User talk:Ornithoptera/Archive 1

Welcome

Hello, Ornithoptera, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! CMD (talk) 10:11, 27 June 2014 (UTC) Getting started Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pseudolaureola atlantica has been accepted

Pseudolaureola atlantica, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:23, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of geological features on Vesta

added links pointing to Calpurnia, Antonia, Severina, Aricia, Fabia, Albana, Postumia, Marcia, Eusebia and Lepida

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:39, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of geological features on Titan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Concordia. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Menrva (crater) has been accepted

Menrva (crater), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

/wiae /tlk 00:01, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of geological features on Charon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oz. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:52, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Ottoman Tripolitania

I would like to tell the page you edited has wrong information and there is no history that there is so I would to reverse the editt

Libyan kid 543 (talk) 16:35, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Ornithoptera. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 162173 Ryugu, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Penglai, Kintaro and Brabo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:07, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 2

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Cyclosia pieridoides (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Bangka and Mentawai

Chalcosiinae (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Dysphania

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:01, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pompelon has been accepted

Pompelon, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Nessie (talk) 13:57, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Josephine Jue has been accepted

Josephine Jue, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Zanhe (talk) 06:31, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Francesca Fiorentini (February 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Francesca Fiorentini and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Francesca Fiorentini, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 04:28, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Ornithoptera! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 04:28, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Acanthacorydalis fruhstorferi has been accepted

Acanthacorydalis fruhstorferi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

SpicyMilkBoy (talk) 03:56, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sabrina Sojourner has been accepted

Sabrina Sojourner, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sulfurboy (talk) 02:36, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nemoptera sinuata has been accepted

Nemoptera sinuata, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sulfurboy (talk) 02:49, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: No Straight Roads has been accepted

No Straight Roads, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

_{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 10:17, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jerry C. Elliott has been accepted

Jerry C. Elliott, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Spicy (talk) 04:55, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Francesca Fiorentini concern

Hi there, I'm MDanielsBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Francesca Fiorentini, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. MDanielsBot (talk) 03:36, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Francesca Fiorentini

Hello, Ornithoptera. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Francesca Fiorentini".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 20:22, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

Yeah, Bubblebladder is bad, sometimes

You noted in your edit to TOH page that "the Bubbleblabber review is not from a reputable source or reviewer, and it does not contribute to the section." While I think Bubblebladder can be good, to be honest, they are often hostile to LGBTQ narratives, so I don't mind that the removal. Sadly, sometimes they are the only people to write about certain episodes... I think at this point, they (Bubblebladder) should have a Wikipedia page, but that's a whole other discussion. So, thanks for removing that. --Historyday01 (talk) 21:09, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

You're very welcome. I appreciate your thanks for the edit. While I believe it is important to include a diversity of opinions, Bubbleblabber is a relatively small platform and its reviewers and community are relatively outside of relevancy during this time. Especially when the statements do nothing to contribute to the overall section. Thank you again though, I'm doing my best to help improve Wikipedia the best I can. Ornithoptera (talk) 21:21, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Creemos has been accepted

Creemos, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 02:44, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:43, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Raven and the First Men has been accepted

The Raven and the First Men, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Andrew nyr (talk, contribs) 04:16, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Apruebo Dignidad (May 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Apruebo Dignidad and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Apruebo Dignidad, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 22:10, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nemoptera coa has been accepted

Nemoptera coa, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gpkp [u • t • c] 07:54, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Borocera madagascariensis has been accepted

Borocera madagascariensis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

KylieTastic (talk) 10:13, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Borocera cajani has been accepted

Borocera cajani, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gpkp [u • t • c] 07:55, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	I just wanted to say you have been the best! Keep on going, and I hope you have a good day! PuzzledWaste (talk) 04:30, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tusk shell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gadila.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

MPs

Please note that (a) you must not start the article about a new MP without citing a reference to verify that they have been declared elected, (b) you must categorize the article, and under no circumstances is it acceptable create an uncategorized stub, and (c) the article must have {{Infobox officeholder}} and {{Current Members of the Canadian House of Commons}} on it right off the bat.

Seriously, there's no need to rush into creating an unreferenced stub right away. It is not going to kill anybody if the articles don't get started until tomorrow morning. Bearcat (talk) 04:54, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

And no, just saying "she was called the winner by so-and-so with X number of polls reporting" is not a reference, either. A reference is a footnote to a news article that states "Lori Idlout has been elected" in words and sentences. Bearcat (talk) 04:59, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

Sorry about that, I got a bit too eager. Its been my first time being informed of such, and thank you for letting me know, I'll keep it in mind next time. --Ornithoptera (talk) 05:01, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ornithoglossum undulatum has been accepted

Ornithoglossum undulatum, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Dan arndt (talk) 06:48, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nemeobiinae has been accepted

Nemeobiinae, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Dan arndt (talk) 07:01, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rhyothemis fuliginosa has been accepted

Rhyothemis fuliginosa, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Quantum^Realm (meow • pawtrack) 03:33, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Patti LuPone, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brian Doherty.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

ITN recognition for 2021 Japanese general election

On 2 November 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2021 Japanese general election, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Indefensible (talk) 16:58, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Borocera cajani

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Borocera cajani you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:21, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

Hi, I've finished adding comments to the GA review. None of them are major, the biggest being a suggested copy-edit (which I've offered to assist), but you'll need to address them if you want the article to pass the GA process. Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:41, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

Hello Chiswick Chap, thank you for your review! This is my first GA Nomination, and I would definitely appreciate some advice moving forward since I'm a bit unfamiliar with the process. Do I reply to you on the review subpage itself or do I go ahead with editing it? I would definitely be welcome for you to edit the offered sentence as I am a bit uncertain as to how I would reword it myself. Thank you so much and I hope to work with you shortly! --Ornithoptera (talk) 00:05, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Replies are a) actions in the article, and then b) in the GA1 page under each of my comments when they're done. I'll take that as an invitation to do a bit of copy-editing as I'd suggested - normally reviewers only do "minor" edits like punctuation. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:02, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Thank you again for your help, and I hope you can understand this is a bit unfamiliar with me so I hope this goes well! I'm busy at the moment, but I'll get to editing as soon as I can! Thank you again Chiswick Chap! --Ornithoptera (talk) 08:13, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Copy-edited. Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:18, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Rhyothemis fuliginosa

On 9 November 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Rhyothemis fuliginosa, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Rhyothemis fuliginosa (example pictured) is known as the "butterfly dragonfly"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Rhyothemis fuliginosa. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Rhyothemis fuliginosa), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Borocera cajani

The article Borocera cajani you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Borocera cajani for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:21, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Falcon Lake Incident has been accepted

Falcon Lake Incident, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 03:43, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rhodinia fugax has been accepted

Rhodinia fugax, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gpkp [u • t • c] 08:07, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sonchus fruticosus has been accepted

Sonchus fruticosus, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hitro talk 06:58, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Styx (butterfly) has been accepted

Styx (butterfly), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

KylieTastic (talk) 11:43, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Awet Tesfaiesus

Hello! Your submission of Awet Tesfaiesus at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Mindmatrix 15:18, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tetracanthagyna plagiata has been accepted

Tetracanthagyna plagiata, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Artem.G (talk) 18:41, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
		You know, a lot of the prep-set building I do at DYK is done rather late, so it can get rather dreary copy/pasting sometimes. Good god, does seeing what you write just bring a smile to my face sometimes. You are consistently chipper, heartwarming, sympathetic, competent, and upbeat in the face of every message you come across. Your words don't just affect the people you write them to, they brighten the atmosphere of Did you know as if you're creating the sky. thanks for making my roles and this place more enjoyable—do stick around :) cheers! theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 08:11, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 08:11, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

@Theleekycauldron: Oh my gosh! Thank you so much for the barnstar! As soon as I read your message I just got incredibly giddy and a bit emotional honestly, and a bit at a loss of words! Thank you so much for your kind words and I really do hope we can work together on DYK together, its been an amazing time working together with other Wikipedians on it! I really cannot thank you enough for your kind words and I'm genuinely thankful for every single word on your message, I genuinely feel touched by your message and I'm rambling here but thank you so very much!! Ornithoptera (talk) 08:27, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

aaaaaa—of course! :) it really is a great community to work in, I've had a great time here as well.

p.s. no worries about the rambling—i get so excited whenever i find a new article topic to write or when i get a barnstar, i can't even think straight enough to touch my keyboard. I definitely end up making lots of pasta ramblioli. Anyways, cheers again :) theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 09:26, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

Again, thank you so very much! I'm really glad to be working with you and the other members of the DYK community and I hope to see you around more often soon! You're the best! Ornithoptera (talk) 09:57, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

I realize I never said this: Thanks for that. I appreciate your enthusiasm around DYK and think this kind of recognition is well-earned. I say this so often that it almost feels cliche, but it's sincere: Hope to see you around soon and often. "Till next time?" A second barnstar here would be brash, so instead a small gift: . Urve (talk) 22:51, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

Wow, that was really an excellent pun. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/she?) 06:24, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Borocera cajani

On 29 November 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Borocera cajani, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that Borocera cajani produces a form of wild silk that has been harvested for hundreds of years? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Borocera cajani. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Borocera cajani), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Tetracanthagyna plagiata

Hello! Your submission of Tetracanthagyna plagiata at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Mindmatrix 02:25, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Falcon Lake Incident

On 3 December 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Falcon Lake Incident, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Falcon Lake Incident is considered "Canada's best-documented UFO case"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Falcon Lake Incident. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Falcon Lake Incident), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 17,504 views (729.3 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of December 2021 – nice work!

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/she?) 06:24, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Elcysma westwoodi has been accepted

Elcysma westwoodi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Quantum^Realm (meow • pawtrack) 04:45, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hebetica sylviae has been accepted

Hebetica sylviae, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Quantum^Realm (meow • pawtrack) 07:47, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Awet Tesfaiesus

On 6 December 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Awet Tesfaiesus, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Awet Tesfaiesus was the first black woman ever elected to the Bundestag? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Awet Tesfaiesus. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Awet Tesfaiesus), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 12:02, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Styx (butterfly)

On 7 December 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Styx (butterfly), which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that Styx's name derives from its seeming to have "come from the underworld"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Styx (butterfly). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Styx (butterfly)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:03, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for your edit to New Horizons

		The Thank You Barnstar
		Hello Ornithoptera! I wanted to leave a "thank you" for this edit to the New Horizons article. I was curious when this was added, and found the responsible edit -- from December 2015. The same IP user (probably with good intentions, as they made constructive edits to other articles) had also added this info to the Kuiper belt article, where I have just removed it. Funny how stuff like this can survive even in highly edited articles for years! Renerpho (talk) 06:12, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Hebetica sylviae

On 19 December 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Hebetica sylviae, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Hebetica sylviae (pictured) was discovered after a two-year-old named Sylvie overwatered her backyard? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Hebetica sylviae. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Hebetica sylviae), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 12:02, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 10,549 views (879.1 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of December 2021 – nice work!

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/she) 05:24, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Tetracanthagyna plagiata

On 21 December 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Tetracanthagyna plagiata, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the giant hawker, the largest living dragonfly, with a wingspan of 163 millimetres (6.4 in), has larvae that exhibit "ballistic defecation"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Tetracanthagyna plagiata. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Tetracanthagyna plagiata), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 6,391 views (532.6 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of December 2021 – nice work!

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/she) 01:37, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

Insects in Japanese culture

Hi Ornithoptera, no, I was completely aware that you are indeed the creator of Insects in Japanese culture. However, just because you did all the work, unfortunately you don't own the text! In fact, anyone is entitled to pick up on any draft and continue to work on it, and indeed submit it for review or move it to main-space, without the permission of the draft's creator. In my view, the article you wrote was already referenced to a better standard than many, and was far more than a mere skeleton. It was a good article. I think, therefore, that it was entirely appropriate for another editor to move it. They should have informed you; it was not courteous for them to do it without telling you. But having done it, the AfD should not have been closed. In my view, the subject is an important one, and likely to attract attention from multiple good editors. I feel strongly that it will be a better article if open to collaborative editing (that's a basic principle of WP anyway), and it's not going to attract collaborative editing while it languishes in draft space. I'm not accusing you of this, but there is a real risk that perfectionist editors will sit on good articles indefinitely, never feeling they're quite adequate for submission; we must therefore try to accept the opinions and work of others, building on what we do. I very, very much hope you will submit this article for main-space without delay. Indeed I've asked the closing editor to reopen the AfD as I felt there was no consensus to draftify (the person who moved it to main space, and I, both presumably believe it's main-space ready). I wish everyone who submitted articles wrote them half as well as you, who didn't! I'd also emphasise that articles don't need to be "perfect" or "finished" before hitting main space. They will be perfected and improved over decades, anyway. Sorry to be having a rant! Elemimele (talk) 15:49, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

As the AfC reviewer, I would not have accepted if I'd realized it was going over the head of the only contributor who was actively improving the article, but I do agree that it seems ready for mainspace. It's a great article! Better than most that I accept at AfC and very interesting. I don't think anyone should force you to publish it to mainspace if you're still working on it, but I'd like to gently encourage it anyway. And you should feel free to publish it directly to mainspace whenever you are ready, it'll only get better and I see no reason to have it go through review again. Rusalkii (talk) 17:08, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

This is quite late of a second question, this whole protracted process coupled with it being a troubling time in my life due to my course load was not a healthy combination I'll let you know. @Rusalkii: when I am able to, how would I move the article draft to mainspace when I'm ready? This is my first time and I just want to know beforehand for the time when I am able to. Ornithoptera (talk) 07:32, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

You want to move the page from draft to article space by opening the "Move" dialog (under "More" in the top right). There should be an option there to change the page from "Draft" to "(Article)".

I hope school has been easier for you lately! I'm on break right now and it's such a relief. Rusalkii (talk) 18:08, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

I appreciate it guys, I really do! I do understand that its a meaningful subject but I was genuinely a bit cheesed that the work was considered done when it was only just midway done. Heck, the introductory paragraph was just adapted from some section where I would have reviewed the cultural context so that sat wrongly with me. Thank you so much for all your help everyone and I appreciate the feedback. Though in all honesty, I wasn't being a perfectionist, I just was aware that I was only half done and was confused that someone just randomly submitted it with any warning or anything at all whatsoever. I just needed time to focus on school is all. The one thing that did bother me was that it was only alone for a week, given I just finished my final exams, it seemed a bit hurried when there were large chunks of the page simply unfinished. Though I understand its a place for collaboration, I just wanted a bit more time (and a warning!) for the future. Thank you so much for the kind words though and I'll be sure to keep on doing my best. Todays been a long day so I apologize if my wording's a bit stilted or I misread something, please be patient with me! Ornithoptera (talk) 17:26, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

No worries, @Ornithoptera:, I'm sorry if I came across as a bit ferocious. But I'd agree with Rusalkii, stick it in mainspace as soon as you're ready, it's a nice article on an interesting subject, and I also see no reason for it to need reviewing again. All I'd say is that if you find yourself in a few weeks simply too busy to do any more on it, don't hesitate to put it in mainspace anyway. You're doing a great job. Elemimele (talk) 21:29, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Elcysma westwoodi

On 23 December 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Elcysma westwoodi, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Elcysma westwoodi is considered "the most damaging lepidopteran pest of Prunus × yedoensis"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Elcysma westwoodi. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Elcysma westwoodi), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Rhodinia fugax

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Rhodinia fugax you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 16:21, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Rhodinia fugax

The article Rhodinia fugax you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Rhodinia fugax for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 16:42, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Tetracanthagyna plagiata

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Tetracanthagyna plagiata you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:01, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Tetracanthagyna plagiata

The article Tetracanthagyna plagiata you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Tetracanthagyna plagiata for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:01, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Corynaea (plant) has been accepted

Corynaea (plant), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rusalkii (talk) 03:54, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nannophyopsis has been accepted

Nannophyopsis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 09:27, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Great work on creating new articles Pretty sure you have no need to use the AFC process any more. Theroadislong (talk) 09:31, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

@Theroadislong: Thank you so much for the barnstar, I can't thank you enough! I love using AfC regardless, so I'm probably going to stick with what I'm most comfortable with! Since I have your attention, you should totally look at the Melibe colemani page, which is definitely not a stub haha! --Ornithoptera (talk) 09:33, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Melibe colemani has been accepted

Melibe colemani, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 09:48, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

Corynaea crassa

 Done Thank you for your contributions. I reviewed and enjoyed the article. Bruxton (talk) 22:55, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mimaporia has been accepted

Mimaporia, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Modussiccandi (talk) 20:12, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Erasmia pulchella has been accepted

Erasmia pulchella, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Extraordinary Writ (talk) 22:34, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Louth (crater) has been accepted

Louth (crater), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 10:03, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Papilio natewa has been accepted

Papilio natewa, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 14:15, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Corynaea crassa

On 29 January 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Corynaea crassa, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Peruvian Viagra grows on the roots of plants? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Corynaea crassa. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Corynaea crassa), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:04, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 5,669 views (472.4 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of January 2022 – nice work!

Bruxton (talk) 15:18, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Space Family Carlvinson manga cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Space Family Carlvinson manga cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:36, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Cristina Calderón

On 17 February 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Cristina Calderón, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 03:47, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Arceus

I noticed you’ve been working on another draft of Arceus. Just FYI, the article was deleted again last year - the version just before the deletion can be seen here. Maybe you can salvage some sources from there. Hope you have better luck with the AFC/AFD. Juxlos (talk) 10:52, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Single bamboo drifting has been accepted

Single bamboo drifting, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rusalkii (talk) 16:30, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Louth (crater)

On 27 February 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Louth (crater), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the ice mound (pictured) at the center of the crater Louth is the warmest permanent body of water on the Martian surface? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Louth (crater). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Louth (crater)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 16,152 views (1346 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of February 2022 – nice work!

Bruxton (talk) 15:01, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Single bamboo drifting

Hello! Your submission of Single bamboo drifting at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Umimmak (talk) 04:29, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Single bamboo drifting is an "orphan"

Hey, again. I just noticed that Single bamboo drifting was an WP:ORPHAN in that no other articles in the Wikipedia mainspace link to it. I just added it as a "See also" to the article for the Miao people -- I didn't see a natural section for it to be added, but it would be great if you could wikilink this in other relevant articles to help "MOS:BUILD the web". Perhaps something in Sport in China#Traditional sports, or List of water sports/List of sports -- or other articles more about traditional dance performances? Meant to bring it up earlier but it slipped my mind. Umimmak (talk) 06:55, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Space Family Carlvinson

Hello! Your submission of Space Family Carlvinson at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! SL93 (talk) 00:23, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Qallunaat! Why White People Are Funny has been accepted

Qallunaat! Why White People Are Funny, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ts12rAc^{talk to me} 11:42, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Melibe colemani

On 6 February 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Melibe colemani, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Coleman's Melibe is said to look like a "string of snot in the water"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Melibe colemani. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Melibe colemani), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Well, this is an odd one. My first suspicion, since I remember building that set, was that I forgot to copy/paste your credit—it's happened before. Surprisingly enough, it turned out not to be my fault. That's a new one :) Looks like DYKUpdateBot crashed right in the middle of updating credits, and since yours was the quirky, no one ever got around to awarding you on that one (or, for that matter, Unknown Temptation, No Swan So Fine, or the editor whose credit I actually did forget to add to that set, I think it was Thriley). Sorry about that, that's pretty weird – cheers! theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 19:52, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kakiniit has been accepted

Kakiniit, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rusalkii (talk) 04:05, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Congratulations on getting your article Kakiniit accepted! Thank you so much for your contributions here on Wikipedia! Heart (talk) 04:17, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Space Family Carlvinson

On 16 March 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Space Family Carlvinson, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Japanese manga Space Family Carlvinson is likely named after an aircraft carrier that is itself named after U.S. congressman Carl Vinson? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Space Family Carlvinson. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Space Family Carlvinson), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Hope Tala

On 17 March 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Hope Tala, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that British singer Hope Tala turned down an opportunity to pursue a master's degree at the University of Cambridge in favour of pursuing a career in music? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Hope Tala. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Hope Tala), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:03, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Single-bamboo drifting

On 18 March 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Single-bamboo drifting, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Miao art of balancing on a bamboo log has been described as "water ballet"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Single bamboo drifting. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Single-bamboo drifting), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Schwede66 12:02, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 7,752 views (646.0 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of March 2022 – nice work!

the automation of this function is in beta testing mode—please let me know if I've screwed up! theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 23:27, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zebedee Nungak has been accepted

Zebedee Nungak, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

asilvering (talk) 04:08, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

Looks worth nominating for WP:GA, honestly. -- asilvering (talk) 04:19, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

You're the second person who told me that actually! Thank you so much for your kind words Asilvering! I'll be sure to look into it when my time frees up! Ornithoptera (talk) 04:34, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Government Palace, Dili

Ornithoptera, I was wondering whether you were planning to return to your review here now that progress has been made, or if you'd prefer that a new reviewer be found. Please continue your review if you wish, or let me know here if the latter is true. Thank you very much. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:03, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anaea (butterfly) has been accepted

Anaea (butterfly), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

– Pbrks ^(t • c) 14:34, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ptychandra has been accepted

Ptychandra, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 10:22, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

Precious

plants and people

Thank you for quality articles about people such as Hope Tala and Cristina Calderón, butterflies such as Tetracanthagyna plagiata, and plants such as Melibe colemani and Corynaea crassa, and all this being "heartwarming, sympathetic, competent, and upbeat", - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

You are recipient no. 2724 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:16, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Good Humor
	For an excellent April Fools Day DYK which I'm sure brightened the day of countless people Fritzmann (message me) 17:14, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Qallunaat! Why White People Are Funny

On 7 April 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Qallunaat! Why White People Are Funny, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the satirical study of "Qallunology", the study of white people, in the film Qallunaat! Why White People Are Funny, is meant as a critique of the treatment of Inuit culture by anthropologists? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Qallunaat! Why White People Are Funny. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Qallunaat! Why White People Are Funny), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 7,008 views (584.0 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of April 2022 – nice work!

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 10:13, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

Film barnstar

	The Film Barnstar
	For your work on Qallunaat! Why White People Are Funny, an excellent and overlooked film topic, and bringing it to attention through DYK. Great work! – Reidgreg (talk) 06:01, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Kakiniit

On 11 April 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Kakiniit, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Inuit traditional belief holds that women without facial tattoos would be sent to the land of the crestfallen to spend eternity with smoke coming from their throats and their heads hanging down? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kakiniit. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Kakiniit), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 7,493 views (624.4 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of April 2022 – nice work!

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 05:56, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Love the page on kakiniit! Lajmmoore (talk) 12:08, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Original Barnstar
		Thank you for creating the excellent 2013 Norwegian Sámi parliamentary election and North Calotte People articles! JackWilfred (talk) 10:02, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Zebedee Nungak

On 15 April 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Zebedee Nungak, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Zebedee Nungak, taken as a child for an experiment by the Canadian government, went on to "cross antlers with prime ministers, premiers and Québec separatists"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Zebedee Nungak. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Zebedee Nungak), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:32, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 7,450 views (647.8 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of April 2022 – nice work!

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 02:07, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

A cup of tea for you!

For your efforts on North Calotte People. May this tea help you keep up the good work! CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 05:52, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Anaea (butterfly)

On 16 April 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Anaea (butterfly), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that butterflies of the genus Anaea (example pictured) are said to have "commanded the admiration of even the most gold-mad conquistadores"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Anaea (butterfly). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Anaea (butterfly)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 16 April 2022 (UTC)