Wikipedia:WikiProject Christianity/Noticeboard
- Recent changes of Christianity-related talkpages
List of abbreviations (help):
- D
- Edit made at Wikidata
- r
- Edit flagged by ORES
- N
- New page
- m
- Minor edit
- b
- Bot edit
- (±123)
- Page byte size change
19 October 2024
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Eastern Orthodoxy 15:22 +1,921 HieronymusNatalis talk contribs (→Request for help: articles related to Trinity / Arianism / Nicaea need attention: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Eastern Orthodoxy 11:02 +2,329 AndriesvN talk contribs (→Request for help: articles related to Trinity / Arianism / Nicaea need attention: Reply) Tag: Reply
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Eastern Orthodoxy 08:53 +2,028 HieronymusNatalis talk contribs (→Request for help: articles related to Trinity / Arianism / Nicaea need attention: new section) Tag: New topic
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Catholicism 08:38 +1,940 HieronymusNatalis talk contribs (→Request for help: articles related to Trinity / Arianism / Nicaea need attention: new section) Tag: New topic
16 October 2024
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Christian music 12:23 +20 3family6 talk contribs (→Adding Art for the Ears as a reliable source: ce)
- diffhist Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Christian music 12:23 +805 3family6 talk contribs (→Adding Art for the Ears as a reliable source: new section) Tag: New topic
- Alerts for Christianity-related articles
Today's featured articles
- 23 Oct 2024 – Wells Cathedral (talk · edit · hist) will be Today's Featured Article; see blurb
Did you know
- 15 Oct 2024 – Church of the East in Sichuan (talk · edit · hist) was nominated for DYK by Uriel1022 (t · c); see discussion
- 12 Oct 2024 – Helmut Bauer (bishop) (talk · edit · hist) was nominated for DYK by Gerda Arendt (t · c); see discussion
- 11 Oct 2024 – Lesser sign of the cross (talk · edit · hist) was nominated for DYK by WatkynBassett (t · c); see discussion
- 10 Oct 2024 – Samuel Lander (talk · edit · hist) was nominated for DYK by PCN02WPS (t · c); see discussion
- 10 Oct 2024 – St Mary's Church, Chislehurst (talk · edit · hist) was nominated for DYK by Cardofk (t · c); see discussion
- 09 Oct 2024 – The Children's Book of Virtues (talk · edit · hist) was nominated for DYK by Slgrandson (t · c); see discussion
- 30 Aug 2024 – Manhood: The Masculine Virtues America Needs (talk · edit · hist) was nominated for DYK by Bobby Cohn (t · c); see discussion
Articles for deletion
- 20 Oct 2024 – Blake Alma (numismatist) (talk · edit · hist) was AfDed by Pppery (t · c); see discussion (1 participant)
- 17 Oct 2024 – Scars to Prove It (talk · edit · hist) was AfDed by Bastun (t · c); see discussion (6 participants)
- 17 Oct 2024 – Imago Amor (talk · edit · hist) was AfDed by Bastun (t · c); see discussion (3 participants)
- 17 Oct 2024 – Living Room Anthology, Vol. 1 (talk · edit · hist) was AfDed by Bastun (t · c); see discussion (3 participants)
- 17 Oct 2024 – The North Star (album) (talk · edit · hist) was AfDed by Bastun (t · c); see discussion (4 participants)
- 17 Oct 2024 – Hope's Not Giving Up (talk · edit · hist) was AfDed by Bastun (t · c); see discussion (3 participants)
- 17 Oct 2024 – Light Makes a Way (talk · edit · hist) was AfDed by Bastun (t · c); see discussion (3 participants)
- 17 Oct 2024 – Magnify (Remedy Drive album) (talk · edit · hist) was AfDed by Bastun (t · c); see discussion (3 participants)
- 16 Oct 2024 – David Michael Moses (talk · edit · hist) was AfDed by Darth Stabro (t · c); see discussion (4 participants)
- 16 Oct 2024 – Rip Open the Skies (talk · edit · hist) was AfDed by Bastun (t · c); see discussion (2 participants)
- (15 more...)
Proposed deletions
- 06 Oct 2024 – Clement the Heretic (talk · edit · hist) PRODed by Here2rewrite (t · c) was deleted
Categories for discussion
- 18 Oct 2024 – Category:Calvinist and Reformed religious workers (talk · edit · hist) was CfDed by Humpser (t · c); see discussion
- 18 Oct 2024 – Category:LGBTQ Calvinist and Reformed Christians (talk · edit · hist) was CfDed by Humpser (t · c); see discussion
- 18 Oct 2024 – Category:Former Calvinist and Reformed Christians (talk · edit · hist) was CfDed by Humpser (t · c); see discussion
- 18 Oct 2024 – Category:Converts to Calvinism (talk · edit · hist) was CfDed by Humpser (t · c); see discussion
- 18 Oct 2024 – Category:Calvinist and Reformed anti-apartheid activists (talk · edit · hist) was CfDed by Humpser (t · c); see discussion
- 18 Oct 2024 – Category:Calvinist and Reformed Christians by nationality (talk · edit · hist) was CfDed by Humpser (t · c); see discussion
- 18 Oct 2024 – Category:Calvinist and Reformed Christians by denomination (talk · edit · hist) was CfDed by Humpser (t · c); see discussion
- 18 Oct 2024 – Category:Calvinist and Reformed Christian socialists (talk · edit · hist) was CfDed by Humpser (t · c); see discussion
- 18 Oct 2024 – Category:Calvinist and Reformed Christians by century (talk · edit · hist) was CfDed by Humpser (t · c); see discussion
- 18 Oct 2024 – Category:20th-century Calvinist and Reformed theologians (talk · edit · hist) was CfDed by Humpser (t · c); see discussion
- (18 more...)
Templates for discussion
- 07 Oct 2024 – Template:Stavesacre (talk · edit · hist) TfDed by Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (t · c) was closed; see discussion
Redirects for discussion
- 14 Oct 2024 – RYL (talk · edit · hist) →The Life and Adventures of Santa Claus was RfDed by Thryduulf (t · c); see discussion
- 14 Oct 2024 – Ryl (talk · edit · hist) →The Life and Adventures of Santa Claus was RfDed by Thryduulf (t · c); see discussion
- 11 Sep 2024 – Hkbu (talk · edit · hist) →Hong Kong Baptist University was RfDed by Rusalkii (t · c); see discussion
Featured article candidates
- 29 Aug 2024 – Apocalypse of Peter (talk · edit · hist) was FA nominated by SnowFire (t · c); see discussion
Good article nominees
- 30 Sep 2024 – Soda Kaichi (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Seefooddiet (t · c); start discussion
- 28 Sep 2024 – Nicolinas (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by V.B.Speranza (t · c); start discussion
- 22 Sep 2024 – Patrick J. Ryan (chaplain) (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Darth Stabro (t · c); see discussion
- 26 Jul 2024 – Crusading movement (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Norfolkbigfish (t · c); start discussion
- 16 May 2024 – Codex Monacensis (X 033) (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Stephen Walch (t · c); start discussion
- 10 Oct 2024 – Samuel Lander (talk · edit · hist) GA nominated by PCN02WPS (t · c) was promoted by It is a wonderful world (t · c), see discussion
Good topic candidates
- 18 Jun 2024 – God Is (talk · edit · hist) was GT nominated by Kyle Peake (t · c); see discussion
Featured article reviews
- 30 Oct 2023 – Byzantine Empire (talk · edit · hist) was put up for FA review by SandyGeorgia (t · c); see discussion
Good article reassessments
- 14 Oct 2024 – Civilian Public Service (talk · edit · hist) was nominated for GA reassessment by Z1720 (t · c); see discussion
Requests for comments
- 12 Oct 2024 – Catholic theology (talk · edit · hist) has an RfC by Jeaucques Quœure (t · c); see discussion
Requested moves
- 16 Oct 2024 – Battle of Jericho (talk · edit · hist) is requested to be moved to Fall of Jericho by StAnselm (t · c); see discussion
Articles to be merged
- 13 Oct 2024 – Chaldean Catholic Church (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for merging to Chaldean Catholics by Klbrain (t · c); see discussion
- 09 Oct 2024 – Lists of Christian theologians (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for merging to List of Christian theologians by Smasongarrison (t · c); see discussion
- 08 Oct 2024 – Presbyter (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for merging to Elder (Christianity) by Dirkwillems (t · c); see discussion
- 07 Oct 2024 – Esoteric Christianity (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for merging to Christian mysticism by Kowal2701 (t · c); see discussion
- 29 Sep 2024 – Malankara–Persian ecclesiastical relations (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for merging to Church of the East in India by Logosx127 (t · c); see discussion
- 29 Sep 2024 – Galatians 1 (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for merging to Epistle to the Galatians by Beland (t · c); see discussion
- 28 Jul 2024 – Apostolic-Prophetic Movement (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for merging to New Apostolic Reformation by Flod logic (t · c); see discussion
- 10 May 2024 – Chaldean Catholics (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for merging by HurryHurrian (t · c); see discussion
Articles to be split
- 08 Jul 2024 – List of common misconceptions (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for splitting by WhatamIdoing (t · c); see discussion
- 18 Mar 2024 – Macau Protestant Chapel (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for splitting by 188.211.233.131 (t · c); see discussion
- 23 Feb 2024 – Religion in China (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for splitting by Remsense (t · c); see discussion
- 09 Aug 2023 – Houston Christian High School (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for splitting by Wjenkins96 (t · c); see discussion
- 26 Apr 2023 – Christian liturgy (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for splitting by Scyrme (t · c); see discussion
- 24 Mar 2023 – Ukraine prison ministries (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for splitting by Wracking (t · c); see discussion
- 11 Feb 2023 – Carols by Candlelight (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for splitting by Adpete (t · c); see discussion
- 04 Jan 2022 – Arthur Neve (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for splitting by Breamk (t · c); see discussion
- 20 Jun 2020 – St Cuthbert's Church, Edinburgh (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for splitting by CPClegg (t · c); see discussion
Articles for creation
- 18 Oct 2024 – Draft:Hagoth (talk · edit · hist) has been submitted for AfC by Oliwiasocz (t · c)
- 09 Oct 2024 – Draft:Antanas Karosas (talk · edit · hist) has been submitted for AfC by Hwqaksd (t · c)
- 06 Oct 2024 – Draft:Piotr Paweł Wierzbowski (talk · edit · hist) has been submitted for AfC by Hwqaksd (t · c)
- 04 Oct 2024 – Draft:National Distributist Party (talk · edit · hist) has been submitted for AfC by 31.94.30.217 (t · c)
- 03 Oct 2024 – Draft:Paulina Ewa Hławiczka-Trotman (talk · edit · hist) has been submitted for AfC by J.nelsonlcigb (t · c)
- 02 Oct 2024 – Draft:Czesław Falkowski (talk · edit · hist) has been submitted for AfC by Hwqaksd (t · c)
- 01 Oct 2024 – Draft:Edward Samsel (talk · edit · hist) has been submitted for AfC by Hwqaksd (t · c)
- 29 Sep 2024 – Draft:Mikołaj Sasinowski (talk · edit · hist) has been submitted for AfC by Hwqaksd (t · c)
- 29 Sep 2024 – Draft:Trialogue of the Abrahamic Faiths (talk · edit · hist) has been submitted for AfC by DrunkenJoe (t · c)
- 26 Sep 2024 – Draft:St Andrew's Parish Church of Oakington (Cambridgeshire) (talk · edit · hist) has been submitted for AfC by Ildiko Dulo (t · c)
- (7 more...)
- Christianity Deletion list
Christianity
[edit]- Blake Alma (numismatist) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Previously deleted as WP:Articles for deletion/Blake Alma (TV Host) and in the first nomination, and salted as Blake Alma. WP:REFBOMBED with unreliable sources, quotes, passing mentions, etc. with very little actual significant coverage cited.
(Not tagging for speedy deletion because it's been several years so things could plausibly have changed. But the refs here fail to convince me they have) * Pppery * it has begun... 00:21, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
- And let's titleblacklist
.*blake.*alma
once this is closed as delete so we can finally stop this campaign or whatever. * Pppery * it has begun... 00:26, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Businesspeople, Radio, Television, Christianity, Florida, and Ohio. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:37, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
- Scars to Prove It (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NOTABILITY requirements, specifically WP:NMUSIC; no WP:SIGCOV. BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 15:00, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:01, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:40, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment - User:Bastun has nominated nine Remedy Drive albums for deletion, all with the same non-descriptive rationale copy/pasted into each: "Fails WP:NOTABILITY requirements, specifically WP:NMUSIC; no WP:SIGCOV." (The first nomination has slightly different syntax.) There is no evidence that a WP:BEFORE search, specific to each album, was done before this mass copy/paste operation. Some of the album articles have citations to reliable sources in the Christian music media, though others could be redirected to the band's article. That's already more variable evidence then given in these mass nominations. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 13:29, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- Reply - not sure what you mean by "non-descriptive"? It's accurate. The albums have all failed to chart, and do not meet any criteria listed in WP:NALBUM (and I did not nominate articles by the band which had charted). Nor do they satisfy WP:SIGCOV - significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Passing mention in genre music reviews was all I could find when doing WP:BEFORE, and that doesn't qualify. BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 16:45, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- See WP:JUSTAPOLICY. You should indicate why and how those policies were violated in the original nomination. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 12:41, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep seems good enough. Babysharkboss2!! (I spread pro-Weezer propaganda) 13:50, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- This AFD is depressing. Vague nominations combatted by vague stances. Come on, do better. Sergecross73 msg me 20:08, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
- Weak keep. There's a bit more on this one too. As I said on the nomination for Imago Amor, the reviews that are present are the usual weak/blog-esque Christian music sources, but it's an indication there is more coverage out there. Ss112 08:04, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
- Imago Amor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NOTABILITY requirements, specifically WP:NMUSIC; no WP:SIGCOV. BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 14:58, 17 October 2024 (UTC) Add: The albums by Remedy Drive that I have nominated for deletion all failed to chart, and do not meet any criteria listed in WP:NALBUM (and I did not nominate articles by the band which had charted). Nor do they satisfy WP:SIGCOV - significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Passing mention in genre music reviews was all I could find when doing WP:BEFORE, and that doesn't qualify. BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 16:55, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:00, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:40, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- Weak keep. The reviews that are present are the usual weak/blog-esque Christian music sources, but it's an indication there is more coverage out there. Ss112 08:03, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
- Living Room Anthology, Vol. 1 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NOTABILITY requirements, specifically WP:NMUSIC; no WP:SIGCOV. BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 14:57, 17 October 2024 (UTC) Add: The albums by Remedy Drive that I have nominated for deletion all failed to chart, and do not meet any criteria listed in WP:NALBUM (and I did not nominate articles by the band which had charted). Nor do they satisfy WP:SIGCOV - significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Passing mention in genre music reviews was all I could find when doing WP:BEFORE, and that doesn't qualify. BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 16:55, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:00, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:40, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect to Remedy Drive per nomination. Lacks significant coverage and isn't notable, like the majority of the band's albums. There isn't even a Jesus Freak Hideout revie for this one. Ss112 07:52, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
- The North Star (album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NOTABILITY requirements, specifically WP:NMUSIC; no WP:SIGCOV. BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 14:57, 17 October 2024 (UTC) Add: The albums by Remedy Drive that I have nominated for deletion all failed to chart, and do not meet any criteria listed in WP:NALBUM (and I did not nominate articles by the band which had charted). Nor do they satisfy WP:SIGCOV - significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Passing mention in genre music reviews was all I could find when doing WP:BEFORE, and that doesn't qualify. BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 16:56, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:57, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:39, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- Weak keep. Similarly to Imago Amor, the reviews that are present are the usual weak/blog-esque Christian music sources, but it's an indication there is more coverage out there. Ss112 12:46, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep - There is sufficient coverage such as ccmmagazine and jesusfreakhideout . Drushrush (talk) 02:54, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hope's Not Giving Up (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NOTABILITY requirements, specifically WP:NMUSIC; no WP:SIGCOV. BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 14:56, 17 October 2024 (UTC) Add: The albums by Remedy Drive that I have nominated for deletion all failed to chart, and do not meet any criteria listed in WP:NALBUM (and I did not nominate articles by the band which had charted). Nor do they satisfy WP:SIGCOV - significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Passing mention in genre music reviews was all I could find when doing WP:BEFORE, and that doesn't qualify. BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 16:56, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:58, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:38, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect to Remedy Drive per nomination. Lacks significant coverage and isn't notable, like the majority of the band's albums. Ss112 07:46, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
- Light Makes a Way (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NOTABILITY requirements, specifically WP:NMUSIC; no WP:SIGCOV. BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 14:53, 17 October 2024 (UTC) Add: The albums by Remedy Drive that I have nominated for deletion all failed to chart, and do not meet any criteria listed in WP:NALBUM (and I did not nominate articles by the band which had charted). Nor do they satisfy WP:SIGCOV - significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Passing mention in genre music reviews was all I could find when doing WP:BEFORE, and that doesn't qualify. BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 16:57, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:00, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:37, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect to Remedy Drive per nomination. Lacks significant coverage and isn't notable, like the majority of the band's albums. A lot of these articles seem to exist under the premise that Christian outlet Jesus Freak Hideout reviewing the release makes it notable—it doesn't. Ss112 07:50, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
- Magnify (Remedy Drive album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NOTABILITY requirements, specifically WP:NMUSIC; no WP:SIGCOV. BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 14:51, 17 October 2024 (UTC) Add: The albums by Remedy Drive that I have nominated for deletion all failed to chart, and do not meet any criteria listed in WP:NALBUM (and I did not nominate articles by the band which had charted). Nor do they satisfy WP:SIGCOV - significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Passing mention in genre music reviews was all I could find when doing WP:BEFORE, and that doesn't qualify. BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 16:58, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:58, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:37, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect to Remedy Drive per nomination. Lacks significant coverage and isn't notable, like the majority of the band's albums. A lot of these articles seem to exist under the premise that Christian outlet Jesus Freak Hideout reviewing the release makes it notable—it doesn't. Ss112 07:51, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
- David Michael Moses (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Notability unclear from sources in article. The news articles containing him are articles written about stories he was involved in as matters of Catholic interest, but do not show that he himself is notable. ~Darth StabroTalk/Contribs 20:13, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Keep: Meets WP:RELPEOPLE. Also, there are enough WP:SIGCOV to establish notability. The article is net positively good, and I don't need to do a source search.Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 20:46, 16 October 2024 (UTC)- How does it meet WP:RELPEOPLE? He is not a head of a major religion; he has not played an important role in a significant religious event that has itself received considerable coverage; has not made contributions to the philosophy of religion; and has not been recognized as an authoritative source on religious matters or writings. Neither is he a bishop or head of a large Protestant congregation. He is an associate pastor.
- Most of the coverage including him does not point out or demonstrate his notability as a person. I myself am a Catholic priest who has been mentioned or featured in a few Catholic news articles, but I am in no way notable enough for a Wiki article. ~Darth StabroTalk/Contribs 20:59, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Christianity, and Internet. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 20:59, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete I don't see a WP:GNG pass (and WP:RELPEOPLE doesn't apply here). The closest I can get is two articles from Catholic News Agency (here, here), but we need multiple that are independent of the subject and each other, plus these aren't necessarily WP:SIGCOV of him. The rest of the sources are affiliated or unreliable blog-type sources. Dclemens1971 (talk) 02:58, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment:: Do we all agree to redirect to List of American Catholic priests per WP:ATD? Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 04:15, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not sure why it would be an appropriate redirect; no one who might be searching for him would be served by a redirection to an incomplete list that couldn't even include him. ~Darth StabroTalk/Contribs 13:54, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- I also fail to see the value of redirection as suggested. There are tens of thousands of Catholic priests in the U.S. and only a small fraction of them are notable. Thus, per WP:CSC, the selection criterion for this list is
Every entry meets the notability criteria for its own article in the English Wikipedia
, and Moses would not qualify as not qualifying for a standalone article. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:51, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- I also fail to see the value of redirection as suggested. There are tens of thousands of Catholic priests in the U.S. and only a small fraction of them are notable. Thus, per WP:CSC, the selection criterion for this list is
- I'm not sure why it would be an appropriate redirect; no one who might be searching for him would be served by a redirection to an incomplete list that couldn't even include him. ~Darth StabroTalk/Contribs 13:54, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete for lack of WP:SIGCOV and not passing WP:MUSICBIO. None of the current sources (Catholic News agency reports) are independent of the Church, and I don’t see any secular reviews. If there was a review in either America or similar reliable religious media, that would go far to showing notability. I also don’t see any touring as a musician outside of Eastern Texas/Louisiana. Normally, I’d advocate for keeping or merging such articles - my record on AfD is pretty much on the inclusionist side of religious articles. However, I find myself agreeing with Dclemens1971 as to the lack of utility in a redirect to a larger list. If you find and better sources, please ping me. Bearian (talk) 03:38, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete then. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 09:39, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
- Remedy (The Blue One) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable, no WP:SIGCOV, does not satisfy WP:NMUSIC. BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 16:52, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:24, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:53, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect to Remedy Drive per nomination. Lacks significant coverage and isn't notable, like the majority of the band's albums. Ss112 07:46, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
- Rip Open the Skies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No claim to notability, no WP:SIGCOV, does not satisfy WP:NMUSIC. BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 17:01, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:24, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:52, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- Bombworks Records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails NCORP. The sources satisfactorily verify what's claimed, meaning that certain bands were released through them, but as a company, it fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:SIGCOV. Possible promotional creation based on creator's association with music promoting business. Graywalls (talk) 15:25, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Texas. Graywalls (talk) 15:25, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music and Christianity. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:02, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- Victoria Park Presbyterian Church (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I believe that this church has not existed for a good number of years. I was told that the property at 2712 Victoria Park Avenue had been sold. It is currently the location of Christ Emmanuel Community Church. Google Street View shows this church's signage prominently displayed on the building as long ago as May 2009. PeterR2 (talk) 19:55, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Christianity. PeterR2 (talk) 19:55, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:25, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy keep. No valid deletion rationale has been offered. Instead we have an WP:OUTOFBUSINESS argument. Notability once gained cannot be lost. This church may not have been notable to begin with (the nominator gives no indication of a WP:BEFORE) but even if it’s not, no policy-based rationale to delete has been advanced. Dclemens1971 (talk) 02:01, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry I wasn't aware of that, and assumed that articles about no-longer-existent places got closed down unless they had a sufficient long-term relevance - since articles to which I have contributed have more than once been deleted without adequate reason - notably [David MacIntyre] was replaced by some ephemeral modern hockey player and moved to [David McIntyre (minister)] and then deleted, despite the fact that MacIntyre was an early Principal of an influential college - International Christian College, formerly Bible Training Institute, which lasted over a century and was very well known in evangelical circles in Scotland. Also the page about the Presbyterian Reformed Church (North America) which still exists, and is still mentioned in other Wikipedia articles, was deleted - see Wikipedia:WikiProject_Reformed_Christianity/Article_alerts/Archive_1#AfD PeterR2 (talk) 14:42, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
- @PeterR2, if you reformat your nomination to address how the subject of the article fails WP:NCHURCH and show evidence of a WP:BEFORE search for potential sources not included in the article, I would reconsider my !vote. (The raising of other deletion discussions is generally irrelevant per WP:OTHERSTUFF, but I'll address them briefly: David McIntyre (minister) was an uncontested WP:PROD, and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Presbyterian Reformed Church (North America) was closed as soft delete; both can be revived upon request at WP:REFUND, at which point they would have to be brought up at AfD again if editors still think they should be deleted. I can only speak to the latter, which I nominated, because I didn't believe it passed the WP:GNG or WP:NORG, the relevant notability guidelines.) Dclemens1971 (talk) 15:18, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry I wasn't aware of that, and assumed that articles about no-longer-existent places got closed down unless they had a sufficient long-term relevance - since articles to which I have contributed have more than once been deleted without adequate reason - notably [David MacIntyre] was replaced by some ephemeral modern hockey player and moved to [David McIntyre (minister)] and then deleted, despite the fact that MacIntyre was an early Principal of an influential college - International Christian College, formerly Bible Training Institute, which lasted over a century and was very well known in evangelical circles in Scotland. Also the page about the Presbyterian Reformed Church (North America) which still exists, and is still mentioned in other Wikipedia articles, was deleted - see Wikipedia:WikiProject_Reformed_Christianity/Article_alerts/Archive_1#AfD PeterR2 (talk) 14:42, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy keep. No valid deletion rationale has been offered. Instead we have an WP:OUTOFBUSINESS argument. Notability once gained cannot be lost. This church may not have been notable to begin with (the nominator gives no indication of a WP:BEFORE) but even if it’s not, no policy-based rationale to delete has been advanced. Dclemens1971 (talk) 02:01, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - There does not appear to be a church by this name in Canada. Article has no sourcing whatsoever. The only church I find by that name, is in Australia. — Maile (talk) 02:00, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
- I can assure you it did exist - I am assuming Victoria Park Presbyterian Church was its local name - it was a congregation of the Associated Presbyterian Churches from their inception in 1989 onwards, having previously been in the Free Presbyterian Church of Scotland. Unfortunately the 2007 Google Street View is of too poor quality to see what any signage may have said! See also An Historical Sketch of the Free Presbyterian Church of Scotland in North America - it seems likely that the author of that article is not a representative of any of the denominations concerned, though his sympathies obviously lie with the Free Presbyterians. In any case the name is mentioned at Montgomery Library Archives of Westminster Theological Seminary and at various directory sites. PeterR2 (talk) 14:20, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
- Ok, I take your word for that. — Maile (talk) 23:31, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- I can assure you it did exist - I am assuming Victoria Park Presbyterian Church was its local name - it was a congregation of the Associated Presbyterian Churches from their inception in 1989 onwards, having previously been in the Free Presbyterian Church of Scotland. Unfortunately the 2007 Google Street View is of too poor quality to see what any signage may have said! See also An Historical Sketch of the Free Presbyterian Church of Scotland in North America - it seems likely that the author of that article is not a representative of any of the denominations concerned, though his sympathies obviously lie with the Free Presbyterians. In any case the name is mentioned at Montgomery Library Archives of Westminster Theological Seminary and at various directory sites. PeterR2 (talk) 14:20, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Well, it existed [1]. That's not enough to vote either way, but it's real. Oaktree b (talk) 23:44, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete due to lack of significant coverage, and my own standards for churches. It might exist, but we can’t write an encyclopedia article around listings and church inside debates. It’s not so old a church building that it’s automatically noted for its historical value. Bearian (talk) 03:17, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: The AfD indeed qualified for a Speedy Keep closure due to the deficient nomination. However, now with two valid Delete !votes, the nomination no longer matters, so I'm relisting this in the hope of additional substantive arguments either way.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 20:15, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
- Kingsley Okonkwo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
An article about a "family life and relationship coach, TV personality, and author" sourced entirely to shady pieces. While most of the publications are reliable on their own, the pieces sourced to are either unreliable, of the subject's opinion, run of the mill coverages or vanispamcruft. It's either the subject is publishing their opinion or it's an unreliable "things you need to know about X" piece. Nothing to confer inherent notability here either. Fails WP:GNG over all. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 23:03, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 23:03, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Television, and Christianity. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:15, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 22:57, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- Lorgius (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Tagged uncited for years and I could not find much in Google Scolar Chidgk1 (talk) 17:15, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Religion and Turkey. Chidgk1 (talk) 17:15, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:28, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. People venerated as saints by major churches are clearly notable. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:11, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. This pre-Vatican martyr never came through a formal Canonization process. All the the sources about him are literally a word or two. I’m not even sure if he really existed. There’s no evidence of a cultus. Bearian (talk) 10:02, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
- It's quite probable he didn't exist, but that's not unusual for early Christian saints, few of whom ever went through a formal canonisation process. It's whether he's venerated that's significant, and he clearly is, even if not that commonly. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:13, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 17:23, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep - Lorgius (Lorgio in Italian, or "San Lorgio" which works as a search term for him) is certainly a venerated saint, with churches named after him. Multiple sources exist supporting this. Chiswick Chap (talk) 18:01, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
- Better Days (Robbie Seay Band album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Give Yourself Away (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Robbie Seay Band Live (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Articles about albums, not properly referenced as having any strong claim to passing WP:NALBUMS. As usual, Wikipedia's approach to albums used to extend an automatic presumption of notability to any album that was recorded by a notable artist regardless of sourcing or the lack thereof, in the name of completionist directoryism -- but that's long since been deprecated, and an album now has to have a meaningful notability claim (chart success, notable music awards, a significant volume of coverage and analysis about it, etc.) and WP:GNG-worthy sourcing to support it.
But none of these three albums are making any notability claim above and beyond "this is an album that exists", two of the three are completely unreferenced, and the one that does have references doesn't have good ones: it's citing one review in an unreliable source, and one "Billboard chart history" that lists no actual chart positions and is present only to footnote a release date that it doesn't actually support rather than any charting claims.
As always, I'm willing to withdraw this if somebody with much more expertise in Christian music than I've got can find the right kind of sourcing to salvage them, but simply existing isn't "inherently" notable enough to exempt an album from having to pass GNG. Bearcat (talk) 14:53, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 14:53, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Christianity. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:09, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 06:36, 8 October 2024 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: We need to see some participation here.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 06:18, 15 October 2024 (UTC)- Redirect to Robbie Seay Band, all 3 fail WP:NALBUM. मल्ल (talk) 22:31, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- Lilia Tarawa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:BLP1E only notable in regards to Gloriavale. Most of the stuff not in regards to Gloriavale are from promotional pieces and Tarawa herself. Traumnovelle (talk) 20:36, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Most of the sources are neither reliable nor independent. They are full of primary sources written by the subject or from unreliable blogs. Ibjaja055 (talk) 21:37, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Christianity, and New Zealand. Traumnovelle (talk) 20:36, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and Women. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 21:13, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep There's enough here to show GNG. She's written a book that Martin van Beynen has called "bestselling". It created a lot of publicity, for example, John Campbell interviewed her for 10 min on Radio New Zealand. She gets keynote speaking slots and, whilst that's nothing unusual, it is unusual when Stuff reports on that. She's been invited to give a talk at TEDxChristchurch and it takes quite something to get invited to TEDx. The pieces by Kurt Bayer (NZHerald; based in Christchurch), Eleanor Black (Stuff), and Now to Love (which belongs to Are Media) go into plenty enough depth to fulfil the criteria of three independent reliable sources. And all those sources are in the article already. All up, that's an easy keep. Schwede66 04:23, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- The Waikato Times piece is a promotional piece for the business awards. The Now to Love piece is just her interview with Women's Daily. The other Stuff piece is also a promotional piece.
- This is the same for most of the refs, they're either promo pieces or interviews about Gloriavale. Traumnovelle (talk) 06:20, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep plenty of media coverage from reliable outlets here to establish GNG. David Palmer//cloventt (talk) 20:59, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- There is a lot of media coverage but it is promotional/non-independent.
- Refs 1-4 are Tarawa herself, they shouldn't be used in the article except in limited aboutself uses, let alone go to notability.
- Ref 5, supplied piece from the festival she appeared at.
- Ref 6, women's day interview
- Ref 7 is about Cooper's conviction and just drops a promotion for her book in it... which is odd. Bit of coverage here but not much and it is still in relation to Gloriavale.
- Ref 8 same coverage but more blatantly promotional this time
- Refs 9 and 10 have the exact same wording as refs 7 and 8 which makes me believe this is some promotional thing sent out to papers, that or they just simply copied the Herald, either way the refs adds nothing to notability.
- Ref 11 is a promotional piece.
- Ref 12 is a promotional interview
- Ref 13 is an interview
- Ref 14 is another interview that involves promoting the book
- Refs 15-16 are reprints of Herald refs mentioned earlier
- Ref 17 uses same wording as the other promotional pieces
- Ref 18 is a promotional interview
- Ref 19 is a promotional interview from women's day and the same ref as 6.
- Ref 20 isn't promotional or an interview but very brief coverage (3 lines) as part of her grandfather's death
- Ref 21 is an interview
- Ref 22 is from Tarawa herself
- Ref 23 is a promotional piece for the Matamata business awards
- Ref 24 is a broken url but it is a very brief interview
- Refs 25-27 are interviews
- Ref 28 is promotional
- Ref 29 opinion piece and it provides little coverage anyhow
- Ref 30 is brief coverage of the book
- Ref 31 is dead but appears to be a blog from an unreliable source
- Ref 32 is about someone else's death
- Ref 33 is the exact same as ref 32.
- Ref 34 is the same as 9, 9 is presumably a reprint of it. Contains the exact same sentences used in the other promotional pieces
- Ref 35 is about Gloriavale but suddenly just drops in the same promotional content about Tarawa's book seen before.
- Ref 36 is a radio interview, not even an RS.
- Ref 37 is a podcast interview.
- Ref 38 is a promotional piece for some event she was invited to
- Ref 39 is another piece on Gloriavale that just suddenly includes the same promotional content as else where, it is really odd and I cannot see a reason for it other than being sponsored/paid for it
- So yes, there is a lot of media coverage, but little of it is independent, most of it is from the same source, and plenty of it is promotional. The fact that two identical articles are used as a reference right after each other just looks like COI/Paid editing with refbombing so it looks notable. The user who wrote most of this article is now blocked for copyvios but from looking at his contributions I think he may have been a paid editor. Traumnovelle (talk) 22:22, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 21:55, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep per Schwede66.-Gadfium (talk) 23:25, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
Weak delete, or maybe easier, rescope (retitle) the article to represent coverage of her book. [On reflection, “delete” doesn’t accurately represent my opinion, and I am neutral. 23:50, 7 October 2024 (UTC)] None of the sources appear to be doing any fact-checking, and are covering her story as though it were independent reporting, so functionally what they are covering is her story, and most closely her book. Ultimately, media coverage of her herself most resembles something like coverage WP:VICTIM, where as an individual she isn’t that notable, but for the fact that she was the centre of some event, and then wrote it all down and sold the story. Reading that guideline: Outside of her book, or her story, obviously there isn’t some higher-level event-centred article to incorporate her into, and so if we are to just keep the article as is (not an absolutely awful outcome, per my “weak” !vote), her testimony, which should have lead to an article about her own life and experiences, just becomes a page about her. Not optimal, given how much we have to rely on her as primary sourcing, but there is clearly secondary reporting on her talking about her story/book. — HTGS (talk) 23:46, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. Is there consensus to delete or not?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 08:46, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
Delete very promotional, nothing relevant apart from being a speaker. 181.197.42.215 (talk) 09:59, 14 October 2024 (UTC)Striking sock !vote. Daniel (talk) 22:22, 14 October 2024 (UTC)- Delete per WP:VICTIM. Since an article about the Gloriavale Christian Community already exists, there's no need for a separate one about one of the victims. The references are also questionable: too many primary and promotional sources. DesiMoore (talk) 15:33, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
Delete: This is about her book, in a RS [2], but the rest of the coverage doesn't come in RS, so I'm not sure we have notability. Oaktree b (talk) 23:52, 14 October 2024 (UTC)- Keep also a review here [3], should meet AUTHOR with two book reviews in RS, on different continents. Oaktree b (talk) 23:56, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- Where is the review...? It is an extract from the book written by Tarawa herself. Traumnovelle (talk) 00:25, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry, wrong link. It's discussed here [4]. Oaktree b (talk) 00:54, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- It's discussed here, not at length [5], this is a good review also [6]. With the Herald and the NZ Review of Books, that should be AUTHOR notability. Oaktree b (talk) 01:03, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- Maybe the book is notable but I still see an issue with a lack of independent/non-promotional sources to be able to write an article about the subject. An article about the book with a basic ABOUTSELF about Tarawa might be better. Traumnovelle (talk) 01:17, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- New Zealand is a rather small media market, other than the Guardian, it's all local coverage. Oaktree b (talk) 14:27, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- You've got the two book reviews that talk about the person and the ton of secondary coverage, we can build an article about this person with that. She's a notable author with a decently reviewed book and a story about her life can be built. AUTHOR doesn't have a two book minimum requirement, once you're notable, you're notable. Oaktree b (talk) 18:29, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- The 'ton of secondary coverage' is largely all promotional pieces with many just quoting the same press-release they've been given. Traumnovelle (talk) 19:51, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- which is fine once notability has been established, that's how we flesh out articles. Oaktree b (talk) 20:07, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- I hope you're not suggesting that the promotional pieces should be used as sources. Traumnovelle (talk) 20:30, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- As proof she's spoken at TedX and that she's on a book tour, they're fine. Oaktree b (talk) 14:26, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- I hope you're not suggesting that the promotional pieces should be used as sources. Traumnovelle (talk) 20:30, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- which is fine once notability has been established, that's how we flesh out articles. Oaktree b (talk) 20:07, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- The 'ton of secondary coverage' is largely all promotional pieces with many just quoting the same press-release they've been given. Traumnovelle (talk) 19:51, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- Maybe the book is notable but I still see an issue with a lack of independent/non-promotional sources to be able to write an article about the subject. An article about the book with a basic ABOUTSELF about Tarawa might be better. Traumnovelle (talk) 01:17, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- It's discussed here, not at length [5], this is a good review also [6]. With the Herald and the NZ Review of Books, that should be AUTHOR notability. Oaktree b (talk) 01:03, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- I’m sorry, there is absolutely zero chance that Tarawa passes WP:AUTHOR as a subject-specific notability guideline on any of its four criteria. — HTGS (talk) 03:06, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry, wrong link. It's discussed here [4]. Oaktree b (talk) 00:54, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Meets GNG as outlined by others above. Paora (talk) 07:24, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep per referenced WP:GNG. I also tried to cleanup some of the non-significant or primary source references as well, probably more work to go. CaptainAngus (talk) 19:45, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
- Helaman Jeffs (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No indication of standalone notability. Hardly any coverage of the subject; notability is not inherited. (NPP action) C F A 💬 20:19, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Christianity. C F A 💬 20:21, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:54, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Latter Day Saints-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 23:49, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
Keep Multiple references (already found on the article) are stating that he is claiming to be the current head of the FLDS church, I will hunt down some more sources. Thief-River-Faller (talk) 12:54, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- That doesn't really matter. There needs be significant coverage in independent, reliable sources in order to meet WP:NBASIC. C F A 💬 14:40, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:01, 28 September 2024 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 05:25, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
Draftify -- I feel like draftifying this until further notability is presented later on is suitable, considering he is the son of a cult leader so there is probably something likely to come up in the future and if these sources are presented by User:Thief-River-Faller then we could improve on the article. 79lives (talk) 17:12, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
Delete - WP:INVALIDBIO So far, we only know he's a presumed possible heir to his imprisoned father. And possibly being used to carry out his father's wishes. He may or may not be viewed by others as his father's heir as a cult leader, but Wikipedia does not predict or presume the future. — Maile (talk) 01:02, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. I'll just add that no new sources have been added during this AFD. A review of sources might be useful as there is not much discussion of them here.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:37, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
Categories for discussion
[edit]- Christian religious leaders: further follow-up required, see Category talk:Religious leaders#Clergy categories