Jump to content

User talk:Ruhrfisch/Archive 34

Page contents not supported in other languages.
This user has administrator privileges on the English Wikipedia.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Peer reviews with no or minimal feedback
If your review is not in the list of unanswered reviews, you can add it.

Welcome to my talk page. Please leave me a message below and I will generally reply on your talk page. Although my email address is enabled, it is not an address I check often (so I may be slow in replying to email and very much prefer to have conversations here). Please also note that while I am glad to do a peer review on just about any article, it will often take me a few days, and I do not usually have the time to do copyedits (sorry). If you want me to review an article, please open a peer review on it. Thanks for stopping by and happy editing! Ruhrfisch ><>°° 02:58, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

List of covered bridges on the National Register of Historic Places in Pennsylvania

I finally got around to splitting this off from List of bridges on the National Register of Historic Places in Pennsylvania. I still have some checking to do: There are 201 covered bridges and 191 other bridges and tunnels, but only 390 total in the original file. (I suspect my counting skills are to blame). Any help as far as a quick look at the format or text would be appreciated. BTW, when the leaves turn, I'm going to take a trip to Columbia County - lots of covered bridges there.

All the best.

Smallbones (talk) 21:10, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

Princess and the Frog peer review

Just wanted to say thanks for the review! Your input was helpful and I'll get to implementing your suggestions shortly--GroovySandwich 04:10, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

Film

I need a copyedit on Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides for the GA nomination, can you give me some help? (also, I'd also be welcome to input on this PR) Thanks. igordebraga ≠ 17:14, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

No problem. Let's just hope my GA review doesn't take too long (or ends up failing). And both me and the guy who started the PR will thank for your help! igordebraga ≠ 04:21, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

Beatrix Potter

Just wondering whether you have the page watched. A lot of activity & rewriting with minimal sourcing; I'm not sure what to do about it. Maybe let this one go? Dunno. Truthkeeper88 (talk) 21:25, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

WP:FOUR for Ganoga Lake

Four Award
Congratulations! You have been awarded the Four Award for your work from beginning to end on Ganoga Lake. TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 22:45, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 22:45, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

X Township, Y County, Pennsylvania

Could you way in on the discussion at Horton Township, Elk County, Pennsylvania? I could go either way, but I know that the decision was made several years ago to add the county name to the township articles in Pennsylvania? I am alerting you because you were involved in the moves when we did them and I am not sure that you are watching Horton Township. Gerry D (talk) 01:41, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

WP:FOUR for Forksville Covered Bridge

Four Award
Congratulations! You have been awarded the Four Award for your work from beginning to end on Forksville Covered Bridge. TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 23:31, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 23:31, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

We still have to sort through Category:Possible Wikipedia four award articles. Let me know if you see any others.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 12:30, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
We don't just go by the nominator anymore. We now go by who made the editorial contributions at each stage.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 17:09, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
I will do Clemuel Ricketts Mansion in my next batch.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 17:10, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

Messiah

Thanks for your praise of a wonderful work, Hallelujah, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:01, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

WP:FOUR for Clemuel Ricketts Mansion

Four Award
Congratulations! You have been awarded the Four Award for your work from beginning to end on Clemuel Ricketts Mansion. TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 06:01, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 06:01, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

Beatrix Potter

Hi Ruhrfisch,

I saw your {{refimprove}} template at Beatrix Potter.

I don't see anything challenged there and there doesn't seem to be anything there likely to be challenged. The broad details of Beatrix Potter's life are of course very well known. I suppose some of the minutiae of her scientific work might be challeneged. The aticle is very well sourced of course.

Can you put on its talk page please a summary of your concerns. That would be helpful. Thank you. 81.178.38.169 (talk) 22:50, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

I propose to add some citations from Linda Lear (2007). It's difficult to understand exactly what is wanted. One would have hoped that an administrator who adds a template like this would be more forthcoming, especially when I see that the editor responsible for the expansion you originally messaged was encouraged to "ask" . Exactly what is challenged here or raising concerns?
You mentioned The Story of Miss Moppet as a model and I shall follow that; that is to say not citing literally every assertion, though as I say, lacking guidance, it's indeed hard to know what is wanted. Thank you. 81.178.38.169 (talk) 23:41, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
I am quite busy in real life and have not edited much in the past few days. I will add some comments on the Beatrix Potter talk page in the next day or so. Please be patient. Ruhrfisch ><>°° 00:52, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
Thanks, Ruhrfisch. Appreciated. No rush. Didn't mean to hassle. 81.178.38.169 (talk) 07:23, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

German consonants

I'm just starting on your comments at the Offenbach PR, but may I ski off-piste for a moment apropos of what you say about Jacob/Jakob. My own family has background in the Rhineland but there is some doubt whether great-grandpa was "Horbach" or "Horback". Do you suppose it might in fact be one and the same? (Sorry to digress so flagrantly). Now, back to your most welcome PR comments. Tim riley (talk) 14:19, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

Many thanks indeed for your helpful comments both on this small matter and on the Offenbach PR page. Tim riley (talk) 12:39, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

Jennifer Connelly

Many thanks for your comments on the Peer Review, I will notify you when the FAC is in progress.--GDuwenTell me! 21:51, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

The article is now a FAC, you can find the review here.--GDuwenTell me! 19:08, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

Yes, the article for Ivan Kral is all copy-pasted from what I can tell, from his own biography! {http://www.ivankral.net/bio.html]. I wish Admins. and editors in general would put less emphasis on creating articles as they do how the articles are created' and better yet, whether they finish the darned things. I tagged it and wrote a note on the talk page there. --Leahtwosaints (talk) 09:47, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Favor

I added John Day Fossil Beds National Monument to the PR list just now, and I'm planning to leave it there for quite a while. For various reasons, I probably will not take the article to FAC until mid- to late September. If you have a chance to review it while it's at PR, I'd very much appreciate it. Finetooth (talk) 17:54, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

Lighters (song)

Thank you for your comments. I will eventually get them addressed over time. I plan to use 4 Minutes (Madonna song) as a model and will also use Tony1's guides for copyediting. —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 21:12, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

Paul Kelly PR

I'm working my way through your comments at Paul Kelly's PR. I've a query about I would at least make redirects for the band names to the sections on them in this article. Do you mean article Redirects e.g. [[Paul Kelly and the Dots]] re-directs to [[Paul Kelly (musician)]] whereas do you suggest it re-directs to [[Paul Kelly (musician)#1974.E2.80.931984: Early career and with the Dots]] instead? Or do you mean that the Lead's second sentence should have such a link: e.g. "including [[Paul Kelly (musician)#1974.E2.80.931984: Early career and with the Dots|the Dots]],"?

I've had a go at expanding the captions on the sound samples and an image: is this the sort of thing you had in mind?

Once again, thank you for your advice.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 01:46, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the clarification (I've transcluded your reply to the PR page for continuity). I've Redirected the first two and placed an entry on the dab page. I will work on incorporating the newly added caption material into the adjacent text.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 04:35, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

Dr. No

Thanks very much for your input on Dr. No: I've undertaken most of the edits except two: one I am not sure about the source of information (er the bikinis) and the second (about the cast) I'll need to take a bit more time on to do it properly, but I will be working on it shortly. Thanks again for undertaking the review. - SchroCat (^ • @) 08:39, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

Hi there, I've now finished off the casting section so that the cast is much slimmed down and the narrative section is more complete, with Connery as a separate sub-section. The legacy section also has info about the bikini too. May thanks once again for looking over this - it's much apperciated. - SchroCat (^ • @) 13:33, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

Black Mo (mo pix)

I was just telling my wife that I hadn't taken any pictures in sometime. It looks like you've been having fun. My favorite of the new pics is the one of the boats at the boat rental. One of the mountain men looks more like Christ or a disciple. The kayaker one is lovely with the cloud reflections. I can really tell an improvement in your pics with the new camera. I need to get one someday. He survived the hurricane with no problems at all. Glad we missed the bad stuff. Gerry D (talk) 18:06, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

I changed a few, the school, dam, lily pads and stumps. Gerry D (talk) 18:13, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

DYK nominations reviews

Hi,

I see that your an active reviewer of DYKs, would you mind taking a look at the two below. It would be much appreciated, not to worry if you can't. Thank you.

Kind regards,

DYK nominations reviews

Hi,

I see that your an active reviewer of DYKs, would you mind taking a look at the two below. It would be much appreciated, not to worry if you can't. Thank you.

Kind regards, --Ratio:Scripta · [ Talk ] 20:22, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

Peer reviewing

A situation has arisen which means I shall have to take a short enforced wikibreak - I hope for not more than a couple of weeks. So after tomorrow (30th) I won't be able to do the PR housekeeping, or indeed to help with reviewing. I'm sorry to drop this on you when there's still a pretty big backlog (though I notice that the rate of input to the process has slowed down recently). I trust that I will be able to resume normal service in mid-September, and will keep my fingers crossed that the system doesn't get overloaded meantime. Brianboulton (talk) 23:11, 29 August 2011 (UTC)


Pennsylvania townships

I realize that category talk pages are not the usual place for discussions, but I think this is the best place for this discussion. It covers all of the townships in Pennsylvania. There has been much discussion lately about how township names in Pennsylvania should be titled. Some go for X Township, Pennsylvania. Others want X Township, Y County, Pennsylvania. Of course there are many Washington Townships in Pennsylvania so they and others like it will need to include the county name in the title. The townships in question are the unique ones like Horton Township and Plunketts Creek Township. I think it is best to limit this discussion to Pennsylvania. If other wikiprojects want to do it differently that is fine. The status of townships vary greatly from state to state.

E71 review

Hi! Thanks for the European route E71 peer review. Your comments were constructive and helpful.--Tomobe03 (talk) 22:51, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

NRHP discussion

Hi, I noticed that you are active in the NRHP WikiProject, and I was hoping that you would like to make a comment on a discussion going on there. You don't have to, but it would be greatly appreciated. The discussion is at WT:NRHP#Numbers in NRHP county lists. Thank you. Theking17825 16:06, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

Image review request for Murasaki Shikibu

Hi Ruhrfisch, I don't know whether you're around much these days, but was wondering whether you might have time for an image review for the Murasaki Shikibu FAC? The good news is that with one exception they're all old images, the bad news is that there are a lot of them! Anyway, if you have time, thanks in advance. If not, that's okay too. Truthkeeper (talk) 02:44, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

Kent State addition of Bob Pickett

Thank you for your May post regarding why you deleted by uncle's inclusion on the list Kent State Alumni. There are numerous articles on my uncle for your information and he fits the "notability" assessment you made reference to. For example, please look at the NY Daily News article (http://articles.nydailynews.com/2009-10-08/entertainment/17937497_1_radio-open-line-show) written about him and his radio show in NYC. This Show is a major Show in NYC -- the number 1 market in the U.S. Google his name and you will see that he was one of the major players in the Kent State May 4th event, subsequently became National Chairman of the Black America Law Students Association while at The University of Michigan Law School, former judge in NJ and participant in major cases in NJ and NY. To leave his name off the list of "notable" Kent alumni is a travesty. I know he does not care about such acknowledgement but his friends and family do. This is the second or third time that you have decided unilaterally to remove his name from the list of KSU notables. Please review your decision and add him to the list of notable alumni from Kent State and the University of MIchigan Law School. He deserves that. There is no conflict in that statement and in my posture on this matter. It is a matter of public record. Thank you. Dietrick Pickett Pickett303 (talk) 16:39, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Peer review/Michael Jordan statue/archive1

Please close Wikipedia:Peer review/Michael Jordan Statue/archive1 in light of Wikipedia:Peer review/Michael Jordan statue/archive1--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 19:32, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the review. Each subsection of the newly-organized article is included in the WP:LEAD. Do you think each paragraph of the current article should be in the LEAD?--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 18:50, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
I was going to ask the GA reviewer, but he passed it without requesting changes. Can you comment at Talk:Michael Jordan statue#Content removal.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 21:59, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

September 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States

The September 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

 
--Kumioko (talk) 00:21, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

Re: Wikipedia:Peer review/Anachronox/archive1

Yeah, I'll be working on it now. I've been derailed by real-world issues so I haven't been on the past few days. Thanks for the reminder. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs(talk) 15:21, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Peer review/Political abuse of psychiatry in the Soviet Union/archive1

Hi Ruhrfisch,

I've just done my first peer review. I was wondering if you could spare the time to give it a quick glance in case I've missed anything. Wikipedia:Peer review/Political abuse of psychiatry in the Soviet Union/archive1 Thanks. FiachraByrne (talk) 12:01, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

Flood

Thanks for sharing the pic of the flood. Did the covered bridges in Sullivan and eastern Lycoming County make it through okay? I've seen pics of lots of damage at Knoebels. Too bad it happened there, but the end of the season would be the "best" time for that. I checked Ricketts Glen State Park's page and it said that the falls trail is closed until further notice. Do we add this to the article(s) or wait for further developments? I am getting ready to read the news from the Sun-Gazette right now. Gerry D (talk) 15:30, 10 September 2011 (UTC)

I guess we just need to hope for the best on the covered bridges. We'll soon know one way or the other. Gerry D (talk) 18:15, 10 September 2011 (UTC)

I found an article in the Towanda paper that says Sonestown was evacuated, but doesn't mention the bridge. I would imagine the Sunday papers will have more information. article here Gerry D (talk) 23:56, 10 September 2011 (UTC)

I've been concerned about the facilities at Worlds End too. From what I've read getting up 87 isn't going to happen for awhile. Gerry D (talk) 02:50, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
I wonder if the Williamsport & North Branch stations at Sonestown and Nordmont made it through. The railroad grade is higher up the valley than the road, but what an awful flood! I'm gland you made it through OK. (Not too bad down here in Delaware, aside from dodging the odd tornado during Irene.) Choess (talk) 02:09, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
Good to hear from you, too. I'm sorry, it's been a while on my part as well. These should be the correct locations for Sonestown and Nordmont. From old photos, it looks as though they probably resemble Pennsdale, but now that I look at the terrain, I feel pretty confident they made it through. Choess (talk) 03:50, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
It sounds like the W&NB built better than they knew! I don't think the Peck Rd. bridge is ex-railroad, although it may be vintage. The main line was up on the hillside in the back of the picture; a spur came down to reach the station. There was a dual gauge track behind the depot, and a narrow gauge track in front, part of the lead to the clothespin factory, which was on the flats to the south of the depot. Nothing to see there now. The Eagles Mere RR (narrow gauge) crossed the creek on a diagonal a bit further north, crossing old 220 just north of Maple St. Thanks very much for the picture; I'll incorporate it into the W&NB article. Choess (talk) 05:27, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
Ah! More good news. Latest update says Forksville is undamaged, Hillsgrove has "major siding damage" but not destroyed. Choess (talk) 05:37, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
The bridge was probably for both the depot and the clothespin factory, which was on the east side of Muncy Creek to the south of the depot. I had heard about the LV bridge, maybe from one of your earlier postings. I hope it gets rebuilt. It's amazing to see what an angry stream can do. Choess (talk) 02:56, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
Different industry. Ricketts was a part owner (with Trexler & Turrell) of Big Run Mfg., which had a stave mill in Sonestown 1914–1922. From the one photo I've seen of it, I tend to think it was on the west side of town, probably just south of where current 220 crosses Cemetery Rd.; 220 was probably built right across the mill site. Agreed that there's plenty to write about Ricketts, the lumber industry up in the Endless Mountains, some of the LV branches serving it, etc. Will try to draw on Taber to help with that sometime. Choess (talk) 03:49, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

I am glad the bridges are still standing. The pictures are really something to see. Gerry D (talk) 10:53, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

Thank god Forksville is safe, I am going to go see it on the 17th while I am out in Williamsport.Mitch32(Never support those who think in the box) 10:50, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

That picture of the rails in place without the bridge is really good. I know they'll have to rebuild it and quick. I am sure the gas companies was rail access. Gerry D (talk) 10:59, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

That is a good angle. It almost makes it look like a stairway. I am glad to hear the the bridge is going to be replaced. I don't know if I have ever seen a new railroad bridge being built. Gerry D (talk) 02:58, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

PA 187 is really out of the way, considering we aren't leaving Williamsport until around 5-ish. However, this puts a stick in our plans, we'll figure out if we need to change plans what to do.Mitch32(Never support those who think in the box) 23:12, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

I heard about the Bloomsburg Fair. I also heard that Knoebels has already re-opened, mighty impressive. Gerry D (talk) 18:43, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Knoebels had a video of the carousel on their Facebook. It is up and running. I always ride that when I am there and try to get a brass ring. I have one on my dresser here at home. I just learned what a varve is today. Being a student is fun. Gerry D (talk) 21:54, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Opinion needed

As our honorary Chicagoan I was wondering if you might comment at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Chicago#Michael_Jordan_statue_main_image.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 15:54, 10 September 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for your prompt reply. Keep in mind that any of them can be cropped and that the final fair use image will be at most 450x600 if not smaller.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 19:22, 10 September 2011 (UTC)

Paulo Francis

Hi. I have requested a third peer review on the Paulo Francis article, after a series of corrections that beneffited a lot from your original PR. I would like to discuss also the issue about requesting fair use for one of the various Francis pictures available on the Web. My RegardsCerme (talk) 23:19, 10 September 2011 (UTC)

Anachronox

Hi Ruhrfisch. I've taken my 'doing' tag off Wikipedia:Peer review/Anachronox/archive1. I'd got through about 3000 words of it a couple of weeks ago and then had to go away for a week and since I've got back I just can't get my head around the rest of the article. I don't know how far along David Fuchs is with his review but it would be much appreciated if you could drop some comments into the review in place of mine. I'll have a go at some of the backlog this weekend. Thanks. Bradley0110 (talk) 18:45, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

David O. Selznick filmography

Hi. I need a peer review for my new list. Can you help? Thanks — Jimknut (talk) 23:21, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

Hi, again. Thanks so much for peer review. I made changes per your suggestions. I believe that I am now ready to archive the peer review and move on to FLC. — Jimknut (talk) 18:58, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

Panos and other things

Thanks. I'm having a great time with the photography. I have two or three other panos to upload as well as some more singles. Until earlier this year, I almost never uploaded any images that I couldn't add to an article. I have way too many good fossil-bed ones to fit, and I don't think a gallery would be a good idea. However, just adding them to the Commons may be useful. The weather has gone from very hot to slightly cool, and the skies have been much more interesting for the past two days. The Internet connection here is quite erratic; I will wait until we are home again to do the final touch-ups and nominate the article. I'm glad your bridge survived, though it's certainly worse for wear. Finetooth (talk) 23:12, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Wow! 100. I have seen quite a few of them but not that many. I'll have to look again. By the way, I did not know about the Crater Lake image on quarters. That certainly is worth mentioning. I plan to turn my attention to Crater Lake once the John Day Fossil Beds article is put to bed and the Oregon Caves article gets quite a bit further along. Each will require a photo trip, which I'm looking forward to. Both places, especially Crater Lake, are hard to get to in winter. Maybe next spring for the cave photos and summer for the lake. Finetooth (talk) 03:43, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Thanks

The Genji Award
Thanks for the image review of the many many images for Murasaki Shikibu. That was a big request to make and I appreciate the time you put into reviewing the images. Truthkeeper (talk) 17:23, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Thomas Graeme

Here's a blast from the past of an article I barely remember, Graeme Park. Do you know how to resolve this? I have no idea. I don't even know if it's important. It's up for deletion for some reason or another. It may be a foreshadowing of other old images we have uploaded. Gerry D (talk) 03:43, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for fixing this for me. Gerry D (talk) 21:44, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

Peer review backlog

Hi, thanks for your good wishes. As you see, I am back and will resume the backlog managemennt duties as from today. Could you meantime look at Equestria Daily, where it does not seem to me that PR is the appropriate forum for the discussion that is taking place about the subject's degree of notability? But I may be wrong, of course. Brianboulton (talk) 19:30, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

Peer Review

Hi there, Ruhrfisch. You recently peer reviewed an article I'm working on, Irenaean theodicy (here) and one of the things you suggested was to change the lead section. I've substantially expanded it; I was wondering if you could have a look at what I've done and let me know what you think. Thanks. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 21:07, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

Michael Sheen

I'm just wondering if you have feedback of any kind on the Michael Sheen article? Thanks for your offer to peer review it! (Popeye191 (talk) 17:02, 18 September 2011 (UTC))

Thanks for taking the time to review it - it's been a huge help. Popeye191 (talk) 20:56, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

Anachronox

Finally had some time to get back to it here. There are a couple questions there. Feel free to nominate an article in particular you'd like me to look at, too; I can choose a random one in the backlog otherwise. ZeaLitY [ Talk - Activity ] 01:21, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. I'll do some tweaks and pick something out from the backlog. ZeaLitY [ Talk - Activity ] 03:02, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Fossil beds

I have nominated John Day Fossil Beds National Monument at FAC. Knock on wood. Finetooth (talk) 18:54, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Peer review/FutureSex/LoveSounds/archive2

Hi Ruhrfisch. Does music interest you? I was wondering if you drop by the PR page. Regards, Efe (talk) 10:52, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

It's fine with me Ruhrfisch. Take your time. --Efe (talk) 07:37, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Thanks for the help! Jimknut (talk) 18:59, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

Jared Leto

Hi Ruhrfisch. Your comments at the peer review represent consensus among editors (at least with me). An user is ignoring this fact and is still removing sourced content without reason. I inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard#Jared Leto, and you can leave a comment if you want. Best regards.--Earthh (talk) 17:39, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

A comment by one user is not a consensus, nor does it override the consensus established by several users already editing the article. Nymf hideliho! 20:45, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
There isn't any consensus of your unexplained removal of content. The only consensus I see is at the peer review.--Earthh (talk) 20:47, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
Again, one comment is not a consensus! It's impossible for one comment - by one user - to reflect a consensus, as the very definition of a consensus is that it's a decision made by a group. There are three different editors disagreeing with you (read: group!), and one very vague comment (interpreted by you) by a user who may or may not be familiar with the issues of the removed material. Nymf hideliho! 21:00, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
Also, we have explained more than once why it has been removed. You are just ignoring things. Nymf hideliho! 21:00, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
Kindly take your content dispute elsewhere. Ruhrfisch ><>°° 01:52, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
Apologies. I didn't mean to bring it here. Nymf hideliho! 07:02, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
No problem, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 15:45, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

Ernie Fletcher (again)

Just wanted to let you know that Ernie Fletcher is at FAC again. You supported the previous nomination. Unfortunately, you were the only one to register a !vote in the month that the nomination was open. Hoping for more reviews this time. Acdixon (talk · contribs · count) 14:47, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

Yep. I missed the transclusion step. Now that peer reviews and GACs get listed automatically, I'm getting bad about that. Thanks! Acdixon (talk · contribs · count) 13:21, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

Titration peer review

Hello! I've started a peer review on Titration, and would be much obliged if you could give me some input. Thank you very much for your time.  :) Neonfuzz (talk) 17:47, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ruhrfisch/Archive_34&oldid=1079382961"