Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Architecture/Archive 14
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Wikipedia:WikiProject Architecture. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 10 | ← | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 |
User script to detect unreliable sources
I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Wikipedia. The idea is that it takes something like
- John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14. (
John Smith "[https://www.deprecated.com/article Article of things]" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14.)
and turns it into something like
- John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.
It will work on a variety of links, including those from {{cite web}}, {{cite journal}} and {{doi}}.
The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.
Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.
This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:00, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
FAR for Michigan State Capitol
I have nominated Michigan State Capitol for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Hog Farm Talk 17:46, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
Architectural Design Optimization
Hi, I recently completed an article on Architectural design optimization for my Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment and was looking for any suggestions/advice. Thanks! Timidfrog (talk) 09:28, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
List of architecure awards
Would some members of this WikiProject mind taking a look at List of architecture awards and assessing it for WP:Namechecking and WP:LISTCRUFT. It's not clear what the WP:LSC are for the list are other than the entry be an architecture award of some type, broadly contrued. Perhaps, the awards should be limited to those which are considered notable enough to have Wikipedia articles written about them per WP:CSC; in other words, an article about the award already exists (even in a some other language Wikipedia) or one could exist per WP:REDYES. List articles like this often end up have lots of entries added over time that might be minor compared to others and thus they probably need not be mentioned. -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:06, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
DEFAULTSORT for churches - by location, or not?
There is a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Categorization#DEFAULTSORT for churches which may be of interest. PamD 16:49, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
RfC on sorting churches
Members of this project may be interested in Wikipedia talk:Categorization#Request for Comment on sorting of UK churches in categories in English Wikipedia PamD 06:51, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
Does the term Al-Aqsa Mosque need disambiguation?
.jpg)
Please comment at Talk:Al-Aqsa Mosque#Requested move 30 May 2022 - we are in need of editors who have the time to review the sources. Our Al-Aqsa Mosque article is about the small building. The large compound, also known as Al-Aqsa Mosque, is our article Temple Mount.
For reference:
- Al Aqsa Mosque (Temple Mount) is the third holiest site in Islam
- Al Aqsa Mosque (Temple Mount) was the first qibla in Islam
- Al Aqsa Mosque (Temple Mount) gave its name to the Al Aqsa Intifada, and the al-Aqsa Martyrs' Brigades
- Al Aqsa Mosque (Temple Mount) can hold over 300,000 people (note: the small building can hold only 5,000)
- Al Aqsa Mosque (Temple Mount) was recently in the news after clashes between Israeli soldiers and Palestinians: the location of the route is shown here
- Al Aqsa Mosque (building) is an important monument of early Islamic architecture
- Al Aqsa Mosque (building) houses the Imam of the Al Aqsa Mosque
- Al Aqsa Mosque (building) is where the Islamic prayers are led from
Per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, what matters most is whether it is highly likely — much more likely than any other single topic, and more likely than all the other topics combined — to be the topic sought when a reader searches for that term
. It is also important to assess how the term is used amongst scholarly sources - an assessment of this has been provided at the discussion, and it would be good to have it confirmed by editors who have the time to review the sources themselves.
Thank you.
Onceinawhile (talk) 08:39, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
- More editor contributions here would be appreciated. Many thanks. Onceinawhile (talk) 11:41, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Geology Hall, New Brunswick, New Jersey Featured article review
I have nominated Geology Hall, New Brunswick, New Jersey for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 22:06, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
Requested move: Acrisure Stadium → Heinz Field
A requested move is under discussion at Talk:Acrisure Stadium § Requested move 22 July 2022. ––FormalDude talk 21:15, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
Requesting Help for my Draft
Hello Architecture WikiProject! Unfortunately, my draft was declined for submission. In the improvement section, it says to reach out to a relevant wikiproject for some feedback before resubmitting for review. My draft is Draft:Victor F. “Trey” Trahan III, FAIA. I have been working on editing other pages to get the hang of wiki, and this is my first article. I have over 30 independent sources and looking back, I can agree with the reviewer that it reads somewhat like a CV. I am wondering if anyone would be willing to take a look and give me feedback so I can rewrite the draft before resubmitting it.I will take any and all suggestions. I am very determined to work on my writing and make it more encyclopedic-like. Thank you again!!! Architect110402 (talk) 13:53, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
- Your article has now been selected. I just looked over it and made some adjustments, such as removing his website as a source. More info could be added to the award section. Rublamb (talk) 00:51, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
Victor Trahan
Would some members of this WikiProject mind taking a look at Victor Trahan and assessing it? The article was recently created via WP:AFC and I've done some minor cleanup, but it probably needs some more attention. The MOS:LEAD in particular might need some rewriting since some of the information it contains probably is better suited for the MOS:BODY of the article. -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:09, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
- I did some more cleanup. Rublamb (talk) 00:52, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
Good article nominee
I nominated the article on architect Stockton B. Colt for good article status. If you have time, please check it out and share your opinion. Thanks Rublamb (talk) 00:55, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
- Have you considered adding a much longer first paragraph noting his education, firms, and summary of his works? Prburley (talk)
Structure
What do you call the structure above this gate? Peter Ormond 💬 20:59, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
- If you are talking about the engraved section, I would describe it as a cartouche. Rublamb (talk) 00:59, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
FAR for Palladian architecture
I have nominated Palladian architecture for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Z1720 (talk) 18:15, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
- Work has been done on this to seek to retain its FA status. Any additional contributions gratefully received. KJP1 (talk) 12:12, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
Featured Article Save Award for Palladian architecture
There is a Featured Article Save Award nomination at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review/Palladian architecture/archive2. Please join the discussion to recognize and celebrate editors who helped assure this article would retain its featured status. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 03:50, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
AfD: Alcoa House (Portland, Oregon)
Participation welcome: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alcoa House (Portland, Oregon) ---Another Believer (Talk) 21:58, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
List of Art Deco architecture in the United States
While working on the copy editor drive, I cam across List of Art Deco architecture in the United States. I don't mind working on standardizing its format, but I need some feedback. This is a really long list! It is not in tables and is, therefore, not sortable. This is causing duplicate entries. For example, items are both listed under generic California and the "Los Angles and vicinity" sections. I know tables are the solution but before I go to that major effort, I a have a question. is there a reason for this article to manually created? Could it also be created and automatically sorted using the Art Deco category? Or should I move forward on the massive project of converting the list to tables? Rublamb (talk) 16:55, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
- Rublamb, Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lists#Stand-alone list articles has some brief guidance. Lists should be referenced and are usually in title and bullet style. I would say that there is little point in copy editing the list as it is unreferenced . TSventon (talk) 09:42, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- Citations are another issue with this article for sure. Most of the sources given are for database-type websites, rather than then specific articles within the database. As in, we are supposed to believe that the entire list for buildings in NC came from the NCSU database. Same with New York City, etc. It the group thinks this article is of value, I would be willing to work on the needed citations over time. I am also willing to be vicious and delete all buildings that lack proof of notability (as in no Wikipedia article) and no source.
- As to bulleted list vs. table, as you said, there is limited information in the Manual of Style. I was introduced to dynamic tables instead of bulleted lists in another WP Project that I work with as that is their preference for stand alone lists of notable people (and is supposed to be an upcoming guideline for Wikipedia in general). I have started using tables for project lists within biographies of architects because tables allow the reader to sort the list by project name, date, city, etc. I just wondered if this concept had been introduced to this WP group yet as I have fairly new here. Rublamb (talk) 20:00, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
On which Barefoot should the shoe be placed?
I recently discovered that the architect Leslie Barefoot also has a wikipedia page as Herbert Barefoot. Bearing in mind that his gravestone names him Leslie Barefoot, I would suggest this is the more suitable name.Leutha (talk) 08:32, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- Articles now merged. TSventon (talk) 17:25, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
For your viewing pleasure
A good chunk of things could be added here most certainly, however, the most prevalent being that this is an article about architecture, so why not add more than just 6 pretty standard photos and really showcase what you are trying to explain about here. Ryangrady8 (talk) 17:01, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- Hi Ryangrady8, WikiProject Architecture is a Wikipedia:WikiProject, an area for focused collaboration among Wikipedians, so the pictures are not particularly important. The article is Architecture. TSventon (talk) 17:33, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
AfD for PEI Architects
Here is an AfD discussion which may be of interest to this WikiProject:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PEI Architects
Cielquiparle (talk) 09:35, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
AfD: Skinner Building (Seattle)
Skinner Building (Seattle) has been nominated for deletion. Discussion participation welcome. ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:33, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
Snow cave
Snow cave was created way back in 2005, but it never seems to have really been assessed since that time. It's creation might pre-date WikiProjects which could explain why no banners had been added to its corresponding talk page until I do so earlier today. Would some members of this WikiProject mind taking a look at the article and assessing it? A fair amount of unsupported content was additionally added to the article earlier today by an IP, but even prior to those edits there was quite a bit unsupported content. Over the years a lot of WP:VNT type of edits might have been made in good faith, but these would still be technically WP:OR. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:57, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement!
 Hello, |
Article creation at scale discussion
Project members might be interested in the wide-ranging discussions ongoing at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Requests for comment/Article creation at scale; discussions cover WP:GEOLAND, which includes heritage-listed structures and non-heritage-listed structures. Espresso Addict (talk) 02:27, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Heian Palace FAR
I have nominated Heian Palace for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Bumbubookworm (talk) 12:17, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
PROD: St. Anne's Chapel (Marylhurst University)
---Another Believer (Talk) 18:57, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
- Unusual PROD rationale but I can't say I disagree with the general sentiment. Newspapers.com for instance has many hits for this, but limited to adverts of concerts or events being held there, none of which seem to demonstrate WP:SIGCOV or even close. Of course that isn't to say that won't exist elsewhere, but as it stands the article is only cited with WP:PRIMARY refs so the PROD isn't unreasonable. Bungle (talk • contribs) 21:16, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
Melbourne's Lost Victorian Landmarks
Need help with Melbourne's Lost Victorian Landmarks. Should this become "Demolished buildings and structures in Melbourne" OR "List of demolished..." I feel like it has more content than a typical list. Of course, I could create short articles for the buildings with longer sections and link them to the list page. Just want to be consistent with what is usual for this type of article. Thanks. Rublamb (talk) 13:53, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
- Bump. Still need advice on this. Thanks. Rublamb (talk) 21:08, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
Add a redirect classification
This WikiProject has no classification for redirects, but I think there should be one. RPI2026F1 (talk) 15:14, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
- Note to page watchers, I think RPI2026F1 wants to give the redirect they created at Interior Architect a WikiProject Architecture quality rating of Redirect rather than NA. TSventon (talk) 19:03, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
- Yea, that's basically it. RPI2026F1 (talk) 19:09, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
- I initially misunderstood the question and was going to suggest reading Wikipedia:Categorizing redirects. I don't see having a quality rating of Redirect as a priority. TSventon (talk) 19:30, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
- Yea, that's basically it. RPI2026F1 (talk) 19:09, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement!
Hello, |
Church of St John the Baptist, Saint-Jean-de-Luz
Could someone please take a quick look at Church of St John the Baptist, Saint-Jean-de-Luz? I made the page a while ago, looks like it could use some improvement, not sure from what direction to come at it though. Thank you Tbf69 17:13, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
- Tbf69 - Made a few suggestions on the article Talkpage. KJP1 (talk) 18:25, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
Gaudi at GAR
Antoni Gaudí has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. — PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 18:12, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
Lanfranco Cirillo, architect of Putin’s Palace
Lanfranco Cirillo, the architect of Putin’s Palace now has an article. I believe it was put into article space by an editor with a conflict of interest as the article doesn’t include any criticism or mention of Cirillo’s legal problems at all. Any help would be appreciated. Thriley (talk) 23:31, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
- I worked on it a bit, adding info on his education and early projects. Someone else must have added his legal problems, but I expanded. A general copy edit and reorganization of text made a big difference. I found a reference (used elsewhere in the article) that indicates he was not known at all in architectural circles in Russia. However, I did not include this as I could not determine if that is factual, or another way of saying he worked under the table for those with criminal connections. I did find that he could not legally sign off on his own projects because his Italian degree was not accepted in Russia--this is now in the article. Rublamb (talk) 21:39, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
Cartoon castle
Please, can you help me to find the name of the castle in these paintings: 1, 2. Thank you very much. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.232.235.244 (talk) 09:40, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
Talk:St Mary-le-Bow/GA1 - the GAN review is written, but is due to be failed on 12 January 2023, as the nominator has not looked at the review. Please pick this one up if you can. Amitchell125 (talk) 11:08, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
- The article was failed. Amitchell125 (talk) 15:24, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
Unreviewed Featured articles year-end summary
Unreviewed featured articles/2020 (URFA/2020) is a systematic approach to reviewing older Featured articles (FAs) to ensure they still meet the FA standards. A January 2022 Signpost article called "Forgotten Featured" explored the effort.
Progress is recorded at the monthly stats page. Through 2022, with 4,526 very old (from the 2004–2009 period) and old (2010–2015) FAs initially needing review:
- 357 FAs were delisted at Featured article review (FAR).
- 222 FAs were kept at FAR or deemed "satisfactory" by three URFA reviewers, with hundreds more being marked as "satisfactory", but awaiting three reviews.
- FAs needing review were reduced from 77% of total FAs at the end of 2020 to 64% at the end of 2022.
Of the FAs kept, deemed satisfactory by three reviewers, or delisted, about 60% had prior review between 2004 and 2007; another 20% dated to the period from 2008–2009; and another 20% to 2010–2015. Roughly two-thirds of the old FAs reviewed have retained FA status or been marked "satisfactory", while two-thirds of the very old FAs have been defeatured.
Entering its third year, URFA is working to help maintain FA standards; FAs are being restored not only via FAR, but also via improvements initiated after articles are reviewed and talk pages are noticed. Since the Featured Article Save Award (FASA) was added to the FAR process a year ago, 38 FAs were restored to FA status by editors other than the original FAC nominator. Ten FAs restored to status have been listed at WP:MILLION, recognizing articles with annual readership over a million pageviews, and many have been rerun as Today's featured article, helping increase mainpage diversity.
|
All received a Million Award
|
.svg)
But there remain almost 4,000 old and very old FAs to be reviewed. Some topic areas and WikiProjects have been more proactive than others in restoring or maintaining their old FAs. As seen in the chart below, the following have very high ratios of FAs kept to those delisted (ordered from highest ratio):
- Biology
- Physics and astronomy
- Warfare
- Video gaming
and others have a good ratio of kept to delisted FAs:
- Literature and theatre
- Engineering and technology
- Religion, mysticism and mythology
- Media
- Geology and geophysics
... so kudos to those editors who pitched in to help maintain older FAs !
FAs reviewed at URFA/2020 through 2022 by content area
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noting some minor differences in tallies:
|
But looking only at the oldest FAs (from the 2004–2007 period), there are 12 content areas with more than 20 FAs still needing review: Biology, Music, Royalty and nobility, Media, Sport and recreation, History, Warfare, Meteorology, Physics and astronomy, Literature and theatre, Video gaming, and Geography and places. In the coming weeks, URFA/2020 editors will be posting lists to individual WikiProjects with the goal of getting these oldest-of-the-old FAs reviewed during 2023.
Ideas for how you can help are listed below and at the Signpost article.
- Review a 2004 to 2007 FA. With three "Satisfactory" marks, article can be moved to the FAR not needed section.
- Review "your" articles: Did you nominate a featured article between 2004 and 2015 that you have continuously maintained? Check these articles, update as needed, and mark them as 'Satisfactory' at URFA/2020. A continuously maintained FA is a good predictor that standards are still met, and with two more "Satisfactory" marks, "your" articles can be listed as "FAR not needed". If they no longer meet the FA standards, please begin the FAR process by posting your concerns on the article's talk page.
- Review articles that already have one "Satisfactory" mark: more FAs can be indicated as "FAR not needed" if other reviewers will have a look at those already indicated as maintained by the original nominator. If you find issues, you can enter them at the talk page.
- Fix an existing featured article: Choose an article at URFA/2020 or FAR and bring it back to FA standards. Enlist the help of the original nominator, frequent FA reviewers, WikiProjects listed on the talk page, or editors that have written similar topics. When the article returns to FA standards, please mark it as 'Satisfactory' at URFA/2020 or note your progress in the article's FAR.
- Review and nominate an article to FAR that has been 'noticed' of a FAR needed but issues raised on talk have not been addressed. Sometimes nominating at FAR draws additional editors to help improve the article that would otherwise not look at it.
More regular URFA and FAR reviewers will help assure that FAs continue to represent examples of Wikipedia's best work. If you have any questions or feedback, please visit Wikipedia talk:Unreviewed featured articles/2020/4Q2022.
FAs last reviewed from 2004 to 2007 of interest to this WikiProject
If you review an article on this list, please add commentary at the article talk page, with a section heading == [[URFA/2020]] review== and also add either Notes or Noticed to WP:URFA/2020A, per the instructions at WP:URFA/2020. Comments added here may be swept up in archives and lost, and more editors will see comments on article talk. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 21:06, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
- 7 World Trade Center
- Belton House
- Borobudur
- Buildings and architecture of Bristol
- Freedom Monument
- Heian Palace (at FAR)
- House with Chimaeras
- Hoysala architecture
- Oregon State Capitol
- Palace of Queluz
- Scottish Parliament Building
- Tech Tower
- William Bruce (architect)
- Freedom Monument
Good article reassessment for Architecture of the Song dynasty
Architecture of the Song dynasty has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Onegreatjoke (talk) 04:01, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
FAR Scottish Parliament Building
I have nominated Scottish Parliament Building for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Desertarun (talk) 09:06, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
Featured Article Save Award for Heian Palace
There is a Featured Article Save Award nomination at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review/Heian Palace/archive1. Please join the discussion to recognize and celebrate editors who helped assure this article would retain its featured status. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 04:40, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
Julian C. Messic (1889-1961)
.jpg)
Does anyone have any sources, or ideas as to where to find sources, for a Californian female architect called Julian Messic? The spelling of the name varies; I think the full name was Charlotte Julian Messic, but I have seen C. Julian Messic, Julian C. Messic, and also Mesic with a single "s". I think her dates were 1889-1961, and she worked as a draughter in the office of Julia Morgan, of Hearst Castle fame. Commons does actually have an image. I'd be very grateful for any help in finding sufficient sources for a Start article. I'll also post at the California Project. Many thanks. KJP1 (talk) 17:53, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
FAR for Vkhutemas
I have nominated Vkhutemas for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Z1720 (talk) 21:38, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
Project-independent quality assessments
Quality assessments are used by Wikipedia editors to rate the quality of articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at Wikipedia:Content assessment, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent Village pump proposal was approved and has been implemented to add a |class= parameter to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.
No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.
However, if your project decides to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass {{WPBannerMeta}} a new |QUALITY_CRITERIA=custom parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. Aymatth2 (talk) 14:09, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Acrisure Stadium
Acrisure Stadium has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Onegreatjoke (talk) 21:59, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Dolphinarium
Dolphinarium has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Onegreatjoke (talk) 18:16, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Onion dome
Onion dome has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Hog Farm Talk 14:26, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Llancaiach Fawr#Requested move 28 April 2023
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Llancaiach Fawr#Requested move 28 April 2023 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. EggRoll97 (talk) 00:25, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Walls of Dubrovnik
Walls of Dubrovnik has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Onegreatjoke (talk) 19:00, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
Ramboll Studio Dreiseitl
Would someone from this WikiProject mind taking a look at Ramboll Studio Dreiseitl and assessing it? The article was created back in 2013, but never seems to have been assessed in the years since then. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:44, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Villa Borghese gardens#Requested move 5 June 2023
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Villa Borghese gardens#Requested move 5 June 2023 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 01:10, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
Paintings
Please, can you help me to find the real-life models for these cartoon's paintings: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11? Thank you very much. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.58.208.150 (talk) 12:59, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
FAR for Tech Tower
I have nominated Tech Tower for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Hog Farm Talk 02:37, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
Pierre Debeaux (new)
I've published an article on French architect Pierre Debeaux (also see: French Wikipedia, which is rather more granular and detailed, though I'm tapped-out and couldn't get it all in). Any improvements would be welcome. Cheers, Cl3phact0 (talk) 08:39, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:International Style (architecture)#Requested move 12 July 2023
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:International Style (architecture)#Requested move 12 July 2023 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 20:28, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
Art Deco architecture of New York City is at Featured Article Candidates here, in case project participants want to offer comments. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs talk 19:03, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Royal Albion Hotel
Royal Albion Hotel has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. 🌶️Jalapeño🌶️ Don't click this link! 20:43, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
Al-Aqsa Mosque compound
I have taken the long overdue step of creating an Al-Aqsa Mosque compound page to encompass the full architectural history of Al-Aqsa all in one place. This was not done previously, with there being separate articles for the Dome of the Rock, Al-Aqsa Mosque and Minarets of the Al-Aqsa Mosque compound, etc., but no single page drawing them all together historically and architecturally. The temple mount page provides some architectural overview, but it is so bound up in narrating the full history of the site and is substructure (so much so that it uses the 'mountain' infobox template, not the 'religious building' one) that it has never done full credit to the actual superstructure. Now there is a page that ties it all together. Iskandar323 (talk) 09:08, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Town square#Requested move 21 July 2023
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Town square#Requested move 21 July 2023 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 02:36, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
Proposed merge of Minstrels' gallery into Gallery (theatre)
I've opened a merge discussion at Talk:Gallery (theatre) that concerns this WikiProject. I'd appreciate any input from members! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 02:00, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
The article The Society for the Preservation of Historic Buildings has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
lack of notability - search for independent sources has only revealed those confusing it with SPAB a similarly named but different organisation
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Southdevonian (talk) 12:03, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
- I've deprodded - this should be merged to a section of the different (much older and more successful) Society for the Protection of Ancient Buildings. Johnbod (talk) 15:25, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Hello, anybody hanging around to verify/rectify the references for Dromos: An entrance passage or avenue leading to a building, tomb or passageway. Those leading to beehive tombs are enclosed between stone walls and sometimes in-filled between successive uses of the tomb. In ancient Egypt the dromos was a straight, paved avenue flanked by sphinxes? [35] is an unsecured reference and [36] [https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/1911_Encyclop%C3%A6dia_Britannica/Dromos links to DROMORE, a market town of Co. Down. Linking to [https://www.britannica.com/search?query=dromos Britannica] of looks like the best option. thank you so much for your time. Lotje (talk) 05:09, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
Susan Kozma-Orlay
I've published a stub about the Hungarian–Australian designer Susan Kozma-Orlay in the context of Wikiprojects WP:DESIGN and WP:WIR. I also included WP:ARCH in the banner shell (as Kozma-Orlay is tangentially related to this project), but more to the point, her father was the Hungarian architect Lajos Kozma (d:Q1120648). Kozma is already covered on several other language wikis, and his work is clearly notable, so I though that he may be of interest here (see: image 1, image 2, and image 3 for reference). Cheers, Cl3phact0 (talk) 09:42, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
- While I don't think Susan Kozma-Orlay's article would fall under this project's purview, her father seems like he may be worthy of an article. Thank you for bringing this to our attention @Cl3phact0! SSR07 (talk) 03:03, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
Featured article review for Baden-Powell House
An article under this project's auspices is at featured article review. You can read the notes on the article and discuss its status as Wikipedia:Featured article review/Baden-Powell House/archive1. Thanks, Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs talk 17:07, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Anbang (room)#Requested move 27 August 2023
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Anbang (room)#Requested move 27 August 2023 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. —usernamekiran (talk) 14:37, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
Requested move at Nonbuilding structure
An editor has requested that Nonbuilding structure be moved to another page, which may be of interest to this WikiProject. You are invited to participate in the move discussion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mach61 (talk • contribs) 15:50, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Jan Hird Pokorny (new article suggestion)
Jan Hird Pokorny (1914–2008) Czech-American architect; significant built projects; Commissioner, New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission; etc. Seems like an important gap to fill. (See: NYT obit, NYC Landmarks Comm. bio, and this, as well as wikidata:Q55593539. Cheers, Cl3phact0 (talk) 12:07, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Peter J. Weber
I've written a biography of Riverside, California architect Peter J. Weber. Eight of his designs are on the National Register of Historic Places, and I have another article about the Peter J. Weber House already published. Would appreciate any advice on how to get this article ready for publication, or what the next steps are. Thank you! Davestolte (talk) 20:15, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
- Davestolte - I've left some comments here. KJP1 (talk) 07:02, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Taisha (shrine)#Requested move 10 November 2023
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Taisha (shrine)#Requested move 10 November 2023 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. UtherSRG (talk) 13:33, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
7 World Trade Center featured article review
I have nominated 7 World Trade Center for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. – Epicgenius (talk) 16:14, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
AfD comment request
Comments welcomed please on the deletion discussion for 2 Atlantic Square, an office building in Glasgow. Crowsus (talk) 16:57, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Peer review request for Pruitt–Igoe
I'm looking to take Pruitt–Igoe, an article about a Missouri housing project with an important place in architectural history, to FAC some time in the future. Any and all feedback at Wikipedia:Peer review/Pruitt–Igoe/archive1 would be much appreciated. rblv (talk) 02:14, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
FAR for Matthew Brettingham
I have nominated Matthew Brettingham for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Z1720 (talk) 20:24, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
- Have picked this up. KJP1 (talk) 16:03, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
Peer review request for American Bank Note Company Printing Plant
This is a fascinating building in the South Bronx, designated a New York City landmark. Built in 1909, this was an industrial printing plant on the cutting edge of modern (for the day) technology. The neighborhood suffered from urban decay in the latter part of the 20th century, during which period this building also outlived its original use. This building has been renovated and repurposed as commercial space, taking advantage of the high ceilings and abundant natural lighting inherent in its original design as a printing plant, and has served as an anchor point for the revitalization of the area. I'm trying to get it into shape for WP:FAC and would appreciate input from Wikiproject Architecture. Review page is Wikipedia:Peer review/American Bank Note Company Printing Plant/archive2. RoySmith (talk) 01:01, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
- This is now at WP:Featured article candidates/American Bank Note Company Printing Plant/archive1 RoySmith (talk) 03:42, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Architecture of Norway
Architecture of Norway has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 19:59, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
Borobudur Featured article review
User:SandyGeorgia has nominated Borobudur for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:36, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Western Wall
Western Wall has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 01:17, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
RfC at Montacute House
Hello! I've opened an RfC at Talk:Montacute House on the placement and size of the images in the article, please join in if you would like. Thank you, A.D.Hope (talk) 11:14, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Hudson's Bay Centre#Requested move 26 December 2023
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Hudson's Bay Centre#Requested move 26 December 2023 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. UtherSRG (talk) 18:09, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Sagrestia Nuova (New Sacristy)#Requested move 6 January 2024
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Sagrestia Nuova (New Sacristy)#Requested move 6 January 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 12:48, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:List of synagogue shootings#Requested move 8 January 2024
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:List of synagogue shootings#Requested move 8 January 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 11:47, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:WuWa, Wrocław#Requested move 15 January 2024
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:WuWa, Wrocław#Requested move 15 January 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 17:12, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Requesting assistance for updates to Foster and Partners
I have some minor updates to make to the page, mainly to do with adding sources and correcting slight misinformation about Norman Foster. I’m employed by the firm, so help here would be most appreciated. Talk:Foster_and_Partners#December_2023_proposal_of_edits StaffordJasper (talk) 17:35, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Portal Fernandez Concha
Hello Members of WikiProject Architecture, I hope this message finds you all well and thriving in your contributions to the architectural heritage on Wikipedia. I am reaching out to seek your valuable expertise and assistance in enhancing the article for Portal Fernández Concha, a notable architectural landmark with significant historical and cultural importance.
The Portal Fernández Concha, with its rich history and architectural uniqueness, presents an opportunity to enrich Wikipedia's repository of architectural knowledge. However, the current article faces several challenges, including ensuring accuracy in historical context, architectural detail, and balancing content to meet Wikipedia's standards for neutrality and verifiability.
Here are some areas where your expertise would be invaluable:
- Historical Accuracy and Context: Ensuring the historical narrative of Portal Fernández Concha is accurate, well-referenced, and provides a comprehensive view of its significance in architectural history.
- Architectural Details: Expanding on the architectural aspects of the building, including design, style, influences, and any unique features that highlight its importance in the architectural landscape.
- Balanced Content: Assistance in achieving a balanced perspective that includes not just the architectural and historical significance, but also addresses contemporary issues and public perceptions without veering into promotional or unduly negative content.
- Reliable Sourcing: Help in identifying and citing reliable sources that can substantiate the facts about Portal Fernández Concha, ensuring the article meets Wikipedia's standards for verifiability.
- Photographs and Illustrations: If anyone has access to or can point towards copyright-compliant images that could enhance the article visually, it would greatly contribute to the article's quality.
I believe that with the collective knowledge and expertise of this community, we can significantly improve the Portal Fernández Concha article, making it a valuable and informative resource for all readers interested in architecture and history. I am eager to collaborate and would greatly appreciate any guidance, suggestions, or direct contributions you can offer. Please feel free to dive into the article, make edits, or discuss potential improvements on the article's talk page or here.
Thank you for considering this request, and I look forward to your valuable contributions and insights. Best regards, TraceySear840 (talk) 18:03, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- TraceySear840 - for clarity, I think we are talking about this, Draft:Portal Fernandez Concha? And I see there is an article on Spanish Wikipedia, [1]. Would a starting point be an attributed translation of the Spanish article? KJP1 (talk) 18:12, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- p.s. - Apologies, I should have said, I slightly refactored your comments for ease of reading. KJP1 (talk) 18:13, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- No issues! thanks for editing. The spanish article is really limited sadly. So I used it as a base and then expanded into the key sections of the artcile. I tried my best to be encyclopedic etc. TraceySear840 (talk) 18:24, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- and yes its Draft:Portal Fernandez Concha TraceySear840 (talk) 18:24, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Fine - I'll take a look. KJP1 (talk) 18:34, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks TraceySear840 (talk) 18:44, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- articles like this are greatbut I have no idea where they get their sources https://landie.cl/jueves-adicto/memorias-y-prejuicios-del-portal-fernandez-concha/
- Ps I have found all the current and historical arquitectural plans for the building.If those are useful? TraceySear840 (talk) 18:47, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- This is the position on the plaza in 1890 https://www.enterreno.com/moments/plaza-de-armas-de-santiago-en-1890-5
- This is the building in 1922 https://www.enterreno.com/moments/portal-fernandez-concha-en-1922
- This is apparently 1929 (could be 1927) https://www.enterreno.com/moments/remodelacion-del-portal-fernandez-concha-1929
- This is 1895 https://www.enterreno.com/moments/santiago-portal-fernandez-concha TraceySear840 (talk) 19:02, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- p.s. those photos are all free to use public domain TraceySear840 (talk) 19:03, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks TraceySear840 (talk) 18:44, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Fine - I'll take a look. KJP1 (talk) 18:34, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- and yes its Draft:Portal Fernandez Concha TraceySear840 (talk) 18:24, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- No issues! thanks for editing. The spanish article is really limited sadly. So I used it as a base and then expanded into the key sections of the artcile. I tried my best to be encyclopedic etc. TraceySear840 (talk) 18:24, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- p.s. - Apologies, I should have said, I slightly refactored your comments for ease of reading. KJP1 (talk) 18:13, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Examples of recent internal remodelations/architecture related sources
- https://schwarzhaus.cl/pages/01-portal-fernandez-concha-santiago
- https://www.urbancubearquitectas.com/copia-de-dc-759-603
- https://estudiopedrosilva.cl/Portal-Fernandez-Concha-2019 TraceySear840 (talk) 19:18, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
I see that you have resubmitted the draft, without taking on board the first reviewer's comments, and have now taken the second reviewer, who also rejected it, to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. That's not an approach I'd support, and I can't help you further. KJP1 (talk) 06:05, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
Montacute House
There are discussions at Talk:Montacute House about image placement and infobox format which would benefit from editor input. Thank you, A.D.Hope (talk) 20:02, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Grand Cinema (Shanghai)#Requested move 4 February 2024
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Grand Cinema (Shanghai)#Requested move 4 February 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 14:26, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Three Rivers Stadium
Three Rivers Stadium has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 18:08, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Cannons (house)
Cannons (house) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 02:48, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
The article Clare Cousins has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
failed notability guidelines 5 days ago and has been tagged with copy/paste
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
Good article reassessment for The Blackstone Hotel
The Blackstone Hotel has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Spinixster (chat!) 01:22, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
FAR for PNC Park
I have nominated PNC Park for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Hog Farm Talk 20:13, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Fortress of Klis
Fortress of Klis has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 01:59, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
Afd, if you'd like to take a look
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Carnivale.
"The author of the "The Affordable House" has completed about 510 buildings, including houses in various traditional styles, bars and clubs - a specialty - and recently, a small airport in Tennessee." Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 17:08, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Architecture of the United States#Requested move 16 April 2024
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Architecture of the United States#Requested move 16 April 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 20:56, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Mezhyhirya Monastery
Mezhyhirya Monastery has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. NLeeuw (talk) 13:36, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Grade I listed buildings in England completed in the 20th century - Featured list candidate
If any editors have the time/inclination, the above article is up as a Featured list candidate, here. It currently has a Support for the content, a Support for the Image review, and an All clear on the Accessibility review, but could do with some further comments, in support or flagging concerns/issues. I'd greatly appreciate any comments. KJP1 (talk) 11:24, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Now FL. KJP1 (talk) 19:08, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Golubac Fortress
Golubac Fortress has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Hog Farm Talk 17:32, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement!
Hello, |