User talk:Someguywhat

POV Pushing

Please desist from your constant POV pushing and removing references. Your edit history shows you repeatedly changing English descriptions to British with no justification. I notice you have also regularly engage in distruptive edit warring with multiple editors on the Marcus Mumford article pushing your own POV. If you continue with this behaviour, I will contact an admin.

78.146.202.113 (talk) 10:59, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

First off, I changed Catfish and the Bottlemen to British as a compromise. They should really be labeled as Welsh considering they formed in Wales and many websites refer to them as Welsh. It does not make sense for an English rock band to be from Wales, regardless of what the members say. If we call them British, then we're not specifying whether they are English or Welsh and therefore it could be seen both ways. Again, this was a compromise. Also, it seems you are outnumbered in regards to how many editors consider them Welsh and how many consider them English, so you seem to be the one pushing your view on other people with that one.

In regards to Marcus Mumford, he has British and American citizenship. It does not matter whether he identifies as English or not, what matters is what countries he belongs to. Many other people who have British and American citizenship are labeled as British-Americans as well (Mischa Barton, Rebecca Hall, Lily Collins. Again, this is not me pushing my point of view, this is me simply stating facts. If he didn't have American citizenship, then yes, he could be described as simply English. But the fact that he has dual citizenship and the fact that many other people who have dual citizenship are labeled as British-Americans, means that he should also be labeled as a British-American.

If you need more "justfication", I can gladly provide it. Someguywhat (talk) 04:16, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Someguywhat. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Babyshambles live in 2014.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Babyshambles live in 2014.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Mackensen (talk) 13:42, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Someguywhat. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Someguywhat. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]