Jump to content

User talk:RHaworth/2018 May 03

Page contents not supported in other languages.
This user is an Online Ambassador on the English Wikipedia
This user has administrator privileges on the English Wikipedia.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archives

Emotional Speech Blocks Deletion Syndrome

[Title width guide. Delete above here if no further edits - already in archive. If further edits, move below here.]

Brent–Kung adder

Hi Roger, I was improving some articles on digital adders and saw that we once had an article on the Brent–Kung adder, which was apparently moved to Draft:Brent–Kung adder at some stage and then deleted. I don't know if the article was good enough for a stub already, but what I do know is that the subject "Brent–Kung adder" is a notable one in principle and that eventually we should have an article about it (as we have for a number of other types of adders). Do you think it would make sense to undelete that page and move it to article space, or to merge the contents into another article (like adder (electronics)) for now? I can't promise to work much on the article myself but given that I ran into it today I wanted to bring this to your attention the least. Thanks for your time and greetings -- Matthiaspaul (talk) 21:37, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

Thanks -- Matthiaspaul (talk) 12:48, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

Why not WP:DENY?

to Category[1] and this one[2]. Both are created by a banned editor's sockpuppet and had no substantive edits by anyone else. The whole category tree was created by a banned editor as I pointed out on one of the talk pages where you reverted my edit. Why isn't it WP:DENY? ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 12:45, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

Y

Y u delete my page. — Premwikier (talk) 14:39, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

Fig you later

Hello! Thanks for your hard work on keeping Wikipedia's guidelines enforced, i truly see you as a coach as of now. My apologies for the foul photo. I deeply apologize. Please if you have any advice for me it will be taken in great consideration. - Figguhlator P.R. editor — Preceding unsigned comment added by Figguhlator (Rapper) (talk • contribs) 17:24, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

  • When you/your client become notable enough that other people write about him in third-party independent reliable sources, then someone will be interested enough to write his biography here. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:04, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

Habibur Rahman (police officer)

Please recheck Habibur Rahman (police officer) article there have more news references Habibur Rahman (police officer) award winner by Bangladesh prime Minister ,Habibur Rahman (police officer) is is 100% government employee and public figure & Additional DIG Police HQ Bangladesh , please restore this article. Check Google link see more information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ismailim (talk • contribs) 20:14, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

Dear User:RHaworth Please Help me how can Make This article check news reference: [3], [4], [5], [6]. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ismailim (talk • contribs) 20:25, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

Request for deletion

Could you please also delete page User talk:Ram The Editor in the criteria of G5 just like you did to User:Ram The Editor/sandbox because it is created by the blocked user. — 122.162.39.134 (talk) 11:56, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Did you delete User talk:Ram The Editor as G5? Please do so. — 122.162.39.134 (talk) 10:02, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

Please delete User talk:Ram The Editor as G5 as it was created by Ram The Editor via blocked user. 122.162.39.134 (talk) 10:24, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

I will have to talk from IP only because I don't have an account. 122.162.39.134 (talk) 10:28, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

Piano reduction of the Busoni piano concerto

I don't think we should rush to delete the Busoni concerto files, e.g., File:Busoni- Piano Concerto (2-po rdn) Mvt1.pdf. I left some questions requesting help on the talk page, but there really has been no discussion. I think maybe these files just need to be moved to Wikisource. Once this is done, then they can be deleted from Wikipedia. also you have now broken a link from Piano Concerto (Busoni) to this file. --Robert.Allen (talk) 18:24, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

I think I can figure out how to do this. I just need some time to do so. But I need to have access to the information and files you are deleting. -- Robert.Allen (talk) 18:36, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

  • Robert, the complete scores should be in Wikisource if it will have them. PDFs are deprecated because the format is just a wrapper for various native formats but in this case PDFs might be better than having lots of PNGs, one for each page of the score. As for Wikipedia, I suggest just one PNG to illustrate the article. But this should be uploaded to the Commons. "Access to the information" - whaddya mean? You did the uploads so the stuff should be on one of your computers. I am currently on holiday and emailing stuff is messy. If you need stuff sent, remind me on or after Apr 20, Fri. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:55, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

RHaworth, I uploaded these files quite a while ago. Upload of PDFs was allowed at that time. I don't think I kept the originals on my computer, since I assumed they would remain available on the Wikipedia. The descriptions, dates, author, source info etc that I added to the information templates would make it easier to transfer those details to Wikisource, rather than having to reconstruct everything. The following are the files that I would like to transfer:

-- Robert.Allen (talk) 01:45, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Restore Xometry Page

This company is growing, doing well, and is being covered in the Wall St. Journal, Forbes and other national media. Could you unlock the page? — Lichtig2302 (talk) 21:48, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Retrieval of my draft article

Kindly retrieve Draft:Camillus Anthony Ejikemeuwa Mbaka, so that I can work on it. — Nwachinazo (talk) 08:15, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

I think

that you have been involved in the mass migration of a mess of my images from here to eternity. Make that to Commons. For this I thank you. Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 17:13, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

Please check draft:Divya Agarwal

Hi, you delete this page some days ago, and user who create that page is creating this page again and again, please notice this because she is only the contestant of one show and the user is paid promoting it here draft:Divya Agarwal and previously at Divya Agarwal. — Kironkhann (talk) 17:44, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

Hi, Yesterday and from many days you and other admins deleted this page at Divya Agarwal and at draft:Divya Agarwal, but now user creates the same article with the spelling change in article name i mean from Divya Agarwal to Divya Agarwaal , please notice this and take some action against user too. Kironkhann (talk) 08:35, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

 Done by Alexf and the title was protected from creation by non-administrators indefinitely due to the repeated recreation. Thank you for bringing this up Kironkhann! -- (talk page stalker) TheSandDoctor Talk 06:19, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

Buchalter unprofessional spamming

Hello. It appears you have deleted the page Buchalter, A Professional Corporation. There seems to have been a previous article about this firm but it too was taken down. To contest this immediate deletion, I provided several points outlining the notability of this firm. However, you were unable to respond to the case in which I presented because another editor seems to have deleted that page as well. Can you please outline here why this page was voted into immediate deletion? I have edited several Law Firm pages and have noticed almost all have flagged pages however are able to stay up. What edits do you see fit to change in order to make this article work? This topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list. I have identified and included independent sources (also called third-party sources) that fairly portray the subject, without undue attention to the subject's own views. The majority of the references are solely about the articles subject. In accordance with Wikipedia's dispute resolution we were unable to come to a consensus as to which would allow for this article to be published in order to satisfy both editors. Per Wikipedia guidelines, may we discuss and compromise this dispute since there is a disagreement over complete deletion of this whole article? — Missfixit1975 (talk) 18:03, 18 April 2018 (UTC)Missfixit1975

  • The ridiculous spammy title was sufficient to condemn your article. When your company becomes notable enough that other people write about it in third-party independent reliable sources, then someone will be interested enough to write about it here. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:05, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

The legal name of this corporation is "Buchalter, A Professional Corporation." I am sorry you find the legal name of a company a "ridiculous, spammy title". I am not sure how you reached that conclusion when numerous other businesses in this industry have pages with their legal name as the title. Numerous third-party independent, reliable sources have written about this particular company as it is a notable company. This could easily be confirmed. Furthermore, I found this company while looking through different articles that mentioned this law firm without an article for it, and felt the need to write one. — Missfixit1975 (talk) 18:36, 23 April 2018 (UTC)Missfitit1975

Now at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2018 April 25, where Missfixit1975 tried and failed to ping you. —Cryptic 22:15, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Meena Lalit

Thank you for deleting this draft as G4, but I forgot to report the block evasion, which is sockpuppetry in its history. The author of the draft was blocked for disrupting the AFD. The two resubmissions afterwards were by IPs. I am assuming that they were the author. I can't see the history now because it has been deleted. Can you please check the history and see if the IPs need blocking? Thanks. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:46, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Maharashtra Samruddhi Mahamarg

Hi, There are two expressway road projects between Mumbai and Nagpur cities, the newer and upcoming one is Maharashtra Samruddhi Mahamarg. The associated article was deleted from Wikipedia probably in confusion whether it is same as Nagpur–Aurangabad–Mumbai express highway. Pl note both are different. Kindly restore it or let me know whether I can restore it. Check the latest news associated with Maharashtra Samruddhi Mahamarg [7] (pl note there are multiple names of this project including Nagpur-Mumbai-Expressway, Mumbai-Nagpur Samruddi Expressway, Mumbai-Nagpur Super Communication Expressway etc). Thanks. IndianGeneralist 10:29, 19 April 2018 (UTC).

Draft:Chairman

Do you know if I nominated Draft:Chairman as G1? — Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 23:07, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

That's right, never mind then. — Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 21:13, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

Dr . Ikram Ullah Khan

There's an AFD open for Dr . Ikram Ullah Khan, which you recently speedy deleted on 4/17. I thought you might want to give your input. Is the current version substantially different from the one you deleted? –dlthewave ☎ 15:39, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Cantor's diagonal argument/Arguments

Hi RHaworth. Please undo the deletion of talk:Cantor's diagonal argument/Arguments. It is not the talk page of a deleted page. It's a subpage of a talk page. Someone unfortunately added a corresponding mainspace page, which was then deleted. There is a current deletion discussion for the subpage of the talk page, but it is not completed, and indeed the sentiment seems to be against deletion. -- Trovatore (talk) 18:30, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

And actually, if you wouldn't mind, would you also please salt Cantor's diagonal argument/Arguments? There is no reason to have a page there in mainspace, and a lot of the recent trouble seems to have been caused by the spurious creation of the mainspace page. -- Trovatore (talk) 18:44, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

Thanks! -- Trovatore (talk) 19:17, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

96.31.202.203

Could you please block user:96.31.202.203 as soon as possible because she is continuing to vandalize more quickly than I can revert, and nobody at AIV is handling reports. — CLCStudent (talk) 20:07, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

Watchlist

You people are causing unnecessary problems with your edits. The link to talk solved the problem but twice has been removed. Watchlist does not accept the talk page in it's current form, confusing people not used to the effect. It is thus on NO watchlist except mine. I tested this. It has been abandoned for 6 months for that reason and the 2 links to it are obscure. You will have us on the regular talk pages if you continue this way. Put the watchlist fix in and put in the links to it you people want. 1. On watchlist list it is red, not black 2. It does watchlist, but not to talk but to the page 3. Likewise when linking from watchlist watch.

It would be more appropriate if the pertinent page had two talk pages, is that doable? As for the arguments, only I correctly know how to disprove set theory cardinal infinity, the correct arguments in the talk page and elsewhere on the internet are half correct, no exception. Thus none of their arguments are appropriate for mainspace, only mine. Presumably thus that will continue for years after it is/isn't fixed. Victor Kosko (talk) 23:01, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

Hi Victor. Watchlists work just fine without a mainspace page. Talk:Cantor's diagonal argument/Arguments is on my watchlist, and it works fine.
It's true that if you look at it under "View and edit watchlist", you see a redlink for the nonexistent mainspace page. I'm not sure I had ever noticed it before, but it is of no importance. The page in question is not the talk page of any page; rather it is a subpage of a talk page. There is no need for a corresponding mainspace page, and indeed it makes no sense for such a page to exist. --Trovatore (talk) 00:22, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of article

Greetings. The article "Monetary/fiscal debate" was speedily deleted. Immediately after noticing the nomination, I provided a rebuttal to it, which I believe covered the concerns about copyright violation. Yet without so much as a response by anyone, not the nominator, not the admin deleting the article, nor anyone else, the page was deleted. Can I at least have a post mortem justification for that action? I submit that the subject of the article is very important (and, of course, Wiki-notable) in Economics. - The Gnome (talk) 09:20, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

The user meant Monetary/fiscal policy debate. Eddie891 Talk Work 19:39, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Yes, the full title is Monetary/fiscal policy debate. I'd like to know the reason my response was completely ignored. What we now have is a subject of quite some significance in Economics missing from Wikipedia. Not a very satisfactory situation, I'd say. -The Gnome (talk) 21:15, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) @The Gnome and RHaworth: Probably because monetary policy and fiscal policy are two distinct things, plus there's already an article over fiscal policy debate. I would encourage The Gnome to make sure that he isn't creating a redundant content fork. It may only be appropriate to create a new article covering monetary policy debate, and incorporate anything instead pertaining to fiscal policy into that article. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 03:17, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
Thanks, Compassionate727. Just to clear any misunderstanding: The article I had created (but never owned, of course) has been reinstated and it is now titled "Fiscal policy debate". It's the very one!
The title, by the way, is incorrect. The appropriate title for the article, as evidenced by the text, should reflect the debate that took place at the time between the respective merits and pitfalls of monetary policy versus fiscal policy, a debate that spawned a lot of interesting, even revelatory, work. As soon as I get some time off from real life :-) I'll change the title to something more appropriate, possibly the original one; as it now stands, a user will naturally understand that the article is about fiscal policy per se. It's not; it's about the AM/FM debates. Take care. -The Gnome (talk)

Speedy deletion of article

Hello, You just deleted our page Draft:Hearty Mart. We had contested for the speedy deletion and also asked the other user to check our page who had firstly declined the page. I wrote in the contest for speedy deletion that we would make the necessary changes within today. But, when we were making changes, you deleted this page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JP2300 (talk • contribs) 11:35, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Definately not notable for a Wikipedia page. Sorry. Legacypac (talk) 17:50, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Do you guys think that the company on which there is an international case study is not considered to be notable? Hearty Mart has been an international case study for the business students studying in India and Europe. Also, a well-known book has been published on this topic. It's like you guys, don't know about the company so you have been asking for its notability and declining the article. — JP2300 (talk) 05:17, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

I know what case studies are, and no, being used as a case study or being featured in a book is NOT enough to make the business Wiki notable. Why do you care so much about this one business getting a page? If the business becomes notable someone without an agenda will write about it. — Legacypac (talk) 05:54, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

I have no agenda behind writing this page and I am just familiar with the concept of Hearty Mart and so wanted to contribute by writing about it on Wikipedia. It seems that you cant get your head around the fact that someone wants to write about an organisation just for the sake of contribution and may not necessarily have an agenda behind it. Have a good day! — JP2300 (talk) 09:55, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

Hey RHaworth, Why have you given my sandbox for the nomination of deleting that? What have I done now? I have neither created a page article nor I have done anything that is promoting the organisation? Why is my sandbox page now getting deleted? — JP2300 (talk) 10:37, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

  • JP2300, I am not "you guys" and in any case, what is your definition of "you guys" in this context? Please reply. I am trying to work out your MO. You have done two pointless edits in mainspace and uploaded and blanked essays on privacy in India, Teresa Thatcher vs. Margaret May and the French economy. On the basis of these edits I would say that you are blatantly using Wikipedia as a free host. (I also see essays being submitted by Anoushkashah78 (talk · contribs) and Anupriya Maliwal (talk · contribs) who you probably know. ) As to draft:Hearty Mart which you created with Furqaan jafri (talk · contribs) and Rajshah7 (talk · contribs), I have restored this for the moment, not because I think it is worthy of mainspace but because, now I look at it, I cannot understand the speedy tag. I invite Legacypac to review the deletion nomination - apparently he was asking for deletion because the page was a copy of itself!
I think that you are all students of Tumkur University and Ashwin Kumar A P (talk · contribs) is your supervisor. If so, please announce yourselves at WP:SUP and learn the difference between a Wikipedia article and a student essay. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 14:04, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

Here-and-now-ism

Here-and-now-ism. Hi there, Thank you very much for leaving a brief comment why the above article was deleted. However, I did not expect that it will happen so fast and I did not leave any copies for myself. This environment here is new for me and I spent a good amount of time to get all those links in place etc. Therefore, as the deleting administrator, please retrieve the deleted material for me. I would appreciate it very much. I actually thought the article stays in the sandbox after publishing. By the way, your "Parliamentery language" section is very good. Best Regards, Tricap (talk) 13:08, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Why did you delete Zero Trust?

Zero Trust Network: Why did you delete this? This is a current and emerging topic in cyber security. Multiple vendors and military users rely on this technology. Books have been published on it, industry analysts support it (aka Forrester). Please reinstate this page. Thank you. 20JacksonP (talk) 17:24, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

It was found by at least two editors to be Unambiguous advertising or promotion. You might consider creating a page in WP:AfC if one can be properly written. — Legacypac (talk) 17:49, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Advertising or promotion of what? There is no product nor vendor being promoted. Zero Trust does not pertain to any specific vendor. The concept was originated by an industry analyst. Multiple vendors, NIST and other large cyber security organizations use this term. If you know the cybersecurity space, you know this is correct. Who were these editors please? I don't see it. 20JacksonP (talk) 19:06, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Whichever editor tagged it for deletion and the Admin thst deleted it. It's a Newtwork which is a type of organization which can be promoted. — Legacypac (talk) 19:10, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
  • I have to disagree with Legacypac on this. I could not immediately see any specific advertising - you shot yourself in the foot by putting capitals on trust and network. However I did see a total lack of any attempt to use Wikipedia standards - horrible shouting, no section headings, not a single wikilink, indeed, worse, use of Wikipedia as references, etc. Learn our standards then try again. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:03, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

Article Removal

Hello, I have been trying to get in contact with soembody for the last couple of months about an article that was removed via speedy deletion. I have contacted User:Winged Blades of Godric many times without success, so maybe I should be contacting you instead? I understand why the article was deleted, but I was hoping that I could get the copy of the article to retrieve the resources I collected, and then ask a third party to write the article. It was Draft:NCSIMUL Machine Machine or NCSIMUL Machine Thank you again in advance, ArialApproach (talk) 18:04, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

It was deleted as " Unambiguous advertising or promotion". You should not be hiring someone to write for you, and if you insist, they MUST disclose a WP:COI. — Legacypac (talk) 19:12, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Understood, thank you. Is there any way to get a copy of the article or at least the references for my personal use though? — ArialApproach (talk) 19:43, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

I did it through email not through a talk page. I thought it was how he suggested to get in contact with him; sorry if that was incorrect. Either way, thank you for you help. — ArialApproach (talk) 15:37, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

I have 2 of the emails that I also cc-ed myself in, just to make sure they were going through, if you would like me to forward them. Thanks. — ArialApproach (talk) 14:56, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

Talkback?

I believe there is a message for you here. — GMGtalk 19:49, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Mota Group, Inc.

Could please restore the page and provide specific edits to make it compliant with policy? Mtjoe — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mtjoe (talk • contribs) 20:42, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Mota Group, Inc. was deleted for being an advertisement WP:G11 You were not the creator - at least under this account. I suggest trying the WP:Article Wizard and reading the steps and guidance closely. Also comply with WP:COI if applicable. Legacypac (talk) 08:23, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

Deletion of Page - Radical Frames

There was an active talk in the page about contesting the deletion. I hope you went through the significance of having the page approved. If it still doesn't meet the criteria, I will give you the links of other similar pages in hundreds and thousands, I would like you to explain me about how those pages were approved and not mine. — Yeshasnag (talk) 04:23, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) That falls under our article WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS: over the many years of Wikipedia's existence, hundreds and thousands of sub-par articles and articles on non-notable subjects have slipped through the cracks; but that is no excuse for allowing more of them to clutter up our servers and distract us from improving articles on subjects that actually meet our standards of notability. --Orange Mike | Talk 04:43, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

Deletion of Baker Klein Engineering

Hi, Could you undelete the draft of Draft:Baker Klein Engineering? I am going to make changes to it that more accurately reflect its notability. Thanks, Grace.k (talk) 05:10, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) It was overly promotional. Are you connected to or paid by the subject? Have you disclosed the connection WP:COI? Legacypac (talk) 08:15, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

Bad job

Hello RHaworth, Wishing to get deleted article in mail and create article title in same name with modified content ( don't ruin tiresome research) Good day, hope this message finds you well around. If you go through my activities history on Wikipedia, you may not find an extraordinary contributor but can't also ignore my contribution as you believe here Wiki is life here.

By the way, After doing tiresome research I have created an article for Bdjobs.com that is one of most googled job portal in Bangladesh. But no reliable content was available for this company. So, I intended to gather information for this organization to help people who look for it.

But unfortunately, the article has been tagged with speedy deletion because of writing tone and lack of resource link. Hereafter that, I did more research and grab lots of proper reference link and change the way of writing that will not violate any Wiki rules. So, I will be happy to get the previous content in email for further improvement and create the article title again. Thank you very much — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moshiur meraj (talk • contribs) 08:13, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) the page was excessively promotional in tone. It is not create protected (you need to be an Admin here to start the page). You could start in Draft at WP:AfC and be sure to disclose any WP:COI if you connected to the business. — Legacypac (talk) 08:18, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

Jump the sky

How do I get my page back that you deleted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skyjumpersix (talk • contribs)

(talk page stalker) I have no idea. This is the very first edit you have made with this account so who knows what page you are asking about? Legacypac (talk) 09:20, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

Why did you delete Amir Hetsroni

Why did you delete the entry on Amir Hetsroni? He appears in the list of needed entries under "arts and entertainment". See here. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Orenberg 1 (talk • contribs)

Thanks for the guidance. The entry was corrected. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Orenberg 1 (talk • contribs)

Greenwich Music School

Hi, please could I have access to draft:Greenwich Music School so that further references including from national organisations Music Mark [8] and Classical Music magazine [9] can be added to demonstrate notability, and the article rewritten as necessary to disprove the speedy deletion criteria of Unambiguous advertising or promotion? — Wiki-edit-3457 (talk) 22:37, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

User:Wiki-edit-3457 It's a new music school for young kids. One exists in every small city. There is no way this is going to pass W:N or WP:CORPDEPTH. Wasting your time trying to promote this on Wikipedia. — Legacypac (talk) 22:41, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

It's a registered charity [10] which runs several programmes including a professional training course with international reach (London Conducting Academy), and other courses and training for people of all ages, including training for music teachers. This is why there is significant coverage in the multiple independent reliable secondary sources linked above. — Wiki-edit-3457 (talk) 08:19, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

Well the deleted draft never said any of that, so I suggest starting over. see WP:42. — Legacypac (talk) 08:24, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

User:Natheloiz04

Hello Roger. This user has recreated their userpage as a WP:FAKEARTICLE for the 4th time [11] (you deleted it twice before). He also blanked my userpage in retaliation [12], offered a feeble apology for it [13] after being admonished by Cahk [14], then almost immediately blanked all the prior warnings [15]. Looks like a case of WP:NOTHERE to me... could you take whatever action you feel is appropriate? Thanks. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 23:44, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

Hamamatsu International Piano

You've restored Hamamatsu International Piano Academy Competition. It redirects to Hamamatsu International Piano Competition. Both competitions are different and are organized by different organisations: http://www.actcity.jp/hacam/PianoAcademy/ and http://www.hipic.jp/en/. Please delete this redirect. Thanks. Grimes2 (talk) 15:13, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

Module:IPAc-en/pronunciation-testcases

Thank you for taking care of my speedy deletion request at Module:IPAc-en/pronunciation-testcases/doc, but I'm afraid you seem to have missed the whole point of the request. What I requested to be deleted is Module:IPAc-en/pronunciation-testcases. Since a module cannot contain a template, I placed the speedy deletion template at the /doc page, which is then transcluded in its parent. Can you delete Module:IPAc-en/pronunciation-testcases if you agree it meets WP:CSD#T3? Thank you. Nardog (talk) 10:50, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

Thanks! Nardog (talk) 18:54, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Peter's Railway

Can you undelete Draft:Peter's Railway we want to continue working on it to get it right for submission. — JaxLax (talk) 13:43, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

Donald Trump gropes women redirect

Is there a reason you deleted that redirect with a comment that the RfD as closed as delete (after it had only run for about six days, I might add) but didn't actually close the RfD? — Smartyllama (talk) 01:26, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

  • Depends how I am feeling when I see a speedy tag on a page being discussed at XfD. If I think the use of XfD was reasonable, I may close the discussion. But when the XfD was obviously redundant, I may not bother to close it. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 14:04, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

Adorama deletion

Hi I reviewed my contribution and I think I had a good reference to the entries that I submitted. May I know to which part does my entry has an issue. Thanks. Tamaragordon91 (talk) 27 April —Preceding undated comment added 10:51, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

  • Learn to provide wikilinks when you talk about an article. Adorama and Bezalel - two companies with Jewish connections - do you have a CoI or, worse, are you doing undeclared paid editing. But you missed out from the Adorama article, the only interesting bit: about them observing Shabbat. Possibly your version established notability, feel free to submit via AfC. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 14:04, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

Niyi Akinmolayan

Hello, please can you unprotect Niyi Akinmolayan, that is the common name and WP:CONCISE title for a very notable Nigerian film director. Current location - Niyi O. Akinmolayan, I'll cleanup after move. Regards. HandsomeBoy (talk) 17:15, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

I'm not sure whether to thank you or trout you for protecting this user's page, but I got a good laugh out of it either way. Thanks for that! — Compassionate727 (T·C) 01:21, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

Lifang & Partners

Heya, New to Wikipedia. I note that you deleted a page that I was working on. Please restore it. The law is an important part of society and lawyers are the actors in the law. Legal history gives people insights into how the law works that may not be apparent from case reports and pieces of legislation. As you may have noticed from the draft that you deleted, specific cases had been used as section headings. I note that Wikipedia is full of pages relating to law firms. Some have more useful information and some have less. If you decide not to restore it, please return the draft materials to me (mithdol@yahoo.co.uk). Additionally, if you decide not to restore it then please consider why the pages of so many law firms, companies and other entities are on Wikipedia. Regards, Mithdol — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mithdol (talk • contribs) 09:53, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

  • When your company becomes notable enough that other people write about it in third-party independent reliable sources, then someone will be interested enough to write about it here. And that someone will not use horrible <h1> section headings but will provide evidence of notability. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 14:28, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

Kakarlamudi

An editor has asked for a discussion to address this shouting redirect. Since you had some involvement with the it redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Reyk YO! 11:17, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

Freeloading??

Today you sent me a notice that I'm freeloading. What exactly am I doing to get this notice? Why is this a problem? What will happen if I continue freeloading? — Stryperfan (talk) 11:45, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

What did I do to get my Sandbox deleted? Why am I blocked? Did I stay logged in for too long and didn't contribute? If so, I'm sorry I didn't know. Please explain to me everything I asked about this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stryperfan (talk • contribs)

Explain me?

Hi RHaworth, What is the reason behind moving this? Explain me briefly. Thank you, Siddiqsazzad001 <Talk/> 13:14, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

Why is Muhammad Samiuddin Qazi (sami) (talk · contribs) creating draft:Ek Deewana Tha - Filmazia HD as a fork of Ek Deewaana Tha. Explain me briefly. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:31, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

Dr DisRespect

Please restore both Dr DisRespect, the talk page and this redirect DrDisRespect and Guy Beahm. I am an experienced editor and would not create a non-notable subject. There were numerous sources which suggest speedy does not apply. If you feel it is not notable please AfD, though I am confident it would survive. He is one of the top viewed streamers on Twitch and has received extensive coverage. Valoem talk contrib 14:48, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

Stop deleting copyvios

Please just stop. I was looking into Draft:Vaadin Framework and was getting a second opinion when you deleted it. It was/is a reverse copyvio. You keep doing this, and quite frankly it's starting to piss me off. I could care less about the other categories, but please leave the G12's alone - I regularly patrol that category and it rarely gets above a handful of pages (which I clear out as soon as I see them). Primefac (talk) 14:06, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

  • Primefac, so which other {{db-copyvio}} deletions of mine do you object to? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:27, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
    Well, there's the page we discussed a month ago, where it appeared that you didn't bother checking to see if it was actually copyvio. And now this page, where it appears you didn't a) see the "checking" tag on the page, or b) see the talk page notice as to why it looked like a copyvio in the first place. There are a handful others, but they were of the sort where it was a borderline case and while I could have restored and salvaged a paragraph or two, it wasn't worth the hassle and to be honest I don't have the time or energy to sort through your G12s to find them.
    I know two pages out of the hundreds we both delete every month is a relatively small number, but my main concern is that it seems like you're just clicking "delete" simply because there's a tag on the page. I'm no fan of useless garbage either, but I know enough to at least check a claim before taking action.
    At the very least, could I request that if you see a G12 with the |checking=yes ticked, that you leave it for a bit so whichever admin is checking can actually check it? Primefac (talk) 13:35, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

Stocks?

I like how you deleted the G6 category... under G6. ∰Bellezzasolo✡ Discuss 21:44, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Field Hockey

Hi. Regarding the G7 deletion of 2018 Women's Asian Youth Olympic Games Field Hockey Qualifier, I was actually asking about the page at User talk:PhilKnight#G7 deletion of moved page. It seems to me that it might have been cut & pasted into 2018 Asian Youth Olympic Games Qualifier (girls' field hockey) and needs a history merge, not deletion. Could you check this please? (PhilKnight wasn't quite sure of what happened there.) --Paul_012 (talk) 06:01, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

Deletion of Page - Dr. Balbir Singh

Hello, My name is Tanvi Sharma and I submitted the page Dr. Balbir Singh for review. However, the page has been deleted. I wish to make the edits to the page. Pls do let me know how should I go about doing the same. Thanks for your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sharma.tanvi (talk • contribs) 09:51, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

User:Muhammad Samiuddin Qazi (sami)

Hi Thanks for the edit on my user page. This user created another account Muhammad Samiuddin Qazi (Sami Uddin) (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki). — Sid95Q (talk) 12:29, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

Restore article

Please restore Draft:NeuroShell Trader. Per the chat room help, I have added my company affiliation on the talk page. I would like to edit the deleted article to remove the offending material. Can you restore the article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sherald44 (talk • contribs) 14:36, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

And redeleted as spam.--Dlohcierekim (talk) 15:00, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

Journey into Night

Can you please help me delete the redirect and mainspace Draft:Journey into Night. The complications are blowing my mind. I believe the proper procedure if an editor has issues with an article never AFDed is to AfD it, not move it into Draft. This should be uncontroversial am I correct? Policy says its not bold to create a new article, but allowed. Doesn't AfD exist for this ever reason? Ever episode including the episode after has an article. Valoem talk contrib 17:18, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

 Done — Valoem talk contrib 17:27, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

Journey into Night (Westworld)

Please restore this redirect per Wikipedia:Naming conventions (television)#Episode and character articles, editors "are encouraged to create extra redirects to help with internal linking and avoid creation of duplicate articles". It was created specifically for this purpose, and is certainly not an R3 typo. -- Netoholic @ 18:44, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

User:Faisaldeve/sandbox

Hi there RHaworth, we ec'd and it resulted in me accidentally creating User:Faisaldeve/sandbox right after you deleted it. Could you please delete it again? Sorry about that, I was just declining it to get it out of the queue. --TheSandDoctor Talk 21:42, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

Thanks. Sorry again about that. --Happy editing, TheSandDoctor Talk 21:44, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

Kalisochina Adrustum

Respected, RHaworth, this is regarding the movie article Kalisochina Adrustum which has been deleted lack of references according to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kalisochina Adrustum. But these are maximum available and the same are used in other articles which are accepted. Can you please guide me how to recreate the article. Regards Dr. Bhargava Teja.(B.Bhargava Teja (talk) 04:21, 2 May 2018 (UTC))

  • In two years with thousands of edits you have not learned that when you talk about pages you bracket their titles with [[]] not '''' . In borderline cases like this, it is a bit of a lottery as to whether they will be spotted by deletionists. Suggestions:
  • Simply re-submit via AfC so that the past history is not so obvious. Possibly wait six months before doing so.
  • The rule book says that refs to paper sources are just as valid as to web sources. So go out to a big library and hunt through newspapers of the period to find glowing reviews. Then re-submit via AfC.
  • (Hoping no-one else is reading this.) Invent some credible-looking refs to newspaper articles and re-submit. Is anybody going to check them?
  • Decide that the movie is not actually notable and give up.
— RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:58, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

Template:Asianet Programmes

Hi, why did you delete Template:Asianet Programmes? The seven-day grace period that is part of WP:CSD#T3 still had more than six and a half days to run. -- Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 21:18, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

Draft:John Sturge Stephens

Hello RHaworth, Could you please restore draft:john sturge stephens so I am able to work on it. I have recently verified my identity and need to be able to work on this page so that it is in an acceptable format for review. Thank you. SusanSoyinka (talk) 11:26, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion of legitimate page. American Litho

Hi,

Why was the page I created for American Litho deleted? It says you nominated it for speedy deletion.

I created the page following the same format as other companies in my area with an existing page.

I believe my page was flagged unjustly, as it is not advertising. I purposely removed any "advertising" language and only included company history and milestones, with external citations to reputable industry trade publications mentioning the company.

Did you even read the article? I would at least like my work back for a future version. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Swanny913 (talk • contribs) 17:12, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion requests

Could you do me a favor and delete User:Andisthermal/vector.js and User:Pheonixoflostages/modern.js per U5? Thanks. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 17:48, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:RHaworth/2018_May_03&oldid=1172210338"