Talk:For My Woman

For My Woman has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
May 9, 2023	Good article nominee	Listed

R&B and Soul Music Low‑importance

	R&B and Soul Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Rock music Low‑importance

	Rock music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

Passed.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:For My Woman/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 07:21, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):

b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a. (reference section):

b. (citations to reliable sources):

c. (OR):

d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
It is broad in its coverage.
a. (major aspects):

b. (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):

b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/fail:

(Criteria marked are unassessed)

I will get on with this right away! --K. Peake 07:21, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead

Pipe 2UW Theatre to KIIS 106.5 in the infobox
Remove Australian rock since that is not actually sourced as a genre
Wikilink Stevie Wright to himself
Remove overly obvious wikilink on Sydney
The following being in clubs is not sourced
"who liked the band enough to sign them to" → "who liked then enough to sign with"
Pipe 2UW to KIIS 106.5
"Musically "For My Woman", boasts clear influences from" → "Musically "For My Woman" is centered in" since this is the actual genre
"on 18 March 1965 backed by" → "on 18 March 1965, backed by"
Could you mention what retrospective critics praised about the song?

Background and composition

Split into a Background and recording section and a Composition one rather than altogether, as they are both two paras
Pipe 2UW to KIIS 106.5 on the img text
"Sydney, Australia in 1964 by" → "Sydney, Australia in 1964, by"
"they were never particularly influenced" → "the Easybeats were never particularly influenced"
"an acquaintance of Vaughan." → "an acquaintance of his."
Add a comma after Albert Productions
"something the band were" → "something they were"
Pipe 2UW to KIIS 106.5
""The Bells", "For My Woman" along with" → ""The Bells" and "For My Woman", along with"
Add the release year of "I (Who Have Nothing)"
"the group performed on" → "the Easybeats performed on"
"contributing with lyrics while" → "contributing lyrics while"
"pop trio Bee Gees." → "pop trio the Bee Gees."
Pipe merseybeat to Beat music
"from Pretty Thing's lead singer" → "from their lead singer"

Release and reception

"his top-ten hit" → "his top-10 hit" per MOS:NUM
"as the group's first single." → "as their first single."
Remove wikilink on rhythm and blues
"was reluctant to market it." → "was reluctant on marketing."
Quote box looks good!
"after their follow-up single" → "after the follow-up single"
"a top-ten hit in" → "a top-10 hit in"
"It fared particularly well" → "The song fared particularly well"
""Say That You're Mine" were excluded" → ""Say That You're Mine", was excluded"
"one of the group's singles" → "one of their singles"
"on that album." → "on the album."
"was a "mid-paced" blues song" → "is a "mid-paced" blues song" with the wikilink
"states that the song is" → "stated that the song is"
"that it is a "Taut," → "that it is a "taut,"

Charts

Good

References

Copyvio score looks amazing at 8.3%!!!
Archive these two URLs by using fix dead links
Cite AllMusic as publisher instead on ref 25

Sources

Good

Final comments and verdict

On hold until all of the issues are fixed; that went very quickly! --K. Peake 08:46, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Kyle Peake! It's a rather short article, meaning I should've fixed all of the points listed here. VirreFriberg (talk) 18:31, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Pass now, it was mostly fixed and I did some brief copy editing in any areas where there seemed to be slight misunderstandings! --K. Peake 09:43, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.