User talk:TheBirdsShedTears

	; Archives (Index) ;
	2020/February; 2020/March; 2020/April; 2020/May; 2020/June; 2020/July; 2020/August; 2020/September; 2020/October; 2020/November; 2020/December; 2021/January; 2021/March; 2021/April; 2021/May; 2021/June; 2021/July; 2021/August; 2021/September; 2021/October; 2021/November; 2021/December; 2022/January; 2022/February; 2022/March; 2022/April; 2022/May; 2022/June; 2022/July; 2022/August; 2022/September; 2022/October; 2022/November; 2022/December; 2023/January; 2023/February; 2023/April; 2023/May; 2023/June; 2023/July; 2023/August; 2023/September; 2023/November; 2023/December; 2024/January; 2024/April;
	This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Hello, TheBirdsShedTears. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Hello TheBirdShedTears.

I would like you to review Draft:Jaey Price

New pages patrol September 2024 Backlog drive

New pages patrol \| September 2024 Backlog Drive
On 1 September 2024, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each article review will earn 1 point, and each redirect review will earn 0.2 points. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rather (surname in Kashmir) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Rather (surname in Kashmir). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Whpq (talk) 13:37, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Whpq: this is not my article, but i found it randomly and tried to rescue it. TheBirdsShedTears (talk)

Yes, I realize that. I just wanted to inform you as you did make an attempt at improving it and might want to do a bit more so I wanted to let you know it has been draftified. -- Whpq (talk) 13:52, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@TheBirdsShedTears OH YOU ARE THE ONE WHO IS CONSTANTLY IRRATATING FROM EVERYWHERE NA Sarim Wani (talk) 13:43, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refer to WP:PA before making false accusations. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 13:49, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

bro you took it seriously i thought you were cool from youre user page.. Sarim Wani (talk) 15:05, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please participate in ANI discussion than making fun of others. You may explain your concerns there. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 15:08, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey TheBirdsShedTears,

I want to sincerely apologize for my actions. I realize that what I said/did came across as bullying and that was never my intention. I made a mistake and I deeply regret it. I value respect and kindness and I know that I didn’t show that in this situation.

Please know that I’m committed to learning from this and doing better moving forward. I hope you can accept my apology. it's just that everywhere I do something I get well help from you so you can see what can go wrong here.

Take care oh also I can't talk there? Sarim Wani (talk) 15:16, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/V._M._Munuswamy

Hello sir please confirm this article why it is not in use yet Kala321 (talk) 07:48, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Kala321: It is yet to be reviewed by New page reviewers, a user group dedicated to determine notability criteria of newly created articles. For further information regarding notability, please visit WP:GNG. If you need any assistance regarding your draft or article, your may ask a question at Wikipedia:Teahouse, a friendly place for newcomers. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 08:07, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you help with Draft:Rotas The Rapper

Help arrange it so it can be ready for articles mainspace. Celinejunior24 (talk) 17:55, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refer to notability guidelines for a detailed information. If this is your first article, please refer to WP:YFA. You may wish to ask questions at our Q&A hub, a very friendly place for new editors. In case you are associated with the subject in question, please visit WP:COI. If you are writting about yourself, please visit WP:AUTOBIO. Regards TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 18:11, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:10, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TheBirdsShedTears,

I've noticed several times that occasionally your signature just includes your username without a time and date of the comment. Please remember to use FOUR tildes when signing your comments, not three or five. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:12, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz: Thanks for the heads-up! I didn't realize I was messing up the signature by not using the right number of tildes. I'll make sure to use four from now on. Appreciate you pointing it out! TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 09:54, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi TheBirdsShedTears. Thank you for your work on Roshni Act controversy. Another editor, Dcotos, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work! I would suggest it should be renamed, as the majority of sources referred to it as the Roshni land scam.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Dcotos}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Dcotos (talk) 08:15, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Dcotos: Thank you! Since the case is still pending in court, I chose 'controversy' instead of 'scam' to adhere to WP:NPOV. Although not concretely, it appears ~~there is a possibility of~~ the ~~case~~ incident it overlapped by political rivalry in some cases. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 08:26, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@TheBirdsShedTears That makes sense. Thank you. The article is large; it could be a bit shorter and please consider adding more reliable sources. Cheers! Dcotos (talk) 08:54, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edits on page of EMAM

@TheBirdsShedTears I don't know If you studied Islam or not but for your kind information I remind you that, we 'muslims' have a special law called 'shariah' in which there's a specific topic on images and paintings. It is agreed by all the prominent scholars of the old and the new era that Images with Faces (Eyes, Nose, Mouth etc.) are 'Haram' which means prohibited, No means No.

and If you're thinking to quote some Wikipedia references of Other personalities with faces then you'll be giving a proof of being an illiterate.

So let me do my work under the Shariah rules and Wikipedia rules too and good luck for your future edits. Itsmeaasifqureshi (talk) 11:23, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Itsmeaasifqureshi:, if you're promoting images you've designed yourself, it might be better to create a blog to showcase your work. Wikipedia has its own guidelines that don't support personal promotion or emotional attachment to content. Please stop engaging in edit warring, as it goes against Wikipedia's collaborative principles. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 12:48, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:28, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

WP:G5 tagging

Hi there, when you put a G5 tag on an article, the username to add is the sockmaster, not the sockpuppet. It's not a huge deal, but it saves admins the step of looking up the SPI. -- asilvering (talk) 02:15, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Asilvering: Got it, thanks for the heads-up! TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 05:40, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Zakir Ali Zaidi moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Zakir Ali Zaidi. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 11:19, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Zakir Ali Zaidi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zakir Ali Zaidi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zakir Ali Zaidi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

— Saqib (talk I contribs) 11:42, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your email

I'm not sure what you're wanting me to do with the information your sent me via email. You haven't provided any evidence or diffs of disruption and Checkusers can't link IPs to accounts, so there's little I can do there. I suggest you report your concerns via WP:SPI.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:25, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I will provide diffs at WP:SPI or by email. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 17:52, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the drive!

Welcome, welcome, welcome TheBirdsShedTears! I'm glad that you are joining the November 2024 drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.

Fix a random page lacking sources

Cielquiparle (talk) 13:18, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Zakir Ali Khan moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Zakir Ali Khan. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 08:41, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you reverted my draftification and wrote I was "disruptive editing" and "misuse of NPP rights". I think that’s a bit excessive since I’m not the only one who believes this fails WP:N. If you truly think it meets WP:N, you could have let it pass through AFC, but it seems you want to avoid that route. No problem, I’ll take it to AFD, though not necessarily right now, as I’m occupied elsewhere. But please AGF and refrain from calling our edits disruptive. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 14:11, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Saqib:, Since we seem to have different views on the notability of this article, it might be better to take it to AfD so the community can decide its fate. I could be wrong about its notability, so I've also left a message on the article's talk page to seek the input of the editor who tagged it. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 14:26, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Like I said, I wasn’t entirely sure about its WP:N either, but when I saw the WP:N tag, I thought we should get it passed through AFC. Because AFC is a better way to preserve an article than taking it to AFD and risking deletion. However, your reversion of my draftification and labeling my edits as disruptive was quite disappointing. But no worries; I’m glad you started the discussion on the article's tp. I might join in later as well. Happy editing! — Saqib (talk I contribs) 14:37, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New page reviewer granted

Hi TheBirdsShedTears, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.

This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:

Add Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers to your watchlist to follow NPP-related discussions
If you use Twinkle, configure it to log your CSDs and PRODs
If you can read any languages other than English, add yourself to the list of reviewers with language proficiencies

You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone! _signed,Rosguill ^talk 15:58, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

dealing with copyvios

Thanks for spotting the copyvio at Draft:North Star of Herschel Island but please; when you find a copyvio, remove the offending material then request revdel. Nthep (talk) 15:14, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Nthep:, Got it, thanks for the heads-up! TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 15:28, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations now open for the WikiProject Military history newcomer of the year and military historian of the year

Nominations now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2024! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Nominations are open here and here respectively. The nomination period closes at 23:59 on 30 November 2024 when voting begins. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:21, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the feedback

Dear TheBirdsShedTears , Thank you for the editorial feedback on Draft:Anand Reddi. I have made the changes you have requested add more notable referenes, deleted primary referenes and inline website references and also shorted the prose and made it less promotional.

I have also added new editorial feedback from the Treehouse chat:

[7:56:13 AM] <A09> sources however aren't the only problem. I still think it'd be better to shorten the prose to just facts and statements indirectly related to Reddi. backgrounds on certain topics can be linked through other, less specific articles.

[7:57:13 AM] <A09> remove external links from the last prose paragraph and place them in external links section. links in article body should only link to wikipedia pages, everything else goes in a footer

[8:02:38 AM] <A09> I have spotchecked the prose and there is still lots of space to improve, especially as certain phrases sounded very promotional. I suggest you first try to improve these things I have listed above and then resubmit your draft.

[8:02:40 AM] <WhiteAlpaca38> will add this additional feedback Trex32 (talk) 16:43, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]