User talk:MrLinkinPark333
|
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
Article for Sam Feldman
[edit]Hi MrLinkinPark333, I work for Canadian music executive Sam Feldman, and I'm trying to create a Wikipedia article for him. I see that you have an interest in articles related to Canada, and that you've updated the Walt Grealis Special Achievement Award list, which Sam Feldman received, in the past. I'm hoping that you will take a look at the draft I have posted here. Would you consider moving it to main space?
Thank you, Sarah for SF (talk) 17:25, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
- Hello there. Per Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#Paid editors, this draft requires Template:Connected contributor (paid) to be filled out at User talk:Sarah for SF/Sam Feldman draft. Secondly, this draft would need to be submitted at Wikipedia:Articles for creation. A reviewer there can give advice for what this draft requires. Taking a quick look, I notice that the references require cleanup. The main issues I see there are duplicate citations and too many quotations. I suggest taking a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources and Wikipedia:Quotations#Overuse on ways to fix there issues. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 20:23, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your feedback, MrLinkinPark333. I have added a paid editor tag to the draft talk page in addition to the disclosure that was already on my user page. As for the quotes in my citations - I have source material from reliable publications that are not available online, and included the relevant quotes in the references so that those without access to hardcopies can verify. I looked into Wikipedia:Citing sources, and I understand that this is an appropriate method for this situation- do you know if there is an even better way to address this? Thank you for your guidance, I really appreciate it. Sarah for SF (talk) 19:24, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
- Hello, I think the number of quotes could be trimmed down per Wikipedia:Offline sources. For example, I don't think a quote would be needed to show Feldman was born in 1949. Reference quotes would be useful for information that could be challenged, like which bands A&F Music worked with in the early 1970s. Also, the length of the quotes could be trimmed down as well. Reference quotes can help with verification, but many long quotes can be too much per Wikipedia:Quotations#Overuse. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 23:37, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your feedback, MrLinkinPark333. I have added a paid editor tag to the draft talk page in addition to the disclosure that was already on my user page. As for the quotes in my citations - I have source material from reliable publications that are not available online, and included the relevant quotes in the references so that those without access to hardcopies can verify. I looked into Wikipedia:Citing sources, and I understand that this is an appropriate method for this situation- do you know if there is an even better way to address this? Thank you for your guidance, I really appreciate it. Sarah for SF (talk) 19:24, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your feedback, MrLinkinPark333. I have added a paid editor tag to the draft talk page in addition to the disclosure that was already on my user page. As for the quotes in my citations - I have source material from reliable publications that are not available online, and included the relevant quotes in the references so that those without access to hardcopies can verify. I looked into Wikipedia:Citing sources, and I understand that this is an appropriate method for this situation- do you know if there is an even better way to address this? Thank you for your guidance, I really appreciate it. Sarah for SF (talk) 21:41, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- Hello. I previously replied to your comment above on June 25th. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 21:56, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your feedback, MrLinkinPark333. I have added a paid editor tag to the draft talk page in addition to the disclosure that was already on my user page. As for the quotes in my citations - I have source material from reliable publications that are not available online, and included the relevant quotes in the references so that those without access to hardcopies can verify. I looked into Wikipedia:Citing sources, and I understand that this is an appropriate method for this situation- do you know if there is an even better way to address this? Thank you for your guidance, I really appreciate it. Sarah for SF (talk) 21:41, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
June 2024 backlog drive
[edit]
|
Thanks for participating in the June 2024 backlog drive!
You scored 330 points while adding citations to articles during WikiProject Reliability's first {{citation needed}} backlog drive, earning you this citation barnstar. Thanks for helping out! |
Cremastra (talk) 20:27, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
CS1 error on List of monster movies
[edit]
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of monster movies, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:21, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
CS1 error on List of monster movies
[edit] Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of monster movies, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:21, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
Welcome to the drive!
[edit]Welcome, welcome, welcome MrLinkinPark333! I'm glad that you are joining the November 2024 drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.
Cielquiparle (talk) 12:43, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
Sorry. I misclicked and accidentally undid you on this page. Please ignore the notification, it's already restored. Meters (talk) 23:27, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- No worries! I was confused for a bit, but I saw that it was an error. Thank you for the message :) MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 23:28, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 19 November 2024 (UTC)