User talk:Yoda1893
Welcome!
Hello, Yoda1893, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Kusma (討論) 02:46, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
I have announced your new stub at Portal:Germany/New article announcements. Please add any other Germany-related articles you create there. If you need help with Germany-related things, check out the talk page of the German-speaking noticeboard. Happy editing, Kusma (討論) 02:46, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
Reason for deletion
[edit]Please provide an adequate reason for deletion. For three AfD's, you just wrote "I think this person hasn't importance in any country". If you could add something like if the subject fails WP:BIO, write in "Fails WP:BIO" or stuff of that nature.
--Nishkid64 21:55, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
Your AfDs for Idol contestants
[edit]You've created a lot of AfDs for contestants of American Idol-style shows. Many of them say that these people fail WP:MUSIC, but they don't; WP:MUSIC has a clause stating: "Has won or placed in a major music competition"; it also says that a person is notable if it meets any one of the criteria. Crystallina 15:21, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
I think that American Idol and the other Versions of it surely AREN'T a major music competition!!! In a major music competition contest EXPERIENCED singers and not people who are NOTHING who are nothing without this competition. A major music competition has also TRADITION like the Eurovision Song Contest Yoda1893 15:40, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
- Regardless of what you may consider the quality of such contestants' music, the definition of a 'major music competition' includes the competition being widely attended or televised, and receiving much press coverage - experience is not a factor here. Crystallina 15:48, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
I think there are not much people who would say that a contest, where teeenager contests who are half children, is a major contest, this is only YOUR definition or do you see this defined in this way on WP:music? Yoda1893 16:18, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
- The word 'major' is by definition subjective - there's been discussion on the WP:MUSIC talk page of changing it to 'notable' or something of the sort - but criteria most people seem to bring up are press coverage, viewership, and scope. Crystallina 17:23, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
SuperStar KZ merge and my reversions/unreversions
[edit]Sorry about reverting some of your changes relating to the merge of the season 3 article with SuperStar KZ. I've unreverted my reverts, so it's back to what you did. However, it probably would help everyone in the future if you were to have a more descriptive edit summary than "link" (especially when you remove a link) -- maybe say why you're removing the link? Thanks. -- ArglebargleIV 17:28, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
The link is by a deleted article Yoda1893 17:30, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
The link was to an article that hadn't been deleted yet when I saw the edit. I know what happened now -- but if you had done a explanatory edit summary, people like me would not have treated the delinking as possible vandalism that needed to be undone. Good edit summaries can prevent a lot of misunderstandings. -- ArglebargleIV 17:34, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
information removal in Serbia national basketball team
[edit]Please see my response on the article talk page, as your edits contradict themselves, this as well as your "rv stop serbisation" [1] comment in the edit summary make feel as your edits are done in bad faith. // Laughing Man 00:09, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
Cacau
[edit]Thanks for the note. I added the tag because the article on en: didn't have any sources; I didn't think to check de:. I will add them later. --Merovingian ※ Talk 19:08, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
Hello
[edit]Hi, I am Italian. Thank you so much for updating our italian wiki. Do you have Messenger? I read that you do not understand Italian. I would like to understand German too. :-) If you want, you can write on my Italian wikipedia discussion page in English. --Freddyballo 21:57, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
Translation of VfB Stuttgart
[edit]I saw your translation request, and I'm willing to help. My level of German is very basic, but I've got football articles to FA before. Oldelpaso 17:58, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
Re: Andreas Hinkel
[edit]That page (the Sevilla site) doesn't say he has actually moved to Celtic yet, just that he has been offered terms that he would accept. The article also states that an agreement has yet to be made between Celtic and Sevilla. I think it will happen, but it hasn't yet. Thanks Whitstable (talk) 23:33, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
- In German TV Hinkel explained that he has passed medical check-up and will move to Celtic. Yoda1893 (talk) 23:36, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, that article also says he has passed a medical. Personal terms have been agreed but the two clubs have yet to finalise the deal. It will happen, I am sure, but it hasn't quite happened yet. Whitstable (talk) 23:38, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
Are you sure Pitroipa has joined Hamburg? Both SC Freiburg's official site and Kicker.de still list him in Freiburg's squad. Or is he joining Hamburg next season? - Dudesleeper Talk 12:41, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
- Never mind. I've just seen the note in his article. - Dudesleeper Talk 12:42, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Germany Invitation
[edit]
|
--Zeitgespenst (talk) 07:54, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
Stuttgart II
[edit]That's fine, but a nomination without an appearance signifies nothing and so he's still macedonian. bneidror (talk) 08:05, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
- No, he's born in former Yugoslavia and that means he have at least the macedonian & the albanian citizienship. vfb.de -> macedonian [2] bneidror (talk) 11:03, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
- Source? bneidror (talk) 11:48, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
- OK, but he hasn't played for the Albanian national team, when he makes his first cap, change it. bneidror (talk) 12:00, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
- Source? bneidror (talk) 11:48, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
Who is ignoring sources now? Look at discussion page.--Serbov (talk) 11:55, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
Cacau
[edit]Thanks you for a 2 years hoax. Cacau named Claudemir Jeronimo Barretto in his official site and his brother called Vlademir Jeronimo Barreto, but you wrote Jeronimo Maria Barreto Claudemir da Silva. Please verify information before adding to the article. Matthew_hk tc 20:58, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
Transfermarkt.de
[edit]Gut ich hatte auch schon mehrere male hier die Transfermarkt.de Quelle gelöscht bekam dafür jedoch eine verwarnung daher benutze ich sie weiter. deswegen bin ich jetz über deine aussage überrascht!
--Zombie433 talk) 12:35, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
- jo eine Verwarnung, ich habe auch als Edit Summary bemängelt das die Datenbank total veraltet ist, aber irgendwie kam das bei dem Portal Fussball hier nicht gut an! daher war ich jetzt verwundert, aber gut ich werde nun nach deinen hinweis seriöse quellen nehmen! ich habe bei einigen auch das profil von Tm.de rausgenommen und durch das kicker profil ersetzt dort wurde es jedoch als fehlerhaft auf den stand meines vorherigen schreibers zurück gesetzt! weil ich seit langen die Tm.de Datenbank bemängele da sie total veraltet ist und die meisten Profile unvollständig, wenn greife ich auf Weltfussball.de zurück, den sie verlinken ihre news mit den vereinsseiten, kicker oder diverse lokale zeitungen.
--Zombie433 talk) 12:47, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
Unreferenced BLPs
[edit]Hello Yoda1893! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 3 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 139 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:
- Stefan Mappus - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Egidius Braun - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Erwin Staudt - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 08:40, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
Niedermeier ist im Kader des VfB gemeldet weshalb er auch sofort einen Vertrag beim VfB unterschreiben konnte und somit kein Leihspieler mehr ist. Das wird auch durch beide Vereinsseiten bestätigt. --Yoda1893 (talk) 17:46, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
- Gut ich habe mich auf die DFL verlassen, dort ist er in keiner aktuellen Transferliste gemeldet daher wird wohl der transfer meines erachtens erst im sommer durchgezogen. -- (Zombie433 talk) 17:49, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
- Er muss auch gar nicht mehr auf die Transferliste. Er müsste nur wieder auf die Transferliste wenn er nach München zurückkehren würde. Die Transferliste unterscheidet nicht zwischen Leihe und festen Transfers. Es geht nur um die Spielberechtigung. Niedermeier wird dort heute und auch im Sommer genausowenig erscheinen wie zum Beispiel Hummels das getan hat. --Yoda1893 (talk) 17:51, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
- Gut er spielte jedoch ein Jahr auf Leihe also müssen wir die Daten bestehen lassen, der er war ja leihspieler und ist erst jetz fest verpflichtet, spielte 14 spiele keine 10 siehe Fussballdaten Fussballdaten. -- (Zombie433 talk) 17:55, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
- Nur weil er mal einen Leihvertrag hatte und jetzt eben einen festen Vertrag hat halte ich es nicht für sinnvoll, seine Spieldaten beim VfB in 2 verschiedene Zeilen zu packen. Eine Leihe in der Infobox anzugeben ist sinnvoll wenn sie auch Bestand hatte. In diesem Fall reicht es aber vollkommen aus, wenn im Artikel erwähnt wird, dass er zunächst einen Leihvertrag hatte. --Yoda1893 (talk) 18:00, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
- Gut er spielte jedoch ein Jahr auf Leihe also müssen wir die Daten bestehen lassen, der er war ja leihspieler und ist erst jetz fest verpflichtet, spielte 14 spiele keine 10 siehe Fussballdaten Fussballdaten. -- (Zombie433 talk) 17:55, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
- Er muss auch gar nicht mehr auf die Transferliste. Er müsste nur wieder auf die Transferliste wenn er nach München zurückkehren würde. Die Transferliste unterscheidet nicht zwischen Leihe und festen Transfers. Es geht nur um die Spielberechtigung. Niedermeier wird dort heute und auch im Sommer genausowenig erscheinen wie zum Beispiel Hummels das getan hat. --Yoda1893 (talk) 17:51, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
Editing before event is finished
[edit]I'm looking at the event now. It's not finished. So how can he have won gold?--81.167.16.108 (talk) 00:59, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
- I looked live in German TV at the event. And on 00:49 UTC he won. --Yoda1893 (talk) 01:02, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah I'm looking at what appears to be a recording, even though they have listed it as live. I apologize--81.167.16.108 (talk) 01:03, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Selina Jörg. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:13, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
You are now a Reviewer
[edit]Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:43, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
David Muller
[edit]Yes I have now changed my vote. The only reason I said delete in the first place was due to lack of sources. Adam4267 (talk) 18:51, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
Der Grund für seine Auflistung in der ersten Mannschaft war für mich erstmal nicht ersichtlich. Die Standard-Quellen wie VfB-Website oder kicker.de hatten ihn nur in der 2. Mannschaft. Warum Du aber im Zuge Deines Edits die einzige Referenz dieses Artikels entfernst und ihn damit zur Löschung freigibst (siehe Wikipedia:Proposed deletion of biographies of living people) sowie den Link auf Fussballdaten entfernst, solltest Du mir auch noch erklären, das verstehe ich nämlich auch nicht. Ich halte Deinen Edit diesbezüglich nicht für sehr hilfreich. --Jaellee (talk) 16:46, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
- Ich habe auf deiner Diskussionsseite geantwortet. --Yoda1893 (talk) 17:05, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
Re: season not over yet
[edit]Mir ist es eigentlich egal ob diese Klubs in die Infobox eingetragen werde oder nicht, ich habe nur bemerkt das andere Benutzer sie wieder enternt hatten, also bin ich davon ausgegangen dass es dazu ein Konsenz gab. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:28, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
Patrick Bauer (footballer)
[edit]Dear Yoda1893, Patrick Bauer is on a loan from VfB Stuttgart to play for CS Marítimo B. As you can see this page is for the first team of CS Marítimo. There is a page for CS Marítimo B in english and in portguese. Best regards! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.138.235.198 (talk) 18:41, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
- I answered here. --Yoda1893 (talk) 19:43, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
January 2013
[edit]Hello, I'm AxG. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Eurovision Song Contest 2013, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. [[ axg ◉ talk ]] 22:48, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
- I wanted to undo vandalism by User:AlbanHoxha1800 but he undid his version himself and so I restored accidentaly his vandalism. --Yoda1893 (talk) 22:50, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
The declined speedy
[edit]I suggest you bring the issue to WP:ANI, but that's just my opinion. Origamiteⓣⓒ 01:33, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you. :) I took your advice. --Yoda1893 (talk) 01:44, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
November 2014
[edit]Please do not add or change content, as you did to Chima Onyeike, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. GiantSnowman 15:01, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Yoda1893. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Yoda1893. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Yoda1893. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2024 (UTC)