Talk:Indicud

Indicud has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: April 14, 2014. (Reviewed version).

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Hip hop Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hip hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of hip hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Hip hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip hopHip hop articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Edit request on 9 April 2013

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

"Solo Dolo Part II" actually samples "Going the Distance" by the same band, not "The Traitor." 150.216.111.11 (talk) 22:56, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Provide a reliable source to support your change. STATic message me! 20:39, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 10 April 2013

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Tenthbrett (talk) 18:57, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please specify what you want to change, not copy the entire article on the talk page. STATic message me! 20:39, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Solo Dolo PT II not written by Michels, Brenneck, Guy

Solo Dolo Pt II contains a sample of Menahan Street Band's cover of "Going The Distance" originally written by Bill Conti.

Bill Conti should be credited as a writer w/ Mescudi and Duckworth, not Michels, Brenneck, and Guy.

See BMI registration here: http://repertoire.bmi.com/title.asp?blnWriter=True&blnPublisher=True&blnArtist=True&page=1&keyid=15404156&ShowNbr=0&ShowSeqNbr=0&querytype=WorkID — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.79.190.150 (talk) 17:49, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Indicud/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: WikiRedactor (talk · contribs) 17:27, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

General

One external link to address.
Can you organize the references in columns of three instead of two?
When discussing chart positions, can you write out "number X" instead of "#X"?
A "Release history" section would be nice to have at the end of the article.
Please make sure that every citation has an access date.

All the above is done. However, checklinks yields no results for me? STATic message me! 19:26, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

When I checked it was one link from Amazon.com, but the link works fine for me and it doesn't seem to redirect or anything, so I think it will be fine to leave it as-is.

Introduction

Can you touch on the musical styles in one of the paragraphs? That would be good information to have at quick glance.

Done. STATic message me! 19:42, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Background

Can you find another way to write "to say the least" that sounds more formal?
Similarly, maybe "uncharacteristic" (or something of that nature) can be a more neutral way to say "surprisingly".

I removed both instances as they seemed to be unnecessary an puffery. STATic message me! 19:42, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Recording and production

Since this section is so long, maybe you can break it up into separate "Recording" and "Production" sections? I figured that the former could focus more on the fact that he was back in the studio and reaching out to new collaborators, while the latter can talk about his focus on production values and the movie inspiration stuff.
Instead of saying "Indicud MC", it would be better to just say Kid Cudi or Cudi.

Getting to these rather quickly, done. STATic message me! 19:42, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Release and promotion

Looks good to me!

Singles

It looks like every mention of a chart position needs a citation to verify them.

Took care of it. STATic message me! 19:42, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Commercial performance

To give this section a little bit more meat, can you make prose out of all of the chart positions listed in the "Charts" position?
You'll also need to find another reference for the UK chart position in this section, since the Complex citation only talks about the U.S.

Thanks for mentioning this, I guess around its release a lot of chart positions were missed. Now they are added to the table and the prose. STATic message me! 03:37, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Critical response

Can you paraphrase some of the longer quotes?

It was a bit lengthy at some points, I trimmed them down quite a bit. STATic message me! 03:37, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Track listing

You should mention that the songwriting/production credits are pulled from the liner notes.
When you add in the official liner notes reference, it won't be necessary to have those questionable WhoSampled sources.

Done. STATic message me! 03:37, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Personnel

Can you add in a reference to supplement the "Credits for Indicud taken from the album's liner notes" piece?
And done. STATic message me! 03:37, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Overall, the article looks to be in good shape! I'll check back regularly to see how progress is going! WikiRedactor (talk) 17:52, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a bunch for review WikiRedactor. I believe I have now taken care of everything. If there is anything outstanding still, let me know.

STATic message me! 03:37, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

My pleasure! I have no additional issues to raise, so I am happy to pass the article, good work! WikiRedactor (talk) 19:39, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.