Jump to content

User talk:Cl3phact0

Page contents not supported in other languages.
This user helped get "Livio Castiglioni" listed at Did You Know on the main page on 2023-01-14.
This user helped get "Sabine Marcelis" listed at Did You Know on the main page on 2023-03-15.
This user helped get "Yinka Ilori" listed at Did You Know on the main page on 2023-03-16.
This user helped get "John Hoke III" listed at Did You Know on the main page on 2023-04-12.
This user helped get "Patricia Davies (codebreaker)" listed at Did You Know on the main page on 2023-07-19.
This user helped get "Olivetti Valentine" listed at Did You Know on the main page on 2024-03-14.
This user has extended confirmed rights on the English Wikipedia.
This user is an Articles for Creation reviewer on the English Wikipedia.
This user has new page reviewer rights on the English Wikipedia.
This user is not an administrator.
This user is a WikiGnome.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 Skip to the bottom  ⇩ 


Your submission at Articles for creation: Livio Castiglioni has been accepted

[edit]
Livio Castiglioni, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 15:44, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! Made my day. Cheers, Cl3phact0 (talk) 17:53, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Also, thanks for taking the time to improve the article, correct formatting for the inter-wiki links, and clean-up my mistakes, etc. I look forward to seeing what others add over time too. Cheers, Cl3phact0 (talk) 18:09, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Livio Castiglioni

[edit]

On 14 January 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Livio Castiglioni, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Italian designer Livio Castiglioni was the elder brother of Achille and Pier Giacomo Castiglioni, sons of sculptor Giannino Castiglioni? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Livio Castiglioni. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Livio Castiglioni), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

-- RoySmith (talk) 12:02, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yinka Ilori has been accepted

[edit]
Yinka Ilori, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hoary (talk) 12:29, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! -- Cl3phact0 (talk) 12:40, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

[edit]
The Barnstar of Diligence
For being generally tireless, diligent, and open minded in spite of all the curveballs Wikipedia throws at you.  Mr.choppers | ✎  03:01, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


(if you were wondering, barnstars used to be a thing amongst the community but no one seems to use them much anymore.)

Thank you! Made my day. Cheers, Cl3phact0 (talk) 05:01, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
PS: Yes, I was wondering what they were and from[1] whence they came. Now I know ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

DYK for Sabine Marcelis

[edit]

On 15 March 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sabine Marcelis, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Dutch designer Sabine Marcelis was a semi-professional snowboarder in New Zealand before she decided to pursue a career in the arts? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sabine Marcelis. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Sabine Marcelis), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 00:03, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Yinka Ilori

[edit]

On 16 March 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Yinka Ilori, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the artist and designer Yinka Ilori once made a collection of chairs that were inspired by a Nigerian parable about a giraffe? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Yinka Ilori. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Yinka Ilori), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Aoidh (talk) 12:02, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for John Hoke III

[edit]

On 12 April 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article John Hoke III, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that John Hoke III, who is dyslexic and the chief design officer of Nike, has described drawing as his first language? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/John Hoke III. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, John Hoke III), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Aoidh (talk) 00:02, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hello, Cl3phact0. Thank you for your work on ADI Design Museum. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, I had the following comments:

Hey y'all! I sure hope y'all are havin' a mighty fine day today. I just wanted to say a heartfelt thank you for takin' the time to contribute to Wikipedia by creatin' that there article. I'm happy to inform you that your article has adhered to Wikipedia's policies, so I've marked it as reviewed. Now y'all can rest easy and enjoy the rest of your day, along with your kinfolk! Y'all take care now, ya hear?

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 16:13, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New page reviewer granted

[edit]

Hi Cl3phact0. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at the permissions page in case your user right is time-limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page or ask via the NPP Discord. In addition, please remember:

  • Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
  • You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
  • If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
  • Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page, including checking for copyright violations using Earwig's copyright violation detector, checking for duplicate articles, and evaluating sources (both in the article, and if needed, via a Google search) for compliance with the general notability guideline.
  • Please review some of our flowcharts (1, 2) to help ensure you don't forget any steps.
  • Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. If you can read any languages other than English, please add yourself to the list of new page reviewers with language proficiencies. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 16:36, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Ingenuity. Much appreciated. Cheers, Cl3phact0 (talk) 16:46, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Notice

The article Giorgia Zanellato has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not notable person

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PakisOne (talk) 11:53, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

PakisOne (for reference only: MrsSnoozyTurtle, Ipigott), Contested and removed WP:PROD (see rational in edit summaries). Expanding the article would be more constructive. Thank you, Cl3phact0 (talk) 10:17, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New message from Stifle

[edit]
Hello, Cl3phact0. You have new messages at Stifle's talk page.
Message added 17:51, 14 February 2024 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Stifle (talk) 17:51, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New message from Stifle

[edit]
Hello, Cl3phact0. You have new messages at Stifle's talk page.
Message added 08:54, 15 February 2024 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Stifle (talk) 08:54, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Olivetti Valentine

[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Olivetti Valentine at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 14:52, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Olivetti Valentine

[edit]

On 14 March 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Olivetti Valentine, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that Ettore Sottsass's design of the Olivetti Valentine typewriter (example pictured) was inspired by the pop-art nudes of Tom Wesselmann? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Olivetti Valentine. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Olivetti Valentine), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:10, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valentine DYK

[edit]

I want to congratulate you on the successful Olivetti Valentine DYK link -- I don't know which is more challenging: putting together a good Wikipedia article or getting an article successfully into DYK. I have a nagging disappointment that I did not think to time all of this so it could hit DYK on Valentine's day! Years ago I had nominated many articles successfully for DYK, but found the process somewhat brutal, with a tendency to take the rigorous dissection of the articles... personally. I tend to take an arms-length approach, now, to DYK -- though I can't wait to see the number of pageviews, lol. I appreciate your hopping onto the article after I started major edits, helping form it, and especially doing so in a way that was constructive and collaborative. The next time I expand an article, I may tag you, as you understand the process well and can make impacts in a professional and friendly way. It's hilarious that after all the work and effort put in to polishing that article, the first sentence carried a typo on the article name -- until it was released to DYK! It takes a village. Bravo and congrats. 842U (talk) 10:50, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks to you for putting together a fascinating little gem of an article! It does an excellent job of highlighting this curious and iconic design, as well as framing its historical context and enduring significance – and yes, utterly hilarious that it took 15K+ pairs of eyes to spot that Valentine was misspelt in the first line of the lead. Apart from the satisfaction of seeing a good article so widely read, this is the best rationale I can think of for enduring any inherent stress of the DYK process itself. Also, tag at will. I'm happy to look at anything you'd like. Cheers, Cl3phact0 (talk) 10:55, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations!

[edit]
Home-Made Barnstar
For all the work done within the controversial fettuccine Alfredo page.

JacktheBrown (talk) 17:20, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion

[edit]

You're very good at improving the pages. When you've finished editing the fettuccine Alfredo article, would you like to help me with another page? Of course I don't want to rush you.
You're an important user for this encyclopaedia. JacktheBrown (talk) 13:09, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I would be happy to help you where I am able. Let me know which article(s) you would like me to look at, and if I believe I can be helpful, I will! Cheers, Cl3phact0 (talk) 18:46, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There are many articles that should be improved, but for the moment I would propose the pasta salad page. JacktheBrown (talk) 20:50, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you want you can check the English of the quote I added on the baccalà mantecato page, I'm not a native English speaker. JacktheBrown (talk) 11:51, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you're interested in improving Italian foods, you can find them all on this page: List of Italian foods and drinks. JacktheBrown (talk) 11:59, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, would you like to help me improve this page? JacktheBrown (talk) 08:04, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cronotime

[edit]

MoMA misspelled Cronotime in their catalog! Embarrassing!  Mr.choppers | ✎  13:57, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Missed that. Easy enough to make translation mistake though (as "Cronotime" is a portmanteau of 'Crono' from Italian: cronografo [kroˈnɔɡrafo] + English 'time'). Also, doubly embarrassing in that the design curator at MoMA is Italian!
[NB: The clock itself doesn't appear to be isn't a chronograph either – for what it's worth.]
All of that aside, the Pio Manzù article would benefit from a photograph of this lovely object (I had a first look on Commons, but didn't find anything).
Cheers, Cl3phact0 (talk) 15:12, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Erremm (who created the article) already asked me to look into it. I don't know that it is on display, though.  Mr.choppers | ✎  17:09, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Mr.choppers and Erremm: There are some photos of the clock here. These apparently come from Flicker (where there are also a few other shots), however, my knowledge of our copyright policy vis-à-vis that site is thin. I don't know if any of these photos are WP or Commons compliant – nor, for that matter, would I think that "Design is fine" is itself usable as a source (though it does contain useful links to some good RS sites). Cheers, Cl3phact0 (talk) 15:10, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Flickr user took the photos from t3d.be/, who seems to have scanned a magzaine or something. No good, alas!  Mr.choppers | ✎  16:24, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This will be addressed soon. Erremm (talk) 07:54, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Great! Looking forward to seeing the photo in due course. If it is of interest (or relevant), I hope to locate a good photo of the Solari Cifra 5 clock too (see Cifra 3 for context – the image would nicely enhance this article, as well as the Gallery section of the Compasso d'Oro article, and perhaps eventual articles about the architects Nani Valle and Gino Valle [it] as well). Cheers, Cl3phact0 (talk) 05:51, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Erremm (talk) 09:53, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for letting me know! It looks very good and adds a nice contrast (size, colour, typology) to the other photos used in the article. [NB: Ritz-Italora also made the Sandwich clock by Richard Sapper. Perhaps there's even enough here for a stub about the company (or the clocks)?] Cheers, Cl3phact0 (talk) 14:35, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Erremm and Mr.choppers: Tangent yet related – another clock that would be nice to have a photo of is the Optic Model 02 designed by Joe Colombo (apparently also with a similar Ritz-Italora/Alessi history). Once again, I'm not sure about rights. Can we use a photo from the Brooklyn Museum site (which states: "You may download and use Brooklyn Museum images of this three-dimensional work in accordance with a Creative Commons license.")? -- Cl3phact0 (talk) 07:57, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

KieranTimberlake Selected projects outreach

[edit]

Hello! I do apologize for posting here, but I did want to alert you that I've uploaded an edit request to update the Selected projects section over on the KieranTimberlake Talk page. You've been accommodating with previous COI edit requests I have uploaded there and I figured you'd be interested in evaluating this one as well if you've got the time. Again, thanks so much for all the time and effort. IvyKieranTimberlake (talk) 19:57, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

[edit]

Hello Cl3phact0. I am part of the Wikiproject Women in Red. I created the article Tasha K. Do review and give me feedback. Regards. Laurengoldstreet (talk) 10:49, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You removed my edits on Moshe Safdie's page

[edit]

Your comment was "Please, no politics". I'd like to have a discussion on what you think is political about what I wrote, so we can resolve this before taking it to the talk page. Gamalny (talk) 14:53, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That is fine with me. Please feel welcome to open the discussion. Cheers, Cl3phact0 (talk) 14:58, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I will start by saying for transparency that I'm not an apolitical person. However, my edit in the Moshe Safdie article was ethical and historically accurate and not meant to cause controversy or be "political", although I realize that everything that mentions Palestine or Israel is seen as political. It was also conventional. I used customary terms such as Mandatory Palestine instead of "Palestine", or "British Mandate of Palestine (Now Israel)", which follows the convention of most Wikipedia articles about historical and current individuals. It is not related to current affairs or any edit restrictions regarding the "Israeli-Palestinian Conflict". What is your take? Gamalny (talk) 17:55, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Noted. Did you have a chance to look at the recent edit history of the Safdie article? -- Cl3phact0 (talk) 15:33, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I just took another look. I see you've been editing the page since at least 12 April 2024. Do you still have any concerns regarding my edit specifically? If so, I hope we can resolve it. I see you removed edits that appear similar to mine by some past users, but my wording is different and tries to align with convention and historical accuracy. Gamalny (talk) 16:18, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
My concern is (and was) only to avoid dragging the article into any contentious aspects of Israeli-Palestinian matters (either current or historical) by larding it with syntactical over-specificity. Safdie is an architect who happens to have been born in Hafia, a city in what is now known as Israel (which is probably relevant in that he is an Israeli citizen). In my view, too much emphasis on what the country was called in July 1948 1938 (or who was in charge of it politically, militarily, or otherwise) when he was born doesn't add much of use to the article. Keep it simple: Mandatory Palestine (now Israel) in the infobox would probably be fine. Adding this level of detail throughout the text seems overkill. -- Cl3phact0 (talk) 16:43, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Can we compromise and say he was born in "Haifa, Mandatory Palestine (now Israel)" both in the infobox and the first sentence on his early life? Gamalny (talk) 16:47, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I wouldn't object. Again, mostly, I was focused on trying to tidy the earlier iterations and rid the article of any hint of politics (and the un-readable multi-hyphenate-nationality verbiage that sometimes comes along with it). It's the last thing that's needed (again, in my view) in an article about an architect (or artist, or chess player, or inventor). Cheers, Cl3phact0 (talk) 17:07, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds good, thank you for the conversation, and I hope we reached a fair compromise. Gamalny (talk) 17:11, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
An IP editor seems to have decided it was a good idea to remove your contribution (per above). I'm not inclined to get involved at the moment, though you may be. [NB: This also highlights the disadvantage of having a discussion of this nature here on User talk rather than on the article's Talk page itself.] Cheers, Cl3phact0 (talk) 18:03, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Got it, thank you for the heads-up. Gamalny (talk) 19:38, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brittany Spanos (September 29)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JoelleJay was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
JoelleJay (talk) 22:02, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

John Venables-Llewelyn

[edit]

Thanks for your edit. I will add a picture of some of the cars mentioned. I cannot find a public domain image of Sir John himself, but if you know of one feel free to add it! Mac Edmunds (talk) 14:40, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red November 2024

[edit]
Women in Red | November 2024, Vol 10, Issue 11, Nos 293, 294, 321, 322, 323


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 20:45, 29 October 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

The Signpost: 6 November 2024

[edit]