User talk:Shane Harper 4 Life

Hello Shane Harper 4 Life, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents

Department directory

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The or button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.

If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

Shane Harper 4 Life, good luck, and have fun. – Jnanaranjan Sahu (ଜ୍ଞାନ) ^talk 12:30, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Shane Harper 4 Life, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Shane Harper 4 Life! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Doctree (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:41, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Feb 22, 2014

Stop please, they was released as singles. Regards. Connie (A.K) (talk) 18:55, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to R5 (band), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 15:54, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Davey2010. An edit that you recently made to Emily Osment seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! -
→Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 00:48, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Loud (EP) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Digital download

Loud (R5 song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Digital download

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Austin Mahone discography. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. -→Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 03:41, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited East Coast Tour, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Can You Feel It (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Bridgit Mendler. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. IPadPerson (talk) 15:19, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you purposefully and blatantly harass a fellow Wikipedian again, as you did at User talk:IPadPerson, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. IPadPerson (talk) 16:12, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. IPadPerson (talk) 20:12, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ignored/removed warnings and failure to resist a block

You have ignored and removed all of the warnings that I gave you ([1] and [2], despite you claiming they were attacks when they were not pertaining to your edits on the Bridgit Mendler. An ANI discussion was already started about you and you couldn't even bother to comment on it or resist a block from editing. IPadPerson (talk) 23:20, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but please. "Failure to resist a block"? For fuck's sake--we're not inside a Queensryche album here. Shane Harper, please look at the ANI thread. No need to comment. My apologies for the unexplained reverts and the ridiculous warnings you received: they were wrong. Drmies (talk) 01:17, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2014 Summer Tour

The article 2014 Summer Tour has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Hasn't even happened yet. Her other tours are at AfD--they are run-of-the-mill concert tours, promotional efforts. We're not talking about Zoo TV here.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Drmies (talk) 01:24, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies

Hi Shane,
Not entirely sure why you've got so many warnings but I wanted to apologize for my warning (which I did remove anyway) and the revert which looking back at it shouldn't of happened!, I assumed you were being disruptive but nonetheless I should've shown some good faith, So apologies for the warning and for reverting,
Happy Editing :)
If you need any help just ask :)
Regards, →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 01:41, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

FDR charts

FDR charts are on WP:BADCHARTS: not only are they unused by reliable sources, they make pretty strange claims like #1 positions for Aly&AJ Christmas songs.—Kww(talk) 03:46, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 78violet discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Walking on Sunshine (song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:R5 Louder Tour.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:R5 Louder Tour.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:27, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Art of Letting Go

Do not change it to a promo single without achieving a consensus in the talk page, which states otherwise. Your edit has been reverted for these articles. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 04:57, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shakira - La La La (Brasil 2014) cover.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Shakira - La La La (Brasil 2014) cover.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. WonderBoy1998 (talk) 18:48, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Shakira - La La La (Brasil 2014) cover.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Shakira - La La La (Brasil 2014) cover.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:35, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Music of the World Cup: Allez! Ola! Ole! may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

#"[[The Cup of Life|The Cup of Life (Official Song of the [[1998 FIFA World Cup]])" – [[Ricky Martin]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:12, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Austin Mahone "Shadow" promotional single

Hi Shane Harper 4 Life! Thanks for your updates to the Austin Mahone discography. I think it was good to add Til I Found You, and to removed the promotional singles from the main single list on The Secret EP page.

However, I am pretty certain that Shadow is a promotional single, considering the various Billboard articles that refer to it as a single, and the fact that it has a music video on the official Vevo page. I don't think the fact that it isn't included on the AllMusic list confirms that it's not a promotional single, that is not an official source. Didn't want to add it again without speaking to you first though, would not like to get into an editing war! How would you feel about adding it again as a promotional single?

Thanks, Robbieg2012 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Robbieg2012 (talk • contribs) 01:51, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Raise Your Voice, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Keane and Walking on Sunshine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia as you did Austin Mahone discography. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Eliluu (talk) 19:09, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to R5 discography may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

October 20, 2012 - Holiday Songs|publisher=Billboard |date=2012-09-08 |accessdate=2012-09-13}}</ref>
|}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:59, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Jason Ritter

added a link pointing to Teddy Bears

Raise Your Voice

added a link pointing to James Avery

The End of Love

added a link pointing to Frances Shaw

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Revert on Shakira discography

About your really disgusting revert on Shakira discography page: The list was a featured article candidate when you made that revert. Now two users have made comments about the article in relation to its older version, hence you have successfully initiated mass confusion and doubled my work. About your issue with it being "vandalism/." Considering how poorly made and referenced the old list was, my new version is definitely far from "vandalism." Regarding the 10 column thing, please feel free to list it at the review page. Also, Wikipedia:DISCOGSTYLE states that " A limit of approximately 10 separate charts is suggested." I have listed 11 and 12 charts for albums and singles, respectively, which do not effect the layout in a negative way and only add to the reader's understanding. However, you were right about including certifications of only those countries listed, hence I am making changes shortly. I can see you receive a lot of warnings, and maybe you tried to do the right thing here. I apologise for my tone but just put yourself in my shoes and how embarrassed I must have felt when I realise users are actually reviewing an article I didn't even make. Any suggestions, any critique, will be appreciated at the review page, but not in the form of a direct reversal right? Even if you're still displeased with the list, please don't make another revert as the FL nomination may fail on the basis of instability and edit-warring.

I don't mean to be rude here but please realise that making really hasty reverts like this benefit no one and only result in a lot of wastage of time. Best of luck, --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 18:55, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stop

Shane Harper 4 Life, please stop with the reverting. I don't know what point you are not getting, but if you notice, the new page I have made is much better than the old one, as it is evident on the Featured list nomination page. If you wanted me to remove CAPIF and ABPD certs, you could have peacefully pointed that out on the Nomination page, linked above. Please stop this. It is disheartening to find this is happening. What seems to be going on is that you're not happy I replaced the content as you wanted to revamp the list. Well I have done that, and the only entities who benefit from this are Wikipedia and the readers who visit the page, not you and I. Your reverts are not wanted, and you will surely get the article failed on terms of instability if you continue this. Please, it is a humble request. Stop. --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 15:24, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Becky G, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 19:05, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Austin Mahone - The Secret.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Austin Mahone - The Secret.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 10:03, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Booty featuring Iggy Azalea.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Booty featuring Iggy Azalea.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 10:06, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Hannah Spearritt, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Musdan77 (talk) 19:35, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary with every edit. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, even if it is very brief, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history.

The edit summary appears in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! --Musdan77 (talk) 19:37, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ChamithN. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Debby Ryan because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Chamith (talk) 15:59, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Hello My Name Is..., you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. IPadPerson (talk) 16:30, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia. Chamith (talk) 16:36, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tina Barrett

One appearance only?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vSkZZiyfPCk - Birmingham Pride

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=civAwdBi5WU - Wrexham central station

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2gOCKnt5Qs - Cazfest

https://twitter.com/insanityartists/status/514061811579383808

https://twitter.com/realtinab1/status/516289211461550080

https://twitter.com/ohhellobris/status/512249536149196800

and loads more on her twitter page....

I'm pretty sure this totals up to more than one.... 82.27.242.159 (talk) 08:40, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of VEVO Lift: Bridgit Mendler for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article VEVO Lift: Bridgit Mendler is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VEVO Lift: Bridgit Mendler until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 16:30, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Jersey (EP), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. IPadPerson (talk) 16:30, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Meghan Trainor. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 05:29, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistent disruptive editing, as you did at Call It Whatever (album). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 20:11, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Halloween cheer!

Happy Halloween!

Hello Shane Harper 4 Life:
Thanks for all of your contributions to improve Wikipedia, and have a happy and enjoyable Halloween!
– IPadPerson (talk) 16:16, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Send Halloween cheer by adding {{subst:Happy Halloween}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.

Orphaned non-free image File:Mendler VEVO Lift.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mendler VEVO Lift.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:22, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Demi Lovato discography, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You have been warned several times by myself and other users, and you are still continuing to remove/blank pages without consensus after you were released from a block. If you choose to continue, you will be reported and blocked for a longer period of time. IPadPerson (talk) 23:23, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Some advice / last warning

Shane, Part of editing here is not only editing but communicating with everyone especially on talkpages,

If you want a large chunk of an article removed you go to the talkpage,
If you want to redirect an article you go to the talkpage etc etc,

It seems you simply blank and redirect articles but obviously don't discuss beforehand hence why you're being reverted,
Everyone so far is Assuming Good Faith but that can't go on forever and sooner or later someone's faith here is going to run out and by the looks of it fairly soon!,
So I'll end with this - Start discussing your edits appropriately and stop earning warnings otherwise I will personally report you myself for disruptive editing which trust me I don't want to do!,
Just take things slowly and work yourself up
If you need help I'm only a few clicks away!
Happy Editing (and Happy Halloween btw )
Regards, –Davey2010 • (talk) 23:45, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Meghan Trainor discography. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
It is imperative that you leave edit summary contents so other editors can understand why you have removed content, added content, changed content.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 00:40, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Heart-Made-Up-On-You-single.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Heart-Made-Up-On-You-single.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:06, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at S Club 7. livelikemusic ^{my talk page!} 03:47, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mfield (Oi!) 06:41, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of East Coast Tour for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article East Coast Tour is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/East Coast Tour until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BlueMoonset (talk) 00:00, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:R5 - Weast Coast Tour.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:R5 - Weast Coast Tour.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. czar ⨹ 22:22, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:R5 - East Coast Tour.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:R5 - East Coast Tour.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. czar ⨹ 22:23, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Meghan Trainor discography for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Meghan Trainor discography is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meghan Trainor discography until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — ₳aron 10:27, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Wild Canaries film.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Wild Canaries film.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 21:09, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:R5 - HMUOY.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:R5 - HMUOY.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:25, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:R5 Loud Tour.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:R5 Loud Tour.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 20:22, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:RDMA Old logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:RDMA Old logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:55, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:RDMA 2006 logo.png

Thank you for uploading File:RDMA 2006 logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:04, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:R5 (band) concert tours

A tag has been placed on Category:R5 (band) concert tours indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:53, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]