of specific portals are encouraged to sign up as project members here, noting the portals they maintain, so that those portals are skipped by the maintenance pass. Currently, we are interested in upgrading neglected and abandoned portals. There will be opportunity for maintained portals to opt-in later, or the portal maintainers can handle upgrading (the portals they maintain) personally at any time.
Background
On April 8th, 2018, an RfC ("Request for comment") proposal was made to eliminate all portals and the portal namespace. On April 17th, the Portals WikiProject was rebooted to handle the revitalization of the portal system. On May 12th, the RfC was closed with the result to keep portals, by a margin of about 2 to 1 in favor of keeping portals.
Since the reboot, the Portals WikiProject has been busy building tools and components to upgrade portals.
So far, 84 editors have joined.
If you would like to keep abreast of what is happening with portals, see the newsletter archive.
If you have any questions about what is happening with portals or the Portals WikiProject, please post them on the WikiProject's talk page.
Thank you. — The Transhumanist 10:54, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
Fifth Wall Ventures Articles for Deletion discussion
Fifth Wall Ventures, an article about a venture capital firm, has been proposed for deletion, with the vote ending June 12, 2018. You may with to participate at: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Fifth_Wall_Ventures BC1278 (talk) 20:41, 9 June 2018 (UTC)BC1278
Update Permanently Broken link on Career Break Page
I found a permanently broken link on this page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Career_break while researching taking a sabbatical a from private company.
I would like to update that broken link with a very similar, but updated article on a similar type of website.
Recommended updated article: [1] ).
The site is the same type of site as the original link (checked on WayBack Machine), similar but more detailed information and discusses exactly the issue the citation is about (sabbaticals being traditionally for academics but are now being considered by private employers wanting to retain top talent). It also gives employers information about how to establish a policy inclusive of sabbaticals in the workplace.
The updated link is on a recruitment site with experience in workplace policy. I think this link would be better than a permanently dead link from an old article that is very similar to the new one (but the new one is updated).
Tessrob2345 (talk) 22:22, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Tessrob2345:, as an anonymous blog post on a commercial site (the blog post was only written 1 week ago by the way), the source fails Wikipedia's requirements for a reliable source. Please see WP:RS for more information. Such blogs with "tips" and "useful information" are routinely hosted on commercial sites to boost the site's reputation and draw additional webtraffic to its services, but they are not reliable sources. Adding such links is generally frowned upon and will usually get reverted. To improve the article, I have removed several similarly inappropriate links and added a functional archive for the dead link. That should fix the mentioned issue. GermanJoe (talk) 04:07, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
Discussion at talk:Donald Trump#RfC: Should the immigration section include material about Trump's family separation policy?
You are invited to join the discussion at talk:Donald Trump#RfC: Should the immigration section include material about Trump's family separation policy?. - MrX 🖋 18:47, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
Help with Gallup article?
ResolvedHello, I am working on updates to Gallup that editors at WikiProject Business might be interested in. The bulk of the article for the company focuses on The Gallup Poll, for which Gallup is obviously very well known. However, the poll is just a fraction of what the company does. Its main business is in management consulting. I am just getting started with my proposed updates to the page with a smaller request to update the article infobox and Gallup Press section. The infobox is missing key content and the Gallup Press section is currently supported only by primary sources. I've made some suggested changes to fix all these issues. As disclosed on the Gallup Talk page, I have a financial conflict of interest, as I'm offering these updates on behalf of the company as part of my work with Beutler Ink, so I'm looking for other editors to review. Could any editors here help? Thanks for considering, Danilo Two (talk) 20:56, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
- This has been answered. Danilo Two (talk) 16:20, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
FLRC
I have nominated List of United States graduate business school rankings for featured list removal here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured list criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here.--Cheetah (talk) 18:35, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
Jim Bankoff draft article
ResolvedOn behalf of Vox Media, I've drafted an expanded and improved Wikipedia article about Jim Bankoff (the company's chairman and CEO) for community review. The current article has some bad sourcing and a couple of inaccuracies (including his birth date), so I've worked to draft a more thorough overview of his early life and education, career, and personal life. I don't edit the main space because of my COI, so I'm looking for volunteer editors to review this draft and implement proposed content appropriately. If this sounds like something you'd be interested to help with, please read my comments on the article's talk page, and let me know if you have any questions or concerns. Thanks, Inkian Jason (talk) 18:43, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
- This request has been answered. Thanks! Inkian Jason (talk) 17:38, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
Request at Gallup (company)
Hello, WikiProject Business editors might be interested in a request at Talk:Gallup (company) to develop a new section focusing on Gallup's services. I'm also looking for editors' input on the question of whether Gallup Poll should be split into its own standalone article. I have a financial conflict of interest, as I'm offering these updates on behalf of the company as part of my work with Beutler Ink, so I'm looking for other editors to review. Thanks for considering, Danilo Two (talk) 20:48, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Information broker - low importance
I was surprised to see that the page for Information broker was marked as "low importance". We have heard of Facebook, Cambridge Analytica, the theft from Equifax.... Am I looking in the wrong page? Or have the community of people who worry about their exposure and privacy losses not come to wp for info?
I also noticed that there are a few pages like List broker that were not linking to Information broker. And vice versa probably. Are there varying opinions about the names for these companies?
I am also tempted to start a "List of Information Brokers" page, but I recall hearing that the wp community is not in love with the while "List of" thing. Does anyone have any suggestions? Should I go somewhere else in particular to either find or add to or build such a list? My inner data junkie needs to know.
I am itching to "fix" some of these issues but do not want to do it in a contrary manner.
Much thanx. RayKiddy (talk) 19:31, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
HELP WANTED
For a number of years we have been experiencing a steady decline in the number of administrators as a result of attrition and a declining number of editors willing to consider adminship. Things have reached a point where we are starting to experience chronic backlogs in important areas of the project including noticeboards, requests for closure, SPI, CSD & etc. If you are an experienced editor with around two years (or more) of tenure, 10k edits give or take and no record of seriously disruptive behavior, please consider if you might be willing to help out the community by becoming an administrator. The community can only function as well as we all are willing to participate. If you are interested start by reading WP:MOP and WP:RFAADVICE. Then go to WP:ORCP and open a discussion. Over the next few days experienced editors will take a look at your record and let you know what they think your chances are of passing RfA (the three most terrifying letters on Wikipedia) as well as provide you with feedback on areas that might be of concern and how to prepare yourself. You can find a list of experienced editors who may be willing to nominate you here. Finally, I may not have this page on my watchlist, so if you want to reply to me directly please ping me. Thank you and happy editing... -Ad Orientem (talk) 22:03, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Featured quality source review RFC
Editors in this WikiProject may be interested in the featured quality source review RFC that has been ongoing. It would change the featured article candidate process (FAC) so that source reviews would need to occur prior to any other reviews for FAC. Your comments are appreciated. --IznoRepeat (talk) 21:39, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi! Navigant Consulting has hired me to request some updates to its article, which I've done over on the article's talk page. The article is currently tagged with a few maintenance templates—{{third-party}} and {{ad}}. I'm hoping my requests will begin to address both. If anyone here is up for taking a look and sharing feedback, I'd appreciate it tremendously. Thank you! Mary Gaulke (talk) 19:08, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
I added Quotaism to this project as it appears relevant but also low quality and possibly overlapping with articles such as affirmative action. If this was inappropriate please feel free to remove the project. MegaSloth (talk) 09:56, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
Scott Smith (American politician), an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 18:28, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
Distinguishing Between Atlas Consortium.com and Atlas Consortium.info
Wikipedia characterizing "Atlas" as a unique entity fails to identify Atlas Consortium.com as the primary holder of the common identifier ".com" and erroneously allows second tier identifiers like xxx.info a certain level of primacy. This is VERY misleading to my potential Atlas Consortium customers. Please correct your copy. B Smith President47.154.58.36 (talk) 18:42, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement!
Hello, |
Marketing systems term
Need your inputs regarding Draft:Marketing Systems. Is this a notable term or is it covered by other already existing articles? Discussion at Draft talk:Marketing Systems#Notability discussion AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 23:48, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
Updates to Wesley G. Bush article
Hello, I'm Jan, and I'm an employee of Northrop Grumman. I am interested in working with the Wikipedia community to make relevant updates and improvements to the Wesley G. Bush article. I've educated myself on Wikipedia's conflict of interest guidelines and will do my best to follow those entirely. My hope is that someone on this page will review my proposed changes to the article, which I've posted at Talk:Wesley G. Bush, and put them into effect. If you have any questions, feedback, or comments, please do not hesitate to reach out. Thank you! JanAtNorthropGrumman (talk) 21:44, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
Done Thank you. JanAtNorthropGrumman (talk) 18:45, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
More updates to Wesley G. Bush article
Hello, it's Jan from Northrop Grumman, again. I'm here to see if there are any editors at this WikiProject willing to take a look at my additional requests to update the Wesley G. Bush article? I am requesting to make a few updates to the Career section. My complete request is posted on the Wes Bush Talk page. Please don't hesitate to reach out with any feedback, questions, or comments. Thank you! JanAtNorthropGrumman (talk) 21:34, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
More updates to Wesley G. Bush article
Hello, it's Jan from Northrop Grumman, again. I'm here to see if there are any editors at this WikiProject willing to take a look at my additional requests to update the Wesley G. Bush article? I am requesting to make a few updates to the Career section. My complete request is posted on the Wes Bush Talk page. Please don't hesitate to reach out with any feedback, questions, or comments. Thank you! JanAtNorthropGrumman (talk) 13:27, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Requested move: Chairman → Chair (officer)
Hello, there is an RM discussion you may be interested in:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Chairman#Requested_move_22_March_2019
Any input would be appreciated. WanderingWanda (they/them) (t/c) 01:23, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Portal:Anti-consumerism for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether Portal:Anti-consumerism is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The page will be discussed at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Anti-consumerism until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the page during the discussion, including to improve the page to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the deletion notice from the top of the page. North America1000 02:44, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
A new newsletter directory is out!
A new Newsletter directory has been created to replace the old, out-of-date one. If your WikiProject and its taskforces have newsletters (even inactive ones), or if you know of a missing newsletter (including from sister projects like WikiSpecies), please include it in the directory! The template can be a bit tricky, so if you need help, just post the newsletter on the template's talk page and someone will add it for you.
- – Sent on behalf of Headbomb. 03:11, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Possible Nativo Wikipedia Article
Hello! I've been a user of the platform for some time (although not the most active) and would like to request some help with an article 😊
On my sandbox page, I’ve created a draft of an article for an organization, Nativo. It’s a conflict of interest for me to publish the article (as I’m a current employee), but it would be fantastic if someone could take a look and see if the topic is noteworthy enough to warrant a place on Wikipedia. If so, and anyone would like to help edit the draft or move it into mainspace, please let me know; and if not, I completely understand. I’ve been doing my best to research the best way to go about this process, so if I’m out of line, my sincere apologies: I’m more than happy to follow a different procedure/process in creating or requesting the article, if needed. Thank you for taking the time to read over this request, and I look forward to discussing the matter further!
--EH9890 (talk) 15:30, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
Requested move: Chairman → Chairperson
Since you are listed as a wikiproject on Chairman I am informing everyone of a requested move to chairperson. Join in the fun at the chairman talk page. Fyunck(click) (talk) 23:15, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Portal:Donald Trump for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether Portal:Donald Trump is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The page will be discussed at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Donald Trump until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the page during the discussion, including to improve the page to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the deletion notice from the top of the page. North America1000 11:57, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
Requested move: Chairman
In case anyone is interested, see Talk:Chairman#Requested move 8 May 2019. SarahSV (talk) 23:18, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
Discussion of The Next Web on the reliable sources noticeboard
There is a discussion on the reliability of The Next Web on the reliable source noticeboard. If you're interested, please participate at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard § The Next Web for ProProfs. — Newslinger talk 06:30, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
New categories?
I proposed two new categories at Talk:Mergers_and_acquisitions#Propose_new_categories. Please comment there on whether it is a good idea. TIA. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:24, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
Draft entry for Antonio Neri
Hello, I'm Andrada and I work for Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE). I've created an account to suggest improvements to articles related to the company, and I've disclosed my conflict of interest as required. I've saved a draft entry for the President and CEO at Draft:Antonio Neri (businessman). I'm trying to find an editor who can review and move the draft, presumably to Antonio Neri (businessman) since there's already a page for the Florentine priest Antonio Neri. Thank you. AMorar HPE (talk) 22:36, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Employment website
I'd like to improve Employment website. Any tips? Benjamin (talk) 00:34, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
Up for deletion Commuter Cars
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Arguably a notable company. Sources in Time Magazine, CNN Money and a blurb in Bloomberg. I spent some time trying to develop the categories and improve the refs. Perhaps more refs can be located. Should be considered in conjunction with Commuter Cars Tango. I have improved the reference formatting on the latter article, but it would be improved by moving some of the "References" to in line citations. I also improved the formatting of the reference in this article Commuter Cars. In any event, between the two articles, there is plenty to satisfy WP:GNG. [[WP:NEXIST] 7&6=thirteen (☎) 18:08, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello my name is Ida sechele from Klesksdorp from Klesksdorp and am a child but I wrote this because I am so glad to write,Be careful when you choose friend There was a girl called Lesego she was a caring and kind child and she was the clevest in class.The were three girls which were very naughty in class their behaviour were not suitable for them.They didn't even do homeworks when the teacher has given them one those girls were Karabo, Lerato and mathapelo.And there the was a clear girl like Lesego called Lindiwe.Lindiwe always wanted to have a friend like Lesego but she was afraid to tell Lesego that she'd like to be her friend.whenever when Lindiwe wanted to tell her about how she want Lesego to be her friend they would stop her.
Nomination of Portal:Companies for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether Portal:Companies is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The page will be discussed at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Companies until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the page during the discussion, including to improve the page to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the deletion notice from the top of the page. North America1000 03:20, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
Article renaming: 5 Whys > Five Whys
I started a discussion on the renaming of the 5 Whys article, which recently had a name change without discussion or an explanation from the person who did it. I am interested in getting feedback and thoughts on this from the community before possibly reverting it. Any comments there will be welcome. --- FULBERT (talk) 15:04, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
Call for portal maintainers
Are there any editors from this WikiProject willing to maintain Portal:Business? The Portals guideline requires that portals be maintained, and as a result numerous portals have been recently been deleted via MfD largely because of lack of maintenance. Let me know either way, and thanks, UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:34, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
Some input, whatever it may be, would be appreciated.4meter4 (talk) 16:10, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
Dear business experts: There's a draft article about a business topic waiting for review at WP:AFC. Please take a look!—Anne Delong (talk) 12:38, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
Request for information on WP1.0 web tool
Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.
We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Family businesses
Category:Family businesses was deleted in a 2011 CfD on the grounds that the inclusion criteria were undefined and thus too subjective. That category reemerged in 2017 but as a shadow of its former self, indeed excluding the vast majority of the best-known family businesses from Tata Sons to S.C. Johnson & Son to Koç Holding. Rather than submit it for speedy deletion, I thought it would be best to ask here: is it worth keeping or not? Different firms might be known as family businesses for different reasons (e.g. ownership vs. control), so a list would arguably be superior, because it can incorporate citations. If kept, we will need to define an appropriate scope, particularly as the degree of family ownership or control is sometimes debatable (e.g. Hyundai Group). -- choster (talk) 23:05, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Renewable energy commercialization
Renewable energy commercialization, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. AIRcorn (talk) 11:19, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement!
Hello, |
Requested move
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Barclays Bank Mauritius that would benefit from your opinion. Please come and help! PI Ellsworth ed. put'r there 04:12, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Lee Fixel
ResolvedHello! I've submitted a request to update the Early life and education section of the Lee Fixel article as part of my work with Beutler Ink. Lee Fixel is an American venture capitalist and investor and I'm hoping to update some straightforward biographical information. You can view my full request here, which seeks to improve flow and fix a few inaccurate details. Will someone please review this request? Given my COI, I'm asking independent editors to confirm accuracy, neutrality, and verifiability. I'll happily address any questions or concerns that may arise. Thanks in advance! Inkian Jason (talk) 15:47, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
- This request has been answered. Inkian Jason (talk) 16:15, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
RfC on scope of wet market article
Hi, there is a new RfC here on whether the scope of the article wet market should include those outside of Southeast/East Asia. Any participation is welcome! — MarkH21talk 20:48, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
There's a long standing allegation that the cartel engaged in planned obsoledence by reducing the lifespan of lightbulbs. However my strong suspicion is that this is a myth that people have been repeating. The article isn't particularly any good and I'd like to have others give input on the article. I have done cleanup and added a UK parliamentary report that discussed this issue.
Harizotoh9 (talk) 06:59, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
Can I get some eyes on the discussion at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Chicago#Draft:Darvin_Furniture_&_Mattress.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 17:53, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Suggested citation for Californian Housing Crisis
Please consider this article as a citation for the Californian housing Crisis and how it pertains to flipping https://newsilver.com/the-lender/what-is-causing-the-housing-crisis-in-california/
ElizabethRossouw (talk) 10:03, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
Philosophy of business
Philosophy of business is pretty much a stub, but it would seem to be a very important article, considering the amount books written on the topic; and even the subcategory of Sun Tzu's Art of War in business books are very numerous. We don't have coverage, and it could do with some help. Could editors familiar with the topic expand the article? -- 65.94.170.207 (talk) 10:33, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
small office/home office
Please help with the discussion on the naming of this article: small office/home office, I think this format is unacceptable per naming rules. Teemeah 편지 (letter) 09:33, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
For the discussion, see Talk:Small office/home office. --Neo-Jay (talk) 10:31, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
Confederate Motors
Can someone from this project weigh in at Talk:Confederate Motors#Confederate Motorcycles Lives On!. I've reverted a COI editor who bought the IP from this company and set up a new one. I viewed what they were doing as hijacking the page, but this is not really my speciality and I'm not 100% sure how we normally handle such cases. I'd like someone else to review what the editor has to say. SpinningSpark 23:15, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
WP:Articles for Creation has a new sort tool, you can see all pending business-related drafts here: Wikipedia:AfC sorting/History and Society/Business and economics
Just in case there are folks here who might be interested in reviewing drafts awaiting article status that are particular to this WikiProject. If you'd like to sign up to review/approve/decline new Drafts, instructions are here. AFC Reviewers get to use really cool automated tools that make reviewing really quick and easy, and I've really enjoyed volunteering there, and I'm really digging the AFC Sorting tool so instead of having to comb through lots of articles, I can zip right to topics I'm interested in. MatthewVanitas (talk) 06:53, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
Debt settlement
Debt settlement has received a lot of editing from an editor with a conflict of interest, but they have also said the previous stable version was non-neutral in a different direction. Some expert help would be appreciated if anyone's interested in sorting this out. -- Beland (talk) 03:17, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
There are about 2000 articles in CAT:NN on organisations, and 5000 on companies some having been waiting almost 12 years. This links to them: [33] [34]. If anyone from this wikiproject could help, we'd be extremely grateful. Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 14:57, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement!
Hello, |
DMAIC Article "Flavors" Removal
The first thing is the pronounciation.. There is seemingly much flavor in region and person. It ranges from de, də, dah, duh at the beginning to ma-ik and may-ik at the end. I personally think that the "y" (may-ik)is more of a local flavor than the ma-ik - which is how at least i hear it most often. "may" is pretty much US/UK only.
second: "measure the specification of (a) problem/goal" sounds again quite US like as well, since they have a tendency to omit the "a". once more in "The purpose of this step is to identify, validate and select (a) root cause for elimination." Or use the plural..
Under improve the "create" step could use some more context.. Wikipedia should help people seeking quick answers, it is not for well versed veterans..
"Replicate and thank the teams" This does not belong into a discriptive article, at least not in this form.
It might be viable if written as "Additional Steps: It is a sign of respect towards the involved parties to thank them for their participation and contribution. Additionally the DMAIC analysis results can be translated into other fields or used as an examplary case."
Is it is written now it looks like a copy paste from a 5cent advertisement brochure laying around in an employment office...
212.64.228.98 (talk) 10:16, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
(Extra-)low-voltage wiring, from more than a technical perspective
Mentioning it here as it involves business technology like VDV (voice, data, and video) cabling information (and where to put it). — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 03:48, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Discussion on branding slogan
I have started a discussion on an article covering a branding slogan and campaign for a Canadian company. Comments are welcome. isaacl (talk) 19:40, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement!
Hello, |
Extended content
|
|---|
Merger discussion
Managing Organisational Culture and ChangeI was unable to find an article that covers managing culture and change in an organisation and explains its important and how difficult it is to change culture. Any suggestions on an article that covers this topic? If not, would it be useful to create an article that explains managing organisational culture and change and has quotes like the ones below? The most frequently cited reason for failure was neglecting to address organisational culture (Cameron 1997) <ref>Cameron, Kim S. “Techniques for Making Organizations Effective: Some Popular Approaches.” In Daniel Druckman, Jerome E. Singer, and Harold Van Cott (eds.), Enhancing Organizational Performance. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 1997</ref> “70% of all major change efforts fail” - Dr. John Kotter, 1995 <ref>Kotter’s 8 step Organisational Change Model https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LxtF4OXzhyI</ref>
Aryanization compared to Affirmative actionZezen[35] and GizzyCatBella[36] are comparing the anti-racist Affirmative action policy to the Nazi policy of Aryanization. This is deplorable, and Wikipedia should stop this! Wikipedia:TALKOFFTOPIC |
Draft:Mansfield Rule - is it notable? If so it needs a rewrite
This topic looks like it might be notable, but the submission as-is is too promotional for my taste. Plus, I had to remove some copyrighted material.
If anyone familiar with the subject wants look at this and reject it outright as "yeah, I know what it is and I know it is not notable enough for Wikipedia" or "yeah I know what this is and it is notable enough" that would be helpful. Just add an {{afc comment}} right above the most recent comment on the page and ping me. If you know it is notable and want to improve it enough to reach Wikipedia standards, please do so. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 20:42, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of InnerSloth for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article InnerSloth is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/InnerSloth until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Right cite (talk) 13:31, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement!
Hello, |
Accenture edit request
On behalf of Accenture, I've posted a request at Talk:Accenture to updates three paragraphs to provide additional context surrounding certain topics. One reviewing editor said "Most of the proposed changes look not unreasonable to me but it would be good if other editors could also take a look", so I'm here to see if any project members would be interested in taking a look. Thanks for any help in advance, Inkian Jason (talk) 16:57, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
Wendy Luhabe
Talk:Wendy Luhabe § This page needs to be watched for undisclosed paid editing I dream of horses (Contribs) Please notify me after replying off my talk page. Thank you. 22:48, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
Out of date information updates
The key information box on the right incorrectly has us listed on the Frankfurt stock exchange, this should be removed and replaced with the London Stock Exchange (the company listed on 28th October 2020, link to the press release here: https://www.londonstockexchange.com/news-article/WPM/admission-to-trading-on-the-main-market-of-the-lse/14734411).
The article has the wrong President & CEO. Randy Smallwood is the President and CEO and Douglas Holtby is the Chairman of the Board, please see a link to the management team here: https://www.wheatonpm.com/Company/management-and-directors/default.aspx
The financial info is from 2013 in the grey box at the top of the article. As of 2020 half year results they now sit at:
Revenue US$247.954 mil (2020) Net income US$105.812 mil (2020) Total assets US$180.275 mil (2020) Total equity US$5.516 (2020)
Please see their half year 2020 results here for reference: https://money.tmx.com/en/quote/WPM/news/5644243550442243/Wheaton_Precious_Metals_Announces_Record_Revenue_and_Sales_Volumes_in_the_First_Half_of_2020 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 05ademorgan (talk • contribs) 16:31, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
- Courtesy link: Wheaton Precious Metals. I have already put this editor's name on the talk page as a paid contributor even though he has not edited the article itself. I have not made these changes to the page, I will leave that for another editor. I also put a note on the editor's talk page reminding him of WP:PAID. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 17:54, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
An IP editor added it to the list of pages needing attention.
It turns out a new logged-in editor basically rewrote it from scratch, using the page to promote his own work. That, and it was in a writing style that was very much "not standard." I reverted it. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 03:29, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
FAR notice
I have nominated New Orleans Mint for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Hog Farm Bacon 05:06, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
This needs a lot of work. Bearian (talk) 21:28, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
- It reads like a technical manual. --Devokewater (talk) 22:12, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Interactive collateral management has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unsourced and tagged for almost 11 years.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bearian (talk) 21:47, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
- Is this notable? --Devokewater (talk) 22:28, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
Proposed Merge: Human resources and Human resource management
Hello editors. It has been proposed that the article Human resources be merged into the article Human resource management. And one or both of those articles is within the scope of this WikiProject. If you would like express support for or object to the merge then you are strongly encouraged to do so at the talk page for Human resource management. Thank you!
--—Naddruf (talk ~ contribs) 19:07, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
This stub could use a lot of work. Bearian (talk) 22:34, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
Informal request for comment
Input from this WikiProject is requested at Cross-docking § Informal request for comment - replace article?. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 13:45, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
Vanity awards essay
I'd recently nominated a vanity award for deletion and in it, mentioned some of the signs of a vanity award. MarnetteD suggested including this information somewhere.
I've started on a draft about identifying vanity awards, which can be found here. Right now it's in a rough draft format, so I thought it would be good to get some feedback and see if anyone would be interested in working on it as well. I admittedly wrote it with more books and film in mind, but I know that there is often an issue with vanity awards popping up on business related articles as well. Can someone look this over and suggest anything, especially when taking businesses into mind? I'm very much still in the drafting stage.
It's definitely going to remain an essay and I'm not looking to make it policy. More I'm just hoping to have a nice guideline in place for identifying vanity (or at least non-notable) awards. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:30, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
Please help fix this mess. Bearian (talk) 20:29, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
Help improving Nate Morris article
Hello All, I am a paid representative for Nate Morris, the founder of Rubicon Technologies, and I'm here to help improve the current article about Mr. Morris. More about me is on my userpage. I know I shouldn't update the live text on my own because of my "conflict of interest". The article in its current state leaves much room for improvement in terms of quality Wikipedia content, as I understand it. Recently, I posted an entirely new draft of the article, attempting to shore up references and improve content relevance, readability, and overall quality as an encyclopedic, biographical entry. Having received no replies yet, I'm posting here in case there could be interested editors to assist. My request can be seen here: Talk:Nate Morris#Well-sourced_draft:_Rewrite. Thanks! MS rep 4 NMorris (talk) 15:28, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
request to update rating
Please review and update the rating for Contract packager. It is currently rated Stub but has been largely rewritten since then. Pkgx (talk) 00:23, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
If anyone is looking for something to do: purchasing is listed for this project as high-importance, yet consists of 99% unsourced original research, which as been the case since (at least) 2007. Lennart97 (talk) 15:18, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Work–life balance
A previous version of the Work–life balance article was deleted due to copyright violations, with no otherwise salvageable content. This means that we need to start over on this high-priority article. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 22:51, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
FAR of United Kingdom corporation tax
I have nominated United Kingdom corporation tax for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. FemkeMilene (talk) 19:16, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
CarZing: Article Review
Hello - I'm writing on behalf of my client, CarZing. CarZing’s mission is to make auto financing quick and easy while providing a modern, hassle free way of shopping for cars. The article (see draft) was submitted back in December 2020, and is still waiting to be reviewed. Google Search is currently showing outdated company info until this article can help update SEO, which is causing some customers to get confused. My client and I would greatly appreciate if someone could assist in reviewing the article draft. Thank you so much for your help! - Chase — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:8000:C244:2300:2D42:BA6C:A33F:FD27 (talk) 23:53, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
Article Review
Hey Guys,
I have updated the IOOF (Company) Wiki article and would love some feedback.
Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jsoed1234 (talk • contribs) 00:54, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
Help in improving Vella Group draft
Hello, I would like help regarding Vella Group. It is a real estate company founded by Zach Vella who has appeared on Million Dollar Listing Los Angeles. Please edit the page in such a manner that it does not give the feel of an advertisement and add some reliable, secondary sources to the article. Precariousman123 (talk) 15:48, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
Wikipedia Article Additions
Hi, Im a student at the university of Sydney and part of my course was to improve a stub-level article. My assigned topic was The Polyester Prince biography on Dhirubhai Ambani, a famous Indian tycoon. I just finished adding a lot of detail to the article and was wondering if anyone could take a look at it to provide me with some feedback. It would be much appreciated! --WaTErMelON690 (talk) 03:54, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Discussion on removing the net worth parameter from the infobox
There is a discussion on removing the net worth parameter from the infobox. Please comment if you have an opinion.
see Template talk:Infobox person#Deprecating the net worth parameter?
Thanks! Patapsco913 (talk) 15:22, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
EuroWeek /Global Capital magazine naming issue
This business magazine article needs some attention. An article move may be needed.4meter4 (talk) 23:44, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Template talk:Infobox person#Deprecating the net worth parameter?. Spy-cicle💥 Talk? 18:59, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
Jon Hammes: Request for review
Hi WikiProject members, I've recently made a request to add some biographical details to the article for Milwaukee businessman, Jon Hammes. The proposed content is based on what I've seen as customary in other business people's Wikipedia articles. However, I need help reviewing because I am employed by Hammes Company and have a conflict of interest. My request is here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Jon_Hammes#Biographical_details_to_add Can anyone help me with this request?
Thank you. Brad KM (talk) 19:39, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
- Brad KM, please note that the current backlog of edit requests is quite heavy, and that it will presumably take a few weeks before an editor is able to address your request. I hope you understand. JBchrch talk 20:24, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
'Borderless selling' : proposed for deletion
I have proposed Borderless selling for deletion since it appears to be entirely WP:OR, has no citations whatever, and has been tagged as such since 2008. If you disagree, then see Wikipedia:Proposed deletion to intervene. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 13:29, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Telecommuting#Requested move 3 August 2021
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Telecommuting#Requested move 3 August 2021 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ASUKITE 15:08, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Fortune Brands (1969–2011)#Requested move 8 August 2021
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Fortune Brands (1969–2011)#Requested move 8 August 2021 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 18:40, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:N. R. Narayana Murthy#Requested move 27 August 2021
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:N. R. Narayana Murthy#Requested move 27 August 2021 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. — Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 18:11, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Improve "business planning"
--Edwardvdk (talk) 12:59, 7 September 2021 (UTC)edwardvdk I would like to help creating a category series like strategy but for "business plan" is this something I can discuss here?
Tuck School of Business FAR
I have nominated Tuck School of Business for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Bumbubookworm (talk) 13:06, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
RFC at Talk:Stakeholder theory
There is an RFC at Talk:Stakeholder theory concerning whether Stakeholder capitalism and Stakeholder theory are synonymous, or whether one is a subset of the other. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:38, 15 September 2021 (UTC)