Jump to content

User talk:Zombie433/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
     Archive 1   
All Pages:  1 -  ... (up to 100)


Notability of Stephen Tetteh

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Stephen Tetteh, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Stephen Tetteh seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Stephen Tetteh, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 12:18, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Welcome

Hello, Zombie433, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and have been reverted. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

There is a page about the verifiability policy that explains the policy in greater detail, and another that offers tips on the proper ways of citing sources. If you are stuck and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  triwbe (talk) 11:29, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sunterra (band)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Sunterra (band), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.sing365.com/music/lyric.nsf/Sunterra-Biography/771EB85407A7065748256D7500175284. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 10:30, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Aaron Fletcher

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Aaron Fletcher, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Mattythewhite (talk) 10:58, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your articles

Hi. Your articles could be better. For one, they lack Wikipedia:Categories. How about looking at other articles, to see how it's done? Punkmorten (talk) 11:18, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And please don't create articles on youth and developmental players, only people who actually played soccer for grown-ups. Punkmorten (talk) 11:21, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Sunterra (band)

A tag has been placed on Sunterra (band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 14:52, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Derek Gaudet

An article that you have been involved in editing, Derek Gaudet, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Derek Gaudet. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? bneidror (talk) 17:39, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Derek Gaudet

Don' t remove the AfD message. bneidror (talk) 14:56, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kilian Elkinson

Do you have any proof of him having a cap for the Bermuda national team? пﮟოьεԻ 57 09:57, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide proof of Elkinson playing for Bermuda. пﮟოьεԻ 57 10:34, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
As you've removed the claim that he played for Bermuda, I've deleted the article as it was effectively a copy of the one deleted by Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kilian Elkinson. пﮟოьεԻ 57 10:38, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Ernest Asante

An article that you have been involved in editing, Ernest Asante, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ernest Asante. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? JohnCD (talk) 11:55, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Advice on notability guidelines

Hi. You would save yourself disappointment at seeing your articles deleted by reading Wikipedia's guidelines on Notability and Notability (people) which determine who qualifies for an article. In particular, WP:ATHLETE, which is part of the "people" guideline, says that footballers need to have actually played in a fully professional league. WP:FOOTYN gives more detail. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 12:23, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of William Owusu Acheampong

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article William Owusu Acheampong, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. JohnCD (talk) 13:00, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Admir Salihovic

An article that you have been involved in editing, Admir Salihovic, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Admir Salihovic. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? bneidror (talk) 16:36, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Wykked Wytch, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://www.wykkedwytch.com/bio.html, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Wykked Wytch and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Wykked Wytch with a link to where we can find that note.
  • If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Wykked Wytch.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at Talk:Wykked Wytch/Temp. Leave a note at Talk:Wykked Wytch saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:58, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Un-attached MLS players

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Un-attached MLS players, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.footballtransfers.info/squads/club3.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 12:17, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Diego Milito. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Thank you. -- Alexf42 11:32, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hellas S.C.

There is a non-specific complaint about this article at Wikipedia:Help desk#Hellas S.C. PrimeHunter (talk) 00:40, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Delson Banda

I have nominated Delson Banda, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Delson Banda. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. AllynJ (talk | contribs) 18:28, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Tumor (Band)

A tag has been placed on Tumor (Band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. tomasz. 13:48, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

René van Eck

As I've seen you revert the accent change on FC Carl Zeiss Jena's new manager yet again, I'd like to recommend you have a look at the team's official site. You'll find that the correct accent is indeed the Acute accent, not the Grave accent you insist on adding. Please use the correct accent. Thank you. -- Madcynic (talk) 15:54, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas Hitzlsperger nickname

Hi there. Just to let you know that there is no point in adding the nickname parameter to football biography infoboxes, as you did with Thomas Hitzlsperger. This parameter was removed from Template:Infobox Football biography some time ago, so any nickname you add will not be displayed. Thanks. --Jameboy (talk) 19:26, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Yggdrasil (german band)

A tag has been placed on Yggdrasil (german band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. TallNapoleon (talk) 09:34, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Yggdrasil (german band)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Yggdrasil (german band), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Michig (talk) 13:08, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Calvin Mac Intosch

An article that you have been involved in editing, Calvin Mac Intosch, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Calvin Mac Intosch. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Aecis·(away) talk 16:13, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

African footballers

Hi Zombie. I believe we met in Resident Evil LOL? ANyway I see you are starting Burundian footballers. Great. Could you also start the national players from the Niger national football team? Cheers The Bald One White cat 12:51, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Nikita Andreev, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. BanRay 22:27, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Geoffrey Castillion

An article that you have been involved in editing, Geoffrey Castillion, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geoffrey Castillion. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Aecis·(away) talk 15:50, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've also nominated seven other articles you have created: Darko Bodul, Danilo Sousa Campos, Christian Supusepa, Daley Blind, Toby Alderweireld, Sergio Padt, Roy Ouwerkerk. They are included in the same AfD discussion. Aecis·(away) talk 19:14, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Carlos Bilardo, you will be blocked from editing. -- Alexf(talk) 10:46, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kwara United

Please add citations and sources for your updates on Kwara United FC. Also please be careful about adding out of date informations from sources not updated in over a year.Embele (talk) 01:00, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Francesca Chiara.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Francesca Chiara.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:08, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:The lovecrave name.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:The lovecrave name.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:09, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:The lovecrave name.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:The lovecrave name.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:28, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of File:The lovecrave name.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:The lovecrave name.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:File:The lovecrave name.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. BanRay 18:07, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of File:Francesca Chiara.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Francesca Chiara.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:File:Francesca Chiara.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. BanRay 18:09, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AJ Auxerre

This article needs more long sentences: AJ Auxerre . There are just flags... What do you think? Can you do something about it? Maybe I will start, because this article is now ... sooo not too good.. --Tamás Kádár (talk) 16:54, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Milan Jovanović (footballer born 1981)

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Milan Jovanović (footballer born 1981). Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Matthew_hk tc 13:18, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Roman Neustaedter.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Roman Neustaedter.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:07, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Sydney Olmpic FC logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Sydney Olmpic FC logo.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:05, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Olympic Sharks logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Olympic Sharks logo.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:05, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Celestial Crown

I have nominated Celestial Crown, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Celestial Crown. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Undead Warrior (talk) 20:06, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Celestial Crown.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Celestial Crown.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Undead Warrior (talk) 20:08, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An article you created maybe deleted soon: Tools which can help you

The article you created, Celestial_Crown maybe deleted from Wikipedia.

There is an ongoing debate about whether your article should be deleted here:

The faster your respond, the better chance the article you created can be saved. This is because deletion debates only stay open for a few days, and the first comments are usually the most important.

There are several tools and other editors who can help you keep the page from being deleted forever:

  1. You can list the page up for deletion on Article Rescue Squadron. If you need help listing your page, add a comment on the Article Rescue Squadron talk page.
  2. You can request a mentor to help explain to you all of the complex rules that editors use to get a page deleted, here: Wikipedia:Adopt-a-User. But don't wait for a mentor to respond on the deletion page.
  3. When try to delete a page, veteran editors love to use a lot of rule acronyms. Don't let these acronyms intimidate you.
    Here is a list of your own acronyms you can use yourself: WP:Deletion debate acronyms which may support the page you created being kept.
    Acronyms in deletion debates are sometimes incorrectly used, or ignore rules or exceptions.
  4. You can merge the article into a larger or better established article on the same topic.

If your page is deleted, you still have many options available. Good luck! travb (talk) 21:25, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RE:unblack metal

Being christian makes no difference in this matter. Wikipedia does not take religious sides. Christian black metal is unblack metal. That's just that. It's the term they started for themselves. Undead Warrior (talk) 07:28, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:J. Schneider.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:41, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Zdenko Baotić

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Zdenko Baotić, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Using fake statistic does not make the player more popular Matthew_hk tc 13:52, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Football player Infobox

The stat section is for domestic league only and not include the followings: European Cups, International Cups, friendly, domestic cups. Matthew_hk tc 16:06, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Nemanja Milisavljević.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Nemanja Milisavljević.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:05, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ariza Makukula

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Ariza Makukula. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Matthew_hk tc 15:16, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Mike Grella

I have nominated Mike Grella, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Grella. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Kevin McE (talk) 11:23, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of AfD templates.

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Milos Kocic. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you.--ClubOranjeTalk 09:24, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Viktor Budyanskiy

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Viktor Budyanskiy. Thank you. Matthew_hk tc 16:17, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Ante Rozic.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:33, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alessandro Potenza

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Alessandro Potenza. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. . The transfer has not yet listed in both club website. Matthew_hk tc 01:32, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Adekunle Lukmon

You stats in infobox is fake again. Matthew_hk tc 05:34, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Anna Depenbusch

A tag has been placed on Anna Depenbusch requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 22:28, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Anna Depenbusch

I have nominated Anna Depenbusch, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anna Depenbusch. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 22:51, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reflist

Hey there. Just a reminder that you should add {{reflist}} to articles if they are using footnotes. Otherwise the references will not display. Good luck, Renata (talk) 05:18, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Anatoliy Tymoshchuk

Zenit official denied the transfer is done yet. Please chjange the play club after Official source published. Matthew_hk tc 11:58, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Roberto Merino

Again, your transfer is fake. He signed for Salernitana Calcio 1919 instead of S.S. Juve Stabia. Matthew_hk tc 13:28, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Petteri Pennanen

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Petteri Pennanen, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Player has never played in a fully-pro league - Finland's Veikkausliiga is only semi-pro - and therefore fails WP:ATHLETE.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. GiantSnowman 23:24, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please spell footbal more correctly!

Of all the words to misspell, this is the one you should get right.

See David Ofei, David Terkpertey, etc.

Tabletop (talk) 05:47, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Petteri Pennanen

I have nominated Petteri Pennanen, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Petteri Pennanen. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Kevin McE (talk) 20:21, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Kyle Hall

An article that you have been involved in editing, Kyle Hall, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kyle Hall. Thank you.

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Inferno estonia.jpg)

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Inferno estonia.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 00:56, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:The lovecrave name.jpg)

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:The lovecrave name.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 01:01, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Whispering Forest Logo.jpg)

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Whispering Forest Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 01:04, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ive Sulentic

Hi there, please don't rever my edits. If you want to edit an article, do so - but DO NOT revert edits in order to add new information. Regards, GiantSnowman 16:53, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Green & Gold Soccer Club

The article Green & Gold Soccer Club has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 17:20, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Leandro Mariano da Silva.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:49, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Steve Worgu.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — neuro(talk) 23:19, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File copyright problem with File:We Came with the Northern Winds - En Saga I Belgia.jpg

File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:We Came with the Northern Winds - En Saga I Belgia.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — neuro(talk) 17:09, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:The Lovecrave Logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:The Lovecrave Logo.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 20:58, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Canadian soccer players with multiple nationalities

An article that you have been involved in editing, Canadian soccer players with multiple nationalities, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canadian soccer players with multiple nationalities. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. GiantSnowman 03:17, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:The Lovecrave.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:54, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:The Lovecrave Scripture Logo.jpg)

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:The Lovecrave Scripture Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 16:38, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Damien Germanier

Me again. Please add REILABLE SOURCE for national caps. Matthew_hk tc 09:41, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of Nigerian expatriate football players

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article List of Nigerian expatriate football players, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Content is already covered by Category:Nigerian expatriate footballers; previous AfDs - one, two, three - show that consensus is that such lists should only be covered by the relevant category.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. GiantSnowman 18:34, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:The Dreamside.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:The Dreamside.JPG. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 10:06, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Julien Berthomier

A tag has been placed on Julien Berthomier requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. gordonrox24 (talk) 23:24, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Evocation I - The Arcane Metal Hammer Edition.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Evocation I - The Arcane Metal Hammer Edition.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:06, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

April 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Asante Kotoko, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Strongbadmanofme (talk) 19:42, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Abdullah Omari

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Abdullah Omari, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Article fails WP:N and WP:ATHLETE as it covers a non-notable footballer who has not yet played in a fully-pro league

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Jogurney (talk) 01:09, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Rammstein discography worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. Cannibaloki 13:48, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sinupret Ice Tigers Transfers

A tag has been placed on Sinupret Ice Tigers Transfers, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article that does not provide sufficient context to identify its subject. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.  Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 12:17, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Martin Cibak.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Martin Cibak.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. Additionally, if you continue uploading bad images, you may be blocked from uploading. STBotI (talk) 15:25, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of File:Vukovic Vladimir.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Vukovic Vladimir.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. BanRay 09:39, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Hell's Belles (band)

I have nominated Hell's Belles (band), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hell's Belles (band). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Yintaɳ  12:23, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Hell's Belles (band)

A tag has been placed on Hell's Belles (band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ironholds (talk) 14:17, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2009

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Djurgårdens IF Fotboll. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --> Halmstad, Charla to moi 22:09, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Kein Engel.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Kein Engel.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:51, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Russian hockey rosters

Hi, noticed you're usually on top of things when it comes to updating rosters. We (in the ice hockey portal) are trying to keep the format for rosters like that of the Sokil Kyiv/Salavat Yulaev articles. Would you be interested in helping bring the articles up to standard? --Lvivske (talk) 19:09, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cedric Makiadi

Please do not revert infobox edits, as you did on Cedric Makiadi - the edits I made match the MOS at WP:FOOTY. Regards, GiantSnowman 12:43, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Lira Bajramaj.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Lira Bajramaj.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:06, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Football Transfer

Try citing the announcement from football club. Media does not has the responsibility to keep the news totally true. Matthew_hk tc 18:45, 5 June 2009 (UTC) Please make sure that when adding players that the source you are citing. This was not the case for twenty players you recently added to the List of German football transfers summer 2009. I've cleaned it up, but please don't do it again as it is counterproductive. Thanks Sir Sputnik (talk).[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Torpedo SKA Minsk logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Torpedo SKA Minsk logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:41, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:FK Torpedo Minsk logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:FK Torpedo Minsk logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:41, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:FK Torpedo MAZ logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:FK Torpedo MAZ logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:41, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sven Bender

Transfers are not official until July 1st. Kingjeff (talk) 14:43, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vincent Hognon

The is no source he is released, at least he is not listed on [1]. This is the first warning for adding unsourced football transfer. Matthew_hk tc 15:03, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tiago Antônio Campagnaro

Again, please verify the source. The transfer does not happened. Matthew_hk tc 09:40, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification on Fernando Belluschi

Thanks for your recent edit [2] to Fernando Belluschi. If this was in response to the {{clarify}} tag I added, I don't feel as if this issue has been addressed. The 50% rights bit is still not explained—albeit briefly—for the layman. I've expanded on my comments at the talk page.

If, however, you were just adding a source and not directly trying to address the {{clarify}} tag, ignore this. Thanks.—C45207 | Talk 10:01, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Football transfer reference system

First and foremost, let me thank you for your ongoing contributions to the List of German football transfers summer 2009. As you are probably aware, the reference list of this article is not fully functional due to the large number of reference. I've taken the liberty of dividing it into three parts, one for each league. In order to place a reference on the appropriate list, please use the group extension. Group 1 refers to Bundesliga transfers, 2 to 2. Bundesliga transfers and 3 to 3rd Liga transfers. For more information on how groups work see reflist. When citing the same source multiple times, please use the name extension so as not to add unnecessary references to the list. Thanks again, your work is very much appreciated.Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:59, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:KDFF.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:KDFF.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 14:16, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

I am contacting you regarding your recent edits linking players to other teams. Wikipedia is not a primary source of information, and all of its contents must be reliably sourced and verifiable. In this particular case, you should not add claims of a player X joining club Y unless you can provide an official source confirming this: that is, official public statements from at least one of the involved clubs; sources like football press articles linking players to a team are hardly reliable and should not be used instead, and blog references (such as the one you used with Javier Pastore, whose move to Palermo was not completed yet) should never be used at all. Regards, --Angelo (talk) 15:13, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Likewise with your edit to Jean-Claude Darcheville saying that he had been released. Please take the time to provide a reference to back things like this up or people will just undo it. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 11:49, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am quite sorry to note you are keeping on editing articles without checking for the real state of the things, as you did with Zlatan Ibrahimović and Samuel Eto'o. Again, a football rumour is far from being a completed and finalized move, and Wikipedia is neither a news service nor a place for incorrect information. So, I regretfully have to notice you with a first official warning: all of your following edits which are actually reporting false or incorrect information will be therefore regarded as vandalism, with all the given consequences. Regards, --Angelo (talk) 20:57, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Zlatan Ibrahimović, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Angelo (talk) 20:57, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am contacting in regards to you're recent edits to List of German football transfers summer 2009. I've said it before but in light of you're recent edits I feel the need to say it again: Do not add players to the list with sources that do no mention them. I've now had to remove forty-six players that you added with references that didn't even mention their names.Sir Sputnik (talk) 01:22, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of Nigerian expatriate football players

An article that you have been involved in editing, List of Nigerian expatriate football players, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Nigerian expatriate football players (2nd nomination). Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. GiantSnowman 18:51, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nightmare poster

Did you not get the point of the message? It's there to prevent editors from adding fan posters to the article, had a link to an image that doesn't exist is useless, like this internal link, it has no page so why provide an empty link? • S • C • A • R • C • E • 14:16, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is a very gorgeous fan-made logo, it's not official, see the A Nightmare on Elm Street photo, we need the writing at the bottom of the poster, plus it has to be obtained from New Line otherwise it's un-official • S • C • A • R • C • E • 14:23, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
We could find great use for this logo if you can find another source that states this image is official, can you? Also, your image requires a fair use rationale and some difference between this and the original per that rationale • S • C • A • R • C • E • 14:31, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I've uploaded a newer version of this image, this will greatly assist you in retaining the image • S • C • A • R • C • E • 14:38, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:A Nightmare on Elm Street 2010 poster.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:A Nightmare on Elm Street 2010 poster.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image which is not under a free license or in the public domain and it has not been used in any article for more than seven days.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. • S • C • A • R • C • E • 14:19, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:The Cabin the Woods Teaser Poster 3.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:The Cabin the Woods Teaser Poster 3.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Polly (Parrot) 18:56, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:The Cabin the Woods Teaser Poster 1.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:The Cabin the Woods Teaser Poster 1.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Polly (Parrot) 18:56, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Joevannie Peart

I have nominated Joevannie Peart, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joevannie Peart. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ClubOranjeT 20:22, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cut and paste moves

Please note that moving a page should be done using the "move" tab at the top of the screen and not by cutting and pasting as you appear to have done by moving content from the page currently at Matthew O'Connor (formerly Patrick Wilson II) to Patrick Wilson (soccer). Cutting and pasting does not preserve the edit history of a page and so is a violation of the GFDL license under which the content was released - see Help:Moving for more information. Regards, Guest9999 (talk) 21:34, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Patrick Wilson (soccer)

The article your created at Patrick Wilson (soccer) has been nominated for deletion, as it was already under AfD as Patrick Wilson II when you moved that page to Matthew O'Connor and removed the AfD notice. refer Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick Wilson II. Please also do not remove AfD notification templates. Also, creation of new pages should not be done by moving existing pages, as this creates in appropriate redirects and irrelevant histories.--ClubOranjeT 21:35, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Patrick Wilson II

I have reverted your edits to Patrick Wilson II, undone the move to Matthew O'Connor and deleted the the article Patrick Wilson (soccer), as this is plainly inappropriate editing. If you wish to create an article about Matthew O'Connor, please do so in a new page and do not overwrite an existing article, even one that has been nominated for deletion. I have placed a copy of your text about Matthew O'Connor at User:Zombie433/Matthew O'Connor; you may create a new page with this if you wish. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:51, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Grammar

Greetings. Reading some of your recent edits to football players playing in Germany, I get the impression that English is not your first language. I must commend you. Your English is excellent, but there are a few mistakes you keep making that I would like to correct.
1. A sentence in English always needs a subject. For example, you wrote, "before signed an two years contract with Fortuna Düsseldorf." It should be "before he singed a two-year with Fortuna Düsseldorf."
2. The word "than' is used only when comparing things. For example, "A is better than B." For after use "then". "Then he went to the park" is right, "Than he went to the park" is not.
3. The word "an" is only use before words that start with a vowel (a,e,i,o,u). There are a few exceptions to this rule. If a word starts with o but begins with "w" sound, like one, use a. In British English an is also used before words starting with h.
4. Don't separate sentences with commas. For example, "Tim Gorschlüter is a German football player, he plays for Sportfreunde Lotte." Here everything that comes before the comma can stand alone as a sentence. So can everything that comes after it. Instead of a comma, use a period or a semi-colon (;).
5. Things that show when something happened, like "in 2004", should go at the beginning of a sentence. Putting them in the middle isn't wrong, but it sounds awkward.
6. A contract over two years is called "a two-year contract" not a "two years contract". There should be a hyphen (-) between the number and the word year which should be singular not plural.
I hope this helps. Keep up the good work. –Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:39, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

July 2009

Since you changed clubs to two more players without any official confirmation (namely, Derek Boateng and Rasmus Bengtsson), and without even trying to provide any reliable source confirming them, I have to give you a second official warning. I would really appreciate also if you could reply to the messages left on your talk page, I am seriously concerned that you are simply ignoring all the notices and warnings you've received. Regards.

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Derek Boateng. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --Angelo (talk) 11:16, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I refer to your recent removal of Red Internal Links from the page Natassia Malthe, removing red links was something I constantly used to do until I became aware of Wiki guidlines regarding them. Before removing Red Links please keep in mind that they can be important to wikipedia. Red Links lets others no what pages need to be created and reminds us that wiki is far from finished. It's also helpful for other users if you explain your edits using the summary provided. For more information go here. Cheers, have a great day. --Freikorp (talk) 11:41, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Jake West- Doghouse.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Jake West- Doghouse.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:15, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Pijus Rulevičius

A tag has been placed on Pijus Rulevičius requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Львівське (talk) 04:35, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Asylum of the Damned.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Asylum of the Damned.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 00:23, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wake Wood

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Wake Wood, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.exclusivemedia.com/productions/wakewood.php. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:54, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sicko film

Proposed deletion of Sicko film

The article Sicko film has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

article has concerns with WP:N, WP:OR and WP:RS

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Andrzejbanas (talk) 04:10, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've also nominated the category for Sicko films. Andrzejbanas (talk) 04:18, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Proposed deletion of Paul Djedeou Kabran

The article Paul Djedeou Kabran has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about athlete who has not played in a fully-pro league and does not satisfy general notability guideline.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jogurney (talk) 16:43, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Red Sonja 2010.jpg)

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Red Sonja 2010.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 20:54, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Robert Rodriguez- Red Sonja.jpg)

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Robert Rodriguez- Red Sonja.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 20:59, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Asante Gullit Okyere

The information provided is totally wrong again. Matthew_hk tc 23:31, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

en-4?

In etlichen deiner Artikel (etwa hier) finden sich sehr merkwürdige Denglisch-Konstruktionen, von daher solltest du deine "en-4" Einstufung vielleicht nochmal überdenken. --bender235 (talk) 11:17, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keine Reaktion? Das war nur als freundlicher Hinweis gedacht. Es wäre im übrigen ganz sinnvoll, wenn du deine Artikel mal auf Fehler wie in dem oben erwähnten Fall abklopfst. --bender235 (talk) 12:43, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ist ok, danke für den Hinweis, bin den englischen zwar mächtig, aber habe es nich täglich im gebrauch daher ist es eingerostet, allerdings arbeite ich dran, bin auch eher amerikanisiert sprich habe das amerikanische englisch schreiben und sprechen gelernt bekommen! habe auch mit der grammatik so meine probleme im englischen, da ich es halt nicht im alltagsgebrauch habe! --zombie433 (talk)
Alles klar. Die Fehler, die du (mehrfach) in deiner Artikeln machst sind nur einfach sehr merkwürdig, etwa die falsche (typisch deutsche) Stellung der Zeitangabe im Satz, oder "maked" statt "made", oder "than" statt "then", usw. Ich hab nicht das Gefühl, dass deine Einstufung von "en-4" (near-native speaker) der Realität entspricht. Diese Angaben in der Babelbox dienen ja nicht bloß der persönlichen Eitelkeit, sondern sollen Hinweis an anderssprachige Benutzer sein. Aber letztlich ist es deine Entscheidung, ob du dein Level runtersetzt. --bender235 (talk) 13:37, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:The Cabin the Woods Teaser Poster 2.jpg)

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Cabin the Woods Teaser Poster 2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 05:49, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Proposed deletion of Adams Doumbia

The article Adams Doumbia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about athlete who hasn't played in a fully-pro league and which fails general notability guideline.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jogurney (talk) 04:15, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Survival of the Dead.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Survival of the Dead.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image which is not under a free license or in the public domain and it has not been used in any article for more than seven days.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Twilight Nightmare (talk) 00:05, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:De2cent.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:De2cent.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 14:59, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

September 2009

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Botev Plovdiv. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. LoVeCa (talk) 18:54, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Marvin Matip

Re:him being cousins with J-D Job, please don't lump in new information with a reference that doesn't deal with it - it's misleading and just generally poor form. GiantSnowman 15:02, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Proposed deletion of Garin Garinyan

The article Garin Garinyan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about athlete who hasn't played in a fully-pro league and which fails the general notability guideline.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jogurney (talk) 21:25, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Survival of the Dead, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. McGeddon (talk) 10:58, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Luca Toni

Why add Toni to the reserve roster when he is rehabing an injury? This is not like Thorsten Fink who was dropped from the first team. Raul17 (talk) 21:53, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your talk page

Your talk page is excessively long, I suggest creating an archive. - GunMetal Angel 16:32, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Here's an archive box, all you have to do is put the archive links inside of it, I'll set the one that you made inside of it as an example:... -- GunMetal Angel 16:45, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dawid Kwiek

He is not German, and for the stats in Signal FC Bernex-Confignon please give a source.--Oleola (talk) 15:06, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

He was only born in Germany, he doesn't have German citizenship.--Oleola (talk) 16:36, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Domagoj Kape[cć]

Hello, are you sure that his surname should be spelled "Kapeć" and not "Kapec"? On Croatian Web pages it is mostly written as "Kapec", e.g. here. --Filemon (talk) 11:26, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Plot templates

Please do not remove the cleanup plot template, as you did to Urban Legend (film), unless you actually address the issue. Aspects (talk) 06:04, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sly Tetteh

Hi, can I ask why you changed the infobox from the long established {{Infobox Football biography}} to the obsolete {{Football player infobox}}? GiantSnowman 23:05, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, as you forgot on your recent edit to The Hanging Woman. Thank you. Law Lord (talk) 19:57, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on The Hanging Woman. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Law Lord (talk) 02:57, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Sam Heenan

I have nominated Sam Heenan, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sam Heenan. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Steve-Ho (talk) 19:39, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Drag me to Hell

Hey Zombie, I just thought i'd inform you on your edite for Drag Me to Hell, that film plots do not generally need citation per WP:Filmplot. Since you work with a lot of film articles, I reccomend reading MOS:Film to understand the rules and measures we usually work with. This also goes for the List of zombie films article where you and many other users have cited imdb as a source. Cheers. Andrzejbanas (talk) 11:49, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ref tags

Hello. Thanks for supplying inline citations -- that's really useful. Just a formatting hint -- we put the punctuation before the tag, such as this.<ref>source</ref> So the full stop/comma comes immediately before the ref tag, with no space in between. The JPStalk to me 21:40, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Kaledon, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.--猛禽22 •• 19:36, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

{{subst:uw-spellcheck|1=Ghostbusters (franchise)}} magnius (talk) 12:55, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nigeria League

Are you in Nigeria? Do you have any info on the Nigeria National League this upcoming season? Embele (talk) 02:04, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lead section

Hello. Please don't take all the information out of the lead section of footballer pages and move it to some random point of the article, like you did to Semih Aydilek. Have a look at WP:LEAD. It tells you that this section is supposed to summarise the article, not just be one sentence saying Semih Aydilek is a footballer who plays for Kayserispor. Thanks, Struway2 (talk) 08:23, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

List of foreign players - Serbia

Hey, many thanx for solving my doubts. I´ve put them in the bottom of the list hoping somebody will know something about them. Can I ask you how did you done it? Do you know more about this players? couse I can´t find anything about them... I just had to take out Miloš Šćepanović couse I cant find that he played for the senior team, only as youth career, but, you put as he played for Red Star 2000-2006, but in his wikipage it says Partizan youth team 2000-2006. ??? Where he played? And one more question, you added Francuske to Rama, is that his name, Francuske Rama? or is he French (Francuska, France)? Well, many thanx again. FkpCascais (talk) 23:52, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How did you find the Spartak Subotica guys? Osvaldo Montero and Marco Antonio Seixas? I search the entire net and I couldn´t find anything... FkpCascais (talk) 00:38, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Hi again. Listen, I really hope you want get me wrong, I really apreciate your help, almost no one else helped me, but I´ll have to ask you to check the players before including them to the list. About players: Ronald Habi is not Albanian, he has a wiki page, he is Croat/Hungarian, check it... Thanx for Leonardo. Anzour Nafash played in FK Sutjeska that is in Montenegro, and this list only comprehends players that have played in clubs from the present day territory of Serbia, in the 1st league. So, he´s not included in this list, as all the other foreign players from Montenegrin clubs such as FK Budućnost Podgorica, FK Jedinstvo Bijelo Polje, FK Mogren and FK Sutjeska. Darko Ramovš has a name that may sound Letonian, but he is Serbian, I did his wiki page, chek it... About Razvan Kirica, I know how his name is written in Serbia (I´m Serbian), but I write the names as they are written in their respective languages, as in all other wiki foreign players lists is done. So, in Serbia Razvan Kirica, he is Romanian, I write in Romanian → Răzvan Kiriţă. If you are interested, I started other two lists: List of foreign players in Serbian lower football leagues where you can find a list of all the foreign players that have played in all other leagues in Serbia (2nd, 3th, youth teams...) and I did also User:FkpCascais/Sandbox where I have a entire list of foreign players that have played in all yugoslavia + all new ex-Yugoslavia countries (Serbia, Montenegro, Macedonia, Croatia, Slovenia, Bosnia and Kosovo, only 1st leagues). I have Anzour Nafash in the Yugoslavia list, and I put "your" Miloš Šćepanović in the Serbian lower leagues list because he played for reserves teams of Partizan in Serbia. You can see the external sources that I used, (EUFO, Srbijafudbal, Transfermarkt, Worldfootball/Weltfussball, National-football-teams, Playerhistory from 2000-until now, Zerozerofootball, Zerodic ), so I know them all. It´s better to have a player in the doubt list, than in wrong country. Regards. FkpCascais (talk) 22:31, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added such as to the page Haunted attraction do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. CliffC (talk) 22:38, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Valediction

Hi Zombie433! I reverted your changes from "Valdiction" to "Locked In" because having the article talk about a film whose name is different from the one in the article's title without explanation is plain confusing for the unelightened reader. I'd already started a discussion on the article's talk page proposing to make the "Valediction" article into a redirect to Locked In, and added a note in the "Locked In" article explaining that it's also known as "Valediction" so readers would understand why they'd been redirected. I'm just waiting for some responses to the discussion before I make the proposed change. Cheers -- Timberframe (talk) 12:59, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Secret Sunday.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Secret Sunday.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. FASTILYsock (TALK) 22:48, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Tyler Labine. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. - Adolphus79 (talk) 22:50, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

en-4?

In etlichen deiner Artikel (etwa hier) finden sich sehr merkwürdige Denglisch-Konstruktionen, von daher solltest du deine "en-4" Einstufung vielleicht nochmal überdenken. --bender235 (talk) 11:17, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keine Reaktion? Das war nur als freundlicher Hinweis gedacht. Es wäre im übrigen ganz sinnvoll, wenn du deine Artikel mal auf Fehler wie in dem oben erwähnten Fall abklopfst. --bender235 (talk) 12:43, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Denglisch

Ich habe mal beispielhaft den Artikel "Joel Matip" korrigiert. Wäre schön wenn du das bei deinen übrigen Artikeln auf ähnliche Weise korrigieren könntest. Danke. --bender235 (talk) 14:24, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

I remind you user of Wikipedia:Civility so when users post discussion on your page, I'd recommend you reply to them, rather then delete them. Several additions you've made to pages have not been constructive or contain cites which I do not understand. I'm speaking specifically of the large amount of horror films listed on the list of horror films page and the citation you added to the Vampyr article. Can you explain them? I'd also recommend leaving edit summaries as well. By not following these actions, your edits will be reverted. Cheers! Andrzejbanas (talk) 03:53, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting?

Why is it you constantly reverting text messages someone (not necessarily me, but everyone with some critical comment) adds to your talk page? As a matter of fact, archiving those comments is strongly recommended. --bender235 (talk) 14:46, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to concur. On seeing several of your edits, a lot of them either do not make sense to me. This includes your citations on Vampyr that did not really add anything to the article and your lack of response to edits. Perhaps you should edit on the German Wikipedia instead? :) Andrzejbanas (talk) 14:47, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

I remind you user of Wikipedia:Civility so when users post discussion on your page, I'd recommend you reply to them, rather then delete them. Several additions you've made to pages have not been constructive or contain cites which I do not understand. I'm speaking specifically of the large amount of horror films listed on the list of horror films page and the citation you added to the Vampyr article. Can you explain them? I'd also recommend leaving edit summaries as well. By not following these actions, your edits will be reverted. Cheers! Andrzejbanas (talk) 03:53, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Proposed deletion of Mathias Coureur

The article Mathias Coureur has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Did not play a single game in a fully-professional league and therefore fails WP:ATHLETE

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Geregen2 (talk) 21:31, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kévin Barré

The article Kévin Barré has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Did not play a single game in a fully-professional league and therefore fails WP:ATHLETE

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Geregen2 (talk) 21:37, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Romuald Marie

The article Romuald Marie has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Did not play a single game in a fully-professional league and therefore fails WP:ATHLETE

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Geregen2 (talk) 19:11, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Denis Petrić

The article Denis Petrić has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Did not play a single game in a fully-professional league and therefore fails WP:ATHLETE. The fact that he played 9 games for Auxerre main team (as listed in the infobox) is wrong and not supported by any sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Geregen2 (talk) 19:23, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Guillaume Lecacheur

The article Guillaume Lecacheur has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Did not play a single game in a fully-professional league and therefore fails WP:ATHLETE. Infobox lists him as having 1 game for the main Auxerre squad, that is not supported by any source.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Geregen2 (talk) 19:50, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Arnaud Sauvage

The article Arnaud Sauvage has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Did not play a single game in a fully-professional league and therefore fails WP:ATHLETE. The link provided as proof he played 1 game in Ligue 1 does not list any Ligue 1 games.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Geregen2 (talk) 19:57, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Abdoulaye Soumaré (born 1985)

The article Abdoulaye Soumaré (born 1985) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Did not play a single game in a fully-professional league and therefore fails WP:ATHLETE

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Geregen2 (talk) 20:21, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Oxence M'Bani

The article Oxence M'Bani has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Did not play a single game in a fully-professional league and therefore fails WP:ATHLETE

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Geregen2 (talk) 20:23, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jules Ondjola

The article Jules Ondjola has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Did not play a single game in a fully-professional league and therefore fails WP:ATHLETE

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Geregen2 (talk) 20:33, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Losseni Keita

The article Losseni Keita has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Did not play a single game in a fully-professional league and therefore fails WP:ATHLETE

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Geregen2 (talk) 20:36, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Adams Doumbia

The article Adams Doumbia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Did not play a single game in a fully-professional league and therefore fails WP:ATHLETE

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Geregen2 (talk) 20:37, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Benjamin Levacher

The article Benjamin Levacher has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Did not play a single game in a fully-professional league and therefore fails WP:ATHLETE

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Geregen2 (talk) 20:48, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ange Gnaleko

The article Ange Gnaleko has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Did not play a single game in a fully-professional league and therefore fails WP:ATHLETE

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Geregen2 (talk) 20:50, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Guillaume Heinry

The article Guillaume Heinry has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Did not play a single game in a fully-professional league and therefore fails WP:ATHLETE

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Geregen2 (talk) 20:51, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ali Keita

The article Ali Keita has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Did not play a single game in a fully-professional league and therefore fails WP:ATHLETE

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Geregen2 (talk) 20:52, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lukas Königshofer

The article Lukas Königshofer has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Did not play a single game in a fully-professional league and therefore fails WP:ATHLETE

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 89.54.176.183 (talk) 22:59, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Scream 4.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Scream 4.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ejfetters (talk) 04:52, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

I remind you user of Wikipedia:Civility so when users post discussion on your page, I'd recommend you reply to them, rather then delete them. Several additions you've made to pages have not been constructive or contain cites which I do not understand. I'm speaking specifically of the large amount of horror films listed on the list of horror films page and the citation you added to the Vampyr article. Can you explain them? I'd also recommend leaving edit summaries as well. By not following these actions, your edits will be reverted. Cheers! Andrzejbanas (talk) 03:53, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kerry O'Quinn

"He becames in 2009 an Award dedicated" makes no sense to me. What were you trying to say? Chris the speller (talk) 05:31, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Ghana Premier League

Hi Zombie. Did you see the vandalism in this article: Since you have edited the article last time, an IP-address has written some bad things. You will find it in "Performences by club". Could you reset the page to your version please. Thank you so much und liebe Grüße aus Deutschland, --217.226.127.90 (talk) 18:24, 16 November 2009 (UTC) (Kleinstein95, dtsch. Wikipedia).[reply]

Proposed deletion of Frédéric de Wilde

The article Frédéric de Wilde has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about athlete who hasn't played in a fully-pro league and which fails the general notability guideline.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jogurney (talk) 16:38, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jessy Moulin

The article Jessy Moulin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Did not play a single game in a fully-professional league and therefore fails WP:ATHLETE

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Geregen2 (talk) 19:20, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Oumar faye

The article Oumar faye has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Implausible redirect *not* recently created.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DJBullfish 08:26, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your Edit on Area 51 film article

Please do not add information that is incorrect. In the Background Section of the article, you stated that the film is based on the game and provided a reference. The referenced page did not state anywhere, nor did it even hint, that it is based on the game. Please make sure references are relevant. Just because it had the game's poster in the webpage does not mean it's based on the game. RyanGFilm (talk) 12:21, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 10 Rue d’ la Madeleine

The article 10 Rue d’ la Madeleine has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable band.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hoponpop69 (talk) 16:51, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Aly Koulibaly

The article Aly Koulibaly has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Did not play a single game in a fully-professional league and therefore fails WP:ATHLETE

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Geregen2 (talk) 16:39, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ali Vanomo Bamba

The article Ali Vanomo Bamba has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Did not play a single game in a fully-professional league and therefore fails WP:ATHLETE

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Geregen2 (talk) 20:36, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Patrick Ekeng-Ekeng

The article Patrick Ekeng-Ekeng has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Did not play a single game in a fully-professional league and therefore fails WP:ATHLETE

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Geregen2 (talk) 20:45, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

List of Horror films

Dear Zombie433, I splitted List of horror films: 2000s into several articles since at 275KB this article is difficult to edit (see Template:very long). This tag got lost when you reverted to the old version. Please provide some reason for keeping the "status quo" on the talk page. Inwind (talk) 08:29, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Fair use rationale for File:Hatchet 2.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Hatchet 2.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 04:27, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Fair use rationale for File:Edges of Darkness.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Edges of Darkness.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 04:30, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Edges of Darkness1.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Edges of Darkness1.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 04:31, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:REC3-teaser-poster.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:REC3-teaser-poster.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 06:38, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ekene Igwe

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Ekene Igwe. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Orphaned non-free image File:Haunting Kira Poster.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Haunting Kira Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:46, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Saw VI German poster.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Saw VI German poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:46, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Splatter Movie- The Director's Cut.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Splatter Movie- The Director's Cut.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:47, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mezquida

Moin,

der Wechsel von Mezquida wurde im Früjahr nur von Schnusenberg angekündigt. Ein Vertrag wurde nie unterschrieben, wie man dieser kicker-Meldung entnehmen kann http://www.kicker.de/news/fussball/bundesliga/startseite/517145/artikel_Mezquida_Magaths-Joker-im-Sturm-Poker.html . Außerdem absolviert er gerade ein Probetraining bei Schalke und Magath sagt in diesem Video, dass danach entschieden wird, ob er verpflichtet wird. http://www.schalke04.de/aktuell/videoarchiv.html -- 80.171.192.192 (talk) 14:51, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kristjan Gauti Emilsson

The article Kristjan Gauti Emilsson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fails WP:ATH - the Icelandic league is not fully profressional

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Steve-Ho (talk) 13:18, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Cabin in the Woods.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Cabin in the Woods.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:10, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Alone in the Dark II.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Alone in the Dark II.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 02:33, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nationality of SC Verl players

Hi Zombie433, you edited the team roster of SC Verl, changing the nationality of three players. I reverted the edit and started a new section on the talk page. You might want to answer there. —Preceding unsigned comment added by DevSolar (talk • contribs) 08:01, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pavel Krmaš

Hi, why did you remove a bunch of valid external links from this article? GiantSnowman 18:38, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why?! The admins wish only official External Links (Fussballdaten, Club Sites etc.) in several other links are the stats in complete or obsolete! (transfermarkt.de etc. are only user edits and very bad old database) User talk:Zombie433, 18:53, 17. December 2009 (UTC)


Orphaned non-free image File:Saw VI German poster.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Saw VI German poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:54, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Descent Part 2 French.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Descent Part 2 French.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:58, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

La bête

Hello Zombie433, Paradoctor has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

"Build it and they will come.". Thank you for proving me right. ;) Paradoctor (talk) 15:07, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

improper block

I apologize for inappropriately blocking you. It was for a duration of a couple minutes. It was triggered by what appeared to be an inappropriate edit to Body of Evidence (film) which I didn't realize was German, even though it was filmed in my home city. That edit combined with a quick sequence of similar edits caused me to issue a protective block. I believe I've undone all the blocking mechanism related to your account. Sorry for the inconvenience. —EncMstr (talk) 19:55, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Some favours

Hi there ZOMBIE, VASCO from Portugal here,

Since it is almost Christmas, i would like to ask you some favors: 1- Please do not overlink in articles, one time is enough (please see here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overlinking#Overlinking); i explain better: when you insert Atlético Madrid the word is linked, if you write it again, please do not use the [[]] again, this is overlinking (simply Atlético Madrid or even Atlético is enough).

2- Please do not speak in present tense in Wikipedia (for example "Sporting Clube de Portugal has signed Mário Jardel"), in encyclopedias we always write in past tense.

3- Please stop removing EXTERNAL LINKS i add and moving it to REFERENCES. References are for articles in newspapers, interviews, etc, which contain conversation, analysis, etc. Stats which only have a photo and some stats are LINKS, not REFS (good example is what you did at José Carlos Fernandes Vidigal).

I think that is all for the moment, happy editing, Danke schön, Merry Christmas,

VASCO - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 03:10, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Predators 2010.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Predators 2010.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 05:04, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Evil Angel.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Evil Angel.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. FASTILYsock(TALK) 23:31, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:South African horror films

I have nominated Category:South African horror films (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 01:08, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Necrosis.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Necrosis.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. FASTILYsock(TALK) 23:33, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009

Your recent edit to the page Shark Attack (film) appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any other tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 17:50, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]


December 2009

Your recent edit to the page Shark Attack (film) appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any other tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 17:50, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Abdourahime Toure

A tag has been placed on Abdourahime Toure requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 17:54, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Fleisch (2007 film)

The article Fleisch (2007 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unnotable random horror film. Fails WP:NF

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 17:54, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Shark Attack 3: Megalodon. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. IMDB is not a reliable source, nor is Amazon categorization. Further, the film was not made by a South African company, nor is there any verified source stating it was filmed there. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 18:07, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of The Angel and the Rain

I have nominated The Angel and the Rain, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Angel and the Rain. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 18:27, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Angel... album

Hey Zombie,

If you added some verifiable independent documentation of notability from established music reviewers to the album's article, I think it would probably have a much better chance of being kept. Thanks, Scott P. (talk) 18:46, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

We have not yet been able to find any professional reviewer, working for a music site or magazine and who is not a music distributor, who has yet reviewed "The Angel and The Rain" in English. I tried to follow your suggestions, but I didn't find this. If you could give us a link for such a review, we could probably keep the article. Otherwise, I will have to withdraw my support for it. The deletion debate is at Article deletion discussion Thanks, Scott P. (talk) 23:45, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Il Parco Dei Sogni

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Il Parco Dei Sogni. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Il Parco Dei Sogni. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:08, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Left message regarding "The Angel and the Rain" afd discussion.

See archive. Scott P. (talk) 00:02, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Deadline 2010.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Deadline 2010.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:49, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ibrahim Shkupolli Article

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also useful when reading the edit history of the page. Thank you.

--220.101.28.25 (talk) 13:02, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you very much and I hope you have a healthy and prosperous New year. I really appreciate your contributions. (Shotgun pete talk) 12:16, 01 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:CatharsisLimited.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:CatharsisLimited.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 02:17, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Be more carefull and check info twice before adding to pages, PLEASE!!!

Hi. Can you please be more carefull about your edits? You have been adding non-existing teams to footballers (like FK Javor to Stanley Ibe, can you please explain to me where you found that info?) or false stats (like you edited that Ilija Stolica played 58 league matches for Partizan, when he really played only 4, as it was already in the page before you changed it. You know it´s only LEAGUE matches/goals that count, dont you? Or, some time ago, you added a bunch of players to the Foreign players in Serbia list, that, after close look, came out to be ZERO players you added wright. You even said, after me asking you where you found "Francuske Rama", you told me that Francuske is an Albanian name, like François. Hahahahaha, there is no Francuske in Albanian, Francuske is completely other thing... Please, be more serious here! I´ll be watching your football edits, and if I continue to see you doing the bad job you have been doing, I´ll report you. Don´t mess out other people hard work. Dont need response. FkpCascais (talk) 06:32, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Web Cam 3D

I have nominated Web Cam 3D, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Web Cam 3D. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ash (talk) 10:45, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Web Cam 3D

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Web Cam 3D. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Web Cam 3D. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:07, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Abandoned.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Abandoned.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:24, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Football transfers and verb tenses

I would just like to point out a grammatical error that you are consistantly making. To footballers transfering on 8 January you added the sentence: On 08 January 2010 Club A have signed Player from Club B. Or something similar. Because the time is clearly defined, it should say: Club A signed Player from Club B. There are two other smaller details I'd also like to point out. First, there should be a comma after 2010, although I don't think many people would notice if it were missing, and secondly, please don't add leading zeroes to numbers. It should say 8 January, not 08 January. Thanks for adding the information. Your contributions are appreciated. Sir Sputnik (talk) 02:01, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:IF Limhamn Bunkeflo.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:IF Limhamn Bunkeflo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 07:21, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Grammar

I would very much appreciate it if you would follow grammatical advice when given some. Some of what I have posted bellow I posted about half a year ago, and I still see many of the same mistakes. I'll repeat everything in German so that you might understand better.

Ich fände es schön dass wenn jemand dir Grammatikhinweise gibt, dass du auch folgst. Manche von den sach die Ich hier geschrieben habe, habe ich schon vor zirka einem halben Jahr geschrieben, aber ich sehe dass du immer noch die selben fehler machst. Ich werde alles was ich hier schreibe noch mal auf Deutsch schreiben so dass du es besser vileicht verstehen kannst.

1. A sentence in English always needs a subject which must always come before the verb. For example, you wrote, "before signed an two years contract with Fortuna Düsseldorf." It should be "before he singed a two-year with Fortuna Düsseldorf."

Im englischen braucht ein satz immer ein Subjekt, und es muss immer vor dem Verb seien. Zum beispiel, du hast geshrieben "before signed an two years contract with Fortuna Düsseldorf." Es solte heissen "before he singed a two-year with Fortuna Düsseldorf."

2. The word "than" is used only when comparing things. For example, "A is better than B." For after use "then". "Then he went to the park" is right, "Than he went to the park" is not.

Das Wort "than" (als) wird nur benutzt um zwei sachen zu vergleichen. z.B. "A is better than B." Für dannach bentutze "then" (dann). "Then he went to the park" ist richtig, "Than he went to the park" ist falsch.

3. The word "an" is only use before words that start with a vowel. There are a few exceptions to this rule. If a word starts with vowel but begins with a consonant sound, like one, use a. In British English an is also used before words starting with h. I have to give you credit here. This is something you've improved since I first posted.

Das Word "an" wird nur vor wörtern die mit einem Vokal anfangen benuzt. Es gibt ausnahmen zu dieser regel. Für Wörter die mit einem Vokal an erster Stelle, die aber aber mit einem Konsonantlaut anfangen, z.B. "one", wird a benunzt. Im Britischen Englisch wird "an" auch for Wörtern die mit h anfangen benuzt. Im leztem halben Jahr hast du dich hier viel verbessert.

4. Don't separate sentences with commas. For example, "Tim Gorschlüter is a German football player, he plays for Sportfreunde Lotte." Here everything that comes before the comma can stand alone as a sentence. So can everything that comes after it. Instead of a comma, use a period or a semi-colon (;). This is called a comma splice, and is considered a very serious error, although I don't understand why.

Trenne sätze nicht mit Kommas. z.B. "Tim Gorschlüter is a German football player, he plays for Sportfreunde Lotte." Alles dass vor dem Komma steht kann als satz alleine stehen. Dass was nach dem Komma steht auch. Mach entwieder zwei sätze draus oder trenne sie mit einem Kommapunkt (;). (Ist Kommapunkt das richtige wort?) Dieser Fehler nennt sich "coma splice", und wird als sehr schwerer Fehler gesehen, obwohl ich nicht weiß wieso.

5. Things that show when something happened, like "in 2004", should go at the beginning of a sentence. Putting them in the middle isn't wrong, but it sounds awkward. If they are at the beginning of the sentence, place a comma after them.

Zeitanzeigen wie "in 2004" gehören an den Anfang und ans Ende vom Satz. Obwohl es nicht falsch ist sie in die Mitte zu tuhen, es klingt sehr kommisch wenn sie dort sind. Wenn sie am Anfang vom Satz sind, trenne sie vom rest des Satzes mit einem Komma.

6. As a general piece of advice, keep you sentences short. The single most common correction I make to your edits is to take something that you have written as one sentence and break it down into sevral.

Schreib kurze sätze. Die Korrektur die ich am häufichsten zu deinen Beiträgen mach ist etwas dass du als ein Satz geschrieben hast und es in Mehrere aufzbrechen.

7. For the most part, an encyclopedia is written in the past tense, especially when referring to events that have already happened.

Eine Enzyklopädie wird zum grösten teil im Perfekt oder Präteritum geschrieben, besonders wenn mann Sachen beschreibt die schon geschehen sind.

8. Relative pronouns like who always replace the noun that immediately precedes them. For example, when wrote "He was later scouted by RC Lens who played in the Training Center of the youthteam", it means that RC Lens played in the training centre. Often changing the pronoun will correct the error. In this case, "where he played" would be the correct way of saying what it is your trying to say.

Relativpronomen wie "who" ersetzen immer das Substantiv dass direkt davor steht. z.B. "He was later scouted by RC Lens who played in the Training Center of the youthteam" heist dass RC Lens im träningszentrum gespielt hat. Meistens can dies durch ein anderes pronomen ersatzt werden. Hier wäre "where he played" richtig.

I don't mean to be offensive, but I'm sick and tired of having to clean up your grammatical errors. If you can't improve your english to encyclopedic standards, I'm going to have to ask you to stop editing, and I don't want to do that. The edits you make would be very helpful, if they were grammatically correct.

Ich möchte dich nicht beleidigen, aber ich hab es leid deine Grammatikfehler korrigieren zu müssen. Wenn du dein Englisch nicht auf den enzyklopädischen Standard bringen kannst, muss ich dich bitten aufzuhören beitrage zu machen, und ich würde dass nur ungern tun. Die beiträge die machst würden sehr gut sein, wenn sie nicht so viele Grammatikfehler hätten.

Danke Sir Sputnik (talk) 03:38, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Web Cam 3D

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Web Cam 3D. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Web Cam 3D. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:08, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Abandoned.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Abandoned.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:38, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Albino Farm.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Albino Farm.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:57, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2010

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of horror films: 2010s, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 15:37, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The same applies to International Ammunition Association. I suggest you review your recent edits and revert such unconstructive edits. Toddst1 (talk) 15:41, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Modify previous warning - You will be blocked for the next occurrence of inappropriate removal of maintenance tags.

Looking through the history of your talk page, I see the removal of maintenance tags is something you have been warned about before. You need to address the concerns these tags identify and/or reach consensus to remove them on the talk page before removal. You will be blocked for the next occurrence of inappropriate removal of maintenance tags. Toddst1 (talk) 15:53, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2010

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did to List of horror films: 2010s, you will be blocked from editing. All additions regarding living people must be cited. Toddst1 (talk) 16:16, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

transfermarkt.de als Quelle

Wie du vielleicht schon gehört hast ist transfermarkt.de wegen seine Unzuverlässigkeit in der deutschen Wikipedia als Quelle verboten. Daher sollte man sie nicht unbedingt so häufig in der englischen Version verwenden. Dann lieber kicker.de - oder am besten die Vereinsseiten, die oft auch eine englische Version haben. --Yoda1893 (talk) 12:32, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gut ich hatte auch schon mehrere male hier die Transfermarkt.de Quelle gelöscht bekam dafür jedoch eine verwarnung daher benutze ich sie weiter. deswegen bin ich jetz über deine aussage überrascht!

--Zombie433 talk) 12:35, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Eine Verwarnung? Das werden wahrscheinlich User sein die von Deutschland und der Bundesliga 0 Ahnung haben. Ich werf transfermarkt.de als Quelle immer nicht nur raus, sondern ersetze sie -vor allem wenn die Vereinsseite eine gute englische Quelle bietet- Hier findest du den Hinweis aus der deutschen Wikipedia: de:Portal:Fußball/tm.de --Yoda1893 (talk) 12:39, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
jo eine Verwarnung, ich habe auch als Edit Summary bemängelt das die Datenbank total veraltet ist, aber irgendwie kam das bei dem Portal Fussball hier nicht gut an! daher war ich jetzt verwundert, aber gut ich werde nun nach deinen hinweis seriöse quellen nehmen! ich habe bei einigen auch das profil von Tm.de rausgenommen und durch das kicker profil ersetzt dort wurde es jedoch als fehlerhaft auf den stand meines vorherigen schreibers zurück gesetzt! weil ich seit langen die Tm.de Datenbank bemängele da sie total veraltet ist und die meisten Profile unvollständig, wenn greife ich auf Weltfussball.de zurück, den sie verlinken ihre news mit den vereinsseiten, kicker oder diverse lokale zeitungen.

--Zombie433 talk) 12:47, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Coaching / Other jobs

Hi ZOMBIE, VASCO from Portugal again,

I would like to ask you another favour - i know that you will not answer although i do not understand why, and remove my message immediately, but that's OK, just enough if you read and understand my request.

Please do not add COACHING CAREER sections in players when it's a false input, for example you have done that at Ricardo Sá Pinto and Gerhard Poschner, a director of football is not the same thing as a coach, i think.

Thank you, until some other time,

VASCO - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 21:26, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Adewale Wahab

You source is wrong and un-reliable again. How come a region league side signed a Swiss Top Division footballer?! Adewale Wahab played twice for Bellinzona in 2009-10 after you claimed he left the club. Matthew_hk tc 21:07, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

several local press announced the transfer of Wahab to SE Eivissa see [3] [4] [5]

Zombie433t 22:38, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Predators

Please stop adding links to Bloody Disgusting as references in this article, unless they actually serve to reference the text you are placing them in front of. You are effectively disguising spam links as references, as none of the links you have been adding actually support any of the statements you are appending them to. All of these "sources" amount to effectively nothing more than "zomg behind teh scenes pix! 1st!". Since they don't actually support any of the article text, your edits have been reverted. --IllaZilla (talk) 23:27, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Zombie433! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 16 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 68 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

  1. Udeorah Uche - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  2. Jeffrey Sneijder - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  3. Austin Brown - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  4. Femi Babatunde - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  5. Mohammed Usman - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  6. Niyi Ogunlana - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  7. Mohammed Shuaib - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  8. Nasiru Aliyu - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  9. Sarafa Usman - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  10. Babatunde Yusuf - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 09:00, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Something Wykked This Way Comes

The article Something Wykked This Way Comes has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails Wikipedia's notability criteria for albums.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Neelix (talk) 14:34, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jimmy O Article

I saw that you have made a number of contributions to the Jimmy O article. You may also want to contribute your vote to the discussion over whether or not to delete the page, which is located at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jimmy_O. Thanks. David Straub (talk) 15:03, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Azian Innocent Tano

An article that you have been involved in editing, Azian Innocent Tano, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Azian Innocent Tano. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Matthew_hk tc 17:32, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Simone Calvano

I know that a lot of sources report his transfer, but we have to wait until it appears here or here before adding him to the Milan primavera page. All other sources are NOT official. — Luxic (talk) 16:15, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I know that a lot of sources report his transfer, but we have to wait until it appears here or here before adding him to the Milan primavera page. All other sources are NOT official. — Luxic (talk) 16:15, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Élson

Gibt es irgend eine Quelle für die Rückennummer? --Yoda1893 (talk) 16:13, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Angelic Vengeance

The article Angelic Vengeance has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails Wikipedia's notability guidelines for albums.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Neelix (talk) 14:28, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Robyn Whitehead

The article Robyn Whitehead has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Clear cut case of a non-notable tabloid fodder who is only in the news because of her death by drugs, connection to Pete Docherty, who is known by tabloids for drug taking; and her connection to a wealthy family; all this an ingredient of an USP for tabloids. No other forms of notability is available.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donnie Park (talk) 15:15, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources

Please don't add content sourced to bloody-disgusting.com or dreadcentral.com. Neither of these meet our criteria for reliable sources. Thank you. Wildhartlivie (talk) 12:47, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Robyn Whitehead

I have nominated Robyn Whitehead, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robyn Whitehead. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Donnie Park (talk) 13:23, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Robyn Whitehead

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Robyn Whitehead. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robyn Whitehead. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:07, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Antal Nimród/Nimród Antal

Hi. The next time you move an article, please use the move link at the top of the page. Moving via cut-and-paste disrupts the article history by splitting it across multiple pages. If the move function does not work, you can list the article at requested moves. Thanks. - Eureka Lott 17:24, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Georg Niedermeier

Niedermeier ist im Kader des VfB gemeldet weshalb er auch sofort einen Vertrag beim VfB unterschreiben konnte und somit kein Leihspieler mehr ist. Das wird auch durch beide Vereinsseiten bestätigt. --Yoda1893 (talk) 17:46, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gut ich habe mich auf die DFL verlassen, dort ist er in keiner aktuellen Transferliste gemeldet. -- (Zombie433 talk) 17:49, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Er muss auch gar nicht mehr auf die Transferliste. Er müsste nur wieder auf die Transferliste wenn er nach München zurückkehren würde. Die Transferliste unterscheidet nicht zwischen Leihe und festen Transfers. Es geht nur um die Spielberechtigung. Niedermeier wird dort heute und auch im Sommer genausowenig erscheinen wie zum Beispiel Hummels das getan hat. --Yoda1893 (talk) 17:51, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nur weil er mal einen Leihvertrag hatte und jetzt eben einen festen Vertrag hat halte ich es nicht für sinnvoll, seine Spieldaten beim VfB in 2 verschiedene Zeilen zu packen. Eine Leihe in der Infobox anzugeben ist sinnvoll wenn sie auch Bestand hatte. In diesem Fall reicht es aber vollkommen aus, wenn im Artikel erwähnt wird, dass er zunächst einen Leihvertrag hatte. --Yoda1893 (talk) 17:59, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nefret

The article Nefret has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails Wikipedia's notability guidelines for albums.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Neelix (talk) 14:23, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of horror films: 2010s

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is List of horror films: 2010s. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of horror films: 2010s. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:11, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

thx for the ac stlouis help

your help on the A.C. St. Louis project has been greatly and thus i award you with the first recently created stl barnstar Dylant2011 03:59, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Dylant2011 (talk • contribs) 03:59, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

List of horror films: 2010s

Excellent work on adding all the references to this article. Lugnuts (talk) 19:21, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Exorcismus.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Exorcismus.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? feydey (talk) 21:57, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Isaac Okoronkwo

Do you have a source for your edits? He's currently on trial at Krylia Sovetov. BanRay 18:33, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Špejbls Helprs

I have nominated Špejbls Helprs, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Špejbls Helprs. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 22:41, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Page titles

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give Noel Seka a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Noël Séka. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. R'n'B (call me Russ) 23:21, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Špejbls Helprs

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Špejbls Helprs. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Špejbls Helprs. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:07, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned and missing rationale images

The following images are missing fair use rationales and are also orphaned. This makes them subject to deletion in seven days:

Please do not restore the logo gallery to Thomas Sabo Ice Tigers, as such a gallery of non-free logos is not permissible under our guidelines. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 20:22, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ugly Americans (TV series)

Your recent edit to this page was marked as minor. Please see WP:MINOR. Minor edits are never for changes in content. Turning references into in-line citations may have arguably be okay as a minor edit, but your content additions are not. Please keep this in mind for the future. Vertigo Acid (talk) 06:09, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Wykked Wytch

The article Wykked Wytch has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails Wikipedia's notability guidelines for musical ensembles.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Neelix (talk) 13:51, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Saw VI Blood Drive.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Saw VI Blood Drive.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:21, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Kliment

I noticed in the Andrew Kliment article that you keep adding a reference to this page establishing that someone named Andrew T. Kliment is from Binghamton, New York and went to Utica College, earning a Bachelor of Science degree in May 2005. Another editor (IP 24.77.77.171) seems to believe this is a different person from the article's subject. I've been able to find references verifying that the Canadian-born footballer Andrew Kliment was born on June 4, 1991, [6] making him 13 years old in May of 2005. I don't think this is the same person. It seems you might have searched for "Andrew Kliment", found the Utica College reference, and assumed it was the same person. If there is a reason why you still believe it is the same person it would be helpful to state that reason on the article's talk page. Narthring (talk • contribs) 22:25, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Benjamin Stambouli

The article Benjamin Stambouli has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:ATHLETE having never played in a fully professional league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Joao10Siamun (talk) 03:00, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2010 Pentagon shooting

Hello Zombie433,
Just letting you know the date of death you have in the 2010 Pentagon shooting Criminal infobox is incorrect. I'd fix it myslf but article is protected.

  • It has 3 May should be 5 March.

You are a very prolific contributor, (58,000+ makes my ≈2,100 look insignificant), so I was also wondering why you tend not to give edit summaries?
Regards, --220.101.28.25 (talk) 15:13, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Helmuth Lehner

Hi,

Where did you get Helmuth's birth date, if you don't mind me asking? Thanks. Dark Prime (talk) 00:29, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Nachtblut

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Nachtblut. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nachtblut. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:09, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:WrongTurn3LeftforDeadUnratedB.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WrongTurn3LeftforDeadUnratedB.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.
  • If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 04:15, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:WrongTurnLeftForDead.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WrongTurnLeftForDead.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.
  • If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 04:32, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Trixie DVD.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Trixie DVD.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.
  • If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:22, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Wykked Wytch

I have nominated Wykked Wytch, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wykked Wytch. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Neelix (talk) 18:36, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:WrongTurn3LeftforDeadUnrated.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WrongTurn3LeftforDeadUnrated.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 20:01, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Wykked Wytch

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Wykked Wytch. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wykked Wytch. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:08, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]


CfD nomination of Category:Uzbekaistani expatriates in Russia

I have nominated Category:Uzbekaistani expatriates in Russia (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for renaming to Category:Uzbek expatriates in Russia (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Russavia I'm chanting as we speak 05:21, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Alone in the Dark II.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Alone in the Dark II.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:30, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fight Club

Fight Club (film) is not a German thriller film. Why did you add this category? Erik (talk) 13:08, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please be aware that even if a German-originating production company contributed to the making of the film, this does not mean that it is recognized as German in the national sense. Many films, especially of this century, get help from international production companies. We need to identify the nationality by its home studio, however. Erik (talk) 13:12, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
A film like The Hangover getting help from the German production company IFP Westcoast Erste does not make it a German film. Since this category affects multiple articles, please discuss it at WT:FILM. Erik (talk) 13:13, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Orphaned non-free image File:Survival of the Dead TFW.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Survival of the Dead TFW.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —Mike Allen 01:54, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:2001 Maniacs Beverly Hellbillys.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:2001 Maniacs Beverly Hellbillys.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 02:56, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gallowwalker

Hallo, woher hast du denn den Kinostart am 20. Mai? Google spuckt mir dazu nix aus. Grüße --Berntie (talk) 23:34, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Nachtblut

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Nachtblut. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nachtblut. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:09, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Wykked Wytch

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Wykked Wytch. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wykked Wytch. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:06, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Weißes Fleisch

I know this was a while ago, but in this edit you removed maintenance templates. Please do not remove maintenance templates without first addressing them. I'm aware you added a reference in the next edit but that was not enough to satisfy either template. Rehevkor ✉ 22:08, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Wykked Wytch

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Wykked Wytch. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wykked Wytch. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:07, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Congolese

Just a heads up—in category names we don't use the adjective/noun "Congolese", because it is ambiguous. We use either "Republic of the Congo" or "Democratic Republic of the Congo" as the adjective. Thanks. Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:42, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Robert Stark

Hello Zombie433, this is a message from an automated bot to inform you that the page you created, Robert Stark, has been marked for speedy deletion by User:80.171.195.9. This has been done because the page seems to be about a person, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant (see CSD). If you think the tag was placed in error, please add "{{hangon}}" to the page text, and edit the talk page to explain why the page should not be deleted. If you have a question about this bot, please ask it at User talk:SDPatrolBot II. If you have a question for the user who tagged the article, see User talk:80.171.195.9. Thanks, - SDPatrolBot II (talk) on behalf of 80.171.195.9 (talk · contribs) 15:40, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]


AfD nomination of Jean Michel Kore

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Jean Michel Kore. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jean Michel Kore. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:07, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Wykked Wytch

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Wykked Wytch. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wykked Wytch (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:03, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Muhammed Aburub

I have again restored the "orphan" tag to this article. Merely adding his name as a "Notable player" to the articles for the clubs for whom he played does not change his "orphan" status, nor does it tell a user any more about his career. Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 12:09, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Blum (footballer)

Woher weißt du, dass er in Düsseldorf geboren ist und dass er von 1999 bis 2001 beim CFR Links, von 2001 bis 2002 bei BV Düsseldorf und von 2002 bis 2004 bei Fortuna gespielt hat. Gruß --Edwinvandersar (talk) 08:07, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Woher weißt du, dass er in Düsseldorf geboren ist und dass er von 1999 bis 2001 beim CFR Links, von 2001 bis 2002 bei BV Düsseldorf und von 2002 bis 2004 bei Fortuna gespielt hat. Gruß --Edwinvandersar (talk) 08:07, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Meadowoods

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Meadowoods. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meadowoods. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:11, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lucas Barrios

Why you deleted the external link which is far more useful than the current ones ??--Jor70 (talk) 17:38, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Armand Djerabe

Hallo, wie ich sehe ist deutsch deine Muttersprache. Dann schreibe ich hier auch mal auf deutsch. Du hast in dem Artikel zu Armand Djerabe zuletzt 89 Länderspiele und 4 Tore für den Spieler eingetragen. Darf ich fragen, aus welcher Quelle du die Informationen hast? Gibts da einen Link im Internet? Das würde mir nämlich sehr weiterhelfen. Vielen Dank schon mal für deine Antwort.--Losdedos (talk) 14:01, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deaths in 2010

Please note that, by consensus, expiring months are not collapsed until seven days of the new month have elapsed [7]. You moved April deaths to Deaths in April 2010 after only five days. WWGB (talk) 10:54, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ethnicity and BLP categories

Hi Zombie433, I noticed you created a number of articles with uncited ethnicity categories. Could you remove any uncited categories, such as Category:Igbo footballers, if there is no source to support it? Thanks for your help.--TM 23:34, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Expatriate footballers in East Germany

Hi,

Just to note - West Berlin wasn't East Germany, so players from Hertha, TeBe, Blau-Weiß etc don't fit this category. ArtVandelay13 (talk) 14:32, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Abdul Aziz Moshood

He never played for Dynamo Dresden and Stuttgarter Kickers. What's your source for the Finnish player stats ? He only played 15 league games for Ilves in 1987-1988 0 goals Cattivi (talk) 09:51, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Do you really think that the Finnish Sports Museum [8] and the DSFS publications [9] are more reliable than anything you can google? (Date of Birth is wrong as well) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cattivi (talk • contribs) 10:51, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I appointed me of the Atlantis FC announcement, wereby birth dates of many Africans inconsistent see the birth date of Yeboah, which is variable. Zombie433 contribs) 11:51, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

1987 Ilves 11-0 1988 Ilves 4-0 1995 Ponnistus 10-0 1996 Ponnistus 7-0 According to the Finnish FA he was born 22-7-1968 (I agree DOB's for African players can be very unreliable) Never played for Dynamo Dresden and Stuttgarter Kickers first team 62.194.188.112 (talk) 11:13, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Categories

Hi there, just letting you know that I've removed the Category:Pacy Vallée-d'Eure players you added to Arnaud Gonzalez and Vincent Guignery. I'm not sure why this category was added since neither player has ever represented that club. You might want to go through others who you have edited with this category to make sure there aren't any more inaccuracies. Cheers, BigDom 18:46, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP Munich invitation

I noticed you made an edit for SpVgg Unterhaching. Are you a fan and would you like to be part of the task force for it? Kingjeff (talk) 17:16, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

You are invited to join WikiProject Munich!



There are a lot of things to do in this project. From creating new articles to finetuning articles into featured article status.


How can you help?

  • You can join a Task Force.
  • You can help comform Munich-related articles to Wikipedia Policy.
  • You can get free Munich-related images under GNU Free Documentation License.
  • You can create and edit of Munich-related articles.
  • You can do translations from German Wikipedia to English Wikipedia on Munich-related articles.
  • You can help do assessments of Munich-related articles.
  • You can help expand articles currently in the Stub-class and Start-class.
  • You can help reference articles.
  • Since original research is against Wikipedia policy, you can research topics to expand. This means you don't need to know anything about Munich.
  • You can help expand stubs and start-class articles and help finetune other articles into Featured article status.

A WikiProject of this nature is very broad. Munich has a rich history in sports, culture, politics along with many more topics. Feel free to help out in your area of interest.

If you want to check the project out you can click the link above. If you want to join the project, you can sign up here.


If you have any questions feel free to contact myself or any other member of the project.

Kingjeff (talk) 17:29, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sadick Adams

Zombie, why you added Category:SC Adelaide players to Sadick Adams??? FkpCascais (talk) 18:18, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Can you add a source to the article about that? FkpCascais (talk) 18:39, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

See the Wikipedia article S.C. Adelaide or Swami Panchadasi The Human Aura: Astral Colors and Thought Forms Des Plaines, Illinois, USA:1912--Yogi Publications Society Page 36 Zombie 433 talk) 19:46, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
What does Swami Panchadasi has to do with this? FkpCascais (talk) 19:01, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I asked you a question. Be educated and please respond: What does Swami Panchadasi has to do with Sadick Adams? FkpCascais (talk) 21:10, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Be funny with me once more and you´ll see what will happend. FkpCascais (talk) 21:17, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Grammar

I know you say you speak English at a near-native level, and I'm sure your English is better than my efforts to write whatever your first language is, but you **really** need to work on your grammar and spelling. Your tenses are all over the place, your conjunctions are all wrong, and your sentence structure is totally whacked. If you're going to contribute to this project in a major way, your language skills really need to improve, because it's a pain in the ass having to cleanup after you every time you write something. Just some friendly advice. --JonBroxton (talk) 17:11, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you just delete everything from your talk page without responding? --JonBroxton (talk) 17:18, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Still no response. --JonBroxton (talk) 19:57, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Gates (TV series) writer Richard Hatem

Hi there. I am the one who created the infobox at The Gates. I just wanted to explain to you that most of the information in the infobox came from the press release (currently reference 1, name=PR). At the time, I cited the first item in the box with the source, (which happened to be writer Grant Scharbo), rather than adding the same cite all the way down the box (which IMO looks messy.) In response to your edit, I have placed the same cite that was next to Grant Scharbo also next to Richard Hatem, for fairness. I have removed your reference to Bloody Disgusting, which is not a reliable source nor was it formatted correctly. Both writers are properly and fairly sourced now. --Logical Fuzz (talk) 20:31, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Franck Etoundi

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Franck Etoundi, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.ftbl.com/ratingmatches/GameProtocol.aspx?gameId=27748. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 11:37, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CFd

Hi there, Just to let you, I've nominated a category of yours for deletion today. Check it out if you wish to defend it.--TM 16:00, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Walker (film)

You added this film to the Mexican horror category and I am damned if I can figure out why. It was neither filmed nor set in Mexico, nor is it a horror film. So, would you kindly explain your actions? ---RepublicanJacobiteThe'FortyFive' 16:32, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mayola Biboko (warning)

Your link provided just said Visé verse UR Namur and Biboko played for Bohemians. [10] How could you said Biboko played for Namur in January 2010?! Matthew_hk tc 08:07, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gerson Aboagye

The article Gerson Aboagye has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable footballer who fails WP:ATHLETE and WP:GNG

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GiantSnowman 23:54, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Francis Oumar Belonga

Hi.

What was your source for the league appearances in this edit: [11]? Greetz --Ureinwohner (talk) 20:25, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ondřej Mazuch (warning)

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Ondřej Mazuch. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please provide a reliable source for his transfer fees. Matthew_hk tc 21:31, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Club Sportif Orne 1919 Amnéville-les-Thermes players

Category:Club Sportif Orne 1919 Amnéville-les-Thermes players, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. BigDom 17:55, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ten Cate Palmeras

Good morning, I'm very sure that Ten Cate was not Panathinaikos Manager since 8th of December 2009 and his Palmeras is wrong.

Regards Telismad 14/06/2010 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Telismad (talk • contribs) 09:19, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Skype

You might note that at least one of your recent edits also introduced some extraneous text around some numerical characters. This may be due to a combination of your browser and Skype trying to identify and highlight telephone numbers. Thank you. This edit --Rumping (talk) 08:02, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations on receiving the Dr. Heiter Award!

For your contributions to The Human Centipede (First Sequence) I present you with the Dr. Heiter Award. "Feed!"

Hi there, thank you for your contributions to The Human Centipede (First Sequence). When the article was first started in October 2009 is was but a tiny stub that was immediately tagged for deletion, but thanks to the efforts of wikipedia editors that tiny acorn has grown into a great oak tree of an article. The Human Centipede (First Sequence) now has B-Class status and on the 17th June 2010 the article received its 1,000,000th page view!

The Dr. Heiter Award was created to reward editors who have made positive contributions to the article. It can be presented by any wikipedia user to anyone who has helped the article grow. This might be by adding new content, fixing any errors or reverting vandalism.

Thanks!

Coolug (talk) 10:33, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Leonardo da Vinci

There have been 13 acts of vandalism in two days. It isn't likely to stop. I think that removing the protection is most unlikely to be helpful. People who have good suggestion, but can't edit the page, generally leave them on the talk page. Amandajm (talk) 13:02, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page SuicideGirls do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. tedder (talk) 12:09, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

dreadcental.com

An editor has raised a concern regarding your additions of dreadcentral.com at WT:WPSPAM#dreadcentral. Please comment at the aforementioned link, as it is in your best interest that you do so. MER-C 13:24, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fabio Borriello (warning)

Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. There is no reliable source that Fabio Borriello played for Rodengo Saiano. Neither in official site http://www.tuttomercatoweb.com, tuttocalciatori.net/ and aic.football.it (for stats.) Matthew_hk tc 22:30, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Matthew_hk tc 22:41, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Canyon.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Canyon.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:23, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion about you...

Hi, there is an ongoing discussion about your edit history and contributions Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Football#User:Zombie433. Please visit this page and enter communications with everyone so we can resolve this. Basically a number of users question some of your edits and wonder where your derive your sources from as they do not seem to match statistics fro known sources. Perhaps this is carelessness, perhaps it is dyslexia, perhaps it is because you have a better source, perhaps it is vandalism, I don't know. If you [Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Football#User:Zombie433 come and talk to us] we can get it sorted I'm sure. Cheers.--ClubOranjeT 10:21, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Abdul Aziz Moshood

Wo sagt dir deine finnische Quelle, dass Moshood 1989 bei Dresden und 1995 bei den Stuttgarter Kickers war? Ich sehe da keine Jahreszahlen. Wo sagt dir deine finnische Quelle, dass er in der DDR-Oberliga und die Regionalliga Süd spielte, deutsche Quellen kennen diesen Spieler in den Mannschaften der entsprechenden Spielzeiten nicht, ganz davon abgesehen, dass er niemals im höherklassigen deutschen Fußball eine Partie absolvierte. --Ureinwohner (talk) 13:16, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

benutze google oder erkundige dich im Almanach dann erfährst die genauen Daten! (Zombie433 talk) 13:18, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Nein, ich muss nicht google benutzen, wenn du nachzuweisen hast, dass er 1989 bei Dresden oder 1995 bei den Stuttgarter Kickers war. Und apropos Almanach, welche Ausgabe, welche Seite? Ich hab hier ein paar rumliegen.. --Ureinwohner (talk) 13:22, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Aber wenn es problemlos bei Google zu finden sein soll, dann kopier mir einfach hier den Link rein, in dem ich das nachlesen kann. --Ureinwohner (talk) 13:24, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Siehe z.b. die Finnische Wikipedia Ausgabe dort sind auch diese Daten oder durch forsche Finnische Zeitungen oder frage beim Verein an! dort bekommst du auch infos! (zeitung) (Zombie433) 13:28, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
Ich sehe weiterhin keinen Nachweis für meine Fragen, der finnische Artikel wurde einen Monat nach deinem angelegt, und ist komplett quellenlos. Deine Allgemeinplätze "Almanach", "finnische Zeitung", "frag beim Verein nach" sind indiskutabel, der verlinkte Zeitungsartikel erwähnt Stuttgart und Dresden nichtmal. Also nochmal, woher stammen die entsprechenden Angaben, irgendwoher musst du die Angaben ja haben... --Ureinwohner (talk) 13:40, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ich hatte sie aus ner finnischen Zeitung, dieser link ist aber mittlerweile Dead link, weil diverse Zeitungen ihre Artikel nicht archivieren und diese nach einem Tag zur Start seite zurück führt! ich habe die Vereine nur noch im Text, ich denke damit ist die Sache gegessen! (Zombie433 talk) 13:40, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Es ist interessant, dass du von Seriosität sprichst, selber aber keine Quellen nennen kannst oder wie kürzlich bei Belgona ein afrikanisches Forum (genauerer Link?) angibst, das du offenbar als seriös einschätzt. In diesem Zusammenhang wäre es z.B. auch interessant, wo du Einsatzzahählen zu kamerunischen Spielern wie Vincent Aboubakar oder Brice Owona (sowohl Liga als auch Juniorennationalteams) entnimmst. Daher die Bitte: Gib deine Quellen an, und es gibt keine derartigen Probleme. Gruß --Ureinwohner (talk) 14:57, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Cabin Fever 2- Spring Fever.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Cabin Fever 2- Spring Fever.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 16:24, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Cabin_Fever_2-_Spring_Fever.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Cabin_Fever_2-_Spring_Fever.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Melesse (talk) 00:35, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ezequiel Schelotto

You just misunderstanding the source. Matthew_hk tc 18:00, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Diego Maradona. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. -- Alexf(talk) 21:33, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Christopher Smith´s Black Death.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Christopher Smith´s Black Death.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:33, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Genre cats

Please do not just add tons of genre cats to articles out of the blue. Where are you getting the information from? Some of them you are adding for films that aren't even released yet! Andrzejbanas (talk) 06:23, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Genre cats

Again, Please do not just add tons of genre cats to articles out of the blue. Where are you getting the information from? Some of them you are adding for films that aren't even released yet! Andrzejbanas (talk) 06:23, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Don't Be Afraid of the Dark (2011 film)

Just a quick inquiry about your edit to Don't Be Afraid of the Dark (2011 film). You changed the release date from 2011 to 2010, but another editor recently moved the page to reflect the fact it was being released in 2011, as opposed to 2010. Is there a source that shows the release date to be 23 July 2010? IMDB currently has the release date at 21 January 2011. JEN9841 (talk) 06:22, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rupel Boom

Hello,

I appreciate your help with the wiki page of Rupel Boom. But I would appreciate it even more of you'll let me handle the page. I've already put in a lot of time and effort into creating, maintaining en updating the page (I've started the page from scratch).

f.e.: I know the squadnumbers aren't mentioned, but as the new season is about to begin, the new squadnumbers aren't known yet. I find it also more clear when the players are listed per position, and not per squadnumber.

Don't hesitate to contact me if you have any news or improvements, but as I've already put in a lot of time and energy into this page, I would like it if you contact me before making major changes?

Khad het ss ook int nederlands kunnen typen, but you never know he :-)

Grtz Kenneth —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kennethcelie (talk • contribs) 11:48, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dread Central spamming

Please stop. If you continue to add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Black Swan (film), you may be blocked from editing. Erik (talk | contribs) 19:40, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Language

Hallo, Zombie433. Wir freuen uns zwar über alle Beiträge, aber leider ist das Englisch in deinem Beitrag zu fehlerhaft, um wirklich hilfreich zu sein. Ich vermute, du sprichst Deutsch; weißt Du schon, dass es auch eine deutschsprachige Wikipedia gibt? Vielleicht möchtest du dich ja lieber dort beteiligen. Trotzdem herzlich willkommen und vielen Dank für deine Bemühungen Andrzejbanas (talk) 19:49, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Language

Hallo, Zombie433. Wir freuen uns zwar über alle Beiträge, aber leider ist das Englisch in deinem Beitrag zu fehlerhaft, um wirklich hilfreich zu sein. Ich vermute, du sprichst Deutsch; weißt Du schon, dass es auch eine deutschsprachige Wikipedia gibt? Vielleicht möchtest du dich ja lieber dort beteiligen. Trotzdem herzlich willkommen und vielen Dank für deine Bemühungen Andrzejbanas (talk) 19:49, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for a period of 1 month from editing for continuing to add spam links. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. tedder (talk) 20:11, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Buried.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Buried.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:41, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Buried.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Buried.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:45, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Deadgirl.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Deadgirl.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 16:12, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Forest of the Damned.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Forest of the Damned.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 15:37, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Forsaken Forest.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Forsaken Forest.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 15:38, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Guabirá.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Guabirá.gif. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 15:40, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Hora film.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Hora film.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 15:43, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Johannes Roberts' Demonic.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Johannes Roberts' Demonic.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 15:48, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Logo Prishtina.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Logo Prishtina.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 15:57, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:La Mujer Sin Cabeza.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:La Mujer Sin Cabeza.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 16:01, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Schooner-of-Blood.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Schooner-of-Blood.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 22:52, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Taboo.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Taboo.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 22:56, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]


AfD nomination of Babou Barro

An article that you have been involved in editing, Babou Barro, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Babou Barro. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.


AfD nomination of Stéphane Dimy

An article that you have been involved in editing, Stéphane Dimy, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stéphane Dimy. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.

WP:ANI

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Since you're currently blocked, if you wish to intervene, you can post your reply here and someone will paste it on ANI. Salvio Let's talk 'bout it! 11:01, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Coastal-FC.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Coastal-FC.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:30, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Mountain-WFC.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mountain-WFC.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:32, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cotton.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cotton.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 04:46, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Danilo Pereira da Silva (warning)

Again, please provide a source for his US career (with Chivas USA). I think you mixed him up to a namesake or you worked for a agent to advertise the footballers with fake stats. Matthew_hk tc 20:47, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Dread Central

Welcome back! I hope you will no longer add dreadcentral.com references to articles indiscriminately like you did here. Erik (talk | contribs) 21:46, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rupel Boom

I would appreciate it if you could leave the stats of the Rupel Boom players as they are. For me it is much easier if the seasons aren't grouped per team, it is much easier if theye stand per season, as they were. Now I don't know how many games are allready counted.

Thnx —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.108.201.16 (talk) 10:32, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

John Saxon

Hi, I need this picture [12]in polish version. But I can't use it. Help if You can. --Morus kot (talk) 19:45, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Diego Aparecido Ferreira Oliveira (warning)

Diego Aparecido Ferreira Oliveira did not made any appearances for ABC in Brazilian National League Serie B and Serie C. Your claim is false. Matthew_hk tc 20:04, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Diego Aparecido Ferreira Oliveira

An article that you have been involved in editing, Diego Aparecido Ferreira Oliveira, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diego Aparecido Ferreira Oliveira. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Matthew_hk tc 21:21, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're being discussed on ANI

See Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Zombie433. Toddst1 (talk) 20:25, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Chihuanhas

The article Chihuanhas has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

About a movie that has not yet been filmed. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. WP:FUTURE

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Quable (talk) 21:17, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

List of horror films

You may be interested as you contribute to these pages: Talk:List of horror films: 2000. Andrzejbanas (talk) 16:01, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

I'm sorry to say that your refusal to acknowledge the seriousness of the problem asserted of your edits (namely that you repeatedly add material which is either dubious or outright false to our biographies of living persons) has left me no other choice but to issue you with a final warning. The next time that you add material to a BLP which is either false or dubious and unreferenced, I'll block this account indefinitely. Your productive contributions do not excuse you from following what is now considered to be one of our important policies. If you have any questions feel free to leave me a note. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward: not at work) - talk 19:56, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Zombie433/Archive_1&oldid=1147948216"