Talk:Balladen om killen/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 08:08, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|
I will get on with this right away! --K. Peake 08:08, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
Infobox and lead
[edit]- Change the genre in the infobox to only rock since hard rock is not sourced and ballad does not count
- Replace hlist with bullet points per Template:Infobox song
- Remove the release year of "Like a Rolling Stone" because it is not notable for the lead
- It is not sourced that the girls are actually invited to an apartment
- Remove pipe on A-side per MOS:LINKSTYLE
- "the single was due to" → ""Balladen om Killen" was due to"
- "role in the production of the single," → "role in the production of the song,"
- "attribute to its'" → "attribute to its"
- "Nonetheless, it garnered positive reviews" → "Nonetheless, the song garnered positive reviews"
Background
[edit]- Pipe rock to Rock music
- "and the band had changed" → "They had also changed" starting a new sentence
- "both guitarists of the group, Danne Larsson and" → "the guitarists Danne Larsson and"
- "the band's bassist Göran Lagerberg," → "bassist Göran Lagerberg,"
Recording and composition
[edit]- "with Lagerberg himself" → "with the bassist himself"
- "their respective instruments, drums and" → "their respective instruments of drums and"
- Quote box looks good!
- Pipe ballad to Sentimental ballad
- "According to Göran Brandels and" → "according to Göran Brandels and"
- "does sing lead on" → "does sing lead vocals on"
- "Despite this" specify what since this is a new para
- "in which Lagerberg's bandmate Tommy Blom was" → "in which Blom was"
- "which included being cocky" → "such as being cocky"
- "of Lagerberg, and who's" → "of Lagerberg and his"
- Invoke the ref after the fifty years ago quote because they need to be after any direct quotations
- "were putting out at the same time." → "were putting out then."
Release and commercial performance
[edit]- "releases, which both have different picture sleeves were" → "releases both have different picture sleeves and were"
- "would not known who Örjan Ramberg was," → "would not have known who Ramberg was," and if this is a problem, write Örjan instead of first name
- "though notes that the" → "though notes the"
- "likely assumed that the image of Ramberg" → "likely assumed how the image of him"
- "of just number 13," → "of only number 13,"
- "It was additionally the only week it appeared" → "This was additionally the only week the song appeared"
- "it also failed to" → "the song also failed to"
- "even though it was never released in his name." → "despite never being released in his name. ", as this is missing the space after the full-stop
- Shouldn't a colon be used instead of semi-colon?
- "and partly due to" → "and also due to" to be less repetitive
- Wikilink bonus tracks per MOS:LINK2SECT
Reception and legacy
[edit]- The img's abandoned part is not sourced
- "the single received primarily positive reviews," → "the single was met with primarily positive reviews,"
- "the subject matter, and that the inclusion" → "the subject matter and the inclusion"
- "though they end by noting that" → "though the staff writer ends by noting how"
- Add a writer or the staff of for Aftonbladet and Svenska Dagbladet
- "though write that the song is" → "though write it is"
- "that gives the single a" → "giving the single a"
- Add a full-stop after rock and roll
- Avoid the word claim per WP:CLAIM
- "in Swedish,[33] the release of" → "in Swedish;[33] the release of"
- "as "Balladen om killen" was" → "as "Balladen om killen", was"
- "and that they both should be" → "and thinks they both should be"
- "under his name solo." → "under Ramberg's name solo."
- "such as Siw Malmkvist, and Martin Ljung," → "such as Siw Malmkvist and Martin Ljung,"
- "Although it was only moderately commercially successful, it" → "Despite only being moderately commercially successful, the song"
- "were once again brought into" → "was once again brought into"
Personnel
[edit]- Good
Charts
[edit]- Good
References
[edit]- Copyvio score looks excellent at 3.8%!!!
- Remove staff author from refs 29, 30, 31 and 32
- Ditto for ref 34, also add the language parameter
Sources
[edit]- Why does one source cite Premium Publishing and the other Premium, or are they different?
- Fix MOS:QWQ issues with the Hymn source, add the language and I can't seem to go from page to page
Final comments and verdict
[edit]- On hold until all of the issues are fixed; this went smoothly! --K. Peake 10:08, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
- Solved listed issues with a few exceptions:
- Staff writers in the reviews formatted after "Mother's Little Helper", which is a GA and feature these citations:[1][2]
- "under his name solo." → "under Ramberg's name solo." → replaced it with a sentence instead: "Following the release of the single,[29] Ramberg chose to pursue a career as an actor, with "Balladen om killen" remaining as his only solo release"[13], with an added citation
- Premium and Premium Publishing are the same publisher, just forgot to add the suffix to one of the sources. Should be solved now
- The pages for the Hymn source refers to the physical copy of the article.
- Hopefully all issues should be corrected now. VirreFriberg (talk) 23:12, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
- VirreFriberg I don't agree with your response to the staff writers part since that is a WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS argument, also why have you kept hard rock as the genre when it is not sourced? --K. Peake 09:38, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
- Removed mention of staff writers in the sources and changed genre to simply Rock music as hard rock was indeed unsourced. VirreFriberg (talk) 12:31, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
- VirreFriberg No, what I meant is that you should use the staff or a writer of those publications, or something similar. --K. Peake 08:51, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- The articles themselves have no named author, but at the same time you stated "Remove staff author from refs 29, 30, 31 and 32" so I'm a bit lost. VirreFriberg (talk) 12:49, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- VirreFriberg I meant the part you mentioned above for the references themselves; in prose, you need to write "the staff" or "a writer" of the publications said something because it makes no sense to write it as the opinion of a publication. --K. Peake 14:54, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Sorry, my mistake. Should be fixed now VirreFriberg (talk) 16:12, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- VirreFriberg I meant the part you mentioned above for the references themselves; in prose, you need to write "the staff" or "a writer" of the publications said something because it makes no sense to write it as the opinion of a publication. --K. Peake 14:54, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- The articles themselves have no named author, but at the same time you stated "Remove staff author from refs 29, 30, 31 and 32" so I'm a bit lost. VirreFriberg (talk) 12:49, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- VirreFriberg No, what I meant is that you should use the staff or a writer of those publications, or something similar. --K. Peake 08:51, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Removed mention of staff writers in the sources and changed genre to simply Rock music as hard rock was indeed unsourced. VirreFriberg (talk) 12:31, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
- VirreFriberg I don't agree with your response to the staff writers part since that is a WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS argument, also why have you kept hard rock as the genre when it is not sourced? --K. Peake 09:38, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
- Solved listed issues with a few exceptions:
- ✓ Pass now, we finally found a resolution to the problem! --K. Peake 11:16, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
- ^ Record World Review Panel (2 July 1966). "Single Picks of the Week" (PDF). Record World. p. 1.
- ^ Cash Box Review Panel (2 July 1966). "Record Reviews" (PDF). Cash Box. p. 202.