Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Literature/Archive 2
 | This is an archive of past discussions on Wikipedia:WikiProject Literature. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 |
Deletion discussion - List of books about AIDS
Ongoing deletion discussion for List of books about AIDS at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of books about AIDS.
Perhaps this WikiProject and its members may be interested in contributing to this discussion, and/or a quality improvement project for this list page. — Cirt (talk) 07:04, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Everything Tastes Better with Bacon - FA nomination
Everything Tastes Better with Bacon is currently a candidate for consideration for a 2nd time for Featured Article quality status.
The discussion page is at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Everything Tastes Better with Bacon/archive2.
Thank you for your time, — Cirt (talk) 18:53, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
== dezinsectie purici
==
That is the very best blog for anyone who desires to search out out about this subject. You comprehend so a lot its nearly exhausting to argue with you (not that I truly would need to have aHa). You positively put a brand new spin on a topic thats been written about for years. Fantastic stuff, basically fantastic! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.121.142.175 (talk) 08:14, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Created new article: Fuck: Word Taboo and Protecting Our First Amendment Liberties
I've gone ahead and created a new article for the book, Fuck: Word Taboo and Protecting Our First Amendment Liberties.
Collaboration and particularly suggestions for additional secondary sources would be appreciated at the article's talk page, Talk:Fuck: Word Taboo and Protecting Our First Amendment Liberties. — Cirt (talk) 06:37, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Sidereus Nuncius Medicean Stars.jpg
File:Sidereus Nuncius Medicean Stars.jpg has been nominated for deletion -- 65.94.79.6 (talk) 05:03, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
TorrentsofSpring.jpg
image:TorrentsofSpring.jpg has been nominated for deletion -- 65.94.79.6 (talk) 05:41, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
{{Nonfiction}}
template:Nonfiction has been nominated for deletion -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 05:04, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
File:Sepid Div.jpg
File:Sepid Div.jpg has been nominated for deletion -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 04:08, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
When God Writes Your Love Story
The article about the book When God Writes Your Love Story is a current featured article candidate. Any constructive comments you would be willing to provide at the discussion would be greatly appreciated. Neelix (talk) 19:14, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
The usage of Monogatari series (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) is under discussion, see talk:Monogatari (novel series) (monogatari is a literary form) -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 06:26, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
The Democratic Review Poe July 1846.jpg
image:The Democratic Review Poe July 1846.jpg has been nominated for deletion -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 05:54, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
"Monogatari"
naming of various things monogatari is up for discussion, see Talk:Bakemonogatari -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 05:10, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
Infobox book: streamlining publication details
Changes to streamline the way Infobox book displays the date of publication and publisher from multiple fields into one (using a standardised format) and to remove the "(s)" in "Author(s)" etc. in line with other infoboxes have been suggested. Please read and give your opinion there. --xensyriaT 17:48, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
Mystery is a mystery
The lead sentence of our article mystery fiction is "Mystery fiction is a loosely-defined term."
Yes, it is. Under Fiction by genre we have the chain of subcategories thriller, crime fiction, mystery fiction, detective fiction. But mystery fiction is also a direct subcat of {fiction by genre}; murder mystery redirects to crime fiction; and the lead paragraph says mystery fiction is sometimes merely that subset of detective fiction excluding hardboiled detective stories.
A two-year-old banner atop the article mystery fiction suggests appeal to WP Literature or its Portal for attention from an expert in Literature. That is template {{Expert-subject}}.
--template documentation says "If the issue is of some urgency, you may also post a notice at the WikiProject that was included in the template." Maybe not urgent but let me pass it on two years later.
I discovered this by accident, poking around for a WikiProject or task force or portal dedicated to detective/mystery/crime/thriller coverage. Except nonfiction Crime this seems to be directly under WP Literature and its Portal. Right?
--in contrast to Portal: Speculative fiction and WP: Science fiction; both Portal and WP: Children's liteature; and so on --areas whose coverage i know fairly well. --P64 (talk) 22:39, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
Come and join The Wikipedia Library
The Wikipedia Library is an open research hub, a place for organizing our amazing community of research and reference experts to collaborate and help improve the encyclopedia.
 | The Wikipedia Library (talk | edit) Research tools and services Outreach Get involved  ...Support Open Access...  |
We are working together towards 5 big goals:
- Connect editors with their local library and freely accessible resources
- Partner to provide free access to paywalled publications, databases, universities, and libraries
- Build relationships among our community of editors, libraries, and librarians
- Facilitate research for Wikipedians, helping editors to find and use sources
- Promote broader open access in publishing and research
Sign up to receive announcements and news about resource donations and partnerships: Sign up
Come and create your profile, and see how we can leverage your talent, expertise, and dedication: Join in
-Hope to see you there, Ocaasi t | c 14:59, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
Missing topics page
I have updated Missing topics about Literature - Skysmith (talk) 08:38, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
File:Long Branch Plantation horse sale 1883.jpg
File:Long Branch Plantation horse sale 1883.jpg has been nominated for deletion -- 70.24.249.39 (talk) 04:32, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
File:Handbill Long Branch Auction.jpg
File:Handbill Long Branch Auction.jpg has been nominated for deletion -- 70.24.249.39 (talk) 04:32, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
Requested move for Lorca
There's a move request to place Lorca at Lorca, Spain to avoid ambiguity of the title with Federico García Lorca. Diego (talk) 09:11, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Beatrice Kozera for deletion
Beatrice Kozera was the Mexican farmworker girlfriend who inspired one of Jack Kerouac's characters, and the subject of a film and an upcoming fictional biography. Djembayz (talk) 00:07, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
She is mentioned in biografies often. I would like her to stay. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.38.33.7 (talk) 09:52, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
Requested page move of 1957 in literature
Interested parties should have a look at this move request Talk:1957_in_literature#Requested_move, which, if successful, would have a knock-on effect on all Year in Literature articles. Deb (talk) 10:48, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
Fuck peer review, again
- Fuck: Word Taboo and Protecting Our First Amendment Liberties
- Wikipedia:Peer review/Fuck: Word Taboo and Protecting Our First Amendment Liberties/archive1
I've listed the article Fuck: Word Taboo and Protecting Our First Amendment Liberties for peer review.
Help with furthering along the quality improvement process would be appreciated, at Wikipedia:Peer review/Fuck: Word Taboo and Protecting Our First Amendment Liberties/archive1.
Thank you for your time,
— Cirt (talk) 01:07, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
Dan Savage bibliography for FLC
I've gone ahead and nominated Dan Savage bibliography for WP:FLC consideration, the discussion page is at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Dan Savage bibliography/archive1. — Cirt (talk) 12:46, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
Fuck: Word Taboo and Protecting Our First Amendment Liberties for Featured Article
I've nominated Fuck: Word Taboo and Protecting Our First Amendment Liberties for Featured Article candidacy.
Comments would be appreciated, at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Fuck: Word Taboo and Protecting Our First Amendment Liberties/archive1.
Thank you for your time,
— Cirt (talk) 05:32, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Unintelligible plot summary at Angus, Thongs and Full-Frontal Snogging
I ran across this YA book in an indirect way, and the plot summary is so inside-jokey or slangy it's unintelligible. Can someone familiar render the summary in proper phrasing? MatthewVanitas (talk) 05:52, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
Which wikiproject for an article on Exposition (narrative)?
This has never been a good article so far as I can see, always relying heavily on material from Writer's Digest. I may be the first person to have added an academic source after I removed a self-published source from a Writer's Digest affiliate company. Thanks. Dougweller (talk) 14:52, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
Infobox book series
Editors involved in this project may be interested in a discussion at Template talk:Infobox book series#"Publisher" Wikilinked?. In short: Should the parameter "Publisher" be wikilinked in the template? Cnilep (talk) 03:55, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
RfC for proposal at Talk:Alter ego
An editor has made a proposal on dividing the article Alter ego in three distinct parts or separate articles, as they have different meanings/interpretations in different fields. Community input is greatly appreciated. - Mailer Diablo 18:39, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
Adrianne Wadewitz deletion discussion notice
There is an ongoing deletion discussion taking place now about whether or not to have a biographical article about Adrianne Wadewitz on Wikipedia.
The discussion is at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adrianne Wadewitz.
For those newer to Wikipedia, you may wish to read Wikipedia:Articles for deletion and Wikipedia:Notability.
— Cirt (talk) 15:15, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
how find only new pages on literary works
Hi everybody, is there any bot that deals with newcomers for categories like, e.g., short story collections, novels, plays ... independently of when a work was published? Or maybe there is any other way to find out which articles that were started recently deal with literary works. Thank you, --Jackentasche (talk) 16:17, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
Brunei English (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) was ranked "high" importance to your project. As it is a dialect and not a literature article, is that assessment correct? -- 76.65.128.112 (talk) 05:28, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Malaysian English (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) was ranked "mid" importance to your project. As it is a dialect and not a literature article, is that assessment correct? -- 76.65.128.112 (talk) 05:28, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Not in Front of the Children
I've recently gone ahead and created an article about the book, Not in Front of the Children: "Indecency," Censorship, and the Innocence of Youth.
Help with suggestions for additional secondary sources would be appreciated at the article's talk page, at Talk:Not in Front of the Children: "Indecency," Censorship, and the Innocence of Youth.
Thank you for your time,
— Cirt (talk) 01:27, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Encyclopedia of the Central Intelligence Agency
I've created a new article about the Encyclopedia of the Central Intelligence Agency.
Suggestions for additional secondary sources would be appreciated, at Talk:Encyclopedia of the Central Intelligence Agency.
Thank you for your time,
— Cirt (talk) 22:10, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
Created new article = Sex, Sin, and Blasphemy: A Guide to America's Censorship Wars
I've created a new article on the book, Sex, Sin, and Blasphemy: A Guide to America's Censorship Wars.
Help with researching additional secondary sources would be appreciated, at Talk:Sex, Sin, and Blasphemy: A Guide to America's Censorship Wars.
— Cirt (talk) 08:57, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
Fuck: Word Taboo and Protecting Our First Amendment Liberties promoted to Featured Article
Fuck: Word Taboo and Protecting Our First Amendment Liberties was promoted to Featured Article quality.
Thank you very much to all who helped with this successful quality improvement project related to freedom of speech and censorship,
— Cirt (talk) 00:39, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
New article = Cutting the Mustard: Affirmative Action and the Nature of Excellence
I've created a new article on the book, Cutting the Mustard: Affirmative Action and the Nature of Excellence.
Help with researching additional secondary sources would be appreciated, at Talk:Cutting the Mustard: Affirmative Action and the Nature of Excellence.
— Cirt (talk) 04:17, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
It was created recently and is now being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Contemporary Writers of the American West.
Should there exist Category:Contemporary writers of the American West as well or instead? Please comment at the AfD discussion. Many thanks, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 12:16, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
Archived some threads
I've archived some inactive threads to subsections which were notifications about discussions that have since been closed. — Cirt (talk) 17:28, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi, guys. I think the section "Works" in the Wikipedia:Good articles/Language and literature is becoming too long (there are 392 so far). I'd suggest to split it into subsections divided by period of time like "Albums" and "Songs" in Wikipedia:Good articles/Music and "Films" in Wikipedia:Good articles/Media and drama. What do you think? Also, I've raised a question about light novels in Wikipedia talk:Good articles#Light novels in language and literature. Gabriel Yuji (talk) 19:41, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Adrianne Wadewitz for Peer review
I've nominated the article Adrianne Wadewitz for Peer review.
Discussion is at the peer review subpage, at Wikipedia:Peer review/Adrianne Wadewitz/archive1.
Thank you for your time,
— Cirt (talk) 04:02, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
AfC submission
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Renouveau catholique. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 23:22, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
This is a message to inform you that Portal:Literature (promoted to Featured Portal in 2006, delisted in mid-2013) is currently being considered for relisting as a Featured Portal at Wikipedia:Featured_portal_candidates#Portal:Literature. If you have any questions or comments, or would like to offer your support or voice your opposition, I encourage you to do so there. The FPO criteria can be found at Wikipedia:Featured portal criteria. Thank you, Sᴠᴇɴ Mᴀɴɢᴜᴀʀᴅ Wha? 07:49, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
Help needed at Yashpal
I've been improving Yashpal (1903-1976), who is recognised as one of the greatest writers in Hindi literature and has been widely translated. There seems to be quite a lot of analysis/literary criticism available in the English language but I'm out of my depth when it comes to summarising this sort of stuff & worry that it will end up being a bunch of quotations. Can anyone offer assistance, please? - Sitush (talk) 11:15, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
There is a conversation going on at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2014 March 4#Male writers about the gendered categorization of author pages (particularly whether to use "men" or "male" writers). Further voices would be appreciated to develop a consensus on the standard amongst writer articles, Sadads (talk) 19:20, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
Susanna Kearsley
Greetings, literature specialists, can anyone vouch for the notability or otherwise of novelist Susanna Kearsley? The article states she won the Catherine Cookson Literary Prize, which sounds like evidence of notability, but it's a poorly referenced stub. I came across the article because someone added a mention in the article on Cruden Bay, saying that one of her novels is set there, and I wondered if this was noteworthy. --Deskford (talk) 00:37, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
- I've just removed links to it under New Slains Castle and James Hamilton, 4th Duke of Hamilton - in the latter it just stated he was a 'minor character'. I'm not sure whether the Susanna Kearsley should be prodded (or AfD); the only refs are to goodreads, which I don't think is viable as I think it's a just a review site that anyone can post on? The other ref appears to be a blog? Comments from others more involved in author articles would be appreciated! SagaciousPhil - Chat 07:37, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
A Contract with God Featured Article Candidate
I've put the article for Will Eisner's 1978 graphic novel A Contract with God up as a Featured Article Candidate. Everyone is encouraged to participate in the review at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/A Contract with God/archive1. Thanks, Curly Turkey (gobble) 12:47, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
AfC submission - 03/04
This looks like a good article, although some of it looks like WP:OR. Draft:Isabella Breviary. Could you have a look? Thanks, FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 15:20, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Infobox book request for comment
In August last year, all publication data in {{infobox book}} was merged into one new |published= parameter. Work began on migrating existing uses to the new format, until questions were raised about the effect this had on data granularity.
Any input and suggestions on a proposed fix, which keeps the new one-line per edition formatting while providing full data granularity would be much appreciated (centralised discussion here). Thanks. ‑‑xensyriaT 23:52, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
AfC submission - 08/04
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Augusta G. Almeda. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 18:03, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
- Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jewish poetry from Al-Andalus. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 19:58, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
Hello, literature experts. This old Afc submission is soon to be deleted as a stale draft. Is this a notable essayist, and should the article be kept and improved instead? —Anne Delong (talk) 15:20, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
Scope?
What is the scope of WikiProject Literature? It seems quite poorly defined; how would someone know if a topic is meant to be in WPLIT or not? -- Mikeblas (talk) 14:50, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
List of notable figures.
The Naturalism article could use a list of authors who wrote in this style. Like the Transcendentalism Article. 207.192.244.242 (talk) 15:54, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
AfC submission - 22/04
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Old English Elegies. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 16:42, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
AfC submission - 27/04
Articles for creation/The Island Queen. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 17:04, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
Audit of author list at Urban fiction
Is there someone in the know about urban fiction who could audit and trim the list of authors under that article? The large majority are redlinks, and I wonder how many of them don't meet the notability requirements for inclusion. —Largo Plazo (talk) 15:21, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
RfC: Proposed rewording for instructions for disambiguation at the WikiProject Comics Manual of Style
A Request for Comment has been made regarding how to disambiguate articles which are on topic for WikiProject Comics. I presume some of you may not consider comic books to be literature, but I believe the discussion could use some outside opinions to keep it from getting too insular. If interested, please join the discussion here. Thank you! --GentlemanGhost (converse) 20:58, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
RfC: Revised proposed rewording for instructions for disambiguation at the WikiProject Comics Manual of Style
A revised Request for Comment has been made regarding the policy compliance of title disambiguation for articles under WikiProject Comics. Please join the discussion here (original here). Curly Turkey (gobble) 23:50, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
Portal:Children's literature for Featured Portal candidacy
I've nominated Portal:Children's literature to be considered for Featured Portal quality.
This was a joint quality improvement collaboration between myself and User:Wadewitz.
Participation would be appreciated, at Wikipedia:Featured portal candidates/Portal:Children's literature.
Thank you for your time,
— Cirt (talk) 17:21, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
AfC submission - 08/05
Wikipedia_talk:Articles for creation/The Island Queen. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 20:27, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
Naming conventions for bibliographies
I have proposed naming conventions for bibliographies here. Any constructive comments you are willing to provide there would be greatly appreciated. Neelix (talk) 16:16, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
Bloomsbury Group revisited
Are there still any people of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Literature/Bloomsbury Group editathon around? I started Bloomsbury Group in LGBT history, which I marked as a stub: mainly concentrates on the people now, the narrative of the history can still be expanded. --Francis Schonken (talk) 06:24, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
Proposal to delete categories involving literature by women.
There is a proposal to delete categories involving literature by women, including deleting Literature by African-American women, Literature by Asian-American women, Literature by Native American women, Literature by Hispanic and Latino American women. See discussion here: [link to discussion]. __ E L A Q U E A T E 23:30, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement!
 Hello, |
Dutch-language LGBT writers cat
- Current deletion discussion of Category:Dutch-language LGBT writers at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2014 July 4#Category:Dutch-language LGBT writers
During this discussion it was mentioned "this may not be the right place to discuss a very fundamental issue, namely: in literature, a categorization by language is much more relevant than by nationality", to which was replied:"...If others need to be invited to this discussion in a neutral manner, then you have the right to do that." (my bolding). This is the invitation. --Francis Schonken (talk) 05:25, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
Nadine Gordimer books
Hello. Would anyone be interested in creating and expanding pages about all of her novels and other works? I could try to start more stubs, but I don't have time to re-read all her books now. Since she has just passed away, I thought some of you would be interested. Those books definitely deserve a page, with a short summary and referenced criticism. Let me know on my talkpage if interested. Thank you.Zigzig20s (talk) 03:51, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
Notification of a TFA nomination
In the past, there have been requests that discussions about potentially controversial TFAs are brought to the attention of more than just those who have WP:TFAR on their watchlist. With that in mind: Fuck: Word Taboo and Protecting Our First Amendment Liberties has been nominated for an appearance as Today's Featured Article. If you have any views, please comment at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests. Thank you. — Cirt (talk) 22:16, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
Vijayanagara literature in Kannada considered for Main Page
There is an ongoing discussion on whether to feature the WP:FA quality article Vijayanagara literature in Kannada on the Main Page.
You may participate at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/Vijayanagara literature in Kannada.
Thank you,
— Cirt (talk) 17:12, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
Project related discussion
This should be noted here, since it won't show up on project alerts. There is a discussion at Talk:Songs of Innocence (album) including whether to move the new U2 album over the William Blake Songs of Innocence (1789) redirect to the later Songs of Innocence and Experience combined Blake collection. In ictu oculi (talk) 01:26, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
There is a new article that popped up on my NPP queue called Signalism that may be of interest to members of this project. It seems a tad essayish and I have tagged it accordingly. Perhaps someone can take a look at it? -Ad Orientem (talk) 17:01, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
Literature Online Access
Hello all! At The Wikipedia Library we are currently in talks with Proquest's Literature Online and Early English Books Online to get Wikipedians access to those databases/collections. They asked us for a bit of information about how Wikipedians might use the research materials, asking us to do a brief survey. It would be extremely helpful if users could fill out the following Google form: Proquest - Literature Online / Wikipedia Library user interest survey. Afterward, while waiting for us to finish talks on Literature Online, we would like to invite editors to apply for already established available partnerships, listed at our partners page. Thank you for all of your help! Sadads (talk) 16:50, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
- Just reminding everyone that this might be of interest! Calling all survey takers, Sadads (talk) 20:17, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
Banner header for new WP
Hello. I've created a new WP, Women writers and I've added it to WP:LIT's Related project's list. An editor mentioned on the Women writer's talkpage that a bot could be used to place banner headers on the pages which fall under the project's scope (articles in Category:Women writers). AnomieBOT requires approval from affected projects before it starts tagging so I'm seeking that approval from WP:LIT. Thank you. --Rosiestep (talk) 16:31, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
Missing articles about SF classics
I've correlated James Wallace Harris' list of science fiction classics with our articles, and come up with a shortlist of classic science fiction works for which we do not currently have articles. (See User:The Anome/Classic science fiction for the full list.)
Of these, the most notable are these classic novels:
- Casey Agonistes by Richard McKenna
- On the Wings of Song by Thomas Disch
- The Clockwork Man by E. V. Odle (1923) (#139 on James Wallace Harris' list: see http://io9.com/now-you-can-read-the-first-cyborg-novel-ever-published-458729406 for background -- but the claim that E. V. Odle was actually Virginia Woolf appears to be unfounded. See here for E. V. Odle's real identity: Edwin Vincent Odle (1890-1942))
- The Embedding by Ian Watson
- The Girl in the Golden Atom by Ray Cummings
- The Weigher of Souls by Andre Maurois
- To-Morrow's Yesterday by John Gloag
Update: I've entered the above into Wikipedia:Requested articles/Arts and entertainment/Literature/Books, but I think they are of sufficient prominence as SF classics to also mention here.
-- The Anome (talk) 16:15, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
New article on graphic novel Bucko
I've created a new article on graphic novel Bucko.
Help or suggestions with additional secondary sources would be appreciated on the article's talk page, at Talk:Bucko.
Thank you,
— Cirt (talk) 04:19, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
No Lifeguard on Duty: The Accidental Life of the World's First Supermodel
I've started a new article on the book by Janice Dickinson — No Lifeguard on Duty: The Accidental Life of the World's First Supermodel.
Feel free to help out with additional secondary sources, and/or chip in with collaborative discussion at Talk:No Lifeguard on Duty: The Accidental Life of the World's First Supermodel.
Thank you, — Cirt (talk) 06:39, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
Good Article promoted in 2013, nominated for deletion
- Critical response to She Has a Name
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Critical response to She Has a Name
WP:GA article Critical response to She Has a Name, promoted in 2013, nominated for deletion, discussion page is at: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Critical response to She Has a Name. — Cirt (talk) 18:47, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
"Epic"
The usage of Epic (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) is under discussion, see talk:epic poetry -- 70.51.46.146 (talk) 05:35, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
"Outro"
The usage of Outro is under discussion, see talk:outro -- 65.94.171.225 (talk) 07:30, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
Comment on the WikiProject X proposal
Hello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on Wikipedia struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please review the proposal here and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for your time! (Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.) Harej (talk) 22:47, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
You Are One of Them (new article)
Hello. I have created You Are One of Them, a 2013 novel written by Elliott Holt. I have not read it, but it has been widely reviewed, so I was able to write a start. I would appreciate it if some of you wanted to expand the page, add the cover photo to the infobox, etc. Thank you.Zigzig20s (talk) 08:32, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
Improving User:Zigzig20s/My Policeman
Hello. I have created User:Zigzig20s/My Policeman, and I was wondering if you thought it could be moved to a proper article as a stub, and/or how it could be expanded/improved. I could add a section with a listof characters. I could also flesh out the plot summary a little bit. There have been other reviews in The Times and other publications, but I don't have access to them. Are any of you able to find them? Thank you.Zigzig20s (talk) 22:31, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
Launch of WikiProject Wikidata for research
Hi, this is to let you know that we've launched WikiProject Wikidata for research in order to stimulate a closer interaction between Wikidata and research, both on a technical and a community level. As a first activity, we are drafting a research proposal on the matter (cf. blog post). Your thoughts on and contributions to that would be most welcome! Thanks, -- Daniel Mietchen (talk) 02:16, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
RFC: List of literary awards
RFC notification: Should these four external links be included in the article List of literary awards? -- GreenC 19:17, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
Guinness RM
You are invited to comment on a requested move at Talk:Guinness#Requested_move_24_December_2014. -- Calidum 06:39, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
WikiProject X is live!
Hello everyone!
You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that WikiProject X is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested, check us out! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!
Note: To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to Wikipedia:WikiProject X/Newsletter. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X.
Harej (talk) 16:57, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
What experts say about prevalent slants in entries on literary works
I am seeking information about what experts say might be considered the prevalent theoretical slant in descriptions of literary works in Wikipedia entries. In case you know of any studies, please refer to the section at the Humanities Desk, thank you, --C.Koltzenburg (talk) 11:14, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Writer Templates
How come the "influences" don't show up on the infoboxes for writers?
Go to Tom Clancy or Shakespeare for example. They have "influences" in the info boxes, but it doesn't display. I just tried to use the infobox template for someone else.
Also see Gary Gygax. Same thing. There is info in the template for "influences" but it just plain doesn't display. Why?
96.51.16.28 (talk) 01:41, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
- I was hoping someone could answer this. Is this a bug that needs to be reported? If so, how would I do that?96.51.16.28 (talk) 16:33, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
- In the absence of the courtesy of a response, I've reported it as a bug. Apparently it has been discussed before: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template_talk:Infobox_writer/Archive_8 I guess the question is why it still shows up in the template. 96.51.16.28 (talk) 17:27, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
One of your project's articles has been featured
Hello, |
New Wikipedia Library Donations
Hello all, there are two recent donations available through The Wikipedia Library that are relevant to this project: WP:Women Writers Online and WP:Project MUSE. Please sign up for the accounts if you think you can use them. Enjoy! Nikkimaria (talk) 04:15, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
Hard Choices, new article about book on climate change in Canada
I've created a new article about the book on climate change in Canada, titled, Hard Choices: Climate Change in Canada.
Help with suggesting additional secondary sources would be appreciated at the article's talk page, at Talk:Hard Choices (Coward book).
Thank you,
— Cirt (talk) 02:59, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
User adding excessive detail to plot summaries
User talk:EditorOctober1990 has been adding excessive details to plot summaries of a number of articles - despite being reverted and warned by several other editors. Members of this wikiproject might want to keep an eye on his/her edits and or try to redirect his/her energy into something more productive. DexDor (talk) 18:45, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
One of your project's articles has been featured
Hello, |
Peter Glassgold
Rev. H. Carlton Earwiggherd contacted me about Peter Glassgold, an author, editor and publisher. There's a discussion about sources on my talk page; it appears Glassgold meets the standards of notability, but finding third-party coverage may prove something of a challenge. If there were enough sources online I'd have whipped up a short article on Glassgold myself, but it seems a more thorough search would be necessary to find those necessary sources. Help by people more familiar with (and more enthused about) the publishing world than myself would be greatly appreciated. Huon (talk) 22:35, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
- I think that the problem of finding enough sources to justify a Wikipedia entry for Peter Glassgold points to a larger problem with Wikipedia. Peter, like me, is in his 70's. He did his major work and had the most influence on literature before the internet was there to suck up all that information. He is eminently qualified for a Wikipedia entry. If you look at his CV outlined on the New Directions page devoted to him, that is quite obvious.
- I think Wikipedia must somehow deal with the fact that its role as an all-encompassing encyclopedia is compromised by its reliance on on-line sources. Its articles are skewed towards people, events, ideas, general subject matter that came to prominence after the maturing of the internet, or towards particular subjects studied in current academic curricula.
- My daughter is a writer and teacher; she has an entry in Wikipedia. She’s a great writer and a great teacher, with published books and a substantial on-line presence. She deserves a Wikipedia article, but when it comes to Western literature, Peter Glassgold has had a much greater impact over a longer span than she has, has been more influential, has devoted more productive years than she, and is known and respected by at least as many prominent writers, editors, scholars and critics as she. But my daughter is part of the on-line generation, as is whoever was the colleague or fan or student or academic responsible for her Wikipedia entry.
- If Peter Glassgold, who for two decades was editor-in-chief of New Directions Publishing, co-edited, with John Laughlin, the periodical, New Directions, edited numerous well-known authors of the modern canon, was active in PEN, and published – with publishers other than New Directions – anthologies, poetry translations and a novel, cannot slip easily into a short Wikipedia entry, then there is some flaw, some lacuna, in the Wikipedia system that should be addressed.
- Frankly speaking, when there are obituaries for Peter Glassgold, his Wikipedia-worthy on-line presence will be assured. That’s how old-fashioned encyclopedias worked. With the finality of death, a person’s importance – or lack of it – was given an “official” determination. Maybe there’s nothing wrong with that. But that is not the way Wikipedia is supposed to work.
- Wikipedia is an “encyclopedia” in which not only every band that has made an album this century but in which the album itself and sometimes even particular songs from that album each is accorded an entry, yet passes over older persons who have made notable contributions to society, but whose milieus happen not to be internet-oriented. Something needs to be fixed. Rev. H. Carlton Earwiggherd (talk) 15:38, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
- Not so. Offline sources are entirely acceptable, but random strangers like me who haven't heard of Glassgold before have little chance of finding them. If you know which print editions of newspapers or literary journals have discussed Glassgold or his work in some detail, please provide bibliographical information. If, however, the only source that bothered to write about Glassgold in some detail is the magazine he headed, then it's quite obvious that he is not qualified for an encyclopedia article on Wikipedia. Wikipedia does't care what someone has done, but only what others have written about them. That same rule holds for publishers, politicians and singers. One might argue that something is wrong with our culture when it's easier to find reliable sources discussing the latter than the former, but that's not Wikipedia's fault. (Conversely, I've heard proponents of practically every subject, from publishers via scientists to, yes, musicians, argue that their specific subject was unfairly under-represented in media coverage and should therefore be held to lower standards than everything else.) Huon (talk) 17:34, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
Fictional Canon : please help
start quote:
In fiction, canon is the material accepted as part of the story in an individual universe of that story.
end quote.
from
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canon_(fiction)
What does "material" refer to ? scripts ?? props ?? films ?? the opinions of the director scriptwriter ??
thanks
who decides what counts as material ??
is this the right place to ask this question ?? i would like to contribute but i am not a very good writer so i am just asking.
any guidance will be welcome
thanks for wikipedia — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oduoduprometheus (talk • contribs) 08:39, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
Discussion at Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(people)#Bestseller_list_as_notability
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(people)#Bestseller_list_as_notability. Thanks. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:02, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
- Long story short, this is part of a discussion to make it easier for authors to pass notability guidelines. It spawned off of one recommendation and right now the idea is that achieving a top spot on major/notable bestseller lists would be something that would be a sign of notability. This would be the major lists like the New York Times and such, not Amazon. Anywho, the main discussion is taking place at the link above. (Or you can click here.) We probably won't get a good enough consensus to make it into a new rule, but I can seriously dream, can't I? Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:04, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
Shall they be merged?
I'd like to ask if Neither (opera) and neither (short story) should be merged in a single article. Cheers. --Paopp (talk) 07:37, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
Notification of discussion on the categorisation of fictional universes at WikiProject Comics
If interested please join discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Comics#Propose developing umbrella categories and navigations according to "Fictional universes in literature", "Fictional universes in film" and "Fictional universes in television programming".
Apologies for the novel sized link. GregKaye 18:41, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
Discussion at Template:Did you know nominations/Nautical fiction
You are invited to join the discussion at Template:Did you know nominations/Nautical fiction. Thanks. RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 02:58, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
Literary technique listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Literary technique to be moved to Narrative technique. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 22:46, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
Work dates in Navboxes
Important conversation going on at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Templates#Consistent_formatting_of_template_titles_for_navboxes_of_literary_works: please join, 15:31, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
James Joyce infobox RfC
Members of this wikiproject may be interested in this Request for Comment regarding James Joyce. --Albany NY (talk) 16:50, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Request for photographs and images
To help address the many requests for photographs People-photo-bot has moved article talk pages from Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of people to Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of writers if it contains the template(s) {{WPBooks}}, {{WikiProject Books}}, {{WPJournals}}, {{NovelsWikiProject}}, {{WikiProject Novels}}, {{WPPoetry}}. Members of this project are invited to address the requests for images listed. Please note that some articles may now have an appropriate photograph and that the need-image flag has simply not been removed, this can also be checked using the Image Existence Checker link on the category page. If a page has been incorrectly moved please inform me on my talk page.
You are invited to participate in Wiki Loves Pride!
- What? Wiki Loves Pride, a campaign to document and photograph LGBT culture and history, including pride events
- When? June 2015
- How can you help?
- 1.) Create or improve LGBT-related articles and showcase the results of your work here
- 2.) Upload photographs or other media related to LGBT culture and history, including pride events, and add images to relevant Wikipedia articles; feel free to create a subpage with a gallery of your images (see examples from last year)
- 3.) Contribute to an LGBT-related task force at another Wikimedia project (Wikidata, Wikimedia Commons, Wikivoyage, etc.)
Or, view or update the current list of Tasks. This campaign is supported by the Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group, an officially recognized affiliate of the Wikimedia Foundation. Visit the group's page at Meta-Wiki for more information, or follow Wikimedia LGBT+ on Facebook. Remember, Wiki Loves Pride is about creating and improving LGBT-related content at Wikimedia projects, and content should have a neutral point of view. One does not need to identify as LGBT or any other gender or sexual minority to participate. This campaign is about adding accurate, reliable information to Wikipedia, plain and simple, and all are welcome!
If you have any questions, please leave a message on the campaign's main talk page.
Thanks, and happy editing!
One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement!
Hello, |
Significant deletion discussion
This is not my field, so I wanted to advertise this discussion on the appropriate noticeboard: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephanie Powell Watts. Thanks for any input. -O.R.Comms 02:03, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Quran listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Quran to be moved to Koran. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 03:14, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
- To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.
New Wikipedia Library Donations
Hello all, I wanted to let you know of two recent donations we just opened up at the Wikipedia Library: WP:Taylor & Francis and WP:Cairn. We also have many older partnerships with accounts available. Please sign up for the accounts if you think you can use them. Cheers, Nikkimaria (talk) 23:21, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
"Appendix"
The usage and primary topic of Appendix is under discussion, see talk:Vermiform appendix
Do we have an article specifically on the supplementary material to the primary text ? appendix lists subtypes of these appendices -- 70.51.203.69 (talk) 05:49, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
Books and Writers (kirjasto.sci.fi)
"Books and Writers" (aka kirjasto.sci.fi) has quality biographies of writers and is often linked to (579 articles). A couple of months ago the site went offline. This created many dead links both in External links and citations. The site was hosted by the Kuusankoski Public Library in Finland and authored by Petri Liukkonen. The last good Wayback capture was on February 10 2015. The site went offline between then and March 15 2015.
There are 1170 biographies at Books and Writers (full list). On the English Wikipedia "kirjasto.sci.fi" is linked to in 579 articles. Full list.
More info here.
-- GreenC 00:59, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
- This project is complete. All the kirjasto.sci.fi links have been updated to use {{tl{Books and Writers}} which now links to Wayback Machine. -- GreenC 17:29, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
Experts on Oxford literary, history, and arts scene, 1920-1990
…please see [1]. Cheers, Le Prof 71.201.62.200 (talk) 05:42, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
AfC submission
Could you please have a look at Draft:Ruthenian Triad? Thank you, FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 16:32, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
- Also, I'm not willing to copy edit this draft at present. It's possibly a notable subject, but it needs quite a bit of work. I'd appreciate it if anyone would be willing to have a look. Thank you very much, FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 00:40, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
Daniel Silva (novelist)
I've been working on the Daniel Silva (novelist) page. I think most of the concerns expressed at Talk:Daniel Silva (novelist) have been addressed. Can someone evaluate the page? Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography is also involved. Thanks.--Jim in Georgia Contribs Talk 00:23, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
And while we're on the subject, eight of Silva's fifteen Gabriel Allon novel pages have the qualifier (Daniel Silva novel) appended to the pagename because of DAB issues. Is there any benefit in consistency to be gained by adding the qualifier to the others? (Gabriel Allon series) could also be used as a qualifier/extension.--Jim in Georgia Contribs Talk 01:36, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
AfC submission
Would anyone care to review Draft:Maura Bwee O'Leary? Much appreciated, FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 20:00, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
"Boy Cried Wolf"
The usage and primary topic of Boy Cried Wolf is under discussion, see talk:Boy Cried Wolf (album) -- 67.70.32.190 (talk) 05:08, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Press - deletion
Hello there! I've come across one editor's COI edits, and they all pertain to Thin Man Press and Peter Doherty in some way or another. I've been trying to clean his edits up, and am unsure as to whether XfD Thin Man Press. Only sources I've come across mention it in passing while discussing Doherty's book. What do you reckon? Best, FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 20:30, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
RfC: Are personal pronouns (including "who") to be avoided for fictional characters?
Please take part in the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style#RfC: Are personal pronouns (including "who") to be avoided for fictional characters? Curly Turkey ¡gobble! 23:09, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
Help with an article?
I've posted this at WP:FRANCE, but the gist is still the same:
I'm looking for some help with an article about Sur les femmes. It's up for AfD and I've found sourcing to show that it's notable, but I need help from people that can help with sourcing in general and flesh it out some. I've added some to the article, but more is always helpful and I want to try to give a varied amount of sources since the article initially relied heavily on the same two sources. Anyone want to help? I'm slightly swamped with schoolwork and I have a project coming up, so I can't really devote a lot of time to this. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 13:05, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
Not in Front of the Children - at Peer Review
I've requested Peer Review for Not in Front of the Children.
Feedback would be appreciated, at Wikipedia:Peer review/Not in Front of the Children/archive1.
Thank you,
— Cirt (talk) 06:04, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
Created new article on book - Climate Change Denial: Heads in the Sand
I've created a new article on the book Climate Change Denial: Heads in the Sand.
Input and suggestions for additional secondary sources would be appreciated on the article's talk page, at Talk:Climate Change Denial: Heads in the Sand.
Thank you,
— Cirt (talk) 06:01, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
The Diary of a Young Girl listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for The Diary of a Young Girl to be moved to The Diary of Anne Frank. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 11:14, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.
Draft:The Tolkien Society listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Draft:The Tolkien Society to be moved to The Tolkien Society. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 04:59, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.
The Tolkien Society listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for The Tolkien Society to be moved to The Tolkien Society. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 09:14, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.
Literary festival: suspicious editing
Could I please ask for a few more eyes on the article Literary festival? An anonymous editor with a dynamic IP address has been persistently removing one particular entry, Lucknow Literature Carnival, from the list, without giving a clear explanation – indeed some of their edit summaries have been misleading. I'm not sure if this festival is notable enough for inclusion in the list – it's a redlink, but so are many others on the list. The motivation of this editor in targeting this one entry seems suspicious. Any thoughts welcome. --Deskford (talk) 14:53, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
Propose changes to {{Infobox bibliography}}
I am proposing some changes to {{Infobox bibliography}}. See the discussion at Template talk:Infobox bibliography. RockMagnetist(talk) 01:28, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
Second Thoughts are Best listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Second Thoughts are Best to be moved to Second Thoughts Are Best. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 06:30, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
- To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.
Academy Award for Best Directing listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Academy Award for Best Directing to be moved to Academy Award for Best Director. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 20:59, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.
Edward Plunkett, 18th Baron of Dunsany listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Edward Plunkett, 18th Baron of Dunsany to be moved to Lord Dunsany. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 11:15, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
- To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.
Genetic Engineering in Fiction
Any thoughts about [2]? --David Tornheim (talk) 07:58, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Tom McCarthy (writer) listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Tom McCarthy (writer) to be moved. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 02:45, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
- To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.
Wikipedia Visiting Scholars at Rollins College
Of potential interest to members of this WikiProject, Rollins College is looking to sponsor a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar to improve Wikipedia articles on 19th and 20th century American writers and/or on the connections between American literature and feminist thought, desegregation, the civil rights movement, environmentalism, or political activism.
This is a great way to get access to university library databases and other resources while making an impact in areas you may already contribute to. For more information, including an overview of library resources, see the Rollins College Visiting Scholars page. Thanks. --Ryan (Wiki Ed) (talk) 14:03, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Hero listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Hero to be moved to Heroism. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 09:45, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
- To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.
"Hero", "Heroine" and "Heroism"
The usage and naming for Hero and Heroism and Heroine is under discussion, see talk:hero -- 70.51.44.60 (talk) 05:34, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Jesse Haynes
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jesse Haynes Joeykai (talk) 04:35, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
WikiProject English Language
It's rather shocking that this project is missing, though its absence explains why we have so few articles about our language (most of the linguistic material on English is buried as sections, when we're lucky, in general linguistics articles), and why so much of what we do have is riddled with Victorian prescriptivist PoV-pushing and original research. Properly sourced, neutral, linguistically descriptive, detailed, encyclopedic coverage of the language is one of en.wp's most obvious topical gaps. The scope is general, including everything from the Great English Vowel Shift to Quotation marks in English to English as a global language, and various missing articles like major styles of English writing.
I've drafted the wikiproject outline at User:SMcCandlish/WikiProject English Language, including some "Goals" and "Scope" points. Please "pre-sign" as a participant so that it already has a number of supporters (7+ would be nice) when I take it to Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals in the next day or so. I've not yet created a to-do list for it or other resources (mainly so I don't have to move them later after the proposal goes through).
As far as I can determine, this project is missing because several times in the past, various camps of prescriptivists have tried to create something called "WikiProject English" to PoV-push their version of "correct" English on Wikipedia, and had it deleted at WP:MFD. This proposal would be the diametric opposite of such WP:FRINGE / WP:SOAPBOX campaigning.
It will not focus on literature in particular, but the language as such. Nevertheless, I figure many people in this project will be interested in the new one. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼ 23:52, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
Louise Ross listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Louise Ross to be moved to LJ Ross. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 03:16, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
- To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.
Fairy tale FAR
I have nominated Fairy tale for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Sadads (talk) 14:00, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
"Misfortune"
The usage and topic and primary topic of Misfortune is under discussion, see talk:Misfortune (disambiguation) -- 70.51.46.39 (talk) 04:57, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Interactive narrative listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Interactive narrative to be moved to Types of fiction with multiple endings. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 06:30, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
- To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.
Is anyone familiar with a minor English poet (1908-1996) who had a very well received semi-autobiography Gentleman of the Road published in 1978. I recall the book from school, but I'm surprised to see no obit on-line. Does anyone have better archive access than I do? Andy Dingley (talk) 15:42, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Invitation to our April event
.jpg)  | |
|---|---|
|
Women Writers worldwide online edit-a-thon
| |
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 02:02, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
RfC notice: In-universe name details of fictional characters, in article leads
Please see Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#RfC: In-universe name details of fictional characters, in article leads (concerning fictional characters as article subjects generally). — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼ 01:24, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Notice of discussion regarding the {{tl:Goodreads}} template
A discussion regarding the {{Goodreads}} template is being held at WP:External_links/Noticeboard#Is_Goodreads_an_appropriate_EL.3F. – S. Rich (talk) 12:35, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Fictional crossover listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Fictional crossover to be moved to Crossover (fiction). This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 17:14, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
- To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.
Fictional crossover listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Fictional crossover to be moved to Crossover (fiction). This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 14:29, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
- To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.
Could someone look in at a novel's article page?
@SMcCandlish:@Rosiestep:, others: Could you look in on Sophie's Choice (novel), and see if you can think of individuals in your respective writing communities, that might give some attention to this article? It is a sensitive article, insofar as Styron took a view, in the book, that has been very controversial, vis-a-vis his view of the Holocaust. When I arrived at the article, it did not even mention the controversy, and I have added it. But this is not my area of expertise, and what is needed is an English Prof, or a Holocaust literature expert, that can sensitively provide a balanced perspective on the book, from published sources. (I spent some time in my editing, in adding an extensive Further reading list of sources I could find.) I am simply not an expert in 20th century cultural history, or literature, or literary criticism, to be able to undertake these revisions. Cheers, good luck. Le Prof Leprof 7272 (talk) 17:51, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
- Outside my area, too. I'm mostly linguistics, zoology, anthropology, billiards. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼ 06:45, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Shakespeare and fair use
Hello, I've asked a question at WikiProject Shakespeare about adding fair use media to articles. Any opinions would be greatly appreciated.
In addition, for anyone in London this weekend there is an editathon about Shakespeare taking place. The event page is here. Richard Nevell (WMUK) (talk) 10:05, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Singaporean English listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Wikipedia:Singaporean English to be moved to Singaporean English. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 15:30, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
- To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.
Singapore English listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Singapore English to be moved to Singaporean English. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 20:15, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
- To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.
Category:Harry Potter in the real world has been nominated for discussion
Category:Harry Potter in the real world, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for upmerging to Category:Harry Potter. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 01:31, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Auto-assessment of article classes
Following a recent discussion at WP:VPR, there is consensus for an opt-in bot task that automatically assesses the class of articles based on classes listed for other project templates on the same page. In other words, if WikiProject A has evaluated an article to be C-class and WikiProject B hasn't evaluated the article at all, such a bot task would automatically evaluate the article as C-class for WikiProject B.
If you think auto-assessment might benefit this project, consider discussing it with other members here. For more information or to request an auto-assessment run, please visit User:BU RoBOT/autoassess. This is a one-time message to alert projects with over 1,000 unassessed articles to this possibility. ~ RobTalk 01:12, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
Draft:Outline of William Shakespeare listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Draft:Outline of William Shakespeare to be moved to Wikipedia:WikiProject Outlines/Drafts/Outline of William Shakespeare. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 22:32, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
- To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.
Manikya Kodithuwakku
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Wallybastian1 (talk • contribs) 12:48, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Manikya Dinushi Kodithuwakku is a Sri Lankan editor and publisher and co-founder of PawPrint Publishers, Colombo, which she set up in 2014 as an initiative in photography, publishing and editorial work. She is a former academic and researcher in Literature and Law, having served the Open University of Sri Lanka from 2009 to 2015.
Manikya Kodithuwakku was born in March 1980 in Colombo and was educated at Ladies’ College, Colombo. Her childhood was spent in Korea and Japan where her family was located in the late 1980s. She received her tertiary education at the Monash University, obtaining Bachelor’s qualifications in English Literature and Law. She also holds an LLM from the University of Colombo, Sri Lanka and an MA from the University of Peradeniya, Sri Lanka.
In 2014, Kodithuwakku set up PawPrint Publishing on a not-for-profit basis with the objective of encouraging literature worthy to be published and in the market. She is currently attached to a leading magazine in Sri Lanka, LMD, serving as Senior Manager in its editorial branch. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wallybastian1 (talk • contribs) 12:42, 16 June 2016 (UTC) --Wallybastian1 (talk) 13:37, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
Novel sales
Is there a reliable way to find the number of copies that a particular book has sold? I've been struggling through unhelpful web sources for a while now. Regards, Vanamonde93 (talk) 10:27, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
In the news candidate for writer Péter Esterházy
Hi, I've proposed Péter Esterházy as a Recent Death item for the "In the news" section, and would welcome input from you guys both at the candidate page here and of course in the article itself. Thanks! Yakikaki (talk) 12:44, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
Gabriel Rossetti
Hi. Please see Gabriel Rossetti: Revision history. The son is also known as "Gabriel Rossetti", so why a redirect to the father?--Spinoziano (talk) 16:26, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
Chapter summary
What is the opinion of WikiProject members on detailed chapter summaries in articles? Another user and I are having a disagreement about whether to include or omit such a summary in The Bridge on the Drina article. Would appreciate feedback. 23 editor (talk) 18:04, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
- Hi 23 editor, we don't include detailed chapter summaries. I took a look at The Bridge on the Drina - it's coming on quite nicely. If I get a chance I'll post to the talk page but if I don't make it there, you can link to this comment. Victoria (tk) 21:00, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Bible listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Bible to be moved to The Bible. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 12:14, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
- To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.
Dear literature experts: I cam across this article while working on a draft about a novelist. I haven't worked much on literature articles, but this one seems to be pretty essay-like. It's been around quite a while, though, and no one has tagged it for that, or for needing references. I can't rewrite it; my knowledge is more in the musical and computer areas. Would it be appropriate to add the tags?—Anne Delong (talk) 17:18, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
The History of Britain listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for The History of Britain to be moved to The History of Britain (Milton). This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 18:17, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
- To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.
Star Wars RfC
There's an ongoing WP:RFC at Star Wars expanded universe regarding the issue of the non-canon material before April 2014. The discussion can be found at Talk:Star Wars expanded universe#RfC: Is it relevant to group all non-canon EU material in a Legends subcategory?. Input from project members would be very much appreciated. Thanks, Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 02:56, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Please comment
Please comment at Talk:The_Land_of_Painted_Caves#Genre. The question is if Jean Auel's Earth's Children is best called historical fiction , prehistoric fiction, or both. And the same for categorizing. Including the question what reliable sources say about this. Debresser (talk) 16:04, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
The subject article is an FL nominee since quite a long time for now and hence requesting the community to review and comment at the review. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:38, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
AfD for Martha deMey Clow
There's a discussion at Articles for Deletion for an article listed under this project. AlexEng(TALK) 08:41, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
"History of literature" article, I suggest, needs a large downgrade from B-class on the quality scale.
The article History of literature has been assessed as B-class on this project's quality scale. I would suggest this is downgraded for the following reasons.
- Large parts of it are unreferenced.
- Various sections are out of balance. Eg:
- The section Islamic World has far too much on The Arabian Nights given that an article with such broad scope cannot afford to give over too many words to one work.
- The section Early Modern Period is primarily about English works (admittedly one may expect that in an English Wikipedia).
- The 18th, 19th and 20th century sections are extremely limited.
I recognise that an article of such massive scope is going to be a HUGE challenge for the community to make good but that's not a matter for my current argument, which is that the article presently cannot lay claim to being a B-class article. --bodnotbod (talk) 04:24, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Peer review: Vlad the Impaler
All comments are appreciated here. Thank you for your time. Borsoka (talk) 06:08, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
Folio Prize listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Folio Prize to be moved to Rathbones Folio Prize. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 11:17, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
- To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.
Man Booker Prize listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Man Booker Prize to be moved to Booker Prize. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 18:30, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
- To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.
Please translate es:Premio Municipal de Literatura de Santiago
Could someone please translate es:Premio Municipal de Literatura de Santiago? Looks like the main literary prize in Chile, apparently!Zigzig20s (talk) 05:18, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
On adding a novel to a category
Greetings, o literary ones. User:Debresser suggested I post here. We are in disagreement about adding Clan of the Cave Bear to Category:Fictional bears. Our arguments are fleshed out on the talk page. My view is that I want to help someone who is reading about e.g. Marian Engel's Bear (novel) or Richard Adams's Shardik to find CotCB and vice versa. Debresser's position is that Jean Auel's "book is not related in a significant way to any bears". If any of you would care to read our discussion and comment there, I'd be grateful. Thank you. Carbon Caryatid (talk) 18:04, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
Please comment at Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2017_January_2#Template:Nobel_Prize_in_Literature.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 12:58, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
Missing topics list
My list of missing topics about literature is updated - Skysmith (talk) 14:13, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
This FA (high priority) is in a bad shape and in my view does not qualify for FA status. If someone from this project has some time to spare, they might be able to improve it enough for it to qualify, before I put it up for an FA Review. It is a really important and significant article and Wikipedia deserves to have the best article on Yeats possible. Currently we do not.·maunus · snunɐɯ· 14:18, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
Journey of self-discovery listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Journey of self-discovery to be moved to Self-discovery. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 15:46, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
- To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.
Template:Plot listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Template:Plot to be moved to Template:Long plot. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 10:45, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
- To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.
Types of fiction with multiple endings listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Types of fiction with multiple endings to be moved to Multiple endings. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 23:00, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
- To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.
Nouveau roman listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Nouveau roman to be moved to Nouveau Roman. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 01:46, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
- To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.
American romance-author Kay Cornelius died recently. I just updated her article to say so; it would be quite easy and nice to expand and improve the artice - if anyone has the time.
There is quite a lot of useful info in the obituary (first ref).
86.20.193.222 (talk) 05:48, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Artificial intelligence in fiction listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Artificial intelligence in fiction to be moved to List of artificial intelligence fiction. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 20:46, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
- To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.
Impressum listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Impressum to be moved to Imprint (printer or publisher's details). This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 09:16, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
- To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.
Malleus Maleficarum v. The Formicarius
Hello all, I just had a basic question I wanted to pose to anyone and everyone about the differences between the Malleus and the Formicarius. Any Literary concepts that emphasize your point are absolutely appreciated.
I just want to compare both pieces and see how they are held across the witchcraft scholarship.
-K — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kspencer894 (talk • contribs) 22:04, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
Anthony M. Esolen listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Anthony M. Esolen to be moved to Anthony Esolen. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 15:30, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
- To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.
Popular pages report
We – Community Tech – are happy to announce that the Popular pages bot is back up-and-running (after a one year hiatus)! You're receiving this message because your WikiProject or task force is signed up to receive the popular pages report. Every month, Community Tech bot will post at Wikipedia:WikiProject Literature/Archive 2/Popular pages with a list of the most-viewed pages over the previous month that are within the scope of WikiProject Literature.
We've made some enhancements to the original report. Here's what's new:
- The pageview data includes both desktop and mobile data.
- The report will include a link to the pageviews tool for each article, to dig deeper into any surprises or anomalies.
- The report will include the total pageviews for the entire project (including redirects).
We're grateful to Mr.Z-man for his original Mr.Z-bot, and we wish his bot a happy robot retirement. Just as before, we hope the popular pages reports will aid you in understanding the reach of WikiProject Literature, and what articles may be deserving of more attention. If you have any questions or concerns please contact us at m:User talk:Community Tech bot.
Warm regards, the Community Tech Team 17:15, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Seeking feedback on a guide for students who edit articles about books
Hi everyone! The Wiki Education Foundation is creating a guide to help students write about books (fiction and non-fiction). It's a handout intended to supplement their other resources, such as the interactive training and basic editing brochures. I'd love to get some community feedback on the draft here: User:Ryan (Wiki Ed)/Books. We're planning to send these off to the printer at the end of the month, so feedback by Sunday, May 28, would be appreciated. Thanks! --Ryan (Wiki Ed) (talk) 22:16, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
Contemporary setting
Can novels set in the modern day (or thereabouts) also be considered like a genre? I am trying to distinguish between different works on wikidata based on their setting (or multiple settings), e.g. science fiction, fantasy, historical fiction, etc., but have no category in which to put works in a contemporary setting. Thanks. SharkD Talk 16:40, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of The Plot to Hack America for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Plot to Hack America is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Plot to Hack America until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sagecandor (talk) 17:55, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
I'd like to join the WikiProject
I'd like to join the WikiProject.
Is there a place to list myself? Sagecandor (talk) 23:19, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
Trump Tower: A Novel listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Trump Tower: A Novel to be moved to Trump Tower (novel). This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 21:35, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
- To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.
RfC about the author credits of first edition in first sentence in book article
RfC about the author credits of first edition in first sentence in a book article.
Please see Request for Comment, at Talk:Trump_Tower:_A_Novel#RfC_about_the_author_credits_of_first_edition_in_first_sentence. Sagecandor (talk) 02:38, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
RfC about inclusion of films in Bibliography of Donald Trump
RfC about inclusion of films in Bibliography of Donald Trump:
Discussion at Talk:Bibliography_of_Donald_Trump#RfC_about_inclusion_of_films_in_Bibliography_of_Donald_Trump. Sagecandor (talk) 04:16, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
Fantasy vs Fiction
According to the current definitions in Wikipedia, as I understand it, every book, movie etc that has it's setting on earth falls into the category of fiction. Even if the story line would include imaginary monsters or unknown creatures. Yet, if the exact same story would be put in a setting of another planet we would no longer put it in this category. I can't help but feel that this does not make any sense.
Is it even possible to draw a line between fantasy and fiction ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ruudschmitz (talk • contribs) 18:38, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
Complete review listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Complete review to be moved to Complete Review. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 22:01, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
- To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.
Dannah Gresh listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Dannah Gresh to be moved to Secret Keeper Girl. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 17:31, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
- To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.
Nomination of Elijah Daniel for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elijah Daniel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elijah Daniel (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sagecandor (talk) 04:21, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Merge with Emily Dickinson or separate section / article about her sexuality?
There is a merge discussion at Talk:Emily_Dickinson#Proposed_merge_with_Kate_Scott_Turner about merging an article about someone that it seems that Dickinson loved with the main article. In my response, I have also posed the question about further exploring Dickinson's sexuality, which could be done within the main article or perhaps a separate article.
I know that this project is about literature - I posted this at the Biography project and thought that there might be more people here that might be interested in this. Any input would be wonderful!–CaroleHenson (talk) 18:02, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
Great Man theory listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Great Man theory to be moved to Great man theory. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 05:44, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
- To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.
My hope is to get this to Featured status. I think the article is 99% of the way there but there's usually something preventing it from being accepted whenever I nominate it. Would anyone with experience be willing to help go over this article with me? Suggestions are also appreciated.--CyberGhostface (talk) 18:24, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
Does anybody want to save this mess? Bearian (talk) 18:14, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
Yorkshire dialect listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Yorkshire dialect to be moved to Yorkshire English. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 13:59, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
- To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.
One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement!
Hello, |
Hi. In November The Women in Red World Contest is being held to try to produce new articles for as many countries worldwide and occupations as possible. There will be over $4000 in prizes to win, including Amazon vouchers and paid subscriptions. If this would appeal to you and you think you'd be interested in contributing new articles on women writers during this month please sign up in the participants section. If you're not interested in prize money yourself but are willing to participate and raise money to buy books about women for others to use, this is also fine. Help would also be appreciated in drawing up the lists of missing articles. If you think of any missing articles for your project please add them to the appropriate sub list Missing articles. Thankyou, and if taking part, good luck!♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:16, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Once described as 'the best journalist ever', also subject of controversy for blurring allegory with reportage. Window of opportunity this week to massively improve the article, but not too many editors involved. Please chime in at the Talk page there with suggestions for improvement. -Chumchum7 (talk) 05:55, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
Artificial intelligence in fiction listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Artificial intelligence in fiction to be moved to List of fictional artificial intelligences. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 15:31, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.
Bankim Chandra Chattopadhyay listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Bankim Chandra Chattopadhyay to be moved to Bankim Chandra Chatterjee. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 13:59, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
- To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.
Early medieval literature as top-important?
I have written a comment to the article Early medieval literature. After that, I discovered that it was rated top-important, which I find very surprising. I hope, and am also very curious, to read any responses to the issues I have raised in the comment. But, please note that I am not always online. I will surely keep an eye on the page, as much as possible. Sechinsic (talk) 15:01, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation links on pages tagged by this wikiproject
Wikipedia has many thousands of wikilinks which point to disambiguation pages. It would be useful to readers if these links directed them to the specific pages of interest, rather than making them search through a list. Members of WikiProject Disambiguation have been working on this and the total number is now below 20,000 for the first time. Some of these links require specialist knowledge of the topics concerned and therefore it would be great if you could help in your area of expertise.
A list of the relevant links on pages which fall within the remit of this wikiproject can be found at http://69.142.160.183/~dispenser/cgi-bin/topic_points.py?banner=WikiProject_Literature
Please take a few minutes to help make these more useful to our readers.— Rod talk 16:54, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Notification of WP:RFC regarding including historical figures in navboxes
Join the discussion at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Templates#Removal_of_historical_characters_from_navboxes.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 03:59, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
Theater of the United States listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Theater of the United States to be moved to Theatre in the United States. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 17:59, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
- To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.
Is Cat Person notable?
It's viral and has received good pageviews, but does it qualify as WP:GNG? Coderzombie (talk) 11:46, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
Lulu (company) listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Lulu (company) to be moved to Lulu.com. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 18:44, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
- To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.
Need help, article on writer/literary critic
I have been very active on Wikipedia for years, but have never published an article from scratch.
I just wrote one but it remains as a Draft; I don't know how to actually Publish it.
Draft:Fred Jacob (journalist) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Fred_Jacob_(journalist)#Primary_works
Can you provide any advice?
Draft:Fred Jacob (journalist) From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Fred Jacob (1882–1927) (occasionally shown as Fred Jacobs in some publications about his work)[1] was a journalist with Toronto's The Mail and Empire (now the Globe and Mail), having joined the publication in 1903, after having won the publication's poetry contest.[2] Jacob was first a sports reporter but from 1910 to 1928, he was responsible for the entire literary section of the newspaper; he was also the drama and music critic.[3][4] Occasionally, he wrote about drama in the Canadian Magazine.[5]
Contents [show] Early years[edit] Jacob was raised in Elora, Ontario, the son of a lawyer and the nephew of a judge and particularly enjoyed lacrosse. Later, while living in Toronto, he was the president of a lacrosse club for 16 years.[6]
Primary works[edit] Jacob wrote two novels, The Day Before Yesterday (published in 1925) and Peeee (1928),[7] both satirical works[8] the first set in fictional small communities resembling Elora, Ontario, his home town with some characters (especially in the first book) resembling those Jacob had known. He wrote that his intention in the books was to "preserve an impression of the Canadian scene".[9] A review of the first book provided this comment: "To the structure of Canadian literature Mr. Fred Jacob has contributed not only a substantial brick but a graceful vine."[10]
Jacob also wrote several popular stage plays, including One third of a bill and Autumn Blooming.[11][12][13][14]
Legacy[edit] Jacob suffered from rheumatic fever and died on 3 July 1928 of a heart attack during a social function.[15] An obituary in Saturday Night (magazine) referred to him as the "ablest critic on drama of the daily press in Toronto", praising "the soundness of his judgements and clearness of his expositions".[16]
References[edit]
Thanks, Peter K Burian (talk) 16:11, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
Underdog (term) listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Underdog (term) to be moved to Underdog. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 07:29, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
- To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.
Other (philosophy) listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Other (philosophy) to be moved to Other. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 23:14, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
- To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.
List of ghosts listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for List of ghosts to be moved to List of ghosts in mythology and fiction. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 15:05, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
- To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.
Dante Alighieri listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Dante Alighieri to be moved to Dante. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 00:45, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
- To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.
Discussion on using quotation style at the Manual of Style
There's a discussion at WT:MOS#WORDSASWORDS vs. NOITALQUOTE for articles about a quotation regarding a dispute at The lady doth protest too much, methinks over whether to use italics or quote marks for such quotations. It may well impact other articles within this project - please add comments there. Thanks, Batternut (talk) 16:38, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
Fyodor Dostoyevsky listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Fyodor Dostoyevsky to be moved to Fyodor Dostoevsky. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 00:16, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
- To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.
Bad boy (archetype) listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Bad boy (archetype) to be moved to Bad boy. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 06:00, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
- To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.
Grateful dead (folklore) listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Grateful dead (folklore) to be moved to Grateful dead. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 15:01, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
- To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.
Walter Scott listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Walter Scott to be moved to Sir Walter Scott. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 21:30, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
- To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.
Ellery Queen (house name) listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Ellery Queen (house name) to be moved to Ellery Queen (collective pseudonym). This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 05:16, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
- To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.
"Salve Deus Rex Judaeorum"
Hi all, I've been working on the "Salve Deus Rex Judaeorum" article. I was wondering if anyone had more suggestions for it, or if someone could reevaluate it. Thanks! -CarefulCatBird (talk) 22:18, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
List of common misconceptions listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for List of common misconceptions to be moved to List of common errors. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 02:29, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
- To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.
Psychological novel listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Psychological novel to be moved to Psychological fiction. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 21:15, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
- To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.
An editor recently created this article, Transatlanticism (culture), but I have doubts as to whether the topic is a legitimate literary discipline, or if its been WP:SNYTH'd together from various sources that just use the word as a basic construction/WP:DICTDEF. Would welcome your input. -- Netoholic @ 11:38, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
Romance novel listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Romance novel to be moved to Romance fiction. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 03:45, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
- To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.
Elif Şafak listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Elif Şafak to be moved to Elif Shafak. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 11:00, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
- To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.
Scandinavian noir listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Scandinavian noir to be moved to Nordic noir. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 15:31, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
- To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.
Human disguise listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Human disguise to be moved to Human form (mythology and fiction). This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 11:47, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
- To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.
WikiProject collaboration notice from the Portals WikiProject
The reason I am contacting you is because there are one or more portals that fall under this subject, and the Portals WikiProject is currently undertaking a major drive to automate portals that may affect them.
Portals are being redesigned.
The new design features are being applied to existing portals.
At present, we are gearing up for a maintenance pass of portals in which the introduction section will be upgraded to no longer need a subpage. In place of static copied and pasted excerpts will be self-updating excerpts displayed through selective transclusion, using the template {{Transclude lead excerpt}}.
The discussion about this can be found here.
Maintainers of specific portals are encouraged to sign up as project members here, noting the portals they maintain, so that those portals are skipped by the maintenance pass. Currently, we are interested in upgrading neglected and abandoned portals. There will be opportunity for maintained portals to opt-in later, or the portal maintainers can handle upgrading (the portals they maintain) personally at any time.
Background
On April 8th, 2018, an RfC ("Request for comment") proposal was made to eliminate all portals and the portal namespace. On April 17th, the Portals WikiProject was rebooted to handle the revitalization of the portal system. On May 12th, the RfC was closed with the result to keep portals, by a margin of about 2 to 1 in favor of keeping portals.
Since the reboot, the Portals WikiProject has been busy building tools and components to upgrade portals.
So far, 84 editors have joined.
If you would like to keep abreast of what is happening with portals, see the newsletter archive.
If you have any questions about what is happening with portals or the Portals WikiProject, please post them on the WikiProject's talk page.
Thank you. — The Transhumanist 07:45, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
Fake memoirs listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Fake memoirs to be moved to Fake memoir. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 21:45, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
- To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.
Original or translated title?
Should an article about a book use the original language title or the English translation's title? To be specific, which title should Draft:Kringe in 'n Bos (Circles in a Forest) use? Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 11:15, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
- You want to use the English translation. There are good guidelines at WP:COMMONNAME and WP:TRANSLITERATE. Jaldous1 (talk) 14:58, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
Dream world (plot device) listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Dream world (plot device) to be moved to Dream world. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 04:15, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
- To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.
Academy Award for Best Director listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Academy Award for Best Director to be moved to Academy Award for Best Directing. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 20:59, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
- To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.
Please assess
Please assess the article Buddhist poetry. Thanks! Thinker78 (talk) 06:13, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
Alexandre Dumas, fils listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Alexandre Dumas, fils to be moved to Alexandre Dumas fils. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 17:29, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
- To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.
Nobel Prize in Literature listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Nobel Prize in Literature to be moved to Nobel Prize for Literature. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 01:15, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
- To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.
"The Executed Renaissance" needs citations and assessing
Hi. The article The Executed Renaissance needs citations and assessing. Thanks! Thinker78 (talk) 03:50, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
Please assess
Please assess Fictitious entry. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Asianflavoure (talk • contribs) 03:30, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
WikiJournal of Humanities published first article
 |
The WikiJournal of Humanities is a free, peer reviewed academic journal which aims to provide a new mechanism for ensuring the accuracy of Wikipedia's humanities, arts and social sciences content. We started it as a way of bridging the Wikipedia-academia gap. It is also part of a WikiJournal User Group along with Wiki.J.Med and Wiki.J.Sci. The journal is still starting out and not yet well known, so we are advertising ourselves to WikiProjects that might be interested. |
Editors
- Invite submissions from non-wikipedians
- Coordinate the organisation of external academic peer review
- Format accepted articles
- Promote the journal
Authors
- New Wikipedia articles on topics that don't yet have a Wikipedia page, or only a stub/start
- Existing Wikipedia articles to be externally peer reviewed (analogous to GA / FA review - see submission page)
- Image articles, based around an important images, photographs or summary diagrams
If you want to know more, please see this recent interview with some WikiJournal editors, the journal's About page, or check out a comparison of similar initiatives. If you're interested, please come and discuss the project on the journal's talk page, or the general discussion page for the WikiJournal User group.
As an illustrative example, Wiki.J.Hum published its first article this month!
- Miles, Dudley; et al. (2018). "Æthelflæd, Lady of the Mercians". WikiJournal of Humanities. 1 (1): 1. doi:10.15347/wjh/2018.001. ISSN 2639-5347.
T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)talk 09:35, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
Scope of Wikipedia:Naming conventions (books)
There is currectly an RFC on the scope of WP:NCBOOKS which may be of interest. See Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (books)#RFC: Does this guideline cover plays and other literary works? --woodensuperman 15:42, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
WP 1.0 Bot Beta
Hello! Your WikiProject has been selected to participate in the WP 1.0 Bot rewrite beta. This means that, starting in the next few days or weeks, your assessment tables will be updated using code in the new bot, codenamed Lucky. You can read more about this change on the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial team page. Thanks! audiodude (talk) 06:48, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
New task force proposal
I am thinking about setting up a task force within this WikiProject to deal with Jewish works, primarily the Talmud and Mishna. Despite the importance of written works in Judaism, many of the articles devoted to Jewish works, including articles on specific tractates of the Mishna and Talmud, are in desperate need of attention. They are poorly written, lack sources, and don’t convey enough information. If you would be willing to join such a task force, please indicate below. Any feedback about this idea would be appreciated. Two users over at Wikipedia:JUDAISM already agreed to join. — Puzzledvegetable (talk) 12:27, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
Notification about article needing work (Critical lens)
Hello WikiProject Literature denizens! While I myself am not a member of this wikiproject, I am very interested in literature/books, and I edit a wide variety of articles. While doing some unrelated reading, I found Critical lens (then named 'critical lens essay') and set about rewriting it. Your help, advice, and heckling would all be appreciated!
Some notes - the article as it originally stood was on a non-notable topic - 'critical lens essays' - which struck me as both vague and unencyclopedic. I promptly moved it to its current page name and started rewriting it. The article as it stands with the start of my rewriting is a stub - I'm nowhere near finished. But I think the article should actually be a fairly well fleshed out broad overview article as it summarizes a major way of literary analysis. That's why I'm requesting help.
This in fact could be a fairly major project, not only because this is a major article topic that should be expanded upon, but because some of the sub-articles it will link to can also use some help. See Marxist literary criticism for an idea of what I mean - it doesn't mention Literature and Revolution, one of the introductory works in the field (and that article itself could use some help).
Thanks, and have a great day! --Nerd1a4i (talk) 05:41, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
A new newsletter directory is out!
A new Newsletter directory has been created to replace the old, out-of-date one. If your WikiProject and its taskforces have newsletters (even inactive ones), or if you know of a missing newsletter (including from sister projects like WikiSpecies), please include it in the directory! The template can be a bit tricky, so if you need help, just post the newsletter on the template's talk page and someone will add it for you.
- – Sent on behalf of Headbomb. 03:11, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Theatrical adaptation, TV adaptation
I feel sure that editors have used [[theatrical adaptation]] and [[TV adaptation]] in the parallel senses of literary adaptation for the stage and for the TV screen. In fact, however, TV/television adaptation are two redirects to adaptation of television material for the cinema, or TV-to-film.
Moments ago I posted a longer notice of the problem at Talk:Literary adaptation#Theatrical adaptation, TV adaptation.
(I post this short one also at WP:TV, WP:CHILDLIT). --P64 (talk) 22:49, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Portal:French and Francophone literature for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether Portal:French and Francophone literature is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The page will be discussed at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:French and Francophone literature until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the page during the discussion, including to improve the page to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the deletion notice from the top of the page. North America1000 23:29, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Portal:William Shakespeare for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether Portal:William Shakespeare is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The page will be discussed at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:William Shakespeare until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the page during the discussion, including to improve the page to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the deletion notice from the top of the page. North America1000 08:14, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
Inferno (Dante) listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Inferno (Dante) to be moved to Dante's Inferno. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 04:02, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
- To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.
Subliterature
The article Subliterature has a section titled "Examples of books considered subliterature". This section seriously needs citations of reliable sources considering such things to be subliterature, particularly since subliterature is a pejorative.--Solomonfromfinland (talk) 19:42, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
Dream world (plot device) listed at Requested moves
A requested move discussion has been initiated for Dream world (plot device) to be moved to Dreamworld. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 06:01, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
- To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.
Request for information on WP1.0 web tool
Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.
We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
John E. Alvis, a literary scholar who taught at the University of Dallas, has died. He wrote books about Shakespeare and Hawthorne:
- Alvis, John W.; West, Thomas, eds. (2000). Shakespeare as Political Thinker. Wilmington, Delaware: ISI Books. ISBN 9781882926503. OCLC 468981760.
- Alvis, John E. (2017). Nathaniel Hawthorne as Political Philosopher : Revolutionary Principles Domesticated and Personalized. Routledge: New York. ISBN 9781351503822. OCLC 1000454678.
I am not able to find an obituary yet and not sure there are enough sources (maybe book reviews?) to create an article.Zigzig20s (talk) 14:22, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
Deletion of Updike-related article
Hey all. There is currently a deletion debate ongoing about Brewer (John Updike), the setting of John Updike's "Rabbit" cycle of novels. Any input at the AFD would be welcome, as would any contributions anyone might have from reliable sources discussing this topic outside of a plot summary. Thanks! — Hunter Kahn 13:21, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Notice of re-proposal to merge all volumes of The Lord of the Rings to its main article
The AfD suggesting merge/delete and redirect has closed, and another discussion about merging all three LotR volumes' articles into The Lord of the Rings has now opened at Talk:The Lord of the Rings#Proposed merge of The Fellowship of the Ring etc into The Lord of the Rings, as of February 4.
This likely has implications for our handling of other multi-volume works of literature (such as Das Kapital and the separate Das Kapital, Volume I – Das Kapital, Volume III; and similar cases).
— SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 09:57, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
List of fictional counties up for deletion
- Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- List of fictional counties (3rd nomination) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs|google) AfD discussion
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional counties (3rd nomination)
I've added some sources. More are out there. Important literary device. Important list for some of our readers. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 12:00, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Requesting wider attention
Requesting wider attention.
I felt article Islamic_literature is in bit of neglect so I added my note on talk page there, requesting to take note of Talk:Islamic_literature#Article_review. If possible requesting copy edit support. Suggestions for suitable reference sources at Talk:Islamic_literature is also welcome.
Thanks and greetings
Bookku (talk) 07:06, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Requesting expansion and update edit support
Hi,
Season's greetings
I am looking for proactive expansion and update support/input help the following (So far neglected but important topic) articles, if possible. Even if you feel your focus area bit different still contribution of few line may help bring in some different perspective and also help Wikipedia goal of neutrality. If you can't spare time but if you know any good references you can note those on talk pages.
This has been posted to this forum since, one of article review suggested to have more diverse editor participation to have more inclusive, neutral and balanced worldview
I hope and request some editors from this forum too proactively and constructively participate in updating and expanding of article Islamic advice literature
Thanks, warm regards and greetings
Bookku (talk) 07:51, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
Seeking collaborators for an "ambitious" draft.
I have a draft languishing in my sandbox User:Dodger67/Sandbox/Disability in literature that I originally intended as a brief summary/introduction to the depiction of disability in literature throughout history and across cultures. I'd apreciate some assistance as I'm not a literature specialist (nor history really, my interest is primarily in disability. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 13:06, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
I have started Draft:Master Skylark, apparently a well-known book in its day. BD2412 T 19:22, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
FAR for Mario Vargas Llosa
I have nominated Mario Vargas Llosa for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. (t · c) buidhe 06:56, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
Chronology categories for the arts
Please see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2020 September 15#The arts, where I have proposed standardising the naming of by-year, by-decade and by-centuries for the arts.
Currently the by-century categories are named "in the arts", but the by-decade and by-year categories are named "in arts". I have proposed two options for a common format: either "in the arts" or "in arts". --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 18:40, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
2020 Booker Prize
Hey all. Using the Booker Prize website itself - https://thebookerprizes.com/fiction/2020 - I have quickly thrown up 2020 Booker Prize so this year at least gets an article of its own. Lots to do but the groundwork has been typed for you at least. doktorb wordsdeeds 22:37, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
- Hey again. The 2020 Booker Prize article has been updated. Four of the five nominated titles have no Wikipedia articles. I wonder if this is something we need to explore, either through this project or the wider community. doktorb wordsdeeds 20:52, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
A lot of drafts about Korean literature to tweak and publish
I believe there was an education or WP:GLAM project relating to Korean literature. They generated a lot of draft articles, many of which were unfairly (in my opinion) declined. I have accepted a significant number of them already, and there are more to check over and tweak/approve as appropriate. Please have a look at the following drafts to improve/accept them (or possibly in rare cases determine they aren't worthy of articles -- I doubt this often applies):
- Draft:An Heon-mi
- Draft:Choe Dooseok
- Draft:Choecheokjeon (최척전 The Tale of Choe Cheok)
- Draft:Eom Won-tae
- Draft:Ha Sangwook
- Draft:Hong Changsoo
- Draft:Hwamongjip (A Collection of Romance and Dream Journey Stories)
- Draft:Inhyeon wanghu jeon (仁顯王后傳, Story of Queen Inhyeon)
- Draft:Jo Yongho
- Draft:Jung Hanmo
- Draft:Kim Chong Kwang
- Draft:Kim Deok-ryeong
- Draft:Kim Eon Hee
- Draft:Kim Eui-kyung
- Draft:Kim Joong-sik
- Draft:Kim Jun Tae
- Draft:Kim Kyoungin
- Draft:Kim Moon-soo (Novelist)
- Draft:Kim Myung-su
- Draft:Kim Sa-i (Poet)
- Draft:Kim Yeonkyung
- Draft:Kim Youn Bae
- Draft:Ko Jinha
- Draft:Ku Jung-seo (literary critic)
- Draft:Memilggot pil muryeop (메밀꽃 필 무렵, When the Buckwheat Flowers Bloom)
- Draft:Memoirs of Lady Jo of Pungyang
- Draft:Min Gyeong-hyeon
- Draft:Park Cheong-ho
- Draft:Seo Joon-hwan
- Draft:Seong Mi-jeong
- Draft:Sohn Won-pyung
- Draft:Tales from the Green Hills
- Draft:The Black Leaf in My Mouth
- Draft:Woodblock commercial publication in Korea
- Draft:Yeom Seungsuk
- Draft:Yoo Juhyun
- Draft:Yu Sun-ha
Thanks, Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:53, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- There are also a few more drafts that are trickier; they were declined as duplicating existing content, but I don't know if the myths themselves deserve separate articles. They are as follows:
- Thanks again, Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:53, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- I replied at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Korea#A_lot_of_drafts_to_tweak_and_publish where this was crossposted. I think almost all of them are notable and rescuable with just a bit of effort. Help needed! --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:55, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Frontiers Media request
Hello, I have suggested updates to Frontiers Media's list of journals at Talk:Frontiers_Media#List_of_journals. Do any editors at this WikiProject care to vet these potential updates? (Disclosure: I have also sought assistance at WikiProject Open.) I do not edit the article myself because I am an employee at Frontiers Media.
Best, JBFrontiers (talk) 08:00, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
More opinions needed at Requested move Nineteen Eighty-Four → 1984
It would be really helpful to get more opinions here. Thanks! —PermStrump (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 03:46, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Millie (short story) up for deletion
- Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Millie (short story) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs|google) AfD discussion
Important author, Katherine Mansfield, particularly of short stories. Lots of sources at Google books. Referencing needs improvement. Only pretended compliance with WP:Before. Nominator says this is "a test case." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 7&6=thirteen (talk • contribs) 21:50, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
The Big Butt Book
I created a new article, about the literary work which traces the cultural history of the buttocks -- The Big Butt Book. Let me know if you want to help out with further research! Thanks very much, Right cite (talk) 02:03, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
- I get the feeling we're the butt of someone's joke here. No need for a rump session to discuss it, though. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 02:30, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
See RfC on changing DEADNAME on crediting individuals for previously released works
Please see Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Biography#RfC: updating MOS:DEADNAME for how to credit individuals on previously released works
This potentially would affect a significant number of articles. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 02:33, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
When God Writes Your Love Story Featured article review
I have nominated When God Writes Your Love Story for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 17:36, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Project Scope
It looks like the general scope of this project is limited to pages about literature, rather than works or authors themselves (which are already covered by other wikiprojects). Are there any objections to officially defining that as the scope of this project? It looks like some other wikiprojectsWP:WikiProject Books have already delegated that as the primary project of this project. - car chasm (talk) 02:26, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
- A source is needed for this claim of general scope. Xxanthippe (talk) 03:04, 27 January 2021 (UTC).
- Original discussion is here (I borked the link on the revert, sorry about that), and original project scope is shown here [3] - car chasm (talk) 03:12, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
- To be clear I've already removed the project banner from some of the more prominent talk pages that were authors and works where it was added erroneously - if there's no indication that the consensus on scope has significantly changed in the past 15 years I'll find a more automated way (AutoWikiBrowser?) to remove the rest. Also, as for my own opinion on the matter, I favor the status quo here (keeping the limited scope) because I don't think it's practical or worthwhile to define which pieces of written work are "literature" or not while also maintaining WP:NPOV, and the scope of "every single written work and author ever" is certainly too large for a single wikiproject, and indeed, that scope is already covered by several other WikiProjects. Based on the watcher count for this page I assume I'm probably shouting into the void here so once the scope is well defined I'll also try to recruit some more members... - car chasm (talk) 19:27, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
- As there appears to be no indication that consensus has changed, I will remove the template from Talk pages on authors and works. Xxanthippe - please understand that these removals say nothing about the quality of the work that these authors have done and please stop reverting my edits - it's solely being done for project tracking purposes. Proust and D.H. Lawrence are very definitely authors of literature but since they are not general topics about literature they should not be tracked by this project. - car chasm (talk) 03:49, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
- I initially questioned CarChasm's removal of John Cowper Powys and James Hanley from this project, but now believe that they belong with Project:Novel. What is needed is some careful editing rather than frantic deletion. Rwood128 (talk) 11:02, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
- I suggest those two belong with both projects. I agree that frantic deletion should be stopped. There have been many more deletions not yet noted here. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:30, 4 February 2021 (UTC).
- I initially questioned CarChasm's removal of John Cowper Powys and James Hanley from this project, but now believe that they belong with Project:Novel. What is needed is some careful editing rather than frantic deletion. Rwood128 (talk) 11:02, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
A discussion on whether villains should be categorized by gender, in case anyone has an opinion. This cover literary character categories. Liz Read! Talk! 20:23, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Boomer lit
I've added Boomer lit to the scope of this article, although it still needs assessment. What's clear, though, is that while the topic is notable, the article is in a terrible state. Would anyone here be interested in improving it? Lennart97 (talk) 14:52, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
All novels of Olive Higgins Prouty complete at Wikisource (as of 2021)
Hi, I wanted to inform anyone interested to know that on Wikisource I have completed proofreading the entire library of Olive Higgins Prouty's novels that are in the public domain as of 2021. This includes five novels; Bobbie, General Manager (1913), The Fifth Wheel (1916), The Star in the Window (1918), Good Sports (1919), and Stella Dallas (1923).
As these novels are all in the public domain in the United States due to copyright expiration, these novels can all be used for any purpose on the WMF projects. Any images as well as text content from them can be reused or remixed in any way shape or form, including quoting entire sections verbatim or using images in articles. Hopefully Wikisource's offering of in-depth evidence of the content of Prouty's original novels will help Wikipedia somewhat. PseudoSkull (talk) 23:36, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
Don Quixote template
At Talk:Don_Quixote#Related_works_in_the_template, I had some thoughts on improving the "Related works" section of Template:Don Quixote. Would love to discuss! –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 02:45, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Category:Metafictional characters has been nominated for renaming
Category:Metafictional characters, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 16:24, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
Most viewed stub in this Wikiproject
Coming-of-age story 32,553 1,085 Stub--Coin945 (talk) 14:52, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
Booker Prize
Hey Literature project
I've thrown up a rough and ready 2021 Booker Prize article after today's Longlist publication, if anyone here wants to take a look and all that. doktorb wordsdeeds 02:40, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Merge proposal
It has been proposed that List of fictional librarians be merged into Libraries and librarians in fiction. Seeking your feedback at Talk:List of fictional librarians#Merger proposal. Thanks. --Historyday01 (talk) 13:23, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
Imagery in need of attention
This is listed as a high importance article for this WikiProject, but seems to have had a dodgy edit history. I've just fixed a couple of problems, but perhaps someone might like to take care of it? The talk page suggests that there has been a longstanding problem. PamD 10:37, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
Kirkus Reviews as refs
If you have an opinion, please share at Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#Kirkus_Reviews,_again. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 08:02, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement!
Hello, |
History of modern literature - just delete it?
This is listed as Top Importance for this project, but it's a real mess - mostly just a long list of books and dates. Someone on the talk page suggested deletion in 2007 to no reply. Does anyone here want to pick this up? Or to throw in a vote for deletion on the talk page? asilvering (talk) 03:48, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
- Articles are not deleted by votes on talk pages, but at WP:AFD. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 01:34, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
RfC on whether and how to cover J. K. Rowling's trans-related views in the lead of her article
Please see: Talk:J. K. Rowling#RFC on how to include her trans-related views (and backlash) in the lead
I am "advertising" this RfC more broadly to relevant pages because someone selectively notified three socio-political wikiprojects that are likely to vote-stack the RfC with a single viewpoint, and the article already has a long history of factional PoV editwarring.
Central matters in this discussion and the threads leading up to it are labeling of Rowling, labeling of commenters on Rowling, why Rowling is notable, what is due or undue in the lead section, and whether quasi-numeric claims like "many", "a few", etc. in this context are legitimate or an OR/WEASEL issue. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 01:36, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
- The idea that WikiProject Feminism and WikiProject Women Writers are
likely to vote-stack the RfC with a single socio-political viewpoint
seems wildly implausible, but by all means, we do need fresh eyes on the RfC. The lead of that article, in particular, has seen a great deal of whitewashing and FALSEBALANCE POV-based editing. Newimpartial (talk) 02:20, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
Sumerian King List has an RFC
Sumerian King List has an RFC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Zoeperkoe (talk) 12:39, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
"Literary canon" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Literary canon and has thus listed it at redirects for discussion. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 23#Literary canon until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 12:00, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Taiwanese Literature - Three articles
I recently stumbled upon these three articles concerning Taiwanese literature:
Is there a case for merging any of these or are they distinct topics. I'm not too familiar with Taiwanese writing so I'm not sure. The articles themselves are not great so could benefit from a merge and thorough edit. Vladimir.copic (talk) 23:44, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
User script to detect unreliable sources
I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Wikipedia. The idea is that it takes something like
- John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14. (
John Smith "[https://www.deprecated.com/article Article of things]" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14.)
and turns it into something like
- John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.
It will work on a variety of links, including those from {{cite web}}, {{cite journal}} and {{doi}}.
The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.
Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.
This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Looking for peer review of Paul Goodman
Hi all, I'm looking for peer reviews of our article on the American public intellectual and writer Paul Goodman before it goes to FAC, if anyone would be so inclined: 
Wikipedia:Peer review/Paul Goodman/archive1. No prior experience necessary—just want to know how it reads for a general audience, given that the content gets a bit obtuse. czar 19:14, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
Hi there! I am an English major at an Australian university taking a class on the significance of Wikipedia on writing in the digital world. Our major assessment is to write a Wikipedia article, which I have never done before, and I have been working on Alabama literature and have just started publishing it! I'd really appreciate it if anyone would take a look at it and give me any advice on it. Thank you very much. CatVallejo (talk) 02:13, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Lorraine cycle#Requested move 13 August 2022
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Lorraine cycle#Requested move 13 August 2022 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. – robertsky (talk) 05:05, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
Requested move
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Crusade Cycle#Requested move 30 August 2022 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. QuietHere (talk) 14:34, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Gordon Burn Prize
Hello to all volunteer friends from Italy!! Sorry for the inconvenience, but I created the page in italian of Gordon Burn and I believe, in my humble opinion, that the Gordon Burn Prize, now in its tenth edition and with the many sources available, deserves a page on its own... I would opt for a spin-off, what do you think? GabrieleBellucci (talk) 09:44, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
RfC over whether or not James Joyce should have an infobox
Talk:James Joyce § Should the article have an infobox I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 20:41, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
Afd
I would appreciate it if editors give their opinion here. Thanks. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 04:32, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Category:Non-fiction has been nominated for discussion
Category:Non-fiction has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Οἶδα (talk) 23:24, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
- The CfD was closed as "no consensus". There is now a discussion at Talk:Nonfiction#Requested_move_1_February_2023, discussing a proposed move of Nonfiction to Non-fiction. PamD 08:50, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Further opinions on article merger would be appreciated
Currently, there is a proposed merger of Libraries and librarians in fiction and Librarians in popular culture to a new page entitled Libraries and librarians in culture. But, it has been inactive since July 2022, so it would be great to get some more eyes on it, so there can a clearer consensus before moving forward. Thanks! Historyday01 (talk) 18:07, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Deconstruction#Requested move 3 March 2023
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Deconstruction#Requested move 3 March 2023 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 17:12, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
Input request at category deletion discussion
Comments are needed at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2023_May_25#Category:Novels_set_in_fictional_villages.4meter4 (talk) 13:05, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
Merger discussion on Uchronia
Please help us settle a dispute over whether to merge the page Uchronia to Alternate history; see the full discussion here: Talk:Uchronia#Merge to Alternate history. Wolfdog (talk) 23:52, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Kailyard school#Requested move 22 July 2023
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Kailyard school#Requested move 22 July 2023 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE 19:13, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
Discussion at Talk:Stephen King § Philanthropist
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Stephen King § Philanthropist. Discussion of whether "philanthropist" should be an occupation in the infobox and lead for writer Stephen King. Sundayclose (talk) 13:38, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
FAC of Communication
Hello, I wanted to let you know that I nominated the article Communication for featured article status. So far, there has not been much response from reviewers and I was wondering whether some of the editors here are inclined to have a look at it. If you have the time, I would appreciate your comments at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Communication/archive1. For a short FAQ on the FA reviewing process, see Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2008-04-07/Dispatches. Phlsph7 (talk) 08:11, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
FAC notification: Brother Jonathan (novel)
The earliest work of American fiction, Brother Jonathan by John Neal is currently being reviewed as a featured article candidate. Would anyone like to comment on the nomination page? Thanks in advance if you do! Dugan Murphy (talk) 17:07, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement!
Hello, |
Requested move at Talk:Women in refrigerators#Requested move 8 January 2024
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Women in refrigerators#Requested move 8 January 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 11:46, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Topic request
Meyer& Meyer Sport Publishers is a leading book publisher not listed on Wikipedia. I'm asking the question why? I am an avid practicer of yoga and have utilized the company's books. I did some digging and saw that some of their employees are trans. Is there a bias against that, I thought? It's a German based company. Is the trans community not supported there? As a supporter of the arts, I want to encourage this book publisher into Wikipedia. Kkded (talk) 20:42, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
- Hello Kkded, thanks for your interest in improving Wikipedia's coverage. Usually when an article is missing it is for one of two reasons: either, 1, there are not enough reliable sources for someone to actually write an the article (since Wikipedia is a tertiary source, which summarizes other sources without original research); or, 2, such sources exist but nobody has gotten around to writing anything yet, because this is a completely volunteer project. People are free to work on what they like. For a publishing company, there needs to be enough coverage to meet these criteria before an article can be written, but if you're able to find good sources to cite it would be great if you could be the volunteer who fills the gap! I suggest reading this set of tips on preparing to write an article, and then you can use this tool to get started actually writing it. Happy editing! ~ L 🌸 (talk) 23:55, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
FAC: The Structure of Literature
An article about a literary theory book, The Structure of Literature, is presently at FAC. All comments are welcome from those with the time/inclination to review. czar 14:28, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Proposal to deprecate the country parameter of {{Infobox book}}
There is a discussion at Template talk:Infobox book#Proposal to deprecate "country" in favor of "location" that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Οἶδα (talk) 10:42, 25 February 2024 (UTC)