Jump to content

User talk:PeterR2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:PeterR)

Welcome!

[edit]
Hi, PeterR2, Welcome to Wikipedia!


You can help improve the articles listed below! This list updates frequently, so check back here for more tasks to try. (See Wikipedia:Maintenance or the Task Center for further information.)

Help counter systemic bias by creating new articles on important women.

Help improve popular pages, especially those of low quality.


I hope you like this place--I sure do--and want to stay. If you need help on how to title new articles check out Wikipedia:Naming conventions, and for help on formatting the pages visit the manual of style. If you need help look at Wikipedia:Help and The FAQ , plus if you can't find your answer there, check The Village pump (for Wikipedia related questions) or The Reference Desk (for general questions)! There's still more help at the Tutorial and Policy Library. Plus, don't forget to visit the Community Portal. And if you have any more questions after that, feel free to post them on My User talk Page.

Additional Tips:

Here's some extra tips to help you get around in the 'pedia!

  • If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in assigning those to your username.
  • If you want to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.
  • You can sign your name using three tildes, like &#126&#126~. If you use four, you can add a datestamp too.
  • You may want to add yourself to the New User Log
  • If you ever think a page or image should be deleted, please list it at the votes for deletion page. There is also a votes for undeletion page if you want to retrieve something that you think should not have been deleted.

Matani2005 18:56, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)

School stubs and Edu Stubs

[edit]

Hi! On my talk page you wrote: How do people distinguish between a school stub and an edu stub?

  • Being fairly new to Wikipedia, that's not something that I've ever tried to do. Many of the stub categories have some overlap, so I just put articles into the most specific category that fits. At Wikipedia:Stub_categories it says that Edu-stub is for universities and School-stub is for schools. Being English my interpretation is to reserve School-stub for high schools. I realise that many people use the term school to refer to universities too, so in this case School-stub would fit OK but Edu-stub is more specific. JeremyA 16:17, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Willison

[edit]

Hello! With regard to this article, first, the 'delete' tag needs to go at the top of the article, so that it can be seen immediately, not at the bottom. Secondly, it didn't need deleting, but turning into a redirect to John Willison. Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 21:23, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)

The best place to start is Wikipedia:Guide to layout — it gives you most of the main stuff. to be honest, that would be a more useful link in the 'wikify' template than what's there now. Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 21:31, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)

User language templates

[edit]

Hi, Peter! I saw your name from the John Willison article. Looking at your user page, you said you speak Dutch as a second language. You might be interested in the Wikipedia:Babel project. --Ricky81682 (talk) 06:09, May 11, 2005 (UTC)

Chapel

[edit]

Thanks for the note. Yeah, it seems that the whole thing revolved around how "nonconformist" was understood differently — due to the Catholic overtone, I was't sure if it was used disparagingly or not. Thanks for the clarification. Maybe the best thing to do would be to revert back to the original sentence you wrote, but with either a different word or some sort of brief explanatory phrase for those unfamiliar with English ecclesiastical relationships. By the way, I enjoy the work you've written in the article, particularly the history of the word's origin. Deadsalmon 23:35, 3 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I think the sentence I mentioned was about all I did write in the article.--PeterR 07:36, 5 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The Clapham Sect

[edit]

I don't know of Daniel Wilson being a member of the Clapham sect, although it is not beyond the bounds of possibility, looking at his biography. He certainly may have known Beilby Porteus, Bishop of London - who took an active interest in the establishment of the Anglican Church in the colonies (in fact, this was part of his charge), which may have included an interest in India. I will look into this further - I am writing a paper on Bishop Porteus' Life and Times, and have access to much material - and am in touch with others who have written on him.

Bruce, aka Agendum | Talk 23:39, 18 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

William_Wilberforce certainly had some involvement in the foundation of the church in India, and possibly the creation of the Diocese of Calcutta (see the article), but I am looking into the possibility of Wilson also having been involved, and have referred the original question to a researcher who may know more.
Bruce, aka Agendum | Talk 23:35, 21 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I've had a response to my enquiry about Daniel Wilson and the Clapham Sect. I enclose the salient points from the response of my correspondent:
Re Bishop Wilson. Bishop Wilson was one of the Evangelical Chaplains who was sent to India with the support of the Claphamites. All of the early Anglican chaplains were evangelicals. Professor Walls has always argued that we need a work on the influence of Charles Simeon on both the Evangelicals in England and the Evangelicals on the mission field. The only work that gives some clues to this is the book by Michael Hennell, whose main work is 'John Venn and the Clapham Sect'.
Walls thinks that this work is one of the most influential works to be written on the modern missionary movement, evangelicals within the Church of England and the use by evangelicals of ministerial societies... Hennell also wrote 'Sons of the Prophets' (it covers some of the second generation evangelicals) and Walls is of the view that this goes some way to providing an insight into Simeon's influence...
Stephen Neill, in his 'History of Christian Missions' has only a single line to say on the work of the early evangelical chaplains and I know that he has been criticised for this. He was working on a revision of his work when he died and so I have no idea whether he expanded on the work that they did.
So it fair to say that Wilson was an evangelical, that he enjoyed the support of the Clapham Sect but that he was not a member of the Clapham Sect. It would also be fair to say that Simeon was the backbone of his support team.
I hope this helps. Bruce, aka Agendum | Talk 22:44, 18 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Category:British churches

[edit]

Hi, redirects do not work on categories. Yes it will redirect the page, but it will not redirect the article, and they will be mis-categorized. This category was renamed per WP:CFD in this discussion. Please use the new category. Thank you. ∞Who?¿? 05:50, 5 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

re. Whitefield's Tabernacle, Kingswood

[edit]

Hi, I'm afraid I don't have any photos, and I'm currently in London. The only real reason I edited this article was that I came across Category:Grade I listed buildings and User:Rbrwr/Grade I listed buildings in Bristol, and decided to categorise any in Rbrwr's list that weren't already in the cat. (Wiki + boredom leads to strange things :-) ) -- AJR | Talk 22:29, 26 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]


Freie Presbyterianische Kirche Schottlands

[edit]

Thanks a lot for the hints on the German article about the FPCS, Peter. I will work on correcting the article.

Best wishes, Parka Lewis 21:18, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Amy Catherine Walton

[edit]

Hi, just a note to say sorry for the Americanisation edit. My mistake. --Muchness 06:02, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Bristol Community Church

[edit]

Generally speaking, you can remove any non-deletion tag from an article, as long as you make a good-faith effort to fix the problem the tag addressed, which you have certainly done here, so I have nothing to say but nice work! Articles need to cite sources, even if it's just a webpage, to have credibility. Personally I just added it to the Kingswood, South Gloucestershire page because A) I felt it was relevent and B) The article was an orphan, meaning that no pages linked to it. The more relavent pages that link to an article, the better an article can be, in my opinion. --W.marsh 16:49, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Free Presbyterian Church

[edit]

But it is a dab page. And the format you've reverted to makes it much harder for anyone to figure out which page they're actually looking for. For the articles that already have been written, the information on that page is redudant. For those that haven't been written yet, perhaps that information should simply be used to start the articles so it can be removed from the dab page immediately. The page is clearly a dab, with or without the tag you've removed. I do not reformat as a bureaucratic exercise, but to make the encyclopedia easier to use for the reader. Tedernst | talk 22:36, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

KJV c/right

[edit]

Thanks for your comments. As for your questions:

Commonwealth: My source at Cambridge told me the Letters Patent does not have any effect in the Commonwealth.

NI: My source also told the Letters Patent are written for the world as it existed in 1611, so (Northern) Ireland isn't included.

Thanks again. - Thanks, Hoshie | North Carolina flag 19:28, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Marylp00.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. BRossow 18:12, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Talmud question

[edit]

Please see this link: The Talmud Does Not Permit Sex With A Three Year Old. Jayjg (talk) 07:22, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Translation

[edit]

Thanks for translating an article listed at Wikipedia:German-English translation requests. This is just a little reminder to remove the translation from the list when you've done it and add it to the "completed translations" list at the bottom of the page - thanks! Saint|swithin 07:02, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Asahel Nettleton

[edit]

Peter, how'd you feel about writing a new page about Asahel Nettleton? See Talk:Second Great Awakening#Asahel Nettleton. DFH 19:39, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Huntington

[edit]

As your suggestion, it was an overlooked copy from another page's template that I had found. I have made the correct modifications so that Frank Griswold did not consecrate him and that he is not the first bishop of Atlanta.

Thanks for finding the error. Cheers. CJJDay 21:05, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

'Rabbi' Duncan

[edit]

Peter, I just added John Duncan (theologian) to the disambiguation page for John Duncan. Feel free to start a new page about him. DFH 16:05, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And feel free to add to it now. StAnselm (talk) 07:52, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

John Ball

[edit]

Peter, I just added an item under Covenant_Theology#References. DFH 15:28, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Someone has already removed your reference to John Ball in the section Covenant_Theology#History of Covenant Theology. DFH 15:35, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bas Jan Ader's Parents

[edit]

I'm pretty certain he was, as you say, the son of Rev Bastiaan Jan Ader. What I know of Bas Jan Ader the artist is that his father was a clergyman, and that he was from Nieuw-Beerta. If you take those words for facts, i guess that would make it pretty conclusive.

Greetings from Winschoten.

Anglican Saints

[edit]

Peter, I am no expert on Anglican Saints. Many have been added to various calendars, official and unofficial, of various churches of the Anglican Communion. As I understand it, two were declared to be saints and martyrs by the synod of Westminster. They were King Charles and King Louis of France. I appreciate the point that the latter was not even an Anglican, but such was the reaction to the French Revolution. Regards ClemMcGann 22:47, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Colin Tilsley

[edit]

Please see User_talk:Atilsley#Colin_Tilsley. --Flex (talk|contribs) 14:14, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Tuff and Tufa

[edit]

I've replied inline on my talk page. --Kbh3rdtalk 23:21, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Whitefield's Tabernacle, Kingswood

[edit]

Peter, I saw your request on Whitefield's Tabernacle, Kingswood & will be driving near there between appts this afternoon. I will try to get some snaps & add them to the article this evening. Is there anything in particular you are interested in? There is a 2001 pic on Images of England entry for this site— Rod talk 10:55, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ignore the comment about the photo on the Images of England site - that appears to be the RUC church not Whitefields Tabernacle. I have some pics in my camera & when I get to my home machine will upload them — Rod talk 14:54, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It' not easy to get access but I've now added some pics to the article.— Rod talk 18:33, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mistaken vandalism id

[edit]

Sorry about mistakingly marking your edit of Christian Conferences as vandalism. I have reverted my edit and removed my comment. Mikieminnow 21:58, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

LOL thanks - my blood had already started to boil and I was writing a message for your talk page. All is forgiven. Are you using a bot or what? --PeterR 22:00, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I am using vandalproof and not only did I revert too quickly, I hit the wrong rollback button. I apologize again. Mikieminnow 22:17, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Maurice Wood

[edit]

Thanks for spotting the typo. Springnuts 11:57, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re : London Taxis

[edit]

I never expected that editors tried to identify the model of the taxi...Oh well! =P - Best regards, Mailer Diablo 16:42, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Bible Presbyterian Church do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Flex (talk/contribs) 23:43, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please see User_talk:Flex#Deleted_Link_2. --Flex (talk/contribs) 17:54, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image permission problem with Image:Marylp00.jpg

[edit]
Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Marylp00.jpg, which you've sourced to http://www.geocities.com/churchcrawler/bristol/marylept.htm. I noticed that that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the image's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:27, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dispute - James Carlile .... ummm

[edit]

Hi, thanks for your note. I think you may have diificulty with your dispute insomuch as I just looked at the sources and wrote what I thought was there. I have no private agenda so if I have made a mistake then please correct it, thats how it improves I hope. You appear to have a church related background - my interest was only intrigued by him appearing in a painting of a conference that I wanted to know more about. I believe the DNB has an article which should help. Cheers. I will look foreward to the improvements, best wishes.

ps "How do people distinguish between a school stub and an edu stub?" I'm on the schools project .... a school article about a school is a school article. Nearly everything else is education. School projectr is very active, education less so (personal opinions only). A school needs a school template ... it doesnt really need an education one too. Victuallers (talk) 15:30, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of David McIntyre

[edit]

The article David McIntyre has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article is about a preacher and principle who does not meet notability requirements per WP:AUTHOR or WP:TEACHER.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dolovis (talk) 05:29, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Strict Baptist churches, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Grace Baptist. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, PeterR2. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, PeterR2. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, PeterR2. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:20, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Shredded Wheat?

[edit]

Hi PeterR2, I'm currently working on a draft for the old Shredded Wheat factory in Welwyn Garden City. I noticed this edit of yours way back in 2007 and was wondering if you had access to the 1994 Butterfield source? If you do, would you be able to contact me by email? If not, apologies for bothering you. Thanks, Pahunkat (talk) 17:35, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am completely mystified as to what may have prompted me to make an edit to the article on Shredded Wheat in 2007. I can only think that this may have been during the period that I was studying an Open University course entitled "Cities and Technology", and that somehow this was brought to my attention during the course. It is also conceivable that, at the time, Industrial Archaeology Review was available to me online as an OU student. PeterR2 (talk) 22:50, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No worries, I wouldn't be able to remember stuff from that long ago either. Just wanted to check because otherwise it's behind a ridiculous paywall (£40 for 24h access!), fortunately I have access to something Butterfield wrote later on. Thanks for the quick response, and happy editing :) Pahunkat (talk) 23:59, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:PeterR2&oldid=1224705466"