User talk:Inwind

Hello! I saw you edited the University of St Andrews page last. It is missing the coat of arms in the brief information window, could you please add? Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.251.197.71 (talk) 01:20, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Conquest of Constantinople

The article The Conquest of Constantinople has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No claim of significance

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Guy (Help!) 09:14, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Like It Never Was Before

Hallo Inwind, alles gut?

Like It Never Was Before was started as a redirect by me, and you expanded it to an article. In these cases, I believe you are the one who deserves "creator credits". As nobody apart from you has made substantial edits to the article, the simple solution is that I move it to User:Inwind/Like It Never Was Before without leaving a redirect. From there you can restart it in mainspace by copy-pasting it. Let me know what you think. Sam Sailor 16:55, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

Fine by me ! Inwind (talk) 17:59, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (What Rats Won't Do) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating What Rats Won't Do, Inwind!

Wikipedia editor Eagleash just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Would benefit from plot summary and reception sections.

To reply, leave a comment on Eagleash's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Eagleash (talk) 08:33, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:A Royal Home in Wales.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:A Royal Home in Wales.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:02, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Marie Zielcke

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Marie Zielcke requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. TBMNY (talk) 02:58, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (The Lion Woman (film)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating The Lion Woman (film), Inwind!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Time to put yourself forward for WP:Autopatrolled, perhaps?

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 18:23, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Giuseppe Battiston

The article Giuseppe Battiston has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one.  » Shadowowl | talk 09:29, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (The Day Will Come) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating The Day Will Come, Inwind!

Wikipedia editor Bennv3771 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please see MOS:DABPIPING.

To reply, leave a comment on Bennv3771's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Bennv3771 (talk) 12:24, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve The Sea Is Watching

Hi, I'm Insertcleverphrasehere. Inwind, thanks for creating The Sea Is Watching!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Needs additional references. See reviews from top reviewers at Rotten tomatoes, could be used to fill in a 'critical' reception section

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

— Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 04:46, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dorothy Duffy

The article Dorothy Duffy has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Natureium (talk) 19:30, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jean-Bernard Pommier

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jean-Bernard Pommier requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.bach-cantatas.com/Bio/Pommier-Jean-Bernard.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Bradv 03:21, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve Jean-Bernard Pommier

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Inwind, thanks for creating Jean-Bernard Pommier!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This has been tagged for one issue.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 19:11, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Marcello Antony

The article Marcello Antony has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced BLP

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  » Shadowowl | talk 18:08, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Marcello Antony

Hello, are you able to add WP:INLINECITED references to this blp you created a while back? It has no refs, jsut an external link to an unreliable sources. Thanks for looking at this, Boleyn (talk) 19:43, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Gladys Hooper for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gladys Hooper is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gladys Hooper until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — JFG ^talk 18:20, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Inwind. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Request

Hello! can you create an english page for the German actor Sabin Tambrea. He is married to actress Alice Dwyer. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.15.233.183 (talk) 18:52, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:KSH code

Template:KSH code has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 18:28, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Martin Haldbo Hansen moved to draftspace

An article you created on 7 August 2015‎, Martin Haldbo Hansen, does not have enough content, sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved this article to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the title) where you can incubate the draft article with minimal disruption. When you feel this draft article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. JoeHebda (talk) 21:11, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Somewhere in Palilula for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Somewhere in Palilula is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Somewhere in Palilula until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sincerely, Masum Reza^☎ 04:49, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kento Nagayama

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kento Nagayama requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 18:43, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Laure Killing for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Laure Killing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laure Killing until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Snickers2686 (talk) 18:31, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sean Hall (disambiguation)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sean Hall (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
• disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
• is a redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Boleyn (talk) 20:21, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

Ways to improve Marianna Fontana

Hello, Inwind,

Thank you for creating Marianna Fontana.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

I'm not seeing much in the way of secondary sources with significant coverage on this person (though I suspect that most that are available are not in english). Arguably meets WP:NACTOR, but really needs at minimum one more independent reliable source with significant coverage to demonstrate meeting the GNG. Can we fill out a bit about personal life etc?

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Insertcleverphrasehere}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

— Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)}_{(click me!)} 20:18, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

"Lagerwey" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Lagerwey. Since you had some involvement with the Lagerwey redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:58, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Skandaloto for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Skandaloto is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skandaloto until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Minecrafter0271 (talk) 00:25, 2 February 2020 (UTC)

Like Water for Chocolate (novel)

Hi Inwind. When you move pages like "Like Water for Chocolate" for diambiguation purposes, please check to make sure that there aren't any non-free files being used in the article. All non-free files are required to have separate specific non-free use rationales for each use; so, when you change the name of an article, the rationale also needs to be correspondingly changed to avoid problems like this. I caught this and re-added the file to the infobox, but non-free files which aren't being used in any articles can be speedily deleted per WP:F5 after five days. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:04, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

Same thing happened with respect to Only the Animals (short story collection). If you've made any more page moves like this, please go back and check to see if you inadvertantly created and non-free file problems. If nobody catches them before five days pass, such files are likely to be deleted. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:53, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Dave Tamburrino concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Dave Tamburrino, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:38, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Iossif Surchadzhiev

The article Iossif Surchadzhiev has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable actor. Only source is IMDb.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 10:20, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Zoë Belkin

Hello, Inwind,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Crystallizedcarbon and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged an article that you started, Zoë Belkin for deletion, because it seems to be an article that has been already decided by a consensus decision to be unsuitable for inclusion.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Crystallizedcarbon}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 10:51, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Oliver Stokowski

The article Oliver Stokowski has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no meaningful coverage, never had any real sources and despite appearing in 80 films, none of his roles seem to be notable. If running around naked on tape were notable, we'd have an article on every fray boy in America.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Praxidicae (talk) 21:29, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Stephen Singer

The article Stephen Singer has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable actor

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 23:49, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Renzo Rivolta for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Renzo Rivolta is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Renzo Rivolta until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. U¹ _quattro TALK 03:17, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

translation fidelity help on [Draft:Adolf Baeumker]] User:Peteschulz210 (talk) 16:47, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

Dear Inwind, Might you have time to use your German language skills to check on my first translation article? Draft:Adolf Baeumker from [Baeumker] This translation supports my original article Evangeline Lodge Land Lindbergh and Charles Lindbergh enhancement. Thanks in advance for your consideration! Peteschulz210

Proposed deletion of Cave of the Living Dead

The article Cave of the Living Dead has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film with no independent, verifiable reviews.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 16:10, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Snowboarder (film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Snowboarder (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snowboarder (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 07:00, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Snowboarder (film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Snowboarder (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snowboarder (film) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 15:14, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Mariana (film)

Hello, Inwind. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mariana".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:08, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Gravity (2009 film)

The article Gravity (2009 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film, with no verifiable reviews found during search. Tagged for notability for 3 years.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 23:56, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Requested move

 Done A Man About the House (disambiguation) → A Man About the House (closed by non-admin page mover)   Kadzi   (talk) 09:46, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Who Killed Bambi? (2013 film)

The article Who Killed Bambi? (2013 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This non notable film has no independent reviews found in a WP:BEFORE search. Only things found were film database site, youtube videos, and blogs. Tagged for notability for 3 years.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 00:08, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Bhasker Patel for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bhasker Patel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhasker Patel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AngusMEOW (chatter • paw trail) 09:17, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Someone Else's America

The article Someone Else's America has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No reviews found to help this pass WP:NFILM. Tagged for notability since April.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 22:04, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kenau

The article Kenau has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFILM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 19:38, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Ingrida Šimonytė

On 25 November 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Ingrida Šimonytė, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 23:49, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of John Tormey for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Tormey is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Tormey until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 13:23, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Zoë Belkin

Hello, Inwind. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Zoë Belkin".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:32, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

Precious

begin articles

Thank you for beginning quality articles, such as Wind turbine design (2006), List of cities and towns in the San Francisco Bay Area, Golden Bear and Gernot Roll, and thousands of biographies, for disambiguation and categories, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

You are recipient no. 2507 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:11, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of A Small September Affair

The article A Small September Affair has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film, appears to fail WP:NFILM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 01:28, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Category:Geography of the Tibet Autonomous Region has been nominated for merging to Category:Geography of Tibet

Category:Geography of the Tibet Autonomous Region has been nominated for merging to Category:Geography of Tibet. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Place Clichy (talk) 13:46, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Jedan na jedan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jedan na jedan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jedan na jedan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 14:23, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of A Small September Affair for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article A Small September Affair is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Small September Affair until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Donaldd23 (talk) 13:50, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Raimundas Palaitis

The article Raimundas Palaitis has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:47, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Argo (2004 film)

The article Argo (2004 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film, nothing found in a WP:BEFORE to help it pass WP:NFILM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 16:19, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Principles (retailer)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Principles (retailer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.vintagewardrobe.ro/en/cumpara/rochie-retro-rosie-cercuri-ivoire-anii-80-7494987. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Störm (talk) 12:17, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Heads up

Just a heads up that your user name is included in the code of this template. You started the article in question back in 2011 – thank you! Schwede66 23:16, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Baby Love (2008 film)

The article Baby Love (2008 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film, appears to fail WP:NFILM as nothing of substance was found in a WP:BEFORE that could help support notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 15:04, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Emma Twigg

On 23 July 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Emma Twigg, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that New Zealand world-champion rower Emma Twigg (pictured) came out of retirement to compete in her fourth Olympic Games today? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Emma Twigg. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Emma Twigg), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Ways to improve Quick (2019 film)

Hello, Inwind,

Thank you for creating Quick (2019 film).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

More references are needed for this article.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 12:02, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

Sam King

Hi there. I was just wondering what you had in mind for this having liberated it from the golfer – redirect to Samuel King or, a new disambiguation page to include other Sams, if there are any (just Sam, Samantha, Sampson, etc.)? _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 14:07, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
	Thank you clearing out the redirect on In the Ditch. I appreciate your kindness. Reading Beans (talk) 12:41, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Animals with the Tollkeeper for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Animals with the Tollkeeper is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Animals with the Tollkeeper until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

The Film Creator (talk) 14:55, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of The Parade for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Parade is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Parade until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Laterthanyouthink (talk) 10:22, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

Category:Novels by Wilson Tucker

Hello, Inwind,

If you would like to rename, merge or delete categories, the proper step is to go to WP:CFD and make a nomination or do a speedy rename. Do not empty categories "out of process" for a new category. Deletion of the original category deletes its page history which is important to preserve. Please go to CFD in the future, I'd really rather not revert all of your edits. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:34, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

• Category entries were modified by accident and are now corrected. 20:23, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

Category:Academics of the Helsinki University of Technology has been nominated for merging

Category:Academics of the Helsinki University of Technology has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 19:00, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Baby Love (2008 film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Baby Love (2008 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baby Love (2008 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DonaldD23 talk to me 00:10, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Clash of Egos

The article Clash of Egos has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film, appears to fail requirements in WP:NFILM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 18:54, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

"Noguera Ribagorzana/Noguera Ribagorçana (river)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Noguera Ribagorzana/Noguera Ribagorçana (river) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 24#Noguera Ribagorzana/Noguera Ribagorçana (river) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. eviolite (talk) 23:18, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

The Neighborhood (film) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, The Neighborhood (film), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Ts12rAc^{talk to me} 13:11, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

• Have replaced the weak reference and moved back to mainspace. Inwind (talk) 15:01, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of François Damiens

The article François Damiens has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Stafford

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Stafford requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Lavalizard101 (talk) 23:44, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

The Neighborhood (film) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, The Neighborhood (film), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 05:49, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Gregory James for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gregory James is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gregory James until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:13, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

Ways to improve Haydée Padilla

Hello, Inwind,

Thank you for creating Haydée Padilla.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

The article is a bit short at the moment. Checking the Spanish-language page will yield more sources and information.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|CollectiveSolidarity}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 16:58, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

Ways to improve Apollo Goes on Holiday

Hello, Inwind,

Thank you for creating Apollo Goes on Holiday.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Consider translating the article from the Greek Wikipedia.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|CollectiveSolidarity}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 15:52, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lucy (2006 film)

The article Lucy (2006 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NFILM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 23:52, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

Ways to improve Rodrigo Conde

Hello, Inwind,

Thank you for creating Rodrigo Conde.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This page needs additional references or sources for verification.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|FormalDude}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

––FormalDude talk 01:27, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

Ways to improve Harry Brightmore

Hello, Inwind,

Thank you for creating Harry Brightmore.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please consider expanding the article

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bruxton}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Bruxton (talk) 15:27, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Inwind. Thank you for creating A Man in a Hurry. User:VickKiang, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

The article needs expanding, especially adding a plot section and reception section (I've added a couple of refs).

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|VickKiang}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

VickKiang 22:17, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bundfald

Hello, Inwind

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Slywriter, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Bundfald, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

1. Edit the page
2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Slywriter}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Slywriter (talk) 02:35, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Inwind. Thank you for creating Rien sur Robert. User:VickKiang, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article, with four reviews this passes WP:GNG and WP:NFILM, though consider adding a plot summary.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|VickKiang}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

VickKiang (talk) 21:40, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Vladimir Antonik moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Vladimir Antonik, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:45, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Rue des prairies

The article Rue des prairies has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NFILM as no reviews found in a BEFORE.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 14:07, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Rue des prairies for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rue des prairies is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rue des prairies until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

DonaldD23 talk to me 23:41, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

Gustav Fischer disambiguation

I see you moved Gustav Fischer to Gustav Fischer (explorer). Does that mean he's no longer primary topic? Are you going to make the original one a disambiguation page and redirect the incoming links to explorer? AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 20:54, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

• All done Inwind (talk) 20:56, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

Michael Dee (jockey)

Hi, I see you moved his page to Michael Dee. The reason I added jockey is because there is an American country singer ToddyOC (talk) 21:05, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Good Plumber

The article The Good Plumber has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NFILM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 13:23, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Emilis Vėlyvis notability

Dear Inwind,

Thank you for baptizing the new Emilis Vėlyvis article. An American, New York-born editor onel5969 has questioned Emilis' notability. In response, I have added content referenced by three independent, reliable non-English media sources, delfi.lt, Lithuanian TV3 and Lietuvos rytas. In addition, a new section "Selected awards and nominations" has been introduced.

I therefore deem the Velyvis' notability criteria has been satisfied.

I have informed onel5969 on his talk page and have requested to remove the "notability" tag. onel5969 has not responded. I can not remove the notability tag due to possible conflict of interest because I have started the article about Emilis.

Can you please remove the notability tag?

Thank you for your help and attention,

Mit freundlichen Grüßen,

Tomas Ttk371 (talk) 00:27, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

Category:People associated with the finite element method has been nominated for deletion

Category:People associated with the finite element method has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 20:22, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sharon Duncan-Brewster, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Monica. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Preprocessor (CAE)

The article Preprocessor (CAE) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Presumably unsourced articles were fine 15 years ago, but if I had created this just now I doubt it would last more than a few days without cites

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chidgk1 (talk) 12:42, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

As Green As It Gets moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, As Green As It Gets, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. EdmHopLover1995 (talk) 01:35, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Süt Kardeşler

The article Süt Kardeşler has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NFILM.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 10:51, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Süt Kardeşler for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Süt Kardeşler is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Süt Kardeşler until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

DonaldD23 talk to me 00:05, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Maro Kontou

Hello, Inwind

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Significa liberdade, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Maro Kontou, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. To prevent the deletion, please add a reference to the article. You may remove the deletion tag yourself once the article has at least one reliable source.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Significa liberdade}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Significa liberdade (talk) 00:46, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Asfalto

The article Asfalto has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No References/Citations, WP:Before Found nothing.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PaulGamerBoy360 (talk) 14:38, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

Hello@PaulGamerBoy360

I deproDed it. The film is obviously notable. Best, -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 17:48, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Chancellor Miller for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chancellor Miller is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chancellor Miller (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 19:39, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Apriltsi (disambiguation)

The article Apriltsi (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This disambiguation page contains the primary topic and one other topic for the ambiguous title and no other topics can be found within a reasonable time.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

• Nikolaevo (disambiguation)

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Precious

Three years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:47, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

Ways to improve Brother's Keeper (2021 film)

Hello, Inwind,

Thank you for creating Brother's Keeper (2021 film).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Hi Steel1943. The article as it stands is borderline for meeting WP:NFILM and would really need to be expanded with additional WP:RS sources to demonstrate notability. It would benefit from an explanation of the plot, and the addition of a 'Reception' section. It would also benefit from addition to relevant Wikiprojects.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bastun}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Regards, Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 16:49, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Nello Mascia for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nello Mascia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nello Mascia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Ldm1954 (talk) 22:31, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

Edit summaries

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Laterthanyouthink (talk) 05:32, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Inwind. Thank you for your work on Strangeness (film). North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 18:22, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

Hammarskjöld (film) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Hammarskjöld (film). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and does not seem to meet WP:NFILM. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Broc (talk) 13:17, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

March 2024

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Uncle (2019 film). When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Broc (talk) 16:00, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Yūko Daike for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yūko Daike is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yūko Daike until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

She was ^afairy 21:31, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Nelson Goerner

Hi, I've marked the page Nelson Goerner as reviewed, but do you have a source for the birthdate? The closest I could find is the birth year. Thanks! ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 17:09, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

Chronological of Alfphabetical order

Hello Inwind, since you created the article I was wondering how the list should be made up. Thank you so much for your time. Lotje (talk) 07:01, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Marina Massironi

The article Marina Massironi has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Un assiolo (talk) 14:55, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Life! for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Life! is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Life! until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

QuietHere (talk | contributions) 05:03, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

Rimini Protokoll

Hi User:Inwind,

sorry to bother you, but would you mind having a look at Talk:Rimini Protokoll? I have seen that you started René Pollesch, which is often compared with Rimini Protokoll, so perhaps you could give us advice how to proceed with the article. We somehow got stuck there. Best regards --Olag (talk) 21:06, 9 October 2024 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:27, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:40, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2024 (UTC)