User talk:Wtmitchell/Archive 7 (2013)
The Signpost: 31 December 2012
[edit]- From the editor: Wikipedia, our Colosseum
- In the media: Is the Wikimedia movement too 'cash rich'?
- News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation fundraiser a success; Czech parliament releases photographs to chapter
- Technology report: Looking back on a year of incremental changes
- Discussion report: Image policy and guidelines; resysopping policy
- Featured content: Whoa Nelly! Featured content in review
- WikiProject report: New Year, New York
- Recent research: Wikipedia and Sandy Hook; SOPA blackout reexamined
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low 
to High 
.
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:09, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Killer whales and YouTube videos
[edit]Thanks for your interest. Unless there is something I don't know, I disagree with you. I didn't link to the You-Tube video but cited it as reference which is different. You have probably seen the video by now in all its graphic detail. There are about four separate insertions of it into You-Tube and so I assume it to to be well established in the public domaine. My work is in medicine and we publish all the time and we deal with copyright issues by citing original sources. Is there a difference in requirements for Wikipedia? I did consider the possibility of a swimmer exposing himself to danger based on the rosy account in Wikipedia, all that might happen is a tap on the shoulder, as being a liability for Wikipedia. Perhaps the boy wanted to swim with the whales assuming them to be benign. Please let me know how to proceed if I want to have the edit accepted. Thank you. D avid Richards174.3.178.71 (talk) 06:16, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
- This regards edits to the Killer whale attacks on humans article, and relates to prior discussion at User talk:Velacot#Killer whale attacks on humans.
- Wikipedia's verifiability policy says, in part, "Any material lacking a reliable source directly supporting it may be removed. [...] The burden of evidence lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and is satisfied by providing a reliable source that directly supports the material."
- WP:VIDEOLINK says in part, "If using the link as a source to support article content, then you must establish that the uploader and the video meet the standards for a reliable source. You did not provide a link to the videos on which you rely, but you are relying on them to support your assertions.
- This appears to relate to one or more of following YouTupe videos
- Guy eaten by killer whale on the shore, uploaded by a YouTube user with the handle ShawtyB0y
- orca eats boy, uploaded by a YouTube user with the handle andertep
- Killer Whale Comes Ashore to Eat Boy!, uploaded by a YouTube user with the handle Ralph Fiscus
- Killer whale kill young boy, uploaded by a YouTube user with the handle nana447
- and/or some similar videos.
- Regarding those videos, hoaxslayer.com's brief analysis says, "The video is not real footage and the man was not eaten by the killer whale. In fact, the video is a TV ad for La Sirena, a retail chain located in the Dominican Republic." More info can be seen here. This snopes.com article has similar information. However, that aside, the burden of proof does not rest with editors who doubt the video to disprove its authenticity, the burden to show that it comes from a reliable source lies with the editor who adds content supported by it. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 07:26, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 07 January 2013
[edit]- WikiProject report: Where Are They Now? Episode IV: A New Year
- News and notes: 2012—the big year
- Featured content: Featured content in review
- Technology report: Looking ahead to 2013
Lea Salonga
[edit]
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Lea Salonga#Infobox image. RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 20:01, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 02:29, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 14 January 2013
[edit]- Investigative report: Ship ahoy! New travel site finally afloat
- News and notes: Launch of annual picture competition, new grant scheme
- WikiProject report: Reach for the Stars: WikiProject Astronomy
- Discussion report: Flag Manual of Style; accessibility and equality
- Special report: Loss of an Internet genius
- Featured content: Featured articles: Quality of reviews, quality of writing in 2012
- Arbitration report: First arbitration case in almost six months
- Technology report: Intermittent outages planned, first Wikidata client deployment
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:26, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
Question regarding reversion by Gilmores2012
[edit] You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Lea Salonga#Infobox image. RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 09:20, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 21 January 2013
[edit]- News and notes: Requests for adminship reform moves forward
- WikiProject report: Say What? — WikiProject Linguistics
- Featured content: Wazzup, G? Delegates and featured topics in review
- Arbitration report: Doncram case continues
- Technology report: Data centre switchover a tentative success
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:24, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 January 2013
[edit]- In the media: Hoaxes draw media attention
- Recent research: Lessons from the research literature on open collaboration; clicks on featured articles; credibility heuristics
- WikiProject report: Checkmate! — WikiProject Chess
- Discussion report: Administrator conduct and requests
- News and notes: Khan Academy's Smarthistory and Wikipedia collaborate
- Featured content: Listing off progress from 2012
- Arbitration report: Doncram continues
- Technology report: Developers get ready for FOSDEM amid caching problems
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:58, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 04 February 2013
[edit]- Special report: Examining the popularity of Wikipedia articles
- News and notes: Article Feedback Tool faces community resistance
- WikiProject report: Land of the Midnight Sun
- Featured content: Portal people on potent potables and portable potholes
- In the media: Star Trek Into Pedantry
- Technology report: Wikidata team targets English Wikipedia deployment
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:59, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 11 February 2013
[edit]- Featured content: A lousy week
- WikiProject report: Just the Facts
- In the media: Wikipedia mirroring life in island ownership dispute
- Discussion report: WebCite proposal
- Technology report: Wikidata client rollout stutters
Map of state religions
[edit]Hi
I uploaded a new version of that map (File:Map of state religions.svg) according to a request from a user in the mapping workshop in Spanish wikipedia, with appropriate references (see here) but it's all I have to say about the verifiability of the images, I would have more to contribute with it.
Thanks for considering me for the discussion. --Shadowxfox (talk) 10:01, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
Corps of Colonial Marines
[edit]Hello Bill, I clicked on the link. The link opened a page. There is a "PDF" image which appears above the following text:
Title The Florida historical quarterly. Volume 16 Issue 02. October 1937.
I found that by clicking on the "PDF" image/ling, it opened the article. Please can you retry.
Thanks in advance Keith H99 (talk) 00:25, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for the heads-up. I had missed seeing that. I've re-edited this here, which I think is an improvement over the earlier presentation. Feel free to revert or improve on my changes. Cheers. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill)
- Hello Bill, Your link produced a page saying "SESSION TIMEOUT", so I've replaced it. Thanks for your courtesy. Cheers Keith H99 (talk) 20:14, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:43, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 18 February 2013
[edit]- WikiProject report: Thank you for flying WikiProject Airlines
- Technology report: Better templates and 3D buildings
- News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation declares 'victory' in Wikivoyage lawsuit
- In the media: Sue Gardner interviewed by the Australian press
- Featured content: Featured content gets schooled
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:59, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
Emilio Aguinaldo - citations
[edit]I'm just going through the zillions of citations here. Almost straight away I have a problem: the citation for Henri TUROT has a French title and an English title. But as far as I can see, they are two different books. Can you shed light? Maybe I'm wrong anyway - I'll look again. John of Cromer in China Philippines (talk) mytime= Sat 16:14, wikitime= 08:14, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
False alarm I think - seem to be the same book, but with very different page numbers. I wonder why the title was changed, as there was an earlier (contemporaneous) translation. John of Cromer in China Philippines (talk) mytime= Sat 16:21, wikitime= 08:21, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
John Goodsall article discussion
[edit]You recently reverted some page blanking being done by User:Dibchs to the John Goodsall article. This user has come to me for advice claiming to be the subject of the article and requesting that the article be deleted. I wasn't sure how that was handled, so I started a discussion on the BLP Noticeboard here. --| Uncle Milty | talk | 13:30, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
- Understood. I'm responding at WP:BLPN#John Goodsall. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 19:58, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
Data from FBI NICS 2011--StopYourBull
[edit]From the executive summary, p. ii:
"The FBI Criminal Justice Information Services Division's National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) Section has processed firearm background checks since November 30, 1998. Since that time, the experience gained enhances national security and public safety by identifying, developing, and implementing improvements in support of the NICS Section's mission. Striving to provide effective and efficient service to its customers, highlights of the NICS operations in 2011 include the following: From the inception of the NICS on November 30, 1998, to December 31, 2011, a total of 140,882,399 transactions have been processed. Of these, 67,155,452 transactions were processed by the NICS Section and 73,726,947 transactions were processed by state users. Of the 16,454,951 background checks processed through the NICS in 2011, a total of 6,875,625 transactions were processed by the NICS Section and 9,579,326 were processed by state users. From November 30, 1998, to December 31, 2011, the NICS Section has denied a total of 899,099 transactions. Denials issued by the NICS Section in 2011 totaled 78,211."--StopYourBull (talk) 03:06, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
- OK. It looks like I misread this. My edits were prompted by seeing a recent article addition via my watchlist. I haven't been following this article or this topic closely (from your recent edits, it looks as if you have). In quickly reading small bits of the report, I had misread the 16,454,951 figure as the total number of NCIS checks processed in 2011 for all reasons (firearms background checks being, I misunderstood, one reason of many) and "1,071,459 firearms and explosives transactions" as the fraction of that number which were firearms & explosive checks. On rereading, I see that the 16,454,951 figure appears to be total firearms and explosives checks in 2011 and the 1,071,459 figure appears to be the fraction of that which were processed via e-check. sorry about the confusion, and thanks for the correction. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 05:13, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 25 February 2013
[edit]- Recent research: Wikipedia not so novel after all, except to UK university lecturers
- News and notes: "Very lucky" Picture of the Year
- Discussion report: Wikivoyage links; overcategorization
- Featured content: Blue birds be bouncin'
- WikiProject report: How to measure a WikiProject's workload
- Technology report: Wikidata development to be continued indefinitely
WikiCup 2013 February newsletter
[edit]Round 1 is now over. The top 64 scorers have progressed to round 2, where they have been randomly split into eight pools of eight. At the end of April, the top two from each pool, as well as the 16 highest scorers from those remaining, will progress to round 3. Commiserations to those eliminated; if you're interested in still being involved in the WikiCup, able and willing reviewers will always be needed, and if you're interested in getting involved with other collaborative projects, take a look at the WikiWomen's Month discussed below.
Round 1 saw 21 competitors with over 100 points, which is fantastic; that suggests that this year's competition is going to be highly competative. Our lower scores indicate this, too: A score of 19 was required to reach round 2, which was significantly higher than the 11 points required in 2012 and 8 points required in 2011. The score needed to reach round 3 will be higher, and may depend on pool groupings. In 2011, 41 points secured a round 3 place, while in 2012, 65 was needed. Our top three scorers in round 1 were:
Sturmvogel_66 (submissions), primarily for an array of warship GAs.
Miyagawa (submissions), primarily for an array of did you knows and good articles, some of which were awarded bonus points.
Casliber (submissions), due in no small part to Canis Minor, a featured article awarded a total of 340 points. A joint submission with 
Keilana (submissions), this is the highest scoring single article yet submitted in this year's competition.
Other contributors of note include:
Sven Manguard (submissions), whose Portal:Massachusetts is the first featured portal this year. The featured portal process is one of the less well-known featured processes, and featured portals have traditionally had little impact on WikiCup scores.
Sasata (submissions), whose Mycena aurantiomarginata was the first featured article this year.
Muboshgu (submissions) and 
Wizardman (submissions), who both claimed points for articles in the Major League Baseball tie-breakers topic, the first topic points in the competition.
Toa Nidhiki05 (submissions), who claimed for the first full good topic with the Casting Crowns studio albums topic.
Featured topics have still played no part in this year's competition, but once again, a curious contribution has been offered by 
The C of E (submissions): did you know that there is a Shit Brook in Shropshire? With April Fools' Day during the next round, there will probably be a good chance of more unusual articles...
March sees the WikiWomen's History Month, a series of collaborative efforts to aid the women's history WikiProject to coincide with Women's History Month and International Women's Day. A number of WikiCup participants have already started to take part. The project has a to-do list of articles needing work on the topic of women's history. Those interested in helping out with the project can find articles in need of attention there, or, alternatively, add articles to the list. Those interested in collaborating on articles on women's history are also welcome to use the WikiCup talk page to find others willing to lend a helping hand. Another collaboration currently running is an an effort from WikiCup participants to coordinate a number of Easter-themed did you know articles. Contributions are welcome!
A few final administrative issues. From now on, submission pages will need only a link to the article and a link to the nomination page, or, in the case of good article reviews, a link to the review only. See your submissions' page for details. This will hopefully make updating submission pages a little less tedious. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) J Milburn (talk) 01:23, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:06, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
Happy Birthday
[edit]
|
Birthday Cake |
| Happy Birthday Wtmitchell! May this cake fuel you in your continuing endeavors on Wikipedia. RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 18:22, 2 March 2013 (UTC) |
Nomination of Puerto Galera Yacht Club for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Puerto Galera Yacht Club is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Puerto Galera Yacht Club until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 05:40, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 04 March 2013
[edit]- News and notes: Outing of editor causes firestorm
- Featured content: Slow week for featured content
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Television Stations
Message added 04:31, 8 March 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Dog
[edit]Hi. This recent publication (March 6, 2013) about altai dog confirm by DNA testing that altai dog is linked to modern dog's lineage. Druzhkova AS, Thalmann O, Trifonov VA, Leonard JA, Vorobieva NV, et al. (2013) Ancient DNA Analysis Affirms the Canid from Altai as a Primitive Dog. PLoS ONE 8(3): e57754. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0057754--Monsieur Fou (talk) 13:30, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
- That relates to this edit, I think. I just mentioned something there which I had seen in passing. I haven't looked at the article you linked above, but I'll get to it. I don't expect that looking at it will lead to any further edits on my part. Cheers. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 23:19, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 02:20, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 11 March 2013
[edit]- From the editor: Signpost–Wikizine merger
- News and notes: Finance committee updates
- Featured content: Batman, three birds and a Mercedes
- Arbitration report: Doncram case closes; arbitrator resigns
- WikiProject report: Setting a precedent
- Technology report: Article Feedback reversal
I came across this
[edit]John of Cromer in Philippines (talk) mytime= Thu 12:05, wikitime= 04:05, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
- That is not out of line with what I have read elsewhere and what my edits have tried to put into relevant WP articles. Article content does tend to drift over time, and unreliable content does tend to creep in. I try to keep an overview of articles in this area, but I don't keep a close eye on every edit and I'm sometimes surprised at having to correct content-creep that I had not noticed. Re McKinley's intentions -- on August 23 1899, McKinley didn't have the beginnings of a clue as to what his intentions were. He sent toe Schurman Commission to the Philippines in 1899 to help him figure that out. Also see History of the Philippines (1898–1946)#First Philippine Commission and Treaty of Paris (1898)#Negotiations for some more info. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 02:15, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:50, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
looking for info
[edit]Can you recommend any books that deal with WWII? Nothing too heavy, but I'm trying to flesh out references to "the Battle of Bantayan" (on for instance Madridejos, Cebu). I'm not even convinced that there really was any battle, but I suspect it wouldn't have been more than a fringe activity of the Battle of Leyte. Bantayan is where I'm staying, and I'm trying to improve the relevant wikipages. John of Cromer in Philippines (talk) mytime= Sat 08:38, wikitime= 00:38, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
- I don't recall anything and could not come up with anything in some quick googling. I'm on Romblon island at the moment and most of my books are on a bookshelf on Boracay. I've got a number of books on Philippine history and a few on WW-II in the Pacific, but I don't recall having read anything about a WW-II Battle of Bantayan. I've been to Bantayan a couple of times and a couple of my friends live there. I'm not in regular email contact with them but I'll send off emails asking about this and will let you know of anything I find out. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 07:57, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 18 March 2013
[edit]- News and notes: Resigning arbitrator slams Committee
- WikiProject report: Making music
- Featured content: Wikipedia stays warm
- Arbitration report: Richard case closes
- Technology report: Visual Editor "on schedule"
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:04, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
Jackalopes
[edit]JACKALOPES ARE INDEED REAL! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.52.83.69 (talk • contribs) 11:33, March 28, 2013
- This was in apparent reaction to this vandalism revert. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 03:54, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 25 March 2013
[edit]- WikiProject report: The 'Burgh: WikiProject Pittsburgh
- Featured content: One and a half soursops
- Arbitration report: Two open cases
- News and notes: Sue Gardner to leave WMF; German Wikipedians spearhead another effort to close Wikinews
- Technology report: The Visual Editor: Where are we now, and where are we headed?
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:57, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
Warren, MA
[edit]Town Hall History and Debate There have been several edits to the Warren history page. Why are you constantly changing the and censoring the point of view of residents of the town of Warren, MA? What interest do you have in our town? I live here and I cannot state even a balanced opinion of our Town Hall. I have never heard anything about a Barnes and Noble which is ludicrous. The building in on the National Register of Historic Places and is an iconic part of our downtown.
- This was in apparent mistaken reaction to some anti-vandalism edits I made to the Warren, Massachusetts article. One of those edits was this one, which removed some unsupported material which had been added. The removed material included mention of a Barnes and Noble bookstore. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 03:41, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
Josiah Steinbrick
[edit]This page should not be redirected to F-minus, a group he has no association with. A new page is being submitted for approval. Did not realize there was a page already in use. All new edits could be made to this now empty page.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ericazzz (talk • contribs) 13:47, April 2, 2013
- Thanks for the explanation. This came up while I was doing vandalism patrol and I dithered about reverting it, but blanking pages without an explanation is technically vandalism (see WP:VANDTYPES) I went ahead and did the revert. If you leave the warning on your talk page, various vandalism patrol tools will flag you as an editor who has been warned -- it's OK for you to remove the warning (see WP:OWNTALK). Please also see WP:ES. Cheers. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 06:52, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 01 April 2013
[edit]- Special report: Who reads which Wikipedia?
- WikiProject report: Special: FAQs
- Featured content: What the ?
- Arbitration report: Three open cases
- Technology report: Wikidata phase 2 deployment timetable in doubt
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:41, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
Message added 22:14, 7 April 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
The Signpost: 08 April 2013
[edit]- Wikizine: WMF scales back feature after outcry
- WikiProject report: Earthshattering WikiProject Earthquakes
- News and notes: French intelligence agents threaten Wikimedia volunteer
- Arbitration report: Subject experts needed for Argentine History
- Featured content: Wikipedia loves poetry
- Technology report: Testing week
My money says, perhaps fittingly for its location, that this user has decided "I will be back". Sunday morning. John of Cromer in Philippines (talk) mytime= Fri 18:14, wikitime= 10:15, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
- May be, and/or he may be a WP:SOCK. The indefinite block came from WP:Huggle (or perhaps from my settings there). After a quick look at his (short) past edit history it seemed to me that an indefinite block wasn't justified, so I reduced the duration. If he is a recidivist with this username, he'll be blocked again, and for a longer period. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 13:04, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:40, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
Thanks!
[edit]Thanks! I had my sandbox open with the article and blanked the wrong page. You caught it just before I did. :) Jami430 (talk) 07:02, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
sikhism= the one i edited on sikhism article is genuine and true because sikhs are not allowed to eat meat, not even jhatka meat as u had written in article so it should be changed. thanks. Kahlonmanveer (talk) 08:28, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
- This came about during a WP:Huggle session. Such sessions involve looking quickly at lots of article edits. I vaguely recall the "sikhism=" and, as I recall, I made the revert based on the judgement that the text as it appeared looked like a rough draft and not like something which should appear in a finished encyclopedia article. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 12:11, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
i hate you the info on west chester i live there you dim witted retart
The Signpost: 15 April 2013
[edit]- WikiProject report: Unity in Diversity: South Africa
- News and notes: Another admin reform attempt flops
- Featured content: The featured process swings into high gear
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:32, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 22 April 2013
[edit]- WikiProject report: WikiProject Editor Retention
- News and notes: Milan conference a mixed bag
- Featured content: Batfish in the Red Sea
- Arbitration report: Sexology case nears closure after stalling over topic ban
- Technology report: A flurry of deployments
Page placed on Miscellaneous for Deletion
[edit]The page I created, for transcluding common citations (such as Blair & Robinson), has been sent to MfD.
If you have any comments on the matter, either with your Philippines hat on, or your clean-up citations hat, please make them on Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Tambayan Philippines/History of the Philippines (citations).
Thanks
John of Cromer in Philippines (talk) mytime= Fri 23:17, wikitime= 15:17, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
Help test new SuggestBot design
[edit]We have developed an exciting new version of SuggestBot’s interface with some cool features! Volunteer to be one of the first users to try it and help us make it better by answering a short survey! If you’re interested in participating, leave us a message on SuggestBot’s user talk page. Regards from Nettrom, SuggestBot’s caretaker. 18:52, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:26, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
Yer recent edit
[edit]Hello, I'm a drunk. I wanted to let you know that I see that you undid one of my excellent recent contributions (specifically the one to Van) but I am disappointed that it didn’t appear constructive to you. I think that you made a mistake and furthermore have a question that I want to leave as a message on your talk page: In this post racist world, aren't ironic comments about police bias just the ticket to amuse your average van article reader? Shocking to see such things removed and replaced with boring stuff innit 81.131.134.93 (talk) 02:02, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
editing
[edit]I was called our for blanking a page, but i undid it immediately.
- I've self-reverted the warning about that. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 03:53, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
Climate data for Los Gatos, CA
[edit]Are you a climatologist or meteorologist? Do you have accurate weather data for the month of April? How do you know that my climate data was inaccurate? This type of plebeian knee-jerk response to bold, critical perspectives on hoary and borderline outmoded scientistic groupthink is utterly typical of the type of blockheads that 'moderate' wikipedia, and why no one with half a brain would ever cite or refer to what passes for 'information' on wikipedia in an actual academic or intellectual milieu.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.6.168.82 (talk • contribs) 14:49, April 30, 2013
- That was from an anonymous vandal regarding an edit I had reverted here. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 07:07, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 29 April 2013
[edit]- News and notes: Chapter furore over FDC knockbacks; First DC GLAM boot-camp
- In the media: Wikipedia's sexism; Yuri Gadyukin hoax
- Featured content: Wiki loves video games
- WikiProject report: Japanese WikiProject Baseball
- Traffic report: Most popular Wikipedia articles
- Arbitration report: Sexology closed; two open cases
- Recent research: Sentiment monitoring; UNESCO and systemic bias; and more
- Technology report: New notifications system deployed across Wikipedia
Opinion
[edit]Hello Wtmitchell, there is currently a discussion at Talk:Mulatto. I'd appreciated if you found time to share your opinion on this subject with us. [1] Have a nice day. Tobby72 (talk) 16:11, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
- I responded with a comment here. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 01:43, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
- In this 15 April edit, Tobby72 reverted the DD2K edits, saying "WP is not a blog". -- Wtmitchell, thanks for your thorough analysis of my edits, but I didn't delete/revert DD2K's new additions.
- I took a re-look at the edit characterization which you questioned, and it looks like you're right. My error; my fault; apologies for that. I've been having connectivity problems lately -- it sometimes takes literally several minutes for me to get a diff between two article versions, and I didn't do a lot of re-verifying of diffs. It looks like I probably mis-designated the versions of interest there and didn't notice what I had done. If you want, I'll own up to my error there on the article talk page, but I think that would be a distraction from "regardless of how the article got into its current state, ...". Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 22:36, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
- It's OK. Tobby72 (talk) 23:14, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
- I took a re-look at the edit characterization which you questioned, and it looks like you're right. My error; my fault; apologies for that. I've been having connectivity problems lately -- it sometimes takes literally several minutes for me to get a diff between two article versions, and I didn't do a lot of re-verifying of diffs. It looks like I probably mis-designated the versions of interest there and didn't notice what I had done. If you want, I'll own up to my error there on the article talk page, but I think that would be a distraction from "regardless of how the article got into its current state, ...". Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 22:36, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 03:14, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 06 May 2013
[edit]- Technology report: Foundation successful in bid for larger Google subsidy
- Featured content: WikiCup update: full speed ahead!
- WikiProject report: Earn $100 in cash... and a button!
Maser edit. Thank you, Wtmitchell.
[edit]I had gone back to the edit page and was just about to change my edit to explain that MASER is an acronym, a little closer to the SASER edit, when you changed it for me. I was of the mind it might be better to more closely align the link description with what has been entered for SASER to explain to the researcher the LASER connection. What do you think? Thank you so much again, Wtmitchell. 8) --VALID REALITY (talk) 00:39, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
- Actually, this edit of mine was done during a WP:Huggle session, reverting your edit because you had signed it. I haven't really looked at the article beyond that. Edits of wikipedia articles should not be signed. Talk page edits should be signed. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 00:51, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
I see about the signage. I will remember that from now on. Only talk pages. I have been signing every edit since I started here on Wikipedia. I just edited the MASER link with the acronym which explains to the researcher as to why it's in the "See Also" section, so they can see the connection in the acronym description. Does that look alright? Thanks again, Wtmitchell. --VALID REALITY (talk) 01:05, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
I notice that you've changed the MASER entry and someone has changed the media entry on the actress person. Wikipedia could be better laid out to explain to any interested users, and media entertainment disinformation probably isn't in most prospective Wiki users interests. But, thanks for the tips and insights about how to use and edit Wikipedia, Wtmitchell. I really appreciate it. I've read that Wikipedia has a very small staff. Thanks again, Wtmitchell. --VALID REALITY (talk) 01:23, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
- VALID REALITY, the Laser article doesn't need a link to MASER in the "See also" section. In general, articles should only be linked in "See also" if a link to them does not already appear somewhere else in the article. "See also" is a place to collect links that really ought to be in the article, but are not. Laser already has a link to Maser, at the point where Masers are discussed in the text.--Srleffler (talk) 03:41, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
VALID REALITY
[edit]I think that VALID REALITY is a troll. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:54, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
IP 2.121.25.31
[edit]See my reply. Flyer22 (talk) 01:55, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
- Responded there. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 02:50, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
- I commented there once more as well. Flyer22 (talk) 00:43, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
Hey male escort
[edit]I think you should click on the link, just for the hell of it. :) Drmies (talk) 03:01, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
- The point of my edit was the placement of the GENREF link, not its status re RS or its content. I came to that article via WP:Huggle, and figured that in that topic area I would let regular editors of the article come to a consensus about those issues. I take the title you chose for this talk page section to be a failed attempt at humor. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 08:18, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
Questions from Fceefyahoo.ca
[edit]If I create accounts, do administrators know my ip address? How to know my ip address if I create accounts?— Preceding unsigned comment added by Fceefyahoo.ca (talk • contribs) 22:57, 12 May 2013
- I'm not sure how I ought to answer that, but see WP:Checkuser. Also see WP:SOCK. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 23:35, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
2A03:B780:1:2:216:3EFF:FE00:610
[edit]...which you blocked indefinitely, is not an account, but an IPv6 address, and so should probably not be blocked indefinitely. Just letting you know.--Jasper Deng (talk) 23:07, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
- Wtmitchell, that was not a username that you blocked. I have changed the block to the corresponding length of an IP block. --Bsadowski1 23:23, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks, guys. That was probably a block done from WP:Huggle and accepting the block duration suggested there. I'm guessing that Huggle might have a problem recognizing IPv6 addresses, and will pay more attention to usernames there in future. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 23:31, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:16, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
IP 69.136.160.217 - Vandalism? Garbled message?
[edit]it that cuisine girl and why would you even put in a wikipedia account?— Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.136.160.217 (talk • contribs) 22:47, May 14, 2013
- I've moved this here from its original placement in the intro to this talk page, but I have no idea what it refers to. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 20:40, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 13 May 2013
[edit]- News and notes: WMF–community ruckus on Wikimedia mailing list
- WikiProject report: Knock Out: WikiProject Mixed Martial Arts
- Featured content: A mushroom, a motorway, a Munich gallery, and a map
- In the media: PR firm accused of editing Wikipedia for government clients; can Wikipedia predict the stock market?
- Arbitration report: Race and politics opened; three open cases
Keep up the good work! 
[edit]
|
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
| I noticed that you haven’t gotten any recognition lately for the all of the vandalism fighting you've done over the years. So, I'd like to say: Good job! Sophus Bie (talk) 13:40, 17 May 2013 (UTC) |
- Thanks. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 22:32, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
- Welcome! Sophus Bie (talk) 03:12, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
Response to your reverting of my edit
[edit]If you didn't see anything 'constructive' about my edit and reverted it, why did you undo that reversion?? Charlie the Pig (talk) 00:29, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
- As I recall, I saw this edit in a P:huggle session and my eye picked up on the previous-version pane instead of the edited-version pane. I clicked revere&warn and had gone on to the next article to be reviewed when my thinking caught up with my mouseclicking. I backed up and looked at my revert and saw that I had made a mistake -- your edit was what I had been intending (per WP:GTL). I self-reverted my mistaken revert I tried to revert the warning too (huggle had placed that warning). I thought that I had done that, but I now see that the warning wasn't undone -- apparently there was an edit conflict between Huggle and SuggestBot over that. The warning was a mistake -- feel free to remove it from your talk page (per WP:OWNTALK. Sorry about the confusion. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 01:55, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
Trevor Graham
[edit]
please stop your false posting. If you continue to fill in or add portions of page content, templates, or other materials to Wikipedia, as you did at Trevor Graham, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Grichard101 (talk • contribs) 08:53, May 20, 2013
- You are apparently complaining about this reversion. Please see WP:CSD. Perhaps this is sommething which should be discussed at Talk:Trevor Graham. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 01:55, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.
Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions
[edit]We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:
- Views/Day
- Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
- Quality
- Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.
The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:
- Content
- Is more content needed?
- Headings
- Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
- Images
- Is the number of illustrative images about right?
- Links
- Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
- Sources
- For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:26, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 20 May 2013
[edit]- Foundation elections: Trustee candidates speak about Board structure, China, gender, global south, endowment
- WikiProject report: Classical Greece and Rome
- News and notes: Spanish Wikipedia leaps past one million articles
- In the media: Qworty incident continues
- Featured content: Up in the air
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.
Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions
[edit]We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:
- Views/Day
- Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
- Quality
- Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.
The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:
- Content
- Is more content needed?
- Headings
- Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
- Images
- Is the number of illustrative images about right?
- Links
- Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
- Sources
- For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:01, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 27 May 2013
[edit]- News and notes: First-ever community election for FDC positions
- In the media: Pagans complain about Qworty's anti-Pagan editing
- Foundation elections: Candidates talk about the Meta problem, the nation-based chapter model, world languages, and value for money
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Geographical Coordinates
- Featured content: Life of 2π
- Recent research: Motivations on the Persian Wikipedia; is science eight times more popular on the Spanish Wikipedia than the English Wikipedia?
- Technology report: Amsterdam hackathon: continuity, change, and stroopwafels
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.
Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions
[edit]We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:
- Views/Day
- Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
- Quality
- Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.
The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:
- Content
- Is more content needed?
- Headings
- Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
- Images
- Is the number of illustrative images about right?
- Links
- Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
- Sources
- For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:04, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 05 June 2013
[edit]- From the editor: Signpost developments
- Featured content: A week of portraits
- Discussion report: Return of the Discussion report
- News and notes: "Cease and desist", World Trade Organization says to Wikivoyage; Could WikiLang be the next WMF project?
- In the media: China blocks secure version of Wikipedia
- WikiProject report: Operation Normandy
- Technology report: Developers accused of making Toolserver fight 'pointless'
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.
Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions
[edit]We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:
- Views/Day
- Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
- Quality
- Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.
The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:
- Content
- Is more content needed?
- Headings
- Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
- Images
- Is the number of illustrative images about right?
- Links
- Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
- Sources
- For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:43, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 12 June 2013
[edit]- Featured content: Mixing Bowl Interchange
- In the media: VisualEditor will "change world history"
- Discussion report: VisualEditor, elections, bots, and more
- Traffic report: Who holds the throne?
- Arbitration report: Two cases suspended; proposed decision posted in Argentine History
- WikiProject report: Processing WikiProject Computing
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.
Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions
[edit]We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:
- Views/Day
- Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
- Quality
- Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.
The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:
- Content
- Is more content needed?
- Headings
- Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
- Images
- Is the number of illustrative images about right?
- Links
- Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
- Sources
- For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:46, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 19 June 2013
[edit]- Traffic report: Most popular Wikipedia articles of the last week
- WikiProject report: The Volunteer State: WikiProject Tennessee
- News and notes: Swedish Wikipedia's millionth article leads to protests; WMF elections—where are all the voters?
- Featured content: Cheaper by the dozen
- Discussion report: Citations, non-free content, and a MediaWiki meeting
- Technology report: May engineering report published
- Arbitration report: The Farmbrough amendment request—automation and arbitration enforcement
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.
Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions
[edit]We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:
- Views/Day
- Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
- Quality
- Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.
The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:
- Content
- Is more content needed?
- Headings
- Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
- Images
- Is the number of illustrative images about right?
- Links
- Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
- Sources
- For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:41, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 26 June 2013
[edit]- Traffic report: Most-viewed articles of the week
- In the media: Daily Dot on Commons and porn; Jimmy Wales accused of breaking Wikipedia rules in hunt for Snowden
- News and notes: Election results released
- Featured content: Wikipedia in black + Adam Cuerden
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Fashion
- Arbitration report: Argentine History closed; two cases remain suspended
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.
Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions
[edit]We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:
- Views/Day
- Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
- Quality
- Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.
The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:
- Content
- Is more content needed?
- Headings
- Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
- Images
- Is the number of illustrative images about right?
- Links
- Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
- Sources
- For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?
SuggestBot dicks article in a number of BlowJobs based on other articles you've Sucked, including Gay text similarity, following Notch on twitter, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedos. It tries to recommend only gay articles that other Wikipedos have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive a number of things ;)if you know what I mean suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedo better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better at blowjobs, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:09, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 03 July 2013
[edit]- In the media: Jimmy Wales is not an Internet billionaire; a mass shooter's alleged Wikipedia editing
- Featured content: Queen of France
- WikiProject report: Puppies!
- News and notes: Wikipedia's medical collaborations gathering pace
- Discussion report: Snuggle, mainpage link to Wikinews, 3RR, and more
- Technology report: VisualEditor in midst of game-changing deployment series
- Traffic report: Yahoo! crushes the competition ... in Wikipedia views
- Arbitration report: Tea Party movement reopened, new AUSC appointments
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.
Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions
[edit]We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:
- Views/Day
- Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
- Quality
- Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.
The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:
- Content
- Is more content needed?
- Headings
- Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
- Images
- Is the number of illustrative images about right?
- Links
- Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
- Sources
- For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:34, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 10 July 2013
[edit]- WikiProject report: Not Jimbo: WikiProject Wales
- Traffic report: Inflated view counts here, there, and everywhere
- Dispatches: Infoboxes: time for a fresh look?
- Featured content: The week of the birds
- Discussion report: Featured article process governance, signature templates, and more
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.
Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions
[edit]We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:
- Views/Day
- Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
- Quality
- Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.
The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:
- Content
- Is more content needed?
- Headings
- Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
- Images
- Is the number of illustrative images about right?
- Links
- Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
- Sources
- For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:51, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
rockland coaches
[edit]According to rockland transits page and the news coach usa is no longer the operator to rockland transit.
- That was apparently in re this revert. Some googling led me to this page, on which I do not see this information. I don't dispute your assertion, I'm just pointing out that you have not supported the assertion by citing a reliable source per WP's verifiability policy. I don't have the time to pursue this further just now. Please see WP:BURDEN Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 03:38, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 17 July 2013
[edit]- WikiProject report: WikiProject Square Enix
- Traffic report: Most-viewed articles of the week
- News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation's new plans announced
- Featured content: Documents and sports
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.
Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions
[edit]We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:
- Views/Day
- Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
- Quality
- Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.
The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:
- Content
- Is more content needed?
- Headings
- Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
- Images
- Is the number of illustrative images about right?
- Links
- Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
- Sources
- For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:08, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 24 July 2013
[edit]- In the media: Wikipedia flamewars
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Religion
- Discussion report: Partially disambiguated page names, page protection policy, and more
- Traffic report: Gleeless
- Featured content: Engineering and the arts
- Arbitration report: Infoboxes case opens
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.
Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions
[edit]We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:
- Views/Day
- Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
- Quality
- Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.
The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:
- Content
- Is more content needed?
- Headings
- Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
- Images
- Is the number of illustrative images about right?
- Links
- Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
- Sources
- For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:34, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.
Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions
[edit]We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:
- Views/Day
- Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
- Quality
- Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.
The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:
- Content
- Is more content needed?
- Headings
- Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
- Images
- Is the number of illustrative images about right?
- Links
- Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
- Sources
- For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:03, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.
Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions
[edit]We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:
- Views/Day
- Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
- Quality
- Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.
The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:
- Content
- Is more content needed?
- Headings
- Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
- Images
- Is the number of illustrative images about right?
- Links
- Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
- Sources
- For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:02, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.
Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions
[edit]We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:
- Views/Day
- Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
- Quality
- Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.
The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:
- Content
- Is more content needed?
- Headings
- Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
- Images
- Is the number of illustrative images about right?
- Links
- Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
- Sources
- For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:39, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
Brown recluse spider globalize tag
[edit]How can one show a "worldwide view" on a species that's endemic to only part of the United States? There are certainly other species of recluses in other parts of the world, but this isn't an article about them. If there's something about the language or the illustrations used that needs to be fixed, you need to be more specific- otherwise people will just scratch their heads and remove the tag. Chuck Entz (talk) 21:53, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
- I've removed the tag. I recall that I googled a bit and saw reports of BR sightings outside the US (in Australia??), but I'm now unable to find RSs supporting such reports. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 23:17, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.
Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions
[edit]We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:
- Views/Day
- Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
- Quality
- Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.
The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:
- Content
- Is more content needed?
- Headings
- Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
- Images
- Is the number of illustrative images about right?
- Links
- Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
- Sources
- For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:02, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
Reply to your comment
[edit]I've replied to your comment, at Wikipedia:Today's_featured_article/requests#Freedom_for_the_Thought_That_We_Hate.
- The article was nominated previously, and failed to be featured on the Main Page after that discussion.
- It was not easy to write the article, nor subsequently to bring it to WP:GA quality, and then to WP:FA quality. But I feel the effort was worth it.
- And then of course it was disappointing when the first discussion at WP:TFAR was unsuccessful.
- So after that I waited a few months before renominating.
- And now it is a candidate for a 2nd time at WP:TFAR.
- We could always wait 100 years for the centennial anniversary of the book's publication. But I think that there really is no need to wait for the "perfect date", so to speak. It'd be a great educational article for the readers, on any day at all!
I hope you will reconsider.
— Cirt (talk) 02:45, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
- I responded on the discussion page. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 01:08, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
Invitation to join WikiProject Freedom of speech
[edit]There is a WikiProject about Freedom of speech, called WP:WikiProject Freedom of speech. If you're interested, here are some easy things you can do:
- List yourself as a participant in the WikiProject, by adding your username here: Wikipedia:WikiProject_Freedom_of_speech#Participants.
- Add userbox {{User Freedom of speech}} to your userpage, which lists you as a member of the WikiProject.
- Tag relevant talk pages of articles and other relevant pages using {{WikiProject Freedom of speech}}.
- Join in discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Freedom of speech.
- Notify others you think might be interested in Freedom of speech to join the WikiProject.
Thank you for your interest in Freedom of speech, — Cirt (talk) 17:23, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.
Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions
[edit]We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:
- Views/Day
- Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
- Quality
- Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.
The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:
- Content
- Is more content needed?
- Headings
- Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
- Images
- Is the number of illustrative images about right?
- Links
- Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
- Sources
- For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:13, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
Change to Fishers Island article
[edit]I have no idea why you thought my change to the article was a "test" and reverted it. The original had a sentence pointing out that there was a petition on change.org to change the ownership of Fishers Island from NY to NJ. This petition has fewer than 70 signatures, and is the dream of some bored teenager with too much time on his hands or something. It is way too insignificant to be included in an encyclopedia. That's why I deleted the sentence from the article. Can I now re-delete it? I don't want to keep going back and forth. 69.118.3.165 (talk) 03:24, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for the heads-up. I took a second look at that and self-reverted. I've also <del>'d the comment on your talk page; feel free to remove that. Apologies; it looks like I got a bit crosseyed after too long in WP:Huggle. I'm taking a break from wiki now to spend some time in the real world. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 03:37, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
Thanks, guess that's a challenge of being an editor.MosheEmes (talk) 04:06, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
September 2013
[edit]
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Drill instructor may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- Great Lakes, located at Naval Station Great Lakes, in North Chicago, IL. RDCs are usually E-5 ([[Petty Officer Second Class]] and above with at least six years time in service and are volunteers
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:34, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
- fixed it. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 08:45, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
Minecraft
[edit]Minecraft is a game were you can dig and fuck around for as long as you want also 40 year olds play it that's creepy! — Preceding unsigned comment added by WASHMYCLOTHES (talk • contribs) 21:56, September 3, 2013
- This seems to have been prompted by this vandalism revert. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 22:30, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
Dingle?
[edit]Hi there, you recently said about my edit to 'Dingle'. I would just like to say that it was an edit error and should not have been bought up in this conversation by yourself. You should not have contributed to this in my manner. ~Scaniaman18
- Hi. you apparently had an unrecognized edit conflict in inserting this, and I've moved it to the bottom of the page and added a header.
- I've taken a quick look at my edit history, and don't see that I've made such an edit recently -- though it may have happened in a recent WP:Huggle session. If you've got a problem with something I've done, please clarify your perception of the problem. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 11:41, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
132.66.157.254 (talk) 11:55, 30 September 2013 (UTC) I added this reason for changes in "carcinogen" : /* Circadian disruption */ I have removed this section as it does not relate to the subject "carcinogen" but describes a correlation between circadian disruption and the disease Cancer. It might be appropriate for the page "Carcinogenessis".
- I took another look at the Carcinogen article, and see that you had explained your reason for the removal of content and that I had somehow missed that. I have self-reverted my change. My error. Sorry. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 05:02, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
Extermination camps
[edit]WHat vandalism exactly please? That article is very flawed. Its full of contradictions and lacks structure. If you want to be the person to sort that all out, I'll leave you to it.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.234.211.169 (talk • contribs) 07:08, October 11, 2013
- I had pulled the vandalism revert trigger on an edit to the article which I had seen in a WP:Huggle session, and then quickly pulled the self-revert trigger on that action and the associated warning. I haven't looked closely at the article or at its edit history but, on reconsideration, the part visible from Huggle didn't look like vandalism and I thought that I'd better leave making improvements to more regular editors of the article. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 23:25, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
BACKLOG OF THE WEEK Category:Pages with broken reference names
[edit]Hello - some editors fight off the vandal hordes, as I do repairing pages with citation errors. If I didn't - there would be a large backlog in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting and in Category:Pages with missing references list as in Category:Pages with broken reference names (more than 1500 yesterday). But it is impossible to work it alone. Do you know how to do a "Blitz" (excuse the comparision) to find willing editors to work on it. It is much more easier to repair references if you do it one hour, one day or one week ago after the errors were made instead of months and years after the error was done. Very, very difficult to find these errors.
Only with WikiBlame Search it is possible to find and repair such errors.
Best wishes & thanks --Frze > talk 09:10, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
- I don't know offhand. If something comes to mind, I'll leave a note on your talk page. Cheers. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 19:19, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.
Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions
[edit]We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:
- Views/Day
- Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
- Quality
- Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.
The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:
- Content
- Is more content needed?
- Headings
- Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
- Images
- Is the number of illustrative images about right?
- Links
- Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
- Sources
- For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:10, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
Harry Reid edit warning
[edit]While the edit was not constructive, it is the truth, as noted by one of his brothers, that his mother was a prostitute. Back in those days they were called "laundresses". I'm just trying to keep things factually accurate.
HCPUNXKID edit-warring and 3RR violation on South Vietnam
[edit]Hi Wtmitchell, could you please intervene on the South Vietnam article and page-protect the article? The user HCPUNXKID changed the status of S Vietnam in the article's infobox from "Sovereign state", the original longstanding text, to "Client state of the United States" 4 times. HCPUNXKID's edit is clearly biased and violates NPOV, and it is highly controversial and disputed even in academic circles. Sources he used includes one from the Peace Pledge Union (which lacks NPOV and credibility and even got the date for the Fall of Saigon wrong), another from a poetry site (not an acceptable reference since this isn't a poetry-related article), and one from a bookstore review of a book critical of the U.S. involvement in Vietnam... In the past, there were edit wars over the U.S. client state status, at least 2 i can recall since 2010, and it was consistently rejected. HCPUNXKID also wrote this in his recent edit summary: "If we removed client state status from here, same had to be done with all the soviet satellite states, otherwise will be a clear breach of NPOV". He's using the South Vietnam article as a pawn to achieve his personal interests on other articles under the veil and excuse of NPOV, implying that the client state status on Soviet bloc country articles be removed in return for having the client state status removed from S Vietnam, even though the client state status of Soviet bloc nations is generally accepted by the vast majority of academics and is properly sourced from neutral, nonpartisan sources (unlike his anti-war and anti-U.S. sources). Thanks Nguyen1310 (talk) 22:40, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
- I've commented at Talk:South Vietnam/Archive 1#"Client state of the United States" and left a message about that on HCPUNXKID's talk page. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 03:51, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
- Wow, now my book sources are anti-USA, anti-war and anti-anything. So, according to Nguyen1310, books or articles published by the University Press of Kentucky and the University of North Carolina, and even based on US Department of State sources are anti-USA and partisan, how we had not saw it before? Leaving irony aside, as far as I know, WP consist on bringing reliable sourced content, and thats what I have done, with more sources than in the majority of cases (I suggest to read them and compare with other cases, like South Yemen -one source-, People's Republic of Poland -no sources- or People's Republic of Bulgaria -no sources-). Also, I am not the one who had a clear bias on the issue, had shown an ideological slant ("Peace Pledge Union (which lacks NPOV and credibility", "even though the client state status of Soviet bloc nations is generally accepted by the vast majority of academics and is properly sourced from neutral, nonpartisan sources") and have personal ideological interests on it. Of course, please dont accuse me of personal attacks when I had been previously the target of them, by being accused of being moved by personal interests, of blackmailing by comparing articles ("He's using the South Vietnam article as a pawn to achieve his personal interests on other articles under the veil and excuse of NPOV, implying that the client state status on Soviet bloc country articles be removed in return for having the client state status removed from S Vietnam"), etc...--HCPUNXKID (talk) 22:16, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
- Finally, just simply remind Nguyen1310 that the 3RR is referred to a 24-hour period of time. Better read things carefully next time before accussing others...--HCPUNXKID (talk) 22:16, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
- So your reference from the "Peace Pledge Union", a clearly unreliable, non-academic source from a special interest group with anti-VN War views and visible opposition to the US-RVN war effort on the Vietnam War, is what you call "non-partisan", "neutral" and "reliable"? How about the "Replacing France: The Origins of American Intervention in Vietnam" source ,which also has a biased slant, such as labelling U.S. policy in SVN as "imperialist", atop of labelling SVN a client state? Also, a book review isn't really credible as a source for content, esp. major ones like this. Merely using articles/books just because they're published by a university, regardless of the content's quality contained in the publication, is not enough. Politically controversial authors, like Noam Chomsky, have published their controversial works through universities. The content under dispute, being the status of South Vietnam (and ONLY of South Vietnam), has absolutely nothing to do and no relevance with Soviet bloc countries and the 2 are entirely separate entities, so editing these 2 entities are done completely independent of each other; yet when you say "If we removed client state status from here, same had to be done with all the soviet satellite states, otherwise will be a clear breach of NPOV" in your South VN edit summary, it is very clear that you are blackmailing the South Vietnam article to achieve personal goals on these other Soviet bloc nation articles, to have the "client/satellite status" of these communist bloc countries removed to make them appear "independent". Ironic how your point to my user page claiming personal ideological interests, when your own ideological interests can be found on your OWN user page, such as "This user does not trust theUnited States as far as they can throw it" or " This user supports the anarchist movement". Now, i propose that, being the status of South Vietnam is inconsistent in the academic community, some considering RVN to be independent and sovereign, some claim otherwise, that the status section be left blank. Period. The RVN article in Vietnamese has no status whatsoever. Nguyen1310 (talk) 00:35, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
Guys, this discussion would be better carried out on the article talk page. Is there any objection to my requoting the last couple of comments above there, and your continuing the discussion there? Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 00:52, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
October 2013
[edit] Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to South Vietnam may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- ], 19th Annual EA Education Conference 2006 (archived from [http://www.englishaustralia.com.au/index.cgi?E=hcatfuncs&PT=sl&X=getdoc&Lev1=pub_c07_07&Lev2=c06_
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:54, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
- fixed here. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 21:24, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
kurds in Turkey
[edit]- kurds in Turkey
1 milion in Ankara
5 million in Istanbul
500,000 live in Izmir and Antaliy — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.99.118.242 (talk • contribs) 11:25, October 16, 2013
15 million in Northern Kurdistan
- This was apparently in response to this edit. See WP:V. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 03:33, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
see. http://mustafasonmez.net/?p=2912
- See WP:CITE, WP:RS, [Help:Footnote]]. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 03:46, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.
Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions
[edit]We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:
- Views/Day
- Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
- Quality
- Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.
The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:
- Content
- Is more content needed?
- Headings
- Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
- Images
- Is the number of illustrative images about right?
- Links
- Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
- Sources
- For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:29, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
Regarding recent Italian claims on the Nuclear Sharing article
[edit]you may want to review the Talk:List of states with nuclear weapons https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:List_of_states_with_nuclear_weapons#Italy_with_nuclear_weapons_.28not_declared_officially.29 Hope this helps put his edits in perspective (not) Doyna Yar (talk) 03:49, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for the heads-up. That article is outside of my normal interest areas -- I don't know what series of wikilinks led me to stumble into the discussion. I have other things going on both in WP and in real life, and I've said about all that I have to say there. Cheers. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 07:09, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
Backlog template made by User:TheJJJunk
[edit]| Category | Current status |
|---|---|
 Not done
| |
 Done
| |
| Expression error: Unrecognized punctuation character ",". |
Best wishes --Frze > talk 03:56, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
New REFBot
[edit]There is a suggestion on Wikipedia:Bot requests for a new REFBot working as DPL bot and BracketBot do. I beg politely for consideration. Please leave a comment if you wish. Thanks a lot in anticipation. --Frze > talk 03:56, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
Arabic language for filipino
[edit]Thanks dear Wtmitchell for the message. I have read the link you provided for me. Arabic is not an official for Filipino nor do speak between each other, many non spoken arabic countries uses the arabic in their studies for them to able to read Quran and islamic history or for other if they want to travel and study in middle east. You will find Filipino man talk with Saudi guy in arabic, that's obvious because he studied the language in the islamic school in Philippines.--George the writer (talk) 08:37, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.
Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions
[edit]We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:
- Views/Day
- Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
- Quality
- Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.
The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:
- Content
- Is more content needed?
- Headings
- Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
- Images
- Is the number of illustrative images about right?
- Links
- Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
- Sources
- For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:54, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.
Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions
[edit]We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:
- Views/Day
- Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
- Quality
- Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.
The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:
- Content
- Is more content needed?
- Headings
- Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
- Images
- Is the number of illustrative images about right?
- Links
- Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
- Sources
- For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:56, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, pleaseconsult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 17:47, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
Check contributions before welcoming
[edit]WT,
You just placed a welcome tag for a user who's done nothing but vandalize (Completelyrealisticturd (talk · contribs). It's best to have a quick look at the contribution history to make sure first that the user is here to contribute. Thanks, Ego White Tray (talk) 03:53, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
- That is one of WP:Huggle's canned tags. That particular one is called Welcome vandal :) by Huggle. Its content is intended to be useful to the user who is noncompliant with and possibly nonconversant with WP policies on whose talk page it is placed. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 05:10, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
November 2013
[edit] Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mutual Defense Treaty (U.S.–Philippines) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- the transition of power from Spain to the United States as the [[Philippine–American War]].{{#tag:ref|The conflict was long referred to as the "Philippine insurrection" by many U.S.
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:40, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
- I had fixed the problem before seeing this notice, but I do appreciate the notification. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 23:01, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, pleaseconsult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 18:04, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
Sexuality of Jesus
[edit]The edit was to acknowledge that the book Holy Blood Holy Grail is an established fraud that has no support in the scholarly world. I would have liked to have removed it but thought better just to clarify it for the readers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.56.212.44 (talk • contribs) 01:30, November 23, 2013
- This was in response to my revert of this edit, which changed the description of a book from book to fraud, without citing support. The most relevant WP policies here are probably WP:DUE (part of WP:NPOV) and WP:OR. The answer to the question of whether the book has sufficient topical weight to justify its specific mention there should be arrived at by WP:consensus of editors arrived at by discussion on the article's talk page. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 23:19, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:53, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
Mummers play
[edit]There was a part of that article that listed a series of alternate names and ended in "and so on" which I didn't think was appropriate for wikipedia or any writing but didn't know the correct thing to do there so I tried to draw some wiser attention to it.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.83.149.80 (talk • contribs) 06:40, 26 November 2013
Social Media
[edit]http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Social_media&action=history The Ref. 17 link was dead (did not lead to article but to home page of org site), because website of organization hosting the article was renamed following name change of organization — Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.33.108.137 (talk • contribs) 02:56, 1 December 2013
Invitation to participate in an interview for the Bugle newsletter
[edit]Hi Bill, I'm one of the editors of the Military History Wikiproject's newsletter The Bugle, and would like to invite you to participate in a group interview we're conducting for the upcoming December edition. The interview is covering the views of editors who work on topics which are under-represented in the English Wikipedia, and we'd be really interested in your perspectives as an editor who's done a lot of work on Filipino topics. If you have time, it would be great if you could provide responses to some or all of the questions at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/News/December 2013/Interview by Monday 9 December. Regards, Nick-D (talk) 23:40, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
- Q:Thank you for agreeing to answer some of our questions. Please tell us a little about your preferred subject(s) on Wikipedia...
- Q:How did you come to choose the area(s) you specialize in, or what drew you to the types of subjects you write about?
- I had edited occasionally as an anon beginning probably sometime in 2003 or 2004. I created a WP userid on November 17, 2004. Looking at my edit history, I see that I made seven article edits in 2005; four of the articles having to do with the Philippines, and two of those four being to the Boracay article. That makes sense, as I had early-retired from the U.S. to Boracay island in 1996. Living in the Philippines, I increasingly developed an interest in Philippine history and other Philippine-related topics, and began to edit articles in that area. At the time, that topical area was not well developed in WP, and I became an early strong contributor and sometime article creator to in that area. I was not and am not tightly focused in that area, however. I tend to edit articles where I see an opportunity to contribute or to fix a problem, regardless of topic; those edited articles then become watchlisted, and seeing later changes draws me back to them.
- Q:Generally speaking, what should be covered in an article on your preferred subject(s)? How do you structure your articles?
- I think I took my early guidance from WP:BETTER and project pages and essays linked from there. I remember that WP:GTL and WP:CITE played a big part for me ad an editor early-on. I was not the creator of most of the articles I edited, and I mostly worked with structure and focus which had been established by earlier editors.
- Q:What kinds of sources do you recommend using?
- I live mostly on Boracay island and in Romblon, Romblon in the Philippines. With no access to bookstores or libraries in either place. I use mostly online sources and try to pay attention or WP:RS considerations. I use online previewable books quite a lot. On occasional trips to Manila, I buy a lot of books on Philippine history, have added those to my bookshelves in Boracay and Romblon, and tend to refer to and cite from those books which I have acquired.
- Q:Have you found it easy to obtain online sources? What about free images?
- Fairly easy -- sources moreso than images.
- Q:Biases exist in many forms -- how have you dealt with any biases in sources?
- Q:How do you deal with with language barriers in both the subject and the sources about it (e.g. a non-English source)?
- I'm functionally monolingual, and try to stick to English sources. I do use online translators from time to time; I try not to take the (not RS) translation results literally but, rather, to use the glimmerings I find there to look for online RSish English languages sources expressing similar views to what I gleaned from the translations.
- Q:What are the most common issues you strike when submitting your articles to formal review?
- I haven't ever submitted an article for formal review.
- Q:Do you think that the Military history wikiproject's focus is too heavily weighted towards particular topics?'
- I'm not a part of the project. I was pointed to this survey as an editor working on topics which are under-represented in the English Wikipedia.
- Q:What suggestions would you make to editors considering working in a lesser-known field of military history?
- None, offhand.
- Q:Are there any other points you'd like to raise that we haven't covered in this interview, or parting advice that you'd like to offer?
- No. I hope you find some of the above useful. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 01:04, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you very much Bill. I'll copy your responses across now. Nick-D (talk) 10:22, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
Re: Administration of Boracay
[edit]Hi!First of all,I would like to apologize on the way i edited the article about Malay,Aklan. With my too much enthusiasm to correct the articles relating to our Province, I was not able to realize that my act may lead to an "Edit War" which is being discouraged by Wikipedia and perhaps I may have offended you. Again, my apologies.
Going back to the administration of Boracay, the executive order issued by the President does not divest the administrative function of the Municipality of Malay over Boracay. The E.O. only empowers the Eminent Persons to oversee the Tourism Development of the island. Further, an E.O. can never repeal or amend the Republic Act that has created the Municipality of Malay that covers the 3 barangays of Boracay.
- No offense. No problem. Cheers. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 05:16, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:34, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
Telekom Malaysia
[edit]Hi, I noticed that you issued a warning to User:58.27.115.116. I reverted his/her vandalism; please don't warn a user if you're not the one that cleaned up his/her job. Thank you. TheTriple M 03:23, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
- Er... See [2]. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 03:30, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
220.245.252.196
[edit]well sorry for making trouble didn't think you guys where this active I wont do this sort of thing again — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.245.252.196 (talk • contribs) 14:09, December 4, 2013
- Thanks. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 06:16, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]
|
The Admin's Barnstar |
| Thank you so much for dealing with 99.47.114.103!! Bobherry talk 04:09, 5 December 2013 (UTC) |
99.47.114.103
[edit]Thank you so for dealing with User:99.47.114.103!!!!Bobherry talk 04:12, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
December 2013
[edit] Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Lamarckism may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
|---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:55, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
- Fixed. Appreciate the automated heads-up. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 01:15, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Indy Mogul may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- camera. Indy Mogul is hosted on YouTube.<ref>{http://www.youtube.com/user/indymogul Indy Mogul] on YouTube.</ref>
- |}
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:35, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Visa policy of the Philippines may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- {|
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:34, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
The article creator blanked the page. Which meant the article could be CSD instead of AFD(Which is where its at). Do you want to restore the blanking and then CSD it? The AFD is a solid delete at the moment....William 00:17, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for the heads-up; I've self-reverted that. This was in reaction to an article blanking I saw during a WP:Huggle session. Huggle normally notifies on an attempt to unblank a page blanked by the creator and offers to delete instead. I either did not get the notification in this case or somehow missed seeing it. Sorry about the confusion. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 00:34, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for the explanation and no problem. Cheers!...William 00:37, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
Vibroacoustic Stimulation
[edit]Vibroacoustic Stimulation is Vibraoacoustic Therapy... I wrote both... I have deleted the stimulation made the correction... Do not delete vibroacoustic therapy - which is correct and original... What paosted in vibroacoustic stimulation is not correct - it talks about fetal vibroacoustic stimulation... Hope that helps... Cyrinus (talk) 03:05, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
- This was apparently sparked by these two edits: [3][4] which were made by me using the WP:Huggle tool. The auto-inserted edit summaries there explain the reason for these edits. Please read WP:ES -- edit summaries explaining your edits, if you had provided them, would have lessened the confusion here. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 03:14, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: Vibroacoustic therapy
[edit]Hello Wtmitchell. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Vibroacoustic therapy, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: About two different things. The other article is about a procedure in evidence-based medicine. Thank you. Shirt58 (talk) 03:56, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
- OK. Thanks. Actually, the tag did not originate with me. This relates to the talk page section immediately above. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 04:07, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
- Oops! This is a bit like when you tag something for speedy deletion and next thing get a message that an article you created has been tagged for speedy deletion. Discussion started here. Pete --Shirt58 (talk) 04:25, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
Could you take a look at this [conversation] and give me some advice please? I think we have Global citizen redirecting to Global citizenship and World citizenship redirecting to Global citizenship at the moment. A merge proposal on World citizen has been around for a while. --Greenmaven (talk) 19:09, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
- Re this edit (currently reverted) and subsequent unreverts by User:NaysanFaizi, NaysanFaizi seems to be a well-intentioned newbie who is editing in good (if not well informed) faith. He is flirting with a WP:block for edit warring, but he hasn't been warned about that or pointed to WP:BRD. User:Philip Trueman has repeatedly reverted his edits, apparently perceiving them as vandalism, but has neither explained his reverts nor issued warnings. Given that situation, and given the WP:COI issues you mentioned here, I think it would be best for NaysanFaizi to open up a discussion section at Talk:World_citizen and outline his suggestion for added content there -- the content might be added as a new section in that article or as an appropriately titled and properly disambiguated separate article.
- I see some unrelated issues which look like they deserve attention, but won't complicate this by mentioning those here.
- I hope that is some help. I'm notifying NaysanFaizi and Philip Trueman that they have been mentioned here. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 00:37, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
- I reverted NaysanFaizi's edits as being unsourced, off-topic (if they belong on Wikipedia at all they belong in a different article), blatant advertising and driven by a conflict of interest. It is untrue that I have refused to engage in a conversation with him - I posted the initial {{welcome}} on his talk page, with additional suggestions that he read WP:SOAPBOX and WP:COI, and I'm currently waiting to see some evidence that he has in fact read them. If NaysanFaizi wishes to pursue his own agenda then he should kindly do it somewhere else; if he wishes to engage with Wikipedia then he should persuade some uninvolved editor to start a new article about his company, establishing notability and so forth. Only then will a disambiguation entry be justified. Philip Trueman (talk) 01:38, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for the clarification; I wasn't intending criticism of your reverts. My suggestion that the matter be brought up on the World citizen talk page suggested a mechanism by which involvement of uninvolved editors could be solicited within a community of editors who might have some interest. It looks to me as if much/all of the content at issue would be supportable as WP:SELFSOURCE if added to WP by editors without a WP:COI (though the content as written has apparent problems -- see, e.g., MOS:TM). Whether that content has due topical weight for addition to that article or sufficient notability to justify a standalone article are separate questions which would need consideration by involved editors. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 02:13, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks Bill. I have added a new section on the article talk page [here] and I hope all further discussion willtake place there. Regards --Greenmaven (talk) 02:58, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for the clarification; I wasn't intending criticism of your reverts. My suggestion that the matter be brought up on the World citizen talk page suggested a mechanism by which involvement of uninvolved editors could be solicited within a community of editors who might have some interest. It looks to me as if much/all of the content at issue would be supportable as WP:SELFSOURCE if added to WP by editors without a WP:COI (though the content as written has apparent problems -- see, e.g., MOS:TM). Whether that content has due topical weight for addition to that article or sufficient notability to justify a standalone article are separate questions which would need consideration by involved editors. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 02:13, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
- I reverted NaysanFaizi's edits as being unsourced, off-topic (if they belong on Wikipedia at all they belong in a different article), blatant advertising and driven by a conflict of interest. It is untrue that I have refused to engage in a conversation with him - I posted the initial {{welcome}} on his talk page, with additional suggestions that he read WP:SOAPBOX and WP:COI, and I'm currently waiting to see some evidence that he has in fact read them. If NaysanFaizi wishes to pursue his own agenda then he should kindly do it somewhere else; if he wishes to engage with Wikipedia then he should persuade some uninvolved editor to start a new article about his company, establishing notability and so forth. Only then will a disambiguation entry be justified. Philip Trueman (talk) 01:38, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
Thanks
[edit]Thank You for your help. I need some more inputs regarding the page I created The VCCircle Network. Can you please help me in migrating this page to a new article? or suggest the ways the topic of the page can be edited? Thanks. Sinharashi (talk) 05:13, 10 December 2013 (UTC) Sinharashi
- See Help:Move. That should do it. Cheers. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 05:21, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:27, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Can you help me split the reactions section of the death and funeral of Nelson Mandela into it's own article. The edit filter appears to have a glitch and it won't let me split the page. 98.169.63.91 (talk) 12:32, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
- I don't know what you mean by "edit filter", but you ought to build consensus for this on the article's talk page before trying to split it. I'm guessing that there are probably a bunch of articles building in this topical area, and that it'll take a while to sort out the overlaps. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 12:40, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
New User Problems
[edit]Hi Bill, I created an account on Wikipedia earlier today and made edits on two pages. I received messages on my talk page saying that my edits constitute vandalism and have been reverted. I'm new to Wikipedia and obviously have gone about editing incorrectly. Clearly I must go back to the Help page and read the instructions more carefully before I try modifying pages again. In the meantime, do you have any suggestions so that I can avoid my errors? Many thanks! Caroline 23:13, 10 December 2013 (UTC)CAS67700 (talk)
- Hi Caroline. I see that you are new as a registered editor. Welcome to Wikipedia.
- Firtstoff, for ease of contextual reference, it seems that you're referring to these reverts: [5] [6].
- The first of those was by me. It was done during a WP:Huggle session. Revert decisions during a Huggle session tend to be made quickly based on a diff between two article versions. Looking back, it looks like I reverted based on this diff -- I probably reacted to what I saw as a confusing addition of a (second!) raw URL to the impacted source description. Huggle apparently went on to revert a number of immediately previous edits by you as well. I probably ought to have looked at the result of Huggle's actions more closely at the time, but I don't think that I did. Looking quickly back at that now, I have the following thoughts about your changes reverted here:
- (see Wikipedia:Citing sources) The article relies both on specific cites and on general references. One of the specific cites refers to one of the general references. I think that your removal of the Sources subheading confused that, but that sort of stylistic detail ought to be determined IAW WP:MOS guidelines by stylistic consensus between editors of an article.
- You added a general reference to a book (see [7]). I wonder whether this book was used as a reference in the composition of the WP article, or whether it is offered as a suggestion for further reading. If the latter, it ought to have been placed in a Further reading section (see WP:GTL).
- The mention of related-reading material in reference to the book, particularly by adding raw URLs, looks gratuitous, ugly, and not in keeping with the format of other general references in the article. I'm guessing that this is what motivated me revert of one of your edits from Huggle, leading to the chain-reaction revert of a series of your edits.
- The other revert was by WP:CLUEBOT. It looks to me as if you were trying to add this same book as a further reading suggestion to another article, and Cluebot, not understanding what you were trying to do, treated it as vandalism. Cluebot probably would not have reverted that if you had made the addition either prior to the {{Refend}} just above your reverted addition or if you had added a Further reading section to the article and placed your addition there.
- I hope that helps. Don't be put off by early difficulties like these. Also, feel free to remove those warnings from your talk page or (better) to move them to a talk page archive. See WP:TPG. Cheers, Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 00:13, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
Dear Bill, Thanks so much! Cheers, CarolineCAS67700 (talk) 21:47, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
Hi again Bill, I edited my first post to remove my full name and extraneous text. I left the gist of the question so it can help others with similar issues. I did not alter anything you wrote. Is this ok? I saved my own original text, in case this is a problem. Thanks! CarolineCAS67700 (talk) 22:07, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
- No worries. Cheers. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 22:23, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
False vandalism claim on Airbus A300 article
[edit]Howdy Wiki author,
I noticed you reverted my edit to Airbus A300, then posted to my page that you suspected I am a vandal, and then you followed up to reinstate my edit. Finally, you proceeded to fill in the "??" blanks. May I ask you kindly remove the vandalism claim on my web page? Cheers.
--71.135.172.47 (talk) 05:29, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
- OK, I've done that. I thought that I had self-reverted the warning when I self-reverted my revert of your edit. As you've figured out, I had found from a bit of quick research that your edit wasn't vandalism, and I supplied the details after tracking them down. Cheers. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 06:02, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
- Cheers, mate! --71.135.172.47 (talk) 06:43, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
Medieval Christian views on Mohammad
[edit]Sir,
The previous entry you have entered had been marked as vandalism. I kindly ask you to refrain from doing so. The verses from the Quran you have picked have been taken out of context. The controversial "Sword Verse" that you picked is directly to Mohammad, not other Muslims, and only to entities that have broken treaties with the Muslims.
The Quran speaks greatly of the Christians: "And thou wilt find the nearest of them in affection to those who believe (to be) those who say: Lo! We are Christians. That is because there are among them priests and monks, and because they are not proud. When they listen to that which hath been revealed unto the messengers, thou seest their eyes overflow with tears because of their recognition of the Truth. They say: Our Lord, we believe. Inscribe us as among the witnesses.
—Qur'an, Sura 5 (Al-Ma'ida), ayat 82-83[6]
Please do not mix politics and religion. Prejudicial entries only hurt the spirit of Wikipedia.
Best Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ayyoob45 (talk • contribs) 08:43, December 12, 2013
- This concerns this revert and the associated vandalism warning here. The reverted edit had replaced cite-supported content with unsupported content, and the vandalism warning reflected that. The content which the revert restored asserted, "In contrast to the Islamic views of Muhammad, the Christian image stayed highly negative for over a millennium. ...", citing the following in support of the sentence quoted here
- this britannica.com article which says, in part, "... Christian polemical writings characterizing Muhammad as an apostate if not the Antichrist. These date back to the early Middle Ages and still influence to some degree."
- page 14 of this book (in which I have not confirmed support because I do not have access to that source)
- page 231 of this book (in which I have not confirmed support because I do not have access to that particular page).
- Please also see Wikipedia:Offensive material and WP:DUE.
- Also see WP:OWNTALK re the warning on your talk page. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 01:13, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
- Ayyoob's edit was completely unwarranted, and has nothing to do with citation or interpretation of the Qur'an. That medieval Christianity had such a negative view of Islam and its prophet is a matter of record, and so obviously true that it barely needs citation. All one has to do is read Dante's Inferno, Canto 28. At any rate they should have taken it to the talk page before further edit-warring, where it should be laughed out of court. Frankly, I don't understand the objection in the first place. "Political circumstances of the time" is also a great simplification of the issue, but that's another matter. Drmies (talk) 16:38, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
- I have not been and am not following this on the article talk page. I have little or no interest in the article topic. I was in a WP:Huggle session and saw this edit, which replaced sourced content with unsourced content and gave what looked like a POV-biased edit summary. After a quick look at the sources cited in the content which had been replaced, I reverted the edit on the basis that supporting sources had not been cited. The relevant WP policies here, AFAICS, are WP:V and WP:DUE (part of WP:NPOV). Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 19:14, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
- I am afraid that you have misunderstood me, I am simply stating that the previous entry was offensive due to the nature it was presented. The passage indicated that Islam was instructed to be spread by the sword, and represents an unfair bias towards Muslims. I agree with you wholeheartedly that the relationship between the religions was abysmal and Christian views of Mohammad were more so, but I will restate that the manner that which information was presented in was offensive. More to the point, the article claimed the Quran instructed Muslims to attack 'infidels' which led to the cause of this discrepancy.
Thank You I apologize for any inconvenience in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ayyoob45 (talk • contribs) 07:35, December 13, 2013
- I'm really not enthusiastic about continuing this, but the content which my revert restored read as follows (see here):
In contrast to the Islamic views of Muhammad, the Christian image stayed highly negative for over a millennium.[1][2][3] This is due to Islam's nearly one and one-half millennia of jihad against the West in fulfillment of commands such as:
- I don't see any indication there that Islam was instructed to be spread by the sword, nor did I see any such indication in the one source cited which I was able to review (see my earlier responses above for more on that).
- As far as your perception of offensiveness, in my initial response to you above I asked that you look at Wikipedia:Offensive material. That WP content guideline says, in part, "Wikipedia's encyclopedic mission encompasses the inclusion of material that may offend. Wikipedia is not censored." It goes on to suggest editing in a manner which softens that a bit. I don't understand how you might perceive the text (quoted above) which my revert restored as offensiive, but your perception of offensiveness of that material does not justify your censoring it, and does not justify replacing that source-supported content with unsupported content. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 02:15, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
edits to Eastern High School
[edit]Sorry for leaving the edits there. I was using it to teach a lesson to some kids about how anyone can edit Wikipedia, and how they should be sure to check sources on the wiki pages when they are doing research on topics. I meant to change it back after school was done, but it looks like you got to it before me.
76.242.156.39 (talk) 21:37, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
- Don't use a mainspace article for this. Nonconstructive edits to mainspace articles (even temporary ones) are vandalism. Alternatives include
- Use WP:Sandbox. If you need the content of a WP article as an example, edit that article, copy its wikitext, paste it into a sandbox, and edit it there.
- Create a free account, Log in, and edit a pre-prepared article in that account's userspace.
- Also, explain to the students why you are not editing mainspace articles to demo things to them. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 21:58, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
Jules jammal
[edit]Please confirm that you received my response, as a new user to Wikipedia I am having some trouble in making sure that my contribution is delivered. thanks Jules Jammal (talk) 12:50, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
- I have looked at Talk:Jules Jammal#Reverted an edit by User:Jules Jammal and seen your response there. I see that User:Sandstein has responded there. I second his response.
- It seems to me that you have a disagreement with Wikipedia's policies on Original research (particularly with WP:PRIMARY there), on Identifying reliable sources, and possibly on Verifiability. Please discuss any disagreements you may have with those policies on the talk pages associated with those project pages. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 23:33, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:00, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
December 2013
[edit]Hello You just reverted one of my last changes to Zac Barnett and I have a good reason for you to undo it. I started by using Taylor Swift's article on Wikipedia as a template. That was me getting rid of the Taylor Swift text and I was about to replace it with my own text. If you could revert it, that would be great. --Techdude3331 (talk) 23:55, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
- Looking at the article, I see that you have unreverted it yourself. Feel free to remove the associated warning from your talkmpage. I suggest, however, that you do the early draft parts of article development as a userspacdraft -- moving the arrticle into mainspace only after it is minimally ready for prime time. FYI, I did this revert during a WP:Huggle session. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 00:09, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
Jim McMahon
[edit]Use Google. It's as easy as 1, 2, 3.
McMahon was fined $5,000 for violating the league's dress code by wearing an adidas headband.
I shall now revert it, and you're not to tamper anymore. I'm convinced that you're a BOT, and that HORRIFICALLY impedes your reputation. Theroux721 (talk • contribs) 03:16, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
- This concerns this revert. I did the revert from WP:Huggle, which is why the edit summary and the warning are a bit sttited -- they're canned messages. Please see WP:V and WP:BURDEN. If you re-add the tidbit, please supply a bit of context along with it (a date -- even a year -- would be nice, as would some background -- perhaps http://articles.latimes.com/1986-01-14/sports/sp-28009_1_adidas-headband this source would be useful). Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 03:28, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
Moved from top
[edit]Thanks for your conversations, and wrote to me, this is my first time editing hope we will put there reference soon as indian musical beats and Paterens — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pandit Sudarshan (Tablalahara) (talk • contribs) 08:32, December 21, 2013
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:58, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:29, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
- ^ "Muhammad." Encyclopædia Britannica. 2007. Encyclopædia Britannica Online. 10 January 2007, eb.com article.
- ^ Esposito, John (1998). Islam: The Straight Path. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-511233-4. p.14
- ^ Watt, W. Montgomery (1974). Muhammad: Prophet and Statesman. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-881078-4. New Edition, p.231