Jump to content

User talk:Stephencdickson

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hello, Stephencdickson! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Jonathan Oldenbuck (talk) 15:53, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines
The community
Writing articles
Miscellaneous

AfD nomination of Old calton cemetery

[edit]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Old calton cemetery. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Old calton cemetery. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:06, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Stephen, thank you for adding this detailed article. Hopefully it won't get deleted as its a fine topic for inclusion. However, Wikipedia requires all articles to be fully verifiable. This is one of the so-called "five pillars of Wikipedia", and means that everything should be referenced to sources which can be checked by anyone. So, your statement that the reference for this article is an unpublished leaflet is not sufficient. Presumably, you have done some extensive research into the topic, and can call on a range of sources for the information you have added. The best approach would therefore be to cite these sources directly, whether they be information in books or primary sources such as Town Council records. I hope you can assist in this, as its not often that someone is willing to add the results of such detailed research to the encyclopedia! Your efforts will certainly be appreciated by myself and other members of WikiProject Edinburgh, an informal collaboration seeking to improve Edinburgh-related articles. Please feel free to contact me if you need any help. Regards, Jonathan Oldenbuck (talk) 11:55, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 12:29, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Whitehaven appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you.203.63.130.37 (talk) 06:50, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Signing talk page posts

[edit]

Hi Stephen, when you make a comment on a talk page (whether of an editor or an article), you should use four tildes ~~~~ to sign your comment. Thanks, LadyofShalott 14:38, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Complete book information

[edit]

Would you please provide complete information for the book mentioned in this edit? Who was the publisher? When was it published? What page was the information on? Jc3s5h (talk) 12:01, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.
Stephencdickson (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
193.39.157.76 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Martay85". The reason given for Martay85's block is: "Violations of the Biographies of living persons policy".

Accept reason: Autoblock removed  Ronhjones  (Talk) 12:39, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

15th Battalion Royal Scots

[edit]

Stephen, Do you know of this chap from the Royal scots?

New Police chief for Argyll. Newspaper cutting from: The Glasgow Herald – 21 July 1927. Inspector Donald A. Ross, Edinburgh Police, has been appointed Chief Constable of Argyllshire. The new Chief Constable is 33 years of age, was educated at George Watson’s College, Edinburgh and after leaving school entered the law office of Messrs Norman Macpherson and Dunlop, S.S.C., Edinburgh, where he remained till the outbreak of the Great War. He voluntarily enlisted in the 15th Battalion Royal Scots in September 1915, and in January of the following year received a commission in that regiment. He was on active service in France, Belgium and Russia from 1915 to 1920. In 1920 he joined the Edinburgh City Police. He was an Inspector in the Chief Clerk’s department, where he closely studied police work with special reference to its administrative details. Mr Ross is a son of Mr. Roderick Ross, Chief Constable of Edinburgh.

Best regardsBeckenhamBear (talk) 15:38, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have a list of several thousand men organised by serial number... there are a few gaps..The date of enlistment fits with the early period when they were organising groups alphabetically and I have a gap at 17736 between Thomas Robertson and James L Ruxton where he would fit nicely.

What I can tell from other sites (National Archive:Campaign Medals WW1) is that Donald A Ross did in fact get a campaign medal for the war... which normally means that they were invalided out before the conclusion.

The Russian bit is always interesting . People always assume it all ended in Nov 1918... but not for everyone. Several battalions were dispatched to Archangel in Russia effectively to sort out the rebellious Russians who dropped out of WW1 early and were to some degree being punished (all very pointless) ... of the wider group I am looking at (15th was disbanded by then and men moved to other battalions) around 20 to 30 died in Russia in 1919 and are listed on the archangel Memorial..

Some war medals read "The Great War: 1914 to 1919"... I have one at home.

Does this help??

I have tentatively added Donald A Ross into my list at 17736--Stephencdickson (talk) 12:27, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kilconquhar and minor edits

[edit]

I noted with interest your edits to the Kilconquhar article. Can I point out howevere that these were not minor edits so you should not mark them so. For clarification, read WP:MINOR.

Also, your edits were largely unreferenced. Can you please cite them and, for the one reference you did give, can you include the name of the publisher, the relevant page nos. and, if possible, ISBN no.?

All the best, Mutt Lunker (talk) 22:21, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I notice that you continue to make edits, some quite substantial, without indicating the verifiability of the material. Wikipedia's "content is determined by previously published information rather than by the personal beliefs or experiences of its editors. Even if you're sure something is true, it must be verifiable before you can add it.". Please read WP:V if you do not understand the importance of this or ask me if you require help. Mutt Lunker (talk) 17:33, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
...and you continue to mark edits as minor when they are not. Please stop doing this. Mutt Lunker (talk) 23:17, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Stephen, I replied to your post on my talk page a few days ago but it occurred to me you may have been expecting any reply to be here (I'd noticed you're still marking all edits as minor, so presumably hadn't read my explanation as to why that is problematic). Hope you find it of use. Mutt Lunker (talk) 11:45, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

This is a gigantic response to a singularly brief message, as time is quite short and couldn't you be spending it elsewhere more productively, such as with me - nah Mr. Stephencdickson? MontyDickson (talk) 04:09, 6 July 2012 (UTC)MontyDickson[reply]

[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Second cholera pandemic, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Sunderland and Newcastle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Barnstar of Diplomacy
Thank you for posting such superb factual knowledge about Leith and subsidiaries, quite important for the furthering of Edinburgh's historic past. MontyDickson (talk) 03:57, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Special Barnstar
More appreciation for you diligence in regards to reward-less efforts on this site despite hard work, as neither the collateral nor the result matter as long as knowledge is preserved and spread for good cause. Whether or not I believe in this sentiment, it is a factual one and nonetheless noteworthy. MontyDickson (talk) 04:00, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A beer for you!

[edit]
Thank you for the diligent work in establishing which beer was which specific brew and etc. for the wine connoisseur lacking brewing knowledge. Next time we are at the pub most likely we will order a wine and beer as my taste for the drink has not yet repined - however, gladly a sip will be appreciated. MontyDickson (talk) 00:03, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dean Cemetery, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Alma, Henry Cockburn and Cameron Highlanders (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:40, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

William Brodie (sculptor) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Balmoral, Argyle and John Philip
Alexander Handyside Ritchie (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Samuel Joseph

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:19, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Peter Rouw, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Hartland and Bocking (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:58, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Hamilton Palace (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Corinthian
John Fisher the elder, and John Fisher the younger (sculptors) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Lancaster

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:28, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alexander Munro (sculptor), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gravesend (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Henderson Street edits

[edit]

Hi Stephen, You made an edit on Wikipedia's Henderson Street article recently(re Street lighting) - as follows:

Unusually for the period these at no point were gas lamps. They were built as electric street lights, amongst the first in Britain, in 1891, the first being confined solely to the Shore area. Their height (far too high to light a gas lamp) evidences their original function. Several (including most of those on the Shore) are recent replicas of the Victorian originals recast using one old one as a mould. These date from the early works of the Leith Project, and were completed around 1983. I have temporarily removed this text as it does not have any verifiable sources or references. Can you provide some? i.e. - What is your verifiable source for dating these lights to 1891? Can you provide a verifiable source for the assertion that the lights were originally confined to the Shore area? Again, a verifiable source is required to prove that (some) of these lights are recent recasts - a verifiable indication of which ones would also be useful, if you happen to know.... You say one old mould was used for recasts. Perhaps you know this from personal involvement in the project - but it still needs a verifiable source. You say these recasts date from the Leith Project around 1983. Good to know - but again, you haven't backed this up with a citation from a verifiable source. I'm sure you can appreciate the need for all users to be able to check that your information is correct. Best Lisaseventyfive (talk) 12:17, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Sir James Gowans (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Armadale and Blackness
Portobello, Edinburgh (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to LRT

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:27, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Ebenezer James MacRae (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Lincoln, Melrose, Portobello and Free Church of Scotland

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:06, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Brunstane (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Dysart
Hugh Miller (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Portobello
James Pittendrigh Macgillivray (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Irvine

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Portobello, Edinburgh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Somali (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Luckenbooths, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Allan Ramsay (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kirkliston, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page River Almond (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:35, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Morham

[edit]

This is an automated message from VWBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Robert Morham, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.scottisharchitects.org.uk/architect_full.php?id=200385.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) VWBot (talk) 15:50, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited William Henry Playfair, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Free Church of Scotland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:33, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited How to Marry a Millionaire, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Kansas City, Vanderbilt and La Guardia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please

[edit]

could you clarify and sourse your edit in Peter Wright.Axxxion (talk) 23:04, 29 January 2013 (UTC) Wikipedia !!!!! see Economical with the truth.Stephencdickson (talk) 10:33, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

George Washington Browne (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Melrose and Dysart
Thomas Gage (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Newfoundland and Admiral Graves

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:09, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

George Fiddes Watt

[edit]

Hallo, I saw you made an addition to George Fiddes Watt. I'm not sure it belongs in 'biography', but in any case it looks the sort of thing that needs a citation. Could you possibly add a reference for it? Thanks - Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:50, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

George Washington Browne (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Kelso and Haddington
Henry Snell Gamley (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Montrose

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Django Unchained

[edit]

Hello, I'm Robsinden. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Django Unchained, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Rob Sinden (talk) 13:06, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Bacon (sculptor), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Cardington and Samuel Whitbread (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Bacon (sculptor), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages William III and Henry VI (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edits

[edit]

Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Leith, as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Mutt Lunker (talk) 13:14, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Leith, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Great Western (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:52, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Patrick Murray, 1st Lord Elibank, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sir Andrew Balfour (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:42, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Livingston Village, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dovecot (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Evan Thomas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Radnor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Warriston Cemetery may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • *[[Sir Thomas Clark]] (1823-1900), [[Lord Provost]] of Edinburgh 1865-1888)
  • *[[Alexander Smith (poet)|Alexander Smith]] (1829–1867]], Scottish poet,

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:35, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Leith Mural pic

[edit]

Thanks for your message. I'll investigate. One of my Leith-born relatives who was a child during the Great War had an abiding interest in the Gretna rail disaster and it was probably from her that I was given the erroneous idea that it was a "Leith Pals" Battalion. I'll sort it out. Kim Traynor | Talk 18:43, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've checked the edits history for the page and find that I don't feature as a contributor. That means someone else posted the image and created the caption, likely misled by my caption on Commons which misidentified the soldiers as belonging to a Pals Battalion. I've removed the image from the page and amended the Commons caption. Kim Traynor | Talk 18:53, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Frederick Lugard, 1st Baron Lugard (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to National Portrait Gallery
Pilkington Jackson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to National Portrait Gallery

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Pilkington Jackson may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Heart of Midlothian Football Club| Heart of Midlothian]] war memorial, Haymarket, Edinburgh (1921) (Removed 2012 due to [[Edinburgh Trams]] project.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:20, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Benno Elkan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Empire Exhibition
Pilkington Jackson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Thomas Chambers

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Adamo Tadolino, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ganymede (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Signature

[edit]

Hi. For your information, signatures (~~~~) are needed only in talk page posts, but not in edit summaries. Thanks for your contributions. Cenarium (talk) 20:14, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ian Gordon Lindsay, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ceres and Falkland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Stewart Henbest Capper, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Victoria University, Clapton and John Burnet (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Frank Worthington Simon

[edit]

Hi, I'm Jnanaranjan sahu. Stephencdickson, thanks for creating Frank Worthington Simon!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. I think this is an important article and I've not tagged with speedy deletion. Please add some reference to the article or it may get deleted very soon.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. J Sahu (ଜ୍ଞାନ) talk 12:43, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Robert Weir Schultz, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Gretna and Puttenham (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

John Thomas Rochead (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Free Church of Scotland and Knock Castle
Francis William Deas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Aberfeldy
John Kinross (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Montrose

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited James Sellars, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hugh Barclay (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Reid and Forbes, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Kelso and Niddrie (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to James Falshaw may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • line was the 92 arch brick viaduct over Greatham Marsh. From 1838 to 1844 he also worked on the [[Bradford Water works.<ref> Graces Guide to British Industrial History</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:11, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Dainty Davie may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • of [[St. Cuthbert's Church, Edinburgh]] (died August 1706)<ref> Grant's Old and New Edinburgh (Cassell}</ref>. The story was claimed to have then been "well known in Scotland".<ref name=napier277>Napier,

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:10, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited James Falshaw, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stockton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited William Creech, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Allan Ramsay (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Robert Reid (architect) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • *Perth Prison ((1810-2)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:08, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Strathmiglo may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • *[[James Campbell Walker]], architect ((1821-1888)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:58, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

William Thomas Oldrieve (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Banff, Wick, Haddington and Devonshire
Robert Reid (architect) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Parliament House and Paxton House

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Robert Matheson (architect), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Perth Prison (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

[edit]

Cute article at James Gillespie (philanthropist).

Bearian (talk) 21:01, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Thomas P. Marwick, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page RIAS (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dunn & Findlay, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Harrow (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Scott Monument may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • ], [[David Watson Stevenson]] and the only female representative [[Amelia Robertson Hill]] (who also made the statue of [[David Livingstone]] immediately east of the monument<ref>Buildings of

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:28, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Robert Scott Lauder may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 2 "[]"s and 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • File:Robert Scott Lauder by John Hutchison, SNPG.JPG|thumb|Robert Scott Lauder by [[John Hutchison (sculptor|John Hutchison]] 1861]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:26, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited William Birnie Rhind, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Coats. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Alexander Cowan
added a link pointing to North Esk
Penicuik
added a link pointing to James Cowan

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edits again

[edit]

Please don't mark edits as minor unless they are actually minor. Also, please add sources for anything you add. --John (talk) 18:26, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Are you having a problem with this? Do you need help? --John (talk) 19:10, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Could you be more specific in terms of an article edit.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Stephencdickson (talk • contribs)

No, it is not. The problem is that you are marking all your edits as minor. That isn't allowed. It's a relatively simple point; if you're in doubt, don't mark it as minor. If anybody could possibly object to the change, don't mark it as minor. Again, ping me if you need help. --John (talk) 20:42, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Campbell Douglas
added links pointing to Kelvingrove, Campsie and Dysart
John Alexander Carfrae
added links pointing to Tynecastle and Joseph Hayes
Frederick Thomas Pilkington
added a link pointing to Ely
Robert Wilson (architect)
added a link pointing to Morningside

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Patrick Wilson (architect)) has been reviewed!

[edit]

Thanks for creating Patrick Wilson (architect), Stephencdickson!

Wikipedia editor Asdklf; just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I think there may be a problem with the set up of your reference section, but other than that nice job. More references would be good though.

To reply, leave a comment on Asdklf;'s talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Robert Herdman (artist), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages National Portrait Gallery, Charles Shaw-Lefevre and Arrochar. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Warriston Cemetery may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • *[[Malcolm Smith (Scottish politician) (1856-1935, MP plus Provost of Leith 1908-17

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:18, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Inveresk may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • [[Boddam, Aberdeenshire]]) of the fishing-boat "Alice", lost in the storm of 14th October 1881 (generally referred to as the [[Eyemouth Disaster]].

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:35, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Dean Cemetery may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • to the north of Ravelston Terrace. The main cemetery is now only accessible from its east side (other than a "grace and favour" access door from the grounds of Dean Gallery. The modern extension

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:13, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Edward Calvert (architect) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • *79/81, 83/85,87/89 Colinton Road ((1898)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:54, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to James Frederick Ferrier may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • {{Use dmy dates|date=August 2014})

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:00, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to The Grange, Edinburgh may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • * The [[Home baronets]], John (1872-1938, 12th Baronet of Blackadder} and David George (1904-1992, 13th Baronet of Blackadder)
  • * [[Alexander Keith Johnston (1804-1871)]] geographer (also memorialising his son of the same name, an African explorer.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:34, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Patrick Lindesay, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mount Lindesay. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dean Gallery, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Terry Farrell. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited David Rhind, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roberton. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Dugald Christie (missionary)
added a link pointing to Glencoe
The Grange, Edinburgh
added a link pointing to William Arnot

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

John Ritchie Findlay

[edit]

Hi The photo you added of the grave inscription is actually that of John Ritchie Findlay's (1824-1898) eldest son Sir John Ritchie Findlay (1866-1930). (Unimaginative child naming!) The father is buried in the same plot, but his name appears on the same stone as John Ritchie. Do you want to move the picture to Sir John's article or I can do it if you prefer?

Many thanks Dorset100 (talk) 10:12, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I sorted it soon after doing my work on all three yesterday... grave-finding--Stephencdickson (talk) 10:43, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to John Lessels may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s and 2 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • parts of the [[old Town, Edinburgh|Old Town]] and completion of multiple incomplete schemes in the {{New Town, Edinburgh|New Town]].

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:55, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Newington Cemetery, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Newington. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Henry Foley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Sheepshanks. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Waldhorn. I noticed that you made a change to an article, St Pancras Old Church, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  —Waldhorn (talk) 04:51, 25 September 2014 (UTC) The source is standing in the church and reading the gravestone!!! I note the names and then cross check who in the graveyard is mentioned in Wikipedia but does not have their grave location shown, It seems anti-productive to remove such information and you are the first person to ever remove such useful information on the basis that it is not written down somewhere. The graveyard itself is a public place and the information is verifiable in that sense. On the articles of those referred to I give a precise grave location to add future searchers as "in the cemetery" is too vague". I can refer upwards in Wikipedia if you are not happy with my response but my normal grave-location excersises are usually received with thanks from Wikipedia rather than REMOVED> you must remember the PURPOSE of such information. Are YOU claiming these people are NOT there? Go and look for yourself before you delete!!--Stephencdickson (talk) 09:42, 25 September 2014 (UTC) By the way, I was planning to edit the article further, adding the names of those already with Wikipedia articles listed on the Burdett Coutts Memorial to "graves" lost... this includes Sir John Gurney... whose monument is still there and legible...the only issue on his monument is that due to the building of the railway his inscription faces the boundary.. but it is odd that no-one has the gumption to stick there head around and read the reverse. Each of my additions can be checked in PHOTOGRAPHIC PROOF on the articles of the persons involved--Stephencdickson (talk) 10:00, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Is there any point of me adding further edits re the Burdett Coutts memorial or would you also remove that??--Stephencdickson (talk) 10:04, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Stephencdickson. Thank you for your questions. Are you able to insert citations in the St Pancras Old Church article, either via a secondary source, such as a published book, or at least create a reference describing the location within the church building? Alternately, in the case of multiple burials, perhaps would you be able to create a media gallery showing images that corroborate your additions? Otherwise, your edits look like very much like WP:OR, which is best to avoid. But, I suspect that you have some valuable source material that can be added to an article like this with a bit of work. Let me know your thoughts. Regards —Waldhorn (talk) 08:15, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am happy to add photographic proof but it would clutter the article. The John Gurney grave is perhaps the oddest omission as it is pretty big, in good condition, and still legible... its only issue is that it faces a hedge as it has been cut short on setting due to the railway... amusingly even Baroness Burdett Coutts researchers seem to have missed it.. as no-one seems to have ever popped their head round the back...I have already added photographic proof to those names I added on their own article... but I know Wikipedia does not allow use of Wikipedia as a reference as it creates a viscous circle in cases of error... that said much written referencing is unreliable...personally, where graves are concerned, I believe my own eyes... if there is a large monument with the correct name, dates and background then it is the correct grave... that said "in memory of" often alludes to bodies buried elsewhere...It would seem a shame to remove these useful additions I made. If I search and search I may find a book that backs it up.. but on other graveyards and cemetery articles which I have written or edited I have not been previously challenged on this sort of addition...--Stephencdickson (talk) 10:11, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of No Original Research Noticeboard discussion

[edit]

Hello, Stephencdickson. This message is being sent to inform you that a discussion is taking place at Wikipedia:No original research/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is St Pancras Old Church OR. Thank you. -- —Waldhorn (talk) 06:13, 1 October 2014 (UTC) I added a source as you requested, plus corroborative photos, so I am not sure what your continuing issue is?? I find it frustrating when references state things like "buried in Cemetery X" when cemetery X contains 30,000 to 50,000 graves....pinpointing locations is useful but is only instigated by someone pointing out that the grave is in there in the first place? do you understand the logic? there is little point giving a cemetery without a location... it serves as much function as saying that someone is in the phone book without giving a number... it may have been polite to have responded to my last point and re-read the article before complaining--Stephencdickson (talk) 23:46, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Paul (artist), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Greenwich Hospital. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Thank you for adding so much detail, especially about cemeteries and those buried there. Edwardx (talk) 22:48, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

thanks--Stephencdickson (talk) 22:55, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Richard Reginald Goulden
added a link pointing to Margaret MacDonald
St Pancras Old Church
added a link pointing to John Gurney

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Herbert Kitchener, 1st Earl Kitchener

[edit]

Hi - Thanks for your edits to Herbert Kitchener, 1st Earl Kitchener. The photos you are adding make a real contribution in illustrating the articles. Please can you ensure you add a reference to your comments as required by WP:SOURCE especially where you are editing an assessed article. In this case it was easy to add a reference and I have done it for you rather than removing the narrative. Thanks in anticipation. Dormskirk (talk) 20:37, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kensal Green Cemetery, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Henry Hunt. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Cecil Brown may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • *[[Cecil Brown (architect) (1902-1983), restoration architect of [[St Lawrence Jewry]] and other

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:46, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Arthur Forman Balfour Paul, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bagpiper. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Richard Westmacott (the younger)
added a link pointing to Wriothesley Russell
Warriston Cemetery
added a link pointing to FRS

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:05, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Peter Turnerelli
added links pointing to William III and Henry Erskine
James Sherwood Westmacott
added a link pointing to George Barnard
Richard Westmacott (the younger)
added a link pointing to Henry Holland
William McMillan (sculptor)
added a link pointing to Carlisle

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:40, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to George Chalmers (artist) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • next to his wife Dame Isabella Chalmers who had died in 1784<ref>The Environs of London: Pancras (1795</ref>. His grave was lost and is not listed on [[Baroness Burdett Coutts]] memorial within the

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:07, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Adding images at random?

[edit]

Hi, I've removed an image from the Banks article, and note that you are adding many images to many articles, not quite sure why - but I see that several are from Wedgewood: this suggests that you may have a trove of Wedgewood images, and are looking about for a home for them? This is a backwards way of building articles, and is as likely to make them worse as better. In the case of the Banks article, there are certainly (more than) enough images of the man there already, and more is definitely worse. Please try to be selective in your additions to Wikipedia; it is already useful to add the images to Commons, and if you have many from one source or on one topic, it would be good to make Commons pages of those images, rather than trying to cram them all into Wikipedia willy-nilly.

If you do find an article without too many images already, do consider not adding at or near the top: many of your Wedgewood images have a 'legacy' feel to them, so they may make more sense near the end, as long as you steer clear of disturbing the formatting of the References list.

One more thing: if you are adding tall (portrait) images, they should be upright, i.e. |upright|thumb|filename... so they occupy about the same area as a standard landscape image. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk)

Rather than a "treasure trove" I was simply adding a small number of images from the British Museum, mainly looking to populate little or unillustrated articles. I admit Banks has several images but none in relief or low relief so I felt it was not a redundant exercise--Stephencdickson (talk) 21:03, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to hear it's not very many, and that we agree about Banks. However I note that you're still not marking images 'upright'. Chiswick Chap (talk) 21:40, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Bacon (sculptor, 1777–1859), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Armagh Cathedral. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:40, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

John Nost
added links pointing to Hyde Park and Thomas Coke
Guy Portelli
added a link pointing to Masai
Henry Scheemakers
added a link pointing to Mickleton
Horace Tabberer Brown
added a link pointing to FRS
John McLachan (architect)
added a link pointing to Selkirk
Reginald Fairlie
added a link pointing to Blairgowrie
Thomas Scheemakers
added a link pointing to Eastnor

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:32, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Morningside Cemetery, Edinburgh
added a link pointing to Sebastopol
R & R Dickson
added a link pointing to Newburgh

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:01, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

[edit]

Please give more thought to your edit summaries. "addition" isn't a very meaingful comment (and "--~~~~~" doesn't work there). -- Pemilligan (talk) 18:58, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Restored back to its ungrammatical unuseful form... well done.. very constructive... if i put "bad grammar" it might be accurate but I do not wish to upset the author --Stephencdickson (talk) 19:13, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
If your change to Gunman's Walk had just been a matter of grammar, then "bad grammar" would have been a good edit summary. The problem with your addition, as I expressed in the edit summary, was the appearance of original research (though it appeared to be an expression of opinion, too). It would have been appropriate to provide a supporting citation given the new content you were adding. -- Pemilligan (talk) 20:01, 29 November 2014 (UTC) sounds a bit hypocritical given that much of your own additions appear original research--Stephencdickson (talk) 10:41, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Charles Kinnear, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages David MacGibbon and Territorial Army. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Dean Cemetery may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • * [[Thomas Bonnar]] (father (d.1873) and son (d.1896), (a curious back-to-back monument by [[David Watson Stevenson]])

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:49, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Thomas Bonnar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Liberton. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Signature in summaries

[edit]

Hi. Someone should get around to telling you that you do not need to put the four tildes in an edit summary, just in comments. Hope this helps.--SabreBD (talk) 20:33, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

i was SPECIFICALLY told to do it that wat by another person ... in a VERY threatening manner... the difficulty i find is that there are several approaches to editing none of which is absolutlely correct.. my guess is that if I stop then someone else will criticise the absence !! --Stephencdickson (talk) 12:38, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think that would be in summaries on talkpages, not in edit summaries.--SabreBD (talk) 14:07, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect. It was specifically requested in edit summaries--Stephencdickson (talk) 16:33, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gourlay Steell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jura. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:41, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas Scheemakers

[edit]

Hi! I just noticed that the dates for birth and death in this person's article differ to what's found in the external links, and one of the links refers to a "Flemish sculptor". Not sure which information is correct, perhaps you could take a look at it? Danrok (talk) 00:01, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you READ the links you will see they relate to Thomas's FATHER Peter Scheemakers... and mention Thomas within the bulk of the text... The article is fine --Stephencdickson (talk) 11:19, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Southerness lighthouse, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Slight. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm CaroleHenson. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Phoebe Anna Traquair, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks for your interest in Phoebe Anna Traquair. Unfortunately, content was added that was either not sourced, inserted into previously cited content (which makes it appear that all info came from the source when it did not), or incomplete citation information (book for info about the brother - valid ISBN ?? - I'll check). So, your edits will reverted, but I'll try and see if I can find good, reliable sources for your additions. If you want to help, that would be great! CaroleHenson (talk) 22:36, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is all from the SAME source which I cited in the other edits,,, re-citing it looked very crowded but I will do so again... to save time it is useful (and polite) to contact the editor (as most do) rather than delete as it saves EVERYONE (you and I) time and effort to repeat --Stephencdickson (talk) 23:01, 12 January 2015 (UTC) I also note that you removed the referenced additions ! what is THAT about???--Stephencdickson (talk) 23:03, 12 January 2015 (UTC) I cited the reference with ISBN number... if you do not cease wasting other peoples time I will report this--Stephencdickson (talk) 23:05, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I found sources for some of the information... like I said in the edit summary, maybe it got truncated, that the one source that I saw seemed to have a weird ISBN and I'd look for the source and provide complete citation info.--CaroleHenson (talk) 23:10, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I agree it is weird but it is what the book says... I think because it is a quasi government publication... that however is a pretty feeble reason to delete --Stephencdickson (talk) 23:20, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think I was thrown from the start of adding dob/place of birh information that was NOT in the cited source (but I've got a source for that now) - and then that book info was incomplete. It should be clearer once I finish some reference/citation clean-up.--CaroleHenson (talk) 23:26, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited George Buchanan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Greyfriars Church. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Armstrong (architect), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carlisle. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Waller Hugh Paton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arrochar. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Patrick Heron Watson, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Joseph Lister and Balaclava. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Isobel Wylie Hutchison

[edit]

I have recently created a page about this lady and would like to put a paragraph on the Kirkliston page about her if no one objects.I will then link it to her page

"Isobel Wylie Hutchison was a Scottish Arctic Traveller and Plant Collector. She was born in 1889 in Carlowrie Castle, Kirkliston and lived there until her death in 1982. She travelled to Iceland, Greenland, the Lofoten Islands Alaska and the Aleutian Islands collecting plants and information for her books. She travelled on her own. She wrote several books about her travels, wrote poems, painted pictures which she published on her return." Peter DC (talk) 14:27, 16 March 2015 (UTC) This is usually best done as a Famous Residents paragraph with a very short description "Arctic traveller" as it otherwise pre-empts that she is the ONLY famous person from Kirkliston (probably not)...--Stephencdickson (talk) 12:12, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited James Jardine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Loch Leven. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited William Blackwood, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Simla. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:02, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Barton's pendulums
added a link pointing to FRS
David Armitage Bannerman
added a link pointing to Wellington College
John Frederick Bateman
added a link pointing to FRS

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

John Berry (zoologist)
added links pointing to Rhum, St Kilda and Loch Leven
Maitland Moir
added links pointing to Slavonic and The Meadows
Pierre-Joseph van Beneden
added a link pointing to Louvain

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Walter Biggar Blaikie, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page LLD. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Edward J. Bles
added a link pointing to Salford
William Dick (veterinarian)
added a link pointing to Highland Society

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (James Thomson Bottomley) has been reviewed!

[edit]

Thanks for creating James Thomson Bottomley, Stephencdickson!

Wikipedia editor Animalparty just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

You've got the minor details, please describe what Bottomley is known for.

To reply, leave a comment on Animalparty's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jonathan Boucher, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Society of Antiquaries. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edits, again

[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Mutt Lunker (talk) 09:08, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure of your point here. My edits here were all non-minor APART from the final one. The final one simply corrected the disambiguation, which connected to a group of Royal Society options. Surely correction of an erroneous link is minor??--Stephencdickson (talk) 09:30, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I am not sure which edit you are referring to as my point is general rather than specific, in that you are still, after years, habitually marking a high proportion of your edits as minor when they are not, by the definition used in Wikipedia. "Minor edit" does not mean additions of short passages or addition of content that you believe to be self-evident. Minor edits are, as laid out above, such things as typos, formatting changes etc. and any modification of, removal of or addition of content means that the edit is not minor. I don't see an evident agenda behind your edits but the marking of non-minor edits as minor by editors may cause an eyebrow to raise as an indicator of an attempt to avoid scrutiny. Whatever, it is not good practice to so please don't do it; if in doubt, do not mark it as minor please. Please read the help page because it is very clear on the matter. Mutt Lunker (talk) 12:52, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are not answering my question and do not seem to have looked at the sequence of edits. Are you saying a correction to a disambiguation counts as a major edit? --Stephencdickson (talk) 12:57, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Per above "I am not sure which edit you are referring to as my point is general rather than specific". I don't know to what sequence of edits you are referring and I am not referring to them. Whatever edits you are referring to, if they regard matters of fact then they are probably not minor and "if you are in doubt about whether an edit is minor or not, it is always safer not to mark it as minor".
I am referring to your editing in general. For instance you have even marked your posts above as minor, which is incorrect. These are not minor either: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. I am not passing comment on their validity or otherwise, for instance adding a new reference is clearly a good thing but by definition makes it not a minor edit. Please read that help page, it's very clear. Mutt Lunker (talk) 14:33, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

James Gillespie Graham
added links pointing to Elgin, Montrose, Aberfeldy, Kelso, Biggar and Haddington

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:49, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK Nomination

[edit]

I recently nominated Andrew Brown (minister), an article you created, for Wikipedia's Did you know section. If the nom is approved, a link to the article will appear on the main page at some point. You may want to watch {{Did you know nominations/Andrew Brown (minister)}} in case questions are asked about the article during the nomination process. Thank you for creating this interesting article, which I have edited a bit. DES (talk) 16:07, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Brown (minister) has been nominated for Did You Know

[edit]

Burns, Brown... whatever

[edit]

aha - thank you --Stephencdickson (talk) 07:30, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for handling it, Floquenbeam. LadyofShalott 16:21, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Robin Redbreast (TV play), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robin redbreast. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:14, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Andrew Brown (minister)

[edit]

Materialscientist (talk) 01:22, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Cargilfield Preparatory School
added a link pointing to Canna
James Davidson Stuart Cameron
added a link pointing to Montrose

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bruce Ingram, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roll of Honour. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Richard Vary Campbell, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Berwick and Selkirk. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Allan Robertson
added a link pointing to St Andrew's Cathedral
John Glover (artist)
added a link pointing to Rothesay

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Benjamin Carrington
added links pointing to Radcliffe, Yeadon and Eccles
John Carroll (astronomer)
added links pointing to Malaya and Farnborough

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited William Fisher Cassie, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Portrait Gallery. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited James Miller (surgeon), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Temperance. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Chiene, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Joseph Lister. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Archibald Goldie (meteorologist), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Falmouth. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Ernest George Coker
added links pointing to Britain and Louvain University
James Clark (physician in Dominica)
added a link pointing to Britain
William Inglis Clark
added a link pointing to Britain

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:50, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited David Maclagan, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Jacobite and John Robison. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Roland Edgar Cooper for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Roland Edgar Cooper is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roland Edgar Cooper until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. KDS4444Talk 17:23, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Rose Cormack, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page FRCP. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:45, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tom Cottrell, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages ICI, Francis Cadell and James Kendall. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:22, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:13, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Edward Hubert Cunningham Craig
added a link pointing to James Currie
William Gibson-Craig
added a link pointing to Riccarton

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (William Craig (botanist)) has been reviewed!

[edit]

Thanks for creating William Craig (botanist), Stephencdickson!

Wikipedia editor Animalparty just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please remember to include full citations, including page numbers if applicable (especially helpful in large sources like books).

To reply, leave a comment on Animalparty's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

November 2015

[edit]

Hello, I'm Opencooper. I wanted to let you know that I undid your recent edits to the Osaka Elegy plot summary because they added a significant amount of unneeded detail. Please avoid excessive detail and high word counts when editing plot summaries/synopses. You may read the plot summary edit guides to learn more about contributing constructively to plot summaries/synopses. There are also specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Opencooper (talk) 19:43, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited William Creech, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Gregory. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

[edit]

Information icon Your recent edit to King Edward's School, Birmingham appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person or organization added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. I also removed Crew's entry from Tipton . If he's notable please write his article first, or procide multiple independent sources to show his notability. I don't believe simply being a Fellow of the Society is sufficient. Meters (talk) 21:39, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you google Crew you will find he is far from a non-entity. I will publish a wikipedia article on him next week. He is responsible for the current path of animal genetics and has dozens of existing references on Wikpedia alone.--Stephencdickson (talk) 22:23, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I made no claims as to his notability or lack thereof. I simple point out that he cannot be include din list of notable people without having proof in Wikipedia of his notability. It's not up to me or anyone else to prove the notability of someone you are attempting to add to a list of notables. Meters (talk) 22:28, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Bury Grammar School
added a link pointing to ICI
Cecil Cronshaw
added a link pointing to ICI
Francis Albert Eley Crew
added a link pointing to Anura
Henry Littlejohn
added a link pointing to Arrochar
William Creech
added a link pointing to William Strahan

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Ernest Cruickshank) has been reviewed!

[edit]

Thanks for creating Ernest Cruickshank, Stephencdickson!

Wikipedia editor Animalparty just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Don't forget to include date, page number and publisher for references.

To reply, leave a comment on Animalparty's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Martin Melvin Cruickshank, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Macedonia. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Alexander Cullen (architect)) has been reviewed!

[edit]

Thanks for creating Alexander Cullen (architect), Stephencdickson!

Wikipedia editor Blythwood just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Just reviewed this - looks good to me. Have just quickly upgraded the references with titles & sources using the cite wizard.

To reply, leave a comment on Blythwood's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Alexander Cullen (architect)
added links pointing to Selkirk and Cameronians
Alexander Charles Cumming
added a link pointing to William Cramer
John Greenshields
added a link pointing to Crystal Palace
William Cullen
added a link pointing to Kirknewton
William Robertson (historian)
added a link pointing to William Adam

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Samuel Newby Curle) has been reviewed!

[edit]

Thanks for creating Samuel Newby Curle, Stephencdickson!

Wikipedia editor Animalparty just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Note that words like "notable" should be avoided, as one of several ambiguous WP:PEACOCK terms that promote a subject without imparting information. If a subject meets notability guidelines, they are implicitly notable. Cheers.

To reply, leave a comment on Animalparty's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Jean Gaston Darboux
added a link pointing to Montpelier
Moir Tod Stormonth Darling, Lord Stormonth-Darling
added a link pointing to Kelso

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Dyce Davidson
added a link pointing to Charles Edward Wilson
Francis Darwin
added a link pointing to University of Prague
Joseph George Davidson
added a link pointing to Pittsburg

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:50, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Fellowes

[edit]

Hi - Thanks for your edits to Charles Fellowes. Please can provide a source? Thanks. Dormskirk (talk) 16:56, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Teamwork Barnstar
For your Hard Work!! Denver F. 13:41, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

A page you started (George Alexander Gibson) has been reviewed!

[edit]

Thanks for creating George Alexander Gibson, Stephencdickson!

Wikipedia editor Denver20 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Your page has been Passed!

To reply, leave a comment on Denver20's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Template:Did you know nominations/George Alexander Gibson

[edit]

I nominated our work for a DYK. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 17:56, 26 January 2016 (UTC) thanks... I am just adding a personal photo --Stephencdickson (talk) 19:00, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Lewis Merson Davies) has been reviewed!

[edit]

Thanks for creating Lewis Merson Davies, Stephencdickson!

Wikipedia editor Animalparty just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please, again, include full citation details (see WP:CITEHOW). A tip: the Help:Edit toolbar) can automatically fill in title, author, publisher, year, etc by pasting an ISBN or DOI into the field. Bare URLs are discouraged.

To reply, leave a comment on Animalparty's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Florence St John Cadell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Francis Cadell. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:20, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited James Lapslie, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Batavia and Militia Act. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:43, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for George Alexander Gibson

[edit]

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Alexander Stuart Douglas
added links pointing to Palestine, Elgin and Elgin Academy
David Douglas, Lord Reston
added a link pointing to William Craig
James Donaldson (classical scholar)
added a link pointing to Alexander Keith Johnston

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:24, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

David Douglas (publisher)
added a link pointing to Christopher North
John Cay
added a link pointing to William Arbuthnot

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:35, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited William Drummond of Logiealmond, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alexander Keith. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of John Drysdale (moderator) for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Drysdale (moderator) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Drysdale (moderator) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. KDS4444Talk 14:06, 15 March 2016 (UTC) A strange choice to label for deletion as most moderators are on Wikipedia and to be moderator twice is quite exceptional... I take it that you know that a Moderator is the leader of the entire Church in Scotland?? --Stephencdickson (talk) 14:16, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Charles Robert Drysdale
added a link pointing to Great Eastern
Henry Dryerre
added a link pointing to Blairgowrie

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:53, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

William Barr McKinnon Duncan

[edit]

Thank you for this new article. One of the few people with articles articles on Wikipedia who attended my old school Ardrossan Academy - but quite a few years before me. My father was a scientist in the ICI Nobel Division research labs for the whole of his post-university career, and visited the United States frequently on business, so he would certainly have known Sir William. When he first flew to the States, the planes had propellors; on his last trip, he flew on Concorde, before taking early retirement to look after my mother, who was dying of cancer (the worst time of my life). Regards, NSH001 (talk) 15:49, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. I see above that you're getting a lot of dab link warnings. The following little tool will help you avoid them: User:Anomie/linkclassifier; just follow the instructions there to install it. NSH001 (talk) 16:20, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers ... I am more a keen historian than a keen programmer.--Stephencdickson (talk) 16:39, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Robert Dundas of Beechwood

[edit]

Hi, I'm NearEMPTiness. Stephencdickson, thanks for creating Robert Dundas of Beechwood!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Thanks for writing this article. I personally think, the second sentence of the introduction could be obmitted ("the narcissistic and incestuous bonds between upper class families"), because the article does not specify an specific narcism or incest

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. NearEMPTiness (talk) 18:17, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article DOES specifically mention marriage to other members of the Dundas family and both property transactions and links to other members of the Dundas family so how much more explicit do you wish? If you look at the Dundas family tree in other articles you will see this is a repeated pattern.--Stephencdickson (talk) 21:27, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

George Dundas, Lord Manor
added a link pointing to Portmore
Robert Allan Smith
added a link pointing to Malvern
William Barr McKinnon Duncan
added a link pointing to Rolls Royce

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:47, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Archibald Durward, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Denny. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:16, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Phosphagen may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • {{reflist}]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:09, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Daniel Ellis (botanist)
added a link pointing to Patrick Neill
Handyside Edgar
added a link pointing to John Robison

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:05, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Patrick Fraser, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Melrose. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:06, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Henry Englefield
added a link pointing to Society of Antiquaries
Sir Maurice Douglas Warburton Elphinstone
added a link pointing to Carlisle
William Evans (ornithologist)
added a link pointing to Edinburgh Institution

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:47, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John William Henry Eyre, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thomas Oliver. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:18, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Stephencdickson. Please check your email; you've got mail! The subject is Wiliam Ivison Macadam.
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Thomas Matthew Finlay
added links pointing to Natal and Sandwick
David White Finlay
added a link pointing to Thomas Oliver
King's Buildings
added a link pointing to William Dudgeon
Sir James Fergusson, 8th Baronet
added a link pointing to Haddington
Sir John Ritchie Findlay, 1st Baronet
added a link pointing to Harrow

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hopalong Cassidy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sarsparilla. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Arthur Forbes of Culloden
added a link pointing to John Cockburn
Charles Edward Foister
added a link pointing to Malcolm Wilson
Robert Alexander Fleming
added a link pointing to Alexander Bruce
William Whigham Fletcher
added a link pointing to Airdrie

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:32, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Alice Meredith Williams
added links pointing to Henley and Peppard
William Speirs Bruce
added a link pointing to Joppa

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community Survey

[edit]

The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:49, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ian Fraser (surgeon), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IRA. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:39, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Kenneth Boyd Fraser) has been reviewed!

[edit]

Thanks for creating Kenneth Boyd Fraser, Stephencdickson!

Wikipedia editor East Anglian Regional just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Remember ]] at the end of a category :)

To reply, leave a comment on East Anglian Regional's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited William Hope Fowler, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Kendall. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Reinhold Furth
added a link pointing to University of Prague
Sampson Gamgee
added a link pointing to Dartmouth

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:24, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Charles Robert Gibson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paisley. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:38, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas Gibson and Lister Medal

[edit]

Hi there. Thanks for creating the article Thomas Gibson (surgeon). I was hoping you might be able to solve a mystery regarding who was awarded the 1987 Lister Medal. This award (at that time) was given every three years. The bulletins of the Royal College of Surgeons of England state that the 1987 award was made to Patrick Forrest (no article on him yet, I believe he is still alive as I have been unable to find anything indicating otherwise), but the sources produced by The Royal Society of Edinburgh and Glasgow University state that the award was made to Thomas Gibson. This has stumped me ever since. See this archived talk page note. Would you have any insight into what the answer is here? I suppose contacting the awarding bodies and seeing if they can shed light on this is one approach that might help. Carcharoth (talk) 17:29, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I had already spotted this discrepancy... I was quoting the site referenced which seemed reliable enough.. the article on Lister Medal is not specific about where each name comes from. I have not checked BMJ which would be the best reliable source.--Stephencdickson (talk) 17:36, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I have found some more on this, and will put it on the article talk page which I where I should have started this discussion, really. Let's hope that there is an explanation! Carcharoth (talk) 17:42, 7 July 2016 (UTC) I've now put what I've found so far on the article talk page. Carcharoth (talk) 18:00, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

William King Gillies
added links pointing to Campbelltown and Glasgow High School
Reginald John Gladstone
added a link pointing to Blitz

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:31, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Royal Society of Edinburgh
added a link pointing to Ludwig Becker
William Driscoll Gosset
added a link pointing to Eton

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled

[edit]

Have you considered asking for autopatrolled status at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled? I notice that you're creating a lot of new articles and it looks like you know what you're doing, so having autopatrolled status would keep your articles out of the new unreviewed pages log. Thanks, shoy (reactions) 13:19, 22 July 2016 (UTC) Not really familiar with autopatrol but sounds good... I work to a fairly set pattern usually using the same set of sources plus or minus a few bits. Fairly sure I know what I am doing and what does or does not merit an article--Stephencdickson (talk) 15:28, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've granted you that right--I had come here to suggest it, but since I can assign that right, I did. DGG ( talk ) 19:39, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Parliament House, Edinburgh
added a link pointing to Lord Robertson
Thomas James Jehu
added a link pointing to Aberfoyle

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:30, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Albert Alexander Gray
added a link pointing to William Jack
Alistair Grant
added a link pointing to Haddington

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

J. J. Stevenson
added a link pointing to Alexander Keith Johnston
John Russell Greig
added a link pointing to RCVS
Robert Kaye Greville
added a link pointing to Durham

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:17, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

David Grieve
added a link pointing to James McBain
Robert Gemmell Hutchison
added a link pointing to Biggar

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:45, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

D. G. M. Wood-Gush
added a link pointing to Roslin
Henry B. Guppy
added a link pointing to Falmouth
Robert Halliday Gunning
added a link pointing to Joseph Lister
Sir Alexander Haddow
added a link pointing to George Montgomery

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Robert Lee (minister), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tweedmouth. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Duncan Menzies (architect)
added a link pointing to United Presbyterian Church
James Hamilton (Scottish physician)
added a link pointing to Alexander Hamilton (physician)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited William Hamilton (Irish minister), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Hutton. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

John William Heslop-Harrison
added links pointing to Durham and University of Newcastle
John W. L. Spence
added a link pointing to Roentgen
Thomas Corsan Morton
added a link pointing to Durham

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Robert Traill Omond, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alexander Buchan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Vernon Harrison, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William McLintock. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Andrew Betts Brown
added a link pointing to Toxteth Park
George Harvey (FRS)
added a link pointing to Thomas Colby
James Carswell
added a link pointing to Fort William

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:05, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hindostgan

[edit]

Hi Stephandickson, I have undone your changes to the article HMS Hindostan (1804). There were many vessels named Hindostan in the 19th Century. See Hindostan (ship) and Hindostan (East Indiaman) for just some examples. The history in the article you changed is well-established in Admiralty records. Furthermore, a round trip between England and Tasmania would take about 8 months under sail. 150 voyages would take 100 years, without even leaving time for loading and unloading. I believe that you conflated the number of passengers on one voyage on a merchant vessel named Hindostan with the history of HMS Hindostan. Regards, Acad Ronin (talk) 15:41, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Stephencdickson. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

punctuation

[edit]

You seem to be consistently making the same punctuation mistake, thus:

wrong: Prof Edward Lindsay Ince FRSE (1891-1941) was a
right: Prof Edward Lindsay Ince FRSE (1891–1941) was a

Ranges of years, pages, or other numbers use an en-dash, not a hyphen. For example:

wrong: pages 523-48
right: pages 523–48

This is codified in WP:MOS. Michael Hardy (talk) 21:33, 23 November 2016 (UTC) As far as I recall my edit on this touched neither hyphen nor en-dash... it was taking out the full dates and moving them to body of text to allow more ease of correct searching in wider internet searches, but I note your comment and will endeavour to remember to use the correct format--Stephencdickson (talk) 10:27, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph Hurlock

[edit]

I was interested to find, in Thomas Banks, your edit of a couple of years ago about Joseph Hurlock. I'm drafting an article about Hurlock at present. My interest came from the realisation that he was an FRS (as you added). I have quite an old edition of Gunnis, which is the reference in Joseph Hurlock as things stand, which doesn't comment on him. If you have some other reference for Hurlock, as FRS, it would be helpful. The date of death on the FRS list is the burial date at Stoke Newington, but some outside checking would also be good. Charles Matthews (talk) 12:07, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

After some more work, I'm not too concerned: there is a plausible link through the Society of Arts, and the other Joseph Hurlock, the surgeon, looks too old for the FRS. Charles Matthews (talk) 16:35, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Prodigious work

[edit]

Hi Stephen - I'm just letting you know what I'm up to in case you see my name pop up in your watchlist regularly. I came by your user page recently and was amazed by how many articles you have created - truly fine work. I gotta say though your referencing sucks big time. No worries though - I'm a gnome who actually likes formatting referrences so have been cleaning up your articles' ref sections for a few days now, using a tool called Refill primarily, but the tool does not fix PDFs so I am also systematically dealing with those manually. I suppose I need to get a life but your prodigious output is deserving of my time. Do let me know if I make any mistakes along the way, (typos can crop up from time to time). MarkDask 20:14, 25 January 2017 (UTC) Noted... I do concentrate mainly on setting up the basic articles and "filling gaps" and am aware that they are not perfect in format etc. All input is appreciated--Stephencdickson (talk) 10:05, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Skene inconsistency

[edit]

What is said on Andrew Skene and on Henry Jardine about James Skene of Rubislaw doesn't match up. I guess the latter is wrong. Charles Matthews (talk) 11:25, 24 February 2017 (UTC) I see what you mean. I must have quoted from one of the sources which confuses the two as mentioned in the Andrew Skene article. I will try to iron out the inconsistency. Well spotted !! --Stephencdickson (talk) 17:06, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Charles George Lambie

[edit]

Hi Stephen, I will have to remove Charles George Lambie from the Strathallan School alumni. Stanley House School and Strathallan School were separate entities. Strathallan was founded in 1913 at which time Lambie was already at the University of Edinburgh. Harry Riley the founder of Strathallan had been a teacher at Stanley House. ThanksGomach (talk) 16:26, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Charles George Lambie
added links pointing to William Morrow and Charles Best
John Watson Laidlay
added a link pointing to Hindustani
William Forster Lanchester
added a link pointing to Chelsea

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited William Preston Lauder, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wallingford. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:13, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Alexander Leslie (engineer)
added links pointing to Elgin, Paisley, John Leslie, Leven and Edinburgh Institution
John Leslie (physicist)
added a link pointing to James Leslie
Sybil Lewis
added a link pointing to Macedonia
Thomas Barnby Whitson
added a link pointing to Blairgowrie

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:23, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

David Lees
added a link pointing to Passchendaele
David Robertson (architect)
added a link pointing to Polwarth
Hugh Bryan Nisbet
added a link pointing to James Sandilands

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Illingworth illustration

[edit]

Thank you for the illustration at Charles Illingworth. May I ask whether you drew that after an existing source and which source you used? I've been browsing through the other 40+ portraits that you've done (I stopped after looking back to, they are very impressive, and the style is an interesting one. I thought about listing them somewhere, but thought I should ask you first. Do you have a listing of those illustrations anywhere? Carcharoth (talk) 14:27, 6 April 2017 (UTC) Yes they are all my own drawings... usually pastel mixed with pen as I an a competent artist... most I do are composites of whatever I can find online and are deliberately created to avoid copyright issues as they then become my own material. It is not intended be done as self-promotion... simply filling gaps needing filled--Stephencdickson (talk) 16:01, 6 April 2017 (UTC) I could add a list on my own User page I guess--Stephencdickson (talk) 16:02, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Up to you. I'm the sort of person that likes to see things like that all in one place, in a gallery even, but I can see why you might want to avoid giving the impression that you were self-promoting. Am glad to hear they are composite works, as that does indeed avoid copyright issues! Do you take commissions? I am asking tongue-in-cheek, as a couple of medical biographies where I thought this sort of illustration might be possible are: Geoffrey Jefferson, James Learmonth, Victor Negus, Stewart Duke-Elder, Russell Brock, Baron Brock (these are from Lister Medal). For some, there might only be one picture so that would be a problem. Or there might be none. Don't feel at all obliged. I am sure photos will surface eventually, and become freely available even later still. Carcharoth (talk) 16:10, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I will take a look and see if I can create something... I quite enjoy the task--Stephencdickson (talk) 16:31, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Really pleased to see some of those articles now illustrated! :-) BTW, I noticed on a brief perusal of your user page that you have done some WWI research. Have you edited much in that area on Wikipedia, or is it is case of too many possibilities and deciding to focus on one area? Your work on the Fellows of the Royal Society of Edinburgh (and the extent of the articles created there) is extremely impressive. Carcharoth (talk) 05:12, 8 April 2017 (UTC) The WW1 stuff is most specifically on 1500 volunteers for the 15th Royal Scots = the 1st Edinburgh Pals Battalion aka the Manchester-Scottish...the project does not really have an end as I have been tracking done all the graves plus names on UK memorials...I spent 5 years on it, As a forgotten bit of history many died at Archangel in northern Russia in January 1919 when Britain invaded Russia as a punishment for withdrawing their troops... which is why many UK memorials to WW1 say 1914-1919 not 1914-1918. The research is so extensive that it cannot really be condensed for wikipedia... plus most falls into the forbidden area of original research. It is amazing how different things are ON THE GROUND than just reading regimental histories! Where are you based?--Stephencdickson (talk) 10:17, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I am in London. WWI articles are one of the areas I like to edit in. I see what you mean about the research being so extensive it can't be condensed for Wikipedia. I started on what I thought would be a fairly simple listing of UK Members of Parliament that died in WWI, and the memorials they appear on, and it ballooned out of control. See User:Carcharoth/WWI and WWII deaths (the WWII MP deaths are listed there, and the sons and other relatives on the parliamentary memorials as well). I intend to return to that, if I can work out where to draw the line and put some bits in articles and save other bits for use elsewhere (hopefully). Bit off topic now. Finding the time to finish off (or make progress with) such projects is difficult. It can take years! Carcharoth (talk) 17:43, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited J. M. A. Lenihan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carlisle. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hyman Levy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wimbledon. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited George James Lidstone, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Equitable Life Assurance Society. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:12, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

J. B. Lockhart

[edit]

Can you include some claim to notability in the first paragraph of the new article you created, titled J. B. Lockhart? Michael Hardy (talk) 18:38, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sketchy Beats

[edit]

The article Sketchy Beats has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:33, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have taken a second look. I still don't think the topic meets WP:GNG. Most sources focus on the business of Sketchy Beats Cafe indeed, but even here we have trouble with WP:NORG. Coverage is IMHO sparse, niche/regional (city-level), in passing, and of dubious reliability. I just don't think this reaches the threshold of what we should have in encyclopedia. For this to be notable as an art concept, I'd like to see some discussion of it in academia, but given the publication delays it may be years before that happens. Barring that, coverage form reliable media that has impact/size larger than in-city newspaper/radio/TV would help. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:22, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I will add in some of the several newspaper references. ok? --Stephencdickson (talk) 13:59, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Mary Youngblood CD.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mary Youngblood CD.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:58, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not my upload--Stephencdickson (talk) 18:11, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Survey Invite

[edit]

I'm working on a study of political motivations and how they affect editing. I'd like to ask you to take a survey. The survey should take 5 minutes. Your survey responses will be kept private. Our project is documented at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Wikipedia_%2B_Politics.

Survey Link: http://uchicago.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_80J3UDCpLnKyWTH?Q_DL=3dz0m2ubQw1KSnb_80J3UDCpLnKyWTH_MLRP_5ANvH6hKtW6xLz7&Q_CHL=gl

I am asking you to participate in this study because you are a frequent editor of pages on Wikipedia that are of political interest. We would like to learn about your experiences in dealing with editors of different political orientations.

Sincere thanks for your help! Porteclefs (talk) 19:52, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hastings

[edit]

Thanks for your edit to Hastings. I moved the entry for Ernest R. Matthews to List of people from Hastings because although notable he isn't as well-known as the other few summarised in the Hastings article. I enjoyed reading about him! Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 05:01, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

[edit]

Hi, I'm Kudpung. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, William Christopher Miller, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:15, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

6th/8th Baronet

[edit]

Hi Stephen,

I've moved Sir Alexander Grant, 8th Baronet back to the old title, as 8th not 6th - the details in the article match those in the History of Parliament and Oxford DNB which confirm him as the 8th. He was also born ten years after the 5th Baronet died, so couldn't possibly be his son!

Is it possible that there was some weird numbering issue and the 8th is down in some sources as the 6th - I know this has happened for some peerages, but not sure about baronetcies? Andrew Gray (talk) 15:00, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am writing an article on the nephew at the moment and there is definitely much confusion between the two people... it also seems odd that the earlier one has the same dates (but not year) for birth and death and it looks like at least some of the info has leaked from one to the other. As far as I can see the one I am looking at (as a member of RSE) seems to say 8th baronet on his grave and his father is listed as Robert Innes Grant, 7th baronet brother to Alexander ... which title he inherited on his death... therefore the existing article logically should be 6th not 8th... I will try to find more sources... I am pretty sure the Alexander Grant I am studying is NOT the 10th baronet... which would follow from your numbering.. ONDB is certainly not infallible, it could be a simple slip confusing the two--Stephencdickson (talk) 15:13, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I think I need to do a diagram to work it out,,, there seems to also be more than one Robert Innes Grant. I know that sometimes peers are 6th of one title and 8th of another. I guess if I leave the numeral out of my article it leaves it more flexible--Stephencdickson (talk) 15:18, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I think I have it. Certainly the RSE list seems to say that Sir Alexander (1826-1884) was the 8th Baronet. However, we have an article at Sir Alexander Grant, 10th Baronet (the chap you're working on?) which seems to match fairly well; it disagrees on some minor details but is basically consistent with the ODNB, which calls him the 10th, as does the National Portrait Gallery.
However, the original DNB entry for Alexander (1826-1884) from 1900 has him down as son "of the seventh baronet", and the DNB entry for Alexander Cray (1782-1854) calls him the sixth. The Venn Cambridge Alumni entry for Alexander (1826-1884) calls him the 10th Baronet, but notes that the DNB and one other source give him as the 8th. It's worth noting that the ODNB entries will have been revisions of the older DNB ones, so it implies that a historian has looked at it fairly recently and updated it with the new numbers; the Venn entry also indicates someone making an explicit decision.
In the ODNB entry for Alexander (1705-1772), 5th Baronet, it says that he claimed a dormant baronetcy; ie he went back and demonstrated the link between himself and the last known holder. Some of the people in between were not included in the count at the time (because they themselves never claimed the title); note that this 1859 source goes straight from James (1st) to Patrick (2nd) passing over Sweton. The list at Grant baronets has Sweton as 3rd and Patrick as 4th.
Putting it all together, it suggests that Alexander (1826-1884) called himself the 6th Baronet in his lifetime, but the historians now consider him the 8th. Likewise, Alexander Cray (1782-1854) called himself the 8th Baronet (which would explain the gravestone!) but is now considered the 10th. Andrew Gray (talk) 20:18, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A bit strange... it implies two earlier baronets mysteriously appeared. As a GUESS I think the Grants were some of the several families granted baronetcies in Nova Scotia in the 17th century. I think the Nova Scotia baronetcy predates the Scottish one but is probably the same family i.e. there is no 1st and 2nd Baronet of Dalvey... and the "first baronet of Dalvey" is the 3rd baronet--Stephencdickson (talk) 20:40, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited George Kinloch (politician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blairgowrie (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:44, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited George Moir, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Whig (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Referencing

[edit]

Hi Stephencdickson! Thanks for the various articles you have created recently. However, could you please stop added bare URL references? There are various Wikipedia:Citation templates you could use if you don't want to write them out the long way. These are available as a pop up on the edit bar if you go to your preferences and tick Wikipedia:RefToolbar (I use this, its very helpful). If you need help with this, I'm happy to walk you through it. Gaia Octavia Agrippa Talk 19:38, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I can see that you have created more articles but you are still using bare URLs as references. Please stop doing this: if the URL becomes dead, there is no record of what the reference is pointing to. If you need help with this I am happy to give you some guidance. Gaia Octavia Agrippa Talk 00:08, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies... I taught myself simply by looking at existing articles and following cut and paste type techniques...my Edit Page does not seem to look like that shown in the link... and I am NOT a computer whizz... I just like to fill my time as I had a stroke and this occupies myself productively. A little guidance as to where to go on Edit page is welcomed--Stephencdickson (talk) 15:25, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for getting back to me; sorry of hear of your stroke. I had amused that you were either stubborn or trying to keep it simple, so I'm glad its the latter in your case. I'm very busy at the moment so won't be able to talk you through step by step. However, I did write a number of introductory pages back when I was an adopter/trainer of new Wikipedians. Here is the one I did on referencing. There is also a video (although slightly out of date) that you can find here which will take you through refToolbar. I hope these help and if you need more help give me a ping. I am still checking my watchlist, I just don't have much spare time for anything else right now. Gaia Octavia Agrippa Talk 19:09, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks... I will try to follow--Stephencdickson (talk) 23:41, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CREDENTIAL

[edit]

Hello. Please do not include 'Prof'/'Dr' and 'PhD/LLD' as you did here per WP:CREDENTIAL. Please also see this --Omnipaedista (talk) 03:33, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. [6][7] --Omnipaedista (talk) 15:21, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
You did it again [8]. --Omnipaedista (talk) 02:02, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

MOS:DOB

[edit]

Please use n-dashes in life spans as per MOS:DOB [9] --Omnipaedista (talk) 03:43, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Stephencdickson. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Moderators of the General Assembly of the Church of Scotland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kirknewton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:42, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Alexander Murray of Elibank (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Allan Ramsay
Alexander Philip (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Provost
James Russell (surgeon) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to David Martin
Robin Philipson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Alick Buchanan-Smith

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Robert Lorimer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Carlisle, Glenelg, Paisley, Macedonia, Galston, Parliament House, Selkirk, GSWR, Carnbee and Minia

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alexander Whyte, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cobbler (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tip for URLs for National Library of Scotland digital resources

[edit]

Hi there, I see from some of the articles that you've edited that you've included references to National Library of Scotland resources, in particular the digitised Post Office directories. First I wanted to thank you for your great work in adding this information to articles. And second I wanted to offer you a tip about citing NLS digital resources (I work in the Digital team at the Library so know a little bit about this). The URLs you've been using are fine for now, but at sometime in the future the Library may change the structure of its URLs. Knowing that we might do this, we create what we call Permanent URLs and these will always 'point' to the digital resources. If you look at this URL http://digital.nls.uk/directories/browse/archive/87345066 and scroll down under the image you will see a field Permanent URL with this URL http://digital.nls.uk/87345066 - this is the best URL to use to ensure that National Library of Scotland URLs persistent on Wikipedia and don't turn into dead links if we change the URL structure. You'll see that the id numbers in the long URL and the permanent one are, in this instance, the same however this is not the case for all the Library's resources.

I see also that you usually link to the transcription page, and I understand why you do that. We don't assign Permanent URLs to transcription pages but rather just to the image page and then, as you'll have seen, give the option to go to the transcription.

Anyway ... just a friendly suggestion. And thanks again for your amazing work on Wikipedia. Triptropic (talk) 22:33, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Helen Porter (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Clifton High School
James Pringle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Provost
Mungo Ponton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Robert Allan

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Andrew Pritchard (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Hackney
Juda Hirsch Quastel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Galicia

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Alexander Hume (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Alva
Herbert Harold Read (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Simon Langton Grammar School

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:41, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sir William Pearce, 1st Baronet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gillingham (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:00, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

John Robertson Henderson

[edit]

Stephen,

So far I can find was John Robertson Henderson also an Carcinologist. I don't know if he has published in Proceedings and Transactions of the Natural History of Glasgow, new series 1: 315-353. The author is J.R. Henderson or is this an other J.R. Henderson? PeterR (talk) 10:34, 18 February 2018 (UTC) This would appear highly unlikely as a carcinologist would require medical training. J R Henderson is a VERY common name both now and then. I doi NOT think this would be a safe addition.--Stephencdickson (talk) 12:46, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Francis Stuart, 10th Earl of Moray, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pilton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited James Law, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Falkland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Commons and derivative images

[edit]

Hi there. I only just got the alert about the threads over on Commons. I don't have much time to respond at the moment, but will try and say something before the threads are archived. I am sorry if the advice I gave you was incorrect (I am not sure the advice was incorrect, but Commons is frequently more conservative than it needs to be, and that is very unfortunate in this case, particularly give the amount of effort you put into those images). Carcharoth (talk) 06:14, 28 March 2018 (UTC) Any help greatly appreciated. The definition of "derivative" work seems to be being misinterpreted as by the seeming interpretation any photo of a man-made 20th century object or image is "cerivative"--Stephencdickson (talk) 14:12, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

[edit]

Information icon Before adding a category to an article, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. Categories must also be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Please do not add categories to your sandbox - these are only for articles. You can add in the categories when you move content to article space. StAnselm (talk) 01:18, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bone meal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Britain (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

New Town, Edinburgh

[edit]

Hi, I have been working on the New Town, Edinburgh article, trying to improve the structure of the text and balance of the illustrations. Perhaps you would like to have a look! I think you understand these Edinburgh articles as well as anybody! Regards. Kleinzach 12:09, 4 April 2018 (UTC) I will take a look--Stephencdickson (talk) 12:51, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

geni.com

[edit]

Hi, geni.com is not a reliable source. I'm not sure why you are still using it but I am fairly sure I've mentioned this to you before. Also, Prabook is not reliable and I've had to remove that from one of your recent creations, sorry. - Sitush (talk) 17:46, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Alexander Lockhart, Lord Covington (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Carlisle
David Dalrymple, Lord Hailes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Haddington

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Peter MacGregor Chalmers by Stephen C Dickson.jpg

[edit]

I posted a question on File:Peter MacGregor Chalmers by Stephen C Dickson.jpg; not sure you saw it. Anyways, is that a drawing of Chalmers, or is it Robert Stodart Lorimer ? The source appears to be here, which is of Lorimer. Also, can you read the artist's name on the original? Copyright status would depend on that. Thanks, Carl Lindberg (talk) 19:11, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I will need to check my source material... it was certainly not intended to be Lorimer who is already illustrated--Stephencdickson (talk) 19:14, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Given that other sources (eg. 1) appear to back up the identity of the scottisharchitects.org.uk portrait as being Robert Stodart Lorimer, I've removed this image from the Peter MacGregor Chalmers article, at least for now. --Lord Belbury (talk) 08:21, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks. Do you know what the signature is on your source drawing? It could still be OK as a Lorimer illustration, but we would need to identify that artist at the very least. Carl Lindberg (talk) 00:05, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

reducing all-caps references

[edit]

Greetings. We recently had a bot change over 1,200 articles that contained "BIOGRAPHICAL INDEX OF FORMER FELLOWS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF EDINBURGH 1783 – 2002" to title case and unspaced en dash, as "Biographical Index of Former Fellows of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 1783–2002". If you would use that format in new articles, we would not need to dust off that bot task at some point in the future. Happy editing! Chris the speller yack 18:41, 25 April 2018 (UTC) It was not myself who originally created the link. I have just been using cut and paste as I worked through the members. The choice of all capitals would not have been my choice--Stephencdickson (talk) 19:14, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Page James Montagu Frank Drummond (Scottish Botanist)

[edit]

Dear Stephen,

I was interested in your page on James Drummond. I am related to James Drummond and was interested in your reference to him being a distant cousin of Rev Henry Drummond from Stirling. Thomas Drummond botanist 1793-1835 is my gt gt gt Grandfather. I liked the sound of Henry Drummond being related and just wondered if you could let me know the records/research you accessed to verify the connection to Henry Drummond. I know that Henry Drummond's Grandfather was a nurseryman and established the firm called Drummond Seeds in Stirling. Any Info on this connection you could provide would be greatly appreciated.89.241.229.71 (talk) 20:20, 15 May 2018 (UTC) I cannot off the top of my head remember ... I only wrote about half of the Henry Drummond (evangelist) article... but it definitely seems to say he was the son of the founder of Drummond seeds (a firm I know well as I am from that area and a keen gardener)...as far as I can see the stated link between Drummonds is correct... the "distant cousin" means second cousin at closest, but it was a link worth mentioning--Stephencdickson (talk) 20:28, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

K A Pyefinch

[edit]

Hello Stephen Just to let you know that I’m proposing to amend an entry you made for K A Pyefinch (my father). I’d like to add information to all sections and correct inaccuracies. Details on the K A Pyefinch talk page. Peg Pyefinch (talk) 07:36, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Page James Montagu Frank Drummond (Scottish Botanist)

[edit]

Hello Stephen, Many thanks for your reply. If you remember where you got the link to Reverend Henry Drummond from, do let me know. It will be worth me researching. I know Stirling University Archives have papers on Henry Drummond's family and the business Drummond Seeds.

The line is James Montagu Frank Drummond son of James Ramsay Drummond, son of Reverend James Drummond, (Clackmannan minister) son of Thomas Drummond 1793-1835 (Botanist/ Assistant Naturalist Sir John Franklin's 2nd Arctic Expedition) son of Thomas Drummond gardener Fotheringham estate and his wife Elizabeth Nicol. James Drummond Botanist, Western Australia is the brother of Thomas Drummond 1793-1835.

There is a Reverend James Drummond on this line, who moved from Glamis to Clackmannan, to take up his position as a minister in the Free Church of Scotland in Clackmannan and later died at Bannockburn. This would be in the 1850s when he moved to Clackmannan. There does seem to be some connection with the Stirling area and the ministry in the Free Church of Scotland. He studied at New College, University of Edinburgh as did Henry Drummond. When I saw your reference to Henry Drummond, I thought the connection was maybe from Henry Drummond's grandfather William Drummond born 1760. I thought he might have been a brother to Thomas Drummond born 1756, who was a gardener on the Fotheringham estate. He was born in Perthshire.

I liked the sound of Henry Drummond being related! I have read some of his books and have become familiar with his quotes. If you remember please let me know.

Many thanks

Louise H R Meikle — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.241.170.95 (talk) 20:45, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited James Pringle (Provost), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hooge (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Thomas M'Crie the younger, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Haddington and Andrew Agnew (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:37, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Samuel Shepherd, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Streatley (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Robert Silver, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Frank Bell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited George Simpson (meteorologist), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lapland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alexander Smith (chemist), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Gibson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited William Somerville (physician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Falmouth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

John Harrison Burnett (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Paisley
William Somerville (physician) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Hanover Square

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Thomas Linley the younger, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Lonsdale (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:37, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Alan Stevenson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Anglesea
Dean Cemetery (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to David Stevenson
Duncan Cameron (Scottish inventor) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to James Gowans

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Caleb Andrew Stewart

[edit]

The article Caleb Andrew Stewart is written exactly the way a biographical article on Wikipedia should not be written, i.e. it should not be a chronological account of the subject's life. It should begin by saying what the person is noted for, justifying the existence of a Wikipedia article. Michael Hardy (talk) 18:18, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

David Stewart (major-general) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Aberfeldy
Frederick Stewart (geologist) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Durham
Garth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Aberfeldy

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sophia

[edit]

In this edit, do you remember where Sophia is? Someone later piped your link to Niulakita in the Pacific, also called Sophia. But that can't be right; for one thing, the Niulakita article says there were no white visitors from 1595 to 1821. For another, the context of your edit implies some location closer to Constantinople. Art LaPella (talk) 19:34, 18 September 2018 (UTC) I had not spotted this disambiguation issue... logically it is Sophia closest to Constantinople --Stephencdickson (talk) 19:42, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, but I couldn't find a place called Sophia in Turkey or Greece, using Google, unless it's something like Hagia Sophia. Greece is a good guess because it's a Greek word, but then again there were Greek colonies throughout the Mediterranean in ancient times. If it's Greece, we could just change it to "Sophia, Greece" unlinked. Art LaPella (talk) 20:04, 18 September 2018 (UTC)... It is Sofia capital of Romania, which was generally spelled Sophia until fairly recently (certainly in the reference used and still when I went to school) --Stephencdickson (talk) 20:15, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Art LaPella (talk) 21:18, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Joseph Muter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Montrose (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Henry John Dobson

[edit]

Hi Stephen, I've just ( a few minutes ago) had my submission on Henry John Dobson rejected on notability grounds ! I thought he should have his own page on account of his body of work and as both his artist sons have their pages. I'd included some of the same links . Never mind. Regards, Jamie Stuart. Jamie Stuart 20:21, 1 October 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamie Stuart 11 (talk • contribs)

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Crichton-Stuart, 6th Marquess of Bute, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alwyn Williams (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Additional information about Robert deBruce Trotter.

[edit]

Dear Stephendickson, I am George Baird Trotter, living in Western Australia. I am g/grandson of Robert deBruce Trotter and have a lot of family information about him. This information comes from family memory and from research. May I advise you that,

firstly, despite the birth date (1834) given on his tombstone in Perth, Scotland, he was actually baptised at Urr, Kirkud. on 8 Aug. 1833 <LDS film 1068036>.

secondly, his father's name was plain Dr Robert Trotter (of Dalry), not Robert deBruce Trotter Snr.

thirdly, about his names as author and or editor: Please understand that he encouraged his mother "Maria Trotter" to relate all the folk tales she could remember from her childhood and early years in Wigtownshire. This she did (she clearly states this on <p.1 of Gal. Goss. 1877>). When Robert published the work in 1877 and a 2nd edition in 1878 he gave the authorship as Maria Trotter with himself as "Saxon" the editor. This he states in the <Preface to GG 1877>. He re-states this in the <preface to the 2nd Edit of 1878 p.vi>. Maria was given on the title page as the author of the stories and he, who wrote them down and carved the little adornments on the pages, was given as "edited by Saxon". In the second book of GG in 1901, usually known as the "Stewartry" volume, the title page is identical, but his mother's name as author is removed and so is "edited by Saxon" and the author's name is given as R. DeBruce Trotter. This is because his mother "Maria" died in 1879, just after the first volume was published. From the prefaces and various pages within the two editions of the books themselves it is clear that Maria Trotter is the author even though she did not physically write them as she narrated them her son to allow him to record her remembered tales. Even in the 1901 volume there are a number of instances where Maria's words are quoted verbatim. The family considers that Maria was the source/author of the 1877 volume and also partially of the 1901 volume. Robert deBruce Trotter was the editor (Saxon) of the 1877 volume and author of the 1901 volume, although some significant stories are narrated therein by Maria. One of the differences between the 1877 volume and the 1901 volume is that some stories in the latter were submitted from people outside the family. We Trotters therefore do not consider it accurate to suggest that R DeB Trotter used both names to attract the two genders to the work. In other words, Maria Trotter (his mother) is not a pseudonym. On this point, I found the same incorrect statement, almost word for word as given above, on the Abebooks site of an Edinburgh bookseller offering Galloway Gossip. I think this is possibly where that story originated?

Please be advised that "Maria's" real name was Martha Nithsdale. She confirms this on p.20 of the 1901 edition. Her father, Daniel Nithsdale, began to believe that he was in fact an illegitimate son of the last Maxwell, Lord of the dormant title of Nithsdale. From c.1830-1832 Martha and her husband Dr Robert Trotter and their son Robert deBruce Trotter also began to believe this and her name can be seen on the various birth records of her children to progress from "Martha Nithsdale" to "Maria Nithsdale" to " Maria Maxwell" etc. etc. There is no evidence for any connection to Maxwell, but the result of this "delusion" is that there are a multitude of records, and even her tombstone, that record her as Maria Nithsdale Maxwell.

I hope this is of help. George Baird Trotter Western Australia 211.26.104.79 (talk) 06:10, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of George Smith (1833–1919)

[edit]
Notice

The article George Smith (1833–1919) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:Notability acadamics

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PoliceSheep99 (talk) 18:10, 20 October 2018 (UTC) I truly do not see the problem. He is far more notable than 90% of the people with articles .... can you be more SPECIFIC? Are you unfamiliar with any of his work? If so is this not a problem of your knowledge not his notability?--Stephencdickson (talk) 21:14, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies on behalf of PoliceSheep99 (talk · contribs) who quite obviously made a mistake. Tony May (talk) 05:14, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Tedder, 2nd Baron Tedder, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Neil Campbell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:40, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Robert Thalén, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Upsala (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:20, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Stephencdickson. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Greyfriars Kirk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Free Church of Scotland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Free Church of Scotland (since 1900) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Kenneth Cameron, George Mackay, Ferintosh, Fearn, Knock and Roderick Macleod
Norman Purvis Walker (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Dysart

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Thomson of Duddingston, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Archibald Alison (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Samson Gemmell

[edit]

Hi Stephencdickson I had to revert your edits. Not only did you provide a crummy reference, that was a bare url that could easily have been linked using the cite journal doi lookup wizard, you also changed a fact into a not fact by adding in MB ChM which as a qualification did not exist until some 40+ years after Gemmell took the qualification. You also moved the article out of third voice. Poor quality editing and all of it avoidable, and against the Manual of Style, apart from the simple mistake on the qualification. Can you please be more careful the next time. scope_creepTalk 18:39, 11 December 2018 (UTC) It is incorrect to say that ChM did not exist... CM and ChM stand for the same thing... whilst Glasgow usually used the abbreviation CM they stepped into line and used the more widely used Scottish abbreviation, as you say, about 40 years later, but for the sake of national understanding versus parochialism ChM is perfectly understandable and more correct on a national basis...BTW your tone sucks--Stephencdickson (talk) 19:16, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Stephencdickson. It is not the correct fact. It took centuries to create that qualification, almost 2000 years of physician work before they could come up with that qualification. Someday, somebody will update the article and the several dozens of articles that have CM MB as linked text, will be linked properly. I really don't see the point in putting a non-fact in, when is suitable to apply a proper fact. Wikipedia is all about precision. The more precise the information, the deeper the understanding of knowledge. You're essentially positing that a specific block of knowledge is of no use, you want to apply a slightly more generic term, diluting the quality of that article. I really don't think that is the best way of doing it, I really don't. That is not the worst. I came across several of your articles, that are generally pretty decent to excellent quality, but a fair to large number have terrible references, and other folks will need to fix them. They as so bad, within 3-5 years, they will be useless to non-existent. The existence of most websites is fleeting, and the only way to preserve that information is to apply properties to the reference, so it easy to find the info later. This may help: Wikipedia:Refb. My tone is terrible. Other people used to comment on it when I was working when I was a nipper in the corporate world. I write in an exceedingly male voice as it is my nature, and years ago when I was working in Edinburgh in the 1990's I had to be sent on an expensive communications course, to learn how to modulate it, which I did for a while, but I've mostly forgotten everything, hence the tone. scope_creepTalk 22:39, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If we are discussing "non-facts" (not that this is a word!) your last paragraph is full of them. Both C and Ch are an abbreviation for Chirugery?Chirurgical ... or in modern spelling Surgery... it is a Scots word not a Latin word... though arguably has a Latin root. The non-conformity of Glasgow in calling the degree CM is easily proven... when it was later renamed ChM or ChB it was NOT due to a change in the teaching content, it was simply a regularisation so that all universities used the same abbreviations.--Stephencdickson (talk) 23:59, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, If you think that is correct show me a source, and I will adopt it, in all articles that write in the future, and change all the ones I have done in the past. scope_creepTalk 15:16, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you look at Wikipedia :p you will see an article on ChM ... and the article on CM has no reference to medical degrees. Glasgow used CM as an abbreviation but was at odds with most of the country who called it ChM. Or do you have your own definition for CM outwith the medical degree? As I say Glasgow came into line in the 20th century, but if you like the archaic and misleading CM (which is non-intelligible to the international world) play it your way--Stephencdickson (talk) 15:29, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The only reason I used it in that article, was the Glasgow Univesity article used, and their article was likely peer reviewed before it was published, which means they still refer to it as CM etc. It is likely that they have whole books, documents, papers going back 40-50 years that use the term, so they think it is still valid. I will put a link to next to it, to the modern version. scope_creepTalk 09:54, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of William Smellie (geologist) for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article William Smellie (geologist) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Smellie (geologist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ~Sıgehelmus♗(Tøk) 06:07, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Virtually by definition every Fellow of a Royal Society is worthy of inclusion. Some articles are necessarily stubs (as this one) as the full scope of their contribution to science is unclear. But election to the Royal Society is an accolade few can aspire to. Not you or I.--Stephencdickson (talk) 16:12, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Joy Tivy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lord Cameron (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of William Smellie (geologist) for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article William Smellie (geologist) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Smellie (geologist) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ∯WBGconverse 11:38, 18 December 2018 (UTC) You still have not explained why a Fellow is not worthy of an article.Stephencdickson (talk) 12:33, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Walter Trower, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hanover Square (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Johannes Herman Frederik Umbgrove (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Morphology
William Tytler (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Roslin

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Provosts of Edinburgh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ruthven (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Angus Makellar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kilmichael (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Stephen Hislop (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Olney
Theodore Fraser (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Moderator

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

John Murray Mitchell (missionary)

[edit]

Hi, I have a vague memory that we have had words about your unwillingness to abide by WP:V and WP:RS somewhere before but, regardless, I've reverted you at John Murray Mitchell (missionary) because it simply will not do. You source stuff, and you source it reliably, otherwise I will bin it.

Trade, street and phone directories - which is just about the only thing you did provide as a source for your changes - are completely unsuitable. You have no idea if the person mentioned in them is the same as the one about whom you are writing. There are very few people in this world, certainly back in Victorian times, who are uniquely named. (Oddly, my sister-in-law is one, due to immigration officially mishearing her parents' name, but it is a rare event and there have likely been tens of thousands od John Murray Mitchells.) - Sitush (talk) 19:00, 27 January 2019 (UTC) This is a wholly incorrect observation. I only add Street Directory information when I am 100% sure it is the correct person. Despite your opinion that there are thousands of people with this name you are wrong. This is the advantage of a three name system. People with only two names I accept your logic. But you are wrong in regard to three.--Stephencdickson (talk) 19:08, 27 January 2019 (UTC) By the way the Garvock reference you deleted was not my addition, all I did was create a potential link if an article is written on Garvock.. more haste less speed... and a charming attitude to editing (not)--Stephencdickson (talk) 19:11, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Most accept post office directories as 100% reliable, my guess is you have never looked at them, if you did you would realise that they also state occupation of the person, which pinpoints them exactly. Before you criticise check your own facts. --Stephencdickson (talk) 19:17, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Alexander Roberts (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Carlton Hill
Carl Schwartz (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Meseritz

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019

[edit]

Hello, I'm Thegooduser. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Alexander Moody Stuart, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Thegooduser Life Begins With a Smile :) 🍁 20:18, 3 February 2019 (UTC) I dont really understand your reversion. Some were grammatical changes as the previous article had an archaic style. References were mainly sourced from Ewings Annals and Free church of Scotland Monthly (both of which I cited) but included on-line refs such as findagrave... I truly think your reversion is unhelpful and not in the public interest as it has gone back to a sloppy article with several bits that did not make chronological sense. If you read my edit re the period around 1843 you will see what I mean. Moreover, much of the edit was filling in "blanks" as the previous author had some preconceived ideas which need explaining. I think it is important to clarify the Church of Scotland from the Free Church of Scotland. I am unclear of your objective as to me my references were adequate ... the essence should be that others can verify... which they can if they have the correct sources.--Stephencdickson (talk) 20:29, 3 February 2019 (UTC) If you now read what you have done you should spot the numerous problems, not least of which is a non-sequential chronology! the previous and now reverted form is poor and illogical... I had not finished my edit but if you must revert an item can you please at least reorganise into the correct sequence of events--Stephencdickson (talk) 20:43, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Carl Schwartz (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Leghorn
James Stewart (missionary) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Lovedale

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Thomas Lipton page

[edit]

In your edit you added that his family moved due to the famine, where is your source for this?

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Thomas_Lipton&oldid=683171691#Parentage_and_childhood

Are you aware that they are in Scotland on the 1841 Census?!?

KDDA (talk) 21:32, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It all comes from the same source: The Late Victorians: Thomas Lipton.... although the Irish potato famine is usually given the date of 1845 it was several years in the build up. I have no personal knowledge on Lipton but the famine is common knowledge--Stephencdickson (talk) 01:08, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wish

[edit]

Hello. Help improve for article Maureen Wroblewitz. Thanks you. Arina56 (talk) 12:22, 10 February 2019 (UTC) I will check later today. Just going out to take some photos to feed into Wikimedia --Stephencdickson (talk) 12:28, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mirrors

[edit]

Information icon Thanks for contributing to the article Alexander Henderson of Press. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be verifiable and attributed to reliable sources. You have recently used citations which copied, or mirrored, material from Wikipedia. This leads to a circular reference and is not acceptable. Most mirrors are clearly labeled as such, but some are in violation of our license and do not provide the correct attribution. Please help by adding alternate sources to the article you edited! If you need any help or clarification, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. Thank you. Kuru (talk) 12:51, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The list of provosts is publically visible as a dis[play board in Edinburgh, but is this a valid reference?--Stephencdickson (talk) 17:32, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly, you may want to get clarification at WP:RSN. In the meantime, please stop adding links to blatant mirrors - you've just added two more. Kuru (talk) 01:13, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Stephen, I'm not sure how to be more transparent about this, but it now seems that you are deliberately adding links to references you are clearly aware are mirrors, as you just did here. I'm not sure how to get your attention to this. Kuru (talk) 12:59, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Borgue Highland

[edit]

Hello Stephen, According to the source cited, "Ewings Annals of the Free Church ", the Rev Samuel Smith, Rev James T. Stuart and the Rev George Elder were ministers of Borgue, Kirkcudbrightshire in Galloway. Jamie Stuart (talk) 00:34, 10 March 2019 (UTC) Thanks, I will check. Unless you already changed?--Stephencdickson (talk) 10:59, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John MacLeod (solicitor), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tobermory (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:36, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Royal Edinburgh Hospital, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andrew Duncan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Campbell (1802–1878), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Star of India (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:52, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kenneth Williamson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Berry (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:32, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited George Wilson (chemist), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daniel Wilson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:15, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sir Alexander Dick, 3rd Baronet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alexander Boswell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Wishart (statistician), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Montrose and Intelligence Corps (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:08, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Harry Harvey Wood, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Marston (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:33, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

James Wordie (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Great Western Road
Patrick Scougal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Haddington
William Penny (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Cornwallis Island

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alexander Watt Beveridge for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alexander Watt Beveridge is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexander Watt Beveridge until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mutt Lunker (talk) 22:11, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alexander Karley for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alexander Karley is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexander Karley until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mutt Lunker (talk) 23:19, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of George Pirie (mathematician) for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article George Pirie (mathematician) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Pirie (mathematician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mutt Lunker (talk) 11:50, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Thomas Balfour, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Balfour (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:30, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Richard Cockburn of Clerkington, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Haddington (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:27, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited William Scott, Lord Clerkington, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Haddington (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:22, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Stockbridge, Edinburgh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tivoli (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:19, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Rhubarb, rhubarb

[edit]

Hi. Just mentioning: in the Rhubarb article, you added information about Scottish cultivation, with a named reference ... that doesn't actually link to a reference. It's just named. IAmNitpicking (talk) 13:10, 3 November 2019 (UTC) Grants Old and New Edinburgh is a readily accessed 19th century book that predates ISBN but many pdf versions appear on line,, the reference to rhubarb is in the history of Edinburgh's Botanical Garden--Stephencdickson (talk) 14:07, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Thomas Forrester (theologian), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Alva and Campsie (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:15, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Harry Rainy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Kincardine
John MacDonald (Gaelic Moderator) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Apostle of the North
Thomas Stewart Traill (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Kincardine

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:33, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited HMS Formidable (1777), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brest (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:24, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Robert Faulknor the younger, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Greenwich Hospital (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:22, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited We'll Meet Again (1943 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blitz (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:59, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Accident

[edit]

I think I just did an revert on your article by accident. Sorry New3400 (talk) 19:15, 25 April 2020 (UTC)... I was only improving a link --Stephencdickson (talk) 19:17, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Beauty Jungle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ronald Fraser (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:44, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Don't Panic Chaps! (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to George Cole
First Men in the Moon (1964 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Flashback
The Man Between (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Reichstag
The March Hare (1956 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Derby Day

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:39, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Cottage to Let (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to George Cole
Hallelujah (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Keep on Truckin'
The Knack ...and How to Get It (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Car transporter

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:05, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Article Thomas Murray MacRobert

[edit]

Hi @Stephencdickson:: Are you sure that Thomas Murray MacRobert is the autor of A Short Introduction to Fine Typography (1957)? Biographies of this person, like this one by R. P. Gillespie and A. Erdélyi do not state this book in the list of MacRobert's publications. On the other hand, it seems that the book's matter is not according to the autor's profile.--Ferran Mir (talk) 08:32, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Looks fine to me. This is the source ... it comes up in many sites: https://www.abebooks.co.uk/Printed-Books-short-introduction-typography-MACROBERT/30383610805/bd--Stephencdickson (talk) 11:32, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Stephencdickson: I have no doubt about the existence of the book and about the author: somebody named T.M.MACROBERT. But, do you really think that an Scotish mathematician could were spending his time writting about typography for Her Majesty's Office? And none of his biographers mentioned this fact?--Ferran Mir (talk) 18:26, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited My Foolish Heart (1949 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shillingbury Tales, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jack Douglas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Fiddlers Three (1944 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to WRNS
The Rebel (1961 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Dali

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lure of the Wilderness, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page River otter (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:21, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Western General Hospital

[edit]

Hi - Thanks for your additions to the article on Western General Hospital. Please can you add some references as required by WP:V, WP:CITE and WP:RS. Thanks. Dormskirk (talk) 16:20, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Raymond Huntley

[edit]

This edit was reverted because the reference you added is not a citation. You simply repeated the programme details and that is not acceptable sourcing per WP:V or WP:CITE. Please attribute a reliable, independent source when adding content and use an acceptable means of citation. Raymond Huntley appeared in The Way Ahead and your edits at that article have been reverted too for reasons given at the edit summary. You obviously did not read the article before making changes as otherwise you would have seen the link to Peter Ustinov in the same paragraph and the piece at the end about Dad's Army. Please exercise due diligence and remember that articles are created to provide information for readers who need them well written, in context and without duplication. No Great Shaker (talk) 06:15, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jet Storm, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Craigcrook
added a link pointing to Blackhall
Joanna Southcott
added a link pointing to Chatham
The Courtneys of Curzon Street
added a link pointing to Horse Guards

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:27, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited James Archer (artist), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages George Trevelyan and Lady Dufferin.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:50, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited That Hamilton Woman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hearts of Oak.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:27, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Heriot Row, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Archibald Alison.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:44, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dylan Thomas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ministry of Information.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:13, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can you archive your talk page?

[edit]

It is difficult to leave you new messages as your talk page is very long. Cheers, --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:46, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Budgie (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gordon Jackson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:39, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited William Collins (Lord Provost), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Ure.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:20, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Richard WB Ellis (paediatrician)

[edit]

Hello, I am writing in the hope of making contact with the main author of the page on Richard Ellis. I am interested to find out the source of information for the claim that he adopted two children during the Spanish Civil War. I would also love to know of any other sources of information on Richard as he was my maternal grandfather and I know very little about him. Any details of source reference s apart from those already listed would be very welcome. Thank you for your time and effort in putting this article together 🙏 2A01:4C8:48:22FC:1:2:A84:B09E (talk) 18:05, 10 December 2020 (UTC) Yes I wrote this... as one of around 2000 articles I wrote of Fellows of the Royal Society of Edinburgh... so the sad thing I suppose is that I have no specialist knowledge I just set myself a list and worked through them one bt one... The information on the Spanish Civil War was from Munks Rolls, however, their website has changed quite radically since I did the article and is now much harder to get into--Stephencdickson (talk) 22:36, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited København (ship), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Falmouth.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Portrait of Clare (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hugh Morton.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Harry Aitken, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Intolerance.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:37, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Burial places

[edit]

I see you have been adding information about burial places to various articles. Please, please, I beg you to provide more complete and thorough referencing for this material. Publication information, including year of publication of the source, and especially page numbers are absolutely essential. --Midnightdreary (talk) 01:38, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Michael Alldredge

[edit]

Hello, Stephencdickson,

Thank you for creating Michael Alldredge.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Needs more in depth coverage and / or sources added to confirm notability. Body of work *could* establish notability but IMDb cannot be accepted per WP:UGC. Note; an article was previously deleted see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Alldredge.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Eagleash}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Eagleash (talk) 21:52, 23 January 2021 (UTC) I try to do an article per day and am a Protected Editor... certainly I know his face from multiple programmes... I never understand the mistrust of IMDb as it seems more reliable than TV guides which seem to be acceptable... I was not really planning to put any more work into it as I have other things to do--Stephencdickson (talk) 21:57, 23 January 2021 (UTC) I would also point out in regards to notability that Alldredge comes up in multiple existing articles in his various roles --Stephencdickson (talk) 21:59, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Edmund Outram, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Birmingham Cathedral.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mud and Sand, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bull ring.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:23, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fountainbridge

[edit]

Hello there. I notice that you added some information to the article on the Fountainbridge area of Edinburgh not too long ago. One of your references was "By the Three roads, Aberdeen University Press" - could you be more specific about what this is and where you got it from? I haven't been able to track it down on Google. Zacwill (talk) 14:16, 4 February 2021 (UTC) I seem to have missed a critical word... sorry... it is By The Three Great Roads--Stephencdickson (talk) 14:22, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A year, author, page number, etc. would be helpful too. Zacwill (talk) 14:47, 4 February 2021 (UTC) Its a community book which is why its flagged as Aberdeen University Press ISBN 0 08 036587 6[reply]
Nevertheless, you need to provide a proper reference. Zacwill (talk) 19:19, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Couch Adams, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page FRAS.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

John Bacon (sculptor, born 1777)
added a link pointing to Windsor
William Heberden
added a link pointing to Windsor

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Peter Scheemakers
added links pointing to Windsor, Stoughton, Lamport and Edward Wortley Montagu
Catweazle
added a link pointing to Touchstone
Thomas Reeve
added a link pointing to Windsor

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:31, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Peter Scheemakers
added links pointing to Goodnestone, Brook Bridges and Studley
HMS Royal Oak (1769)
added a link pointing to Digby Dent

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:22, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Digby Dent (Royal Navy officer, died 1761)

[edit]

Hi - I have added a few missing references to your additions to this article. I cannot find any sources which mention an earlier wife. Please feel free to insert something about his first wife if you have a source. Thanks. Dormskirk (talk) 22:37, 8 March 2021 (UTC) I found nothing but he is referred to as a "widower" so logically was married before. Also since he was by then 50 it would be normal to presume an earlier wife.--Stephencdickson (talk) 22:41, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Let's continue to try and find details. Thanks, Dormskirk (talk) 23:47, 8 March 2021 (UTC) I was mainly researching his nephew Sir Digby Dent and info on this Digby Dent was coming up tangentially as they were alive at same time. I had to take off ref. to HMS Queensborough as that was "my Dent" hh… I will try to relocate where I found the word "widower".--Stephencdickson (talk) 14:10, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited HMS Formidable (1825), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles Sullivan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:34, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Old Man's Draft

[edit]

Hi, could you respond to my question at Talk:The Old Man's Draft? Thanks! Lennart97 (talk) 14:41, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited David Greene (director), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Everyman Theatre.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Two and Two Make Six, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Basque.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Please Turn Over, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ted Ray.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Fairweather, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ibrox.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited David Laird Adams, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blairgowrie.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Earth Dies Screaming, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Territorial Army.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Arthur Frederick Saunders, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cameron Highlanders.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited East of Sudan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Swahili.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Benjamin Wood (MP)
added a link pointing to Tiverton
John Henning (1771–1851)
added a link pointing to The Good Samaritan

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Hew Scott
added links pointing to Haddington and Garvald
Archibald Riddell (minister)
added a link pointing to Granton
Colinton Parish Church
added a link pointing to Elgin
Trinity College Kirk
added a link pointing to Patrick Robertson
William Leiper
added a link pointing to Paisley

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

John Hall (minister)
added a link pointing to Montrose
Patrick Galloway
added a link pointing to Carnbee

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Robert Gordon (minister), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Elgin.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Andrew Ramsay (minister)
added a link pointing to Calderwood
John Cowan (steel merchant)
added a link pointing to Gretna

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

N. W. Simmonds

[edit]

Thanks for creating N. W. Simmonds. Hope I've improved it. Invasive Spices (talk) 21:44, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Thomas Liddell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fincastle.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your editing

[edit]

Hello Stephen. You will have seen that I have edited numerous articles that you have created. Can I please ask you to abide by the Manual of Style and also reconsider in what you include that this is an encyclopaedia not a family history site. In terms of the former, please do not continue to add honorific titles to names, which MOS:HON is very clear about. On the latter, James Barclay (minister) is a good example of what I mean: the street address someone was living at in a particular year is rarely encyclopaedic content (perhaps only if it was a very famous address), and using directory/census information for this seems to me to be original research. And then including a unsourced comment that "Barclays literary works are not clear, but his twin doctorates would usually link to academic writing of some kind." is pure speculation and editorialising. I appreciate that you have done a lot of work building a huge number of articles, but I would have thought that doing so for such a long time should mean that these kinds of core guidelines should be second nature. Thank you. Melcous (talk) 11:44, 7 September 2021 (UTC) To me the "research" of a Post Office Directory is done by its creator, not myself, and if someone is worthy of an encyclopedic entry then their address is always of interest. As regards some "comments" some aspects are self-evident. I presume you have an academic background so you know that DD and LLD are ALWAYS honorary doctorates given in response to written (academic works). Whilst family history, I agree, is not always relevant, in spartan articles I hope it might allow future researchers to more readily fill in some gaps, and the information is rarely wholly irrelevant.--Stephencdickson (talk) 11:57, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

With respect, to suggest that anyone notable enough for a wikipedia article should have their address listed does not make sense and would lead to articles being full of lists of addresses that add no value for readers. In terms of doctorates or any other academic degrees, honorary or not, perhaps read MOS:DOCTOR which is even clearer - they should not be included in the way that you have regularly been doing. Melcous (talk) 14:02, 7 September 2021 (UTC) I think you miss the fact that DD and LLD are regularly shown by all contributors but wrongly labelled as a normal degree.. although "honorary" they are awarded on pure merit and are especially noteworthy where awrded by a foreign university.. but are more usual from an alma mater. I also think you misunderstand the title Very Rev...which is only used for a former leader (Moderator) of the entire church... and is the Scottish equivalent of Archbishop. The title is only adopted after the role ends (being Right Rev during service) and should be used in the same way as seculsr titles such as Lord. I presume your knowledge of the Church of Scotland is limited as I am sure you would not remove Archbishop as a prefix to Church of England articles--Stephencdickson (talk) 14:36, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, but you are incorrect, I would indeed remove Archbishop as an honorific prefix in the the opening line of a biography. Have a look at Justin Welby for example - the title Archbishop is not used with his name in the opening line of the article, because as I have now repeatedly pointed you to, the WP:MOS is clear that it should not be used in that way. You appear to be something of a subject matter expert, but perhaps that focused view can lead to missing the bigger picture, which is consistency and policies that apply across the whole project to all the thousands of biographies here. Melcous (talk) 23:23, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My intention is not to break the rules but to aid a general Google search, and particularly with common names like John Smith it helps to narrow the field. I presume there is no objection to adding in the lower text of an article "whilst serving as Moderator he was titled as Right Reverend and after service was titled as Very Rev" ?--Stephencdickson (talk) 10:38, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have continued to add honorific prefixes and suffixes in contradiction to the manual of style, as well as create multiple articles with the same issues of poor sourcing, original research, and editorialising/point of view. It would be great if you could take more care and seek to follow these accepted guidelines. I would also be interested to know if you are aware of any consensus here that holding the one year position of moderator automatically makes a person notable. Thank you Melcous (talk) 11:43, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have to presume with that response that you are not British and/or do not understand the British church (and especially the Scottish church. I would certainly say that EVERY moderator deserves a mention as this is the egalitarian Scottish system but would equate to an Archbishop. I also think it is necessary to any search engine that a Very Rev JohnSmith is distinguished from a Rev John Smith as this is the usual method of pinpointing. Whilst I have deffered on the issue of prefixing, it is wholly legitimate to explain how that person would thereafter be addressed in person or documents. If your argfument is that Scotland is not big enough to metit the leader of its church being an article I would highlight that the church not only served the population of Scotland but also several million in India and Africa and in the Scottish population within the Commonwealth.--Stephencdickson (talk) 11:52, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Probably best not to make presumptions or assumptions about what others do or don't understand. Obviously this is a topic about which you are very passionate and knowledgable but I am trying to point out that wikipedia has its own guidelines and conventions, a core one of which is notability criteria. While no doubt many, even most, of these people meet it, my question is whether there has been any consensus reached here that someone meets it simply by virtue of holding this particular office (which I would personally argue does not "equate" with an Archbishop, given the completely different church structures). But it is not about my opinion, nor yours, but about the wikipedia community reaching consensus - that's how this project works. Melcous (talk) 01:19, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am increasingly concerned that your editing and more so your comments, exceed a purely administrative role. In particular your comment that "not every moderator deserves a wikipedia entry" is particularly concerning. I must preseme either you have a lack of understanding of the status of this position or you have some axe to grind on the subject matter. I am going to presume that the comments are aimed at some of the more humble moderators... but this truly shows a great acheivement. If you have an objection to this you either have an elitist outlook on the topic or (hopefully not) some underlying bigotry. I would be extremely concerned if the "Wikipedia community" took issue with any entry on any Moderator of the Church of Scotland... in which case you require to explain why one (or more) does not require an article--Stephencdickson (talk) 11:05, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please assume good faith rather than throwing around accusations of elitism or bigotry. Please also do not put words into my mouth: I did not say "not every moderator deserves a wikipedia entry". I asked the question as to whether there is any consensus that holding the role of moderator in and of itself automatically means a person meets wikipedia's notability criteria, and I do not believe this has been answered. I'm not sure, for example, that it meets WP:ANYBIO; and I cannot see any specific discussion of notability criteria that would cover this situation. The question has been asked at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Taylor (moderator), and certainly one editor has suggested that it is a "strong indicator" of notability, but you appear to be proceeding on the basis that it is automatically an indicator of notability, which is not exactly the same thing. If all the historical information available is that a person lived, died, and held this position, do they meet wikipedia's notability criteria? I flagged the article Ernest David Jarvis for that reason. Another editor flagged the article Lewis Gordon (minister) back in 2019 for a similar reason. The issue has not been resolved. Melcous (talk) 12:40, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate that your approach to the Scottish system may be an unintentional slur but it is a slur nevertheless. The head of any religious system is a very major thing, and if you/Wikipedia were to remove any (nothing to do with my authorship or not) this would be of major concern. The Scottish system is unlike almost all others but is a legitimate system operational for 450 years. It would be a very sad world if it were decided that only those Moderators of the more magnificentb churches were noteworthy. The whole point is that all are equal in status and their role is only flagged AFTER its cessation by the title Very Rev... a title which unlike Sir continues after death. I had spotted a number of gaps in the list which were largely due to issues such as common names John Smith etc... I also have no particular axe to grind... I am mainly addressing the List of Moderators as it is a very dry topic which has a few gaps here and there.... and I am trying to fill those gaps... removal of the "Very Rev" address is irksome and to my mind my reformatting does not breach the Wiki rules on honorific titles in the lead line ...and really needs to be said somewhere as most Scots or people understanding the Scots system would search using Very Rev John Smith et al ... --Stephencdickson (talk) 13:01, 28 September 2021 (UTC) I have sought legal opinion on both your editing and your above comments. Two legal friends familiar with internet law have read the wikipedia guidance on honorifics and we remain EXTREMELY CONCERNED by your editing as it far exceeds an admin tidy up and strays very much into changing both content and understanding. The rules on honorifics say such may be used "if it is how the person is usually known"... You seem to wholly misunderstand the entire Scottish church system, as such your over editing is at best dangerous but I am also sad to say would appear to be highly bigotted. Not all moderators are known as "very Rev"... your editing out of when this was applied to any individual (within the BODY OF THE TEXT) would seem to have a very peculiar axe to grind. To all legal opinions, whether the lead in honorofic editing is legitimate or not, that within the text is both counter to the honorific guidelines and counter to the spirit of Wikipedia in impartation of accurate information. As these mid-text edits seem to have a wider objection we all three consider this to be inappropriate bigotry, and/or you have zero understanding of the subject matter (in which case it is also wise not to edit). I have finished my "Moderator project" but I see your editing on this topic (whether my articltes or those of others) is widespread and mischeivous PLEASE REVERT ALL MID TEXT EDITS AS YOU CLEARLY HAVE NO KNOWLEDGE AND HAVE A VERY BIASED VIEW ON BOTH THE HONORIFIC GUIDELINES AND THE SCOTTISH CHURCH.--Stephencdickson (talk) 15:03, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, I do not care what the lawyers you have consulted think, that is not how wikipedia works (and you should probably read WP:NLT - I'm not suggesting you have made a legal threat here, but please be careful not to even come close to doing so). Wikipedia works by editors engaging in discussion to reach consensus, which I have asked multiple times if you have done regarding this, and to which question you have not once responded. You have also continued to disregard WP:AGF, now again making incorrect assumptions and imputations against my motives and intelligence. And you have continued to make the same kind of edits that you have previously agreed go against the WP:MOS (e.g. including academic suffixes after a person's name). I have no bias against the Scottish church, but I would suggest that you may too close to the subject to be being seeing things from a neutral point of view. I would also suggest you have been editing here long enough that you could take some time to learn some other basic rules of wikipedia etiquette such as how to tag other editors and indent posts in a discussion, as again, this helps editors here work together, not just do their own thing, which is the entire point of the project. Melcous (talk) 23:53, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My issue (and that of every Scot I have spoken to and shown your comments) is that it is yourself who is failing to maintain a NEUTRAL STANCE.. In terms of "working together" you are nagating a broad swathe of work by a number of people far beyond any legitimate wikipedia guideline..and certainly most Scots find your editing (to quote my contacts) "outrageous" and "deeply concerning". I consulted lawyers not as any threat but to check the interpretation of Wiki rules and NO_ONE agrees with your interpretation. It seems hard to credit that you claim to know how these people were or were not known and are editing to suit your own agenda. Unless you have any knowledge in the field please restrict yourself to admin tidy ups in STRICT accordance with rules NOT YOUR INTERPRETATION--Stephencdickson (talk) 11:04, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a Scottish issue, stop trying to make it one. It is a wikipedia guideline issue. Here is a strict accordance with the rules for you (emphasis added in bold): "honorific prefixes—styles and honorifics in front of a name—in Wikipedia's own voice should not be included, but may be discussed in the article. In particular, this applies to: styles and honorifics derived from a title, position or activity, including The Most Noble, The Most Honourable, The Right Honourable, and The Honourable; styles and honorifics related to royalty, clergy, and sainthood, such as Her Majesty, His Holiness, The Reverend, and The Venerable." Melcous (talk) 11:15, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It is you who is not getting it, I completely agree "the most honourabe XYZ" needs to come out... but the guidance is very clear that IF IT IS HOW THEY ARE USUALLY KNOWN it stays in... what the Scottish concensus agree is that YOU DO NOT UNDERSTAND... if you want to prove the point to yourself google some examples you have wrongly edited to another site and you will find a huge number are NORMALLY known as Very Rev XYZ. Therefore this form is permited even in the entry line... but the area where you are being particularly outrageous is removing "known as Very Rev XYZ form 1843 etc" from the body of the text. Viewing your edits they have drifted from an earlier neutral stance and are mainly DESTRUCTIVE rather than CONSTRUCTIVE and are counter not only to the spirit of Wiki but also the wording. As the focus (for some reason) appears upon the Scottish Church we can only presume a highly undesirable bias on your part--Stephencdickson (talk) 12:22, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please point out where the Manual of Style says "if it is how they are usually known". Are you referring to MOS:CREDENTIALS which says "when the subject is widely known by a pseudonym or stage name containing such a title" (which does not apply because we are not talking about pseudonyms or stage names)? Melcous (talk) 12:35, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
(And just to be clear, I have been editing regarding the WP:MOS and MOS:CREDENTIALS across a whole range of biographies on wikipedia for quite a long time. The only reason I have edited so many articles to do with the Scottish church is that there are so many that have this exact same issue.) Melcous (talk) 12:40, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wow.. all have "exactly the same ISSUE".. this is why I got lawyers to look at it... no one agrees your stance... you are effectively sayong all other editors were wrong.. You DO NOT UNDERSTAND THE SYSTEM... you are causing insult to the entire Scottish church ... the Scots never used a system akin to "Moderator John Smith" but it has to explain the step to Very Rev in a wiki summary somewhere or it becomes meaningless... and underlying all this is your hiding behind the view that "there is no wiki concensus that all moderators should have an article" which is like someone saying "their is no concensus that every prime minister of Australia desreves an article". The entire population of Scotland is wrong... but you are right! Reread the rules. and try to edit without insulting a whole country's religious system--Stephencdickson (talk) 13:30, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And again, there is a very simple way to resolve this. I have pointed you to wikipedia guidelines. Please point me to where in the Wikipedia Manual of Style you think it says that it is ok to include these titles as you have been doing. Otherwise, simply stop doing it and move on. Melcous (talk) 13:52, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
[An aside: The notability question is a separate issue, and one it would be good to be able to have a civil discussion about. But having been accused of "bigotry" and "elitism", being "mischievous" and "outrageous", and having "zero understanding" and "an axe to grind", I'm sadly not really in the mood to do so. Suffice it to say, "Prime Minister of Australia" is not a comparable topic - there is a clear wikipedia guideline (WP:NPOL) that says unambiguously that national politicians are by definition notable for wikipedia articles. Unfortunately there is no similar guideline for church leaders, hence my raising the question in the first place. But if the very idea of me asking that is taken as a "slur" then it's hard to see a constructive way forward to reach one.] Melcous (talk) 14:30, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There are two issues in editing a) is the title honorofic: it is not in the same mode as "the honourable" but I have conceded on the lead-ins b) my issue is that you are removing the terminology from the inner body of the text which is clearly not what is intended in the guidelines and greatly depletes the articles. However, I am going to give up trying to explain to you. You have caused widespread offence. End of story. You pin it on wikiguidelines but this is mainly your own whim as some alleged expert on the Scots church and terminologies. As to your dismissive attitude which implies not all leaders of an entire religious system for an entire country need an article I will let you ponder the stupidity of this rather than you saying "their is no concensus" You hide behide Wiki rules rather than take ownership of your own very peculiar editing. I am obviously wasting my time. Please try to realise how offensive you are being not to me but to the Scottish church. I do not understand why you do not see this.--Stephencdickson (talk) 16:33, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lady Glenorchy's Church has been nominated for Did You Know

[edit]

Hello, Stephencdickson. Lady Glenorchy's Church, an article you either created or to which you significantly contributed, has been nominated to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page as part of Did you knowDYK comment symbol. You can see the hook and the discussion here. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. EnterpriseyBot (talk!) 12:01, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited William Hamilton (university principal), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Airdrie.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Thomas Taylor (moderator) for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thomas Taylor (moderator) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Taylor (moderator) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

➤ Tajwar – thesupermaN!【Click to Discuss】 18:19, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As a Moderator is the leader of the entire church you seem to misunderstand the importance of this position! --Stephencdickson (talk) 18:35, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited William Taylor (Scottish minister), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paisley.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mapping moderators

[edit]

I don't know if this is of interest, but after looking at the ongoing AfD, I thought that the Moderators of the General Assembly might be something to visualise (as I have been attempting for 19th century Scottish railways and football clubs in recent weeks). Perhaps, I thought, something of the changing centres of culture in the country could become evident? So I tried this mapping this morning. Ideally, to be useful such a query could locate each Moderator by their year and by their then-location but, sadly, the information captured in Wikidata seems rather deficient at present. However, map visualisations can sometimes be helpful: previously it has shown wildly-wrong data such as a New Zealand railway station linked to Scotland, and the present map did identify one Moderator whose death location had been mis-allocated from Helensburgh to San Diego. AllyD (talk) 09:16, 29 September 2021 (UTC) Hi, curious to know who got relocated to San Diego hhh...sometimes logic goes out of the window. As you will see I have been doing many articles on moderators, ironicallty not due to any special interest, but I have a lot of spare time and this ultra boring research keeps my head busy, and is unlikely to be targetted by others... that said I am having some trouble with other editors who seem not to understand the Scottish system.. or the status which Moderrator actually holds. I think the problem is that it does not now mean what it used to mean. In terms of mapping I am uncertain it serves any great function... Edinburgh and Glasgow have a very high proportion. When it comes to small parishes my observation would be that some truly tiny parishes can produce 3 or 4 Moderators... a perfect example being Urray which is truly tiny and produced one Moderator of C of S and three Free Church Moderators. I would like to do more Free Church Moderators but their "modesty" makes the topic really hard and most I have found have been through the inscriptions on their gravestones (which is my main focus of research. Only from that point can I start filling in the blanks... The AfD discussion is to my mind highly disrespectful of the Scottish system and I am sure no other secular or religious leader of a whole country would ever be discussed for deletion!--Stephencdickson (talk) 18:28, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited James Oswald (moderator), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Methven.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Banchory Ternan East Church, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Hutchison.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mirrors, again

[edit]

Stephen - as per our previous conversation which was prompted by your addition of a very clearly identified copy of a wikipedia article here, here, here, and here it seems we need to revisit the problem. You have begun adding the same mirror here and here. I'm not sure how to be more clear: stop adding sources that you are aware are fake. Thanks. Kuru (talk) 11:57, 18 October 2021 (UTC) A bit rude... and not quite sure what you mean by "fake"... all my articles and editing is done in good faith. I was not aware that every site with "wiki" in the title was banned and I do not always scrutinise the web addresses. Some of my usual sources disappeared so I was left with a dilemma and used the best source I could find but did not think they were under the Wikipedia umbrella. Often the problem (ironically) is that is is hard to see where some Wikipedia articles (especially lists) were sourced. I will try to avoid anything that looks derivative--Stephencdickson (talk) 11:01, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited James Farquharson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Croy.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draft: David Leitch (minister)

[edit]

You will see that I moved this article to draft space because when I came across it, the content did not match the title and it had no WP:RS. I see now that you were apparently working on a new article and seem to have made a mistake in doing so on this article rather than in your sandbox, so I trust that can be sorted out. I appreciate your usual practice of waiting until an article is more "ready to go" before moving it to main space and thus am sure this was inadvertent - as was my not realising that was what had happened until after I had moved it to draft. Thanks Melcous (talk) 21:16, 26 October 2021 (UTC) You are a bit quick off the mark to the extent that I presume you are monitoring me!... I accidentally deleted a big section and have redone it... on you part "more haste less speed"--Stephencdickson (talk) 21:20, 26 October 2021 (UTC) Check history before you make a sudden change[reply]

I'm not "monitoring you", but I do have my preferences set up to check new biographies in certain areas of interest, in one of which you create a very large proportion! I saw the history, but yes, missed that the most recent editing was at almost the same time as I was reading it, and misunderstood the error that had occurred. Melcous (talk) 21:27, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have got a few people monitoring your edits which I still conclude are highly bigotted and have no understanding whatsoever of the Scottish system or as to who is normally known as Very Rev and who is not. You seem to have sabotaged nearly every entry relating to Scottish clergy and whilst some can be bracketed as legitimate the bulk is not legitimate editing.--Stephencdickson (talk) 21:35, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wow. I was trying to be polite and believe I have always assumed good faith regarding your editing, even though I have disagreed with it. You have yet again made personal attacks against me as an editor, which is not acceptable practice here. My edits are abiding by the Manual of Style. You are free to argue that those guidelines should be changed, but unless they are, then those kinds of edits will continue to be made and I would ask you again to stop using language like "bigoted" and "sabotage" when you have been repeatedly advised (by others as well as me) that that is what the MOS says. Melcous (talk) 23:19, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Gavin Gibb
added a link pointing to Irvine
Kemnay
added a link pointing to Kinkell

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Holyrood Park, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Meadowbank.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled

[edit]

I'm concerned that you put this into mainspace. There are way too many things wrong with this bio for it to be justifiable that you are WP:Autopatrolled. This is a courtesy notice that I shall remove that flag. That will have no bearing on your ability to edit etc; it just means that your articles will go through the usual patrol process. Schwede66 21:39, 21 February 2022 (UTC) Could you be more specific what the problem is..? I do up to three articles per day... this one is short by I see no reason for it to be problematic and was created in good faith--Stephencdickson (talk) 22:10, 21 February 2022 (UTC) PS I certainly knew the name before I wrote the article so I saw it as a gap to be filled... my normal approach--Stephencdickson (talk) 11:51, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, The French Connection (film), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 02:47, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is simply from the film itself. I think a film is an acceptable reference --Stephencdickson (talk) 10:57, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
BTW there were errors in the plot summary as if someone had written without watching the film i.e. the drug car is not replaced by a lookalike... this makes no sense... a lookalike adapted to also have the drugs put back in... if you are happy with all the pre-existing errors fine, so be it--Stephencdickson (talk) 11:00, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The information you added about the cars at best seemed to be trivia (how is it relevant to understanding the film?). Sources would be useful to demonstrate that they're considered significant as well as verifying the information. I haven't seen the film, so I can't speak to any errors in the plot summary itself. As far as I'm concerned you're welcome to edit that, bearing WP:FILMPLOT in mind. Cheers. DonIago (talk) 14:19, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Crawford's Biscuits

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Crawford's Biscuits, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CUPIDICAE💕 13:06, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hello, Stephencdickson

Thank you for creating Crawford's Biscuits.

User:TheLongTone, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

mmm, garibaldis

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|TheLongTone}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

TheLongTone (talk) 14:47, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"John Ure (Lord Provost))" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect John Ure (Lord Provost)) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 2#John Ure (Lord Provost)) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 192.76.8.78 (talk) 16:02, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"David Meredith (Smithton-Culloden))" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect David Meredith (Smithton-Culloden)) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 2#David Meredith (Smithton-Culloden)) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 192.76.8.78 (talk) 16:59, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Crawford's Biscuits for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Crawford's Biscuits is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crawford's Biscuits until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

valereee (talk) 15:32, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alexander Forbes (bishop of Aberdeen), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Warburton.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Riviere

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for creating Daniel Riviere. Please consider returning to the article and addressing the tagged issue(s) Also the body comprises mainly short, single sentence paragraphs beginning with 'He'. Please consider rewriting these into flowing prose. These are issues that the Wikipedia community might not necessarily address for you, or it may take a longtime (years). Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:31, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Edward Pierce (sculptor)

[edit]

Hello, Stephencdickson,

Thank you for creating Edward Pierce (sculptor).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Nice article! Needs page numbers in Dictionary of British Sculptors; fill in bare URL references, consolidate duplicate refs using ref-names.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Netherzone}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Netherzone (talk) 15:02, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Edward Davis (sculptor)

[edit]

Hello, Stephencdickson,

Thank you for creating Edward Davis (sculptor).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thanks for the new article! Please consider filling in bare-URL references, as they are prone to link rot. The re:FILL tool can help with this, more information here: WP:REFILL.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Netherzone}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Netherzone (talk) 17:51, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited William Theed the elder, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Prodigal Son.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hello, Stephencdickson

Thank you for creating Charles Raymond Smith.

User:Netherzone, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for creating this article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Netherzone}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Netherzone (talk) 01:43, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please archive your talk page

[edit]

Hello! I just wanted to request that you archive your user talk page. While it may not be bothersome to you, many editors have slow connections, and having a very large talk page can hamper communication. If you need help, just check out the guide over at Help:Archiving a talk page. Thanks! HouseBlastertalk 19:26, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of William Palmer (sculptor) for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article William Palmer (sculptor) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Palmer (sculptor) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

HouseBlastertalk 20:37, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Artus Quellinus III
added a link pointing to John Cutler
William Stanton (mason)
added a link pointing to Hythe

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lancelot Skynner

[edit]

Hi, thanks for creating Lancelot Skynner. If I might make a couple of points, however; threedecks.org is a vaguely useful starting point for research, but it takes all its information from other sources, is run by amateurs, and is more than occasionally incorrect or incomplete in its information. Morethannelson, on the other hand, is usually reliable in what it says, but is almost entirely unsourced (having spoken to the creator, a lot of it is old work that he never recorded the sources of). If you want to produce work a little more accurately I suggest taking a look at sources such as:

  • Winfield, Rif (2007). British Warships in the Age of Sail 1714–1792: Design, Construction, Careers and Fates. London: Pen & Sword. ISBN 978-1-84415-700-6.
  • Winfield, Rif (2008). British Warships in the Age of Sail 1793–1817: Design, Construction, Careers and Fates. Barnsley, South Yorkshire: Seaforth. ISBN 978-1-78346-926-0.
  • Marshall, John. "Royal Naval Biography".
  • O'Byrne, William Richard. "A Naval Biographical Dictionary".

Thanks, Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 21:01, 11 July 2022 (UTC) ... well ... all the info seems to tally... personally I find most of the RN research reliable--Stephencdickson (talk) 22:50, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Charles Pinckney (governor)
added a link pointing to Charleston
John Hickey (sculptor)
added a link pointing to David La Touche

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve John Toup Nicolas

[edit]

Hello, Stephencdickson,

Thank you for creating John Toup Nicolas.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Threedecks is a UGC forum which means it can’t be used as a reliable source.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mccapra}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Mccapra (talk) 05:56, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Charles Pinckney (governor), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charleston.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited HMS Namur (1697), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thomas Whitney.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia mirrors and user generated sources

[edit]

Hi Stephen, I noticed you used a couple of unreliable sources when creating the article about Robert Barron (minister). The Patrick's People source clearly cites Wikipedia itself, so it would not be reliable for sourcing on Wikipedia (WP:CIRCULAR). I see others have already left you messages about using Wikipedia mirrors over the last few years, so please take care to avoid using them.

Prabook is also an unreliable source, for a few reasons. Much of the content is scraped from other who's who sites, like Marquis, which are considered at WP:RSP to be unreliable. Prabook is also an openly editable wiki with no editorial oversight, so much of its content is unreliable under WP:USERGENERATED.

Please let me know if you have any questions about reliable sourcing. Best, Politanvm talk 21:12, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I see looking through other articles that use Patrick's People as a source, they they do not always cite Wikipedia, however, many of them cite Hew Scott and Family Search. Family Search is also unreliable because it's largely user generated (see WP:RSP). And rather than citing Patrick's People, any information sourced from Scott could just be cited to him. Patrick's People seems like a helpful way to find sources, but it doesn't appear to be a reliable source itself. Best, Politanvm talk 21:23, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited HMS Mordaunt, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Tyrrell.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:32, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve John Stirling (principal)

[edit]

Hello, Stephencdickson,

Thank you for creating John Stirling (principal).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

The two Geni citations should be replaced with reliable sources. Geni is considered low-quality and unreliable because it is user-submitted content.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Netherzone}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Netherzone (talk) 04:45, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hello, Stephencdickson

Thank you for creating John Toup Nicolas.

User:Scope creep, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good article but all seems to be based on one dictionary plus three decks is not the best. Could do with an image, if a portrait is available.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Scope creep}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.) 

scope_creepTalk 17:42, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Bank Holiday (film), disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Riverbend21 (talk) 12:24, 4 September 2022 (UTC) I am puzzled by your reversion as my edit was concerning inaccurate content and is not related to style.-- (talk) 12:27, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Matthew Charteris, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Comrie.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited James Cooper (minister), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Upsala.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hello, Stephencdickson. Thank you for creating Thomas Grundy (sculptor). User:Netherzone, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for creating this article.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Netherzone}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Netherzone (talk) 18:43, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of George Smith (surgeon)

[edit]
Notice

The article George Smith (surgeon) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of significance. No value as an encyclopaedic article. Can't find any sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Raydann (talk) 10:30, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hello, Stephencdickson. Thank you for creating Henry Bazely. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:33, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A brownie for you!

[edit]
Thanks for your article on James Jopp. Next time, can you please ensure you add a full reference rather than a bare link? Just paste the link into "find automatically" in the reference. Looks much cleaner and means if the link changes, we can look up the other details and save the link. Cheers MaxnaCarta (talk) 23:26, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hello, Stephencdickson. Thank you for creating Nellfield Cemetery. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 18:36, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mirrors, third conversation

[edit]

Stephen, please stop using 'liquisearch'. This is, again, a very clearly identified copy of our articles. If you've evaluated a reference and it notes "Source: Wikipedia", that should probably conclude your evaluation. Additionally, if you see me constantly removing the same source from your articles with the edit summary "rmv reference to clearly identified wikipedia mirror per WP:CIRCULAR", we can probably avoid this discussion. Thanks. Sam Kuru (talk) 12:04, 8 October 2022 (UTC) I do a lot of articles and never revisit to see who has removed what so a statement that "I see you constantly removing" is incorrect, and presumptious. Keep it polite. I will refrain from using this source, but please do not presume that everyone monitors your edits--Stephencdickson (talk) 14:13, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sir Alexander Lyon moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Sir Alexander Lyon, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creepTalk 23:38, 15 October 2022 (UTC) I think anyone would say that all Lord Provosts (the Scottish equivalent of Lord Mayor) are clearly notable, and most were also Deputy Lieutenants. It is an elected role with more power than an MP, and most MPs would be credited as notable. I am working my way through the Lord Provosts but a lot of the primary sources are a bit circular... However, I do not see the problem with citing newspapers as the source. Are you saying newspapers and public records are not recognised by wiki? --Stephencdickson (talk) 23:50, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hello, Stephencdickson. Thank you for your work on Edward Hunt (Surveyor of the Navy). User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 21:14, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

{{Re|SunDawn}} Thank you SunDawn... However my apparent arch nemisis Melcous has moved the article to Speedy Delete, which seems a bit crazy. Melcous hounds me continuously (and others) with somewhat malicious editing and deletes... do you know how to address this. She also seems highly bigoted in relation to several topics, and particularly makes inaccurate edits on articles on the Scottish church and politics--Stephencdickson (talk) 11:32, 23 October 2022 (UTC) This has been tweaked but I do not understand... Edward Hunt (Surveyor of the Navy) jumps to Speedy Delete BUT the article itself seems to have jumped to Edward Hunt (shipbuilder)--Stephencdickson (talk) 12:38, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hello, Stephencdickson. Thank you for your work on Glendevon Castle. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 04:51, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

James Sligo Jameson moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, James Sligo Jameson, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Tagged for weeks without improvement. In addition, there is not enough information in the sources to satisfy WP:VERIFY. Please look at WP:CIT on how to format citations, and what to include. 

Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 13:38, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have no particular connection to Jameson but stumbled upon his name doing other research. I thought I had adequately referenced everything... he appears to have created a scandal in his age, but even without that, his contribution to the Natural History Museum on its own appears encyclopedia material even without the rest. There is a wealth of info about him out there if you care to check--Stephencdickson (talk) 17:58, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Geoffrey Denton (actor) moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Geoffrey Denton (actor), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Reading Beans (talk) 02:31, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Archibald Stobo moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Archibald Stobo, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) In addition, more information is needed in the references so as to be able to pass WP:VERIFY. Please see WP:CIT on how to format, and what needs to be included in footnotes. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 12:39, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Three Live Wires moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Three Live Wires, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 11:05, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year, Stephencdickson!

[edit]
Happy New Year!

Stephencdickson,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
— Moops ⋠T⋡ 05:12, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

thank you... to you a good year also Stephencdickson (talk) 11:28, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

— Moops ⋠T⋡ 05:12, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hello, Stephencdickson. Thank you for your work on Arthur Francis Stoddard. User:Girth Summit, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Interesting read. I'd suggest trying to find alternative sources to findagrave and ancestors.familysearch - they're both listed as generally unreliable. Cheers

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Girth Summit}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Girth Summit (blether) 18:26, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The findagrave article provides a photo which is clearly the right person and right place and it accords with his residence... I agree findagrave is not always reliable but this one looks correct--Stephencdickson (talk) 19:32, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not saying that it's wrong, or even that it needs to be removed - it's more a general note, that I would always pass on to authors who are using unreliable sources. It's a matter of sourcing philosophy, I suppose: as encyclopedia editors, we should not be engaging in the process of evaluating primary sources (in other words, checking to see whether the photographs look legit), we should restrict ourselves to what we can say authoratitively, based on reliable published sources. Your content is almost certainly accurate; on the other hand, I have seen cases where intentionally fabricated images have been uploaded to third party websites specifically to introduce falsehoods into Wikipedia articles. Our sourcing guidelines can be a pain in the proverbial for good-faith contributors like yourself, but they exist for a reason. Girth Summit (blether) 00:35, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As a grave enthusiast I try to personally visit graves to verify, but this is not always easy--Stephencdickson (talk) 21:38, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

James Mackcoull moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, James Mackcoull, is not suitable as written to remain published. The current citations do not contain enough information in sources to pass WP:VERIFY. Please see WP:CIT to see what should be included. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 14:53, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Kincaid Mackenzie

[edit]

Hi. I see that you started the article for Charles Kincaid Mackenzie. He wrote for the DNB 3rd supplement and we recently created an author page for him at English Wikisource, s:Author:Charles Kincaid MackenzieS. I transcribed his obituary from the The Scotsman if you are interested in incorporating that information into the article. "Former Judge, Death of Lord Mackenzie, 17 years on bench". The Scotsman: 10. 4 April 1938. ISSN 0307-5850. Wikidata Q117037545. Thanks if you can. — billinghurst sDrewth 19:38, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I will try to take a look--Stephencdickson (talk) 23:01, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Original Barnstar
Hew Dalrymple, Lord Drummore is a very good article. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 03:43, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Sir Alexander Lyon

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Stephencdickson. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sir Alexander Lyon, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:02, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Cheere, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hanover Square.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited W. J. Coffee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Sealy.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Kay (architect) moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Robert Kay (architect), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 12:06, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Archibald Stobo

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Stephencdickson. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Archibald Stobo, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:22, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Geoffrey Denton (actor)

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Stephencdickson. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Geoffrey Denton (actor), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:26, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Three Live Wires

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Stephencdickson. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Three Live Wires, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Geoffrey Denton (actor)

[edit]

Hello, Stephencdickson. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Geoffrey Denton".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 16:46, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for adding the picture of the grave of the Sri Lankan Medical Corps' private grave in Edinburgh

[edit]

As someone of Sri Lankan descent and who had family serve in the Armed Forces during the British era, I am always happy to see more imagery relating to that history which in my experience has been hard to come by.

Best regards and happy history hunting Yohan Anthony Sunanda (talk) 02:26, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:James Mackcoull

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Stephencdickson. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:James Mackcoull, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:03, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers!

[edit]
A beer on me!
For creating the articles Henry Peake and John Williams (on my to do list for some time). Grog or a tot of rum would have been more appropriate but unavailable, sorry. Ykraps (talk) 07:40, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:James Mackcoull

[edit]

Hello, Stephencdickson. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "James Mackcoull".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 16:40, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Alexander James Russell

[edit]
Notice

The article Alexander James Russell has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable individual.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GraziePrego (talk) 02:51, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Her Painted Hero for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Her Painted Hero is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Her Painted Hero until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JMWt (talk) 07:50, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:James Sligo Jameson

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Stephencdickson. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:James Sligo Jameson, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:06, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Robert Kay (architect)

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Stephencdickson. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Robert Kay (architect), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:05, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Robert Kay (architect)

[edit]

Hello, Stephencdickson. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Robert Kay".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 07:17, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kirk of St Nicholas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Colin Campbell.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:47, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


St Anthony's church, St Anthony in Roseland (memorials)

[edit]

ArtUK says this monument is by Richard Westmacott (the elder), whereas you have it for Humphrey Hopper. I've sorted it out, there are two monuments, I've posted the correct one onto both articles, with images. Hopper's name is signed at the bottom of one's plinth as a confirmation. Broichmore (talk) 14:12, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Thomas Niven for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thomas Niven is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Niven until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Clarityfiend (talk) 11:36, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Strange nomination... the head of the church representing the whole country... suggestion that this is not worthy suggests an ani-Scottish bias.--Stephencdickson (talk) 09:34, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Stephencdickson&oldid=1248404600"