User talk:Nwachinazo

Father
Nwachinazo
Father Nwachinazo
Born	Ejikemeuwa Mbaka; 1967; Amatu-Itukwu, Ukpatu,Enugu
Nationality	Ngerian
Other names	Camillus Anthony Ebenezer
Citizenship	Nigeria
Occupation(s)	Priest, Musician, Entrepreneur
Parent(s)	Late Chief Humphrey Ogbuefi and Felicia Mbaka
Religion	Roman Catholic Church
Church	Our Lady of Rosary Catholic Parish,Emene, Iji Nike, Enugu
Ordained	29 July 1995 by the Late Bishop Michael Eneja
Writings	Prayerful Prayers Book That Makes Things Happen
Offices held	Resident Priest

Welcome!

Hello, Nwachinazo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 10:45, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Whiteplains British School.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Whiteplains British School.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 10:45, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Whiteplains British College.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Whiteplains British College.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 10:46, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Whiteplains British Collge.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Whiteplains British Collge.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 10:46, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Whiteplains British School Logo.png

Thanks for uploading File:Whiteplains British School Logo.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 10:46, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Nwachinazo/sandbox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Nwachinazo/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. — O Fortuna^{semper crescis, aut decrescis} 12:58, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KGirlTrucker81 was:

This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Nwachinazo/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I've been doing} 14:20, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Nwachinazo, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I've been doing} 14:20, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Hi, thanks for message. No page Whiteplains British School has existed, so I think you mean Draft:Whiteplains British School, which was deleted as spam. Although the images were deleted as copyright violations, I didn't check the text for copyright, so I didn't include that as a reason. You already have a draft here. You shouldn't have two drafts of the same article, so if I restore the deleted page, I'll delete your sandbox purely as housekeeping. Other problems:

much of your text was lacking independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the company, press releases, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company claims or interviewing its management. Please don't use bare urls for references, they are hard to understand and subject to linkrot
it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. One of many examples of unsourced claims presented as fact is Ultra-modern stadium, sports courts with experienced coaches. Incidentally, lists are not a good idea, write in sentences. The whole tone of your piece was to promote the school whether or not that was your intention. Why do we need the admission procedures otherwise?
Your lead section should be a summary of the article with no heading. subsequent headings should follow normal capitalisation rules.

Since the original was too promotional even for draft space, if I restore it, I'll remove any text that I consider to be promotional or otherwise inappropriate, and that shouldn't be replaced. Please make sure that you understand all i have said above, and let me know if you still want me to proceed. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 12:49, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Jimfbleak: Thanks for your reply. Yes, I mean Draft:Whiteplains British School submitted last Friday (16 June 2017). Although there was a claim of its file(s) being a copyright violation, I pray you restore deleted page (the main article and its infobox) with your modifications to avoid promotional tone. 'Admission Requirements'? That section was there to give the article a broad scope. If you nonetheless feel otherwise, you should remove it. I think the promotional tone you suspected in the text was not deliberate. Nor do I have a link with the organization I wrote on. Do you mean any article aspiring to be on Wikipedia pade should be qualified with adjectives? However, what did you mean by ‘I’ll delete your SANDBOX PURELY as HOUSEKEEPING’? Please do explain better.

While I disagree that ‘much of’ my text lack independent verifiable sources, I understand that I immaturely inserted bare url which I later suspected that it could cause link rot, as you said. It is on this ground that I want you to restore it, so that I can make some edits. Besides, I have tried as much as possible to insert sources (not blogs or websites that linked to the organization or are self-edited as you claim) that are reliable and verifiable. But if there is any you suspected of, I think you should highlight it for me to understand. Nonetheless, please proceed with your edits as long it will give the article a place on Wikipedia. I believe you understand more than I do.Nwachinazo (talk) 14:11, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk question

Hello, Nwachinazo! I'm Jcc. I have replied to your question about a submission at the WikiProject Articles for Creation Help Desk. jcc (tea and biscuits) 11:20, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Whiteplains British School (June 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Most of the sources are either directory-type listings or profiles written by the school itself. This draft needs proper independent and reliable sources such as mainstream news media and magazine articles that cover the subject in significant depth and detail, written by people who have no connection to the school.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Whiteplains British School and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 12:27, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Dodger67, I have some edits on the references. Could you now review and help find if there are any irregularities you could highlight and possibly remove?Nwachinazo (talk) 11:30, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Whiteplains British School (WBS) has been accepted

Whiteplains British School (WBS), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 20:30, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Camillus Anthony Ebenezer Ejikemeuwa Mbaka is an Igbo Nigerian Roman Catholic cleric, gospel musician, Christian author, entrepreneur, philanthropist, and socio-political crusader.^[1]}}^[2]}} Father Mbaka, as he is fondly called, is also the founder and spiritual director of Word Prayer Centre of the Eucharistic Jesus (now Adoration Ministry, Umuchigbo Ije-Nike, [[Enugu], a prayer centre of healing and deliverance.^[3]}}^[4]}}

References

^ {{cite web|url=http:// |title=Biography Of Reverend Father Ejike Mbaka|date=|publisher=Believers Portal|website=www.believersportal.com
^ {{cite web|url=http:// |title=Nigeria: Father Mbka—Petulant or Foul Prophet|date= 10 January 2016|publisher=The Guardian Newspaper via www.allafrica.com
^ {{cite web|url=http:// |title=South-East, Adoration Camp and politics of worship centres|first=Tony|last=Adibe|date=10 November 2013|publisher=Daily Trust Newspaper|website=www.dailytrust.com.ng
^ {{cite web|url=http:// |title=Rev. Father Mbaka Attackks Buhari, Says Nigerians May Not Vote For Him In 2019|date= 3 August 2016|first=Ihuoma|last=Chiedozie|publisher= Sahara Reporters|website=saharareporters.com

Draft:Camillus Anthony Ejikemeuwa Mbaka

Hi, have read this draft but am not reviewing it because I am undecided on his notability so will leave it for others to review. If he was a Bishop he would definitely be notable, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 16:30, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Atlantic306, thank you for reading the article. However, being a bishop cannot stand as a test for notability as you claimed. I think Wikipedia concept of notability means more than you claim. Read this:

Basic criteria People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable , intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject. If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability; trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources may not be sufficient to establish notability. Primary sources may be used to support content in an article, but they do not contribute toward proving the notability of a subject. People who meet the basic criteria may be considered notable without meeting the additional criteria below. Articles may still not be created for such people if they fall under exclusionary criteria, such as being notable only for a single event , or such as those listed in What Wikipedia is not.

Additional criteria

People are likely to be notable if they meet any of the following standards. Failure to meet these criteria is not conclusive proof that a subject should not be included; conversely, meeting one or more does not guarantee that a subject should be included. A person who fails to meet these additional criteria may still be notable under Wikipedia:Notability . Editors may find these criteria helpful when deciding whether to tag an article as requiring additional citations (using

for example), or to instead initiate a deletion discussion.

Any biography:

1. The person has received a well-known and significant award or honor, or has been nominated for such an award several times.

2. The person has made a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in his or her specific field.

3. The person has an entry in the Dictionary of National Biography or similar publication.--Nwachinazo (talk) 20:46, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Covenant University

Thank you for your edits to Covenant University article, but you removed encyclopedic content from it. Please see similar university articles if you're not sure on what is encyclopedic in schools articles. And so you know, while Wikipedia frowns at primary sources, primary source is still better than no source per WP:verifiability. You can't remove primary source without replacing with a reliable secondary source. Darreg (talk) 09:30, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

Hello, I'm Darreg. I noticed that you recently removed content from Covenant University without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Darreg (talk) 13:02, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Imo State

Hello. Your recent edit to Imo State appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person or organization added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 07:48, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You are right dear. The entry is a notable person which I wish to create a page for soonest. Nwachinazo (talk) 21:40, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Nwachinazo. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Camillus Anthony Ejikemeuwa Mbaka

Hello, Nwachinazo. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Camillus Anthony Ejikemeuwa Mbaka".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 10:18, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Legacypac, see what they did. Nwachinazo, that edit is not "working on it". Drmies (talk) 01:48, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Drimes It's a promotional COI about a non-notable prophet. Maybe seek deletion? Legacypac (talk) 03:01, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Morgan K Orioha (April 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by John from Idegon was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The vast majority of this article is sourced to books and papers written by the subject of the article. It is also at least in part, sourced to original research. Language is fluffy and promotional. Since a portion of the article is sourced to an interview, one also has to ask whether the author of this article is subject to either WP:COI or WP:PAID.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Morgan K Orioha and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Morgan K Orioha, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

John from Idegon (talk) 16:24, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Morgan K Orioha (April 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KJP1 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Aside from the weak sourcing, and promotional tone, there's nothing that is indicating Notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Morgan K Orioha and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Morgan K Orioha, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KJP1 (talk) 06:15, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Imo State, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Development and Conservative Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:00, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Orlu, Imo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Development (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ejikeme Mbaka

Hello, Nwachinazo. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Ejikeme Mbaka, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 12:09, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Nwachinazo. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Imo State

Hello. Your recent edit to Imo State appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 21:35, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oru East

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Oru East. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 21:39, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is old. Meanwhile, my edit on Oru East is genuine and valid. I have been a contributor to that page since its creation. You may have a good case in Imo state page, but I don't think you understand correctly the rules concerning vandalism in this case. Nwachinazo (talk) 21:55, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Nyerere Ogbonna has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Nyerere Ogbonna. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 11:35, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Theroadislong I beg to disagree with your assumption that I have been paid for this article with the intention of hiding it from Wikipedia. I wish to state category that your assertion is a figment of your imagination. I maintain my neutrality with the subject in question and I have not been paid whatever by him. I only know him at a distance and someone I have been following on newspapers in my locality. From my research about him which is even available on media, he is a notable person close to the governor of Imo state of Nigeria. For the record, I have not been paid as you wrongfully alleged. If I have been, I see no reason to fail to disclose such a transaction since Wikipedia provides for that. Please spare me of this accusation. I deserve an apology for your insinuation without tangible proofs.Nwachinazo (talk) 11:50, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All that is required is that you state - as you have above - that you are not being paid or otherwise compensated for creation of the Ogbonna article. The query was made because of your self-description on your User page "I am a content creator and media consultant". I have removed the undeclared paid statement. David notMD (talk) 13:33, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can you at least understand why we might have thought you were a paid editor? You say you are a media consultant and you have made it clear you want a speedy review. Many politicians make use of media consultants. If you are not paid and have no conflict of interest, okay, but please understand why we might think that. 331dot (talk) 13:59, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing?

Hello Nwachinazo. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Nwachinazo. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Nwachinazo|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Theroadislong (talk) 11:38, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Nyerere Ogbonna has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Nyerere Ogbonna. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 12:04, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nyerere Ogbonna (January 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

A number of these sources were actually written by the subject, Wikipedia requires in-depth, independent, reliable sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nyerere Ogbonna and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nyerere Ogbonna, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 14:01, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Nyerere Ogbonna has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Nyerere Ogbonna. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 16:16, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Question

I'm wondering why you are so invested in the subject of this draft to the point where you attack other users who give their good faith opinion. Being a reviewer is not something that is attained, it is something that volunteers decide to do in their own time. 331dot (talk) 17:18, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you are right. I didn't attack anyone but tried to prove my points. He raised unjustifiable claims against me which I am not comfortable with. If you have watched or read his many statements, you will notice that they have inherit discouragement. Wikipedia reviewers are polite and encouraging but this one is not. I see him as fault finder. If I do not regard his opinions, I would stick to my gun. But I continue to re-edit and re-edit just to show my humbility but he continues to raise unnecessary issues each moments I have succeeded in doing his bidding. That is unfair to me as a Wikipedia contributor.Nwachinazo (talk) 17:33, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

COI

@Nwachinazo: I see it has been noted at the top of the draft for Nyerere Ogbonna that you have said you have no conflict of interest. Is that correct? If so, could you please explain this? I may not have third-party independent source(s) to support the claim but I can say in confidence that the information given is true, given a primary source available to me here. Who is it that you know who can confirm his birth date and other details? Possibly (talk) 17:51, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What else do you people want me to say again? I have said it several times that I have no conflict of interest in this matter and have not been paid. The issue of primary source is based on the context of birthdate. Does having primary sources makes someone have a conflict of interest or being paid? Do you want me to accept what I never did? Or are you asking me where I got the primary source? If you are, then I will say that I watched him on television and heard him on radio some time last year and that was what prompted me to write about him on Wikipedia and conducted research online too. There is no way I can make reference to this broadcast since it is not readily available. Hence, it is an oral source as far as I am concerned or unless Wikipedia states otherwise. In fact, I do not have any conflict of interest or paid for this job!Nwachinazo (talk) 18:30, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly, you are trying to see if you can implicate me in agreeing to what is wrong by asking me whom I think that can confirm his date of birth and other details. I know nobody except the media platforms I mentioned above.Nwachinazo (talk) 18:39, 1 February 2021 (UTC) I think I have cleared the air of conflict of interest and paid services. Please remove such tag on my post and let us face the fact on whether the article is worth being reviewed. You people invest so much in fact-finding comments which I have given you all I know and paying less attention to reviewing the article. Why wouldn't many drafts be pending? If we know what is right, let us do it without attaching any unnecessary delays!Nwachinazo (talk) 18:39, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia has no deadlines so I ask again, what is your need for a speedy review? 331dot (talk) 18:59, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are right my brother. But what is the essence of delaying when people like you who quickly reply my comments can do a review? I have stated elsewhere that I am not overdesperate for a speedy review but everyone of us want to see that our efforts are quickly manifested. That is one of the proofs that you are working and you can move to the next stage in life. I cannot draft any article here on Wikipedia unless the already drafted one is reviewed or approved. Follow my articles so far, you will find out that this one Draft:Nyerere Ogbonna is the first article since two or many years I have submitted my last one. For the record, I have no need for a speedy review but for my effort to quickly see the light so that I can move to the next stage. This does not show that I am calling for a quick review as some has already shouted at me about that. Or don't you like eating rice when it hot? If you don't, I do because the hotness is the joy of the eating not only the taste. "Make haste while the sun shines" is a popular saying.Nwachinazo (talk) 19:16, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I can only assume you have some kind of conflict of interest here, as you refuse to answer the very simple question of "who is it that you know who can confirm his birth date and other details?" Possibly (talk) 19:23, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think it would be inappropriate for me to do a review, as I am in agreement with the reviews that have been conducted thus far. 331dot (talk) 19:24, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly I have for the oftentimes said I have NO conflict of interest and HAVE NOT BEEN paid whatsoever. I also do not know anyone who can provide me with such details. Maybe I would have to wait until he or someone publishes his memoir, so that I can extract the information from there and sources it appropriately. Or I should remove the birthdate since it is unsourced by the third-party independent materials. I think the later is better. Or what do you think? Anyways, let other reviewers do the needful while I make my own corrections as recommended so far.Nwachinazo (talk) 19:35, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So you don't charge for your work as a media consultant? 331dot (talk) 19:41, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

NO. It is on a volunteering basis. All media consultancy as far as I know do not charge for their services. Many may charge. But I cannot go beyond what Wikipedia allows. You even misinterpreted my description. All of us here are media consultants by the very fact that we are Wikipedia contributors. Do you collect charges when writers submit their drafts? Of course NO. Why reviewing a draft, by the virtue of your position in Wikipedia, you are automatically a consultant. I repeat I do not charge any fee. Meanwhile, you are pushing this matter so far. How many times will someone declare his innocence before you believe him? Nwachinazo (talk) 19:51, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So you are volunteering to edit for Mr. Ogbonna? 331dot (talk) 19:56, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And no, most editors here are not "media consultants". We are mostly volunteers, participating here in our free time because we believe in the mission of this project. 331dot (talk) 19:56, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

NO. 331dot I remain mostly a volunteer, participating here too in my own free time because I believe always in the mission of expanding knowledge via Wikipedia without any financial attachment. Please you are bullying me. Your continuous accusations are becoming an affront to my person. Have I not even you enough reasons to believe me? Please cease from incriminating bidding. Wikipedia reviewers are not know to go too far as you are currently doing. Two or three reasons are enough for you to leave a creator alone. Continuous asking of the same questions is bullying and insult! If I sound rude, please I am sorry and apologise. But everyone deserves respect too.Nwachinazo (talk) 20:13, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly I have just discovered after researching online that there is a third-party independent source to the subject's spouse and I have added it accordingly. I will continue to research until I find more of these kinds of sources to justify my initial claim of birthdate. Thanks my brother.Nwachinazo (talk) 20:20, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry and I regret giving offense, but many of your answers have been evasive. You say on your user page that you are "remain a volunteer content creator and media consultant without charges". Consultants do work for other people. Maybe there is a cultural language barrier here, but that's what "consultant" means to me. 331dot (talk) 20:22, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

331dot Thank you for acknowledging that there is a language barrier between us or between where I come from and where you come from. Consultancy may mean different things to many people in many places. My answers to you have ever remain plain, only that you continue to push for more and trying to pick holes even to the extent of checking my user page to see if you can nail me. I think you are moving out of the job of a reviewing. The draft is left before you and you did make any review or adjustment or link any fault to conflict of interest but you left it and went straight to my user page to see reasons why my draft should not be accepted. Anyways, seeing that there is created ambuguity in language used and what I tried to do here, I have revised my description. For the last time, I am a volunteer Wikipedia contributor.Nwachinazo (talk) 20:37, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The meaning of media consultant in English = "someone whose job is to advise a company on the most effective ways to advertise its products, services, or brand, or on how to present a positive picture of the company to the public: Media consultants draft press releases to highlight positive achievements of a business" I think this is why there has been some miss-understanding here. Theroadislong (talk) 20:43, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Theroadislong Oh yea! Now I see. You have tried to educate me using Cambridge online dictionary. I never thought as much in this meaning. I have nailed myself using a wrong phrase to describe myself. Well, now I will not blame any reviewers for bringing up the issue of CoI anytime they see my description. This is generate unnecessary attention. I have now revised it and asking reviewers to ignore the mismatch in the use of words. I must confess that I am a Wikipedia volunteer contributor. Let no one make reference to my initial zeal in description. Thank you once more for the education.Nwachinazo (talk) 20:58, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Nwachinazo! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Delay in reviewing my new article, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Muninnbot please explain what you meant by my thread has been archived Nwachinazo (talk) 19:07, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Muninnbot is an automated tool, not a person. (Any usernames that end in bot are automated tools). Inactive Teahouse threads are automatically archived. 331dot (talk) 20:59, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Nwachinazo! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Draft:Nyerere Ogbonna, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Nwachinazo! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, What is a third-party source: The Case of Opera News Nigeria, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draft

If you don't, for whatever reason, wish to wait for a review, you are able to move the draft into the encyclopedia yourself as you are autoconfirmed. I advise against that, as it's better to find out any issues now rather than once the draft is in the encyclopedia, when any issues might be handled through deletion.

The only way to speed things up here is to find more volunteers willing to spend their free time conducting reviews. If you know of ways to do that, please offer them at the Village Pump. 331dot (talk) 21:14, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nyerere Ogbonna (February 10)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Celestina007 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Celestina007 (talk) 22:05, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Celestina007 Thank you for your review of my draft. Sadly, you confuse me the more with your review.

Can you explain in clear terms why Draft:Nyerere Ogbonna fails to be accepted after including more than 9 third party independent sources which give the subject enough coverage to show his notability? I am beginning to see some ambush against this article and it is unfair to me. I have read and re-read Wikipedia policies and guidelines on notability and I have tried my best to improve on that issue, even seeking professional advice from senior colleagues, yet you can walk up to decline the article for a flimsy reason. Can you just prove to us that no three or four sources included of more 10 of its sources are enough to make the article's subject notable? This is disappointing!Nwachinazo (talk) 23:15, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Flimsy reason, you say? I don’t care how angry you are Atm, you cannot be rude to me & expect me to help you, I repeat you cant be rude to me & expect me to be of assistance to you. Goodluck on getting that UPE article to be accepted, you definitely would be needing all the luck you can get. O buro m ka-gi ga pali. Nope not me! Please don’t ping me or try to contact me again. Thank you. If you need help go to the TEAHOUSE for further assistance. Please once more don’t ping or try to contact me again on or off wiki. Celestina007 (talk) 23:30, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If I had sound very disrespectful to you with my "flimsy reason" usage, I am sorry. But you got me more perplexed with your unfair decline. You do well to have reviewed Draft:Nyerere Ogbonna but you seem to err on the point of "sufficient notability" of the article. I have proved my point in the previous response to your decline but you decided to single out words which offend you. From your dialect, you are an Igbo like me and you should not effect negative review to such an article's subject that has enough notability in the third party verifiable and reliable sources. I think you should reconsider your stance and look into those sources once more for justice unless you tell me that you didn't consider print newspapers which do not have online equivalent as good sources. I didn't just cite them but ensure that they give the subject sufficient coverage. Please my brother assist me, User:Celestina007. Nwachinazo (talk) 23:55, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Several of us have reviewed the draft's sources and agree with the rejection decision. The most obvious problem, among several, is that there isn't significant coverage about the subject. Nwachinazo, you've been asked by Celestina007 not to ping them, so please respect that. If you have any further questions, please respond at the Teahouse. Zindor (talk) 00:23, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Nwachinazo! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Draft:Nyerere Ogbonna is unfair declined after review, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Nwachinazo! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, What Makes Quality Sources?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Nyerere Ogbonna

Hello, Nwachinazo. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nyerere Ogbonna, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:03, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Nyerere Ogbonna

Hello, Nwachinazo. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Nyerere Ogbonna".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:59, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Professor Joy Eyisi.jpeg

Thank you for uploading File:Professor Joy Eyisi.jpeg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 13:39, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[1] {{cite web|url=http:// |title=Biography Of Reverend Father Ejike Mbaka|date=|publisher=Believers Portal|website=www.believersportal.com

[2] {{cite web|url=http:// |title=Nigeria: Father Mbka—Petulant or Foul Prophet|date= 10 January 2016|publisher=The Guardian Newspaper via www.allafrica.com

[3] {{cite web|url=http:// |title=South-East, Adoration Camp and politics of worship centres|first=Tony|last=Adibe|date=10 November 2013|publisher=Daily Trust Newspaper|website=www.dailytrust.com.ng

[4] {{cite web|url=http:// |title=Rev. Father Mbaka Attackks Buhari, Says Nigerians May Not Vote For Him In 2019|date= 3 August 2016|first=Ihuoma|last=Chiedozie|publisher= Sahara Reporters|website=saharareporters.com

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]