User talk:Britfilm

February 2023

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to Hey, Hey, It's Esther Blueburger because they seemed inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 11:43, 10 February 2023 (UTC) Hi there. Thanks for your interest. Are you sure you want to remove the link? It's a fabulous resource on Austrslian movies, really exhaustive. I have no connection with it. Click on the site and have a look - I think you will be impressed. Regards. Britfilm (talk) 11:45, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Never Never Murder moved to draftspace

Unfortunately, an article you recently created The Never Never Murder, is not ready as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage with citations from reliable and independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. I've moved your article to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's WP:GNG guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 14:17, 2 March 2023 (UTC) No worries. Britfilm (talk) 01:56, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Britfilm, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Laterthanyouthink (talk) 11:20, 13 March 2023 (UTC) Thank you you you are very kind Britfilm (talk) 11:22, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Love Box for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Love Box is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Love Box until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

// Timothy :: talk 14:15, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No Man's Land (1964 film) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, No Man's Land (1964 film), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:47, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Murder at the Mardi Gras moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Murder at the Mardi Gras, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:35, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dulcima, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page And Soon the Darkness. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Britfilm. Thank you for your work on The Gentleman Bandit (TV movie). User:Onel5969, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hi. When you use Newspapers.com, you should clip the article, and then share the clipping, so that folks who do not have a subscription can view the source.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:43, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Martine Carol

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Martine Carol, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can (bot)&section=new report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 07:38, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of British films of 1978, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page International Velvet.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Golden Gate Murders moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, The Golden Gate Murders, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:24, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Writing "Add info" in the edit summary

Could I respectfully ask you to stop just writing "Add info" in the edit summary? It is usually what you have written over time and its not very helpful to other editors. For example, in the case of your recent edits to The Chalk Garden, what you could write is something like "further production details from Neame's book." Also, can I ask you to proof-read text you have taken from a source like the Internet Archive? If you just copy and paste from a source like that, it often imports typos - text that the computer has misread. I have twice corrected such errors in the last few days. Many thanks Nickm57 (talk) 11:53, 9 May 2023 (UTC) No worries. Totally fair feedback. Appreciate the respectful tone. Britfilm (talk) 11:56, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - that's much easier to follow. Nickm57 (talk) 07:12, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on The Raging Moon

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page The Raging Moon, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 04:21, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cavalcade (The 20th Century Fox Hour) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Cavalcade (The 20th Century Fox Hour), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:27, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

South Sea Bubble (TV play) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, South Sea Bubble (TV play), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:27, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Present Laughter (Play of the Week) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Present Laughter (Play of the Week), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:36, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cavalcade 1955.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cavalcade 1955.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:13, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks it was used in an aticle that was moved to draft space 02:19, 25 May 2023 (UTC) Britfilm (talk) 02:19, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on All Coppers Are...

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page All Coppers Are..., may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 09:01, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Kidnapped (1971 film)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Kidnapped (1971 film), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 13:44, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on The Last Valley (film)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page The Last Valley (film), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 01:23, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Kidnapped (1971 film)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Kidnapped (1971 film), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 10:53, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Television infobox date formats

Your edits are appreciated. However, television infobox |first_aired= and |last_aired= dates should be formatted using the following formats:

```
{{Start date|YYYY|MM|DD}}
```
```
{{Start date|YYYY|MM|DD|df=y}}
```
```
{{End date|YYYY|MM|DD}}
```
```
{{End date|YYYY|MM|DD|df=y}}
```

See Template:Infobox television for more info.

I understand putting in an MOS:DATE format when adding a new date, but please don't undo the formatting of dates that are already properly formatted: [1] TIA. ButlerBlog (talk) 12:35, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:LBW Smith Poster.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:LBW Smith Poster.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:22, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is used... in the page LBW Smith. That hasn't been removed jas it? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LBW_Smith Britfilm (talk) 03:04, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:LBW Smith Poster for Radio serial.png is used in that article, not File:LBW Smith Poster.png. The two images look identical to me, so you probably don't need to do anything – the old/duplicate versions will be automatically deleted. Nb. the user above is a bot, they're not going to respond to you. – Joe (talk) 13:01, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	For your articles on old movies and TV series, keep up the good work! – Joe (talk) 13:06, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

thanks Joe - I mostly get criticism on here! Appreciated :) Britfilm (talk) 13:23, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A familiar story, unfortunately. – Joe (talk) 08:27, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Murder at the Mardi Gras has been accepted

Murder at the Mardi Gras, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Twinkle1990 (talk) 07:49, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on The Misanthrope (1974 film)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page The Misanthrope (1974 film), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 13:38, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Gums (film)

Hello, Britfilm,

Thank you for creating Gums (film).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

One reference does not establish notability

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Paul W}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Paul W (talk) 19:58, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dirt (1979 film)

The article Dirt (1979 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NFILM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 23:35, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Ridge and the River, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Sun.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on The Beast in the Cellar

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page The Beast in the Cellar, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:00, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve The Break (play)

Hello, Britfilm,

Thank you for creating The Break (play).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Some statements here are still uncited. Could you find an appropriate source?

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Schminnte}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Schminnte (talk • contribs) 01:18, 19 July 2023 (UTC) No worries thank you Britfilm (talk) 09:54, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Thank you for your informative and well referenced articles on Australian films and theatre. I'm enjoying reviewing them! Keep up the good work. Thanks,

Schminnte (talk • contribs) 19:25, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
What a lovely message! Thanks it made my day! Britfilm (talk) 09:59, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on The Last Outlaw (miniseries)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page The Last Outlaw (miniseries), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 12:37, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:The Never Never Murder

Hello, Britfilm. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Never Never Murder, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on The Undertakers (TV play)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page The Undertakers (TV play), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 07:07, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on The Undertakers (TV play)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page The Undertakers (TV play), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:47, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Article moved to draftspace

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, ‎The Last Outlaw (radio serial), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it has been moved to Draft:‎The Last Outlaw (radio serial) where you can continue to work on it. Please consider using the Article Wizard or the Articles for Creation procedure. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read "Your first article". You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 16:19, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Specifically, notability is suspect. Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 16:37, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Article moved to draftspace

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Margaret Catchpole (radio serial), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it has been moved to Draft:Margaret Catchpole (radio serial) where you can continue to work on it. Please consider using the Article Wizard or the Articles for Creation procedure. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read "Your first article". You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 16:36, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Specifically, notability is suspect. Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 16:37, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lady in Danger (play), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Sun.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Curly on the Rack.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Curly on the Rack.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:13, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

are you aware of

https://trove.nla.gov.au/work/19065134?keyword=this%20the%20abc Trove? I think it might help you with getting NLA referencing a lot more accurately. If you need help, please ask, thanks. JarrahTree 09:32, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Britfilm (talk) 09:33, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

my apology profusely - it looks like you might be using it (hard to tell) - please see the instructions as to how you can collect the wikipedia ready reference from the column on the left hand side - it might take a bit to get used to... JarrahTree 09:42, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Edgar moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Dear Edgar. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Schminnte (talk • contribs) 16:12, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bruce Stewart (scriptwriter), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Sun.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Mr Smart Guy newspaper ad.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mr Smart Guy newspaper ad.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:17, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Strange as it may seem newspaper ad.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Strange as it may seem newspaper ad.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dear Edgar (September 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Utopes was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

It does not appear that this play meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines for plays. Winning £100 does not constitute a noteworthy accomplishment.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dear Edgar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 02:15, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Britfilm! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 02:15, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Sundowners (radio serial), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Sun.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dirt (1979 film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dirt (1979 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dirt (1979 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

QuicoleJR (talk) 13:26, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Trove links

Hello and thank you for creating several articles on Australian topics. It looks as if they use citations provided by Trove. Although a handy starting point, Trove often links to the wrong Wikipedia article. For example, Trove archives of The Daily Telegraph (Sydney) usually contain wikilinks to The Daily Telegraph (London). The Sunday Times is another popular mislink; there full list of errors is in User:Certes/Trove. I've contacted Trove about the discrepancies, but they don't have the resource to fix their systems. Thanks again, Certes (talk) 17:13, 13 September 2023 (UTC) okay thanks for that yes I use Trove extensively. That's annoying about Trove! It will keep an eye out for it. Thanks again Britfilm (talk) 01:15, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"The Long Night (1975 film)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect The Long Night (1975 film) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 16 § The Long Night (1975 film) until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 08:41, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Look After Lulu! (Brian Rix Presents...)

The article Look After Lulu! (Brian Rix Presents...) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NTV and WP:GNG. Tagged for notability since May

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 01:48, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Golden Gate Murders (September 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by OlifanofmrTennant were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Golden Gate Murders and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

OLIfanofmrtennant (she/her) Questions? 23:06, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Robbery Under Arms (1943 radio adaptation) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Robbery Under Arms (1943 radio adaptation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robbery Under Arms (1943 radio adaptation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Alexandermcnabb (talk) 05:54, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Some baklava for you!

Solid research in to historical sources with The Harp in the South (play), nicely done! Justi yaya 11:31, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Britfilm (talk) 13:37, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Present Laughter (Play of the Week) has been accepted

Present Laughter (Play of the Week), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

voorts (talk/contributions) 23:58, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Henry Lawson Stories, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1950s Australian radio drama

A tag has been placed on Category:1950s Australian radio drama indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. JarrahTree 14:12, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Point to note - the parent category has dramas - and the separate decades had dramas, this one had drama - that didnt make sense. JarrahTree 14:14, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Finger Your Neck

Hello, Britfilm, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Significa liberdade, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Finger Your Neck, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Finger Your Neck.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Significa liberdade}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Significa liberdade (talk) 18:06, 3 October 2023 (UTC) Thanks for letting me know (and for being so polite about it:)) I'll have another pass see what I can add. If the group doesn't think it's worth a page, then that's fine. Just so bizarre to have an Australian play about the mafia! Britfilm (talk) 23:52, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mistress of the Seas

I was really delighted to see this, thankyou for adding it - I went down a bit of a rabbit hole researching it eighteen months ago but never thought of putting it together into an article. It's not exactly the Great American Novel but the way that it got taken as fact by later historians is very fun, and a nicely cautionary tale.

I have a recollection from my earlier reading that the last attempted adaptation of this somehow got developed into the project that became Cutthroat Island (1995) - but on looking at it again the only definite connection I can see is Davis + the general theme, and I'm not sure I understand enough about the nuances of the industry to work out if that makes sense or not. On the other hand, the timing was very close, so maybe... Andrew Gray (talk) 14:45, 7 October 2023 (UTC) Look, it could be... I'm pretty sure Cutthroat Island was based on the life of Anne Bonney, as have so many films about female pirates... but it's hard to copyright facts. Cutthroat Island producers probably optioned another book about Bonney to cover themselves maybe? But that's just guessing. Thanks for your thanks. Britfilm (talk) 15:21, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Questing Heart moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to The Questing Heart. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. voorts (talk/contributions) 04:16, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Britfilm. Thank you for your work on Captain Swift (play). User:Skynxnex, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for writing about this.

Oh thank you! What a nice message ! Britfilm (talk) 05:09, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Skynxnex}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Skynxnex (talk) 02:20, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:South Sea Bubble (TV play)

Hello, Britfilm. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:South Sea Bubble (TV play), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:02, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Cavalcade (The 20th Century Fox Hour)

Hello, Britfilm. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cavalcade (The 20th Century Fox Hour), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:05, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please

After some time, other editors have had to add items to talk pages and categories to category space that you have created. It would really help if you looked at (reverse engineered perhaps) what others have done - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Works_by_Rex_Rienits

has neither a project tag or two on the talk page - or a category for the category to 'sit in'.

There should be plenty of other's following on edits chasing after your new creations (thanks for your efforts) to be able to see what they did after your edits. Any problems - please ask!

Thanks for your understanding. JarrahTree 10:45, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you I tried doing it to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category_talk:Works_by_Edmund_Barclay is that the sort of thing you are meaning? Keen to do whatever I need to. Britfilm (talk) 12:19, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes - thank you

Thank you so much for your understanding ! - if it gets complicated at all, ask! JarrahTree 12:32, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

it is less of need to than it always helps the status of a new article, and they are less likely to be a problem - the WP:RS standard is always important, the category, the project tag - are worth the effort.JarrahTree 12:44, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No you're right... I was working on a few pages which didn't have many categories I could put them in... so I created some... probably too many too quick! Thank you! Britfilm (talk) 13:06, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Cultural depictions of the Malayan Emergency

A tag has been placed on Category:Cultural depictions of the Malayan Emergency indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:30, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Edge of Ice 2.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Edge of Ice 2.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:15, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Australian plays performed in Britain has been nominated for deletion

Category:Australian plays performed in Britain has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 14:22, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Edge of Ice 2.png

A tag has been placed on File:Edge of Ice 2.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LucasKannou (talk) 03:16, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Name, Age and Occupation

The article Name, Age and Occupation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFF.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 19:22, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Name, Age and Occupation for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Name, Age and Occupation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Name, Age and Occupation until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 21:55, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Television play directed by William Sterling

A tag has been placed on Category:Television play directed by William Sterling indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:21, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2000s Australian mini-series

A tag has been placed on Category:2000s Australian mini-series indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:25, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Australian radio play references

G'day and thank you for all the good work on referencing Australian radio plays. I'm following up with changes like this where Trove's prepared citation provides a link to the wrong Wikipedia page, but I'm not familiar with the topic and may have made mistakes or missed a few, so you may want to check my edits. Thanks again, Certes (talk) 11:21, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for helping me! I just take from Trove... but thank you for helping out. Really appreciate it! Britfilm (talk) 03:46, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Trove citations look so plausible that plenty of editors are copying them. I've tried contacting Trove directly but they don't have the resources to fix them, and our article titles occasionally change. I'm thinking that this may be a bot job. Comments welcome here. Certes (talk) 12:17, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:South Sea Bubble (TV play)

Hello, Britfilm. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "South Sea Bubble".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:16, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Cavalcade (The 20th Century Fox Hour)

Hello, Britfilm. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Cavalcade".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:58, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Musicals originally directed by George Abbott has been nominated for deletion

Category:Musicals originally directed by George Abbott has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 17:06, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 30

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Mates from the Murrumbidgee

added a link pointing to Punch

The Lady Outlaw

added a link pointing to Daily Post

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

trove citations

Lately, whenever I encounter trove citations with cs1|2 errors, the errors are the result of your edits. Please, when adding cs1|2 citations, do it correctly so that others don't have to follow you around cleaning up the mess. The latest encounter we have had is at The Martyrdom of Nurse Cavell. See these references that show error messages (permalinks):

This diff shows how I fixed your edit (diff).

If you have questions, please ask.

—Trappist the monk (talk) 16:30, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And still you are creating broken and malformed citation templates and leaving the mess for others to clean up. Please stop. I just reverted your edits to Grant Taylor (actor) because most if not all of the citation templates you added are broken or malformed.

If you have questions, please ask.

—Trappist the monk (talk) 14:46, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm so sorry Trappist - I bad on that I apologise. I try to remove the "section" because it is always wrong and try to remove the links. Apologies. Very slack of me. Britfilm (talk) 15:18, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is not just |section=. Take this {{citation}} template as an example:

{{Citation
  | author1=Australian Broadcasting Commission.
  | title=LISTENING POST
  | journal=ABC weekly
  | year=1939
  | issue=Vol. 8 No. 28 (27 July 1946)
  | location=Sydney
  | publisher=ABC
  | url=http://nla.gov.au/nla.obj-1400339040
  | id=nla.obj-1400339040
  | access-date=23 December 2023
  | via=Trove
}}

Here is what is wrong with that citation template:

|author1=Australian Broadcasting Commission. – not the author; if any name can be used for this article, that name is probably 'Selector' but because 'Selector' is not a real name, I would drop it
|title=LISTENING POST – don't shout: |title=Listening Post
|journal=ABC weekly – not a scholarly or academic journal; use |magazine=, |newspaper=, or |periodical=
|year=1939 – where did you get this date? At the top of page 34 is the issue date: 'July 27, 1946'; use |date=July 27, 1946 or |date=27 July 1946; omit the nonsense |year=1939
|issue=Vol. 8 No. 28 (27 July 1946) – do not, do not, combine volume, issue, and date into a parameter intended to hold only 'issue' information; use |volume=8 |issue=28; see |year= above
|location=Sydney – for journal, magazine, newspaper, & periodical citations, |location= is generally omitted unless there is a need to disambiguate the journal/magazine/newspaper/periodical title
|publisher=ABC – for journal, magazine, newspaper, & periodical citations, |publisher= is generally omitted; if really required, do not abbreviate use |publisher=Australian Broadcasting Commission
|id=nla.obj-1400339040 – the path portion of a URL is not an identifier; omit
|page=34 – missing from the citation; do not omit insource locators

—Trappist the monk (talk) 15:52, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I didn't realise Trove was so off the pace. Have they been informed at all by someone from Wikipedia? Apologies again. Britfilm (talk) 01:46, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Umm, what? You wrote the citation. At Wikipedia, you are responsible for what you write.

—Trappist the monk (talk) 02:07, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And you continue to write broken citations (Western Limit):

{{Citation
  | author1=Australian Broadcasting Commission.
  | title=NEWS and GOSSIP
  | journal=ABC weekly
  | issue=Vol. 14 No. 48 (29 November 1952)
  | url=http://nla.gov.au/nla.obj-1401475893
  | id=nla.obj-1401475893
  | access-date=21 January 2024
  | via=Trove
}}

Australian Broadcasting Commission is not an author; don't SHOUT the title; ABC Weekly is not a scholarly or academic journal; volume, issue, and date need their own parameters (|volume=, |issue=, |date=); repeating the path portion of the url in |id= is pointless.

Please stop writing malformed citation templates.

—Trappist the monk (talk) 16:17, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

oh sorry Trappist - I had been trying to do these better thanks for pulling me up on it. Britfilm (talk) 00:21, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Crime and the Criminal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Sun.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Edmund Conquest.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Edmund Conquest.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:16, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Australian plays produced by J.C. Williamson's

A tag has been placed on Category:Australian plays produced by J.C. Williamson's indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Gjs238 (talk) 15:48, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Britfilm,

This category was tagged for CSD C1 speedy deletion because it is empty. It doesn't matter whether it had parent categories assigned to it or not but it looks like there have never been any so nothing was removed. It will sit for 7 days and if it is still empty after a week, it will be deleted. If it is deleted and there is a need for it in the future, it can be recreated. This is unlike categories that are deleted through Categories for Discussion which can not be recreated if it is decided that they should be deleted. It would be worth your time to participate in those discussions if you haven't already done so. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:17, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Liz, thanks for getting back to me! At one stage there actually were a fair few entries but they were all removed from each page. I've set it up again as Category:Australian plays presented by J.C. Williamson's. Thank you! Britfilm (talk) 00:52, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Films where the director died during filming has been nominated for conversion

Category:Films where the director died during filming has been nominated for conversion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 14:21, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Films where the director was replaced during filming has been nominated for conversion

Category:Films where the director was replaced during filming has been nominated for conversion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 14:26, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Films where the star died during filming has been nominated for deletion

Category:Films where the star died during filming has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 14:27, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

when creating new categories

The lack of a parent category on the front, and he lack of a project tag on the talk page is something that anyone observing your prolific contributions, might have hoped that you have cottoned on that the are needed:-

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Australian_radio_dramas_about_explorers. happy new year anyways JarrahTree 08:53, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your response... JarrahTree 12:17, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No worries Jarrah happy new year to you too I appreciate you bring nice rather than nasty about giving me a kick up the bum! :) (I'm guessing you're Aussie so will understand the cultural reference...) Britfilm (talk) 12:21, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Queer Affair at Kettering

The article The Queer Affair at Kettering has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of any notability, all we have is "this will air, this is the summary as provided by the ABC", not even a contemporary review, never mind any WP:SUSTAINED indepth attention.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 16:10, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Australian plays about bushrangers

A tag has been placed on Category:Australian plays about bushrangers indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:06, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

oh please delete! there's already a play about bushrangers one - sorry! Britfilm (talk) 07:07, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1940 Australian films

A tag has been placed on Category:1940 Australian films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 15:14, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1941 Australian films

A tag has been placed on Category:1941 Australian films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 15:14, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1944 Australian films

A tag has been placed on Category:1944 Australian films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 15:14, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1955 Australian films

A tag has been placed on Category:1955 Australian films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 15:14, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1928 Australian films

A tag has been placed on Category:1928 Australian films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 15:14, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1945 Australian films

A tag has been placed on Category:1945 Australian films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 15:14, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1915 Australian films

A tag has been placed on Category:1915 Australian films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:34, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1914 Australian films

A tag has been placed on Category:1914 Australian films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:35, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1918 Australian films

A tag has been placed on Category:1918 Australian films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:35, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1956 Australian films

A tag has been placed on Category:1956 Australian films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:35, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1919 Australian films

A tag has been placed on Category:1919 Australian films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:35, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1922 Australian films

A tag has been placed on Category:1922 Australian films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:35, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1924 Australian films

A tag has been placed on Category:1924 Australian films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:36, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1942 Australian films

A tag has been placed on Category:1942 Australian films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:06, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1943 Australian films

A tag has been placed on Category:1943 Australian films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:07, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1946 Australian films

A tag has been placed on Category:1946 Australian films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:07, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1947 Australian films

A tag has been placed on Category:1947 Australian films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:07, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1948 Australian films

A tag has been placed on Category:1948 Australian films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:07, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1949 Australian films

A tag has been placed on Category:1949 Australian films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:07, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1950 Australian films

A tag has been placed on Category:1950 Australian films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:07, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1951 Australian films

A tag has been placed on Category:1951 Australian films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:08, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1952 Australian films

A tag has been placed on Category:1952 Australian films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:08, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1953 Australian films

A tag has been placed on Category:1953 Australian films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:08, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1954 Australian films

A tag has been placed on Category:1954 Australian films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:08, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1957 Australian films

A tag has been placed on Category:1957 Australian films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:08, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1958 Australian films

A tag has been placed on Category:1958 Australian films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:09, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1910 Australian films

A tag has been placed on Category:1910 Australian films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:21, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1912 Australian films

A tag has been placed on Category:1912 Australian films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:21, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1913 Australian films

A tag has been placed on Category:1913 Australian films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:21, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1916 Australian films

A tag has been placed on Category:1916 Australian films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:21, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1917 Australian films

A tag has been placed on Category:1917 Australian films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:22, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1920 Australian films

A tag has been placed on Category:1920 Australian films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:22, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1921 Australian films

A tag has been placed on Category:1921 Australian films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:22, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1925 Australian films

A tag has been placed on Category:1925 Australian films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:22, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1926 Australian films

A tag has been placed on Category:1926 Australian films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:23, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Thanks for contributing to the article Hope Grant. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. Please help by adding more sources to the article you edited, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the claims (see here for how to do inline referencing). If you need further help, you can look at Help:Menu/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse, or just ask me. Thank you. Dormskirk (talk) 07:53, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Commonwealth Government Film Competition

Hello, Britfilm,

Thank you for creating Commonwealth Government Film Competition.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Nice work on your new article. It may benefit from inclusion in additional categories. Good job!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bastun}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 18:06, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Britfilm (talk) 03:07, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Britfilm. Thank you for your work on Edmund Conquest and the Pirates of the Barbary Coast. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:25, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Arthur of Van Dieman's Land

Hello Britfilm,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Arthur of Van Dieman's Land for deletion, because it's a redirect to a non-existent or deleted page.

If you don't want Arthur of Van Dieman's Land to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

ChaotıċEnby(talk · contribs) 10:42, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No go for it - the play actually has a different name. Thank youBritfilm (talk) 10:46, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Consulting Room, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sunday Mail.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:51, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Images in infoboxes

Hi there, thank you for all your contributions! I wanted to say when adding images to infoboxes specifically, you don't need the whole File: template, just the filename as per WP:IBI. Thanks. -Kj cheetham (talk) 11:36, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi cheetham... thanks for that. Britfilm (talk) 11:58, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ralph Rashleigh.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ralph Rashleigh.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:35, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Shark Fishers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ethel Lang.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Dear Edgar

Hello, Britfilm. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dear Edgar, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:05, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Britfilm. Thank you for your work on Tradesman's Entrance. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 12:49, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Britfilm. Thank you for your work on Reach for the Sky (radio serial). North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 00:02, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

THank you what lovely messages!! Britfilm (talk) 01:36, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on George Peppard

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page George Peppard, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 05:36, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Strong Is the Seed, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Sun.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:06, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Britfilm. Thank you for your work on Crazy Family. Bastun, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hi Britfilm, your new article would benefit from inclusion in appropriate Wikiprojects.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bastun}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 17:31, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Britfilm. Thank you for your work on The Army Hour (Australian radio series). Bastun, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Likewise, inclusion in appropriate Wikiprojects would be a benefit.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bastun}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 17:32, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:The Golden Gate Murders

Hello, Britfilm. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Golden Gate Murders, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:05, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Britfilm. Thank you for your work on They Never Come Back (play). Bastun, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hi Britfilm, another nice article. Again, inclusion in appropriate Wikiprojects would be of benefit.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bastun}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 12:04, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Britfilm. Thank you for your work on Friday the 13th (The Philco Television Playhouse). Usedtobecool, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

ABC Weekly and Sunday Times pieces are the same.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Usedtobecool}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Usedtobecool ☎️ 14:23, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that! Sorry about the error I appreciate you bringing it to my attentin. Britfilm (talk) 13:35, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Britfilm. Thank you for your work on Break in the Music. Usedtobecool, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Isn't it "A Break in the Music"?

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Usedtobecool}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Usedtobecool ☎️ 14:38, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I had read both and made the call. Now you've drawn my attention to it though maybe I should add the "A". Thank you Britfilm (talk) 13:41, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I had read both and made the call. Now you've drawn my attention to it though maybe I should add the "A". Thank you Britfilm (talk) 13:45, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why aren't you autopatrolled?

If you have got the hang of our notability guidelines and do not have any personal philosophies to put before them, you likely should be autopatrolled. Thoughts? — Usedtobecool ☎️ 14:49, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you think I am ready? Flattered! Britfilm (talk) 13:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So, here's the thing. Your work looks good to me. I don't see the benefit to someone double checking every one of them. But autopatrolled is a responsibility. It is your commitment to the community that you are going to abide by project guidelines. In essence, it means you don't first decide a topic and then go looking for sources. Instead, you'll have to first look for sources and if you don't find a couple good ones, be able to resist the want to create an article for that topic even if you think that would be a loss. If that sounds good to you, I would recommend you; I can't actually change your permissions. Regards! — Usedtobecool ☎️ 14:52, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What do you think, Joe? — Usedtobecool ☎️ 14:54, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join New pages patrol

Hello Britfilm!

The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:20, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for this offer it is flattering. I'm not sure I am ready to patrol just yet though. Maybe in another few months? Thank you again or the offer. Britfilm (talk) 13:42, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Would you like to join WikiProject Australian television?

Hi Britfilm, our group, WikiProject Australian television, is currently recruiting additional editors to help edit the large project that is Australian TV. I was wondering whether you might consider joining us, since you work on Australian TV-, film- and radio-related articles anyway. If you are interested, please add your name to the list of active participants, and see our list of open tasks. All the best, Lotsw73 (talk) 13:38, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Britfilm. Thank you for your work on The Punk. Skynxnex, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article. I've added a few more sources and a bit of prose.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Skynxnex}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Skynxnex (talk) 16:59, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An additional note. It may be worth considering adding some of the additional meta-type data that new page patrols (and other WP:GNOMES) tend to add to new articles. Such as WP:DEFAULTSORTs, WP:Short descriptions, and WP:WikiProject banners (I use User:Evad37/rater to help add and update which projects, assessments, and so on for pages). I think my edits on The Punk and its talk page might help give examples of the edits I mean. In any event, these aren't required to do by any means but is generally useful and I've noticed that consistently makes getting auto patrolled more likely, if you care about such things. But definitely thanks for making these articles. Skynxnex (talk) 17:12, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thank you! i'm really surprised no one had done an article on this film before Britfilm (talk) 01:37, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Britfilm. Thank you for your work on Lady Franklin (barque). Klbrain, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

What a boon TROVE is, helping to pick up this gem of a mutiny, with a barque to boot. Looks like this one crosses the bar ...

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 18:52, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Night of the Gods

I see another editor removed for the moment your edit on 1886 eruption of Mount Tarawera as unreferenced which I would not challenge given the work that went into get it to a GA grade article. Certainly should be mentioned if a verifiable source exists. You might like to know the BBC did the play as BBC Saturday Night Theatre on 31 Jan 1959 ( Genome 31/1/1959) as well as the replay on 2nd Feb that you did note. I can not verify myself that any of the references used by you in your new article Night of the Gods mention the context or the eruption but do not hunt beyond paywalls. I might suspect given the looting etc in real life that happened after eruption that context might be important. ChaseKiwi (talk) 23:08, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think the play was a chase thriller with the eruption as a background. I wish I could track down a copy of it Stewart was a v good writer. Britfilm (talk) 01:51, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, perhaps your article will encourage the BBC to dig it out. ChaseKiwi (talk) 17:51, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Blood on the Coral Sea

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Blood on the Coral Sea, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 02:24, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lola and the Highwayman

The article Lola and the Highwayman has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NTV and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 16:11, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Robbery Under Arms (1943 radio adaptation" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Robbery Under Arms (1943 radio adaptation has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 3 § Robbery Under Arms (1943 radio adaptation until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 17:51, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Dark Moon (novel)

Hello, Britfilm,

Thank you for creating Dark Moon (novel).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

The reference look like little more than routine coverage from 1953 and 1954, and don't seem to meet the notability criteria for books. I wonder whether it might be better to create a page for Helen Heney, consolidating her works there. We could even start one by moving this page to her name.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Klbrain (talk) 18:26, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! I think as the novel was adapted for radio it is notable... but happy to improve. Think Helen deserves her own page too. Thank you! Britfilm (talk) 23:13, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Britfilm. Thank you for your work on The Shades Will Not Vanish. CurryTime7-24, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Cited sources can be used to expand the article beyond its present stub state.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|CurryTime7-24}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

CurryTime7-24 (talk) 01:38, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Britfilm. Thank you for your work on Helen Fowler. Bastun, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

This article would benefit from being added to appropriate Wikiprojects, such as Biogrpahy and Australia.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bastun}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 11:30, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are totaly right have done so! Thank you Britfilm (talk) 12:54, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sunrise 1926.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sunrise 1926.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:55, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Kingdom of Twilight, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Table Talk.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Britfilm. Thank you for your work on Marcus Clarke (radio play). Klbrain, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for adding more well-researched material through the creation of this page. While the material is great, I think that it works better on the main Marcus Clarke page, on the grounds that notability isn't inherited, and all the notable discussion related to Clarke rather than primarily to the play.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 16:44, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure no worries. I'll add a radio category though to Marcus Clarke. Britfilm (talk) 02:22, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:The Questing Heart

Hello, Britfilm. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Questing Heart, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:30, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Britfilm. Thank you for your work on Anniversary (play). Klbrain, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

I note that this short play had no sustained coverage, and so is likely to stay as a permanent stub. It's better merged for context.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 14:55, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Britfilm. Thank you for your work on Coat of Arms (radio play). Bastun, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

As always, will benefit from inclusion in appropriate Wikiprojects.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bastun}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 12:14, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Overcapped "And" in newspaper names

Is there anything that can be done to reduce the frequent additions of these links to over-capitalized redirects such as The Cumberland Argus And Fruitgrowers Advocate in articles you create? Dicklyon (talk) 09:54, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also a bunch of all-caps newpaper article titles. Can you try to fix those auto-generated refs, instead of leaving them to others? I did a bunch here, but more work is needed there and lots of others. Dicklyon (talk) 22:41, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Britfilm. Thank you for your work on Whose War Is It? (film). Bastun, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bastun}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 17:58, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh thanks Bastun. I had no idea this film even existed and Peter Finch was involved. Appreciate your support (as always). Britfilm (talk) 00:24, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled granted

Hi Britfilm, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.

Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.

Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! – Joe (talk) 09:44, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Very kind! Britfilm (talk) 10:24, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Britfilm. Thank you for your work on Jere Henshaw. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for your work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 03:30, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Squatter's Daughter (play), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Evening News.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

recent new category

Did you check - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Bushrangers Or look to the articles for examples of the articles https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ned_Kelly

or https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moondyne

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robbery_Under_Arms I may have got it very wrong - perhaps https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Biographies_about_bushrangers

is too narrow in context, as historical novels might have been possible within the scope?

Apologies if I missed the mark somewhere... JarrahTree 11:34, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent question. I saw "biographies about businessmen" was a category so adapted that. Maybe biographies about bushrangers is too narrow... Books about bushrangers? Honesty I'm easy - would appreciate any thoughts you had! Thank you Britfilm (talk) 12:02, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Precedence (as understood in the term as used in law) is an important process here in wikipedia, where if there is an established practice of items to be taken as good examples - to look at an unrelated subject is never a very good idea - as it is you have gone off and created novels about bushrangers. The parent category of novels and biography could be books about bushrangers... I don't think it is something arbitrary or ad hoc, there should be some consistency from examples as close as possible to the subject. But hey, who knows ? JarrahTree 12:42, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think "novels about bushrangers" is a category that we should have and I have introduced I think it's a terrific idea. I've found three "biographies about bushrangers". I'm sure there are more. Maybe we keep it for a while and see how it goes? Perhaps categories could be merged down the track. Thank you for your interest, feedback and thoughts they are great appreciated. Britfilm (talk) 12:47, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In most cases categories like the ones that you have created are not merged. Separation of media/modes of expression whatever which separate things about bushrangers is a process that is usually required. But a close look at the main Bushranger category might elicit other things as well. JarrahTree 12:52, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!!! Britfilm (talk) 12:57, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

and if you are not aware of it there is the template -

{{Bushrangers |state=autocollapse}} (open at the bottom of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Francis_(bushranger) )

JarrahTree 13:39, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Russ Tamblyn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dickie Moore.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:15, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WSC World XI cricket team in Australia in 1977–78 moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to WSC World XI cricket team in Australia in 1977–78. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Boleyn (talk) 09:40, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1978–79 World Series Cricket International Cup moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to 1978–79 World Series Cricket International Cup. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Boleyn (talk) 09:41, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 1

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Fraser Film Release and Photographic Company

added a link pointing to Table Talk

How We Fought the Emden

added a link pointing to The Advertiser

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Abductors (1972 film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Abductors (1972 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Abductors (1972 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Meligirl5 (talk) 16:53, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ostracized (play), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Evening Journal.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dear Edgar (May 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Samoht27 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This play does not appear notable, perhaps something on the plays cultural impact and reception would help?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dear Edgar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-Samoht27 (talk) 20:40, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Wreck of the Dunbar Two.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Wreck of the Dunbar Two.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:44, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Learn as you go

Thanks for all the articles. I've been fixing a bunch of over-capitalization and mis-punctuation in citations from Trove. These are among the things that you can learn to fix when creating articles and citations. No all-caps titles, no period after title, and don't cap words like "Of" or "And" in newspaper names. See MOS:CAPS. Also see MOS:DASH for when to use dashes, when to use spaces around them (e.g. in "1880 – 11 May 1930" needs the spaces, but "1880–1930" does not), when not to use them (e.g. never "From 11–14" type things). And about commas after state names and such per MOS:GEOCOMMA. Also, please always put a blank line before any heading. Take a look at the diffs of others on articles you've created to get an idea how much work you could save others. Dicklyon (talk) 16:08, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

E.g. like this and this. Dicklyon (talk) 19:13, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Britfilm (talk) 05:29, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Non-free" images from old newspapers

For images like File:Jackey Jackey the bushranger.png, you should probably mark them as public domain, not non-free. In Australia, copyright of items with unknown author expire 50 years after publication, as I read it. If they're non-free, they will be reduced to a small unreadable size and the original upload will be deleted. Dicklyon (talk) 19:17, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To do this right, upload in Wikimedia Commons, not in Wikipedia itself, and use both {{PD-Australia}} and {{PD-US-expired}} as the license tags. If you need help, ask. Dicklyon (talk) 04:31, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

THank you Britfilm (talk) 05:30, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Are you not getting to read these talk items, or just don't know that it would be polite to respond or acknowledge in some way? Dicklyon (talk) 03:45, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I have been out all the day. Thank you for this. I'm always wary about uploading anything to public domain (just nervous about doing the wrong thing) but you're right I should do it more. Britfilm (talk) 05:31, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for replying. PD is the only way your old news uploads are going to survive. Dicklyon (talk) 05:33, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

gawd

what next 'the bush?' - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Plays_set_in_the_Australian_outback fair crack of the whip mate, we gonna get the plays set in wooloomolloo next? You gotta be careful, you might stir the one item in the cat ghost, they linghers to strike fear in the free and easy cat creators... cripes, throw another prawn on the barbie before the crow starts singing god save the bunyip... JarrahTree 03:49, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate the imagination of this feedback :) - I am just trying to increase the categories for plays... some of the ones for films are along the lines of the ones I've created for plays. I do appreciate the message it made me smmile. Britfilm (talk) 04:20, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

sheesh outback is nebulous and undistinguishable as the The Bush - if you cannot populate a category with 20+ items - stop before you start or the steak on the barbie will bite back JarrahTree 04:24, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay persuaded. I'll delete. Britfilm (talk) 04:29, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

bah, shark meat method - find 20 bloody items that might not have the outback specifically in the title but are clearly in that nebulous lot of dusty area - needs a stretch of the imagination to clarify, not that difficult. JarrahTree 04:33, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No you convinced me - "outback" too vague... does it need to be desert? can it be rainforest? etc I'll stick with state delineation. And if I find 20 plays set in Woolomooloo I'll def do that :) Britfilm (talk) 04:55, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

more

edit summaries are just that, adding small novels to edit summaries is like, another crab on the barbie - edit summaries are meant to be brief and concise, I am not sure why or how there is a need to fill them with article details, or where that came from, but unless someone proves me wrong, you are throwing the confetti into on coming wind - the edit summary gets lost in the edit history, and will be truncated forever after...

JarrahTree 04:02, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for the heads up I will try to be more thorough. I admit sometimes mine are too brief. thanks for support Britfilm (talk) 04:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I might be reading page history very wrongly, by the fin or the wing -

curprev 20:54, 12 May 2024‎ Britfilm talk contribs‎ 2,017 bytes +2,017‎ ←Created page with 'Gold or Never Too Late to Mend' is a 1860 Australian stage play. It was produced at a time when local plays were relatively rare in Australia.cite news |url=http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article13048198 |title=List of Donations |newspaper=The Sydney Morning Herald |volume=XLII, |issue=6992 |location=New South Wales, Australia |date=5 November 1860 |accessdate=12 May 2024 |page=4 |via=National Library of Australia}} cite news |u...' thank Tag: Disambiguation links added

to me that looks like what got plonked into edit summary, admittedly I might have got it very wrong, but that is what it looks like... apologies if I read it wrong, but it shows up as if you have put an article content into the edit summary... not what they are about... JarrahTree 04:31, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

When a page is created without an edit summary, the page contents get stuck in as an automatic summary. Dicklyon (talk) 04:56, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like all of Britfilm's new pages come without edit summaries. Bad. Dicklyon (talk) 05:00, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Dicklyon - I was sure I was getting something very wrong... the point is Britfilm has been editing long enough to see what happens in the place - lack of edit summaries is a very bad sign JarrahTree 10:19, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's not "Bad"; it's definitely not "a very bad sign". And they're not without summary, they're with automated summaries. It's something a lot of people do, including admins. Personally, I like these kinds of edit summaries that often give enough on what the articles are about, especially compared to stuff like "c", "r", "create" or "start". But say I didn't, say nobody did, edit summaries are not compulsory. It's just something the rest of us might appreciate. Brit has an edit summary usage rate of 99%, compared to Dicklyon's 90%, and JarrahTree doesn't have 100% either. So, how about making a polite suggestion as to what it is you might appreciate and leaving it entirely up to them to take it or leave it, instead of throwing over the top cliches as though they're two minutes away from being blocked? Just because they're nice doesn't mean you have to keep piling on. You both have been around long enough to know you'd be kicked out from most regular editors' talk pages pulling stuff like this. — Usedtobecool ☎️ 12:15, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you everyone for contributing. All good, all friends, I appreciate everyone's contributions. We are all part of the wikipedia family! Thank you everyone. Britfilm (talk) 12:55, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. Just trying to help you be a better editor. Dicklyon (talk) 16:01, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Plays set in the Australian outback

A tag has been placed on Category:Plays set in the Australian outback indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:32, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sentenced for Life (1911 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Advertiser.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Golden Gate Murders has been accepted

The Golden Gate Murders, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 02:42, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	For all the pages you created! -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 08:16, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - and thanks for helping add to them. Sometimes on this site people are quick to slab "get rid of these" notices on them instead of helping out. Appreciate it :) Britfilm (talk) 10:03, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Peter Vernon's Silence, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Table Talk.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: WSC World XI cricket team in Australia in 1977–78 (June 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RoboCric was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of events). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I would say that the tour consists of minor fixtures, as they aren't listed as offcial Test or first-class matches by ESPNcricinfo. WP:CRIC will not consider it as notable unless there's some independent coverage about the tour apart from routine announcements.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:WSC World XI cricket team in Australia in 1977–78 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robo^Cric Let's chat 12:08, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Water Wars moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Water Wars. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 13:38, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Saurian (film)

Hello Britfilm,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Saurian (film) for deletion, because it's a redirect from an article title to a namespace that's not for articles.

If you don't want Saurian (film) to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

C F A 💬 17:25, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rescue Force

Hello dear Britfilm! Can you make an article about film Rescue Force 1990? Thank in advance! 178.70.157.121 (talk) 20:59, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Repeated errors

This is just a reminder about errors that you are repeatedly making in the hope that you will avoid them in the future. In the new film articles you are creating, you are mistakenly writing that a reviewer "said" something. You should write that the reviewer "wrote" something. In addition, you need to place a comma after the word "wrote" and before the quotation marks for the quoted text. You have forgotten to include the comma in your recently created articles. Also, the word "YouTube" is one word. You have repeatedly written it as two words, which is incorrect. Please keep these details in mind for the articles you create in the future. Nicholas0 (talk) 09:13, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Margaret Catchpole (radio serial)

Hello, Britfilm. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Margaret Catchpole (radio serial), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:05, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:The Last Outlaw (radio serial)

Hello, Britfilm. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Last Outlaw (radio serial), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:06, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Frank Gardiner, the King of the Road, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Evening News.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:09, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 10

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Robbery Under Arms (1907 Tait film)

added a link pointing to The Empire

The Man They Could Not Hang (play)

added a link pointing to The Daily News

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:03, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on The Sick Stockrider

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page The Sick Stockrider, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 06:54, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 19

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

The Remittance Man

added links pointing to The Herald and Table Talk

Lincoln-Cass Films

added a link pointing to The Herald

The Sick Stockrider

added a link pointing to Table Talk

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:08, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ancestors (radio play)

Hello, Britfilm. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ancestors (radio play), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:05, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Water Wars (August 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Water Wars and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 15:45, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jim Hutton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ironside.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Napoléon (1955 film)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Napoléon (1955 film), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 08:42, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Over-capitalized ref titles

You continue to add refs with links through over-capitalized redirects, e.g. to The Newsletter: An Australian Paper For Australian People in this edit and this edit. And to The Mount Barker Courier And Onkaparinga And Gumeracha Advertiser in this edit. And to Newcastle Morning Herald And Miners' Advocate in this edit. You can find more such via the links in this report: Wikipedia:Database reports/Linked miscapitalizations. Maybe you can take a look and try to clean up after yourself, so I don't have to do it. Dicklyon (talk) 03:51, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"The Devastator (film" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect The Devastator (film has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 19 § The Devastator (film until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 22:09, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved content from Peter Pan (1954 musical) into Peter Pan (Producers' Showcase). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content (here or elsewhere), Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 10:15, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Diannaa you are totally right and I apologise. The original text was so good - I should have attributed. Thank you for drawing my attention to that. Britfilm (talk) 12:35, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:1978–79 World Series Cricket International Cup

Hello, Britfilm. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:1978–79 World Series Cricket International Cup, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:07, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Wayward Stork

Hey, I've removed the synopsis from The Wayward Stork as the quote likely doesn't fall under Non-free content criteria. Synopses can be easily be written in one's own words and therefore fail the first criteria: "Non-free content is used only where no free equivalent is available, or could be created, that would serve the same encyclopedic purpose" If you have any questions, feel free to ask. The4lines |||| ^{(Talk) (Contributions)} 01:33, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay no worries. Thank you and apologies. Britfilm (talk) 04:45, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:WSC World XI cricket team in Australia in 1977–78

Hello, Britfilm. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:WSC World XI cricket team in Australia in 1977–78, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:07, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Dear Edgar

Hello, Britfilm. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Dear Edgar".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:57, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]