User talk:STATicVapor/Archive 6: April 2014-December 2018

It's Dark and Hell Is Hot

Hey Static, it's Shallowharold here. I went on the page of the DMX album and noticed the production credits were very wrong. So I went to correct them by way of the liner notes inside the CD. I added in who were the song's actual producers and assigned co-production and additional production credits accordingly. I hope this isn't an issue- I just noticed that there were a few producers and samples listed that were incorrect. Shallowharold (talk) 03:12, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

@Shallowharold: Thanks, in the future just use your edit summary to explain this, you would be surpirsed how many people try to make up things on here. STATic message me! 06:41, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

I'm not surprised at all, Static. I've seen them add things to articles even after they have been provided references and citations from reliable sources. Case in point: I once went back and forth with a person editing Toni Braxton & Babyface's album Love, Marriage & Divorce. They put in songwriting credits from someone that clearly wasn't listed in the credits. I pointed out to them to look at the sources and citations I provided and they STILL made the edit listing the name of the person that wasn't listed in the credits, SMH. Shallowharold (talk) 16:44, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

WikiCup 2014 March newsletter

A quick update as we are half way through round two of this year's competition. WikiCup newcomer Godot13 (submissions) (Pool E) leads, having produced a massive set of featured pictures for Silver certificate (United States), an article also brought to featured list status. Former finalist Adam Cuerden (submissions) (Pool G) is in second, which he owes mostly to his work with historical images, including a number of images from Urania's Mirror, an article also brought to good status. 2010 champion (Pool C) is third overall, thanks to contributions relating to naval history, including the newly featured Japanese battleship Nagato. Cliftonian (submissions), who currently leads Pool A and is sixth overall, takes the title for the highest scoring individual article of the competition so far, with the top importance featured article Ian Smith.

With 26 people having already scored over 100 points, it is likely that well over 100 points will be needed to secure a place in round 3. Recent years have required 123 (2013), 65 (2012), 41 (2011) and 100 (2010). Remember that only 64 will progress to round 3 at the end of April. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page; if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points equally. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email), The ed17 (talk • email) and Miyagawa (talk • email) 22:55, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Chiodos "Devil" Edit

I added the review for New Transcendence to the Chiodos "Devil" page and you removed it, claiming it wasn't a professional site. I had received the album from the label and wrote the review, so I figured it should be here. I just want to know the reason why we're not considered a professional site. Thank you for your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DeathMountainDew (talk • contribs) 05:32, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Due to our policy on WP:COI you should not be adding reviews that you or your site have done. New Transcendence is not listed at WP:ALBUM/SOURCES. STATic message me! 06:04, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

PewDiePie

Are you sure he is notable enough, even if he has a lot of subscribers? The Toon Disney Guy (talk) 18:45, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

@TDFan2006: If the multiple reliable sources cited in the article do not make it clear enough, Google him and you will find out. STATic message me! 19:01, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

HIMYM revert

Would you mind explaining why you reverted my edit without leaving an explanation? I don't appreciate unexplained reverts. Davejohnsan (talk) 20:21, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Just saw your latest edit. Thanks. Davejohnsan (talk) 20:25, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Artpop fiasco

Thanks for your comment Static, brrrrr let's hope another fiasco like last time is averted. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 06:37, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

@IndianBio: As long as a certain person is not involved, I am pretty sure it won't. RfC was a good idea, I should have done that way back then. Damn hindsight fails again. STATic message me! 06:44, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Yeah and thank God I was not developing this for GA, let all this hulla-baloo go away. This article is grossly unstable now. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 06:51, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

@IndianBio: Yeah you might have to give it a year or two lol. STATic message me! 07:05, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Thankfully, the RfC is so far not becoming a pain-in-the-ass..... let's hope it stays that way, Wikipedia has held enough controversies already..... XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 07:24, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Only Girl (in the World)

I asked User:Andrzejbanas for help to improving genre and composition section but he can't do it, and User:Calvin999 won't allow me to edit. Entertainment Weekly says "Europop dance cut".[1] There's Pitchfork says "an electro take on "Funkytown"-style riffing on the verses, Euro-pop catharsis everywhere else-- moves "Only Girl" into classic disco territory, which is a nice relief from modern dance pop's congested take on four-to-the-floor thump." [2] 183.171.176.164 (talk) 07:42, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

What? I've made one edit to the article in 5 weeks.  — ₳aron 10:03, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Stay Trippy

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Stay Trippy you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of XXSNUGGUMSXX -- XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 01:41, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Copyright templates

Hi. I've reverted your edits to Mac & Devin Go to High School. As the template itself says, "Do not restore or edit the blanked content on this page until the issue is resolved by an administrator, copyright clerk or OTRS agent." You are welcome to rewrite the content if you feel it appropriate in the temporary space linked from the template itself. If you feel the content is not a copyright issue, you can also explain that at the copyright problems board listing (linked from the template as well). But the template is not to be removed or the content restored pending closure of that listing. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 02:25, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

@Moonriddengirl: This revised version of the plot is far from a copyright violation of [3] and I would seriously like to see you try and explain how it is. STATic message me! 02:55, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

You're welcome to debate the tag - you are simply not welcome to remove it and restore the content or modify it within the article.

However, what you're showing there is a clearly derivative work. Let's take two sentences from the center for example. The source says:

He finds an unlikely inspiration in Mac Johnson (Snoop Dogg), the least achieving student on campus. Mac, a 15-year senior and consummate ladies man, is smitten with the school's new substitute chemistry teacher.

The article as you link it says:

He finds an unlikely inspiration in the oldest student on campus, Mac Johnson. Mac, a tenth year senior, player and heavy marijuana user, is overtaken by the school's new substitute chemistry teacher Ms. Huck.

Not only is the structure retained, but so is much of the language. Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing discusses such issues and how to address them. If you want to rewrite the plot summary, you are welcome to do so in the temporary space, but you are unlikely to be successful if you try to do it by changing words and phrases within the existing structure. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 03:01, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

@Moonriddengirl: So make the entire article look quite shitty over two sentences? A sentence that is not closely paraphrased at all.. The structure is not the same. I even used a plagiarism checker right now and the only hits it got was to Wikipedia and Wiki mirrors, none to the iTunes link you provided. But let me play your game, how about "Soon he befriends the oldest student on campus, Mac Johnson. Mac, a tenth year senior, player and heavy marijuana user, is simultaneously smitten by the school's new substitute chemistry teacher Ms. Huck." How about that? STATic message me! 03:12, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

The whole thing is closely paraphrased, STATicVapor. I plucked those two sentences out at random. The material started as a copy-paste; what we have now is a clearly derivative work based on modifications of the original text. This is not an acceptable use of copyrighted source material.

The article is now listed at WP:CP. The listing will remain open for at least a week pending closure. During that week, you can rewrite it. But it must be rewritten from scratch. You cannot modify the existing, copyrighted description to build your own. The temporary space is the place where the rewrite goes, and if you think that what exists is not a copyright problem, you explain that at Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2014 April 2. If you happen to do a complete rewrite before the week is over and want review sooner, you're welcome to request it. We sometimes have a backlog at that page, but I'd be happy to look at it earlier or ask another admin to do so. Alternatively, if no usable rewrite is proposed, the plot will be removed. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 03:17, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Stay Trippy GAN

You're very close to getting this to GA! Just have one question to address and we're good to go. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 04:38, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Stay Trippy

The article Stay Trippy you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Stay Trippy for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of XXSNUGGUMSXX -- XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 05:01, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

About the article "Sharaf Qaisar", Which no more exists, despite it being reviewed/revised.

The article Sharaf Qaisar which, I agree, was a re-post. But the deficiencies it consist previously, which indeed were discussed in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sharaf Qaisar too, were completely removed. These made the article in accordance with proposed guidelines of Wikipedia. Article doesn't had, even an indication, of promotion or advertisement. Still, wiki administration deleted it. I condemn! Syed Jamal Ahsan (talk) 08:39, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

@Syed Jamal Ahsan: Condemn all you want, the article was deleted because the subject is not notable, as they fail WP:GNG. Do not recreate until they have received significant independent coverage in reliable sources. STATic message me! 16:07, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

@STATicVapor: The article Sharaf Qaisar may lack notability etc... but the artist don't. I intended to write it again, more accurately, with more refrences & reliable sources, so that it can meet Wikipedia's notability requirements: "WP:MUSICBIO and WP:GNG". Please, guide me when I'll able to publish it again? Syed Jamal Ahsan (talk) 04:18, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

@Syed Jamal Ahsan: You can work on it at User: Syed Jamal Ahsan/Sharaf Qaisar, however if you do not want to risk deletion, do not move it to the main article space until the subject meets WP:MUSICBIO and/or WP:GNG. STATic message me! 21:13, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Image

Hello, Yes i was delete it, Because when i uploaded that picture, I was committed from wiki-admin that soon i was provide the license of picture,but the owner of the picture not give me license of picture, so i was afraid that may be wiki-admin block my account. that's why i delete the picture. regard — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cristine nickol (talk • contribs) 17:15, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Regarding the 3 Doors Down edit

I'm just wondering, how are 3 Doors Down not post-grunge? Many of their songs are post-grunge and I don't understand why the edit had to be reverted. Thanks! - Aperonia238 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aperonia238 (talk • contribs) 18:23, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

@Aperonia238: All genres require multiple reliable sources to support their listing, not just one person's opinion of a couple of their songs. STATic message me! 21:11, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Anchorman 2 editing reverts

Hey! Why did you change everything around in the Cast section? The characters introduced themselves! That wasn't right! Why?Christopher K. Howell (talk) 20:49, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

You are the only one that changed anything, is there a reliable source for your changes? Ever since the film was released different editors had credited Kanye West as three different MTV people. STATic message me! 21:09, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

What do you mean reliable source? I watched the DVD. It's just... in the fight scene, it was Sacha Baron Cohen, Kanye West, Tina Fey, Amy Poheler, Jim Carrey, and others in cameos that introduced the characters. Would that count as reliable source... or not? Christopher K. Howell (talk) 02:40, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

The film alone can't be used as a source for such things, particularly when they aren't things an audience would recognize right away. They need to be supported by independent sources like reviews or something. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 04:58, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

I'm not so sure what it means. What do you mean, "independent sources"? Christopher K. Howell (talk) 06:22, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Independent sources = sources not affiliated with production, writing, etc. of the subject. In other words, someone who was not involved in the creation process. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 06:23, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Oh. I see. Wow, bummer. So there's no alternative to this? Christopher K. Howell (talk) 15:24, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Hello

STATic I have a feeling there are some IP which might belong to Reece as socks. I just expanded the article "G.U.Y." and some IP blatantly changed the mixed review to rave reviews. Would you mind checking the IP? —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 05:09, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

@IndianBio: Well I do not have Check User rights, so I would not be able to. Judging that that edit was the IPs only edit, I do not believe there is enough to go off of. The thing is, it could not be him using his personal IP, because he was just blocked for sockpuppetry, so his IP should be autoblocked. Funny how I pegged the Reece sock on the Artpop talk page immediately, he makes it so obvious. If that IP or IPs in similar range continue such antics, then let me or User: Ponyo (the admin that performed the CU that confirmed Reece's sock) know. STATic message me! 06:01, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Thanks STATic, noted. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 16:42, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	Great editor! :) Syed Jamal Ahsan (talk) 05:26, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

@Syed Jamal Ahsan: Thanks a lot, I appreciate it greatly :) STATic message me! 06:19, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

WrestleMania 31

You are invited to take part in this discussion at WT:PW that mentions you. Thanks. CRRaysHead90 | ^#RaysUp 05:49, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

A possible FA

STATic,

I've been trying to improve the Eminem article so it can become FA, and thought maybe you'd be able to help given your work on his article, albums, songs, and such. Should it go through a peer review first? I saw this once was nominated for FA but wasn't promoted, then got a peer review followed by a successful GAN. Thought we'd get this up to an even higher standing. Perhaps..... it could be the "Today's featured article" for his 42nd birthday this upcoming October 17th if promoted in time?

XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 05:02, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

That sounds like a great idea, and I appreciate the work on the article. I am always open to helping in anyway. I do believe that it should go through a peer review first, just inform that it is your intention to take it through FAC. I have never taken an article up to FA status so this would be quite interesting if we could get it to that point. STATic message me! 07:25, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Will do! XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 13:52, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

My apology

In regards to Anchorman 2: The Legend Continues, I am sorry for making the Cast changes in the cameo section. I thought maybe I could, you know, put the character's names down there. I didn't realize about the reliable source you guys needed to approve this. So I am sorry about that. --Christopher K. Howell (talk) 15:31, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

No problem, it would not be controversial if it was not for several different users writing what their "character" was, most of the time saying a different name. STATic message me! 20:39, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Reece sock

Can you revert the sock's additions on "G.U.Y."? I've had enough of that user's nonsense and I don't wanna get dragged into WP:EW since I have reverted twice. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 16:31, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

@IndianBio: Glad to see the IP has now been blocked. Sorry I could not get there sooner. I will watchlist the page in case he returns. STATic message me! 20:53, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

It's a sad situation which has developed and I particularly feel bad because I had kept enough Good faith for Reece, but turns out he's just another nuisance. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 06:09, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Possible Deja Vu

I'm sure you remember quite clearly how things were with Monterrosa's repeated warring and evasion, and am tempted to say that Reece is headed in the same type of direction. As much as I hope Reece has better intentions than that, it feels too similar. IndianBio filed an SPI which led to an IP block for ban evasion. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 19:00, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

@XXSNUGGUMSXX: Well it is what those type of users do, the most disruptive ones always return, it becomes something of an obsession I guess. I saw the SPI, and I am glad to here that the IP address was blocked. Is it the last we have heard of him? Probably not. STATic message me! 20:46, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

I doubt Reece will leave Wikipedia after this block, though I don't want him to make the same mistakes Monterrosa did. If it keeps up and he gets indefinitely blocked, your interaction ban might not apply anymore, but don't quote me on that. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 20:56, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

@XXSNUGGUMSXX: Pretty sure it does in general, but if I am reporting a sockpuppet or reverting a sockpuppet, I doubt it. I will have to ask someone, but either way I do not believe anyone would complain considering the circumstances. He gets caught once or twice more and it will probably be indefinitely. STATic message me! 21:03, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Also, looks like Monterrosa was just at it again and got blocked. Winkelvi is quite the diligent tracker. I've asked Winkelvi if he'd be able to help track any further socks Reece might make. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 06:56, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Linkin Park - The Hunting Party (tracks)

These are the next confirm tracks for the album, they aren't mixed yet, but Mike Shinoda said they are plan to be on the album.

• “All For Nothing” (featuring Page Hamilton of Helmet)
• “Rebellion” (featuring Daron Malakian of System Of A Down)
• “The Wastelands”
• “Keys To The Kingdom”
• “Until It’s Gone”

Not really sure about

• "Mark The Graves"
• "Warrior"
• "Line In The Sand"
• "Final Masquerade"

This what the tracklist might look like: (I think) I seen it on some website, its look right though I don't knoe

• The Wastelands
• Guilty All the Same|Guilty All The Same](featuring Rakim)
• Mark The Graves
• Warrior
• All For Nothing (featuring Page Hamilton)
• Line In The Sand* Final Maquerade
• Until It’s Gone
• Keys To The Kingdom
• Rebellion (featuring Daron Malakian) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.1 Jibbz (talk • contribs) 20:47, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

There's 2 other tracks, I don't know them yet but the album is 12 tracks long. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.1 Jibbz (talk • contribs) 20:35, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

@2.1 Jibbz: Can you please provide a reliable source? If you can, I can add the confirmed songs to the page. STATic message me! 20:43, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

• http://lplive.net/
• https://www.facebook.com/TheHuntingPartyOfficial
• https://www.facebook.com/newLPalbum2014

I'll look for some more, these are the one I found so far

oh yeah, there's one where there was a session hosted by Mike at MSR Studios in NYC, he annoucned 5 new tracks, people are saying that he played those new songs, this morning, I've listened to SIRIUS XM's Octane, they said that there 5 new songs from the new album, he explain the music as "...the return of the early Linkin Park..." then they played Guilty All The Same. I have Dish Network, that how I heard it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.1 Jibbz (talk • contribs) 20:58, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

100s Wiki Page

Hello, my apologies for the lack of regulations followed on my behalf, I am new to Wikipedia and have only been taught a few things about how everything works! I am a good friend of 100s and received a text from him earlier today explaining his dissatisfaction with some of the things included. Not that anything offended him personally, or that I'm trying to insert some of his own wishes into this article, I was simply going in and trying to change/update some of the things I observed. If you would be interested in collaborating to make this process go quickly I would be more than happy to talk with you on ventrilo/skype or whatever! Again, my apologies for being a noob. Thanks! --Adamberson510 (talk) 00:46, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

@Adamberson510: No problem bro. But what is incorrect? A few things in your edits I had a problem with were, the lead was written much better before (no need to put so much emphasis on the producers of the mixtape in the lead, it is about 100s not about his team), you removed everything about his stay in Africa which is all supported in this interview, coming straight from his mouth. You removed every mention of the origionally announced second mixtape Sex Symbols (which im guessing just transformed into Ivry, but still worth mention, especially since the quote related to the influences definitely transferred over to Ivry). It is all worth noting when telling the story. This information is attributed to several interviews and reliable sources including [4][5][6] and [7]. You moved information around so it was no longer in chronological order (which it should be) and you changed "100s wrote his first song in 2008" to "100s wrote for the first time in 2008" and I do not think he wrote for the first time in his life in 2008 lol. STATic message me! 00:58, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

@STATicVapor: I was on the phone with the interviewer and 100s during his first interview with Metrojolt, and I used to write a lot for that blog as well (you can find me credited for the hook-up at the bottom of the interview). If you are able to chat about this with me via mic I would be able to provide you with the full picture! I have ventrilo, skype, and g-chat. --Adamberson510 (talk) 01:14, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

@Adamberson510: It is not that I do not believe you, I do. I have talked to many friends of (and actual artists before). However, I would not be able to communicate that way at the moment (or anytime soon really), so if you could just type out and explain why this information should be removed. As far as I see, it is backed by reliable sources, the most controversial being backed by interviews. STATic message me! 01:30, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

@STATicVapor: Haha no worries, I understand your reluctance! He texted me about this earlier today as he was concerned about being mis-represented and wondered if I would be able to correct some of the inconsistencies or mis-understandings located within this page. If you'd like to talk to him on the phone about this, i'm sure he'd be more than happy to straighten everything out though it seems you are unavailable to do so at the time. Below are some of the things I would love for you to take into consideration!

Essentially, there are a few things that are incorrect or mis-interpreted, whether he initially said them in his interviews or not. Everything about Africa is fine, though there's a section I'd like you to add at the end and correct a few things in the process. The section is as follows: After his attempt at escape, he was sent to the small town of Bouaflé where he lived with his uncle. Not long after, him and his uncle's family moved to Yamoussoukro, and he soon returned to the United States in late 2010. (Also, he had malaria more than 5 times, so best to say he contracted it a number of times)

You also put his parents in a very bad light, and much of the negative criticism towards them is not needed. I don't personally feel comfortable explaining the entire story to somebody he doesn't know as it is still a touchy subject to this day, though I'll touch on it for you to provide some context. To summarize candidly, there was an ongoing exterior event occurring within his family and his parents felt it best to remove their son from the setting at the time in Berkeley. In other words, their decision to send him to Africa was not a result of his poor behavior, or a result of anything he did. Therefore, his parents decision to send him away was a very hard one, and yes he felt a lot of anger towards them at the time, but in my opinion (and I know 100s shares this opinion with me as well) their decision was justified considering all of the circumstances. HE LOVES HIS PARENTS and feels he would never purposely criticize their decision. (That last statement comes directly from him).

Also, If there's any way you could change to picture to anything other than an action shot of him, perhaps more updated, that would be great as well. Thanks for your reading and hopeful consideration!

@Adamberson510: Thanks a lot for detailing everything. Took me awhile to respond as I just got done writing Sincerely Yours (Iamsu! album). It kinda sucks when there is only about 3 active editors that can write decent articles on hip hop subjects, that is why 100s took so long to get an article aha.

Okay good, I did not want to misinterpret how his early life was at all, as it did seem quite interesting to me. I adjusted the end of that section to what you said as I would not like to get little facts like that wrong, and good to know when he returned to the US. Oh and very sorry about that, I did not mean to any way shed a negative light on them at all, I only took what 100s said in the Vice interview, not in any way attempting to say that he hates his parents or has a bad relationship with them. As I type this I am attempting to correct any wrong in that paragraph, does it look good now?

As for the picture, unfortunately we can only use free images. I was lucky to find that single image of him buried in a ASAP Ferg concert gallery on Flikr. For more information on our policy on that you should read Wikipedia:Image use policy. In all, thanks for bringing this to my attention early, I never wanted to make 100s feel any negative thoughts about the page, it took me quite awhile to write it and I am a huge fan of his. Make sure you let him know that it was not my own words that caused the page to seem to shine his parents in a negative light, it would be the sources I used to write the article and I apologize again for any possible misinformation. I just felt as if 100s deserved a biography on himself and I wanted to write it as detailed and informative as possible. STATic message me! 06:29, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

{{ping|STATicVapor} Really appreciate your edits!! Also - Would you mind adding the following genres? This comes from 100s himself as well: R&B. Neo-Soul, Funk and Disco.

His birthday is November 26, 1992. I really find it hard to believe that the picture you found is the only "free" image that follows wikipedia's copyright policies and such, I can definitely find other concert photos of him from SXSW etc...He would really appreciate it!!! Thanks again man! --Adamberson510 (talk) 18:25, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

@Adamberson510: On the genres, we usually try to limit the genres in the infobox to a select few. That is why if you see any article on a rapper, they will only list hip hop, the reasons those genres would be undue weight is because you would not see this conversation. "Have you heard of 100s? Yeah the "... artist" Would he be considered "a R&B, Neo-Soul, Funk or Disco artist"? The last EP had influences of those genres, but he is not well known for being a primary performer of those genres. I think g-funk easily covers the connection between his rapping and Neo-Soul, Funk, Disco influences in his music. Thanks for the birthday tho, I could not find it anywhere. It may be sad, but search Flikr or other similar sites yourself, I had to look really hard to even find that one. If you read Wikipedia:Image use policy in there I believe you will be able to find information on how he can release images user free license, and then be able to upload them. Or all you really would have to do is personally take a picture of him and WP:UPLOAD it. STATic message me! 21:45, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

@STATicVapor: Thanks for all your help man! He actually performed up here in Vancouver last night and I got to kick it with him for a bit and talk about this ordeal. Essentially, if you EVER come across a different "free" photo of him he would love you to use that instead. Also, sex-symbol was scrapped so in my opinion it'd be best to just delete any references to that in the page. Again, thanks so much, he really appreciates all of this! If you're actually a fan let me know when he comes to your city and i'll see what I can do to get you on the list! 100s would be happy to return the favor. --Adamberson510 (talk) 17:02, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

@Adamberson510: That's awesome bro, I am sure he has a pretty awesome live show. I'll have to catch one in the So Cal area sometime. I will also make sure to search Flikr every once in awhile in case any new image pops up. As for Sex Symbols, it is all apart of his career whether it was scrapped, shelved, renamed or whatever. The relevance most being as that his idea for the project surly carried over to IVRY, based off how he described it in interviews. Since he has not been famous that long the article is already kinda short, so no need to make it shorter. I am really glad to hear that tho! I put quite a bit of work in it. STATic message me! 05:16, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

@STATicVapor: For sure, great work man! It makes me sad and inspired to hear that Wikipedia is in need of more editors, though I don't nearly have the tech-savvy skills to write wiki articles yet, just took a class where we made our own pages for a project and that was hard enough!! Also -- Photos taken from the event he performed at and uploaded to the nightclub's facebook page wouldn't be considered "Free" would they? --Adamberson510 (talk) 16:59, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

@Adamberson510: At least in hip hop that is aha. I took a class where we had to do that before, I can understand how hard it could be. Wiki can get hard to use at first, but once you get used to it, it is really easy. If you contacted the club and asked them to either 1) release them under a "free license", upload them to Commons or give you permission to upload them there, or upload them to Flikr or a similar site under a "creative commons" license. Sorry if it seems excise, Wikipedia just takes copyrights very seriously, and with images it has to be clear that they are free for anyone to use. STATic message me! 18:39, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

@STATicVapor: Thanks again for your patience! Yes, I've come to understand how serious Wikipedia takes copyrights!! I will talk to the club and get back to you if I've successfully arranged something. Thanks again!--Adamberson510 (talk) 18:41, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

@Adamberson510: No problem at all brother. Good to hear that, I will be looking forward to your update. STATic message me! 19:28, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

@STATicVapor: Hey man I just did a minor edit in the early life section; you had "100s was born in 1993" when he was really born in '92. Hope alls well! --206.87.103.65 (talk) 17:29, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

Forgot to fix that after you told me his birthday, I adjusted it to the full date. STATic message me! 00:25, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

@STATicVapor: Mind updating the section about Africa to include the fact that the initial city he lived in was Abijan? Thanks again. --Adamberson510 (talk) 03:16, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

@Adamberson510: You mean the city the boarding school was in correct? STATic message me! 04:06, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

@STATicVapor: yes and it was the first city he lived in

@Adamberson510: Okay I did add it as you can see in the article. STATic message me! 00:22, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

{{ping|STATicVapor} Hello again! Hope all is well. There's a few things that 100s wanted changed. First, his birthday never got changed (born in '92 not '93) and second, he will not be releasing his debut album on Fools Gold and doesn't know where you got that information from; it is false information. He's been receiving inquiries about it and would it to stop! I am going to go in and make these minor changes I have outlined, if you spot a mistake that I made please go ahead and fix it. Thanks again! Adamberson510 (talk) 17:59, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

Pardon me jumping in, but I just undid Adamberson510's edits. We've got a published source saying he was born in 1993; where is the 1992 date supported? For that matter, where is his date of birth supported; the source we're using only gives a year. (I've got a thread going at Talk:100s (rapper) about that.)

As for the debut album: we've got a source saying he'll release something in 2014. Is it so vague that we just want to leave it out until something more substantial comes to the press about a new album (i.e., hit that section of text out of the article with a WP:HAMMER)? —C.Fred (talk) 21:56, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

@C.Fred: I am a long-time friend of 100s and worked with the person who created his wikipedia page initially, : : @STATicVapor: to correct some of the misunderstandings or misinterpretations that were represented before. If you scroll up, i'm sure you will understand my position. At that time, I was contacted by 100s via text message to see if I would be able to fix some of the mistakes portrayed on his newly created Wikipedia page. Yesterday and again this morning I was contacted by him again as to why his birth-year still hadn't been changed to 1992 (as he was born in '92 not '93 and is 21, what cited source is reporting that he was born in '93?), and asking if I could get someone to take down the bit about his next album being released on Fools Gold this year, because he currently doesn't have a timetable for when it will be finished or released. If you need screenshots, I've got 'em.

@C.Fred: Ah I see it was from a Pitchfork article, sorry I am new to Wikipedia and still learning how to be a real Wikipedia user. Took a class recently in University that taught us to create our own page, so I've only learned the basics. Thanks for bearing with me! I'm not sure where Pitchfork concocted the fact that he was born in '93 but the correct year is 1992. Again, not sure how to actually show them to you in a discreet manner (if you have email I would gladly email them to you), but I can take some SS's of our text conversation to prove what I am saying.

• @Adamberson510: It was The BoomBox that said he will make his debut on Fools Gold during 2014, however if that is not the case I shall remove it. STATic message me! 04:43, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

Linkin Park - The Hunting Party (Album Cover)

How do you upload a file or photo because I have the album cover for Linkin Park's new album, The Hunting Party. It's like a black cover with the title "LINKIN PARK" and "THE HUNTING PARTY"2.1 Jibbz (talk) 16:42, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Check out this website: http://releasedateinusa.com/music/linkin-park-the-hunting-party-music-album-232/2.1 Jibbz (talk) 16:46, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

WP:BRD on Daniel Bryan

I'm not the one that added it, it was only brought to my attention from a recent edit. But on to the matter at hand, why is it not standardized, then? I don't see a country in the infoboxes for John Cena, Randy Orton, Big Show, Dolph Ziggler - I can go on and on. Obviously it was not my intention to edit war because, as I said, this is not standardized and I imagined my revert of your revert would've explained that. I believe the idea is that U.S. cities and states are at first glance obvious to the reader that they are from the United States. Until this is on every single U.S.-based wrestler's infobox, I don't believe it should be relegated to just one which, in this case, is Daniel Bryan. Antoshi ☏ ★ 19:52, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

I do not see why not and I was not aware of that. All Biographies of Living People include them, and there is nothing in Template: Infobox professional wrestler that says not include the country, so I do not understand why someone has gone arbitrarily through and removed it. Not every person visiting this encyclopedia article will be familiar to all the cities and states of the United States, they might be confused and think Washington or Arizona are countries, as that is how it appears to someone unfamiliar with them. STATic message me! 20:01, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

I'm gonna take a shot in the dark here and say they never were there. I've personally never seen "U.S." on any wrestler's infobox. That's why I reverted your revert. Antoshi ☏ ★ 21:55, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

@Antoshi: If that is true, then that does not make any sense. In every other BLP I have ever edited in other subjects, they include the country. Anyways, because every other article uses it without, I will restore it. STATic message me! 23:25, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Logic page photo

Hey, I was wondering if you could possibly upload a photo of Logic for the main infobox? I always seem to have trouble/confusion when I attempt to. Preferably the black & white picture that was originally in the infobox. Don't know if I can attach the photo here. NanishaOpaenyak (talk) 04:37, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

@NanishaOpaenyak: It appears as if that one was copyrighted after all. For living people only free images can be used, and I checked Flikr and there was none. So unless you have taken one, or could find another free one, it seems as if his page will have to go without one for the time being. STATic message me! 05:13, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

Question: how is that picture copyrighted if it was Logic's? It was originally posted to his personal Facebook. NanishaOpaenyak (talk) 21:03, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

@NanishaOpaenyak: Unfortunately we cannot just pluck images from social network sites, or else there would not be so many BLPs without images. Wikipedia:Image use policy might help you fully understand. STATic message me! 21:12, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

Alright, thanks for all your help! NanishaOpaenyak (talk) 21:54, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

@NanishaOpaenyak: Anytime at all my friend. STATic message me! 05:04, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

How Rob Bourdon became a better drummer

Mike Shinoda commented on the frustation with Rob Bourdon on this new album, where he was pushed, the interview was with Rolling Stone.

Here is the full interview with Mike Shinoda and Rolling Stone: http://www.rollingstone.com/music/news/inside-linkin-parks-heavy-new-album-we-need-to-weed-out-the-emo-201404102.1 Jibbz (talk) 21:09, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

@2.1 Jibbz: Interesting, if you want to add it to the article, you have to cite the source along with your addition. STATic message me! 21:17, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

Here is one of the songs that Mike Shinoda played during the listening session that he did in NYC.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cNQ0oBoH308

2.1 Jibbz (talk) 23:02, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

Open SPI assistance request

Hey there. I have an open SPI case against the editor that's been actively changing the Results section of WrestleMania articles to remove the numbers from "Pre-show" and etc. Wondering if you could toss in your two cents, too. Thanks! Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Person512 Antoshi ☏ ★ 23:38, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

Mike Shinoda on The Hunting Party

Shinoda does rap on the album, on the reviews of the new songs from Loudwire, they mentioned him rapping on the working title to "Keys To The Kingdom" and "The Wastelands" (later changed to "Wastelands Of Today").2.1 Jibbz (talk) 00:28, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

Demo/Working Titles request

When I first start to look for these demo names, I wasted about a week trying to find them, I was hoping Wikipedia had them but they didn't, Wikipedia was the first place I looked at, Nothing, I asked people, friends and family, they suggested me to ask you guys to post official demo names on the site. I'm just trying to do people a favorite, starting with Linkin Park, since I know the band very well. and all the things here about them, they're true.2.1 Jibbz (talk) 01:25, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

Sting's status with the WWE

Please stop posting rumors as fact, as you did to Sting (wrestler). Dave Meltzer's reports should be taken with a grain of salt as he has been wrong with previous predictions. With so many rumors floating around, it would be best to wait for an official confirmation from WWE or Sting himself. At this point your edits are not looking very constructive and you attempt to drag my name through the mud for removing them. I will be reverting the change and any further vandalism will get you reported. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Killhammer (talk • contribs) 03:58, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

@Killhammer: We have something known as WP:BRD, abide by it. We are reporting what the reliable source says we are not stating it as fact. Meltzer is considered a reliable source by WP:PW. If you read the sentence it says "according to a report by Dave Meltzer", and the information is not in the article lead. LOL go ahead and report, it will be ignored and your vandalism accusations are in violation of WP:CIVIL. Keep reverting and you will be blocked for violating WP:3rr. STATic message me! 05:02, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

Illmatic

My edits were not in "good faith". Obviously you didnt do any research, as I did, because then you would realize everything i wrote up was factual. All good. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MikeCalisFunkHouse (talk • contribs) 14:02, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

@MikeCalisFunkHouse: You must not know the definition of good faith. I do not have to do any research, the burden of proof is on who adds the content. You must cite reliable sources for all your additions, or they are likely to be reverted for violating WP:V. STATic message me! 02:31, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Nirvana

Led Zeppelin and The Doors' Wikis count their one off Hall of Fame performances in the 'Reunion' category. Nirvana also performed a full length show in addition to the Hall of Fame set. I put it in 'Reunion' though because it was a short term thing, the timeline won't change to '2014-Present' with Kurt Cobain listed as a past member unless they tour.

That is something that should be discussed at Talk: Nirvana (band). STATic message me! 17:42, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

Repeatedly reverting Bizarre's pages.

You keep reverting the edits I am making for no particular reason then to revert them.

This is a sample:

Bizarre *does not* use his myspace page. If you click on the link you keep putting up there you will see it is not active.

Bizarre *IS* associated with Yelawolf, they did a song together and it is on his album, what part of this do you not understand?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6joBBGgv4Pw

The rap battles took place in a basement called *The Shelter*, do you understand that? St.Andrews is a big venue, in the basement is a SEPARATE venue called The Shelter. Google St.Andrews Detroit, go to the faq section, there you go!

There are so so many interviews where the guys have discussed this, I can narrow it down to 10 if that would help you including the film 8 Mile and Marshall Mathers -2- autobiographies. THE SHELTER IS IN THE BASEMENT OF ST.ANDRWS IT IS A SEPARATE VENUE.

An aside, I am trying to enlighten you here, these kids from Detroit weren't headlining shows at a huge venue, they were in the basement earning their stripes during the day.

Denaun Porter is a member of D12. I am horrified that you keep taking that out.

RZ.

@Rozilla: Lets give this a go... Then remove the MySpace page and say that in the edit summary, I did not revert that. Yelawolf does not deserve listing in that section, because as you just said they did a single song together, that is it. We do not list every single collaborator. As for The Shelter, you need a reliable source. The burden is on the person that adds or changes content, not the person reverting the content that violates WP:V. As for Denaun Porter, see [8] and the recent [9], so be horrified all you want. STATic message me! 02:29, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Thank you

... to you and @XXSNUGGUMSXX: for reverting the IP vandalism on my talk page. Just FYI, that is banned CharlieJS13 (talk · contribs) who wreaks havoc on the genre of the pop song articles. Should be reverted continuously. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 17:28, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

@IndianBio: No problem bro. STATic message me! 18:20, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Indicud

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Indicud you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of WikiRedactor -- WikiRedactor (talk) 17:30, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Linkin Park

I've added info on it but there's nothing on it, i found ref on it but it not showing.2.1 Jibbz (talk) 17:06, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Indicud

The article Indicud you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Indicud for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of WikiRedactor -- WikiRedactor (talk) 19:51, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

Whose Mixing Linkin Park new album

Andy Wallace is mixing Linkin Park's new album, the same guy that mixed their 2 breakthrough albums, Hybrid Theory and Meteora.

https://www.facebook.com/lplive — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.1 Jibbz (talk • contribs) 23:04, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Million award

		The Million Award
		For your contributions to bring Yeezus (estimated annual readership: 1,081,512) to Good Article status, I hereby present you the Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! -- Bobnorwal (talk) 01:19, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Great job! Bobnorwal (talk) 01:19, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Thanks a lot Bobnorwal! I had no idea. STATic message me! 01:50, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Non-admin closure

Hi STATicVapor. As you can read in WP:NACD, non-admin closure are generally for cases when the discussion has been ongoing for some time and the TfD page is backlogged, while in other cases "administrators are responsible for closing deletion discussions". Note also this point: "closing discussions in which you have offered an opinion […] should be avoided". Thanks,--eh bien mon prince (talk) 14:15, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

@Underlying lk: I was unaware that a random user can just arbitrarily decline another users good-faith closure? It appears it is a case of WP:SNOW, at least five editors have indicated a speedy keep, and not to mention the in-line tag is messing up every record label article. Also I did not close it, so it appears your last point is moot. STATic message me! 14:20, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Well you did restore the closure after another editor (not me) reverted it, so you are involved in the process. WP:SNOW is an essay and should be treated as such, deletion discussions on Wikipedia are not votes, so the number of keeps is not strictly relevant to the decision of closing a discussion so early. And if you give the nom enough time, more users could still vote: it wouldn't be the first case of a TfD discussion that is seemingly directed towards one outcome and in the end reaches another. If, despite all that, you are still adamant that it should be speedy kept, I suggest you contact an admin and ask him/her to close it, per the normal procedure.--eh bien mon prince (talk) 14:25, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

@Underlying lk: Yes, a random user that gave no valid reason. It should be closed ASAP, since your nom was quite ridiculous. I do not have mind waiting for the inevitable, I just do not understand why you decided to screw up every record label article with the in-line tag. I guess you get off by being disruptive tho. STATic message me! 14:30, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

That is something really silly to say, even offensive. I motivated my proposal far more extensively than you motivated your opposition, and if you find the banners annoying that is your problem, they are standard for every TfD discussion in case you didn't notice. If you have no policy-based reasons to motivate your reverts, it would be better if you left the template, and the nomination, alone. Thanks, --eh bien mon prince (talk) 14:35, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

@Underlying lk: Not silly just factual. If it was so motivated you would have at least one person that shares your opinion, but unsurprisingly you do not. I am not the only one and no they are not standard, they give you an option when you start the discussion, in case you didn't notice. The common sense being that the nominator should not be reverting closures. STATic message me! 14:49, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Yes, that tag is standard, do you understand the use of the word? Anyway, I'll leave you to wallow in your grumpiness, just leave the nomination alone.--eh bien mon prince (talk) 15:00, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Overlinking

STATic, you said, "You can link cities and states, just not countries." Where do you get that from? I posted a question at the MOS talk page but didn't get an answer. --Musdan77 (talk) 17:12, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

@Musdan77: Countries are widely known throughout the world, however do you think someone accessing Wikipedia from Australia or South America is going to be familiar with Buffalo, New York? WP:OVERLINK covers this under what not to link; "the names of major geographic features and locations", cities and states are not major geographic features and locations. STATic message me! 17:40, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

Apparently, you didn't go to the discussion that I linked to. And there have been other discussions about this in the archives. That sentence (and the word "major" in particular) is subjective and a matter of interpretation. Sure, Buffalo, New York is not major, but New York City certainly is -- but NYC is located in a state. Anyway, I was just wondering if you got your standing from somewhere other than that MOS. --Musdan77 (talk) 19:20, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

@Musdan77: Besides my common discretion in linking I would not be able to provide you with much. I think Davidwr covered it good in the discussion you linked me. I am not sure what edit are conflict was related to, so I would not really be able to give you my exact reasoning for reverting, other then it is generally okay to link cities and states, but countries are never linked. STATic message me! 00:29, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Well, I'm glad you mentioned that editor because I may not have read that new reply. Thanks. --Musdan77 (talk) 00:45, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Imaginary Enemies genre

Hey, i noticed that you left me a message, i just wanted to discuss about it, even though what you did was because of good intentions, i still have to disagree with the genre of the album i edited, so i will tell you why i edited the genre to be the way it is. 1)Alternative rock - the instrumentation of the ablum has a lot of Alternative rock influences, which is why i cited it as a genre. 2)Post hardcore - they always played in the punk style of, they use screams and post hardcore has uncleans, that is why i edited it in. 3)Emo - it has a lot of softer songs with melodic choruses and instrumentation, not to mention the emotion there and the screaming 4)Nu metal - i labeled it Nu metal, firstly because of the use of programming in the album, it is in the style of Nu metal, secondly, there are some heavier songs there and the way they play them and the programming over there has a lot of Nu metal influences, now Nu metal was always known for the emotional and agressive sound(like on the album) and the use of scratching, programming, sampling, etc. etc. This is why i changed the genre from "rock" to those 4 and rock is a completely different genre itself, the lyrics, instrumentation and everything is just different, so if you'd label the genre as "Rock" people would think that they made a record similar to: The Beatles, or The Rolling Stones. I hope that i cleared all of this up, this is just why i did it and i think that a lot of people would agree with me there.(MTG980 (talk) 19:26, 19 April 2014 (UTC))

@MTG980: Rock is just a generalized genre (what section you would find in a store), to cover the album until reliable sources were cited for any subgenre(s). If you can provide any reliable source to back any of the genres you want to add, then it would fine to change it. However, we normaly try to limit the genres, so whatever genre dominates the album's song should be used, not just the minor elements of some they use. STATic message me! 00:33, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Vandalism

Vandalism on Austin Mahone discography by ConnieGB. Please, help me. Thanks! Shane Harper 4 Life (talk) 03:19, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Animal Ambition

Hi, STATic VaPor, I understand that I edited an article without leaving any evidence but I do not know how to do that. Everything that I write on an article is 100% confirmed and I find it through official websites (in this case, I edited 50 Cent's 'Animal Ambition' confirmed tracks so I saw the news at 50cent.com). I usually edit articles because the information is confirmed it's just the article has yet to be updated. If I knew how to provide the evidence I would but I just leave it there and hope somebody else will add that for me. LukeKHipHop (talk) 12:18, 21 April 2014 (UTC) LukeKHipHop 21/04/14

@LukeKHipHop: If you do not understand how to, please see WP:CITE and WP:RS, should explain it to you. Thanks for taking the time to update the article, we just require reliable sources along with information to prove it as factual, and not just someone making up BS. The latter happens a lot. STATic message me! 14:36, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Quack

Special:Contributions/Rjm241, check it, ring a bell? Can you or any of the talk page watchers please list it at the SPI? I'm on phone and twinkle is pretty fucked up on Mobile Wikimedia. Ugh! —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 05:31, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Ponyo performed a CheckUser which indicated that, surprisingly, the accounts are not connected. I asked myself. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 20:06, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Sorry just got home guys, sad to hear that. It is only a matter of time though. Maybe we need to invent another controversy on the Artpop page to draw it out, kidding of course. STATic message me! 06:11, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

Subtitles

Since when do we not use subtitles? I mean i wasn't gonna change the page name either but when i noticed Best Buy and Amazon were both using the subtitle i figured we should. 50 Cent has also used the subtitle several times when talking about it. I don't think it matters what the hip hop blogs call it, but whatever. Koala15 (talk) 23:58, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

@Koala15: As my edit summary said, WP:SUBTITLES and WP:COMMONNAME applies. The most well known name for the album is simply Animal Ambition, and the subtitle would only apply if it was well known, or if it would be needed for disambiguation. Not sure what hip hop "blogs", have anything to do with anything, I do not follow random blogs. However, 95% reliable sources refer to the album under the simplified name, hardly ever under the full title. STATic message me! 01:07, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

It just seems odd to me, we wouldn't leave a subtitle off on a movie article would we? I understand the common name thing but that can change fast, i guess we shall see when it gets closer to release. Koala15 (talk) 02:15, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

@Koala15: We do all the time? The Amazing Spider Man 2 has a subtitle of "Rise of Electro" in many major markets [10][11], but the common name remains the simplified name. For an album example, there is May Death Never Stop You, which full title is May Death Never Stop You: The Greatest Hits 2001-2013, among others I do not have the time to look up right now. There is the guideline at WP:SUBTITLES for a reason. But it does only apply to the article title, so it is okay to leave it with the subtitle in the article lead and on the 50 Cent page, which I saw you removed. STATic message me! 02:45, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Nothing Was the Same

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Nothing Was the Same you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of XXSNUGGUMSXX -- XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 01:41, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Award 4 U

• 
  50,000 Edit Star

awarded to STATicVapor for being a member of the 50,000 edit club
Vjmlhds (talk) 04:21, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Linkin Park - The Hunting Party (The Second Single)

Linkin Park revealed that the second single to promote their new album would be, titled "Until It's Gone"

http://wiki.lpassociation.com/index.php/Until_It%E2%80%99s_Gone and http://www.lpassociation.com/forums/showthread.php?t=40321 2.1 Jibbz (talk) 17:30, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Also that, Rakim the one who wrote the rap words on "Guilty All The Same", (Short story: after Mike asked Rakim to rap on the song, Rakim decided he write his own part for the song. Mike send him the lyrics so he can understand how the song is explain and written, he took that idea and written himself a rap verse for the part, he was a part of the writer in the song.) But the thing about Mike not being to rap after Rakim was true. But now Mike is practicing rapping, he knows he has to since he will be rapping all his part for Hybrid Theory on June 14th in Castle Donington, England. 2.1 Jibbz (talk) 17:42, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Eminem discography

The small numbers i changed on the Eminem discography comes from the information already there. It says one thing and then you click on the song/album and the numbers are more updated and increased on the inside. Instead of changing all the numbers back, you should actually click the songs/albums and look for yourself. My numbers are not incorrect. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mcbedford (talk • contribs) 14:06, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Nothing Was the Same

The article Nothing Was the Same you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Nothing Was the Same for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of XXSNUGGUMSXX -- XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 04:11, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

Turn Down For What

The song has now peaked at number 5 and PASSED number 7

"DJ Snake and Lil Jon's "Turn Down for What" enters the top five (7-5)"

http://www.billboard.com/articles/news/6070358/pharrell-williams-tops-hot-100-chart-10-weeks-iggy-azalea-top-10 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lucifer1998 (talk • contribs) 20:26, 30 April 2014‎ (UTC)

I've added that source to the article. —C.Fred (talk) 20:43, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

Thanks C.Fred. @Lucifer1998: Next time cite the source when you add the content to avoid confusion. STATic message me! 21:03, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

The used

Damn dude, i just did it because of the genres their albums have, by that i mean labeled, it was for generalising and emo was pretty dominant (MTG980 (talk) 21:09, 30 April 2014 (UTC))

@MTG980: We need reliable sources present in the article supporting the genre. STATic message me! 22:25, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

Ok, so those are what? Record companies? They labeled them as emo, screamo and what not. (MTG980 (talk) 22:28, 30 April 2014 (UTC))

@MTG980: Click the link "reliable sources" link or visit WP:IRS, to answer your question, it is not their record label. STATic message me! 22:37, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

Well, ok then, sorry, i didn't think it was a huge deal so i did it, but ok i understand(MTG980 (talk) 22:40, 30 April 2014 (UTC))

@MTG980: No worries at all. Since Wikipedia is not a source for Wikipedia, content must be cited in the article is appears in. If the genres are unsourced in the album articles too, they should probably be removed too per WP:V and WP:SUBJECTIVE. STATic message me! 06:24, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

Oh ok, i understand now, well i am glad that that was sorted out — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.101.133.218 (talk) 13:43, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

Discussion

Hello, I believe the following discussion about template accessibility may be of use to you. Please comment if you wish at Template_talk:Infobox_album#Consistancy. → Lil-℧niquԐ 1 - { Talk } - 21:54, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

Da Mafia 6ix

Recently added info about Gangsta Boo being removed from the group. No formal announcement has been made other that the quote I (thought) I cited from dj Paul's Instagram account. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abdutchie (talk • contribs) 05:57, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

@Abdutchie: You did not cite any source with your change. Major changes such as to members of a group require reliable and official sources to support. STATic message me! 06:16, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

Until It's Gone

I guess now there are enough links to keep the single as a page! So please don't delete it! I guess the song would be available for download within a week! Thank you! Chopra.nitin96 (talk) 06:10, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

@Chopra.nitin96: Well there is not. No where close to meeting WP:NSONGS still. Wikipedia is not the place for guessing or speculation. Also do not think you were slick by logging out to revert the redirect, now it is up for deletion because you did that. STATic message me! 06:18, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

Well! Now the single is released! It was done yesterday! The official lyric video also appears on youtube with the credits of the video and the lyrics of the song! So I think the release date should be changed to May 5th! Thank You! Chopra.nitin96 (talk) 03:54, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

@Chopra.nitin96: It has yet to receive an official retail release or radio service as a single. You can only listen to it for free and it is apart of the pre-order on iTunes. There has been no official release as a single. All the other competent editors of the song and album article seem to agree with this. STATic message me! 17:23, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Hail To The King (A7X)

Hey, I'm sorry if my last edit appeared to confuse you on that page (that IP edit was mine). I can't really source very well (I don't know what does and what does not belong) and This Means War plays regularly on my local Rock radio FM station AND SXM Octane. I do not have a date for it, but through the Deathbat site I did see that they were recording a music video for the song, which usually, but does not always, suggest a single release. I was thinking maybe we could keep that there until we got evidence that proved otherwise. Is this possible? Is this even a good source?

I'm just saying that there seems to be plenty of radio evidence that this will lead to be single. Thank you.

DannyMusicEditor (talk) 20:01, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

@DannyMusicEditor: Radio airplay or music video do not alone indicate a single release. We need an official source to confirm either a retail release or a official service date to radio. There needs to evidence to prove the added content per WP:V and WP:NOR, not evidence to prove the unsourced statement wrong. STATic message me! 17:26, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Problem (Ariana Grande song)

Can you keep an eye on this ConnieGB user continuously adding iTunes chart to the article? It is not allowed per WP:SINGLEVENDOR and the user is resorting to WP:WAX excuses. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 05:38, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

@IndianBio: I have been dealing with this user for a long time on Ariana Grande and her discography, so welcome to the club. Whenever the user is reverted they always resort to WP:WAX arguments, no madder how many users have told them they are null and void. I will revert them again and tell them to take it to the talk page, hopefully for once they will listen. STATic message me! 05:46, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

Thanks STATic for explaining the background of the user. Really seems problematic. PS, I am excited to see how high "Problems" can debut on the Hot 100, seems like Iggy's on fire. :) —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 05:53, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

@IndianBio: It has been, I mean she has been blocked twice since January and has came close a couple other times. Same here, it looks like it is going to be a guaranteed top 10 debut, but who knows it might even top the chart. Yeah, I was surprised with how much "Fancy" took off and "Black Widow" has the sound to be a big hit as well. I mean she is no where near the best rapper in the world, but I would never complain about her on my screen ;D STATic message me! 06:03, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

It should be noted that even if this wasn't a case of WP:SINGLEVENDOR, iTunes is listed under WP:BADCHARTS. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 06:11, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

If the edit warring continues, have to be reported again I guess. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 15:16, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

@STATicVapor:, might I tempt you in this discussion? —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 00:30, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Album

So what? If you let me do my work I will put the sources, just give me some time, I have all the sources, damn it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by OriginalDoc (talk • contribs) 19:43, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

I don't see anything related to synthesis, it's called a reliable source. Plus I am not doing it all myself, it's on the Internet, search is yourself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by OriginalDoc (talk • contribs) 20:25, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

@OriginalDoc: No you do not, you are just making it up. How was the album well-received when it only had two reviews that were both mixed? The Billboard sources you are giving do not support anything. How could it chart at 27 on a year-end chart when it peaked at 130 something on that same chart when it was released, that is just ridiculous. The sources you are using for your claims do not support what you are saying in the article. So stop. If you continue to violate WP:V and WP:NOR you have a good chance at being blocked. STATic message me! 01:20, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

The Hunting Party

I think this clears it up pretty much... https://twitter.com/linkinpark/status/462285748272500736 — Preceding unsigned comment added by MrF1shIsFish (talk • contribs) 03:59, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

@MrF1shIsFish: Thanks for citing the source. However, the source just implies it will be premiered that day, it does not say there will be an official retail release or radio service date. STATic message me! 04:10, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

What is it w/ u & music genres?

Bullet for My Valentine has a thrash metal album & thrash metal elements in their music, so I don't understand how u can think they don't do thrash metal. And because of that, people can't know about the thrash metal in their music. I know thrash metal when I hear it. And Five Finger Death Punch is also alternative metal & hard rock, it's says so on their albums & songs, so I don't see y the band's article itself can't say they do alternative metal & hard rock. Same goes for Bullet for My Valentine w/ thrash metal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ravenkills97 (talk • contribs) 15:45, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

@Ravenkills97: That is your original research, take it to another Wiki, because it wont stand on this one. Please type your messages in English too BTW. STATic message me! 02:32, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

WikiCup 2014 April newsletter

Round 3 of the 2014 WikiCup has just begun; 32 competitors remain. Pool G's Adam Cuerden (submissions) was Round 2's highest scorer, with a large number of featured picture credits. In March/April, he restored star charts from Urania's Mirror, lithographs of various warships (such as SMS Gefion) and assorted other historical media. Second overall was Pool E's Godot13 (submissions), whose featured list Silver certificate (United States) contains dozens of scans of banknotes recently promoted to featured picture status. Third was Pool G's ChrisGualtieri (submissions) who has produced a large number of good articles, many, including Falkner Island, on Connecticut-related topics. Other successful participants included Cliftonian (submissions), who saw three articles (including the top-importance Ian Smith) through featured article candidacies, and Caponer (submissions), who saw three lists (including the beautifully-illustrated list of plantations in West Virginia) through featured list candidacies. High-importance good articles promoted this round include narwhal from Reid,iain james (submissions), tiger from Cwmhiraeth (submissions) and The Lion King from Igordebraga (submissions). We also saw our first featured topic points of the competition, awarded to Czar (submissions) and Red Phoenix (submissions) for their work on the Sega Genesis topic. No points have been claimed so far for good topics or featured portals.

192 was our lowest qualifying score, again showing that this WikiCup is the most competitive ever. In previous years, 123 (2013), 65 (2012), 41 (2011) or 100 (2010) secured a place in Round 3. Pool H was the strongest performer, with all but one of its members advancing, while only the two highest scorers in Pools G and F advanced. At the end of June, 16 users will advance into the semi-finals. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email), The ed17 (talk • email) and Miyagawa (talk • email) 17:57, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Discography and Space Bound edits

Hi! I made some edits regarding of albums on the Eminem discography page. The edits were all cited. For example the mmlp2 sales were updated as the present edit shows sales upto march according to Hiphopdx.com i also updated it using the same website. All i did was update it to the list published by the site on 27th april. So i consider it is reliable. The sales of MMLP and The Eminem Show were edited according to sales provided by mediatraffic.com. I guess its reliable too. I cited it too and if you want you can check it the sites decade end chart. The quote that i changed on the Space bound section was from the reference already provided in the article. So even that is not wrong. I would like that you update the above info as or allow me to do so cause the numbers I provide are not wrong or if you feel that there is a mistake on my behalf you can help me to get rid of the confusion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abhinav0908 (talk • contribs) 13:18, 5 May 2014 (UTC) Abhinav0908 (talk)

@Abhinav0908: Hey Abhinav0908. HipHopDX is a reliable source however, you updated all the others with bloated figures from an unreliable source (mediatraffic). As for the quote, you need to indicate that in the edit summary, so not to confuse other editors. Also your bit about its success on YouTube or whatever was WP:OR, that is what I left the message for. Feel free to restore the update to MMLP2 sales and change that quote. Sorry for any confusion. STATic message me! 14:54, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

hi!!!

Crazychick7 (talk) 19:21, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Hey man as usual can you help me with this mixtape article?

I want to get rid of that articles for creation thing and I will do the rest.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/White_Christmas_2 — Preceding unsigned comment added by PyschopathicMan (talk • contribs) 20:02, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

@PyschopathicMan: You can cut and paste the content to White Christmas 2, however before you do that, you might want to provide some indication that the mixtape is notable enough for a Wikipedia article. Per WP:NALBUMS, most mixtapes are generally not notable, except for rare exceptions. If notability is not proven, someone might come around and either redirect it or AfD it. STATic message me! 16:35, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Sovereign

If you like Christian music and more importantly CCM and worship, you can take a listen to the new album over on iTunes Radio.HotHat (talk) 04:33, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Oh, The Black Keys new album Turn Blue is available to listen to at iTunes Radio.HotHat (talk) 04:37, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

@HotHat: I like it at church, but not that much in my free time, I will give it a listen though man, thanks. STATic message me! 16:37, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Problems again

STATic can you make sure that the WP:SINGLEVENDOR info like this is not added again to the article.? These IPs are just so annoying. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 06:46, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

@IndianBio: I have the page watchlisted do not worry, if it is not me that catches it, it will be you, or someone else. Looks like we are having some Problems with "Problem". STATic message me! 16:40, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Iggy is seriously killing it, the top 3 and 4 songs on the Hot 100, ah-fuckin-mazing. PS, did you know about the user who is tying to kill a nomination I made just because I opposed the promotion of this and this? Humor yourself with this piece of novelty. "Problems" my foot, lol. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 17:37, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Problems with "Problem", I do enjoy a good pun :P XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 17:39, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

I know right, it is about time she had some US chart success. LOL wow that is messed up, not completely unexpected though. And doesn't every one XXSNUGGUMSXX :P STATic message me! 21:29, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Record labels

Your reverting of my revisions to record label articles were incorrect. Frontline labels - such as Atlantic, Columbia, etc. - manage their own distribution affairs, before sending that info. off to the physical distribution leg of their parent company. Note that the article of Atlantic Records sister label Warner Bros. Records lists that it is 'self-distributed,' note that the article of Columbia Records sister label Epic Records lists that it is 'self-distributed.' The way these articles are set up, thanks to your reverting my revisions, are inconsistent when they should be uniform. The Real One Returns (talk) 01:05, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

@The Real One Returns: You just provided your own answer. They send out the info to the parent, who then in turn distributes it. I am not sure about Sony labels, but all Universal Music Group label releases (Def Jam, Republic, Interscope, Island) are distributed by Universal Music Distribution in the United States, I was just looking at the back of 2014 CDs from all these labels today, they say distributed by Universal Music Distribution. As for Warner, WBR distributes itself and then they distribute Atlantic. Your claims have no sources anyways. STATic message me! 01:56, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Sting

Please see the talk page. And dont add Rumors to page. This is a factual site, not a dirt sheet. BlackDragon 15:39, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

I did not add the content, but worked with numerous editors to build the section. Yes it is factual so stop ignoring the facts and get your opinion out of the way ignoring the obvious reliable sources that are in place. STATic message me! 16:05, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Yes, but you readded it. Your ignoring the facts that he HASNT signed a contract. Until WWE or Sting says so it is NOT official. Until then its speculation only. BlackDragon 18:44, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

@Black60dragon: Yes he has, that has been confirmed by reliable sources. Reliable third party sources are better than primary sources. You do not understand what speculation is, since the content is backed by reliable sources. Stop bugging and waiting for a discussion on the article talk page to take place. STATic message me! 19:56, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Its confirmed that he has appeared. Not that a contract has been signed. I removed the stuff that he didnt do himself, like an article written about him. The appearing on the Network should stay, but the rest should not be reverted. BlackDragon 20:11, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Yes and we do not say he signed a contract, try to open your eyes and read better. We do not only need to state things he has done, it is all about the buildup, this is not his autobiography. Yes it should have been reverted, so please cease to remove sourced content and stop edit warring. STATic message me! 21:34, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Discography edits

Hi - I blocked the IP 187.109.224.34 due to a request on WP:AIV by TheEpTic. The IP made a very large number of small edits, fairly rapidly, across multiple music related articles. Most of them seemed to have no impact, but in at least one I found that artists names that were correct were removed. I can't really judge the edits, but based on that one, based on that 187.109.224.33 had been blocked for vandalism with very similar edits, and based on the report at AIV, I rangeblocked all the 187.109.224.xxx IPs and reverted all of 34's changes. I did not touch the changes of 33 that are still live. I later noticed at least one edit was correct, and it looks like you found another. Should I undo this block and the other reverts? Input from you and TheEpTic would be excellent. Prodego ^talk 20:06, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

@Prodego: Thank you very much for blocking them. They have been hopping around IPs being disruptive over many pages over the last few days. They were vandalizing on 187.109.224.33, created an account User: Daolon Wong, then the IP and then user was blocked, which was when they hopped over to 187.109.224.34 where they have made many rapid disruptive edits over the next few days. I have noticed a few have been constructive, but a very vast majority have not been. The block was definitly a good call and if I see any correct edits I will restore them. Again thanks a lot for taking care of this. STATic message me! 21:03, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Headlights Video

Hey! its regarding the headlights video. I guess that the video is released all over the world not just United States. So shouldn't we change it? And is a description for what happens in the video required?Abhinav0908 (talk) 20:18, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

@Abhinav0908: It does not say it was only released in the United States, it says it was on the United States' Mother's Day which was on May 11, 2014, in other countries it was the 12th already when it was released. Yeah that sure could be included. STATic message me! 21:21, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Recent amendments of my edits

Hi, You have recently undid some revisions that I made to some pages. Can you please explain your reasoning for this? Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stevemhancock (talk • contribs) 15:47, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

@Stevemhancock: My edit summary included my reason. The template is limited to only 10 ratings by the most notable reviewers that are listed at Wikipedia:ALBUM/REVSIT. The website you are adding is not listed on Wikipedia:ALBUM/REVSIT, so it should not be used. The way you are adding them makes it seem as if you are trying to spam Wikipedia with reviews from that website. STATic message me! 16:12, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Linkin Park - The Hunting Party (DVD)

The DVD that Linkin Park is releasing, is for Europe only I think, the DVD is a live DVD from the performance they did for MTV WOrld Stage back in 2012 from Monterrey, Mexico. Not the full performance just like a 45 minutes DVD, I seen it on a few websites. So yeah, I'm letting you know about the DVD that the United States wouldn't be getting. 2.1 Jibbz (talk) 20:59, 13 May 2014 (UTC) oh yeah here is a website sort of confirming it [12] 2.1 Jibbz (talk) 21:00, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Your revert in the article "2014 in hip hop music"

Hello,

you reverted my edits. I have provided reputable sources.

http://www.rap.de/news/40-news/17481-fler-gratuliert-kollegah-zum-gold-rekord

rap.de is the biggest hip hop related online platform in Germany and the author Oliver Marquardt is the chief editor.

http://www.musikmarkt.de/Aktuell/News/Spotify-Kollegah-erzielt-Streaming-Rekord

Musikmarkt is the biggest journal of the music industry in Germany, Austria and Switzerland.

Regarding the importance of Kollegah's achievement I think it is fair enough to mention it in the section and include his picture instead pictures of rappers who haven't achieved similar success. Ich901 (talk) 14:19, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

@Ich901: I understand that, however to add a huge image and two entries to the event section is WP:UNDUE weight. To say that the others have not achieved similar success is just your non-neutral point of view talking. STATic message me! 22:49, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

I mean commercial success and that's not my point of view it's a fact. Other notes in the event section are pretty much less important from an objecdtive point of view.

Example: "On March 5, Lil Boosie was released from the Louisiana State Penitentiary where he has been incarcerated since 2009 on drug charges."

What does this have to do with Hip-Hip???

You did also two entries to replace mine. That is exactly doing the same thing. Several of the pictures in the "upcoming releases" section have the same size as th picture I have added.

What you did twice is basically vandalism. --Ich901 (talk) 14:08, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

@Ich901: Feel free to bring up it up on the article talk page. Lil Boosie is a major hip hop recording artist in the United States and his release has received an insane amount of mainstream media coverage, compared to just the regional coverage Kollegah has gotten. And sorry you must have no idea what vandalism is, content disputes are not vandalism. STATic message me! 01:06, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Lol, Kollegah has posted his Gold record for his album on his Facebook page not even one week after the release. That's the proof for 100,000 records sold. His label announced that the first week sales are 161.976 copies in Germany alone, it's the fastst selling rap album in Germany of all time and fastest selling album in Germany in the last ten years.

The independent GfK, which is responsible for the German album charts, states 160,000 copies of King were sold in Germany in the first week: http://www.gfk-entertainment.com/koeniglicher-rekord-grandiose-verkaufswoche-fuer-kollegah.html

It's enough to list it in the table for highest first week sales in the article. Not many American artists, sell more in the first week. Most of the rappers in the acrticle sell less. "Lil Boosie" is maybe popular in the United states but I have never heard of him before and I can name atleast 100 American Rappers. He probably doesn't get any media coverage outside of the United States. In addition to that the event is not even Hip Hop related. Ich901 (talk) 15:16, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

@Ich901:See thank you very much for fully explaining it. It sure is enough to list in the highest first week sales table, feel free to do that, also add it to the released albums table if it is not already there. Maybe you have not heard of him (he has been in prison since 2009), but his release received very substantial, international media coverage (maybe not in Germany, but UK and Oceania yes), however until this conversation I have never heard of "Kollegah", which shows you the amount of coverage he receives internationally. Information about certifications and facts like it was the fastest selling rap album in Germany of all time belong in the notes part of his entry in the released albums section. STATic message me! 16:01, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Hello

Hi, i'm WikiFact123

Why did you revert my edit on the R. Kelly template, you can't yous erase what others have contributed and made to better something. Hit me back with a good reason, cause i really can't think of any. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiFact123 (talk • contribs) 16:41, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

@WikiFact123: Because User: AffeL you are blocked indefinitely. STATic message me! 22:51, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

A cheeseburger for you!

Thank you so much for being nice Ysleta61 (talk) 17:11, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Rapture Ruckus new EP

I just created Invader Volume 1 by Rapture Ruckus if you want to go and look it over, and should it be included on the list?HotHat (talk) 23:22, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

@HotHat: Any official retail studio album (no free albums or mixtapes), by a rapper or group with a Wikipedia article can be added to the list. The album does not immediately have to be notable enough for its own article (or currently have one) to be added to the list, just as long as the artist does. STATic message me! 05:13, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

Eminem records sales

Hello there. How do you do?

I've seen that you are one of the Eminem's wikibiography editor, and i also seen that you are insist to put Eminem's sales with 96 million albums and over 120 million singles worldwide, by using this source (http://www.xxlmag.com/xxl-magazine/2014/05/dr-dre-eminem-and-jimmy-iovine-three-kings-originally-published-april-may-2014/) while actually, the article inside stated "rap titan Eminem, who’s been signed to Dre’s label since 1998 and has sold 96 million records as an Aftermath/Interscope artist." Not 96 million albums and over 120 million singles worldwide like you stated on eminem's wikibio.

Please be consider that Wikipedia should be fill up with a reliable source. Please look up this page (best-selling music artists), eminem's certification sales has been reach nearly 99m and while his "real and not inflated sales claim" still around 100m.

The source from this (http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/features/why-eminem-is-a-greater-artist-than-lady-gaga-will-ever-be/story-e6frg8h6-1226836137106) could be use for while to state eminem's records sales at 115 million, because that number is much more and much better reliable than another eminem's 200m or more claim sales which is so INFLATED.

thanks. Politsi (talk) 03:40, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

@Politsi: Please do not make unfounded assumptions about my editing. I did not origionally change that figure with that source and only challenged yours as it seemed that the source was inflating the sales figures. That has been a major problem with Eminem's page for a long time. All Eminem's sales have been as an Aftermath/Interscope artist so that would be the total. If the total lines up with the List of best-selling music artists page feel free to change it. Feel free to restore the change. STATic message me! 05:11, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

Hello

why did you revert this edit? [13]. On the talk page, the consensus doesn't end yet You are imposing an edit without consensus by user Status [14], (the edit summary "lol", isn't a reason). Grande's label said, christmas kisses songs are promotional singles, and she confirmed that "Problem" is her fifth official single. On i tunes the singles and the promotional are release independently, depends on the label. see. Thanks. Regards. Connie (A.K) (talk) 22:31, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

@ConnieGB: Consensus was reached on the talk page. They were all released as independent singles on iTunes. I am tired of going through this with you, just drop it and stop edit warring. STATic message me! 22:36, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

On itunes the songs and the promotional, are released as independet. Connie (A.K) (talk) 23:04, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Will Ferrell drum-off

You again removed the section on Ferrell's drum-off with Chad Smith giving no reasons behind it's removal although said discuss on the talk page, which you didn't to explain it's removal again. There already was discussion on the talk page about it. Someone else had previously removed it but understood it's importance. I'm not sure why this shouldn't be included on his page since it will be a national televised charity event on Jimmy Fallon's show and is making news through all the major media outlets. It has received more news and press than most of his recent movies have. Jason1978 (talk) 02:23, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

@Jason1978: To dedicate a whole section on it is clearly undue weight. Continue the discussion on talk page until consensus is reached. Until then, the article should remain in its form before the bold edit. To say it "received more news and press than most of his recent movies have" is just blatantly incorrect. STATic message me! 18:31, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	For all your requests at Requests for Page Protection, keep up the good work. kelapstick(bainuu) 11:32, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

@Kelapstick: Thank you very much! STATic message me! 15:24, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

Speaking of being civil

You know how condescending that came across, right? --GentlemanGhost (converse) 06:46, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

@GentlemanGhost: You can make any denotation of what I said you want, but I was not being so. See WP:LEAD if you do not understand how they are meant to be written. They are meant to be longish (3-4 paragraphs) to summarize the article body. All information that is present in the lead, should be present in the article. STATic message me! 06:54, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

I understand it just fine. I merely disagree with you about which points to sum up in this particular article's lead section. But more importantly, if you had phrased the rationale for your reversion like you did above, it would have been more pleasant. Asking a rhetorical question in an edit summary will only be interpreted one way: condescension. --GentlemanGhost (converse) 07:07, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

@GentlemanGhost: Well there is not that much room in an edit summary as there is in the unlimited talk page. I did not in anyway write the lead and I am sure your copyedited lead is better, but as I said the content should be covered in both places. Not really rhetorical, from your edit summary I took the impression that you did not know that. STATic message me! 07:27, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Well, I'm glad to hear that you didn't intend to be rude. :-) A simple message like "Lead should summarize entire body, see WP:LEAD" would have done it for me. --GentlemanGhost (converse) 07:34, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Not suprised

...that you would say something like this. Maybe you should change your edit notice? It clearly reads "I edit with good intentions, so please assume good faith as I always do", which is obviously an incorrect statement. Cheers, — Status (talk · contribs) 07:12, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

@Status: Removing content that is backed by reliable sources did not seem to be much in good faith at all. I have to admit it was a bit snappy, but your edit summary was not good enough. If you would have actually checked the sources out, they are clearly reliable. STATic message me! 07:23, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Question about Peter Stomare in 22 Jump Street

Peter Stormare's name is on the 22 Jump Street poster uploaded here, so is a source also needed to confirm his presence in the film? Bluerules (talk) 17:23, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

RMS Titanic

You guys made some mistakes, there's were actually a total of 2,223 passengers on board and a total of 1,492 died in the water (7 were saved from the water) and a total of 731 people survived. I know this, I did alot of reading on the ship and her disaster in 1912, she hit the iceberg at 11:40p and disappeared under the waves at 2:22a not 2:20a, a watch said 2:20a, it was found inside a second-class stateroom but she actually sank at 2:22a.2.1 Jibbz (talk) 19:08, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Plus, she broke in-half under the waves, right before the third funnel not after, before. Believe me I've drew the ship like more than 15 times, I've studied it, I even drew the ship breaking apart, there a actually video on youtube, on how she sank. It should be under "Titanic final sinking decision 2012".2.1 Jibbz (talk) 19:15, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Marshall Mathers LP 2

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Marshall Mathers LP 2 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of XXSNUGGUMSXX -- XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 21:21, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Unsourced edits

Hi I have seen from the talk page that you have gave User:Lroberge13 2 warnings about unsourced edits, he has done another one on Payback (2014) which I have since removed just letting you know kind regards. Lukejordan02 (talk) 00:43, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

@Lukejordan02: Yeah thanks, I noticed that. I shall shall warn again I suppose. STATic message me! 01:20, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

On 'Noah' Test Screening Section

Hey man,

I've been trying to change the Test Screening section of the 'Noah' page since yesterday and you keep reverting it to the old section. If you'll take a minute you'll see that what I'm trying to post features essentially the same information, links to the same articles but is more kindly worded to all parties involved, particularly Aronofsky. I don't want it to suggest malice or control issues to anybody. Please let me keep the changes. Thanks.

Szsap12 (talk) 20:06, 20 May 2014 (UTC)szsap12, 5/20

@Szsap12: Why do you refuse to use the edit summary field to explain your changes? Sorry I am going to revert again, you are making the section look messy... Why did you; just have "[46]" sitting in the middle of the paragraph, removed a quote, removed a reference and unlinked Variety? STATic message me! 21:18, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

I haven't refused to do anything, this is my first edit on Wikipedia ever so I'm still not 100% sure how to do anything. If you could show me that would be awesome. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Szsap12 (talk • contribs) 14:17, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

@Szsap12: Okay, what I would suggest is going through the links in the welcome message that someone left on your talk page. Did you happen to be using visual editor by any chance? STATic message me! 16:33, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Help

Can you please weigh in on my dispute on the article Raging Fire? The discussion is on the talk page of the article and I really don't understand what this guy "Hzh" is even complaining about, so since you are very professional, I am proudly asking for your help, you can also assist on the article. PS. Respectfully, I am sorry for disturbing you. Smarty9108 (talk) 2:11, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

@Smarty9108: No disturbance at all, good to hear from you. What are you trying to accomplish in the discussion? I can see that one review he removed was in the right, because "Perez Hilton" is an unreliable blog. There does seemed to be a few low level blogs in the section, they are not really good "reviewers" per WP:SPS. What other ones did he remove? STATic message me! 16:38, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

I don't think he did anything else. But I don't get the "uncritical fan treatment". Thank you very much anyways. Smarty9108 (talk) 1:58, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Oh and are you able to review the article as well? Smarty9108 (talk) 2:01, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Reply: May 2014

I must apologize for more unsourced material I added on each article. I saw it online, but I always forget to reference it every time I save the article. I promise it will not happen once more. DBrown SPS 16:04, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

@DBrown SPS: Please try to always cite material with reliable sources when you add it. Unsourced content immediately brings down the quality of the article, and plus it could be wrong because I do not know if you are just getting the information from some blog or forum. STATic message me! 16:40, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Linkin Park - The Hunting Party (DVD)

I've edited the site on tracklisting I changed it alittle, putting CD and then The Hunting Party: Live From Mexico, DVD

The DVD info was release yesterday on lpassociation.com. The performance is fro the World Stage in Mexico back in 2012.

here is the reliable source I've got it from (http://www.lpassociation.com/forums/showthread.php?t=40488)2.1 Jibbz (talk) 16:31, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Bound 2

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Bound 2 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Petergriffin9901 -- Petergriffin9901 (talk) 10:41, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

IndianBio constant reverts on GUY page

I see he's a regular in here always complaining about other people, but I'm her to complain about him. He's constantly changing all Lady Gaga pages to his own interest, with biased language and subjective adjectives. I changed "the single was unsuccessful" to "not as successful as her previous singles". Because, who decides what's a flop? Him? It has charted in more than 10 countries reaching top 10 in some of them. Obviously not a hit, but not "unsuccessful". And if this remains, I will go to other artists' pages to put the same thing in all singles with worse chart peaks. He's not the king of the page to put his personal opinion on everything. He's an editor in ALL Lady Gaga pages he's always into edit wars. And, besides all that, he broke the 3 reverts rule today. Thanks. Rub rb (talk) 16:01, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

Restructuring

I took and did some major work to the critical reception section to Yours Truly. I hope you like what I did.HotHat (talk) 05:01, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

@HotHat: Yeah, looks good, it needed a few more reviews in the template. I cut the double image as it sandwiched the text too much. I wish we had something better then AbsolutePunk in the template though. STATic message me! 17:35, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

X

Chris Brown Added A New Song to X Titled We On Tina Davis Leaked It — Preceding unsigned comment added by HackerKing1 (talk • contribs) 10:30, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

@HackerKing1: According to what reliable source? STATic message me! 17:35, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

PS

This is Justin (Party Supplies). I would like to help you edit our page. I am new to the wikipedia editing process so I tried to edit it myself and you sent me a message asking me to stop. I have the utmost respect for wikipedia and I understand the implications of random fans editing these sites so I agree with your quick defense towards my actions but I'm assuming that you operate our page with good faith so with that being said there are a few simple edits that need to be addressed. Please contact me via twitter dm @xpartysuppliesx to verify it's me or email bookpartysupplies@gmail.com and I'll send the edits. I'd rather you do the edits or grant me the permission to edit the page. My wiki username is partysupplieswiki I appreciate all that you do for wiki and hip-hop just wanna get the page right. Thanks again. 24.193.231.253 (talk) 19:38, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

@Partysupplieswiki: So what are the edits you want to be done? Do not worry, I believe it is you. STATic message me! 09:37, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Mars Ill merger discussion

Hello, STaTic VaPor

There's been a merger discussion at Talk:Mars Ill that has stagnated. I added to the discussion to days ago to try and move things forward. Would you mind taking a look as well?

Thanks, --¿3family6 _contribs 20:23, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

All of Me (John Legend song)

Re this edit: Please explain "requires third party coverage". —ATinySliver/^ATalkPage 08:09, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

@ATinySliver: No problem. To establish the notability of the song cover, it should be covered by a reliable third party source. STATic message me! 08:16, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

The linked citation is Ms. Ryan's official YouTube channel, so reliability is not the issue. Meantime, as a long-time editor, I was unaware—though I suppose I shouldn't be surprised, in hindsight—that a song cover from a clearly notable artist needs to meet its own standards of notability? —ATinySliver/^ATalkPage 08:50, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

@ATinySliver: Yes I understand that, notability is the issue not reliability. To establish the notability of her cover, a third party source is needed. If it is really notable, a reliable third party source would have covered it. STATic message me! 17:25, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

In other words, ATinySilver, needs to be covered by reliable sources that are not affiliated with the creation of the song (i.e. music critics). This is what STATic means by third-party sources. Also, coverage from album reviews doesn't count as notable coverage for songs. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 18:43, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

(←) Thanks for the update. :) —ATinySliver/^ATalkPage 21:49, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Your hasty reversion to Haim

Hi, I saw you reverted my additions to Haim here. While their consideration of the band name is questionable, the fact that they are Jewish is not. That is not mentioned anywhere else in the article and needs to remain. I am going to reinstate and will add additional references. Bangabandhu (talk) 20:40, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Hey how are you?... I will make this very quick.

I am writing because you have one of my articles marked for speedy deletion. I have researched carefully and given nothing but facts which are all of a level that would be considered notable enough to warrant an article.

Could you please at least remove the speedy deletion and allow me to work on the article a bit more until it suits your desired journalistic criteria? Or can you delete the portions of the article that are not working well for your tastes?

This is the article -->> D'ron Forbes

Nicki Minaj videography (featured list nomination)

Hi, I am currently in the nomination process of getting Nicki Minaj videography up to featured list status. I was wondering whether you could take a look and possibly leave your thoughts/opposition/support for the nomination and leave any suggestions you may have to improve it. Any input would be appreciated, thanks :) Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Nicki Minaj videography/archive1

KaneZolanski (talk) 18:58, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

SPI note

Hello, STATicVapor. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Reece Leonard.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

He's persistent, I'll give him that. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 13:58, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Bound 2

Hi STATicVapor. There has been some issues with the Bound 2. I've provided sources and fixed syntax for the information. It wasn't my own original research. I can even provide news articles to resolve this issue. I just don't want anyone to feel I'm trolling/ warring. KHooks95 (talk) 17:52, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Help with WWE pages

Hi there has been a lot of vandalism on the wwe event pages as of late I have noticed you have reverted such edits yourself, with the Payback PPV just days away the interest in that particular page has shot up and seems to be getting unneeded changes both pure vandalism and poor but good faith edits, I was just wondering is there anything we can do to stop and/or decrease this, I am relatively new to wiki so I am looking for help/advice from senior members like yourself. For example there has been a user changing the pre-show key on all PPV up to the beginning of 2013 I have reverted them and explained that the page was better before in the edit summary but haven't sent the user a message as I don't no what to say. Kind regards. Lukejordan02 (talk) 00:25, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

Hi, user Mitko pi4a70 is still vandalising Payback even though you have gave him multiple warnings. Lukejordan02 (talk) 20:40, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

@Lukejordan02: Report to WP:AIV, sorry I have not been as active recently monitoring the situation. STATic message me! 04:34, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

No worries, it's been sorted now, kind regards. Lukejordan02 (talk) 04:36, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

GAR

Hey Static, haven't heard anything from you in a while. Wanted to inform you that I've opened a GA reassesment on Curtis here. Since you're one of the most active (if not the most active) members of WikiProject Hip hop, thought you'd be interested in this. Cheers.--Вик Ретлхед (talk) 22:21, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

Bound 2

Hey. What's going on? Get your ass on it :)--PeterGriffin • Talk2Me 17:53, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

@Petergriffin9901: Haha, sorry man work forced me to be offline for most of the time the last few days. I shall get my ass on it :P STATic message me! 00:53, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

2001

Hey Static, it's Shallowharold again. I have a slight problem with vandalism on the page to Dr. Dre's album 2001 and his single "The Watcher". There are a few people on there editing the page that want to list Nas as a co-writer of "The Watcher" and are doing so because of the website RapGenius. Aside from the fact that RapGenius isn't exactly a reliable source, virtually NONE of the publishing companies have verified this claim. Every source on my end lists Dr. Dre and Eminem as the sole writers of "The Watcher".

I was wondering if something can be done about it- it's something that you should look into. Thanks. Shallowharold (talk) 15:48, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

@Shallowharold: I have not been as active recently as I used to, I have it watchlisted so if I can catch anything first, I will try to help. I have the album too and I can back up that Eminem is credited as a songwriter not Nas, which has been rumored for a long time. STATic message me! 06:19, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

West Coast hip hop

I don't think you should really revert my edits on West Coast Hip hop since no copyright text was indicated. I have the full rights to post biographies from westcoastpioneers.com and the there isn't too much WP:NO, I put way too many links in it regarding the subject matter. You COULD contribute to IT instead making it sucking, it's a HISTORY, period. I request my edits to be undone if possible some of mine, because I don't think there is a specific reason to revert it ALL.--OriginalDoc (talk) 02:47, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

@OriginalDoc: Many of your edits should not have done without discussion. How do you have full rights to post them from that site? Even if you did, you couldn't because there is zero indication the site is reliable. The large majority was either WP:UNDUE to subjects that you seemingly like and mostly WP:OR. STATic message me! 06:19, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

@STATicVapor: Okay I will handle this later, now please take a look at Dazzie Dee's talk page, thank you very much. --OriginalDoc (talk) 11:47, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

Seth Rollins

You have sourse? The second time you ignore my question about the availability of the source. Not that source, I do not see any arguments. Mistery Spectre (talk) 14:00, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

@Mistery Spectre: What? And where is the source for Latin American? STATic message me! 23:08, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

Lopez is not latin american surname? Seriously? In an extreme case, the Spanish, if you dig even deeper. At the same time, his Armenian roots, absolutely no sources. And if both options without sources, why do we have to choose is the one that you like, especially by default? Mistery Spectre (talk) 20:58, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

@Mistery Spectre: That is your WP:OR. If you would have paid attention to the edit I made, I was reverting vandalism and that change got caught up in it. I do not like it, nor care about it at all. I have no interest in this dispute at all. STATic message me! 20:03, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

Should not play with the rules, you know the sources deny that Lopez Latin name? I would like to see this. And again, I wonder if it's original research, what it is worse than the more controversial research about Armenian roots? I just do not understand why a few times to roll back without comment, if I ask to provide sourse Mistery Spectre (talk) 05:11, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Three 6 Mafia, Hypnotize Minds & My Updates

Hello STATicVapor!

As you've probably noticed, I have been doing a lot of work lately updating (or at least temporarily updating) Hypnotize Minds, Three 6 Mafia & several related pages. I am a dedicated fan with a wide range of knowledge in this area of music. I have continuously been researching, editing & updating these pages along with related ones like Frayser Boy, Crunchy Black, Juicy J, DJ Paul, Project Pat, La Chat, etc. However, despite adding citations & changing the data to be as accurate & current as possible, you keep reverting ALL OF MY CHANGES to old versions of the pages. For example, you keep insisting Three 6 Mafia is an active music group. THEY ARE NOT RIGHT NOW & have not made an album since 2008 or even a single track since 2010. When Juicy J announced he was signing with Taylor Gang to pursue a solo career, it was also announced that all Three 6 Mafia projects were being put on hold indefinitely. Another thing is the "associated acts" section which continues to be poorly edited (for example Lil Jon has never been associated with Three 6 Mafia save for one song, "Act a Fool").

As for Hypnotize Minds, you keep deleting most of my changes as well. The only changes you seem to have accepted are my additions of Frayser Boy & La Chat to "previous artists". There have been more than the 12 current & former artists you insist on & keep listed. There have in fact been several dozen, as I have previously edited the page to include. I understand you wanting to take out sentences appear like they are "hearsay" & not cited, but I don't understand you continuously reverting the entire pages. If you believe that you have more knowledge about Hypnotize Minds & Three 6 Mafia than me, prove where I am wrong. I'm sorry if this is coming off as at all rude & I know you have a lot of experience as a wikipedia admin, but I feel you should research the changes before just reverting the whole pages. I'm just getting frustrated having my changes continuously reverted by YOU alone when other users have commended most of my updates.

A separate issue is the images I have uploaded to be profile images of individuals who previously had no image to identify themselves by on their personal wikipedia pages. I have uploaded the following images recently, but after several days of being the functioning & accepted image of the respective pages, I have gotten notices that they are not technically "free" images & cannot be used? I just don't understand this part & if you could give me an explanation so I can effectively continue to improve Wikipedia, it would be greatly appreciated. File:La Chat 2014.jpg File:Project Pat at the Grammys 2014.jpg File:Frayser Boy & Snoop Dogg 2014.jpeg File:Crunchy Black March 21, 2014.jpg File:Full Three 6 Mafia & Project Pat.jpg

Thanks for reading my message, get back to me with your thoughts soon, and have a great day!

Swolson — Preceding unsigned comment added by Swolson (talk • contribs) 20:50, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

@Swolson: Sorry but much of your edits have been made without providing reliable sources for your changes. In the end all, Da Mafia 6ix is practically Three 6 Mafia, that is why they are covered on the page. You have no source for Triple 6 being disbanded officially. I reverted your changes because you are adding every member of Three 6 to their associated acts, when the group is already listed. You will not see every member of Wu-Tang in RZA's infobox. As for Hypnotized Minds, when adding information about non-notable artists that do not have articles, when relating them to notable record labels, reliable sources must be cited. I am about the only mod on these pages, so that is why it is only me, I am not going after my way to go after you. About the images, since you did not photograph them yourself, you cannot use them unless they were released as free use. STATic message me! 23:08, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

@STATicVapor ok I will try to source the data as thoroughly as possible — Preceding unsigned comment added by Swolson (talk • contribs) 01:32, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

gta v reedit

Hey thanks for the Reedit on GTA V. I just thought it would make a little sense to include the fact that Microsoft Windows is still waiting for a release of Gta v. But thanks again! I would love some hints as I'm new here. Only a month. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.3.10.168 (talk) 01:04, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

MMLP2

Hi, you nominated MMLP2 for GA and it has been some time since that nomination failed and i guess all the issues that were raised are addressed are addressed. So do you feel that the article is ready for GA and renominated? If you are not free I can nominate it but as you have editing it since its creation stage it would be better that you do so.Abhinav0908 (talk) 16:39, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

@Abhinav0908: Hey, I have yet to fully go over everything in the GA review and I would like to do that before renominating. There is no rush at all. Everyone of Eminem's albums since Slim Shady LP has been failed at GAN, those articles are in much poorer shape, but still. Hopefully, by the end of this month I should get it done, I have been busy with work a lot recently. STATic message me! 20:20, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

Yes @STATicVapor: I saw Recovery failed twice. But i ahve also seen some GA Albums which are in poorer shape than some Eminem albums. Will work on them too. It would be nice if it passes the review this time, take your time. All the best.Abhinav0908 (talk) 06:28, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

@Abhinav0908: Yes I know, that is why I was so annoyed when it was quickly failed. Due to that, that is why I am in no rush to get it done. It would be cool to get a few up to GA status. STATic message me! 19:19, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

@STATicVapor: Yes and details about Eminem are more easily available than others. So we can improve other album articles i guess. He is highly covered by the media. Seems like even Wikipedia expects more from him as comapred to other artists. :p. Abhinav0908 (talk) 05:19, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

File:Daughtry-Baptized.png

Reverted 1 edit by Stefan2 (talk): Are you blind? The following pages on the English Wikipedia link to this file:: Baptized (album). (TW)

Note that the article apparently was blanked by User:BigMan43, so the file was not in use when it was tagged. It is of course fine to remove the tag since someone has discovered that the article incorrectly had been blanked. --Stefan2 (talk) 18:56, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

@Stefan2: Well this is something that you should look into before tagging and leaving templates on my talk page. Due diligence when editing is the key. STATic message me! 19:33, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Hey

It was already good at The Hunger For More page but someone edited it you can see it everywhere man Banks sold 4 million copies in interviews , youtube and everywhere but I can't find a source you know like news to put it . Thanks for understanding — Preceding unsigned comment added by SlimJimmyBRabbit (talk • contribs) 15:16, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

@SlimJimmyBRabbit: According to the cited sources it has only been certified Platinum, so it was not already good, nor it is sourced that it has sold four times that amount. The artist is not a good source for their own album sales either. STATic message me! 02:46, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

new mixtape and albums

Do you think you could add Thot breakers and "b4 ep bfo b3" to list of mixtape a and albums i would add them but can't find a reliable source thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.183.25.198 (talk) 06:13, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Aron "Deuce" Erlichman Wikipedia Page

Hello this is MzPuerta, personal friend of Aron, you can find me on twitter @MzPuerta or facebook/mzpuerta

Im coming here wondering if you are the person that keeps re-editing His page? We are trying to change info to update it and someone keeps changing it.

If itz you or if u know who it may be can u please verify that this info gets added somehow.

under members, Gadjet should be added as a new new member for Deuce. Bryan Lay is still a member as well.

Also, instead of "Band" it should be Deuce "Crew". Deuce is a solo artist and has a crew he tours with, not a band.

Id appreaciate the help.

thanks.

feel free to email me if u have questions: mzpuertaofficial@gmail.com (ItzYessika (talk) 08:11, 12 June 2014 (UTC))

@ItzYessika: The article requires reliable sources when being updated or changed. Most editors recently have been removing Bryan Lay all together. Band is just a general word to cover them, they are touring members of the act and play instruments. He wants to call it a crew, but it is still a band. STATic message me! 16:22, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Aron "Deuce" Erlichman Wikipedia Page

Hello this is MzPuerta, personal friend of Aron, you can find me on twitter @MzPuerta or facebook/mzpuerta Im coming here wondering if you are the person that keeps re-editing His page? We are trying to change info to update it and someone keeps changing it. If itz you or if u know who it may be can u please verify that this info gets added somehow. under members, Gadjet should be added as a new new member for Deuce. Bryan Lay is still a member as well. Also, instead of "Band" it should be Deuce "Crew". Deuce is a solo artist and has a crew he tours with, not a band. Id appreaciate the help. thanks. feel free to email me if u have questions: mzpuertaofficial@gmail.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.49.160.181 (talk) 07:36, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Meek Mill, Dream Chasers Records, and WikiProject Record Labels

I believe your removal of the WikiProject Record Labels from Meek Mill was incorrect for the following reasons. First, the main subject point of an article does not have to be relevant to a WikiProject in order to merit inclusion. For instance, If a person was born in Georgia, often WikiProject United States: Georgia is added to the person's talk page, even though the main subject certainly isn't Georgia. If an entertainer served during one of the World Wars, usually WikiProject Military History is added, even though their military service might only have a paragraph, or less. In this case, a record label is indeed discussed, and it is not beyond the realm of possibility that this portion of the article be expanded, or even eventually separated out into its own article. As such Record Labels is indeed and appropriate WikiProject. Second, Record Labels is not only for the labels themselves, but for record company executives and those who have direct influence on the operations of a record label. As the founder of a record label, Meek Mill should indeed have the Record Labels WikiProject added. Please reconsider. Most cordially, 78.26 (His Wiki's Voice) 11:48, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

@78.26: I just have never seen that Wikiproject on a recording artist's talk, when there are many that discuss their barley notable record labels in the article. Yet alone the rappers/singers/bands that have major record labels that have their own articles. It is very possible that it will one day have its own article, and then that article should be covered under the Wikiproject. What does Meek Mill have to do with record labels, besides having one that is independent, active less than a year, and has yet to release an album. He is irrelevant to the Wikiproject as he is not some CEO/president of a major record label. There are so many other rappers/singers/bands that should have this Wikiproject tag before him. STATic message me! 16:31, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Taking care with using revert

Hi! Thanks for pointing out in your edit comment that, when you reverted my edit on the Eazy-E page, it wasn't my edit you were aiming at, but another editor's unsourced paragraph that had been added before and that you wanted to remove. Fair enough.

I'd argue, however, that it's better not to use revert on unwanted edits if doing so means taking additional, later edits down as well, as a kind of "collateral damage". Why not just remove the offending content manually, instead of making the good faith editor whose changes were caught in the middle redo his edits?

Cheers No-itsme (talk) 20:16, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

My mistake, but when you made your revert, you should have paid attention to what you were restoring. STATic message me! 02:08, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

power 106 staff

Hi how are you.

I was wondering why did you remove me from the former staff of KPWR Power 106.

I was a dj and a mixer on that station from 1994-1997

You can visit my facebook page if you need verification

www.facebook.com/djspeedyk

Thank You. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Djspeedyk (talk • contribs) 04:19, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

@Djspeedyk: We have an edit summary field so you can explain this when you make edits. Without the explanation there is no way for me or other patrolers to know that you are not just some no-name DJ trying to add your name to the page. STATic message me! 02:23, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

V (Maroon 5 album)

Sorry for interrupt, User:RazorEyeEdits defended it for its genre and wrote "We can still generalise though. Maroon 5 are a pop rock band; it would make sense for them to make pop rock music. Variations will come when the album releases." Then he/she added pop rock as genre.

Can you figure it out? 183.171.173.205 (talk) 15:42, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

I changed it to just Rock, as that would be the generalized genre. Generalized genres such as rock, hip hop, country, pop are okay to use for unreleased albums. STATic message me! 18:33, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

Notifications

Hi, This is Aloyne. I noticed you sent me a notification regarding WrestleMania XXX. To be honest, I haven't edited the page at all and I never vandalized it. I do my best to ensure these pages are accurate. I would appreciate it if you send me another notification, you would notify me in advance the reason for it. Thanks!Aloyne (talk) 18:28, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

@Aloyne: Yes you did edit that page, unless this was not you, which it was. Now please stop changing the result table without explaining why or discussing it. STATic message me! 18:31, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

I Need Help

hey man, I was wondering if you knew how to help me I was doing the guest appearances thing on Krizz Kaliko. and there was like a couple songs in a row that had no album so I put rowspan="3"| data-sort-value="" style="background: var(--background-color-interactive, #ececec); color: var(--color-base, #2C2C2C); vertical-align: middle; text-align: center; " class="table-na" | — but that fucks it all up, like it doesnt do the N/A thing its supposed to do, do you know what I'm doing wrong?

@ChuckT187: I fixed it. Instead of putting "| rowspan="3"| {{n/a}}" use "| rowspan="3" {{n/a}}". When adding {{n/a}} to that table, you need to remove the | between the rowspan and {{n/a}} or it messes it up. STATic message me! 18:38, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

@STATicVapor and STATi: thanks a lot man, you dont know how long thats been fuckin with my head

Zillur Rahman John

I'm pretty sure they picked that article and moved it to the other title get around new page patrollers. There was a previous speedy of a similar title on the editor's userpage. Good catch :) §FreeRangeFrog^croak 20:46, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

@FreeRangeFrog: Yes, there has been a big problem with sockpuppets creating articles on that subject Deezy/Demetrice Nguyen/Demetrice Jackson. Since most of the other alternate titles they have tried to use have been protected from creation, I guess this was the new strategy. You can find some of the craziness here. STATic message me! 21:08, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

Riff Raff

I keep trying to edit the 'Riff Raff' page as well as the 'Neon Icon' page and you keep reverting my edit. I cited my information properly so I don't understand why you keep deleting my edits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Someguywhat (talk • contribs) 22:45, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

@Someguywhat: I already explained many many times. He released his debut album The Golden Alien in 2012. Unlike all his mixtapes, it was not also released for free legal download. It is only available for retail sale. Neon Icon is his major label debut studio album, but not his first album. Just as Good Kid, M.A.A.D City, My Own Lane and Oxymoron were not Kendrick Lamar's, Kid Ink's and Schoolboy Q's debut albums. Just major label debuts. We do not remove mention of The Golden Alien just because he wants to call Neon Icon his debut. STATic message me! 22:55, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Knock Madness

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Knock Madness you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 3family6 -- 3family6 (talk) 23:01, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Knock Madness

The article Knock Madness you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Knock Madness for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 3family6 -- 3family6 (talk) 23:21, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

Linkin Park - The Hunting Party release date

I noticed your change of my release date change. The "first" date shouldn't be used because it causes confusion with all official information mentioned about the release of the new album. Linkin Park's official web site, Facebook page and YouTube channel as well as the Warner Bros Records website(the recording studio that is releasing the album) all say June 17th, 2014. That date should be used so that the page does not conflict with all official information. --Jimv1983 (talk) 20:22, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Please join the discussion on the album's Talk page. I'd really like to resolve this issue so that it reflects consistent information across all sources. --Jimv1983 (talk) 20:56, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Kidd Kidd in G-Unit

How is official single artwork released by 50 Cent and G-Unit themselves not valid proof that Kidd Kidd is a member now? It's a first hand source.

Distortiondude (talk) 14:36, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

@Distortiondude: It is still WP:OR. As you can tell by the talk page, I am not the only one that disagrees with you. STATic message me! 17:46, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

@STATicVapor: Are the HHDX source and the Instagram picture enough to change it? I do agree that a lot of it is WP:OR but HHDX is pretty official. Distortiondude (talk) 05:38, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

@Distortiondude: I will comment further there. STATic message me! 06:56, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

Sting???

Stop overreacting. Its been confirmed. I get it...... BlackDragon 14:45, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Dude, stop reverting sourced info and besides if you ever bother to check you would see I brought it to the talk page like WEEKS ago. BlackDragon 03:03, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Radio Edit on Guilty All the Same

You know that's not how it works. It needs to stay as "Radio Edit" on Guilty All the Same, now change it back. I don't know why everybody's so sensitive about it one of these days. Just get over it. User:Skylar3214 12:00, 18 June 2014

@Skylar3214: What is your problem? Calm yourself down. It is proper in lower-case, where is the guideline that says both words should be capitalized there? That is not proper English, so I will not be changing it back. STATic message me! 07:27, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Yes, you will. It doesn't matter how it is. And I will not calm myself down, unless if it's changed properly. User:Skylar3214 10:13, 17 June 2014

@Skylar3214: Haha no I most certainly will not. You do need to take a chill pill. STATic message me! 17:18, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

I will not until you change it back! It's not proper for "radio edit" on Guilty All the Same! User:Skylar3214 4:42, 20 June 2014

The Dark Horse (Twista album) spam

Links to iTunes and BestBuy pages for purchasing music are not only not reliable sources, but they are WP:REFSPAM. They are clearly against policy. Please do not re-add them to The Dark Horse (Twista album). - MrX 11:53, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

@MrX: iTunes most certainly is a reliable source, you are not familiar with recent music at all if you think that. Links to iTunes are not against policy at all, you cannot purchase anything from those links, and they are used to prove that the singles were in fact released for retail sale. You will not find news sources reporting that obviously. You are just mad because your poorly thought out AfD failed, so stop trying to grab at straws to bring the article quality down by making content uncited. STATic message me! 17:22, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

lol. I was the one who closed the AfD when actual sources were added. I guess you intend to edit war these references back into the article, so I will let someone else deal with it.- MrX 17:27, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Knock Madness

The article Knock Madness you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Knock Madness for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 3family6 -- 3family6 (talk) 13:42, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

KG Bustle

Static, just leave that fluff in and let the admin decide, please. Thanks, 207.157.121.52 (talk) 19:22, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

No problem, reliable sources need to be cited though. STATic message me! 21:40, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

And if they aren't, the knowing admin knows. :) Drmies (talk) 21:48, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Ed Sheeran

I certainly don't understand the insistence on putting Ed Sheeran's album on the page, when we leave off most major R&B albums. And i'm not extremely familiar with his music but i don't think i've ever heard anyone call him a rapper our an R&B artist. Amazon puts the album under the pop category and AllMusic calls it Pop/Rock. Oh, and also the "he raps more then Pharrell" quote was the most hilarious thing i read all week. Koala15 (talk) 19:41, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

@Koala15: G I R L was a pop album, yet you were insistent on including it. I do not want to pull the race card, but come on. I meant on the albums that I had mentioned. Ed Sheeran is an R&B singer and as you can tell from his article and the album article, hip hop is very much an influence on his music. If you looked past his radio songs, he has full rap verses by him throughout some of his songs. At least one of the songs on the album I listed features only rap verses. If you are not familiar with the subject then do your research and stop reverting over and over like a wild man. STATic message me! 21:46, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

I guess i will take your word for it for now. And Pharrell is a rapper so he should be on the list no matter the genre. Also, which song does Ed Sheeran rap in? I would love to hear that ;). Koala15 (talk) 23:11, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Limp Bizkit

--72.251.108.80 (talk) 00:20, 19 June 2014 (UTC) Do you like Limp Bizkit? --72.251.108.80 (talk) 00:20, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

"Sockpuppet"

That Wazzuppp account isn't mine. Don't be bitter and assume that i'm the only person that thinks that R. Kelly song is relevant. Have someone check my I.P if you don't believe me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BlaccCrab (talk • contribs) 15:40, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

@BlaccCrab: I never said it was you... It is User: AffeL. STATic message me! 00:47, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

Broken links

So here is something i find to be really irritating, when i go to a Wikipedia page of a album and there is a link for a song on the singles bar or track list section i want to click that link so i could see information about the song(and the genres it is based on) but instead it just takes me back to the album Wikipedia page and is there any way to fix that? I will list some songs as examples: Deftones - Elite Black Tide - That Fire Breaking Benjamin - Evil Angel This is not songs only but links in general and i really wish there was a way to fix that(MTG980 (talk) 22:10, 19 June 2014 (UTC))

I should pay attention?

I simply reverted. I made no direct edit. I didn't mean to undo your edit, but don't forget WP:NPA Walter Görlitz (talk) 20:17, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

@Walter Görlitz: Yes, but you reverted my edit that was fixing a mistake you made here. If you look at your diff, the only thing that you reverted was my edit. There was no personal attack at all, I just asked if you could pay attention when you are reverting, so very important fixes do not get mixed in. STATic message me! 21:31, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

I didn't see who made the three edits and reverted them all. I admit that was an error.

You commented on the contributor rather than the content. That was your mistake. That's what is stated at NPA. It's minor issue at best though.

Sorry that I didn't acknowledge my error above. Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:35, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Bound 2

The article Bound 2 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Bound 2 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Petergriffin9901 -- Petergriffin9901 (talk) 02:21, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

@Petergriffin9901: Thanks a lot, I very much appreciate the review. STATic message me! 18:13, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Nice job buddy :) Sorry for the delay. Keep it up!--PeterGriffin • Talk2Me 18:16, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

EL Seven

I cannot understand why pages like mine have been deleted when there exists pages like SBTV that exist without deletion. Im not saying that page should be deleted but if it is allowed to stand then so should mine! — Preceding unsigned comment added by ElSevenuk (talk • contribs) 15:00, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Eminem Discography

I got a message from another user that I can't edit in Eminem Discography unless its an official RIAA cerification . But the thing is the sales are already like at Encore 5 million so I just edited 4x Platinum and I made it 5x Platinum

Also at the singles I added the sources and all what needed and he deleted all those I'm not really adding somethin I'm just correcting some mistakes . — Preceding unsigned comment added by SlimJimmyBRabbit (talk • contribs) 15:42, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

@SlimJimmyBRabbit: Yes, we can only put certifications if the RIAA has officially certified it, even if the sales have exceeded the current certification. STATic message me! 18:16, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

New artist notification

I have created and established the article on Big Smo, for you to edit at your leisure, editor STATicVapor.HotHat (talk) 06:43, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

@HotHat: Cool! After I had seen the ads on TV I was really racking my mind wondering how a musical artist could have their own reality show, but I had never heard of them and they did not have a Wikipedia article. STATic message me! 16:14, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

I will provide my sources now.

You reverted my change on Mike Will Made-It's page. I added Two-9 to his list of associated acts. Two-9 has appeared on Mike Will's last 2 mixtapes Est. In 1989 Pt. 2.5 and #MikeWiLLBeenTriLL. And Mike Will has produced tracks for their own mixtapes/albums. Also you removed the addition of CP Junior as one of the artists who responded to Kendrick Lamar's control song. Well here's proof http://youtu_.be/jVH-qVDS4V_s (no _) A rapper named CP Junior did do a response to Kendrick Lamar's Control. Please do not change my edits now.

@Claudface: Just appearing on two songs of his does not make them notable enough to list in the infobox. If they appear on the album then we can reconsider it. As for "Control", how old is that? CP Junior is not notable and that is why he will not be mentioned there. STATic message me! 16:19, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

But Two-9 has not only appeared on his mixtapes, but he produced multiple tracks for their albums/mixtapes and is constantly promoting them on his Instagram. And as for CP Junior. Maybe not where you live but where I do, CP Junior is a very well known artist. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Claudface (talk • contribs) 16:34, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

@Claudface: Yet they are not mentioned a single time in his article, that shows how significant to his career they are. As for CP Junior, he does not have a Wikipedia article and you did cite your addition with a reliable third party source to prove notability. STATic message me! 17:43, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Drake – Nothing Was The Same LP

There is a blue bootleg LP floating around from the UK for this album but no official LP has been pressed. Have you found something otherwise? Thanks. Charger2 (talk) 23:18, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

@Charger2: I had no knowledge of that, I do not live in the UK. Amazon indicates it was available for sale in vinyl/LP format, but as you can tell it was only a limited run. STATic message me! 23:40, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Bootlegs often appear on Amazon – their don't have tight governance on their pages. The artwork in the above link matches the UK bootleg's. This is a big problem for artists. Chance the Rapper's Acid Rap has been one or the larger examples of this (unrelated to Amazon) link — Preceding unsigned comment added by Charger2 (talk • contribs) 23:47, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Idolator

Hello STATic, could you help reach consensus here? Thank you! — prism △ 11:47, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

22 jump street

Hey man I don't know if you deal with 22 jump street page or any other movie pages but I got a problem . At the boxofficemojo.com the production budget for the movie it says that is $50 million but Variety newspaper : http://variety.com/2014/film/news/22-jump-street-opens-strong-with-5-5-mil-at-thursday-box-office-1201219965/ it says that the budget is $65 million . Now I edited a couple of times to $50 million but someone just keeps editing it to 65 . I just want to know which one is the exact one cause both sources have different claims . Thanks for taking your time reading this . — Preceding unsigned comment added by SlimJimmyBRabbit (talk • contribs) 18:13, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

@SlimJimmyBRabbit: I believe it would be better to take the magazine over the database-type website that is boxofficemojo. If you are ever reverted on a page, the best thing to do would be to take the dispute to the article talk page to achieve consensus. STATic message me! 00:55, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

The Color Morale

Thanks for straightening out the changes to this article. The edits by two different IP users apparently confused me. Your edit confirms I was on the right track when I reverted the second user's edits. But looking it over again, I thought that the second user had corrected the first user's edits. So I undid my edit. Instead, both users' edits needed to be reverted to get to the last clean version. I believe I am usually alert to the possibility of two different users vandalizing or at least making erroneous edits to an article. If I had followed through correctly, I would have seen this was that type of situation. This time I allowed myself to be thrown off the track - because the format problem disappeared with the second edit. I suppose the differing number of bytes should have been enough of a clue if proofreading did not disclose the problem to me. Again, thanks for correcting this. Donner60 (talk) 05:55, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

@Donner60: Yeah no problem at all, I assumed you had got confused when multiple IPs edit at the same time, it happens. STATic message me! 09:07, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Knock Madness

Gatoclass (talk) 08:02, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

The Game

Do you think if I made a Game namedrop list I could make a page for it — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChuckT187 (talk • contribs) 19:19, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

@ChuckT187: Hahaha, that sounds like the greatest thing ever. However, I would have to tell you, if you did, I am pretty sure it would be deleted shortly. Wikipedia is not really the place for trivial information like that. STATic message me! 19:48, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

so do it anyway is what you're saying — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChuckT187 (talk • contribs) 19:51, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

@ChuckT187: I mean if you want to waste your time doing that then sure, just do not be surprised when it is deleted. STATic message me! 20:55, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Sorry

I didn't do it because of disruption or anything, i just did it because i left you some messages for some time and i never got a response, i thought this was maybe the only way of reaching out to you and also, Guilty All The Same wasn't the only song i edited, i also did it for Wastelands and Keys To The Kingdom(MTG980 (talk) 20:53, 25 June 2014 (UTC))

A barnstar for you!

	North Korean Fashion Watch Barnstar
	Gerald Shields, founder of the North Korean Fashion Watch, awards you the North Korean Fashion Watch Barnstar for your continuing efforts to add reliable and poignant discussions about North Korean topics, such as the 2014 comedy movie The Interview.

Geraldshields11 (talk) 14:00, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

Hey man

Hey STATic VaPor thanks for taking time to read this . I recently a few days ago edited on the Sylvester Stallone page and I added at Revisiting Rocky & Rambo that Sylvester announces Rambo V and also added all the sources , dates , publisher all necessary and someone keeps deleting it . It's been happening with a couple more edits than I made since I started here why is this keeps on deleting it's not like I'm making it up I'm doing all needed in order to add that or maybe I'm doing something wrong . Thanks again .

@SlimJimmyBRabbit: There is a rule within actor articles that in order to be listed in their filmography, the film must already be in production. STATic message me! 18:09, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

Trey Songz Trigga tracklisting

Hey something is wrong with the code on the best buy deluxe part of the tracklist, could you fix it? BlaccCrab (talk) 22:33, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

uhh

the page has been here since 2012 and you see a problem with it now? how about we both just go bump NEON iCON, the album of the year. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.3.16.12 (talk) 04:17, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

What? STATic message me! 04:25, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

The page has been here since mid 2012, if it should have been deleted it wouldnt have made it a day, much less 2 years. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.3.16.12 (talk) 05:54, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Looks like someone just did not ever notice it. It is a clearly not notable person and clearly promotional. STATic message me! 06:00, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

August Alsina chronology

Isn't this a bit misleading, implying that he released no singles between ILTS and Numb? Adabow (talk) 06:42, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

@Adabow: I have seen that chronologies link to the next single that has an article, or else they do not really serve the purpose to navigate between song articles. You know instead of just a dead end, I doubt "Downtown" a minor single that did not chart will ever have an article. Or what about the artists that are featured on minor singles that do not become notable, you do not see those in the chronologies, you will find the next single with an article. If anyone wants to know the exact order of the singles they can see that on his biography. STATic message me! 23:14, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Fair enough, makes sense. Adabow (talk) 23:35, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

My apologies

My statement was not appropriate and I apologize with high hopes that you will forgive me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jujube2009707 (talk • contribs) 00:55, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

Control System Sample Edit?

I placed an edit that states that the track Soulo Ho3 samples the song Control by Janet Jackson and you erased it. May I ask how come, its not a joke or anything. Was it in my formatting? Please let me know :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davidmechaly (talk • contribs) 03:33, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

No source or edit summary was given in the edit. STATic message me! 03:07, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

ChopHouze (music producers) article

Hey, why did you placed my article under 'speedy deletion'? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.77.212.149 (talk) 09:25, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

It appears that the producer does not currently meet the notability guideline, which can be found at WP:MUSICBIO. STATic message me! 03:09, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

how much you earn by editing wikipedia pages

hey..lol you doing a good job but how much u really earn by doing this thing...can u get me a job like that...im from india.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.178.7.87 (talk) 18:40, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia editors are volunteers, I earn no money from editing. STATic message me! 02:09, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

Which sources are reliable music sources?

Hey, I recently edited the Lupe Fiasco article. I was wondering, as Rapgenius is not a reliable source, would other lyric or music websites fall under this category as well(such as azlyrics, whosampled, etc.)? I just want to know before I make edits in the future so I don't add any bad sources. Thanks, and happy fourth. Kinfoll77 (talk) 17:49, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

@Kinfoll77: Lyric websites such as those are overall not considered reliable sources as most of them are user-generated and are considered unreliable. A good place to discover what are considered reliable sources for music articles would be WP:ALBUM/SOURCES. STATic message me! 07:24, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

Eminem albums

Hey bud,

I just finished reviewing Recovery, and will say its article is currently an absolute disaster which led to its 3rd unsuccessful GAN. Easily the longest review I've ever written so far (see Talk:Recovery (Eminem album)/GA3 for details). You told me back in May when I failed the GAN for MMLP2 that it was "1000% better" than Shady's other FGAN albums. I took some time to look them over, and you definitely weren't kidding. Even though the GAN for MMLP2 was premature, its article was unquestionably worlds ahead of the ones for Recovery and Encore when I reviewed it and still is today. Encore and The Eminem Show have multiple completely uncited sections (major red flag). I promise you we will get his album articles up to GA (if not FA) at some point, but it'll take some considerable work. I'll see what I can do on my own, hit me up if you need a reviewer.

SNUGGUMS (talk · contribs) 08:14, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

@SNUGGUMS: Hey man, I do not have any idea why that user decided to randomly show up and nominate it, it is nowhere close to GA status. Yeah can you tell that MMLP2 is the one I have significantly contributed too? Haha. The other ones are just in such poor condition, I do not even have them all watchlisted, yet I own the physical copy of all but Encore. I'll let you know once I take MMLP2 to GAN again. STATic message me! 17:07, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

It doesn't at all surprise me that you've worked your ass off on it more than any of the others. Come to think of it, I couldn't find any contributions within the last several months from the user who nominated Recovery. Did he even work on the article at all proud to that? I haven't looked through the entire history, so can't say for myself just yet. I look forward to when MMLP2 gets renominated- it isn't ready just yet but is definitely better now. You deserve the GA for it, just am not sure when that will be. SNUGGUMS (talk · contribs) 19:58, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Trap

Could you please stop making uncited changes to the Trap music page, without backing up your reasons for doing do. The changes to the stylistic origins section have been agreed by numerous posters. You have repeatedly vandalised the Trap music page with uncited edits and when I have tried to have a discussion with you about it, which you have merely defined as trolling. Anymore uncited edits and I will request that the page is locked. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.178.88.81 (talk) 06:54, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

I have not added content, so I have made no uncited changes, that would be you. You must not know who references work since you never use them, see WP:CITE, WP:RS and WP:OR. Your changes have not been agreed to and there is no consensus for your change. Your personal attack filled message was removed of course. Stop hopping around IP address and just leave the page alone if you do not get consensus for your change. For your information, I already requested protection, so you will not get to vandalize the page anymore. STATic message me! 17:02, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

I am actually happy with the page as it stands. So I will not be making any edits, it is you who dislikes the references to Dubstep and Grime as the origins of the new EDM Trap sound. I havent been hopping around IPs and I have provided clear references showing the influence of the two aforementioned genres on early EDM Trap. There is consensus for these changes, as numerous other posters have accepted EDM Trap is a stylistic offshoot of UK Bass genres. The only outstanding point of contention is whether cultural origins are the US and UK. You will notice I cited a source which references the UK Trap scene, but I am waiting for others to see and agree to it, before I make any additional changes.

I have not launched any personal attacks, but I have tried to reach out to you and show you links between EDM Trap and its British Forbears Grime and Dubstep. I actually am a big Hip Hop fan from back in the day (Africa Bambaataa till now), but I would like to show the musical contribution of the tiny British largely black community to what is generally refered to as EDM Trap. If you were from Frisco and everyone claimed 'Hyphy' calling it another name, wouldnt you wish to show what its true origins were?

Have a listen to these tracks

• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mznv4ACjkzc&feature=kp 2004 signature Trumpets/horns/snares that apparently signify the modern Trap Sound
• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-2wYVjHlis&feature=kp 2005
• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rM2YLUc3c0Q 2006
• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m_dvT8dttyQ 2006
• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yk4qfri3X8U&feature=kp 2008
• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Oh87toN2CY 2006 sounds like drill to me, but hit in 2006
• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=URZuZyDy07Y 2006 Asap Rocky Palace anyone?
• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hyLkLHY2LuQ 2001 Grime in its rawest form, the beginning!! Poor kids in projects MCing to pirate radio

Even if you choose to ignore the sources I have provided, can you honestly say that these tunes are not a stylistic influence on both Drill and EDM trap genres?

Hello, I have observed the edit wars between 129.178.88.81 and yourself. The only individual who seems to dispute the changes is you.

User 129.178.88.81 did provide a source showing the links between dubstep and trap (see below)

The LA weekly also noted the links between the newer electronic form of Trap and its UK Bass progenitor Dubstep http://blogs.laweekly.com/westcoastsound/2012/10/trap_music_edm_uz_baauer_ugk.php?page=2 stating re Trap "You could basically call it the next phase of dubstep. It plays at a club-ready 140 bpm while retaining dubstep's craze-inducing drops. (That said, eschewing the over-hyped and much-disparaged name "dubstep" is definitely a good PR move.)"

user 129.178.88.81 also provides a source showing the links between crunk (southern hip hop) and UK Grime with the following source

And finally similiarities between the intense sound of Crunk and Grime have been noted before with Lil Jon in 2004 a well known Crunk artist stating in the BBC with regards to Grime Artist Dizze Rascal "“I like Dizzee,” Lil Jon said recently, joining the Dylan Mills fan club, which also includes Andre 3000. “Even if I don’t know what the f**k he be saying.”" and even as far back as 2004 from when this article is dated American media outlets were noted for paying attention to this UK Bass Genre noting "Having all but ignored UK urban music for years, even American artists and magazines like XXL are opening their ears to the cockney accents spitting their stories over chaotic keys and speaker-smashing bass" http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/collective/A3299204

Even prompting another user to remark

After reading these sources about grime/crunk artists collabing before the EDM trap boom I'd be for keeping grime as a stylistic origin. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 11:38, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

It very much looks like you have been able to set the agenda as an established user, above all other users with regards to the trap music page. I dont want to get involved, but I think you should revaluate your position and revert your recent change and wait until other users to show their concerns with the stylistic origins section of the trap music wikipedia page.

I for one dont think user 129.178.88.81 changes can be viewed as original research as he has a good source and other users back the changes made.

Also I for one think some of the links provided above sound very much like EDM trap songs in rotation today. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.174.219.170 (talk) 19:34, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

Hello StaticVapor,

Nograviti here, I also have been watching the whole Trap origins debate. Could you please return to the Trap Talk page and give proper reasons as to why the references to at least 'Dubstep' should be removed from the Trap Stylistic origins section. I think the sources provided by user 129.178.88.81 are good enough see WP:CITE and cannot be written off as original research WP:OR. While I don't share his belief that Grime is stylistic origin, I certainly think the evidence is clear enough that 'Dubstep' has been a significant influence on the modern trap sound.

If a response isn't forthcoming, then either you or I can raise a third party dispute and see if the issue can be resolved that way. I am actually British unlike the individual/s posting from Sweden based on their IP addresses and I think part of edits made by user 129.178.88.81 are valid. I will also suggest to user 129.178.88.81 that he creates a proper account. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nograviti (talk • contribs) 10:31, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

Dispute resolution noticeboard/request raised. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nograviti (talk • contribs) 09:08, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

@STATicVapor: Could you return to the Trap Talk page as I can see that you have been posting and updating on Wikipedia over the last few days. From what I have seen, the issue of Dubstep and Grime as stylistic origins should be discussed until a consensus or compromise can be drawn. I think the others are clear on Dubstep as a direct origin, but are less happy with Grime. You are the only individual who objects to either, so it needs to be discussed on the talk page.

Hey, SV, I'm just (a) alerting you to this discussion on my talk page and (b) encouraging you to engage with the other editors at the article talk page. See this at DRN for background. Regards, TransporterMan (TALK) 13:34, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Capital Steez

After a false report by Hip Hop XD (I believe), alot of people started posting his death as Jamal Dewar however, it's a huge debate whether his name is Jamal or Courtney, but as no obituaries exist for a "Jamal Dewar" and Courtney Dewar is the only person from the New York area that I can find. There's several pictures on the internet talking about him with a gravestone labeled, "Courtney Dewar". Even if his name is Jamal, shouldn't we put a note somewhere that it's disputed amongst reports whether his name is Courtney or Jamal. RyanTheBackpacker (talk) 17:30, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

The name used by all reliable sources was Jamal Dewar. Using obituaries as sources is original research. Reliable sources would need to be provided for Courtney Dewar to be mentioned at all. STATic message me! 15:48, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

http://www.thefader.com/2013/11/26/capital-steez-king-capital/ If this article is previously used as a source couldn't we use it again?RyanTheBackpacker (talk) 17:30, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Huch McDonald

Hello, dear STATic. Don't you think that Hugh McDonald is more of a unofficial member of Bon Jovi than merely a substitute? And thus he deserves to be lined as such?

Regards: The Mad Hatter (talk)

Young Thug's Label

I had recently added Cash Money Records to Young Thugs record labels because I seen him say it in a video that he signed to cash money and mtv.com also confirmed the signing.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Badassgypsy01 (talk • contribs)

He can say whatever he wants, he is contracted to 1017/Asylum Records/Atlantic Records and they are who release his records, not Cash Money. STATic message me! 23:06, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Discog formatting

Wikipedia:WikiProject_Musicians/Article_guidelines#Discography_section doesn't say anything about not separating collaborations from solo releases. And Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_(lists_of_works)#Discographies states: The exact format chosen will depend on the discography and the amount of verifiable information available, which may vary greatly between musical acts. In all cases, the format should follow from what's best for the article, and not vice versa. And of the two GAs you pointed to, Eminem just omits his D12 collaborations altogether, just as the Wu-Tang members' articles omit the group releases. Does that mean the group/collaboration projects should be omitted? Not necessarily.

Some variations in the GAs (just browsing A-E): Nadia Ali, Anggun, Rodney Atkins, Australian Crawl, Emilie Autumn, Big Bang, Clint Black, Billy Talent, Brooks & Dunn, Eva Cassidy, Cherry Poppin' Daddies, Death Cab for Cutie, Bruce Dickinson, Joe Diffie, Doro, Eazy-E, Evermore - all of these are artists with dedicated discography articles that separate the releases in the main article by category. Note that many of these also include EPs, compilations, live albums, singles, etc, while many other articles, like Eminem, Beyonce or indeed all of the individual Wu-Tang members exclude major collaborative studio albums. There are obviously no hard and fast rules to follow here. In fact, browse through those articles and you'll find infinite and seemingly arbitrary variations in the formatting of the discogs. So it's not a question of the iron application of policy, it's a question of what's appropriate for this particular artrist's article.

I would propose something like this for Method Man, Ghostface, Raekwon, etc.

Method Man

• Tical (1994)
• Tical 2000: Judgement Day (1998)
• Tical 0: The Prequel (2004)
• 4:21... The Day After (2006)
• Crystal Meth (TBA)

Method Man & Redman

• Blackout! (1999)
• Blackout! 2 (2009)
• Blackout! 3 (TBA)

Wu-Tang Clan

• Enter the Wu-Tang (36 Chambers) (1993)
• Wu-Tang Forever (1997)
• The W (2000)
• Iron Flag (2001)
• 8 Diagrams (2007)
• A Better Tomorrow (2014)

Other collaborations

• Wu-Massacre (2010) (with Ghostface Killah and Raekwon)

It makes sense to separate solo albums from collaborations (because this article is about the solo artist), and it makes sense to isolate longstanding group projects with multiple releases from one-off collaborations. It makes the discography, and the overall shape of his career, far clearer, which is the point.

- Wetdogmeat (talk) 21:25, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

@Wetdogmeat: Eminem's article does include D12 releases. Wikipedia:WikiProject_Musicians/Article_guidelines#Discography_section says that the section should include a simple list of the artists "major works". There is no reason they should be separated by categorization. As for all the articles you mentioned, they were probably promoted many years ago I am guessing, while the high profile ones Eminem/Beyonce follow the guideline. GA reviewers do not search the Wikiprojects to make sure layout is correct, if you would have ever taken an article to GA status you would know the reviewers are more concerned about spelling, grammar and major policies, rather than making sure everything follows the genre specific guidelines. Wikipedia:WikiProject_Musicians/Article_guidelines#Discography_section is the guideline that is followed in all high profile articles such as Kanye West, Lil Wayne, Jay-Z, Eminem, as it should be in all articles since it is the WikiProjects guideline. The format you suggested is quite messy in my opinion, I much rather prefer the current consensus of the community which is at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Musicians/Article_guidelines#Discography_section, a simple chronological list of their major works works better then anything else. Categorizations should be left for the discography article, which makes complete sense. As for including the Wu-Tang releases, I also wondered about this awhile back, however I think it makes much more sense to just include a link to Wu-Tang Clan discography to avoide listing them in every single members articles. STATic message me! 23:21, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

A few stray observations:

• No, Eminem's discography section does not include D12 releases. I suggest you go and actually look at it.
• Jay-Z's discography section uses my preferred formatting, not yours. Look at that one too.
• Since Mariah Carey has no collaboration albums, we can't deduce anything from the example used at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Musicians/Article_guidelines#Discography_section, whether we should separate solos and collabs (like at Jay-Z), or whether collabs should be omitted altogether (like at Eminem).
• You're playing no true Scotsman with the GAs. "GAs all have integrated disographies!" "Here's a long, long list of GAs that don't." "Oh, well all TRUE GAs have integrated disographies." This is a logical fallacy, however, this point is actually moot, because...
• ...You're undermining your own argument anyway. You're now claiming that an article can make its way to GA status without anyone paying any attention to the way the disography section is formatted, which means ANY appeal to how GA discogs are formatted is irrelevant.
• The policy that you're repeatedly citing says literally absolutely nothing about whether solo albums should be separated from collaboration albums. So you're appealing to a non-existent piece of policy.
• You claim "there is no reason they should be separated by categorization", but you didn't respond to the several reasons I gave you. Your only reason for integrating them was based on your own aesthetic judgement (it "looks messy"), which is irrelevant. Here are my reasons again: It makes sense to separate solo albums from collaborations (because this article is about the solo artist), and it makes sense to isolate longstanding group projects with multiple releases from one-off collaborations. It makes the discography, and the overall shape of his career, far clearer, which is the point.

Anyway, since there is no policy to speak of, I'll take this to the talk page at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Musicians/Article_guidelines. - Wetdogmeat (talk) 19:43, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

@Wetdogmeat: Your rudeness is not even worthy of a response. In your future interactions with other editors keep in mind Wikipedia:Civility is a policy. STATic message me! 22:54, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Regarding removing content of Tinashe's article

Hi. I happened to remove the "Singles" content on Tinashe's page because those songs don't represent her actual single she put out for Radio. The only single she has released was "Vulnerable" (which was a buzz single) and "2 On" being her first commercial single sent to radio by her label RCA Records.

I think I actually did leave a message regarding this on the page but if not I'll make sure I do it again. Sorry for the inconvenience.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 51stash (talk • contribs)

@51stash: That is irrelevant. We do not only list radio singles in any musicians article, why would we on hers? STATic message me! 23:22, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

US marijuana laws map

I noticed that you were the last person to update this image: If you could, please update New York on the map as it now allows medical marijuana. I would, but I'm not sure how to do it. Thanks in advance. --WikiTryHardDieHard (talk) 21:48, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

@WikiTryHardDieHard: I do not know how to either, I just reverted an editor that disruptively changed the colors of the map. STATic message me! 23:23, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Oh, ok. Sorry for bothering you.--WikiTryHardDieHard (talk) 23:46, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

BISD

My source for the Before I Self Destruct album is directly from the album cover. The labels that this album were released under are Shady Records, Aftermath Entertainment, G-Unit Records and Violator Management. The booklet also names Sha Money XL as an associate producer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheXPROMan (talk • contribs) 23:29, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

@TheXPROMan: Just because the logo is there, does not mean they released the record. Management labels do not release albums and they are never listed in Wikipedia or elsewhere. STATic message me! 23:36, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, STATicVapor. You have new messages at DrewieStewie's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Future WWE Champion, DrewieStewie (talk) 00:11, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

Pu$$y song edit

Is your edit explanation a genuine question or an attitudinal one? Remember, don't expect other editors here to be able to read your mind. thanks--Aichik (talk) 15:51, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

@Aichik: What are you talking about? The article falsly stated that the song featured this long list of rappers, when it does not. STATic message me! 20:26, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

Waves - Joey Badass

It's one of Joey Badass's only singles and if Unorthodox has a wiki, shouldn't Waves? — Preceding unsigned comment added by RyanTheBackpacker (talk • contribs) 17:30, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

@RyanTheBackpacker: Not necessarily. Wikipedia has a notability guideline for songs at WP:NSONGS. Per that guideline, Waves would not be notable enough for its own article. "Unorthodox" was significantly covered by reliable sources, while waves was not really at all. STATic message me! 20:28, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sanctified (song)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sanctified (song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of DepressedPer -- DepressedPer (talk) 06:21, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Fragile (Tech N9ne song)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Fragile (Tech N9ne song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of DepressedPer -- DepressedPer (talk) 07:41, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

Hierarchy

So you undo my edit, tell me to use a reliable source. Then once I supply a reliable source you use your personal opinion to undo it and patronize me without backing up your decision with any facts whatsoever. This is why people hate wikipedia editors. BlaccCrab (talk) 19:10, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

@BlaccCrab: Good to know you hate me. However, you choose to ignore the majority of what I say to you. You need a source that says "Old School Love" will not be on the album. It was not a promotional single since it was released for retail sale and to radio. "Mission" was not even released to radio or charted. So I do not know how you can discredit the international success of "Old School Love" by saying it wont be on the album, when you do not know that. You were blocked for the disruptive editing related to this, and if you want to be again, that is your choice. STATic message me! 19:43, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

The Infamous Mobb Deep

Hi.

Indeed, i mistakenly assessed The Infamous instead of The Infamous Mobb Deep, The Infamous is a C, while The Infamous Mobb Deep is rated a B even while the personnel section is missing since that is the only thing is missing and i`m sure it can be added without much trouble. Zidane tribal (talk) 20:10, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sanctified (song)

The article Sanctified (song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Sanctified (song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of DepressedPer -- DepressedPer (talk) 17:42, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

Owner

You need to stop changing the ownership section of WWE, the McMahon Family is the owners because of there class B shares they hold togetherTorrian2014 (talk) 21:03, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

@Torrian2014: There is one owner, and that is Vince. He bought the company from his dad in the 70s and he is the majority owner of the stock. I am not sure where are you getting the 96% from, I do not see that anywhere. You keep changing it to your own WP:OR and that will be reverted. STATic message me! 01:25, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

You can report me all you want the bottom lime is that the content you are putting is misleading, and that's the bottom line — Preceding unsigned comment added by Torrian2014 (talk • contribs) 02:28, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

Ed Sheeran – X mixed reviews

The Independent, Time Out and The Big Issue are all reliable, published sources – they are not small, unknown publications with low readerships; and definitely not WP:OR. Negative reviews by such publications which Metacritic hasn't taken into consideration shouldn't be ignored. If those negative reviews were from personal blogs etc then you would have a point about WP:OR, but that's not the case. I hope you can see the point I'm making. 87.81.143.227 (talk) 01:05, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Metacritic says reviews have been generally positive and now the article states the same thing. Just because the were some negative reviews, does not make the reviews generally mixed, unless you have a source for that it is WP:OR. You must not understand original research, so visit the link. STATic message me! 05:06, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

You've entirely missed the point. Metacritic says reviews have been generally positive, but it has only included a few mixed/negative reviews – there are many others by well known outlets and publications. Also, of the 19 reviews chosen by Metacritic, nine – or 47% – are listed as "mixed". I haven't reverted your changes, since it's accurate to say "Metacritic says reviews have been positive" while listing the many negative reviews not taken into account by MC. Also, your assertion that I "must not understand original research" and instructing me to visit the link is hugely patronising; I already did read the link, hence my prior quoting of "reliable, published sources". You must not understand how to be less condescending, so take time to learn. 87.81.143.227 (talk) 22:55, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Thank You (Busta Rhymes song)

Hi. Thank you for reverting my edits on the song "Thank You" by Busta Rhymes, but here's my explanation of why you reverted my edits: on the single cover of the song, it said "FEAT. KANYE WEST, LIL WAYNE & Q-TIP", not "FEAT. Q-TIP, LIL WAYNE & KANYE WEST". And also, E.L.E. 2 is still an upcoming album, so it has not been released yet. The track listing should have been okay when I put it there, and the part "(2014)" that you put back on the article is really unnecessary. It should also say that it "features additional vocals from fellow rappers Kanye West, Lil Wayne and Q-Tip" and also "released as a single on November 7, 2013, from his upcoming tenth studio album E.L.E.2 (Extinction Level Event 2)." The track listing for the digital download format should have also been alright with you since you put it out. Skylar3214 11:04, 14 July 2014

@Skylar3214: Well you should have said that, however do not change "and" to "&", it is not proper encyclopedia writing to use the symbol. As for ELE2 being upcoming, it does not really need to be said. I added the track listing back as you know. Go ahead and throw the release date info back in, but it should be its own sentence, not awkwardly lumped into the first sentence. STATic message me! 06:22, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Should I put the release date in another sentence? Skylar3214 11:29, 14 July 2014

@Skylar3214: Not in another sentence, it should be its own sentence, along with the format of release. STATic message me! 15:01, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

I saw what you put on the article. It's really perfect. Thanks, man. I would have done it myself, but I was away for a couple hours. ;) Skylar3214 10:38, 15 July 2014

Mike Will Made-It

I noticed you removed my changes to Mike Will Made-It. This morning Mike Will made a post on Instagram saying he will be releasing a new mixtape titled "Ransom". I don't understand how that's not a reliable source. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Claudface (talk • contribs) 06:35, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

@Claudface: You did not cite the post, or better yet a reliable news source. Also you did not format the addition right, copy the format of the previous mixtape's listing and change the relevant entries. STATic message me! 15:06, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion

Hello Static,

I noticed you added the Speedy deletion tab to the Yung Stet artist page. I totally respect your opinion but I was wondering more in detail of why Yung Stet page was decided to be placed as unimportant artist? I noticed it was also reviewed by one of the Master editors also whom didn't place it for deletion. Its tagged with some great artist background information that shows importance for this artist/songwriter to be added. He has received major awareness from well known major brands and artists. His social media accounts including twitter are verified also. I was just curious because I reviewed other artists pages that didn't have as much background info as this page. Once again I am just curious of your decision. (Topdog2014 (talk) 19:23, 15 July 2014 (UTC))

@Topdog2014: At this point in time it looks like Yung Stet does not meet the notability creteria of WP:MUSICBIO. If you would like to have a copy to work on in your sandbox, ask the administrator that reviewed and deleted the page if they could userfy it for you. I will give you credit, you did write a pretty good article, but at this point it looks like he is just not there yet. STATic message me! 21:38, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Northstar

Why did you revert my Northstar edit? You're wrong. They weren't able to reattach it. Read the news... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tommyrgd (talk • contribs) 18:27, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

You did not cite your edit with a reliable source, that is why. STATic message me! 18:54, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Money in the Bank (2011) peer review

Hi STATic, due to your experience in editing professional wrestling related articles (and other experience for GAs), I'd like to invite you to comment on the peer review for Money in the Bank (2011), which I have an interest to eventually push for Featured Article status. Thank you very much. starship.paint ~ regal 09:36, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Sorry

Hi, it's me, THX4,444. I am sorry for that.But it's okay now. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by THX4,444 (talk • contribs) 01:35, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Azealia Banks

Hello, I've seen your message about making changes on Azealia Banks' Wikipedia, but only shortly after I've edited it again. I'm very sorry that I bothered you, it won't happen again. I'm a proof fan of Azealia & I just wanted to make updates. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RANDYLAMONT (talk • contribs) 23:54, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

@RANDYLAMONT: No worries, since the article is about a living person and genres cannot by WP:OR, just be prepared to cite reliable sources. Also the labels she has been signed to will always be listed in the infobox, no matter if she is or is not currently a artist for that record label. 00:19, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

Summerslam 2014

You claim that there was not a credible source attached to my link. That link showed a Vimeo video that is a preview that shows that John Cena will be wrestling Brock Lesnar for the title at Summerslam. The final frame of the video shows that the commercial is from MTS, which is a Canadian PPV provider. The Vimeo video looks professionally made and has recent footage of Wrestlemania and Cena winning the title for a 15th time.

Here is the link to the Vimeo video: http://vimeo.com/100854216 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dmack79 (talk • contribs) 00:05, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

@Dmack79: A reliable source needs to be provided for verification not a copyright violation video. For PPVs, we usually wait for WWE to announce it publicly. Just taking it from the poster would be WP:OR. STATic message me! 00:21, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

My edit to Brick Mansions

Hi, thanks for posting on my talk page. The reason I changed it to negative reception is because the film only received 26% on Rotten Tomatoes and most of the reviews are pretty negative of the film. I doesn't make sense to have it as mixed since the reviews are generally negative.XKid3202 (talk) 03:09, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

@XKid3202: That is just your original research of the reception. Rotton Tomatoes does not call 26 percent approval negative, so you cannot take that as negative. Metacritic supports saying that it received "generally mixed reviews", so that is why we say mixed. STATic message me! 03:15, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

No. What you are saying is also just original research of the reception. Just because one site states the it received generally mixed reviews doesn't make it so. Metacritic only takes a limited number of reviews and if you look at the majority of reviews for the film you will see that the majority of them are negative.XKid3202 (talk) 03:35, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

@XKid3202: Well I guess you just do not understand what original research is, try taking a look at WP:OR. That one site is the source, and you have no source for saying it received generally negative. Metacritic takes only the most notable reviewers, while Rotton Tomatoes includes every Joe Schmoe that writes for a random blog. Either way, RT does not call the reviews generally negative. STATic message me! 04:08, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

Edit to List of Wu-Tang Clan Affiliates

Hey, just a quick question. You reverted my edit to the article based on a good faith assumption. I didn't do it in good faith and did my research instead. Although there are no definitive sources on the web, there are sources in the world. :-) The best source I could provide was the interview I posted, also there are some tracks on youtube, one of them featuring Bomshot & Holocaust, Ghostface Killah and Straight. Also, a member of the German chapter is a co-worker of mine. (He asked me whether I could do the edit.) Before doing so, I made him show me the contract, which in fact exists and seems legit.

Of course, you are way more important to this project than me and more experienced with all this, too. So I can only ask, whether you want to look into the this yourself. Anyways, keep up the good work and have a nice weekend! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Action Boo (talk • contribs) 10:40, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

Your opinion

Hi, I don't like to bad mouth people but User:ShawnMichaels11223344 has been nothing short of an nuisance since they have started editing wrestling articles making bad punctuation edits adding unofficial artwork/taglines amongst other things, what do you think the best outcome should be? Lukejordan02 (talk) 20:27, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

@Lukejordan02: If they continue for a long time WP:ANI would be an option, but not at this point. They have already received two warnings this month, so if keep adding unsourced content warn them, or notify me and I will warn them. STATic message me! 01:33, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

OK thank you for the advice, kind regards. Lukejordan02 (talk) 02:05, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Drake infobox

I've launched a discussion at the talk page, which you should have been notified of, but I wanted to say a few more things here on your talk page aside from that discussion. While I think it was perfectly fine to revert my changes per WP:BRD, I would be very careful with leaving edit summaries like the one you left, which imply that discussion is a necessity for any change, no matter how seemingly uncontroversial. I'm not completely sure if that's what you meant, but the implication seems to go against WP:BOLD. I personally wasn't offended, but you might scare off other editors who may be newer or less familiar with Wikipedia and just want to make contributions with such edit summaries.

Also, other changes were made to the infobox outside of the mere change of type, such as a new image that showed the subject more clearly and the removal of an excessive laundry list of "associated acts" that mostly have no significance to the artist's career, and it would have been helpful if you explained why these were changed, in your edit summary or elsewhere. No hard feelings, just wanted to let you know. Cheers, –Chase (talk / contribs) 02:32, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

@Chasewc91: I was doing the revert on the base of WP:BRD, there was no problem with making a bold change, it is just that infobox changes should be discussed. As for the changes, feel free to change the image back, I personally felt that one looked much better, but another reason for the revert was you removing the associated acts. The limited amount ones that were listed have been very significant to Drake's career as someone who follows it would know and they all met the guideline. If I do not jump in that discussion immediately, it is because I want to see what others think. STATic message me! 16:47, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Hi, it's been over a week since I launched the discussion and no one has replied. I would appreciate it if you leave your input. Thanks. –Chase (talk / contribs) 23:26, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Edit warring on Babymetal article

Hi there, I know you are often busy but on a certain article I need you expertise. Several Wikipedians have been editing in against template guidelines and have been formatting against them, and while I have been following these templates and guidelines I just keep getting my work reverted simply because they disagree, they don't reference any reason why they just disagree and while I would have back up on any other page this particular page is watched by what appears to be many fans and want it in a particular way that is not in accordance to Wikipedia and I may have snapped one or two times just trying to justify my edits so I am coming to you for some help, even if somehow my edits are wrong it would be great to hear from you since you're a professional so your opinion is of great value. I hope you help us with your better knowledge one way or another. SilentDan297 talk 09:56, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

@SilentDan297: No problem, glad to help you SilentDan297. Instead of me combing through the talk page, could you detail in what sections are these edit conflicts are taking place? Just from a quick view it looks like there are way to many genres and the discography has some weird format. STATic message me! 16:50, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Thank you, the current discussion is taking place here: Talk:Babymetal/Archive 2#Once again justifying my edits - SilentDan297. Apologies for the mass amount of text but I kinda lost it after being reverted many times before, I went through the trouble of replying to every point he made against me after he/she replied so the discussion looks incredibly disorganised, thank you for your help though it is very much appreciated! SilentDan297 talk 16:59, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Since this argument I have calmed down I started another discussion with a much better structure here: Talk:Babymetal/Archive 1#Fresh discussion, hopefully you can still contribute since we are waiting for the opinions of others before we make any more edits, thank you for your time. We are currently discussing;

• • What genres should be in the infobox and what should be removed.
  • What details should be mentioned in the Members section, more specifically whether their birth dates would be mentioned here and the roles of the two younger singers.
  • The layout of the discography and how it should be presented.

Again thank you for your time and hope to hear from you on the talk page. SilentDan297 talk 09:01, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Sorry for the lag man, I was about two-three days behind on my watchlist and I was trying to get the majority of it done. I'll comment there now. STATic message me! 09:33, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Update Unfortunately the dispute rages on. I am deeply sorry for asking a second time, this will be my last, but he is now trying to get me blocked for my attempts to improve the article based on the discussions on the talk page. I no longer can edit the page without him reverting and I do not want to be blocked from editing other articles as well so I'm stuck, all I can do is attempt to discuss fairly with him but it doesn't seem all that possible since he hasn't really cooperated all this time. If you could look at the discussion he has made here: Talk:Babymetal/Archive 2#Disruptive edits by SilentDan297 and include your third opinion then that would be great, otherwise I understand if you are too busy or don't want to be included in such a discussion. Thank you for your time. SilentDan (talk) 10:53, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

808s & Heartbreak

Nah cuz, I was removing the persons edit but you did it before me but it was still showing up as hip hop/rap when I saw it. HackneyE8 (talk) 16:56, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Breathe Carolina

Hi! I just wanted to ask you (you are one of the most notable editors in Breathe Carolina's page) if you think that would be more appropiate to change electronicore instead of post-hardcore because their post-hardcore sound is heavily influences by electronica, electropop and that kind of stuff. What do you think? Thanks! :) Justasaddream (talk) 15:39, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion of Danagog

Hello Static,

Trust you're having a great day, I noticed you placed a Speedy Deletion Tag on article Danagog. I have gone through the criteria and the article in question has independent references and also speaks of an artiste with direct affiliations with one of the foremost record-labels in Nigeria, also this artiste has been on rotation on both local and international TV & Radio stations, a comparison with peer artistes also shows that similar references were provided. It turns out these still didn't meet your criteria, kindly make the article available for further editing in order to further conform to the stated criteria.

Many thanks

@Damilae: Danagog is not notable. Just because he's a member of Davido's HKN Gang doesn't make him notable. B-Red and Sina Rambo are not notable as well. Please do no try creating articles for these artists. Versace1608 (Talk) 19:12, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Fragile (Tech N9ne song)

The article Fragile (Tech N9ne song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Fragile (Tech N9ne song) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of DepressedPer -- DepressedPer (talk) 23:01, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Ludaversal

Look, I looked up like 6 links, producers and read several articles to edit that Ludacris album because of it's lead single that's supposedly dropping soon. You don't have to be a total jerk and say "good to know you can copy paste". I didn't copy paste anything, I restored the old information from 2 years ago and added everything i could find to make it relevant to present time. I get it, you think I ruin every hip hop article. Why don't you take 5 seconds out of your day to relax/understand and stop belittling everyone. BlaccCrab (talk) 09:55, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

@BlaccCrab: Okay? The album still does not meet WP:NALBUM, if you would like me to restore it and AFD it I would be glad to. I get that you got mad you were blocked for your disruptive editing again, but do not waste your time ranting on my talk page, it won't help anything. After all the uncivil remarks and insults you have made towards me, you are not the one to complaining about anyone else's behavior. STATic message me! 10:27, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

I got blocked for 3 days because wikipedia didn't allow my link to get posted on a weekly chart table. Yeah bud, super disruptive. Uncivil insults? Better than hiding the insults behind passive aggressive shots taken out on everyone who barely do anything to warrant it in the first place. Next. BlaccCrab (talk) 03:15, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Hudson Mohawke

The edits made earlier today were accurate please don't remove good edits without researching

Retired and American

I don't have a preference for putting either adjective first, but I notice you and a few others do. So no problem. Just curious, what's the difference? InedibleHulk (talk) 08:34, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

@InedibleHulk: I am confused at what you are getting at Hulk. STATic message me! 09:07, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

This. Why's "American retired" proper English, but the other way isn't? Or did you mean the "the ring name" part?InedibleHulk (talk) 09:09, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

@InedibleHulk: I know what edit you were talking about, my proper English comment was more related to the poor structure of the sentence in general. From what I have seen in BLPs their nationality is always what comes first, before saying what their known occupation(s) is. He is not a retired American after all. Personally I think we do not really need to say he is a "retired" professional wrestler, but with the recentism of the issue, someone is sure to add it back. STATic message me! 09:14, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

That bothered me just up until I noticed Flawless Viper's summary after pasting the diff here. Punk's eyes said he was kidding, but the words came out of his mouth. "Never ever" getting "back into a squared circle". Verifiability, not truth.

I'd get your point if you read American as a noun, but that's "professional wrestler". He was an American one, and a retired one. Also an American American and a retired retiree. But it works for anyway you read it this way, so it's all good.InedibleHulk (talk) 09:29, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Discography/mixtape tracklist

Hey, I was looking at Young Chris discography, and I noticed that it's got a list of all his mixtapes like a normal discography, but it also had every tracklist for them all. So I'm just wondering should I delete that? Or should I start doing that to everyone's discography page?

--ChuckT187 (talk) 18:35, 24 July 2014 (UTC)ChuckT187

@ChuckT187: No, the tracks are trivial and they should be removed. It was probably just a huge fan that added that. STATic message me! 02:52, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

Charts for "Calm Down"

Hi. Can you fix the charts on Calm Down (Busta Rhymes song)? Apparently, the box for them are really messed up. I'll thank you for your recent edits, if you do so. Skylar3214 6:06, 24 July 2014

Or actually, a text from the eighth resource is being ignored. Skylar3214 6:10, 24 July 2014

@Skylar3214: The second two of your three edits should not have been made, I restored it. STATic message me! 02:50, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

Thank you, but it's a text that's being ignored, and it's "11" for the eighth source that you might have put on the article. Skylar3214 7:58, 24 July 2014

@Skylar3214: Okay thanks for bringing it to my attention again. I fixed it now. STATic message me! 03:07, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

That is WAY better, Static. I shall thank you for the edit now. Skylar3214 8:11, 24 July 2014

Your GA nomination of Fragile (Tech N9ne song)

The article Fragile (Tech N9ne song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Fragile (Tech N9ne song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of DepressedPer -- DepressedPer (talk) 05:22, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

Ant-Man revert

Uh...why did you ask for a source on this revert? I would've reverted it to, but your rationale is a little confusing. It's not like these people aren't confirmed for the film, we have several sources saying they're in it. Sock (The Editor Formerly Known as Corvoe) ^{(be heard)} 10:15, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

@Sock: Is there anything saying they are starring in the film? That is what I meant. STATic message me! 16:51, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

Ahhh, okay. Got it. Thank you! I was just a bit puzzled. Sock (previously Corvoe) ^{(be heard)} 16:58, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

SummerSlam (2014) Poster Delete

I was the user who originally put that poster up onto the page only for it to get promptly deleted. So when another user puts it on there, it stays up? I call dick on that situation Linkiscool99 (talk) 16:57, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

@Linkiscool99: Whoever deleted it the first time was warned for removing it too. You just removed it again, do you have a reason? Or is it only because someone else added it? STATic message me! 17:03, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

*Curious*

Hey are you only writing about hip hop? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.130.4.71 (talk) 20:54, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

Can you please write about Bandz a Make Her Dance? I really would like to have more info about that song but unfortunately i don't know how to find the background and other details :S — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.130.4.71 (talk) 21:26, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

Sorry I really do not have the spare time to do that. This might help somewhat. STATic message me! 21:35, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

Question for ya?

Obviously when I edit I do with the intention of making pages better or clearer, and I'm not a big tech-guy so some logo may escape me. What exactly did I do wrong on Lucy and Hercules pages that may get my blocked from editing? Thanks, man.— Preceding unsigned comment added by TropicAces (talk • contribs)

@TropicAces: Reliable sources must be cited for all content additions and Wikipedia cannot accept your own observations of things per our policies of WP:V and WP:OR. STATic message me! 04:33, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

Drake vs. Lil Wayne

You should create a page for the drake vs lil wayne tour — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.120.68.241 (talk) 05:43, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

Sounds like something that should have an article, feel free to create an account so you can create it. See WP:Writing your first article. Sorry I do not really take requests, I hardly write articles anymore. STATic message me! 05:48, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

Revision of my edit on Mad Decent

No citation is needed, so thank you for your revision, but why does he claim that he is independent and unsigned if Mad Decent's website lists him? Thanks. WikiWinters (talk) 22:27, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

@WikiWinters: I have no idea, Mad Decent is an independent label after all, but did he just start saying this? STATic message me! 23:22, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

@STATicVapor: No, he's always said it since he first started putting tracks out on SoundCloud, but if you look at the page of Snoop Dogg, you'll find that the record labels list in his infobox includes Mad Decent, so I don't know if it's an independent label. WikiWinters (talk) 23:30, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

@WikiWinters: Well maybe he recently signed, I am not that familiar with the genre and have never heard of him before this. Snoop is a different story, he signed to Mad Decent and RCA Records for a one-album deal to release his Reggae album last year. Sometimes they do deals with high profile acts and major labels (such as the guy that made "Harlem Shake"), but the majority of their artists are independently just signed to them. STATic message me! 23:58, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

Bone Thugs

Just curios, but why was my edit reverted on the Bone thugs n harmony page? Bino5150 (talk) 15:36, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

@Bino5150: The addition was lacking a cited by a reliable source and random fan votes are not notable. STATic message me! 18:46, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

notice

I only removed my own edits. Why did I get a warning for that?

Curren$y edit

STATic VaPor, I saw that you recently edited the "Curren$y" page, overriding my previous edit where I changed the tab current artists under Jet Life Recordings. I took the information regarding which artists were on the label directly from the Jet Life site, and I don't exactly understand why you would revert my edit. I am open to hearing your perspective, so please explain your reasoning to me. If I am wrong, then I stand corrected. Thanks for your time. Jon'sfrontlawn (talk) 01:07, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

@Jon'sfrontlawn: We have a lot of editors that add fake artists, or formerly signed artists to the section. You need to use citations to the artists section of the website or another reliable source so we know that you are adding factual official signings, or if they have officially left the label. STATic message me! 19:18, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

Bizarre & Seven the General

Hello,

I mean no disrespect to you or the forum, However before I made the edits to Bizarre (rapper) page I asked first and then did the proper research and referencing. The issue initially was that "Seven the General" is notable but has not enough biographical info for stand alone article, I was instructed to improve any article that I could prove through ref's that he belongs in. I thought I did this properly? based on my references and articles Seven the General is managed by Bizarres Red head records per Bizarre interview Murder Dog #17. Thus warranting the update in information to the article, GjonPreni (talk) 13:31, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

@GjonPreni: But it is clearly undue weight to have entire paragraphs about this not notable rapper in Bizarre's article. Just because he is managed by his label hardly makes him that related. Sorry to be reverting you, but this rapper you keep trying to press into Wikipedia is just not notable enough. STATic message me! 15:36, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Gazing At the Moonlight

Hey, I was just wondering if there's a specific reason why there isn't an actual page for Hopsin's Gazing At the Moonlight album. Thanks --ChuckT187 (talk) 18:33, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

@ChuckT187: That is only because it received basically no coverage at all. See this AfD about it. STATic message me! 19:24, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

Do you think if I gathered enough information and sources and all that other shit, I could create the page, or do you suggest I just leave it? --ChuckT187 (talk) 16:50, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

The Game

Hey thanks for changing the link to The Game instead of just game. The only reason I set it like that in the first place was because Celebration was listed under (game song) and I didn't want to complicate things even though I know he's gone back to using The ever since Jesus Piece came out. BlaccCrab (talk) 18:47, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

@BlaccCrab: No problem, I can understand why you did that. STATic message me! 19:31, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

keto page

Hi STATicVapor, thx for all your work reviewing different hip hop pages. I was about to post a smallish bio and noticed you'd opened a deletion discussion this June (I'm assuming for this copyvio version at wikibin?). The new version has some refs the old discussion missed, so if you had a moment, I was curious about your opinion. I'll post sometime soon so you could renominate it then, though if you think passing #1 on WP:MUSBIO is impossible I might just wait till the sophomore album (I don't spend much time in afd, so I'm inclined to lean on your experience.) Thanks! Earflaps (talk) 01:58, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

@Earflaps: In my opinion, your version of the article has to be much better. It clearly demonstrates coverage in reliable sources, indicating meeting WP:GNG, which is the first point of WP:MUSICBIO. I do not think you will at all have to worry about an AfD in this case. Another well-written article Earflaps! STATic message me! 19:36, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

@STATicVapor: Right on; I always try to act above it, but tbh I have the same reaction to red tags as I do police sirens, so thanks for setting me at ease. And a compliment! yay! Not lightly taken, since I've learned a lot from your editing the past year. You know, you're making it difficult not to do this:

	The Badass Barnstar
	For being a generally badass Wikipedian. Earflaps (talk) 16:21, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

@Earflaps: Haha, good one. Don't mention it, that is great to know, glad I could provide any knowledge to you. Thanks for the barnstar also :D. STATic message me! 17:57, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

burning gold

It is confirmed that "Burning Gold" will serve as the second single on Christina Perri's album, Head or Heart. I even cited. Please stop reverting my edit. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.88.233.90 (talk) 02:54, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

DYK for No Mediocre

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:39, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

Song Notability/Deletion

How come all these songs that have been tagged as Fails Notability haven't been merged or deleted by an administrator yet? Jingalin should be by now and I believe When I Feel Like It should be as well. Just seeing if you can give me some insight as to how long it normally takes for them to decide or if it's even a concern. BlaccCrab (talk) 19:02, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

@BlaccCrab: Administrators do not patrol pages that have that maintenance tag on it. If anyone sees a song as not meeting WP:NSONGS, they may nominate them at Articles for Deletion or boldly redirect them. I would not suggest you not doing the latter, since you seem to not understand WP:GNG or WP:NSONGS, judging by your tagging of "When I Feel Like It". It is more then clear from looking at the references that it was significantly covered in reliable sources. Being old is not a criteria for deletion. STATic message me! 19:17, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

Why are you being rude again? I Literally just asked a question. And how exactly is that song not up for deletion? Despite being scrapped (hence old, which wasn't even my point) it didn't make it past the bubbling under r&b/hip hop chart nor rhythmic/hot 100 or any relevant chart. What major publication covered the song? It's probably the only song featuring 2 Chainz that no one even knows existed let alone all the things I just pointed out. BlaccCrab (talk) 05:59, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

@BlaccCrab: I am not, apologies if you took it that way. I just told you, being tagged with a maintenance tag does not make the article up for deletion. That can only happen if it was placed at WP:AFD. Being scrapped from the album is also zero reason for deletion, I have asked you to see WP:NSONGS and understand what it means. Chart positions do not immediately make songs notable, and songs that chart low or do not chart are not immediately not notable. If you would look at the references section you would see the coverage, but you do not understand WP:N. I have it in iTunes, enough people bought it to make it chart, and it has been viewed 2,000+ times in the last three months, so there are people that certainly know it exists. Why are you refusing to listen to anything I tell you? STATic message me! 16:49, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Dreams Worth More Than Money

Appreciate the clean up bro, It has been a while since I done this. Some other editor tried to delete the page because there wasn't enough "information," but anything else i add if you want to clean up and make it look nice...go for it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jay2020 (talk • contribs) 17:54, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

@Jay2020: No problem bro. STATic message me! 19:59, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

Nicki Minaj feuds

Refer to Talk:Nicki Minaj for proof if you don't believe me. There is still an ongoing discussion about the feuds and issues in regards of a separate talk page that has yet to meet an agreement. ChocoLantern88 (talk) 18:50, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

@ChocoLantern88: Of course I saw that discussion. However, it does not have anything to do with their being a separate article at all. If you think there shouldn't be one, WP:AFD is the venue. STATic message me! 19:58, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

MTV VMA's BFV

Hey there. As i see you're interested in hip hop music and sometimes you're editing Juicy J's article. Can you tell me should i put MTV VMA's Best Female Video category at his Awards and nominations section? This year "Dark Horse" is nominated for that award. Just the little problem is that the category is titled "Best Female Video", but when they announce the nominees during the awards they also reveal the featured artist's name (if there is one). Thank ya, waitin' for ya answer --Eurofan88 (talk) 20:22, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

@Eurofan88: IMO I do not think we should, it would look weird and it is not that major of an award for him anyways. STATic message me! 02:59, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

Turn Down For What

Hey,

Just wanted to ask why my edit claiming that "Mad Decent" released Turn Down for What was removed. If you consider the actual ISRC, it was released under Columbia but also as well from Mad Decent which you know is another division of Jefree's publishing. Is there any reason why my revert was edited other than the one I have posted above? If so, please do let me know

Thanks SwervingStyle

Sorry to message again, but I see that you have also reverted my edits made to Cashmere Cat and Mad Decent's roster. I don't see why. Jack U is Diplo's project with fellow artist Skrillex and it was made clear on the official Mad Decent site that Jack U will be releasing everything via Mad Decent's label. Doesn't that allow for the Jack U to be placed under the Mad Decent artist's spot? Additionally, Cashmere Cat has been signed to Mad Decent. He is currently on the roster as two of his new tracks were released under Mad Decent and furthermore, he is taking part in the Mad Decent Block Party. Please do explain in further why I may be wrong,

Thanks

@SwervingStyle: Reliable sources must be cited for all content additions. Who is Jefree? The song was released under Columbia, who DJ Snake is signed to. The Cashmere Cat label addition was not sourced and they are not listed here, since they would be one of the biggest artists on the label, you can be sure they would be listed there. The Jack U addition should have been supported with a citation to a source and Outkast is most certainly not signed to Mad Decent, was that just vandalism or what? STATic message me! 15:02, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

Pro Era

Hey. I noticed you pretty much reverted my changes to the article. Before I (or you, or we) put them back I want us to agree on something; the infobox is clearly too long and it sort of makes the top part of the article a bit of an eyesore. Since infoboxes are meant to be a sort of summary I only left the most popular members of the group (obviously Joey Badass, CJ Fly, Kirk Knight, Nyck Caution and Chuck Strangers, plus Powers Pleasant since he's one of the founders of the collective) in the infobox and put that See members below part to let the reader see the entire roster in the Members section. Putting all the musical artists in both the infobox (making it too long) and the section is unnecessarily repetitive in my opinion. My point is even strengthened by the fact that you left the See members below part in the infobox (which maybe should change to See all members below, although not all the members are listed in the article). Davykamanzi → talk • contribs • alter ego 17:35, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

And I'm not sure whether Kwon Swank's a rapper though. Davykamanzi → talk • contribs • alter ego 17:36, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

@Davykamanzi: What gives you the authority to pick and choose who to list? You're determination of popularity is both WP:OR and not WP:NPOV. It makes sense to list all the musical members. I would like you to point out any high quality article doesn't. Also the columns you tried to make was not proper in the infobox and the ones in the body were also not proper as they clashed with the image. I only left the members link for anyone that is interested in who the non-musical members are. STATic message me! 17:57, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

I'm not trying to give myself any authority or whatever. It's just my opinion that we shouldn't have to repeat all the members in both the infobox and the section. It doesn't make sense to me. And my reasoning behind the members I named was that since Capital Steez, Joey Badass, CJ Fly and Powers Pleasant are the ones who started the collective, they should be in the infobox, and since then Kirk Knight, Chuck Strangers and Nyck Caution have become prominent members as well, since they appear in most of the group's collective songs and, along with the founders, are usually prominent figures at their concerts and stuff as well. Aside from all that I can agree with you on the matter with the columns. Davykamanzi → talk • contribs • alter ego 18:06, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

By the way I can't see how WP:OR comes in here. I'm picking out information that was already in the article; I don't need to have done original research for that. Davykamanzi → talk • contribs • alter ego 18:08, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

@Davykamanzi: Well we do, at least the musical members. I asked you to point me to any hip hop group or band article that doesn't, and you haven't. When you select a few and call them the "prominent members", that is your WP:OR as you have no source for that. We are supposed to list the whole group, not just a select notable few. STATic message me! 15:22, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

TF Age Of Extinction cast

Why will you only let Wahlberg and Tucci be the cast on the page for TF4? You revert edits that show the proper cast of the movie and I jus wanna know why. Jacob Sudduth — Preceding undated comment added 04:13, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

Eminem videography

Would you care to join me in making such a page? There is also an ongoing discussion on his discography page about splitting the article into an albums discography page, a singles discography page, and a videography page. The structure of Justin Timberlake videography would be a good basis for constructing the page. Snuggums (talk / edits) 20:01, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

@SNUGGUMS: I am afraid I would not be able to help you with construction of the page, due to the limited time I have been able to help out on here in the last few months, which has grown increasing less recently. I certainly support the split of the articles, but due to the lack of opposition on the talk page I do not think I need to additionally comment there unless some pops up. Thanks for leaving me a message though, good to hear from you. STATic message me! 06:13, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

No problem, bro. Good to hear from you as well. Snuggums (talk / edits) 10:24, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

808s & Heartbreak

Can you reverted edits by User:Vanillagreek? (the user has been blocked by User:DoRD) And also, tell other admin to change protection level of the page to allow only admin and indefinitely. 183.171.160.95 (talk) 02:45, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

That page has been the subject of edit warring by a blocked user using multiple sockpuppet accounts and various IP address'. Looks like this issue had been taken care of by the time I had a change to respond to you. STATic message me! 06:16, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

The Pinkprint

It would be appreciated if you looked over and voted on the move request for The Pink Print to the The Pinkprint. Up to this point there hasn't been a direct response as to which spelling was correct. Nicki Minaj herself clarified the question directly stating it was written, "The Pinkprint", (https://twitter.com/NICKIMINAJ/status/497117375712329728). Leave either your support or opposition for the move here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:The_Pink_Print#Requested_move_06_August_2014.

Thank you for your time, KaneZolanski (talk) 00:08, 7 August 2014 (UTC).

User Draft

Never seen a user space draft but it was attached to the Talk Dirty (album) page so I got rid of it.BlaccCrab (talk) 16:48, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

@BlaccCrab: You can identify them by the "User:Andsnurcn/ prefix. Good job on removing the link to it on the Talk Dirty page, as main space articles should never link to user drafts. STATic message me! 14:36, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Wu

Static Vapor, what's wrong with you? You can't revert edits by more than half a dozen different people, edits that came with summaries, with one shitty edit summary, "vandalism and unsourced content removal". Bullshit. Look at the edits, and look at the terrible condition of the stuff that was removed. You're supposed to be a GA editor: act like one. Drmies (talk) 02:49, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

@Drmies: There is nothing shitty about my edit summary, it explained that revert. You removed over 10,000 bytes of sourced content without a single word in the edit summary, that is most certainly worthy of a warning if you were not an admin. Someone needs to take care with the content removal if there needs to be one and you need to stop adding back the unsourced content. STATic message me! 02:55, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

Partly sourced bullshit fan chat is what you mean. And what is your excuse for all the other edits? Drmies (talk) 03:09, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

• Static, I got a better idea. Why don't we make this article better? The amount of unsourced information is still immense, though the amount of trivia is more manageable. You know how to find the relevant sources and how to format these articles: the band is important enough to deserve a much better article (though I didn't care much for their show on Stewart's show). Drmies (talk) 13:24, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

@Drmies: What I restored right now was not "Partly sourced bullshit fan chat". Drmies, edit summaries that fully explain your removals would just be nice, instead of edits like this with not a single word in the edit summary. I agree that there was a lot of unsourced trivia, and that is why I only restored that one section. That one section is most certainly worthy of including until there is a separate album article to break the information on to. Try to delve deeper then the Daily Show appearance, it kinda sucked. STATic message me! 16:14, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

OK. Look, there is certainly stuff to be said about that album--but what we're saying now is nothing, nothing of any value whatsoever--just announcements. A Facebook post, a complaint (?) that one guy only worked on two songs, etc.--it doesn't even try to rise above the level of gossip. Plus, I don't see how "RZA has also said he had talked to Adrian Younge about working on a song for the album" is better than "Adrian Younge was to work on one of the songs". "Also" is typically filler, and "said he had talked to" is more verbosity. Note that I didn't even remove it. But have it your way. And that one edit summary you complain about, I had an edit conflict with an IP editor, so please forgive me. Drmies (talk) 22:41, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

Transformers "Billing Block"

STATicVapor, there's something despicable going on involving one of your edits. You've seemed to have some good edits to show for, but the edit for the Transformers: Age of Extincsion block is obserd and pointless. Why cast only Mark and Stanley when there's clearly more than one maincharacter throughout the movie? What's the purpose? - Theironminer (talk), 10:38, 10 August, 2014 — Preceding undated comment added 14:39, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

@Theironminer: Complain all you want. There is consensus to only list those that are on the poster's billing block. See Template: Infobox film. It says for the starring field you should, "Insert the names of the actors as they are listed in the billing block of the poster for the film's original theatrical release. If unavailable, use the top-billed actors from the screen credits. Other additions by consensus." STATic message me! 17:23, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

Then the artists who made that poster obviously didn't care about putting more actors in the credits who play important characters. The 'starring' section shouldn't have to be like what the poster says, if there's more important characters in the movie than Mark and Stanely, then they should be put in that section. And I consider your previous word choice of "complain all you want" to be very rude and uncalled for. - Theironminer (talk), 15:27, 10 August, 2014

@Theironminer: I guess they didn't, some of the actors you added sure deserved to be listed, but this was not an artist decision, it was a studio decision. If you think it should not have to be what the poster says take it to Template talk: Infobox film, because that is what the current consensus of film article editors is. Or if you want local consensus, wait for someone to respond to you on the article talk page. You are being very rude to me, calling my edit "obserd (sic) and pointless", but you think I am the rude one. STATic message me! 19:43, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

We're both being rude right now. I don't "think" you're the rude one. - Theironminer (talk), 16:39, 10 August, 2014 — Preceding undated comment added 20:39, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

Yes that is what happens when you are rude to someone first, you should know this. Anyways I already gave you suggestions on what to do and you did not respond to any of that. STATic message me! 19:26, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Bro, I was busy. You can't expect me to get on it immediately. - Theironminer (talk) 15:01, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

The Lego Movie

Your message to my talk page is patronizing and rude. I hope you know that I've been a Wikipedian longer than you; please don't treat more experienced members in such a demeaning way. As for the edit you reverted, WP:V hardly applies. The relevant information is at WP:MINREF, which states that not everything needs a reference. Per MINREF: "Technically, if an article contains none of these four types of material (BLP material, material that could be or was challenged, direct quotations), then it is not required by any policy to name any sources at all, either as inline citations or as general references".--ɱ (talk) 15:32, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

That is kind of sad then, you should not be adding your own original research to articles. WP:V certainly applies and all subjective content MUST be sourced. You are also directly contradicting yourself, it certainly was "material that could be or was challenged", it was tagged with Template:CN, and then I later removed it. So two editors challenged it and you still restored it without a source. STATic message me! 17:25, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

I like how you say (in your edit notice for this talk page) "...I'm not new, so please don't slap me with a generic "Welcome to Wikipedia" warning template", yet you do that to editors who are older than you? I think you're contradicting yourself. Anyway, the content was not subjective or could be rightfully challenged. The information you removed does not need a reference, being simple, understandable, and unquestionable material. Anyone who has seen the film can tell you that those are themes relevant to the film. It should not have been given a CN tag. Whoever gave it the tag was thinking just like you, that 'whatever content doesn't have a citation needs to go'. The CN tag is only used in good judgement of material that is probably false. As stated on MINREF, "Editors are expected to use good judgment when determining whether material has been challenged." If any editor expresses doubt in the veracity of the material, the proper procedure is to put a CN tag and dispute the fact's truth on the talk page, not merely tag it and delete it soon afterwards. Too many Wikipedians have no sense of proper procedure. Until several editors honestly express doubt in that content's accuracy, the content has all rights to stay.--ɱ (talk) 20:32, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

To be clear - you can't just challenge it because you want a citation. There has to be a strong reason for you to doubt the content's veracity. That hasn't been stated by anyone, so as of now, the content by all means has the right to be included.--ɱ (talk) 20:39, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

An older Wikipedia editor, does not mean you are the wiser one. If you created your account before me and you are still violating WP:V and WP:NOR, then that is a serious problem. The content was certainly subjective and per WP:V all content in a encyclopedia should be cited. Your statement of "Anyone who has seen the film can tell you that those are themes relevant to the film", just proves even more that you do not understand the Wikipedia policy of WP:OR. I have seen the film myself, but I would not create a unsourced section about my opinion of the themes the film covers. STATic message me! 04:39, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

You're wrong, an older editor just doesn't necessarily mean I engross myself in the particulars of the many Wikipedia policies and guidelines. I am a largely a contributor of content on Wikipedia and the Commons, I do not specialise in such trivial matters. And you can say that the information is subjective all you want, but it is simply understandable and unquestionable material. Also, I am surprised that when I tell you standard and certainly courteous procedure for removing content, you just proceed to insult me and my knowledge of policy. And WP:V may tell you one thing, though WP:POLICIES and WP:RULES specify that WP:V and the other policy pages are not hard-and-fast rules that must be obeyed; it's the same reasoning behind WP:IAR. I am in the middle of disputing a WP:V inconsistency anyway; I will get back to you on this. It is still clear that your arguments are incorrect just like so many others have argued this; please see Wikipedia:Perennial proposals on 'requiring inline citations for everything'.--ɱ (talk) 11:31, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Revert per WP:DENY

Please stop reverting back in edits from a banned user utilizing a sock. The reason for reverting his edits the first time around was clear: Revert per WP:DENY. Every time you revert his edits back in you are circumventing policy and giving the sock a victory. -- Winkelvi ● ✉ ✓ 17:39, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

@Winkelvi: The IP address has not been blocked or confirmed as a sockpuppet, and it does not look as WP:DUCK as you think. So you should not be reverting them yet. Since when did they ever edit hip-hop articles? You are jumping to crazy conclusions, if they improved the article then the edit should stay. Once you revert my edit to improve the article, you are reverting me, not the sockpuppet. So you must give a valid reason. Instead of just edit warring and ruining the article. STATic message me! 18:23, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

Ruining the article? How silly. There is no deadline in Wikipedia. Regardless of whether you think because the edit was good it should stay, DENY policy is clear. And your incivility and personal attacks are noted. -- Winkelvi ● ✉ ✓ 23:18, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

@Winkelvi: You most certainly were trashing up the article. Thanks for not responding to the points about the IP address not being confirmed and blocked as a sock yet. You can cry wolf about incivility and personal attacks, anyone including myself reading this obviously can see that, that claim is b.s. STATic message me! 04:49, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

AfD Maat Morrison

Hi, you commented "delete" on Maat Morrison article for deletion. The subject clearly do not fail on WP:MUSICBIO for criteria for musician and ensembles:

11. Has been placed in rotation nationally by a major radio or music television network. 12. Has been a featured subject of a substantial broadcast segment across a national radio or TV network.

as described in the subject, the musician has reached popularity on national radio rotation (in case of him, international) in the United States. Can you please describe me, why you don't agree with the page, is it bad to help Wikipedia adding new musicians?

Have a great day
HaroldSalasI (talk) 04:25, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

@HaroldSalasI: There is no reliable third party source for his music being played on US radio and it must have been put on rotation, not just played. As for 12, the article does not indicate that happened. When it is "as described in the subject", how do you know it is true and they are not just trying to make themselves seem more notable? It is not bad by creating articles, but we have notability guidelines so not everyone that picks up a mic has a Wikipedia article. STATic message me! 16:22, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

@STATIcVapor:, the music has been put on rotation in DR radio and Colombia radio for 3 months, and been played 100+ times in the US. We claim for a little respect in the talk page, and remain civil when you talk about an article or an user. The artist that I've wrote about, is not "anyone that picked up a mic and started singing/rapping or a camera and record himself", so please keep the professionalism by trying not to direct offend people, or I suggest you to please stay our of my article talk page. HaroldSalasI (talk) 19:42, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Island Records logo

Hey Static, it's Shallowharold. I was looking at the new album by The Gaslight Anthem and I noticed that Island Records has introduced a new logo for their label. It's pretty much the world "Island" in capital letters with their signature palm tree logo hidden inside the letter "A". I don't know if you happened to see it, so here's the new logo straight from their website- which is undergoing a change after Universal Music Group decided to dismantle The Island Def Jam Music Group a few months back. http://www.islandrecords.com/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shallowharold (talk • contribs)

@Shallowharold: Very interesting. If you can find the logo online it upload it so the image in the infobox of Island Records can be changed. STATic message me! 19:31, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Question

Hi, I'm new to this but I've been trying to follow a discussion that you have been involved in and I follow your point. It seems that the article is discussed in many different places in WP and many of the discussions have been moved making it hard to understand what's going on. Could you help me understand how archives and discussions get changed and moved from the subject's talk page. I noticed that this archive [[15]] which says "do not change" cannot be found on the subject's talk page and the archives that are there seem radically different. The resulting new archive on the subject is quite different and misleading. How can one tell when an archive has been changed or removed? Any help with understanding this would be appreciated. Thanks, Nothingknewunderthesun (talk) 20:24, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Calm Down

Ahaha, I misread "unsourced" as "uncensored" on your revert of the Composition section (I thought you minded the n-words); so sorry, haha! --Khanassassin ☪ 00:39, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

@Khanassassin: Ooookay haha. Yeah I was confused about the censorship talk in your edit summary, but its all good man. I do not mind some bad words at all. I cannot remember the last time I listed to the clean version of a good song outside of radio or television. STATic message me! 06:59, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Snowgoons Page

hi, this ia manuu from the snowgoons. i want to ask you if you could put our label Goon MuSick in the info section before the old label Babygrande. further could you help me set up the Goon MuSick wikipedia page? you can email too so i can send you all the info at manuu@snowgoons.de

thanks alot for your work peace manuu --Snowgoons (talk) 15:00, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

@Snowgoons: Putting it first would be fine, feel free to do that. It is just meant to list every label, not just the current one you guys release music under. I am afraid I would not be able to help you with a record label page as my time on here is much more limited and I hardly write articles anymore. Maybe instead make a section in the Snowgoons about the record label and I might be able to help you with that. STATic message me! 15:35, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

@STATicVapor: I will change it soon but i wanna set the Goon MuSick page first so i can link it. Unfortunatly someone deleted it and i have to rewrite it first. I'll also make a section in Snowgoons page as you suggested. Thanks for your time and help, i really appreciate it. --Snowgoons (talk) 16:48, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

@Snowgoons: No problem at all bro. STATic message me! 23:54, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

@STATicVapor: update: i placed our target logo image inside the infobox of the Snowgoons page. The label is called Goon MuSick not Goons MuSick (someone wrote Goons MuSick). i fixed it. The Goon MuSick page/article is waiting for a review and is located over here User:Snowgoons/Goon MuSick. I don't know if it's ok to link it (inside the Snowgoons article) yet because the link might change to Goon MuSick once it is on mainstream? wiki is still pretty new to me =) I also moved Goon MuSick infront of Babygrande (info box). have a great day Snowgoons (talk) 08:26, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

@Snowgoons: Yes you should wait until the article is in the mainspace before linking to it. You have a great day too. STATic message me! 17:00, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

So Far Genre

I understand what you mean about the need for neutral point of view in relation to the genre of the song So Far.... I still believe that comedy rap should be placed as a genre however. Can you please help to explain either why that would be wrong, or explain how I can make that so that it is a part of the genre. NewJibaJabba (talk) 05:43, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

@NewJibaJabba: It cannot be included, since that is just your opinion or original research. Subgenres need to be cited by multiple reliable sources to be included. STATic message me! 07:32, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Ok thank you for clarification on this issue. NewJibaJabba (talk) 05:49, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

Edit

I'm new here on Wikipedia. Can you edit the article I've created, Denzel Curry. I don't know what you mean by reliable and secondary sources, and I don't want it to be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nba-fan-11 (talk • contribs) 23:38, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

@Nba-fan-11: When you leave talk page messages, you should sign them with four ~ symbols, just letting you know. As for your question, see WP:RS and WP:IRS. Examples of reliable sources for music subjects are MTV, XXL, The Fader, HipHopDX, Complex, Spin, among many others. See a good example at Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums/Sources. The article is not currently up for deletion, it is a tag that says there are notability concerns. Articles on rappers have to meet WP:GNG or WP:MUSICBIO. I see that is only has two refs to reliable third party sources (DJBooth and Complex), which is not enough. This is why when you created Bas (rapper) I added a bunch of sources to the article, so no one could question the notability. STATic message me! 00:09, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

Yukmouth and reliable sources

Hey man,

The edit I did was regarding associated acts. I added 2 Live Crew and the 2 members Fresh Kid Ice and Brother Marquis.

Luniz the band of Yukmouth did a featuring on the 2 Live Crew album The Real one. At the time of The Real one Fresh Kid Ice and Brother Marquis were the only two members of 2 Live Crew.

See for yourself https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Real_One.

Also I still haven't figured on how to attach reliable sources.

Thank You

Filmman3000 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Filmman3000 (talk • contribs) 23:59, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

@Filmman3000: The associated acts section is not for one or two time collaborations. It is only for the most significant people to their career, you know people they collaborated with 5+ times. STATic message me! 00:13, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

@Filmman3000: See WP:CITE to learn how to add them to the article and see WP:IRS to learn how to identify them. STATic message me! 00:25, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

Screen Gems

Why do you think Screen Gems is not a distributor? Sony Pictures Releasing is just some name pulled off IMDB. Every Sony movie is released under 3 banners, either Columbia Pictures, Sony Pictures Classics or Screen Gems. Go to the Screen Gems film list and see every one of their film's lists them as the distributor. Koala15 (talk) 00:06, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

Fresh Kid Ice Page

Dear STATICVapor,

Please Stop tempering with the Fresh Kid Ice page, however I invite you to help me improve it. I have putted a lot of work into it. This gentlemen is one of the founding father and still a current member of the revolutionary group 2 Live Crew, on top of discovering the rapper Flo Rida. If you need citations I will get to it shortly. While Mr. Mixx and Luther Campbell have pages of their own, I don't understand why you are doing this. I also intend to make a page for the other 2 Live Crew Member Brother Marquis. If you want me to improve my writing, my methods, or my style please give constructive feedback but please do not delete my work.

Thank You

Filmman3000

@Filmman3000: I already explained my reasoning to you. The subject is not very significant outside of the group and the consensus of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fresh Kid Ice was closed as a redirect, so it must stay that way. STATic message me! 21:33, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

@STATICVapor: Well I disagree with that kind of reasoning we would have to cancel the pages of Dj Yella, Mc Ren, other 2 Live Crew Members, Pete Best, all underground artist, and so forth. The guy is in a major band, discovered Flo Rida, and is the first Asian Rapper on a Platinum Rap Album. If 2 Live Crew never had a Gold record I would agree. So no it must not stay that way. I will debate it and it is not obliged to stay this way. Don't get me wrong I respect your devotion, and please leave my work alone.

Denzel Curry

I edited the article Denzel Curry with more secondary sources as you said. Can you review it now. Nba-fan-11 (talk) 00:08, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

Images

Yeah, uploading images to Wikipedia. I also redirected Young Sinatra: Undeniable to Logic_(rapper). Why was it nominated for deletion? --Nba-fan-11 (talk) 05:07, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

@Nba-fan-11: Did you look at WP:UPLOAD? Do you want to know how to upload album/single/mixtape covers or images of rappers? As for Young Sinatra, I tried to redirect it, but since you challenged it, I was not going to edit war about it. I will clarify in the AfD that I support redirection, but you could also vote for that too. STATic message me! 17:03, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

@STATicVapor: Yeah, I've read that already but I still don't understand it. And yes, I mean both Album covers, and images of rappers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nba-fan-11 (talk • contribs) --Nba-fan-11 (talk) 05:45, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

@Nba-fan-11: For album/single covers use this page. For images for rappers, they have to be free images or images you have taken yourself. You can use WP:Flikr to upload some from Flikr. STATic message me! 03:01, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

@STATicVapor: Thanks --Nba-fan-11 (talk) 05:45, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
	thanks for your help =) Snowgoons (talk) 09:27, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

X (Chris Brown album)

Hello, allow me to offer my kind critique regarding the apparent edit war over at X (Chris Brown album). I know you mean well, but you shouldn't clutter the page history using edit summaries to communicate when you have a lonely talk page designed for that very purpose. You cannot force BRD on others. BRD can work, BRRRD can not. Thanks for your understanding — MusikAnimal ^talk 06:07, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

@MusikAnimal: I kept asking them to start a discussion per WP:BRD, but they refused. I just cannot stand unnecessary, poorly-sourced speculation in articles. STATic message me! 15:24, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

Sales figures

I see that you reverted the edit for the sales figure of All of Me. I believe you misunderstood why Hits Daily Double sales figures are not considered reliable. The HDD figures that are considered unreliable are from the building charts and predictions - they collect only information from the major vendors (one day or 3-4 day sales for the prediction and the whole week for the building chart) and extrapolate sales for all vendors in these charts. The extrapolation of the sales is why those figures are unreliable. However, apart from those charts, HDD uses SoundScan numbers and not their own. For example, in this chart, it gives Jason Aldean's previous album (Night Train) first week sales as being 409,000, however its own building chart that week gave the first week sales as 415,155. The 409,000 figure is the SoundScan number. I can give a few other examples. Note that the sales figures in this particular page, although SoundScan figures, are also not used - not because they are unreliable, but because those figures disappear once the album are out so you can't check the figure in the future, and HDD does not allow the page to be cached. The page I cited however is a news item with SoundScan numbers and does not disappear like the other page. Hzh (talk) 11:05, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

@Hzh: Alright, I understand. STATic message me! 01:04, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Ariana Grande revert

Hi STATic Vapor,

Can you please tell me why you reverted my edit? I added links to her Facebook and twitter pages. Thanks, Robert4565 (talk) 16:12, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

@Robert4565: There was a hidden note right there that says not to include her social network sites per WP:ELOFFICIAL. This is because they are easily accessed from her official site. STATic message me! 01:06, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Forbidden Fruit (J. Cole song)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Forbidden Fruit (J. Cole song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of DepressedPer -- DepressedPer (talk) 02:21, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Proposal

There is currently a discussion, you might be interested in, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Record_charts#Inclusion_of_Amazon.2C_Spotify.2C_iTunes.2C_Beatport_under_digital_charts Thanks. prokaryotes (talk) 18:08, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Forbidden Fruit (J. Cole song)

The article Forbidden Fruit (J. Cole song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Forbidden Fruit (J. Cole song) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of DepressedPer -- DepressedPer (talk) 11:03, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Forbidden Fruit (J. Cole song)

The article Forbidden Fruit (J. Cole song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Forbidden Fruit (J. Cole song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of DepressedPer -- DepressedPer (talk) 21:03, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Image issues from prblematic user

STATic, bro how are you? Long time no chats. I see you are aware of the problematic edits from this user and I recently came across a lot of image related issues from him/her, inspite of locating numerous instances where people have explained WP:NFCC. I warned the user twice, once for uploading unencyclopedic images and the other for removing maintenance template, is there anything else we can do? —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 09:58, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

@IndianBio: Hey, yes it has been a long while. If they refuse to abide by the image policies we have there is nothing to do but to report to WP:AIV or WP:ANI. STATic message me! 01:55, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Double Trouble

IPs or non-admin users are not allow to revert it as on pages for Rihanna's two songs "Russian Roulette (song)" and "What Now (song)". For "Russian Roulette", can you remove invalid source that is a video? And does not says R&B/soul; and "What Now", replace with genre that what composition section says. 183.171.171.130 (talk) 09:36, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

I do not at all understand what you are saying. STATic message me! 01:56, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

The Night Runners

Why did you request Deletion of my page The Night Runners?? Did you not look at the references? They are public figures as reported on IMDB, Wikipedia, and many more. --Iampixiedust (talk) 22:10, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

This page should not be deleted because all references have been already previously approved. All references have been well credited from reliable sources such as IMDB, the The X Factor (U.S. season 1) Wikipedia page where The Night Runners were then known as "Illusion Confusion" while being on the show. If you google search "Illusion Confusion X Factor" and look at the images you will clearly see that they are now known as The Night Runners and are public figures. No content on this page violates any copyrights. All content is verifiable, and all terms and conditions are met with The Night Runners Wikipedia page. This page is credible due to The Night Runners being living public figures in the Entertainment industry, specifically the music industry. I kindly ask that you do not delete this page.

Perhaps you should read A7 in the speedy deletion section as it states: It is irrelevant whether the claim of notability within the article is not sufficient for the notability guidelines. If the claim is credible, the A7 tag can not be applied. Often what seems non-notable to a new page patroller is shown to be notable in a deletion discussion. Meaning just because you may not be familiar with the show "X Factor USA" or "The Night Runners" for that matter, does not grant you the right to request deletion of this page when substantial evidence and references have been cited to discredit your accusation of The Night Runners page being deleted.

Yes I did, none of them are third party reliable sources. Well it is now up for AfD, so the discussion shall decide it. I know what X Factor is, but not even group/singer that makes it to the main show gets an article. They must meet WP:BAND. STATic message me! 04:05, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Abuse from Koala15 - Run the Jewels - need help

Hi there, I need your help!

I have been watching the activity within the Run the Jewels (album) page and I've noticed that Koala15 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Koala15) has been unnecessarily removing other user's contribution to the Run the Jewels album and artists page, despite the contributions being reasonably or well sourced. The recent reasons given by @koala15 for removing other users contribution suggests personal preference. For instance, @koala15 refuses to accept the relevance of non-US labels in relation to the Run the Jewels project. Run the Jewels licensed and released their first album on a non-US label (Big Dada / Ninja Tune), for European release; this information was taken from a valid source. Even El-P of Run the Jewels credits this label with helping to expand its accesibility - see this source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2BLnKpEW6pg

Is there a way to report a complaint on this user to Wikipedia's admin?

Thanks

@Fasokanesq: Hello, sorry I will not be much help as the page is currently fully protected due to your two's edit war, which you are both lucky for not being blocked for. However on the subject, Template: Infobox album#Label says "only the record label that the album was originally released on should be specified. Where significantly different versions have been released (featuring alternative track listings) e.g. in the US vs UK, the later release date or record label should be mentioned in the article, for example in a Release history section." STATic message me! 04:11, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Recent edits to JGramm Beats

Sup STATicVapor! I recently made a few edits to the article that I had started for JGramm Beats. If you could please review them for me I would greatly appreciated it. Malcolmrevere (talk) 14:44, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

@Malcolmrevere: Out of the references currently in the article, three are considered third-party reliable sources: Complex, Vice and Fact, but out of those three, only the Vice source would be considered significant independent coverage. The other two are only trivial mentions, as the articles are not about JGramm, they only mention him. At this point I think it is a bit WP:TOOSOON for an article on this producer as he is still mostly unknown and reliable sources have not significantly covered him yet. He has yet to meet WP:GNG. STATic message me! 16:26, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

My Everything

You sent me a message on that article, but my account might be hacked, because I don't even know German and did not edit this thing. Thanks, DEW. Adrenaline (Nahnah4) 10:22, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

Chris Brown's X

Can you add that No Lights will be a Japanese bonus track? http://www.hmv.co.jp/en/artist_Chris-Brown_000000000319568/item_X_5535971 (68.58.85.155 (talk) 20:11, 29 August 2014 (UTC))

wrestlemania.

Hi i just want to say thanks for the help but can you add the rumored match for wrestlemania 31 like ttaker vs sting,hogan vs cena,batista vs triple h,and reigns vs lesnar i just want everyone to know so they can at least know what to expect — Preceding unsigned comment added by Undertakerlargestfan (talk • contribs) 14:47, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

@Undertakerlargestfan: Speculation or rumors are not allowed. Do not try to add them, we only put announced matches. STATic message me! 15:02, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

Your Edits

What is your problem? Your edits aren't helping The Angriest Man in Brooklyn. Did you see the movie? In the movie, the characters weren't narrating themselves; the actors playing the characters narrated them like they were a different person. The narration part deserves to be where is was. As well as your edit for Dawn of the Planet of the Apes, "widespread" shouldn't be included because the word was never used in the article, yet you revert these edits with your good faith BS that makes me feel bad. Want to reject these statements? Reply. I'd like to see what comes out of your head onto this section. - Theironminer (talk) 04:23, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

Theironminer You have not sourced that and if you see Template: Infobox film it is not proper to include character narrations. As for the inclusion of widespread, if you see the two reliable sources I cited, they both say "widespread critical acclaim". It has always been in the article too. STATic message me! 05:33, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

WikiCup 2014 August newsletter

The final of the 2014 WikiCup begins in a few short minutes! Our eight finalists are listed below, along with their placement in Round 4:

1. Godot13 (submissions), a WikiCup newcomer, finished top of Pool A and was the round's highest scorer. Godot is a featured picture specialist, claiming large numbers of points due to high-quality scans of historical documents, especially banknotes.
2. Casliber (submissions) is a WikiCup veteran, having been a finalist every year since 2010. In the semi-final, he was Pool B's highest scorer. Cas's points primarily come from articles on the natural sciences.
3. Czar (submissions) was Pool A's runner-up. Czar's points come mostly from content related to independent video games, including both articles and topics.
4. Adam Cuerden (submissions) was Pool B's runner-up. Another featured picture specialist, many of Adam's points come from the restoration of historical media. He has been a WikiCup finalist twice before.
5. Cwmhiraeth (submissions) won the WikiCup in 2012 and 2013, and enters this final as the first wildcard. She focuses on biology-related articles, and has worked on several high-importance articles.
6. 12george1 (submissions) is the second wildcard. George's points come primarily from meteorology-related articles. This year and last year, George was the first person in the competition to score.
7. Sturmvogel 66 (submissions), the third wildcard, was the 2010 champion and a finalist last year. His writes mostly on military history, especially naval history.
8. Bloom6132 (submissions), the fourth and final wildcard, has participated in previous WikiCups, but not reached any finals. Bloom's points are mostly thanks to did you knows, featured lists and good articles related to sport and national symbols.

We say goodbye to this year's semi-finalists. Matty.007 (submissions), ThaddeusB (submissions), WikiRedactor (submissions), Figureskatingfan (submissions), Yellow Evan (submissions), Prism (submissions) and Cloudz679 (submissions) have all performed well to reach this stage of the competition, and we hope they will all be joining us again next year.

There are two upcoming competitions unrelated to the WikiCup which may be of interest to those who receive this newsletter. The Stub Contest will run through September, and revolves around expanding stub articles, especially high-importance or old stubs. In addition, a proposal has been made for a new competition, the GA Cup, which the organisers plan to run next year. This competition is based on the WikiCup and aims to reduce the good article review backlog.

There is now a thread for brainstorming on how next year's WikiCup competition should work. Please come along and share your thoughts- What works? What doesn't work? What needs changing? Signups for next year's competition will be open soon; we will be in touch. If, at this stage of the competition, you are keen to help the with the WikiCup, please do what you can to participate in review processes. Our finalists will find things much easier if the backlogs at good article candidates, featured article candidates, featured picture candidates and the rest are kept at a minimum. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk · contribs) The ed17 (talk · contribs) and Miyagawa (talk · contribs) 22:09, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

Apology

Hi Static I would like to apologize for my bad behavior yesterday creating the talk page Kasirap I will refrain from creating such pages in the future.

Again I would like to appeal to you remove the tag which is on Npk Twice as it states it is in consideration for deletion.

And also please assist me in making the Npk Twice better and to meet every criteria for a wikipedia article of a biography of a living person.

My aim by creating this account was to help bring fourth articles which are reliable from South Africa and other parts of Africa as I am also an Entertainment Magazine editor this side.

Hope you will find it in you to assist and take my apology.

Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kasirap (talk • contribs) 17:54, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

Kes Tokyo (rapper)

hi,i want to know what's wrong with the what's wrong with the Kes Tokyo (rapper) page that you keep placing deletion tags on it Spexj (talk) 19:06, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

@Spexj: (talk page stalker) You might want to read the deletion tag, which explains why the page has been tagged. The subject the article describes lacks notability. --k6ka (talk | contribs) 19:12, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) The Kes Tokyo article was deleted previously. Evidence is here The user simply added a dab and created the page under a new name. Maybe he/she thought they could beat the system. @Spexj: I just checked the web and Kes Tokyo isn't a notable artist. He fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. Not everyone can have a Wikipedia page. Versace1608 (Talk) 19:19, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

lol seems like everyone is against the page,to be honest I don't know why. what do you mean the artist is not notable? you might want to Google him again. what does notable mean to you?

Spexj (talk) 19:25, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

Thank you two for the responses while I was out. As for Spexj I will be reporting you as a sockpuppet of User: Mhbent. STATic message me! 01:56, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

#Curious

Hey STATIC, what's up? I would like to ask you a question but probably this is not the right place to ask it. Anyway i'm asking because i'm really curious :D Can you please tell me who is rapping in this song in this song from 2:52? Thanks in advance bro! --Eurofan88 (talk) 20:14, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

@Eurofan88: No problem at all. The rapper at that point is Rich Homie Quan. What I usually do when I am curious in the way you just were, is to look up the song lyrics, as it will usually tell you who is performing what. STATic message me! 02:03, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

G-Unit

It is very clear that Young Buck is resigned with G-Unit. G-unit also just released an EP on G-Unit Records which is why i changed it to 3 albums released. Young Buck is clearly signed as well. There isn't a single source confirmed with anything on their former roster, so why would i have to add one. Take 2 seconds out of your day and google it yourself. It clear news that he is re-signed and G-Unit released a third album. Instead of immediately changing what I just spent time updating, why dont you do some research on it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mcbedford (talk • contribs) 02:23, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

@Mcbedford: No it is not. He has his own record label, you are just speculating he is signed. Just because he is a part of the group and signed as part of the group, does not mean that he is at all signed as a solo artist. STATic message me! 03:36, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

AXS

I am just curious about using such sources like AXS for album reviews on articles such as My Everything. I removed the source, but another editor added it back into the article.AdditionSubtraction (talk) 19:52, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Edit the line about stone creek having a gang problem in Riff Raffs wiki page

Hello,

I was hoping you would remove the line about the stone creek area of Houston "developing a gang problem" in the early life section of Riff Raff's profile. It was stated in the LA Weekly article about Riff Raff but is unverified. No police log or article that I can find refers to a gang problem in stone creek so I feel it may not stand up to accuracy standards. I would do it myself but the page is locked. I noticed you were able to edit the page. Could you help me amend the description? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bays21 (talk • contribs) 02:03, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

@Bays21: The LA Weekly, a reliable source says it. There is nothing saying there wasn't so why would it be removed? Police logs are not available just like that and to be honest, almost all cities have gang problems, so even though it is not Compton, there are probably still gang problems. STATic message me! 05:51, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

I own property in the area. It does not have a gang problem documented in any other source other than a hearsay account in LA Weekly. Any inference that there is a gang problem in the area can effect the perception of an area as well as the value of the investments in that area. Consequently I feel it would be best to remove that inference. I'm not trying to be a jerk or anything I simply found this by looking at famous people from my zip and found this as a result. Is there perhaps some sort of proof I could provide you to make the edit? I'm happy to secure crime logs for the area and in doing so demonstrate that there is not a gang problem at all. Perhaps the occasional unkept lawn but that's about it. I hope this doesn't make me sound like some greedy land baron I just want the area to be accurately depicted and I'm happy to prove that it is a safe place. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bays21 (talk • contribs) 21:02, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

@Bays21: Your fears are unfounded. The article is referring to the area when the subject's childhood, many years ago. Either way, do you really think the Wikipedia page of some rapper is going to do anything to your property value? STATic message me! 06:27, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Neon Icon

I only changed it because what was stated was false. Riff Raff had extremely negative reviews. He paid off everyone who gave him high praise for his album.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rojocube (talk • contribs) 19:14, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

@Rojocube: Please take your wild conspiracy theories somewhere else. STATic message me! 03:34, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Regarding article page redirected Remember the Love

Hello, i was surprised that the article page for Remember the Love was redirected to Nomadic (Adriana Evans album). You complimented me doing the article page very well. I made sure to provide as much valuable resources related to the song and its popularity. I'm a fan of Adriana Evans and her great music, did you know "Remember the Love" was and is still one of Adriana Evans most popular songs all around the world and used on the very popular Logo TV series Noah's Arc as well on soundtracks to the Noah's Arc Jumping the Broom movie and the series TV soundtrack. I just felt her song "Remember the Love" highly deserves its own article page and devoted my time to provide as much valuable resources references and external, this is one of her most popular songs in her professional music career. Dshun

Regarding article page redirected Remember the Love

Hi i'm thinking it prob would've been better to have noted bulletin at top of article page for Remember the Love stating please help enhance this article page by providing more additional resources, then to have page redirected. I know that bulletin is used often on a few article pages on wikipedia. There are plenty available verification resources online regarding the song "Remember the Love" and the artist Adriana Evans altogether.

Regarding article page redirected Reality (Adriana Evans song)

Hello, i'm just curious other then a redirect as i just notice your edit redirect for Reality (Adriana Evans song), wouldn't be best as to help improve the article page with more valuable resources yourself or other members then to just redirect the page altogether. Still hard to believe you left a message on my page saying Great Article written for Remember the Love, then later you redirect the page altogether, i don't understand. Still i will mention that's why there is bulletin notes above the article page to state please help enhance or this page by helping to provide additional resources or information regarding the article page. I may need to take a break from taking time and effort to creating a great article page on wikipedia, it gets very frustrating even though i received high rewards compliments from many of the editors on wikipedia through out the last two years.

i dont know how to cite but heres some reliable source to the frank ocean and damienn Jones article portion

http://www.bbc.co.uk/music/artists/e520459c-dff4-491d-a6e4-c97be35e0044 http://www.outsmartmagazine.com/2014/08/keeping-jones/

http://www.mtv.com/artists/damienn-jones/biography/

if yu can site it i would appreciate that and thank you so much sir ‒ – — ― — Preceding unsigned comment added by Missthug713 (talk • contribs) 23:21, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

It needs to be taken to Talk: Frank Ocean Missthug713. To learn to cite sources see WP:CITE. STATic message me! 06:24, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Hey! Quick Question.

Hey, how's it going? Just curious what is needed to keep the NIKO IS article up? He has 2 notable sources Orlando Weekly (40,000 print copies a week, and 200,000 weekly visitors) and Vibe.com. His music is posted on major hip hop blogs (Hip Hop DX, All Hip Hop, 2DopeBoyz, and many more).

Thanks!

-Nik — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.220.120.58 (talk) 19:32, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

The current sourcing (Vibe, HipHopDX, AllHipHop) are just song postings, not any coverage of him or his career. STATic message me! 21:30, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Hey. The vibe article and the orlando weekly article aren't just song postings.

http://www.vibe.com/article/niko-talks-upcoming-album-his-brazilian-roots-and-working-talib-kweli http://orlandoweekly.com/music/the-chill-agility-of-niko-is-flow-pops-on-good-blood-1.1745602 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nikwilliamson (talk • contribs) 07:18, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

@Nikwilliamson: Okay, it does not look like it is close to being deleted at this point, but a bit more coverage in reliable sources might need to be supported in the article so notability cannot be questioned. STATic message me! 03:57, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

peace

This is abensir I would like to know is there any reason you edited the Wu tang affiliate section rapper and deleted Dungeon Masta and United kingdom Population click Which is under Prodigal Son And Popa Wu group United kingdom ( UK )When All sources of the Individuals Is Valid and credited as a journalist I done that research and analysis of all of them Which they are under many Wu related sites and for the longest they was even on the section that was mentioned I feel that it is disrespect to these hard working artists and it should be rectified peace and blessings74.83.244.113 (talk) 23:53, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

It needs to be cited by reliable sources in the article to be included. STATic message me! 03:59, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Fresh Kid Ice (2nd nomination)

Hi STATicVapor, Just a heads up - I've reopened Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fresh Kid Ice (2nd nomination) for another week since someone had a problem, Cheers, –Davey2010 • (talk) 21:36, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

Dreamville Records

I just created the article Dreamville Records. Can you help it?Nba-fan-11 (talk) 02:19, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Box Office Figures

So I'm always editing box office numbers and you're always changing them to shorter versions (eg $24.6 million). I just assumed you were right and I missed some rule however then an administrator (on Ride Along) said otherwise. So unless you know something he doesn't know, your shorter box office format is wrong. Just trying to help/clear things up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TropicAces (talk • contribs)

@TropicAces: I already explained where it was decided. MOS:LARGENUM is the manual of style that says to do it and there is consensus at Wikiproject film, so it now says to round at Template: Infobox film/doc. The admin at Ride Along was reverting vandalism by an IP, your edit just got caught in the revert. I just changed it back. STATic message me! 16:44, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Something Wicked (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Robinson. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Paperwork: The Motion Picture

Hey Static, you think you could help me move the article Paperwork: The Motion Picture to Paperwork (T.I. album), apparently the subtitle has been dropped. Please and thank you. 1Sire (talk) 09:34, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Chief Keef Children

I was written to voice my concern on the matter : Chief Keef Personal life, his children. Keith has a daughter with Erica Early her name is Kimora Sosha Cozart 18months. Court order childsupport proves Keith father the lil girl DNA proved Keith is 99.9% the father, can you please update his children info to add Kimora Cozart. Thank you 50.151.198.23 (talk) 01:38, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/breaking/chi-arrest-warrant-for-chief-keef-in-child-support-case-20140714-story.html http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/breaking/chi-chief-keef-20131125-story.html

WikiCup 2014 September newsletter

In one month's time, we will know our WikiCup 2014 champion. Newcomer Godot13 (submissions) has taken a strong lead with a featured list (historical coats of arms of the U.S. states from 1876) and a raft of featured pictures. Reigning champion Cwmhiraeth (submissions) is in second place with a number of high-importance biology articles, including new FA Isopoda and new GA least weasel. Casliber (submissions), who is in his fifth WikiCup final, is in third, with featured articles Pictor and Epacris impressa.

Signups for the 2015 WikiCup are open. All Wikipedians, new and experienced, are warmly invited to sign up for the competition. Wikipedians interested in friendly competition may also like to sign up for the GA Cup, a new WikiCup-inspired competition which revolves around completing good article reviews. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk · contribs) The ed17 (talk · contribs) and Miyagawa (talk · contribs) 22:11, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Oxymoron (album)

The article Oxymoron (album) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Oxymoron (album) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SNUGGUMS -- SNUGGUMS (talk) 08:41, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

October 9th is the deadline, just a reminder. Snuggums (talk / edits) 16:02, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Linkin Park and Jay-Z - Collision Course

LP and JZ's album, Collision Course, is consider a remix album mostly instead of a EP, it started as just one song to be mash-up but they changed it into a 6-songs EP that was mashed-up, the album consisted of songs remixed, rerecorded, and mash together.

it's consider a Remix Album, Live Album, and EP DVD Live Performance is from the second take, then the first take is for MTV Ultimate Mash-Up session.2.1 Jibbz (talk) 18:23, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

i have edited it as per the regulations and have given a credible source — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kapilangal (talk • contribs) 16:17, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Linkin Park - Guitar Center Sessions

I've corrected the mistake on the page where it says about LP performing at GCS in LA, it said the performance is on Dec. 7, its not, its on October 24, then the performance will premiere as "Guitar Center Sessions: Linkin Park" on December 7th, not sure if it gonna air on Dish Network, so far it just Direc TV. go to http://lplive.net/shows/2014

the performance is schedule on Oct. 24th. I go to lplive.net to know what the setlist and venue, place LP perform Past, present and future. 2.1 Jibbz (talk) 20:19, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Associated Acts and Linkin Park

Hello Static. We are considering revising the Associated Acts section of the Linkin Park article per an anon's recent edits. Since you contributed to the discussion last time, I believe you might be interested in the new discussion:Talk:Linkin_Park#Associated_Acts_again! --  StarScream1007  ►Talk  01:28, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Linkin Park - Hiatus

Uh...I forgot to mention that Linkin Park went on hiatus by September or October 2004 after the last show which was in Sao Paulo.

The reason for this was because the band wanted to give Mike Shinoda a chance to do a side-project, during the making of their 2nd record, Meteora, and during the world tour of the album, he been making Hip-Hop music, his bandmates knew he been making hip-hop the whole time, so they gave him the opportunities to do this. Then the band took a break from music, but they reunited 3 times just for rehearsals, for the Music For Relief show (2005) and Live 8 show (2005) and the 48th Grammy Awards Show (2006). Mike spent time in the studio making his album The Rising Tied. afterward he rehearsed the songs then went on tour. By July 2006, Linkin Park reunited for good, they begun production on the next album which was Minutes To Midnight. By August 2006, his side-project Fort Minor and Linkin Park performed (which was on August 12th, 2006 - Osaka, JP), the only time in history that he ever did that. After that Linkin Park returned to the studio to continue production on M.T.M.. Fort Minor went on hiatus by November 2006, a year after Shinoda released his side-project album.

And...

Here is something you might not know (a lot of people don't know this) but Rick Rubin told the band that they should make music they want, not what their fans want, the early demos/ideas were the same as Hybrid Theory and Meteora, they changed up the sound of the music. Look at the song "QWERTY", its was a song written by Linkin Park on the second week of August in 2006, its written in just 4 days. I read some interview, that style was planned for the next album, but it was for the Japan Tour and was a Reunited Song, to show that they've returned/reunited. They didn't have time to record the song in time, so they record the song after the Japan run but recorded it a littlebit different then it was performed in Japan.

Fast forward to 2014 - The Hunting Party ...the album idea take off where the band left off before Rick Rubin told them to write music they wanted. And Shinoda was disappointed with how rock music is today, he wanted to bring back what rock music is all about, and to return Linkin Park to their Nu-Metal roots.

Shinoda reunited with his friends Styles Of Beyond to make another album, a follow-up to The Rising Tied, it plan-release is either this year or next year. Fort Minor been on hiatus since November 2006 to until the album is release, at this point...I don't know if he gonna tour again as Fort Minor...but Linkin Park has more surprise in store for 2015.

I'm a hard-core Linkin Park fan, I know my stuff.

2.1 Jibbz (talk) 20:22, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

Terminator Movies

It seems that movie series made a mistake, John was conceived on May 15th, 1984 by Sarah and Kyle, nearly 9 months later on February 28, 1985, Sarah gave birth to John. The terminator was send back in time to protect him when he was just 10-years-old, T3 mentions it was 13-years.

John Connor = February 28th, 1985 - July 4th, 2032

Should mention that on the page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Connor

I did my research

http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/7991/933/400/t2-1985.jpg, show the DOB of John (from Terminator 2: Judgment Day) 2.1 Jibbz (talk) 20:06, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Some words

Noticed that you've left a notice indicating discouragement/wikistress on your main page. Sorry to see this, and hope any issues are resolved soon. Your hard work for articles, especially hip-hop and wrestling, shall never be forgotten or overlooked. Not sure what you'll end up deciding to do, but wishing you all the best. Cheers, Snuggums (talk / edits) 20:25, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Smosh

Template:Smosh has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. 117Avenue (talk) 04:00, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Halloween cheer!

Happy Halloween!

---

Hello STATicVapor:
Thanks for all of your contributions to improve Wikipedia, and have a happy and enjoyable Halloween!
    – Snuggums (talk / edits) 21:01, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Send Halloween cheer by adding {{subst:Happy Halloween}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.

Orphaned non-free image File:BuyTheWorld.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BuyTheWorld.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:00, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:HellofanightScHoolboyQ.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:HellofanightScHoolboyQ.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:49, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

WikiCup 2014: The results

The 2014 WikiCup champion is Godot13 (submissions), who flew the flag of the Smithsonian Institution. This was Godot13's first WikiCup competition and, over the 10 months of the competition, he has produced (among other contributions) two featured lists and an incredible 292 featured pictures, including architectural photographs and scans of historical documents. Cwmhiraeth (submissions), 2012 and 2013 WikiCup champion, came in second, having written a large number of biology-related articles. Casliber (submissions), WikiCup finalist every year since 2010, finished in third.

A full list of our prize-winners follows:

• Godot13 (submissions) wins the prize for first place and the FP prize for 181 featured pictures in the final round.
• Cwmhiraeth (submissions) wins the prize for second place and the DYK prize for 65 did you knows in the final round.
• Casliber (submissions) wins the prize for third place and the FA prize for four featured articles in the final round.
• Czar (submissions) wins the prize for fourth place
• Sturmvogel 66 (submissions) wins a final 8 prize.
• Bloom6132 (submissions) wins a final 8 prize.
• 12george1 (submissions) wins a final 8 prize.
• ChrisGualtieri (submissions) wins the GA prize for 27 good articles in round 2 and the review prize for 28 good article reviews in round 1.
• Caponer (submissions) wins the FL prize for three featured lists in round 2.
• Sven Manguard (submissions) wins the FPo prize his work on featured portals.
• Figureskatingfan (submissions) wins the topic prize for a nine-article featured topic in round 3.
• ThaddeusB (submissions) wins the news prize for 28 in the news articles in round 3.

Congratulations to everyone who has been successful in this year's WikiCup, whether you made it to the final rounds or not, and a particular congratulations to the newcomers to the WikiCup who have participated this year. We warmly invite all of you to sign up for next year's competition. Discussions and polls concerning potential rules changes are also open, and all are welcome to participate. The WikiCup judges will be back in touch over the coming months, and we hope to see you all in the 2014 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk · contribs) The ed17 (talk · contribs) and Miyagawa (talk · contribs) 22:52, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:BuyTheWorld.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:BuyTheWorld.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:10, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Jesus Piece

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Jesus Piece you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Retrohead -- Retrohead (talk) 11:41, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Jesus Piece

The article Jesus Piece you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Jesus Piece for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Retrohead -- Retrohead (talk) 21:42, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

• Bot screwed up. The nomination didn't fail on November 8th, the article was moved to Jesus Piece (album) and "Jesus Piece" was made into a DAB page. DepressedPer is currently working to get the article up to GA per Retrohead's review. Snuggums (talk / edits) 04:11, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Linkin Park - Chester Bennington plays guitar

He played guitar on It's Goin' Down, Shadow Of The Day, and Iridescent. 2.1 Jibbz (talk) 17:07, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:BuyTheWorld.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BuyTheWorld.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:47, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

A7

Hi my friend!

I hope you are doing well in these tough days. I have just created This Means War (Avenged Sevenfold song). May I ask you to check the chart performance of the song? I guess I am not able to correctly write references in that section. I had to copy-paste.

Cheers from sunny Moscow. Lamro (talk) 20:58, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Fila

Please be more careful deleting material from dab pages - indeed it was a redlink that someone had vandalized and you accepted the vandalization and acted upon it. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 20:57, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Kobe (singer) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Kobe (singer). Since you had some involvement with the Kobe (singer) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Rayukk (talk) 02:02, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

WikiCup 2015 is just around the corner...

Hello everyone, and may we wish you all a happy holiday season. As you will probably already know, the 2015 WikiCup begins in the new year; there is still time to sign up. We have a few important announcements concerning the future of the WikiCup.

• We would like to announce that Josh (J Milburn) and Ed (The ed17), who have been WikiCup judges since 2009 and 2010 respectively, are stepping down. This decision has been made for a number of reasons, but the main one is time. Both Josh and Ed have found that, over the previous year, they have been unable to devote the time necessary to the WikiCup, and it is not likely that they will be able to do this in the near future. Furthermore, new people at the helm can only help to invigorate the WikiCup and keep it dynamic. Josh and Ed will still be around, and will likely be participating in the Cup this following year as competitors, which is where both started out.
• In a similar vein, we hope you will all join us in welcoming Jason (Sturmvogel 66) and Christine (Figureskatingfan), who are joining Brian (Miyagawa) to form the 2015 WikiCup judging team. Jason is a WikiCup veteran, having won in 2010 and finishing in fifth this year. Christine has participated in two WikiCups, reaching the semi-finals in both, and is responsible for the GA Cup, which she now co-runs.
• The discussions/polls concerning the next competition's rules will be closed soon, and rules changes will be made clear on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring and talk pages. While it may be impossible to please everyone, the judges will make every effort to ensure that the new rules are both fair and in the best interests of the competition, which is, first and foremost, about improving Wikipedia.

If you have any questions or concerns, the judges can be reached on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, on their talk pages, or by email. We hope you will all join us in trying to make the 2015 WikiCup the most productive and enjoyable yet. You are receiving this message because you are listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk), The ed17 (talk), Miyagawa (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Figureskatingfan (talk) 18:54, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Your dispute with BlaccCrab

Hello, STATicVapor. I have noticed that you and BlaccCrab are having a dispute at Buy the World. Personally, to me, I think that the article does not meet the notability guidelines and standards. Edit warring can cause in long-term hatred and other forms of unacceptable behaviours that might be unfolding behind closed doors. I am a victim of a case like this, so I hope you will not feel hate against the fellow amateur editor. I have noticed that you posted a warning message on his/her talk page, and he replied you there in a rude manner. I have told him about it and hope that this dispute will end soon. I have also told him about filling blanks from pictures they have uploaded. I guess you should have a proper discussion about it with BlaccCrab, and please assume good faith. I hope you understand. Ping me for any replies, as I don't use the watchlist. Thanks, DEW. Adrenaline (Nahnah4) 08:35, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Dance Gavin Dance wiki page trouble

Hi. I'm not sure if you remember, but on July of this year you messaged me not to change the band Dance Gavin Dance's genre and I left it alone afterwards. On December 17 this year someone decided to remove half of the bands info about Acceptance Speech and other history from them because of this""The stuff you're adding is trite and sourced to Twitter and other non-printed webby material." Pretty much all bands Wikipedia pages have the same sources and other "non-printed" Webby material from Twitter and stuff and I don't see any of those pages info and stuff removed from it by you." Let's keep it here. You keep sticking material into other people's conversations. To answer your question: a. maybe you need to look further in my article edits. b. that is immaterial anyway. The content is simply not acceptable: we're not a fan site or a press agency or whatever. Drmies (talk) 18:28, 19 December 2014 (UTC) I was wondering if you can help me do something about this. If not, then ok. A person on Wikipedia name Drimes is the one to message about the problem

• Hey STATIC, I suppose we're dealing with a relatively new user of good faith but with more zeal than knowledge. One part of my comment was made because they kept making comments about this band in random sections on my talk page. The more important bit is the info they keep adding, which is all of the "X announced that Y was planned" and stuff like that--the kind of info you see in K-pop articles. It's Facebook-sourced and stuff like that, and it's not actually information, since it's not about facts but announcements of and suspicions about facts. Drmies (talk) 22:50, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:IWannaBeWithYouDJKhaled.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:IWannaBeWithYouDJKhaled.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:18, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!

Dear STATicVapor,
MERRY CHRISTMAS!!! Best wishes to you, your family and relatives this holiday season! Take this opportunity to bond with your loved ones, whether or not you are celebrating Christmas. This is a special time for everybody, and spread the holiday spirit to everybody out there!
From a fellow editor,
--Nahnah4 (talk | contribs | guestbook)

This message promotes WikiLove. Created by Nahnah4 (talk | contribs | guestbook).

Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#Requesting_input_at_Walter_Keane

Hello, you may be interested in the discussion I opened at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#Requesting input at Walter Keane per your edits to the associated article. — kikichugirl ^speak up! 06:54, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Global account

Hi STATicVapor! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to ping me with {{ping|DerHexer}}. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 12:14, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Happy New Year STATicVapor!

Happy New Year!

STATicVapor,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. Snuggums (talk / edits) 06:40, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year 2015}} to user talk pages.

Happy New Year!

Dear STATicVapor,
HAPPY NEW YEAR!!! A new year has come! How times flies! 2015 will be a new year, and it is also a chance for you to start afresh! Thank you for your contributions!
From a fellow editor,
--Nahnah4 (talk | contribs | guestbook) 09:25, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

This message promotes WikiLove. Created by Nahnah4 (talk | contribs | guestbook). To use this template, leave {{subst:User:Nahnah4/Happy New Year}} on someone else's talk page.

WikiCup 2015 launch newsletter

Round one of the 2015 WikiCup has begun! So far we've had around 80 signups, which close on February 5. If you have not already signed up and want to do so, then you can add your name here. There have been changes to to several of the points scores for various categories, and the addition of Peer Reviews for the first time. These will work in the same manner as Good Article Reviews, and all of the changes are summarised here.

Remember that only the top 64 scoring competitors will make it through to the second round, and one of the new changes this year is that all scores must be claimed within two weeks of an article's promotion or appearance, so don't forget to add them to your submissions pages! If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAN, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! Figureskatingfan (talk · contribs), Miyagawa (talk · contribs) and Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs)
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:51, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:BuyTheWorld.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BuyTheWorld.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:17, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

WT:PW Discussion

You're invited to participate in the discussion Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Professional wrestling#Signature move sourcing. starship.paint ~ ¡Olé! 00:13, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

WikiCup 2015 March newsletter

One of several of Godot13's quality submissions during round 1

That's it, the first round is done, sign-ups are closed and we're into round 2. 64 competitors made it into this round, and are now broken into eight groups of eight. The top two of each group will go through to round 3, and then the top scoring 16 "wildcards" across all groups. Round 1 saw some interesting work on some very important articles, with the round leader Freikorp (submissions) owing most of his 622 points scored to a Featured Article on the 2001 film Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within which qualified for a times-two multiplier. This is a higher score than in previous years, as Godot13 (submissions) had 500 points in 2014 at the end of round 1, and our very own judge, Sturmvogel_66 (submissions) led round 1 with 601 points in 2013.

In addition to Freikorp's work, some other important articles and pictures were improved during round one, here's a snapshot of a few of them:

• Cwmhiraeth (submissions) took Bumblebee, a level-4 vital article, to Good Article;
• AHeneen (submissions) worked-up the Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 article, also to Good Article status;
• Rodw (submissions) developed an extremely timely article to Good Article, taking Magna Carta there some 800 years after it was first sealed;
• And last but not least, Godot13 (submissions) (FP bonus points) worked up a number of Featured Pictures during round 1, including the 1948 one Deutsche Mark (pictured right), receiving the maximum bonus due to the number of Wikis that the related article appears in.

You may also wish to know that The Core Contest is running through the month of March. Head there for further details - they even have actual prizes!

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Figureskatingfan (talk · contribs · email), Miyagawa (talk · contribs · email) and Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email)

Thanks for your assistance! Miyagawa (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiCup.

(Opt-out Instructions) This message was send by Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:55, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Down-on-my-luck-vicmensa.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Down-on-my-luck-vicmensa.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:24, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Chris-Brown-Loyal-West-Coast.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Chris-Brown-Loyal-West-Coast.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:30, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:TheyDontLoveYouNoMore.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TheyDontLoveYouNoMore.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 05:48, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

WP:Missing Wikipedians

STATic, it's been a while since we last spoke. I know you've been semi-retired since last October, and saw you haven't edited since February. Just letting you know that I've added your name to the linked page above due to inactivity. If you ever come back, remember to remove your name from the list. Either way, know that you and your work shall never be forgotten. Cheers from one bro to another, Snuggums (talk / edits) 00:33, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Greetings

Saw you make some edits lately after quite a lengthy lack of Wikipedia activity, and even if you don't plan on fully returning anytime soon, it's nice to see you haven't completely vanished :). Take care, Snuggums (talk / edits) 22:41, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

@SNUGGUMS: Yeah I'm still alive, makes me sad when I see a overwellming mistake in articles lol. I wish I had the time or the incline to edit and patrol vandalism like I used to. Nice hearing from you, I hope everything's well and I'm glad your still on here helping. STATic message me! 16:52, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

Not a problem, and things are quite well for yours truly. Happy to still help make Wikipedia a better place. Snuggums (talk / edits) 17:00, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, STATicVapor. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Digital (Soulja Boy Tell' Em song) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Digital (Soulja Boy Tell' Em song). Since you had some involvement with the Digital (Soulja Boy Tell' Em song) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Richhoncho (talk) 14:39, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Cruel Winter

Hello, STATicVapor. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Cruel Winter".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 14:28, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:BrickSquadMonopoly.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BrickSquadMonopoly.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:31, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Vandalism

Orphaned non-free image File:1017BrickSquadd.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:1017BrickSquadd.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:46, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

Super Duper Kyle 'Light Of Mine' Production Credits

Hi STATicVapor,

I noticed you made the most significant update to the production credits on Light of Mine, and the reference lists iTunes as the only source for the tracklisting, yet when I navigate to the info section in Apple Music that lists the composers (that service's most in-depth form of credit attribution), the credits are not nearly as precise as the ones you have. I'm just wondering what your source for the production credits is? (I'm not asking as like some wikipedia stickler, I'm actually an editor on genius.com and trying to make sure I have the most up-to-date credits for the album on there).

Lemme know, thanks again!

Adam fishman (talk) 05:57, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

Suite ( listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Suite (. Since you had some involvement with the Suite ( redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Thryduulf (talk) 12:28, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, STATicVapor. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)