User talk:SBFCEdit

Welcome!

Hello, SBFCEdit, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Anna Lincoln (talk) 10:29, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

Football Barnstar

For excellent work on all things Stevenage Borough. Mattythewhite (talk) 19:19, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Catgory renaming

Hi, just thought I'd let you know that if you think a category should be renamed, it's better to list it at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion. If the community agrees then a bot will do all the tasks. Anemone Projectors 10:57, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Graham Westley

The current one that I took would appear to be the only one I have access to. Don't think I have any other pictures of Westley from the 2009 FA Trophy Final or last season's game at BC and a flickr search brings up nothing. Mattythewhite (talk) 14:57, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lawrie Wilson

As you suspected, the fact that he never played a first team match for Colchester is the reason the article was deleted. Wait until he has played in the Football League for Stevenage, and then ask me to restore it (if done now, it would violate WP:CRYSTAL - i.e. we cannot be certain that he will actually play a game until he does). пﮟოьεԻ 5 7 13:41, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Both restored. пﮟოьεԻ 5 7 18:47, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Bostwick

Howdy, thanks for the note. I'm afraid I don't have much expertise on this. I can do one of two things: I can check with editor who nominated it, Jimbo online (talk · contribs) or re-create it in you userspace to discuss further. Let me know if I can do one of these for you. TeaDrinker (talk) 02:14, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-wikipedia related question

Why did the club drop "Borough" from the name? As a neutral with a soft spot for you due to being in Hertfordshire and keeping the ~~hooligans~~ team up the road out of the Football League, I was sad to see it go. The lead is fine, but perhaps another sentence about it in the history would be warranted? WFCforLife (talk) 20:21, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, those are my kinds of areas as well. I spent yesterday doing some tedious but necessary maintenance, and slowly but surely I'm getting the lists done. I have Stevenage F.C. watchlisted though (I watchlist any club that is likely to be edited by Watford or Luton fans), and you've done some top work there. As for our mutual friends, even I conceed that Luton have a respectable history if you ignore the hooligans. But I've made the point to Luton fans on several occasions that having 5,000 season ticket holders, bringing 40,000 people to Wembley and having people miss out on tickets doesn't make them a big club. It means that their town has over 35,000 glory hunters. WFC (talk) 13:08, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"bringing 40,000 people to Wembley and having people miss out on tickets doesn't make them a big club. It means that their town has over 35,000 glory hunters." – funnily enough, I agree. Just thought I'd say. – Cliftonian^{the orangey bit} 06:00, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations

Hi there, I noticed that you've listed a few Stevenage players on the Good Article nominations page. However, you need to complete the nominations by substituting the {{GAN}} template at the top of the articles' talk pages. The articles look pretty good overall but one problem that I can see with them is that they refer to "Stevenage" rather than "Stevenage Borough" when discussing events prior to 2010. General consensus is to use the name of the club as it was at the time, so you might want to sort that out to avoid any problems when they are reviewed. Cheers, Big Dom 14:21, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Photos

I've not been able to find any Wiki-friendly photos on flickr, but this collection of photos could contain the players you're looking for (I'm not wised up on what Stevenage players look like so you'd better off looking through, I'd probably get them mixed up). So if you'd like to use any of those photos give me a shout with the links to the photos and I'll contact the author on flickr; fingers crossed they'll relicense them. Cheers, Mattythewhite (talk) 17:55, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've now sent the author a message asking for permission to use the photos and I'll give you a shout and upload them onto Commons if he hopefully does change the copyright. Also, I notice he's now uploaded a collection from the Pompey game. You can take a look at that if you like and let me know if there are any photos you'd like uploading. And in response to your second comment, I've certainly seen instances of work I've written being pretty much directly copied. For example, the squad list in the Stoke City match programme for our FA Cup game was pretty much copied exactly from Wikipedia. When the YCFC article (incorrectly) had Djoumin Sangare's name written as "Djoumine Sangaré" they had it written exactly as that and gave Luke Graham's a Welsh flag (which is correct as he was a youth international for them, but I've not seen him recognised as Welsh in many places other than Wikipedia). Cheers, Mattythewhite (talk) 14:14, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, have just got a reply from him and he says the photos are strictly copyrighted and that strict company rules apply. But if you find any other pics by a different author, just give me a shout. Mattythewhite (talk) 15:08, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Roberts

I've reviewed Mark Roberts here and placed it on hold. --Sarastro1 (talk) 09:52, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Passed now. Well done. --Sarastro1 (talk) 20:47, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Luke Foster...

... is now a good article. Congratulations. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 12:48, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Appearances

I noticed that in some cases the numbers doesn't match in various of your articles. For example List of Stevenage F.C. players states that Mitchell Cole made 142 appearances and scored 22 goals for Stevenage, but his own article shows numbers 140/22 of those 121 apps earned in league games (but in fact it should be 120 (19+26+42+33) and overall career numbers are off too.

Numbers doesn't check out in some other cases too - Lawrie Wilson and Steve Morison. Maybe there are others too because I didn't check many articles. Maybe Boroguide and/or Soccerbase have mistakes in their own numbers.

I thought I give you heads up this matter because I love your work on wikipedia and want to help you get these lesser known club/player articles to be in best shape possible. Because of your articles I now have a soft spot for Stevenage and always check out how they are doing on weekends. Utinsh (talk) 12:33, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA on hold

Michael Bostwick is on hold. Please see my comments here. Quadzilla99 (talk) 17:33, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've made some more comments. Should be nothing major. Quadzilla99 (talk) 07:34, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Yemi Odubade/GA1

Just a note to say that I have begun the review of Yemi Odubade at Talk:Yemi Odubade/GA1, and would invite your responses and improvements to the article. Harrias ^talk 18:03, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jay O'Shea

Hello. Just to say what a brilliant job you've done on Mr O'Shea in such a short time. I wish I had your enthusiasm. Couple of things you may be unaware of. When you use the same citation for a second time, you don't have to copy out the whole thing again, just use its name with a slash before the > and no closing </ref> tag. So if the original definition has <ref name="O'Shea signs">{{cite news etc etc etc}}</ref>, to use it again you just put <ref name="O'Shea signs"/> (see WP:REFB#Same reference used more than once).

The other thing is Soccerbase urls. If you just use the plain url http://www.soccerbase.com/squad_season.sd?teamid=2499 for Stevenage player appearances, it takes you to the page for the current season. You need to add the seasonid parameter to the url to reach the page for other seasons, e.g. http://www.soccerbase.com/squad_season.sd?teamid=2499&seasonid=138 for Stevenage appearances for 2008/09. Same applies to individual player pages: http://www.soccerbase.com/players_details.sd?playerid=43628 is Michael Bostwick for the current season, http://www.soccerbase.com/players_details.sd?playerid=43628&seasonid=140 is Michael Bostwick for 2010/11 whether that's the current season or not. I've fixed the ones on O'Shea, but you might want to check your stats tables for other players. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 09:45, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Lee Boylan/GA1

Talk:Lee Boylan/GA1 has been awaiting your responses for some time.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 18:28, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Peter Vincenti

The article Peter Vincenti you nominated as a good article has failed ; see here for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of said article. If you oppose this decision, you may ask for a reassessment. Sarastro1 (talk) 20:47, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Stevenage F.C. 3–1 Newcastle United F.C. for deletion

The article Stevenage F.C. 3–1 Newcastle United F.C. is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stevenage F.C. 3–1 Newcastle United F.C. until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 22:48, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Stevenage F.C. for good article

I think the article stands a good chance. I'd be prepared to help out with its nomination if you were prepared to do the expert thing? Up to you. All the best! The Rambling Man (talk) 22:41, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Feather Barnstar
		Excellent work on bringing Stevenage player articles up to 'Good Article' status. A credit to the project. Echetus Xe 20:34, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Robin Shroot

Hello. Just to let you know I removed Robin Alexander E. Shroot from the fullname parameter of the infobox because it isn't his full name. Unless his third given name really is just E., but I don't suppose it is. Mattythewhite looked him up in the Hugman Who's Who, which gives Robin Alexander, and the FA registrations list just Robin. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 16:49, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Phil Edwards (footballer)

The article Phil Edwards (footballer) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Phil Edwards (footballer) for things which need to be addressed.--Echetus Xe 17:35, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Article has now passed! Congratulations! Suggestions for further improvements have been made on the talk page. If you would like to review a GA nominee yourself than please feel free. You have the experience to make a good reviewer!--Echetus Xe 13:15, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Alan Julian

The article Alan Julian you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Alan Julian for things which need to be addressed.--Echetus Xe 16:06, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Article has now passed! Congratulations!--Echetus Xe 09:35, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Jennison Myrie-Williams

The article Jennison Myrie-Williams you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Jennison Myrie-Williams for things which need to be addressed.--Echetus Xe 09:38, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Article has now passed! Congratulations!--Echetus Xe 16:41, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA nomination of Chris Beardsley

The article Chris Beardsley you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Chris Beardsley for things which need to be addressed.--Echetus Xe 13:19, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Article has now passed! Congratulations!--Echetus Xe 21:58, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Ben May

Has been successful. Congratulations!--Echetus Xe 19:06, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Byron Harrison (footballer)

The article Byron Harrison (footballer) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Byron Harrison (footballer) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Sarastro1 (talk) 21:51, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In 2007 FA Trophy Final, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Mark Yates (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Scott Laird

Has been successful. Congratulations!--Echetus Xe 19:50, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Chris Holroyd

The article Chris Holroyd you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Chris Holroyd for comments about the article. Well done! There is a backlog of articles waiting for review, why not help out and review a nominated article yourself? Jezhotwells (talk) 01:36, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

		The Good Article Barnstar
		Thanks SBFCEdit for helping to promote Chris Holroyd to Good Article status. Please accept this little sign of appreciation and goodwill from me, because you deserve it. Keep it up, and give some a pat on the back today. --Sp33dyphil ©^hat_ontributions 03:03, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Gary Smith (footballer born 1968)

I have failed this article owing to sourcing concerns; the cited sources do not support the given facts. Given that this is now the third or fourth time I have noticed this issue in your GA nominations, I would suggest that you check this aspect very carefully before nominating further articles. This is not to say that the facts are wrong: sometimes it is difficult to reliably source information. However, in a GA, such sourcing should be to a good standard. --Sarastro1 (talk) 18:36, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Andy Iro, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Entourage (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:07, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Phil Wallace, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gary Smith (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Stevenageleytonorientmroberts.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:Stevenageleytonorientmroberts.JPG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 08:05, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Roberts (footballer born 1983)

Hi, I've never uploaded someone else's image having been e-mail their permission so I'm not sure of the exact process involved, but I think it'll depend on what licence they've attributed to the image. Was this indicated in the e-mail? I see you attached "© Kevin Coleman" below the image; if he's retained all rights on the image I don't think it can be used. I think your best bet is reading the OTRS page on Wikimedia Commons, which is for when permission to use an image his been given via e-mail. Hope this is of some help. Cheers, Mattythewhite (talk) 15:07, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'd upload it as your own image, then leave a note in the summary explaining who took the photo etc. I've done that with a few like Stevland Angus and Christian Hanson, although this was years ago. Hope this has helped, --Jimbo^[online] 19:37, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

John Nutter

I have completed the GA review for John Nutter, and placed the article on hold. The review can be found on the talk page. Oldelpaso (talk) 19:57, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've now passed the article, congratulations! Thank you for your efforts, and for responding so promptly after such a long wait. Oldelpaso (talk) 20:48, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Marcus Haber

Hello. Just happened to notice that your GA nomination of Marcus Haber was currently on hold, and wasn't sure if you were aware. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 12:32, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. I was over at GAN keeping an eye on my nom slooooowly working its way up the waiting list and was surprised to see a Stevenage player being on hold for longer than no time flat, given how efficient you usually are about that sort of thing. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 13:46, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It was a reassessment, and it is back to GA status. Cheers EBY (talk) 17:46, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013–14 Stevenage F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Doughty (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Invite to the African Destubathon

Hi. You may be interested in participating in the African Destubathon which starts on October 15. Africa currently has over 37,000 stubs and badly needs a quality improvement editathon/contest to flesh out basic stubs. There are proposed substantial prizes to give to editors who do the most articles, and planned smaller prizes for doing to most destubs for each of the 53 African countries, so should be enjoyable! So it would be a good chance to win something for improving stubs on African sportspeople, including footballers, athletes, Olympians and Paralympians etc, particularly female ones, but also male. Even if contests aren't your thing we would be grateful if you could consider destubbing a few African articles during the drive to help the cause and help reduce the massive 37,000 + stub count, of which many are rated high importance (think Regions of countries etc). If you're interested in competing or just loosely contributing a few expanded articles on African Paralympians, Olympians and committees etc, please add your name to the Contestants/participants section. Diversity of work from a lot of people will make this that bit more special. Thanks. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:14, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Come back plz

Dude come back, you were a great editor!--Echetus Xe 14:40, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Danny Newton, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Giant Snowman 14:45, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Leamington stats are sourced to Soccerway. Giant Snowman 16:50, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Soccerbase urls

Hello. As to "You're not fixing the Soccerbase URLs, they were working perfectly before so there was nothing to fix".

Soccerbase changed their url format halfway through the 16/17 season. Which meant that pages that started the season with the then-correct season_id=146 in the url needed changing. The {{soccerbase season}} template was updated to cope with it, some editors changed some pages manually, and someone commissioned a bot run to convert the incorrect ones to the new format (not me, I just helped clean up the mess that was left).

If you click on the url http://www.soccerbase.com/players/player.sd?player_id=87884&season_id=146 and look at what you get, you'll see not Alex Samuel's stats for 2016/17, but instead his stats for the current season.

The same problem existed with 2017/18 as well, but because the format changed before the start of the 2017/18 season, it didn't affect as many articles.

You don't have to use the template if you don't want to, but for verifiability purposes, it does help Wikipedia if the urls in references point to the page they're supposed to. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 17:28, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, SBFCEdit. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jack King (footballer, born 1985), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paul Gallagher (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Luke Amos‎

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

GiantSnowman has been removing Luke Amos’ involvement with the first team for a while now. Being on the bench is very noteworthy and many Wikipedia pages also contain this information. Amos has made the bench on 3 different occasional vs Liverpool efl, vs apoel ucl and vs Newport fa. Also it is true that he was playing for Tottenham u23 while at Southend, look at Tottenham u23 teamsheets last year. I hope you can help update this page as GiantSnowman feels the need think only he is right. User:86.156.17.212 14:52, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why is him being on the first-team bench notable? Where does it say he was playing for Spurs U23s/on Southend bench during early parts of his loan, and why is that notable? Per WP:BRD please not not re-add without consensus on the article talk page. Giant Snowman 14:45, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Again, him being on the first team bench is just one-line in a routine transfer article. It is not that notable - and it was not mentioned in the source you provided! See also WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. But I've included it to avoid further conflict. Same with the Southend bench/Spurs. As for your edits, they are largely OK, but not perfect, hence why I have to clean up after you. You need to abide by WP:NPOV, WP:OR and WP:CITEVAR. Giant Snowman 16:00, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I saw his name on the team sheet - I did not see where the source said that was his first ever first-team appearance as you claimed...do you see that crucial difference? Something being true is not enough; it must be verifiable. Giant Snowman 16:56, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This should be disucssed at the article's talk page and resolved based on what reliable third-party sources report. If being on the bench is very noteworthy, it should be easy to find sports magazines writing about it. Huon (talk) 18:33, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Has already been resolved. The "Help" notification was sent by another editor who, by the looks of it, has also had some issues with Mr Snowman on the Amos page. Not sure either of us can be bothered with moving the conversation to the article's talk page, I certainly can't. Cheers. SBFCEdit 19:07, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A friendly tip

Instead of typing in the 'ndash;' in-between the scores, use the first dash on the 'wiki markup' tool on the bottom of the editing window. It should save you a bit of time doing it that way. Iggy (Swan) 17:07, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Jack King (footballer, born 1985)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Jack King (footballer, born 1985) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 22:21, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Jack King (footballer, born 1985)

The article Jack King (footballer, born 1985) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Jack King (footballer, born 1985) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 23:01, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Jack King (footballer, born 1985)

The article Jack King (footballer, born 1985) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Jack King (footballer, born 1985) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 07:21, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Matthew Godden

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Matthew Godden you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 21:01, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Matthew Godden

The article Matthew Godden you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Matthew Godden for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 14:21, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Matthew Godden

The article Matthew Godden you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Matthew Godden for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 19:21, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Gavin Mahon

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Gavin Mahon you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 20:01, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Gavin Mahon

The article Gavin Mahon you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Gavin Mahon for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 20:20, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Gavin Mahon

The article Gavin Mahon you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Gavin Mahon for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 18:41, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Luke Freeman

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Luke Freeman you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 20:21, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Luke Freeman

The article Luke Freeman you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Luke Freeman for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 19:40, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Luke Freeman

The article Luke Freeman you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Luke Freeman for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 07:41, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Danny Newton

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Danny Newton you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GiantSnowman -- GiantSnowman (talk) 11:21, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Oumare Tounkara

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Oumare Tounkara you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 19:21, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Oumare Tounkara

The article Oumare Tounkara you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Oumare Tounkara for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 14:20, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Oumare Tounkara

The article Oumare Tounkara you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Oumare Tounkara for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 20:01, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Jon Nurse

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Jon Nurse you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 20:40, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Jon Nurse

The article Jon Nurse you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Jon Nurse for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 18:40, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Jon Nurse

The article Jon Nurse you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Jon Nurse for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 20:01, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Alex Reid (footballer, born 1995)

First you added unsourced content about a BLP, now you are edit warring in violation of WP:ELNO??? Giant Snowman 11:55, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Danny Newton

I've picked up the GA review of Danny Newton, and have left a couple of initial comments there that we should discuss before I continue. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 09:52, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Danny Newton

The article Danny Newton you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Danny Newton for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GiantSnowman -- GiantSnowman (talk) 10:02, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your Joe White

Any reason you removed my link for a player out on loan and replaced it with one of your own? Mine is an official website and provided the same infomation. Before i report you, please reverse this. - Craigw87 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Craigw87 (talk • contribs) 07:54, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What are you on about? Been doing this for years and never had a revert done just for that. I will be raise a revert and referring you to Wikipedia for suspension. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Craigw87 (talk • contribs) 09:58, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Live updates

Please do not do live updates of player's stats - wait until the match is over / they have been substituted. Giant Snowman 19:23, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Please start using them to explain your edits - see WP:EDITSUMMARY. Giant Snowman 07:37, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Any reason why you don't/won't use them? Giant Snowman 12:16, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, SBFCEdit. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Marvin Williams (footballer)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Marvin Williams (footballer) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 10:21, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Marvin Williams (footballer)

The article Marvin Williams (footballer) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Marvin Williams (footballer) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 15:40, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Marvin Williams (footballer)

The article Marvin Williams (footballer) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Marvin Williams (footballer) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 21:01, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Stacy Long

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Stacy Long you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 15:20, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Stacy Long

The article Stacy Long you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Stacy Long for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 19:20, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Stacy Long

The article Stacy Long you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Stacy Long for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 06:21, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Released players

Will not leave their contract until 30 June 2019, so remain with the club until then. Giant Snowman 11:50, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I can't believe you are still making the same incorrect edits 2 years later...! Also unsourced at Jake Reeves. Giant Snowman 15:30, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Peter Vincenti

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Peter Vincenti you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sarastro1 -- Sarastro1 (talk) 11:21, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Peter Vincenti

The article Peter Vincenti you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Peter Vincenti for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 20:01, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Peter Vincenti

The article Peter Vincenti you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Peter Vincenti for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 19:41, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Peter Winn (footballer)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Peter Winn (footballer) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 10:20, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Peter Winn (footballer)

The article Peter Winn (footballer) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Peter Winn (footballer) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 12:20, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Rob Sinclair (footballer, born 1989)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Rob Sinclair (footballer, born 1989) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 16:41, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Peter Winn (footballer)

The article Peter Winn (footballer) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Peter Winn (footballer) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 21:03, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Rob Sinclair (footballer, born 1989)

The article Rob Sinclair (footballer, born 1989) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Rob Sinclair (footballer, born 1989) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 16:41, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Craig Reid (footballer, born 1985)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Craig Reid (footballer, born 1985) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 22:41, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Craig Reid (footballer, born 1985)

The article Craig Reid (footballer, born 1985) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Craig Reid (footballer, born 1985) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 10:01, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Rob Sinclair (footballer, born 1989)

The article Rob Sinclair (footballer, born 1989) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Rob Sinclair (footballer, born 1989) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 17:21, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Craig Reid (footballer, born 1985)

The article Craig Reid (footballer, born 1985) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Craig Reid (footballer, born 1985) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 16:22, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas

	Merry Christmas SBFCEdit
	Hi SBFCEdit, wishing you and your family a very Merry Christmas and a happy New Year. Thanks for all your contributions to Wikipedia this year – Kosack (talk) 09:55, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Ronnie Henry

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ronnie Henry you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 20:41, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Ronnie Henry

The article Ronnie Henry you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Ronnie Henry for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 13:01, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Ronnie Henry

The article Ronnie Henry you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Ronnie Henry for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 17:41, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Live updates

For the avoidance of doubt - no issues with updating stats when a player has been substituted, the issue is updating when they are still on the pitch! Giant Snowman 15:47, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:25, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Players will not actually be released until their contracts end on 30 June 2021

Please do not remove them from squad listings/change their articles until that date. Giant Snowman 14:35, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Luther James-Wildin

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Luther James-Wildin you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MrLinkinPark333 -- MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 16:21, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Luther James-Wildin

The article Luther James-Wildin you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Luther James-Wildin for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MrLinkinPark333 -- MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 16:41, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Patrick Agyemang

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Patrick Agyemang you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Harper J. Cole -- Harper J. Cole (talk) 12:20, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Patrick Agyemang

The article Patrick Agyemang you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Patrick Agyemang for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Harper J. Cole -- Harper J. Cole (talk) 21:00, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Patrick Agyemang

The article Patrick Agyemang you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Patrick Agyemang for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Harper J. Cole -- Harper J. Cole (talk) 23:21, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Lucas Akins

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Lucas Akins you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Harper J. Cole -- Harper J. Cole (talk) 10:20, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Lucas Akins

The article Lucas Akins you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Lucas Akins for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Harper J. Cole -- Harper J. Cole (talk) 13:20, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Lucas Akins

The article Lucas Akins you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Lucas Akins for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Harper J. Cole -- Harper J. Cole (talk) 23:21, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Joe White (footballer, born 1999), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Southern Football League Cup. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Darren Murphy

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Darren Murphy you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SNUGGUMS -- SNUGGUMS (talk) 19:40, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kelland Watts, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Newcastle.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Luther James-Wildin

The article Luther James-Wildin you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Luther James-Wildin for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 10:21, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Ryan Johnson (footballer, born 1996)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ryan Johnson (footballer, born 1996) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 18:01, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Ryan Johnson (footballer, born 1996)

The article Ryan Johnson (footballer, born 1996) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Ryan Johnson (footballer, born 1996) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 09:41, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar for you

		The Feather Barnstar
		For the first time a page I've created, Luther James-Wildin, has become a good article and it's thanks to your tireless work. And you consistently do it for other pages! I don't know how you do it, but I appreciate your work. Keep it up!--Ortizesp (talk) 05:21, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Ryan Johnson (footballer, born 1996)

The article Ryan Johnson (footballer, born 1996) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Ryan Johnson (footballer, born 1996) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 07:42, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Kevin Lokko

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Kevin Lokko you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 18:41, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Kevin Lokko

The article Kevin Lokko you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Kevin Lokko for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 20:41, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Kevin Lokko

The article Kevin Lokko you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Kevin Lokko for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 07:22, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Darren Murphy

The article Darren Murphy you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Darren Murphy for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SNUGGUMS -- SNUGGUMS (talk) 02:40, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Darren Murphy

The article Darren Murphy you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Darren Murphy for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SNUGGUMS -- SNUGGUMS (talk) 21:41, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Owen Cochrane

Hello, SBFCEdit,

Thank you for creating Owen Cochrane.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

What is needed are references from significant coverage about this player, and not their own words; in multiple secondary sources which are WP:RS; that is your guide. Lists, Team rosters, pages listing matches and results, databases, Instagram, Soccerway, Facebook, none of these are reliable sources. (There have been changes to the notability guide for sports - see WP:NSPORT ) You may also read WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources. A more comprehensive guide is WP:SOURCES ... Providing sufficient references, ideally giving more information about this player, that meet these criteria is likely to allow this article to remain. Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that this article is not suitable for inclusion. Kindly do the needful. Thank you

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 11:54, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Owen Cochrane for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Owen Cochrane is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Owen Cochrane until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

_signed,Rosguill ^talk 20:28, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tom Pett

I nominated it for GA but it got rejected as the editor said the sourcing for his early career and Stevenage was inaccurate. It shouldn't be too far off FA standard though if you want to take a look at it and nominate it yourself. Echetus Xe 13:17, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Makise Evans moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Makise Evans, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) WP:NFOOTY is no longer a valid SNG, so GNG must be met. It needs several refs from independent, reliable, secondary sources to pass WP:GNG. It should have at least 3 of those. Please remember that routine sports coverage does not satisfy GNG, and that interviews, being primary sources, do not go to notability either. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:50, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

About Jamie Cumming

Hi, about the recent edits we did on Jamie Cumming, I understood that this case had not reached a very clear consencus, And I have looked for several talks and debates in WikiProject, they concluded that youth career should never overlap with senior career, so the middle ground you did may not be the best solution. But I see your point that he earned a medal in 2018–19 UEFA Europa League so I recovered your edits. Cheers. Chelsdog (talk) 10:42, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Carl Piergianni

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Carl Piergianni you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Oltrepier -- Oltrepier (talk) 09:03, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Carl Piergianni

The article Carl Piergianni you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Carl Piergianni and Talk:Carl Piergianni/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Oltrepier -- Oltrepier (talk) 21:02, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Carl Piergianni

The article Carl Piergianni you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Carl Piergianni for comments about the article, and Talk:Carl Piergianni/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Oltrepier -- Oltrepier (talk) 21:22, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]