User talk:The Real One Returns

A&M Records

Hi. I realized you made a lot of adjustments to the A&M page, but you seemed to have removed relevant information. For instance, why was the section on A&M (uk) removed? Imperatore (talk) 06:09, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect of Category:Multi network shows

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Multi network shows, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Multi network shows is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Multi network shows, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 11:40, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Fair use Vibe magazine covers

I have nominated Category:Fair use Vibe magazine covers (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Damiens.rf 13:33, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Control and New Jack Swing

Richard J. Ripani in The New Blue Music identifies Control as influencing new jack swing, even though the album was not labeled as such at the time of its debut. The Bookkeeper (of the Occult) 09:33, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:UniversalRecordsSign.png

Thanks for uploading File:UniversalRecordsSign.png. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 15:00, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:UniversalMotown.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:UniversalMotown.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 15:05, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Nonesuch records logo.jpeg)

Thanks for uploading File:Nonesuch records logo.jpeg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:02, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:NE-popcorn love.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:NE-popcorn love.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 22:52, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Please fill in the info for th Popcorn Love pic u added so that it wont get deleted. Thx. 70.108.91.208 (talk) 20:24, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Giant Records (Warner Bros. subsidiary label)

Please don't move pages without first asking for a consensus, preferably at WP:RM. "Giant/Warner Bros. Records" goes against naming conventions, as the label's true name was indeed "Giant Records". Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Many otters • One hammer • HELP)} 03:56, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There are two labels with that name, so the (Warner Bros. subsidiary label) part is needed to clarify which Giant Records we're talking about. Also, we have conventions on how to name articles, and "Giant/Warner Bros. Records" doesn't fall under that convention. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Many otters • One hammer • HELP)} 17:48, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Copy of db beavis cornholio1 7144.gif)

Thanks for uploading File:Copy of db beavis cornholio1 7144.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:07, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Universal Motown/Universal Republic

Please see my page move and revisions/updates to Universal Motown Republic Group. Imperatore (talk) 07:46, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Viki

To move the article to Victoria Lord we would need to do a requested move, not a cut-and-paste move and redirect, which loses the edit history.— TAnthony^Talk 00:51, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Sugeknight1995.JPG)

Thanks for uploading File:Sugeknight1995.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:41, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sugeknight1995.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sugeknight1995.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:53, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Signatures

Just so you are aware of official policy: WP:SIG: Signatures must include at least one internal link to your user page, user talk page, or contributions page; this allows other editors easy access to your talk page and contributions log. The lack of such a link is widely viewed as obstructive. If, while making modifications, you accidentally disable this link, see Wikipedia:How to fix your signature. When you insert your signature on your talk page or user page a link to that page will appear black, bold and inactive, so test your signature elsewhere. The Bookkeeper (of the Occult) 06:43, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I see you still have not changed your signature. Please be aware disabling links in your signature to your user page, talk page and contributions is considered Wikipedia:Disruptive editing and could therefore lead to a block, even if you are making constructive contributions. The Bookkeeper (of the Occult) 01:10, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Signature reactivated. Thanks for the tip. You should, however, concentrate on the accuracy of your own edits instead of worrying about whether or not my signature has a hyperlink. Again, thanks for the tip -- this conversation is now over, please do not write back. —The Real One Returns (talk) 03:47, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lead sections

Please do not cut or remove lead sections from articles, as you did here. Per WP:LEAD, the section serves as an introduction to the article and as a summary of the important aspects of the subject of the article. Also, please do not link dates. That practice is long deprecated, see WP:UNLINKDATES for further information. Thank you. — ξ ^xplicit 06:49, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A&M/Octone

I don't understand why you seek to undo legitimate updates to this article, including details previously added by others and added by myself. The previous version of the article you "restored" is less complete and objectively worse in several ways. Please discuss the article on the Talk page if you have disagreements about its content. --Ten Thousand Bullets (talk) 17:14, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Beavis full frontal.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Beavis full frontal.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 03:28, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:02, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crave Cristian and Evangeline

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Mhiji 22:40, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:5teevee5#Changing and choosing images

Hello, The Real One Returns. Would you mind weighing in on this, especially the Téa Delgado part? Flyer22 (talk) 02:45, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Elektra Records

Please provide a supporting citation to prove that Elektra releases new material using the "Elektra Entertainment Group" name since the label was revived by Atlantic Records. Steelbeard1 (talk) 20:37, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Family Guy characters

We do not list 1-off and joke characters in FG articles, especially in the infoboxes. If you'd like to debate that, please comment on the Project page for it and establish a consensus before making further changes. DP76764 (Talk) 18:44, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Todd Manning#Seperate articles

Hi, The Real One Returns. Mind explaining in the above linked discussion why you made this edit and your take on whether there should be separate articles for these characters? Flyer22 (talk) 19:51, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I felt that it was inappropriate to create an article/section for this character until the reveal was complete. Editors were prematurely concluding that Trevor St. John was Victor Lord Jr., prior to the episode that confirmed it. Even with heavy innuendo and correct hunches, articles shouldn't be edited until everything is completely verified.The Real One Returns (talk) 04:11, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I considered that as your reason as well. Although, you really didn't have to remove the whole section; it could have been edited away from naming St. John as Victor Lord II. The character won't be getting an article, per what has been stated in the linked discussion above, but he can be given a spot on the character list. I'll go ahead and undo your edit, since he has been revealed as Victor Lord, Jr. now. If that changes in the future, it can always be changed to name Howarth's Todd as the impostor. Flyer22 (talk) 15:13, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:OLTL Howarth.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:OLTL Howarth.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 01:52, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Irene Manning (One Life to Live)

I've reverted the changes made to the above referenced article pertaining to the relationship of Irene and Peter Manning. While maintaining the verifiable, I have included content that indicates that Todd Manning (while berating his mother in the October 3, 2011 episode) made a remark that indicated that Irene was Peter's cousin. Please note that while we would prefer at times to only include that which we personally determine to be "truthful", Wikipedia is limited to that which is verifiable. For more information, please see our verifiability policy. Please feel free to contact me if you have questions. Best regards, Cind.amuse (Cindy) 22:01, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Swv-cosign.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Swv-cosign.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:12, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Todd Manning#New Image

Since you uploaded the long-standing main image of the Todd Manning article, you may want to weigh in on the above linked discussion to help us gain WP:Consensus on whether or not the image should be changed. Flyer22 (talk) 02:23, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:OLTL Howarth.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:OLTL Howarth.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:43, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited It All Belongs to Me, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Digital Download and New Life (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:46, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mama's Family template

Your !vote makes no sense. Every link on this template redirects to Mama's Family except for the episode list. The template now navigates nothing. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 06:51, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Geffen Records (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to The Wanderer

New Edition (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Candy Girl

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

LaFace Records

Hi, you added CeCe Frey as a LaFace Records artist. Do you have this confirmation? Thanks for clarifying this. RaphaelRBarbosa (talk) 02:02, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit to Houston album article

Please dont base the sources you look for on your opinion of what genre the album is (WP:GWAR). Instead, the most reliable sources available on the topic should be researched, and whatever comes from those should be used (WP:STICKTOSOURCE). It's not "obviously" an R&B/adult contemporary album if all the public and scholarly critiques available (i.e. music journalists reviewing this album) point out "pop", "dance-pop","dance", etc. Dan56 (talk) 08:53, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Teairra Marí, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Division 1 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:33, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Madea Goes to Jail, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Meet the Browns (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Hello, I'm STATicVapor. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Republic Records, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. STATic message me! 17:39, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah please do not mass change major record label articles to incorrect information, thanks. The labels are not self-distributed, they are distributed by their parent labels. STATic message me! 17:50, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MJB—Everything.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MJB—Everything.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:33, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MJB—I Can Love You.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MJB—I Can Love You.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:33, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:DGC Records (logo).gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:DGC Records (logo).gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:16, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:AsylumRecordsLogo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:AsylumRecordsLogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:14, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Mjb-notgoncry.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mjb-notgoncry.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:00, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:The Surreal Life

Template:The Surreal Life has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Rob Sinden (talk) 08:18, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, The Real One Returns. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, The Real One Returns. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Capitol-music-group-logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Capitol-music-group-logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, The Real One Returns. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox song#released

Regarding your recent changes to Madonna song pages, please read the above link. We're supposed to use the earliest known release date with no concern for what nationality a singer/band is. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 03:43, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Candy Shop (Madonna song) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Candy Shop (Madonna song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Candy Shop (Madonna song) (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

HĐ (talk) 15:42, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of current Island Records artists for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of current Island Records artists is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of current Island Records artists until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

pburka (talk) 15:36, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Asylum Records logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Asylum Records logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:00, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fontanalogo.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Fontanalogo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Issues about record label and release history table

Hi @The Real One Returns. The recent discussions of Talk:The_Storm_Before_the_Calm#Euro_label, Template talk:Infobox album#Labels from countries and Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Albums/Album_article_style_advice#"Release history" tables. Your comments would be appreciate. Regards. 183.171.120.95 (talk) 09:13, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion

Proposed deletion of Joya (singer)

The article Joya (singer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No independent references and no reason to assume notability; everything I can find online relates to a different singer of the same name, based in China

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]