User talk:Thoughtfortheday

Hello, and welcome! just noticed you did some nice edits to Codex Las Huelgas, which I started back in the day. Just wanted to say welcome, and enjoy. I'm not around much, but when I edited here a lot I found User:Antandrus to be both very knowledgeable and very friendly, so if you have any questions, you might ask him. I'll leave the welcome "template" below, because it has some useful links on it. Best, Mak (talk) 21:15, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Thoughtfortheday, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Mak (talk) 21:15, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Library issues

Your free 1-year HighBeam Research account is approved!

Good news! You are approved for access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research.

The 1-year, free period begins when you enter the code you were emailed. If you did not receive a code, email wikiocaasi@yahoo.com your Wikipedia username.
To activate your account: 1) Go to http://www.highbeam.com/prof1
If you need assistance, email or ask User:Ocaasi. Please, per HighBeam's request, do not call the toll-free number for assistance with registration.
A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a HighBeam article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free HighBeam pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:HighBeam/Citations.
HighBeam would love to hear feedback at WP:HighBeam/Experiences
Show off your HighBeam access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/highbeam_userbox}} on your userpage
When the 1-year period is up, check applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi 15:34, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Books and Bytes: The Wikipedia Library Newsletter

Books and Bytes

Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013

by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs)

Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved...

New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian

Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.

New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??

New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges

News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY

Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions

New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration

Read the full newsletter

Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. --The Interior 21:07, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library's Books and Bytes newsletter (#2)

Books & Bytes

Sign up for monthly delivery

Welcome to the second issue of The Wikipedia Library's Books & Bytes newsletter! Read on for updates about what is going on at the intersection of Wikipedia and the library world.

Wikipedia Library highlights: New accounts, new surveys, new positions, new presentations...

Spotlight on people: Another Believer and Wiki Loves Libraries...

Books & Bytes in brief: From Dewey to Diversity conference...

Further reading: Digital library portals around the web...

Read Books & Bytes

The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs) 16:48, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library Survey

As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi^{t | c} 15:27, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library completed the first 6 months of its Individual Engagement grant last week. Here's where we are and what we've done:

Increased access to sources: 1500 editors signed up for 3700 free accounts, individually worth over $500,000, with usage increases of 400-600%

Deep networking: Built relationships with Credo, HighBeam, Questia, JSTOR, Cochrane, LexisNexis, EBSCO, New York Times, and OCLC

New pilot projects: Started the Wikipedia Visiting Scholar project to empower university-affiliated Wikipedia researchers

Developed community: Created portal connecting 250 newsletter recipients, 30 library members, 3 volunteer coordinators, and 2 part-time contractors

Tech scoped: Spec'd out a reference tool for linking to full-text sources and established a basis for OAuth integration

Broad outreach: Wrote a feature article for Library Journal's The Digital Shift; presenting at the American Library Association annual meeting

...Read Books & Bytes!

Books & Bytes, Issue 4

Books and Bytes

Volume 1, Issue 4, February 2014

News for February from your Wikipedia Library.

Donations drive: news on TWL's partnership efforts with publishers

Open Access: Feature from Ocaasi on the intersection of the library and the open access movement

American Library Association Midwinter Conference: TWL attended this year in Philadelphia

Royal Society Opens Access To Journals: The UK's venerable Royal Society will give the public (and Wikipedians) full access to two of their journal titles for two days on March 4th and 5th

Going Global: TWL starts work on pilot projects in other language Wikipedias

Read the full newsletter

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:00, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes - Issue 5

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 5, March 2014
by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs)

New Visiting Scholar positions
TWL Branch on Arabic Wikipedia, microgrants program
Australian articles get a link to librarians
Spotlight: "7 Reasons Librarians Should Edit Wikipedia"

Read the full newsletter

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:55, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes, Issue 6

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 6, April-May 2014
by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs)

New donations from Oxford University Press and Royal Society (UK)
TWL does Vegas: American Library Association Annual plans
TWL welcomes a new coordinator, resources for library students and interns
New portal on Meta, resources for starting TWL branches, donor call blitzes, Wikipedia Visiting Scholar news, and more

Read the full newsletter

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library: New Account Coordinators Needed

Hi Books & Bytes recipients: The Wikipedia Library has been expanding rapidly and we need some help! We currently have 10 signups for free account access open and several more in the works... In order to help with those signups, distribute access codes, and manage accounts we'll need 2-3 more Account Coordinators.

It takes about an hour to get up and running and then only takes a couple hours per week, flexible depending upon your schedule and routine. If you're interested in helping out, please drop a note in the next week at my talk page or shoot me an email at: jorlowitzgmail.com. Thanks and cheers, Jake Ocaasi via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:41, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

New Wikipedia Library Accounts Now Available (November 2014)

Hello Wikimedians!

The Wikipedia Library is announcing signups today for, free, full-access accounts to published research as part of our Publisher Donation Program. You can sign up for:

DeGruyter: 1000 new accounts for English and German-language research. Sign up on one of two language Wikipedias:
- English signup
- Deutsch signup
Fold3: 100 new accounts for American history and military archives
Scotland's People: 100 new accounts for Scottish genealogy database
British Newspaper Archive: expanded by 100+ accounts for British newspapers
Highbeam: 100+ remaining accounts for newspaper and magazine archives
Questia: 100+ remaining accounts for journal and social science articles
JSTOR: 100+ remaining accounts for journal archives

Do better research and help expand the use of high quality references across Wikipedia projects: sign up today!
--The Wikipedia Library Team 23:25, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

You can host and coordinate signups for a Wikipedia Library branch in your own language. Please contact Ocaasi (WMF).

This message was delivered via the Mass Message to the Book & Bytes recipient list.

JSTOR

I have given up my JSTOR access via Wikipedia as I have been offered access via my alumni association. -Thoughtfortheday (talk) 20:57, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cézanne

Were crossing article a fair bit in the last few weeks, so saying hello. Nice work on Marie-Hortense Fiquet and José Lázaro Galdiano. I see you are new to en.wiki, any problems or help needed, give me a shout on my talk. Best. Ceoil 21:03, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I modified some of your text from the Fiquet article in this edit.[1]. I think its allowed, and if you don't mind, thanks, its very relevant to the page. Ceoil 15:18, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I would moved on from the article if not for the back story I saw in her bio. I think I can get a fairly good page here if I stick with it, which is my plan. I want to develop the coverage of their realtionship, and I think this painting is the best place to do it, its very much a physco-drama, that painting. I'm a slow worker though, tend to read a lot of sources before I add, but I'll be swapping info back and forth to the bio once I get going. Its a nice concidence we are both working on a similar thing at the same time. Ceoil 19:20, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers for the edits to the Titian series. I need to sort that article out! Ceoil 16:28, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I didn't get around to it this weekend, but will at the next chance. Ceoil 22:55, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merida theatre

Ciao! Thanks for your help at Merida Theatre... I had given it some attention last year, but honestly I missed to notice how poorly written it was. I tried to cleanup some illiterate parts which were remaining. Let me know if you think it's OK now. Ciao and good work. --'''Attilios''' (talk) 17:35, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Thanks for you words, hope you're to remain. I think there are some difficulties at the beginning to enter into the Wikipedia-mind (for example, having sometimes to cease to a mass of other - often less intelligent - contributors in a dispute due to sheer number), but the pleasure is, 99% of times, greater than the angriness. I usually write stuff about Italian arguments, but recently (since 2010 or so; PS: if you notice this word "recently" in some article, remove it; we should always give some precise reference, and "recently" in 2005 is no more recent in 2011, if no one has erased its content in the meantime) I have switched to Spanish stuff after noticing most of its article are in a rather poor state. I mostly write about monuments or histories, and Spain is second only to Italy in such matters. I thing I've noticed is that most description of southern Spain coastal cities are slanted towards tourism, speaking of how to find a house, the social class of the English who have moved there etc. I tried to removed such useless stuff when not truly relevant, and adding History and Main sights using the Spanish original as a base. OK, I stop it here... Let me know if you need any help and have fun!! --'''Attilios''' (talk) 17:58, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Psalm settings

I like that category! I added Handels Utrecht Te Deum and Jubilate, because the Jubilate is an elaborate setting of a psalm. But the Te deum is not. How about the Bach cantatas which contain (for example) one verse of a psalm as one of six movements? Perhaps the category article might explain? - I'll watch here. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:06, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the encouragement to add some more works to the new category "Psalm settings". Yes, I was thinking of adding some Bach, and have now started. However, I don't know the cantatas nearly as well as you. -Thoughtfortheday (talk) 12:32, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Most of the cantatas I encountered with a psalm are listed on Psalms#Psalms set to music, as is other music, I just didn't know if the category applies, because the psalm verse is only a small portion of both the cantata text and the psalm. How about Rutter's Requiem which contains 2 psalms? Consider to include all vespers, Monteverdi, Mozart ... --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:45, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think pieces should be able to qualify even if they fail to set the complete text of a psalm. Even so, perhaps we should limit the cantatas for the time being to the six you mention. -Thoughtfortheday (talk) 21:10, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

[2] 188.227.160.244 (talk) 20:36, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FYI there is also a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Ongoing edit-warring and incivility by IP editor that relates to you. Prioryman (talk) 22:55, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

van der Paele

Hey and thanks for the edits. Just getting my head around the painting for now, and yeah will add a more rounded bio of van der Paele himself. Take care. Ceoil (talk) 21:38, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sometime when you get a chance, could look at Witches' Sabbath (Goya, 1823). I've been sitting on it for ages, and want to make a push there. Esp can you watch for repition and redundancy. Ta once again. Ceoil (talk) 14:19, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tks for the edits and help. Ceoil (talk) 02:34, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 16

Hi. When you recently edited Christopher Page, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Society of Antiquaries (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:38, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I´m not sure...will have another look later

A barnstar for you

		The Modest Barnstar
		In recognition of all the work you’ve done lately! 66.87.0.115 (talk) 20:48, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

BWV 193 and 193a

Thanks for improving. But please find another term for "sacred sibling". I personally think that the average reader can handle the math that 11 is slightly higher than 7 without being told ;) - Wolff thinks that Picander may have been the author also of the sacred cantata BECAUSE he wrote the other,- that's why I didn't mention him earlier. Chronologically, BWV 193a should come first, - but that music is lost. What can we do? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:18, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In addition, BWV 119, but generally: cantor in Leipzig meant for the main churches, s. Bach article, "Thomaskantor" is nice but misleading, thanks for fixing that, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:16, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking care of BWV 131, neglected so far ;) - I go by the liturgical calendar - We don't need to link all the locations of the Bach Pilgrimage, the place to do so is on Monteverdi Choir. - It would be nice if that cantata and other "old style" ones followed the standard format, example BWV 76, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:41, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You find scoring for any given cantata in the sortable List of Bach cantatas, as you probably know, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:24, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

We could keep the discussion this place, I am watching. When I say choir it can be a group of four people. For the Weimar cantatas, that seems most likely, no more room on the organ loft that you see pictured in BWV 172 ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:11, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I see. I imagine there can be a problem in trying not to replicate information about, say, the forces available to Bach in Leipzig, across multiple entries.

The place to add things that apply to more than one cantata is Bach cantata, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:37, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

On the topic of libretti, I have amended the article about Ringwaldt, and have assumed the article on Wo gehest du hin? 166 is correct in referring to a different chorale from the one used in 131. -Thoughtfortheday (talk) 08:59, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for adding to the hymn writer! Yes, the hymn for 166 is a different one. The bach-cantatas site has reasoable information for most of them. - The term that I found used for the "Lesungen" is "readings", not lessons, always two: "Epistel" ("epistle", mostly from an apostolic epistle, sometimes Old Testament) and "Evangelium" ("Gospel"). - I was dealing with Konrad Huber today and would like to get him to the Main page as DYK. He will be mentioned with the cantata but deserves more attention ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:37, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for explaining about the readings. I tend to say lessons because I have been exposed to Anglican services, but I appreciate such terminology probably makes the article rather esoteric. It's interesting to read about the DYK. -Thoughtfortheday (talk) 22:52, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I would accept "lessons" as quite understandable if not some 150 of 200 cantatas had "readings", - it serves the reader of several to find the same wording repeated for the same things. Of course this very early cantata is different in many respects, perhaps point out even more that it was very early in his career, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:59, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Categories on userspace pages

No worries. Inspired by your edit to List of fugal works by Johann Sebastian Bach, I decided to check Category:Compositions by Johann Sebastian Bach to find out what was new, so to speak, and that's how I found your userspace page. Graham87 10:13, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Title of article should be G minor with the m low case, but I haven't got authority to move pages. -Thoughtfortheday (talk) 11:00, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

BWV 131

After you expanded the article nicely, I nominated it for DYK, please watch the discussion and answer, perhaps you can propose a better hook? (I usually wait for a reviewer to say something.) I would like to add the pic of "Young Bach" as in BWV 150 but it needs to be in the article. The church pic is not good. Please add a few more inline citations, they can be doubled by just mentioning their name. Good luck! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:22, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ps: I moved the fugue --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:29, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for moving the fugure, and particularly for the DYK nomination. I will think about another hook and add some citations.

I would be happy with the pic of the "Young Bach". -Thoughtfortheday (talk) 13:33, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I added the pic to article and nom. - BWV 244, I see you working on it. I think most of what is now lead should be history, a new lead should just give basics. What do you think? - I will be busy with the next liturgical cantata, BWV 17, - no DYK, too long already - after a musician, Klaus Martin Ziegler, who needs references, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:18, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the lead of 244 has been far too long. Even so, there may be a case for mentioning the work's relationship to the St Matthew Passion in the lead, as for many people this will be important. -Thoughtfortheday (talk) 11:27, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly (better than the time elapsed between death and funeral), sourced in the article, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:31, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Going back to the hook, I wonder whether it might be good to say something about the cantata as a taster of future achievements the lines of "Although Bach was in his early twenties when he wrote the cantata, by including fugues and developing a chorale tune, he gave an indication of how he would later make his mark as a composer". -Thoughtfortheday (talk) 10:04, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Go ahead and say that in a way the general public around the globe might understand. 200 characters is the maximum. Start by explaining your point, followed by ALT2, similar in format to ALT1, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:42, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I gave you a bad example, forgot a word and the signature for ALT1 ;) I fixed the missing word, but you will have to sign. (ALT2 looks way too long, but let the reviewer say so.) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:23, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's OK, it was useful to see the amendments. I have pruned ALT2. -Thoughtfortheday (talk) 12:36, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, - I linked to chorale fantasia, the article made no sense, so far it only spoke about organ, but we can change that, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:50, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

New day, ideas: I found this sentence "The chorale is juxtaposed with the words of the psalm (with the chorale sung to long notes)." in the history section. It belongs to music and leaves unclear which cantata is meant. I also don't understand the juxtaposition. Please think about removing the repetition of Psalm 130, supply the source once, Psalms 130, then refer to it by verse number. no translation needed unless its relation to the music is discussed. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:39, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gerda: Yes, I have strayed from text to music in that para. I will have another look at it. -Thoughtfortheday (talk) 10:42, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Scoring: it says one violin part, but not how many players took that part, could have been three, for example. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:53, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the recordings. I think Rifkin recorded the work this century, but I wasn't completely sure of the date. -Thoughtfortheday (talk) 20:25, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I took the date - and the other information - from bach-cantatas. Many more performers were interested in this work, see if you want to mention more. Some have pdfs, good for background are Suzuki, Gardiner and Koopman. - Please: no bolding other than redirects, matter of Wikipedia style. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:40, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ps: now I see: it was re-issued this century, but the review is dated 1991. bach-cantatas is not always right, but there's no reason not to believe this date --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:51, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK Gerda, thanks for the information. I think the programme notes I cited rather over-emphasise the cantata's weaknesses. As you say, many performers are interested in it. -Thoughtfortheday (talk) 22:39, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Chorale fantasia

I have altered the chorale fantasia article, but feel free to revert. -Thoughtfortheday (talk) 14:09, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Aus der Tiefen rufe ich, Herr, zu dir, BWV 131, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Decca (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:46, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I am not sure what would be the correct way to wl Decca in this case....have linked to Decca Classics for the time being. -Thoughtfortheday (talk) 15:24, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Aus der Tiefen rufe ich, Herr, zu dir, BWV 131

Hello! Your submission of Aus der Tiefen rufe ich, Herr, zu dir, BWV 131 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yazan (talk) 11:18, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You don't need additional refs for the recordings, they are on Bach cantatas. When you are done with referencing, let the reviewer know in the nomination, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:41, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks. -Thoughtfortheday (talk) 14:45, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It was already in preparation, but returned, please look at the nomination again, 3 alternatives, two pics, and a sourcing request, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:20, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it should be easy enough to establish which psalm Bach was using. I have provided a citation.

I don't know much about the pics. -Thoughtfortheday (talk) 00:33, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I remember that an inline citation was wanted for the place of composition, that should be easy as well. If none of yours does it, look in "Sources", the two universities in the end are best for the purpose. - Don't care about the pics, it's up to the one to build the prep to take one or the other or none, ---Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:11, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I don't think there is any dispute about the place of composition. I have now cited the Vermont site. -Thoughtfortheday (talk) 10:52, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good to me! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:58, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps I am worrying too much, but the English translation of the title/incipit is slightly different from the version in the Wikipedia article on the psalm. Are the translations of cantata titles from a standard source? -Thoughtfortheday (talk) 21:32, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats to passing! - The translations - long discussions already on Project Classical music. In this case I would take the standard (King James) Bible translation, because it is Bible text. In other cases, I check the possibilities (bach-cantatas typically offers at least three different ones, Mincham another, Hofmann another) and take the one I like best ;) - It's Emmanuel more often than any other, but sometimes it's off. The translation is only a translation, a help to understand, never a title, never italic. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:57, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikisource has Psalm 130, verse 1-6, like this: Psalms 130:1–6, you may want to change, - "Aus der Tiefen": "aus" is closer to "out" than "from", you can't say "Tiefen" is a singular, only "der Tiefen" is singular (while "die Tiefen" would be plural), --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:10, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again for your encouragement. I'd probably better leave the article for a while to see if it attracts attention from anyone else. Thanks for the information about translations....I will try to do some reading on this subject. -Thoughtfortheday (talk) 23:13, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Leave it, but implement the source, better than a second link to the Wikipedia article on the psalm ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:27, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have put in the King James source, as suggested. -Thoughtfortheday (talk) 10:21, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Fine article! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:40, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Aus der Tiefen rufe ich, Herr, zu dir, BWV 131

On 23 September 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Aus der Tiefen rufe ich, Herr, zu dir, BWV 131, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Johann Sebastian Bach composed the cantata Aus der Tiefen rufe ich, Herr, zu dir, BWV 131, as a young organist at Mühlhausen's Divi Blasii church? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Aus der Tiefen rufe ich, Herr, zu dir, BWV 131. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Orlady (talk) 00:02, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

	Bach cantatas
	Thank you for improving Bach cantatas such as BWV 131. dedicated to detail and precision, - you are an awesome Wikipedian! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 04:59, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for this article. Great to see this series so well done in WP. (Last night listened to a brilliant live performance of the B Minor Mass and today a live performance of the Allegro of BWV 593.) Keep up the good work! Whiteghost.ink (talk) 07:24, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's now featured on Portal:Germany. If you have more DYK related to Germany feel free to insert it there yourself, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:19, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the honours. I will certainly try to produce another DYK in due course. -Thoughtfortheday (talk) 21:12, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your addition to the recordings section of BWV 4. What do you think of inserting it to the general article Bach cantata, rather than repeating it in every cantata? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:37, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you are right, you could say the same thing about many of the cantatas.

I didn't like the first sentence as it was, so I was really rewording the bit about performance options rather than adding a mention of the topic. -Thoughtfortheday (talk) 21:42, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fine there, but consider to add it to the other also, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:50, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've made a start...possibly in the wrong section! -Thoughtfortheday (talk) 22:06, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Precious again: A year ago, you were the 252nd recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:38, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank-you! -Thoughtfortheday (talk) 19:22, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating William Towers (countertenor), Thoughtfortheday!

Wikipedia editor Niado just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Good stub-class article, but some expansion would be nice! :)

To reply, leave a comment on Niado's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Training the Trainers

Hi Thoughtfortheday, we're looking to finalise numbers and I just wanted to confirm that you're still interested in attending the event on 23-24th February? Thanks, Richard Nevell (WMUK) (talk) 20:15, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the message. As 18 people have registered their interest and there's only space for 12 we're in the process of chasing up who can come and who would need accommodation (arranged by Wikimedia UK). Would you need accommodation? Richard Nevell (WMUK) (talk) 12:38, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The details of the venue are now on the UK wiki. Richard Nevell (WMUK) (talk) 13:58, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

We've finalised the list of attendees and you're amongst the 12. See you there! Richard Nevell (WMUK) (talk) 11:35, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cat

I like your new cat Category:Psalm-related compositions by Johann Sebastian Bach. Do you think compositions, which mention only one verse should go there as well? BWV 76? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:52, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Good question. I think I had better have another look at the relevant cantatas, as there are bound to be a few grey areas. -Thoughtfortheday (talk) 21:55, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I moved them to the sub-cat. Bach is more precise than no composer, and psalm-related more precise than setting, which suggests a setting of a complete psalm, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:15, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for moving the cantatas....looks OK to me. -Thoughtfortheday (talk) 23:18, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation training material

Hi Alan, I've uploaded (via Doug) the disambiguation training material that we developed on the TtT course. If you want it, it's here: [3]. Cheers, Bazonka (talk) 21:25, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

	WikiProject Forestry
	Thank you on behalf of WikiProject Forestry! We appreciate your contribution(s) and invite you to join us in further improving Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to forestry. Feel free to ask questions or make suggestions on the project's talk page.

Kind regards, DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 13:00, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Tavener, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Liturgy of St John Chrysostom (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 21:35, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Prince Edward, Duke of Kent and Strathearn

Thanks for comment on Prince Edward, Duke of Kent and Strathearn - do you know where there is a pic of it? Victuallers (talk) 14:17, 30 May 2013 (UTC) =- Nice additiohn - which ive added to the crescent article as well Victuallers (talk) 16:03, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Titian

Hi long time no talk. I'm working up Pope Paul III and his Grandsons, and was hoping that you might keep an eye, lend a hand. Ceoil (talk) 19:54, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Good call Re Innocent X.[4] Ceoil (talk) 20:37, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ping re sources. Ceoil (talk) 22:03, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Northern Sky

I'm guessing this might be to you taste; very forlon, very pastoral. Interested? Ceoil (talk) 11:43, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads-up. -Thoughtfortheday (talk) 11:46, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Penrith, Cumbria, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ALFA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:56, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Wilbye, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles Cavendish. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cumbria Wildlife Trust

Sorry, I've just noticed I jumped in while you were still working on this. Please feel free to reverse or alter as you think fit. Bmcln1 (talk) 08:57, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Books and Bytes - Issue 7

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 7, June-July 2014
by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), Sadads (talk · contribs)

Seven new donations, two expanded partnerships
TWL's Final Report up, read the summary
Adventures in Las Vegas, WikiConference USA, and updates from TWL coordinators
Spotlight: Blog post on BNA's impact on one editor's research

Read the full newsletter

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:20, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Las Huelgas Codex may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

18 August 2014 | author=Weber, J F.}} Accessed via [[HighBeam Research]] (subscription required))</ref>.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:55, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Stile Antico (early music vocal ensemble) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

s support for [[OUP]]'s multi-volume publication of Tudor church music in the 1920s.<ref name="">{{cite web | | title=| publisher<ref name="observer">{{cite web | url=url=http://www.theguardian.com/
* ''Tune Thy Musicke to Thy Hart'' (2012) (Awards: Choc de Classica (mars 2012)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:39, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to O angenehme Melodei, BWV 210a may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Science and Art), this version is also called "{{lang|de|Sponsorenkantate}}", the sponsors' cantata).<ref name="Paczkowski" />

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:41, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Abraham Rawlinson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Henry Rawlinson. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

Bach cantatas
Thank you for improving Bach cantatas such as BWV 131. dedicated to detail and precision, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 04:59, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Two years ago, you were the 252nd recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize. Thought of the day: all featured and good articles of the topic have an infobox ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:48, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Next thought: After BWV 165 was accepted as a FA, I dream of doing something like that for BWV 4, also with a background of history, mentioning the other early cantatas. I hope to do it with you because you know much more about the early ones and their place than I do. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:30, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it would be a good idea to work on BWV 4. Thank you for your kind words about my contributions. They aren't really as good as you suggest, as I lack access to some of the sources for one thing. However, a Christmas deadline sounds realistic. -Thoughtfortheday (talk) 10:49, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Three years ago, I enjoy this more and more! - How do you like the new link? - Thank you for for expanding the "hour of death". For overcoming that, I look forward to BWV 4 for Easter (why I wrote Christmas I don't know), - it helps my health to have long-term goals, - actually: I'll do a bit towards it today! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:18, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I couldn't do all I wanted but got a few more refs in, - feel free to use them more. I think we should have first music, then publication and modern performances, - perhaps call "history" "composition history"? - Will look for two more sources, probably tomorrow, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:51, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the award. I have enjoyed reading about the other recipients. As to BWV 4, yes I am sure you are right to think about some revisions to the headings/structure of the article. I look forward to following up the new refs in due course. -Thoughtfortheday (talk) 21:12, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Four years ago, you were recipient no. 252 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:54, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Six years now ;) - Working on BWV 134a for FAC, if you like to help! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:16, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Seven years now! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:05, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Books and Bytes - Issue 8

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 8, August-September2014
by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), Sadads (talk · contribs)

TWL now a Wikimedia Foundation program, moves on from grant status
Four new donations, including large DeGruyter parntership, pilot with Elsevier
New TWL coordinators, Wikimania news, new library platform discussions, Wiki Loves Libraries update, and more
Spotlight: "Traveling Through History" - an editor talks about his experiences with a TWL newspaper archive, Newspapers.com

Read the full newsletter

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:51, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Orlando Gibbons

added links pointing to Wait and John Harper

Thomas Snodham

added a link pointing to John Savile

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:39, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

SoT

Don't ask me how of why I got there- but I did spend two hours taking photos at a certain museum. There are many more to be uploaded... but I am wrapping it around my 3 yr old grand-daughters play and sleep patterns.-- Clem Rutter (talk) 10:14, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

New Wikipedia Library Accounts Now Available (December 2014)

Hello Wikimedians!

The Wikipedia Library is announcing signups today for, free, full-access accounts to published research as part of our Publisher Donation Program. You can sign up for:

Elsevier - science and medicine journals and books
Royal Society of Chemistry - chemistry journals
Pelican Books - ebook monographs
Public Catalogue Foundation- art books

Other partnerships with accounts available are listed on our partners page. Do better research and help expand the use of high quality references across Wikipedia projects: sign up today!
--The Wikipedia Library Team.00:25, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

You can host and coordinate signups for a Wikipedia Library branch in your own language. Please contact Ocaasi (WMF).

This message was delivered via the Mass Message tool to the Book & Bytes recipient list.

Books and Bytes - Issue 9

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 9, November-December 2014
by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), Sadads (talk · contribs)

New donations, including real-paper-and-everything books, e-books, science journal databases, and more
New TWL coordinators, conference news, a new open-access journal database, summary of library-related WMF grants, and more
Spotlight: "Global Impact: The Wikipedia Library and Persian Wikipedia" - a Persian Wikipedia editor talks about their experiences with database access in Iran, writing on the Persian project and the JSTOR partnership

Read the full newsletter

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:36, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Books and Bytes - Issue 10

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 10, January-February 2015
by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), Sadads (talk · contribs)

New donations - ProjectMUSE, Dynamed, Royal Pharmaceutical Society, and Women Writers Online
New TWL coordinator, conference news, and a new guide and template for archivists
TWL moves into the new Community Engagement department at the WMF, quarterly review

Read the full newsletter

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:41, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A new reference tool

Hello Books & Bytes subscribers. There is a new Visual Editor reference feature in development called Citoid. It is designed to "auto-fill" references using a URL or DOI. We would really appreciate you testing whether TWL partners' references work in Citoid. Sharing your results will help the developers fix bugs and improve the system. If you have a few minutes, please visit the testing page for simple instructions on how to try this new tool. Regards, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:48, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Books and Bytes - Issue 11

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 11, March-April 2015
by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), Sadads (talk · contribs), Nikkimaria (talk · contribs)

New donations - MIT Press Journals, Sage Stats, Hein Online and more
New TWL coordinators, conference news, and new reference projects
Spotlight: Two metadata librarians talk about how library professionals can work with Wikipedia

Read the full newsletter

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:33, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Thoughtfortheday, did you mean to apply for RIPM on behalf of someone else? If not, could you change the user template to your username? Thanks, Nikkimaria (talk) 17:05, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No, I didn't mean to apply on behalf of anyone else...my mistake. -Thoughtfortheday (talk) 17:30, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library needs you!

The Wikipedia Library

Call for Volunteers

The Wikipedia Library is expanding, and we need your help! With only a couple of hours per week, you can make a big difference in helping editors get access to reliable sources and other resources. Sign up for one of the following roles:

Account coordinators help distribute research accounts to editors.
Partner coordinators seek donations from new partners.
Outreach coordinators reach out to the community through blog posts, social media, and newsletters or notifications.
Technical coordinators advise on building tools to support the library's work.

Sign up to help here :)

Delivered on behalf of The Wikipedia Library by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:18, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Books and Bytes - Issue 12

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 12, May-June 2015
by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), Sadads (talk · contribs), Nikkimaria (talk · contribs)

New donations - Taylor & Francis, Science, and three new French-language resources
Expansion into new languages, including French, Finnish, Turkish, and Farsi
Spotlight: New partners for the Visiting Scholar program
American Library Association Annual meeting in San Francisco

Read the full newsletter

The Interior 15:23, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Invite to Editathon

Hi, I am organising another Editathon - this time at Clitheroe Castle Museum. The details are Wikipedia:GLAM/Clitheroe Castle Museum. I hope you can come. Jhayward001 (talk) 15:17, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

BWV 161

Hi again, hope all is well with you. I want to do a review of this cantana with Gerda; hoping you might help as you have a knowledge and an interest. If busy, no worries. Ceoil (talk) 12:05, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Armide (Lully)

Hi Thoughtfortheday, I'm writing about your latest edit in Armide referring to " a homosexual scandal". Since the source I had cited (Le magazin de l'opéra baroque) makes no mention of a homosexual scandal (however well known Lully's sexual orientation may have been), I was wondering whether you could update sources as well, citing a more appropriate one. Thanks.--Jeanambr (talk) 05:30, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message. I have found a source for the scandal, which I hope is OK. Le magazin de l'opéra baroque appears to have gone dead, or rather is no longer maintained, and I haven't been able to check what it says about Armide. Thoughtfortheday (talk) 07:17, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks. If you want to enter Le magazin de l'opéra baroque (which has no longer been updated since late 2014, but is still fully accessible), you just need to click on the left side of the screen "Les oeuvres : par ordre alphabétique" and choose the opera you like. Cheers.--Jeanambr (talk) 15:31, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Easter cantata

Continued from above. I converted the recordings to tables and tried to structure a bit. We should now look at each section, make things a bit more logical - it shows that the article grew since 2005, and things were added here and there, some almost contradicting each other. We also need more lead, then we can go for GA. In the next step, I suggest to have more background, about Bach at the time, perhaps also at his colleagues and their works, his models? - and I would like a look at his later cantatas on purely chorale text, - but those steps only after it's GA. Looking for images is another task which can start right now. Compare BWV 165, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:41, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Books and Bytes - Issue 13

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 13, August-September 2015
by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), Sadads (talk · contribs), Nikkimaria (talk · contribs)

New donations - EBSCO, IMF, more newspaper archives, and Arabic resources
Expansion into new languages, including Viet and Catalan
Spotlight: Elsevier partnership garners controversy, dialogue
Conferences: PKP, IFLA, upcoming events

Read the full newsletter

The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:30, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Solo cantata

Re BWV 188, I remember to have read (but don't remember where) that Bach named cantata only a work with soloists, note plural. Worth looking for a source. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:04, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. However, I don't think he used the term much. Thoughtfortheday (talk) 15:34, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Edith Villiers

On 16 November 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Edith Villiers, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the model for a Pre-Raphaelite painting (pictured) became the Vicereine of India? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Edith Villiers. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:01, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Josefa Celsa Señaris

On 29 November 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Josefa Celsa Señaris, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Celsiella, a type of glass frog, was named after Josefa Celsa Señaris? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Josefa Celsa Señaris. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Books and Bytes - Issue 14

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 14, October-November 2015
by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), Sadads (talk · contribs), Nikkimaria (talk · contribs)

New donations - Gale, Brill, plus Finnish and Farsi resources
Open Access Week recap, and DOIs, Wikipedia, and scholarly citations
Spotlight: 1Lib1Ref - a citation drive for librarians

Read the full newsletter

The Interior, via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:12, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

BWV 4

I was bold and made the GA nomination. Thank you for all you did already, background and recordings developed in a stunning way. Let's not change much right now, more details after GA please ;) - Please watch the review and feel free to make changes and discuss questions! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:42, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for making the nomination and let's see how it goes. --Thoughtfortheday (talk) 11:15, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You will have seen that I made a link to the general sections on recordings and removed some things on the cantata, such as that Rilling finished sooner,-feel free to polish. We even found a willing reviewer already! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:36, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You were right to remove the mention of Rilling winning the race. --Thoughtfortheday (talk) 12:26, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year! Heading for FA: could you write a very first section "Background", a (very brief) summary of Bach's career until he first wrote the work? I will expand the music section and upgrade the references to Harvard. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:45, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year! I will write something. -Thoughtfortheday (talk) 20:22, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You can copy from what you wrote for other early cantatas, - just say you did on the talk. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:28, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

... about where he came from, at the most likely time, - imagine a reader who has no idea who Bach is ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:42, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! - I think 15 Jan - celebration of 15 years Wikipedia - would be a good day to go for FA. I will try to change more refs to Harvard. Could you point out the relevance of the choral preludes, and date them? Perhaps move it to the section about the hymn, in music? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:06, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps also mention BWV 695? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:10, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am working on the chorale preludes. -Thoughtfortheday (talk) 20:39, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Great. I plan to improve the other early cantatas, but after the main one. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:38, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Harvard refs established. Do you have access to the Taruskin book and can look up precise page numbers? One more thing needed is alt descriptions of the images. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:41, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am in Cumbria and I don't think I can access the book, sorry. Thanks for all the work you have been doing. Is there another article that shows what needs to be done with the images? -Thoughtfortheday (talk) 00:07, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

BWV 172, BWV 22, BWV 165, parameter "alt" better has a description of the image for someone who doesn't see it, such as a blind reader. Happy 15 years! With a conductor of a Bach cantata on the Main page ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 00:23, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Review

I was bold again: Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Christ lag in Todes Banden, BWV 4/archive1 --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:49, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. My edit on the current FAC resolved a sneaky syntactic ambiguity regarding the referent of the pronoun "he" (i.e., was "he" Bach or was "he" Pachelbel); yours removed content (the fact that JSB & P never met). I'm struggling to think of a congenial way to present this request (given that you can't see my face to know that I'm not being snippy or anything like that), but I think perhaps you should consider self-reverting your edit here. Thanks Lingzhi ♦ (talk) 02:22, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

- Hello. Thank you for raising this. My worry with your edit, and I was possibly being too fussy, is that "the two" potentially introduced another ambiguity, namely that it could be construed as meaning that Pachelbel did not meet the elder of the brothers rather than the correct interpretation that Pachelbel is not known to have met JS. I take your point that my edit removed relevant content, and I have modified it again. -Thoughtfortheday (talk) 05:06, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  - OK, looks good. I have no idea whether anyone will slap a "cite needed" on the Thuringia detail, but I doubt. Thanks! Lingzhi ♦ (talk) 05:45, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for adding but I wouldn't change right now when supports are coming ;) - there was a harv error when I looked last, started on the one below, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:34, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I looked at the refs and found two not in the style of the others, one is about the doubtful image, and is the same for the other FAs, the other the Grove online ref. I tried formatting:

Emery, Walter; Wolff, Christoph. "Johann Sebastian Bach – 1. Childhood.". In L. Macy (ed.). Grove Music Online (Special English edition). Subscription required

I looked at our Bach article and found only the real Grove. How about that? Page number? If we want to use the above, it's missing a year. Delegate said "almost there"! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:58, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the Grove reference does need attention. Unfortunately I am away from the public library I normally use to access Grove. Instead I have had a look at Wolff's "The learned musician" (corrected edition 2014). On p.37 he mentions that Bach may have met Pachelbel at his brother's wedding, but we don't know whether this was the case, and Wolff isn't aware of other possible occasions. As far as I know, Grove Online covers much the same ground (I'm not sure about the printed version). -Thoughtfortheday (talk) 18:17, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Good idea to use Wolff! - Wouldn't surprised if it covers the same, Wolff was one of the authorsfor Grove as well ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:04, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done! Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/Christ lag in Todes Banden, BWV 4 --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:15, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Precious again, your excellent contributions which helped to improve Christ lag in Todes Banden, BWV 4 to FA!

My next idea for a Bach FA is BWV 161 (because it was possibly premiered in 1716), - feel free to be part of that also, - I liked the teamwork! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:12, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well done for geting all that work completed in time for Easter! I will have a look at BWV 161. -Thoughtfortheday (talk) 12:08, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

For your album: Wikipedia:Main Page history/2016 March 27, with thanks! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:27, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

BWV 106

In the mood for that one. How would you summarize the text sources (for our table): it's so complex, see? Several bits from the Old Testament, several from the New, additions, several hymns, often a mixture in one movement: so thoughtful! Thought for eternity, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:24, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I will have a think about this. By the way, thanks for all the work you have been doing on BWV 4. I'm somewhat bemused about how complicated the review process has been, but I suppose it reflects that fact that it is quite a difficult work about which to make definite statements. -Thoughtfortheday (talk) 15:55, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You haven't seen me reviewing Wagner ;) (In which context the line "An infobox would damage the article." was coined.) - Actually, so far it's rather straightforward: refs missed, refs supplied, duplication avoided. I hope by changing the order of things I didn't frustrate the reviewers who may have to read again. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:03, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Afterlife" is - to my knowledge - not covered in the lyrics added to biblical and chorale, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:57, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Passion of Joan of Arc

Hi, just noticed the great work you did on this page a while ago and was wondering what you thought this page needed to get to GA status. I know that there's at least two books I could get for additional info, both by David Bordwell (I think). Do you like how the production section is organized? I hadn't done it that way before and was just experimenting.--Deoliveirafan (talk) 23:05, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

If you want to, please take a look at the article about Jovan Radomir. Any help is appreciated.--BabbaQ (talk) 10:12, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Allonby Bay

Thank you for your recent contributions to Allonby Bay and the MCZ there. It's great to see the article being developed and updated as new information becomes available! Stcuthbertsport (talk) 11:42, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Jovan Radomir

On 18 February 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Jovan Radomir, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Swedish television presenter Jovan Radomir wrote the English translation of the Marija Šerifović song "Molitva", which went on to win the Eurovision Song Contest 2007? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Jovan Radomir. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:03, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes - Issue 15

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 15, December-January 2016
by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), Sadads (talk · contribs), Nikkimaria (talk · contribs), UY Scuti (talk · contribs)

New donations - Ships, medical resources, plus Arabic and Farsi resources
#1lib1ref campaign summary and highlights
New branches and coordinators

Read the full newsletter

The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:19, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

BWV 196

I am in the process of going over the other early cantatas, today BWV 196. There's this interesting idea that Bach may have composed it for his own wedding, - however, I don't find that in any of the sources I consulted. Did I miss something? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:05, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I did read it somewhere. I wish I took better notes, as I will have to do some searching. I don't think the reasoning was complicated - just that the date of Bach's wedding would make it a possibility. -Thoughtfortheday (talk) 10:53, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The reasoning coming up more often is for the wedding of the minister who had wedded Bach,a year later. Where was Bach's wedding. One source says Arnstadt, can't find Dornheim, other than for the minister's wedding. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:01, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ps: I see our article has Dornheim, and it seems so close that it may be regarded as part of Arnstadt. What was her maiden name? Bach,- as his cousin? Wedemann? see [5] --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:09, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I found About Bach by George Stauffer, Gregory Butler on a Google search for "Bach's own wedding BWV 196". They suggest that if the cantata was suitable for performance at Dornheim for the minister's wedding, it could have been suitable for Bach's wedding at the same location. I hadn't really thought about Frau Bach's maiden name....I will have to look into this. -Thoughtfortheday (talk) 11:19, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, there doesn't seem much doubt her surname was Bach. Opinions vary, however, on why they married in Dornheim rather than Arnstadt. -Thoughtfortheday (talk) 19:17, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

She was from there, and the minister. Up to this time, weddings are often the obligation of the bride's family. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:21, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for explaining. -Thoughtfortheday (talk) 19:25, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

BWV 71

Looking at that one, I noticed how often - starting in the lead - it says what it is not, - can you add positively to the lead what it is? Bach's first printed work, as far as I understand. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:27, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it is held to be his first printed work, and Handel hadn't had anything printed by that date apparently. -Thoughtfortheday (talk) 17:13, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Election" for the council was how? - In Leipzig, there was nothing deserving the term election in a democratic sense, compare BWV 22. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:58, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Good point. Perhaps inauguration would be a better word. -Thoughtfortheday (talk) 22:05, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Inauguration is used for the occasion of the cantata, but it says something like "election the previous day". I suggest to source that, and say very precisely what's meant, or drop that bit,- I don't think it helps our understanding of the music ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:01, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Organ (pipe organ magazine)

The article The Organ (pipe organ magazine) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails Google test.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 00:06, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

UK Wikimeet survey results

Hello. This is a quick note to let you know that the results of the UK wikimeet survey have now been posted on Meta at m:UK Wikimeet survey 2015. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 21:03, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	For getting Christ lag in Todes Banden, BWV 4 up to FA status with Gerda. Well done! Hope to see more at FAC!♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:24, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you also for having started Der Herr denket an uns, BWV 196, now a GA. On Bach's birthday, I would like to nominate one more for GA, thinking of BWV 71. Would you perhaps do BWV 131? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:30, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm fond of BWV 131, so I would enjoy doing more work on it. -Thoughtfortheday (talk) 12:04, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lovely! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:29, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bach continued

BWV 131 (improve to GA)

I suggest that tomorrow I give it a table of the movements, and then YOU nominate it for GA,you did so much more than I did, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:24, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking on the table. I will nominate it. Give me a few days, as one of the references (Hill, John. "The Church of Blaise the Divine) has gone dead and I will need to replace it. --Thoughtfortheday (talk) 23:55, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Table is in. I will also format the recordings and get more text and translation in. If you do more lead, it should be fine! Love it! - Suggest to use an interior image of the Marienkirche if there is one. (I prefer the German name, "St" looks so un-German ;) (would be "St.") --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:04, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations

On your main page appearance today. Ceoil (talk) 22:55, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GA nomination of Aus der Tiefen rufe ich, Herr, zu dir, BWV 131

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Aus der Tiefen rufe ich, Herr, zu dir, BWV 131 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 13:21, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Aus der Tiefen rufe ich, Herr, zu dir, BWV 131

The article Aus der Tiefen rufe ich, Herr, zu dir, BWV 131 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Aus der Tiefen rufe ich, Herr, zu dir, BWV 131 for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 13:40, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Aus der Tiefen rufe ich, Herr, zu dir, BWV 131

The article Aus der Tiefen rufe ich, Herr, zu dir, BWV 131 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Aus der Tiefen rufe ich, Herr, zu dir, BWV 131 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 21:01, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:18, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Jaguar for passing the article and Gerda for your help. I intend to do some more work on the article. -Thoughtfortheday (talk) 21:22, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Good plan! Could be FA some day. - Do you want to help with my plan to have a GA for every occasion of the liturgical year? I picked two, for Easter I and Easter II, we have already two for Easter III. Would you like to expand one of the Easter IV choices? Three weeks to go. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:35, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the invitation. I'm not sure how much time/stamina I will have this month, but yes, I will have a look at one of them. No preference really...they are more or less new to me. Perhaps you could suggest one. -Thoughtfortheday (talk) 15:54, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have no preference. If you feel the same, perhaps take the one on the woman's libretto, the one he struggled with for the end of the second cycle ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:54, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK. -Thoughtfortheday (talk) 20:21, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

BWV 71 more

The repeat performance in Bach's church, - where does that come from, and it should be clarified more if true? Please see the GA review, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:23, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As I understand it, the repeat performance is mentioned by a near-contemporary source but not specifically in the context of the Bach work, so we can only assume Bach expected a repeat. -Thoughtfortheday (talk) 09:33, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If it's that vague, should we mention it at all? - Please feel free to discuss in the review, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:43, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dowland

Hello. I was looking at the article for John Dowland's Second book of Songs which is largely your work (for which, thanks). I have been trying to change the page name the title of the book, which does not have an archaic 'e' in the word 'songs' (but is does in 'booke') in the original print. I don't have the editing skills to change that though. Maybe you can.

Here's a link to a jpeg of the original title page so you can check my fact and the original spelling. http://kulturserver-bayern.de/home/harald-lillmeyer/Texte/Downloads/Bilder/Dowland4/DowlandSecond.jpg Preceding unsigned comment added by Je9671111.

I am happy to help. I have the permission necessary for moving a page on my alternative account. There is a complication in that the IMSLP score has "Second Book of Songes" with the title you cite as an alternative [6]. I have left the title as "Second Book of Songs" (modern spelling)for the time being. -Thoughtfortheday (talk) 17:48, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gott ist mein König, BWV 71 has been nominated for Did You Know

Hello, Thoughtfortheday. Gott ist mein König, BWV 71, an article you either created or to which you significantly contributed,has been nominated to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page as part of Did you know. You can see the hook and the discussion here. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. APersonBot (talk!) 23:00, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

BWV 108

... should be nominated for GA tomorrow, - will you or should I? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:02, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I did it.

Thanks -Thoughtfortheday (talk) 17:41, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Want to pick one for the sixth Sunday, BWV 44 or 183? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:33, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to do some work on BWV 183, please. -Thoughtfortheday (talk) 17:46, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Go ahead, I am happy about less work. If you wanted to nominate BWV 108, I can revert and you do it. I just thought it was written for this Sunday and should receive attention today ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:03, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You were right to nominate BMV 108, and I don´t think there is any particular point in my nominating it. -Thoughtfortheday (talk) 09:38, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I wish they'd accept teams. On my user page, I note collaboration, and I enjoy it! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:45, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it is a good idea to encourage collaboration.-Thoughtfortheday (talk) 09:52, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for progress with 183, while I plan to work on BWV 34. - How do you feel about the changes to BWV 4. I have no idea how BWV 4 is better than BWV 4, - do you? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:08, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think there is scope for improving the BWV 4 article, but too many issues have been raised at once. -Thoughtfortheday (talk) 10:31, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Agree, let's deal with it one by one. Name first: only today did I understand that the ngram used to justify the move doesn't distinguish the cantata title from any other mentioning of the term, in other compositions etc, - which should have no consequences on the spelling on this particular piece, - there's no "incorrect" spelling, but there's good and better. I go for better: as published in the latest critical edition. - Pentecost cantata was reviewed for GA and is nominated for DYK, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:29, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

For BWV 183, I made the structure a table (missing a few keys and times), also the recordings. Just add to the lead, and perhaps to the individual movements, then it should be ready for GA. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:34, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks -Thoughtfortheday (talk) 16:58, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

BWV 108 is a GA now, - thank you for your work on it! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:04, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FAR on Christ lag in Todes Banden, BWV 4

I have nominated Christ lag in Todes Banden, BWV 4 for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. --Francis Schonken (talk) 09:21, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

open again --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:03, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Gott ist mein König, BWV 71

On 12 May 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Gott ist mein König, BWV 71, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Gott ist mein König, BWV 71, is the only surviving church cantata by Bach to have been printed during his lifetime? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Gott ist mein König, BWV 71. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Gott ist mein König, BWV 71), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:27, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Höchsterwünschtes Freudenfest, BWV 194

On 22 May 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Höchsterwünschtes Freudenfest, BWV 194, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Bach used the cantata Höchsterwünschtes Freudenfest, BWV 194, written for the inauguration of the church and organ in Störmthal (pictured), several times for Trinity Sunday? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Höchsterwünschtes Freudenfest, BWV 194. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Höchsterwünschtes Freudenfest, BWV 194), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

pictured, thank you, for this one and many others --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:16, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may have seen that the Easter cantata is back to a previous state, - please repeat the improvements you made afterwards, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:14, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes - Issue 17

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 17, April-May 2016
by The Interior, Ocaasi, UY Scuti, Sadads, and Nikkimaria

New donations this month - a German-language legal resource
Wikipedia referals to academic citations - news from CrossRef and WikiCite2016
New library stats, WikiCon news, a bot to reveal Open Access versions of citations, and more!

Read the full newsletter

The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:36, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bach continued

Nach dir, Herr, verlanget mich, BWV 150 has been nominated for Did You Know

Hello, Thoughtfortheday. Nach dir, Herr, verlanget mich, BWV 150, an article you either created or to which you significantly contributed,has been nominated to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page as part of Did you know. You can see the hook and the discussion here. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. APersonBot (talk!) 12:01, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Sie werden euch in den Bann tun, BWV 183

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sie werden euch in den Bann tun, BWV 183 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carbrera -- Carbrera (talk) 02:41, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Sie werden euch in den Bann tun, BWV 183

The article Sie werden euch in den Bann tun, BWV 183 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Sie werden euch in den Bann tun, BWV 183 for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carbrera -- Carbrera (talk) 04:01, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Nach dir, Herr, verlanget mich, BWV 150

On 23 June 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Nach dir, Herr, verlanget mich, BWV 150, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that some Bach scholars believe that Nach dir, Herr, verlanget mich, BWV 150, is his earliest extant church cantata? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Nach dir, Herr, verlanget mich, BWV 150. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Nach dir, Herr, verlanget mich, BWV 150), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Sie werden euch in den Bann tun, BWV 183

The article Sie werden euch in den Bann tun, BWV 183 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Sie werden euch in den Bann tun, BWV 183 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carbrera -- Carbrera (talk) 03:21, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:23, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Gearagh

Thank you for working on this. Passed by it only this morning. Ceoil (talk) 14:29, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes - Issue 18

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 18, June–July 2016
by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi, Samwalton9, UY Scuti, and Sadads

New donations - Edinburgh University Press, American Psychological Association, Nomos (a German-language database), and more!
Spotlight: GLAM and Wikidata
TWL attends and presents at International Federation of Library Associations conference, meets with Association of Research Libraries
OCLC wins grant to train librarians on Wikimedia contribution

Read the full newsletter

The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:25, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Books and Bytes - Issue 19

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 19, September–October 2016
by Nikkimaria, Sadads and UY Scuti

New and expanded donations - Foreign Affairs, Open Edition, and many more
New Library Card Platform and Conference news
Spotlight: Fixing one million broken links

Read the full newsletter

19:07, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

Churches

Hi, great work on the Hertfordshire church pages I've seen you do lately. I just have a request in case you're thinking of it. Please don't write any articles about the churches in Stevenage, because I've been working hard on them in my userspace for a while already (as well as some other historic aspects of the town). I don't know if I'm allowed to request that, but I'm.... nervous! Thanks :-) anemone projectors 00:16, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Books and Bytes - Issue 20

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 20, November-December 2016
by Nikkimaria (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), UY Scuti (talk · contribs), Samwalton9 (talk · contribs)

Partner resource expansions
New search tool for finding TWL resources
#1lib1ref 2017
Wikidata Visiting Scholar

Read the full newsletter

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:59, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jesu, meine Freude

Jesu, meine Freude, - I just happened to look, and saw your familiar name among the contributors. I think the term chorale should be reserved to the movements setting the hymn, the others are just choral. Could you clarify? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:18, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for drawing this to my attention. I will check what I wrote, but I probably won't have time today. Feel free to alter anything in the meantime.--Thoughtfortheday (talk) 14:45, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I also have not much time, - you go first ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:53, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have modified the table in question. I am sorry I took so long to complete the task, but after making a few edits earlier I wondered whether other editors might get involved. -Thoughtfortheday (talk) 10:47, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I tried to sort a bit (hymn, tune, scripture), and eventually the article might profit from more detail. - What do you think of my open FAC? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:50, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, there is more to say about the motet. I like the open FAC. -Thoughtfortheday (talk) 15:27, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Books and Bytes - Issue 21

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 21, January-March 2017
by Nikkimaria (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), UY Scuti (talk · contribs), Samwalton9 (talk · contribs), Sadads (talk · contribs)

#1lib1ref 2017
Wikipedia Library User Group
Wikipedia + Libraries at Wikimedia Conference 2017
Spotlight: Library Card Platform

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:54, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Books and Bytes - Issue 22

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 22, April-May 2017

New and expanded research accounts
Global branches update
Spotlight: OCLC Partnership
Bytes in brief

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:35, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The false positive your reported

You reported the URL http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/podcasts/radio3/earlymusic/earlymusic_20111031-0900a.mp3 as a live URL, but when I checked it, I got a 403 error. Please makes sure the pages you are reporting are actually alive.—CYBERPOWER (Chat) 17:29, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly a case of "subscription required". I am replying in more detail on CYPERPOWER's page.--Thoughtfortheday (talk) 17:49, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Books and Bytes - Issue 23

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 23, June-July 2017

Library card
User Group update
Global branches update
Spotlight: Combating misinformation, fake news, and censorship
Bytes in brief

Chinese, Arabic and Yoruba versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:03, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Books and Bytes - Issue 24

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 24, August-September 2017

User Group update
Global branches update
- Star Coordinator Award - last quarter's star coordinator: User:Csisc
Wikimania Birds of a Feather session roundup
Spotlight: Wiki Loves Archives
Bytes in brief

Arabic, Kiswahili and Yoruba versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:53, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Thoughtfortheday. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bach's copies

Thank you for adding to St. Michaelis, Lüneburg. Is there any year of the find? I'd think that the detail has more to do with his biography than the church ;) - "recruitment" sounds as if he was chosen, but the source says he wanted to go, no? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:31, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest that the detail is relevant because it throws light on the importance of the surviving baroque instruments in Lüneburg, but I agree I could make a better job of the wording. I understand that it was a bit of a puzzle why Bach joined this choir when he did, because his voice was probably breaking around that time. --Thoughtfortheday (talk) 11:39, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Books and Bytes - Issue 25

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 25, October – November 2017

OAWiki & #1Lib1Ref
User Group update
Global branches update
Spotlight: Research libraries and Wikimedia
Bytes in brief

Arabic, Korean and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:57, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Books and Bytes - Issue 26

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 26, December – January 2018

#1Lib1Ref
User Group update
Global branches update
Spotlight: What can we glean from OCLC’s experience with library staff learning Wikipedia?
Bytes in brief

Arabic and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:36, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes - Issue 27

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 27, February – March 2018

#1Lib1Ref
New collections
- Alexander Street (expansion)
- Cambridge University Press (expansion)
User Group
Global branches update
- Wiki Indaba Wikipedia + Library Discussions
Spotlight: Using librarianship to create a more equitable internet: LGBTQ+ advocacy as a wiki-librarian
Bytes in brief

Arabic, Chinese and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:50, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

New articles

Regarding your sandbox suggestion, I'd be more interested in having a look at things once you've produced a few articles this way. Once you've done another half dozen articles, say, give me a ping and I have a look at what shape they were in when you put them into mainspace, and what the community has had to add to it since. That way, I keep a nice high-level overview of what's going on. How does that sound? Schwede 66 06:24, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Schwede66, this sounds OK, thanks.--Thoughtfortheday (talk) 09:12, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Schwede66: I have done about six more articles ("about" in the sense that Honister Crag was converted from a redirect into two articles, one about the mountain and one about the SSSI). There is some feedback from helpful members of the community on this talk-page, although some of my articles are about rather obscure subjects and do not elicit many views.--Thoughtfortheday (talk) 08:00, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've looked at those and have added detailed edit summaries so that you know what to look for with future articles. Autopatrolled can be granted only when you produce articles that don't need maintenance tags. Honister Crag and Honister Crag SSSI are both too thinly sourced; every paragraph needs at least one reference. You aren't far off, but not quite there yet. Schwede 66 19:54, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for looking at the articles.--Thoughtfortheday (talk) 06:04, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hertfordshire Spike

Do you think it's worth adding a subcategory to Category:Churches in Hertfordshire for churches with a spike? Cabayi (talk) 14:50, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Honister Crag

Hi. I'm a New Page Reviewer. I was going to ask you to clarify your thinking when you created two pages relating to Honister Crag and Honister Crag SSSI, as this wouldn't normally be accepted. However, knowing the area a bit, and having an interest in SSSIs, I looked into it a bit further, and it's clear from the MAGIC website that the SSSI designation incorporates Fleetwith Pike too (see here). So, I wonder if you could make this distinction clearer on both pages, especially if you want to avoid someone slapping on a merge request, or simply blanking one page and creating a redirect again?

You might also like to take the opportunity to use the SSSI citation to add more background information on the crag and its biodiversity here; see a site map of the designation (which includes Fleetwith Pike) here and perhaps link to a source on management issues here and maybe refer to the rock climbs on the Honister Crag page see here and here.

Hope this helps, Regards, Nick Moyes (talk) 00:29, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 28

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 28, April – May 2018

#1Bib1Ref
New partners
User Group update
Global branches update
- Wikipedia Library global coordinators' meeting
Spotlight: What are the ten most cited sources on Wikipedia? Let's ask the data
Bytes in brief

Arabic, Chinese, Hindi, Italian and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:33, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

BWV 157

How are you? Expanding BWV 157, and happy to see your name in the history. Please watch and help! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:49, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am well thank-you and have some free time this week for interesting things like Bach.--Thoughtfortheday (talk) 16:48, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

His day of death today, see my talk ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:53, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 29

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 29, June – July 2018

New partners
- Economic & Political Weekly–10 accounts
Wikimania
Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
Global branches update
Bytes in brief

Hindi, Italian and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:03, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes, Issue 30

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 30, August – Septmeber 2018

Library Card translation
Spotlight: 1Lib1Ref spreads to the Southern Hemisphere and beyond
Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
Global branches update
Bytes in brief

French version of Books & Bytes is now available in meta!
Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:43, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Thoughtfortheday. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tönet, ihr Pauken

Thank you for helping there. Please make sure everything is sourced, and I think the "often recycle" thing - true as it is - is not, - I'm also not sure I like the term "recycle" in the context. Listening to Bach ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:52, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted the edit about recycling and I will try to put in a couple of references for the other things tomorrow.--Thoughtfortheday (talk) 21:31, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for both! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:36, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for reverting some, - I dislike "under the baton" unless its for one of these emperor-like figures ;) - I didn't have the pleasure yet to watch Koopman conduct, but could imagine him not even using a baton, or even conduct from the harpsichord. - Please don't add too much at this point, - it's a GA nomination with a time frame. You can send it to FA afterwards ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:41, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No need to apologise...you are right about "baton" and I will leave the article in peace. On a general point, I don't know if you are adding the Lutz recordings to discography sections, and if so, whether there is a standard format.--Thoughtfortheday (talk) 17:54, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

My standard is different, - this is Nikkimaria's ;) - Yes, I add Lutz, and just today worked on his teacher. I miss Mathsci, fearing for his health. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:19, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't realise that Mathsci had been away from WP for as long as he has. He hope he is feeling better.--Thoughtfortheday (talk) 21:56, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well, he edited when miserable, so not editing really makes me wonder. - Do you think you could improve the recordings section of BWV 140. On the day it was first performed, and it rarely happens that we have a 27th Sunday after Trinity. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:59, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it is worrying about Mathsci.

I will have a look at the cantata.--Thoughtfortheday (talk) 21:01, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Now Tönet, ihr Pauken is in prep to be shown on 8 December. Additions of sourced material welcome ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:37, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Tönet, ihr Pauken! Erschallet, Trompeten! BWV 214

On 8 December 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Tönet, ihr Pauken! Erschallet, Trompeten! BWV 214, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Bach composed the cantata Tönet, ihr Pauken! Erschallet, Trompeten! to honor Maria Josepha of Saxony (pictured) on her birthday on 8 December 1733? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Tönet, ihr Pauken! Erschallet, Trompeten! BWV 214. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Tönet, ihr Pauken! Erschallet, Trompeten! BWV 214), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Mifter (talk) 12:01, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your part! - They shall do today ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:01, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Carlos Arniches

In reference to the page Martín Domínguez Esteban, thank you for your correction but Carlos Arniches (architect). was not an architect, he was a Spanish Playwright Carlos Arniches. ovA_165443 (talk) 17:29, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry for any confusion I have caused. My understanding is that the associate of Martín Domínguez Esteban was the son of the playwright and was also called Carlos.--Thoughtfortheday (talk) 23:18, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation pages and redirects

Redirecting a term to the article a reader is most likely to want to see, is not discriminatory. It is Wikipedia policy (see also WP:TWODABS). Where there is potential ambiguity in a title, or in a term that is redirected to a particular page, but there is an obvious primary topic, then you can place a hatnote on the page to help the small number of readers who wanted to go somewhere else. It isn't clear that this would be useful to direct people to a pointless uncited stub that you just created, but if the stub survives then nobody can really complain about a hatnote. Lastly, the re-targetting of a redirect that is already linked from multiple articles to point to something else breaks all those articles, so that in itself is reason to revert to the original redirect. Please familiarise yourself with these policies before making an even bigger mess. Lithopsian (talk) 22:04, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't mean to suggest that you are personally discriminatory, merely that the invisibility of the girls' school is a problem, even if women's education is only of interest to "a small number of readers" as you appear to posit. Some people are trying to increase the number of articles about women as they represent about half the population. You are welcome to improve the new article about the girls' school.--Thoughtfortheday (talk) 23:05, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I of course am inherently discriminatory (male in my case), but this has nothing to do with social engineering, merely about what people are actually interested in looking at when they type "Harrow High School". Wikipedia is not judging, and most especially it isn't trying to influence. There are tools that will show you what articles people are reading. The policies are quite explicit that where the majority of people looking for an ambiguous term want to go to a particular article, they should be sent there and not to a disambiguation page. That is nearly always the case when there are two options, we try to pick the right one and hatnote to the other. It can also be true when there are more than two options, but the guideline is that there should clearly be more readers of one article than all the others combined. Those tools are completely useless in this case because the girls school article was only just created, but since it refers to a school that disappeared completely over 40 years ago, I suspect it isn't going to be the #1 destination. Interesting about Diane Abbott, maybe that link will swing it, check back in a few weeks when there will be better stats. Arguably, it could be said that the boys school also disappeared in 1975, but since it just changed its name (more than once) and still exists on the same site with a similar name, it is a blindingly obvious primary topic at the moment. Hatnote it.

The name itself is an interesting one. Harrow County School never existed, so far as I can tell from my brief researches. That's fine of course, it is only a redirect. However, Harrow County Grammar School for Girls also never existed, at least not under that name, however badly the BBC managed to get it wrong. The title of the article should normally be the title of the institution and so this article should probably be renamed. The fact that it is a grammar school and that people tend to mangle its name (perhaps for their own ideological reasons in this case) just means we have to be especially clear and also add more redirects. Lithopsian (talk) 12:07, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your thoughtful reply. I take your point that I have probably got the name wrong....the official version appears to omit the word "grammar".--Thoughtfortheday (talk) 18:42, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes, Issue 31

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 31, October – Novemeber 2018

OAWiki
Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
Global branches update
Bytes in brief

French version of Books & Bytes is now available on meta!
Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:34, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2019

Die Zeit, die Tag und Jahre macht

Happy 2019 -

begin it with music and memories

Thank you for your help last year, including Bach's works, not only this TFA! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:20, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please check out "Happy" once more, for a smile, and sharing (a Nobel Peace Prize), and resolutions. I wanted that for 1 January, but then wasn't sad about having our music pictured instead. Not too late for resolutions, New Year or not. DYK that he probably kept me on Wikipedia, back in 2012? By the line (which brought him to my attention, and earned the first precious in br'erly style) that I added to my editnotice, in fond memory? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:09, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for adding to the Chandos Anthems. Please do me a favour: until after DYK don't add anything without a reference. Neither the recording by Trinity is sourced, nor that they are about 40, nor that it was well-received. - I am a bit distracted right know, have a peer review running, and friend is in trouble. Will return. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:41, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry! You know what I am like.--Thoughtfortheday (talk) 19:44, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, just a DYK-problem (this belief that even the sky is blue needs a ref) ;) - Today there: Psalm 75 and two Bach compositions! Thank you for all the additions! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:41, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes, Issue 32

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 32, January – February 2019

#1Lib1Ref
New and expanded partners
Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
Global branches update
Bytes in brief

French version of Books & Bytes is now available on meta!

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:30, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Beate Heinemann has been accepted

Beate Heinemann, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Milowent • ^hasspoken 13:41, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Chandos Anthems

On 10 March 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Chandos Anthems, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Chandos Anthems, psalm settings by Handel (pictured) as composer in residence at Cannons, were described as a "panorama of the composer's creative output"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Chandos Anthems. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Chandos Anthems), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Amakuru (talk) 12:01, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve The Gordon Monument (Waterloo)

Hello, Thoughtfortheday,

Thanks for creating The Gordon Monument (Waterloo)! I edit here too, under the username Girth Summit and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

I had a look online, and found a few sources that might be useful to expand this and improve the verifiability. I've also moved the article to The Gordon Monument (Waterloo), because I found quite a few other 'Gordon Monuments' while searching.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Girth Summit}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

GirthSummit _(blether) 18:07, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Gordons

Hi - well, that search I did for 'Gordon Monuments' led me down an unexpected road... I noticed that you took an interest in the first couple of articles I wrote, so I thought I'd let you know that I have also written Gordon Chapel - your thoughts would be appreciated! I was wondering whether it might be possible to work that up to GA status - I see you've had a bit of success in that area, so anything you might be able to suggest, if you have time/inclination, would be most welcome. Cheers GirthSummit _(blether) 17:44, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for catching that duplicate - I must have hit Ctrl+V by accident when navigating to the right part of the article!GirthSummit _(blether) 18:58, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. It is an interesting article.--Thoughtfortheday (talk) 18:59, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

BWV 4

Thanks for watching Christ lag in Todes Banden! - Do you know what the Christoph Wolff 1997 ref is, which is not used? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:43, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think the 1997 ref is anything I consulted. I wonder how it got there....it hasn't rung a bell so far. I remember reading the other one, of course, the Wolff biography.--Thoughtfortheday (talk) 21:48, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's by Mathsci, - we can't ask him. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:00, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Facilities named after David Attenborough has been nominated for discussion

Category:Facilities named after David Attenborough, which you created, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 00:46, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Isabel Hardwich (May 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for academics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs more sourcing besides its own organizations.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Isabel Hardwich and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Isabel Hardwich, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:55, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Thoughtfortheday! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:55, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your quick response to this resubmission, Angus. Oh dear, I can't claim the excuse of being a new editor, unfortunately. I have had problems finding sources for this article, having tried to help some new editors who started the draft.--Thoughtfortheday (talk) 18:55, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Update. Now in mainspace.--Thoughtfortheday (talk) 15:36, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes, Issue 33

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 33, March – April 2019

#1Lib1Ref
Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
Global branches update
Bytes in brief

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:41, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Arlanzón (river) moved to draftspace

Entirely unsourced. Please provide at least a link to a regional cadastral registry or similar. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 00:42, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arlanzón (river) has been accepted

Arlanzón (river), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 06:37, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

		The Christianity Barnstar
		Dear Thoughtfortheday, I award you The Christianity Barnstar for all your hard work in WikiProject Christianity-related articles, especially your creation of Santa María de Wamba. Keep up the good work! Your efforts are making a difference here! With regards, Anupam^Talk 20:39, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Vespers

I am busy with Vespro della Beata Vergine, which has a separate Vespro della Beata Vergine discography, and I wonder if you could - as for Bach works - write a short prose summary from the list of recordings for the main article. Heading towards GA and possibly higher. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:35, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, of course. I have just been looking at the discography article in order to familiarise myself with the recordings.--Thoughtfortheday (talk) 08:40, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I like what you did. I boldly nominated for Good article. Can you please get references over from the discography? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:09, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have made a start. Perhaps I am leaning too much on the useful Kemp review of the field.--Thoughtfortheday (talk) 07:57, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Review has begun, as you probably noticed. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:17, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up. Yes, I will keep an eye on the review.--Thoughtfortheday (talk) 15:31, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I just read an interesting article about Monteverdi only responsible for ducal chapel music, not the Santa Barbara church. I'm close to removing the pic, - too bad the chapel was remodelled. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:21, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That sounds very interesting. I haven't read much about how his work was organised at Mantua.--Thoughtfortheday (talk) 12:08, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Scholars disagree on many things regarding the Vespers, but agree on one thing: it was originally just pieces, not "a work". I didn't know - until today - that Monteverdi had any responsibility for church music in Mantua, but he had, only not at the big church, but the duke's chapels, with 10 singers at his hand. When the big church job, vacant in 1609, was not given to him, he may have decided to search for a different one, and publish the best of the best. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:53, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for excellent copyediting! Could we please not end the recordings with one that uses a rather poor (abridged) edition? - Look at our choir in today's paper, with interview of the conductor (in German) ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:10, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Going back to the discussion regarding Mantua, I think I was wondering about the composer's working life in the palace rather than intending to imply that his vespers were necessarily performed there as a work...that would have been presumption on my part.

I have reworded what was said about choosing one of the magnificats, so the recordings section doesn't finish with Denis Stevens now.--Thoughtfortheday (talk) 13:31, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I'm browsing what Kurtzman wrote about the Rome episode, - would you have time to look at that more diligently and use for the article? - I will have dress rehearsal soon ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:20, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I would be pleased to have a look today. I hope the rehearsal goes well.--Thoughtfortheday (talk) 11:09, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Rehearsal and concert went well, uplifting!!! Picture and review on my talk, and there to stay for a while. I added a review of the amarcord recording to the discography page, have not much time right now, - you can do what you like from discarding to quoting and improving its formatting. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:20, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am glad it went well. Thanks for the review of the amarcord recording. I will need to get a machine translation done, as I don't know some of the words, but I see it is positive and also relates to some of the other recordings.--Thoughtfortheday (talk) 17:26, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes Issue 34, May – June 2019

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 34, May – June 2019

Partnerships
#1Lib1Ref
Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
Global branches update
Bytes in brief

French version of Books & Bytes is now available on meta!
Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:21, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Vespro della Beata Vergine

On 27 September 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Vespro della Beata Vergine, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in September 1610, Monteverdi dedicated to Pope Paul V his Vespro della Beata Vergine, a complex vespers composition which included the style of the emerging opera? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Vespro della Beata Vergine. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Vespro della Beata Vergine), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

valereee (talk) 00:01, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 35, July – August 2019

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 35, July – August 2019

Wikimania
We're building something great, but..
Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
A Wikibrarian's story
Bytes in brief

Read the full newsletter

On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:58, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jauchzet, frohlocket!

Christmas coming closer: how do you feel about making Christmas Oratorio discography, perhaps a bit like Mass in B minor d? The info is now in the oratorio, but I would like to link from the single parts as well. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:56, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It sounds a good idea, Gerda, and I will have a look at this project.--Thoughtfortheday (talk) 22:00, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank s for a start! No comma in the article title, please, and best use the template as in the cantata articles, - I was always too lazy to avoid the repetition of soprano etc, but this would be the time ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:32, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Presumably I should start with the soprano rather than the tenor soloist.--Thoughtfortheday (talk) 19:12, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have a query about the 1980s Rilling recording (which I think is missing from the list in the Christmas Oratorio article). The credits name an "Echo Soprano", and I am not sure what to do with this. Harry Christophers' recording has a similar credit.--Thoughtfortheday (talk) 14:17, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In Part four, there's an echo aria, and the echo usually sung by someone capable from the choir, - perhaps a footnote? - When we sang it last, a voice student of Elisabeth Scholl did it, and next concert teacher and student were the two sopranos in the Monteverdi Vespers, in lovely harmony --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:24, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for explaining. I haven't been to a performance for a long time.--Thoughtfortheday (talk) 14:37, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

+ if a performance it's typically 1-3+6, no 4, no echo. They love to use the trumpets and don't want to pay for horns also. But we did it all last year, and 6 is actually pictured on my user page. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:44, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Real Monasterio

Vision in 2020

... with thanks from QAI

Thank you so much for adding! Just please be careful with making something a bulleted list, because those don't count for DYK, and right now it's barely long enough. Please - for DYK - also don't add anything without a ref. I was there, and impressed, but sadly have no time to dig into it. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:38, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please feel free to revert anything you want.

I like Avila but I haven't been to this monastery so I was interested in reading about it.--Thoughtfortheday (talk) 14:04, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I discovered it only this second time around. There is MUCH more in Spanish, but I can't see the sources, so hesitate until after DYK. But might be interesting for reading. Thomas and the inquisitor ... --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:24, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Motets

Do you think you could add something about recordings to Motet (Bach), in the article or separately? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:31, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I should be able to do something during the week. I have quite a lot of free time as a result of the coronavirus, it's just question of organising it.--Thoughtfortheday (talk) 10:05, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 36

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 36, September – October 2019

#1Lib1Ref January 2020
#1Lib1Ref 2019 stories and learnings

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:21, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 37

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 37, November – December 2019

#1Lib1Ref
Wikimedia and Libraries User Group

Read the full newsletter

On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:10, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Rooks Nest House

On 2 February 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Rooks Nest House, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Rooks Nest House (pictured) in Stevenage was the childhood home of author E. M. Forster, who described it in his 1910 novel, Howards End? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Rooks Nest House. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Rooks Nest House), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Amakuru (talk) 12:01, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Fuensanta Nieto

Hello, Thoughtfortheday,

Thank you for creating Fuensanta Nieto.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thanks for creating this article

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Abishe}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Abishe (talk) 06:42, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Easter

or: the resurrection of loving-kindness --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:40, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

... today see Credo, or this is the day from Psalm 118. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:31, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Issue 38, January – April 2020

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 38, January – April 2020

New partnership
Global roundup

Read the full newsletter

On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --15:58, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 39, May – June 2020

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 39, May – June 2020

Library Card Platform
New partnerships
- ProQuest
- Springer Nature
- BioOne
- CEEOL
- IWA Publishing
- ICE Publishing
Bytes in brief

Read the full newsletter

On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:13, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cite EB1911

Thank you for this edit. To aid those who work on the Wikipedia:WikiProject Encyclopaedia Britannica please use the template {{Cite EB1911}} if you wish to link to a Wikisource:EB1911 article. It places Wikipedia articles into various maintenance categories and for you it automatically adds the standard (editor, date, encyclopaedia name etc):

{{Cite EB1911 |wstitle=Valencia (Venezuela) |volume=27 |page=846}}

Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Valencia (Venezuela)" . Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 27 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 846.

There are other specific options which you will find documented in the template documentation page. There are also two other templates: {{EB1911}} which provides attribution for use if you copy text from EB1911 directly into an article (see WP:FREECOPYING); and {{EB1911 poster}} as an alternative for a link in an external links section.

--PBS (talk) 09:24, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Spanish Royal Collection

This was not a very helpful redirect to set up, as the two collections are by no means the same thing. Linking to it at Arnolfini Portrait for example is downright misleading for the reader, as like many other famous paintings this left the collection well before the museum was set up. I am reverting inmappropriate uses (of which you seem to have done many), and am likely either to nominate the redirect for deletion, or to start a proper article on the subject. Johnbod (talk) 12:36, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Whilst I'm looking at your edits, this was a silly breach of policy]. I hope you can see why. Johnbod (talk) 12:48, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September

September
Dahlias in Walsdorf

I like today's Main page, with the TFA (thank you for your contributions!) on the anniversary day (of both dedication and our concert), a DYK, and a great photographer who didn't make it soon enough, Jürgen Schadeberg, - more on my talk, mostly about the tribute to Brian who shared his sources. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:31, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the message. I was pleased to see the Vespers article on the Main page.--Thoughtfortheday (talk) 20:36, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 40

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 40, July – August 2020

New partnerships
- Al Manhal
- Ancestry
- RILM
#1Lib1Ref May 2020 report
AfLIA hires a Wikipedian-in-Residence

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --10:15, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 40

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 40, July – August 2020

New partnerships
- Al Manhal
- Ancestry
- RILM
#1Lib1Ref May 2020 report
AfLIA hires a Wikipedian-in-Residence

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --14:26, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

Precious
Eight years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:05, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October harvest

October

thanksgiving

today's music is particularly charming, - enchanting, said a critic about the Mendelssohn that I heard on 3 October, - this video is older, and the YT in the article (from Paris!) comes with a Bach encore as she played for us! - She plays a Stradivari, - could she perhaps be mentioned in that context? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:30, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I am sure the instrument is noteworthy and that you are right to mention it along with the violinist in the "List of Stradivarius instruments".--Thoughtfortheday (talk) 17:27, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, done, wanted to do it while she was featured on the Main page. Berthier, - please check if I did it right. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:36, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

16 October memories --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:14, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jesus Meine Freude. Thanks, I might have missed this if you hadn't drawn my attention to it.--Thoughtfortheday (talk) 08:33, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jesu, meine Freude, my song of defiance, see my 2013 talk archive. Struggling with the motet for GA, - would you want to review that? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:56, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think I am a bit biased, as I would assume the article is already pretty much at the right level. Perhaps there is someone who could come to it with fresh eyes.--Thoughtfortheday (talk) 08:59, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Did you look? I was failed twice already ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:15, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I haven't had a good look recently, but I formed the impression that the faults were pretty minor but there was a disproportionate amount of discussion being generated. I'm sure we can agree that you are right to persist in submitting it for GA.--Thoughtfortheday (talk) 10:57, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It is submitted, just not by me --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:20, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I got the wording wrong because I hadn't looked at the pages properly. Looking on the bright side, I imagine that a few people want it to pass.--Thoughtfortheday (talk) 15:55, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 41

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 41, September – October 2020

New partnership: Taxmann
WikiCite
1Lib1Ref 2021

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --10:48, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Stradivari violas

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Category:Stradivari violas requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. RevelationDirect (talk) 23:28, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. I am disputing the proposed deletion.--Thoughtfortheday (talk) 10:07, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is more a horse before the cart issue than anyone objecting to the category conceptually. Regardless, I hope those articles do get created. - RevelationDirect (talk) 12:11, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have created Medici tenor viola. I am not planning any more viola articles for the time being.--Thoughtfortheday (talk) 20:07, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:21st-century European female musicians

A tag has been placed on Category:21st-century European female musicians requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:54, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes - Issue 42

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 42, November – December 2020

New EBSCO collections now available
1Lib1Ref 2021 underway
Library Card input requested
Libraries love Wikimedia, too!

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --14:00, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2021

Have a good new year! - On the Main page today Jerome Kohl, remembered in friendship - I hope you will help me again splitting a discography from a Bach cantata, now BWV 1, perhaps next week? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:54, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I appreciated Jerome's contributions.

I would be happy to work on BWV 1 next week.--Thoughtfortheday (talk) 20:35, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If I'll get to it - listening to BWV 3 first - I'll split tomorrow. - DYK that {{harv}} - his favourite method - is deprecated, and I'm slowly working on transforming it to {{sfn}}, see Chöre für Doris. Help welcome ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:59, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OK, split done Wie schön leuchtet der Morgenstern, BWV 1 discography. I suggest we make improvements to that new article - more refs, more prose, reviews - and then I'll see what to take over to the other. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:13, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

We should split the complete series sentence, each conductor his own. Rilling began and ended first (1969 to 1985), - I was sloppy. Details in the new ref, which doesn't have all ends, though. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:41, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OK, but does the end date of the series matter so much, as they tend to tackle BWV 1 early in the project?--Thoughtfortheday (talk) 13:11, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

not really, just that the source was kind of old. Thank you for working on it, - we have freedom now, that it's split. Pic of Bach music --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:18, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I would have done more on the discography, but I was a bit busy. You have made a lot of improvements to it.--Thoughtfortheday (talk) 21:35, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, - I nominated it for DYK for 25 March, - there's time. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:48, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I found an interesting book [7], some tables. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:12, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's good on early Bach recordings, I see.--Thoughtfortheday (talk) 02:03, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I found another good one, a dissertation. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:26, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oboe da Caccia

Oh dear! I have cited a recording Harnoncourt released to promote the oboe da caccia, but I haven't heard it yet, and I don't actually know what instruments his oboeists used for the BWV 1 recording. I have kept the wording of the relevant passage a bit vague for the time being.--Thoughtfortheday (talk) 11:57, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mary Augusta Wakefield

Thanks for all your work on the Mary Augusta Wakefield article. You really improved it! T. E. Meeks (talk) 13:34, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for getting it started!--Thoughtfortheday (talk) 13:43, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Silver Street, London

The article Silver Street, London has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Okay, it existed, but I can't find any in-depth coverage to show why it's notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:58, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Have you heard of William Shakespeare? He was a well-known writer.--Thoughtfortheday (talk) 21:06, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Silver Street, London for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Silver Street, London is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Silver Street, London until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:08, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Sorry for the sarcasm.--Thoughtfortheday (talk) 18:44, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Christ lag in Todes Banden, BWV 4 scheduled for TFA

This is to let you know that the Christ lag in Todes Banden, BWV 4 article has been scheduled as today's featured article for April 4, 2021. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/April 4, 2021, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1000 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so.

For Featured Articles promoted recently, there will be an existing blurb linked from the FAC talk page, which is likely to be transferred to the TFA page by a coordinator at some point.

We suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 16:37, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 42

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 42, January – February 2021

New partnerships: PNAS, De Gruyter, Nomos
1Lib1Ref
Library Card

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:28, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Wie schön leuchtet der Morgenstern, BWV 1 discography

On 25 March 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Wie schön leuchtet der Morgenstern, BWV 1 discography, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that recordings of Wie schön leuchtet der Morgenstern, BWV 1, a Bach chorale cantata for the Annunciation, include Fritz Lehmann's with the Berlin Philharmonic, and Nikolaus Harnoncourt's using period instruments? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Wie schön leuchtet der Morgenstern, BWV 1 discography. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Wie schön leuchtet der Morgenstern, BWV 1 discography), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 25 March 2021 (UTC) [reply]

Thank you! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:08, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jesu, meine Freude again

wild garlic

Thank you for taking care early - from 2013 - of an article about music significant in my life, Bach's motet Jesu, mein Freude! From the start to the Main page in 15 years ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:51, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

more memories on the Main page today, Psalm 115 thinking of Yoninah, Christa Ludwig and Milva, - voices that made the Earth a better place. Sad that the psalm hook didn't appear on Earth Day as planned, but better pictured and late than going unnoticed ;) - Do you think we could make a Jesu, meine Freude discography? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:13, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the delay in replying. Yes, I would be interested in working on a discography for this motet.--Thoughtfortheday (talk) 22:33, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at the talk, how about doing it within the article? We could still split if it gets too long and dominating. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:19, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, this seems to be a good way forward.--Thoughtfortheday (talk) 18:20, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Things named after Francisco de Miranda has been nominated for deletion

Category:Things named after Francisco de Miranda has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. NebY (talk) 17:14, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 43

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 43, March – April 2021

New Library Card designs
1Lib1Ref May

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:12, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Songs about nightingales has been nominated for deletion

Category:Songs about nightingales has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Richhoncho (talk) 10:14, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 45

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 45, May – June 2021

Library design improvements continue
New partnerships
1Lib1Ref update

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:05, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Wymondley Roman Villa

The article Wymondley Roman Villa has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

It needs more RS to meet WP:NBUILD.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Htanaungg (talk) 09:29, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Battlefield of Waterloo

A tag has been placed on Category:Battlefield of Waterloo indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:22, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 46

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 46, July – August 2021

Library design improvements deployed
New collections available in English and German
Wikimania presentation

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:15, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

Precious
Nine years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:36, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 47

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 47, September – October 2021

On-wiki Wikipedia Library notification rolling out
Search tool deployed
New My Library design improvements

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:59, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lemsford, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hatfield.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 48

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 48, November – December 2021

1Lib1Ref 2022
Wikipedia Library notifications deployed

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --15:13, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Songs about swans

A tag has been placed on Category:Songs about swans indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:41, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Internet Archive Scholar vs. JSTOR

Hello, I see on your user page that you use JSTOR and I'd like to know more about your experience. By my calculations, a good 70 % of the main JSTOR content is now available for everyone at Internet Archive Scholar, with full text search provided e.g. at https://scholar.archive.org/ . The service is still in beta, but I've used it for some source-finding and it seems quite usable to me; I wonder whether that's just my experience. If you have a chance, the next time you'd be looking for a source on Google Scholar or JSTOR or similar, to perform the same search on IA scholar instead, I'd be curious to hear how it ends up. Thanks, Nemo 19:06, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I am sorry that I seem to have neglected to reply to your messsage from 2022. I find that the search facility of Internet Archive Scholar is not so efficient. I see that it is still in beta. Thoughtfortheday (talk) 20:15, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 49

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 49, January – February 2022

New library collections
Blog post published detailing technical improvements

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --10:06, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

help for Bach

March songs

Thank you for your help with Bach's works and his No. 1 especially today! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:04, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I was pleased to see BWV 1 today and was intending to send you my congratulations.

Alan Thoughtfortheday (talk) 17:18, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Sunday flowers and sounds, don't miss the extraordinary marriage of the beginnings of the theme of Wie schön leuchtet der Morgenstern, BWV 1, and Prayer for Ukraine - here! - Perhaps creating a separate discography article would be a good idea, given some comments in the FAC. Would you have time? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:23, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I would have missed the musical item without your heads-up.

I can find time to do a discography if there isn't much of a hurry for it. Having said that, I'm not really up-to-date on the discussions. I note that there is a BWV 1 discography article in existence which goes up to 2013.Thoughtfortheday (talk) 20:45, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I was perhaps not clear about this meaning BWV 56, sorry. The discussion is mainly the Source review, claiming many sources are not so reliable, and 80% of those are for recordings. Two choices: have the disco separate, or find better refs for it. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:12, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake. I should have realised you weren't referring to BWV 1. Thoughtfortheday (talk) 21:25, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

blue (and yellow)


April songs

Ukraine day today: Maks Levin DYK, expanding Kyiv Symphony Orchestra (have tickets), and creating Anthony Robin Schneider, the bass who could be heard opening the singing in Beethoven's Ninth twice on 10 March 2022, live in Frankfurt, Germany, and recorded in Auckland, New Zealand, singing "Freiheit!" (freedom) instead of "Freude" (joy), in a tradition started after the Fall of the Wall. In case of interest. - It slowed me down for the discography, sorry. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:37, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

next offer: now you can listen to what I heard live yesterday, Kyiv Symphony Orchestra, Luigi Gaggero & Diana Tishchenko (violin) / Kulturpalast Dresden (25 April 2022 on YouTube (that's 25 April in Dresden, a different violinist, but the same program) - ours pictured here - dove sono as encore --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:19, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May songs

continued: I like my talk today (actually mostly from 29 May - I took the title pic), enjoy the music, two related videos worth watching! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:14, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 50

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 50, March – April 2022

New library partner - SPIE
1Lib1Ref May 2022 underway

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:52, 1 June 2022 (UTC) (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Ich will den Kreuzstab gerne tragen, BWV 56 discography

On 4 June 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ich will den Kreuzstab gerne tragen, BWV 56 discography, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the first recording of Bach's Kreuzstab cantata was a 1939 Dutch live broadcast sung by Mack Harrell, 25 years before the 1964 German recording by his protégé Barry McDaniel? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ich will den Kreuzstab gerne tragen, BWV 56 discography. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Ich will den Kreuzstab gerne tragen, BWV 56 discography), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 12:02, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Music history

Thank you for having started Oxford History of Western Music! How about now writing it, beyond predecessors? Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:48, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gerda. Yes, I should do some more work on this page.--Thoughtfortheday (talk) 11:20, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 51

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 51, May – June 2022

New library partners
- SAGE Journals
- Elsevier ScienceDirect
- University of Chicago Press
- Information Processing Society of Japan
Feedback requested on this newsletter
1Lib1Ref May 2022

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:45, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Rogers Covey-Crump

On 17 August 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Rogers Covey-Crump, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Rogers Covey-Crump, once the high tenor of the Hilliard Ensemble, is known as a leading Evangelist in Bach's Passions? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Rogers Covey-Crump. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Rogers Covey-Crump), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Always precious

Ten years ago, you were found precious. That's what you are, always. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:53, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rocío Márquez moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Rocío Márquez, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hitro talk 13:54, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the message. I am looking for English language sources. The subject is better documented in Spanish. Thoughtfortheday (talk) 14:06, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there,

Just FYI, sources in any language will work as long as they satisfy WP:RS. Regards. Hitro talk 14:12, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rocío Márquez (September 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Akevsharma was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rocío Márquez and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Akevsharma (talk) 11:10, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 52

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 52, July – August 2022

New instant-access collections:
- SpringerLink and Springer Nature
- Project MUSE
- Taylor & Francis
- ASHA
- Loeb
Feedback requested on this newsletter

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:21, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Narrow-gaurge railway lines in Venezuela

A tag has been placed on Category:Narrow-gaurge railway lines in Venezuela indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:15, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 53

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 53, September – October 2022

New collections:
- Edward Elgar
- E-Yearbook
- Corriere della Serra
- Wikilala
Collections moved to Library Bundle:
- Ancestry
New feature: Outage notification
Spotlight: Collections indexed in EDS

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:19, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Charpentier

December songs

Thank you for helping with Charpentier's mass for Christmas! Feel free to add, just only sourced things please, as I hope to have it on DYK for Christmas. I didn't get to it today, but keep hoping. The Bärenreiter and Carus editors don't agree on the year, and I guess the Carus numbering is not by the composer. Would you know. IMSLP has han Offertoire that my vocal score doesn't have but no wonder, it will be instrumental.;) -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:59, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad you are working on this lovely piece. I don't know much about the publication history.

A memory from years ago is that a reviewer thought the Willcocks' recording didn't sound very French. I must try to find the review.--Thoughtfortheday (talk) 02:07, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Today was a day rich in music, with two new pictures, and also rich in WP:QAI contributions on the Main page: the TFA, 2 DYK and 2 RD with members as principal editors. The church pictured there (not by me, nice snow dust and tall evergreen) comes with memories, detailed on my talk. - It all meant of course I the mass article didn't make progress. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:21, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Enjoy the season, dreaming of peace! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:58, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Stisted, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Living.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Messe de minuit pour Noël

On 24 December 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Messe de minuit pour Noël, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Marc-Antoine Charpentier composed the midnight mass Messe de minuit pour Noël based on the melodies of ten French Christmas carols? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Messe de minuit pour Noël. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Messe de minuit pour Noël), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

-- RoySmith (talk) 00:03, 24 December 2022 (UTC) [reply]

December songs
happy new year

We sang that delightful piece today, pictured, - thank you for helping! Enjoy the season! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:17, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled granted

Hi Thoughtfortheday, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.

Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.

Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:34, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January music

January songs
happy new year

was about time - congratulations! - just my mother's birthday - she introduced me to music, next project Ich habe genug, BWV 82. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:37, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

vacation pics --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:02, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm back - Melitta Muszely died, RIP - the other story is 10 years old OTD ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:11, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 54

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 54, November – December 2022

New collections:
- British Newspaper Archive
- Findmypast
- University of Michigan Press
- ACLS
- Duke University Press
1Lib1Ref 2023
Spotlight: EDS Refine Results

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --14:15, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February songs

February songs

my daily stories

yesterday's cantata, 300 years later --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:33, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

music today: the regional festival - DYK of 13 years ago ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:42, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My story on 24 February is about Artemy Vedel (TFA by Amitchell235), and I made a suggestion for more peace, - what do you think? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:08, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

today: two women whose birthday we celebrate today, 99 and 90! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:21, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rocío Márquez (February 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Twinkle1990 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Spanish and English Wikipedia are different. The subject person's notability must be demonstrate with WP:SIGCOV per WP:RS.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rocío Márquez and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Twinkle1990 (talk) 08:27, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:United Kingdom expatriates in Venezuela

A tag has been placed on Category:United Kingdom expatriates in Venezuela indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:11, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 55

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 55, January – February 2023

New bundle partners:
- Newspapers.com
- Fold3
1Lib1Ref January report
Spotlight: EDS SmartText Searching

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:45, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

James Bowman

March songs

my story today

thank you for helping with the iconic countertenor! - sharing impressions from vacation on Madeira 20-30 March, pics now at 25 March with ups and downs and two cats - do you think you might find references for his positions and awards? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:53, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'll see what I can do to find references. If I remember correctly, it is a bit difficult to pin down some of the facts about his early career. I was lucky enough to hear him sing several times from the mid-70s onwards.--Thoughtfortheday (talk) 08:42, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for James Bowman (countertenor)

On 4 April 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article James Bowman (countertenor), which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 04:35, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April songs

my story today

Thank you! - Today is the 80th birthday of John Eliot Gardiner, who's going to conduct on 6 May. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:47, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 56

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 56, March – April 2023

New partner:
- Perlego
Library access tips and tricks
Spotlight: EveryBookItsReader

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --10:04, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May music

May songs
my story today

my story today is that 300 years ago, Bach became Thomaskantor, with BWV 75, writing music history. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:08, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 57

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 57, May – June 2023

Suggestion improvements
Favorite collections tips
Spotlight: Promoting Nigerian Books and Authors

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:22, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Musical manuscripts of the Fitzwilliam Museum has been nominated for merging

Category:Musical manuscripts of the Fitzwilliam Museum has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 04:33, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Rocío Márquez

Hello, Thoughtfortheday. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rocío Márquez, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:02, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia

You did provide information which helps identify the source of the material in your edit. It appears to be Kelham. Copying within Wikipedia is acceptable but we have a guideline on how it must be attributed.

This type of edit does get picked up by Copy Patrol and a good edit summary helps to make sure we don't accidentally revert it. However, for future use, would you note the best practices wording as outlined at Wikipedia:Copying_within_Wikipedia? In particular, linking to the source article and adding the phrase "see that page's history for attribution" helps ensure that proper attribution is preserved.

While best practices are that attribution should be added to the edit summary at the time the edit is made, the linked article on best practices describes the appropriate steps to add attribution after the fact. I hope you will do so.

I've noticed that this guideline is not very well known, even among editors with tens of thousands of edits, so it isn't surprising that I point this out to some veteran editors, but there are some t's that need to be crossed.~~~~ S Philbrick (Talk) 11:48, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I apologise for not crediting the material appropriately. Thoughtfortheday (talk) 15:02, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 58

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 58, July – August 2023

New partners - De Standaard and Duncker & Humblot
Tech tip: Filters
Wikimania presentation

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --14:27, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Aboreta in the Republic of Ireland

A tag has been placed on Category:Aboreta in the Republic of Ireland indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:40, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Trees in County Wexford has been nominated for deletion

Category:Trees in County Wexford has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 16:47, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October music

October songs
my story today

Today, it's a place that inspired me, musings if you have time. My corner for memory and music has today a juxtaposition of what our local church choirs offer. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:50, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Dr Who Proms has been nominated for renaming

Category:Dr Who Proms has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym (talk) 10:32, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November music

November songs
my story today

Vacation pictures offered if you click on songs, and my story today is a DYK hook from 13 years ago OTD: about the great music at one of my churches. Mozart's Requiem to come on Sunday, coupled with Arvo Pärt's Da pacem Domine, - I guess you might come if it was a bit closer. Perhaps watch the video of our last production, our first on yt, ever. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:35, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 59

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 59, September – October 2023

Spotlight: Introducing a repository of anti-disinformation projects
Tech tip: Library access methods

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:15, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December greetings

December: story · music · places

Thank you for what you do and stand for! I wish you a good festive season and a peaceful New Year! -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:50, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Today, I have a special story to tell, of the works of a musician born 300 years ago. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:13, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

2024

Die Zeit, die Tag und Jahre macht

Happy New Year

2024

Like 2019, see above ;) -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:13, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On the Main page: the person who made the pictured festival possible --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:47, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 60

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 60, November – December 2023

Three new partners
Google Scholar integration
How to track partner suggestions

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --13:36, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Rocío Márquez

Hello, Thoughtfortheday. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rocío Márquez".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 09:12, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Marbella Club Hotel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Golden Mile.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Cannons (house)

Cannons (house) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 02:47, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 61

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 61, January – February 2024

Bristol University Press and British Online Archives now available
1Lib1Ref results

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:32, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:21st-century European male musicians has been nominated for merging

Category:21st-century European male musicians has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 20:37, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:20th-century European male musicians has been nominated for merging

Category:20th-century European male musicians has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 20:38, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:21st-century European musicians

A tag has been placed on Category:21st-century European musicians indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:00, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Salomè (1986 film)

A tag has been placed on Category:Salomè (1986 film) indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 14:49, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 62

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 62, March – April 2024

IEEE and Haaretz now available
Let's Connect Clinics about The Wikipedia Library
Spotlight and Wikipedia Library tips

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:03, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May music

story · music · places

Today's story mentions a concert I loved to hear (DYK) and a piece I loved to sing in choir, 150 years old (OTD). -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:04, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I follow your talk page, but I might not have looked at yesterday's episode for a while. I love the Verdi Requiem too.

Thank you for following ;) - Today's story is my little contribution to Trinity Sunday, with a church named after the Trinity (which I'd have liked to see pictured, and what would be a good description of that kind of facade? "splendid" was reverted as not neutral) and a cantata Bach conducted 300 years ago for the occasion (having composed it 9 years earlier). I plan to improve BWV 7 for the occasion of its 300th anniversary on 24 June, - help welcome! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:57, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What an impressive facade! Perhaps "soaring" would be slightly more neutral than "splendid".

I will look at BWV 7. It's not a piece I am familiar with.--Thoughtfortheday (talk) 20:09, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kendal public library

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Thoughtfortheday (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy, as far as I know. My IP address is 10.106.20.17. I imagine some vandalism has been committed by users of the library in Cumbria, England, but presumably people with an account need not be caught.

I am blocked from editing my Sandbox too - block is stated as applying to range 147.161.236.0/23.--Thoughtfortheday (talk) 13:13, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

The library seems to be using a zscaler proxy(the IP range you give), probably for security. As a long time user I will give you a short term IPBE so you can resume editing. If you edit from the library frequently and need something longer term, please contact a checkuser(see WP:IPECPROXY). 331dot (talk) 09:14, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I'm happy with a short-term solution.--Thoughtfortheday (talk) 10:59, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Grade I listed barns in the United Kingdom

A tag has been placed on Category:Grade I listed barns in the United Kingdom indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 14:01, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 July 14 § Museum collections

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 July 14 § Museum collections on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Ham II (talk) 07:25, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 63

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 63, May – June 2024

One new partner
1Lib1Ref
Spotlight: References check

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:16, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July music

Today's story is about a photographer who took iconic pictures, especially View from Williamsburg, Brooklyn, on Manhattan, 9/11, yesterday's was a great mezzo, and on Thursday we watched a sublime ballerina. If that's not enough my talk offers chamber music from two amazing concerts. - I'm in the process of improving BWV 178 towards GA, - help welcome, such as referencing the recordings, adding prose to the section ... -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:56, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As you know, I have made a start on BWV 178. Thoughtfortheday (talk) 19:43, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, and it became GA. On Bach's day of death my story is about his cantata Was frag ich nach der Welt, BWV 94, although the article needs work. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:07, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You got BWV 178 to GA very quickly, well done! --Thoughtfortheday (talk) 07:31, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September music

story · music · places

Thank you, I was pleased, and per calendar, BWV 78 is 300 years today! The next will be BWV 99 for last Sunday and then BWV 8 for next Sunday. Thank you for your work on the interim Leipzig music director. Please make the version with initials a redirect, to find him better ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:10, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have created the redirect.--Thoughtfortheday (talk) 15:11, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:57, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Today is Schoenberg's 150th birthday! On display, portrayed by Egon Schiele, with music from Moses und Aron, and with two DYK hooks, one from 2010 and another from 2014; the latter, about his 40th birthday, appeared on his 140th birthday, which made me happy then and now again. - See places for a stunning sunrise, on the day Bruckner's 200th birthday was celebrated (just a few days late). --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:40, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ach, lieben Christen, seid getrost, BWV 114, is one of the pieces in my topic of this year. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:00, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My story today features a pic I took from my position in the choir, I can also offer varied delightful music, some from Venice, also with pics I took, - note the rose in the clarinet ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:24, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 64

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 64, July – August 2024

The Hindu Group joins The Wikipedia Library
Wikimania presentation
New user script for easily searching The Wikipedia Library

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:34, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Statues of Simón Bolívar in Venezuela has been nominated for merging

Category:Statues of Simón Bolívar in Venezuela has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 04:27, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Statues of Simón Bolívar in the United States has been nominated for merging

Category:Statues of Simón Bolívar in the United States has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 04:27, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October thanks

story · music · places

Thank you for improving articles on October! - My story today is a cantata 300 years old, based on a hymn 200 years old when the cantata was composed, based on a psalm some thousand years old, - so said the 2015 DYK hook. I had forgotten the discussion on the talk. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:08, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:26, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 65

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 65, September – October 2024

Hindu Tamil Thisai joins The Wikipedia Library
Frankfurt Book Fair 2024 report
Tech tip: Mass downloads

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:49, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:39, 13 November 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Thanks for the reminder. I completed the survey a while ago, so you should have my response. I also received an invitation via Spanish WP (I sometimes edit in Spanish), but I politely declined. Thoughtfortheday (talk) 11:03, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]