User talk:VirreFriberg

VirreFriberg, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi VirreFriberg! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Mz7 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Brazer Özel has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Brazer Özel. Thanks! Hammersoft (talk) 22:30, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. bonadea contributions talk 11:08, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Noel Bondesson

A tag has been placed on Draft:Noel Bondesson requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Mildly disparaging text about a minor, probably created as a joke by a friend; could never become a Wikipedia article; U5 (webhost violation) would apply in user space but in draft space, G3 is the closest applicable rationale

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. bonadea contributions talk 11:21, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Some falafel for you!

här får du din neger AssalamualAikum123 (talk) 17:01, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:SmallFacesBBC.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:SmallFacesBBC.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:31, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited (Tell Me) Have You Ever Seen Me?, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IBC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Patterns (Small Faces song) (June 25)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Dan arndt was: undefined

Dan arndt (talk) 07:29, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hang 'Em High (composition), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Memphis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hep Stars On Stage.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hep Stars On Stage.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:33, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Now And Them.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Now And Them.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:45, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SmallFacesBBC.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SmallFacesBBC.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:52, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:TheKoobas.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TheKoobas.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:56, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited You Need Love (Muddy Waters song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heavy metal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:38, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, VirreFriberg

Thank you for creating List of Small Faces members.

User:Doomsdayer520, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for this new article, but it seems to be a repeat of history that is already at the main Small Faxes article and this type of list article is typically necessary for bands with for more complicated membership histories.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 14:06, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Show Me The Way (Small Faces song)

Hello, VirreFriberg. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Show Me The Way".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 13:08, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Them Belfast Gypsies.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Them Belfast Gypsies.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:36, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Small Faces (1966 album)

Template:Small Faces (1966 album) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Poydoo (talk) 00:47, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SmallFacesBSide.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SmallFacesBSide.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:21, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:DokiDokiAlbum.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:DokiDokiAlbum.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:42, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:DokiDokiVinyl.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:DokiDokiVinyl.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:43, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:01, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Here Come the Nice

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Here Come the Nice you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 09:00, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Here Come the Nice

The article Here Come the Nice you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Here Come the Nice for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 08:20, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Here Come the Nice

The article Here Come the Nice you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Here Come the Nice for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 22:01, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

I came across your page for We Are Paintermen. Great work! Well done on doing good articles for singles and albums that really deserve them.Humbledaisy (talk) 21:18, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Leave Me Be

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Leave Me Be you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 08:21, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Leave Me Be

The article Leave Me Be you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Leave Me Be for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 09:01, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Leave Me Be

The article Leave Me Be you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Leave Me Be for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 20:21, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:(Tell Me) Have You Ever Seen Me?.ogg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:(Tell Me) Have You Ever Seen Me?.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:03, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 31

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Elkan Allan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cathy McGowan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Göran Lagerberg

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Göran Lagerberg you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vacant0 -- Vacant0 (talk) 18:01, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Göran Lagerberg

The article Göran Lagerberg you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Göran Lagerberg for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vacant0 -- Vacant0 (talk) 15:21, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Göran Lagerberg

The article Göran Lagerberg you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Göran Lagerberg for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vacant0 -- Vacant0 (talk) 12:41, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Small Faces tracks

Template:Small Faces tracks has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:16, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Jonesey95 hi there what kind of stuff do you like 👍? 84.65.249.177 (talk) 08:01, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dona, Dona

In this edit, did you intend to change "Translation by Kodesh & Schwartz" to "Translation by –& Schwartz", or was that an error? --Metropolitan90 (talk) 16:11, 23 February 2022 (UTC) It was an error, sorry. VirreFriberg (talk) 18:31, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Left Banke's Walk Away Renee / Pretty Ballerina LP

Recently an edit was made changing the release date on this album from the originally posted February of 1967. It was changed to January of that year. The source is given as a Billboard chart publication. However, examination of the source material reveals that the record referred to on the chart listing is NOT the LP, but rather the "Pretty Ballerina" single which was released in December of 1966. Numerous other sources on the web confirm the originally published release month as February. If it was not you who made this edit, please ignore. ToddPence (talk) 18:11, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Moviestar (Harpo song)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Moviestar (Harpo song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 07:20, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Moviestar (Harpo song)

The article Moviestar (Harpo song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Moviestar (Harpo song) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 15:00, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Are you going to work on this article or not, as it has been around a month with no response on this? I will have to fail elsewise. --K. Peake 07:53, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited All Day and All of the Night, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Listener (magazine).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:50, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nice!

	Finnish Chart MASTER
	Gratitudes pluribus, for your addition to Aftermath (Rolling Stones album) ... 𝒮𝒾𝓇 𝒯𝑒𝒻𝓁𝑜𝓃 (talk \| contribs) 19:26, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Moviestar (Harpo song)

The article Moviestar (Harpo song) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Moviestar (Harpo song) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 09:42, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Motivestar

Hi, I just came across your article for Moviestar and I want to congratulate you on such great work. If only every hit single could have an article like it. Nice one! Incidentally, Ken Bruce on BBC Radio 2 still plays "Moviestar" quite often on his mid-morning show (the most popular in the UK), so it's still getting some love here despite only making No. 24. Humbledaisy (talk) Humbledaisy (talk) 21:10, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Semi-Detached, Suburban Mr. James

The article Semi-Detached, Suburban Mr. James you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Semi-Detached, Suburban Mr. James for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Example -- Example (talk) 12:41, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Semi-Detached, Suburban Mr. James

On 10 September 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Semi-Detached, Suburban Mr. James, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Manfred Mann's 1966 single "Semi-Detached, Suburban Mr. James" was amongst the first songs to utilize the Mellotron? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Semi-Detached, Suburban Mr. James. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Semi-Detached, Suburban Mr. James), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Just Like a Woman"

Hi, I see you're a major contributor to the "Just Like a Woman" article. I was thinking about tidying it up and adding some further information, with a view to nominating it as a Good Article. Would you be interested in being a co-nominator? (This won't necessarily involve any further effort on your part; I'm happy to work on the article and respond to the reviewer.) Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 10:55, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, that works for me! Regards, VirreFriberg (talk) 11:04, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Great. I did some minor copyediting on the Manfred Mann section - feel free to revert anything you're not happy with. (I saw the Manfreds live a few years ago and they were superb, although d'Abo was missing.) Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 16:37, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Was there anything else to do before nomination? I think it's ready, but let me know if there's anything you want me to improve before that. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 12:17, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good to me, though I'd ad an image under one or some of the headings. Thanks VirreFriberg (talk) 14:33, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, the review is underway. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 17:30, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Can't Seem to Make You Mine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hollywood.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of The One for You

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The One for You you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 10:44, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of The One for You

The article The One for You you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:The One for You and Talk:The One for You/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 10:04, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of The One for You

The article The One for You you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The One for You for comments about the article, and Talk:The One for You/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 22:24, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Balladen om killen

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Balladen om killen you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 08:23, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Balladen om killen

The article Balladen om killen you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Balladen om killen and Talk:Balladen om killen/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 10:22, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Balladen om killen

The article Balladen om killen you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Balladen om killen for comments about the article, and Talk:Balladen om killen/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 11:21, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of There's a Blind Man Playin' Fiddle in the Street

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article There's a Blind Man Playin' Fiddle in the Street you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 07:22, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of There's a Blind Man Playin' Fiddle in the Street

The article There's a Blind Man Playin' Fiddle in the Street you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:There's a Blind Man Playin' Fiddle in the Street and Talk:There's a Blind Man Playin' Fiddle in the Street/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 09:41, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of There's a Blind Man Playin' Fiddle in the Street

The article There's a Blind Man Playin' Fiddle in the Street you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:There's a Blind Man Playin' Fiddle in the Street for comments about the article, and Talk:There's a Blind Man Playin' Fiddle in the Street/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 08:22, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for There's a Blind Man Playin' Fiddle in the Street

On 21 February 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article There's a Blind Man Playin' Fiddle in the Street, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the 1968 single "There's a Blind Man Playin' Fiddle in the Street" by Tages was inspired by an old man that could be seen roaming around the streets of Gothenburg, playing a violin? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/There's a Blind Man Playin' Fiddle in the Street. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, There's a Blind Man Playin' Fiddle in the Street), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

-- RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Balladen om killen

On 12 March 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Balladen om killen, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the song "Balladen om killen" was unusually released on two record labels, CBS Records International and Mercury Records, around the same time? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Balladen om killen. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Balladen om killen), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

-- RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Studio (album)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Studio (album) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ffranc -- Ffranc (talk) 15:23, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Scandinavian Musicians' Union"?

Hi there. In working on an article of the Kinks' 1965 US tour, I found a claim in several Kinks biographies that after the band refused to perform a concert in Denmark in 1966, they were banned for a few years by the "Scandinavian Musicians' Union" (e.g. 1 & 2). Are you aware of any such organization? I have only seen it mentioned it the various Kinks books. I'm wondering if they are mixing things up between the Danish and Swedish Musicians' Union, but I thought your Swedish language sources would have more information to clarify the situation. Cheers. Tkbrett (✉) 14:11, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! According to the website of Svenska Musikerförbundet (Swedish Musicians' Union) I. E. this page, the books may be referring to the Nordisk Musikerunion (NMU), a Nordic equivalent of the International Federation of Musicians. I am unaware of an entity known specifically as the "Scandinavian Musicians' Union", though the authors of the books you provided may merely confuse the Nordic countries with Scandinavia. VirreFriberg (talk) 14:48, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the clarification. You'll have to forgive us North Americans for always mixing up Scandinavia and the Nordics. Tkbrett (✉) 12:21, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Studio (album)

The article Studio (album) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Studio (album) and Talk:Studio (album)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ffranc -- Ffranc (talk) 15:23, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Tages is one of my favourites bands. Thanks for contributing to the creation of articles relating to the group. A lot of work was put into making the articles for Göran Lagerberg, Danne Larsson, and Anders Töpel, and it really shows how dedicated you are to making them!! Foox123456789 (talk) 23:19, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Studio (album)

The article Studio (album) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Studio (album) for comments about the article, and Talk:Studio (album)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ffranc -- Ffranc (talk) 14:02, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of For My Woman

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article For My Woman you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 07:23, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of For My Woman

The article For My Woman you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:For My Woman and Talk:For My Woman/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 09:02, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Studio (album)

On 9 May 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Studio (album), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that despite being marketed as Tages' international breakthrough, Studio was only issued in Sweden and Denmark upon original release? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Studio (album). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Studio (album)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Aoidh (talk) 00:02, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of For My Woman

The article For My Woman you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:For My Woman for comments about the article, and Talk:For My Woman/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 10:01, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations \| August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. (t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of My Little Red Book

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article My Little Red Book you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jalapeño -- Jalapeño (talk) 19:23, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of My Little Red Book

The article My Little Red Book you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:My Little Red Book for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jalapeño -- Jalapeño (talk) 19:43, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My Little Red Book quickfail

I've ruled the quickfail you received as ineligible for the drive. If you want to renominate it now, I can 'reset' the nomination so it goes back to the same place in the backlog it was originally in. Vaticidalprophet 23:35, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I would greatly appreciate that! VirreFriberg (talk) 23:45, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Great -- have done :) It'll reappear with the same nomination date (February) and the same eligibility for age-related bonus points in the backlog drive. Vaticidalprophet 00:56, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of My Little Red Book

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article My Little Red Book you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Thebiguglyalien -- Thebiguglyalien (talk) 16:02, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of My Little Red Book

The article My Little Red Book you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:My Little Red Book and Talk:My Little Red Book/GA2 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Thebiguglyalien -- Thebiguglyalien (talk) 01:41, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of My Little Red Book

The article My Little Red Book you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:My Little Red Book for comments about the article, and Talk:My Little Red Book/GA2 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Thebiguglyalien -- Thebiguglyalien (talk) 23:21, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Groovin'

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Groovin' you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vaticidalprophet -- Vaticidalprophet (talk) 02:40, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Groovin'

The article Groovin' you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Groovin' for comments about the article, and Talk:Groovin'/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vaticidalprophet -- Vaticidalprophet (talk) 18:41, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(You've) Never Been in Love Like This Before

Hi VirreFriberg. The article (You've) Never Been in Love Like This Before is missing a cite for "Tracy 1988". I thought it might be a typo for "Tracy 1994" but that doesn't cover the details. Could you add the cite or let me know what work this refers to? -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 10:56, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Small Faces (1967 album)

Template:Small Faces (1967 album) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --wooden superman 16:17, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of One Two Brown Eyes

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article One Two Brown Eyes you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of BennyOnTheLoose -- BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 23:22, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of One Two Brown Eyes

The article One Two Brown Eyes you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:One Two Brown Eyes and Talk:One Two Brown Eyes/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of BennyOnTheLoose -- BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 22:24, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024 GAN backlog drive

Good article nominations \| March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive: On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:40, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of One Two Brown Eyes

The article One Two Brown Eyes you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:One Two Brown Eyes for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of BennyOnTheLoose -- BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 16:44, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Matthew and Son

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Matthew and Son you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 03:03, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Matthew and Son

The article Matthew and Son you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Matthew and Son and Talk:Matthew and Son/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 04:01, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Matthew and Son

The article Matthew and Son you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Matthew and Son for comments about the article, and Talk:Matthew and Son/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 18:42, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of (You've) Never Been in Love Like This Before

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article (You've) Never Been in Love Like This Before you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ganesha811 -- Ganesha811 (talk) 13:00, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of (You've) Never Been in Love Like This Before

The article (You've) Never Been in Love Like This Before you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:(You've) Never Been in Love Like This Before for comments about the article, and Talk:(You've) Never Been in Love Like This Before/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ganesha811 -- Ganesha811 (talk) 05:41, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Something Else from The Move, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Four-track tape and 33 ⅓ RPM.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Koobas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Keith Ellis.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:11, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]