Jump to content

User talk:Prosperosity/Archive 6

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Charly Bliss, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WGBH. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations on the Auckland Museum residency

[edit]

Great to see that the Museum got such an experienced Wikipedia editor! Would you be interested in joining the Aotearoa Online Meetup on Jan 31 to say hi and introduce the editing community to the project? There will also be a WikiCon in Auckland in about July if you wanted to give a presentation on how the residency went. Anyway, all the best with the project, and if you want any assistance or to organise an online event just get in touch with some of the regular Meetup crew. —Giantflightlessbirds (talk) 03:08, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! I'll likely be able to attend (will update the page with my attendance when I know for sure). --Prosperosity (talk) 04:13, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Congrats on the appointment. Well done. Schwede66 21:14, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Auckland War Memorial Museum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kiwi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:31, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Auckland Residency and resources that may be of assistance

[edit]

Congratulations on the appointment! I hope to see you at one of the upcoming Aotearoa New Zealand Wikipedian online meetups. In the meantime while reading the GLAMWiki monthly report I've just come across these recently created resources that may assist you in your role. It's some documentation of workflows for the ingestion of bibliographic data into Wikidata. I hope this is of use and good luck! - Ambrosia10 (talk) 18:35, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That looks like a great tool, thank you! --Prosperosity (talk) 21:24, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Arthur Pycroft

[edit]
60th anniversary meeting of Auckland Institute

Hi there, here's something where you may be able to help. I've written a bio for Arthur Pycroft (1875–1971) and in 1935–36, he was president of the Auckland Institute at Auckland Museum. Therefore, Auckland Museum would hold contemporary photos that by now are out of copyright and could be used in the article. Those photos aren't online, though. There's a book chapter of Contributions to the History of Australasian Ornithology online and figure 20 in chapter 2 has a photo of him sourced as Auckland Museum, which shows Pycroft in middle age (it says "taken soon after WWII but I'd say he looks more like 50 in that photo, which would make this a photo from the 1920s). Could you possibly do some digging and upload anything that ought to be freely licensed to Commons? Schwede66 19:32, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'll see if there's anything the museum owns or is out of copyright, and let you know! --Prosperosity (talk) 00:49, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
There's a great photo from later in his life in the collection that I'm checking for copyright status, but there's this group photo from the 60th anniversary which has no copyright restrictions. --Prosperosity (talk) 23:13, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Awesome. Thanks so much. That photo is a real puzzle, of course. We know the names (sometimes just with initials) but they are in random order! Who's who? Ah well, I'll do some detective work. Ah well, here's piece number 1: the anniversary meeting was held on 7 November 1927. Schwede66 02:31, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No worries!
Number 3 on the top row should be A.G. Lunn - is the name order mirrored (so the name is behind each person when you flip the physical photo over)? --Prosperosity (talk) 03:20, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Jump onto Commons; I've added "notes" to the image for those who I have identified (or where I think I've identified them). Schwede66 04:00, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I've figured out who the 10 people in the photo were and they are now all in Wikidata. Now the tricky bit – can we match more of the faces to the names? Schwede66 04:32, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that was simpler than I thought. I had nine matches and that left only one chap (Henry Bruce Morton). BTW, you were right with Lunn. Schwede66 10:31, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
That's awesome! Most of these people don't seem to have many pictures up online, so this'll probably be great for future articles. --Prosperosity (talk) 23:10, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I thought so! It was the eyebrows that were a give away for me. --Prosperosity (talk) 23:13, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I've now nominated this at DYK (as nominations have to be done within seven days of starting the article) and it's already had its initial review. To that end, it would be good to get the better-quality picture soon. How's the copyright research going? Schwede66 01:07, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The potential photo we found seemed like its copyright had expired, but after some research we found out the photographer was active in the 1970s (i.e. definitely not 50 years since their death and out of NZ copyright). There's a photo on Google with a parrot which looks great, but I'd have to do some in-depth research on that. --Prosperosity (talk) 05:44, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Much appreciated. Schwede66 08:48, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Just noting , in case you weren't already aware of it, that any NZ photo taken pre-1945 (conservatively, pre-1 Jan 1944) is now in the public domain, regardless of when the photographer died. The template in Commons in that case wold be {{PD-two|PD-New Zealand|PD-US-1996}}. —Giantflightlessbirds (talk) 08:59, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately, this photo was likely from the 1960s! --Prosperosity (talk) 09:46, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red

[edit]

Hi there, Prosperosity, and welcome to Women in Red. I see you've already written a few biographies of NZ women and Japanese singers and am glad to see you now intend to create many more. In connection with organizing an editathon, you might find Wikipedia:How to run an edit-a-thon useful. The essays Primer for creating women's biographies and Ten Simple Rules for Women in Red might also help. I see there is also a page on Wikipedia:Meetup/Auckland. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 15:02, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ipigott, thank you! I'm planning to make the event in person and online - would it be possible to have this event listed at the main Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red list of upcoming events as well? We'll be focusing on New Zealand women. --Prosperosity (talk) 07:03, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You are free to make your own announcement on our main WiR page via Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Announcements. Alternatively, if you give me the date(s), focus and any additional details such as a link to your editathon page, I'll add an announcement myself.--Ipigott (talk) 08:19, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I see you are involved in Wikipedia:Meetup/Auckland 10 on 6 March. Is this the event you are referring to? If so, it might be useful to add Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Missing articles by dictionary/DNZB. These should be easy to cover.--Ipigott (talk) 09:58, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! I'll add these names to our list and publish them on our event. That's the one - we'll be holding the event in person and online. --Prosperosity (talk) 00:43, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cape Egmont, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bell Block.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:41, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021 at Women in Red

[edit]
Women in Red | March 2021, Volume 7, Issue 3, Numbers 184, 186, 188, 192, 193


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 18:49, 26 February 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Editathon on the 6th

[edit]

Is this still going ahead virtually? I hear there are serious restrictions in Auckland over the next few days.--Ipigott (talk) 20:11, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

At this stage it's likely we'll be going ahead virtually, but I'll have to check and rearrange everything tomorrow with museum staff. I'll update the event tomorrow when we've worked out the details! --Prosperosity (talk) 21:59, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ipigott, we've decided to postpone until we're out of restrictions. Hopefully not too far away! --Prosperosity (talk) 02:26, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

About Asian music citations

[edit]

Hello. Prosperosity. Did you updated and modernized that citations from RIAJ Japan for most Japanese music, Korean music, Taiwanese music since December 2013 and began to adding it around the 6th anniversary year of its joining ? Yoga Widya 1994 (talk) 14:49, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Did you need some help with this? --Prosperosity (talk) 20:47, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Greeeen silhouetteABDest.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Greeeen silhouetteABDest.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:35, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Te Waiohua, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Waka and Drury.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April editathons from Women in Red

[edit]
Women in Red | April 2021, Volume 7, Issue 4, Numbers 184, 188, 194, 195, 196


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:17, 22 March 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CDTV opening2009-11.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CDTV opening2009-11.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Letting Attendees to Women in Red Edit-a-thon know about upcoming Auckland WikiCon

[edit]

Kia ora Prosperosity, I've taken the liberty of adding a Future event section to your Edit-a-thon page to promote the Auckland WikiCon. I hope that is okay. Can you also let the group know that this is a weekend event that will be coming up and for them to keep an eye on the event page? Thanks... Einebillion (talk) 08:08, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sure can do! --Prosperosity (talk) 20:05, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021 at Women in Red

[edit]
Women in Red | May 2021, Volume 7, Issue 5, Numbers 184, 188, 197, 198


Online events:


See also:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 21:37, 28 April 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

June 2021 at Women in Red

[edit]
Women in Red | June 2021, Volume 7, Issue 6, Numbers 184, 188, 196, 199, 200, 201


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 18:50, 28 May 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

July 2021 at Women in Red

[edit]
Women in Red | July 2021, Volume 7, Issue 7, Numbers 184, 188, 202, 203, 204, 205


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 16:06, 22 June 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Auckland edit-a-thon on performing arts 14 Aug

[edit]

Kia ora Prosperosity, I am running an edit-a-thon in Auckland on performing arts Sat 14 Aug. I need to make a project page for it but am not sure how to title it. Do I need to call it Auckland Meeting 12 or can I call it 'Auckland Women in Performing Arts Edit-a-thon' - or any suggestions. I am asking you as you organised the GLAM edit-a-thon / event. For references you can see the Dunedin and Wellington event pages which are linked in the project page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Pakoire/Performing_Arts_Aotearoa_-_Wiki_Project.

Many thanks, Pakoire (talk) 22:11, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Pakoire I'd recommend going with [[Wikipedia:Meetup/Auckland 12|Auckland 12, although it's up to you! As long as it's linked in the . There were a choice of event titles with ours (we could have gone with the Auckland title, or the Women in Red title), but decided the location title was better suited since it was invisioned as an in-person event. As long as it's in the template, I don't think there'll be a big issue. --Prosperosity (talk) 22:34, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Sweet potato cultivation in Polynesia

[edit]

The article Sweet potato cultivation in Polynesia you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Sweet potato cultivation in Polynesia for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of A. Parrot -- A. Parrot (talk) 22:22, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A. Parrot has now given it Good Article status. Well done you in creating the article and getting it to GA status. Great work. Congratulations. Nurg (talk) 22:05, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Nurg: Thank you! Also, thank you for copy editing the article! That was very helpful. --Prosperosity (talk) 06:25, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August Editathons with Women in Red

[edit]
Women in Red | August 2021, Volume 7, Issue 8, Numbers 184, 188, 204, 205, 206, 207


Online events:


See also:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:27, 23 July 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

September 2021 at Women in Red

[edit]
Women in Red | September 2021, Volume 7, Issue 9, Numbers 184, 188, 204, 205, 207, 208


Online events:


See also:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 22:30, 26 August 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Frederick Potter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Balmoral.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop marking most of your edits as minor

[edit]

Hello. This is in no way a minor edit. And looking at your contributions, adding 1,000 bytes to these GLAM pages should not be marked as minor either. Please see Help:Minor edit for what constitutes a minor edit. In most cases, anything larger than single-digits byte change should not be marked as minor. Thanks. Ss112 22:17, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Māori Language Week, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Victoria University.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Whatsgoinonai.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Whatsgoinonai.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 23:07, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021 at Women in Red

[edit]
Women in Red | October 2021, Volume 7, Issue 10, Numbers 184, 188, 209, 210, 211


Online events:


Special event:


See also:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 01:37, 29 September 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kerry Gibson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page South African.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021 at Women in Red

[edit]
Women in Red | November 2021, Volume 7, Issue 11, Numbers 184, 188, 210, 212, 213


Online events:


See also:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Innisfree987 (talk) 21:32, 24 October 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Wikipedia requested images of New Zealand ships

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Wikipedia requested images of New Zealand ships indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:51, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your work

[edit]
The New Zealand Barnstar of National Merit
For your excellent and high quality work with Sweet potato cultivation in Polynesia and other important New Zealand articles
this WikiAward was given to {{subst:PAGENAME}} by ~~~ on ~~~~~

Dracophyllum 09:52, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Dracophyllum: Thank you so much! I'll try to keep improving NZ articles where I can. --Prosperosity (talk) 01:43, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021 at Women in Red

[edit]
Women in Red | December 2021, Volume 7, Issue 12, Numbers 184, 188, 210, 214, 215, 216


Online events:


See also:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Innisfree987 (talk) 00:13, 27 November 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

a barnstar for you!

[edit]
Women in Red Women in Oceania contest
Prosperosity Thank you for your additions November 2021 WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 01:33, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! --Prosperosity (talk) 02:25, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:KaelaButterflyInstrumental.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:KaelaButterflyInstrumental.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:27, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kaelabutterflymv.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kaelabutterflymv.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:28, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022 Women in Red

[edit]
Happy New Year from Women in Red Jan 2022, Vol 8, Issue 1, Nos 214, 216, 217, 218, 219


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

  • Encourage someone to become a WiR member this month.
Go to Women in RedJoin WikiProject Women in Red

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:03, 28 December 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Thanks re: Maisey Rika

[edit]

Thanks for adding more detailed discography information to the article I created for Maisey Rika! And a very happy new year from Canada. Goyston talk, contribs 19:45, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Goyston No worries, thanks for making the article in the first place. Hope you have a wonderful new year's! --Prosperosity (talk) 20:30, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Māngere Bridge, New Zealand

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Māngere Bridge, New Zealand you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Steelkamp -- Steelkamp (talk) 03:01, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Māngere Bridge, New Zealand

[edit]

The article Māngere Bridge, New Zealand you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Māngere Bridge, New Zealand for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Steelkamp -- Steelkamp (talk) 09:00, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Panmure Bridge

[edit]

On 21 January 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Panmure Bridge, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the construction of Auckland's Panmure Bridge in 1865 involved underwater repairs using Heinke diving suits? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Panmure Bridge. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Panmure Bridge), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

記事名移動について

[edit]

初めまして、Hattoと申します。宇多田ヒカルの記事名を「Utada Hikaru」から「Hikaru Utada」に移動するようリクエストしているのを見つけてこちらに投稿いたしました。僕のユーザーページを見て頂ければ分かる通り、僕は生粋の日本人で英語はあまり得意ではありません。あなたのユーザーページも見たのですが、ニュージーランド人で日本語が分かる方のようですが本当でしょうか？そのため、このように日本語で記述しています。宇多田の件についてですが、僕も記事名は「Hikaru Utada」の方がいいと思っていて、なぜ「Utada Hikaru」になっているのか不思議に思っていました。ところでなんですが、そうなると同じく日本の歌手である倖田來未の場合でも同じではないかと思います。彼女の記事名は現在、「Koda Kumi」になっていますので、これも「Kumi Koda」あたりに移動した方がいいのではないかと思ったのですが、どう思いますか？--Hatto (talk) 15:23, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Hatto:さん、はじめまして！最近、日本語を使う機会があまりないので、変なところをすみません。WP:JTITLEではこういう考えがあります。
  • ほとのとの記事では[個人名][家族名]が適切（明治時代以前は[家族名][個人名]）
  • 英語圏で使うみんな分かる名前があれば、このほうがいい（特にニュースや論文などの二次資料）
宇多田ヒカルさんの件は一般の記事とちょっと違います。２０年前にほとんど「Utada Hikaru」を使いました（本人でも、英語圏のニュースや雑誌でも）。日本人の歌手の中で、ローマ字で[個人名][家族名]を使う人は一般的ですが、まれに[家族名][個人名]を使う歌手がいます（たとえば、「Utada Hikaru SINGLE COLLECTION VOL.1」や「KODA KUMI LIVE TOUR 2006-2007 〜second session〜」）。その人は海外で人気者になる機会に、時々日本で使った[家族名][個人名]のローマ字名前をそのまま英語でみんな使います。
宇多田さんは数年前からオフィシャルサイトで「Hikaru Utada」を使い始めて、最近のニュースでほとんと「Hikaru Utada」が書かれたんだから、記事名を移動したほうがいいと思い始めます。倖田來未さんなら「Kumi Koda」「Koda Kumi」両方使いますが、今のところはどちらのほうがいいとははっきりわかりません。初音ミクなら「Miku Hatsune」の順番は英語で見たことはないから、絶対みんなが分かる「Hatsune Miku」の記事名が一番適切と思います。
説明が曖昧なところがあれば、言って下さい！--Prosperosity (talk) 23:13, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Prosperosity: 返信ありがとうございます。日本の著名人は基本的に他国では「個人名 + 家族名」で報道されていると思っていましたので、英語圏のニュースや雑誌では「Utada Hikaru」として報道されていたとは知りませんでした。初音ミクも「Miku Hatsune」ではなく「Hatsune Miku」だとは思ってもいませんでしたが、あれは実在の人物じゃありませんからね、僕も記事名は「Hatsune Miku」で問題ないかと思います。とはいえ、倖田來未は「Kumi Koda」も「Koda Kumi」も両方使うので、どちらがいいとは言えないことから、宇多田の記事のように記事名移動のリクエストも出す予定は今のところはないということでしょうか？--Hatto (talk) 01:57, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Māngere Bridge, New Zealand

[edit]

On 25 January 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Māngere Bridge, New Zealand, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a Māori military settlement at Māngere Bridge, New Zealand, was established in the 1840s to protect Auckland? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Māngere Bridge, New Zealand. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Māngere Bridge, New Zealand), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February with Women in Red

[edit]
Women in Red Feb 2022, Vol 8, Issue 2, Nos 214, 217, 220, 221, 222


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:10, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

DYK for Siren kings

[edit]

On 20 February 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Siren kings, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that siren kings use music by Celine Dion in loudspeaker battles? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Siren kings. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Siren kings), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Auckland isthmus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Polynesian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March editathons

[edit]
Women in Red Mar 2022, Vol 8, Issue 3, Nos 214, 217, 222, 223, 224, 225


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:38, 27 February 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

International Women's Day Aotearoa Editathon

[edit]

Thanks for joining the editathon over the weekend. There is a draft of an Edith Amituanai article by someone in the Pacific Arts wikiproject: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Kowhaiarewhana/Edith_Amituanai Pakoire (talk) 22:59, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Pakoire: Thanks for the head's up! Since you're working with them, what do you think would be the best thing to do? I could do something similar to the FAFSWAG article (wait until it's published then add any bonus content). --Prosperosity (talk) 23:08, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I am just contacting the other editor now and will advise. Thanks for pointing out the other FAFSWAG draft. There is a FAFSWAG article (that you and I have both worked on). Will check if content can be combined. Pakoire (talk) 23:14, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Meeting Invitation: to establish Wikimedia Aotearoa New Zealand Inc ("WANZ Inc") as an Incorporated Society and register as a charitable entity

[edit]

Kia ora,

We are meeting on Thursday 17 March at 7.30pm on Zoom to establish Wikimedia Aotearoa New Zealand Inc ("WANZ Inc") as an Incorporated Society. Please do join us. You can find more information here

Einebillion (talk) 07:10, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Madeleine Chapman

[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Madeleine Chapman at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Mujinga (talk) 13:11, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April Editathons from Women in Red

[edit]
Women in Red Apr 2022, Vol 8, Issue 4, Nos 214, 217, 226, 227, 228


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:45, 22 March 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

DYK for Madeleine Chapman

[edit]

On 26 March 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Madeleine Chapman, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that New Zealand editor and journalist Madeleine Chapman, known for fashion label exposés and snack food ranking lists, is a champion javelin thrower? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Madeleine Chapman. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Madeleine Chapman), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022 at Women in Red

[edit]
Women in Red May 2022, Vol 8, Issue 5, Nos 214, 217, 227, 229, 230


Online events:


See also:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Innisfree987 (talk) 04:57, 2 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

June events from Women in Red

[edit]
Women in Red June 2022, Vol 8, Issue 6, Nos 214, 217, 227, 231, 232, 233


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 09:22, 31 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red in July 2022

[edit]
Women in Red July 2022, Vol 8, Issue 7, Nos 214, 217, 234, 235


Online events:


See also:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:49, 27 June 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lake Pupuke, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page North Shore.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

muse.aucklandmuseum.com

[edit]

I see that you are tidying up AM URLs that have gone stale. It may help if we were to define a template for those URLs; that way, your work might become easier. It could look something like {{AklMusCenotaph|ID|date}} and that way, all you'd need to enter is the ID and the access date. Shall I set this up for you? Schwede66 02:54, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the offer! As far as I know, the Cenotaph urls are going to be stable in the future (and for the others, I need to double-check the data that's being cited, since sometimes it's not at the same location). --Prosperosity (talk) 03:21, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Just to avoid misunderstanding: that’s a "thanks but no". Correct? Schwede66 07:16, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That's right. I'm all good for now! --Prosperosity (talk) 08:04, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Recording completed articles

[edit]

Kia ora, what shall I do for record-keeping once I've created an article from the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:GLAM/Auckland_Museum/Articles_to_work_on#People? Delete the entry from the list? And add to another list of completed articles somewhere? MurielMary (talk) 07:35, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@MurielMary: Awesome that you're making some of these pages! Feel free to delete them from the list, or I can go through and remove them (I do this regularly). --Prosperosity (talk) 07:39, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Waitakere City to West Auckland, New Zealand

[edit]

Kia ora, just wanted to follow up with you as a few of your changes have come up in my watchlist recently because I have a lot of football related articles in it. I see you have been changing Waitakere City to West Auckland and while in a lot of cases that is fine. I do question them being changed when it relates to when the time of that article might be relevant. Waitakere City was correct from 1989 to 2010 so changes like in the article 2013 Chatham Cup the competition was played when it was called Waitakere City. In the OFC Champions League with the link in that one being about a game played during the 2007–08 season, then it was also called Waitakere City. They still link to a valid article for people to read, and it was the correct link for that time. While other changes like in Northern Region Football are good. — NZFC(talk)(cont) 23:40, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sure thing. I've stopped, and have been trying to leave references to Waitakere City for events from 1989 to 2010, but occasionally I've been making a few mistakes when a competition was held post-2010, but the qualifying matches were held earlier (i.e. when they were played in Waitakere City). --Prosperosity (talk) 23:45, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No problem and completely understand sometimes it isn't clear either. Its not the end of the world having either/or linked but just nice if relevant to have Waitakere City if during that period. — NZFC(talk)(cont) 00:17, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red August 2022

[edit]
Women in Red August 2022, Vol 8, Issue 8, Nos 214, 217, 236, 237, 238, 239


Online events:


See also:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:59, 29 July 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Thank You!

[edit]
The Music Barnstar
For your many contributions to Ai and other relating articles such as her albums and discography page. I am grateful for your corrections on Voice as well. Your contributions have helped in many ways in forming new articles relating to her. -Verso- (talk) 04:37, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@-Verso-: Thank you! I was a big fan of hers back in the Viva AI / Independent era, and I'm really happy to see that her more recent albums/songs are getting good pages.
Did you mind if I changed up the discog format a little? I think that some of the things that were appropriate for the 2010s don't make as much sense now (like the sales data and the awkward Taiwanese chart, which didn't age well). --Prosperosity (talk) 21:54, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, you can make any changes you want! I would so much appreciate any new contributions.
I am so glad you are noticing her recent album/songs pages. She has been getting a bit more coverage on English news sites and magazines such as Billboard recently which has been helpful in creating some of the articles such as "Summer Magic" and Kansha!!!!! - Thank You for 20 Years New and Best. Creating the article for her most recent single "Aldebaran" was a bit tough for me but it was so worth it in the end. Someone even translated it so now it is on the Japanese Wikipedia as well, which was pretty cool. I hope they do that for more of her articles there eventually since I noticed most of them do not exist on there or are stubs. -Verso- (talk) 23:57, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Redwood 70

[edit]

Unfortunately this is a little before my time, although I remember attending Nambassa and Sweetwaters festivals (it isn't true that if you remember these events you really weren't there). You might like to add mention of Redwood 70 at New Zealand music festivals since it precedes the festivals currently listed there.-gadfium 01:56, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Gadfium: Thanks, I've added some links. I think I remember my first concert! Although who knows if I actually remember Boney M or not (less because of drugs, more because of being two). --Prosperosity (talk) 02:26, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Aotearoa New Zealand has funding for support of Auckland editors

[edit]

Kia ora, I've also reached out to User:Susan_Tol a couple of weeks ago and I thought it might be useful to reach out to you too. I was wondering whether there was anything else that Wikimedia Aotearoa New Zealand Inc could do to support gatherings of Auckland editors this financial year i.e. until 30 June 2023? We've got funding available for running edit-a-thons or a WikiCon-type event or a content competition if this was something you or User:Susan_Tol were interested in organising. To apply email secretary at wikimedia.nz or drop me a line on my talk page Einebillion (talk) 01:48, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Aotearoa New Zealand Incorporated - Draft Strategy 2022-2025 Feedback Round

[edit]

Kia ora,

The Committee of Wikimedia Aotearoa New Zealand Incorporated have developed a draft strategy for 2022 -2025. Feedback from members of the Wikimedia User Group of Aotearoa New Zealand that are New Zealanders or residents of Pacific islands without an established chapter is encouraged. The draft strategy can be read and commented on at this Google docs link  https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XoqMupo_5TlLs_6xuMU-3KU5_Lzks8unwFRo4QuDVM4/edit?usp=sharing  or in the discussion page of the Wikimedia User Group of Aotearoa New Zealand by adding a New Topic. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Wikimedia_User_Group_of_Aotearoa_New_Zealand  The feedback round closes at midnight Sunday 9 October 2022. Einebillion (talk) 03:41, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red in September 2022

[edit]
Women in Red September 2022, Vol 8, Issue 9, Nos 214, 217, 240, 241


Online events:


Request for help:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:37, 31 August 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Categories for 'watersheds'

[edit]

Kia ora. I see you created several categories for 'watersheds' as subcats of Category:Drainage basins of New Zealand. Were you aware that 'watershed' means a drainage basin only in North America, and that in NZ and the rest of the world it means a drainage divide? There are several terms that would be much more appropriate for NZ – 'catchment', 'drainage basin', 'river basins' or just 'basin'. A variety of these terms are used for subcats at Category:Drainage basins of the United Kingdom. Note also that most of these terms do not need to be plural when referring to the catchment or basin of a single harbour or gulf, e.g. Category:Poole Harbour catchment. 'River basins' would be an exception that needs to be plural (unless referring to a single river basin, of course).

I would find any of these other terms acceptable. If picking a preference, I would go with 'catchment', which seems common in NZ, and is also used most frequently in the aforementioned UK category. Thus we could have Category:Hauraki Gulf catchment, for example. Cheers. Nurg (talk) 02:12, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have any strong ties to watershed, it's just the word I was most familiar with. I'd be happy to support a move. --Prosperosity (talk) 21:47, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Hauraki Gulf watersheds has been nominated for discussion

[edit]

Category:Hauraki Gulf watersheds has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Nurg (talk) 09:39, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

[edit]

I nominated an article that you started for DYK - Template:Did you know nominations/Mahurangi Harbour. I hope that you don't mind. I also reworded the nationally endangered part in reference to southern right whales because the source doesn't explicitly state it. SL93 (talk) 20:19, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's amazing, thank you! --Prosperosity (talk) 20:26, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You write nice articles. Most of them deserve to be shown at DYK. Do you know how that works? Are you interested in that? Schwede66 23:41, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Schwede66: Thank you! I know how to submit for DYK and I really should do it more, but there are a couple barriers for me (promoting things feels so much more stressful than submitting articles, so it gets put to the bottom of my tasklist. Also I find reviewing other articles difficult). --Prosperosity (talk) 22:01, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red October 2022

[edit]
Women in Red October 2022, Vol 8, Issue 10, Nos 214, 217, 242, 243, 244


Online events:


See also:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:01, 29 September 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Lotu Fuli

[edit]

Do I see this right that you got this article into mainspace through copy-paste? If so, please note that’s one of the biggest Wikipedia sins possible. All the attribution gets lost by doing so. You must only ever move articles; never copy-paste. If a redirect is in the way, ask for someone with permissions to move the item for you. Schwede66 23:21, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Schwede66: I started off with the Shane Henderson article as a template, and in the process of creating the article, discovered the 2020 election draft and incorporated everything I could from there. I didn't intend it as a copy-paste, but honestly I think the article ended up as basically a version of the draft in the end. I'm very sorry about that! Prosperosity (talk) 23:41, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, it's a bit more complicated than I thought. I'll do a history merge. Schwede66 02:43, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
All tidied up now. Schwede66 02:59, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! Prosperosity (talk) 03:01, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red November 2022

[edit]
Women in Red November 2022, Vol 8, Issue 11, Nos 214, 217, 245, 246, 247


Online events:


See also:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 17:35, 26 October 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

DYK for Mahurangi Harbour

[edit]

On 28 October 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mahurangi Harbour, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that after being extensively hunted in the 19th century, southern right whales can again sometimes be seen in Mahurangi Harbour? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mahurangi Harbour. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Mahurangi Harbour), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Eatoniella mortoni

[edit]

On 24 November 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Eatoniella mortoni, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the New Zealand mollusc Eatoniella mortoni (pictured) can thrive in extreme carbon dioxide-rich environments, making it a subject for the study of ocean acidification? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Eatoniella mortoni. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Eatoniella mortoni), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Auckland Shell Club has been accepted

[edit]
Auckland Shell Club, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Schwede66 20:17, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red in December 2022

[edit]
WiR Women who died in 2022
WiR Women who died in 2022
Women in Red December 2022, Vol 8, Issue 12, Nos 214, 217, 248, 249, 250


Online events:

See also:

Tip of the month:

  • Remember to search slight spelling variations of your subject's name,
    like Katherine/Katharine or Elizabeth/Elisabeth, especially for historical subjects.

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:56, 26 November 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Utada Hikaru - First Love8cm.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Utada Hikaru - First Love8cm.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:37, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Thank you for helping with Team Critter

[edit]
A slug for you
Thank you for helping improve the coverage of uncharismatic New Zealand species as part of the Critter of the Week team. Please accept this leaf-veined slug (Athoracophorus sp.) as a token of appreciation. —Giantflightlessbirds (talk) 23:13, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red January 2023

[edit]
Happy New Year from Women in Red | January 2023, Volume 9, Issue 1, Nos 250, 251, 252, 253, 254


Online events:

See also:

Tip of the month:

  • De-orphan and incorporate an article into Wikipedia using the Find Link tool

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:03, 27 December 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Your GA nomination of West Auckland, New Zealand

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article West Auckland, New Zealand you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Mertbiol -- Mertbiol (talk) 14:00, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited All She Wrote (Six60 song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Homage.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Drax Project - Catching Feelings (feat. Phony Ppl).jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Drax Project - Catching Feelings (feat. Phony Ppl).jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 02:30, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red in February 2023

[edit]
Women in Red Feb 2023, Vol 9, Iss 2, Nos 251, 252, 255, 256, 257, 259


Online events:

Tip of the month:

  • Explore Wikipedia for all variations of the woman's name (birth name,
    married name, re-married name, pen name, nickname)

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:29, 30 January 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Mount Roskill

[edit]

Your references to Reidy 2013 are not resolving, and I cannot quite see why. It might be that the entry at Wikidata is not separating the author surname from the full name correctly. You may need to install User:Svick/HarvErrors.js to see the sfn reference error messages (see my User:Gadfium/common.js for how to install).-gadfium 08:55, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I was right that the Wikidata entry was creating the reference as "Reidy, Jade" rather than as "Reidy". I have corrected the article so the reference links work. If you now change the Wikidata entry, you may need to revert my last edit at Mount Roskill.-gadfium 18:08, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Gadfium:, Aaah, that's what was happening, I couldn't quite work it out. Thank you! --Prosperosity (talk) 20:12, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of West Auckland, New Zealand

[edit]

The article West Auckland, New Zealand you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:West Auckland, New Zealand for comments about the article, and Talk:West Auckland, New Zealand/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Mertbiol -- Mertbiol (talk) 19:01, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mount Roskill, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hillsborough, New Zealand.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red March 2023

[edit]
Women in Red Mar 2023, Vol 9, Iss 3, Nos 251, 252, 258, 259, 260, 261


Online events:

See also:

Tip of the month:

  • Mobile phone readers may only see the article "lead" – take some time to make it shine!
    Include something to keep people reading.

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 12:55, 26 February 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

DYK for Chickaboom!

[edit]

On 11 March 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Chickaboom!, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Chickaboom!, by country musician Tami Neilson, was nominated for both Canadian and New Zealand music awards? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Chickaboom!. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Chickaboom!), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 12:02, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for West Auckland, New Zealand

[edit]

On 16 March 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article West Auckland, New Zealand, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that West Auckland is home to the largest stratovolcano in the geologic history of New Zealand? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/West Auckland, New Zealand. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, West Auckland, New Zealand), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 00:02, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red April 2023

[edit]
Women in Red Apr 2023, Vol 9, Iss 4, Nos 251, 252, 262, 263, 264, 265, 266


Online events:

See also:

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:53, 27 March 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

April 2023

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Prosperosity. I noticed that your recent edit to St George's Street railway station added a link to an image on an external website or on your computer, or to a file name that does not exist on Wikipedia's server. For technical and policy reasons it is not possible to use images from external sources on Wikipedia. Most images you find on the internet are copyrighted and cannot be used on Wikipedia, or their use is subject to certain restrictions. If the image meets Wikipedia's image use policy, consider uploading it to Wikipedia yourself or request that someone else upload it. See the image tutorial to learn about wiki syntax used for images. Thank you. - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 04:04, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Sumanuil: Kia ora Sumanuil, this is a technical issue. I've replaced the local en.wikipedia image with a freely available one on Wiki Commons, but I'd accidentally given both files the same name. I'm in the process of moving the old image. --Prosperosity (talk) 04:06, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I've just gotten rather paranoid in my old age. - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 04:13, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:St George's Street railway station.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:St George's Street railway station.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:32, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Westbrook railway station, Auckland.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Westbrook railway station, Auckland.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:43, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Prosperosity/Archive_6&oldid=1149232283"