User talk:Bullmoosebell
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
2011 WikiProject Film coordinator election[edit]Voting for WikiProject Film's October 2011 project coordinator election has started. We are aiming to select five coordinators to serve for the next year; please take a moment from editing to vote here by October 29! Erik (talk | contribs) 11:56, 15 October 2011 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue LXVII, September 2011[edit]
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 01:56, 27 October 2011 (UTC) WP:FILM October 2011 Newsletter[edit]The October 2011 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. —Erik (talk | contribs) 15:01, 31 October 2011 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue LXVIII, October 2011[edit]
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 07:55, 28 November 2011 (UTC) WikiProject Film November 2011 Newsletter[edit]The October 2011 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. —Peppage (talk | contribs) 22:36, 5 December 2011 (UTC) Thank You for the Welcome[edit]I appreciate your time in offering mentorship to me as a new Wikipedian. Thank you for your suggestions. Regarding my analysis of themes for In the Valley of Elah, I very much disagree with you on several points. First, citing other movie reviews that do not cover themes in as detailed a manner is not an argument for excluding them here. There simply may not have been anyone willing or able to do the analysis for those films. I stand by my assertion that if it's appropriate to allude to themes, it's appropriate to elaborate on them. Also, many summaries of books on Wikipedia explore themes and I am doing the same here with respect to the narrative medium of film. Second, I do not agree with you that this film depicts "the death of a soldier and his father's tireless effort to solve the mystery (runaway AWOL soldier, suicide, or murder), not PTSD." In fact, with respect, I believe the exact opposite. I believe the screenwriter fictionalized this true story for the very reason of having a narrative device to shed light, through various vignettes and sub-plots, on the symptoms of PTSD, cultural masculinity and controversial expressions of patriotism. That is how film works. There is a literal story that serves to illustrate the message behind it, which is sometimes polemic. Which brings me to my third point: It is not my analysis that has intended or subtle motives, it is the film that has them. My analysis of these themes is pure Film Studies 101, showing how a writer can use narrative to convey themes, albeit controversial and emotional for many viewers. Such analysis is absolutely appropriate and relevant to a discussion of the film as a work of art. I truly believe this film is a brilliant example of how to convey themes through fictionalized narrative and should be recognized as such. Perhaps you believe I have cherry-picked plot devices to grind an ax. Not so. In fact, the exact opposite is the case. The screenwriter's examination of the range and variety of symptoms was so subtle that I believe it helps the Wikipedia community to have those connections made for readers who are not familiar with PTSD or critiques of masculinity and may not realize that the characters' actions and motivations were PTSD related or connected to concepts of masculinity. In fact, most readers may not have the perception to recognize these threads running through this film. That is what Wikipedia is for. Those who have expertise on a subject (like film narrative analysis or combat PTSD) write articles to educate those who don't. Finally, I disagree with your comment that the true story itself is the proper place for this content. I am commenting on how this particular script deftly portrayed a range of PTSD symptoms, which may or may not have been present in the original true story. Again, with respect, I truly believe your characterizations of "emotion" or "motive" on my part are more a reflection of a bias in interpreting my analysis due to the potentially inflammatory nature of the film's themes and it's close relation to actual events. While it is clear that we are allies in our commitment to these issues, I think you have wrongly judged the appropriateness of this content in this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amyluna13 (talk • contribs) 12:56, 11 December 2011 (UTC) PTSD (Perpetuating This Stimulating Discourse) ;)[edit]Dear Bluemoosebell, Thank you again for your time and assistance in helping sort out my proposed edit for this article. It is a pleasure to communicate with an informed and thoughtful intellect such as yours. I would like to address some points in your last message to me. "Hank Deerfield is trying to find his son & his killers. As it states, the film "explores" themes of PTSD, the GWOT, prisoner abuse, et cetera. Those are not the main plot." I agree. Which is why my edit would not be in the article's "plot" section, it would in the article's "themes" section. From the wiki Manual of Style for Film articles http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Films/Style_guidelines#Themes "Themes Themes are unifying or dominant ideas and motifs in a film's elements (such as plot, dialogue, photography, and sound) conveying a position or message about life, society, and human nature. Most themes are implied rather than explicitly stated, regardless of whether their presence is the conscious intent of the producer, writer, or director. Inclusion of a treatment of a film's themes – well-sourced and cited to avoid original research – is encouraged since an article's value to a reader and its real-world context will be enhanced. A separate section is not required if it is more appropriate to place the material in the Production or Reception sections." (emphasis mine) You provided me with a link to the book, All Quiet on the Western Front. In that article, it states (under the "Themes" section) "One of the major themes of the novel is the difficulty of soldiers to revert to civilian life after having experienced extreme combat situations. Remarque comments in the preface that "[All Quiet on the Western Front] will try simply to tell of a generation of men who, even though they may have escaped shells, were destroyed by the war." This internal destruction can be found as early as the first chapter as Paul comments that, although all the boys are young, their youth has left them. When on leave from the front, Paul feels strongly isolated from his family and removed from daily life. Another topic concerns how soldiers' lives are put at risk by their commanding officers who seem unaware of the trauma of their charges. " (emphasis mine) This is identical in style and content to what I am proposing to do, just in more detail, which should be a welcomed! "Don't get me wrong, as a combat veteran diagnosed with PTSD," On a related note, I read on your personal page about the "Baker Boys" documentary and watched all of it yesterday. I am currently researching and writing a book which is partially on how our cultural concepts of masculinity are shifting, allowing us to break cycles of generationally perpetuated trauma and there was excellent material in there. I found it very compelling how insightful, aware and open many of the men were about their personal internal process and seeking help without shame, while others clearly were not. I think this variance among the men's stories illustrates the exact shift occurring today that I am documenting through my book. So, thank you for that referral. I would also like to familiarize you with the lifelong work of Dr. Peter Levine on healing trauma through body awareness and somatic release... http://www.amazon.com/Unspoken-Voice-Releases-Restores-Goodness/dp/1556439431/ref=pd_sim_b_2 His work has influenced the growing number of somatic healing modalities like clarity breathwork, tapping and biofeedback devices such as the emWave PSR developed by the HeartMath Institute http://www.heartmath.org/about-us/our-focus/soldiers-veterans-military-families.html Perhaps you are already aware of these resources, but in case you aren't, I wanted to mention them. Levine studied how animals are able to so effectively release trauma and not retain the effects and applied that to human biology. Research suggests that these body-centered approaches to releasing trauma work well and can be much more effective and accelerated than traditional psychological "talk" therapy (which may actually re-traumatize the neural net) and/or medications (which serve to suppress the trauma, not release it). "Take a look at the articles of other movies with subtle undertones (PTSD or otherwise), Song of the South, All Quiet on the Western Front, Glengarry Glen Ross." As I stated previously, it is a fallacy of causality to point to an effect as proof of a cause. You are implying that these articles don't have a themes section because it is not appropriate. There could be many reasons why the articles you cite don't have a themes section. Wikipedia articles are not always consistent and these articles may not have extensive "themes" sections because no one wrote them, not because they are irrelevant or inappropriate. Pointing to an effect is not proof of its cause, so it carries no weight with regard to the question at hand. "I understand the importance of educating the masses." I'm not trying to educate the masses on PTSD. I'm trying to educate the masses on how this film's fictional narrative elements brilliantly illustrate the symptoms of PTSD. The script is an excellent example of world class writing in that respect. If a film's narrative brilliantly and cleverly highlighted different species of flowers and I elaborated on that using detail from the script, I'm guessing that probably wouldn't be perceived as "emotional" content having an "agenda." Sometimes, emotion and agenda are in the eye of the beholder. "With that said, Do not feel I am simply dismissing the subject." I do not feel that at all. I can tell your intentions are honorable. :) I understand your argument is about the appropriateness of this subject in this context, not the appropriateness of the subject in general. In fact, knowing that you are probably personally invested in disseminating PTSD information, I admire your impartiality in arguing against including it on principle. Very impressive. "If you so choose to pursue this, feel free to join the Film WikiProject and speak your case there." Again, thank you for your mentorship of the Wikipedia ropes and your suggestions, which I will pursue. "Lastly, do not bring abrasive comments such as you've posted previously, "But, with all due respect, if these issues were obvious to those who serve, this tragedy might never have occurred in the first place." Just because you state "with all due respect," does not mean your comments are not disrespectful. That sort of conduct will not get you very far, on Wikipedia or life. Your comment was purely hypothetical and, without having served in combat yourself, you should guard against making such comments." I couldn't agree more that prefacing an abrasive comment with a disclaimer does not negate that the comment is abrasive! However, we can often misinterpret meaning and intent through the medium of writing (with no body language and tone), so please allow me to explain my comment, which was logical, not hypothetical. You made the statement "Be it known that I am in Baker Company TF 1-15 IN (the unit in which the movie is based upon), so do not presume that I don't understand the situation that piqued the interest of the producers & directors to create this movie." From the point of view of logic, you seemed to be making the argument, "I was part of A (Baker Company), so I know about B (PTSD issues)." I was refuting that on logic (back to the subject of causality), saying "One can be part of A and not know about B," or that "being a part of A does not cause a 'knowing' about B." In addition, I found it not only fallacious but a particularly ironic argument for you to make, given the tragedy that occurred. Because I knew it was a sensitive subject, I prefaced my critique with the "due respect" comment, meant sincerely and not sarcastically, as you may have heard it. But it was a refutation of the logic in your argument, not a comment on you personally or your character. And saying "being a part of A does not cause a knowing about B" isn't the same as saying "no one in A knows about B." It just says that "being in A doesn't cause knowing about B." Whether I have personally served in combat or not is irrelevant to the validity of my assertion, based in logic. With the most compassionate of intention, may I suggest that hearing logical refutations as personal attacks (and personally attacking back) is a sign of hyper-vigilance. I once read a definition of hyper-vigilance that has been very helpful to me -- "Hearing good faith repair attempts as hostile manipulations." Again, sometimes (often?) abrasion is in the eye of the hyper-vilgilant, lol. I am guessing that clarity and respect are important values to you, which I admire. They are also important to me. :) So I am compelled to point out that comments like, "without having served in combat yourself" (which you may suspect, but have no way of knowing--and even if I haven't, you don't know what other systemic or violent trauma I may have been exposed to) and "you won't get far in life" are personal and, as such, weaken the strength of your observation, which I do believe had the best of intentions. It's hard for people to hear constructive criticism if you bookend your critique with personal attacks, since that causes one's reptilian/ego defenses to kick in making it next to impossible to be open to changing one's behavior. I've found I get pretty far whenever I make sure not to do that. :) I'm juss sayin'. Who's the pot and who's the kettle, hmmmm?..... I'm not trying to "win" here, just increase consciousness for both of us. So I guess what I'm saying is I'm trying to "win/win," lol. And I'm dying to know... What in the Sam Hill has "Tar baby, Katczinsky, and The Machine?" got to do with it? Amyluna13 (talk) 00:49, 13 December 2011 (UTC) Oh...[edit]Sorry, from your demonstration of edit power, I thought you were the person to convince. Still learning. :) Roger that you do not find my expertise on PTSD and language engaging. Happy Holidays! Amyluna13 (talk) 03:44, 13 December 2011 (UTC) The Sequel[edit]"if these issues were obvious to those who serve..." I want to offer you my full and sincere apology for these words. My intent was to convey that "It's incorrect and dangerous to assume that because someone serves in combat they correctly understand the dynamics of PTSD." For example, in Baker Boys, one of the soldiers is very confident that he will be able to put it all behind him and never talk about Iraq again and we later learn he woke up choking his wife. I realize now that my words were poorly chosen and did not accurately convey my meaning and could very well be construed as meaning "these issues are not obvious to ALL those who serve," which was not what I intended to say or what I believe. I can hear now how my words may have appeared arrogant and would be annoying to hear from a non-military source. It is a profound subject and considering who I was talking to, I should have been more careful with my words. Mea culpa. :) From Johnathan Shay's work in Odysseus in America, I get how and why those who serve have little patience with uninformed commentary from non-military sources. He devotes a whole chapter to it. Didn't mean to add more fuel to that rodeo fire either, cowboy. ;) From talking to other editors, I now understand how my edits were original content and that you were correct in removing them. Thanks for your gravitas in dealing with a newbie. :) From my cursory research so far, I've found there is ample scholarly commentary connecting this film to all the themes I raised, so I will be reworking my edits to reflect those outside, independent sources. I hope you will look over my edits when I finish them before I post them! I do plan on creating a professional page when I have time. Thanks for the offer to help. Since you shared your personal history which connects you to this film, allow me to share mine. Imagine the excitement and hope of a woman deeply in love waiting to pick up her fiance from the airport who was finally flying home after being discharged from the Marines the day before after two tours of duty in Iraq. But he is not on the flight. Her fear and confusion grow as she waits and waits for one flight after another, but he never shows. She then learns he's in jail on four felony counts (which due to California's "three strikes rule" qualifies you for life with no parole) after defending himself by firing two warning shots into the front lawn of his house the night before as he was being attacked with a knife by a close friend after both were drinking heavily, celebrating his discharge. That's my story. Thanks for the Barnyard Star. Made my day. :) Amyluna13 (talk) 23:02, 13 December 2011 (UTC) Kitten Guy[edit]Re-read your last post. Point taken. I understand well how many cry wolf about having PTSD to excuse any bad behavior. That's why the DA had little sympathy for my fiance's claim of PTSD, even though he had been in a PTSD support group on base for a year before this incident. Sorry you felt misrepresented by the documentary. Must have felt like adding insult to injury. Ouch. Amyluna13 (talk) 00:08, 14 December 2011 (UTC) The Jungle Within[edit]An old Grandfather said to his grandson, who came to him with anger at a friend who had done him an injustice, "Let me tell you a story. I too, at times, have felt a great hate for those that have taken so much, with no sorrow for what they do. But hate wears you down, and does not hurt your enemy. It is like taking poison and wishing your enemy would die. I have struggled with these feelings many times." He continued, "It is as if there are two wolves inside me. One is good and does no harm. He lives in harmony with all around him, and does not take offense when no offense was intended. He will only fight when it is right to do so, and in the right way. But the other wolf, ah! He is full of anger. The littlest thing will set him into a fit of temper. He fights everyone, all the time, for no reason. He cannot think because his anger and hate are so great. It is helpless anger, for his anger will change nothing. Sometimes, it is hard to live with these two wolves inside me, for both of them try to dominate my spirit." The boy looked intently into his Grandfather's eyes and asked, "Which one wins, Grandfather?" The Grandfather smiled and quietly said, "The one I feed." - Cherokee Legend Happy Trails, Bluemoosebell :) Amyluna13 (talk) 08:11, 14 December 2011 (UTC) Searcher 1990[edit]No prob, brother. Happy Holidays. :-) Nightscream (talk) 12:56, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Opt-Out[edit]Edits re Mussey, Hill[edit]Bullmoosebell: Thank you for explanation. Please let me express my sincere gratitude to you for your military service. I have been associated with a Korean War veterans group, not that I deserve to stand in their shadow, but simply as a friend. My admiration for these old gentlemen is unbounded. To be able to sit with them and have them calmly tell you about the Chosin Reservoir is something everyone should experience. I extend that admiration to those such as you who have served more recently. You are the last type of person that I would want to have a disagreement or contentious exchange with. I concentrate on Civil War articles although I have edited and even created a few articles on other historical subjects. I had noted the edits being made by an editor just blocked again tonight and have been checking the Civil War articles he edited for problems or lack of citations, whether caused by him, or as was mostly the case, by an earlier editor. These were sometimes omissions rather than outright errors. I have had to work rather hard just to keep up the pace. Some of these articles need more work but I felt I had time to only change some obvious mistakes or add some important missing fact. That is how we happened to coincide on some of the same articles.
Of course, since I have been participating in good faith and trying to cite good sources for edits, I was unhappy that it appeared I was being lumped into the same category as the editor just mentioned. In any event, I think the Eicher book is the best source unless it contains an obvious error or typo or the weight of other evidence is against it. I have put some information on the book on Nightscream's page and will complete doing the same on Reuben Mussey's page. Then we can proceed as need be. I would not mind putting a footnote in about the web site page but I would still rely on Eicher as the last word. You are correct that each edit must stand on its own. I admit that my reference in the summary to the dates of service for Hill was not clear enough to identify where the information came from within Wikipedia. I did not cite the two lists in the article because we are not supposed to cite Wikipedia articles as sources. I guess I was in too much of a hurry to look for the source within the articles. I used this shortcut in the first place because Hill was not a high enough grade officer during the Civil War to be listed in Eichers books or a few of the others that I commonly use for sources. I will look into this further. The articles from which the information was derived are List of brigadier generals in the United States Regular Army before February 2, 1901 and List of major generals in the United States Regular Army before 1 July 1920. You can see why I might want to have abbreviated the titles but you are correct that this made them unidentifiable. I am sorry to have taken up your time because of a few carelessly abbreviated edits or edits or references that might have been too vague. Maybe most people need a reminder every once in a while to stay sharp. Donner60 (talk) 06:48, 22 December 2011 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue LXIX, November 2011[edit]
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign here. Recurring Topic[edit]I will mention it to the person previously involved, who I think is identified on the talk page. I simply will note what I see and suggest the person draw his/her own conclusion. Donner60 (talk) 01:44, 28 December 2011 (UTC) Good work on the warnings. I went ahead with a new article first. It is appropriate to give the warnings and see if there is a response first. I think administrators expect that. I am glad you did that and I did not put the cart before the horse, to use an apt cliche. Donner60 (talk) 08:19, 28 December 2011 (UTC) Thanks for your message. It appears to me that "Boing! said Zebedee" was the administrator who ultimately put on the long block. As I noted, there is a failure to follow policy and to abide by the block but the user is apparently not an outright vandal. That seems to have gained him some sympathy (if that is the right word). Donner60 (talk) 07:05, 29 December 2011 (UTC) Thanks for barnstar[edit]Thanks for the barnstar of defense. I am gratified that it comes from you. I try to revert vandalism and correct errors when I see them but I am usually looking at only a small range of articles. On the substantive side, I work mostly on military history and biography articles, as you know. I have bogged down from time to time but I suppose anyone who does research and writing is likely to have such periods of time. Civil War research turns up errors or inconsistencies or contradictions in many sources so it is sometimes easy to be misled or get something wrong while in good faith. We can only do our best to rely on what seem to be the best sources. Some errors become obvious after some research. I just have discovered that an editor, no doubt in good faith, added facts pertaining to William Wells to an article on John Michael Tobin. It took a little research but I was sure Tobin was not a full or brevet general and now have the sources to show the mistake. As I noted, Alexander Hamilton was not a Civil War general either but that will take a little more explanation because of the history of the article. I am probably going on too long already, so I will end it by saying thanks again. Donner60 (talk) 08:04, 29 December 2011 (UTC) William J. Carson[edit]The article looks rather comprehensive but perhaps some more information on Carson exists - and can be found in books I have or online. I will look for it. Even if a source mostly repeats information in the article, it could add useful information to the article by being added to the references. I like the first hand accounts or testimonials because they give some life to him. It's amazing that he survived the prison camp experience. My only immediate suggestions would be to change a few of the sentences in the opening paragraphs which are stated in the present tense to the past tense. I would eliminate the "comrade" in those paragraphs as well. I realize that is how the veterans addressed each other but it sounds a little strange to me except when it is in the obvious direct quotations. I think it comes down to another variation of the present/past tense statements. I can make those minor changes in the next day or two unless you wish to do it. I hope I can find some more about Carson quickly as well. I find that in many cases I either find the information within about an hour or less or spend three or four hours and come away with little if anything more than I came up with quickly. By the way, I am not sure whether I have mentioned it, but my father was a medic in the 20th Army Air Force in World War II. Donner60 (talk) 08:59, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
WikiProject Film December 2011 Newsletter[edit]The December 2011 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. —Peppage (talk | contribs) 22:02, 4 January 2012 (UTC) San Francisco meetup at WMF headquarters[edit]Hi Bullmoosebell, I just wanted to give you a heads-up about the next wiki-meetup happening in SF. It'll be located at our very own Wikimedia Foundation offices, and we'd love it if some local editors who are new to the meetup scene came and got some free lunch with us :) Please sign up on the meetup page if you're interested in attending, and I hope to see you soon! Maryana (WMF) (talk) 19:06, 9 January 2012 (UTC) Military Historian of the Year[edit]Nominations for the "Military Historian of the Year" for 2011 are now open. If you would like to nominate an editor for this award, please do so here. Voting will open on 22 January and run for seven days. Thanks! On behalf of the coordinators, Nick-D (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 22:46, 15 January 2012 (UTC) You were sent this message because you are a listed as a member of the Military history WikiProject. You should add[edit]http://www.wartimepress.com/WWII-Archives/images/281/Fort%20Benning%20-%20A%20Camera%20Trip%20Through%20Fort%20Benning.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.138.74.36 (talk) 19:02, 19 January 2012 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue LXX, January 2012[edit]
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. GOCE March copy edit drive[edit]
The Bugle: Issue LXXI, February 2012[edit]
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. WikiProject Film's January–February Newsletter[edit]The January 2012 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. To unsubscribe, please remove your name from the distribution list. GRAPPLE X 00:36, 4 March 2012 (UTC) MOTDs (This space for rent)[edit]You may have noticed over the past few days that the MOTD that you link to on your user page has simply displayed a red link. This is due to the fact that not enough people are reviewing pending MOTDs here. Please help us keep the MOTD template alive and simply go and review a few of the MOTDs in the list. That way we can have a real MOTD in the future rather than re-using (This space for rent). Any help would be appreciated! –pjoef (talk • contribs) 18:54, 6 March 2012 (UTC) GOCE March drive newsletter[edit]
The Bugle: Issue LXXII, March 2012[edit]
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. GOCE March drive wrap-up[edit]
GOCE May copy edit drive[edit]
The Bugle: Issue LXXIII, April 2012[edit]
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. GOCE May mid-drive newsletter[edit]
Invitation[edit]
The Bugle: Issue LXXIV, May 2012[edit]
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. GOCE May drive wrap-up[edit]
GOCE July 2012 Copy Edit Drive[edit]
GOCE July 2012 Copy Edit Drive[edit]
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Atlanta Wiknic Sat June 30[edit]Be there as detailed at Wikipedia:Meetup/Atlanta/Atlanta 3, or be unencyclopedic!--Pharos (talk) 19:55, 28 June 2012 (UTC) GOCE July 2012 mid-drive newsletter[edit]
GOCE July drive wrap-up[edit]
The Bugle: Issue LXXVI, July 2012[edit]
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Service stars/Campaign stars[edit]Hello, Bullmoosebell! I want you to have a look at the following photo, please: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/6b/Stevens_2012_1.jpg Now look at the stars on the Good Conduct Medal ribbon, and then have a look at the two stars on the Southwest Asia Service Medal ribbon right below. While the first ones seem about half the height of the ribbon, the second ones seem like a third of the ribbon's height. Could service stars and campaign stars indeed be different (at least, in some instances)? Thank you very much in case you will be able to give me answer on MY talk page, greetings! claudevsq (talk) 18:50, 19 August 2012 (UTC) GOCE news and September drive invitation[edit]
The Bugle: Issue LXXVII, August 2012[edit]
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. GOCE September activities[edit]
Military history coordinator election[edit]The Military history WikiProject has started its 2012 project coordinator election process, where we will select a team of coordinators to organize the project over the coming year. If you would like to be considered as a candidate, please submit your nomination by 14 September. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact one of the current coordinators on their talk page. This message was delivered here because you are a member of the Military history WikiProject. – Military history coordinators (about the project • what coordinators do) 08:44, 10 September 2012 (UTC) GOCE mid-drive newsletter[edit]
GOCE September 2012 drive wrap-up[edit]
The Bugle: Issue LXXVIII, September 2012[edit]
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project and/or sign up here. GOCE fall newsletter[edit]
The Bugle: Issue LXXIX, October 2012[edit]
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. GOCE November 2012 copy edit drive update[edit]
The Bugle: Issue LXXX, November 2012[edit]
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. GOCE November drive wrap-up[edit]
GOCE mid-December newsletter[edit]
The Bugle: Issue LXXXI, December 2012[edit]
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. GOCE 2012 Annual Report[edit]
GOCE mid-drive newsletter, January 2013[edit]
The Bugle: Issue LXXXII, January 2013[edit]
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. GOCE February 2013 newsletter[edit]
GOCE news: February 2013[edit]
Informing you of a PROD[edit]Hi there, I saw that you were one of the users who contributed most to the Matthew Axelson article so I thought I would just let you know that it was PROD'd today by Beingsshepherd (talk · contribs) and it will be deleted after 5 March 2013 if left uncontested. Regards, — -dainomite 18:43, 26 February 2013 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue LXXXIII, February 2013[edit]
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. GOCE mid-March 2013 newsletter[edit]
Courtesy notice[edit]This is a courtesy notice. A conversation is happening at WikiProject Military history regarding disruptive edits to Audie Murphy. You are receiving this notice because your name has been listed in the article's history as having reverted some of the troublesome edits. — Maile (talk) 17:53, 20 March 2013 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue LXXXIV, March 2013[edit]
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. GOCE April 2013 newsletter[edit]
The Bugle: Issue LXXXV, April 2013[edit]
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. GOCE April 2013 newsletter[edit]
The Bugle: Issue LXXXVI, May 2013[edit]
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. GOCE May drive wrap-up[edit]
The Bugle: Issue LXXXVII, June 2013[edit]
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. GOCE June/July 2013 events[edit]
GOCE July 2013 news report[edit]
The Bugle: Issue LXXXVIII, July 2013[edit]
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. GOCE July 2013 copy edit drive wrap-up[edit]
The Bugle: Issue LXXXIX, August 2013[edit]
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. GOCE Blitz wrap-up and September 2013 drive invitation[edit]
WikiProject Military history coordinator election[edit]Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Kirill [talk] 17:42, 16 September 2013 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue LXXXXX, September 2013[edit]
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. GOCE September 2013 drive wrap-up[edit]
The Bugle: Issue XCI, October 2013[edit]
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. GOCE Blitz wrap-up; join us for the November drive[edit]
The Bugle: Issue XCII, November 2013[edit]
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Military Medals[edit]Hello I am looking for someone to check over some military medals. Would you be interested? regards Heather — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.31.155.114 (talk) 20:20, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
November 2013 GOCE drive wrap-up[edit]
The Bugle: Issue XCIII, December 2013[edit]
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. GOCE December 2013 Blitz wrap-up and January Drive invitation[edit]
Bob Diaco[edit]Might want to read Wikipedia:Other stuff exists. Anyways I don't care enough to revert anymore.--Yankees10 02:55, 2 January 2014 (UTC) GOCE 2013 Annual Report[edit]
The Bugle: Issue XCIV, January 2014[edit]
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. GOCE February blitz wrapup[edit]
March GOCE copyedit drive[edit]
The Bugle: Issue XCV, February 2014[edit]
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. The Bugle: Issue XCVI, March 2014[edit]
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. GOCE March drive wrapup[edit]
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 2 April 2014 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue XCVII, April 2014[edit]
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. April blitz wrap-up and May copyediting drive invitation[edit]
Motto of the Day Help Request April 2014[edit]Today's motto...
→ Man is the only animal that deals in that atrocity of atrocities, War!
Motto of the Day (WP:MOTD) is in a state of emergency and really needs your help! There are not enough editors who are reviewing or nominating mottos at Wikipedia:Motto of the day/Nominations/In review, and this probably means that you will notice a red link or “This space for rent” as our mottos for the next weeks and months. Please take a moment to review the nominations and nominate your own new mottos at Wikipedia:Motto of the day/Nominations/In review and Wikipedia:Motto of the day/Nominations/'Specials. Any help would be appreciated! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:13, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue XCVIII, May 2014[edit]
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. GOCE June 2014 newsletter[edit]
Hey[edit]Are you available for copy editing? URDNEXT (talk) 14:29, 20 June 2014 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue XCIX, June 2014[edit]
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. GOCE July 2014 newsletter[edit]
Speedy deletion nomination of Jeff Rose (disambiguation)[edit] A tag has been placed on Jeff Rose (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Vanjagenije (talk) 20:19, 14 July 2014 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue C, July 2014[edit]
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. The Bugle: Issue CI, August 2014[edit]
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. GOCE July drive and August blitz[edit]
The Bugle: Issue CII, September 2014[edit]
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Damon W. Cooper[edit]Any chance you'd be looking to move User:Bullmoosebell/Sandbox to the mainspace soon? I was thinking of creating a stub for him but if you intend to move it out, I will hold off. Connormah (talk) 19:26, 23 September 2014 (UTC) WikiProject Military history coordinator election[edit]Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 22:06, 23 September 2014 (UTC) GOCE October 2014 newsletter[edit]
The Bugle: Issue CIII, October 2014[edit]
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. The Bugle: Issue CIII, October 2014, Redux[edit]
NOTE: This replaces the earlier October 2014 Bugle message, which had incorrect links -- please ignore/delete the previous message. Thank uou! The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. The Bugle: Issue CIV, November 2014[edit]
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Nominations for the Military history Wikiproject's Historian and Newcomer of the Year Awards are now open![edit]The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for the Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 7 December 2014 (UTC) Nominations for the Military history Wikiproject's Historian and Newcomer of the Year Awards are now open![edit]The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for the Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:41, 7 December 2014 (UTC) This message was accidentally sent using an incorrect mailing list, therefore this message is being resent using the correct list. As a result, some users may get this message twice; if so please discard. We apologize for the inconvenience. GOCE coordinator elections[edit]
December 2014 GOCE newsletter[edit]
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:15, 14 December 2014 (UTC) Voting for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year now open![edit]Nominations for the military historian of the year and military newcomer of the year have now closed, and voting for the candidates has officially opened. All project members are invited to cast there votes for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year candidates before the elections close at 23:59 December 21st. For the coordinators, TomStar81 MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 15 December 2014 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue CV, December 2014[edit]
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. GOCE holiday 2014 newsletter[edit]
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:44, 24 December 2014 (UTC) GOCE 2014 report[edit]
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:54, 2 January 2015 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue CVI, January 2015[edit]
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. February 2015 GOCE newsletter[edit]
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:52, 7 February 2015 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue CVII, February 2015[edit]
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. GOCE March newsletter[edit]
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:41, 22 February 2015 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue CVIII, March 2015[edit]
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. April 2015 GOCE newsletter[edit]
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:28, 16 April 2015 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue CIX, April 2015[edit]
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Resurrection of Southern California Task Force[edit]After moving from Los Angeles County to Kern County to San Luis Obispo County, I am finally realizing that there is life in California outside of L.A. and San Francisco, where I lived and grew up. Oh, I have also lived in San Diego, San Bernardino, San Joaquin, Yolo and Sacramento counties, and I earned my undergraduate degree in Riverside County. I am trying to breathe life into the Southern California Task Force, and I hope you will join me. Could you visit our list of participants at the other end of this link and update your description of what you are interested in doing for us, assuming that you still want to be in the mix, that is. In recompense, I will buy you a drink during the Wikipedia Welcome Week I am planning for Morro Bay on the Central Coast in July. Yours sincerely, The Bugle: Issue CX, May 2015[edit]
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. GOCE June 2015 newsletter[edit]
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:57, 5 June 2015 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue CXI, June 2015[edit]
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. The Bugle: Issue CXII, July 2015[edit]
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. GOCE August 2015 newsletter[edit]
The Bugle: Issue CXIII, August 2015[edit]
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. The Bugle: Issue CXIV, September 2015[edit]
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Reference errors on 23 September[edit]
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 24 September 2015 (UTC) WikiProject Military history coordinator election[edit]Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 29 September. Yours, Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 05:20, 25 September 2015 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue CXV, October 2015[edit]
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. October 2015 GOCE newsletter[edit]
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 26 October 2015 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue CXVI, November 2015[edit]
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Hi, Nominations for the Military history WikiProject historian and newcomer of the year awards now open![edit]On behalf of the Military history WikiProject's Coordinators, we would like to extend an invitation to nominate deserving editors for the 2015 Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards. The nomination period will run from 7 December to 23:59 13 December, with the election phase running from 14 December to 23:59 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:05, 7 December 2015 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue CXVII, December 2015[edit]
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Guild of Copy Editors 2015 End of Year Report[edit]
The Bugle: Issue CXVIII, January 2016[edit]
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. The Bugle: Issue CXIX, February 2016[edit]
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. The Bugle: Issue CXX, March 2016[edit]
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Guild of Copy Editors April 2016 Newsletter[edit]
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:47, 6 April 2016 (UTC) April 2016[edit]
The Bugle: Issue CXXI, April 2016[edit]
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. The Bugle: Issue CXXII, May–June 2016[edit]
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. June 2016 Guild of Copy Editors Newsletter[edit]
Guild of Copy Editors July 2016 News[edit]
The Bugle: Issue CXXIII, July 2016[edit]
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. The Bugle: Issue CXXIV, August 2016[edit]
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. The Bugle: Issue CXXV, September 2016[edit]
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Guild of Copy Editors September 2016 News[edit]
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:36, 9 September 2016 (UTC) Military history WikiProject coordinator election[edit]Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway, and as a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 23 September. For the Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:00, 16 September 2016 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue CXXVI, October 2016[edit]
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. The Bugle: Issue CXXVII, November 2016[edit]
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit] Hello, Bullmoosebell. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue CXXVIII, December 2016[edit]
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Guild of Copy Editors December 2016 News[edit]
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 8 December 2016 (UTC) Voting for the Military history WikiProject Historian and Newcomer of the Year is ending soon![edit]
Time is running out to voting for the Military Historian and Newcomer of the year! If you have not yet cast a vote, please consider doing so soon. The voting will end on 31 December at 23:59 UTC, with the presentation of the awards to the winners and runners up to occur on 1 January 2017. For the Military history WikiProject Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:01, 29 December 2016 (UTC) This message was sent as a courtesy reminder to all active members of the Military History WikiProject. The Bugle: Issue CXXIX, January 2017[edit]
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. The Bugle: Issue CXXX, February 2017[edit]
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Guild of Copy Editors February 2017 News[edit]
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:20, 20 February 2017 (UTC) March Madness 2017[edit]G'day all, please be advised that throughout March 2017 the Military history Wikiproject is running its March Madness drive. This is a backlog drive that is focused on several key areas:
As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement. The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the military history scope will be considered eligible. More information can be found here for those that are interested, and members can sign up as participants at that page also. The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 March and runs until 23:59 UTC on 31 March 2017, so please sign up now. For the Milhist co-ordinators. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) & MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue CXXXI, March 2017[edit]
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. The Bugle: Issue CXXXII, April 2017[edit]
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. The Bugle: Issue CXXXIII, May 2017[edit]
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. The Bugle: Issue CXXXIV, June 2017[edit]
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. The Bugle: Issue CXXXV, July 2017[edit]
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. The Bugle: Issue CXXXVI, August 2017[edit]
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. The Bugle: Issue CXXXVII, September 2017[edit]
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. 2017 Military history WikiProject Coordinator election[edit]Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway. As a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 29 September. Thank you for your time. For the current tranche of Coordinators, AustralianRupert (talk) 10:39, 21 September 2017 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue CXXXVIII, October 2017[edit]
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. The Bugle: Issue CXXXIX, November 2017[edit]
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]Hello, Bullmoosebell. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) 2017 Military Historian of the Year and Newcomer of the Year nominations and voting[edit]As we approach the end of the year, the Military History project is looking to recognise editors who have made a real difference. Each year we do this by bestowing two awards: the Military Historian of the Year and the Military History Newcomer of the Year. The co-ordinators invite all project members to get involved by nominating any editor they feel merits recognition for their contributions to the project. Nominations for both awards are open between 00:01 on 2 December 2017 and 23:59 on 15 December 2017. After this, a 14-day voting period will follow commencing at 00:01 on 16 December 2017. Nominations and voting will take place on the main project talkpage: here and here. Thank you for your time. For the co-ordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:35, 8 December 2017 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue CXL, December 2017[edit]
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. User group for Military Historians[edit]Greetings, "Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Wikipedia. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at Talk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Wikipedia Military Historians. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:29, 21 December 2017 (UTC) Guild of Copy Editors December 2017 News[edit]
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:04, 23 December 2017 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue CXLI, January 2018[edit]
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. The Bugle: Issue CXLII, February 2018[edit]
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. GOCE February 2018 news[edit]
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:00, 25 February 2018 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue CXLIII, March 2018[edit]
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. April 2018 Milhist Backlog Drive[edit]G'day all, please be advised that throughout April 2018 the Military history Wikiproject is running its annual backlog elimination drive. This will focus on several key areas:
As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement. The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the scope of military history will be considered eligible. This year, the Military history project would like to extend a specific welcome to members of Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red, and we would like to encourage all participants to consider working on helping to improve our coverage of women in the military. This is not the sole focus of the edit-a-thon, though, and there are aspects that hopefully will appeal to pretty much everyone. The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 April and runs until 23:59 UTC on 30 April 2018. Those interested in participating can sign up here. For the Milhist co-ordinators, AustralianRupert and MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:53, 27 March 2018 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue CXLIIV, April 2018[edit]
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. The Bugle: Issue CXLIV, May 2018[edit]
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. June 2018 GOCE newsletter[edit]
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:26, 5 June 2018 (UTC) The Bugle: Issue CXLVI, June 2018[edit]
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open[edit]Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 1 September 2018 (UTC) AfroCine: Join us for the Months of African Cinema in October![edit].svg)  Greetings! You are receiving this message because your username or portal was listed as a participant of a WikiProject that is related to Africa, the Carribean, Cinema or theatre. This is to introduce you to a new Wikiproject called AfroCine. This new project is dedicated to improving the Wikipedia coverage of the history, works, people, places, events, etc, that are associated with the cinema, theatre and arts of Africa, African countries, the carribbean, and the diaspora. If you would love to be part of this or you're already contributing in this area, kindly list your name as a participant on the project page here. Furthermore, In the months of October and November, the WikiProject is organizing a global on-wiki contest and edit-a-thon tagged: The Months of African Cinema. If you would love to join us for this exciting event, also list your username as a participant for this event here. In preparation for the contest, please do suggest relevant articles that need to be created or expanded in different countries, during this event! If you have any questions, complaints, suggestions, etc., please reach out to me personally on my talkpage! Cheers!--Jamie Tubers (talk) 20:50, 5 September 2018 (UTC) Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced[edit]G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 15 September 2018 (UTC) Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced[edit]G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:22, 15 September 2018 (UTC) Note: the previous version omitted a link to the election page, therefore you are receiving this follow up message with a link to the election page to correct the previous version. We apologies for any inconvenience that this may have caused. Have your say![edit]Hi everyone, just a quick reminder that voting for the WikiProject Military history coordinator election closes soon. You only have a day or so left to have your say about who should make up the coordination team for the next year. If you have already voted, thanks for participating! If you haven't and would like to, vote here before 23:59 UTC on 28 September. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:29, 26 September 2018 (UTC) Welcome to the Months of African Cinema![edit]Greetings! The AfroCine Project welcomes you to October, the first out of the two months which has been dedicated to improving contents that centre around the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora. This is a global online edit-a-thon, which is happening in at least 5 language editions of Wikipedia, including the English Wikipedia! Join us in this exciting venture, by helping to create or expand articles which are connected to this scope. Also remember to list your name under the participants section, if you haven't done so already. On English Wikipedia, we would be recognizing Users who are able to achieve the following:
For further information about the contest, the recognition categories and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. See you around :).--Jamie Tubers (talk) 22:50, 03 October 2018 (UTC) ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]Hello, Bullmoosebell. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) Nominations now open for "Military historian of the year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" awards[edit]Nominations for our annual Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards are open until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2018. Why don't you nominate the editors who you believe have made a real difference to the project in 2018? MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 3 December 2018 (UTC) Voting now open for "Military historian of the year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" awards[edit]Voting for our annual Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards is open until 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December 2018. Why don't you vote for the editors who you believe have made a real difference to Wikipedia's coverage of military history in 2018? MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:16, 16 December 2018 (UTC) Category:Recipients of the Order of Abdon Calderón has been nominated for discussion[edit] Wikipedia:Meetup/Atlanta/Wiknic 2019 Sunday Aug 4[edit]I wanted to invite you to join Wikipedia:Meetup/Atlanta/Wiknic 2019, which is being held this weekend on Sunday August 4!--Pharos (talk) 18:12, 30 July 2019 (UTC) Metro Atlanta Wiki-Picnic Sunday: Wikipedia:Meetup/Atlanta/Wiknic 2019[edit] A friendly reminder that Wikipedia:Meetup/Atlanta/Wiknic 2019 is Sunday in Morgan Falls Park from 11am-2pm!--Pharos (talk) 17:33, 3 August 2019 (UTC) Backlog Banzai[edit]In the month of September, Wikiproject Military history is running a project-wide edit-a-thon, Backlog Banzai. There are heaps of different areas you can work on, for which you claim points, and at the end of the month all sorts of whiz-bang awards will be handed out. Every player wins a prize! There is even a bit of friendly competition built in for those that like that sort of thing. Sign up now at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/September 2019 Backlog Banzai to take part. For the coordinators, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:18, 22 August 2019 (UTC) Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open[edit]Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:37, 1 September 2019 (UTC) Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced[edit]G'day everyone, voting for the 2019 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:37, 15 September 2019 (UTC) Wikiproject Military history coordinator election half-way mark[edit]G'day everyone, the voting for the XIX Coordinator Tranche is at the halfway mark. The candidates have answered various questions, and you can check them out to see why they are running and decide whether you support them. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:36, 22 September 2019 (UTC) AfroCine: Join the Months of African Cinema this October![edit] Greetings! After a successful first iteration of the “Months of African Cinema” last year, we are happy to announce that it will be happening again this year, starting from October 1! In the 2018 edition of the contest, about 600 Wikipedia articles were created in at least 8 languages. There were also contributions to Wikidata and Wikimedia commons, which brought the total number of wikimedia pages created during the contest to over 1,000. The AfroCine Project welcomes you to October, the first out of the two months which have been dedicated to creating and improving content that centre around the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora. Join us in this global edit-a-thon, by helping to create or expand articles which are connected to this scope. Also remember to list your name under the participants section. On English Wikipedia, we would be recognizing participants in the following manner:
For further information about the contest, the recognition categories and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. See you around :).--Jamie Tubers (talk) 00:50, 30 September 2019 (UTC) ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]
March Madness 2020[edit]G'day all, March Madness 2020 is about to get underway, and there is bling aplenty for those who want to get stuck into the backlog by way of tagging, assessing, updating, adding or improving resources and creating articles. If you haven't already signed up to participate, why not? The more the merrier! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:19, 29 February 2020 (UTC) for the coord team "Dennis Miller (disambuation)" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit] An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Dennis Miller (disambuation). Since you had some involvement with the Dennis Miller (disambuation) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 13:25, 5 April 2020 (UTC) Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open[edit]Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:04, 1 September 2020 (UTC) Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced[edit]G'day everyone, voting for the 2020 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2020. Thanks from the outgoing coord team, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:17, 15 September 2020 (UTC) Join the Months of African Cinema Global Contest![edit]Greetings! The AfroCine Project invites you to join us again this October and November, the two months which are dedicated to improving content about the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora. Join us in this exciting venture, by helping to create or expand contents in Wikimedia projects which are connected to this scope. Kindly list your username under the participants section to indicate your interest in participating in this contest. We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:
We would be adding additional categories as the contest progresses, along with local prizes from affiliates in your countries. For further information about the contest, the prizes and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. Looking forward to your participation.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 19:22, 22nd September 2020 (UTC) Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]
Nominations for the 2020 Military history WikiProject Newcomer and Historian of the Year awards now open[edit]G'day all, the nominations for the 2020 Military history WikiProject newcomer and Historian of the Year are open, all editors are encouraged to nominate candidates for the awards before until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2020, after which voting will occur for 14 days. There is not much time left to nominate worthy recipients, so get to it! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:45, 10 December 2020 (UTC) Voting for "Military Historian of the Year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" closing[edit]G'day all, voting for the WikiProject Military history "Military Historian of the Year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" is about to close, so if you haven't already, click on the links and have your say before 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 23:34, 28 December 2020 (UTC) for the coord team April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive[edit]Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:23, 31 March 2021 (UTC) Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open[edit]Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:58, 1 September 2021 (UTC) Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nomination period closing soon[edit]Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are still open, but not for long. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! No further nominations will be accepted after that time. Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:42, 10 September 2021 (UTC) WikiProject Military history coordinator election voting has commenced[edit]Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Appropriate questions for the candidates can also be asked. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:38, 15 September 2021 (UTC) Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting period closing soon[edit]Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche will be closing soon. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:31, 26 September 2021 (UTC) ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]
Survey about History on Wikipedia[edit]I am Petros Apostolopoulos, a Ph.D. candidate in Public History at North Carolina State University. My Ph.D. project examines how historical knowledge is produced on Wikipedia. If you are interested in participating in my research study by offering your own experience of writing about history on Wikipedia, you can click on this link https://ncsu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9z4wmR1cIp0qBH8. There are minimal risks involved in this research. If you have any questions, please let me know. Petros Apostolopoulos, paposto@ncsu.edu Apolo1991 (talk) 13:54, 14 December 2021 (UTC) Julie Benz edit[edit]I have reverted your addition of a date of birth to Julie Benz because it used "United States Public Records, 1970-2009" as a source. WP:BLPPRIMARY specifies, ""Do not use trial transcripts and other court records, or other public documents, to support assertions about a living person. Do not use public records that include personal details, such as date of birth, ..." Perhaps you can find another source that will be acceptable within Wikipedia guidelines. Eddie Blick (talk) 23:48, 1 July 2022 (UTC) Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations opening soon[edit]Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are opening in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 1 September). A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:51, 31 August 2022 (UTC) Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting opening soon![edit]Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election opens in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 15 September) and will last through 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:26, 14 September 2022 (UTC) Correction to previous election announcement[edit]Just a quick correction to the prior message about the 2022 MILHIST coordinator election! I (Hog Farm) didn't proofread the message well enough and left out a link to the election page itself in this message. The voting will occur here; sorry about the need for a second message and the inadvertent omission from the prior one. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:40, 15 September 2022 (UTC) Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting closing soon[edit]Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election closes soon, at 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. The voting itself is occurring here If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:13, 26 September 2022 (UTC) ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add Orphaned non-free image File:Orlando Film Festival.jpg[edit] Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:27, 16 July 2023 (UTC) Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open[edit]Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:04, 2 September 2023 (UTC) ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add Voting for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023 is now open![edit]Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki . Cast your votes vote here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2023. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:55, 22 December 2023 (UTC) Voting for coordinators is now open![edit]Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:40, 1 September 2024 (UTC) Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open![edit]Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open! A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. Register your vote here by 23:59 UTC on 29 September! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:34, 18 September 2024 (UTC) |
