Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Bible
| This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Bible and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8Auto-archiving period: 182 days  |
 | This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 182 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Help with non-Biblical translations
[edit]Hello, not sure if this is the right place to ask this question. The page on the Proslogion uses a template meant to be used for translations of the Bible. Right now it seems like they are translations of the psalm that is referenced by Anselm in the text itself. Is there any way to use the same template for this text? Is there a different template I could use? Also, do these translations add to explanation? If not, can i remove them? thanks for your help. Drew Stanley (talk) 17:32, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Should Cain and Abel be merged into Cain and Abel?
[edit]Your view is welcome at Talk:Cain_and_Abel#Should_Cain_and_Abel_be_merged_into_this_article?. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 07:19, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Hebrew transliteration
[edit]Please discuss here.-- Carnby (talk) 20:54, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:List of New Testament minuscules (2001–)#Requested move 22 August 2024
[edit]
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:List of New Testament minuscules (2001–)#Requested move 22 August 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Reading of Beans 06:39, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
Please ban editor Potatín5–extreme religious bias
[edit]This editor has made it their mission to make the ENTIRETY of Wikipedia’s Bible pages conform to their conservative Catholic beliefs. Please look through all of their edits. This editor without fail deletes stated consensus that does not align with conservative Catholic beliefs. This is egregious affront to the integrity of Wikipedia. I beg those with the status to do this to ban this editor. See their talk page for the sheer amount of warnings they’ve gotten during their time as an editor. 2600:100C:B0AC:A9B4:E983:E0DA:2F98:914E (talk) 21:47, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- User:Jenhawk777
- User:ActivelyDisinterested
- User:Editor2020
- User:Levivich
- User:SIrubenstein
- User:Yitzilitt
- User:Vibigraphical
- User:Hazhk
- User:Gräbergs Grảa Sảng
- User:Gabby Merger 2600:100C:B0AC:A9B4:E983:E0DA:2F98:914E (talk) 21:57, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not sure how I can help in this situation, as I'm not knowledgeable in the area or an admin. The only relevant actions I can see that Potatín5 has made was reverting edits by 2600:100c:b0af:363d::/64, who was blocked by Izno as a sock of Fajkfnjsak. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested «@» °∆t° 23:22, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Andddddddddd blocked this IPv6 for the same reason. Izno (talk) 23:48, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not sure how I can help in this situation, as I'm not knowledgeable in the area or an admin. The only relevant actions I can see that Potatín5 has made was reverting edits by 2600:100c:b0af:363d::/64, who was blocked by Izno as a sock of Fajkfnjsak. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested «@» °∆t° 23:22, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Masoretic text
[edit]I'd appreciate it if someone could look at the recent changes that an IP insists on making to the first sentence of Masoretic text. Zerotalk 10:56, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
Expert needed: Gerard Gertoux
[edit]This newly mainspaced relatively extensive article deals significantly with the Tetragrammaton which is covered in its own article, and verifiability, dueness, neutrality of content needs to be reviewed by editors with relevant knowledge. The article could have elements of a WP:POVFORK. Please take a look at the content to see if there are any major issues. The talk page discussion is at Talk:Gerard Gertoux#Requires editing. Thank you—Alalch E. 12:28, 29 October 2024 (UTC)