User talk:JaxLax

This is JaxLax's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (October 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Domdeparis was:

This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Peter's Railway, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:JaxLax/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Domdeparis (talk) 12:47, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! JaxLax, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Domdeparis (talk) 12:47, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peter's Railway (October 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

{{divbox|orange|3=This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia.his is essentially an advertisement for te books. You need to show the encyclopedic importance by the standards of WP:NBOOK-- major third party reviews in accepted reliable sources. There are not any references of that sort present. Please do not resubmit the article until you do have them.

If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at my talk page.

DGG ( talk ) 06:59, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]