User talk:Davestolte

Welcome!

Hi OldRiversideFoundation! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Tarheel95 (Talk) 18:23, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, club, organization, company, or website, I have blocked this account from editing. You are welcome to continue editing after you have chosen a new username that complies with Wikipedia's username policy.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable, regardless of the username that you choose. Additionally, if your contributions to Wikipedia form all or part of work for which you are, or expect to be, paid or compensated in any way, you must disclose who is paying you to edit here.

Please take a moment to either create a new account, or request a username change of your current account here. The new username that you choose must represent you as an individual person, and it must comply with Wikipedia's username policy.

To create a new account with a different username, simply log out of this account and then click here to make a new one.
If you prefer to change the username on this account, you may do so by adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page here: {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken or in use by another account. You can go here to search and see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is available to be taken.

Please also note that you are permitted to use a username that contains the name of a company or organization if it also identifies you individually, such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87", but not "SEO Manager at XYZ Company".

Appeals: If your username does not represent a group, organization, website, or other entity described above, and if you believe that this block was incorrect or made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page here: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Thank you.

Salvio

18:30, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Davestolte (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

davestolte (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

block on organization names OldRiversideFoundation (talk) 18:50, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

Rename was processed. 331dot (talk) 09:21, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Davestolte. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Davestolte. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Davestolte|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 331dot (talk) 09:22, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I would further add that new users cannot directly create new articles, and must use Articles for Creation. 331dot (talk) 09:23, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I do not have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic (or a financial stake of any kind in this matter).

I serve as president of Old Riverside Foundation, a certified 501(3)c California Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation. All directors (including the president) are volunteers and our bylaws specifically prohibit us from any financial gain.

Our bylaws are here, for more information if needed: https://oldriverside.org/bylaws/

Thank you. Davestolte (talk) 16:54, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your reply. You will need to review conflict of interest before editing, though. 331dot (talk) 17:13, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, reviewed and noted. Davestolte (talk) 17:15, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm getting an error saying I'm still blocked from editing. How can I submit my article for review? Davestolte (talk) 18:14, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I greatly apologize, I have now removed it. 331dot (talk) 18:16, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Submitted for review. Davestolte (talk) 18:44, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Peter J. Weber House (November 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheAafi was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Peter J. Weber House and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

─ The Aafī (talk) 18:46, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Peter J. Weber House (November 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

None of the sources used are reliable (user generated). Is listed as a National Historic Landmark or a state registry? Those generally meet the notability guidelines.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Peter J. Weber House and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 19:48, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Weber House is not listed on the National Register of Historic Places (although it has been determined eligible), nor on the California State Registry. I will continue to try and find more in-depth sources to cite and resubmit as soon as possible. Davestolte (talk) 22:11, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Davestolte! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 19:48, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Peter J. Weber House (January 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mattdaviesfsic was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Large number of unsourced claims. See WP:CIRCULAR.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Peter J. Weber House and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 19:26, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Revised draft submitted in January with reliable sources (external to Wikipedia). Davestolte (talk) 17:21, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New draft submitted. Davestolte (talk) 03:30, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peter J. Weber House (April 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Majash2020 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Peter J. Weber House and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Majash2020 (talk) 05:13, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Peter J. Weber House has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Peter J. Weber House. Thanks! InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 15:31, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Peter J. Weber House has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Peter J. Weber House. Thanks! SportingFlyer T·C 16:32, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peter J. Weber House has been accepted

Peter J. Weber House, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

SportingFlyer T·C 10:44, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Davestolte (talk) 13:40, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Peter J. Weber, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it has been moved to where you can continue to work on it. Please consider using the Article Wizard or the Articles for Creation procedure. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read "Your first article". You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. B3251 (talk) 19:17, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peter J. Weber (August 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Peter J. Weber, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Davestolte/Peter J. Weber and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 05:56, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I submitted a proposal to delete the other draft after reading advice to create a draft in this space, saying it would be more likely to be reviewed. I deleted all content in the other draft and marked it for deletion. Davestolte (talk) 06:10, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: User:Davestolte/Peter J. Weber has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Davestolte/Peter J. Weber. Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:27, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Peter J. Weber

As far as I can see, the draft article has not yet been submitted for review. Do you need any help? Cheers, Cl3phact0 (talk) 22:38, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Cl3phact0 I think I must need help! I thought it was in review already. Any assistance would be appreciated. Davestolte (talk) 23:30, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The draft is here: Draft:Peter J. Weber

There was an earlier version that got deleted in the process somehow, but this one ^ should be good to go. Davestolte (talk) 23:32, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done -- Cl3phact0 (talk) 05:22, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I appreciate your help and your support of the article. Davestolte (talk) 14:17, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

PS: You might want to ping some of the other editors with whom you've discussed the article too. -- Cl3phact0 (talk) 05:35, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

PPS: I stumbled across your earlier article about the Peter J. Weber House, which is a fascinating structure. Thanks for taking the time to add these to the wiki-project! -- Cl3phact0 (talk) 05:35, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! It really is such a unique place. If you ever find yourself in Southern California, I’d love to give you a tour. Davestolte (talk) 14:10, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peter J. Weber has been accepted

Peter J. Weber, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cl3phact0 (talk) 07:16, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks to Cl3phact0 for picking that up, and congratulations to you for an great article. I look forward to seeing the biography as a source. KJP1 (talk) 07:22, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, will definitely make sure to get you a copy. Your help is so appreciated! Davestolte (talk) 15:07, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Davestolte. Thank you for your work on Peter J. Weber. Another editor, Cl3phact0, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Normally I wouldn't do both AfC and review to avoid the appearance of impartiality, but I think this case is a clear exception. Nice article. Thanks for writing it!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Cl3phact0}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Cl3phact0 (talk) 07:30, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]